skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
and iPhone X navigation is eerily similar to WebOS' cards paradigm. Everyone copies everyone.
No. I'll take Franco over socialists and communists every day. At the end of the day you have property, order and hierarchy.
My gut reaction to seeing this headline was shock at the sticker price. I did some more research and found some more interesting numbers for this company.

They raised 204.5 Million dollars over 9 venture financing rounds. They have approximately 800 current employees. Does any of this seem wild to anyone else?
Stalinist Communists, controlled by NKVD, attacked them. Trotskyists were Communists too.
I know it was Google, but I wasn't sure if Google Research was the same as Google Project Zero or a different team.
Came here to say exactly this. I'd add that of the non-aerospace tech companies that have tried to build planes, I'm not aware of any that have launched commercially and I can only think of one that has ever flown.

Turns out that building commercial aircraft is still hard.
Thank you very much! For the HR perspective, here a post about remote / international hiring some time ago. More a culture and learning approach. https://blog.giantswarm.io/10-insights-of-international-recr...
I don't follow your logic. What he wants is that others do not go through the same death induced trauma. What would having a child of his own achieve?
Saving is wrong word, I guess. I mean that someone who's trying to find a pirated book will just stop trying after few unsuccessful attempts. For example copyright owners are forcing Google to hide search results with pirated content. But may be polluting search results with fake content is better strategy.
Franco wasn't so bad guys.
1) Press-and-hold on the empty text box, 2) a context menu appears, 3) tap Paste. Voila.
I thought this Glassdoor was like someones pet project that aggregated job spots reviews. How they ever made any money?? What was their business model?
पर्स में रख ले चावल के 4 दाने, इतना आएगा पैसा संभाल नहीं पाओगे I dhan prapti
I think abstracting the differences away between the 2 seemingly equal technologies is not a good process for understanding them better. Yes, we seem to go back on ideas but this is because the market is constantly evolving, not because we forgot about the past.

SOA was not that big of a hit because the time wasn't right. Just like MySpace before Facebook, the market wasn't ready. And to say they are the same is to ignore the advances each tech made.

You could push this argument to the extremes and say "well, Microservices are just Processes on different computers talking through a network IPC and this $unknownProject has done that back when Ethernet first started".

Nothing in tech is original and everything is.
Thanks for the interest in JnJ AGI Research! As inter-global head of research I'm happy to answer any questions the HN community may have!
So will there be a path to upgrade CoreOS to RedHat Container Linux?
Yes, I think this is an accurate observation. There seems to be more variation on the fringe and more homogeneity closer to the center (or over large areas).
This is the point that I think too many people don't understand.

If your password is leaked, your username/email has probably been leaked as well.

If your hardware key is lost, assuming it wasn't stolen by someone who has specifically been trying to get your credentials, then there's nothing to tie it to you. You're still going to get a new key and change the locks, but you know it happened.
So now we are going from the general case to the Bay area tech crowd?

I think you live in a bubble, honestly. Get out of it and realize how most people live.
Top Takeaways from the ABM Next Level Experience 2018
What features would you prefer people avoid? Just stuff like coloring, or is there anything else?
My guess is that there would be no pilots. Given they are attempting to get rid of drivers, getting rid of pilots in VTOL seems like an easier proposition with a large added weight advantage.
Software as an academic publication
It wasn't a bug. I actually liked the predictable nature of notepad, even if it did support a line ending I never use and run on an OS I never use.
fortif-id.com | System Software Architect / Identity, Privacy & Security Architect / Distributed Systems & Container Platform Engineer | FULL-TIME, Contract | Mtn View, CA | ONSITE | $100k - $150k (USD), Equity

We're working on simultaneously giving consumers greater control over their data, and businesses ways to get insights about consumers without shipping raw data around.

We just raised seed funding, and are looking for folks to design and build the product.

You should be comfortable with the risk of joining a seed-stage startup, which is of course balanced by the experience of creating a product from scratch.

