skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> JS can introduce more dynamic HTML, but view-source should always represent any non-redirected HTTP response

That is both true and false. Because the JS can introduce dynamic content, the source returned by the HTTP response often doesn't match the source that is rendered by the browser itself. In many cases, a site will return a skeleton (just HTML) and then make an Ajax request to populate it. In my case, it was just the skeleton HTML with a few hundred lines of JS plus a long string of JSON
Yes, it has.

HN is about one step above high school in that regard.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt4fGIoVMpM

Another fun swap: a Tesla drive unit and Volt batteries into a Lotus Evora. Basically recreating the original Tesla Roadster's bigger counterpart.

Volt+Tesla is an increasingly popular swap because the Volt batteries are easier to manage and have a more convenient form factor. Plus, there are more of them available from recyclers.
I will bet you up to 20K USD that tether is solvent years from now. You determine the timeframe and conditions, more than happy to play this game.

Step up mate. The offer was made, put your money where your mouth is. If you are so confident why not bet on it? we can make it cryptographically provable for all to see, why on earth would you not get involved in such a sure thing? Step back for a moment and look at what is happening with online commentary re: tether and ask yourself whether you are a victim of it.
Ask HN: Best book to learn about the JVM?
I want to learn more about garbage collection tuning, common bottlenecks, how to use threads properly, the underlying implementation of the JVM and how it affects performance. I write mostly Clojure and some Java, trying to increase throughput of APIs. Looking for a more systematic learning method than trial and error through endless load tests.
While isolated instances of first cousin marriage aren't especially harmful, contrary to what some comments here suggest, if done across successive generations, these unions can produce a catastrophic unmasking of harmful recessive alleles, and the nations with the highest rates of consanguineous marriages also often have the highest rates of birth defects (see p. 22): https://www.marchofdimes.org/materials/global-report-on-birt...

However, while the dangers of inbreeding depression are common knowledge, it's worth pointing out that outbreeding depression exists as well. Where lies the ideal balance between these two extremes? Surprisingly, it appears to be marriages between third or fourth cousins, if you use fecundity as a proxy for general offspring health: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080207140855.h...

A third or fourth cousin is a person with whom you share first cousin grandparents or great grandparents--essentially a distant relative, or simply put, someone of your own "race," which is quite at odds with the "hybrid vigor" claims often made to tout interracial marriage. Apparently just marrying any old white person (if you're white) gives you all the hybrid vigor your offspring need.
A correction: based on the model that gravity is the only significant force in operation at the galactic and intergalactic level and that the stars within a galaxy aren't moving in accordance with the model, it is being assumed that there is some amount of unseen and unobservable something that is supposed to have mass and is causing the anomalous movement by the stars within the galaxy.

That is the correct presentation. No test yet has occurred to demonstrate that any such "dark" matter exists. That is, all experimental tests have come up nil.

If gravity (and it may be a very big if) is not the only significant force operating at galactic and intergalactic distances then "dark" matter is no longer required.

The assumption that gravity is the only significant force at these distances is just that, an assumption. It may be correct, but on the basis of the observable anomalous behaviours of stars, there is a good likelihood that the assumption is wrong.

There is nothing wrong with the assumption being wrong, it just means that we should be investigating other possible reasons for what is going on.
Thanks for the response.

I'm already prioritizing / cutting things that aren't absolutely necessary. I have a long backlog and it's just discouraging to see how long the items have been on there. The truth is probably that I have largely given up on myself, gradually over many years, and it feels like it has reached a point of no return.

There's just too much negative and not enough positive. I have really fought my way through life, always with the vague hope that I could turn things around. Now that I'm getting old, things are getting even harder. Seeing more and more white hair in the mirror, skin starting to sag. And I'm still plagued by terrible anxiety and depression and an overwhelming lack of self confidence. The isolation is scaring the hell out of me. It's nothing new for me, but at my age it's just much more difficult to fix.

