skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is backwards, traffic doesn't come from housing, traffic comes from jobs.

Rush hour is from people traveling to jobs, not from everyday living. So if you want less traffic, get rid of the jobs in the area, or provide ways for people to commute other than by car.

In fact, putting housing closer to jobs is probably the best thing that could be done to reduce traffic. At least then people have a chance to live close to where they work, and are on the road for fewer miles.

As it is, people live further out, travel further, and create more traffic than they would if there was more dense housing close to jobs.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16940206
No, the story was about one businessman's purported difficulty in getting something removed from Google. For all we know, the difficulty was because his grievance was not as clear of a case as the original story claimed.
From my experience, nothing drives users away faster than a false positive on a fraud check. You immediately lose all trust in the eyes of the users.
"@" on Twitter
The Next-Gen Cheap iPhone Might Be Ditching 3D Touch
> The phrase "affordable housing" has come to mean "cheap housing for poor people."

From a policy perspective, "affordable housing" refers to programs which through some incentive or another, get developers to rent some units at below market rates to people at certain income thresholds. They usually go away (for a specific building) after 10-15 years.

This is confusing, because sometimes it really is cheap housing for poor people and other times it's nice, very expensive but below market rate housing for middle class people.

The other problem, as mentioned in the OP, is that as you start trying to shift cost for more units you end up with higher overall prices. Thus making the market rate higher, and making it harder to get developers to make the same concessions they did before for future development.
Video: How to Measure Database Availability
I'm not being funny but exactly what kind of deal did you cut with the devil in order to keep a Spectrum running reliably for 34 years?

Mine used to go wrong about every two months on average, and then would disappear for the next 6 weeks being repaired. Granted it was pretty heavily used, but still. I loved the machine but it's the most unreliable computer I've ever owned. Although, thinking about it, the +2A it was eventually replaced with was no better. My Commodore 64 and Amiga never gave me a hint of trouble and in fact, 29 years later, the only other computer I've had fail on me was an ageing and much abused 13-inch Macbook Pro (hard disk controller died; disk itself was fine).

Still, as you say, a beautiful machine.
There are more languages on this world that compile to native code, besides C and C++.

It not my fault not everyone bothers to learn them.
The gap in density between most city neighborhoods and where you have to have transit is enormous. Look at the density in old SF, the Sunset or Richmond, or in the inner city Montrose neighborhood of Houston, or many other examples. These places have several times the population per acre of typical post-war suburbs while still consisting mostly of detached houses and townhomes. They have poor transit, and people get by.

I’m not saying it’s utopia, but the idea that the roads can’t take any more people is, in most places, baloney.
When you install the software, the license key comes from the computer (it's stored on the motherboard), or potentially typed in by the user, not from the disc. The discs don't work if you don't have your own key.

Distributing the discs is copyright infringement, but the penalty is proportional to lost revenue. MS didn't really lose any money from this but they claimed that they did.
"AI" still means "Artificial Intelligence", a broad field that includes machine learning. If you think otherwise, I would like to hear why, please.
CorelDRAW X8 Crack and Serial Number Keygen 2018 Latest Version
I haven't read through all the comments here but so far I haven't seen anyone give credit to Kim Jong Un. He's probably a pretty smart dude and has been planning these moves ever since he was a kid. At the end of all this, he will agree to "denuclearize" by reducing his nuclear stockpile over a very long time period; promise to stop doing nuclear research etc. In return he will get a ton of foreign aid, much weakened sanctions against his country and legitimacy in the international stage.

But who knows. I am no expert.
No doubt many people read the original story. Those people will carry on believing the original story unless they are corrected.
I can't see how #6 would be a larger problem than the others unless all existing microelectronics disappeared overnight, which doesn't seem like a real concern.
Thanks! This looks like a good start.
I think about this too. Building more cities seems like an obvious way to help, but it doesn’t happen for many complicated reasons which I don’t pretend to fully understand. YC was looking into this at some point, I don’t know where they went with it, though.
And here's him discussing the Model 3 teardown on Autoline (don't see a link to this in the article)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpCrkO1x-Qo
Ok, then they can admit it on the article. What is published must not be purged. Write a big notice on the page:

This article has been retracted because it doesn't meet our standards.

