skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yea, don't do business with non-programmers. Programming is thinking. If you can't program, you don't know how to think in 2018.

Tech people have traditionally kissed up to business entrepreneurs in the past (for their money, network and supposed "experience"). It's a price so many of us have had the negative experience of having paid. The space is so competitive now (all niches), that you BOTH must be an expert in a niche AND know how to program.

Your partner likely doesn't know how to think, and compensates for it through playing politics and overbearing manipulation like most "business men" (aka "scare tactics"). It's a short-lived strategy that ALWAYS falls apart in the long run. There's no short-cuts around having hard technical skills and respect from people that know you get it when it comes to the all-important details that they will be tasked to focusing on day in and day out.

My advice is to get out as soon as possible.
"The right of the people ... shall not be infringed."

The Constitution says very little about property rights, much less things like car ownership (and driving on public roads is more of a privilege)
Honestly, the K8S ecosystem is so wide now I'd love to see an up-to-date explainer piecing it all together. What folks need, what they don't, etc.
This should check other basic things, for eaxmple:

* Hosted on the same IP

* Shares nameservers

* Shares an SSL certificate

* Same whois info.
I know that at least .docx is a zip of xml also. As far as I know all of the .*x microsoft office formats are
I wish you all the best, really, but your claims are really, really hard to believe.
Hey Jeremy, thanks for making these courses! I was curious if you could offer any points of comparison between the fast.ai courses and the Udacity ML nanodegree course (or any other MOOCs you have opinions about).
I see it differently...If nearly 30% of the internet is running Product X and Host Y doesn't think it's a good idea to enter the 20th century, then Host Y should not be rewarded.

For all intents and purposes WP is rewarding bad behavior to the detriment of the rest of the internet (read: anyone who visits a WP-based site).
Well, you've got my vote. I merely wanted to point out that an expensive outfit is not a requirement to starting out cycling and that you can do some pretty good rides without. If it works for you then that's great, and I'm happy to see you cycling, whatever you're wearing. The activity is what matters. If you ever make it to my neck of the woods consider yourself invited for a trip.
My thoughts exactly, and the article even acknowledges this up front: only 0.91% of start-ups end up raising from angel investors and only 0.05% from venture capital firms. The only lie here is the lie our every member of our generation tells themselves ad nauseam: I am the exception, it doesn't matter that the stats say only .91% of startups ever raise anything, I am a member of the .91%, because I am the exception. (And if I prove not to be the exception it proves someone is prejudiced against me.)
The Steem Blockchain Apps Ready to Challenge Traditional Online Publishing
If free speech is only for people we like, it's not worth much.
Many dictatorial regimes don't find many rights that we enjoy in the United States as legitimate or legal.

Should we, in the United States of America, censor content for our own just because they don't like it?
Existing discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17011320
Drift*, not Drip
Functions? Algebra? How is comprehending any of that, possible without the sort of abstract/counterfactual thinking that develops around age 12?
Why does this make you kick yourself? This is a guy writing an internet rant about how frustrated he is with the life you choose not to live.
Besides using kubectl to manage VMs, you also get VMs that join the cluster network as first-class citizens. In this blog post you can see a k8s service pointing to a VM and accessing k8s services from within the VMs. Also, compared to EC2 / GCE / etc., you can use Virtlet for bare metal on-prem clusters, too.
Show HN: Red latina emprendedora
Why Am I Getting All These Terms of Service Update Emails?
It was painful on a touch screen too.
Must not manage several classrooms of machines. Chromebooks is much cheaper in terms of time.
Is there a reason why head-unit of the infotainment system cannot be easily upgraded?
A significant share of those customers must have been lost by the two companies that flew the Concorde, as the alternatives to it are commoditized and offered by many other companies.
Pretty much all interstates have barriers between the directions to prevent head on collisions.
Your examples are absurd. Would you program a car to assume that all New Yorkers won't Jay walk? How about all people in Tempe will rush into the streets?

