skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Perhaps this is what I recalled:

As children are very prone to be misled, women are similarly very prone to degradation. Therefore, both children and women require protection by the elder members of the family. By being engaged in various religious practices, women will not be misled into adultery. According to Chanakya Pandit, women are generally not very intelligent and therefore not trustworthy. So the different family traditions of religious activities should always engage them, and thus their chastity and devotion will give birth to a good population eligible for participating in the varnasrama system. On the failure of such varnasrama-dharma, naturally the women become free to act and mix with men, and thus adultery is indulged in at the risk of unwanted population. Irresponsible men also provoke adultery in society, and thus unwanted children flood the human race at the risk of war and pestilence.

Bhagavad-Gita As It Is, Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1972. Chapter 1, verse 40, purport. Vedabase

Now, in the Manu-samhita it is clearly stated that a woman should not be given freedom. That does not mean that women are to be kept as slaves, but they are like children. The demons have now neglected such injunctions, and they think that women should be given as much freedom as men.

Bhagavad-Gita As It Is, Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1972. Chapter 16, verse 7, purport. Vedabase

Women as a class are no better than boys, and therefore they have no discriminatory power like that of a man.

Srimad Bhagavatam, Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1999. Canto 1, Chapter 7, verse 42, purport. Vedabase

A woman’s attachment to her husband may elevate her to the body of a man in her next life, but a mans attachment to woman will degrade him, and in his next life he will get the body of a woman.

Srimad Bhagavatam, Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1999. Canto 3, Chapter 31, verse 41, purport. Vedabase

As a clarification on my earlier post, equal rights (and responsibilities) seems like a nice thing to have to try to let everyone have equal opportunities but genders on average seem to be built somewhat differently when it comes to temperament and interests.

The science on that seems pretty convincing especially if you've paid any mind to the James Damore memo thing. The paper is said to have referenced plenty good science and researchers and scientists who have commented on it pretty much have said as much.

If you observe people meditatively in detachment and are not sucked in by lust or other ego games you might witness some crazy behaviour. And then it keeps on repeating and occurring and then... well it may be confirmation bias as well.
Can you describe the way you develop software now that you don‘t do agile any more? I‘m really interested!
Yes, that's why I was interested in the first place. That meant that they had to port the software they had written. The 6809 is a very nice 8 bit chip, the 68000 is a 32 bit chip.
Cheap, yea. But also extremely dirty. What is the mpg ona tanker using crude diesel again? Cool, now swing that tanker three or four times through Singapore.
There are many political action groups etc. that would like to see Facebook go down.
> Or they can stop colluding with Russia under the pretext of freedom

Could you provide a source? I'd love to know more.
here's a good 2m30s youtube that shows 15kW one in action:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY3p2e1-kN4

its amazing how little there is to it, and how relatively quiet it is.
This is a common misunderstanding in my opinion. People don't really care about the environment/climate change that much. People may think they do, but in practice the amount of people that would convert that sentiment to a purchase on a high-ticket item is probably a tiny niche, and not something you would build a business strategy around for something so capital intensive.

The point of Tesla is to force electrification simply by making cars that are better than gas cars, because then the broader market does most of the remaining work. Tesla has always known that the whole environmentalism thing is insufficient and unnecessary.

I think what throws people off is Tesla's stock price and brand. People who don't understand what can go into these assume it must be "hype and dreams," and they conclude that Tesla is popular because of marketing tricks.
I agree, which is why I pushed for it. But it does depend on the quality of the peers, and should go beyond whether the story met the criteria or not.

Feeding that back through the process is pointless when it inflates the complexity of future stories, because they are less likely to be prioritised, and the rot festers.
I wouldnt be too much. Books are a primary medium, they can be consumed without the need of an interpreter or interface.

They dont face any threat of not beeing readable anymore and therefore storage becoming a waste of money, gradually
The XY Problem (2006)
Perhaps the patient should have the right to decide what that threshold is for themselves rather than having the information hidden from them.
I was part of the preorder and just finished my first project with it, an MFT style workbench (3x5). My prior woodworking experience was a single class in high school. I would likely not have attempted this project without access this tool.

The software works off of SVG files, which was appealing as this is a format I'm already accustomed to. They have made a plugin for exporting SVG from Fusion360 models. The workflow to go from idea to a finished prototype is pretty quick.

Price for me was competitive, I had been looking at laser cutters which start at 2x-3x the price of this. Obviously not a direct comparison in capabilities.

