skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, one answer is either it will be positively demonstrated to be statistically safer, or the industry won't exist. So once you start talking about what the industry is going to look like, you can assume average safety higher than manual driving.
So you can design and implement a complex automated system implementing your own logic, a 3rd party API and a payment service.

But this, you didn't understand before doing so?

Do you get you are on HN, not facebook, and therefor people may doubt your sincerity on this point?

Just to save you a marketing shaped comment as a response, it's rhetorical.
I will refrain from begging you to answer the question.

It is sufficient to note that every PKI is as secure as its weakest link. If my CA is 512 bit RSA, that is the security I am going to get.

That public DNSSEC infrastructure is neglected in places is not really controversial or what we're discussing here, but the use of a singular trust root in place of hundreds should not be taken as evidence of incompetence from the protocol designer.
My greatest hope with all of the noise surrounding this, is that the engineers and employees at Facebook realize that Facebook and Zuckerberg’s vision does not line up with reality. Zuckerberg believes that Facebook will connect people and change the fabric of society and communities for good in a way that was heretofore impossible.

Between Facebook’s political issues and the happiness-depressing effects of its use, I think it is pretty easy to draw the conclusion that Facebook is a net negative for society. This is without even taking into account the amount of PII that has been concentrated into a single entity (who monetizes it), or the effects of algorithmically appealing to people’s desires.

A hundred years from now, Equifax, YouTube, and Facebook will be lumped into the same pile: companies who profit off of information about consumers. The algorithmic veneer that protects YouTube and Facebook will be gone by then.

I’m not trying to condemn anyone, and I’m not in the position of having to weigh providing for my family with making ethical choices.

But, I think it is clear that change for Facebook will not come from the top. It will only come as people leave.
> Most interfaces have one implementation.

Close, with the exception of mocking interfaces for unit testing, which is very common in Java.
Robert Mercer's empire is crumbling.
Yes, we're obliged to double down. On safety. The Uber self driving cars are known to be unsafe around pedestrians. Or another way of saying it "people walking". Or just "people". Like you and like me.
I had one try to run me down in the crosswalk (utterly failed to yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk) while Uber was running their ill-fated test in San Francisco. I walked into their offices on Harrison and asked to file a bug report. They laughed it off. Saw the exact thing happen a couple days later. They need to stop till they can figure it out how to do it safely.
All you did was say that there are two protocols that have some kind of DNSSEC integration. That wasn't the question I asked. Lots of things have DNSSEC integrations that nobody relies on. Is the answer to my question "I don't know"?
Signal supports "unencrypted SMS" alongside the ciphered messages. You can then use Signal as a central client for both SMS and Signal chats
I don't understand this at all. Can you explain?

Some people believe the 2008 financial crisis was caused because of de-regulation, rather than regulation; and that the bad guys were mostly untrustworthy/incompetent/greedy types in financial institutions.

Cryptocurrencies, famous for helping people evade regulations (e.g. ransomware) and untrustworthy/incompetent/greedy institutions (e.g. exchanges "accidentally" losing deposits), seem worse on these rather than better.
Cars: The Modern Moloch
I would think it was very likely that Facebook itself seeks to destroy evidence. They've got a much clearer sense of their culpability than any outsider would.
Note that this is essentially the same as facebook’s policy: they did not sell the user data as part of their advertisement business. It was an app that siphoned up user data without Facebook being paid.

A lot of reddit data is actually far more accessible via the API or the public data dump, which is on BigQuery. What makes the data less useful is the comparative anonymity because reddit users tend to use pseudonyms, and the fact that you can’t target users after building a targeting model from scraped data.

