skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Dfgdfgrterter
dfgdfgrt
This article doesn't say much of anything, the real meat is in one of the links:

https://www.visualstudio.com/learn/race-to-push/
More popular it gets, sooner people will remove everything after the plus for mailing purpose. Actually, that's quite strange my "spammers" aren't doing it yet.
It depends on where you are. The AZ version - Fry's - is almost 100% grocery. Whereas other parts of the country I've seen their stores be close to 50/50
The problem is with no feedback, it can be hard to adjust in the right direction.

And I'm not 100% sure of this, but I think downvotes on this platform have consequences beyond just hiding one comment.

I've noticed ordering anomalies here where people who posted newer comments and had > 0 points were ranked below people who posted older comments and had <= 0 points. There was some intrinsic ranking going on.
The approach is very different from Rust because of the minimum version selection. Instead of getting the latest version of a dependency it tries to get the oldest and this happens for transitive (dependencies of dependencies) where you have less control on asking for updates.
> forced down our throats when Google suddenly finds a need for them

You can say that about Go itself. And there are already other/better alternatives. So why use Go?
And which blockchain experts do you follow?
I've been hearing this argument for about 4 years now. Pointing out that .NET has terrible dependency management does nothing for me when Google's main languages (Python, Java, C++) all have solved dependency management for their own use cases. If the Golang team has had enough time to cherry pick the best ideas and lessons learned to build a language they've had enough time to do so for dependency management.

At the very least they could have continued their hard core hands off approach of allowing the community to solve it. But instead they half-assed it and started capriciously anointing chosen solutions and honestly we're probably in a worse spot than we were before dep came along.

Plus, lets be honest here, there's no excuse for constantly changing APIs and binaries. If this was truly about getting the best ideas and lessons learned we'd just see refactors of existing tools with slow migrations to new concepts, but instead we've seen multiple complete rewrites, despite multiple efforts to build common libraries that should prevent such events!
Navigating And/Or Avoiding the Inpatient Mental Health System
what are the downsides
This reads just like a person who felt normal social awkwardness in their youth, not a person that actually has some form of Autism.
In case it is not clear from the title, this is an article about optimizing a BFS implementation in Go.
The benefits are really good too.
The administration (ie. the Trump administration, ie. the executive branch) has no control over spending and the president's budget is more of a wishlist than anything else. Congress sets the budget and passes the bill(s) that fund it.
I agree with the premise, but I think that I actually want something closer to the opposite. >95% of the things I look up are dead ends. Because these externalized cognitive spaces have weight and complexity, I often want to just wipe them out completely and start over.

I've turned my Safari "remove history items" preference to a short interval, specifically to minimize the cognitive overload that URL completion will have.

(I was disappointed to learn that Firefox removed the history expiry setting entirely. All of the forum questions asking for it are met with answers like "We use an efficient database now, so you don't need to set an expiration time!" Cool, but the implementation architecture had nothing to do with why that was a useful feature.)

I also use private browsing a lot. Need to check a quick fact on Wikipedia, that isn't directly related to my main work? Private browsing window. Some people are obsessive about keeping their Git history clean. I'm obsessive about keeping my browser history clean. In a sense, my browser history is the workspace imagined here, only with a less efficient UI.

Instead of a separate concept of "private browsing", though, I would love it if I could option-click a close button (on a window or tab) and have it erase all history/cookies that were generated by it. That would make history curation much easier.
What happens when the company changes direction? If there's a shift of priorities, an internal restructuring, a "strategic startup pivot", an acquisition?

Not to assume bad faith on Kaggle's part, but we got burned one too many times with private companies pushing their proprietary ("open") platforms for gobbling up data. The "it's free! just create an account — data lock-in — gap after project death/monetization" pattern leaves me a little cynical.

It's awesome that resources like these exist, but I'd be more comfortable paying attention if this was hosted as raw data somewhere (Github?), with a clear licensing and access model.
Their profits are down because the salad days of Obama/Hillary fear induced sales are gone for now. Just shows how poorly run Remington is that they can't plan more than a year into the future.
Didn’t Stalin declare all debt with the USSR null and void? I wouldn’t be shocked to see Trump do something like this one day.
Web assembly, of course! I really like to play with Blazor (https://github.com/aspnet/Blazor).
One book I can think of that has a similar chapter/difficulty curve is Boyd & Vandenberghe's "Convex Optimization" book, http://stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/.
"and 27,009 held off the market for unexplained reasons"

the title of the article is sensationalized. most off the apartments have a legitimate reason for being vacant while there were only 30K that they couldn't find a reason for.
> the USA has declared it illegal for any website to knowingly host any content that might be illegal

