skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe it already does actually

(I work at Google but not in search so I could be wrong but I believe they talked about this during orientation)
And the Tesla is furthermore an outlier, because for a long time it was the only luxury EV in widespread use. In a couple more years, the data on "luxury electric vehicles" should have a lot more data points.
> The higher claim severity for the Tesla Model S may possibly be attributed to the battery replacement cost of approximately $16,000.

This seems pretty important metric to me.

> Injury related coverages were also not included due to the small numbers of claims associated with the electric vehicles.

I would like to see more of this with the comparison.
I was actually taught the SI English style in school in Australia (i.e 1 108 512.33) but the comma style (i.e 1,108,512.33) seems to be a lot more common here in everyday use. I guess the SI version is mainly used in scientific publications?
Tesla Auto Pilot fail [35 seconds video]
RFC 8367 – Wrongful Termination of IP Packets (1 April 2018)
See: https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2018/01/using-page-speed-i...
Pretty sure that google time for Sydney is an outlier

This is from my residential ADSL2 connection in Sydney:

[Bigs-MacBook-Pro-2:~] bigiain% ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=21.257 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=25.831 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=22.231 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=21.498 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 21.257/22.704/25.831/1.841 ms
[Bigs-MacBook-Pro-2:~] bigiain% ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=22.481 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=38.814 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=19.923 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=19.911 ms
^C
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 19.911/25.282/38.814/7.882 ms

And this is from an ec2 instance is ap-southeast-2:

ubuntu@ip-172-31-xx-xx:~$ ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=2.24 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=2.27 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=2.30 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=2.26 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=2.31 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=2.25 ms
^C
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5007ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.244/2.274/2.310/0.066 ms
ubuntu@ip-172-31-xx-xx:~$ ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=1.03 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=1.01 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=1.07 ms
^C
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.015/1.046/1.076/0.035 ms
What evidence have you seen of Tesla ‘trying to deny this so hard’?

I've read both of their press releases on the incident [1] [2] and I didn't see any attempts at denial in them.

[1] https://www.tesla.com/es_ES/blog/what-we-know-about-last-wee...

[2] https://www.tesla.com/es_ES/blog/update-last-week%E2%80%99s-...
This exactly misses a significant feature of these new, high temp and high field superconductors: they are a mass manufactured flexible steel-backed tape. These are not the old ceramic superconductors.
How to hack your neighbour's Wi-Fi
Just get a PS4, it's playable using mouse and keyboard on consoles as well.

But controller is better anyway IMHO.
An excellent find!

> We will be destroying all “raw” DNS data as soon as we have performed statistical analysis on the data flow. We will not be compiling any form of profiles of activity that could be used to identify individuals, and we will ensure that any retained processed data is sufficiently generic that it will not be susceptible to efforts to reconstruct individual profiles. Furthermore, the access to the primary data feed will be strictly limited to the researchers in APNIC Labs, and we will naturally abide by APNIC’s non-disclosure policies.

So it's a 5 year research program, with options to extend it as a research program. To me, that means they intend to keep DNS data for up to 5 years (or longer) before performing statistical analysis and processing on it. Here is APNIC Labs's privacy policy http://labs.apnic.net/privacy.shtml and APNIC's privacy policy https://www.apnic.net/about-apnic/corporate-documents/docume...

So much for "privacy-first".
Shipping that from China to the US or Europe isn't expensive. From the port to the end customer is the most expensive part but even that won't be significant. Even washing machines (which are heavier and harder to transport) can be shipped for a relatively low price across long distances. I wouldn't expect shipping costs from China to the end customer to be more than $30 for any mattress.
‘Highly critical’ CMS bug has left over 1M sites open to attack
Litecoin – Becoming the Dark Web Dominant Cryptocurrency
From Sydney

--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.536/13.084/19.910/3.284 ms

--- 8.8.4.4 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.931/15.141/32.453/6.498 ms

--- 1.0.0.1 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.219/16.709/29.498/6.960 ms

--- 9.9.9.9 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.290/22.336/43.267/10.238 ms

--- 208.67.222.222 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 12.985/22.786/46.929/10.036 ms

--- 208.67.220.220 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 16.273/27.225/49.783/10.246 ms

--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---

100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 10.581/35.527/125.641/33.204 ms
Not really. You can debug i386 code just fine, right? It also doesn't have PC mapped to register file.
"...and it accumulates more miles on average per day than other battery-powered vehicles, a new HLDI report shows."

