skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nope. Why do you think it is?

A large use case for collecting all the data about everything is what I just mentioned. Even if they themselves do not do these things, they allow others to do it using their platform.

I don't like linking to Stallman because it sounds like I'm a conspiracy theorist - but here you go: https://stallman.org/facebook.html#psych
Unless they have other data to back up their claim of the hands not being on the wheel, such as camera images, Tesla isn't making a statement of fact. Rather they are recounting what imperfect sensors might be telling them (that's convenient in the upcoming lawsuit).

To give perspective: I have a car (BMW) with lane-keeping "autopilot", which often gets wrong whether I have my hands on the wheel.

It seems to me that it senses resistance to rotation to determine hands-onness. If my hands are very relaxed, just letting the steering wheel do its thing, apparently the sensor can't pick it up anymore.

I had my hands on the wheel, dammit car! Stop beeping and flashing at me all accusatory.
Why do you need to a $5.6M coffin?
Bones is a great name for a project which uses 'skeleton' templates. Love it!
That’s the thing - it has to be audited manually. I’m sure I won’t convince you here of the value of static typing but some people think it is.
I don't know of any companies which failed due to competitor access to source code. There are probably many companies that failed as businesses because their code was open source and as a result they couldn't convince people to fund their work, so that seems like a more pressing concern.

OpenSSL is a famous example of an open source project that is massively depended on, including by billion dollar companies, and yet the company/project trying to maintain it was receiving almost no funding until an outcry a few years ago.

It might also be instructive to think about FreeBSD. It is much less popular than it used to be. Its code was used as part of the basis for the original Mac OS X release in 2001, but Apple's changes were made proprietary rather than contributed back to FreeBSD, and (arguably) as a result hardly anyone uses FreeBSD now, while millions use macOS. We can think of macOS as having been a competitor to FreeBSD in this sense.

Linux, on the other hand, requires contributions to be given back to the main project, and is doing much better.
There this: http://www.kpbs.org/news/2010/mar/26/prop-13s-impact-schools...
> The Air Force and Navy both need (or want) a light, stealthy fighter-bomber. Historically, there's no good reason not to just make the Air Force use the same planes the Navy does.

This is not actually true. The Navy needs a heavy chassis that can withstand repeated 4G+ carrier takeoffs and landings, the Air Force wants a lighter chassis that leaves more room for payload and allows more maneuverability. The Navy wants dual-engine configurations for reliability for over-water flight, the Air Force prefers single-engine for greater simplicity and weight efficiency.

You can make something like the Tomcat or Hornet work, but it's not as agile as a dedicated interceptor, can't carry as much weight as a dedicated strike aircraft, and is heavier than a dedicated light-multirole aircraft. It's also more maintenance-intensive and has higher fuel consumption/shorter range than all of these. Money is no object for the US military, we get the best aircraft for the role, period. You can disagree about whether that should be the policy, but it is.

The Marines' STOVL requirement is a third set of requirements that is totally disjoint to the other services, agreed. I don't know enough about it other than a general sense that it's possibly the complex task to engineer out of all of these. Airplanes go forward, not up and down. From a financial perspective, we might be better off just telling the Marines to fly helos instead and operate light strike aircraft off improved strips once we have a beachhead, but again, money is noobject, so they get a rube-goldberg airplane that can go up and down and land on their pipsqueak carriers.
http://firecalc.com is the best.
Google has the advantage of having two consumer platform (Android and ChromeOS) running on Linux, but with the majority of application code written on top of additional abstractions on top of Linux so a lot of it would still run if the appropriate runtimes were ported over to Fuchsia.

Google is also developing Fuchsia openly, if quietly, giving developers a preview of where they are going. Microsoft developed Midori mostly in secret, and while we've heard a little bit about what they did in that project from blog posts and Twitter threads, nothing official has ever been released publicly.

