skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> You might want to go lookup the meltdown/spectre SharedArrayBuffer proof of concept attack.

That still requires a piece shared state, like I said. That vulnerability results from running untrusted code in the same process as trusted code. The whole point of a process is to establish a protection boundary around potentially unsafe code, hence why I keep mentioning processes, and this is the whole point of microkernels and IPC. Within a process, all bets are off.

My earlier point was that a shared clock between processes amplifies this problem so that timing attacks cross even the process protection boundary. So when you started talking about job scheduling, I assumed the following:

1. we're in a microkernel context, where we partition trusted and untrusted code using processes.

2. the job scheduling system you mentioned either

a) is a process running its own code that it trusts and so in-process timing attacks don't matter, but timing attacks with another process might matter and so you don't want to grant a clock capability if it isn't needed, or

b) is a process scheduling system ala cron, where the job scheduler is trusted but the jobs being run are untrusted, and so they run in separate processes.

In case (a), the ticket system seems sufficient if you don't want/need to grant access to the clock consistent with least privilege, and for (b) the job scheduler may or may not have the clock installed or not, doesn't really matter, since job scheduling happens via IPC so there's no shared read, ie. delay(100 ticks, self) sends the relative delay which the cron-like scheduler adds to its own clock.

Hopefully that clarifies my context, and you can then describe what assumptions your scenario violates.
Both GCC and LLVM can compile Go code.
As an ex-smoker, I’ve heard some highly sensitive stuff in publicly accessible smoking areas.
Hounslow a resting place for travellers on their way to Heathrow Book taxi now
PCA is a special case of factor analysis, so you are representing them as observations of a latent variable (which is often a narrative people use when explaining why two x variables are correlated)
Try anything citing von Förster's paper that was written by:

• Louis H. Kauffman if you're mostly interested in the pure math aspect of it. He wrote numerous papers on the topic of von Förster's paper, you can find one them here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1892

• JM Stern and CAB Pereira if you're mostly interested in the application to statistics and fundamental questions of the epistemology of statistics. I wrote a thread on their works on my Twitter account at some point: https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/877883663014400000

Try this AMAZING paper by AF Zimpel: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/03684920510581...

Also, this paper by Heinz von Förster (first order author) and Karl H. Miiller (second order editor), where Miller basically took a lot of old papers by von Förster and rearranged them to give a more coherent view for certain types of readers:

http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/archive/fulltexts/309...
It could also be possible that he just doesn't care as much about Tesla and is therefore not contributing something crucial to it.
It's sad that the top comment here is a conspiratorial hypothesis with game theory as a supporting argument. It seems wrong to cite game theory as evidence that a gas attack was unnecessary when that gas attack achieved victory by forcing the Douma rebels to, just hours later, agree to surrender. It's sickening to contemplate, but one could argue that in this case, the despicable use of chemical weapons brought a remarkably swift end to the fighting in Douma and in the longer term actually saved lives in that region of Syria.

http://www.dw.com/en/syria-rebels-evacuate-douma-under-new-a...
> if I put up a simple newsletter to contact my users, I have their emails

Okay, so then the only requirement of GDPR is that you must make the newsletter opt-in rather than opt-out and you must make the unsubscribe process as easy as the subscribe process.

This is indeed a problem if you run Mailman, which has a somewhat annoying unsubscribe process and which does not have the funding[1] to address this.

[1] http://mailman.9.n7.nabble.com/GDPR-td46775.html
That sounds like a natural fit for Rust's lifetime-tracking mechanism. The compiler can automatically drop all initialized objects upon exception. In fact, I'm reasonably sure it does just that for panic handling.
Lol. All so wrong.
You don't need to scrap the page, YouTube provides the RSS stream for each channel: `https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=[ID]`. The RSS contains the "normal" link of each video, so you can invoke youtube-dl or mpv on it.
(Editor of the JMAP spec here.) We at FastMail are using standard IMAP/POP/SMTP, which we offer to all our customers to access their email. In addition, we have invested a large amount of time and resources in R&D to design a next-generation client-server sync protocol based on our deep experience with email. While we could just use this ourselves, we believe an open internet built on standards is healthiest for everyone in the long run. That's why, once we felt we had a solid foundation, we took this work to the IETF where a working group was formed. The spec has evolved considerably since then based on the feedback of many other experts in email from both the open-source and commercial world of email vendors.

The spec is now nearly complete and we expect standards-track RFCs to be published later this year. Adoption will then happen slowly over time, as it did with IMAP. Smaller, more nimble companies are likely to move first and then larger companies following later. IMAP took many years to get widespread adoption; I hope we can make the move to JMAP a bit faster, but these things always take time (often measured in years!) to develop, test and release.