Oh, no shit. A really fun to drive car, that can do ~300 miles per charge, is driven more than the Nissan Leaf @ ~150 MPC
Yosimite?
Lol, you wouldn't have had to look at PUBG sales data to know they're making hella bank...
I am in Germany, not far from Stuttgart.
and Id pay full game price just to not see those cancerous hats of yours. they seriously mess with my snap aiming and if they interfere with gameplay, to hell with them.
Aussie Aussie Aussie!
I have addressed this elsewhere in this thread, so let me just copy and paste that comment.

>To be fair this is mostly a problem with the general public's understanding of the term autopilot and not with the actual systems that have used that name before. Aeronautical autopilots would probably only be classified as level 1 or maybe level 2 [autonomy] when that term was first coined and used to describe them. Even now I am not sure if we would classify the average autopilots you find on a commercial airliner as being fully at level 4.

I don't think Tesla's naming it autopilot should have any impact on any legal discussions. I am not sure the driver should be responsible for everything that happens to the car while autopilot is engaged. However I think it is a completely fair and reasonable expectation that a driver understands what autopilot is capable of doing before they engage it. I don't think Tesla (at least through their marketing, I have heard some questionable things about their salespeople) has been misleading about that in any way. I don't have a lot of faith in people handling a Tesla responsibly if the only thing they know about autopilot is that it is named autopilot.
Many of those shops won't make much profit. Shipping companies are probably the only ones profiting (if not shipped via national mail services). Most of the value will flow to the customer as prices are now much lower.
As you can see from some here, people just want to believe. Fusion is the power source of sci-fi, and they’re scared of fission. As with self-driving cars, people just imagine what it could be like and that’s enough for them. Never mind that decades of R&D on fission has yielded breakthroughs in safety and efficiency, and by the time a workable fusion design is possible far more advanced fission will be possible. People want the future to be now, so they believe their way into it. Scientists want funding for research, so they sex it up for the media and mass consumption.

The truth is that politics aside, we could be using fission today to solve the problems people want fusion to solve decades from now. Granted, if aneutronic fusion becomes possible (no time soon, even experimentally with a surplus of energy) that will be a miracle. DT fusion though, is only useful for research purposes.

Most people, including most people here don’t have a working understanding of nuclear physics or the requisite engineering of a power plant. When you don’t understand the hurdles, fusion seems kind of magical. If you’re desperate for advanced space flight, fusion seems kind of magical. Even more, no one has any negative experiences with fusion, while we’ve been literally burned by fission.

It’s hard to argue against a fantasy, and hoping for fusion also let’s people ignore the hard work of using fission. The politics feel intractable in the US, the waste is manageable, but scary. Fusion isn’t real yet in that sense, so like an online romance people can project a fantasy onto it.
Kuala Lumpur, MY
You are correct! It’s maddening that you had to make the correction, though. Commenters in here seem incurious about the new developments detailed in the source material.
Cambodia - crappy office wifi

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=22.806 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=23.321 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=24.379 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=25.869 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=24.485 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=24.165 ms

PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=23.005 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=22.867 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.461 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=23.680 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.581 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=21.033 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=41.634 ms
Luxury car brands ship with a limited feature set that reflects an appropriate conservatism. For example, they can detect cars in your blind spot and warn you, and they can put the brakes if someone short stops ahead of you. They have many of the required sensors but are waiting for the tech to mature
Almonst no one is familiar with how plane autopilots work. And in a plane you don't drive into a barrier or off the road if you don't pay attention for a few seconds like you can do in a car, unless you're flying very close to the ground. A plane can be said to be flying itself if it's just keeping it's course but to drive a car you need to pay more attention to the surroundings.
Please stop saying "performant" when you mean "fast". If you just mean "fast", say "fast".
I thought Douglass North's textbook on economic history was useful when I studied it in school, and he likely has a lot of other articles and books you can pick and choose from. He died in 2015 but was quite prolific and won the Nobel prize. I have the last book he co-authored on my shelf that I still need to read.

