skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"if you think the only thing that makes salad healthy are it's probiotics then you also don't know enough about food."

Learn about the gut micro-biome. The main reason salad is good for you it's effect on gut.

We eat to feed the gut, not ourselves. To imply that prebiotics/probiotics aren't the main reason vegetables have a positive health effect on us is beyond ignorant. That's the reason why diabetes, cancer and heart disease is now worse than all the wars of history combined.
Do it in something searchable so you can look for "have I ever puzzled through this class before?"
So what they're saying is that manufacturing is still going up just in different fields, and the nobody got hired for the manufacturing that is happening...

I understand the distinction they're trying to draw but I don't know if it's actually all that usefully distinct.
A friend of mine tried Optane SSD and he didn't notice any performance increase in software compilation or anything else comparing to 960 SSD from Samsung. So I don't expect to get much from such upgrade and will just keep my current 981 SSD.
I just looked on the news. Apparently none of that matters.
A typical db may do index scan on disk, which requires several times as many io operations per 8kb (Postgresql/Oracle size) page compared to seq scan. These are executed with low queue depth.
Oh, I thought the blank page meant it works as intended (blocking a Belgian IP address). Thanks!
I would try to say that I really had nothing new to discuss this week, but the meetings were not optional. And to be clear, the meetings weren't the main reason I left those jobs. They were more just annoyances than anything else. But I feel the same way about stand-ups which are apparently pretty popular.
Too expensive for whom? If businesses reinvested their profits back into worker’s wages, the marginal rise in these costs could’ve been absorbed. Instead, the channeled them all into executive compensation and created a massive series of political and economic distortions along the way.
If I tell you what I want you won't be engaged or excited. Also, I may not tell you the right thing -- it may not play to all your strengths or what you are interested in right now.

If I tell you what the company goals are and our teams goals, and then ask you how you can use your unique talents to help us achieve those goals, you'll be much more engaged in the work, and also have a greater understanding of how your work fits into the rest of what your team and your company is doing.

Context, not control.
It's a nice idea, but what is the advantage over windows notepad (or equivalent on other OSes)?
Would it be as simple as a global change of all "from PyQt5" to "from PySide" in all import statements?
> But to write that song or create that dish in the first place, like hell you could do that with all that noise and distraction.

A lot of seminal jazz was created on the fly in fairly rowdy venues. But even in that genre, there are performers who can't stand interruptions: http://slippedisc.com/2014/07/keith-jarrett-is-disgraced-in-...
There are a few key differences in our work. First, it's a very different system; the prior experiments were done using trapped ions, and "defects" (nitrogen-vacancy centers) in diamond, while our system used nuclear spins. The more important difference is that our system is very ordered, since it took place on an actual crystal lattice with a high degree of symmetry (this matters because some theories proposed the need for this disorder to observe the effect -- the trapped ion experiment even purposely included disorder). This is the reason for our use of the word "ordered" in the title of the paper.

Other differences include our further work to clarify the phemomenon, including the creation of "echoes" to explore the coherence of the system (see my other comments) among other new contributions about the parameter space and behavior of the effect. Finally, it's just surprising to have observed this effect across so many systems which are all so different from each other (very different Hamiltonians).
Dude, the limitations are explicit on art 83, (2)

When deciding whether to impose an administrative fine and deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case due regard shall be given to the following:

the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement taking into account the nature scope or purpose of the processing concerned as well as the number of data subjects affected and the level of damage suffered by them;

the intentional or negligent character of the infringement;

any action taken by the controller or processor to mitigate the damage suffered by data subjects;

the degree of responsibility of the controller or processor taking into account technical and organisational measures implemented by them pursuant to Articles 25 and 32;

any relevant previous infringements by the controller or processor;

the degree of cooperation with the supervisory authority, in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement;

the categories of personal data affected by the infringement;

the manner in which the infringement became known to the supervisory authority, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the controller or processor notified the infringement;
where measures referred to in Article 58(2) have previously been ordered against the controller or processor concerned with regard to the same subject-matter, compliance with those measures;

adherence to approved codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40 or approved certification mechanisms pursuant to Article 42; and
any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case, such as financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, directly or indirectly, from the infringement.

You should DEFINITELY look for a better lawyer. Pro tip: one not looking to sell mitigation services.
Study finds two spaces after the period makes reading slightly easier
Then, you should give articles 58 and 83 a read. 58 details EU powers under GDPR. 83 details the factors that should be taken into account before levying administrative fines. In 83, you'll notice that the character of the infringement and any acts to mitigate the damage of the infringement are relevant.

