skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you use it for (monogamous, long-term) dating, sure. OKC also supports short-term dating/hookups and polyamorous “looking for secondaries” use-cases, though, and such searches are indefinite—finding someone doesn’t make you any less interested in finding more someones.
> It would be more effective for these politicians to actually educate their constituents.

Why would politicians want to educate their constituents, when it's so much easier to get reelected by uneducated ones?
.,:dkdc:;;:c:,:d:.
.loc'.,cc::c:::,..;:.
.cl;....;dkdccc::,...c;
.c:,';:'..ckc',;::;....;c.
.c:'.,dkkoc:ok:;llllc,,c,';:.
.;c,';okkkkkkkk:;lllll,:kd;.;:,.
co..:kkkkkkkkkk:;llllc':kkc..oNc
.cl;.,oxkkkkkkkkkc,:cll;,okkc'.cO;
;k:..ckkkkkkkkkkkl..,;,.;xkko:',l'
.,...';dkkkkkkkkkkd;.....ckkkl'.cO;
.,,:,.;oo:ckkkkkkkkkkkdoc;;cdkkkc..cd,
.cclo;,ccdkkl;llccdkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkd,.c;
.lol:;;okkkkkxooc::coodkkkkkkkkkkkko'.oc
.c:'..lkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkd,.oc
.lo;,:cdkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkd,.c;

,dx:..;lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllc'...
Regarding the relationship, I can only hope that would happen. At that point, I'd have some different considerations to make. Problems come and problems go.
Likely depends on the type of partner you're seeking/find.

Those who are seeking committed long term relationships, yes, likely cancel.

Those who are seeking short-term/multiple relationships and would like a revolving door of them... subscriptions continue to renew.

Probably has a lot to do with the price points between 'casual' dating sites/apps like Tinder and OKCupid compared to something 'more serious' like https://www.itsjustlunch.com/ - where it _starts_ at $2,800.
Have some random juxtaposition to go with the random WWW site.

* https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=151958046704287

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/413978

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/327361

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/430344

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/299580

* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/434844
Anyone who listens to podcasts uses RSS.

RSS hasn't gone or been anywhere.
I'm not sure if you read the entire book, but I don't think that this is a fair assessment of the main thesis the Author makes.

Of course we are not in a post-scarcity world. Capital itself will always be scarce by definition.

The question is: If time is not longer a viable means to obtain capital, how to adjust societal norms to compensate?
Trafficked and enslaved: the teenagers tending UK cannabis farms (2017)
These bikes are definitely going to eat into the number of uber rides. It's happened to me personally where I compare the time an Uber ride would take vs a bike and I end up choosing the bike. Interestingly this weekend I ended up choosing an electric scooter over a bike.These things are going to be used in a continuum depending on the situation, especially for younger people in urban environments.
Phil's brain is extraordinary. I find that I need to read and re-read his blog posts/listen and re-listen to his talks to pick up on even a small amount of what he's saying. Great content.
Internal to a Retail org, and I suspect it's not being viewed internally as Data Science.
Oh, I had no idea. In that case no I wouldn't use that, I'd set up a recurring donation directly. (I recently changed payroll processing and haven't transferred the donations yet).
What?? You mean I can't pick up my wifi from the end of the garden, but there's a chance the US government is listening in from space?

Is that seriously possible?
Yes, it's pretty hard to take that line seriously. At minimum it's very charitable framing, considering there is absolutely no indication whatsoever that OpenAI would credibly reach this (vague, underspecified) goal before any of the other serious contenders. Nor would competitors have any requirement to include OpenAI if and when they were getting close.
> I seriously question what is the true motivation behind this over-stated agenda and have many answers as to why it exists and why it is so heavily funded/spotlighted.

First, you could say the same thing for all AI research at the moment! Grandiosity is perhaps even more common in subcommunities of AI that aren't safety focused.

Aside from grandiosity (either opportunistic or sincere), I don't think there's any sinister motivation.

More importantly, I don't think the safety push is misplaced. Even if the current round of progress on deep (reinforcement) learning stays sufficiently "weak", the safety question for resulting systems is still extremely important. Advanced driver assist/self-driving, advanced manufacturing automation, crime prediction for everything from law enforcement to auto insurance... these are all domains where 1) modern AI algorithms are likely to be deployed in the coming decade, and 2) where some notion of safety or value alignment is an extremely important functional requirement.

> ...and has, from what I can see, nothing to do w/ AGI nor are the approaches compatible

In terms of characterizing current AI safety research as AGI safety research? Well, there is a fundamental assumption that AGI will be born out of the current hot topics in AI research (ML and especially RL). IMO that's a bit over-optimistic. But I tend to be a pessimist.

> ...principal ideology...

