skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's a big gap between a "day fine" and taking someone's house because their kid stashed some drugs in the closet.

One is proportional and happens on conviction while the other can be nuts.
That doesn't answer how the vote is anonymous. Presumably every coin/token has an unique identifier, and the issuer knows who received which coin.

And since it's a public blockchain, you know exactly which token went to whom.
Which is a fancy way to say `grep -iv '^c'`. EDIT: Oh, I missed that the input was a single line.

I personally feel that control verbs are bad additions to the regexp, even though I do know that it is not a big addition to the regexp engine itself (e.g. naturally extended from posesssive quantifiers like `a++` or atomic groups `(?>foo)`). Most uses of such verbs can be expressed with combined parsers and simpler regexps, in the much simpler and maintainable way.
How a lost Afrikan city was recreated with laser technology
We try to combat this in two ways in Germany (not that it currently poses a problem but still): 1. Voters can destroy their ballot before putting it into the box and get a new one for any reason thus making it possible to create fake proof. 2. Taking pictures inside the booth is explicitly prohibited (which stated on signs in the booth) and if the poll workers notice you taking a picture they require you to destroy the ballot and fill out a new one. I actually had to do this to a women last election who wanted to post a picture on social media – and didn't turn off the shutter sound.

This requires the poll workers to be somewhat impartial. If they are not all bets are off. In the German Democratic Republic voters where socially pressured (by official policy) to not use the booths at all.
Mobile data usage in Zimbabwe increased by 89% in 2017
To add to this: there was even a motion to upgrade unintentional manslaughter into murder, if speeding was intentionally (in the specific case of car races).
That only works if you rectify the beat pattern, so you need some source of nonlinearity in the system.
swift is really good. But swift-evolution makes me nervous.
>but it actually makes systems that have the PSP less secure than systems that do.

Parse error. Did you mean "than systems that don't"?
SaferCPlusPlus has two big issues which prevent me from using it: confusing class naming and too many concepts.

I do like the ideas it builds on, and I will probably implement a simplified version for my needs...
Building pyramids out of single stones is still very labor intensive. So modern technology might save a lot of workers in transporting the stone, but they still have to be placed individually.
To see what modern technology can achieve, look at modern construction sites, like skyscrapers or especially the work done at the spillway of the Oroville dam after it broke. Large parts of the spillway had to be replaced in a couple of months, laying enough concrete to build a pyramid - I have to look up the exact numbers to see how large exactly. Additionally a huge amound of debris was removed from the waterway. All this by a few hundred workers working in 3 shifts. Check out the construction videos here: https://www.youtube.com/user/calwater/videos
The Genesis of Blame
The fines are made as a revenue source, not to disincentivize anything.
Just driving at legal speeds can be a risk to. It depends pn multiple fsctors not just speed.
Klong and T3X, both invented by myself. Klong is a K-like array programming language that I use for all kinds of computations, statistics, and data analysis. T3X is a super-simple typeless low-level language that looks a bit like a cross between Pascal and BCPL. I have also written an awful lot of C code, but it gives me headaches way too often.

See http://t3x.org if you want to have a look at Klong, T3X, and all the other languages I have implemented or invented.
Are you supposed to share login? Does Airtable's policy permit that?
> If you are utilizing the secure coprocessor on a machine that is tasked with keeping secrets secure, and you are worried about sophisticated attackers, then this is incredibly serious.

