skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think its about doing the notes correctly, not the voice. I think it could even work with your mouth closed.
Do you know if the mod includes features/content from the D1 expansion? It's hard to track down and I never played it (despite wanting to).
If the name comes to mind, please share it.
Hi! I'm the co-founder of https://snips.ai and we build a 100% on-device Voice AI platform.
The ASR and NLU are running on a Raspberry Pi 3, and best of all it is free and we are open-sourcing it, starting with the NLU https://github.com/snipsco/snips-nlu

https://medium.com/snips-ai/snips-nlu-is-an-open-source-priv...

The whole platform runs on-device which makes it ideal for privacy, cost, and to allow it to run when there is no network, from hotword to ASR and NLU

We are available in English, French, German, and soon Japanese and Korean, with more European languages coming!

Take a look at what some people have built with it: https://github.com/snipsco/awesome-snips

and a few tutorials to get you started: https://medium.com/snips-ai/building-a-voice-controlled-home...
"I can get going", emphasis on "can" ;)

I usually have more settings, but on a temp machine that's all I need.
> The iPad has a separate SIM slot and I imagine it will have to until the built in SIM is truly universal.

Or you know... In the rest of the world, people actually ask for SIM cards, physical cards, because they are portable, and 100% certifiably decouples your device from your cellular provider.

Why on earth would I have something hidden inside... Which may or may not be interoperable... Which I cannot take and use with other devices if I need to? Which I cannot easily replace with a new one, from any carrier in the world?
The first cars had to have a man with a flag walk in front of them when passing through towns.
Wow, the mobile site is better than the app by leaps and bounds (Android).
It seems plausible that those nutrients might be found in certain plants, and could be identified and concentrated. I wouldn't risk it with my cats, but plenty of people do feed their cats veggie kibble and I haven't heard of them dying of malnutrition in droves.
At https://snips.ai, we process all on the device, from the speech recognition to the NLU.

You can then use any language to create skills to make it perform actions.

Take a look at how to build a connected speaker with Snips: https://medium.com/snips-ai/building-a-voice-controlled-home...
Scratch something is else till it "bleeds"? Get something scratch-y. Or as the other here suggested, decide you can scratch only your arms and scalp but not the face and go from there.
Do you really need to crawl an html? There's APIs to do that already, right?
So, how does this well-orchestrated conspiracy get its message to journalists that "you should investigate this" without the investigative reporters spotting that there is a well-orchestrated conspiracy?
Are you travelling to the UK? There are loads of SIM cards for sale in arrivals, including EE.
Soundhound also works fine with humming/singing. It isn't perfect and I have an indian accent.
> This depends on thread implementation and how much is allocated for the stack. Java will by default allocate 1MB, you can change that if you know what are you doing.

Isn't that vmem? Unless it also writes to the entirety of that 1MB before starting the thread, it's not actually committed by default on most unices.
But 9 women can give birth to one baby per month on average
I would _highly_ recommend “Freedom from Nervous Suffering” if that’s your issue. Claims to be a book about agoraphobia, but properly fixed once and for all my fear of flying.
https://www.fbpurity.com/
actually does not exist. But it can be added. How about "Stripe Transaction" Not funny enough. I will think a little. Do you have a suggestion?
I'm not sure actually. In many videos, he offers it things like fish and chicken and wet cat food but that cat doesn't touch them. It does eat some dry kibbles - maybe that's enough? Now that I think about it, calling it "pure vegetarian" was my mistake because it does eat those kibbles which probably contain non-vegetarian nutrients.
Why is everybody wearing headphones?
But my point is, Uber’s self-driving car has lots of goals -- drive safely, drive legally, drive quickly, drive comfortably, go in the right direction.

A low-level safety system has a much simpler requirement: if it looks like the car is about to hit something, hit the brakes.

And this second category of code is something that already exists, deployed in production today by multiple car manufacturers.

