skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exercise pushes stuff around in your gut which is probably more directly related to the immune response than the possibility of eating raw meat.
haha that's not the case I assure you that. But I understand where you're coming from.
MMA showed the BJJ is a requirement to win but it's no longer sufficient. The sport has evolved. Plenty of non-BJJ guys win. Demian Maia is one of the best BJJ guys (and has been super successful) and he's gotten KO'd by strikes and had his BJJ neutralized by guys like Woodley.

Back when tournaments like UFC started, ground fighting and grappling were not part of the standard repertoire of tournament fighters so those guys won. Now it is. Back in the heyday of Pride, champions like Mirko CroCop were definitely not BJJ guys. Of course they trained BJJ but it's not their only tool.
Android and Amazon using for the Echo and much of their hardware?
I don't follow your comment. The reporting guide doesn't say anything about people snickering at 'dongle', and neither does the post we're commenting on. I also don't see anything in the CoC that suggests that snickering at 'dongle' would constitute a violation.
Local control (and the perverse incentives that operate at that level) is exactly what's causing the problem. State-level intervention is the achievable way to fix it.

Homeowners in a city have an incentive to block housing construction. That hurts everyone who commutes into that city; those people deserve a say too, and they have one at the state level.
Generador de gemas clash royale
Ask HN: What do you enjoy most about your job?
I’m currently changing jobs/careers. I’m mid 30’s - leaving finance, which was rich in $$ but poor in meaning (for me - nothing inherently wrong with finance or money). I want to be intentional in choosing a job where I find more intrinsic meaning.

I feel like it can be easy to list the faults in a job to know what to avoid, but I’m interested in learning what makes a job great. There’s a rich, diverse community on HN and would love to learn more about what people enjoy most about their work.

- What’s the most rewarding part(s) of your job?

- What part(s) of your work makes you excited?

- What part(s) of your work makes you proud?
I know it was off the track of the article, I was gravitating to the more interesting idea.

Thanks for your time!
Maybe they were just testing to see if the applicant can think for five minutes.
> Here's the flip side: You can't be lose data to a breach that you don't store.

That means NO storage, not even "anonymous". (which Apple clearly does)

> You can't have a rogue employee crow on social media about how they have access to data you don't store.

Requires NO storage, which they clearly do.

> You can't be liable for GDPR violations about PII you don't store.

If you store it "anonymous" you can, since the only requirement for it is to be personal data and there is zero change it can't lead to the person and anyone working with those 'unique' identifiers can tell you they most likely aren't that anonymous and the data can be used to trace a single person.
>Bayesian priors.

Is your point anything more than saying "political stereotyping" using verbiage that suggests you agree with the assessment? Even my attempt to find lay-person verbiage for your idea ("stereotyping") found words that carry a negative connotation.
A stream as a chat room. Ask me anything, how cool
Why would you go run (hunt) if there is still stuff (food) in your gut.
It's even been ported and packaged for FreeBSD: https://www.freshports.org/databases/foundationdb/
There's a pretty bright light on between sunrise and sunset, doesn't affect free air optical transmission at all unless the sun happens to align with the sender or the receiver.

The biggest limitations are water vapor in the air, precipitation and dust. Also, the distance is rather limited compared to radio.
Gluu versus Keycloak: Battle of the Open Sounce IAMs
I'd like to see the ANSI SQL layer open-sourced, and some benchmarks.
Honestly, I don't believe any company would "do the right thing". Companies exist to make money, as much as they possibly can. They might start off with good intentions, but inevitably, they will start looking for alternate ways of revenue. Sure, maybe some not for profit, good intention, fairly tale business might pop up. But they will in NO way get to billions of users, and will be dwarfed by the free alternatives.
I think the article is badly phrased, and that they mean that _each_ individual Siri request from a device is from a random identifier, so they can't track it back to you.
Orient your polar orbit perpendicular to the sun, burn to achieve Earth escape velocity approximately when you’re over the equator, and you’ll end up on an elliptical solar orbit in the same plane as Earth’s orbit. Burn the right amount and adjust the plane a bit and you’ll be in a Hohmann transfer to Mars.
Marx says as much in his writings, calling for the centralization of credit, communication, transport, factories, agriculture, and education in the state.
I have most of an abandoned book written on it. Abandoned because I will finish it when I can show it actually works.

