skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are 2) big problems here:

1) This could have been done long time ago

2) People or bots can still share content as images and there is still lot of fake news being spread in that way.

This will probably help but definitely not a sustainable fix.
How about both are bad?
Tweetbot does this, yes.
Algorithms, Etc. by Jeff Erickson chapter on dynamic programming is great, especially that part:

In a nutshell, dynamic programming is recursion without repetition. Dynamic programming
algorithms store the solutions of intermediate subproblems, often but not always in some kind of
array or table. Many algorithms students make the mistake of focusing on the table (because
tables are easy and familiar) instead of the much more important (and difficult) task of finding a
correct recurrence. As long as we memoize the correct recurrence, an explicit table isn’t really
necessary, but if the recursion is incorrect, nothing works.

Dynamic programming is not about filling in tables. It’s about smart recursion!

http://jeffe.cs.illinois.edu/teaching/algorithms/notes/05-dy...
Most people that started using facebook after it opened to everyone were older people reconnecting with their past associates.

Since everyone was getting on the new "cool" facebook, and a lot of their kids were already on it. Facebook replaced classmates.com, friendster, myspace, xanga, and many others.
Even if all employees aren’t equal it will still be some fraction of total productivity that is lost, which is always going to be less than the 100% lost by an employee.
I've spent the last month (yes - month) writing a custom CLI to run on CSV for a customer which have data scattered in a bunch of Excel files. This seem a bit too good to be true.
I've very mixed feelings about Amazon, but one reason they continue to get my business is that they appear to keep payment information secure.

This is going to be the long term "no free pass" effect of such neglect. Or, if we actually have a "marketplace" with consumer choice, it will be. People will avoid the threat and hassle, and show elsewhere.

Only so far, the larger retailers -- and their incompetent management -- seem to be getting away with their neglect.

P.S. I'm not arguing against better regulation and effective penalties. Rather, I guess, while pointing out the "risk" of poorly serving the market, I'm saying that it doesn't really seem to be working, so far.
Why is that significantly slower than the specs of these SD cards (100-80 MB/s read/write)?
I guess Mastodon will see another wave of migrations from tech-types, although the non-technical people probably still won't care.

A recent toot suggested that mastodon.social is effectively twitter now, being a single huge instance. As effective migration comes on-line it will be easier to find, and then move to, other, smaller, more focussed communities.

Maybe this is the time to jump.
Follow up – GitHub repository for completeness:

https://github.com/textpattern/textpattern
I use a Qotom mini pc as a router. I configure it with NixOS. It's amazing.
I'm not familiar with how to set this up. Do you have a link to a guide to use such a service for me and others?
The Kanerva Machine: A Generative Distributed Memory
My ISP can't sniff what I'm doing on a properly encrypted website. Google Analytics and Facebook "like" buttons, however, certainly can and do.
I know of someone who's managed to rewrite the history of how his business came into being and its later success through a combination of 'right to be forgotten' and promotional pieces in the media.

There used to be plenty of material contradicting his version of events (which I know to be factual) but, today, you can't find any of it.

You could say all this material was 'falsehood and lies' but, in the absence of any public record, who is the arbiter of truth here?

Seems to me, it's whoever has the money to do it?
It's more like I want to start with the basics and move on to building complex things like in electronic products in the market.
How to Add Touch ID to Your React Native App
Baryonic matter accelerating into black holes also emits electromagnetic radiation vs. dark matter which does not interact electromagnetically by definition (and observation).
Fast Forward Accelerator
Applications are open for Fast Forward tech nonprofit accelerator! This means $25K, 100+ mentors, fundraising, PR & product training. Applications due 4/10: https://www.ffwd.org/accelerator/
I had a GoPro develop a flaky voltage regulator so it would sometimes brown out, that thing killed microSD cards like a champ.
Amtrak P42 Locomotive Overview (1996) [video]
Steve Jobs on rapid prototyping at NeXT (1992)
I find the use of muted words to slightly better the issue of receiving tweets from people I don’t follow. At least the topics their tweets are about will not be a topic I don’t want to read about.
> we need an increase in societal maturity