I love XKCD as much as the next guy, and of course it's kind-of right, but also too cynical: the only other alternative is to not make an effort at all, and accept the status quo is the best you can hope for. We'd like to do better than that. If we fail, at least we know we tried.
Maybe its not hate, but it is irrational. You are either lying and misrepresent the facts, or you just simply don't know what you are talking about.

In either case you should stop going into technical forums and write strongly worded comments like:

> Uh, most of SpaceX wouldn't exist without the $3.144 billion SpaceX was given under the Commercial Crew Program

Secondly

> Why the irrational fanboyism?

How is it irrational? I'm a 'fanboy' because of what SpcaeX has achived. I'm a fanboy for any company that pushes technology and SpaceX just happens to be one of the most visionary and aggressive companies around.

> Why are you taking a realistic discussion of the company like a shot across the bow?

I'm all for realistic discussion. If you had argued that SpaceX would not exists without NASA or the governmnet (2008 COTS contract), then I would have responded differently. But you did not make realistic discussions, you asserted things that were false.

There is a realistic discussion about SpaceX and the profitiabiltiy of its vision. And I'm happy to talk about that, because it is a difficult thing. Being a 'fanboy' does not preclude realism.

All I did was give you the facts to correct your mistake. Don't be salty.
It seems like a tangent, but I think it may be. If you make reusable rockets, I would think you can sell them based on a straightforward list of technical capabilities. If you want to compete with Nike, and your shoes or clothing don't look right and don't have the Nike logo, you may not get anywhere even if you have all the technical boxes checked.
It's a fair comparison, although not to the present Amazon. The Amazon of today is financially entirely different to the one from 15 years ago.

Amazon nearly went bankrupt after the dotcom bubble era. They were drowning in particularly bad debt and red ink for years. After the dotcom bubble their financing abilities almost entirely dried up, the stock collapsed by ~93% or so. It was almost universally expected that they would not survive, culminating with the infamous Barron's Amazon.bomb story and a parade of stories thereafter. For the next three or so years after that story, bankruptcy was the anticipated end by the press and analysts. Tesla today, when you look at how they're being discussed by the press + analysts, and their financials, looks similar to Amazon's general condition back then (Tesla's growth is both faster and its red ink is greater, than Amazon was back then).

For reference, Amazon had $1.6b in sales for 1999 with a $719m loss, and a $30b plus market cap at the peak of the dotcom bubble. Tesla will probably hit around $17-$18 billion in sales for 2018. If the market lets out - the supportive environment broadly - you'll see Tesla's stock crater unless their burn rate is very sharply reduced. They'll suffer the same financing concerns that pushed Amazon's stock down to $5.51 / share in 2001.
What we talk about when we talk about monads (2018)
It looks like a book at first glance but is really an outline with a list of references to other locations to read more about each of the topics. Useful but no new or interesting content on its own.
This article climbs the HN ranks once every few months... I'm a "real" engineer who chose to make my career in software. There are obviously things that this author does not know about software engineering and there are things that software engineers don't know about "traditional" engineering. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. Everybody chill out
Considering just about everyone I watch ends up being demonized that’s not such a bad thing.
No, it does not say that. It says, specifically for certain standard utility programs such as chown and newgrp, that particular program arguments should always be considered to be user names if such user names exist even if they happen to be in the forms of numbers.

Nor is what you claim about the BSDs true. Aside from the fact that using the shell's comment character would be markedly inconvenient, especially since the colon is a far better choice for such a marker (c.f. Gerrit Pape's chpst), the OpenBSD and FreeBSD implementations of chown and newgrp do not have such a marker either documented or implemented, and in fact operate as the SUS says.

User names and user IDs are, by contrast, explicitly called out by the standard as strings and integers, two quite different things which have no overlap.

* http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_...

* http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_...
And it's not like SpaceX revolutionized the launch market yet — a decade and 10 billion USD later they're still launching for similar prices as Arianespace.

The only reason the launch market seems to be easy to compete in is because the US launch market has historically been a prime example of corruption.
The massive missile strikes the US and allies conducted against Syria actually
Right. The article is actually quite bad and doesn't show much understanding of the problem. Fault tolerance and consistency are very well known and very well researched problems in distributed systems.

Without proper distributed algorithms a fault can leave both ends in an inconsistent state. One end might think the operation was successful, but the other end never saw it succeed and timed out. It doesn't know whether it was successful or not. If there are users most will assume failure in this case and try again, leading to two state mutations where there should be only one.

To solve this you can try to achieve consensus between both ends and if there are users force them to wait an unbounded time, which is unrealistic of course, so only helps somewhat. The other choice is eventual consistency, preferably strong eventual consistency, where write operations never fail, never force anyone to wait, just get delayed and resynced later sometimes.
I believe that the LLVM project is trying to accomplish this [1].

However, the concurrent, non-pausing GC of GoLang is not easy to match in efficiency. I'd be interested to hear about actual high-quality implementations of GCs in LLVM.