We need experienced engineers who have co-created complex distributed apps/platforms.

https://www.fortif-id.com/careers
Except that it's not just frequently used as described. It also takes into consideration what apps you use at a specific time, location, day.
The only difference between "rich text" and what you can do in a terminal is changing font families/sizes. And that is not even close to useful enough to justify runnig a terminal on top of a browser.

As for familiar HTML, it is trivial to write a library that accepts "familiar" HTML and converts it to SGR cdes for formatting. I could do it in an afternoon.

And for "awful slow", do the following experiment. Open a large text file in less in your terminal. Then scroll it continuously and monitor CPU usage (of the terminal and X together). Now compare with a real terminal. Think of all the battery life and all the energy you are sacrificing just for the ability to use multiple font sizes and families.
Nothing could possibly go wrong there. /s

In other words, you're assuming a massive (no, even "10 000 cars" is not "massive"), coordinated, correct deployment. I'd like a pony and world peace while we're in fantasyland.
Google Flexes Its AI Muscles at I/O 2018
I've been into GUI's and so on since before the birth of the web, and I've always had this deep discomfort with where we have arrived here and now, today. The Web and its UI is such a disastrous, convoluted mess of abstractions and significance and conceptual complexity - yet, it works "well enough" that a majority of the world can deal with it.

But this doesn't mean we can't think outside the box. Yes, I concur - TeX's box and glue is another kettle of fish - but then so too are things like Box2D's physics forces and contact mechanisms, which I personally believe, were it integrated into a forward-thinking GUI framework, would open the doors to very interesting and versatile interfaces - as has been demonstrated by its application towards making those most intuitive interfaces of all times, games. I would love to be able to say "[ the context of this independent element has a gravity of -1. ]", and then watch as my sentence floats away to the top of the screen, to function as a daily "Todo list" which, once I press the '.' period at the end of the ToDo item, then sets the gravity to 1, and the whole thing lands at the bottom of the screen, away from my attention. There are many abstractions like this out there which could be applied to human/computer interaction - we've selected a set of words, symbols, concepts that are granted us by the designers of modern OS's, but I truly believe that the effort of producing interaction symbology is far, far from where it could be. As do many other people of course (http://worrydream.com) .. there seems to be a plethora of views about this. Almost as many views, as symbols in the world there are to be read ...
I don't understand this, are you defining feelings of happiness based on some sort of average over time? If so, what is the period and how is it determined?

I think great great gp is using "feel[ing] happier" in the sense of achieving higher baseline happiness, not maximizing the "happiness level" of an instant.
Ontologies first is an idiocy! Whenever you deal with a real data environment, you discover that your use cases drive your data model. Not the opposite way.
For example, the DBPedia ontology is plainly wrong (or outdated, I don't know). If you want the real data model, you really should infer it from the data itself (Guess what, you CAN do that. Because proper RDF auto-describes its data model. But it is a lot of work).
The more i deal with data, the more i realize that the exposed data models are not matching the data. And that is a SHAME for whoever calls himself/herself a data engineer.
So that’s what “this call may be used for training purposes” means!
> transparency is a key part of that

Transparency would mean starting the call by saying "I'm a bot from Google".
I think this is going in a good direction (in contrast with many commenters). I love the idea of an assistant - remind me about stuff, help me become more productive, etc. :-p

I see these apps becoming more and more useful as we build more and more distractions for ourselves - from KFC, to Social media apps, etc.
People don't actually use notepad, do they? The last reason I'd think of to upgrade a Windows OS is "I'll be able to use notepad".
In some cases a copy might not be viable, especially with price hikes. If AWS increased storage and outgoing data costs greatly then exporting all your data will most likely cause a much larger bill.

Splitting your data across multiple vendors protects against all kinds of failures from all sides (including the vendor simply closing your account for no reason)
Virtual Pet Cat Happy Family Simulator
I am not surprised because Mindfulness is not a cure-all.