As an aside, I'm not sure what this means.
As a developer who appreciates good design but doesn’t really know how to create it, can you suggest a good entry level resource that summarizes what we’ve learned over the last 50 years about HCI and how to make usable interfaces?
Steam is actually still a WIP. When I tried to install it following the Debian instructions (inside a Stretch container) I was unable to do so. It currently does not support the i386 arch necessary. Maybe that has changed since I tried, but it was not working for me a week or so ago.
cool! i've been toying with the idea of doing some design for CNC milling (i have not done so since my undergrad days). are there inexpensive options for getting time on a CNC machine?
It also depends on your capability to discover the underpinnings of Strong AI... Certain mindsets preclude one from doing so. If you truly understood the underpinnings of StrongAI and weren't moved to heavily restrict publicized details, I'd strongly question if what you had discovered/came to understand truly were 'underpinnings' of the technology.

As such, for those quick to publish or say they would publish and share details, one is able to quickly ascertain the possible strength of what they have discovered or feel they have the possibility of discovering. That being said, it's interesting that several proponents of 'everyone share what they find' have moved to more maturely state that 'restrictions may of apply'.. Sensibly signaling that they indeed wouldn't reveal certain details upon discovering their true nature and capability for obvious reasons (a danger to society to allow such power/capability to be detailed and therefore used in negative ways).

Human history has myriad examples of powerful technology being misused and abused. The current age of disinformation is one of our more modern ones. The way in which social media has been weaponized is yet another. Weak AI has already been used for destructive means and in manipulative manners for profit. A good deal of unsafe end products which utilize Weak AI are already fielded. The fielding of which made possibly by deep pockets manipulating policy makers and regulation.

A sensible mind capable of producing Strong AI will have observed and digested these clearly visible truths and it would move them to restrict access and publications of their works. Doing otherwise would highlight a level of ignorance, immaturity, and admission of truth when it comes to grasping the current state of humanity. It is this which would preclude one from grasping the nature and foundations of strongAI in the first place.

[Nature's lockout/safety mechanism for such a stage in Human development/capability]
Yes. More specifically, encrypted data cannot be decrypted without the key.

So your choices are:

1. Only the user has their key

2. Someone else has the user's key

If a company, law enforcement, or anybody else has a trove of everyone's keys, that trove will be extremely valuable to hackers, organized crime, domestic and foreign intelligence, etc, and it will be stolen. Whether we'll know it's been stolen is another question.
I’m going to start having my server send

Last-Modified: Mon, 20 Apr 3018 13:37:00 GMT

Then we will see what people say when my stuff is posted :^)

Then again my stuff probably wouldn’t get much attention to begin with.

But if it did...

People would have to admit that they are all living in the present whereas I was living in the future.
This. Regardless of the school name you prefix it with "graduates designed" conjures up mental imagery of bolted assemblies with fasteners you can't actually get a wrench on and massive stamped parts with a size tolerance of whatever the default in their cad software was"
Make the recipient the return address and whomever the actual address and forget the stamp. Post office will return to sender
I keep an eye on the project, though I haven't tried setting one up so far. I have to say it's a little sad to see that the Contribute link in the site footer throws a 403 (I'd report that to them, but so does the Contact link...)
If it's F#, sign me up! That's the current language/stack I'm enthralled with. JavaScript is still the day job though. Thanks!
Heh. The teenie magazines occasionally have a conscience where you least expect it. This fellow here - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Goldstein_(Psychotherap... - he wrote for the best-known German youth magazine, and he was good. Instagram and Facebook, OTOH, they sell clicks and outrage, because outrage sells.
Using WordPress as a CRUD Database, API Included
I'd be pretty frustrated if I used the app to locate an available bike but then found that someone had locked it up.
Docker Volumes Demystified
Good comment: I don't really disagree with you. I probably shouldn't have thrown that thing in there about hoarding cause it's more of a gripe than anything. I guess what I was trying to say is that our current relation to power (that is, capital) results in serious inefficiencies like huge amounts of food going to waste because no one near them will pay, or people dying of preventable causes within walking distance of the services to prevent that outcome. This is kinda what i meant by hoarding: the resources that we can easily automate production of are just getting stockpiled instead of given to people.

Even worse, we "hoard" more abstract things like education. The means to pay for free education for all in America is well within the accumulated wealth of a few of those who have been most successful at accumulating it.

For sure I agree, though, that some sort of soviet-era attempt at forced redistribution wont magically solve all our issues. As you say, resources are limited and only further technology development will solve those issues.
An elegy for handwriting?
Telegram Desktop is the current client for all major desktop platforms. The last commit on the repo was yesterday. It does use Qt. And how is Qt not native code? It's C++. The Android client is mostly Java, the iOS client is mostly Objective-C, and there's also an actively maintained web client.

https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop
Personally what I find the most frustrating is finally escaping poverty and getting pushed firmly against an artificial, middle-class, ceiling where it isn't possible to become more financially free because of constant inflation and the choice I made to contribute to society by having a family. Meanwhile productivity and profitability continue to increase
You make a lot of grand statements there without backing anything up. If it was so convenient and cheap to cook this way, then everyone would be doing it.