As a foundation, "Getting to Yes," is key, but as another commenter mentioned, it has been considered outdated because it assumes rational parties. This isn't a limit, as you need to play scales before you can play jazz, but there are no "scale recitals."

"Rational," has a few concepts wrapped up in it. Main limit on the basic theories (I would say) is that it focuses on discussing a transaction with a finite outcome, positioning one another in relation to a commitment event. A raise, a consulting rate, price of a car, etc.

Reality is that society has changed, and deals are really more about achieving a temporary political equilibrium. You could say they always were, but strong personal connections and relationships in business aren't as much of a factor as public reputation/image has become. In a graph sense, many "weak ties," are more valuable than a few strong ones.

IMHO, traditional negotiation assumed valuing "strong tie" networks. Negotiation in a "weak tie," network has very different dynamics than a "strong tie," network.

A very useful traditional reference is The Economist Guide: https://www.amazon.com/Economist-Negotiation-Z-Guide-ebook/d...

It is an encyclopedia/dictionary approach to get the concepts and an overview of what people on the other side of the table likely already understand.

Weak tie negotiation uses some of the same traditional techniques, but requires more advanced concepts from some other authors. Maybe I should finish that book.
You didn't phrase your comment obliquely enough apparently :-) But, yes, shoe fit and sizing can be really tricky. I've gone back and forth between shoes in a store a half-dozen times. And where shoes are a fashion accessory like jewelry, it's tricky to order online even if you can send a few things back. You can definitely get more hands-on in a store than you can online even with a generous return policy.

And I know I've gotten stuff that was maybe not quite right but not bad. So I never returned. But I never wore much either.
That would be like saying nothing is more core to Microsoft than .NET, which they also gave away for free.

In reality, this is nonsense, because both are backend technical tools, NOT core products. Google is not going to open source Google Search any more than Microsoft is going to open source Windows: Google is a closed product company and they're not going to give away what actually makes them money.

Microsoft has actually been topping GitHub's contributions graph for a while. Even Apple's been opening a bunch of stuff up lately. And apart from some licensing squabbles, nearly everyone's been moving their frontend web code to a framework made by Facebook.

Of course, again, none of those companies open source their actual products, just like Google doesn't open source any of theirs. The closest place they come is open sourcing Android, but it's basically useless without the proprietary half of the OS, and Google uses a hilariously draconian contract to control everyone who uses Android, and they actively punish anyone who dares to fork it, because you're not actually supposed to fork Android.
Securing High-Performance RISC-V Processors from Time Speculation
Do you do Yoga or Pilates? Or anything to help you with flexibility?
After 14 years, I’ve had it. I’m leaving Seattle
When you have a team of 200 people, deploying 100 times a day isn't that big of a number.

A culture of continuous deployment is often hard to fathom for people who've never worked at a company with one. Everything, down to what you write and how you write it, is influenced by being able to deploy it and see its effects almost instantly.

These aren't huge, sweeping changes being deployed. They're small pieces of larger feature sets. It's more like: Deploy a conditional statement with logging and confirm from the logs that it works; next, deploy the view that you're testing with a feature flag toggled in a way that you and the pm can see it that is properly called from the conditional from before; when things look good, deploy some controller code that handles form requests from the view, etc.

You deploy small changes piecemeal and so spread out the risk over a larger period of time. It makes identifying issues with a new piece of code almost trivial. Needing to debug 30 lines of code is so much less harrowing than needing to look over 900.
Same here.. tried it twice.. did not end up on the target card.

Just clarifying if how I counted was correct..

