skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I suppose it depends on what you're looking for in a film.

For example, I can't stand musicals, because I think characters breaking out into song and dance every 5 minutes destroys any attempt at immersiveness or believability. But lots of people love them, and don't find this incongruity problematic. So I don't think breaking from the flow of the main story necessarily breaks the story.

Did the structure of "Adaptation" detract from its 'immersiveness'? I'd say it's the wrong question to ask.

My purpose was not humor, but to pull back the curtain and show the absurdity inherent in all action movies, and the work involved. Satire can be humorous, but that's not really the goal. I'd still love watching Jackie Chan outtakes even if his movies weren't comedic.

I have no use for yet another (whitewashed) action movie. Then again, as I said, there's probably a reason I'm not a Hollywood filmmaker.
I think the traditional approach is to make them 1st-party, by setting up a subdomain, like '3rdparty.yourdomain.com' and forward requests to it to '3rdparty.com.'
i don't like giving buzzfeed clicks and when i share stories with people i like to give sources that preferably isn't buzzfeed. kinda makes it less credible.
Slammed by Trump, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos Chooses Silence
Similar to this hockey story from a couple weeks ago:

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/30/598263399...

The Chicago Blackhawks called-up their emergency backup goaltender, a 36-year-old accountant who plays in a recreation league. He blocked all seven attempts to score and was named player of the game.
> These days I rent far more often, and even being part of elite programs and being very experienced with the process it is still far more of a hassle than simply approaching a car you’ve booked online, tapping your RFID card and driving away.

Really? The last time I rented a car in MIA, I showed up, was Enterprise Executive so I went and could choose any of a few dozen cars that had the keys already in the ignition. After that, I drove up to the exit at which point the person pulled up my reservation, scanned the car, and gave me the paperwork. I was out in less than 5 minutes from when I chose the car.

Return was just as easy, just pulled into the lot, someone scanned the car and sent me on my way.

Granted, it's not as easy as RFID and go, and I don't have that much experience with rentals because I don't use them often, but I wouldn't call it "far more" of a hassle, at least in my limited experience.
Cancer = you, but misregulated. Code for various tissues are turned on at 'incorrect' times, including code for profliferateNow(), ignoreAutoDestruct(), and can start running contradictory code like beNeuronLike() and beMuscleLike() simultaneously.

T-Cells generally sense 'rogue' cells, and command them to auto-destruct. Many cancers are rendered invisible to your immune system because their presentation to the immune system is indistinguishable from a healthy cell in that it doesn't present any feature that is not found elsewhere in the body.

In an engineered Car-T cell, an immune cell is reprogrammed by providing the cell with a DNA blueprint for a synthetically engineered protein called a 'Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)'[1]. That engineered protein has two major functions - sense a particular cell type, and activate the T-cell to kill whatever triggers its sensor. The sensing mechanism is relatively arbitrary from an engineering perspective, so we engineer the sensor to sense a particular cell type which has become cancerous. And the attack trigger is a shortcut of the entire immunological activation pathway - skipping straight to sense->attack, bypassing the natural defenses to prevent autoimmune problems.

Because the sensing mechanism of the synthetic protein is modular, these engineered proteins can swap out various 'sensors' to create new therapies relatively easily. Sense any cell that looks like a [lymphocyte/B-cell] and [kill it]. More sophistocated versions of these synthetic proteins can actually start to incorporate and-gates and other formal logic into their sensing capabilities:

if(sense(neuron && muscle)){
killTarget();
}

(where no neuron-like markers should ever show up with muscle-like markers except in a genetically scrambled cell, i.e. cancer).

[1] https://serotiny.bio/notes/proteins/car19/
Microservices. You track state yourself, call their service and shuttle the data back and forth, all on your servers. The user touches one endpoint and sees one cert.
Knights of the Old Republic
Yeah, the coverup is why they paid the $900 million fine.

The fault existing is why they paid claims to the people that the fault killed, and why they did a recall.
"More efficient" in terms of running LINPACK, maybe not. But the raw throughput of highly numeric scientific calculations isn't the goal of all architectures, even though we pretend it is.

It's possible to be more efficient at showing a bit of text and graphics which is what mobile phones do a lot more of than raw number crunching, except for games, except for games of course.
> So while "learning styles" may be a misnomer, I do believe that presenting one topic in a variety of ways is beneficial.

Absolutely. I think "learning styles" is a reductionist view of Universal Design for Learning [1], which is essentially what you described how your SO teaches.

It's quite possible that at a given time, someone may be inclined to visual learning, but may be more kinesthetically inclined in another setting/moment.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Design_for_Learning
Yeah I'm not really agreeing with ya there.