Judging by how our society has been developing in recent years, I'm not optimistic about this.
I don't know about every objection to Pascal's Wager, but overall it's quite different. In PW it's the belief itself that might be the key to heaven, and you can't have an authentic belief that you adopted simply because you had an incentive to adopt it. With conscientiousness it doesn't really matter what you believe or how strongly, all you have to do is behave conscientiously and see if it helps.
The post above shows a complete misunderstanding of the issue. "Right to be forgotten" laws apply as much to other sources of information as they do to Google. The discussion has become a bad version of "telephone", people responding to quotes in the parent rather than knowing anything about the issue in question.

The question of whether one uses Google or other sources is irrelevant here. Sure, journalists could go to find public records and not be able to be published because of the law (because their article wouldn't be listed etc).
“Thank you. More info for this topic here https://cryptocomes.com/ripple-has-tried-to-buy-its-way-onto...
Maybe ask Dan G. Politely?
And that's why I moved over to MMC based Pi clones (specifically the Rock64), I am overly tired of SD cards mysteriously corrupting themselves. As of yet, I haven't had an MMC go upside down, but that's certainly far from guaranteed as well.
Well, with WMDs we're past that point already. We have enough nukes to transform this world into hell in a few hours. Any advances in that area are of the nature that Putin mentioned recently, ones that no civilized nation would ever develop.

There is an enormous conventional arms market though. These are guns, pistols etc. Their sole aim is to kill people, plain and simple. You could justify it by saying some of those people deserve being killed, but as a creator of the weapon you can't know that, you have no control on how it's used. That's why many people would have moral objections against the production of conventional weapons.
Do you have details on the solar panel and the rest of the infrastructure? (or a blog post?)
>If cable and phone companies were politically weaponizing my data the same way I'd be just as concerned.

What makes you think they aren't? They have influencers in Washington, just like any political group does.

The only difference between what the ISPs did and CA did is that the ISPs sell the data, whereas CA stole it. Your data still gets transferred.
this would seem to be a playlist

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcgrnZay9Yc&list=PLFeJ2hV8Fy...
“Thank you. More info for this topic here- https://cryptocomes.com/ripple-has-tried-to-buy-its-way-onto...
Why make an exception for retailers? Let's not give any institution a free pass on Data Breaches, including governments, the Equifaxes of this world and so on.
Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Spelling_Board
The round of an AR-15 is very much smaller and with much less power than those used for hunting medium or large game. In fact they're so much less powerful that it is generally considered unethical to hunt deer with them.
Also worth mentioning that for each "paying target" you remove from an ad economy, is a devaluing of that economy.
Given their attitude to their users, probably plain text.
Facebook owns the whole ecosystem, which makes it possible and expected for a deleted message to be deleted on all of Facebook.

Your SMS, IRC, etc. messages are stored locally. Your Facebook messages get loaded from Facebook.
wondering if I should just mount my external spinning platter hdd as root instead
Why? It makes more sense to automate a $40/hour worker, then a $8/hour one. It's why law offices still have janitors, but have largely replaced junior lawyers combing through the legal library with computers.
Sparkfun.com is a great spot to buy and learn. They have several YouTube channels, one in particular "According To Pete" is a great set of videos to learn the ins and outs https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9EF3C374FD903ACE
Sure. Looking (quite) quickly at the paper there's a few things that stand out.

- Small vocabulary sizes (20 or less words at each decision level)

- A lack of discussion as to identifying utterance onset

- A lack of trials of the same subject over many different days (EEG/EMG/LFP can vary considerably across subjects and within the same subject in different trials)

- A lack of discussion on the cross-validation protocol (the setup of training and testing folds can provide radically different views on computational neuroscience sorts of results)

All of this is fairly normal within this sort of work, however it also means that a hefty grain of salt should be taken when viewing the work. With the results that they have you have 90% accuracy when picking 1 out of 5-20 words if you setup the system and trained it the same day. That's pretty cool for small muscle movements, though not really a solution that's directly usable IMO. (also don't believe the results that are claimed by [6].)