5 x x x x 9

Above is a crude illustration.. If I first pick the card with "5", I start counting from 1 from the next card, till 5. And then I would land up on whatever that card is (9 in this example), and then I would repeat.

Did this, but did not work for me.
IH community is my new special splace
Can you explain why this would be the case? In theory this shouldn't be an issue because any ShiftJIS conversion to Unicode should be reversible.
I can't answer you directly but perhaps this helps too.

I recently finished Summa Technologiae from Stanislaw Lem which does investigate a lot of these questions in many of its chapters.

I highly recommend it as it is a detailed, vivid exploration written by a very wise person so much so that it is easy to forget while reading that the book was published more than 50 years ago.

But there's also a practical reason why you might be interested in it even if you wouldn't think anything of a personal(?) recommendation from someone on the internet.

It is based on a lot of academic papers Lem read from all sorts of fields, which are all referenced (at least they were in the version I've read), so it should be easy to then start to look for more recent papers based on those.
> Is this surprising in any way? If you buy something (or "buy" it for free on the App Store) of course the company you buy it from keeps records of that.

It need not; for example it doesn't need historical data that have been superseded; if it no longer has an app available for download it could purge the fact that you bought it; it could give purchasers an anonymized download key that their phone could store (or cache in icloud someplace).
> the other concern is how are they protected by changes in who controls a region? We already witnessed what groups like ISIS are willing to do

How are they protected from changes in who controls their current region? We've already seen that the British are willing to grab what they find important and torch everything else...
Why is it that some small high growth companies in non-tech industries get tech-type valuations and prestige, while others do not?

It feels like companies like Warby Parker can use a certain style for people to think they’re super innovative- when in reality they’re just normal boring delivery/sunglasses/sheets/etc with none of the characteristics of real tech companies.
Optician here with some relevant experience regarding the opthalmic space, recognizing that isn't primarily what the article is about.

For the most part glasses still have to be custom made to some extent.

That process has been getting more sophisticated (smarter edgers, free form surfacing everywhere) and faster processing times.

But getting the formula right on mail order is hard.

First you have limited information about and from the patient. You have a PD (pupillary distance) and all of these services, that I have seen only collect a binocular pupillary distance.

The lenses have to be, at the very least cut to shape to fit the frame selected with the optical center of the lens moved so it sits over the pupil of the wearer when they are in the "gaze posture" appropriate to the glasses

That is to say if they are distance glasses the pupils will be looking straight ahead, while using the glasses, but the person's eyes may be 3mm narrower than the frame selected, so before grinding the lens that 3mm must be taken out of the "middle"

If one eye was in two and the other was out eight though (very uncommon) you have a reject pair.

If the glasses were of high power and one eye was out 1 and the other eye were out 2, if we were over 14 diopters of correction we fail quality. But not because the glasses, how they fit the patient's face 2000 miles away.
Yes, newts and salamanders in cave systems have lost their eyes, due to scarcity of nutrition and habitats devoid of light.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_blind_salamander
This article doesnt make mention of my workout where I lift something heavy 1 time.

I had the idea that I wanted to reduce time in the gym, so I used the potential energy equation

PE= Mgh

I'm not getting any taller, so the only thing I could change was either the reps or mass of weight moved.

I made it my goal to lift heavy weights so I'd only need to deadlift 1 time and be able to pig out.

TBH, it works, I lose 1 lb a week eating 3,000 calories a day. We lift 2 times a week. Warm up, then do 2+ reps of a heavy set.

I dont really sweat after a workout, but I look pretty big and I'm still deadlifting 450lbs. But I only deadlift that weight 1 time a week.

Is that 'Strenuous'?
Have done judo, and it’s just as fictitious. It just operates by a different contrived set of rules.

And yes, of course aikido is choreographed. That choreography is hard as hell. On the other hand I’m pretty fearless about getting thrown. I’ve been to judo dojos and traditional jujitsu dojos where my training partners had breakthroughs because I was willing to commit completely to my attack rather than hedge my attack for fear of “losing.”