GDPR has strong language around the purpose of fines and the kinds of considerations that should be made before imposing them. Being overly punitive, especially if a company shows good faith effort to comply, would only welcome judicial oversight. What would the EU gain in such a scenario? And what could the EU lose in such a scenario?
bit of both

http://www.dailyitem.com/news/dropping-milk-prices-jeopardiz...

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2018/03/dairy-glut-pizza-hu...
SpaceX uses powerful rocket technology that NASA says could put lives at risk
> And then also say goodbye to any chance of European expansion, ever.

Blocking the EU effectively means the same thing, though, because it's announcing to everybody that you're ignoring that market and leaving the door open for companies who can copy your business model but are willing to respect user's privacy. Not to mention the reputation damage from snubbing their privacy laws. The door's still technically open, but it's going to be much more difficult.

I also wonder if this kind of announcement will backfire a bit for these companies. When I see a "We're dropping the EU over GDPR," article, I don't think about how bad the GDPR must be, but instead I wonder what shady activities these companies are doing that makes them unable to comply, and that makes me avoid them.

The general public are pretty clueless on these things (look at the surprise around Facebook lately), but I do feel it'll cost them some users.
Because native apps offer the exact same problems and are worse at protecting users from them.

Facebook Messenger in a web browser can't read your phone contacts. That alone should be evidence enough that the web handles security better than native.

Stock Android doesn't even allow proper firewall support or adblocking without rooting or implementing hacks on top of a vpn. On the web I can block individual requests to specific domains, and even rewrite them on the fly.

The app model failed because the app model is the web model, just with bad sandboxing, less granular permissions, slower install times, and a worse development ecosystem.

Everybody loves native, I don't understand why. Native is terrible. 90% of native security boils down to "trust a global company to gatekeep out all of the malware." That's not good security.
It's pretty hard for me to trust economic information that isn't produced by boots-on-the ground data collection. To that point, if the manufacturing sector were booming in the US, how would you explain the countless anecdotes about Americans being laid off and their jobs being outsourced? Where is the analysis that shows these are isolated anecdotes and not stories reflective of a larger trend?
The original meaning of Otaku is almost identical to "nerd" IMO.
Integrating with 20 year old PLC's and robots is such a pain. Most people we work with have stacks upon stacks of abstraction to keep them safe and give them a sane wrapper for the functionality of the robots.
So many labs have homebrew monstorous python scripts made by a grad student that left 2 years ago that everyone uses and no one can maintain.
Yes, the article spelt that out:

And if the two chemicals diffuse at different rates, you can get complex patterns or reaction products like spots or tiger stripes.
> OnCalendar=weekly

What's that mean though? It's entirely meaningless unless you, what's that, check the manual. Or what if you want it to run on another day? What's that? Check the manual? Sound familiar?
How Successful Founders Will Raise Money in 2018
I have looked for but never found a definition of "concerted" like the one you described. Can you provide one?
Works for me in Firefox (61.0b2).
I feel like you're being a little easy on this people.

These were not ignorant children is that were making decisions that they didn't understand the consequences to.

These were adult men who had an opportunity to care about someone ( a child ) and instead decided to harass them into complying with their wishes in order to make money.

The buck stops somewhere. Regretting being a piece of shit is worthless. You were still a piece of shit.
How about TFA for a citation? If you had read it, you would have known that the article you linked is no longer relevant.

How about the article you linked for a citation? If you had read the article you posted, you would have known that it doesn't support your full-take of content claim.

Exactly the same as with GGP, my citations are the articles that you and he posted.
A Magna Carta for the digital age
I think the point here is everything should be on the table? Is there any advice here that is harmful?
Low-income voters are disproportionately minorities, who often likely couldn't bring themselves to vote for someone with an overtly racist/nativist platform. For me, the surprising number is how many (especially hispanic voters) actually did vote for Trump. It was an eye-opener when my (black) mother said that she was going to vote for Trump early on in the election cycle, although I'm fairly sure she didn't in the end (I think she chose to leave her presidential pick blank.)

Clinton had the distinct "cultural" advantage IMO, although evangelical voters united fairly monolithically behind Trump; the marketers of culture lined up pretty solidly behind Clinton. It's also important to remember that the culture of white dudism only represents about 1/3 of the country, although it represents a bit higher percentage of voters, and there were a lot of young defectors this cycle.
Submissions without discussion aren't duplicates.
Sure. Read sections 58 and 83 of the GDPR.

http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-83-general-condi...

http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-58-powers-GDPR.h...

Section 58 is about EU powers under the GDPR. Section 83 gets into the spirit and purpose of fines levied.

