skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly - and for all intents and purposes, that should be good enough. If the data is marked "deleted" and then written over within some reasonable amount of time (whatever their VACCUM cycle is to rewrite the immutable partition) then that should be good enough.

Now as for backups, this is much harder. I don't know how reasonable it is to ask them to discard backups in cold storage - seems like a compliance nightmare that would absolutely punish smaller players that can't build infrastructure to do that.
SOGo could be an interesting open-source option as a groupware.

https://sogo.nu/

They offer a demo here
http://demo.sogo.nu/SOGo/

The account sogo1, sogo2, sogo3 are available to login and see what it looks like.
Definitely possible. As always, dollars and effort are what's required.

https://www.theoceancleanup.com/technology/
All ref and struct related improvements up to the upcoming 7.3.

The Span, Memory and related structures.

SIMD improvements.

As for syntax sugar, MSIL is expressive enough to fully support C++ semantics due to Managed C++ and C++/CLI, so it is quite nice if more such features get exposed at C# level, instead of forcing us to use C++/CLI.
Also these were Zuckerberg's talking points, which he had prepared for all the potential questions. I think it does show that his answers are mostly "scripted" and not necessarily genuine or coming from a place of honesty.

https://twitter.com/becket/status/983846618263891968

Direct image link:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DadTMxlW4AAUz_h.jpg:large
if completeting the training makes someone worth 10k more then give them that raise.
Facebook is in direct competition with old media. Equifax is not.
Name recognition.
If you work out the math for what the river would have to look like, and then inspect these rivers, I think you'll find that it doesn't match up.

At any rate, it would great if this were actually the case, because then it would be easier to bottleneck and corral this trash. But, I don't think this is the case.
I think they're looking at vastly different models. MXRoute looks to be like ordering web hosting (but mostly just for the mail portion), whereas FastMail is more equivalent to a user-based account service, like G Suite or Office 365.

I wouldn't knock MXRoute, if you're happy with it, that's awesome. I'm a pretty happy FastMail user, personally, but I will say the account-based pricing has sniped me: I wanted a separate mail account on my domain for a very low usage, text only email handling piece of software... and it would double my bill to do that. I'd at least like to be able to have my different user accounts on different user tiers, pricing-wise, and currently that isn't available.
I completely agree. I think the outcome of event proves that. I am interested on how this generalization can be so pervasive in the media and among internet communities despite the democrats getting blown away in the presidential, congressional, and state elections
So what, billionaires don't have problems?
You can insure against risks. You can't against bets. Good luck getting an insurance company to sell you a policy covering training cost recovery in the event of employee-initiated turnover.
> They have done that voluntarily for years.

No they haven't.

Take the case of Paul-Olivier Dehaye. In December 2016 Mr Dehaye, a Belgian mathematician, e-mailed Facebook asking for a copy of the data it had gathered about him through an advertising tool called Pixel.

Organisations based in the EU or which process data of EU residents are required to answer questions like this, known as subject-access requests.

Yet it took 106 days for Facebook to do so. The firm acknowledged the existence of Mr Dehaye’s Pixel data, but declined to provide them, stating that doing so would involve “disproportionate effort”.

The data were buried too deep inside Facebook’s data-analytics warehouse, known as Hive. When Mr Dehaye appealed to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), which regulates Facebook’s data processing in Europe, he entered a similar maze of e-mails. The DPC is still assessing the case.

https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21739997-europeans-ask...
We've seen it before:

https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-google-news-effect-spain-r...

Everyone loses. And smaller, local, independent companies lose more.
I work with emscripten and webgl and this looks like a fantastic tool for optimization in particular. Really looking forward to using it. Thank you!
Very vague post. Next time please write specific examples. Everyone should sanitize inputs.
I like FastMail too. I like their philosophy, that I can route and apply sorting rules to multiple domains easily, and I like their web interface.

There is recurring monthly billing and I've never experienced any issues with their billing. Reference image: https://piqdd.com/fastmail.billing.screen.png
> But Ruby was Rails, so the culture accepted constant rewriting and breakage, and people went along.

The main reason people switched probably wasn't rails making people expect breakage, the main reason was that (a) it was relatively easy to rewrite your code to work on both 1.8 and 1.9 (as long as your dependencies had already done it), and (b) 1.9 was much faster.
> We wouldn't judge a carpenter on e.g. his/her ability to use a saw

We absolutely should because it's a fundamental aspect of doing their job. The difference between me and a professional carpenter is literally the ability to use tools effectively to build an item. I know whether to use a dovetail or dowel joint as well as any professional, but I guarantee the pro will achieve a better finish in much less time.