Overall, I'm quite happy with it
A History of Timekeeping – From the Calendar to Millisecond Protocols
What would you prefer?

A surgeon who expects a poor outcome of your surgery:

a)decides to not operate on you?
b)decides to operate on you nonetheless?

I am in camp a
Valuable reasons to attend tech conferences, good investments:

* Connect with leaders in your field
* Generate enthusiasm for yourself and your peers around the technology

Not so valuable reasons:

* To learn the technical things - because this can generally be done more cost-effectively online, or in intense focused training.
You're lucky. I've been through a jub-hunt cycle, my experiences here are: lots of legacy stuff (mostly angular1), tons of react, some nu-angular and one vue (which is going to be my next job, not just because I love vue, but also because they understood the tech stuff I had been talking about, unlike many others).
Personal attacks will get you banned here, so please don't post like this.

You've unfortunately posted other uncivil comments in the past, too; could you please (re-)read the site rules at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and use HN as intended from now on?
Like most decisions, joining a start-up is a risk vs reward decision. So think about the level of risk you’re comfortable with and/or can mitigate (e.g. less job security but it may not matter if you’re confident you can get another job easily). Then look at the potential rewards and figure out if you’re game for it. Rewards usually include working on something that matters to you; being able to have a real impact on the company’s future; a more fulfilling work environment; learning new stuff/leveling up; being exposed to business/strategy/management/non-technical topics; etc.
Notice that financial gain is absent from this list: don’t bank on equity as a golden ticket to millionairedom, I don’t know the numbers but they’re regularly hashed out in HN and you should look at it as a lottery ticket more than anything else. Which brings us to the financials: almost by definition, a start-up’s business plan is incorrect; take it with a huge grain of salt. Burn rate (assuming you can get the number) will give you a sense of the company’ short-term perspective.
Coinbase has been fishy from the start... For example, I placed buy orders for some Bitcoins when they dropped sharply years ago (Coinbase just started at that time) and they canceled those orders after I placed them. Now what they do is that they bring the servers down when it happens.

They did the same with Bitcoin Cash, or maybe worst... (see stories about when they first introduced bitcoin cash)
I just wanted to chim in and say thank you for the question, @offbytwo. I'm in a similar situation now and these answers provide a better mental model to act on.
If I understand correctly, you got internship vs job decision to make. I would choose job for sure.

Secondly its best to exit the offer right now than after joining. that puts company in more trouble, since their investment goes up once you join.

From your message, it looks like you are quite excited with the new offer. It will be best if you confront this sooner and go where your heart is.
Marine Biologists Discover Bizarre Deep-Sea Squid in the Gulf of Mexico
> runaway success in preventing large scale terror attacks

Bit of a tiger-repelling rock argument, this. How can we count how many incidents didn't happen?

Or maybe the terrorist problem is extremely bad, but only within the Middle East? There has certainly been a problem of British jihadis joining factions in the Syria war.
When I was fresh out of a school I worked in a call center for a while. One of the most important metrics (and everything you did was measured) was the average length of each call. So it was common practice, when you got cases that basically were going to be long calls or ones you probably couldn't actually resolve (e.g., "I want the service back on but cannot pay"), to deliberately upset the customers so that they would demand a supervisor and you could transfer them.
The problem I suspect is that a are real company (eg incorporated legal presence - not dismissing other companies, just distinguishing them as things that have government identity), and so must abide by the laws set by their host country (USA), and the policies of banking corps, etc that they interact with.

Assuming they need a bank (liquidity, etc) they need to follow their bank’s rules. Given all us banks hammering WL it would be unsurprising if they were pressured to do that.

That said I despise Wikileaks for a number of reasons, but don’t feel like starting the firestorm that is arguing about them in a comment forum :)
Ah, that makes sense. I've never added an index myself, but essentialy Datomic has to rewrite the main index tree. In other words, all of the stored data, since there is no data stored outside of the covering indies. So I wouldn't be surpised if that causes some down time if you have lots of data in your database.
No. There are very objective reasons why e.g. exceptions do not work for projects of advanced complexity. In short, they add additional, hard to see code paths and a redundant method of result handling (with its own noisy syntax, and new semantics) that brings grand-scheme structural complexity (now EVERY component must be exception-safe, every added feature's behaviour with respect to exceptions must be validated) that affects the whole project. Once you realize it starts to be a problem you cannot fix it anymore because it affects the whole project. This is why bigger projects use less and less features.

