skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Please don't.

I am using gitlab, though we quickly grew beyond auto devops.

Your definition of auto devops is different than gitops. Gitops is the practice of using commits and pull requests to execute change and do releases.
Weave uses it to mean git as the source of truth.
https://www.weave.works/blog/gitops-operations-by-pull-reque...
Kelsey Hightower talked about it and and has demoed the workflow of using pull requests to initiate promotion and deployments.

Gitlab's auto devops does not seem to tackle promotion via environment repos, so in my understanding does not fit gitops and would be confusing to call it such.

Edit:
Kelsey Hightower's kubeconf talk - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07jq-5VbBVQ

And a better writeup on weave's site -https://www.weave.works/blog/gitops-high-velocity-cicd-for-k...
Also I do not need to have directly accesible stuff on my home network. I can use dropbox or buy cheap VPS if I want to keep my data in sync.

One is security, NAT is nice for that a lot smaller attack surface. Second keeping your stuff always running at home is unreliable and annoying.

Would be nice if I would not have to pay for VPS but $5 a month cheapest linode is more than enough for my hobby projects.
This. As someone who has been in poverty tools to help organize your limited time help take the load off immensely. This tool sounds really great, just being able to glance at it rather than trying to call.
It's a cost on society, not on the individual pupil, just like how the education is a gain to the society at large, while the individual effort of the individual may seem negligble.

So of course it's free. You are not paying. And you don't pay it over taxes, society does.
Think of it this way: If you didn't go to university, and just learned on your own, then you still pay the same taxes if you reach the same income level. So taking a university does not increase your taxes. Ergo free.
Reminds me of the classic "Old Shoe or Glass Bottle": https://weblogs.asp.net/alex_papadimoulis/408925
Nice work

Can u elaborate more on the network requirements?
How much bandwidth is required? (I presume latency is less of a problem)
It’s not a redefining of terms. People abuse language and speak in ways that aren’t necessarily technically correct. For instance many times a person will say “fine” when asked how they are doing even if they really aren’t doing fine. Here fine is mostly used as an acknowledgement of the other person's greeting.

I gave an interpretation of what people really mean by “education is free”. If you wish to argue that people who say this phrase don’t mean what I say it means then do so. I might be wrong. But don’t get all pedantic on the dictionary definitions of words. We are talking about what people mean when they say something not what it logically ought to mean.

It appears surprising to you that not everyone is precise in what they say. Sometimes people say what they mean and sometimes they mean what they say. But lots of times they don’t. If this is a surprise to you then I implore you to reconsider your understanding of the nature of human communication.
Other recent discussions about Finlands basic income:

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=basic%20income&sort=byDate&pre...
Depends on the size of your house and the position of your light switches.

It's pretty nice to say, "Alexa, turn on away mode" as I leave the house. Instead of going through the whole place, turning off all the lights, locking the back door and adjusting down the thermostat.
A Vue.js App Using Axios with Vuex
Thanks!

> Student numbers

I still don't quite see why overall growth must change the proportion so much.

Maybe the extra complication of everyone applying to 20 places is a factor which doesn't scale. I don't know exactly how you fix that. Perhaps you should cap the number of applications an individual can make?

Re complicated IT, again somehow needing to collaborate on departmental memos somehow wasn't an issue when we had typewriters. I suspect a lot is weird make-work.

> grants procedure

OK, good. I would not have refused such help, but have never had any!

This however does seem orthogonal to students. It's part of the massive stuff-up that is research funding, where we've allowed the question of allocating these funds to eat up not only a majority of the time of the scientists being supported... but also apparently a huge number of other people. All ultimately paid out of the pot we're trying to distribute. Can't we change the rules of the game so that more of the pot goes to things which aren't obviously zero-sum?

> support staff specifically to help with wellbeing

It's nice to do these things, certainly. But lavishing them on the best and brightest young adults while all the other ones with jobs fend for themselves doesn't seem so easy to defend. Why isn't this part of the NHS budget?
Yeah, at the small companies I worked at, did ok but not crazy growth, the managers & above had been there for years and weren't going anywhere, so there was no place to get promoted into.
I like that you're building something in this vein, but the benefit is not immediately clear to me.

Has it been your experience that talking with others during a lecture is helpful?
>While I am still a big advocator for basic income in the developing world

How do they afford it ?
Ethical advertising is pretty much a unicorn. I don't deny that it's possible but I would struggle to find even a single example of it in the wild.
If the state has no money, then what do you consider the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund?