I think he's most known for his work in the role of institutions (which I think helps elucidate the "economic factors that come together" part of your curiosity):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglass_North#Institutions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_institutional_economics
> every few minutes

*every few seconds (12 seconds, I believe)
And an argument could therefore be made that decimal is more capitalist since it is more likely to result in a franctional remainder. And I would imagine that would end up in the coffers of seller.

Personally, I endeavor to cut my pizzas into 60 slices.
Checkout JavaScript.info. I recently studied JavaScript from there and found it really good.
In other news, smart contracts eliminated cancer.
I think that the S and X have three forward-looking cameras center-mounted. Without a binocular baseline with which to establish distance, ranging of on-center obstructions could be difficult. Even if an edge is visible, the frame-to-frame variarion is low, especially for a black rubber sheet at night.

I'd also be curious about the radar absorbsion of that rubber impact barrier.

This, in part, is why Musk's assertion that this hardware would be sufficient for level 4 autonomy was so ridiculous. It really wasn't the kind of lanuage that a responsible engineer would use.
Weird. youtube-dl will not download this video. Can anyone else confirm?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STREAMS
stolen ancient knowledge is what u see ijevnted in last 50 years...so thank ze ancestors u dumb bullshiter
Seems like they need another system to monitor the backup driver to make sure their eyes are on the road.
You can easily test TV brands by going to a store and looking at them. You can't really test different mattress brands in a store; yes, you can lie on them, but in my experience at least, that doesn't give a very good prediction of what sleeping on the mattress long term will be like.

The result is a standard asymmetric information scenario: the seller knows much more than the customer about the actual quality of the product. And standard microeconomics tells you that in such a situation, the market will be dominated by lemons: products that don't have to (and can't) complete on features and price, and are sold by "high-pressure tactics and obfuscation".

The difference between the mattress market and an idealized market dominated by asymmetric information in standard microeconomic theory is that most people aren't willing to take the option that standard economics recommends for such a situation: don't buy at all. Most people consider a mattress to be a necessary purchase, not optional, so they have to just do the best they can in a highly imperfect market. (Similar remarks apply to, e.g., the used car market: most people who are shopping for a used car are doing it because they have to--they need a car and can't afford a new one.) Many other possible markets which would be dominated by asymmetric information if they existed, simply don't exist, because people can choose not to participate.
RFC 8369 – Unicode IPv6 Addressing (1 April 2018)
There is a solid white line on the right side, it's just faded. The chevrons are quite clear, however, so it's pretty damning that the car ignores the indication that it's cruising along a not-a-lane.
What's the point of a technology that only works under the least challenging conditions, that is probably less than one percent of the actual occurring conditions - and where the current solution, human beings, work better anyway because they don't have to stop for rain?

What you're imagining is a car on a fixed track - a railcar. We already have trains but the US does need to build out their railway, yeah.
The crazy thing is that you can prefer to live in a SFH yourself and still be in favor of letting the market add density. If you already have a SFH, no one will make you move.
While the article raises some valid and disturbing points, I feel like it’s missing the fact that kids have always been subjected to psychological warfare. “Be good and do what you’re told, or He’ll awaits!” The problem now is that the war is automated and online, but I feel like the solution is the same! Teach critical thinking skills. Prepare young people for the complexity of the world, the ads, the religion, the appeals to emotion. We’re not getting rid of phones and the internet, so prepare them for it.

Limit screen time, limit access as best you can, but think in terms of what you can add and not just take away. Give them the tools to fight the war. Yes, it means they’re going to be less likely to believe in your brand of god or political ideology just on your say-so, and that’s probably hard for some to swallow. It also means that some manicured and coiffed shill can’t do the same through a screen.
CEOs of Microsoft, Adobe, MasterCard All Attended This High School in India
So neurons don’t disassemble their current patterns to find the optimal pattern for the latest training goal? That sounds like a good neural algorithm because how do you know that the old should be fully replaced with the new? If I were God, my creatures’ brains would adapt older patterns so they could do double duty, especially in the short term. Because there is still a high Bayesian likelihood that the older behaviors might need to be recalled. This neural model creates creatures that can adapt to an expanding set of training goals.
Stupid game propped up by social media...will hav a shortlie of a fortnight..
If you really think that's fast (and you're on the west coast...), try: https://www.changedetection.com/directory.html

Sadly it seems you can't register new accounts anymore because of their merger(?) with VisualPing, but their old site still functions for those with accounts and the speed is mindblowing as you can see there. I feel every website should strive to be like this.
Probably inside a simulation, not sure!
Why not use a VPN like PIA?
Top choice for a question after the cambridge analytica bombshell ;) too cynical?
Great question, and this article echoes the answer below:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/20...

