skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While this is possible, it is very challenging to actually achieve. Your latency numbers go to hell in a hurry if you're bouncing around satellites in orbit (eating a queuing delay on every hop). Iridium did this, but at the end of the day their mobile to mobile latency numbers are similar to Geo satellites.

SpaceX's plan is almost absurdly ambitious and there is a lot of skepticism in the comm satellite community that they will achieve their stated goals, especially at an affordable price point.
In fact, down 3-1 with under 2 minutes left, it's very common to have an empty net in order to have an extra forward out to enable potentially scoring last-ditch effort goals! The only reason I could see for them playing Alves at all in this situation was if the faceoff with 8 seconds left was in the defensive zone for the Hurricanes.
True, it's a solidly proven game mechanic that taps into feeding the ego mind - not inherently bad, however can be out of balance, "constantly on" or made prominent vs. simply a tool in a toolkit.
neverssl.com is probably what you're looking for.
I understand that. That's why I said "Seems to not lag as much" meaning the perception of lag changes.
I think he wants to make sure they do this at the DNS level.
I always use http://http.rip, topical and easy to type :)
He was stocking shelves, but he was also an absolute stud in the arena football league and went on to lead the league in touchdowns in NFL Europe. Might be one of the only NFL Europe success stories that I know of. I'm a Rams fan and share the same alma mater as Kurt, so I'm extremely biased, but he definitely has one of the best stories in football in my opinion.
His composure in the game and in the interview is remarkable, he looked completely unfazed.
That's a good point though - a lot of times the backup kicker or punter on an NFL roster is someone from a totally different skill position.

Ndamukong Suh is a 300 pound defensive tackle but he was the emergency placekicker for the Dolphins for 2017. There are a bunch of QBs who can punt as well.
> In this case, once Ying correctly deduces that Equifax is the company involved, he needs to block himself from trading and, if he has a question about his eligibility to trade, to seek personal counsel and/or the advise of his compliance officer.

See I think the issue here is that when he made the trade he didn't know that Equifax was the company involved, he just made an educated guess with no confirmation from anyone. The question will be whether the pieces of the puzzle he did have access to were "material non-public information" or was it only that he guessed correctly (if he was later shown to be correct but didn't know at the time). The reporting makes it seem like the project was well known to non-insiders so its questionable that just knowing about the project and then guessing can be insider trading.

A lot of stock analysts are worried about the implication of situations where reading a lot about a company, inferring that you expect something might happen, and trading on an educated guess becomes a crime if you're right.
This crosses into personal attack. Please resist the temptation to do that even when you disagree strongly. It's particularly bad when combined with ideological battle, which is off topic on HN to begin with.

This isn't an agreement or disagreement with your underlying views; it's that you can't go offside when expressing them. Same applies to the other team.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: it turns out you've been doing this a lot. We ban accounts that do that, so please don't do it any more.
to me thats almost the exception that proves the rule.

if someone tells me they have a 100% SLA I write them off as a liar, but tell me you have a 99.995% SLA and have only ever had this one exception and here's why, that builds much more trust with me.
"I'd really love some kind of distributed-for-performance database using the exact optimizer and query planner of SQLite plus std plugins..."

Why do you think the identical optimizer and query planner would work in a distributed environment, with no changes from the single server implementations?
At least where I went to school, teachers generally had full schedules with maybe one period empty for prep. If they are teaching multiple sections of the same class, it isn't feasible to lump all classes of a certain kind into one part of the day. The same person can't teach multiple classes at once.
The website at 1.1.1.1 isn't running, but the DNS service seems to be operating.
> It starts this early so parents can get their kids to school and start working afterwards, without getting fired.

Yep. School is subsidized babysitting.
I was a Facebook employee for several years; I left shortly before this memo was drafted. The environment was pretty much the opposite of "don't rock the boat." Dissenting opinions were encouraged and openly discussed, but everyone understood that could only happen if it didn't undermine the PR department's job.

Boz fostered this culture by example, publishing internal memos critical of the company. In this case, questioning whether the company's driving mission was the universal good that leadership thought it was when it was adopted. Having such high-profile dissent in circulation gives more cover to individual contributors with a gripe than any amount of policy language would.
Internet marketing company with awesome results
Teleoperable Autonomous Vehicles with Nvidia
I think you're mistaken about how probation is used in practice.

Many small offenses will get you put on probation for ten years.
Parole and work release are more often used as alternatives to incarceration.

