skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a huge fan, who has already introduced it to some other companies who have become customers, I can understand the change in pricing, however I find the abrupt removal of an “individual user level” a little frustrating. I have been ardently telling all who would listen they should try it, even on a tiny personal project, however for these solo developers, the price to continue using the product for their personal projects has now quadrupled! I’d sincerely recommend you reintroduce a ‘1 user’ tier, perhaps at 5 dollars.
Visual Studio has a GUI for git, if your developers feel more comfortable that way, but in my limited experience I've had to help a few others who accidentally committed more files than they intended to using it, so the opaqueness of the GUI may be a disadvantage here.
No problem; it happens!
Absolutely. The headline and the banal terror in that quote are all I need to see here. Buy some things from Walmart/Jet if you’re really that worried about a new player monopolizing new industries (for very good reasons). In the worst case there’s still going to be antitrust law.
It does. Dudes like that really care about their careers, and his is undoubtedly over
No, I'd tell you that you are taking a statement about one class of books and apply it to a different one, with different target mission and utility.

Technical documentation has a very narrow scope, and deeply technical writers. It's target users also are engineers directly applying what they read or looking at it for reference to something very specific.

It hasn't been historically the province of any hack and/or snake-oil salesman.

Nor do people buy book after book of technical documentation trying this and that fad to no avail to fill some psychological void. Hmm, now that I read this last sentence again...
> And yes, you also do benefit from "If our system has seen this type of transaction somewhere else, we can make a more intelligent guess"

Suppose User A has a bank entry "Payment to Stormy Daniels" and classifies it as "Hush Money".

User B also has a bank account entry "Payment to Stormy Daniels". Will the system suggest to User B that the entry should be classified as "Hush Money"?
It always comes back to the car analogy
>It actually gave me the impression that avoiding the ire of the SEC is relatively easy if you set your mind to committing fraud without getting caught.

I assure you, it is only possible to avoid risk if you're a small fish and extremely careful. For instance, you have a good chance of getting away with skimming a neighborhood stock fund you setup. If you are managing or receiving millions of dollars in investment, you can bet anything fishy will show up on the SECs radar at some point. Most people with large sums of money don't get where they are by being stupid with it, and if they are the victims of fraud, they know where to go. While the SEC can't bring criminal charges, they have top notch investigators. Once they smell the fish, they won't stop until the entire scheme is unraveled.

I can't speak directly to the observation you made, but I personally know a high up SEC investigator, and he obsesses about the most minute details of the cases he works on and lives to take on the toughest cases possible. My guess is distribution of cases the SEC prosecutes are very heavy tailed. There are many dumb cases that are very easy to find and prosecute that involve 10s to 100s of thousands of dollars. Think skimming, ponzi schemes etc. The more sophisticated and larger cases are also more risky (for the fraudster), harder to execute, and much more rare. That might explain your observations.
World Sports News
World Sports News Headlines, Latest World Sports News Headlines, International News In English Today's, National News Headlines In English, Sports News Headlines In English, Today Sports News, Headlines Today, World Sports News Headlines Today, World News Headlines, World Sports, Breaking News, World ...
https://worldsporstnews.com/
> there is nothing in the genome that directly specifies anatomy

What about HOX genes?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hox_gene
In practice, Bethesda does not permit mods with assets from a different Bethesda game. Everything else is negotiable, there are kid toys trains turned into Skyrim dragons, but mods with assets from another Bethesda game (or even from a DLC of the same game, but without making the mod dependent on that DLC) are taken down.

So, modding projects which plan to accomplish that with some installers extracting those assets tend to operate a bit under the radar, legal gray area or not.
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/wwe-fastlane-results-11-march-20... fastlane</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/sarguja-university-admit-card-20... University Admit Card 2018</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/date-sheet-higher-secondary-part... sheet 2018</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/dental-hygienist-second-year-sup... hygienist second year supple exam result 2018/</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/sarguja-university-time-table-20... University Time Table 2018</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/date-... Sheet</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/date-... Sheet</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com"/>World Sports News</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/wwe"/>wwe</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/golf"/>Golf</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/cricket"/>Cricket</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/football"/>Football</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/basketball/"/>Basketball</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com/motor-sports"/>Motor-Sports</a>
<a href=" https://worldsporstnews.com/f1"/>Formula One</a>
<a href="https://worldsporstnews.com"/>World Sports News</a>
I use QuickBooks so someday other small businesses / investors / industries could easily review my books. Some areas ripe for disruption: better serialized inventory and warranty tracking, barcode scanner support, QBAR reporting documentation, adding custom columns to printed item receipts, integrating with HR providers (Gusto), importing bank statements for reconciliation in PDF, any marketing or CRM integration, running performance comps, mileage and GPS tracking (Corrigo is step in right direction), verifying customer addresses in invoices.
Some things that strike me as odd: a feature to repair the data file (should I run daily? Annually?). Broken filters that still give reports without warnings they are broken (wrong data < no data). Multi-users in invoices, one saves and the entire system crashes. QBAR takes up to an hour to refresh data and says its on step 141 of 132. OS/2 Warp floppies had more accurate progress meters in the 1990s. If you had a button for “fax this PO to my vendor” it might be revolutionary.
After the huge scandal in the 80's, it's very much looked down on. It's worth noting that this "article" is a forum posting of what I think is a press release? That's not exactly reliable...

