skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://www.founder2be.com

https://cofounderslab.com
ah, thanks... but yes, very unintuitive.
The cheaper 8051s aren't on digikey (they are usually integrated into something like the custom MCU used for a pregnancy test or tooth brush), and $0.05 is very worth it if you are making 1000000.
What’s the difference between this and browsing using Safari with “Prevent Cross-Site Tracking” turned on?
Big factor here is the bitrate of the video; on practically all streaming platforms 1080p video is very heavily compressed and while speculating, on sites like YT there is also encoding speed vs visual quality optimization going on.

With equal bitrates and high-quality encoders the difference should be smaller, or even turn towards preferring 1080p depending on the bitrate.
the syncing to desktop library is a key feature for me, please address this in your FAQ
Those are three different addresses. On some systems they may be three different accounts. On others they may be one account.

On some systems, anything ending in '@example.com' may be a single account.

It may be that defined address to account mappings exist on a domain and all other addresses map to a default account. It's common enough the hosting industry supports it and it has a name - a catchall email account.

Nobody sending mail to any of those addresses needs to know how many addresses map to the account associated with the address to which they are sending. It's an address, not an identifier. I would argue you don't have a reason nor a right to know the address to account mappings in my systems.

What a sender should reasonably expect is that someone who can receive mail delivered to a particular address is in charge of the email account to which that address maps. Sending a verification email to someone expecting to receive it is the way to validate the recipient is the intended recipient. That's it.

If I give you my phone number, do you need to know what other phone numbers will ring that phone or how many phones I answer in order to call me? Do I need to disclose all the possible places I might receive a package if I want one delivered to a single place? No.

Email addresses are addresses. That's all they are. Stop pretending they are something else, and this will become much clearer for you.
(pure speculation follows, I do not work in the ad industry)

Lets say I run a website lets say youtube.com or whatever.

I want to serve ads. I have to go to a marketplace like double click where advertisers bid for ads. In an ideal world, the client web browser will never talk to double click. When I serve a website, I will also serve the advertising myself from my own web servers using just html and css (no javascript). We can do a lot of flashy things using css animations so it shouldn't be a problem. If I really want my users to go away, maybe I can even serve video ads. I will simply get the ads from the marketplace and tell them I served an ad. However, reality is not that simple. If they let me do that, then I will have strong incentives to just lie. I probably won't do it for a while but after a bit the temptation to lie just becomes too great. Of course, I had twenty trillion page views yesterday. Why not? I am not saying youtube.com lies (and it would be trivial for Google to check if they did because they own YouTube). I am confident Google is probably the most upstanding member of the prominent players in the ad game. However, how can an advertiser trust some random website? I don't think advertisers will trust them.

I think we can get rid of a lot of problems in advertising by simply prohibiting any kind of javascript in advertisements. I don't know how though. https://static.doubleclick.net/instream/ad_status.js for example take a look at a more benign website https://i.imgur.com/KS3gjMV.png and compare it to this website https://news.ycombinator.com what if we could get rid of all the calls to third party servers?

Thoughts?
And GraphQL for all? A few things to think about before blindly dumping REST
Running Better Lean Startup Workshops
And thank you for this. Despite my gripes with it, HN is indeed a community,not a 'platform'. Thinks like this policy keep it this way
Friend's recent story of her daughter's backpack -- and its contents -- thoroughly slimed after her daughter's purchase from a classmate escaped confinement.

I suggested freezing it and seeing whether the slime would stiffen enough to break off and be brushed or shaken out.
I scrolled really fast. Article is not praising anyone, it talks about basic income. And an idea of Facebook paying basic income, from revenue it gets from selling personal data. Facebook has a pool of collective data from people? - why not pay back to users basic income.

Overall article is about basic income.
PHP 4 to 5, which was what my comment was about, took a middle path and had success much faster than Python did.

Given how much you like Python, I'm surprised at the gall to argue that Python had more technical debt to clean up than PHP did.
Bug reporting is key to user retention
Not all class is bad.

I generally appreciate the caps restriction, but in this instance side strongly withgumby,,abovee.

Of course, now we're discussing site regs rather than the evils and contagion of prison labour and for-profit prisons, which is its own meta-level of distraction and conversational degredation.
Pentagon stops accepting Lockheed F-35 jets over repair cost dispute
Not sure why, but that link just brings me to the normal homepage (as it's looked for years).
Perhaps take a look at 'Modern Russian' materials (Clayton). Great drill course from the 1960s with books and cassettes.