Removing it so nobody can see it is just plain censorship and goes against the essence of journalism and human decency.
> Later on when the post attempts to deliver it, they will at some point realize that the country is wrong and reroute it to the correct country

Will they? Or will they return it to sender with a bad address note? Would the rates be different by country?
I like the logo. However the striped background hurts my eyes. This is a fork without it: https://codepen.io/rockhopper72/full/KRNevm/

Edit: nevermind, it's gone
Amen to that. Every time somebody starts talking about making the Midwest some sort of Silicon Prairie I just wanna smack them and ask why we want that sort of nonsense and baggage coming out and dragging us down and then having transplants act entitled to the right to live here.
How about:

dconf write /org/gnome/mutter/edge-tiling false
I'd sacrifice all three of those to be able to use a Windows VM with reasonable performance.
It does have worth. It is a warning to them to not publish stuff not fully vetted. Removing the article makes everything else vapor. It diminishes the worth of everything they publish.
Anyone knows a redis cli client that supports rediss/TLS? Tunneling the server is one thing, but I do miss the convenience of redis-cli and tunneling the client is a bit of a nuisance.
At least two usernameless Twitter profiles exist:

https://twitter.com/intent/user?user_id=34313404

https://twitter.com/intent/user?user_id=71996998

(credit: https://twitter.com/FakeUnicode/status/989868697660477440 )

It is possible to retweet-with-quote the tweets, but not to retweet directly or (as far as I can tell) to link to individual tweets directly.

EDIT: It is possible to link to individual tweets. Added links.

The user says (tweet_id 989794618467409920 - https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989794618467409920 ) that there are "many bugs" using the account in various clients.

tweet_id 829989674353573889 ( https://twitter.com/i/web/status/829989674353573889 ) may be my all-time favourite tweet. (A tweet by @, with name @, contents @)
That can be prevented by allowing those experiencing financial hardship to defer their property taxes until they sell their house.
You really can't imagine the last event reported under either or both of the first two headlines? Lots of high school sophomores have more media savvy than you claim here.
He was trying to sell the disks to repair shops, complete with MS branding. That's the line.
crashed after i locked and unlocked my laptop :[
>> I don't think this article reflects what people usually mean when they say AI, or am I missing something?

If by "people" you mean the lay press and people who are not AI scientists, then maybe. But AI scientists know their history, usually and can place rule-based systems firmly within AI.

>> I haven't really done any machine learning or logic programming, so could be totally off, but glancing at this was confusing based on the title.

I understand your confusion but my intuition is that you are confused because you are only aware of very recent reports on AI, that focus entirely on machine learning.

It might help to clear up the confusion if you pick up an AI textbook, eg. Russel and Norvig (AI - A Modern Approach).
The 79yr man sailing the sea alone for 300 days
Oh come on. You're patting them on the back for a serious failure to do their jobs in the first place, followed by a questionable strategy for mitigating that failure (complete removal).

For all the hysteria about fake news these days, it seems that "reputable" institutions (like NPR, CNN, WaPo) get a free pass every time their lax standards are exposed just for doing the bare minimum to acknowledge the mistake. There's nothing impressive about that.
Exactly. This is why Proposition 13, limiting annual property tax increases, passed in California in the 70s. (It's now widely maligned by outsiders, but they're usually not interested in the history.)
Download area (https://www.gimp.org/downloads/) lists both OSX and Windows builds as not available and in turn redirects Windows & OSX users to older builds pages, both of which are currently 404s. Be good to just go over these things in cursory sense before publicly announcing new release.
The study isn't denying that there are effects.

