skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So the tinfoil hat theory here is that Apple itself leaks the cracking tech to Cellobrite to ease the fed pressure, and keep reputation intact? Sorry, I don't buy it.
You were referring to CPython implementation details, which do not apply to Jython, IronPython, PyPy, and many more.

Alternative Python implementations do not follow all CPython implementation details.

In other words, if this is not part of the Python specification, it might work on other Python implementations even if it does not work on CPython.
I was in central Paris last week, I saw crazies and people pissing. Reminded me how bad the shadier parts of London was 20 years ago. That was just one of the metro lines though, the other 10 trips on bus, 2 or 3 other metros and a couple of RERs were fine, although metros were always crowded.

I agree with London, Berlin, Beijing, Singapore, Hong Kong etc.

(The reason we took the metro late at night with 2 young kids and a large suitcase was because uber/taxis is a right pain with kids - trying to get one with 2 car seats)
You need to crawl through all your webserver logs (the zipped ones as well) and remove entries by IP.

I seriously don't get what's the huge deal about this. Of course it sucks but it's not THAT hard to implement.
Customizable Icons Webfont: Particles
Will check out HardyPress. Thanks! It might make things easier if I end up with WordPress. Wasn't aware of it :)
>Only if the people want better infrastructure. They do not.

Another very, very odd opinion.
Because you are parent and these discussions are literally how child is learning from you and how they are learning about your opinions. Kids don't change opinions automatically by function of aging, they change them as function of discussions, observations and reading.

It may be you or little classmate Johny or even somebody else. But no, it is not pointless, because that talking about world is child raising.
We have electric heating in our house, I'd never buy a house with it again. Not only is it expensive but it doesn't work very well, I need to adjust the temperature on it for tomorrow, not today.
I was actually enjoying that game until the radiator turned up! haha
> Lots of fun stuff here: https://www.citymetric.com/transport/what-largest-metro-syst....

Seems a bit disingenuous to count far out Queens as subway, but not RER in Paris, which is just as far and unfrequent.
It's not a better service just because people pay more or it costs more.

A service can be better and cheaper.

If congestion starts to worse, I'd also definitely not blame the people who haven't changed behavior when there is another group that has changed behavior in a way that can directly impact this problem.
Thanks for the last link. It will surely be helpful :D Hugo seems to be the winner for now.
Thanks for the clarification. This is definitely going to make lawyers rich and make it much harder to startup. The legal cost overhead benefits the establishment at the cost of startups and SMEs
I acknowledge that I'm in the minority but I find it really hard to understand the idea that "The secured loan you took out and can no longer afford to pay? They're going to take the collateral" isn't the whole fucking point of a mortgage.

This idea that the banks foreclosing is somehow a sign of greed boggles my mind. Now, sure there is a bunch of consumer protection around to help 'honest Joe' out when times are tough - but it isn't going to magically stop a crunch point coming where either you keep paying off the loan or you lose the house.
>How is chain of custody maintained if the process is a secret? Couldn't a person argue that the data obtained was planted?

Well this is a more general issue (I mean not limited to this case or to sending a device to Cellebrite or to another external laboratory) once a chain of custody is formally valid, it has as much integrity as the integrity of the people that had physical access to or worked on the device.

Still - thankfully - "planting" evidence on a modern file system and OS (provided that the end result is an actual physical extraction) is not as easy as it may seem.

Definitely possible, but extremely difficult to achieve without leaving any trace behind.
Is there any (valid) reason why someone would want to use their own hash function? Secure hash functions, as far as I am aware, are pretty established and widely available and really easy to use..
Is that a feature Uber/Lyft drivers have? I always thought they could not see the destination before picking up the client.
2017 Open Source Yearbook
you could replace google authenticator with a yubikey
Yubikeys in U2F mode are better than any OTP because they protect you against phishing attacks. 1Password auto-filling arguably has this property too,

Not really. The TOTP RFC recommends accepting TOTP tokens from before and after the current time step to make TOTP work with clock drift. Since most implementations use time steps of 30 seconds an allow TOTP codes of at least one past and one future time step, the window in which an TOTP code can be used is typically 90 seconds.

Consequently, TOTP only works against 'offline phishing' where a phisher collects data first and tries to take over the accounts later. For any kind of immediate phising, there is typically no problem to forward re-use the token, even with a small delay.

