skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've run vanilla k8s for about 3 years now in prod but am also fairly familiar (and really like) Openshift Origin. I usually tell people asking this question the following;

OO comes with a bunch of really nice quality of life improvements that are missing (but in a lot of cases can be added via 3rd party TPR/CRDs/etc) in k8s but you aren't deviating so far from k8s that you won't be able to go work on vanilla k8s in the future. Not at all. Most of the additional stuff are annotations that simply wouldn't do anything and you'd remove them if you moved from OO to k8s.

I think that if you're brand new to the environment OO can really help you get running quickly. You just have to make sure that you do in fact dive in to the actual k8s yaml and deal with ingresses, prometheus, grafana, RBAC, etc at some point. I haven't used OO in awhile but I believe you could successfully do most of what I do day to day via yaml/json through the OO UI.

On the flip side a lot of people will probably tell you to start from k8s, whether that's GKE or AWS or minikube or wherever and go through the k8s the hard way. Personally, and I help people quite frequently on the k8s slack, I feel like that leads a lot of people down a path of frustration. It may be perfect for your style of learning or it may just scare you off.

Now when it comes to OO you are at the behest of their releases. Their most recent release was Nov 2017 and k8s 1.10 was just cut. I'm not sure what version OO is on now, evidently they changed their versioning numbers to not correspond to the k8s version.

Join #kubernetes-users and #kubernetes-novice on slack.k8s.io if you need any help. It's a vibrant community. You can message me directly @ mikej if you'd like.

edit: Ok OO 3.7 is k8s 1.9, that's perfect. I wait a few months before jumping into new major.
MoviePass ushers in surge of theater sales
I took part in the 2017 round of 'Jugend forscht' and actually talked to him for about 10 minutes. One of the judges already told me about AsTech, but I didn't know about his first project. Even though he wasn't really familiar with my topic he immediately recognized a flaw in my work and had a lot of good ideas on hand. His story is really inspiring.
What the hell were they thinking?
Google Trends: Facebook Interest, 2004-Present
Even worse, while you can change your password, or even your email or telephone number, you won't significantly change your personality.

I find it funny the kind of standards we have around passwords (PKDF, ...) and how it's anathema to not hash and salt them, while we casually store and trade much more valuable personal data.
The possibility of financial collapse is very real, they start losing the ability to keep the lights on at that fancy plant in Nevada this year.

They need to raise some serious money in a new equity offering, guess we'll see if the market will tolerate that or not.
That may simply be a function of how little leaks out of Russia. Reasonably closed states that tend to murder their opposition have a bit of an advantage here. If Snowden or Manning had been Russian I would totally expect them to be killed to serve as an example to other potential leakers.
> Update: Can confirm Firefox Quantum with SOCKS proxy leaks the address. Oh dear!

Did you file a bug report?
The conclusion of the answer, written by a former Google employee, is composed of absurd false dichotomies and strawman arguments.

>So what’s the alternative? A world where everyone uses Duck Duck Go, all email is deleted from the server once its read (less secure, more prone to data loss, by the way), no one uses their real name on the Internet, all ads are for Budweiser and Huggies, and every important web service uses a subscription model?
No thanks. I’ll take Facebook and Google any day.
If they had a solution that was better than what was out there, and they are publishing their research, then it follows we should be able to find their novelty in their publications, right? So, I took a look at their publication track record on this topic [0], and there are a few red flags that stood out to me.

First, they're publishing at a pretty astounding rate, with new submissions roughly every 1-3 months for the past 3 years, with the same authors. I'm skeptical that a small (<5?) research team would be able to produce novel contributions at such a rate, which leads me to believe they're probably remixing previous works into incremental publications.

Second, all of their publications are in neuroscience journals, which may not be up to date with the latest research going on with HTM in (for example) computer science. NIPS does have a computational neuroscience track, after all - I would have expected at least some interdisciplinary leakage if the novelty was very high.