Which law is this and when did it go into effect?
There’s always going to be limitations because you can’t get visa or vaccinations.
* Tools wear and break from constant daily use (only war gets that kind of use out of guns)

* Beds frames can be made cheaply and if they break, you can still put your mattress on the floor (bullets don't work well if just thrown)

* You need to sharpen knives pretty often, which is wearing them out, but it is true that good knives will last a good while. (But when was the last time you heard of a knife lobbying group pushing to prevent laws from limiting the knife industry's ability to sell product)
I agree. But I reacted on comments disqusing if this algorithm is capable of doing more than targeting ads to make them cost effective.
> While neuroscientists struggle to understand how there can be such a thing as a first-person reality, quantum physicists have to grapple with the mystery of how there can be anything but a first-person reality. In short, all roads lead back to the observer.

You won't find many quantum physicists agreeing with this statement.

The notion of an 'observer' is an artificial one, coming from the Copenhagen interpretation, which is well known to be false -- it's still used only because it simplifies the calculations, so long as you know when to apply it. The reality is far more nuanced.

That being said, even Copenhagen doesn't equate observers to humans. Anything can be an observer, and to make good use of the interpretation, it's usually equated with the measuring apparatus used in the experiment. It has nothing whatsoever to do with thought.

In reality, the 'observer effect' is an approximation to decoherence that only applies when the experiment is perfectly shielded, and the measuring instrument is not. That is only usually the case.
Texas was one of those regions. So was California. The borders moved. The Tejanos are still here. All border areas have mixed styles and ingredients. "Fusion" implies someone intentionally looked at two disparate cuisines and mixed them on purpose.
Did you even read the linked article, his seven part blog post series on vgo [1] and the proposal [2]?

[1] https://research.swtch.com/vgo

[2] https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/24301-...
It’s an official Mozilla effort, given that it’s discussed as a key item in our roadmap update four days ago.
Exactly. MVS may sounds weird at first, but in practice it works identically to having a Lockfile (which is becoming the standard these days), just simpler.
The Film Industry and the Smiling Curve
Agreed. Dep had its warts (20 minutes for a very simple dep ensure...), but it solved the 80% use case in a way that was least objectionable for the majority. The fact that they can't (won't?) even refactor dep to suit their new ideas or try and revitalize the gps project just tells me that they don't really care about solving this for end users and just want to have fun writing a fancy dependency graph solver. Which is cool and all, but at least give me a stable API first.
Microsoft brags that their repository contains 3 million files with 4 million commits.

Compare that with Google's repository which had 1 billion files and 35 million commits -- as of 2015.

On a typical workday, they commit 16,000 changes to the codebase, and another 24,000 changes are committed by automated systems.

Each day the repository serves billions of file read requests, with approximately 800,000 queries per second during peak traffic and an average of approximately 500,000 queries per second each workday.

https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stor...
Catch-all is quite known for that. But the problem starts when you need to respond to some emails using such alias. You then need to setup account for sending which for me is quite inconvenient. Also in case of gmail the alias accounts "leak" the original login in some email headers.
A language is valued by its programmer bench, tooling, available libraries, as well as the language itself. Honest question - what is better than go right now?
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16423049 for a discussion between rsc and Rust developers.
How does an IDE know if a given line belongs in an if block or not?
in New Zealand, a parliamentary democracy, all ministers are elected politicians, including the attorney general - that particular attorney general is now out of power - sentencing has completed and a fine (against the government) levied
Yea but that's also a reason to leave. I know one of the main reasons I stopped using Facebook for photos was because I didn't want my Mom and extended family looking at the parties I went to at college.
Interview with Co-Founder and CEO of ClearSky Data
Getting Lazy with Scala
> It is of course possible to build systems that use semantic versioning without semantic import versioning, but only by giving up either partial code upgrades or import uniqueness. Cargo allows partial code upgrades by giving up import uniqueness: a given import path can have different meanings in different parts of a large build. Dep ensures import uniqueness by giving up partial code upgrades: all packages involved in a large build must find a single agreed-upon version of a given dependency, raising the possibility that large programs will be unbuildable. ... Semantic import versioning lets us avoid the choice and keep both instead.

It's a useful exercise to be critical of existing systems and see if there are opportunities to improve that they missed. That's how progress happens.

At the same time, there is a common fallacy (especially among very smart people) that this might be an instance of. Even if it isn't and the Go folks came up with something brilliant, I think it's worth talking about because it occurs a lot elsewhere. I'll call it the "Missing Third Feature".

Cox's claim boils down to. "X gives you A but not B. Y gives you B but not A. I've just come up with Z which gives you both A and B, so it's superior to both."

In many cases, though, the reality is. "X gives you A and C but not B. Y gives you B and C but not A. I've just come up with Z which gives you A and B, but not C (because I'm likely not even aware that C exists)."