> neither persistent nor serious effects from MSG ingestion

Effects don't have to be serious or persistent for them to be a nuisance enough to avoid!

I don't need six hours of a mild headache/nausea, thanks.
Sure, give him some credit. In the same breath that he allowed for and committed atrocities against his people.
Wow. Why not automate it from the beginning?
Do you have any examples? A "retraction" is not just a synonym for "massive correction". It literally means to withdraw something.

Some recent notable examples of retractions; in all cases, the story was completely pulled:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/business/3-cnn-journalist...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/23/statement-on-cove...

http://www.newsweek.com/alt-right-trump-franken-mueller-twit...
Adding onto this, I saw a very interesting seminar a few years ago from a biologist who sequenced bacterial samples from the arctic permafrost. He found resistance genes for antibiotics that had definitely not been created by humans at the time that the samples were deposited.

So "new" antibiotics aren't actually new, and resistance to them probably already exists somewhere -- bacteria have been fighting this war for as long as there have been bacteria.
I'm no expert on this but I do know that their 7nm will switch to their long in-development EUV lithography process. I'd assume the work on 10nm is completely separate from their work on 7nm (there are even rumors that they'll just abandon 10nm if 7nm is ready before they work out the problems with 10nm).
Yeah, by definition housing cannot be both:

"a good investment" - grows faster than inflation.

"affordable" - doesn't grow faster than inflation.
At a location where apartments sell for $200k, a single-family home is probably worth at least $400k, not $100k.
> Why is removal not acceptable?

Because once published, you must stand by what you published. Accept your mistake. Put a big notice on it saying how sorry you are and how much more careful you will be in future. Hiding it is running from it.

> If it's better from the perspective of journalism, does that conflict with what's better from the perspective of not being sued?

It's all about how much these "journalists" respect their own profession. If I commit a horrible bug, I don't go and purge it from github using --force. I leave it there as a reminder and acceptance of my mistake.
Not expecting this to see much traction given there's already an open PR to add SSL to Redis (from an AWS employee):

https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4855
Why would they? It's in their interests to blame the reporter. That's the one-bad-apple way.
GPS tracking? Some kind of tamper-detection with a sender? At his budget he could be communicating through satellites.
It's somewhat interesting to see Erlang go back to its roots, at least the syntactical ones. Erlang borrowed most of its syntax from Prolog, after all. [1]

[1] http://erlang.org/faq/academic.html
Was the goal weight loss?

I would be worried about loss of muscle mass (especially important muscles such as stabiliser muscles), bone loss and cartilage issues. Not even talking about vitamin deficiency and imbalances. I feel that this would wreck my hormone levels too.
It's from Stalker (or more broadly, a modern Russian setting). Note the rifle on the man's back - is an integrally silenced AS VAL, which is a modern development.

The figure in the water is from the game's "Freedom" faction. Anyway, this is a pretty pointless discussion, but the author is definitely mislabelling the image.
You believe that the lesson is forgotten, even though the content of the retracted article is now several paragraphs describing the errors that led to the retraction? How exactly is that not a warning to journalists in the future?
My favourite was a function to swap either a byte, word or dword with a single ret. The function would have three entry points, calling itself recursively like hanoi-towers.
If you can tolerate chicken stock, you can tolerate MSG. It’s as simple as that.
He definitely inherited a unique job. This is a new era of realism in politics. One which is trying to overstep the sort of roadblocks comments like yours introduce. I for one want to try this for a bit.
No, only the battery cells:
http://img.ismap.com/nimg/6c/67/e370d981467b8ba457e178916006...

The battery modules (a group of cells) and the battery packs (a group of battery modules) are completely engineered by Tesla.

