skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If anything it sounds closer in outline to djb's proposed Internet Mail 2000 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Mail_2000) in which initial storage is the responsibility of the sender, not the recipient, thereby making spam much more expensive.

This implementation, however - especially centralized tracking & policy enforcement, and HTTP as the delivery substrate instead of some properly designed protocol - typify everything I dislike about Google's product design choices. And if the open invitation to phishing wasn't bad enough, expiring messages sound to me like a built-for-purpose gaslighting tool.
Dragonfly also has lightweight kernel threads and some other different architectural decisions. Not just HAMMER. But you are right, it will never reach Linux.
> Reading a book, where I actually need to concentrate on the book, some contents generate occasional mind branches. That means, I continue reading, but I think about something else triggered by what's in the book. Then I switch back to the book realizing "Wait, where was I? I have no idea why I'm reading this, and now I skipped a whole page."

I completely relate to this.
Refraction Networking
Congrats, you are very lucky.

Here are a few that will help you and your new baby:

1) Family is the most important community you will ever have. Learn to make it work. Offen, it will seem like it's futile but you need to do your best to keep it functioning.

2)Learn a skill/hobby you can use to scape the harshest part of life. Playing an instrument is a great scape. Don't make it part of your work.

3)Learn to make and keep lifelong friends. Have friends and be a good friend. Life is much easier when you can count on a friend and they can count on you. Friendship is about giving of yourself.

4)A scientific view of the world is only a partial view. Religion can be an additional view. Religion is more than believing in myths. It's a way to transfer knowledge thru time. Learn to identify the best parts of both and reject the bad and make it part of your life.

5) Success starts early, identify and implement habits that will help you from the start. Such as keeping a clean home and body, daily exercise, setting aside time to study and learn, planning your future and on and on

6)Everything in moderation, the problems in life often arise because of excesses, too much food, too much sex, too much alcohol, too much gaming, too much of anything.

7)Set aside time for the 2 of you to bond. Pick a fun activity you can do together regularly. As an adult, he/she will find peace while doing the same activities. Yet, they won't exactly know why but the reality is that it's a way to re-live the past good times.

8) Every action has consequences so understand that some have fatal and/or lifelong consequences, make sure he/she understands that.

9)Help by finding role models that will help thru life. The teen years are especially hard, reading books that help by showing what it's like to be a growing teen and how to cope.

10) Set aside an evening a week for the family. It can be a fun, learning, teaching or listening evening. It's a great time to bond with your family and learn from the family.

11) Life is what you make of it not necessarily a bunch of random events.

12)Work is important. Don't wait until they are adults to make them understand that we all need to work to have a good life. The worst is to have a 22 yrs old that does not have a work ethic. They will struggle all their life. Always looking to mom and dad for help.

There are plenty more but in the same way that you learned a skill, take the time to learn to be a great father.
Information has to be false for it to be defamation, it's in the definition. The news article they are trying to de-list does not contain false information.
And that's not really new either, due to GopherJS [1]

https://github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs
The antenna needs to be able to see a lot of the sky, so that there are multiple satellites in its field of view at all times. Roofs are likely good, many window situations might not be.

BTW existing US regulations on apartments and the like require landlords to install roof antennae if technically required.
Probably because they have already strong convictions about something and having a boss is not much different for them than a bigger company
As a shameless self-plug, I was inspired by http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ for my personal website: https://kroltan.github.io/

I did not go all the way, however. The site is still 11kB plus a 16kB non-essential image. It has quite a bit more than 7 CSS declarations. I did not minify the markup like Better M* Website.

Any feedback is welcome, however!
Seems more Bauhaus to me.
> it doesn't seem like you're trying too hard to assume good faith

The same EU that regulated the shape of cucumbers? They regulated shapes of bananas. The EU also launched a kettle and toaster crackdown after the Brexit vote. [1] -- but hid those plans until after the vote.