Cultural context definetly matters, but for none of the reasons you've mentioned.

Writing specific use cases is insane for more reasons than I should have to point out to you. What if someone from tempe is on vacation in NY, should they be in danger because they follow a different culture?

You need to rely on universal rules and implement the most cautious strategies.

Pedestrian shows up at the curb, slow to a speed in which you can safely stop on a dime, resume cruising speed when the pedestrians intent is known.
But it makes it so kids can use whatever machine each day. They just log in and everything is there.
I might be helping author a textbook based on our upcoming introduction to machine learning MOOC. Which maybe one day would lead to a deep learning book - but that would be years away!

(BTW, I used to think I didn't like videos for learning, but actually I now think some material works best in this format. E.g. in this case we're walking through interactive notebooks, and you can follow along too. Some of the material is animated, and often I'm building up drawings as I talk. Maybe it won't be for you, but it might be worth giving it a go to see...)
Hey! You're welcome here. It's good to hear from people who have this kind of firsthand experience. I value it deeply, and I believe the community does too. But we need you to follow the rules: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

It can be annoying to run into comments that seem to deny what you know from experience, give advice you don't need, and so on. But you can't respond by insulting people and calling names (e.g. "moron", " reactionary, careless ass"). It doesn't matter how right you are; being right makes it worse, because it prevents people from hearing what you have to say. So would you please the rules and follow them when posting here?
Can you share any of the companies you've run prediction markets for? I'm curious.
> Does anyone collect these educational inspirational stories?

That might be really useful. Maybe one barrier to improved education, is people having difficulty visualizing it?

Last summer, I tried to explore teaching atoms in early primary, with a focus on nucleons and nuclei.[1] One big surprise to me in discussions, was a pattern of non-linear response to my saying "teach nucleons to kids".

One physics postdoc, one with a professional focus on introductory physics education, replied basically "Absurd! How could you teach muons to kids!" It turned out that for them, "teach nucleons and nuclei" meant understanding muons. "Teach ... to kids", wasn't enough to change that image. So they tried to imagine teaching muons to kids, and exploded.

Another physics postdoc tried to picture kids chalking quantum math on some graduate seminar blackboard. And was "WTF?" baffled.

A primary-school teacher heard "teach atoms", and tried to picture early-primary students memorizing and regurgitating 4th-grade paragraphs of definitions. Because for them, that's what "teach atoms" meant.

And more. These weren't outliers.

I ended up using an analogy. That it was like proposing to teach kindergarteners about traffic lights. And having highway engineers declaring "Absurd! There's no way kids could understand those standards documents! And they're expensive! And the Chinese ones are in Chinese! You're think you can teach technical Chinese transportation standards documents in kindergarten!?!"

"Red means stop; green means go." "Atoms are sticky little balls that jiggle."

I'd expected that crafting accessible leverageable descriptions would be hard. And that how well one could achieve transferable understanding, at various ages, would be an open question.

But I didn't expect that people would initially be so dramatically unable to picture the possibility of teaching some topics.

People were fine after a "kindergarten traffic lights ... green means go... not network theory" story to set context. But I wonder...

Might there be a badly underappreciated need for stories like OP? To provide "Oh wow... I wouldn't have imagined one could teach that... Now I can picture it..."

That's an idea for helping to disrupt education that I've not seen before.

[1] a crufty slow-loading page, intended merely to set up in-person discussions, but I've nothing better: http://www.clarifyscience.info/part/Atoms
The only solution is open, factual, non emotional discussion about the situation, backed up with both attending a marriage counsellor. I'm not kidding.

Discuss issues with the behaviors, not of the person.

And I presume of course that your shareholders contract defines how this situation will be handled in nthe event that the conflict cannot be resolved?
A while back some academics at MIT designed some surveys for probing what tradeoffs humans would make if they had a chance to decide between bad outcomes in a vehicle fatality incident.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/542626/why-self-driving-c...