It's like theoretical CS vs. real-world programming. It's good to know sorting strategies and whatnot, but knowing how to use the tools is what gets stuff done.
It's not a platform issue, it's a monetization issue. Somehow social networks have to make money, and that either involves charging users which pisses people off, or relying on the fact that people don't properly value their time and / or information and selling them ads. Selling ads incentivizes aggressive data mining, and then you're right back to the situation we have now.
Honestly, I've never used render props yet myself, for a variety of reasons, so I just don't have the experience to understand your concerns there.

As I said: if you have specific concerns that you think can be resolved by changes in the docs or the Redux/React-Redux libraries, please file an issue so we can discuss them in more detail.
Moved away purely for simplicity. Clustering brings too many black boxes in the mix.
Leaning how to pass exams can certainly be done. Weather say the essay part of the SAT (producing a formulaic essay using the approved pattern) is actually much use, in deciding if you should get one of the scarce places on a Tier 1 uni STEM course - not so much.
I don't think that's a meaningful comparison. There's quite the difference between "The data can be readily returned from the database if you omit the NOT deleted clause." and "You can use forensic tools to get data back. Maybe."
As someone who's tinkering on an app to send marketing email, I constantly struggle with the field. On one hand, I really think it helps small/niche businesses survive, which I think is critically important nowadays. On the other, nobody thinks their shit stinks, and man does it stink.

I'm curious--what emails do you actually appreciate getting? Would you subscribe to marketing email with restraints? (e.g. only email me when items in my size are on sale). If you could change how email marketing works, how would you do it?
Mattermark always seemed ironically named to me. I would never see anything that mattered there so I learned to ignore it.

I think of back in the day when people started to complain that TechCrunch was only about Facebook and Apple and it was almost impossible to get a real startup mentioned there. Well 95% of the companies that want to get in TechCrunch and don't have the same trendy names and trendy addresses as Mattermark companies but mostly people don't care.

There are all kinds of business intelligence services out there, from Dun and Bradstreet to Bloomberg to TechCrunch. The diversity of services out there means there is tough competition but also proven market need.
My intent is protection, not control.

Each situation is different. Even though things turned out the way they did for you, can you say they would have been different if they had just allowed you to blatantly disregard their rules? Can you say with certainty that none of the stuff they blocked that you accessed regardless did not harm you? Could they have had the foresight to know for sure if you would or would not have been harmed?

I won't get into a discussion on whether things such as nudity or pornography are truly harmful, that's a can of worms. But they are not accepted in the society we live in, and my son has to be able to function in that society, with its rules, controls, and monitors. We have collectively decided on these and I would be failing as a parent if I didn't try to give my child the tools to function in this environment.

Would you care to elaborate on these things that your parents didn't like that were blocked? Did they explain to you and try to get you to understand why they didn't like them? And why you didn't respect them enough to abide by their rules(not saying that you should have respected them, they may have not deserved it)? It sounds like there may have been some deeper issues there.
Want computers to see better in the real world? Train them in a virtual reality
Is voter id card something different?
> - a tee loadbalancer for gRPC, forwarding the same requests to both A and B backend pools, but only returning results from A. I don't think Envoy has this, but it should.

Envoy can do this, via its shadowing feature. See the docs here: https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.6.0/api-v2/api/v2/ro....
Where do you see 4? I see package.json only. Arguably the build script. And that number doesn't increase at all with more code.

The number of files is exactly the same as if you weren't using webassembly, other than the one rust/c source file.
"Upbringing" can be a slightly misleading way of stating that summary, as most people think of upbringing as comprising environmental factors that parents can influence. But factors that parents can influence should be largely shared between siblings, and studies typically find that the effect of shared environment is quite small in adulthood. IQ researchers typically find that 60-80% of the variance in IQ is explained by genetics, and most of the remainder to "non-shared environment", a grab bag of factors not shared between siblings that we might as well call "luck".

The above is a slight simplification, but I think it's a fair summary of the current consensus among intelligence researchers, given the word count.
The sad part is that a lot of people don't even seem to care.

When my relatively small company announced that they were installing a Palo Alto firewall and that everyone needed to install client side certificates in order for web browsers to continue working, it set off major alarm bells in my head that led to one conclusion -- "No more non-work related web browsing at the office. No exceptions."

Most of my coworkers (albeit mostly those in support and not developers, but still people at least somewhat familiar with the way computers work) only cared that they'd still be allowed to visit Facebook during the day.