If you are worried about sophisticated attackers, and you are trusting a "secure coprocessor" with such an unspecified and undocumented interface as this, I'd argue that you have no reason to think that the tool you have chosen to defend against the threat you're worried about is adequate. Contrast a coprocessor with no documented security boundary (if I'm missing something on that front, please post a link!) against a traditional HSM. Sure, the latter have had some flaws too, historically, but the well-defined boundary is key to even being able to assess suitability. I've not seen any documentation of this coprocessor's interface/boundaries at all. Let alone any that approaches the level of detail you'd get with an HSM.
I would love to see this happen in many places. But in the US - probably the last place it will ever happen.
Pandoc (http://pandoc.org/) is written in Haskell and converts documents across formats.
Worse than that: in UK parlance, isn't "billion" what Americans call "trillion"? (What Americans call "billion" is referred to as "thousand million" in the UK).
How to Make Your Own Diet Programs to Lose Weight?
Are you really worried that _rich people_ are the ones that can’t protect themselves from abuse? :)
And there's cost of its underline infrastructure, presumably it's on AWS or Azure, all cost real $$$. Users with free account, I will assume a bulk load of them, even though limited to 1200 records per base, the resources cost still eat into their bottom line.
Should have a (2017) in the title.
Getaltname – Get Subject Alt Name from SSL Certificates
Interesting. Is there that much slack in employment to cover that? I mean, if you automate a transit line, presumably you're displacing dozens of now-former train operators. It would surprise me if they always have productive, useful jobs to move people to in these situations.
maybe you can contribute to one of the existing open-source alternatives ?
The 'pain' (as in 'felt punishment') inflicted by the fine should be equal in all cases. If you have more money that means a higher fine is needed to inflict equal pain.
>if the housing is actually low rent the wealthy can't just 'take it.'

The only buildings which are permanently carved out for low- and middle-income households are those built as permanently affordable. You are actively hostile to accelerating the construction of such buildings, so this statement is just bizarre. Of course you can spend less than your maximum budget. Do you imagine that rich people can't buy economy cars?

With demand so far exceeding supply, all other housing (regardless of its quality or who previously occupied it) becomes "for" the well-to-do given enough time. Leases end, the units maybe get renovated a bit, and the new occupants are wealthier and whiter and paying more.

Not caring about "techies" doesn't remove the effect of a population boom from the market.

People are wildly overthinking this. Adding N + 1 households to N homes is certainly going to cause a problem, by the pigeonhole principle.
If you have a partner who offers to support you, there's nothing wrong with accepting that offer. That's the nice thing about having a partner -- you don't need to support yourself 100% of the time -- you can also rely on your partner some of the time.
Not likely any time soon. There's absolutely no way humans are going to pull >1000 lbs worth of batteries out of the car every day, and put the same >1000 lbs worth of batteries into it. With a unit of work of 50 lbs (reasonable for fit people), and a minute to pull out each pack, stow it away, take fresh pack and put it back in, it would take half an hour of hard physical work every day. No way regular people are going to do that.
But programmers building the tools for perfect surveillance are the ones enabling them to know who to stick.
Well, yes, until everything is a bit more secure because companies take it more seriously or the computer industry has learned a valuable lesson, and then everyone has benefited because of that.

Either the flaws will get priced into the stock forecasting and cost of doing business in the industry or people won't care (there are strong indications it's the latter for these flaws).

It's the exact same for people that do this to alert on regular companies. Markets function efficiently when there is lots of accurate information. These people are exposing new information (either previously unknown or hidden by people with a vested interest), which allows the markets to function more efficiently afterwards (which might mean using better info to choose who not to trust with your data, etc). What they get out of it is the ability to execute on the new information slightly before everyone else.

This of course assumes the data is real. If it's not there is no public benefit, so it's just fraud. I was under the impression that at least some of the flaws were very trumped up, so it was a little complicated whether they did something wrong, but if most /all are real and cause make problems, then I guess I don't have much of a problem with what they've done even if I do think they've taken a slightly less safe route for the public in order to maximize money. Like freedom of speech is one of those things that I don't always like how it's used but I recognize the good far outweighs the bad.
But each ballot is pre-filled out for a different candidate. The vote fixer already knows what's on all of your ballots, they just don't know which goes into which box. Photos showing what's on the ballot don't disclose any information. The attacker already knows that you have one ballot pre-filled for each candidate. The only secret is which ballot goes in which box.

