skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"And I think the people who are professional traders that go into trading cryptocurrencies, it’s just disgusting. It’s like somebody else is trading turds and you decide, ‘I can’t be left out.'” - Charlie Munger
The kind of emergency restart procedure employed today would work just fine on a MSR design. We're talking restarts on the order 1-10 minutes after an emergency shutdown. That's not nearly enough time to solidify the core, even when you are drawing some steam for emergency propulsion needs while the reactor is shutdown.
FYI: this library has been in development for nearly a decade and is very mature. It is as old as the likes of Scikit-Learn or Theano. It is, or at least was, widely used within MS.

MS only decided to open source it recently.

Disclaimer: I was one of the early team members.
Alright, so where is that line drawn? RMS is the project lead, but it's a community project and at some point the consensus will be that he is just wrong. Clearly that line must exist somewhere, or eglibc would never have been. But the existence of a fork isn't the minimum point since that takes quite a lot to overcome the inertia of forming a new project.

The point I keep coming back to is: What is the purpose of the documentation? What goal does it achieve?
This happens to me sometimes, my solution is to overshoot by a block, then hook 3 right turns, rather than slow up everyone behind me or pull a daredevil left. I would hope self driving cars would be programmed to follow a strategy like mine while still accommodating daredevils by using cautious acceleration and effective collision avoidance.
We should anyway just remove cars from cities altogether
Count for what? Should it excuse his behavior? Should we excuse the behavior of famous and notable people because of their accomplishments?
How did you know it was for Ivy Bells though? The Wiki article describes the huge amount of secrecy around the project; so why did they trust you/your co-workers?
What is and is not funny, is highly subjective. (Just to be clear, I really like Donald Knuth's sense of humor.)
> One of the most significant obstacles against blockchain and cryptocurrency products from entering daily lives is bad user experiences.

I think the biggest obstacle is the use-case for blockchain. Unfortunately, most of the articles written in favor of blockchain solutions don't cover the why and hows and instead directly go for buzz words like trustless, decentralization etc. Case in point about banks:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2018/04/21/bitco...

So I am really looking forward to a curated list of well-written articles on the use cases for blockchain.
cable tv you mean? Its not comparable since many have local monopolies in practice.
You've ignored my second paragraph which explains a far better way of helping those in need.

I'm all in favor of the intentions behind rent control, but the implementation is an atrocious way to achieving its goals. If the goal is to help the poor long-time residents of a city, then do that directly. Raise property taxes, impose a city-income-tax, and use the proceeds to offer assistance to means-tested long-time residents. This would be far better than what SF has currently.
I'm not saying anything about finding cheap electricity. And the greater fool theory isn't true as you could apply this theory to fiat money as well (except it is more foolish since new money is constantly created without the consent of the holders).

The point is that the free market and algorithm finds an efficient equilibrium between what the users value it at (which is a reflection of its utility to them), what it costs to secure the network in relation to the reward paid for it. In these costs are electricity costs, for which miners will find the most efficient means such that they are profitable. The energy prices are determined by the economic actors producing it. The will charge what the market will bear such that they are profitable and competitive. All this is a wonderfully efficient system except for the fact that the externality you are worried about (pollution from energy production) is not accounted for anywhere in the system. In fact, it is almost incentivised, since it is likely that I can produce dirty power cheaper than I can clean power (although this is changing). If you did account for this, dirty power would become more expensive, miner using it would disappear or choose clean energy.

Hence, the problem is not "It uses too much energy! So wasteful!!!!" The problem is "We don't account for externalities!!!! So bad!!!"
pandas is higher-level; it's more similar to R. It does a bunch of modeling, statistics, and time series stuff.
I don't see the difference between "viewer discretion is advised" and trigger warnings. "This show contains scenes of domestic violence, viewer discretion is advised" and "Trigger warning: domestic violence" are just different ways of saying the same thing. A lot of people are using "content warning" or "content advisory" these days anyway, partially to avoid the impression that it's strictly about PTSD.
Maybe it helps being rich, but just as a counter example, my grandfather was never rich. He was a clock-in/clock-out guy and still managed to spend a lot of time with me while I was growing up. He had a lot more patience than most of the "white collar" adults in my life ever did, and taught me lots of useful skills like how to fix a lot of electrical or mechanical things.
It broke up the relative monotony of otherwise dry technical information. It has a similar effect when placed in code. In addition many companies used it as a form branding - "Hey we're not stuffy old IBM! We're Cool!".

Back then manuals were also far more important, you couldn't operate the machine at all without one. Yet the jokes never managed to stop people from getting the information they needed.

I think the real difference when it comes to manuals is most modern ones are not comprehensive. I could see being upset if there was a joke but no information on my actual problem.
You almost certainly don't want to set up a WAF.