And then there's the problem of making it all work efficiently in WASM (which doesn't yet support advanced concepts needed by GCs such as memory barriers).

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html#goals-and-non-g...
There's a startup https://lingumi.com that makes games so kids aged 2-5 can learn new languages, even and especially if the parents don't speak them.
تحميل متصفح تشي دوت للكمبيوتر عربي مجاناً كامل Chedot Browser
If they declare it a right then it's a right. That's all that word means.
Chaos engineering tools and practices in TiDB
The only one being emotional about Tesla is you.
It is 1.11
>We expect to push a lot of ARM changes to a lot of different software in the coming months.

Thank you very much!
They seem to be landing them also and reusing them. That seems like a big leap in the launch market maybe even the only competitor that is reusable
QBasic was included in some of the later DOS versions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QBasic
When algorithms surprise us
But even if the metrics are not the same, they can still be positively correlated with each other.
I think you what you are seeing is just pushback from years of Tesla Hype, just a couple of years ago it wasn't rare to read almost messianic message on how Musk was going to save the world.

That being said, I think you are being somewhat hyperbolic, most of the comments on Tesla posts are asking the though questions, not really putting it down.
> Note that this doesn't mean we like any particular politician. We despise many politicians. But the idea of government as a force for good still remains in Europe as far as I can see (UK).

Coincidentally, this is how most Americans seem to feel about their government's foreign policy.
Big Wind: Fire-Fighting Machine Made from Tank and Jet Parts (2015)
If the expression is supposed to be the definition and not just a derived equality, at least Mathematicians (and some Physicists) would use := instead, just as Niklaus Wirth tried to establish with Pascal.
Seems like many in this thread are thinking about conservation. Thats positive.

Not all paper (papyrus, wood or stone) based documents remains till this day. Effort was made to conserve it because, through different times, enough people thought that knownledge was worth being remembered.

If a interactive paper is meaningful to enough people, it will be preserved.
Think of a tool, like a hammer or a screwdriver. Its handle must have the correct shape for a comfortable and strong grip; a handle that's too thick, too thin, or oddly shaped, will be hard to use. The tool's shape must not force you to hold it in a strange position. The tool's length must be adequate for the task; neither too long, nor too short. Now apply that to a software tool, like a compiler.
> “Good students are good at all things.”

This is an unfounded and dangerous belief. Skills do not necessarily transfer. Ben Carson, for example, is by all accounts the most talented neurosurgeon to ever live. He doesn't give the impression of being qualified as a federal administrator. Another example -- back in school we had a physics Nobel Laureate who decided he was a biologist. Despite all indications to the contrary he was taken seriously in this endeavor.
can confirm, I was referring to an early 2006. Quite an old piece :)
Technically you're correct, but... web browser is the default front end.

Technically command line programs are also front end.
Having worked closely with some of her old lieutenants, I don't think this is accurate.
I find systems thinking an interesting subject but honestly I think it is more useful for people higher up (PMs, etc) and/or people whose primary work is more along the lines of strategizing and evaluation more than implementation
That example is initialization code, but you'd run into the same problem even if the control were already initialized (and you were trying to set new properties on it). In that case, you'd likely have a borrowed pointer, so it wouldn't be dropped when the panic happened.
And thus the brain drain from China will commence at full speed (more than present). Seems government regulators in China don't understand market forces either. Good to know.
Similar trajectory for "catholic," meaning broadly inclusive. (e.g., She has catholic taste in music.)
Facebook uses AI to predict your future actions
Tell that to my coworkers! ;-) When our mail server goes down, people start calling within a minute.
You understand that while The Post takes place in the 1970s, it was written and filmed in the 2010s, right?
Apple publishes how many iPads they sell every quarter.

This is another example of the old internet trope "Do people still watch Tv? I haven't had a TV in 10 years".
Non-political part of government? That sounds like an oxymoron to me. Nothing that sucks away your tax dollars isn't political to the politicians.
I disagree with her leadership style, but it's unfair to blame Yahoo!'s collapse on her. The company was doomed with or without her. She took on an untenable role in exchange for a big pay package.
And many infotainment and desktop frontends are just web UIs...
Technologically, I agree, but they haven't brought the price down yet, and they have to significantly rework their engines to improve their turnaround times.

Arianespace has prototypes of fully reusable engines ready now as well, and is moving into early testing.

While the US launch market was disrupted, SpaceX hasn't reduced prices yet, hasn't made it easier to launch for small companies (which would be necessary for a startup boom in space), and other competitors are only a few years behind.
Wow, care to elaborate more about the switch from Slack to Telegram? I've been thinking of doing the same with my team, and this webhook feature was exactly what I was going to build. Thanks for releasing this.
I did say "usable" though, and the fingerprint sensors before the iPhone were not.