Aikido is metal, because the curriculum is sprawling and deep, the ukemi is far and away the hardest part of the practice (harder than applying the techniques), and the psychology of the practice is often inscrutable to people who are fixated on an incompatible model of instrumental utility.
This was my interpretation as well.
The Epic Collabo That Is Blonde and Black Wigs and How to Pull It Off
HPE partners with Red Hat to bring containers to production
A lot of the data transferred to a new device happens over an encrypted channel - a channel that Apple has no access to, and thus can't populate on a dashboard.
Jack Edmonds: A Glimpse of Heaven [pdf]
Who will accept them if they cannot be converted back to usable currency?
this is really cool.
There's some good-looking stuff and maybe some aspects are appealing to higher-end customers but to me, shopping online for something like shoes is more about price. I don't see them beating Johnston & Murphy which has comparable or better prices and has physical stores.
Should you ditch email for internal communication tools?
It would be nice to have more than "Apple also offers data downloads in the privacy section of its website. It's hard to find..."

I can't find it... I started at icloud.com which sent me to appleid.apple.com which sent me to apple.com/privacy/ and I never found a data download link.
Musk: Question about CapEx was boneheaded because it had already been answered
NY farmer says ICE officers stormed his farm without a warrant, cuffed him
If people needed glasses "now" the local optician would not be a dying trade, and LensCrafters wouldn't have killed off half of their labs three years ago, while eliminating the one hour guarantee.

Davis optical also closed a load of their labs. Quick turnaround spectacles are seeing some changes.
These are early days - I expect an arms race of measures / countermeasures (many of them spilling over from the military ) to develop.
Isn't their HTML/CSS support atrocious? I mean, it might be a bit better than Outlook, but as far as HTML emails are concerned, it's more mobile browsers which have made it actually usable again:

https://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/email-client/gmail/
Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16994341
Just use https://github.com/grote/Transportr/blob/master/README.md (in F-Droid). It supports many transports worldwide.
Isn't this a problem shotguns with bird shot could solve?
Hmmm can't tell if serious or crazy
It's explained here albeit vaguely: http://faculty.uml.edu/rmontenegro/research/kruskal_count/in...

You start at the first card and progress until you would fall off the end on the next step. That card you're on is what you pick as the trap.
Ask HN: Is machine learning worth learning for hobbyists/pet projects?
I'm wondering if the field is accessible beyond pure theory for people who doesn't have exclusive access to datasets or powerful machines.

Can a regular programmer with a macbook achieve something at home? Or would I be stuck doing the same 3/4 basic programs like character recognition and hit a wall after the basics?
It does. Deleting things in an IMAP client usually means "removing the tag corresponding with that folder" in Gmail. There's a hilarious tendency for things you delete in IMAP to just be in "All Mail" with no labels in Gmail, for instance. I used to use Gmail on a Windows phone for a while, and the issues were painful.

Note that FastMail is developing JMAP, a replacement standard for IMAP. And even though FastMail itself doesn't support labels, they've made sure their new standard can support Gmail's currently proprietary way of handling mail correctly. Hopefully JMAP will take off and we'll see better email clients in the future.
Most offices who keep stock lenses keep cyl (astigmatic correction) up to two diopters in quarter increments in my experience.

The main limitation is usually material choice.
The advertising model is a disaster buy no-one has yet figured out how to replace it. Interests are very entrenched.
Pretty sure this meant the technical details of dealing with the increased traffic of the HN hug-of-death, rather than moderating policies.
We do this extensively. A field can be marked as "redacted", and then interceptors can do things like:

1. (most pertinent in this discussion) The logging framework can redact fields before emitting log entries.
2. Endpoints can redact the data unless the client explicitly requests (and is allowed to receive) unredacted data.
3. Serialization mechanisms (e.g. Gson) can be configured to redact data before serializing. (Again, probably can't always do this, but can make that the default for safety.)

