skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't own them, I just manage them for other people. It started when I was in college, and I've just kept doing it.
How should one deploy such a product at all?
Actual usage is really the only way anyone will know if the models are trained appropriately to handle most/all situations they will encounter in the real world.
Friends of mine have convinced me to donate ~$2,000 to a particularly odious political cause whenever I perform certain actions, like drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes outside of their allotted times. I have found this to be remarkably effective in speaking the unconscious brain's language.

Also, this thing exists: https://pavlok.com/
Your belief is meaningless, we have hard data that shows a net benefit to these systems.

It's not a question of zero deaths, it's a question of reducing the number which means you need to look beyond individual events. Remember the ~90 people who died yesterday from a US car accident without making the news are far more important than a few individuals.
Then what is the problem with sending it? The sender should know email is not for time sensitive things, it's for posterity and referencing. If you have an urgent matter, then call.
I don't own, I just manage.
I'd recommend taking a look at the Appendix E: Methodology. It's a little long at three pages, but hopefully answers your questions. If not, hit up the email address or twitter account on page 47 and we'll answer them.

Gabe
Co-Author
You could probably limit some of the insanity by walling off things that you absolutely need to run and can't work around. Even then you still have to worry about someone having too much fun inside the jail, container, or whatever your system offers.

As for aspirin and friends, well, being effectively retired has done wonders of late. But thanks!
The title is extreme clickbait; he acknowledged the existence of nonuser data collection (and discussed one use of it), but denied knowledge of the common use of the term “shadow profiles” to refer to the data thus collected.
Emoji domains... making enough to pay for a Subaru Outback car payment every month!
I got about 20% ROI from cryptocurrency. I didn't get greedy, just targeted a better return than any other account.
In 2017, I made a net profit of $11,000 from 3 niche websites + my blog about said websites

I also have other investments I keep for retirement but I really do not track how much I get there. It is for the distant future.
If all other options have even lower odds, why wouldn’t they?

Also, there may be (somewhat) rational reasons for investors to invest more.

For existing investors, there’s the statistics. Let’s say you invested a billion in a company that says ”if you don’t pay 10 million now, you’ll lose all of it”.

If you think there is a 1% chance that 10 million will save them and bring back your money, you, statistically, play evens if you give them that money (paradoxically, if, a week later they say they need another 5 million, giving them that at that time is OK as long as you think you still have ½% chance of getting all your money back, but you shouldn’t give them 15 million up front when you thought you had a 1% chance)

Of course, some serious delusion may be needed to believe that, firstly, that 10 million will keep them afloat, and secondly, that it will enable them to recover all of your billion.

For potential new investors, it is almost as if that billion is a plus. It is really hard for a company to have spent a billion and not be worth at least 10 million. Fire sales _can_ be bargains. For the Theranos case, all that money should have produced some patents, some of which may be worth something.
Australia Uses Blockchain from Paddock to Plate
> You are reading into that text more than you should.

The page's title is "Autopilot | Tesla". It is the first result for "tesla autopilot" in search results. And "autopilot" appears 9 times on the page. So if that's not an intentional attempt to mislead consumers into conflating Autopilot with "full self-driving", then what would such an attempt look like, hypothetically?
Has anyone been able to figure out where the ad interests from web traffic are?
I'd consider spending time organizing and planning my finances a "side project" since I'm a spreadsheet geek and enjoy doing that sort of thing.

As a result, I realized I was an idiot and had let too much accumulate in my checking account that gets abysmal interest. Moved it to a savings account with slightly better interest and I get a little more money from it. Nothing worth writing home about, but definitely worth the few minutes it took me to make that change.
But Google as a whole isn't working on this. A lot of the projects at Google require collaboration across multiple teams, but I could see Fuschia being done by a fairly small and cohesive team.
I would assume that someone else would be one doing the auditing in this case. Some companies have paranoid IT.
So this is true, but I find that it does not matter much.

Like, how often one needs to rollback a DDL statement? I did that like... never.

And, what is the use case? Like, you added a column to a table by accident? Well, that will not break anything, so no harm done.

That is way different from regular dml rollback which may recover 1bn records and save your life :)
Yeah, it's always a concern. My mitigating factor is that the properties I manage are very close to a University, and students at top Universities tend to not want to mess around, especially as finals approach. In 18 years I've never had a missed rent payment, other than a couple times that were truly "I was thinking about finals and I forgot".
You should read your employee handbook. It's not a ToS and it's not a legalese, they're generally pretty straightforward. Don't use your work machine for anything non work related. Pretend your screen can be seen by everyone at the company (because it probably can).