And on the server side, virtualization and containerization are huge and growing, as many people find the benefits in flexibility, repeatability of deployment, and incremental billing to outweigh the absolute overhead over bare-metal performance. Fuchsia seems to support virtualization as a core part of the API, allowing you to run Linux VMs when you need to, and it could be possible to port containerized applications piecemeal to Fuchsia with some components still running on Linux on co-located or even the same hardware.

I feel like this is one of the benefits of the relatively simpler POSIX style API design, and extensive use of sockets for IPC, over the fairly complex, heaviweight Win32 API and NT kernel. I feel like a lot more software that runs on Linux (and is generally portable to several other POSIX-ish OS's) would be a lot easier to port to Fuchsia, and in an incremental way, than all of the software that runs on Windows systems would be to port to Midori.
I'm sure it is the standard during testing. I doubt you can do this for the general population.
Suggestion to Experience Rsorder Spring Flash Sale for Free Runescape Gold 4.18
The mysterious genie Karima has made a return to Treasure Hunter this week, bringing with her all your favourite runescape gold lamps! 00:00 game time (UTC) on Wednesday 27th to 23:59 on Monday 2nd, find the following items on the Treasure Hunter prize list:It wouldn't bulk abundant for a 'hard phone' (physical phone) unless they capital to splurge and get a 'soft phone' (system declared aloft apropos noting/ticketing) as well. I apperceive that they actualize a lot of accoutrement in abode but something like this is not that simple.

Guys!How to spend 2018 Spring holiday with Meaningful way in Runescape?Now you can Join in Rsorder Spring Flash Sale for Free 750M RuneScape gold&150M OSRS gold at 03:00 am. GMT on April 18!

Prismatic Lamps
Hydra Lamps
Smouldering Lamps
Dark Lamps
Bright Lamps
Celebration Lamps

Jagex has a lot of accumulation anniversary year but they are a lot of acceptable accretion these prices for MORE accumulation and that accepting said, these are the apparently the affidavit why they wouldn't do such a thing:Although it may accept like a abundant abstraction from a customer point of appearance and a agent view,

Guys!How to spend 2018 Spring holiday with Meaningful way in Runescape?Now you can Join in Rsorder Spring Flash Sale for Free 750M RuneScape gold&150M OSRS gold at 03:00 am. GMT on April 18!by http://www.rsorder.com/rs-gold!

Part II:Up to 9% off Runescape Gold/osrs gold with Code SP18 on Rsorder also be offered to you Until Apr.18!
Part III:All Kinds of rs 07 gold/rs3 gold and osrs accounts with only $1 is also waitting for you on RSorder Auction at 03:00 am. GMT each Monday and Thurday!Win from https://www.rsorder.com/auction.
Long-Term Discount Code:7% off code SYTHE to buy RS gold Anytime!
4% real gains includes inflation
And the reason Tesla is not is (among others) that it's unlikely to be economical on the Model 3.
Of course not. You want to send them a patch and have it show up in their "inbox" on Github as a pull request. There's no reason to put pull requests into the git repo.
I always took it as "Nota Bene", meaning "Please note", but I could be wrong.
I climbed my corporate career ladder up to VP/CTO at a large publicly traded company. The total comp was... Wow. I didn't stay there too long, though. I wanted to launch a startup, and I had enough saved that I could do it without worrying too much about the first few years without a salary at all.

I am doing that now. Happiest I've been in years. This is not to suggest this is the only way. I am only reporting one case, the only one I know very well.
Ask HN: Do worthwhile things have to be hard?
I subconsciously find myself discarding endeavors that seem "too easy", even if the end result would be beneficial, in favor of things that seem "hard" [0].

They somehow seem more worthwhile.

E.G. I might discard learning the piano in favor of learning the guitar, because piano seems "easy", and guitar seems exponentially harder. Objectively, one is not more worthwhile than the other. Except since guitar is 'harder', it seems more worthy of pursuit.