On the original cold fusion, from wikipedia:

Hopes faded due to the large number of negative replications, the withdrawal of many reported positive replications, the discovery of flaws and sources of experimental error in the original experiment, and finally the discovery that Fleischmann and Pons had not actually detected nuclear reaction byproducts.[5] By late 1989, most scientists considered cold fusion claims dead,[6][7] and cold fusion subsequently gained a reputation as pathological science
3. The vulnerability is not real, or you intentionally overstate the impact publicly.

Not insider trading, but definitely worthy of SEC inquiry. It's like a short position pump-and-dump.
The report claims to be written by "Francis Tanzella", who seems to actually exist and probably even works at SRI. However, the report claims that he's the PI and Manager of "Low Energy Reactions Research Program", and I see no evidence that such a program exists.
From the Nasa press release, 93% of the genetic expression pattern (very different than "DNA") remained the same before and after spaceflight, while 7% was altered.

Search for "93%" in https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-twins-study-investigators-...
> To them, hearing that they need to read a chapter about the internals of a source control system before working on a project is like hearing they need to understand the details of how a transmission works before they go and drive an automatic

Shouldn't a mechanic have an understanding of how an automatic transmission works? Similarly, shouldn't a software developer have an understanding of how version control works? In general, a professional should have a very good understanding of the tools they use for their work as well as what they're working on.
> It's made shopping for computer parts an absolute nightmare.

Give Newegg a try, they get it right.
Seconded. Their courses are superb, and they have their own library built on top of PyTorch that makes creating high quality models even easier.

You start with their lib, and over time they teach you all the techniques they're using, so the easy black box you start with becomes more transparent over time. It's a hands-on, code-first approach.
In the suburbs, I have a lawn, but there's some big trees. Out on the street, there's power lines. If it's big enough that I should be worried about my house falling down around me, I'm also worried about trees and downed power lines.
If I may, your point is exactly what the taxi drivers in NYC were making about Uber et al.

Still I think there is a misunderstanding on the concept of difficulty here. When the first Quickbooks version came out there were probably not many intuitive bookkeeping software. People/SMB/Accountants loved Quickbooks. And then there were demands to add more features. Now Intuit could either redesign the flow and ask people to re-learn or just tack it on with another new page. Guess what? Most people are resistant to change and learning, especially enterprise level. They are more about saving their jobs and asses than efficient process and software. So, Intuit just tacked on the feature and called it a day. All parties were happy - Intuit making money out of a low effort solution and users being happy of not having to re-learn everything.

But...there is a problem here and Intuit is stuck in a bad place. As newer breed of SMB/Accounts etc get into the market they will be frustrated by how the software behaves. It will take couple of newbies, even maybe someone on this very thread, who grow up into well-known CPA or bookkeepers etc to reverse the tide. And Intuit will go the RIM way, not knowing what hit them because their customers will always say that the difficult to use software is the best. Or even Oracle's way, scrambling to introduce a quickbooks for the newer generation, so to speak.
Not a list but:

"UN’s World Food Programme Builds on Ethereum Blockchain Money Transfers"

https://www.ccn.com/banks-begone-uns-world-food-programme-bu...

"The pilot alone is said to save the agency $150,000 a month while eliminating a staggering 98% of bank-related transfer fees, according to Munich WFP innovation lab chief Bernhard Kowatsch."
It might have changed it more or in different ways.
"I can make a fusion reactor that produces excess energy. I just need a little excess energy to 'sharpen it up a bit'."
I know about epigenetics because of many articles in Popular Science or Discovery.
Not wanting to use those better languages is effectively the same in this case. But you mentioned it being wrong first...
Thank you for posting too. I have a tiny glimmer of hope because of it.

HN, you call yourself scientists? You pursue the truth? You have an open mind? I call bullshit on you HN visitors. Shame on you. I hope I never act as you have done here.
I think any sane biologist will agree that there are layers upon layers of complexity on top of genotype. But the first layer is still DNA. There is a difference between gene-centric and gene-only. The former gives biologist an anchor point to begin their research, the latter is ridiculous.
And the progress report from roughly a year ago is here: http://brillouinenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SRI_Pr...