You could still trawl the reddit data to find useful correlations, and maybe get a good deal on ads if you notice the overlap of /r/the_donald with /r/bedwetting or whatever.
Please point to the 512 bit RSA CA that Chrome, Firefox, or Safari trusts.
Federal Aviation Administration's Joint Order 7110.65 is exactly what you are talking about. It is the manual that Air Traffic Controllers live by. To include situations that involve diverging aircraft or taxiing instructions and how to handle said situations. The entire manual was practically written from real-world experience.
webOS on their TVs isn't to bad. I just wish more companies developed apps for it. Roku is fantastic, but it'd be a bit cleaner if everything was just integrated into webOS.

That said, I do have a nagging feeling that the interface could be improved if it looked a bit more like Roku's. Some people complain that Roku's is archaic, but it's perhaps the most navigable I've come across.
I think that kind psychological profiling you can do with a Facebook profile is not obvious to most people. It’s not even clear to to most people that they are under 24/7 surveillance by using the Facebook app. There has been some raised eyebrows of creepy targeted advertisements, but it’s a different ball game of knowing that there is a company that has profiled you as an individual and then manipulated you with targeted political advertising using your most deepest fears.
About a day.

We have about a dozen external dependencies (databases, caches, front end build systems, etc), custom scripts to set up/populate some of the data stores, and even some third party tools that need to be custom-compiled on every system. We don't use Docker. So it's not as if setup is trivially simple.

But with a clear and specific guide, anyone who isn't terrified of the command line can follow along. Since we added docs, the only person who wasn't working on their first ticket by the end of day 2 was an intern.

When I came on we didn't have docs, and setup time was closer to a week.

Depending on just how low-hanging the fruit is that we can point the new developer at, most have a bug fix in QA by day 4.

Since we grow slowly and turn over slowly, it's really not a huge deal to have the new person spend a day setting up their environment a couple times a year.

It gives them a little insight into how the infrastructure fits together, and an excuse to interact with the team when they need to ask for help (being referenced once or twice a year, the docs are invariably just enough out of date to occasion a few error messages) and discover that we are in fact friendly and helpful.

The best also ask why things are the way they are and gain a little insight into the history of the codebase and the areas that we know are clean or messy or drowning in tech debt.

Are you growing so fast that you have new hires setting up a dozen new development environments from scratch every month? Then yeah, it's probably worth a week of developer time to decrease setup time from 12 hours to 2. If you're growing at a more reasonable pace - even a new hire every month - the ROI is probably not there.
Maybe he's trying to refer to automatic weapons?
Please see my answer to @kruczek in the same thread. This might be quite broad (maybe unconventional) definition of "secure" I'm talking about here, but the point is: everything that leaks important personal data to the 3rd party (I mean "not me and not the person I'm talking to", so FB is a 3rd party) leaking which is not absolutely mathematically necessary to perform its most basic functions — is not "secure" in my book. It doesn't matter if data end ups leaked because of using ROT13 for message encryption, or because it shares it with FB by design. Sharing my whole contactbook with FB, using proprietary closed-source app and protocol, requiring to have a real phone number (and sharing my access code via SMS with my mobile network operator on the first login — this is truly brilliant for a "secure" app, although I don't quite remember if it was WhatsApp or something similar) is not absolutely necessary for its most basic features and thus is not secure.

I want to be clear that `conflating privacy and "secure"` is intentional — violating my privacy automatically harms my security in most direct way. If something quite literally puts me in danger it shouldn't be considered "secure" by definition, no matter how good its crypto is on paper.
I have an ancient book on Private Mobile Radio. It has a section on using leased lines in it
Website Agen Judi Kartu Qq Domino Online Terbaru 2018
> I understand, but the error may be in how it interpreted what it sensed.

It may, it also might not. If sharing data fails, further methods would be needed - but it's a good start for figuring out what data should be recorded for comparison. If the data is entirely incompatible, then we should have regulation to require companies to at minimum transcribe the data into a consumable format after an event such as this.

> ... if the models interpreted the pedestrian as trash on the street, then how it responded (driving over it) is not inappropriate.

If the models saw anything at all, they should not have driven over it. Even human drivers are taught that driving over road debris is dangerous. At minimum it puts the car/occupants at risk - in extreme cases, the driver may not recognize what it is they are driving over.