Don't use any of those scanners, all of which look almost exclusively for vulnerabilities you don't have. Do look into getting a Burp license for every developer on your team.

By all means, harden Nginx. Don't pay SpiderLabs to do it for you.
CarPlay connects wirelessly through both Bluetooth and WiFi. I’m enjoying it a lot. Never need to pull my phone out my pocket.
Yes, but then you end up with a mind-reading exercise, where someone's opinion of your intent matters more than what you actually did or did not do. Your example is obvious enough, sure, but you will surely hit some where many reasonable people strongly disagree after enough such cases.

This is bad because we're all biased in various ways and knowing about that bias actually tends to make it worse among the people who don't realize that simply knowing your biases doesn't make you immune to them, leading them to overconfidence.
> I'm genuinely curious on how do security focus companies discover things like "oh, we got attacked by Bitcoin miners from North Korea". Are there sophisticated tools that do this for you..

I work in a Fortune 100 Security Operations Center (SOC). We have a dev team that builds tools for our Incident Response team, Threat Intel team, etc, etc and an engineering team to manage those tools. And lots of other teams that specialize on lots of other things (malware reverse engineering, spam/phishing, red team, etc). We have to build a fair amount of our own stuff because we operate at levels above what a lot of commercial tools can do. We have hundreds and hundreds of custom alerts that fire based on various network traffic and sysmon activity that our threat team has written rules around.

This, of course, is out of the question for most.

So, what should you do? First, get your logs all in one place. The ELK stack is probably the easiest way to do that. ES makes things searchable and Kibana is a pretty good UI for a lot of this stuff.

Second, if you aren't monitoring your internal network, you really have no idea what is going on, so look at what you can accomplish quickly with distributions like Security Onion (which includes the ELK stack):
https://securityonion.net/

Third, there's a fair amount of Open Source Intel (OSINT) on threats. You'll need to find a way to integrate that information and scan your logs for it. Malware, like Coinminers, will have certain Indicators that will tell you if they are on your network. If you're on the ELK platform, look at something like ElastAlert. You write rules in Yaml and then set up Alerts to fire into your Slack channel or Email you or whatever. There is no real shortcut here.

Commercial tools that can do a lot of this stuff includes FireEye's TAP, but they definitely aren't free: https://www.fireeye.com/solutions/threat-analytics-platform....

And, as mentioned elsewhere, absolutely remove any attack surface that you can. Scan your IP ranges and domains with tools like Shodan.io, HackerTarget.com's DNS tools (DNSDumpster.com has a nice, free DNS search), etc and make sure you have a handle on what, exactly, you're exposing.

And, finally, if you're big enough then every single day a computer will be compromised in some way. There is no company in the world who doesn't experience this so you need to have a clear set of tools and playbooks to handle that. If you can respond to most incidents in days (not weeks), you'll be better than 90%+ of the companies out there.

Edit: clarified acronym
The first blog to appear on the Internet is still active today
We were talking about openshift.com, though. I didn't realize there were more than one site. Since you're going there:

- I didn't even know it was called "OpenShift Origin"!

- I don't understand what the differentiation is between the various things called "OpenShift", from having visited the Google links briefly.

- Third Google hit (https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/cloud-computing/opens...) does not even mention Origin anywhere, but describes it as "a container application platform that brings Docker and Kubernetes to the enterprise". With that copy, you already lost me. That IBM-type business site that makes my skin crawl.

- The Github site actually introduces it as "Enterprise Kubernetes for Developers", which... I don't even know what that means! What does "Enterprise Kubernetes" even mean? The actual readme's introduction ("a distribution of Kubernetes optimized for continuous application development and multi-tenant deployment") does make sense, and the readme itself is fine. However, still no explanation of what "Origin" is compared to other things named "OpenShift".

- Openshift.org (5th link on Google) is good. That's exactly the kind of site I'd want to see as a developer/CTO. However, still no explanation of "Origin". From Openshift.org it seems like Origin is the only product.

- I go back to openshift.com and click on "Products" out of curiosity, and it's clear that there's a bunch of other OpenShifts. What are they? Why should I care? The site isn't inviting me to find out, so I leave.

Why are there are so many sites? Github is one thing, but so far we have three, and none of them really give a cohesive story.

I understand that the marketing department is targeting different people, but do they realize that people google this stuff, and will likely end up on the wrong site, with no signposts to the right thing? The fuzzy messaging leaves the impression that the company is messy and disorganized, and also pretty lost in a fog of enterprise buzzwords.

Anyway, in my original comment, what I was seeking was Kubernetes a cloud service. After sniffing around on openshift.com, I suspect the product I want is called OpenShift Online, but I'm not actually sure. Because there's also something called OpenShift Container Platform, which is also Kubernetes, but apparently in the cloud of your choice? Unfortunately, the site doesn't explain what the relationship is between this and Origin, and of course there is no pricing for Container Platform, probably because it has the label "ENTERPRISE" next to it. Figures.
My understanding is that this argument is not a particularly good one.