This shows that the menu of ethical dilemmas posed at that time was not complete.

In addition to "should I veer left, avoiding the grandmother and grandfather couple, but killing the pregnant mother" the survey questions should have also included some questions like "should I brake hard to avoid killing the homeless person detected with 40% probability, or should I assume the detection is a false positive, in order to maintain a smooth ride of luxurious comfort for the occupants?"
How is looking at them on the car any safer?
I feel like in large cities the majority of drivers actually practice "mean" driving techniques - tailgating, lane protection (preventing people from merging-in when they have to), zoom-ups near contest areas, loud-music in communities, lane weaving.. I've left the bay area a long time ago now, but it's amazing when you live outside of that a couple years how awful people are behind the wheel. I would call it passive-aggressive behavior and it is really really bad to ones mental health. Bay area, Denver, Portland, Seattle there's a few others out west here - but make no mistake, the actions people take while driving is 100% actual jerk, not mistaken jerk.
It depends. Most cities whose road network predates cars have "local customs" which are essential to keep traffic flowing. These "local customs" may not be strictly legal, but you rarely will wind up with a ticket for it.
Lots of discussion here already: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014807
While I agree with the sentiment here of free speech, GoDaddy shouldn't be forced to participate in something they don't want to. He's free to try another provider or setup his own BGP rules etc.
Honestly do not see it changing anything. It will continue to be all about the Apple and Google app stores. Too late.
Maybe I'm a little jaded on the hardware front, but everytime I see one of these articles it's comparing nominally different features the will almost always be beat by another phone within a few months.

Maybe it comes down to brand loyalty (I know I'll never but another LG after my last experience)? Or maybe what your carrier provides? But I'm really curious, with the current state of Android, if you're going to get a flagship phone, why wouldn't you opt for a Google brand phone so you can stay on top of the latest updates?

It's one thing if you just want a cheap phone, but if I drop big money on something, I want to know that I'm getting the latest updates. Especially when it comes to security on the device that has access to my most importantly information. I hear too many Android users complain about how their phone is two whole versions behind. Wake up! That's your carrier/manufacturer putting you at risk.
> bootstrapping success stories often remain unknown

Bingo. I don't even want to be noticed (hence this throwaway account).

My startup has taken over an entire national B2B SaaS market segment but our major competitor hasn't realised yet. They deal in many segments and are a classic incumbent dinosaur, and were recently acquired so their attention is elsewhere. We've done no marketing, never been mentioned in any press, raised no capital. All growth purely by referrals. The more market share we can collect before the dinosaur notices I kicked its tail, the better. We're 100% bootstrapped, debt and dilution free and planning to stay that way, and to remain submarine as long as possible. As a result I'm entirely focused on serving our customers and improving the platform and our organisation to suit them, not running around wasting founder energy chasing investors and trying to dress up the company to look pretty for VCs.
It's not, but do you really think that's going to stop true FP believers from upvoting this article?
I was programming functions in my brother's calculator when I was 8..
He's free to speak as much as he wants and private companies are free to not to business with people whom they believe violate their ToS.

If GoDaddy had some sort of government monopoly on domain names and having your domain registered with GoDaddy was necessary to publish on the internet, you might have point. But it isn't.
I agree wholeheartedly that writing needs a lot of practice. I feel that in science the craftmenship that is necessarily involved is usually underrated (or taken for granted).

Personally, I find clarity and focus the most important qualities of a thesis. The former requires and displays deep understanding and writing competence, and the latter requires and displays planing and the ability to identify a specific issue (out of all the things one could write about).