Finally, the journals that they're publishing in are relatively low-ranking, which also seems to indicate that what they're doing is not necessary very novel (as you said, perhaps just a re-hash of existing HTM research).

Also, this article was co-written with a marketing exec, so I think it's fair to bring a certain level of skepticism.

[0]: https://numenta.com/resources/papers/
I think it's a pretty giant euphemism to refer to the possibility of running out of cash before the end of the year as "challenges".
That is true of some forms of dark matter (e.g. WIMPs). It is not true of others (e.g. MACHOs) which ARE classical matter, just not visible to telescopes.
One of your follow up comments is just pointing out even when someone partially doxes you, HN won't remove the comment.

You are wanting to have it both ways, to suggest this is policy while claiming you are doing no such thing. I have provided my anecdata that supports the idea that, no, this is not true in all cases.

If you weren't trying to smear them, you could have replied to my rebuttal with something like "I stand corrected. It isn't HN policy, though I am still unhappy with their decision." instead of accusing me of being worked up, which veers into personal attack territory and amounts to a cheap shot intended to undermine my points without actually addressing them.

But I said I didn't plan to argue this further, and would not have had I not felt your cheap shot was seriously out of line. So I intend to stop here.

Edit: And the primary reason I don't intend to argue it further is because this is a personal issue for you. I am trying to be respectful of that fact. But I don't think that fact justifies smearing both me and HN moderating policy.
True. Their lines of credit even feel somewhat predatory to me, especially wrt tool storage. I am not a mechanic though.
Surely all theories are amendable given appropriate data. But we do have a few direct examples of “darkish matter”. Neutrinos definitely exist and pass through the sun faster than their counterparts.
If insolvency were a concern the stock would be much lower. Seems like more fud by journalists who want to see Tesla fail.
FWIW, I read the article as addressing the issue in general. The headline and lead-in are Google-specific (as well as many of the examples), which is unfortunate in the sense that it's arguably click-baity and leads to arguments like this, that the thesis is wrong because it's not just Google. I understand why it's done, as providing a familiar, well-understood context helps people better understand what the author is getting at.

Examples of how the author is approaching the topic more generally are found in headings such as "Content and Creators" and phrases like "Information monopolies such as Google". The author's book is likewise entitled "Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism", not "How Google Reinforces Racism".

I agree that results in Bing and Duck Duck Go, for example, currently show a lot of the flaws describe in the article. But the point (as much as the headline may lead you to believe) isn't that it's only Google.
You realize that they can only release what is given to them, right?

This criticism only makes sense if they are sitting on a pile of leaked material that is unflattering Russia. There’s no reason to believe that is the case.
> No, he definitely wasn't/isn't a Russian agent. You'd have known because then he would have fled to the Russian embassy instead.

If Assange is a Russian asset, he is one that it is critical for Russia to conceal it's connection to if he is to continue to have value. Not running to Russia's embassy has helped him continue to spread propaganda that serves Russian interests, so it's not incompatible with him being an (even actively managed) Russian asset.
Based on this site, they're actively breaking out of the web design market.

As for the rest:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/269396/global-market-sha...

It's too early to tell if that last quarter is an amazing turn-around trend, or an anomaly.
I'm glad people are thinking about this. Reputation systems should allow Markov Chaining, a la Google's PageRank algorithm. This would be a great help, but with a drawback or two as well. For example, smart rebels or people who genuinely know surprising things would need to find a high-reputation sponsor or they would likely get downvoted to oblivion; but other institutions have strong mentorship mechanisms to counter such tendencies, and so promote innovation and novelty.
8% in this market? Wow. That's... that's pretty bad. Interest rates have been rising steadily, but a spike to 8% can only mean that bond investors have begun to lost faith in Tesla.

The market however, is reacting to Moody's credit rating. Moody's downgraded Tesla to B3 and Caa1 earlier this week, which is well into junk-bond status.