I was assured that "nobody was actively looking at employee web traffic" but that doesn't matter. They didn't even think it was a big deal to put this new monitoring in writing until I made a big stink out of it, and they added this to the employee handbook:

>Each of these communication avenues are subject to monitoring by the IT Security Manager, a supervisor, or the President. When using any of these communications, be aware that a business record is made, which is retained by the company and becomes the company's property. This business record may potentially contain sensitive personal information related to the sites you are viewing and into which you are logging on, including user/password information. If you do not wish to share such information, it is suggested you do not access those items using [employer]'s network.
Trump was bankrolled by a couple of elites as well as being an elite himself if you believe he's a billionaire. This is just a changing of the guard. Same thing happened with the tea party. In fact Trump hijacked the tea party. Removing the CA profiles won't stop the same electioneering that happened. What really is the problem are the trolls and the Russian/foreign money.
> The best and the brightest have been heading to Silicon Valley because they want to build the future. ... “Tech” implies an intellectual practice in which engineers build neat things to improve the world. The major tech companies are businesses. That’s all they are. They innovate how to make money.

This extends far beyond Facebook or the recent scandal, and gets to the heart of a deep rift over the last few decades. Many people have had a deep skepticism over technology and its motivations, and the broad-scale beliefs about "making the world a better place" are really being called into question now.
$800
great resources. I'll check them out.
That's odd, it's one of my best performing lead magnets. I'll look into it. Thanks!
Thank you. So it uses an ARMv8 SoC, while the Turris uses ARMv7, making the Mox better.
Pairing with a Very Well-Grounded Rubyist: Interview with David A. Black
> I could contractually agree to limit my exercise of that right, and that would be fine. Such a contract could be enforceable.

Wait a minute, isn't that the opposite of inalienability? That is, isn't an inalienable right one that cannot be given away (or whose exercise cannot be limited by, even consensual, contract)?
That's likely what their legal team decided on, not what they actually enforce at the customer support level. I've replaced a Keurig. I called them, told them it was not working when plugged in, they asked I send in the little k-cup holder, and sent me a replacement unit.
Italy's robot concierge a novelty on the way to better AI
Mapping the best states for business using R
That's why I subscribe to The Economist through the iOS App Store. A couple of clicks, and unsubscribed/resubscribed. I've used their digital subscription service straight from the publisher, and yeah, what a pain.
I love that AssemblyScript and bare Wat format are supported as well.
You might be interested in Baltimore Harbor's Water Wheel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5l7s6wC50g

It uses the water flow, solar, some pontoons and a clever design to fill up a dumpster with debris. This seems like the real issue: someone still needs to take it from the dumpster, but at that point it's a manageable problem.
Running into a wall with Fusion 360 while building a marble machine [video]
I'm glad I don't have any warranty nightmare stories, mine have been universally painless (mostly for computer parts). I've sent back a couple of hard drives over the years and I don't think I even had to talk to customer service for those, the entire process was automated. I had a fairly expensive mouse bite the dust after six months and that only took a short conversation with customer service to get the warranty process started.
This is exactly correct. In the past, I didn't consider myself an excellent programmer, because I struggled to solve esoteric number permutation problems and recursive graph search problems during whiteboard interviews. It seemed to me that all my peers could do it, and they were getting good jobs for it.

Over time I learned that the real value comes from solving the right problems, and recognizing wasted effort. It comes from architecting systems that are easily maintainable. That's what makes money in the business.

Solving narrow, intensely interesting algorithms, is a rare case that is not widely needed in the industry at large.
Every smartphone activity is monitored to make a tech company's -I mean- your experience better. Is there some way to tap into that so the monitoring is transparent, and no one's the wiser?
> Yeah, my biggest fear is that they will take away the "compact" display settings in favor of something more design'y.

Reminds me how happy I should be to have a designer on my team who isn't obsessed with removing every nifty feature.

He'll be replaced soon and the new designer seems to be great too: I know she's already tried to get a basic dev environment up and running which is something I really don't expect from the designer camp.
> seriously, when you scroll through a 10,000 email folder in moments

Err, no. Scrolling through 10k emails is a UX disaster. There's a reason why Search exists, and it's this use case. If your email is properly categorized, you rarely end up with folders that large anyway.

I've yet to see anyone handle email categorization and filtering anywhere close to as sanely as Gmail, and I seem to try everything about once a year, get pissed that nobody else can figure it out, and go right back to Gmail. It's especially important to someone like me who's on dozens of open source mailing lists and needs to cross-correlate conversations between lists ("[List Y] Hey I need to update X to make Y work again." "Go talk to someone on list X and file a bug on X's tracker..." "[Bugtracker X] Bug for making Y work again" is an incredibly common email workflow in OSS-land).