Using only few features might slow development a little in the small, and you might even make more errors in the small while developping. But you can FIX them.

I realize this is not hard science, and I have no motivation to do any on it, like collecting and bending statistics. But as long as all people have to say "XY is not good or bad", "things will get better", "XY has just a very steep learning curve", "you just didn't dance the right dance" and all evidence seems to suggest otherwise, then you've just lost the argument. End of story.
You would think that they could adjust these figures by patient age and condition.
Yes, I know (although I was actually asking about non-Trinitarians - sorry for the confusing formulation), but my question was if there were any "complete" non-Trinitarians left, except for Jehovah's Witnesses.
This crosses into personal attack, which isn't ok on HN. Could you please read the rules and post only civil, substantive comments from now on? Regardless of how wrong another comment is.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Ask HN: When not to use Serverless?
So no industry/academic peer review yet.

The link is to a self-published whitepaper, and the 'stanford.edu' affiliation is through a visiting postdoc at the Graduate School of Education (nothing CS related).
Something went horribly wrong when we started demanding never ending work weeks and 24/7 attention to work.
I suppose. I'm just a bit cynical because Glitch is full of these "apps" that feel like a train wreck waiting to happen. jajoosam has a number of services on your platform now, and it's hard to tell if it'll get any updates or support 6-9 months down the line.
I'm a little confused here, are you saying that ML ASICs can't beat compute per $ of GPUs? That seems, on its face, to be a ridiculous assertion, so I'm confused where I'm misunderstanding you.
V to for block-visual highlight, then do your motion, hit esc and I'll be repeated on every line
There's this thing called independent thinking. Not everything must come in pre-digested chunks of peer-reviewed journal meta-studies...

(That said, there's tons of research in group dynamics, including the ideas the parent mentioned).
But you need some cache-busting functionality anyways (otherwise how does the client know that file "something.js" has changed?
All of the OS X performance differences is from the busy box vm, not from docker. And for networking, if you use a different network driver than default the performance issues go away - the bridge/proxy stuff is slower, but you can expose raw interfaces.

That said I’m also not a fan of docker except in certain cases(ie if you need polyglot deployment). The development story is worse- OS X disk performance is bad, and good luck getting a debugger or most tooling to work. It’s an extra layer to worry about, such as now you manage number of containers and number of servers instead of just servers.
Doctors tried to lower $148K cancer drug cost; makers triple price of pill
I'm not an expert in cardiatric medicine or anything, but couldn't patient risk be determined by objective factors like patient age and history of previous heart issues?
F.D.A. Panel Recommends Approval of Cannabis-Based Drug for Epilepsy
Atom got this recently too and it’s such a lifesaver. I keep switching back and forth each time one gets a feature the other doesn’t have.
The Young and the Reckless
https://globee.com/ accepts multiple cryptocurrencies and pays out in either fiat or Monero (the closest thing to digital cash there is). They are based in South Africa with different laws.

Last year they went in 50/50 with the Monero community and worked on https://www.projectcoralreef.com/ which is the implementation of many famous music artists accepting Monero in their online stores.
Suing for conspiracy to violate the law is not a threat to press freedom. Claims that it is sound like a disinformation campaign.
H-curves have better locality, might be interesting to use those:

[0] http://www.akt.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg34/publications-akt/...

[1] http://hint.fm/papers/158-wattenberg-final3.pdf
What is the current relationship between Libav and FFmpeg? I could never figure out which one I should support when there was a falling out, and things might even have changed since then.
Wikileaks, rightly or wrongly, has essentially been declared an enemy of USA. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cia-wikileaks/cia-chief-c... I do not blame Coinbase
> > Scrum, in accounting for all the engineer’s time in a tightly managed fashion, discourages innovation — which typically occurs spontaneously and outside of any schedule or system of good predictability.

> It doesn't. That is why there is a 'focus factor' baked in, to allow for their time to not be tightly managed.

Can tap into my experience and say that it does discourage innovation and has nothing to do with focus.

While doing innovation and research, your path is fuzzy and unpredictable and does not fit into a predefined scope that the team has to commit on at the beginning of the sprint.

While doing research or innovating, you never know if you can deliver business value - your research may succeed... or may fail, which is often the case. Meanwhile, in the predefined sprint scope, everybody is clear what tangible business value it will bring, everything is clear and no room for wiggling and straying away.