This is also the EU that hid plans to ban high powered kettles and toasters until after the Brexit vote so they wouldn't fuel the Leave campaign. So the EU says, "Let's keep this unpopular stuff a secret so we don't piss off the British and cause the vote to swing to Leave."

The same EU that banned effective, powerful vacuum cleaners because of climate change? [2] The EU that would have people living in straw huts if it meant a 0.001% decline in CO2?

This manipulative, vindictive EU that hid their intentions from the British public because they knew those intentions would be unpopular?

To assume "good faith" on the part of the EU for any reason, is, itself, an act of faith and more likely, an act of delusion.

[1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/10/eu-to-launch-ket...
[2] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/1104712...
I searched for "darkest dungeon" and first hits were for Ed Sheeran and One Direction. I know searching is a tricky problem, but this is ridiculously bad.
You need to reveal who is managing the data in any case, which is separate from the DPO.
> Government is already developing most of the drugs to my knowlege. Univerisites research drugs with public money. Universities then work with companies to commercialise it.

That's a nice little scam they put together a while back. If the government funds the research then it shouldn't be patented -- the taxpayer already paid for it, they shouldn't have to pay for it a second time.

But the industry has better lobbyists than the public, so they get the taxpayer to fund the research, then wait to see if it pans out, then buy it for pennies on the dollar after they already have some evidence that it works. If it doesn't work, the taxpayer foots the bill and gets nothing. If it does work, the taxpayers have to pay even more money to use the fruits of the research they already paid for.

It's corruption plain and simple.

> We also see massive success with open source projects which suggests to me that there are other ways of organizing this research which we have done very little to explore.

Open source works, but it's mostly non-governmental.

The thing that worked really well historically was small research trials conducted by individual doctors as part of their practice and then replicated at larger scale if they panned out. That's all but impossible with the current FDA rules, somewhat for good reason (some of those experiments had a tangential relationship with ethics). But the current rules are just crushingly bureaucratic.
MD5 release checksums? c'mon folks, get with the times...
Check the ToS of their APIs. I'm somewhat certain you aren't allowed to build alternative interfaces into their content.
why not maidsafe?
First off, I wish you all the best.

"we have about a dozen of the Fortune 500 signing up"

Let's be honest. What this means is that someone in the Fortune 500 clicked on your email advertisement. Maybe installed your software.

Do you have anyone in Fortune 500 running critical business on your platform?

> we have a couple of thousand reviewers that have signed up to review.

Anyone can sign up a couple thousand "Mechanical Turk" reviewers in no time. Or "RentACoder" or whatever. What is the value provided? Where I work, the value of "review" provided by someone not deeply involved in the code is "0". Which is why you ask some relevant people to review the code.
Hell, if that were true, I'd be making apps. I doubt that any but a small percentage of apps make any money at all.
U.S. Launches Attacks on Syria
Should anyone be interested in making yogurt with Bulgarian cultures, they are available on ebay:

US: https://www.ebay.com/itm/Bulgarian-Starter-Kultur-fur-Tradit...

EU: https://www.ebay.de/itm/Bulgarische-Joghurt-Starterkultur-na...

I make Kefir myself with a culture that I once acquired on ebay. May try to make Bulgarian yogurt one day.
You're not wrong. Interview from 2004 [0]: "DragonFly split off from FreeBSD-5 over major architectural differences, not anything else. We really do feel that FreeBSD-5 is taking the wrong approach to SMP and building something that is so complex that it will ultimately not be maintainable. We think we have a better way."

But their original architectural decisions were done with this goal in mind [1]: "The ultimate goal of the DragonFly project at its inception was to provide native clustering support in the kernel. This type of functionality requires a sophisticated cache management framework for filesystem namespaces, file spaces and VM spaces." It's not difficult to see how HAMMER came to be three to four years later, given their stated design goals.

[0] http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2004/07/08/dragonfly_bsd_int...
[1] https://www.dragonflybsd.org/history/
Your problem is that Apple is not Microsoft.