I recommend this series of videos about Tesla's battery modules:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7GR5fERXNY
I'm going to assume it's because they lie and present themselves as legit PS4 controllers. I tried to buy the IR adapter but it was perpetually pending release and I gave up.
Maybe Java is a bad example. But there are plenty of languages that have similar features to what you mention that are a lot easier to learn.
That's an argument you ought to bring up to Mr. Fenn - since it appears that an eternal search was more or less what he was going for:

> He has also affirmed that hiding the treasure in the first place was largely about encouraging families to enjoy the outdoors. “I wanted to give the kids something to do,” he said. “They spend too much time in the game room or playing with their little hand-held texting machines. I hope parents will take their children camping and hiking in the Rocky Mountains. I hope they will fish, look for fossils, turn rotten logs over to see what’s under them, and look for my treasure.”
Because there is something called professional and human integrity. Own up to your mistakes. Accept responsibility. Do you force push a fix whenever you merge a buggy commit? I would hope not. I describe my mistake, and what I am doing to fix it. But what is done is done. Hiding it is just being unfaithful to your profession and in this case, to your audience.
People can't afford housing where the jobs are, because there isn't enough housing available there. So a large fraction of people end up moving far away and commuting in. That's how traffic happens. If you want to decrease traffic, build more housing where the jobs are.
> and I think it is obvious now that no natural intelligence works symbolically

Not even at the level of language? I don't think it's obvious yet that ML can scale to doing all the things as well as natural intelligences. It's had it's successes, yes, but those are still in limited domains. There's no general purpose ML AI yet.

The difference between AlphaGo and human Go players is that while AlphaGo is superior at the game, you can change the game in arbitrary ways that the human players can easily learn and adapt their play for, but would require programmers modifying the code for AlphaGo. It can't just learn to perform any arbitrary task.

ML performs extremely well in very well defined settings, but computers have always been better than humans in those kinds of domains. That's why we invented them.
> If you really want to think seriously about these issues, you need to move beyond just name-dropping 'logical fallacies'

You crossed into personal incivility here and again later. Would you please not do that, regardless of how wrong someone else is?

Long tit-for-tat back-and-forths are tedious anyhow, and it's better to abstain from them on HN, though I know how hard that can be.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Great answer. It sounds like this was very much the right call for Matrix.
A Day in the Life of a Modern Shepherd
This is not how physical gold works. My understanding is that it's tightly regulated with unique identifiers for all ingots, bars, etc and the ownership of each being recorded so there is an audit trail if a diluted bar or ingot is found later. I assume freshly mined gold has to go through some type of formal lab validation / certification for purity that puts it into this identification scheme. I expect nobody will touch your homebrew gold bars lacking this identification, even at a steep discount, worse still for you, these unofficial gold bars are even easier to track and trace due to lacking official serial numbers and certification.

All of this isn't to say you couldn't "find a way" to get spendable money out of finding this stash, more so a question of staying on the right side of money laundering and taxation laws while doing so.
This is one of the things we've pointed out for years:

A lot of SOers seems to enjoy moderation a lot more than answering questions.

Unfortunately they even do get in the way of the rest of us.
Seems like a teethless piece of legislation then :/
This is Hacker News, not the general public. If we don’t know who Richard Stallman or what a hacker is, who should?
OK, but there are also ones with fewer limitations.
I think the point is that it's very hard to do as good a job as providers like Stripe and SiftScience will do (assuming machine learning against fraud is not your core competency) - they take into account a lot of the signals you might take into account anyway if you feed them clean data. Better to focus on sending them the clean data.
The shape, not size, of our ancestors' brains helped them outlast Neanderthals
Tips for High Availability
All three statements were written with the intent of describing a meeting between two sets of lawyers. I intentionally inserted baseless assertions and innuendo which can not be independently verified.

How can you independently verify the attacks are partisan? How do we know Trump "shrugged off" the attacks or that Trump is "embroiled in a legal battle". You'd have to ask him and he has every incentive to hide his true feelings!