Because that looks like an awful lot of money to me.
IMHO this co-living model is the same as squatting, of course excluding the legal issues.
Excellent comment, although some are older problems, see the novel series Wilt by Tom Sharpe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilt_(novel)

Anyway, for me Bologna is on the par with the more recent so called adoption of Open Access in the form of "Gold OA", i.e. one more way to turn universities into cash cows, presented as a virtuous move. In the case of Bologna it was about the precarisation of researchers, in the case of "BOAI" Gold OA it was about reselling to researchers their minimal units of publication, paid by themselves, written by them under the pressure of obtainment, eventually, of a senior position.
"If we're having a conversation to have a conversation, what's the point?"

You're actually halfway there with the question. Indeed, the point is not conversation, or at least not the literal contents of the conversation.

When I was younger, I had a hard time understanding this stuff too. I'm not 100% sure why (I'm not convinced I'm even slightly on the spectrum, but it's not out of the question entirely; it's also just possible that I was simply too different as a kid from the other kids), but one of the steps to resolving it is just to realize that yes, there is logic to almost all of what is going on, and it isn't actually that complicated of a logic either. The biggest impediment to not being able to understand these interactions is the belief that you can't understand them, or that there's some sort of virtue in not understanding them. The second-biggest impediment is the belief that these things are essentially irrational, in the older sense of "essential" as meaning something like "inseparable from the whole"; there is actually a level on which this is all shockingly rational behavior. Once you get over those ideas, and accept that the surface levels and what's actually going on in the relationship between two people is not the same thing, it doesn't really take long to figure out what's going on.

(There's... a few other ideas you'll find you may want to discard. For instance, while politically incorrect today, there are reasons to be initially distrustful of people not in "your group". If you can't believe that's true today, it was certainly true in evolutionary terms. So there are instinctual protocols for determining whether someone is "in" or "out", and there are reasons for them, and there are reasons why they involve difficult-to-forge signals like simply knowing some in-knowledge from a culture, or burning time on seemingly-inconsequential conversations. And these things operate at instinct level; it doesn't matter if you think they are wrong, out of date, or politically incorrect; they do what they do anyhow. Start putting a few of these things together and it all starts making much more sense. There's reasons why these things exist and persist.)
Love feedbin. I've been using it since Google Reader died and it's been rock solid. Also nice that they have vim-like commands built in.
> According to Reid, she was the victim of “hackers”: somehow, nefarious disinformation agents managed to hack not her blog (which is now deleted), but rather the Wayback Machine and its digital archive. They penetrated the Wayback Machine and then, according to Reid, added some anti-gay content.

This excuse seems entirely implausible, right? There would be massive negative consequences if the Wayback Machine were breached and able to be altered like this.
The NYTimes article (https://nytimes.com/2018/04/23/health/soldier-penis-transpla...) adds a lot of context that this press release didn't go into. Along the lines of what you're saying:

He felt isolated, even in the hospital among other wounded soldiers.

“There were times you’d be hanging out and guys would be talking about getting hurt, and that’s one of the first things when they get blown up, to check down there, and they would say things like, ‘If I lost mine I’d just kill myself,’” he said. “And I’m sitting there. They didn’t know, and I know they didn’t mean any offense, but it kind of hits you in the gut.”

He struggled with thoughts of suicide, he said: “When I would actually think about killing myself, I would think, ‘Am I really just gonna kill myself over a penis?’”
I notice a lot of people talking about moderation on SO. It reminds me of the moderation on HN. It's all focused on one of two things: being "nice", or being "interesting". Which is really bizarre. It's not reasonable to expect people to act in an artificial way. People are emotional, and usually not all that smart or interesting. We're monkeys with hats. Just because you can train a monkey to paint a picture does not mean it won't fling poo at you.

SO wants to keep some beginner questions, but also keep the really complicated questions, and you have to do some homework, but really most questions are okay, and you shouldn't ask a question again, and you have to be nice, ... These are so many subjective rules that serve to make everything "look" a certain way. It's almost like playing a game. Ah, you didn't say please and thank you! You lose five points. In a world where not everyone agrees with you or behaves the way you want, I wonder what the goal of this particular game is?

I guess what I'm driving at is how thinking you can just make up a list of rules of how humans should behave and expect it to go okay, is maybe not the best idea. It's like expecting that you can write some shell scripts that tell a computer how to work, and it will always work that way. Bad news: computers don't always follow simple rules, and neither do humans. Moderators are the equivalent of health checks that go around restarting things that died. That may be fine for your massively scaled enterprise application, but humans have something computer programs don't have: feelings.

Which brings up a completely unrelated question: In the future, when computers have emotions, will server automation be considered equivalent to chicken farms? Yes, we're killing all these living creatures after they have a meager existence in cramped spaces, but have you tasted this amazing chicken cordon bleu?