If this isn't a case where the car was physically unable to stop - it's more likely the telemetry didn't identify the person as an obstacle to avoid at all.
Which language has the same for beers? Bears?
That ownership structure turns the company into a psychopath. Do anything for profit, sue to protect yourself and always bully with your size if you can.

This is not a socially acceptable way to be towards others.
I spend a lot of time doing lighting TD work using non-realtime renderers. Every one of those examples is pretty good for realtime, but also looks soooo wrong! its not anywhere near the same quality as a proper raytracer!

-Thats not what an ao pass should look like. But you shouldnt even need ao if your GI/shadows look good

- Gi should have detail to it, every realtime example is sooooo blurry

-The screen space reflections sometimeslook ok but really depends on your scene, you get all sorts of reflections in the wrong place.

-Yucky DOF without the nice bokeh on highlights and all those edge problems you get with a z-space blur.

The beauty of raytracing with a unified sampler is it makes the algorithm for each of these features you listed incredibly simple and it mixes distributes CPU/GPU time to whats important depending on that part of the image.

scene with lots of motion blur- more primary samples, less samples to gi/shadows/reflections - automatically based on how much gi/shadows you see

scene with lots of gi - more samples in gi, less for reflections etc - automatically

You can have a complex scene with reflections/gi everywhere, and then turn a heavy DOF on and get faster frame times.
Also:
3. Ensure that you don't use or provide anybody superuser in Postgres. (Otherwise, there is much simpler way to download&run anything that explain in the article – just `copy tablename from program 'wget ... && chmod a+x ... && ...'`
In practice it also means they can bundle your killer game with their headset and not pay you for it. Would they? Probably not. Could they, according to this? Yes. (Not a lawyer blah blah.)
Read between the lines. Nobody is that dumb to literally say that the earth is dying.
The article doesn't really say how the algorithm works aside from "they use machine learning," but the basic principle turns out to be pretty simple. In the work by Amgartden, they classify lengths of sequenced DNA by looking at the counts of k-mers (read: substrings of length k, where they use k between 2 to 10) that occur in each; it simply turns out that k-mer occurrence differs sufficiently between viral DNA and cell DNA this works.

The article mysteriously doesn't cite Roux, and I don't have time right now to track it down, but it's probably similar.
Well if what you style is the main content/header/footer area, and there is should only be one of it per page, using an id is a good way to enforce it as well as document it.

If you made it a class, I would assume I can reuse it elsewhere.

Now it's ony true for stuff you can't reuse, but unless you are building a boostrap competitors, there are actually a lot of things you never reuse in a real website.
With web assembly there really is a big opportunity for a browser based mobile OS like webOS or Firefox OS to potentially take off.
Coq Support for Visual Studio Code
> Car companies have (multiple) private tracks that they stress test their vehicles on. Car companies are extremely risk averse. Public road testing for something safety related is going to be very late stage in development/testing, if at all.

Yes, and so do these guys. They might be somewhat risk averse, but lets not pretend they have in the past made sacrifices that have cost lives (Pinto, etc...) and there are constant recalls going on.
Every lesson from aviation is earned in blood. This death wasn't necessary though. The Otto/Uber guys have been informed about their car's difficulty sensing and stopping for pedestrians. I know this because I informed them myself when one almost ran me down in a crosswalk in SF. Can't learn anything from your lessons unless you listen. Maybe they can pause and figure out how to actually listen to their reports of unsafe vehicle behavior.
Keep going!

z-index: 2147483647;
I suppose this subthread is complete, because you have now completely agreed with my original statement: you'll have to leave earlier for your trip to visit your friend, and delivery trucks will have to allocate more time (routes, trucks, drivers, etc.) for their deliveries. Alternatively, freight trucks might make fewer mostly-empty trips. Note that these two examples clearly match the characterization I provided: both may be accomplished at lower speed, with sufficient planning. This will be the "cost" of safe driving.
> I would be devastated if I learned my code ended even one person's life.