That’s the bit Uber turned off. “It’s a hard problem!” doesn’t seem like a good explanation.
Yeah, see, so I've given up on the details of such grand-scheme meddling of geopolitical results of companies - for these kind of in-detail things you mentioned I'll gladly accept the Guardian/NYT/WaPo level or I'm going to Schneier or Krebs :)

I've no aspirations to start a company ever again, I'm nowhere near Silicon Valley and I'm happily hacking away at small and interesting problems. ;)
But it's not sarcasm. It's true. People are "leaving Facebook" for instagram without understanding that Facebook owns instagram.
I would be very hesitant to be the only person signing off on the PRs. Maybe if your company has multiple people approving PRs. If you have no other choice, just try to make it clear to your bosses that you dont actually know the language so you can't guarantee that your reviews will be as rigorous as they would be in Java.

In my experience, it might actually be harder to notice high-level than low-level, because code patterns are kind of tied to languages. Some of the theory stays the same like factories or whatever, but the language-specific things tend to vary a lot.

Take Java, for example. If someone uses an enum or a public static variable or static class with static variables or whatever, those are kind of design decisions that might arguably have a "right" answer to an experienced Java coder. But a newer Java coder probably wouldn't really be able to readily distinguish between use cases, only say that they are correct and somewhat neat code. It's much easier to catch weird syntax or bad style than to say "ok but you probably should restructure these couple of files" in a language you're not super familiar with.

Anyways I kinda rambled but the tl;dr is 1) let your bosses know (to the extent that you're comfortable with) that it's not your primary language, and 2) it's fine to learn as you go, just be aware that there's stuff to learn
> Well, there is a right-wing religious group called the FOSS.

The author must be kidding, right?

> But these people think that paid software is the work of the devil.

No they don't. To reuse the authors tone: Whuut? Listen Buddy, you're talking nonsense - big time.

Even the GNU GPL which repeatedly gets flak for being to "religious" does allow making money of the software projects licensed under the GPL.

I'm definitely not a fan of Stallman and there are valid complaints about his religious view on software and valid complaints about the design of certain licenses to be made.

But what the author is writing there may very well be his view on FOSS and still be complete and utter BS.
[Infographic] See What Happened to Facebook and How Facebook Got into This Mess
But isnt it true that even for persons who have FB accounts but never use them, because of the presence of "Like buttons" or similar beacons, FB is still setting cookies and tracking those users, as well as non-members, as they navigate the rest of the web.

This assumes that those persons are 1. using browsers that automatically load images, even ones that serve them no purpose and exist only to feed data back to FB and other third parties and 2. taking no steps to prevent their computers from accessing these Facebook domains.
Google XML Sitemap Auth Bypass – Black Hat SEO Bug Bounty
I think you’ve identified the smoking elephant in the room.
It's weird that you have to be the one that reviews code when you don't know the language it's written in.

Is this a small organization or are there any staffing limits?

One possibility would be to take a Swift coder you trust from your team and have him/her do the review for you.
Your time line is off. USSR assistance to China on nuclear weapons happened before the split. The rest happened after USSR fell and Russia sold the weapons because they were economically needy.
I'm not commenting on the judge's decision, I'm commenting on s73v3r_'s position.
I know the feeling and I've definitely unfollowed people for this, but only if it never 'clicked'. There's people whose blogs (and Twitter) I've been following for nearly as long as I've been online (20 years in a few months) and we interact every few months or years and it's totally fine if they switch topics from time to time (important note: nowhere near calling these friends or acquaintances, really just random people whose blogs I liked and we've commented on each others stuff over the years).
You completely missed the meat of the comment which was about how cars get old, worn out and damaged over time, and aren't always well maintained, and that this will apply to self-drivers too and affect their safety.
They did eventually add an option, but it's still very limited (single car seat only, not as many drivers have them, and no newborns).
It was announced last week https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/14/alas-digg-reader-is-shutti... (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16588027)
it might be helpful if you go abroad and your roaming options suck. otherwise agree. in new iPad it's not builtin, that's good.
Also blocked by Cisco Umbrella.
"This site is blocked due to a security threat that was discovered by the Cisco Umbrella security researchers."
It doesn't stop at 6 gb, they stop charging you for data at 6 gb. It's "free" after that.
Awesome tool, picked this up immediately. Amazing what things you can discover with it.
Read the blogpost. What do you use and recommend to write React Native? Nuclide, VS Code, Vim, Atom, Intellij?
Production-Grade Async Programming Framework for PHP
> Derivative works requires actually copying