The TL;DR about it is that Telsa's Model 3 production isn't ramping up fast enough. Tesla's current debt deadlines are:

* $230 million due in November 2018

* $920 million due in March 2019

Tesla is running out of time, and the Model 3 isn't being made fast enough. There's plenty of demand. Tesla is most likely going to be forced to borrow money to pay off its last debts.
This guy has been negative about tesla for years. he needs to be held accountable for being wrong.
Water is on the order of 50 parts per million in that part of Venus's atmosphere which is pretty dry compared to Earth but still straightforward to extract from the air. In Venus's atmosphere you basically have all the Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, Sulfur, and Argon you need and pretty good access to Helium, Neon, Chlorine, and Florine. It's everything else that's the problem, like Silicon or metals.
On the contrary, if you don't code, you risk becoming too detached from the realities of the project. Not only that but you're also left behind in the macro sense of losing touch with the state of the art in general.

Never in a million years would I want to be an engineering manager (tasked to lead a team on a specific project) with no technical contributions to my team's work. The best kinds of contributions are those that are less fun or less critical, but being able to understand how things work and be able to give legitimate concrete feedback on work artifacts fosters the most important thing as a leader: trust. Spend too much time away from making the sausage and you risk letting those terrible words slip from your lips: "why don't we just..." :)

This is worth the trade-off in lost time towards other less critical management tasks (and of course there are critical managenent tasks that will always overrule everything else.)

One hack worth mentioning is that certain large categories of management work are corellated with the number of awake humans on your team, so if you can find a local minimum there that can be coding time with minimal opportunity costs.
When your yield moves from 6 to 8% and your debt is rated junk (seven levels below investment grade) yes it is free fall.

The bond price/yield chart appears to be going parabolic in the past few days.
Coincidentally this week Fermat's Library highlighted a paper about the Voyager mission, the only spacecraft (Voyager 2) to visit Uranus and Neptune.

Super interesting paper. Turns out Voyager was the first spacecraft that could be reprogrammed "mid flight". In fact, if it wasn't for that we would have not gotten back images of Uranus or Neptune!

https://fermatslibrary.com/s/voyager-mission-telecommunicati...
Apologies if this is naive, I was looking for a free book for a flight a week ago and I downloaded 'The Einstein theory of relativity; a concise statement' by H A Lorentz, 1920, available here https://archive.org/details/einsteintheoryr00einsgoog as well.

On page 22, Lorentz states a 3rd experimental test for the theory, "If his (Einstein) theory is correct as it stands, there ought, in a gravitational field, to be a displacement of the lines of the spectrum towards the red." He adds, "No such effect has been discovered. ... there is no way of accounting for this failure if Einstein's theory in its present form is assumed."

He goes on to say that some modification would be necessary. What eventually happened to this 3rd test?
You wrote "No, the point is that the author selectively presents information that bolsters the point she wants to make." and then claim the author supports your point?

At best you are supporting hers.

She made the case for the query 'black girls' and to pre-empt comments such as yours bolstered her argument by extending it to a general case. So in no way did she 'selective present information to bolster her point', she was as even handed as she could have been (but apparently not even handed enough for some).
I never worry about being hit buy a bus, I assume it'll be quick :-)
Not necessarily. Globular clusters are sorta like mini galaxies outside the main galaxy. I didn't see anything indicating whether the main collection of stars is itself spinning.
Bonds fall up, and rise downwards. Its a bit confusing if you aren't used to bonds, but that's the terminology.

Its because if you have $950 in bonds, and interest rates rise, then your $950 is worth less (maybe $930 now). Similarly, if interest rates fall, then your $950 is worth closer to $1000.
No, they're telling us selective elements of the truth (e.g., releasing only information on one political party during an election to sway that election) to destabilize our society and government to increase their own power and shield themselves from scrutiny and criticism. Yes, that is pretty disgusting.
I didn't know about .NET permitting interior pointers. Thanks.