I will note that most regulations in the US (PCI, SOX, etc) require centralized log management. Unless you're at the smallest of small companies, your employer is doing this. It's a basic requirement.
Methinks thou peepeth falsely, good sir!
I'm kinda hoping for the opposite effect.

I'll agree - the internet and with it, messaging services have changed my life - I've made a career out of building stuff on it (the internet) but for relationships, I think it's hurt more. Stuff gets lost in translation with a message. Words can be taken out of context, spell check often interferes, etc...

I've been more and more trying to call the person I want to speak to, or - god forbid us - see them in person.

Messaging is great when you want to share something; I'm trying to purchase a dog, so I'll message the girl friend pictures of; but I'll do that while I'm on the phone with her or etc... It's much nicer to actually hear someone's voice then to try to interpret what they mean or are trying to say.
Okay lets move the goalposts.

> People weren’t dying in their Tesla’s before Autosteer

This is false. Although Tesla fatalities tend to be a bit over the top like driving off cliffs, or stolen car escape gone wrong type of situations, there have certainly been non-Autopilot related fatalities in Teslas.

> but now we're looking at 4 deaths and counting in the space of 2 years

This is false. There have been 2 fatalities in Tesla’s which are known to have been operating with Autopilot at the time. There was also one fatality in China where the family claims autopilot was on at the time but Wikipedia states this was not confirmed.

> all directly attributable to the use of Autopilot.

I take issue with “directly attributable” simply based on NTSB (a neutral 3rd party if ever there was one) disagreeing with that. They found Autopilot was not at fault in the Florida crash. I think a neutral fact-finder would defer to the NTSB and rank your claim as false.

But finally, you disregard the obvious flaw in your logic, which is you can’t possibly know how many potentially fatal crashes or maimings have been avoided due to AutoPilot, except the one thing we do know is that airbags in Teslas are deploying 40% less with the feature than without.
I accommodate them and reply and respond, and we set clear expectations that I may not respond in my off hours, and I don't expect them to respond in theirs.
Anybody who has handed Tesla a dime is a total mark, so I wouldn't be so sure that it won't impress those people.
> Don't you wonder why?

No, his job at the hearing is to present an image of a corporate leader detached from the political fray, and specifically not to provide any fuel to any possible partisan political fire, which cannot possibly help him at this point.
Sorry, I honestly have no idea. I don't work with endpoint that closely, I'm more on the security architecture side. I have wonderful technical engineers on my projects who are paid to get that in-depth, but that's not me.
Don’t forget to Like and Repeep my Peeps on Peepeth
As a manager, answering emails in my off hours enables others to do useful work during their unusual hours. What you really want to attack is the expectation for employees to respond when they are not working— something that I do not expect.
Are there any endeavors to decouple VCS interface from the implementation? An analogy is LLVM, but for VCS, in terms of modularizing the architectural layers. It’s difficult justifying learning a new VCS when popular open source projects and employers select for particular systems. Surely there are tradeoffs, but enabling developers to use a familiar interface such as Git would reduce the friction of adoption, while still providing the benefits associated with a particular implementation that’s suited for the project.
Shockingly another industry that pushes against regulation immediately tries to regulate any competitors. I wish regulatory agencies would start using these demands for regulation as evidence that the relevant industries do value, and want regulation.
I want to pay the $36 a year and not use their cloud.
While calories in vs calories out always holds, that doesn't explain the entire system. It is like saying Bill Gates is rich because he makes a lot of money. Well, duh. A theory of weight balance in humans needs to account for the sudden weight gain when hormones change as we age, in women especially. If something changes homeostatis, the fact that we can still restrict calories by fighting the new urge to eat is not much comfort.
How is OpenGL support with Etnaviv progressing? For KWin to work, it will need some usable form. I wonder if anyone is planning to work on Vulkan support for it too.
Go initially billed itself as a language for systems programming, but that claim was quickly retracted when it turned out that Go's creators had a different notion of systems programming than everyone else.
SuperString: a fast and memory-optimized string library for C++
Investors pour nearly $1B into space companies in Q1
BigQuery lazy data loading
Japan's Youth Takes Crypto Investment to Dizzying Heights
When I buy an apartment, and sublet it to a long-term tenant, one unit of housing exists.

When I kick that long-term tenant out, and turn it into a AirBnB hotel, I just took one unit of housing from the market for locals, and added one unit of housing to the tourist market.

> more tourism which is by all means good for the whole

This is contentious. The city may be better off as a whole if it did not have 4,000 homeless people, many of whom were priced out of their apartments, due to tourism, foreign buyers, etc.