I have more recommendations if you want them.
Is there docs on how I can integrate this into my app, do you have a javascript library?
Perhaps the Tesla autopilot should be subject to the same regulations and restrictions regarding use as airplane autopilot.
My favorite is the DC-X that Space X and others are recreating: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv9n9Casp1o
Few ways I could hijack your Node.js applications
Eight things we learned from a new book on Theranos
* The below is copied verbatim from a deeper branch of the thread, but may clarify some things for others as well. *

Those are three different addresses. On some systems they may be three different accounts. On others they may be one account.
On some systems, anything ending in '@example.com' may be a single account.

It may be that defined address to account mappings exist on a domain and all other addresses map to a default account. It's common enough the hosting industry supports it and it has a name - a catchall email account.

Nobody sending mail to any of those addresses needs to know how many addresses map to the account associated with the address to which they are sending. It's an address, not an identifier. I would argue you don't have a reason nor a right to know the address to account mappings in my systems.

What a sender should reasonably expect is that someone who can receive mail delivered to a particular address is in charge of the email account to which that address maps. Sending a verification email to someone expecting to receive it is the way to validate the recipient is the intended recipient. That's it.

If I give you my phone number, do you need to know what other phone numbers will ring that phone or how many phones I answer in order to call me? Do I need to disclose all the possible places I might receive a package if I want one delivered to a single place? No.

Email addresses are addresses. That's all they are. Stop pretending they are something else, and this will become much clearer for you.
The Zuckerberg hearings, condensed
Matlab semantic-segmentation-using-deep-learning
Tesla's autopilot system is no different than a self driving car with a safety driver and should be subjected to the same regulation. In a self driving car (Waymo, Cruise, etc) driver turns on autonomous mode when the driver thinks it's safe to do so. All drivers are thoroughly trained for the safety of themselves and other people on the road. Companies must obtain permits to have cars on the road and report annually on safety of the system. I'm not comfortable driving in the road knowing Tesla's drivers are not trained, the company is not subjected to the same laws as self driving system even though the drivers can turn on Autopilot ANYTIME they want, and the car can do WHATEVER.
"a utilitarian could easily make the case that"

Are you making that argument? Your comment seems an extreme example of writing that uses the passive voice.
I agree entirely. What's the point of an autopilot if I have to spend my entire drive watching it like a hawk to ensure it doesn't steer me into a wall?

You know what I really want? I want a vehicle to save me when I screw up. I love skiing, but it's a dangerous sport, and the most dangerous part is driving home. You're in the mountains in the dark, the road might be icy, and you're tired from a long day of strenuous exercise.

I want to see humans and machines working together. A car that could spot deer on or beside the road would save lives. They can be very difficult to see in the dark, and hitting one could send it through your windshield at highway speed.

Augmenting human ability has a lot of potential. Even just adding sensors that humans don't have would be huge. I bet those deer are way more obvious in infrared.
Note that I wrote, "acting as adults;" there's a difference between being an adult and acting as one.
> would you get into an Uber if you knew the driver had 5 previous DUIs?

Well they somehow convinced the state they should have a driver's license still. If they're that dangerous they shouldn't be on the road.

Further, simply having 5 DUIs on record is itself not a sufficient data point to determine if there is any increased risk today of that person doing so again. For instance, if a person turned to drinking out of grief at one point in their life but has had many stable years since, how would you identify that risk against the risk of someone who hasn't yet lived through such a situation but were it to occur they would drink to excess and make poor decisions too?

NOTE:

I'm not saying those DUIs aren't a problem, I'm just pointing out that it can be more complicated than it first appears to reach an internally consistent, much less fair, approach.
Mark Zuckerberg's dreaded homework assignments
The durability would depend on how many people cared to host that particular blockchain.

For a popular blockchain like teh bitcoin, it would cost quite a lot to introduce much data.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haidinger%27s_brush is a real and really cool phenomenon, but it detects light polarization, not magnetic orientation.
That's an interesting use case, you should try it out with the Dvorak keyboard...
Did she have big titties? Does high estrogen cause nice tits?
I’d be really concerned about the news then. Will you react quickly if the car decides to drive towards a post?
Advance owns more than 50% of the stock. That pretty much gives them control, doesn't it?
Not sure if it’s as optimized as maskrcnn on tensorflow yet, but matlab is almost caught up to deep learning on python.
This confused me as well. See
Izkata below your comment with a wired link to screenshots.

But I see the old reddit as well.
The core of the esp-idf is like a wrapper + a tiny bit of logic over the registers, there is a ton of extra stuff packed in there but you don't need to use it if you don't want to and it is pretty clearly separated in the source directory. I really like it because it gets out of my way when I don't want it, and when I do want it there is usually something there to help.
Think about this.

Any business that has a CRM solution (customer relationship management for anyone unfamiliar) like Salesforce for example has a database of prospective customers (who never opted in to create a profile) and as much information as they can collect or infer about you as they can.

They want your name, your company, your title, your industry, your email, your phone number, your address or city or state.