Cleverness, however, is not so high on my list of requirements. Many hard problem exists in a space of trade-offs, without a silver bullet solution. Understanding and effectively communicating these trade-offs is probably more useful than a single "clever" solution.
Hello there for any cyber hacking service Xiang services delivers a quality service in various platforms of hacking.
Hacking Services :
-Mspy application ( Features > Call logs, Location, messages, images emails).
The application allows you spy on targets cell phone.
- Crediting an account (Terms and conditions applied).
- Changing database information.
- Changing school grades .
-Money transfer.
-Activation of firewalls.
- Retrieval of deleted message.
All hacking services above, for service rendered.
Contact
xiangvadm98090 @gmail. com
Text no: +1(423)-212-6649.
Whatsapp no:+1(781)-720-7259.
.
Keep in touch
This article misses the fact that the "startup ecosystem" is different on the east coast vs. the west coast. And it's especially brutal when you compare the funding sources available to Canadian startups vs. US startups. See 2016 Analysis of 20,000 startups by Vancouver-based Yaletown Partners (here: www.yaletown.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Canadas_Technology_Investment_Gap_Yaletown2016.pdf): “In 2015, U.S. companies raised three times as much on average compared to Canadian companies.”

Just like the author, I tried to raise money from Montreal and Toronto VCs ~10 years ago after having received substantial angel funding (~1.5M CAD). Contrary to what's asserted in the article, previous access to such funding didn't help us much. Albeit this was around the financial crisis, but still, there was no additional openness to listen to us. In fact it felt like a handicap. They wanted to see real sales, conversion ratios, etc. ... pencil-pushing sort of data in general. But I digress.

The more substantial issue that I found is that most VCs in Montreal/Toronto are extremely conservative. After we closed the startup I mentioned earlier I started travelling more actively. That was round 2010 where everyone was going to become a gazillionaire with a new "app". I was at a conference on the west coast and I stumbled on a startup that had raised 10M$ for an app. When I asked about their business model the answer was: "We're focusing on acquiring users for now. We'll figure out monetization later." THAT would never fly for raising capital in Montreal/Toronto. In fact I was recently talking to one of the VCs I had pitched to way back 10 years ago and I told him this story. His answer? "Oh boy, that's one I would've killed right away."

So the biggest mistake from my point of view east coast startups can make, especially if they're based in Montreal/Toronto is to believe what they read about "startup funding" on the Internet. What flies in the Valley doesn't necessarily fly anywhere else. There's a willingness/ability to suspend disbelief that is unique to the Valley, both in terms of funding and in terms of recruiting top talent.

In short, if you're trying to build a startup on the east coast (and Montreal/Toronto specifically) then focus on making money from real, paying customers, not angels nor VCs. Or just pack your bags and head west.
The Legal Dilemma of Intelligent Machines
If you don't have perfect pitch and want to get a better understanding for what your guitar is doing, try using a spectrum analyzer app to visualize how the sound changes as you pluck a string.

The el-cheapo guitar I bought once just didn't hold the note very accurately over time (i.e. pluck string, then it would vibrate at the correct-ish frequency for ~0.5s, then quickly veer off).

Had to use a spectrum analyzer since the guitar was so out of tune that the electric tuner couldn't even pick up which string it was...

(wasn't my idea to use the spectrum analyzer, back in college a friend of mine tuned his dorm piano - which are much harder to tune - using that technique, worked quite well)
To be clear, Clearbit can only transform IPs into company data.
This isn't really accurate if you're aware of all of your options for working with Windows machines. You can freshly deploy a Windows image in a handful of minutes using any number of first or third party tools.

Windows machines with SSDs (like most Chromebooks) can be refreshed and redeployed similarly quickly. Unfortunately, people can make erroneous assumptions based on experience with older or poorly-provisioned hardware.
Private companies are not subject to freedom of speech. Something they do not like can go as long as not a protected class.
I wouldn't make predictions about things that are not possible to make today with with unlimited budgets.