I think you're right about HotSpot GC not using read barriers. I was mixing it up with the Azul GC, which uses read barriers.

> If you have concurrent mark-and-sweep and stop the world only during compaction phases, read barriers are unnecessary.

Do you know if it's possible to bound the pause caused by the compaction phase to some ceiling, like 2 ms for example? I'm asking because it's a goal of Go' GC to limit GC pauses.
This is strange, there was another, very very similar comment here from another user, which disappeared after about 10-15 minutes.

Then 15 minutes later, this comment appears, with only a slight variation in wording.

I am starting to doubt myself. Eerie.
Kubernetes 1.10: Hidden Gems
> Why would there be "no local cache" in the context of SSR?

Because there's no browser?
Is there a service out there that does rate market/tech prognosticators like this? I agree it'd be useful. There are similar ones for, say, politicians or media in general, but I'd like to see an industry-specific one.
Facebook represents the nuanced version of expression of existing culture( albeit only shiny one). Social validation is here to stay. So is FB.
> allow any user script to be able to override system commands

Other users could only override system commands if they can write files to your ~/.local/bin

As /u/CJefferson pointed out, if a user has permission to write files to your ~/.local/bin, they can probably also write to your ~/.profile and ~/.bash_profile.

As long as you control the contents of your home directory, modifying your $PATH to include ~/.local/bin is safe.
https://hamy.io/post/0005/remote-unlocking-of-luks-encrypted...
Wait, MySpace is dead?!?
By having a mirror, we can see and correct our flaws.

I used to be (well, still am, a bit) worried that the increasing automation of our social structures (credit scores, admission processes, etc) will just encode these biases in ways that cannot be altered.

But then saw how much of NIPS was about "fairness".

If these biases get encoded, they are measurable, examinable, detectable - and can then be accounted for in ways (presumably) much more effective than existing patterns.

So now, I'm not worried about the technology, although as always, I worry about the application of it.
I'm glad, we really need to better understand how the Ice Giants[1] in our solar system work.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_giant
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/08/why-me...

Statistics show that man are the new minority in the campus. But it is surely will be frown upon by some AA activists if a that program is extended to cover male. If AA is said to what it is trying to accomplish, then that shouldn't be controversial at all.
There was some talk way back during the FBI iPhone unlock crisis about Apple positioning itself to be strong on privacy so as to leverage their massive cash reserves to become a bank:

http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2016/03/follow-t...

Although this idea has also been shot down:

https://www.vox.com/2016/3/30/11326016/apple-bank

I think its still a good bet that Apple is going to leverage itself as the go to company for privacy. You pay a premium, but you get a curated ecosystem and no data harvesting.

I think they should take this opportunity to launch a privacy-centric social network and attract more people cast adrift to the walled garden.
I suspect that at some point he met the nasty end of a rubber hose.
Except that Tesla is not failing. There is so much demand for their cars that they cannot make enough of them. A Tesla car fatality is breaking news but a Ford Focus crash is ignored. Any shred of bad news pertaining to Tesla is amplified by the media.
> They need to raise some serious money in a new equity offering, guess we'll see if the market will tolerate that or not.

At $260 / share, I don't think so. Tesla's stock is also in freefall.
If pressed they can probably knock on Google's door, given the relationship there. Sell Google 10% of the company for $4 or $5 billion depending. Throw some kind of deal with Waymo into the mix. Google currently has $100 billion burning a hole in its pocket, adding several billion per quarter.
Even the term "anti-pattern" too graciously implies there's some sort of rhyme or reason (some "pattern") to the madness.
That's exactly what is being done - the founder stays on the board as a shareholder and controls the decisions on overall direction, goals and the vision of the company, and hires an executive that has the skills required for management of a large company and will execute these goals.
Doesn't dpkg require root permissions to run?
The reply of the guy Linus is addressing is worth a read: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/871
I love the font and the site, it worked well in chrome (android), except some glitch in the begining. Otherwise, the font is very interestingly and interactively presented.
> There is so much demand for their cars that they cannot make enough of them.