As you say, U2F protects against this, by using challenge-reponse and using the origin selecting the key handle.
Do you also target mobile browsers by any chance and, if so, is the lib fast enough?
... you’re right. I expected them to use entangled photons (which would have achieved the same but without the delay) and that shaped how I read the article.
LineageOS as well has this feature. Put it on a Oneplus (to get rid of Chinese Spyware TM), add an Adblocker and True Caller (leaks agenda information, but we used to have phone-number books) and you'll have an actually decent smartphone experience.

When I'm testing new smartphones in stores, I'm shocked at how crappy the experience is compared to the LineageOS, both in terms of UI, and in terms of interruptions and notifications and ads shoved down the user's throat
> I am very sceptical of statistical findings like this with a poorly/not understood mechanism.

And you’re right to be (in fact, this is exactly the same instinct researchers get). We’ll have to wait until the actual research article is published before we can assess the quality of their evidence. But in their defence, they performed a so-called functional verification by knocking out the suspect gene (MIR206) in mice and looking for phenotypic changes. It is relatively straightforward to perform this in such a way that you get statistically robust results. And it’s also straightforward to replicate independently, which will happen in due course.
That's quite some praise there. Definitely reinforces the suggestions others have made as well.
20+ sites is a lot, wow :O

I do not think the blog is going to be too image heavy as I'd like to keep it simple for now but it's definitely a plus to have. Thank you! :)
Oracle 18c – The Next Generation of Data Management
I think the idea is that the nines trick generally works, but having four nines and pricing down to the cents in such a large price makes the trick a little too insultingly obvious.
I'm sure there will be a lot of hipster-trolls suing left and right, trying to make a name for themselves.
Interesting article, thanks for posting! A few things to add.

Your article actually says that cars use 7x as much embodied energy as devices, (7 to 1), but then corrects both for lifetime (10 and 2 years), thus you get 0.5 vs 0.7 for devices vs cars respectively, not 1 vs 0.7.

The article then concludes cars use 40% more embedded energy than all devices on the planet, not 30% less.

Then, we're talking about phones here, the article about devices, including 60 million laptops which the article assumes use 18x the embodied energy of a phone. i.e., next to the 1.9 billion phones, the article essentially adds in 1.08 billion phone-equivalent laptops, which carry a worse energy/mass ratio, but aren't adjusted for a much better lifetime than 2 years average. Same for smartphones, btw. The article leaves out embodied energy of cars and just assumes a car to perform without any repairs or maintenance for 10 years, like a phone does for 2 years.

It also doesn't really explicitly mention the context which is that it's a comparison is between more than 2 billion devices servicing an approximately similar amount of humans, vs 72 million vehicles.

The article does mention that a phone's energy use in 2 years would add, at most, 8% to its embodied energy, for an indexed figure of 1.08. A car uses 5x as much of its embodied energy, for a total figure of 6x. Again, this is without figuring in maintenance. In short, for a real impact figure you'd multiply the 0.72 by 6, and you end up with energy to 72m cars using more than 8x as much energy than 2 billion smartphones and more than a billion phone-equivalent laptop/tablet devices, at minimum.
6 Best Pre-Launch Mobile App Tactics You Should Try
I use DO Droplets (5$ - 10$) to host multiple static websites with server blocks or multiple applications (Node.js) with Dokku. So far, it has worked out for me very well. If you are interested in Dokko, you can find a guide for my setup over here [0].

- [0] https://www.robinwieruch.de/deploy-applications-digital-ocea...
It is also the main reason python is so hard to speed up and optimize ; JavaScript is not quite as dynamic, so it can be speeded up more (though super dynamic constructs like “with” do kill all optimization’s and hinder JITting)
>is not pure capitalism.

Seemingly everybody has their own definition of capitalism. Everybody also thinks that right thinking people share their definition and people who don't are Just Wrong.

It makes arguments about it a little pointless because six different, intelligent people are arguing about capitalism are usually arguing about six related but different things.

That's why it usually makes a bit more sense to argue with language that has a tighter definition - like "monopoly".
if you are looking for good hacker contact michaelhackerlord @ gmail .com you can also call or text and chat

him up on whatsapp +15127108592 to hack your partners phone, social media accounts and lots more.his the best

hacker, he carry out various activities such as wire transfers, cloning of gadgets, accessory hacking,

clearing of criminal records, upgrading of school grades, IG followers and Twitter followers hacker facebook

and whatsapp and give you day to day activities of your cheating partner. Finally I can go on with my divorce

with an upper hand after years of suspecting my partner, I finally have proof of my partner cheating thanks

to him...help and my friend
Amazon buys startup Ring in $1B deal to run your home security
> That really seems like an argument that is made only to hurt startups.

you're looking at this the wrong way. Yes, startups should enforce copyright. But so should facebook.