> a way to do this remotely.

i.e. with a standard camera at a standard resolution/framerate?
There's coarse information that you can likely see from another human yourself if you see someone mutter something, but there's too much to muddle things for it to be useful immediately. If you get to the point where you're using high resolution high framerate multi-spectral cameras you might be able to get marginally more information, but nothing too major IMO. The MIT heartrate enhancement worked well due to the periodic nature of heart rates as well as the proximity of blood vessels to the surface of the skin. Neither of those help out for observing a-periodic muscle movement under a lot of skin.
> you cant deny it does a lot of good for a lot of people

I'm not really interested in having a value judgment discussion of Facebook here, but it really annoys me when people assume this. At least have an open mind enough where you can imagine someone thinking different from you. It really doesn't take that much imagination or empathy to see why some people view it as, yes, completely and totally a net-negative on the world, regardless of whether you specifically believe it or not; I think the good that facebook does do is both incidental and replaceable.

Besides, c'mon, how can you be "nasty" to a corporation? People publicly complaining is probably the only way this change happened in the first place.
after how long? i've been running my pi off the usb port of my server. knock on wood, no issues yet.
> Emacs Lisp is also pretty darned incompatible with Common Lisp

Not true, both have the core of McCarthy's Lisp and are in the Maclisp line...

> If one chooses a definition of lisp that only includes Common Lisp

Nobody does that.

> , then no other lisp can be a lisp unless it implements the ANSI Common Lisp spec (is SBCL a lisp? I hear they added TCO, which isn't in the spec).

How is that relevant? Garbage Collection is also not in the spec. Lot's of random stuff is not in the spec.

> But most people consider Emacs Lisp, Scheme, and indeed Clojure a lisp.

Since "most people" don't even know what Lisp is, nothing follows from this.

> I've seen the lisp means Common Lisp argument elsewhere

Defintely elsewhere. It hasn't been made here.

First rule: if the thing has not Lisp in its name, it probably is not a Lisp.

Second rule: if it is not somewhat compatible with Lisp 1, then it is not a Lisp.

From that you can infer that languages like Lisp 1, Lisp 1.5, Lisp 2, Maclisp, BBN Lisp, UCI Lisp, VAX Lisp, Spice Lisp, New Implementation Lisp, Zetalisp, Franz Lisp, Standard Lisp, Interlisp, Eulisp, LeLisp, Mulisp, Emacs Lisp, Xlisp, Common Lisp, various Common Lisp derived languages, ISLisp, are all direct Lisp dialects.

See here: http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/LISP/
Show HN: Find a public park gym near you
It's true, spinach is not all you need. You might be forced to enjoy some cheese to get enough K2.
I think many poorer Americans would gladly trade some of those luxuries for freedoms. The market has made some luxury a commodity (which is good) but it has regressed in terms of security and individual freedom of employment (at least for the poor), making free time and choice of lifestyle a luxury.

As a hyperbolic example to prove the point, would you rather work 40 hours a week at a job you hate, and have a cell phone, or work 20 hours a week at a job you like, and not have one? Neither answer is wrong and some people would choose each, but I think current employment conditions largely cater to the former.
>Should we give Trump the right for his bankruptcies to be forgotten?

I think even Trump should be entitled to accurate public reporting, for example, it should be noted Trump has never personally filed for bankruptcy, rather, he has been the owner of companies (casinos) that have filed for bankruptcy.

Would you attribute the recent Toys R Us bankruptcy to individual owners? Or if your favorite startup goes under and has to declare bankruptcy to shield itself from creditors before the company dissolves would you start attributing bankruptcy to individual employees with equity/stock options?
I have a circuit simulator program called EveryCircuit on my ipad (it looks like it's available on Chrome) and it's very simple to use and develop intuitions about basic components.