"During 2017, the calorimeter design was modified to match the analytical methodology suggested by an independent commercial third-party reviewer, who is also overseeing their suggested stimulation and analyses (see dynamic stimulation below)."

Looking at both years side-by-side is interesting, there's slight differences in the figures and text where some things are added and some details removed.
Not for everyone. I don't use smartphone, and have no google on my dumbphone.

And this practice of locking you out or give a number is annoying as fuck. Why? Sometimes companies don't accept just any number. I have perfectly regular number from a "virtual operator", with SIM and all that. It gets rejected for being "unsupported."

I will surely not go and buy new SIM I have no need for, just to get access to some stupid service, with uncertain result anyway. What are they thinking?
The author seems prone to exaggeration. Everything was going wrong for Amazon in 2014? Amazon makes no sense. Working at Amazon is like a Dickens novel. Amazon breaks all the rules.
This is "do things that don't scale" not "fake it until you make it."

I have never heard of someone using "fake it until you make it," referring to Wizard of Oz or Concierge as William Pietri (gosu Lean practitioner) below has mentioned.
Copy/paste formatted HTML into a CMS.
I was just going to say: all 33-1/3 rpm records - regardless of their thickness or chemistry - are observed to rotate at about the same rate, regardless of record size.

And (I'll note that) the drive belts are usually hidden from view.
I live 5 blocks from where these two grew up in Oakland. I've always seen them as role models. I admire their work greatly, and seek to replicate it in video game preservation.
There are some interesting studies by Michael Levine at Tufts that looks at bioelectric field's effect on flatworm regeneration. And there are some cool experiments done in salamanders that looks at nerve dependent regeneration (aneurogenic limb).
This is going to be a golden bone to the men charged with X vs women charged with Y crowd.
Your comment would be at home on https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/
I know this is a bit late as a follow-up comment, I've been busy with other matters.

You make an assumption that it is only "crackpots" who dispute the veracity of GR or QM. If someone does dispute this and provides some evidence to the non-veracity of GR and QM, what is the likelihood of them even getting published in any high profile journal?

We have plenty of evidence across many fields where dissenting voices are shouted down and are called "crackpots" because they don't follow the consensus view. Some of these even get the Nobel Prize decades later for what they were condemned for at the time.

All theories (and I have found none to the contrary) use some form of simplification and assumptions that remove complexity. This is in every field, especially in all fields related to science and technology.

If we did not do so, the problems would become intractable. The wonderful thing is that even with these simplifications and assumptions we can get something that works and is useful. It just doesn't mean that those models and theories are correct or true. It just means that they work well enough for us to get things done.
Which companies are the coveted ones? Off the top of my head, Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon happily hire people without degrees. Bloomberg and Goldman Sachs also do it. The lucrative private companies I can honestly think of that really won’t consider it are usually small and discreet, not well known and widely pursued.

You still need to pass the interview hazing, and structurally you won’t be “inducted” the same way new graduates are. But if you have prior experience most of these companies will take a look. Even recruiters contact people without degrees. In particular, back when Laszlo Bock was in charge of recruiting at Google he’d routinely say they hired non-graduates because none of their interviewing metrics appeared to have a strong correlation with employee success.
You prove the necessity by trying to shoehorn this into "nobody's perfect." This "tech & science literate" mob circle jerk enables bad science and bad behavior.
I doubt many here even know what Hawking really contributed. He simply embodies some need to worship a disabled genius.
No one wants to hear it from me. I get it, but I thought just one person should speak up.
Static memory is at the bottom of the address space, below the heap. But that would really only be relevant in the case of string literals unless I'm mistaken.
Video Conferencing
Probably a better way to guesstimate the "value" of a life is to look at the wages that would have been earned if alive. The median income of a worker in the US earns $44k/year, and can probably expect to work another 30 years for retirement (median US age is 37). Multiply those numbers together, and the median death would have earned $1.2M. If you do more rigorous probability distributions, you could probably build a better estimation of what this number would be. Of course, you could also argue for more precise estimates of someone's value than their wages. But the magnitude of the number does appear to gel with regulatory thought: most regulatory agencies seem to do cost-benefit analysis of regulations assuming that saving a life is worth costing at most a few million. $100K per life does seem quite low.
So in a sense implementing Pascal strings in C?
Would be nice if you didn't have to scroll back to the top of the page to go to the next section. Otherwise seems like a good resource.
I'm not impressed with your posturing, at least.
> I have more important things to think about as a developer than what internal machinery operates git.