You go into the voting booth, seal the N ballots in the N identical envelopes, being sure to keep track of where the ballot for your desired candidate is. You leave the voting booth and drop the one envelope in the vote box, and the N-1 envelopes in the discard box.

Even if you're forced to videotape inside the voting booth of your sealing the N ballots in the N identical envelopes, you could pull a quick 3-card-monty when leaving the voting booth. Even a quick random shuffle would be sufficient to statistically nullify your vote, or if you're only able to keep track of where the Dr. Evil ballot is, a quick deal from the bottom of the deck would guarantee a vote for a random opposition candidate. As long as there's some spot between the polling both and the ballot boxes that isn't covered by video, there's no way for a third party to know which ballot went where.

You aren't allowed to leave the polling station with any of the envelopes, and a tally of the ballots in the discard box will show what percentage of people have left the polling station with their discarded ballots. Any non-negligible percentage of "discard" ballots leaving the polling station will make the whole vote suspect. (The discard ballot count will also provide circumstantial evidence for which way the tampering is going, although Dr. Evil will always claim it's false flag vote tampering to make him look bad).

If someone is really coerced in sneaking their discard ballots out of the polling station, they could sneak N-1 ballots out and either put the ballot for Dr. Evil in the discard box or burn it right outside the polling station. They then show the jackbooted thugs the other N-1 ballots. They end up not voting, but at least Dr. Evil is denied the vote.
I'm with you - and on the subject, having been exposed to a hell of a lot of iOS apps, I kind of think the walled-garden has, in many ways, both promoted the 'weird-art' aspect, as well as limited it.

Promoted: there are now more apps out there than ever before, and more app developers, and more app artists. And they're doing interesting and cool things - most of the top 10 games of the last few years have been artistically appealing pieces, which draw you in with a screenshot and keep you engaged with mechanics.

Hindered: I really, really don't want to see a certain color palette being used to burn itself into my retina and shock me into clicking the icon, among hundreds of others, that stands out the most. I can't see another candy-coating, or amber/cyan highlight, again. But, yet .. still they come. Endless streams of cutesy dreck.

That said, I still think the most interesting game/developer art is coming from the indie gaming/open-source world. There's something about, for example, the benign rag doll look and feel of a game like "Human, Fall Flat" that draws me and the kids back into it. It feels like the good ol' days of gaming, and its something I'm sure has an Amiga heritage, somehow. I don't know if there were really opportunities made for the average mobile App Store to entertain such titles ..
I'm from Finland, and I think the fine system here works well. There are some crucial differences from the US system however.

First, fines don't go to the local police departments, and local municipalities don't get any financial incentive from issuing more fines. Everything goes to the state, and amount of collected fines is not related to the budgets of the police departments. This means that there are no interests for collecting more fines from any specific demographic.

Second, there are actually two levels of fines. For minor offences (like minor speeding, jaywalking, running a traffic light slightly late) you only get fixed fine. If the offence is serious enough to go to the court, then you may get day fines that are based on the income.

Also, the most extreme fines reported from Finland usually result from cases where someone has cashed nicely from selling a company or something, and because the initial amount of the fine is just based on tax information of the previous year, this may be a very high amount. In reality these fines always become lower in the court. The fines should be based on the current income by the law, and if the defendant can prove that the previous year was just an anomaly and the current income is actually lower, the amount of the fine will be reduced.

I know some wealthy people with very nice cars. They are extra careful to never speed beyond the "safe limit" because it would hurt too much if they got a fine, and instead take their cars to closed race tracks if they want to drive fast. Most people who I see speeding on the roads drive some lower-end cars like BMWs or Audis. I take their speeding as a sign that they probably have barely enough income to afford a car like that and want to show off, because if their income was actually high, they'd be more wary of the financial consequences.
char buffer[100] also has a fixed size and is responsible for most buffer overflow bugs :)

array::at is just as mandatory as vector::at IMO.
Politicians are already buying votes by promising future policies for specific groups before the election. This is supposed to be forbidden yet this occurs constantly.
It is. They add it automatically on mobile but you can delete it. And it's never on desktop. Just tried to send from both clients and didn't have any extra added to the message.
Thanks for the open-minded reply.