Whether its put together by Google, or the community, or whoever, really doesn't matter. Yes in this case it's Google, who does exist due to capitalism (not exclusively due to capitalism, though, as other systems work in other countries), but then capitalism is not the only economic or political system that produces 'deep coffers'. And this 'nice to have' is not build-able exclusively by Google.

By your logic anyone born to a family where the parents have U.S. employment would owe their existence to capitalism. Does that instinctively seem correct?
Maybe she could take over Facebook?
I always figured it was an issue with turning an inherently interactive form of media into a form that's taken passively. That seems like a rather difficult transition to make, hence movies about video games in general doing better than movies based on a specific game.
So anyone with an aviation license, gotcha. That should take care of at least 0.02% of the population.
Understanding Blockchain
The same principle applies. Autopilot is not a binary feature that either works or doesn't. It is an evolving system that should continuously get better and safer. Sure, Tesla could have delayed this specific update in favor of more testing. But how many preventable accidents would happen during that testing period that an earlier roll out could have prevented? Neither you or I know the answer to that. Tesla has access to all the autopilot data and therefore should be able to more accurately predict that number. I haven't seen anything to suggest Tesla is ignoring that data or being reckless in when they decide to roll out these changes.
Yeah I think the "physically based 3D renderer" is a bit misleading because it makes you think "ah, like Blender or Unreal Engine 4", but actually I think they just mean they are doing window translucency and drop shadows in a physically correct way (e.g. there is an actual light source) rather than faking it. It is still used to render mostly-2D windows.

(This is my assumption anyway - I haven't tried running it)
Looks like they are using Dart for developing applications. This seems to be the dart sdk for fuchsia

https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/topaz/+/master

There is no documentation at all but there is a few application examples in /app/. The bindings for fuchsia and zircon (kernel) are in /public/dart-pkg/
When you engage the trigger, firearms require a responsible human to aim with attention.

When you engage the autopilot, the system requires a responsible human to watch the road with attention.

I really don't see any difference.
Yea, I added a mention of this history (including RFC 2109 and RFC 2965) in the final essay too, including that DoubleClick was one of the first ones to track via cookies. Here is a link if you are interested: http://yuhongbao.blogspot.ca/2018/04/google-doubleclick-mozi...
Too short. Make a video game tv series.
My favorite is pipe-delimited, though that would depend on your data of course. Pipes are never used with the data I deal with, and would be a "typo" if they were. I do check for them on import and export, replacing them with %pipe; on any free-form text fields.

My data sets aren't that huge, but sometimes do get up to mid 10Ms though frequently is only in the 100Ks.

I know it's not a perfect solution but may work for you too.
After the first set of lies about hit-milestones/sales, it bacame impossible to not invent droplet blood tests.
I'm not sure this is a counter example. It sounds to me like you are learning faster by unifying 2 streams of information. You read the music notes and you listen to the performance.

How would you perform just studying sheet music the night before and not playing at all.
Rampage's plot: "Three people are turned into giant monsters and start destroying cities." That's a pretty good B-movie plot. Do a good job making the rubber monster suits and that's half the film right there.
It isn't, but in twenty years getting paid to write software I have far more regrets where I rewrote and shouldn't have, than where I should have rewritten and didn't.

If you're Google and you have people with these abilities kicking about, it's probably not a crazy investment to see what happens. We've got a HN story elsewhere in the list on post-quantum key agreement experiments in Chrome, again there's a fair chance this ends up going nowhere but if I was Google if throw a few resources at this just in case.

But on the whole I expect Fuchsia to quietly get deprecated while Linux lives on, even if there's lots to like about Fuchsia.
I'd ask Mark to solve a Captcha.

All jokes aside though, I feel like the senators should have been briefed by technology experts on the current industry practices and the capabilities and risks of current internet technology. The questions are pointless if they don't understand the responses and cannot come up with follow-up questions. It's generally really easy to side skirt a question with the first answer. Follow-up questions are where you get to into the meat.
It's a web service. You can host it yourself.
Despite the progress made over the last 24 months, I don't think Rust is ready for embedded primetime. Not to mention, the Rust learning curve is VERY steep for these guys coming from C.

Edit: to clarify ... I don't mean that they won't be able to understand the concepts ... I mean that they will lose a lot of productivity up front and won't appreciate the backend gains enough for there to be a political consensus to switch.
I have yet to see anything useful come from Fuchsia. There are tons of 'press release' type blogs, but nothing functional. The bundled steps to run Fuchsia inside qemu didn't work (and even shipped their own version of qemu in the scripts!)

I'm assuming the Fuchsia development is 100% about not having to use any GPL software. Look how hobbled the Android and ChromiumOS communities are compared to the Linux world at large.