Do you do this as well? Are you driving yourself a little crazy pursuing this vague metric? I can't seem to stop.

[0] Easy and Hard are in quotes to denote subjectivity. These concepts vary from person to person obviously.
The other side of the equation is - how many projects benefit from the additional eyes and hands that a community brings?
^^^ thanks for saying this, it is precisely the crux of the issue
Not sure why, but that font Academica Book Pro vibrates on my screen and is difficult to read. Maybe it's too thin? It is a serif font and looks optimized for print. Firefox and Chrome on Mac.
> First, insurance rates for manually driven cars will shoot through the roof as less risky drivers moving to self driving cars decimate that risk pool (like if gun owners were required insurance for misuse).

Why would the less-risky drivers move to self-driving cars first? Wouldn't some of the higher-risk demographics (e.g. the elderly) make the move first since they have more incentive to do so?

> Second, cities that go to self driving only will have a huge advantage in infrastructure utilization and costs as roads are used more efficiently (with smoother traffic) and parking lots/garages become a thing of the past. Residents will just push for it if it means not being stuck in traffic anymore.

I think self-driving cars will be really cool and reduce traffic accidents once they're perfected, but a lot of these assumptions don't make sense. Unless a critical mass switches to car-sharing, autonomous cars and no parking will make rush hour worse because now each car will make the round trip to work twice a day instead of just once. Also, what happens to the real-estate where the parking lots are now? The financially sound thing to do will probably be converting these lots to more offices/condos/malls. So urban density will increase - increasing traffic.

Even if autonomous cars radically improve traffic flow, I suspect we'll just get induced demand [1]. More people will take cars instead of public transit and urban density will increase until traffic sucks again.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand
I thought the same about Max Payne when I played it. What a story. And you know what? They ruined it...the movie was awful.
> How can anybody in his right mind have vetted this last sentence?

Agreed. Unfortunately, Elon himself probably wrote that.
/r/syriancivilwar being investigated by Reddit
OMG I've got my first web developer job in 7 days
To be honest, the recent accident makes me believe they really didn’t. Waymo’s lidar tech seems more advanced but that might just be marketing.

But like the other person said, your claims have no evidence so please don’t act like it’s fact.
Maybe political allegiance has replaced
basic reasoning skills.

Not for one second, do I buy into that idea. Not for one second, do I imagine, that because of one election result, that suddenly people have somehow been transformed into anything vastly different throughout the world.

We have phases, where aggregate priciples of interaction change, not unlike shifts in musical taste. Cycles of class and intellectualism, and cycles of low-brow simplicity. Each pole has its own facets and degrees of appeal and attraction. The cycles are an expression of the prevailing winds for the dominant age group.

For the most part, a lot of people clearly thought their vote didn't matter, didn't really care who got elected, developed an opinion that the presidency doesn't matter, and cast the vote that seemed to be biggest joke.

Two other, much smaller, groups of people exist: those that genuinely believe a tiny, weak, incompetant and ineffectual government is a good thing (because substitute teachers aren't as demanding), and those that genuinely want to help, improve the world, and make a difference in benefitting the lives of as many people as possible, starting with those that have the least going for them.

The goof offs, though, voted the most and won. That's it. That's the only thing that happened, and it's not a disaster yet. Let's see if we can keep it that way, and stay on track.

There's some violence and sabotage in the picture too, and all of it stems from an unnecessary war in Iraq that should have never happened. Some of the very real political destabilization on the fringes is essentially blowback and revenge for that debacle. Take a step back, and note the coincidence in timing for each. I'm not sure this stuff will difuse itself. It may simmer on in the background for some time, and might not have any solution, as retaliation tends to fuel a continuity of grudges.
The question was not if we produce enough salt to bring a completely desalinated Atlantic ocean back up to normal Atlantic salinity.