I may be incorrect, but my understanding is that while Amazon pays a discounted rate, this is the same as any other bulk shipper for USPS, and in fact, without Amazon, many routes would not be profitable for USPS without Amazon.
The problem with throwing tools at the thing is you have no idea what it's doing or how it works or IF it works, and it becomes forgotten about. But it's better than nothing in the short term while you figure out how to secure your application. Slap ModSecurity in front of your app while you go over OWASP and managing cloud infrastructure securely.
Even with multiple lanes this can be an issue as people behind you try to merge right to pass you which in busy traffic increases the chance of accidents and causes slowdowns.
Update: That has been fixed already.
This is not how people use the terms "lawyer" and "attorney" in practice — at least in for a lay audience, they're equivalent.
We'll forgive you - this time. ;)
I'm curious to know why GPLv2 makes it difficult for your use-case. Are you developing software that your clients install or host themselves?
An IOCCC Judge here. Sure, a variety of things! A competition can take about 4 full weekends of time ~128hrs total (Fri:6+Sat:16+Sun:10 x 4) to set up, judge and release the results. Getting 3 independent and very busy people coordinated with work, travel and major life events going on can get quite difficult. Recently we've opted to not start a competition if we do not pre-schedule the weekends for completing it! The result is that 2016 and 2017 could not happen.
There's been more than one case, actually, so it really depends which case you're talking about.
A WAF will stop a lot of the stupid junk that a kid with a "how 2 hax0r" book can make work a disturbing amount of the time.
One of the folks behind that is also involved in this:

http://www.bootstrapworld.org

They're claiming to get good results teaching young people a number of important topics, including coding. They're also either using Pyret or planning to use it.
>The law doesn't see "all comers" as equal; specifically, there are what's called "protected classes" in United States civil rights law.

This is the real false dichotomy, and why civil rights law as written is total garbage. Creating "protected groups", which by definition are artificially defined and socially polarizing gives certain people more rights than others. This is incredibly counterproductive and entirely wrongheaded. Those who argue that the existance of "protected classes" in law are a rationale for discrimination, rather than defending the logic and morality of "protected classes" themselves are missing the point.

Virtually all reasonable, fair-minded people want a society where everyone is equal and everyone enjoys the same civil liberties. Its irrelevant that various Civil Rights Acts were intended to protect "vulnerable" groups - intentions never matter. What matters are the actual, tangible results of the law. Ignoring this fact and pretending that intentions are what matters is what leads us to where we are today. The truth is that it wouldn't be difficult to word a Civil Rights Act that used neutral language to prevent the violation of anyone's civil rights, by any party, for any reason. This has already been done, most recently in Iceland. The people of Iceland were concerned about the continuing wage gap between men and woman, and so they passed a law that mandated equal pay for all people working the same jobs. They didn't slice and dice the population into artificially created catagories, or specify anything about men, women, "theys", or 25 different genders and races. They simply said that a company has to pay the same salary for the same job, no matter who the person was.

At the end of the day, we need to move to a place where we all view each other as equals (though not the same). Laws that artificially divide us and codify those divisions into law will just continue to ensure that we never move toward a society where this is the case.
I don't see your point, but I should have clarified more:

Kops == AWS install
Rancher == Easy small cluster on-prem or private cloud. GUI push-button setup
kubeadm == CLI tool to set up a cluster manually with basic settings. Not very flexible, but can get a cluster working in minutes.
kubespray == Ansible playbooks for setting up k8s cluster. The most powerful of the bunch, especially if you're familiar with ansible. This is the preferred way to run it in production I believe, along with customizations on top.
Good question. It's the longest flights that are the most irritating, so the willing to pay may be higher. The example given on the Boom site of Los Angeles -> Sydney becoming 7 hours instead of 15 is compelling.
Which law is violated if you enter the intersection when the light is green and exit it when the light is red?
It means navigator in Greek.
Just because Google made something doesn't mean it has sound engineering behind it. Eng at Google is also rewarded for complexity.
If any of that stuff is actually working on your site, not having a WAF is the least of your problems. Don't waste time with this stuff.
It was a rhetorical question, for the self-righteous proposition above.
We're probably at 80% Phillips, 15% flat head, 5% everything else, though.
An IOCCC Judge here. Do you want to volunteer? What do you have in mind? Please contact us at j.2018@ioccc.org and include "IOCCC 2018" in the subject line. Thanks!
It's interesting that you frame the scenarios like this, because as someone who works at a tech company I dislike content takedowns, and the way I see it tech companies are being forced, by journalists, advertisers and the threat of regulatory action, to take down content. So I don't really see these two scenarios as significantly different, but rather popular pressure overriding the preferences of businesses. On one hand the pressure was governmental and on the other it was not explicitly so, but that has more to do with the public's tools than their intentions.
I wonder how does the cryptocurrency community react to such news? Because lot of people holding cryptocurrencies tend to talk about how these coins are going to destroy big banks and Wall Street.
What small problem would you pay $5/month to fix?
This is brilliant.