My biggest pain in email these days is that Gmail hasn't implemented any kind of smart filter for idiots that can't figure out their own email address - (namely, people signing up for email lists and using services thinking they have my email address... I keep getting incredibly absurd why-the-hell-are-you-even-emailing-this email including medical records, police reports, travel documents, confidential legal communications, etc. from people who share my particular first-letter-last-name pair).
I barely get any spam at all on FastMail. The spam I do get is classified fairly well, but I haven't even gotten enough spam in the 18 months since I switched to FastMail to get personalized filtering enabled! (200 spam messages)

Assuming spam filtering is "good enough", which it is, I'd rather not have my mail used for helping other people's mail get filtered better. FastMail solely uses email you confirm as spam to help their spam reporting efforts, and you can even disable that setting. No accidental spam gets mined for any purpose outside your own account's benefit.

I also feel Gmail trusts it's own opinion more than yours, with regards to training behavior. I used to have receipts from some stores always marked as "promotions" or even "spam", no matter how many times I tried to teach Gmail otherwise.
That's not what it shows, it simply shows he has prepared for a number of questions. If he was the one to come up with those answers (potentially running them by lawyers and PR just like you have to do for any public communication when you are a CEO of a publicly traded company) then it's still coming from a place of "honesty", it would be his genuine opinions. In order to say that he wasn't being honest you have to prove that those answers were prepared by someone else.
It's even better....

The total price of cable for us would be:

- cable tv with the same subscription level ~$50 a month

- 5 extra set top boxes (yes we have 6 TVs) - $50

- various fees (network access, regulatory, franchise fee) - $15

- HD Technology Fee - $10

The numbers may make less sense if we didn't have unlimited gigabit internet for $70 a month from AT&T. We also have unlimited Internet on our phones (and my iPad).

In total $125 a month just fur TV. That's not to mention that our older son who doesn't live with us also gets to use Netflix and Hulu. Also, my wife has a split shift. When she isn't at the gym, she can watch content on her phone.

I've made back in increased salary more than enough to make the $360 year for PluralSight worth it.
Basic window with stuff drawn on it with GDI and GDI+ in a double-buffered way.

Edit: Scratch the GDI+ bit, it's just GDI.
Here's a source (http://www.dw.com/en/almost-all-plastic-in-the-ocean-comes-f...) that says most of it comes from 10 rivers, most of which are in China. So it is fair to blame this on China. Shouldn't be surprising, as this is just one item on a litany of environmental travesties they've committed.
$300 to replace battery? I thought battery replacements are $79 and $29 under their promotional pricing from the controversy? Or did you replace a macbook battery?

FYI, Apple has replaced things for me out of warranty all the time (macbook battery, charger, etc, for free). The Genius bar staff have a lot of leeway and when I'm sitting there I always observe some people being extremely discourteous or playing obviously dumb, and in response getting completely different service than what I would normally get.
My older brother had 2 kids and he changed the WiFi password weekly and his kids only got the new passwordifnthey did their chores/homework the previous week.

I think that if you have a kid who puts that much value on a device, saves up and buys said device, than that kid is already on the road to responsible behavior.
There's a way to both make the story the star and have creative amazing visuals that perfectly support the story.

It's called radio.

Seriously, I've heard radio adaptations from the 1940s or 1950s of classic science fictions stories, and they were excellent.

As far as story goes, they could follow the original better than film or TV adaptions, because their cost is pretty much proportional to length. For a visual adaption, cost is a function of length, number of settings, and complexity of those settings. With a visual adaptation you often need to cut out whole settings to keep costs down.

As far as visuals go, you leave that to the listener. A few deft words from a character or from a narrator to provide a little guidance, along with some sound effects, and the listen's imagination can fill the rest.

As an example of the kind of science fiction that was available on radio, here is the episode list for the early '50s program "Dimension X": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dimension_X_episodes
An excellent film
Online Bootcamp Thinkful Acquires Bloc
Do you have data/sources?
i'm betting they remove the chat
Bytecode formats as portable binaries have always been a thing on the mainframe world all the way back to the 60's, it has just taken quite a few decades to become commodity across mobile, desktop and web worlds.
8th Annual Nashville IT Symposium May 1, 2018
Yes it is. My privacy is violated by liberal google employees and facebook criminals
Part of the reason we need these laws to be enforced is so that manufacturers are discouraged from doing idiotic things like making the application software in any way involved in whether the battery explodes.
Lot of Leetcode!