When I slow down, I notice how damaged I am and how little I pay attention to that and to getting better. Of course this happens because I don't believe I can fix it. I don't want to pay attention because that just hurts.

I actually started reading the book about meditation and meditated for a good bit. What I read also made perfect sense to me. My brain is super reactive and scattered all over the place, and I believe it's part of the reason why I don't manage to change. I just can't focus on anything long enough because there are burning fires everywhere, and my mind is pushed around and locks onto whatever is making the most noise.

I have random jolts of anxiety and adrenaline that get triggered by thoughts, many of them repetitive. I don't even notice usually because it's so normal and everything has been bad for so long. Many repetitive toxic memories / beliefs about myself. Basically all the bad stuff that in theory you can work on with CBT and all other approaches.

Anyway, on a positive note, I have also spent some time on pluralsight and enjoyed it. You're right about questioning the motivation - it's not really me. It's mostly fear. I'm worried what happens if I lose my current job. I feel insecure about my technical skills, and the idea about ML is mostly about proving something to myself, dispelling the self doubt. My interviewing skills are...well, abysmal. I'm basically not employable through a standard hiring process even though I think I'm one of the more valuable employees where I'm at now.
> Generally: if it tastes like what you expect ham or bacon to taste like, or it looks like what you expect it to look like, it's cured with nitrates.

So you are saying that even if I got my own raw pork belly from the butcher and learned how to cure it properly with salt, its look and taste would still be inferior to the delicious blocks of bacon I get at any chain grocery store?
I don't know what to say. Demos were working fine for a long time. However, I still haven't seen people actually playing HTML games like they did flash ones.

Some of that, I presume, is just where I look. That said, I feel like flash games were played. HTML has largely missed the boat to native phone apps.

Were people able to make the games? At an absolute level? I guess. Could have done it with Java applets, as well. By and large, that didn't happen. I'm curious why.
A sleeper car. Very common. :)

https://youtu.be/EE5x9vlb0ss?t=25
So yeah: If you do a website and target a different country, ignore emails about legal issues from citizens of that country for months, you should start to think about respecting the laws of that country.

And once again we get this lie being said around here. You should really just be honest with your political comments and come out with what you really want to say.
For an extra class ham interested in HF more than UHF/VHF I'd recommend the Airspy HF+, it's RX only, but quite good at RX.
Considering they built a new subframe and raised it so much, this is really more like a custom Tesla/volt frankencar that is wearing the body shell of an Accord as a hat.
From what I've read, they don't even sell parts to owners of their cars, only authorised repair centers.
From what I gather, he is roughly the equivalent of a CEO and most CEOs would not ever see a lot of what gets sent to him because it would get killed way earlier.

Yes? No?
The Ren'Py Visual Novel Engine facilitates the creation of visual novels
I think the point is the car has to be able to drive completely independently if we are to allow cars to travel without anybody inside at all, which includes handling emergency situations. And of course as some others have pointed out the people inside may be old, handicapped, children etc - expecting them to take control may make things worse.

As far as front seats are concerned, why even have a front seat? Have people sit in a circle facing each other, with a table in the middle - so you can have a conversation. Not having a wheel allows us to reimagine the interiors of cars which are currently built around the driver.
Chuck Feeney: a billionaire who gave it all away
Awesome, so this is what it's like to be rich and bored.
This idea was what lead to the split up of Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger on Wikipedia. Sanger went and created Citizendium which was supposed to be wikipedia with only credentialed authors and a panel of peer review.

By all accounts Citizendium failed pretty spectacularly.
You're never going to get auto-rotation ability out of an aircraft like that. Even with variable pitch the rotors have insufficient mass.