I agree, but there is already a lot of software in a car that can kill people in case of an error. In particular the airbag have multiple sensors and a complex heuristic to decide when the have to open, which ones, full or partial strength, ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbag#Operation An airbag that doesn't open can kill someone. An airbag that open unnecessary can kill someone. From Wikipedia:

> From 1990 to 2000, the United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration identified 175 fatalities caused by air bags. Most of these (104) have been children, while the rest were adults. About 3.3 million air bag deployments have occurred during that interval, and the agency estimates more than 6,377 lives saved and countless injuries prevented.

So, there is already a lot of programmers that have to be careful because an error can kill someone in the car (or the plane, or a medical machine, ...) I guess it's more easy to ignore the people killed by airbags because we are use to them and we imagine that they have a simple sensor (something like a light switch. So in case of a failure nobody is guilty.

With a self driving car, the first problem is that it is new and scary, and the second problem is that in an error that creates an accident we are use to blame the driver. But now we don't have anyone to blame (perhaps the programmer).
I'm curious what your dispute is here. Unless you're reading something into it that I didn't say. I certainly didn't say most new drivers kill someone. But to say that this is not a thing that happens with a decent level of frequency is just silly. There is an actual reason insurance is higher for teenagers.

The post I'm responding to, from my perspective, has a flippant attitude towards the deaths caused by human drivers.
I've included a pandoc generated epub and it seems ok on my computer, would anyone be able to test it on a epub device to see if it works ok?

https://github.com/joaoventura/full-speed-python/releases/
It's basically a race: will infertile memes infect fertile cultures before fertile cultures outbreed infertile cultures?

It's too early to call a winner. If you want to see some early hints, you might want to focus on populations that have very high fertility but are otherwise well-integrated into the prosperous, developed cultures that are experiencing low fertility overall. Mormons, for instance.
It's been 120k @ 7% for years now, I can't imagine that they've changed it.
Unlikely that this is related. Insiders have to post and notify the SEC of plans to sell stock far ahead.

Such pages are generated by robots all the time.
things like superuser should be disabled by default (only DBA needs superuser access, not anybody else).
Ola also always more expensive than Uber when I was in India for a few weeks. And another anecdotal feedback is all of my friends felt Uber had better crop of drivers and service than Ola.
> All of them, I mean you took a poll? that must have taken a while.

If someone wants to pretend it is not acceptable while still driving, that is just silly.
While pithy and edgy, this attitude is, unfortunately, also unconstructive and uninsightful. For those out there who do wish to put their money where their mouth is, do you have any advice besides “don’t work at Facebook”? (Or Uber…) Because that doesn’t seem to be cutting it.

At least doctors have the Hippocratic oath.
Why am I not surprised the first death of a pedestrian came from a Uber driven car.
https://youtu.be/ZDnShu5V99s?t=22m46s is a good lecture about the cryptography of electronic voting.
Close. Going by the article photo [0], the location was in front of these double-left turn signs, and the Uber vehicle would have been facing the other direction, i.e. northbound:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/N+Mill+Ave+%26+E+Curry+Rd,...

[0] The caption for this photo says the crack in the road represents "burned out flares at the location where a woman pedestrian was struck and killed". Not sure if that is exactly where she was hit, or if that's where her body landed, or if the flares were just near the location.

http://s3.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20180319&t=2&...
You're talking statistics. I'm talking common sense. Your interpretation of the data is true, but it isn't honest. As a response to scdc I find it silly.
Show HN: MetaMask for the Stellar – Chrome Extension Wallet for Stellar Lumens
MetaPay - https://pay.meta.re

MetaPay is a Chrome extension wallet for Stellar that simplifies payment by enabled one click purchases. It's basically MetaMask for the Stellar Lumens.