They just get away with it because they are big
Sorry about that. Doesn't seem like Hn has an option to search, or does it? I don't really frequent the Ask HN section so I wasn't aware. Thank you for the link though. Found some interesting info there :)
You can only earn the first seven days after the post was created.
(nitpicking!) I love Jerry Pournelle but he made a little mistake in his text, it's not "chansons du geste" but "chansons d_e_ geste".

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chanson_de_geste
Or "Tack". ;-)

No, of course the word you're after is "tact". (And even as a foreigner, it annoys the heck out of me when people mix them up [which you didn't!], ususally as in "take another tact" when they mean "take another tack" [where 'tack' is a originally a sailing term for flipping the sail to the other side of the boat when going against the wind, IIUC; so the expression means "go in a slightly different direction"].)

I'm just riffing on Heikki's remark about foreign languages: In my primary language, Swedish, "tack" means "thank you" but is also often used for Eng. "please" -- so "Kan du ... , tack?" means "Could you ... , please?".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacking_(sailing)
Ask HN: Do any of these GCC/LLVM features exist?
This is a list of 3 things I would love to see in an optimizing C/C++ compiler. I know how to do none of them, but maybe somebody knows an alternative work-around....

1. Useful pragmas for defining optimization regions. 95% of my code can be relatively portable and acceptably performant with -mtune=generic.

Pragmas would simply classify optimization regions which cross compile multiple targets. Then drops in the correct one at runtime.

(I know this is possible to do, but wouldn't a builtin be better?)

2. Pragmas for linker hints. I have noticed -flto just doesn't do great on larger more complicated projects (perhaps it's the partial templates?). But, usually I have a good idea which ones need to go together.

Like (for a function used in two different tight loops):
```
[[:linker_group="LinearOptimizer"]]
[[:linker_group="Descent"]]
void
Function(...) {}
```

3. And this one is a long long shot. Wouldn't it be cool if every major hardware vendor could support some consistent RISC instructions? So that the compiler could have a universal initializer language capable of extracting the relevant target program. Not sure how it works around ELF/DWARF/...
Meh, all of these caveats apply to module level vars vs instance vars. Monkey patching can be quite effective if you're careful.
Cryptocurrency, Blockchain and ICO Jobs – CryptoJobAlert.com
> Since from an observers POV nothing can actually fall into the black hole, no black hole can form.

The event horizon isn't really a physical boundary in that sense. It's the mathematical boundary at which, according to general relativity, a particle must have velocity equal to the speed of light in order to escape. A density change inside the star can change the size and shape of that boundary without things falling into it in the usual sense.

In the same way, a density wave can 'travel' faster than the speed of sound (or light) in a medium because the wave is a mathematical construct that emerges from a physical situation.
Maybe it will actually help, but self-righteousness of the proponents of such methods never ceases to amaze me. It actually makes the plots of all these stupid sci-fi movies seem somewhat plausible. You know, the movies where some technocratic forces (usually military or research group) always do something so obviously stupid, that it just couldn't happen in real life, with security protocols and all. You know what happens next. It's borderline hilarious and terrifying.

I mean, first you (well, your grand-grand-…-grandfathers) introduce new species to the land. They are absolutely harmless, you have plenty of them at home and would like to have even more. What can go wrong? When you learn the answer, you try to fix your fuck up while your parents don't see and introduce some more new species that apparently fought off these first species back at home. After all, you are smarter now, you know biology and stuff, you know how one animals eat the others and can play with this stuff knowingly. Well, this does the trick, your first little fuck up gets eliminated, but now that second animal dominates the whole new continent and overall situation got just much worse. You try this several times and it gets trickier every time, but you are so sure of yourself, so educated and smart that you just cannot let go, you are sure you can fix it this time. So you artificially construct a virus to wipe off the harmful population. It seems to help at first, but soon they get immune to that virus and really good at spreading this virus around. Then the virus mutates. Scrolling forward, there's no single kangaroo left alive on the continent, rabbits now can produce nuclear weapons and you still have a new, final solution that surely will fix the situation this time. Like artificial kangaroo immune to radioactivity or something, idk…
I have the same impression recently. It's nearly impossible to get a good compact phone.

My last one was Sony Xperia X Compact. XZ1 Compact is basically a clone with slightly better specs, no point to upgrade. XZ2 compact while getting beefier lost the headphone jack.