Can we push our imaginations further though? We are still thinking about the resources being distributed by businesses, for example. What about communes, central planning or automation, minus private enterprise altogether?
There are no empty paper ballots, and if a ballot is brought back, then it's not in the discard box. Since votes in the discard box are still tallied, if someone leaves the polling station with a ballot, it will be obvious that someone has tampered with the election.
Or just do away with the fines completely.

At least where I live, a speeding ticket knocks off a couple of your license's 12hp, and they take like a year to regenerate. Maybe that alone should be enough, or maybe you should also have to sit there one extra minute for every mph over the limit you were going.
All of the envelopes are identical. Absolutely the only difference is which envelope goes into which ballot box. Taking a photo of N-1 ballots for non-Dr. Evil next to one sealed envelope only discloses that the Dr. Evil ballot was put into an envelope first. It gives no information as to which box that envelope was placed into later, and therefore leaks no information about how the vote was cast.
It's a knee-jerk reaction to totalitarian domestic propaganda.

Has a tendency to breed confused, alarmist, emotional and untechnical conversation.

Here's the truth: Russia isn't evil. Neither is the United States. But they are enemies. The people are getting caught in a propaganda war, which has shifted conversation from the venue of technical to ideological. (Propaganda, in practice, breeds ideological self-affirming thinking.)

The breakdown of conversation isn't the fault of the "traitors who support the evil Russians" or the fault of the "domestic saboteurs who support the US mass propaganda apparatus" but the fact that the two countries can't get their shit straight and work toward a post-Cold War without throwing acid at each other.

(I'm rewriting the last sentence of this over and over because I realize its going to attract ever-yet more comments of the form "but Russia's evil and they started it and you can't really compare the US and Russia - can you?". Screw it.)
Rich and powerful are not the same thing.
A small note (though it may be unrelated), some ip address ranges are not accessible from Vodafone TR (3G/4G) connections.

216.239.36.219 <- For example this address returns "HTTP 504" from Vodafone. There are some other addresses like this which happen to be around, randomly.

So it may be a misconfiguration on Vodafone TR Network, routers or such thing. Sample curl output below.

$ time curl -vki 216.239.36.219
* rebuilt url to: 216.239.36.219/
* trying 216.239.36.219...
* connected to 216.239.36.219 (216.239.36.219) port 80 (#0)
> get / http/1.1
> host: 216.239.36.219
> user-agent: curl/7.47.0
> accept: */*
>
< http/1.1 504 gateway time-out
http/1.1 504 gateway time-out
< server: webproxy/1.0 pre-alpha
server: webproxy/1.0 pre-alpha
< date: mon, 08 may 2017 07:04:23 gmt
date: mon, 08 may 2017 07:04:23 gmt
< content-length: 0
content-length: 0
< connection: keep-alive
connection: keep-alive

<
* connection #0 to host 216.239.36.219 left intact

real 0m10.909s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m0.004s
$ curl -vki http://84.19.190.203/
* trying 84.19.190.203...
* connected to 84.19.190.203 (84.19.190.203) port 80 (#0)
> get / http/1.1
> host: 84.19.190.203
> user-agent: curl/7.47.0
> accept: */*
>
< http/1.1 504 gateway time-out
http/1.1 504 gateway time-out
< server: webproxy/1.0 pre-alpha
server: webproxy/1.0 pre-alpha
< date: mon, 08 may 2017 07:56:58 gmt
date: mon, 08 may 2017 07:56:58 gmt
< content-length: 0
content-length: 0
< connection: keep-alive
connection: keep-alive

<
* connection #0 to host 84.19.190.203 left intact
$
It's also a provisioning problem. Let's assuming that the new pricing model is based on usage per user, like 50,000 records per user, and how are you suppose to track each individual record, even that is possible, it would not be very practical as the every CRUD operations would require a record count referenced to the user. Keep X records per Base makes the operation a lot easier and technically much more feasible.
Naturally it goes the other way round: consumer (high end) chips receive new designs first and datacenters get them once they're somewhat battletested.
> people still need to be obliged to go to the city hall to issue their vote, in person!