As soon as someone outside of Google produces anything of any novelty around Fuchsia, I might change my mind, but for now I'm viewing it as a going-nowhere software project that's all hype and will never be 100% Free and Open Source.
Whataboutism is pointing to your opponent's flaws to change the subject from yours. I think OP is suggesting that both social media and consumer financial profilers need closer scrutiny, not that SM should be excused.
Where are you customers? I'd go there.

I'd also consider if you want to accept payments, wether it's going to be EUR or GBP, that could be another layer of unnecessary complexity at the beginning.

For taxes I think Ireland (or Switzerland) are the best places. For startup community and social life I'd go to Berlin or Barcelona.
I've mentioned before on here, it's clear teslas autopilot isn't really any better than other lane assist from other car manufacturers. At this point its just a neat party trick.
hah, thats good!
QNX is owned by Blackberry.
Noteworth | Multiple Engineering and Business Development and Product Positions | Hoboken, NJ | Full-time | Onsite

Noteworth’s mission is to build elegant products that drive healthcare innovation, enrich the patient experience, and allow clinicians to practice at the top of their licenses. We’re united by the belief that what we are creating is changing healthcare, for the better. Our products allow healthcare systems to easily conceptualize, create and operationalize expansions of care that leverage digital health tools, logistics, process refinement and metrics optimization into a single virtual care model.

Stack: Python, Django, PostgreSQL, Redis, Celery, React, AWS (and more)

More info: https://www.noteworth.com/careers/

Questions? nishant@noteworth.com

Mobile Product Manager application: https://angel.co/noteworth/jobs/335857-mobile-product-manage...

Software Engineer application: https://angel.co/noteworth/jobs/102876-software-engineer

Sr. Android Engineer application: https://angel.co/noteworth/jobs/266353-senior-android-engine...
That is very much an outlier, and if it were at all relevant to the issue it would further weaken your case, as these three pilots had several minutes to sort things out. Questioning the assumptions underlying the assumed safety of airplane autopilot use can only weaken the claim that Tesla's 'autopilot' is safe.
Random people all over the internet have already done that. It's called "let's play".
Does the cloud provider have knowledge of the encryption keys? Do you generate the key in the provider's application, or is it import? Do they send the key to their servers? Can you verify all of this?
It does seem to me that the people who argue most passionately for different learning styles also tend to be the same people whose preferred learning style is the most passive - usually "visual learners" who somehow feel like they're absorbing more by looking at it rather than actually engaging it (by, for instance, working actual problems).
In my experience the second time leads to architecture astronautics... third time is when you get it right.

Althought in OS space one might argue that second generation of time sharing OSes (TOPS-10, ITS, MCP...) got more things right than are right in Unix and such.
Also I think they started off with an existing C++ microkernel if I'm not mistaken. Wasn't it something like LM?
Yes, but she did so in part by using fraud and deception. When you're an early stage company trying to raise money from investors there's a large component of "trust us to do the right things with your money" that is going to be hard to sell investors with her on the board.
Good luck with that strategy. Do you really think sleeping in a sleeping bag on the floor of a factory that produces ~150k cars/year (current run rate) will impress investors? That really isn't the strategy, I can promise you that.
> For what benefit exactly?

Wouldn't surprise me if the unofficial reason is because it's more fun.
The core of zlib shouldn't have any POSIX dependence; it just takes buffers of bytes and produces buffers of bytes.

It has some convenience functions for decoding files given a path or FD, but I'm sure Fuscia's limited POSIX compatibility layer will support that, basic file access is relatively easy to provide in a POSIX library wrapping Fuscia's file handling.

Likewise, I'd be willing to bet that curl and Git would mostly work on top of the limited POSIX compatibility layer; they might need a few tweaks, but likely not much more than the tweaks needed in porting to the various BSDs and OS X, and likely a lot less than is needed to provide them natively on Windows.
If you haven't yet, you probably need to see "The Room". My expectations... could not live up to the reality.
They can very suddenly crash into another plane because you have looked away for two seconds. It has actually happened (though nowadays, technology has made it easier to avoid these accidents).
Healing process after breast cancer surgery may enable cancer to spread
Personally, i'll be happy if we can move past read/write constructs designed for tape drives.
Good by what standards?
I think Resident Evil is pretty good.
Doom was fun. So was Mortal Kombat. The first Tomb Raider was fine. It is too bad it doesn't seem that the recent one did well because Alicia Vikander is good.
Using Topological Data Analysis to Reveal Dynamical Organization of the Brain
Quite a lot years ago I had to drive for 6 hours straight at night to get on time to place where I needed to be (air flight was not available back then for me)

What I noticed that when I was following posted/safe speed limit, I was quickly losing focus, mind started wandering and eventually I felt I was falling asleep.

I do not remember what made me to speed up, but once I was about 30% faster than posted speed limits, and once I reached part of the way where road was quite bad + a lot of road work was happening, I realized that I much more alert.

As soon as I slowed down to posted speed limit speed I began drifting away again..