You really don't need to use EagleCad to lay out your own PCBs for a very long time into the hobby. Perf board and jumper wires are sufficient for prototyping for a long time, most SMD/ball only chips/components have prototyping boards from sparkfun or adafruit or whatever.
Yes, but I don't think the Bitcoin pushers are telling us that it's going to revolutionize the world of buying heroin online.
It's not the price this article is asking for, but if you think that those companies who have had big public credit card data breaches recently haven't seen their credit card processing fees shoot up, you're crazy. that's not the sort of thing that the payment industry lets slide.
The きや　きゃ (kiya, kya) distinction is not a phonological alternation. For instance, we have ぎゃく (gyaku), despite the fact that /g/ and /y/ are both voiced.
Yes. Give Tweetbot a try (if you’re on an a Apple platform). It’s great.
Google says it is protecting people from still-predatory actors:

> The claimants ... argue that since their crimes are decades old, they should be able to move on from their past. .... Google counters that the information is in the public interest, and still relevant given that the nature of the claimants’ business has not changed dramatically in the ensuing years.

Google is being picky about what to remove and, in this case, go to great lengths to back up their judgment. What is motivating them? Do they want to preserve information for its own sake, or for their own relevance as a search engine? Or both?

> [Google] reported that it rejects more than half of the requests it receives, but did not provide insight as to why.

The statistics of who wants things removed, and why, are surely very interesting. Here's a report from Google (linked from the article):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H4MKNwf5MgeztG7OnJRnl3ym3gI...

Edit: Oops I should have read further!

> England’s Information Commissioner ... warned that if the court sided with Google, it would completely defang the original ruling. “In effect,” she wrote, Google “would be able to operate the right to be forgotten regime almost entirely free from regulatory oversight and control.”

Is Google looking for a blanket exemption?
Because Facebook is in the business of monetising data about people and ISPs aren't.

It's not obvious to me that ISPs would bother (except where required to do so by law). They could just route traffic and not inspect anything.
Why are we only forcing Google to remove this information when, as you say, it will still be in the public record.

Because ease of access makes all the difference, and it is disingenuous to argue otherwise.

This law won't protect Trump from having his bankruptcies reported but it will protect someone who made a stupid mistake when they were younger having it haunt them for the rest of their careers or lives because it would otherwise have been the top hit when you google'd their name. It will still be there for anyone willing to put in the effort to find it of course. Just like it was in the old days.

Google will happily ruin that person's life forever for a few cents in ad clicks. Think about that.
Something like the dxg-1/dxg-2?

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/dgx-2/
That isn’t true; an efficient market doesn’t imply that we will pay workers subsistence wages. Market rate has nothing to do with what a person needs to survive.

The rate would be set based on competition with other employers for employees; you pay enough to keep a worker from getting a job at another employer.

So the answer to the question, “why would you pay more?” is, “so they don’t start working for someone else instead”

Now, the market system doesn’t work for employment because of the reason I stated in my original comment, but it isn’t related to the ‘minimum wages needed to survive’
A union works by artificially constraining the labor pool, reducing the employer to buying from (typically) one seller (the union) instead of many (each employee individually).

Closed-shop unions, you say? Do they still exist? I work in the UK, and I've worked in many workplaces where there were active unions, and the very idea that you'd have to be a member of the union to work there was laughable and, if I recall correctly, illegal.

In my experience, a union does not work by artificially constraining the labor pool. In every job I've ever had in which I could have joined a union, I only had the opportunity to join the union after I was employed. Before I was employed, I didn't even know there was a union there.
> The AWS UI doesn't handle multiple subscription, it's somewhat annoying when you have multiple accounts (let say dev and prod ones).

It is annoying dealing with multiple AWS accounts.