The only practical option is independent dual redundant power systems so that one failure can't take out more than half the propellers. Plus a rocket assisted ballistic recovery parachute to allow a (mostly) survivable crash landing in case of a catastrophic failure. Of course there will still be some rare failure modes where a parachute won't be sufficient.
Don't buy but pirate and share. Let's not block information only payment.
The Ultimate Cryptocurrency Glossary: From a to Z
RE:spark, we're curious about Ray mostly because of the potential for interactive-time (ms-level) compute for powering user-facing software. RE:dask, we care that Ray interops with the rest of our stack (Arrow). I haven't evaluated Ray-on-pandas, and the Ray was previously focused on powering traditional ML, so again, just first blush on the announce.

I don't think anything is inherent, more about priorities and momentum. For example, Spark devs have been working on cutting latency, and Conda Inc is/was contributing to the Arrow world. I had assumed the pygdf project would get to accelerating arrow dataframe compute before others, so this announce was a pleasant surprise!
Nice Tattoo! I Didn’t Know You Worked at Walmart
Or, if you add German translations? What if you add a link to Google translate, allowing German translations?
Favourite silliness was the chap who got a Rolls Meteor aero engine (27l v12) put into a 1920s Bentley:

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/850bhp-aero-engined-bentley...

Was sold to Jay Leno.
Reading about this makes me feel like I'm hallucinating, wtf.
Anyone who can scrape together a few hundred dollars can take a short helicopter tour ride. It's pretty common in tourist areas.
> Those points can't be picked apart like you did. They add up

Others are doing a fine job of taking apart the specifics, but it's important to understand why this form of argument is itself a fallacy.

Inference works by taking into account new evidence and using it to adjust the probability with which you believe something to be true. So if you see Bob wearing a red shirt, you are more likely to believe that Bob owns a red shirt. Could still be that he has borrowed it or something, but it's now more likely he owns one than it was previously. By contrast, if you go all through Bob's bedroom and find zero red shirts, that makes it less likely, even though it's still possible he owns one that isn't in his bedroom.

The problem with allowing plaintiffs or prosecutors to play this game is that they can take the list of everything you've ever done, ignore everything that makes what they're trying to prove less likely and present only the list of things that make it more likely. If you look only at that evidence then each piece of it increases the probability that you believe what they want you to believe, regardless of whether it's actually true. How guilty they can make you look is directly proportional to their level of resources in finding things that make you look bad, independent of your actual guilt.

> I really didn't know. .de is very common in Germany.

Most countries have .co.uk, .org.uk, .net.uk, etc. The US doesn't have those. US companies use .com, .org, .net, etc. regardless that they're nominally not US-specific.
The one china policy is retarded. One would hope that the US government would stand with a long-time ally above passing pressure from an authoritarian dictatorship.
You're thinking in IPv4.
Hypergamy exists virtually across all cultures. Women date up.
Office wellbeing programs disguise corporate motivations with language of care
FATE – Saber (セイバー) Kimonoo
It won't taste "hammy" without nitrates. It won't be bad. Everything tastes better cured.
Right before release is a bad time to realize there are problems with your build
There is one thing about this that saddens me: PhantomJS still starts up much faster than headless Firefox or Chrome, at least for me, which makes some of our integration tests take a long longer than they should.

Has anyone here figured out any tricks to get headless Chrome booted fast?
Yup, my 2 dqy shipping is 4 days of handling and 2.5 of shipping. I am lucky if I can order monday and get it by saturday. Its nearly worthless as I tend to order enough for free shipping anyway.
Good case study. What is the current DAU/MAU for Walnut?
this reminds me of the white zombie -- the car that started my whole obsession with electric cars all those years ago.
I've seen this line of reasoning quite frequently in the last few hours and am a tad suspicious.

Let's frame it this way: Can the police pay criminals to commit crime in order to arrest other people?

Here is a lovely example of my own wealthy first world country scamming one of the poorest nations on earth out of their oil reserves for a handsome profit. The man (Nick Warner) behind it all lives in luxury guarded by guns and the bureaucratic evil protecting him and his ilk. The minister at the time (Alexander Downer) afterwards went on to work for Woodside Petroleum, one of the biggest oil companies in the world who coincidentally was the main beneficiary of the shady deal.