The main issue here is whether or not people on probation should be allowed to vote. I don't see why they shouldn't and I can't see any justification for putting them in jail if they do. It's absolutely absurd.
This entire thread is focused on the one situation where the stock price doesn't take care of it: When an employee sells their stock before a major price drop in a way that it's unclear if the employee knew about the reason behind the drop or not.
Remember Shuri remotely driving a car from Wakanda. Well looks like Wakanda isn't that futuristic because Nvidia took it too seriously.
It's called Holodeck: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/technologi...
Yes, when I did something like that nearly 20 years ago it was quite odd! But turned out to be terribly useful for us at the time. (Google 'proxytk' if you're curious)
Was the part about a developer turning it down because of the NDA part of the marketing too? Most likely this story came out because the press will print anything about magic leap if it fits the narrative of ML being in trouble. Highly unlikely this was a marketing stunt.
The Science Behind Excellence Is Known; Why Isn’t, Then, Everyone an Expert?
While I agree that what this woman did shouldn't be voter fraud, community service isn't sufficient deterrent for actual voter fraud. People put in lots of volunteer hours to help get their preferred candidate elected, so they'd probably be willing to risk community service too. Voter fraud is very dangerous to society, as society depends on our trust in institutions.
Time to talk about why so many postgrads have poor mental health
There's a difference between saying "[highly controversial statement]. We know company X will not censor us." and "[highly controversial statement]. We know company X will not censor us because the people at company X are really on our side!"
Even for your parents you need to consider the cost. There are a number of satellite internet companies already providing service, but none of it is affordable to your typical rural customer. Often billing is still measured in megabytes, and denominated in full dollar amounts. Think $5/MB, if you buy a lot of data up front to keep the costs down.

Even a highly disruptive network that drops the cost by two orders of magnitude will still be expensive.
Well, the only reason I can think of that voting while disenfranchised would be a felony would be to extend the total period of disenfranchisement.

Surely voting by itself doesn't warrant a 5 year jail sentence
Darn, no IPv6 address?
Because a single PE teacher can manage five rotating classes of twenty kids throughout the day. If kids didn't rotate periods, then all 100 kids would take PE at the same time. That would require extra PE teachers, because one teacher cannot manage 100 kids. Multiply this effect by every different area (music teachers, art teachers, etc.) and you have to hire a bunch of extra teachers which is a waste of money. Plus, those teachers would only be busy for part of the day, so their wasting a lot of their time.
Where can I purchase some Facebook personal information? I'd love to use it for some custom audiences on my ads. /s

As far as I'm aware, Facebook has never sold personal information to advertisers[0], because that would be giving away its crown jewels. It might leak it, but doesn't hand it out for sale.

EDIT: Downvoters, please point out where I'm wrong. It looks bad for the community to suppress factual statements.

0. https://www.facebook.com/help/152637448140583
Companies sometimes drink so much of their own kool-aid that they lose all perspective on what's actually important. Shining a light on conversations like this one can be an ego-check, where people who don't work at Facebook can say, "hey ... wait a minute here...".

It's an "emperor's new clothes" situation where we all get to play the role of the child.
There's a difference between supporting someone's free speech in general and whether you want to continue with them in a business relationship because they are abusing you specifically.

I may support my friend's right to free speech in general, but if they are at my house and start bad-mouthing myself and my family, I'll ask them to leave. They can still say what they want (if not libel/slander), but they don't need to do it in my house. They can go say it elsewhere.
If I'm reading this right, 425 cups of coffee a day might cause cancer. But I've also read that 70 cups will immediately kill you.
I would say more that humans have evolved to be very interested in status (as stated in the text you quoted) and that wasting resources is high on the list of how to show your high status. Status used to be critical to survival when being kick out of the tribe was basically a death sentence. Tim Urban wrote a good article about this[1] with some good ideas to ponder about the value of caring about what other people think about you.

[1]https://waitbutwhy.com/2014/06/taming-mammoth-let-peoples-op...
Fuel efficiency is a national security issue. Reduced dependence on oil means less involvement in the middle east and less vulnerability to energy sources controlled by foreign nations that may be adversaries (Russia in particular is a huge oil exporter). I am somewhat surprised that those who claim to be conservative would take up the mantle of increasing dependence on oil. Renewable resources based in the US are better for the long term security of the nation.
It may also be worth noting that judges in Texas are elected, not appointed, the same way as any other politician.
I can't fault them for wanting to know what DNS requests people are making. There is a gap in tracking people only via http and webrtc.
What do you mean by "its essence"? Is this a semantic essence?
You're confusing two different things. They do a ton of prototyping and user testing, which allows them to make a very polished product. But they don't just throw things out into the market and see what happens.

User testing has clear limits. The context of a user test is usually something like, "Assume that you have bought one of these, and assume that you're trying to do X. See if you can do X with this." If you're assuming those things, you can't test them.