Being overly punitive would only invite judicial oversight.
That's fine, you're allowed to store any data you are required to for some other regulatory or legal reason.
Hmm... so you aren't one of those people who feel uncomfortable bringing things up to their boss. That doesn't mean they don't exist.

One of the fundamentals every manager needs to learn is, people are not all like you. Extroverts may need someone to bounce ideas off of. Introverts may need a time to bring something they have been thinking about to your attention, because otherwise they assume you don't want to be bothered.

People have families and relationships and health issues outside of work that never the less it may be helpful to discuss if it impacts stress, times they can be in the office, their work flow, etc.

And then, and this is truly important, there are interpersonal relationships in the office. Are two employees not getting along? Having a 1:1 with them will often let you get both sides of the story, instead of, potentially, hearing nothing about it.

Finally, while your bosses may have been fine with you discussing something with them any time you wanted, or fine with an email on a topic, I personally hate being interrupted, and would prefer anything like that be scheduled, and find that in person or video chat conversations are helpful in providing context that text communications, especially those that aren't in real time and interactive, may lack.
You did, because what you described is a directive. GDPR is not a directive. It does not require EU member states to do anything. Only country that needs to do something is the UK, since they're leaving the EU and want to convince the other member states that they're not naughty and they want to play in the same digital ballpark as the rest.
This isn't SQL, but HP printers' settings protocol uses XML and doesn't escape Wi-Fi SSIDs, so it breaks completely whenever any nearby SSID includes < or >. Which wouldn't be a massive problem, except for that Com Hem (our Comcast) has set their default SSID to COMHEM<(start of router MAC)>.
Sadly, I think you're right. NIMBY is an asinine reality. 'We got ours. Get outta here.'

And it's spreading. In today's news: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/housing-crisis-small-ci...

There's a lot of empty land in the US ... so, like Oak Ridge and Hanford, there'd have to be new communities, capable of attracting small businesses ... enough to employ the new residents. Some of the first low-cost pre-fabs could be preferentially doled out to people who have have, or want to start a new, small business.

Also ... and I'm thinking of Olympia, WA for example ... government business seems to be fairly stable, and seems to resist recessions quite well. Nice quiet place, for people into that sort of thing.

Nineteenth-century railroads were built in the space of months, if there was a billion feet of wood to be 'harvested'. They didn't cost $10M per mile either. Replace the wood with access to a city 15 or 20 miles away.

It was doable before, and it's just that much more doable.
One of my favourite books is Turn Left at Orion by
Guy Consolmagno. It describes the different astronomical objects that you can expect to see and how to find them in the sky. I think it also does a good job of setting expectations because you just won't see Hubble class images from your backyard. The is also a companion website http://www.cambridge.org/features/turnleft/
> everyone does it

In this discussion of 19 comments, I count around 5, more than 25%, that say some variation of 'everyone else does it too', but never with any support for the claim. It's generally true of any discussion mentioning China, though I don't have the precise numbers. The marginal value of these comments was low, lacking any support, and is greatly diminishing with use.
Lyft adds 30 self-driving cars for public rides in Las Vegas
Short term you are right. Long term our understanding of the law will grow and we will build solutions for the EU market.
<sarcasm>Of course: the time gained by using Untoll.Me - "at least a day's worth of manual effort" - can be used for reading their Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, for analysing, understanding and explaining all the implications...</sarcasm>
I wish the author balanced his praise with some criticism.

Right now, this article is positively fawning.
Since I like torturing metaphors, let's say that the GDPR was instead a law prohibiting the sale of fake medicine.

What happened in this case is that the Unroll me pill manufacturer announced that they'd not be selling their pills in the EU anymore due to the GDPR.

So, though your concerns remain valid in the general case, in this particular case there could be no shifty arbiter. Unroll me self-assessed and decided that their own pills are fake.
This statement is not supported by the facts.

https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-group...
Yeah this article just presents a recent narrative from a recent study, it doesn't mean it's right.

Fact is, the social sciences have completely opposite theories with completely opposite causal mechanisms or even opposite ideas about outcomes and conceptualisation. These studies can't even agree on the dependent variable, let alone the independent variable. And they're all championed by top ivy league scholars.

Take the article's theme for example, globalisation and job security. In public administration there's two hypotheses about the way the welfare state responds to job insecurity from globalisation. One is the efficiency hypothesis which expects the welfare state to retrench and become smaller, assuming increased competition forces a sort of race to the bottom effect in order for a state to stay competitive. The other, the compensation hypothesis, expects the welfare state to expand in order to compensate the losers of globalisation (e.g. factory workers in the US). A whole range of studies exist that show evidence for both hypotheses. They keep getting better, moving from correlation to causation, from aggregates to specifics, towards clearer conceptualisation and a semblance of a consensus. But for decades, this is a field where articles were getting published which could easily be written about in newspapers in an incendiary manner like OP's article about how 'we used to get it all wrong', and linking it to some recent populist movement, explaining how it all wasn't so crazy after all.