I could be wrong, but if I had to guess, C is that vgo has no ability to express compatibility across multiple major versions.

Let's say my package foo depends on bar. The maintainers of bar add a parameter to a function in it as well as fixing a number of other bugs. That signature change is a breaking change, so they rev foo to v2. My package bar does not call that function. In order to get the bug fixes, though, I have to change all of my imports to use foo/v2. Anyone using bar must either fix all of their imports of foo to v2, or end up with two versions of foo in their application (which might cause weird behavior if values from one foo end up flowing to another).

The key problem is that from a package's own perspective, "breaking change" is defined conservatively — any change that could possibly break even a single user is a breaking change and necessitates a major version bump. From a package consumer's perspective, many nominally breaking changes do not actually break that particular consumer. Package managers like Cargo let you express that gracefully. My package foo can say, "I depend on bar and work with bar >1.2.3 <3.0.0" if I know that foo isn't impacted by any of the potential breakages in bar 2.0.0 or 3.0.0. That in turn lets my package be used in a greater number of version contexts without causing undo pain to my consumers.

This may not turn out to be a big deal. It's hard to tell. But my general inclination when I'm designing a system is that if my idea seems unilaterally better than the competition in all axes, then I strongly suspect those systems have a feature that I am oblivious to and that mine lacks and I try to figure out what it is they know that I don't.
RAII works just as well for heap allocated objects as it does for stack allocated ones.
I've been on the internet long enough to notice this mass hysteria. And providing a recent and relevant example is grandstanding, huh? Funny how tangents on freeze peach aren't considered grandstanding to you (especialy when your average HNer couldn't give two fucks about the rights of sex workers except when they can exploit them).

And lastly, I read the book for the second time just last week. Most memeified and over-interpreted book in existence. Interestingly there's this reocurring event of two-minutes hate, as well as war fervor against whoever the government has deigned the enemy. This enemy is never the same entity, but during the war fervor, everyone pretends they're the worst when they were just allies a week ago. Seems awfully familiar. I also see some nice examples of doublethink in these types of threads where HNers usually drool over capitalism and the rights of private organizations; and they also pride themselves on being so logical (2 + 2 = 5); yet they can't seem to understand that free speech only applies to the government. Soooooooo Orwellian, oh em gee. It's so cringey hearing people use 1984 as a stand-in for anything and everything when they've barely read the book, or from a high school understanding of it.
It's true that there is a weak correlation between the party of the administration and science funding, with funding being more under a Republican administration.

However, there is also a correlation between the House of Representatives and science funding, with funding being more under a Democratic House of Representatives.

(In the Senate, no correlation between party and funding)

If you look at where the science spending goes, the Republican administrations spend more than Democrats largely because they spend more on the military, and so military funded science goes up. Democratic administrations spend less on the military, but more on space, energy, and environmental science.

See: http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2015/11/09/do-democrats-alway...
That’s more of an implementation detail though. The design does not demand that. I assume that no concern initially when the ecosystem was tiny.
Thanks for asking. Here is a grab bag in rough order of events. (Spent years 1-20 as Catholic, and years 21-39 as an atheist)

* Leaving my third "failed" startup, post YC. (For the record, my awesome co-founders sold to Cisco after I had left)

* Working with a coach to find and clearly define my deepest values

* Leaving San Francisco to align my life with those values

* Deciding to search for the meaning of life

* Truly realizing that the meaning of life isn't accumulation of money or stuff, and that my identity needn't be tied to those goals

* Wrestling with my ego and deciding it does not deserve primacy

* Donating many of my possessions

* Fasting (many 2-3 day water fasts, 5 day as peak)

* Reading 20-30 books on different spiritual traditions

* Watching hundreds of hours of lectures on esoteric systems and spiritual traditions

* Researching Tarot, Kaballah, Freemasonry, and other ancients systems of enlightenment

* Studying Zen and Taoism

* Learning about [Natural Law](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo) and allowing myself to honestly imagine if that is the way that the universe works

* Experimenting with psychedelics

* Practicing Transcendental Meditation twice daily

* Getting out in nature and learning about plants

* Explicitly working to balance my left and right brain by beginning to trust my intuition

* Keeping a diary of synchronicities and searching for deeper connections than I previously allowed myself to believe could exist

* Opening myself up to the possibility that there is more to the universe than that which has been explained by science

* Learning the eight-circuit model of consciousness

* Researching state of the art physics

* Refactoring, uninstalling or rewriting the legacy operating system and long ago installed background processes that were my subconscious

* Buying a house

* Taking guitar lessons

* Teaching myself to draw

* Releasing fear and deciding to love everyone and everything

* Adopting an amor fati attitude

* Living for the present moment

* Finding my higher self and living out of it on a daily basis
Most functional languages also allow you to do something like this which is pretty much the same idea as guard clauses:

foo 0 = 0
foo 1 = 1
foo n =
...
Not to sound too Monty Python, but shouldn't they have at least the right to know these things?