May history judge them all appropriately.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia–East_Timor_spying_sc...
Instacart Lore – framework for building, deploying and maintaining ML models
Most traffic will be IPv4, if you only use them for work you'll do ok
I actually live in the greater Phoenix area and go to school at ASU, so I see Waymo and Uber autonomous around everywhere. I frequently see these things handle aggressive rush hour traffic with university pedestrians jumping out into the middle of traffic. They stay safe, but they clearly have a sense of when to go for it.
Kudos, but the fit/finish isn’t exactly “sleeper” category.
The entire article is about people liking stuff that is bad for the environment. I suppose the reason we care is because the environment affects all of us.
Your DO section starts when you have already gotten the interview...but that is the hardest part for someone who is self taught or fresh out of a bootcamp.

You need to do everything in the article just to get an interview, just to get a chance.

Getting your foot in the door is by far the hardest part of trying to make a career switch into software development. A lot of people say that you shouldn't have to eat, drink, and sleep code and self-marketing to get an interview with a non-traditional background.

My opinion is that people changing their careers into software development have it easy. Name me another engineering degree where you can teach yourself and get an interview without a degree in that field.
>The hope, Sanchez says, is that if the decoy buses are also attacked the agency can “[look] at damage on the bus and [look] at what angle the projectile is coming from.”

They're not saying it... but there must be cameras all over this bus to catch the shooter, right? Trying to figure out "the angle of the projectile" is almost nonsensical if they have a decoy bus set up.
I don’t think so, but they can still be obtained: https://hsrmotors.com

I believe those come from wrecked cars.
The propaganda states that it's the most secure voting system in the world and other countries envy us.
The Teacher Strike in West Virginia
You are right. The term is over-used, and many of the original tribes have very much blended. Some however, have not (dark green in map)
Here is a good list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Celtic_tribes
To be fair, one of the most famous Teslas in the world was powered by a combustion engine.
According to the linked faq,

* They did not own all of the copyrights at the time the suit was filed. In fact, they may not own the rights now.

* International treaties like the Berne Convention have means to resolve these disputes. The plaintiffs have ignored those and filed suit in their own, likely incorrect, jurisdiction.

* The suit, and the decision, does not ask for the texts in question be blocked in German jurisdiction. It calls for them to be taken down entirely, even though they are legal in the US.
Yes but we still use the oldest system of all.
http://www.brunazo.eng.br/voto-e/textos/modelosUE.htm (in portuguese)
But did they do the right thing by participating in a court that has no jurisdiction? Why would they participate in that? Doesn't participating extend legitimacy to the claims, and make one subject the outcome (including paying the legal fees when losing)?
Really? That's not been my anecdotal experience but would be curious to hear if this is a common experience. I have had trouble with Amazon's own courier, but have largely mitigated that issue by asking Amazon customer service to use other couriers.
There are so many dystopian novels that start with something like this. I can't imagine wanting the branding of any company I ever worked for branded on my skin... and I like everywhere I've worked.

I've met EVE Online devs who have EVE tattoos, but I guess I can understand it for like a game or movie project one is a big fan of (and also worked on). But... company logo, that feels a step too far.
Corps unveils new cyber job field
Yes, and flying a helicopter is heavily regulated just like an airplane. It's the same reason you don't see regular car owners operating their own helicopter (unless as I said they're very rich).
You have to pay U.S. taxes on worldwide income. The U.S. is the only country that does this, though.
The gasser look really does not suit the first-gen Accord.
Thoroughly agree. Ireland has many accents, many of them very strong. This is common in cultures where people stay in a locality for most of their lives. There is recent mobility (in the last 50 years for work, education etc) but most families have been stationary in their home towns for multiple generations. Even the Irish spoken in each area is distinctive.
> solar system
Watching that video of the car accelerate I remember being awestruck how fast circa 1990 my Taiyo RC Fast Traxx could go.