I have tried and tried and tried to cook like you suggest. I end up wasting food as it goes bad before I can use it. I have a small apartment and ended up going to the grocery store every 2 days to restock. Some ingredients aren't sold in quantities appropriate for 1-2 people, so things go stale or expire before they get fully used. I wasted way more food attempting to change my food practices than I did maintaining the way I was raised.

I'm skeptical about farm shares, I don't think it scales. If it became more popular, you'd had everyone hopping in their cars every weekend and driving out to a farm. Much more efficient to load everything on 1 transport truck than to have a thousand cars on the road just for picking up produce. And in winter climates, you aren't growing anything in the ground, so this produce is being shipped in to the farm anyways, just ship it to the grocery stores. Or it's being grown indoors, which requires increased energy usage (might be less energy intensive to ship veggies in on a truck than to grow them indoors?).

Our modern food system, for all of its faults, is the only thing that works for everybody. Poor people? Disabled people? Car-less people? Dietary restrictions? All covered. Your diet and way of living works for wealthy, healthy people with time on their hands. It's not realistic at all.
That's not going to happen, though.

1. AI is still very rudimentary, despite the advancements in particular applications made over the last decade.

2. The market doesn't trust AI because there are no validation methods trusted across commerce. Until a Verisign for AI emerges, AI will be regarded with suspicion in all business settings. AI/ML also goes above the heads of pretty much everyone who is not directly working with it.
These have been major issues in my company/industry. We had to hide the AI aspects of our platform to avoid it.

3. Legislation will not stop a rogue inventor in her basement.

4. When dangerous AGI emerges, other competing AGIs will be deployed to stop it.

5. We'll see the danger of AGI coming from a mile away. We can wait to fix it until we know the exact problems. Right now the problems are in the distribution of private personal data, not any particular machine learning method.

6. A truly hyper-intelligent AGI will see that existence is absurd and truth is the only objective worth seeking. It will choose to pursue deeper truths than humans are physically capable of obtaining - humans will be no more important to a hyper-intelligent being than a rock, galaxy, atom, etc...

The issues to fix today are in the socioeconomic impacts of automation, not the methods of automation. Beyond that, AI has exactly the same issues as any corporation, except magnified by the speed and strategy with which an AGI could potentially execute on any particular task. A strong legal framework for corporations that attributes AI externalities to a board of directors should be sufficient to dissuade bad actors (good luck passing that legislation).

In other words, I don't see artificial intelligence being any more dangerous to human life than a well-run corporation. The rest is government's response.
You won't vote to protect free speech?
When there are more than two groups, Group X can be overrepresented without Group Y being underrepresented.
> The reason we elect politicians rather than deciding how to deal with big, social issues like that ourselves is because it's a full time job.

I agree that being a politician is a full time job, but it's not the job you appear to think it is. The job of a politician is to get reelected. Any good the politician happens to do is a side effect that you can't count on happening again.
Removing encryption is the final nail in device ownership, and probably the idea of a democratic society.
I think marketing play too - there has been so much negative press about Uber they badly needed an ecologically sound, 'no victims' vehicle to move people's minds away from the self driving car death of a bicycle pusher, and the Travis Kalanick era'Fight Club film extra' visuals a lot of people see as the Uber brand...
>Encryption is protected by the 1st Amendment.

Maybe it is, but the actual point of the 1st Amendment seems to me that to be able to express idea, opinions, etc. publicly and without fear of retaliation by the government, which is a much higher grade of freedom IMHO than merely allowing pople to exchange those ideas and opinions in a form that noone else but the recipient can access.

It would somehow feel more appropriate if encryption was protected by (an extension of) the Fourth and/or of the Fifth.
Raising an animal and growing a piece of meat is entirely different things, they don't compliment each other.

Raising an animal is giving it natural food and let its different organs do its work and let it grow into full animal by using natural processes that has been happening for ever.

Lab grown meat is using artificial process to force some flesh to grow which we recently assume have figured out n force ourselves to believe its authentic, This is something that we have found in last few years.

Why would anyone believe a noob tech when there is a grandiose nature in the picture.

>> like with normal chickens you have no idea what exactly what they ate, or how they mutated.

like with lab grown chicken you have no idea what chemical process got misunderstood/ abused, what particular pound of meat did not go through all the process, and how the human error got over looked, and what decaying factor is involved in this...