Tesla cannot make enough of them because Tesla cannot make enough of them.

Everyone knows Tesla can sell those cars instantly if their production lines are up to snuff. But the production targets are laughably behind. 5000 cars/week by Dec2017 ?? Yeah right. Its March2018 and they haven't even hit 5000/week yet.
> I can tell you from experience that nowhere near even 50%

I know way more people whose money is on the line that will gladly take that bet.
> You realize that they can only release what is given to them, right?

So, you mean, WikiLeaks is merely a useful-but-innocent tool of Russian intelligence, rather than an active collaborator?
It never occurred to me to try this. Great idea!
There's no tetris on mac except for all of the tetris on mac.
Super long-term kernel support
I don’t know the math, but my intuition based guess is it’s related to the range of interaction possible with other particles through QMs probability functions. Ie it’s important to remember that at quantum scale matter/energy transfer through space as probability density waves. Dark matter are at a low bar of the interaction distribution. Something about the empirical values of those equations gives way to many more particles at that low end than expected, but their existence couldn’t ever be ruled out.
yeah, I'd guess `cat *.log | sort`
Angry Users Donate $120K to Cancer Research After Brian Krebs' Coinhive Article
Before clicking the link:

grumble grumble typical HN, top comment is whining about the webpage instead of focusing on the content. sigh

After clicking the link on my smartphone:

Sweet mother of Jesus, what have they done.
Analyses like 'stylography' are especially worrying:

https://www.smh.com.au/technology/why-hackers-should-be-afra...
>No one is saying the information is false or should be ignored.

That was precisely the intention behind characterizing Assange as a Russian spy during the election.
I think I agree with you overall — there's no way to perform this task perfectly for all time in such a way that it makes this problem disappear. But I want to push back against the specifics of your argument, namely about the cost and resources involved, as well as the lack of feedback mechanisms. I do that below; I wrote those paragraphs before really giving credit to how hard it would be to comprehensively score audience + topic pairs. That sounds like... exponentially growing complexity. So that approach sounds like a non-starter; maybe an alternative is to look at quality metrics on clusters of search queries as a whole, before diving into seeing if there are problems with individual audiences and those queries. Who knows.

There are many search queries to watch, but 'black girls' was persistently problematic for a long time. Noticing when a cluster of queries gets that status might be extremely resource intensive if that status was highly ephemeral; it's not. It's work that can be done asynchronously, and run daily at most. Is this simple? Nothing involving software is, imo. But it's probably much simpler than many other machine learning-driven pieces of Google's product.

Also, there are tons of feedback mechanisms available and actively used by Google. Every user interaction with search results is available to Google; a lot of these stand in for quality of result: did the person refine their query after seeing crappy results? Did they click a link and then press 'back' really quick? All of these factors already feature in Google's algorithm.
journalists want to create controversy to get views; they likely don't care if it fails or not
Yes but real police are generally superior to movie police.

They are also a much better shot than crime movies would lead you to believe.
If you can't defend the company on its own merits, instead of accusing journalists of wanting it to fail, then maybe you should consider that the journalists are correct and the company really does have some problems.

By the way, the stock is much lower. It's down over 15% since Monday. You can blame general stock market volatility for some of that, but even so it's a much larger drop than the overall market experienced.
Also Canadian, I can easily recall the ICQ number I haven't used in 15 years but I couldn't tell you my student number from University despite all the times I wrote it. Coincidently that was when Facebook was exclusive to students and even then far more popular with us than MySpace. I'm not sure how this 2007 article could have missed it.
+ Canada
Here's the wikipedia page for the test you're talking about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift

>The first accurate measurement of the gravitational redshift of a white dwarf was done by Popper in 1954, measuring a 21 km/sec gravitational redshift of 40 Eridani B.

The effect has been seen in experiments. (See the section on experimental verification.)