And you can also then police the undesirables by putting them through onerous identification processes.

/sarcasm
Haskell. For programming with immutable values and pure functions, beautiful succinct syntax and strong types. Strong types ensure correctness, but in Haskell, they also help me reason about where and when my effects (such as IO) are happening,

Haskell is now the current inspiration for many object-oriented languages like C# and Java:

http://wadler.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/brian-goetz-on-future-o...
US-Cert: Russian Government Cyber Activity Targeting Critical Infrastructure
Don't even think it's invite-only, just an unannounced "beta". I didn't get an invite and went to what I expected the url to be and was able to login just now.

Will probably never really use it over the Android App, but glad it exists.
Do you happen to have a citation for (i)? That's very interesting!
A use-case for lookarounds that I often use is:

grep -Po '(?<=...)pattern'

Which also cuts out and prints the relevant part of the line. This saves a trip through cut, awk or perl. (-P is PCRE and -o is print only matched characters, which the lookarounds aren't a part of.)
I think I'm atm at around 2500 lines, of which the parser and lexer is probably about 1200 lines. I mostly ~~stole~~ used the lexer from the book as inspiration for my own and then rolled a LISP-like language from there (which is rather easy given that a LISP AST is simple in nature)
What about people who drive hard deliberate because they can afford the fines, in their free time?
If you have a group physically controlling a polling station, it will be obvious to everyone that the election is rigged.

Small scale coercion, however, is easier to execute and easier to get away with, hence the need for your private vote to be cast in a public place.
Actually you can do a lot of amazing stuff already with google sheets, like sheet2site.com and sheetsu.com. However, Google api caps the free daily request to 1000.
You don't put gas in your tank with a laddle, why wouldn't you use a machine to swap batteries?
'One' seems to be false.

You can program in teams with ten or in companies with hundred Lisp developers. Usually the team size does not need to be that large.

Lucent for example developed a Lisp based network switch (similar to what Ericsson did later with Erlang) and they had around 100 developers. It was competing with a much larger team developing a similar product in C++.

ITA had around 100 developers for their flight search in Lisp.

Symbolics had at its height around 1000 employees and my guess would be that 40% were Lisp programmers.

Personally I'd say there would be little problem working in a team with ten Lisp developers - you just have to find or educate them.
You are right, but you forget about emergencies. Hospital is 10km away, and batteries are empty. Do you want to wait 2m for enough juice, or 10m?

Or less gloomy: In between appointments, you drive home to charge. Do you want to come 15m late just because your pipe is too weak?

Big pipe = freedom.
how can something which is so trivially cloneable be valued so high?
You do see some libertarians who want to get rid of zoning because it's government, but YIMBYism and New Urbanism are generally pushing towards a city that moves by elevator and train. Support for large apartment buildings and support for reallocating road lanes from cars and parking to transit and bikes generally come from the same people.
This has really gone to far. What’s next?

Some dictator will run the first blockchain-based death sentence via a distributed big data popular jury to guarantee a fair and auditable trial?

PS : forgot to mention this was a cloud based, severless solution developed by a scrum agile team while pair programming in a 6th generation language for extra scalability and safety.
I thought that points were designed for that.
At least in NJ you can get both fines and points depending on a type of a ticket.
NovuMind has certainly went through a tapeout.
How Blood-Plasma Companies Target the Poorest Americans
what does $0 commission mean? unless they're sourcing assets at mid then it's not 0 commission. and they can't be giving trades at mid to customers unless they're taking a loss on every transaction. they must be charging bid-offer - so how much?
'Persistent exploit' and 'Remote exploit' are surely both in some very high category of badness, it seems weird to say they are not the same at all.