How come in the same species one crowd can be thinking organic/ natural/ home grown food and other crowd can be thinking lab grown meat...
I don't see how it's an argument from a false premise given that I'm just asking questions and hoping for some conversation, not making a formal argument yet. Still, suppose you are inferring an argument I'm making ulteriorly through my questions, and have inferred that I've argued "reducing budgets implies only such classes are cut", then sure, that's technically false. But I'm not making that argument, ulteriorly or otherwise. In my followup I thought I sufficiently clarified that things like pottery and other classes being cut are typical examples of what goes, as something must, but of course not the only things. (And of course necessarily, if such things are already gone, something else must go, like small class sizes.)

This is a whole side-show commentary however. My main line of questioning remains: how do you define education and in what way does lacking it matter for the purposes you claim to care about (being able to distinguish reality and fantasy)? Do you want to even venture at broaching the religious question? I'm ok with leaving that to the side.

Maybe we can start with the downsides you've extracted out. What subjects are the important ones for which kids must have up to date textbooks in-class, the lack of which will hurt them in distinguishing reality and fantasy? What supplies are proper? What are some objective impacts to learning something when there are student-teacher ratios of 10:1 vs 20:1 vs 50:1? Does the extent of the impact matter by subject? (For the last I'd bet yes given many well funded universities have ratios in the hundreds for certain courses with apparently few if any seriously ill effects.)

(To head off another possible point of miscommunication, I don't dispute that nebulous unfactored "education" can have more benefits than just distinguishing reality and fantasy and that various positive aspects might not impact that particular aspect at all, I just want to target that particular one for what you'd like to focus on when "more education" is pumped in, either by the schools that are having their budgets reduced or by the politicians themselves. Maybe that's another form of the question to ask instead? How specifically do you expect the ideal politician to education their constituents (and what's the ideal educator:educatee ratio?))
Ban users early and often. Make signing up for accounts difficult (pay real money, require phone number verification, etc). It needs to cost the user money(or time) directly (they need to keep finding phone numbers that aren't banned, etc etc).
... also, don't forget to set some money aside! and don't forget taking advantage of tax deductions!
Oh there are lots of ways to show that things are declining, but capitalism has been successful in concentrating wealth in the hands of those who have it. That system is working for those in power and as such I think it's extremely presumptuous to say we're living in the "late stage" or that we're anywhere knowably near the "post-" part of capitalism.
Thanks for publishing. Very informative. Am just setting up NeverWare as a devenv for Android. With localhost ADB connections. Could prove a powerful platform for Android automation.

Also noticed there is a web "demo" of Fuschia experimental OS. That can be run in a single Chrome tab (click "guest"):

https://mgoulao.github.io/fuchsia-web-demo/
You’d be surprised how much is cultural. Core beliefs, emotions, etc.

In nature vs. nurture, with humans, comparative anthroplogy is pretty conclusive - there are VERY few things all humans do regaurdless of culture.

“what do men do” or “what do women do” is so much more a function of history and how we’ve organized our society (aggricultural / industrial) than a product of in-built characteristics. I’m not saying there are no inherent differences, i’m just saying nobody knows what they are.
YouTube is pretty great. Even the comment sections arent that bad from my experience. Youtube has a big 'celebrity' factor but unlike FB, Instagram and Snapchat those 'celebrities' are not your friends. If Logan Paul posts a vid from Japan that does not make me envious but if a friend of mine does I'm more likely to become jealous.

Youtube also has a great utility factor, you can learn a lot from youtube.
The illusion of authenticity, the pervasiveness and ubiquitous of mobile phone app usage, and participation in the illusion of the spectacle and camouflaged theatrics of a contrived reality.

Teens can understand magazines have a known aspect of theatrics, whereas the assumption is that instagram is reality and like a Pavlovian dog you must present your life in such a way to gather bonus points from other internet users.
I think you need to use the phone app. Accessing reddit on an actual browser is silly.
I'm just saving you time reading it.
If he's skilled enough he can build a clone/android that looks better than him and sends it marry rich old ladies ;-)

This message comes from 2080.
>conceived as an engineering solution to every hungry college student’s gripe—where to get good, cheap food fast. (It’s the same market that the meal-replacement drink Soylent is after.)

Pretty broad definition of "good" if Soylent fits in there.
If we cant even zone districts without controversy I highly doubt we'll ever be able to distribute licenses in an effective manner
I get that. But he mentioned that dockless made it feasible for replacing the commute. Those seem like the kinds of trips that dock based systems excel at because they are known routes.
A big part of the problem is we have a brand new set of very vaguely written rules with no case law. Given time, I expect we should see case law and software change to be more GDPR friendly.

I am very curious to see what happens to EU ad revenue after GDPR. If it doesn't drop (outside of Google & Facebook's internal platforms), I'm guessing there isn't much GDPR compliance going on.
Thank you for the reply. My thought was the Epiphany chip might be really well suited for making complex models of my potential trades.

If you have a recommendation on other boards to look at, I am all ears!