(Inb4 flagged for "incendiary topic: animal rights")
The article says only one sponsor, Ace Hardware, returned.
Oracle acquires Grapeshot
Sure, but that doesn't explain why they show the USA jumping from 27.7% to 38.7% in one day (5/24 to 5/25) when Google's numbers don't show a similar rise.
A Data Scientist’s Guide to Happiness
How to Extract an Integer from a Text String in Excel
Show HN: Open-sourcing the Alexa Skill that scored me a free Echo Dot
Announcing NPM 6
Seems to me that vim is superior to the alternatives you listed, but that's just my opinion.
Even by London prices that's utterly absurd, you can get an entire one bed flat for yourself for £1000 and I don't even mean having to move far out I'm talking walking distance of shoreditch.

Wouldn't wish flatsharing """co-living""" on anyone, what a nightmare.
Duolingo is purely an example - but you could ask why the research occurred in an American University rather than an EU one. Google Translate is another.

In theory there should be many more people willing to pay to learn another language / translate in Europe. Yet the US is far ahead.
Prompted by faith ?
https://thenib.com/private-environmental-protection?t=recent
Did you ever wonder who created this tyrannical technological monster of a government? I don't think a bunch of Chinese farmers did. The British basically conquered China in the Opium Wars and they owned Hong Kong for 150 years.

It seems to me that external powers have built China into what it is today. Mao Zhedong was installed by a group working through Yale, home of the Skull and Bones. They put him in charge of propaganda and you can see their own article about it here - http://digital.library.yale.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collectio...

Mao went on to murder somewhere between 70 and 100 million Chinese people who threatened the new communist government. Western media never talks about that.

Every nation has given up their technology to China one way or the other. Bill Clinton was accused and tried for selling nuclear secrets to them. Israel regularly funnels military technology to China. So where's this going?

My opinion: This is your next world government, built by shadowy figures who are constantly at work to own every aspect of you life.
But in practice many developments do have the effect of blocking off access to a piece of beachfront. The state doesn't interfere with those developments, working off of the assumption that the owners are reasonable folks and will follow public access laws.

If the only way to get people to behave reasonably is to not issue building permits, then everyone loses. What you're suggesting is that California should choose the defect/defect quadrant of a game. But there's a more optimal solution -- just tell people like Khosla they're not allowed to defect on this question.

In other words, why should I be prohibited from owning certain types of land or having the chance to purchase into certain types of developments just because Khosla's being an ass about restrictions he knew about when he bought the property? What you're proposing is the "if I can't have it then burn it all down" solution. Which I guess is a way to vindicate Khosla in a sort of pyrrhic way, but everyone else loses.
and very hard to even get an audience

The question here is whether it's harder to get an audience by being discovered among the millions of other videos on YouTube, or by being discovered among the millions of websites on the internet. If you're competent at marketing it shouldn't really make a difference either way.
I think the essence is in the word ‘emulation’. If a thing exists, and then another thing exists whose sole purpose is to sound like the other thing, this will definitely add to the prestige of the initial thing. I think it’s the trend for digital software and hardware manufacturers to focus on emulations of analog hardware that’s keeping analog hardware desirable for the current generation.
Debugging Windows Services for Malware Analysis / Reverse Engineering
I have to say the Aeron is my absolute favourite chair and I've worked in several different environments.

I haven't had the luxury of testing other high-end ergonomic chairs, but I had to buy an Aeron for my home office as soon as I started getting serious about remote-working.

I can sit in this thing for a lengthy 12-hour shift and feel physically OK doing so (with some regular small walking breaks of course) - and I cannot say the same thing for any other chair.

I also think it just looks fantastic, it's definitely iconic and I have expressed my interest to Herman Miller in this new chair even though the one I'm sitting in right now is five years old and still feels mint condition.
Agree to disagree on this being a universal 'abstract' gender neutral pronoun problem, and not being profession related.
Harley-Davidson is on track to build 2M new riders in the next 10 years
I assume this comes from NeXT who did lot's of TCP-stuff early, not sure though.

Microsoft whoever came to IP world quite late and did NetBEUI or IPX before.
Europeans always seem to forget that well-paying white collar jobs in the US (e.g. tech) usually have good to amazing health insurance. My health insurance is fortunately in what I would consider the "amazing" category and I highly doubt I would get better care via the NHS - the cost would be the same (I pay nothing, not even copays) but I have access to some of the world's best hospitals and even onsite clinics... and this is a benefit that I receive before tax, so it's not coming out of that hypothetical $100k figure.

Furthermore as it seems most tech jobs in the UK are in London, I don't think the rents are different enough to make up for the discrepancy in pay.

From my research into working abroad in the past, it seems that only Australia and Switzerland could compare to the US developer market.
Microsoft’s Devops story
This is why I quit stackoverflow. I'm a top 2% but there became a point where people seemed to care more about the correctness of the information repository than they did about helping people.

It changed from a community vibe into a library and then mods started to stamp on some very good questions that people asked and closed them as duplicates (linking to a slightly different question) or as "too open-ended" or "off-topic".
They gave those mods carte-blanche to enforce their way of viewing the site, of data and people and then meta.overflow adopted a hostile culture to shame people who questioned this world-view.