Microsoft effectively has to support literally any combination of things someone might try to do to their Windows PC, because they know nobody will blame the author of the crappy driver or the manufacturer of the peripheral. They'll blame Microsoft.

Apple, by tightly controlling its hardware ecosystem, avoids a lot of that. But also gets to build software that's tested for far fewer configurations, meaning that if you do step outside that configuration, you have to accept that they're not testing for it and aren't guaranteeing the next version of their software will continue to work for you.

But rather than understand this, you attribute it to Tim Cook twirling his mustache and cackling over how he's going to deliberately brick all those phones that people repaired themselves! Soon, he will rule the world! BWAHAHAHA!

Except you know as soon as you think about it that you have no evidence of this and that the kind of "Apple bricks your phone to punish you for repairing it" narrative you're pushing here is completely false. Apple might not like losing out on some more of your money, but figuring out ways to push updates that will break your phone while not breaking someone else's is just not worth the time and money for them. So the simplest explanation -- that they don't have staff thoroughly test every type of repair you might do to your phone with every update they push -- is the likeliest, and you know that too.

This, for the record, is my problem with the "right to repair" people. You ignore real problems to peddle conspiracies.
This is literally that with many tractor brands. Mahindra will void your warranty if you don't use THEIR oil in a new tractor.
cute, but syntax is like < 50% of this. next step is addressing this as an ontological question.
How is it like China? The government isn't suppressing speech, they are merely giving recognition to organizations that meet certain standards of journalism. It has no force of law behind it, it's merely to create a public registry of which new sources meet certain standards of journalism. The public is free to look at which sources are certified to make more informed decisions about what news they consume, or they can just ignore it. Hell, it doesn't even need to be done by the government, it could be done by an NGO.
Sure, and the grit of clay at a specific location is arbitrary too, but if that’s the material you have to work with, then that’s the material.

I think you’re being too literal about what constitutes material. You think only something the level of hardware or a programming language is “material” and everything above that is arbitrary, but I would argue ALL of the layers of the stack constitute material properties.

How about this: form submission. You don’t need it... you can use Ajax. But forms that can be submitted will work in more environments (no JavaScript, forward and back navigation, etc)

You can fight that current, but the underlying technology wants you to use forms.

I’m not really arguing about Brutalism though, so much as modernism. A modern web page would contain a minimum of changes to what the basic simplest HTML would yield. You start from the raw material with all its idiosyncrasies and you only add a dimension of “designed stuff” when you have a specific articulable rationale for it.

(This is totally different from the colloquial definition of “modern web applications” which are anything but respectful of their materials)
It is utterly ridiculous that to take an =idea= is considered theft. In that case, pretty much every American corporation can be accused of theft. Google: Stolen from alta vista, Microsoft: Stolen from CP/M, Apple: Stolen from Xerox, The american space program: stolen from the Nazis! If that's the basis for accusing China of stealing IP, it's a pretty weak argument.
This shit is way more serious than I expected.
Actually Oneweb and SpaceX did talk about working together a while ago, and you can see what happened: SpaceX ended up deciding to start a competing project.
"Over there is our haunted module - it's been empty for years, and the callbacks aren't even wired up anymore, but people swear they've seen breakpoints triggering in the upstairs windows during late night solo debugging sessions"
Lactobacillus_delbrueckii?

This is actually used for pre-fermentation of a special kind of beer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berliner_Weisse

http://www.southernfriedfermenters.com/2015/10/30/tips-and-t...
If everyone you hire in every department is "not eager to do the work under the timelines you need", then perhaps your timelines are not realistic and you either need to adjust them, hire more staff, or both?

A commander can blame his soldiers for losing him the war, but is it more their fault or his?
> In the event of any internal fault (500), your service should be left in a state that’s consistent, ...