They want to segment you and identify which piece of spam (cough, I mean marketing) will appeal most to you based off your demographic or your pain points or your interests.

They want to figure out which of their regional events they should invite you to based off where you live.

They want to figure out if your company might be a good customer (based on criteria like company size, employee size, annual revenue, goods and services offered, etc) if they are B2B, or they want to figure out as much about you and your income, interests, and background if they are B2C and want to sell to you.

These companies already have these systems, they try to collect as much about you as they can, and there's billions of dollars of investment and spending/revenue in these areas.

You didn't sign up to have an account with them, but they will create one for you as soon as they are able if it helps them better sell to you.

Any time you give your email to a website to sign up, any time you are asked for some personally identifying info at a retail business or swipe a card, a new "shadow profile" about you is created, or your existing "shadow profile" is updated.

So really this practice has been going on for forever.

Before CRM there were files and file cabinets.

Do I support this practice? No.

But if we think more openly about whether shadow profiles are a new invention we can quickly realize they are not.
That's a good point and I partly agree. This might not have been the best hill to plant that flag on!
GPDR (assuming that's what you're talking about) doesn't take effect until next month
Sure, maybe this explains better: The picture shows how light from a galaxy or galaxies from behind the galaxy cluster SDSS J0146-0929 are bent around it. It makes it "seem as though the galaxy is in several places at once".

The key word is "seem", which means that the light-bending characteristic of gravity make space seem like something it is not. Hope this helps.
If I did not directly provided them with my data, they would have stolen it. So, yes, I think they have to provide and delete upon my request.
does this method allow other playlists to sync as well? it sounds like you have only 1 playlist on your iOS device.
We remember people who are the face of things that change the world; inventors/discoverer/scientist/etc. (Edit: it sounds like you're ...) Implying he's a businessman so will not be remembered makes no sense. If Musk colonizes Mars, he will be remembered. Social media may be a footnote in history, or it may be looked back on like the industrial revolution except there is no single frontman for the industrial revolution. Zuck has inspired an Oscar winning movie and now Congressional hearings, so I'm pretty sure he's the face of social media and history will basically be written that he invented it; although we know that's not entirely accurate.

Can you name the person who invented the printing press? The person who invented the cotton gin?
I often feel lost when reading such articles because they never seem to quite acknowledge how bad legacy systems can be. The following examples all originate from the same project I have worked with in the past.

Example 1: You cannot "favor consistent over new/better" because one of the main problems with the old code is that it is horribly inconsistent
already.

Example 2: You cannot "favor consistent over new/better" because the legacy style you would try to be consistent with is so bad that you cannot even understand tiny fragments of the code, let alone write new code in a consistent way.

Example 3: The legacy system was built in a way that makes it impossible to store the code in any kind of VCS, so being consistent with that means breaking well-established best practices.

Example 4: For some part of the system, nobody knew how to make the magic code generators produce code that is consistent with the legacy code (and if you try to write that code without the generators, you are in for a trip to hell).

That said, the article helped a lot in that I now know the name for a problem I somewhat recognized but couldn't describe well.
Van Eck phreaking came to mind immediately - which wouldn't require any remotely malicious code to be run. Anyone with more knowledge than myself know if Van Eck phreaking is still an attack vector on modern technology?
The point seems sensible given the recent behavior of some guys.

But biohackers are indispensable as well as more mainstream scientists. They are the practitioners of Metropolis-Hasting that help overcome some local minimum in knowledge of biology.
Organizations use Medium instead of their own platforms to try to create a sort of social signalling--like, "this is not the usual old-school BS you'd expect from us--this is cool design or tech content."

Whether that actually works is up for debate...
>false positives as low as 0.1 percent

Nice marketing. Another way to write that? 1 in 1000. That's really really high. If you're using a service that you feel like you need 2FA on, would you really want to use this? I'll stick with my hardware token for now.
This class of flying car has never made much sense to me. It has to follow auto and aircraft regulations, with multiple different propulsion systems for different types of travel. Why not just focus on creating a small, autonomous, VTOL aircraft (an enormously hard problem by itself), and then assume the rider will use ride share or public transit for the last mile.
I understand your frustration with the results. But please bear in mind that until the wright brothers flew, the results were frustrating.

What you need to look at is the raw power of internal combustion engines, and the weight they add. Versus the raw power of muscles of birds.

You need to look at the raw number of neurons firing in a human brain. This is the analog device that is our benchmark.

You need to look at the speed each neuron, of which there are a hundred billion, fires at: 200 hertz maximum, and more like 0.1 hertz on average.

you need to look at the speed of propagation: 8 orders of magnitude slower than the interconnects in data centers.

You are looking at a bird in flight, and you are looking at an internal combustion engine that outputs 1,000,000 times more power than its wings, and you are saying, "But our results are abysmal."