I recently read Goleman's Emotional Intelligence. One of the key takeaways for me was the nature of mindfulness/meditation. To paraphase Goleman Mindfulness/meditation works by alleviating your mood. So, if there is lot of anger or you tend to get worried a lot, meditation works.

But, if you tend to be more dispirited most of the time then meditation actually doesn't work for you. A better solution is to try and get into an upbeat mood. Exercise, exciting adventure sports etc might be a better option.
I assume they make money from either advertising jobs or commission on jobs they place someone in. Pretty much the same as LinkedIn, except more targeted to people looking for the jobs and without also providing a platform for recruiters to cut them out.
Crypto Phone on Its Way
"Real life" means "not on a computer". See also "IRL".
How did they figure out how to write 'hovercraft' in Sumerian? Was there a 'Rosetta Stone' like codex describing futuristic transportation technology?
As someone who worked very closely with tech support and sometimes fielded calls, I echo this. It's batshit insane to field support calls, L1 especially. Honestly, no human deserves the wrath of support calls. You get yelled at for no apparent reason and all you can do is be patient. Who knows what the psychological consequences are. I have seen customer support people lose their temper in otherwise normal situations.
What do you think of OpenMined or other distributed projects to do trustless AI training?
> How they ever made any money?? What was their business model?

Advertisement [1] but also [2][3][4].

[1] http://resources.glassdoor.com/advertising-on-glassdoor.html

[2] http://vator.tv/news/2015-06-20-how-does-glassdoor-make-mone...

[3] https://www.quora.com/How-does-Glassdoor-make-money

[4] https://www.quora.com/How-does-Glassdoors-business-model-wor...
It is very much a topic. Check for "moral enhancement" and "ethical enhancement".
TIL Squillion is a large but unspecified amount. I'll add this to my vocabulary of strange words, like umpteen.
”LispKit implements a core language based on the R7RS (small) Scheme standard.”

Don’t you consider Scheme a Lisp?
I actually think one is not very wise to go and fight fascists when it is quite obvious that if you contribute to a win, the harvest will be collected by stalinists.

Of course we could say that at the time it was too hard to see, but Purges had already been going on for long, with millions dead in murders and famines, and people knew. Many just chose not to believe.
I feel these constructs were always present (compare the behavior of a pack of wolves vs a lone wolf) but in our age they're large reinforced by the "pack" being orders of magnitude larger. See how lynch works in social media: someone gets accused of something, then an army of disgusted users carries on the attack, which is not only virtual today. Individual conversation in these circumstances is not possible: you're not talking to individuals, but to a Mob, an animal with it's own behavior and very limited reasoning abilities.

The communication with bots and computer systems that are designed to interact with humans and equipped with the so-called "AI" is of similar nature: it seems there is some exchange, but it's very shallow and limited by the abilities of the receiving end - you can never transmit anything new, anything that the system is unable to understand. Continued use of such systems might have hard to predict consequences.
I'm reading a lot of these comments that say "good parenting is too subjective" - I must say i STRONGLY disagree - and am a little surprised to see so many comments like those from the HN crowd. I wonder how many of those are actual parents?

I think there are MANY pieces of parenting wisdom that are VERY accepted. For instance:

- giving kids 'structure' i.e. repetition, nighttime routines, bedtime to ensure they sleep well, etc

- consequences for negative actions <--- big one

- creating spaces and norms for activities, i.e. reading, eating, etc

- playing in certain ways including imaginative games, etc, that are age-appropriate

- ensuring lots of exercise and play that encourages dexterity, use of all body muscles, etc

anyway, i could go on and on.
The .app domain is now availiable
I agree with almost everything you write here, but I just want to make clear that my comment was about the term "fake news", and not reactionary outrage, FUD, attack TV shows, Reddit, or anything else.
Ubuntu Linux is coming to Windows 10 on ARM
Haha, yes. Glad you said this.
I don't know the exact requirement on FAA approving a new airplane / VTOL whatever, but I do know it takes a lot of time... Same reason I thought the supersonic company was a bit ambitious on their timeframe as well.
Without an ESB SOA services and microservices are just remote procedure calls. Unless there is a real need like a client-server architecture then remote procedure calls are just an extremely slow version of normal procedure calls.
Your fingerprint is not a key, it's an identity. So your design tells every place you sign in this way "I'm joering2". And if course if any of them want to log in somewhere else, they now know to say the same thing, "I'm joering2".