I remember my dad and I scaling up the math (I was only 10 so I needed a little help) and I remember asking him why normal cars didn’t have batteries.

I don’t recall the answer but it was long... I also was quite distracted with my new RC toy car .. err tank (google fast traxx).
It doesn’t seem like much sodium per Google.

https://www.google.com/search?q=bacon+nutritional+value&rlz=...
In the US, yes. Disney would be free to ask US courts to require ISPs in the US to block those servers, assuming they have no more direct legal route by treaty.

Disney could also apply legal sanctions to the owners of the servers, should they ever travel to the US, and could probably convince the US Marines to extradite the owner. But I don't think that should be encouraged.
Seems promising, though false positives for “looks like a tumor” might be problematic. I’m hopeful for something less barbaric than chemo and radiation. We’re truly in the Stone Ages around cancer treatments.
Drones don't weigh enough to be a kinetic energy weapon. You'd have to strap a bomb to them (which I believe is getting very popular in certain parts of the world already).

A 'flying car' is heavy enough to do large amounts damage just by falling out of the sky. Doesn't have to have anyone riding in it to blow themselves up at the right time, a cell-phone triggered bomb will do just as well.
The history of physics is full of "fudge factors" which turned out to actually represent much deeper physical truths.
>they are inherently fuel inefficient compared to devices with wheels

Total cost will be lower.

>they are noisy, a problem which can probably never be solved unless breakthroughs are made in science-fiction fields like anti-gravity

Not electric, though wind may be a problem if the FAA allows a free-for-all, which it probably won't.

>airspace is very limited. In my country, we have already serious planning problems with the current amount of air traffic

With human pilots, sure. With autonomous vehicles, nope. They'll swarm like birds or insects.

>it's not sustainable from nature-perspective

Airborne wildlife will learn to avoid population centers and "skyways".

>flying is inherently weather-bound

Only with human pilots. Autonomous vehicles will care only about ice and lightning. Severe wind, sure, but that's fairly rare in most places.

>flying is heavily regulated, which poses barriers

The FAA just relaxed its regulations and will relax them more in the future. Everyone wants the personal airborne vehicle, especially winkled old bureaucrats in Washington.

>social opposition will always be a thing unless 100% security is neared and near-100% noiseness is reached

This may come as a surprise, but policymakers don't really give a damn about what the public wants. Autonomous vehicles will be more safe than human-piloted craft, which is enough, and electric, which is silent.

>This being said, I really, really, really do like the idea of hopping in an airborne transportation device and go straight to any place in a +-(a few hundreds of KM) range.

Good, because you're going to get it.

P.S. Re: +/- several hundred kilometers: There's no such thing as negative range.
Here's what you've said about Star Citizen elsewhere in this thread:

"An unmitigated clusterfuck." "A mess." "Crummy software."

And now you're saying they chose the wrong engine? That's a Far Cry from being the Crysis you described, which makes it sound like choosing CryEngine makes a game Prey to any Monster Hunter Online. Sure, Crytek's in a State of Decay, but the CryEngine Kingdom's Come: Deliverance in the form of Amazon. The engine is still maintained, and still used for major games.

Okay, I'm resorting to bad wordplay now. I guess that means I'm done. I'll let you have the last word.
On the bright side, for people worried about monopolies and corporations having too much power, this severely hurts Amazon's brand. They really are a much less useful site when instead of being "the place where you can buy anything" they are "the place where you can buy Amazon products, and a few other things too".
No, that's silly. No one needs to fly it, use a cell phone triggered explosive device. That way none of the bombers friends need get hurt.

After all such cars will have to be self-flying. You're surely not suggesting the flying car using public would need to get a pilots license before flying in one ? That would already mean they're only a rich persons toy.

If the target is big enough (sports stadium for example) you.dont need to aim it. And as to why use a flying car instead of going there, I would have thought that was obvious. You can drop a car on people from a distance. Don't need to be there.