If anything, my anecdote confirms your theory - as soon as we perceive something safer, we pay way less attention. And Autopilot sounds like one of these safety things, which makes drivers less attentive and potentially missing dangerous situation, which otherwise would be caught by driver's mind.

I wonder if there is a way to introduce autopilot help without actually giving sense of security to the driver. Granted Tesla would lose so precious marketing angle, but if their autopilot would work somewhat like variable power steering system on background without obvious taking over control of the car, in the long haul that would be more beneficial?
It's hard to ignore when it also goes to your phone. Also when the company _expect_ a reply.

I have had HR routinely email me between 9 and 11 pm on Sunday nights as a deliberate strategy to make me stressed/uncomfortable with the workplace. Some people are trash and use technology as a weapon.
Government funding.
The Tesla warns you, what, 6 times before disabling autopilot. Why not have the car engage the emergency lights and gradually slow down for each warning - eventually coming to a full stop. This plays directly into human impatience, likely resulting in hands on the steering wheel after the first warning. In the event that the driver does not react there is probably something wrong (e.g. seizure) and the car should come to a complete stop for safety. This is a very real trolley scenario because a stopped car on the highway is asking to be rear-ended, but it's still far better than a car traveling at 60mph with an incapacitated driver.

My last idea on how to eliminate these types of casualties was met with fair criticism (TL;DR - battery ejection)[1]. Am I missing anything with this idea?

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16720680
> What measure of proof do you require?

How about a single targeted advert for a product I want to buy? (Note: products I already bought and then start seeing tons of advertisements for don't count)

> PS- One of Seisent's selling points was helping to solve cold cases.

Did it actually help solve those cases? I haven't heard of any dramatic drops in unsolved murders, or huge numbers of cold cases being closed.

If they really do "effectively know everything about everybody", they're keeping damn quiet about it.
Well, it was bought from Urchin and then they discontinued the original software. I mentioned this in the essay too.
Also does Tesla have numbers to show that autopilot has actually been safer than a normal human driver?
Are you talking about vehicles in general or Teslas? I've had a Model X for about a year now and can say that just having hands on the wheel definitely does not generate enough torque to deter the warnings on Autopilot, it definitely requires a "yank".
You can run native code on Fuchsia (and Android for that matter). It should be fairly trivial to do some benchmarks.
Trump’s Rush to Judgment on Syria Chemical Attack
Why use a new OS from a company with historically bad customer support, will likely report everything you do back to google HQ for analytics and frequently abandons projects once developers get tired of it. Sounds like a computing nightmare, I'd be very hesitant to voluntarily use it.
> Iteris Velocity system is already being used by Santa Clara County

https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/64...

> uses unique MAC identifiers, and maintains
anonymous user data to provide travel information data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TempleOS

Problem solved!
Might also be that they're afraid media might start pointing out that it's just fancy lane assist and not the "self driving" they've been subtly marketing. Don't get me wrong, I wish I had one in my driveway right now, but they really need to tone down the whole autopilot bit until they can make sure it doesn't kill people on very obvious obstacles.
The history of massive boom-bust cycles before central banks says otherwise. These cycles haven't been completely eliminated, but the cycles are much more moderated than the way they were before fiscal and monetary interventions.

It seems that the best would be for a currency to automatically detect the conditions needing faster or slower creation and algorithmically adjust (as they adjust the hash rate), keeping political adjustments out of it.
That's honestly not very reassuring at face value. Concurrency is hard...
Which is a fine mentality for personal passwords -- at least I get where the distrust comes from.

But for an enterprise team (or just a team), you need to be able to share passwords with various team members.

Without a system, you're left with each of those people having to use their own (often insecure) personal methodology. Without a password manager, people resort to very simple passwords, or reusing passwords across multiple systems, or writing passwords down on PostIt notes next to their monitors.

Without the convenience of a cloud-based system, you don't have an easy way to back up your passwords -- what happens if someone gets hit by a bus? And you can't easily have someone run compliance to verify when the last time was you updated your password, or how complex your passwords are -- at least not without showing them the raw passwords in all systems.

I get paranoia... but any team that runs a password manager service consistently for all users will be much more secure than any team that doesn't.

* Most Private And Secure Password Managers - Secured.fyi - Alpha || https://secured.fyi/password.html

* Best Password Manager 2018 - Lastpass vs. Dashlane vs. 1Password || https://www.tomsguide.com/us/best-password-managers,review-3...
> So POSIX support is a given on most systems. Why replace it with something that breaks existing code?

Because POSIX has horrible security properties, and does not provide enough guarantees to create truly robust software. See for instance, the recent article on how you simply cannot implement atomic file operations in POSIX -- sqlite has to jump through 1,000 hoops to get something pretty robust, but it shouldn't be this way.