One past example of predicting the future with unlimited budgets is the xerox alto.
As it should, what a ridiculous thing to do.
Step 1: Lay down the cold, hard facts (not your interpretation) in a tactful manner meant to assist in helping him vs. attacking him. Do not issue threats or ultimatums ("I will go to the board", "I'll quit if...", etc.), that will often make things much worse--hurtful to your employees/executive team. Give your co-founder some time to determine whether those facts are true or if it's just you (~2 weeks).

Step 2: If that doesn't breakthrough, then your next step is escalating with the board and letting them do a real investigation to the merit of your claims. Ultimately, they'll likely speak to someone on his team.

Step 3: If you can't do that, consider stepping down since the opportunity cost could be very high. It's much worse for the two co-founders to be at odds and potentially blow up the company at this stage. The company is learning to scale around 4 years in (usually) and if he's a first time CEO, he's probably going to be struggling.

* Try your best to remove the emotion. Consider therapy during this time as it's going to be a bumpy road especially if you've built up resentment over the last four years with each other and care a lot about your company that you started.

Email me (click on my profile) and I am happy to help you through this while keeping it confidential.
Oh man. Thank god they've added this. I've been using an extension to do this for a while now. I'm so glad they finally just implemented it!
I specifically didn't address YouTube's legal right to censor anything and everything they want. That is (most likely) their prerogative, although there are some pending legal challenges. I was talking about the cultural danger of censoring certain types of speech, particularly when the matters at play involve inalienable rights enshrined in our Constitution. Again, if it is considered socially acceptable to censor pro-2A speech, we are a social regime-change away from justifying the censorship of pro-4A or 1A speech, or practically anything else.

Did you not understand that? If you don't see the irony and danger here, it's only because you agree with the censors, but that only lasts as long as it lasts.
And no it's not, that's pretty good.

But what's worse is, it will get to 0% false positive pretty soon, so unless this is a delaying tactic, or using FUD for good, it's distracting from the bigger issue of Big Brother and what it means for governments to have 100% control of it's citizens 100% of the time.
VC is a con-job for the most part anyway. They've convinced first-time entrepreneurs that raising money (and thereby giving away a portion of your ownership) is a great signal that your business is a good idea. Naive founders dream of getting into YC or getting funded to prove to everyone that they're smart and talented.

In fact, making money is the only signal that matters. Try doing that instead.
What I really want to know is how it compares with React Native. I suppose one differentiator is Dart, which might draw in non-web devs who don't want to write JavaScript, or C# (as with Xamarin).

The list of React Native apps is quite impressive, however:

https://facebook.github.io/react-native/showcase.html
It gets more and more interesting. First, swift for tensorflow, then ML.NET. I like that ML is maturing and that we are getting statically typed tools.
I think the implication is that as a Stanford grad he had a pedigree that would have increased his chances of getting funded... but he didn't have any ideas, so now he's using his name-brand degree to do the type of work that a degree from any school would have been fine for.
Collisions with trees and with other vehicles? Or collisions with pedestrians? Maybe we're fine with five 9s of reliability with inanimate objects and with other 2-ton metal crash protection cages but prefer seven 9s with fragile unprotected human bodies (which are far more likely to end up as fatalities than just crashes).
I kind of wish the "lick" would've been playable with the untuned guitar. It'd be fun to see the difference you make by tuning it.
Seriously!?

The responsible position would be to retain the existing system in a passive standby mode, capable of overriding the active 'under test' one in the event certain safety/detection thresholds were exceeded.
> So, unless you come from money, attended a prestigious university in the States or sold your previous startups for a lot of money, you should assume that you’re never going to raise early-stage capital.

Most founders are none of those things. It’s hard to raise money, of course, but the author makes it sound like it’s impossible. I’ve seen plenty of crappy companies with not much to show raise an angel round on nothing but fairy dust.

OP also argues that less than 1% of companies raise money. Does that mean that less than 1% that try to raise money are successful? I highly doubt that. That might be about the percentage that get into YC or raise from a prestigious fund in their seed round maybe, but it seems like what percentage of total businesses raise a seed round, which is a stupid thing to measure.