It was whether we can produce enough to bring the fresh water that is being added from melting ice up to normal Atlantic salinity.
There is no "right" thing. There may be an optimal thing from the development perspective and an optimal thing from the business perspective. Since the two pieces cannot exist without each other, both parties have to communicate effectively and trust each other to find the optimal decision for the combined problem space which may be sub-optimal when considered separately.
> The sensors allow you a few seconds (a lot of seconds

It used to allow you _fifteen minutes_...
Tesla's system demands more from drivers than manual driving. The driver has to detect automation failures after they occur, but before a crash. This requires faster reaction time than merely avoiding obstacles.

Here's a good example - a Tesla on autopilot crashing into a temporary road barrier which required a lane change.[1] This is a view from the dashcam of the vehicle behind the Tesla. At 00:21, things look normal. At 00:22, the Tesla should just be starting to turn to follow the lane and avoid the barrier, but it isn't. By 00:23, it's hit the wall. By the time the driver could have detected that failure, it was too late.

Big, solid, obvious orange obstacle. Freeway on a clear day. Tesla's system didn't detect it. By the time it was clear that the driver needed to take over, it was too late. This is why, as the head of Google's self driving effort once said, partial self driving "assistance" is inherently unsafe. Lane following assistance without good automatic braking kills.

This is the Tesla self-crashing car in action. Tesla fails at the basic task of self-driving - not hitting obstacles. If it doesn't look like the rear end of a car or truck, it gets hit. So far, one street sweeper, one fire truck, one disabled car, one crossing tractor trailer, and two freeway barriers have been hit. Those are the ones that got press attention. There are probably more incidents.

Automatic driving the Waymo way seems to be working. Automatic driving the Tesla way leaves a trail of blood and death. That is not an accident. It follows directly from Musk's decision to cut costs by trying to do the job with inadequate sensors and processing.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2ml6sjk_8c
I don't know why you feel you must lie to yourself to feel better. The numbers you find on Google are also anecdotes, and they match here. HN was literally founded to be a home for statistical outliers. Silicon Valley and its extensions are statistical outliers. Why do you think people complain about gentrification and $2M houses , and throw rocks at buses? Because there is a lot of money sloshing around.
That headline is 3 words too long.
HUGE Babylon 5 fan here, but any sort of B5 film adaptation would have been a complete crap.

Different stories need different mediums?
There are 2 3rd party bitwarden servers:

https://github.com/jcs/bitwarden-ruby
https://github.com/VictorNine/bitwarden-go

but to run the bitwarden-blessed one see: https://help.bitwarden.com/article/install-on-premise/
Well, autopilot was engaged here and it certainly didn't brake, swerve, avoid an accident _at all_, let alone "faster than a human could".
In all seriousness: Yes.
It seems like a really good way to store small pieces of information that aren't changed very often. Such as Name System Registry entries. It works really well for this type of use case, and name registries are good things to be distributed. Using an EVM based blockchain allows me as an engineer to get strong identity, authorization and storage guarantees for free, leaving me to focus on the logic and systems around how names are changed and what those names mean.
A note to all designers reading this thread: HTML + CSS is the best design tool you could learn.

Don't think of it as code, or engineering. Get over the mental block. It's not more complicated than learning Photoshop or Illustrator. It's just a different interface. One that gives you total control. Where you can build things that actually work, and aren't just static representations. If you do web design, learn to work with the final medium. Otherwise, what are you really doing?

(..from a designer and engineer.)
There's a page for that too! http://www.technicopedia.com/8865.html
Meet the New Robot Army – Intelligent Machines for Autonomous Warfare
Most video games story pacing isn’t made for movies. Converting it to a movie they add all kinds of fillers and patches to remove game elements that makes game fun but movies not so fun to watch and nobody has been able to do this well.
Dual Core PowerPC Processor for TESS Planet Hunter
That's not going to fly in about a month under GPDR:

1. A standard cookie notice is nowhere near granular enough about different possible uses to qualify as informed consent.