To mitigate this, you can supposedly use IAM to switch your current IAM User role to a role owned by another account.
What are you taking? I cycle keto, do IF (with 3-5 day fasts a few times per year), lift heavy, etc. I've greatly reduced my vitamins to just vitamin D and a probiotic. It's really nice not throwing back a ton of pills throughout the day. In their place, I focus on eating more green vegetables, I take a greens drink, and Udo's oil (omegas) and drink a ton of BCAAs throughout the day. Feel much better than when I had 15 different pills.
Videos are great. Also, modular synthesizer software. Get a copy of VCV and play. Listening to the behavior of circuit interactions will teach you a lot. Get one of those electronics in a box or breadboard kits.

Book wise, start with something from Forrest Mims III, who provides graduated and clear examples of basic circuits and theory. When you're ready for the hard stuff, the The Art of Electronics by Horowitz and Hill.

You'll never be as good as someone with a reasonably current EE degree, but developing your intuition will enable you to have meaningful conversations with them.
I bet you could have found someone in 1980 decrying how much Austin had changed by then from 1940.

This is a game anyone can play.

What about NYC? Think it hasn't changed? It's changed a ton. Why not complain about that? How about L.A.? The whole world has changed, and will continue to change, and you can be as certain of this as of anything else.
Blockchains are accounting mechanisms. In their simplest form, blockchains are just a linked list of linked lists that that fulfill the requirements of an easily immutable, distributed and auditable system of accounts.

I'm not sure how the author is attributing so much doom and gloom to cryptographically secured accounting systems, some of which have survived for a decade without a major failure of their primary function (securing digital assets with enforceable contractual conditions and private keys).
Yeah, it's very easy for npm dependencies to get out of hand. What I didn't notice when I made my comment (and what you commented on) was that the node_modules dir was actually added to the git project. If that were removed (and a .gitignore line added) and the package.json dependencies were fixed then it should truly have no dependencies upon install.
This detection is easy to circumvent: use an outhouse or septic tank.
I think this is as definitive a proof we'll get until we get close enough to directly measure Hawking radiation. Of course, by that time we should also be close enough to "see" the black hole directly...
> You blame women and immigrants

That's a noticeable step into flamewar. Could you please not do that to the threads here? It isn't necessary to make your point, and in the long run it destroys the site.

Instead, please follow the guidelines at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, including this one: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize."

(Your comment would be fine without that initial phrase.)
The salt must never be a constant, the entire point of a salt is that two identical inputs do not hash to the same value. However, it must be stored alongside the hash, so that you can later verify the hashed value. Many modern password hash functions (bcrypt for example) do store the salt as part of the hash.
We're talking about personal tax records. I don't see how personal tax records being transparent provides any upside. It only paints a target on your back for criminals.
IMO that is the type of thing that could/should be studied in conjunction with basic income.
Google cannot become our only source of truth, but should we eliminate it as a source of truth?

No we should not, the law seems well intentioned, some kid may not have to worry about an embarrassing photo from university days following him/her around into their adult life, etc. But I think it would be an overall net negative for abuse in hiding truly relevant information.
I see a lot of people claim that this is just about having information at the top of a search result, and I agree that's better than outright censorship.

But, I still take some small amount of umbrage with people claiming that nothing is being erased, just people's ability to find it. I think that's a very blurry line to draw - the idea the it's OK for information to exist somewhere in the void, but making it too easy to access is not OK.

The intent behind rules like this is to make it much harder for people to access information. If Google isn't the Internet, and delisting won't suppress speech, then what value is the law? If Google is the Internet, and delisting from their site will hide information from the public, then how is this not censorship?

There's no point in getting myself delisted from Google unless I expect that this will prevent most people from being able to find my information. People search names on Google because they want that information. The only way I can see for GDPR to stay effective or valuable in hiding me from those people is if it becomes a blanket ban on indexing or curation in general.
A good middle ground would be that account deletion changes the user's historical post attributions to Anonymous.