No literal copying of text is required for something to be a derivative work. Transforming a work implementing an API into documentation describing the API would produce a derivative work of that API, if the API is protected by copyright. Transforming that documentation of the API into another implementation of that API would also produce another derived work of the API.
> The client echoes the complement of the last seen bit when sending packets to the server.

Since neither the client or server care about this big, there doesn't appear to be anything that forces the client to actually implement this behavior. The client could always set it to 0 or even set it (pseudo-)randomly on each packet.

The bit shouldn't exist, but if the IETF did add it to the standard, would hostile middleware boxen actually start drooping packets if they don't see the "spin bit" change?
The special sauce was that it was tiny, that was not only important, it was imperative back when EPROMs ruled the motherboards and the backplanes. It was only until the serial flash memory arrived that bloaty alternatives became possible at all.
Spot on. While the idea behind can be interesting, it is implemented by accepting people who have the same "social status" background (same schools, same opinions), but are of different gender/race.

I think that a white factory worker could add way more insight into how other communities views things, than hiring a black/female attorney does...

Having said that, I'm really afraid what the backlash against this type of diversity-thinking will be. The system will surely corrects itself in the future (it's already starting), but I'm not certain going back to another extreme would be very wise...
I mean detailing specifically what problems arise. To my mind, calling something a 'terrible practice ... against common sense',
particularly when another party (with expertise no less) disagrees, is just a lazy put-down.
I wonder if tourists who get addicted carry the habit back at a different rate? Part of the reason to explain the GIs drug usage was, well, they were in a nasty war and probably knew some people who were KIA and wanted an escape.
Blur Busters Lagless VSYNC ON Algorithm for Emulators: True Beam Racing
OK, fair enough. And indeed, I use MySQL with MySQL Workbench in Ubuntu VMs. But still, Excel on equivalent Windows VMs pivots much faster.
Inside Fort Gordon: Where Next-Gen Cyber Troops Are Trained
This goes directly against their own versioning policy of abusing cliffs and bringing everyone along: https://reactjs.org/blog/2016/02/19/new-versioning-scheme.ht...

Quoting from that page:

> Therefore it is important that we don’t just upgrade our own codebases but that we bring our whole community with us. We take the upgrade path very seriously - for everyone.

> If we’re not careful, we can hit a cliff where nobody upgrades. This has happened to many software project ecosystems in the past.

> Therefore, we’re committed to making it easy for most components and libraries built on top of React to be compatible with two major versions at the same time.

I'm not sure if I'm reading them and the diagrams in that page correctly, but looks like the deprecation should happen at 17 and removal at 18 according to it?
Yes but it doesn't really say why anyone wants this spin bit. What are they going to do with it? Measure RTTs? Why? What for?
Bottle and can deposit return scheme gets green light in England
It seems you were the one who completely failed to understand the article. Your first point implies you think the author was talking about QUIC in that section, when instead the author was merely using NAT as an example of packet inspection to provide context to the topic. Your second point is in fact exactly the point of the entire article, which itself is a commentary on the decision making process and factors in that process that IETF is presently using to decide exactly how much to "break" the protocols, and moreover on the observation that many people in the IETF do not consider this to be "breaking" at all. Your third point is a commentary on the utility of the bit itself, which is not really the focus of the article anyway.

You claim:
"IMO the article completely fails to describe the actual issue."