What if the software enters a non-terminating loop?
what are they going to do? Aside from cutting the lock it's pretty much impossible to know who locked it.

If we get a whole city of people doing it, even if they get the cops what are they going to do? arrest 500-1000 people?
> The latter is fundamental for a functioning democracy.

But if distributors have to pay to link to such content, then such content will not contribute to a functioning democracy because nobody will be able to discover this content.

And, it's funny you mention "functioning democracy" -- tell me how Brussels is part of a functioning democracy? The European Commission President and commissioners aren't elected are they? The Commission has the sole right to propose EU legislation -- which is binding on all member states.

So a Commission that isn't elected gets to force it's will on otherwise democratic countries?

How is that "functioning democracy?" A bit ironic that an undemocratic institution's actions are being defended as protecting something fundamental to a functioning democracy.

It's funny to me as an American living in Europe that many people criticize the US Electoral College system to elect the US president, yet see no problem with accepting the regime of the European Commission, despite not getting a vote on the the Commission President or Commissioners.
What I’ve read indicates that if you’re not targeting EU users (via ads or as customers), especially if you aren’t commercial, you don’t have to do anything. Is that not true?
Doesn't seem like conducting forensics "over the web" is a good way to control the custody chain or prove that evidence wasn't planted.
> We're all scrambling to find the 15 grand to get a license

Well, there's that part.

Apparently lots of my tax dollars are going towards purchasing a temporary license for a temporary solution to a permanent problem that isn't really a problem at all?

Though I must admit, one day those things are going to look great in some museum. They tell a really interesting story. Hopefully the price tag is included on the exhibit description.
WW3 just started? Trump orders strikes in Syria
So from now and on, it's called g-mail, and not e-mail, and they are not compatible.
Also this seems to be a stupid idea, as who'd believe self-destructing or expiring emails would actually be ever deleted from g-servers...
While operators are 'overloaded' all the time, equality is a bit of a special case as it is part of logic rather than some algebraic operation.

In model theory you don't require your models to have an equality operator, they have one simply by being logical constructs.

Then again mathematicians use quotient spaces so transparently that you might as well consider:

5 = 1 (mod 4)

as 'overloading the equality operator' even though the technical definition implies that those 5 and 1 are different from the 5 and 1 in the set of natural numbers, and in Z/4Z the symbols 1 and 5 refer to the same object.
>since you can just screen shot it.

The benefit with automated rention policies embeded in content is that it's less easy for the information to be weaponized ex post. I.e. Now that a couple has broken up, a vindictive partner doesn't have a full log of their communications that they can use to blackmail their partner. Basically it tips the balance back towards conversation and less dystopian log by making people who are attempting to log everything incur a cost rather than have them freeride on the logging system.
The UK and France, too
All of the larger constellations, starting with Iridium, then Oneweb, then Starlink, involve building a factory and an assembly line. Iridium hoped other constellation makers would use theirs, apparently hasn't scored any new business and they're getting close to finishing. Oneweb has a factory under construction that's bigger, and Starlink's factory will be even bigger. Oneweb's is built in collaboration with Arianespace and also hopes to sign up business.

Insomuch as Oneweb uses off-the-shelf parts, they want so many of them that their suppliers are having to build new factories to build those parts. Their solar array supplier is doing that, for example. I suspect Starlink will use a model closer to the Gigafactory and Tesla's partnership with Panasonic.

Lots of people are offering standard satellite parts, at high prices and low volumes. It'll be interesting to see what kind of trickledown Oneweb causes.
Trump Orders Strikes on Syria Over Suspected Chemical Weapons Attack
Maybe that's why most startup founders are at 45 years on average, by that age kids are maturing, family finance should be relatively stable, you might be reaching on your career ceiling, and you're getting older but yet not too old -- so you want to give it a shot. All combined the 45-average-founder-age makes sense to me.
> And its more likely that a family member is a danger to you child

"X is worse than Y, therefore you shouldn't worry about Y" is a fallacy.
People are live-tweeting from Syria right now. If you think Twitter is all people swooning over pop stars, maybe you're following the wrong people.
Wag the Dog
Congrats to PullRequest! They are solving a really good problem!