This is in contrast with what startups do, which is just launching something to see if the market gives a shit. Apple is a good example of that, too. Look at their first product:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_I

This computer didn't have a keyboard, a monitor, a case, or a power supply. But it was a clear minimum viable product: people bought it and used it, while making it clear they wanted more. A year later, they launched the Apple II:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_II

These days Apple would never launch something so rough and experimental as the Apple I. Instead, as with MP3 players, smartphones, and smart watches, they were content to let other people pioneer the space and then swoop in once the market was proven.

Magic Leap is trying to be as slick as 2010s Apple, but that cuts them off from acting like 1970s Apple. That could work if they're correct on all their key design and market hypotheses. But it's a giant gamble, and unlike 2010s Apple, a failure could kill them.
Theranos was able to fool people by not allowing their system into 3rd party hands and doing all of the tests behind closed doors, mostly using 3rd party existing industry machines.

I don't see how that analogy applies here when the entire device is being given to actual companies and with restrictions merely because Magic Leap wants to control the full PR experience when the product launches.

That PR will come out in some fashion in the near future, and it won't require a whistleblower within the company to leak it and risk losing their jobs.
> this guy knew it's insider trading

See, I don't know that he did at the time. I think he guessed, sold his stock before he knew whether his guess was right or not, and ended up being right. The question will be whether his guess was based on "material non-public information", but that is a much more difficult thing to determine for someone in the moment.
Statehood or independence for all territories needs to happen. It is ridiculous that in the 21st century we still have what are effectively colonies.
>How does such an attorney and judge feel after such a trial?

They feel ecstatic. They won. The good guys won again, yay! You have a 10oz pot brownie (with a very small amount of mj in it), that's distribution amounts, 30 years in jail for you. Yay! The good guys won again.

* I see I have downvoters... Maybe you don't believe me? I've been working around both the prosecution and defense for around 20 years now, have many family members that work for law enforcement and judges. This is exactly how many of them think.
Yeah but that's only half the argument, right? Early returns make control flow a lot easier to read in general, not only when checking preconditions.
As a golf owner, lol
Thanks for the offer, but there's more to identifying plants for me than what they look like. There's also texture, and smell. I've looked at pictures online, and it's tricky, because apparently their morphology changes depending on where they are grown.
I go to bed between 8-9pm, rarely as late as 10pm.

Going to bed means I'm reading a book (physical, not digital) and winding myself down from the day.

I find exercising during the day helps immeasurably when trying to go to sleep at a reasonable hour (based on your own schedule). Also limiting caffeine after lunch.

To people that say it's impossible, maybe it is. I did have a late schedule for a few years in college (waiting tables until close). I still scheduled my classes for 9/10am at the latest starting time though. Maybe my working out when I get up helps as well. Plus personal discipline (both going to bed and getting up regularly).

I get 8-9 hours of sleep every night outside of rare exceptions. My mom said I've been this way since childhood. I would never give up sleep to stay up late, unless absolutely necessary.

My high school buddies would give me hell during the week, but I got up at 5:30am for my early bird weightlifting every day. So 9pm was "late" for me.
His “solution” would be to hack it to avoid that specific person's image, which is not really solving anything, other than the site author’s own problem.

The footer of uifaces still says _mockups_ and the FAQ/TOS haven’t been available for a while. This is clearly playing legal sword fighting and unethical.
Slide 12 here[1] shows that lsof distinguishes the read and write ends of FIFOs at least. For TCP I suppose I makes sense to check which end uses ephemeral port.

[1] https://github.com/nh2/strace-pipes-presentation/blob/master...
>“That conversation is now gone,” Bosworth continued. “And I won’t be the one to bring it back for fear it will be misunderstood by a broader population that doesn’t have full context on who we are and how we work.”

So you're saying your users aren't supposed to understand who you are and how you work?

Well, that's why I keep a Facebook profile: I want a public persona to have his data collected.
The bad part of the space race is ICBMs, not losing a few astronauts.
How does a company like Cloudflare come to acquire a "vanity" IP address like that? Are they just sold privately to high bidders?
Why do you need a more powerfull graphic card? This laptop is not targetting video editing.
This breach notification is very mealy mouthed.

>The affected information included usernames, email addresses, and hashed passwords

It included usernames, emails, and hashed passwords? So what else was breached? This seems like they are implying nothing serious was stolen without giving specific info.
Check out ksonnet, it is closer to what you're looking for. (https://ksonnet.io/)
That was clear! We just try to respond to title complaints so readers who come by later understand when we changed the title.
They could use a dedicated shard of their IP addresses for sending high risk emails.
I think you can try this.
https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck
I aliased d instead. I also have ll and la but I don't use them that often so didn't change them to be Dvorak optimized.
It's just a little outdated; that used to be the main use of the plant. Now people have found you can "microdose" it for different effects from profuse vomiting.
From the cached page:

Replace those addresses with the Cloudflare DNS addresses:
For IPv4: 1.1.1.1 and/or 1.0.0.1
For IPv6: 2001:2001:: and/or 2001:2001:2001::
While a neat thought, I would argue that the space race had a positive value, while Facebook has more of a negative value than positive one. I think that the memo is flawed because they're pretending that what they're doing is for the greater good, instead of what they're really doing it for, profit.
I always struggled in school, waking up, even as an adult, HAVING to wake up at a particular time, five times a week just made me feel terrible.
Regulatory Capture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
And who writes on Mastodon? Mostly devs or Trump? Maybe Obama? Ellen? No? So no one will use it, ever. I'm not against technology as it is great, but looking on this as a normal user it's not appealing to me. Mastodon is like old fashion phpBB forums 15 years ago, closed groups who talk with each other. ;)

Mastodon will need to find business model sooner or later as internet isn't free as in beer because beer costs money and you can't handle 100m users with donations.
I don't see how punishing (regardless of severity) someone who can't be proven to have broken a law "affords individuals opportunities to exercise liberty".

What you're advocating is mob rule and that's why it is scary.

Obviously there are different standards of proof but the presumption is always innocence and there is always a standard beyond how it "looks". This is preferable because it maximizes liberty.
It's quite obvious what the hype is about. Manhattan project style projects with massive funding and talent will always be interesting.

And just because Nokia had a smartphone before iPhone doesn't mean you could dismiss it just as a "touch screen phone with an operating system and apps".
An aside, can you explain your usage of the word "sublated"?

Is that referring to "Aufheben"?[1]

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aufheben
Do you have any evidence to support those claims, specifically that night owl's "natural" sleep cycle falls in line with school times? There is substantial biological evidence that phenotypes for night owls vs. morning larks do actually exist. Are you suggesting it is "natural" for a night owl to be focused at 8am, which is around the average start time for the earliest classes in our education system?
Plutocracy is Still Bad
Everyone puts them (and other Big N) on such a pedestal that when they finally land the job they feel like the company is a reflection of them as a person.

If you see working at one of these companies as a status symbol, you'll do whatever it takes to protect that image.
That's a big "if", though. I'm still putting my bets on it being 0% of current use, when rounded to the nearest percent.
Here’s the python entrant. A pleasure to work with.

https://bottlepy.org
>You are proposing a black/white dichotomy where I proposed a partnership. Let the corporations provide the services, let the government write the rules of the playing field. Why would you trust the same government that is already not regulating Facebook to do any better if it has to implement something itself?

I'll admit I am proposing a black/white dichotomy in this instance. I don't do that for all markets but I do in this one. To me a free market is best when we really want the market to race to the bottom quickly and there are few externalities or complicating factors. This is very rare. A regulated market is best when there are complicating factors and externalities but we still want to engage in a race to the bottom. This is very common. Removing the market entirely is best when we don't want to race to the bottom. This is rare. Even though it's rare, I cannot think of a better example than Social Media. Facebook and these other companies have utilized mostly free markets to race to the bottom, we've made 95% of the gains already. Now Facebook is exposing it's users to all sorts of nasty costs that society does not want to bear in order to squeeze out profit. This is not being caused by some one-off feature of the market, it is being caused by the central feature of the market, profit motive. The only way to fix these problems are to remove profit motive. That means either nationalization or non-profit status.

Here's two quotes from a recent Tim Wu interview that I think speak to what I'm trying to say here:

>They're not. But, well, that's the problem. I think there's a sort of intrinsic problem with having for-profit entities with this business model in this position of so much public trust because they're always at the edge because their profitability depends on it.

>Well, if Mark Zuckerberg is telling the truth when he says, what I care about is connecting people to their families and friends, that's a very lofty ambition. If that's what he really wants to do, he can do it. But it doesn't mean he'll be the most profitable company in the world. You know, utilities - which is what Facebook is, a social utility - have never been understood as profit centers before. [...] And there's a reason. The social sphere is a little bit different. And maybe we need to accept that it's not a source of major profit to be in people's personal lives.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/27/597221954/facebook-previously...
Not only that, her children would lose a mother for a few more years.
The list looks about right. What do you find weird?
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16714018.
Maybe check the Matebook X pro (Which is a MacBook pro copycat by Huawei): https://consumer.huawei.com/en/tablets/matebook-x-pro/
Toucan play that game: Talking toy bird hacked
It's not nearly as dangerous as privatised corporate justice, or jailing people for five years for essentially trivial offences.
For IPv6: 2001:2001::,2001:2001:2001::
They also went out of their way to automatically treat them as more questionable by default. Unless the website operator explicitly whitelists tor, tor users are given a worse experience.

EDIT: Maybe not anymore? See replies
This attitude was applied to the space race. What's funny is that it's being applied to getting people to click on memes.