It's also very straightforward to hook up as a Java annotation that does the same things.
"I was privileged to have had a childhood in the age of ubiquitous junk availability."

Garage sales are still a thing and so are flea markets! There is still treasure around if one looks hard enough.
Always neat to see real world stories about using TLA+. Putting the talk on my to watch list.
That's not so long though, in the scheme of things. Especially if the computer was very fast.

I read this book Artemis by Andy Weir recently (the guy who wrote the Martian) and it mentioned a moon Internet, and it was like 8 seconds away from the earth Internet or something like that. However, and the book didn't mention it, but what if a computer could be constructed that could perform extremely large calculations, and it was cheaper to produce there? In the book, they used a lot of glass for decor, because the ingredients to manufacture it were byproducts of other manufacturing already present, but something like that could be possible in space.

I like to imagine a satellite orbiting earth, with a little factory onboard, and it would send out probes and repurpose all the space junk in orbit and convert it to energy or use it to build stuff.

A planet computer could be expanding itself in that same way, and even though the calculations' results might be delayed, that might be more effective.

If humans make it another couple hundred years, they're gonna get to start thinking and building that stuff. That'll be cool
The 32 bit version should compile pretty easily if you use gcc rather than clang. Unfortunately it uses variable sized arrays, which clang says will never be supported, and the 32 bit code is unlikely to get a rewrite.

The 64 bit version however, I'm currently trying to get working on macOS. The 'normal' 64 bit version won't compile as it targets x86_64 ASM, in a GNU as dialect. MacOS, even using gcc appears to use clang as, I haven't found a GNU as which supports mach-O. There is an 'emulated' 64 bit version which I've been working to get running with Alex, but it currently seems to be hanging indefinitely on some of the unit tests and I haven't yet had the time to establish which bit.
How to Set Up a Live Chat with WordPress Plugins for Your Website
That's actually good point and puts the text in context.

(your implication of insecurity is rude and dishonest dismissal somewhat spoils it)
If you get any of essilor's scratch coats (or any of unity's they offer a warranty your optician may not tell you about (so he has more wiggle room, or he may buy without warranty to save money)
AVG PC TuneUp 2018 16.76.3.18604 and Keys [Download] Full Version
This doesn't work if the receiver on the drone is directed backwards and you usually are in front of the drone as its target.
market saturation ?
Previewing Material Design 2.0 – UX Collective
Google's mobile support was horrific when they started penalizing other sites for a bad mobile experience.
The "PC" made me think he was talking about political discussion, but I added some caching in https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/commit/e99c0783aa386740... and I'm thinking https://github.com/rails/actionpack-page_caching would be good for logged-out users.
It's hard to say where life (or past life) is most likely to be found, I think. It's only after the most recent rover (Curiosity) arrived at Mars that we discovered clear evidence of long-lived lakes and streams on ancient Mars, and chemical species compatible with life (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6169/1242777.full).
I have a theory that the only reason Apple is today's beacon of user privacy is that they couldn't manage to compete in either the ad (iAd), mail (at least not at G-scale) or social network world (see: Ping).

The only path left for them was to say they were all about user privacy. If Apple had succeeded wildly in any of those three spaces, I think they'd be caught up like Google, Facebook et al.

I'm not saying this is a bad thing for the tech ecosystem, but I do think it was lucky positioning on their part.

Interested to hear opposing opinion on this.
Debugging latency in Go 1.11
No way he shows up to accept the prize though
CI/CD: How to Build an Effective Initial Deployment Pipeline
Just having your own bedroom if multiple kids would be considered wealthy!

Certainly in Britain.

America was always different though, middle class kids always have more. I remember watching tv shows with kids having a phone in their room that blew my mind as a kid sharing a room with two brothers and very locked down phone in the house.

Free local calls amazed me too when I found out about that.

And refills of soda.

Land of plenty indeed.