But then: why not as many furniture ads?
Matamoros, Tamps, Mexico
I’m getting similar ping times from my Digital Ocean droplet in one of their NYC data centers where my website is hosted:

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes

--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.335/1.431/1.517/0.053 ms
Not only selling data, but selling pre-installed app slots as advertising. Sure they won't be able to convince Netflix or YouTube to pay to have their apps pre-installed on the home-screen, but other wannabe streaming platforms would probably be happy to cough up
Show HN: See GitHub issues on a Kanban board
Also the article they link said crossplay happened within the past week or so, even though it was taking off before that.

I'm thinking it being Free To Play on consoles(where there aren't lots of F2P games) was the big upswing.
"... a crappy data sharing service."

Do you mean OpenDNS?
Deciding Between Admissions Offers
There is a difference between the customer being at fault in controlling the car and a customer being at fault for not learning the basics about features of the car. I don't think we can make the first a universal rule, but I wouldn't think it is controversial for the second to be universal.
If that's your argument, then I'd say that C function pointers are absolute shit compared to LISP continuations.

How would do I do this in C ?

int some_function() {
// some processing
fp = package_the_rest_of_this_function_into_a_function_pointer()

do_some_background_processing_and_callback(fp);

// all the background processing is done
}

In LISP, this is easy, in fact, in most LISPs, it's builtin.
That's just sloppy engineering, if it is even engineering. It's more like throwing something against the wall and if it sticks, call it a success.

Trump doesn't like the politics of the people in a business vaguely related to Amazon. Any change made on that basis is going to lead to bad results.
Tim Ferris saves the plunging Chinese Space station in 4 hours
Adblock on firefox on android just works.
32.6345833,-97.0309456
Yes yes and yes. Unless the usecase is truly as simple as CRUD with a single model (in which case I reach for gorm), The easiest road often seems to be just using sqlx and hand-writing the inserts/updates.
Mercedes' system is quite good, to the point that I got tired of waiting for my Model 3 reservation to come up and got a Mercedes plug-in hybrid instead. It's really close to Tesla's AP.
Not to correct you but to add context:

I recently had body work done through the Tesla service center. I dropped my car off, got a loaner, and they took mine to a nearby body shop. (They told me up front they would be doing it this way.) Picked it up a couple days later where I dropped it off.
Nimbus data releases 100 TB SSD in a standard 3.5-inch package
> Now it is easier to develop MVP web app using Spring Boot than Rails.

This caught my eye. I have never used a Java framework, but use Rails daily. Does Spring Boot do Rails things such as migrations? Is there a healthy plugin ecosystems? (whatever the Gem equivalent in Java is).
AArch64 has a lot of the "weird" parts of classic ARM removed. Predicated instructions are gone, the bizarre Java bytecode mode is gone, Thumb/instruction compression is gone. These makes the ISA easier to scale up to more sophisticated processor microarchitectures.
You can find the source on GitHub it not only runs a web server... It runs an IRC bot too and an NNTP server as well so you can download all threads and post with a newsreader / usenet client.
preload: data association exec/query
template exec: custom exec/query
this is my orm great features
Benchmarking is just logging the time taken during the process of waiting for the content to load, which is already happening to index the page. No special framework necessary.

They aren't doing it because AMP gives far more data and keeps first party cookies because of the cached domain.
Melbourne, Australia :)

PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=5.044 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=6.447 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=6.371 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=6.308 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=7.317 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=5.989 ms
Does anyone have any tales of 'street uses' they have come across of some more recent technologies?

I often feel like the technologies people get excited about around here are too tied to their designed uses, but maybe that's a lack of ingenuity or perspective on my part.