It's silly. Studies are valuable, but anyone who spent any time in academia, even as a student, should notice studies never translate well to journalism. It's particularly apparent reading about a field he/she is familiar with. The number of times I cared to look into the research underlying news articles and came out thinking 'this article is nonsense' is tiring.

And it's no surprise, I'm guilty of the same behavior of journalists. Either it's ignorance because I'm not a specialist in my field, or I just don't care. I've written a bunch of school assignments taking positions that were blatantly false, ignoring a whole range of literature that didn't agree while making it appear as if I was being nuanced, just to get the essay out of the way. Journalists are likely not much different.
Perhaps striped paint will finally be a thing?

http://dare.wisc.edu/survey-results/1965-1970/types-and-atti...
Excuses _are_ important; it's just the reality that remains the same.
Like userlist.io ?
Is stripping away computer manufacturing a legitimate thing to do though? After all, it is still output.
"Frappacappa thing" made me laugh and reminded me of what usually is used to make drinks and shakes frothy, something called Vana-Cappa in the industry, which ultimately is not much different from "powdered wood".
On architectures like x86, the set of registers is limited and some are special, so there is some contention going on.
So, single drive configurations - great.

Anyone using more advanced configurations (e.g. RAID) for these type of devices and what/how..

e.g. how to take advantage of things like this for large RDBMS installs which require N>1 devices for capacity alone (if not more throughput)...

Like: Taking GPU/PCI-slot optimized server and threw 8 of this style of device in there as a soft RAID50, etc.

would love to perform some experiments, but I don't have a spare $20k lying around 'for fun', so real world battle tales would be great...
I always wanted to learn something like this! Embarrassingly... I never knew what it was called until today so I never found any books or videos on it. Learning what it is called and about an free course online course is awesome!
Have you actually clicked on the link I put at the end of my comment?
They also try to shame people for jay walking. Surprised at how shaming works so well in Asia.
> Where is the analysis that shows these are isolated anecdotes and not stories reflective of a larger trend?

You've just stumbled upon the secret to how corporatists have taken over the west. It seems to me, most any Westerner with a university degree will believe any story they're told, provided the story fits a general narrative, and the person telling the story has a degree or it is printed by one of several accepted "authoritative" sources. Whether it matches what they see when they leave their desk and walk around in the real world seems to make utterly no difference.
What I cover is a mix of decisions I need in the next week, technical questions I need help with, or a project I'm thinking about proposing. The general idea is to get some feedback on what it takes to earn a promotion, and where I stand.
With Python3 and PyQt5 it is literally as simple as "pip install pyqt5". I speak from having built and maintained multiple PyQt-based apps on MacOS.

Edit: I should say, there are MacOS-unique difficulties if you want to bundle your nice PyQt5 script into a standalone MacOS app bundle using PyInstaller. But that's a separate issue.
A rainbow table is named "rainbow table" due to the lines created on a graph when drawing a continuous line through hash and reduction function chain. The graph can visually appear like a rainbow.

A hash function is a one way mapping, and so is a reduction (attempting to invert the hash function but usually failing).

Think of it this way:

Draw a line from plaintext P on the left to hash output H on the right. Then a line from H back to P2 (plaintext 2 on the left), which is the output of the reduction function over H. Draw a line from P2 to H2 (output of the hash function over P2). Do this for a little bit of the chain, and you will visually have a rainbow.

You can also get banding, when drawing them linearly instead of left to right, when taking closed chains into consideration.

If someone sees such a graph of a rainbow table, that explains the concept directly. Caching in a table is just the implementation.
>> (this law is subject to unique interpretations in 28 distinct countries, so nobody can actually know what "full" compliance is)

As has been discussed before, the GDPR is an EU regulation and as such does not require national governments to pass any enabling legislation and is directly binding and applicable, therefore it is is not subject to "unique interpretation" of any kind. In fact, that was the whole point of making it a regulation, rather than a directive (like the previous Data Protection Directive).

Furthermore, the regulation establishes a European Data Protection Board, tasked with ensuring the consistent application of the GDPR. Articles 55 to 63 of the regulation are devoted to cooperation and consistency, with procedures for multiple Data Protection Authoritiess to coordinate investigations and promote consistent decisions and policies reviewed by the Board and reported to the European Commission.

Now, can we please stop it with the entirely unsubstantiated statements about how everyone will interpret the GDPR as they please?