Edit: I am not talking about occasional research tasks, which seem to fit well into Scrum structure. I was talking about the innovation as a project that requires a big chunk research to be done.
Why there are different URL schemes for direct links, for example:

- https://ams3.digitaloceanspaces.com/cchound/Jahzzar_-_05_-_S...

- https://cchound.ams3.digitaloceanspaces.com/Jahzzar_-_06_-_W...
Build an Android app from a to Z without opening AndroidStudio even once
I'm so happy that this system of 'likes' works for some people.
Right, but Paul's writings is Scripture, which is Word of God, and Christ is God. How could Christ believe anything else?
Don't worry guys, the DNC said so, so it must be true!
This is an ongoing discussion I have with many people. There is a weird idea that empathy is something that makes you good. In reality what it is is neither good nor bad. It's the ability to put yourself in the emotional state of someone else to understand things not only from their rational point of view but from the point of view of them as humans with both irrational (emotional) and rational perspectives.

It can be used for good or bad not just good and it's doesn't mean that just because I can put myself in their position I agree with their pov (which many people will claim i.e. "you have no empathy")
That is what I heard as well. I will add that the tradition states that Maha Pajapati (Buddha's step mother/aunt) and Ananda (1st cousin/close disciple) had to convince Buddha that a female order was viable, so this argument goes all the way back to the start.

There are nuns in the Zen (Mahayana tradition), so I don't think the line died out through China (not sure it is unbroken though).
>Scrum isn't good or bad

Well, it's either good, bad or ho-hum. If it's bad or ho-hum we shouldn't be doing it. If it's good we should be doing more of it.

Now, it's true that a technique can be good but people practice it badly.

But first we need to know positively that the technique is good -- before we insist people follow it more carefully.

So saying "X isn't food or bad, it's the way you use it" don't help.

Saying "X is good, but you're using it wrong" would indeed be helpful (if true).
The entire Alcoholics Anonymous regimen is the result of the insights gained on an LSD trip.
No one ever did that ... and a dreamer is only a last person with creativity

You must be results driven ... even theoritical physicist understand a test os required to back up their claims

Stop being lazy engineers ... but only work 5 days a week , quit if your pm cant organize projects correctly
There's something seriously wrong with the ads on this site. Even with my ad blocker disabled, the ads constantly refresh as I view the page. I wouldn't be surprised if this were some sort of ad fraud scheme, along the same lines as the one that hit Myspace last year:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/ad-industry-insiders...

(Yes, it's Buzzfeed, but it's them doing some real investigative journalism.)
I think a very inconvenient and ugly truth is slowly dawning on Facebook and society in general: connecting people at mass is bad. Facebook may go down in history as the next Big Tobacco or Big Fast Food that touted new innovation as a mass utopian relief, only to be later debunked as charlatan science

Zuckerberg has always touted Facebook's core mission as "connecting people throughout the world." The mission is so fervent you get socially deranged executives like Boz who boast about "connecting people at all cost... even if someone gets killed or bullied" [paraphrased here]

Technologies change throughout the ages, but human societies in general don't. Like it or not, part of what makes a society work is that the people you interact with have some similarity with you culturally and that interactions have costs - in the form of reputation.

If you lie everyday, you'll be known as the liar. If you are prone to anger attacks, people don't want to be near you. If you set a fire in your village, you get condemned or thrown in jail. The threat of social stigmatization helps regulate bad behaviors.

Facebook completely strips away all of that. It forces human beings to interact in an unnatural and inhumane way, which is that almost anyone in the world is allowed to attack your conscience and upset you. Your immediate circle is suppose to be small and protective, whereas Facebook opens you up to attack on all sides, putting you at the whim of whatever the public is feeling. You're assaulted with ideas and emotions you cannot possibly process fast enough as a human being.

It's situations like these where a fair amount of liberal arts training can help engineers like Zuckerberg understand that human beings are not statistical models. Your data set may suggest that the more "connections" people make, the more satisfied they feel. Just like mice who find out that pressing the lever and getting an injection of chemical feels very very good. It completely ignores what it means fundamentally to form a coherent society.
No, I write utilities that make my life easier. I'm open to that combination though.
I can’t think of any attacks now, and there may be none, but you can see the consequences of Google’s high level approach to APIs in the fact that Facebook snarfed up entire call histories for Android users but not iOS users.