I would know, I had the same style fingerprint sensor that you see on the Atrix or the G500 on my laptop, and it was terrible.
Well, Tesla passed Ford in valuation while selling fewer EVs. And on the technological side, these comments aren't that unsubstantiated either.

The negativity might be more of a reaction to the discrepancy between the wider perception and valuation and the realistic prospects, than just the latter.

Is it really clear that it will be harder for Ford/BMW/Toyota to transition to a thorough electric line up than for Tesla to master mass production? If not the valuation and hype are hard to justify.

The reason that the former scenario is not completely absurd is of course batteries. If Tesla can produce their own batteries while everyone else has to buy from China, they will capture a lot of profits that everyone else will miss out on.

Maybe that's the upside potential that people miss out on.
You can certainly state it as an opinion, but calling it "the reality" does typically mean backing the assertion up with some substance.
USA braces against Russia like never before
This is consistent with my experience. Many papers seem to rely on unstated conventions regarding the problem definition and use of variables. Say I'm not in the "small target audience who have a deep understanding of the problem domain," but would like to read and understand a paper. What's the usual approach to overcome this barrier?
Corporate perks like that are taxed as personal income in the United States.
Actually, three times. There were two POSIX subsystems.
Absolutely no problem if you set up your server correctly.
Accelerated Discovery of Metallic Glasses Through Iteration of Machine Learning
It's interesting to observe how China has managed to fuse together, almost seamlessly, the major functional modules of it's government -- Communist Party committees, for example -- with the tech sector.

As other commentators in various publications have pointed out, this deep integration coupled with massive investments in auxiliary sectors, a culture of scientific inquiry and a heavily STEM focused primary education[0] will only keep the scale of the momentum tipped in China's favor going forward.

[0] https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/education/what...
We're only a 2-(wo)man team and already on Telegram so it was a pretty easy switch. We also didn't have too many integrations and the ones we did are now migrated with Push More.
I'm always asking "why haven't scientists come up with more symbols yet?"

I also ask "why haven't more symbols been introduced to our keyboards? Just !@#$%&*..."

It's strange, esp. when you realize coming up with a new symbol that everyone uses is easier these days than it was 4 centuries ago!
Type conversions have to be explicit when they are lossy, otherwise it's just useless noise and cognitive overhead that can lead to a bug.
Very true but somehow Wall St. is valuing Tesla very differently than they valued Amazon 15 years ago. Tesla's stock hasn't gone down that much, there's volatility but not the near 100% crash that struck Amazon. On the flip side, Tesla has needed a lot more capital than Amazon and they have issued a lot more shares to raise that capital (close to 12B now). I don't think Tesla's stock price, despite it's volatility reflects it's debt economics.
Kind of tangential, but I am enjoying NewPipe[0], which can be installed from F-droid. Background audio, video on overlay mode so you can watch it while using some other app, downloading videos/audio. Supports YouTube and SoundCloud.

[0] https://newpipe.schabi.org/
Arya Incubation Centre
No, they really are not the same thing, not even nearly. You yourself mention one class of handles for which Unix has no equivalent. (FreeBSD process descriptors have some gotchas that make them significiantly different; and Linux procfs descriptors do not match behaviours when it comes to the object lifetimes and handle waitability.)
Direct to video from the "What is this" link, https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/songseeds/treblemaker-ins...

Burying it behind a link may be a case of design aesthetics impeding functionality of the landing page. Or not. To me,

secondary text ->
untitled video ->
complex demonstration

is a little indirect for visitors who don't know what it is or why they should care. The cool thing is the tool. The landing page, maybe not so much?
A picture is worth a thousand words.

The sculpture outside the front of Tencents Shenzhen HQ.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXRIsWrVQAAJgjl.jpg
Skyr is a cheese made with rennet in addition to yogurt cultures.
Before claiming he is stupid, you need to read the balance sheet. They have enough cash in hand to pay the maturing debt. If they are cash flow positive, technically they don't need to raise money. However, Tesla wants to expand to start production of Semi and Model Y. Analysts predict they need to raise money for setting up production (which is technically optional).
http://learnyouahaskell.com/

It´s great for beginners.
If you tend toward optimal decisions, having your mind made up for you seems like it could be a real drag.
It's the whole milk that makes siggi's creamier. There is no rennet, and certainly no stabilizers, sugar substitutes etc.. just very good yogurt.
Angr: Python 4 analyzing bin. static and dynamic symbolic (Concolic) analysis
Great product. It is the milk fat that makes it creepier. There is no rennet, stabilizers, sugar substitutes etc., just simple whole milk yogurt.
Not at all, originally the whole purpose of DragonFly was a test ground for its scheduler. It moved on to being much more though, refactoring the entire source tree and rewriting parts of the system. The whole purpose of DragonFly is DragonFly.
Autodesk AutoCAD 2019 Crack Full Download (x86x64) Free