If you feel my headlines are not good enough then I would encourage you to think creatively and conceive of ways a headline could convey both truth and bias.
Well yes, retraction is the act of withdrawing something, so I guess you could consider it "censorship" or at least self-censorship.
Yes, WaPo article [1] mentioned that “If I had just written ‘Eric’s Restore Disc’ on there, it would have been fine.”

[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/02/15...
How do I know what the mistake was? I did not read the original article. There is no proper way for me to understand the issue. Yeah I can go look up archives people took before they purged the article, but that is besides the point. NPR has hidden their mistake. They have made it impossible for a reader to fully understand the blunder they committed. It doesn't help anyone. It certainly doesn't inspire trust in their journalistic capability.
Just a few days ago, AWS announced[1] that they will be contributing TLS to Redis, and judging by one of his comments[2], antirez doesn't seem to be completely against merging it.

According to a comment on Reddit[3], Josiah wasn't aware of this effort by AWS.

[1]: https://aws.amazon.com/cn/blogs/opensource/open-sourcing-enc...

[2]: https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4855#issuecomment-3831...

[3]: https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/8f373k/a_new_redis_f...
"first, he wrote down the question, then he thought very hard, then he wrote down the answer."

this is like:

Step 1: Start

Step 2: ???

Step 3: PROFIT!

" he didn't place any special importance on his own internal "sketching" models when describing things to others."

So the answer was more like: Feynman's priority was to show the most concise derivation, not to show the path he stumbled around to arrive at a result.

Indeed I believe most people once they have a rough path to a result, immediately try to simplify it to the crux of the argument before presentation, all the unnecessary assumptions are trimmed off, just like a mathematician tries to find a proof that relies on the least axioms.

Sometimes I see people explain how they came up with their result, but I suspect even these detours are often substantially cleaned up before presentation. Others simply no longer remember the original thought process, due to time passing, or because while working out the longwinded original path the simpler shortcut simply hits them. That instant high of a realization also tends to pollute your memory of stumbling towards it.

Another problem is that big problems were often in the back of a persons mind for a long time, and before a solution materializes, small insights or even vague associations -that may be seperated by years- ultimately combine, so a sudden insight is often just the last piece, with some of the supporting lemmas never disclosed before (as of seemingly no value when the smaller supporting insights were conceived)

Perhaps there is a text somewhere, where Feynman explains how he originally arrived at it, but if so I haven't seen it. I too would like to see it if it is known or ever turns up...
I watched about 10 seconds of the video. I stopped after that because the guy was still talking about himself, not the software.
I actually went and emailed the NPR Ombudsmen (who posted a short thing about the OP that someone else linked to in these HN comments) suggesting they do such a follow-up story.
Good call I removed it :-)
Yeah, but that's something you have to accept for the positive benefits. In a lot of online businesses, credit card fraud is just insanely rampant. You lose a lot more money by not doing checks with the occasional false positive than you do by not having it.

The cost of fraud is chargeback fee (usually ~15 bucks) + merchandise. It gets expensive fast. Every modern e-commerce business has to be fighting it now to stay alive. For certain SaaS / Software products the cost of failing to fight it is a tad lower, but for physical products it's killer.
I don't feel as if I have depression, but I am lonely.

I want a dog, but I'm afraid I won't have the time to take of it.
There is no indication that they are shipping half-baked junk, though?

I mean, the early S models had drive unit problems and the X hasn't been perfect, but neither have been plagued with major long-term reliability problems. Some established luxury car makers have made far more unreliable vehicles.
Designing Distributed Systems: Patterns and Paradigms for Scalable Services
Bill Gates Wants to Make a Universal Flu Vaccine
I don't know about non-US numbers, but you can send text messages via email for free. You can usually do that by sending the email to the user's number at their provider. There are sites on the internet that will give you the user's provider from the phone number.

For example, a user who has AT&T can receive a text by emailing it to <phonenumber>@txt.att.net.

https://lifehacker.com/5506326/how-can-i-send-an-email-via-t...