2. I'm pretty sure Google Analytics is just a "processor" rather than a "controller" under GDPR, so much of the onus for following the regulations is still on the person using GA rather than on GA itself. Processors would not be responsible for handling deletion requests from individual; they would just need to make it possible for controllers to handle them. Obviously processors that take as much of the responsibility as possible will be much more attractive service providers for controllers, but the controllers can't just pass the buck to processors.
anyone played with framer’s design mode? It produces markup and style from a sketch-like interface that you make interactive with a JS interactivity API. It’s meant for prototyping, but you could make a fully functional app if you were crazy

The responsive design system is really intuitive as well, and is easier to reason about than regular css techniques.

The code markup that comes out is.. quite messy, but it made me realize the potential of design tooling that could completely take care of the work around html and css for an individual component (for me, they take at least 2x time compared to JS for some types of components)

It kinda goes against the rigor of producing lean code, and does away with expertise, but it’s definitey a version of the future: designers could output a bundle that was a packaged responsive UI component that exposed a JS API
Sure, maybe AMOC has been weakening since the end of the little ice age. But that doesn't matter so much if anthropogenic warming is weakening it now.
it also means that you could get a meaningful average of two images by averaging their compressed form (aka latent state z), and decoding, just like with the celebrities :)
" Tesla's system demands more from drivers than manual driving. The driver has to detect automation failures after they occur, but before a crash. This requires faster reaction time than merely avoiding obstacles."

I have been thinking that too. At what point do you decide that the autopilot is making a mistake and take over? That's an almost impossible task to perform within the available time.
I would have asked about GDPR and why they’re only applying policies to fulfill their legal requirements for it to EU citizens. Then some follow up on how they plan on identifying EU citizens from Americans, what if one is living in one place and one in another?

Isn’t your fundamental business model always going to be in tension with your user’s privacy?

Finally, given the way the site is structured specifically to broadcast at such a broad level with little control over the granularity people have over their ability to communicate, won’t the psychology of the site always favor those most comfortable expressing their thoughts and opinions to large groups of people, specifically folks that are either socially awkward or have overt agendas? Doesn’t this lend to a false sense of how one’s peers perceive the world?

I could go on and on. Facebook is a steaming pile of shit, and humanity would be better off without it.
Why does every single rust promoting article have to bash on c++?

They built a GC, good job. But, surely there is something else more worthy of typing about when hyping the language?
> Capitalism is not "the economic system in which things are bought and sold with money"

Well, at least according to Marx (c.f. Capital) capitalism is the system where things are bought and sold with money. If you read first few chapters of Capital you'll see that Marx explains this in various ways such as characterizing capitalism with division of labour where instead of producing bunch of commodities, workers produce one commodity and sell it for money with which they can buy other commodities. And according to, again, his definition communism is the society after this type of commodity production, i.e. the mechanism that produces value (money) is stopped in the sense that people stopped exchanging things for money.

You may not care of Marx's definition, but I just wanted to note for completeness.
Something like this, it has further reading references at the end? http://www.md.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/What_works%2C_...
Bitcoin is an economy for illicit things.

It is a store of value for early adopters trying to get people to basically put money in their pocket.

The only thing people care about is its value against USD. That alone refutes the possibility of it as a currency. USD is clearly a great currency.

Blockchain has some interesting applications; for example, medical records being secured, and maybe other applications.
> I'm in the camp believing that a basic implementation should be built-in, since health checks are already there.

Agreed 100%. Although... in my mind k8s is still pretty young, and this would definitely be a great feature to have by default in the future.
Metamask is quickly becoming one of the most interesting projects to me. It's so easy to spin up a site now and use metamask for identity and authorization. If you have API's that need to be protected from denial of service attacks, you just channel them through a smart contract and make the user's pay the gas, no more need to protect your backends.

The blockchain just becomes a source of truth and a protection against DDoS attacks. Past that, all other "transactions" can be done off chain. Future is exciting!