I guess this is slightly easier than typing your email address? But it's not a security feature.

The FIDO/U2F design is a cryptographic key enshrined as a physical key, so rather than "I'm joering2" it says: "I can prove I'm this particular key talking to your site again using mathematics".

Which key? No way to know, but it's the same one as before. Google can't use the credentials it presents to them to get into Facebook and vice versa, the proof from yesterday is worthless today and so on.
If you judge by reactions of a large number of parents across the world, "Parent Effectiveness Training" book (and training!) seems like a great resource. Interestingly, his approach to parenting has applications in daily life with adults in general :)
One day I had an epiphany: Microservices (or SOA if you will) are just Unix-mindset applied to web applications. Do one thing and do it well, then use all these stand-alone complexes to get an actual result you want.

"Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." -- Henry Spencer
Bandar Poker Online Uang Asli Deposit Kecil – Asiapoker303
Official announcement at 32:50 in the Google I/O Developer Keynote.

https://youtu.be/flU42CTF3MQ?t=1970
Well, that will be until the shop owners install AI assistants to reply customers calls, then we’ll have robots talking to robopts using human language, which would make the whole idea nonsense...
I saw my reviews on the interview process for IBM and couple of other companies disappear without trace. So my guess is their business model is trying to get companies to pay to remove bad reviews.
23 Ejemplos Para Maquillarse Natural
No they did not, that is an urban myth easily dismissed with Google's documents and related ADB podcast.

OEMs are expected to push updates just like before, having a certified Treble device is meaningless, if the OEM does not care to provide OS updates.
What do you think about Zoho SalesIQ
It's a prospecting and engagement tool with an amazing rings view of your visitor.

https://www.zoho.com/salesiq/
Google is using machine learning to redefine Android
And weight is relative to strength and dimensions in this conversation, right? Plastic starts to get pretty large to match strength of aluminum.
> There are services like OpenTable but even here in Silicon Valley only a small minority of restaurants use them.

OpenTable takes a cut, no? That always going to limit availability.
> What’s notable about this is that Slack has achieved it without a designated “head of diversity,” a role...

Well done. It's in the company's culture DNA and not the responsibility of a separate group. It's great that they do it quietly like it shouldn't be a big thing. Like saying there's little sexual harassment, it's good but shouldn't be there to start with.

Might even be getting some moneyball advantages.
Well, if anything about this article is right, then Google lies to us for years.

The company attempts to pass the responsibility for their illegal conduct down to the smaller players in the ecosystem. The total cost of their greed will be greatly multiplied, but Google will avoid paying it by themselves.

There are also personal risks. For example, if someone takes a loan and joins bootcamp to become an Android developer today, the knowledge and skills he/she pays for may become obsolete in the short term. If Google would share any kind of mid-term plans with us instead of telling lies, we could make educated decisions.

So, yes - Google betrays Android ecosystem. They f*ed up due to their greed, but we will pay the cost.

All of that under assumption that I got the main vectors right. Time will tell...
I was going to mention this as well. I don't know about "good" but it's definitely collaboratively built.
Ironically the lack of these stressors may also contribute to people strengthening family bonds because they cannot survive without them.
The question isn't why they were phased out; it's why they existed in the first place.