I really like that site but ended up hating it. My 2% rep is also a lie. I got so much from simple answers and so little from much more complicated ones.
Some significant issues in western democracy can be traced back to the 1980's and before the fall of communism. Untill then it was important at least for appearances to show western capitalism and democracy as the best and fairest political systems for all round prosperity.

Reaganism, Thatcherism and neoliberlism of the Friedman kind unleashed a toxic ideology that legitimizes and surrenders all decision making and thinking to markets. It's like a religion and magical thinking. This disproportionately benefits those with economic power as it is intended to, but under the Orwellian use of words like 'freedom' and 'efficiency'.

This concentrated economic power is then used to co-opt dissent by economic means or disarm it to make it meaningless.

Academics along with a free press were a bulwark against unchecked power and provided dissent. Now they are too tied up with administration and securing grants to perform that role, and this is not an accident. The free press similarly have become too intertwined with entrenched interests and government and have been reduced to a mouth piece for propaganda and special interests.
This is presumably true for the lead surgeons, but there's plenty of other people involved. Presumably there was a large team of surgical nurses, administrators, and other doctors like anaesthetists who can claim no such fame or fortune for taking part.
I would love something like this integrated into VRChat
Introduction to Codeception
It is. Going deeper into particular topics or having folks share additional resources has been incredibly valuable. The lectures serve as conversation-food and not the 'core' of the experience here. That's the premise of the experiment.
You can buy an Android phone and never use the cloud if you want just like an iPhone.

The two are actually very similar.

Google services do not matter if you have an Android phone or an iPhone. Suspect there is actually more consumption of Google services on the iPhone then even Android but do not have numbers handy to support.
Are you implying that you'd use this technology to steal lyrics from a church?
Very good point. Best thing you can do on SO is starting a chat with the user I think, or sometimes you can give a 'teach a man how to fish'-style answer where you don't just give a code-only answer (i.e. how), or maybe don't even give a complete direct answer at all, but explain the bigger picture (i.e. why). Problem with the latter approach is that if the OP doesn't leave any comment you don't really know if it helped at all, whereas chat is more direct. But if you do get a 'well now I learned something' type of comment there's a good chance it actually helped the OP becoming more knowledgeable.
It's pretty repugnant to accept students that have no capability to perform, take their money, and boot them when they fail out because they aren't prepared or equipped.
4G GSM is WCDMA. Your phone supports it.
Short Story Dispenser –  Bring literature to unexpected places
In this cycle, we see a war of complex resources (produced by logistical wealth) emerge. Those with the most of everything, to produce the greatest fighting flexibility, eventually win. Perhaps pyrrhicly.
From the articles that you provided:

> an internet service provider ("ISP") has a record of the temporary "dynamic IP address" assigned to a particular user's device (potentially identifiable data); and

Here they're not talking about "IP addresses", they're talking about "IP addresses assigned to particular users".

> In answering the BGH’s first question, the ECJ confirmed that dynamic IP addresses are considered personal data within the meaning of the Directive in circumstances where the data collector (e.g., a website operator) is likely or reasonably able to obtain information from a third party that would allow it to identify the user.

This clearly says that an IP address by itself is not personal information. It only becomes personal information when you can identify a natural person - when you link it with other data.
Maybe it's because I'm a tall guy (and fairly overweight) but for me it's the mesh that makes it so good - it might feel tight and not exactly 'cushioned', but I can sit on it for hours without feeling sore, whereas nearly every other office chair after a while feels like I've sunk into the cushion and warped my sitting position - or hit the plastics/metal!
The gap has closed rapidly. I've gone to modeling totally, sold all my tube stuff. The digital stuff is about 90% of the way there, and the thing is I can have 90% of about 50 different amps. So nice to be able to go, from, say, a Vox AC30 to a Marshall stack in the flick of a switch.
or some IO/parsing got mixed into the processing of each node. big-o is one problem. Forgetting or not noticing the constants is another
It probably will be able to do this in the future.
Prosthetic memory chip brain implants show some promise
Physical SIM cards are not a requirement for unlocked phones.

From TFA:

>The technology replaces the usual card with a chip that uses software to associate you with a given service provider. On top of freeing up room inside devices (crucial for wearables like the Apple Watch or Gear S3), it makes it much easier to switch carriers -- you could sign up for a new network without even talking to another human being. And it's that last part that reportedly has the companies scared.
I hear you. It's hard to know what a good benchmark would be. Do you have any ideas for what you'd like to see measured and possibly what it's compared against?
This would be kind of like watching someone play a videogame on Twitch— indeed, you could just about implement this as a Twitch channel where people turn up and watch a taped lecture together.