To many people, more tourism brings little to no benefit, while a reduced housing stock brings much direct harm.
This is a good question.

It was really difficult in the beginning to earn the trust but 1Password is now over 13 years old and there are over 15 million users.

We started 1Password Teams project in 2015 and since then we had several external audits:
https://support.1password.com/security-assessments/

We are currently in the process of completing the SOC 2 compliance audit.

We also have the highest paid bug bounty program in BugCrowd:
https://bugcrowd.com/agilebits
I say let the market decide. Ranchers should compete on price, or quality or some other attribute. If they get the feds to regulate, then the market is distorted.

Of course, unless either the ranchers or this high-tech "Animal 47" industry provides us with tainted meat, or tainted "meat". Then we should regulate the hell out of them. There's a bunch of really good reasons for the existence of the Food and Drug Administration.
Is Qt with Rust usable already, or it's still very experimental?
To be fair, the parent did provide a solution to this problem by suggesting emails be saved in the drafts folder until regular work hours resume.

Also, there's the argument that by implicitly encouraging out of hours work you may unknowingly be creating an expectation to some observers.
I am sorry to summarize that a billionaire is an outright liar in a congressional hearing. There is no other way to put it. He might as well say "I am not a crook"
AWS Secret Manager is a password manager for servers. Just like HashiCorp's Vault: https://www.vaultproject.io/

1Password is a password manager for humans :)
I said Tesla failed in my first comment. I am not defending them regarding this particular accident. I am simply explaining the potential logic behind their decisions and why this single failure doesn't mean their approach is inherently wrong. The only assumption I am making is that Tesla has good intentions with their aggressive autopilot releases.
You'll see municipalities and then states banning cars starting off using soft incentive based approaches, then harder approaches once enough people switch over.

Many states (red) won't ban them for a very long time.

the impact on freedom to travel will have to be secured and decentralized without any government kill switches.
> At least he's not saying the magic 4 words - I DO NOT RECALL - that every other senator or congressman or CEO says in their hearings

Of five Zuckerberg responses in the linked excerpt, three are “I don't know...” or “I'm not familiar with...”.
I suppose that's true, but isn't there some precedent for dealing with Web pages? This can't be the first time this has come up.
Considering that they could plausibly have it shipping on tens of millions of devices as soon as they get a browser working and hardware support for a well controlled subset of modern systems, I think that's a real possibility.
> , or faster at doing bad things.

In this context "bad things" would mean either approving things that shouldn't go through, or blocking things that should. It seems to me that leaving things in limbo where they might go through or not at an unknown later date is worse than either.

And that's without even counting the benefit when correct decisions get sped up.
In terms of getting paid: As a content creator, I'd like the barrier to entry to be as small as possible. Youtube Views being the lowest, what's the draw for this over Patreon, or even a Paypal?
This reminds me of an annoying incident where I am at. All the tornado sirens near dallas were hacked one evening a while back. [1] It was more of an annoyance than anything, considering the weather was very clear. The worst part is that it was the middle of the night and everyone was trying to sleep. The alarms closest to me weren't going off, but you can hear those alarms quite a ways away.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/04...
In this case you can still purchase a license. It is less convenient but the option is there.
Because it can take 5 years, in which time the product is obsolete.

But, the core idea behind SBSA and SBBR is to form a common platform to which the vendors conform their machines so they don't have to keep up-streaming special little drivers for their special little SOCs. Only time will tell if its a success, but a large part of the community has effectively declared that they aren't really going to conform to the ideals of a standard platform. So, the ball keeps rolling and new DT properties keep getting added, and new pieces of core platform IP keep showing up. At this point arm64, despite just being a few years old already looks as crufty as much older architectures with regard to GIC versions, dozens of firmware interfaces, etc due to the lack of a coherent platform/firmware isolation strategy.
How is it a solution to handicap both manager and unusual worker by prohibiting emails during their preferred work hours? The real problem is elsewhere. And yes, I actively manage the expectation of who should quickly respond to an email— frequently I will say it is not an emergency and can wait for their normal workday.
Airlines do get aircraft that are capable of 100% self-controlled flying gate-to-gate if they've bought a plane within the last 2 decades. They simply choose not to utilize those features for liability reasons.

And as the other commentor who brought up the sleeping pilots noted, in many cases, both pilots fell asleep during the flight.
> and now someone is dead because of that problem.