They enabled aircraft to make fuel stops at undeveloped supply caches that happened to have a functioning seaport, but no long runway. This was necessary both because of the scarcity of paved runways at the time, and because the short ranges of the time necessitated multiple fuel stops in order to make long-haul journeys.

Once those necessities faded, both because of the build-out of airstrips worldwide (e.g. paved runways in Sri Lanka) and because of improving aircraft technology (no need to stop in Sumatra on the way from Java to Sri Lanka), there was no reason to go with an aircraft that couldn't land inland and had its aerodynamic properties constrained by the need for seaworthiness.
Swiss director Jean-Luc Godard provocatively said once that real impartiality is 50% time for the Jews, 50% time for Hitler. I don’t think I should have to support the views I disagree with anymore than a government should be able to impose their views on my free speech.
The problem is that I don't want more voice; I want less voice and more automation.

I don't want to have to interact with a human because the only time a company makes me interact with a human is when they think it benefits them (upsell, make leaving difficult, etc.).

What I want are good ways for me to handle this stuff via computer without human interaction.
Those ACME features are based on Oberon.

On Oberon the whole OS works like that.

http://www.progtools.org/article.php?name=oberon&section=com...

Plus it had the benefit of being implemented in a GC enabled systems programming language.

Maybe one day we could get ACME re-implemented in Go, running on something like "Goberon System 3", specially now that it finally has plugin's support, essential for how Oberon implemented UI commands.
Are two spaces better than one? (Atten Percept Psychophys)
When my password is leaked, I can still access my $important_stuff. When I lose a hardware dongle, I potentially just lost irreplaceable data.
There's not a great deal more friction involved in making a booking via OpenTable (no financial cost, no deposit etc).
NET Core 3 and ReactiveUI
> The US military has sunk $50 Billion dollars into this problem over the last 30 years and still aren't there.

And that's not the whole cost and time; they've been working on tiltrotors since the 1940s.
Traxroot Usage Based Insurance
As soon as you start working on German soil, German employment laws apply fully. Citizenship, prior residence, etc. are almost completely irrelevant. There is a social security agreement between the US and Germany which might exempt the person from German pension contributions but nothing more.

(If the spouse is working for the US military there are NATO agreements which might make German employment law inapplicable but I know almost nothing about that.)
#baseStriker attack technique allow to bypass #Office 365 anti-phishing filter
The problem is there is very little good science available about parenting, because it is considered unethical to experiment on children.
Traxroot Field Management Software
IMO that's the least spectacular of his contributions. It's not like that algorithm is particularly mindblowing. In fact, I'd wager that any sufficiently experienced engineer with some algorithm work under their belt would arrive at the exact same thing. Actually, I bet there's engineers all over the world who invent it every year, independently, simply because they need it and they didn't go to college or know that there's a thing out there called "Commonly Known Algorithms That Have Names and Wikipedia Pages" so they just worked it out.

In fact, I'd wager someone already came up with it somewhere before Dijkstra did, put it in the code (or, well, on the punch card), and quietly went home, happy about a good day's work.

Dijkstra just was the first one to publish it :-)

His true contributions were, IMO:

* Being the first tech blogger[0] (handwritten!)
* Teaching people to use while/for instead of goto
* Pioneering mathematically verified algorithm derivation

He's also the reason Dutch universities have no independent Computer Science departments. They're always paired with Mathematics, even at universities of technology, which makes no sense and which has effectively halved research funding for both disciplines for decades. He was a better programmer than politician.

[0] http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/indexChron.html - I'm calling it a blog because both the median length and the frequency of publishing is a lot more like blogging than anything else. I'm not aware of other people doing this as much in that day and age (but I'm probably wrong)
Maybe this example will help?
https://github.com/SAP/chevrotain/blob/master/examples/gramm...

It is implemented using a parsing library so the lookaheads are automatically performed by the library, but the general pattern is still relevant.

Basically each binary precedence level gets a rule (weakest first) and each of these rules will consume as many operators of the current precedence level as it can.