Thanks !
If we talk california, the core issue is housing. Housing is a state-wide policy problem: the most onerous building codes in the country, hardest NIMBYism, and uneven taxation: income taxes and sale taxes that hit the renters and not the landlords.

The solution is Land Value Tax. Just that will jettison the NYMBY attitude into anti-regulation, as opposed to pro-regulation, and then buildings will lower rents, which are the main cause and cost of homelessness.
Watching a Keynesian Economist Self Combust and Implode Is Not a Pretty Sight
Yeah, this is compounded by the fact that our products go into marine environments - all our fasteners are 316 stainless but there are still sometimes galvanic issues.
Sometimes it feels like editors write headlines with an explicit goal of riling people up. Specifically riling me up.
Why is the joke dated? It refers to a current (and recently expanded) US government policy.
Quantum cognition via neural qubits in human brain
"The Seawolf was almost lost during one of these missions—it was stranded on the bottom after a storm and almost had to use its self-destruct charges to scuttle the ship with her crew."

Does this imply that they made the whole crew commit suicide via the charges?
"SoC"?
Thanks for your feedback. You're told what 'begin' does when you click begin.

The website is simply a demonstration of how face login can be simple and unobtrusive - it's not actually part of the app and is going to be changed to reflect the rest of the application.
SpectX is a tool that can run fast sql-like queries on top of distributed text files. It was initially built to parse logs by an infosec team. Hope it helps!
Because it hasn't been just his project since he began accepting patches. It's a reflection on every contributor and every member of the community. When a project is the product of many peoples work, dirtying the face of the project affects everyone.
Sure, if you want to move fast and disrupt yada yada. They shouldn't be putting hack-job self-driving cars on public roads. Either do some engineering so that they keep the backup system in place or keep it on a test track. This is Chernobyl-like irresponsibility.
Www.rippling.com
Of course some prices will rise and some will fall, because the new taxes will reduce income from different consumers than the biggest beneficisries are. If we want to prevent any price rises of poor people's products, this same argument could be used again any improvement in poverty / income equality, whether market based or income transfer based.

If this is the wrong direction, should we make opposite changes - concentrate wealth in fewer hands?

Anyway, in general it is not the case that prices would rise to consume all citizens' disposable income, foreastallyng all improvement in living standards. Your comment seems to conflate localized price changes with total real change stopping inflation, without justification.
Actually, recent research found that even when considering externalities, proof-of-work is considered wasteful:

"Another issue relates to the negative externalities arising in proof-of-work blockchains. First, as shown above, when choosing individually optimal computing capacity, miners fail to internalise the negative externality their investment generates for other miners by increasing difficulty. This implies that
equilibrium capacity acquisition in proof-of-work mining is excessive. Second, proof-of-work mining generates greenhouse-effect negative externalities, whose order of magnitude is significant. As of January 2018, the electricity consumed for Bitcoin mining was equal to the electricity consumption of over 3,400,000 US households, with an average consumption per transaction of around 300 KWh. Pigovian taxation could curb overinvestment in mining, but it might also be difficult to put in place, given the international decentralisation of mining."

source: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/...
When I travelled from India to Nepal I noticed that both places had liberal horn usage, but in Nepal almost all of the horns were musical. They felt much more pleasant than the same custom in New Delhi.
While any proposal for finding quantum computing in the brain should be met with skepticism, this paper by a very well respected physicist does an excellent job of exploring one possible route to quantum computing in the brain. It will be up to experiments to add strength to, or disprove, this claim.
Amazon Among Top Washington Companies for Employee Dependence on Medicaid
Or a large cash position to smooth out the rough patches, but that also means more effort in getting there.
Lego Mosaic from photos using R
The song itself (rendered by a singer in the video on the page) reminds of a lot of non-western music, in particular the distinctive minor harmonic 7th that is so common from southern and Eastern Europe through the Middle East to South Asia. I've also heard Jewish cantors in synagogues using it.

Someone once described this very general style of modal music to me as "Alexandrian" music, because variations on it appear in many places where Alexander the Great's army went.

Of course, the musical style probably far predates Alexander, as Alexander was himself following routes established long before his time.
Singley rooted Debs or RPMS with a nice single symlink init system and a log shipping system that is unified across the app stack will get you 90% of the way there. Add in a build system that ships "the world" inside your deb and you are 99% of the way there. Add in a cluster wide config system and you are 100% of the way there.

K8S forces people to use an algebra, the expression of that algebra can take many forms. Containers are _just_ trees of processes with ... contained separation boundaries.