How so?
CyanView Wins Order from NEP Germany for Camera Control Solution
Are you saying China making cell phones and other goods cheaply available didn't benefit most of the people around the world? I don't get your logic.
“For magic consists in this, the true naming of a thing.”
― Ursula K. Le Guin, A Wizard of Earthsea
The streaming industry is fragmenting. From what I'm seeing you can use:

* Freeuim services with a ton of redundant commercials and dated content (Crackle, Midnight Pulp, Cocoro, Pluto). There a couple of 'classic' movies from the 70's and 80's (man I fee old now) but the commercials are automatically inserted by AI based on showing a commercial every 12 minute when the AI thinks the action is at slowest by audio volume. The problem is that it break the flow of the show because it ussualy a reflective moment and not a proper transition. Also I'll see the exact same Holiday Inn commercial 3-4 times at each break.

* Sub $10 services with less commercials and more recent content (Hulu.) I'm already paying for you. Why do I have you even more to turn off your commercial?

* Dull streaming service in the greater the $10 with no commercials (HBO, Starz, Netflix, Sling). These are great content but there some redundancy. Also I'm not going subscribe to each of you to get one or two shows when there's... cable.

Its getting to the point where viewers are saying 'Why do this when you can get a cable box that has a DVR or On Demand service and 'easy' customer service. The same customer service their high speed internet is going through. So there isn't much of a difference there.

If the streaming service was to survive they need to come up with a central application that lets you go more ala carte for your content at a less of an overall price easier navigation. Smart TVs and Roku boxes come close but it still a pain to switch apps. The cost advantage over cable isn't what it use to be. Steaming service had better be careful with pricing and content or cable will take over again.
> According to the well-pleaded complaint rule, the Federal Circuit had jurisdiction.

The Federal Circuit has the right to hear and decide this particular case, but they do not have the right to establish binding precedent on lower courts or other appeals courts in matters of copyright law. This has been explained to you repeatedly.
Waymo's record is only "safer than humans" because they haven't had a fatality yet and thus get 0/x, anything can be "safer than humans" by that count.

I looked up what numbers I could find, according to the OECD's Road Safety Annual Report 2016, in 2014 the US averaged about one death per 150 million vehicle-kilometers (vkm) (6.7 killed per billion vkm).

According to Waymo's own page on the subject, they have driven "more than 5 million miles" (8mvkm) since 2009[0] and they seem to be by far the lead vkm producer in the autonomous space[1]. Just to be as safe as 2014 US human driving they need to clock in an other 140mvkm with no more than one fatality, and even then that could be debated to be in more selected conditions than human driving.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big believer in autonomous driving and I think it would be a great, great thing, but saying it is already safer than human driving is at best misleading.

[0] https://waymo.com/ontheroad/

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/31/16956902/california-dmv-s...
How though, because surely it includes the time outside the observers network? And if they only want to monitor performance inside their network nothing so them from using an out of band system, or even adding their own timing footers to packets.
Which they could presumably also do by injecting their own packets, not snooping on everyone else's?
If not a US H1-B, how about one elsewhere?
That sounds like a great tool for enhancing battery life, if you delete all the „overzealous“ apps.

Charles could show a list of recommended apps to delete.
Not disagreeing with you. It would suck if Apple ever removed the slot, but it would be par for the course for them.
Can you give a citation for that? It goes against everything I've been reading.

The text of the GDPR says: "This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union", not to all EU citizens.
I was in the IETF meeting. It was actually a very civil discussion, and I think almost everyone in the room could see both sides on the issue. On the one hand, we've seen increasing problems with middleboxes making assumptions about end-to-end protocols, and this making it very hard to then deploy new end-to-end functionality. The problem is real; we measured this effect in this paper:

http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/M.Handley/papers/extend-tcp.p...

Indeed, one of the changes the IETF group has made since taking on QUIC is to also encrypt the QUIC sequence numbers, so middleboxes can't play silly games by observing them (they were already integrity protected).