We will, and very soon, match that output. And far, far exceed that output. For sure we will. Because it's just analog meat. And our computers are faster and wider.

The poor state of algorithmic research is due to researchers having small access to the algorithms in question.

We have all of the machinery for "flight" (intelligence).

Personally I also think that researchers are impatient. Humans takes years to bootstrap to where they can understand the world as well as a 3-year-old. Specifically, humans take three years to understand or communicate as well as a 3-year-old. 36 months.

Parity with human brains isn't the goal. The goal is achieving 144 months (12 years) of brain development closely assisted and supervised by parents and teachers, especially within the first few years, within 9 hours of unsupervised learning.

But it will be done. You have the facts there in black and white.
Does Amazon really support net neutrality?
Hello.

So little intro:

Zello its a popular app which allows you to transfer your mobile phone to the radio (useful in case if calls cost more then 3g internet or if your mobile operator charges you by minutes and you always have wifi)

Pro-russian internet organization (roscomnadzor) decide Zello potentially can be you for protests and decide to ban all IPs of zello app. Zello have been using amazon and each time they IP got ban they migrate to new IP.

Russian contact Amazon and they accept they position - Zello app might be used for protests and ask Zello to leave they platform.

I just wonder how does organization might support net neutrality when they are closing client accounts simple because some organization at the edge of the world thinks this app been used for protests?

And, logically, you can close any app which has message/voice functionality abusing that method.
It seems like a big security breach - if you have a rival just tell "roscomnadzor" app is using by oppositions, send few messages in the app you are against russia, and boom they are in trouble

source: https://torrentfreak.com/russia-blocks-100s-of-google-domains-to-shutdown-encrypted-chat-app-180412/
They don't tend to actually sleep. They do become more docile, because they can't see to fly without risking hitting something.
this sounds great until you get hit by a "phishing" attack that steals your typing profile. it's probably that hard to do, all you need is to convince your victim to type something. a signup form would work pretty well, plus you get a nice primary key (email/username) so you can even share your stolen typing profiles with your hacker buddies! then what are you going to do? change your typing profile?
Click maximizer to sell ads.
Well, Duolingo can't make you learn a language. You have to do that yourself. You can use Duolingo along the way..
I don't understand the security model here. This seems like an irrevocable universal login factor, aspects of which can be observed by hostile websites through Javascript. How is this not the worst of all possible MFA worlds? What don't I understand about how the modeling works?

Also: We are conducting ongoing experimental research based on typing biometrics. Some of the predictions(soft biometrics traits) we study by typing biometrics are gender, age, IQ, race, openness, and Jungian/4 letter type personality profile of a person. Potential use cases: Human Resources, Marketing, Health care is a pretty squicky thing to also be planning to build with this.
Sure, here: https://api.typingdna.com/index.html (includes usage samples in different languages). You can sign up and find out more... I thought you knew that. Thanks for asking!
So does morality/ethics boil down to numbers/metrics? I'm not being sarcastic; I don't know the answer myself ... and I'm not entirely sure that I would want to "know".

Humans have gained great powers of number calculation, but I suspect that our greatest power and obsession has always been story-telling. We tell stories to each other and ourselves, and those stories form the basis of our ethics and morality.

Which is why I think utilitarianism always feels cold and unsatisfying; it doesn't play well as a story.
I wish Hubski would take off more. The design is purpose-built for respectful, intelligent discussion.
The U.S. has to stay atop of Russia. The thread, however started about "small countries buying this piece of shit plane", and Norway (my country) is one of F-35 operators. Its current small fleet of F-16 is not enough to deter Russia; but 52 F-35s are to a great extent. Is the rationale clear? Are we on the same page?

The objective for Norway is to have efficient combat airforce, not an airshow crew or a check mark on some NATO list, "has fixed wing aircraft".

Now, to the maintenance costs, so far they do not exceed the rates calculated on purchase, and are lowest among the 5th generation fighters of the world (the only other one being F-22).
EarthNow: displaying near-real time Landsat imagery
Reminds me of writing some simple C programs to calculate and display Mandelbrot and Julia sets on my 2x.

Still, wish I'd ended up with an early Mac, for a better entre into microcomputer graphics, but "the powers that be" at that time insisted on the 2x.

I don't know whether the rubber components (e.g. for the floppy drives) in my shelved 2x have deteriorated to the point of failure, but that linked RS-232C WiFi modem is kind of tempting.

There are also various DOS emulators for running CP/M stuff. Which reminds me that I owe archive.org an image of a CD full of contemporary share- and free-ware.
The idea of a prize is interesting a first glance, but it also creates a lot of additional risk.

If you get $1B for creating the first drug that cures X, what does the person who creates the 2nd drug get? $0? What if it's better than the first? Who makes the judgement as to which is better drug?