That could be extended to other tools like firewall configuration, TLS setup, library details, logging configuratoin, monitoring, etc. But you won't get very far in fixing any problems if you don't read documentation and investigate further.
Hi, I made a video on how to implement Wildcard Certificate for your subdomains. I hope someone finds it useful :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvg8IXAcUwo&feature=youtu.be
> But the first layer is still DNA.

This would be one hypothesis. The article is about how the competing field of inquiry ("bioelectricity") has been mistakenly ignored for the past 60+ years.

What if the field is more important than the genes?
The well goes deeper still. Another mode of epigenetic regulation involves histones, the proteins around which DNA is wrapped, and the many ways they can be modified (by methylation, acetylation, ubiquitiylation, sumoylation, etc.). Both DNA methylation and histone modifications modulate how DNA wraps around histones, and thus how readily any given segment can be accessed and transcribed into RNA (and eventually translated into a given protein).

This barely scratches the surface. This process, along with others that modify how DNA is folded, brings certain genes closer together (while moving others farther apart), increasing (or decreasing) the likelihood of all sorts of first, second, and third order (...) interactions between them and their products.

And we've only just begun...
> The day he quit Theranos, Shultz says, Holmes contacted George Shultz and told him that if his grandson did anything to threaten the startup he would 'lose.'

The entitled thug...
Good question. But realistically, a mod like that would also need an installer software able to pull and convert also: textures, meshes, game plugin data, scripts (and perhaps some other misc stuff I overlooked), or creatively recreate some of these from scratch, or have permission from Bethesda (against the company policy, I am afraid).
Yeah. He failed with A, spun up B. B did well, he paid off A with B and B made money.

Technically fraud. Everyone got paid, but he still committed a process crime
So, BSTRs? They’re common in old-timey COM apis
Diy Paper Flowers for Room Decoration with New Ideas
The SEC is concerned with lying about actual numbers. Not about future projections.

Our experiences are different I suspect, Check this out
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answers-regfdhtm.html. I sat in the courtroom once as one of the officers of a company was being prosecuted for violating this disclosure rule. There are a number of regulations that the SEC enforces that have nothing to do with "actual numbers" and everything to do with information asymmetry where the company knows something and the investors don't.

They have historically been all about that when non-accredited investors are involved (aka public companies). And reading their action with respect to Theranos suggested to me that they are going to bring that hammer into the startup space.
If you would have cut it at the second sentence you would have been upvoted. No need for the two sentences of negative sentiment.
Yes.

There are Low Energy Nuclear reactions that can occur but their often catalyzed by a muon which requires _a lot_ of energy to produce. There has been so little academic research (recently) because experimental evidence hasn't been found and the simple well understood math makes such a system impossible. Wikipedia notes this in their 3rd paragraph on the subject [1].

Cold Fusion, or low-energy nuclear reactions, or condensed matter nuclear science is so far behind the pale of serious physics you might as well start trying to jump into orbit with your own two legs, or invent perpetual energy.

Lastly... Given how much the US and USSR spent on nuclear research in the cold war do you really think we missed a way making nuclear bombs smaller?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
Nah they did. He lost their money on stocks, lied about the state of their investments then paid them all a healthy return from his drug ventures with them none the wiser.
No hard benchmarks, just personal experience. Note that I’m not saying regular Tensorflow is slower than pytorch (in fact I’ve found them to be roughly the same) just eager mode.

Edit: Just realized this might be a good thing to write a blog post about. I’ll get back to you after finals :)
Convert Particular PPTX to PDF and Improved Text/Chart Rendering Support in .NET
Whenever I think of Norway I think "vikings" (honestly, whenever I see pictures of Norwegians, men or women, that don't look like the stereotypical hefty viking I have to do a double take ;-) The vikings did a lot of helping other Europeans regions go Scandinavian, whether they wanted it or not (My family is from the Manchester region of England, but DNA tests show that something like 60% of my DNA is Scandinavian in origin - huh, I wonder how that happened). Maybe it's just Karma!
Driver Reviver 5.3.2.50 License Key with Crack 2018 Latest Version Download
Thinking the same thing. I enjoy using rails. A lot of hype for other frameworks is misplaced
Right, I just find it shocking that AWS wouldn't be running NTP. But I'm not a sysadmin, I dunno.
I am sorry. I dont know what to say to help you.
We cant go to back and make a new beginning, but we can start to do now a new end. And get justice.

I desire good energy for you and your family, and give a chance to forgive yourself. The bad in this world is not a cross that you should carry alone.
> I'm sure Elon Musk's brain scan would look similar to the writer's.

Why are you sure of that?
This comes off as very dismissive of startups.

Do you honestly believe they are all 5 person companies doing frivolous things?
Siri has made me feel like an idiot so many times I don't even try any more. Fool me once...

(I use it for reminders. That seems to work. Looking up anything is useless.)