However, the flip side is that network operators do use observations of network round trip time gained from passive observation of traffic so as to discover if traffic is seeing excessive queuing somewhere. An inability to do this with QUIC may either lead to worse network behaviour, or to them using other methods to gain insight. If you're in a location where you can observe both directions of a flow, you can easily do this by, for example, delaying a bunch of packets by 200ms, then letting them go. When you see a burst of (encrypted) ack packets return, you can deduce the RTT from your observation point to the destination. I'd really like to avoid operators thinking they need to do such hacks just to measure RTT, and the spin bit lets a passive observer see the RTT.

In the end, I was not convinced entirely by either argument, and neither was the consensus in the room. It's not a clear-cut decision; there are reasonable arguments either way. Such is engineering.
1 in 5 College Students Used Loans for Cryptocurrency Investments
This website on my mobile browser is the most visually pleasing experience I've had today. Bravo.
Nice. I especially like this bit: "Sometimes difficult choices admit to no sensible compromise between them and the process simply has to make a contentious decision one way or the other. While individuals make such decisions all the time, the collective process that enlists a large group of diverse perspectives, interests and motivations finds such decision making extraordinarily challenging."
You will probably always lose.

It is someones daily job to try rand enrich the data they are getting from you, you are working on your bot(s) on your spare time. You just purely can not spend as much resources to keep ahead of the algorithm.

EvilCorp™ will always gain more benefit out of adapting the algorithm to even include/exclude your bot since they get profit gains across the board.

More over you need to spend a lot of time on your bot(s) to make them blend in. I'm not saying; "don't do it", I'm saying; "it is going to be hard to get real benefits"
Heidegger doesn't seem too far from the mark, judging by Andy Clark's 1997 "Being There":

http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/BeingThere.AClark1998....

The title even seems to be a nod to Heidegger's "dasein" (as well as to Woody Allen).
This was not a trial, this was an enquiry. It was a massive opportunity - a worldwide stage - for Zuckerberg to get ahead of the questions about Facebook, reassure shareholders and users, and publicly defend his company.

Now he and the company just look weaselly, defensive and contemptuous. Public opinion of Facebook is in freefall. That is a huge problem that is very difficult to turn around with big real world consequences: loss of advertising already and there will now be pressure on politicians in Europe and the US to regulate and fine.

Seriously he really messed up on this.
> I just don't understand the use case for the native app.

You can watch his presentation [1] (which is linked to in the announcement page that story links to) for a few of the use cases.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWotEyTeJhc
> Nice try, but if the outer layer is UDP, then NAT alters the UDP packet headers. The QUIC payload is never touched.

You didn't understand the article. It's talking about existing TCP traffic here, not QUIC.

> I don't see why the people tasked with standardizing Internet protocols now have to make provisions for the jerks who literally break the Internet.

1) A lot of them are the same people and 2) internet protocols are worthless without adoption, which is why we're still groping towards IPv6.

Or for a shorter answer: Politics.

> How is this bit even useful for anything?

Here's an internet draft proposing adding a spin bit which discussed, among other things, some uses for it: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-trammell-quic-spin-01
Keep offending.

You both prove my point further and give me something to link to for whenever the attitude of GIMP devs towards users will come up.
Statistical deaths from pollution are weird though, in that you are perfectly fine legally as long as you pollute within the accepted threshold. Driving 50 miles in a car that pollutes twice the allowed amount somehow makes you responsible for fractional statistical deaths in a way that driving 100 miles in a car that pollutes the allowed amount does not.

This observation does in no way absolve the polluters, but the big picture would be incomplete without this perspective. We all have some blood from statistical deaths in our hands, some people more than others, and again some of them more than others because they broke some rules we introduced to make the deaths not run or of bounds.
Speech to text is precisely the most sensitive thing to protect. There is simply no way to offer real Privacy when processing voice in the cloud.
"Stripe copied us"