You've stated this repeatedly without proof. It has not been established he is dead because of that problem. The investigation may yet reach that conclusion, but until then you have no support for this assertion.
There are a ton of ads in Yankee Stadium (and every major sport stadium I can think of, for that matter): https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Yankee_S...
Hm, do you like any fantasy at all? It sounds like it might not be your genre. Hard sci-fi more your thing? In that case The Talos Principle is pretty good, if fairly gameplay heavy.
I'll second looking at the assembly code. I had a similar problem a few years ago and an assembly expert told us that we were moving data in and out of the cache all the time instead of leaving it there. We had to change the way we looped through arrays and got a huge improvement. this could be wrong but I would also guess that the Swift optimizer is not as good as the ones C++ has mainly for the reason that it's newer.
>Android is broken a lot of the time and people are forced to either find workarounds or do without functionality

Continuing to see this parroted is about as silly as the "Android OS includes ads" which is another comment that lets me know the author hasn't actually used the platform for themselves.
It's hard to make something you don't like.

For example, Ready Player One focused on movies in large part because Spielberg really loves movies. You can tell they move him, whereas the video game parts are largely gags.
And a great way for anyone wanting to start some windows programming to see an example of a nice simple program with a GUI that interacts with WIN32 apis
>> our belief is meaningless, we have hard data that shows a net benefit to these systems.

No we don't. Tesla likes to compare their deaths per mile to the national average. The problem is that their autopilot is not fit to drive everywhere or in all conditions that go into that average. There is no data to support that autopilot is safer overall. It may not even be safer in highway conditions given that we've seen it broadside a semi and now deviate from the lane into a barrier - both in normal to good conditions.
Great point! There's no replacing actual human interaction of being in the same space.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this matter.
To quote Andrzej Sapkowski, author of the Witcher books, "I don't think different media van converge". Each medium has unique properties that enable a story to be told in a certain way that may not be reproducible in another medium.

Take Dark Souls for example. The game's story and mythology are blended with the game world, hidden in little details and item descriptions. If you take its bits and pieces and assemble them linearly, it's nothing special, it could never serve as the plot for a good movie. However, if you experience it properly, by being immersed in the game world, it gets way better.
No, I'm damning Tesla because they sell the vehicle as self-driving when it cannot, and moreover "require" the driver to maintain superficial alertness without actually enforcing alertness in a reasonable matter like all of their major competitors do.
> seem to permit a Confused Deputy attack

I'd never heard the terms "Confused Deputy" or "ambient authority" before, but it sent me on a pleasant and informative internet security tangent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem
The Making of “Peace for Triple Piano”
Is this it? https://hokstad.com/semantic-dictionary-encoding
There is no way we would want to know your keys. There are several million 1Password accounts and 1Password a huge attack target. All keys are generated on the client side and encrypted with a PBKDF2-hardened combination of Master Password + Secret Key.

Details are here: https://1password.com/security/
Whitepaper (PDF): https://1password.com/teams/white-paper/
I also find $36 yearly to be a highly reasonable bargain for any company which has the reputation and credibility, but for an unknown company, I don't know if I'd pay <free> for them to keep my passwords. Arguably, a credible reputation is as valuable as the security product itself, which most people can't evaluate.
People actually do care a lot about the fact that you can't have type safe and thread safe code, or abstractions without tons of synchronization code repeated ad nauseum throughout the code.

Multiply that by 10 if you have several junior team members who have been told, and read, that concurrency and parallelism is easy in go.
They’re really digging themselves a hole. Can you imagine explaining to a jury that your “autopilot” isn’t “fully-autonomous” and trying to justify that as not misleading by pointing to “autopilots in aviation?”
No, the question was a follow-up after he explicitly acknowledged gathering non-user data; the question about that non-user data was “So these are called shadow profiles, is that what they’ve been referred to by some?”

It was literally a question about whether that term was commonly applied to the data Zuckerberg had already acknowledged FB was gathering. Answering “I'm not familiar with that” because you aren't aware of the use of the isn't “pretty legalistic”, it's the only kind of answer that makes sense.
The people that stay at short term rentals are also dwellers. They are taking up the time the longer term rentals aren't taking.
I have the exact opposite criticism. My experience has been Zipcars tend to be better maintained, and it's great to know that you'll have a parking spot to bring the car back to.

With Getaround, you have to street park. In some areas (esp crowded ones like SOMA / Mission) that can easily add 15-30 minutes to the end of your trip.
Product liability (in the US) attaches to the normal usage of a product, whether that is an intended usage of the product or not.

A toaster is not normally used in the bath, so that does not create product liability issues. A car is normally used for driving...in fact, that's a car's primary use...so product liability would attach to its driving-related functional failure.
The Mortal Kombat: Legacy[0] isn't bad though...

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_Kombat:_Legacy