A shameless plug, if you are interested investing into an intellectual property of an 'underdog' competitor, contact me - dmitry@articoder.com - I must have been doing something right, as I've had the exact same idea at the time and applied/interviewed with YC in the same batch as PullRequest. You can see the timeline for yourself at the internet archive of articoder.com.
Based on the reported time-to-unlock it's pretty clear they're brute-forcing the passcode. The phone has an escalating lockout time after failed attempts, so they must have some way of evading that.

I've read a few theories of how that might work, from timing attacks to carefully-sequenced reboots of the phone to try to confuse the lockout mechanism.
There's also hierarchical regression, where you can estimate multilevel models. Also call fixed and random effect models. Assigning a variance coefficient for each parameter can account for heteroscedasticity.
Not sent them to the govt brainwashing centers.
The day when Trump lost 90% of his base.
sounds like he was a pretty cool guy to work with https://tidbits.com/2001/01/01/the-passing-of-martin-minow/
In the near future, I'll need to do something likely very similar to what you did (albeit, probably on a smaller scale). Are there any technical details about this that you can share or perhaps just some pointers to relevant and/or helpful documentation?

(N.B.: I won't even be starting on this for probably a month or two so I haven't even begun to look into it. If there is documentation easily/readibly available via a Google search (i.e., I'll find 'em as soon as I Google for 'em) then just ignore my request. Thanks!)
You would generally want the general purpose string type in your language to always be escaped when serializing, and only allow avoiding that if you opt-in explicitly.

So, for instance you'd have an H1::new(contents: TextNode) constructor, and you'd have to build a TextNode; if you build TextNode::new(text: &str), then it would escape it. If you wanted to explicitly pass in raw HTML, then you'd need something like HTMLFragment::from_str(&str), and it would parse and return the fully parsed and appropriately typed fragment object that could then be used to build larger fragments.

There might be some way to unsafely opt out, like HTMLFragment::from_str_raw(&str), that would just give a node that when traversed would just be dumped raw into the output, but that would be warned against and only used if you wanted to avoid the cost of parsing and re-serializing some large, known-safe fragment; it wouldn't be what you would normally use.
Hate Speech classifier
YouTube version:
https://youtu.be/n0pMQHNjtxc?t=3m34s
The NATO are globalist, totalitarian NWO fascists
Who would have guessed after the Cohen raid, Comey book, start of the Stormy trial, constant Pruitt news, renewed discussions about him being unhinged, and everything else the president would want to distract people? Why no one predicted this at all.

Certainly not 18+ months ago.
> operate in favour of civil society as civil servants: they are subject to oversight..

Subject to oversight? Have you EVER heard of a French civil servant being fired? It's as rare as a baseball game in Paris.
Semantic experiences: Experiments in understanding language
That’s very sensationalist title.
Because killing thousands with bombs is morally superior to using chemical weapons.

UK along for the ride. As always.
Ask HN: Who actually likes videos and why?
I stumbled upon this funny thread, and decided to write about why I hate video: https://medium.com/@laurenholliday_/i-got-99-problems-and-theyre-all-related-to-video-1b779e7ab49

Do you like video? What do you think of it for marketing? I personally hate them.
It's the decentralised/distributed bit rather than the protocol.

That way Ted Cruz and even Bernie Sanders would have an equal access to materials, and individuals would more informed that everything they type on their keyboard is there to stay.
> (it seems unlikely that all ~135,000 would) but it doesn't seem like it would take very many slight differences like this to be able to generate a unique version of this memo for each viewer.

18 differences would cover it. A few less people and they could get away with 17, which would yield 131072 combinations.

That's assuming each combination is binary, if they have more variations you'd need less, of course.