I also tried to drastically simply the developer integration. For MetaPay, there's no API, all you need to do is to create HTML anchor tag with the attribute 'data-meta-pay' pointed to the right metapay endpoint. If the user has the extension install, it will open a popup just like MetaMask, however if it doesn't the link still works and will open the app in a new tab. So this works for mobile as well.

The wallet code is based on Stellar's official account viewer. Everything is stored in the client's browser and no data is sent to any external server.

I built this last week for the Stellar build competition. https://galactictalk.org/d/1149-stellar-chrome-extension-sim...
How to Prepare Emotionally for Your Interview
I would use ".xed-footer" for reusable footer bearing the x caracteristic. And #main-footer for the stuff that stick at the bottom of most of my pages with unique caracteristics.

Way more self describing. No team member will ask which one is reusable and which one is not.
A History of the Future of Work
Your emotional connection to your dream of “Getting the job” will be the no.1 indicator of your success.

You should be willing to do whatever it takes to pursue your dream. Get yourself ready to go to extreme lengths to ensure its fulfillment.

The stronger the emotional connection, the higher the chances of your success will be.

It’s horrible to have no dream.

It’s horrible to have a dream and then not to pursue it.

It’s even more horrible to pursue your dream half-heartedly and then failing to achieve it.

Then it was all for nothing.

You either need to go all in or just kill your dream. But in any case, it’s only you the commander of your dream responsible for its success or failure.
Somebody submitted a ShowHN today of a relevant tool. Or at least a start https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16624211
Radiosity (computer graphics)
Zuckerberg isn’t so stupid as to make a mistake like this. He’s a billionaire and wouldn’t expose himself. These sales are planned ahead.
Nice.

I'm guessing I can't read the source to this particular fault tree, but I wonder where I might find others. Preferably without digging through e.g. troves of court documents and the like.
No, it is not. I don't understand why you are so confrontative. The answer is that at the very least those who rely on SSHFP and DANE will rely on DNSSEC. There are also proprietary protocols which have chosen to rely on it.

Unless your real argument is that no one has ever used that in production, anywhere, that should be plenty by way of example.
FB is worth $500B. $43M is a drop in the bucket.
Flagged for being a useless, automatically generated page.
Knowing that makes this much more infuriating.
In all fairness Turkey does have a sizable economy. Not clear whether that will be true in a year though. Not just humans, a lot of capital has been fleeing the seizures.
That’s the thing though, it wasn’t just these ads: a sizable contingent of Silicon Valley was bitter over the Bernie thing, stoked by emails from hacked Russians for example. Not saying the campaign didn’t screw it up, it’s still an achievement to fumble with all those advantages, but also this was one part of a much larger effort than a particular rash of $1 million dollar ad spends.

In any case, CA thinks they are influencing elections, and are selling as much to clients. It’s like arguing over whether or not someone is helping a drug kingpin because they don’t actually sell a lot of drugs.
I think in some cases, people negotiated a different deal, but I've also read of some applicants who knew they were giving up a lot, but banked on YC still being a real focusing lens for their business regardless.
No. And that's not just because of Betteridge's Law.

Lawyers do much more than write contracts. (In fact, most contracts are boilerplate cobbled together by juniors).

Lawyers exist to explain to their clients what the law means and what they need to do (or not do) to comply with it - often for very specific situations or in areas where the situation of law is ambiguous. Exactly the things that computers aren't good at.

Oh, and the junior lawyers who write contracts aren't going away either. The other part of their job is typically researching the law and identifying potentially relevant extracts and judicial opinions so that the seniors (doing the advising) can just read the relevant bits instead of spending multiple days in the library (digital or otherwise).
>What misidentification of risk?

It's the misidentification of risk before the crash. The financial companies had a vast conspiracy to misinform the public,and the government and conservative politicians and commentators helped them out. Of course Wall Street is greedy, but the government is supposed to stop that from leading it to do things that harm the country.
We simply link to the pull requests in the client's bill. Also, a repo admin can review the work before a payment is issued.