And your example proves the point; because others cared to become the third-party, we have projects like LineageOS for smartphones and tablets. However, they could not have if Google had locked its OS down or restricted it to certain hardware.

Just because most people only want to know the time doesn't mean no one but clock makers should have the right to understand how clocks work.
Node.js yaml vs. json simple benchmark
(data file 16Mb to 20Mb)

- JSON: stringify 161ms; parsing 155ms

- JS-YAML: stringify 13599ms; parsing 813ms

- YAMLJS: stringify 1009ms; parsing 4714ms

https://gist.github.com/jeremychone/700b6ed721565e2488a2cff60b5ad749

Seems like each Yaml's implementation is either fast at parsing or at serializing.
I think the Linux kernel style is similar. That was the first coding standard I somewhat adopted, but naturally have adapted to many others on different teams over time.
I am not happy where we are as a society.

The "easy-ness" diminishes the quality of interaction.
just opened the site and see the top menu which is superimposed on the text on the page, you should fix it guys.
You should consider the possibility that I have not given a complete description of my situation in a single HN comment from which one could properly diagnose me one way or the other. Maybe the aspects of my situation that would definitively decide the question one way or the other are too painful for me to air in public even after all these years, or maybe I just don't feel like baring my soul in public. Either way, I don't really care if you want to attach the label "disorder" to it or not. All I know is that it caused me a lot of pain and anguish well into my 20s and 30s, and it took a lot of years of concerted effort to change my situation. My point is not that I want to wear the scarlet A with pride, my point is that I was able to do something about it, whatever it was, and my life is immeasurably better for having made that effort. The rest is just quibbling over terminology.
>> The idea was that so long as we retained the right to bear arms we would be able to keep tyranny in check.

> How's that working out for you? ...Trump...

Trump is not a tyrant, even though he'd probably like to be one if he could.

> Possessing the means of insurrection doesn't entail having the judgment to use it appropriately.

Unfortunately, there's no way to legislate judgement or restrict rights to only those with judgement. Insurrection by its very nature is illegal, even if it's necessary and right.
Look at the companies providing advanced driver assist technology to the cars people actually buy. I'd personally consider them leaders due to the slow and steady approach.
Well, you'll always have to trust some point on being immutable.

A git repository can mutate, but so can a central registry or a proxy. Once a version is cached in a registry or a proxy, nothing stops people with enough privileges from modifying that cached version.

So really the only thing that changes is just who you trust.
Actually I think the process shows a strength of the Go community. The initial lack of a dependency management tool certainly had to do with the practises at Google - as Google employees, the processes of Google certainly shaped the needs of the Go creators.

But I am very happy, that they did not pick a random management system, just because they "had to have one". We can see enough bad examples in the wild. They left this aspect out of the language standard, to tackle the challenge later, with proper consideration.

As far as I understand all details, Russ Cox has presented a very thoroughly worked out spec, and it seems to solve a lot of problems, other dependency management tools have. It is also completely compatible with Go so far and also fully optional.
Ahh, but they did not have institutionalized racial slavery before the auctions. Simply having slaves is not enough, as US slavery was based on the European peasantry model which has no racial component and it was only after massive influx of African slaves that the connection became so strong.

Also, segregation spread from the South after the Civil War so there was a significant gap from the end of NY slavery to the start of Radical segregation which means it was not a continuous period.

Remember the Civil War ended in 1865 slavery absolutely ended in NY in 1827, but was almost non existent at that time long having been phased out.
> If adding such an optional feature causes Uber to leave the Android platform, adding the optional feature is a net loss to Android users. "You are not the user" rings true here.

That's a big if. I highly suspect that Uber wouldn't want to leave one of the biggest platforms just because of a simple option that might already exist. What if Uber demanded to be able to have root on Android phones? Would Google be willing to bow to that because losing them would be a "net loss to Android users"?

I'd have to ask you to point out why giving user's more ways to manage their data "harms the ecosystem".

> I asked for examples of Google lying about data collection, which was the accusation you levied. You responded with Google being transparent about responding to legally binding government requests.

Yeah. I did. It doens't matter why they lie, it matters that they lie. Especially If they are willing to lie to me about how they use my data, they why wouldn't they be willing to lie to me about how they collect my data? And I fully admit that I have no direct proof of them lying about how they collect data, but I don't see why you would trust a company that regularly lies to it's users about what it does with that data.
New Zealand doesn't do damages like that, that's an American thing