I'm basically waiting and hoping for Xiaomi to release some nice compact in 2018.
Given that Amazon just bought Blink a few months ago you can see the shape of the Amazon smart home ecosystem coming together...
Link does not reference IOTA?
I think this is something that deserves much greater general awareness. I think by default we're pretty unaware of the kind of analogizing/metaphoring that takes place when we conceptualize anything—but it's completely pervasive. I see it as a kind of subtle 'dust on the lens' of the microscope which we use to observe things generally. It's an (in a certain sense) inescapable artifact due to the fact the we conceptualize with a definite thing with its own properties and quirks and limitations, which is the human brain. Anyway, I see it as a kind of 'bias' (best I can think of atm, but that term isn't really broad enough to capture the idea) which we could watch for and in doing so make gains in objectivity.

Edit: also, another way of looking at it is: when we express any concepts in some concrete form, the particular representation we choose (and we have to choose something) brings its own baggage along with it. And, subsequently, we end up reasoning off of the baggage rather than the thing in itself.
I never said it was easier, I just said it was not much harder. :)

Like I said, it is sometimes a bit less readable (tree-walking is a good example of such case), but at the same time, what the code actually does is much clearer. You have no hidden costs, and the code is easier to optimize this way.

You mention a case where you do not fully understand why the recursive solution works, in which case you obviously can't easily write an iterative solution. However, in this case, you are poorly equipped to make any implementation, recursive or iterative.
Karma: How Open Source Changed My Life
This is definitely the first year where I have absolutely no interest in getting a new phone. I used to be able to do without an upgrade, stretching it. (I had an iPhone 4 about 6 years after release) But now I'm fine with an S7.

Seems like only cameras are worth upgrading for nowadays.
why does this website say that it is -24?
https://www.yr.no/place/North_Pole/Other/North_Pole/
>A reasonable reading of GDPR makes standard web server logs (which contain IP addresses) a punishable offense...

You need retention policies and if you use the web logs for (let's say) detection malicious behavior or troubleshooting, you are in the clear.
Parallels Desktop 11.1 Business Edition Crack Keygen for Mac OS X Download
The speed of light is, but it does not have anything to do with relativity.

Those concepts are connected by the speed of light in vacuum, yes, but there is no logical reason for that. This was an educated guess, and was confirmed by observation it's not a conclusion.

Einstein started to formulate special relativity theory starting from an assumption that a "ball of light" won't change its shape for non-inertial (no accelerarion) observers regardless of their respective speed. I.e. constant speed of light was the reason not a result of this theory.

(Duh. This got lenghty.)
Levi Strauss to replace workers with lasers
I'm curious: How does this compare to something like Pixi?
I would argue that the efficiency of public transport during peak hours compensates for inefficiency during off-peak hours.

Most public transports reduce the frequency of transports during off peak (there are 3 trains after 2200 to 0500, from 0500 to 0900 and 1800 to 2200 there are 8, from 0900 to 1800 about 9, total: 30 trains, of which >50% are used during peak hours).

Today the train cart I used held about 40 people while being about as long as 4-5 cars (which would hold about 4 people each, or 16-20 total)

Since 50% of the trains drive during peak hour, the overall efficieny is 50% peak hour: 20 people (0.5 * 40). Which would be equivalent to the number of people transported in the car.

Now keep in mind; trains are much more efficient than a car per passenger, use no roadspace, are much safer and faster and cheaper (0.50€ to 5€ depending on ticket for my particular route, which includes all costs, gasoline used for route costs about 1€ per trip, which does not include other costs incurred by the operator).
An Interactive Satellite Meta Data Catalogue (Live Tracking)
Firedrop, a Free Multi-Platform Cloud Storage Service with 20GB of Storage
I do not know Optimizely specifically. But there are many advantages to having fewer large customers than many small customers. Particularly if you are still inventing product.
>So we shouldn't try to help people in other countries until we are literally perfect?

You shouldn't try to help people in other countries, period. Who appointed you world cop? Besides, it always ends up in tears (besides it being hypocritical help with strategic ambitions attached from the establishment side, even if ordinary people mean it sincerely).

>Or are you making the argument that the US government is in fact more oppressive than the Chinese government?

Internally, not. Globally, surely yes.
I don't think scrolling on the video to change the volume is a good idea. I jumped because the volume of the video suddenly changed as I was trying to get around.
That's reasonable. I think I just got somewhat annoyed to see a project with "open" in its name and GPL as its license, and then hit a brick wall.
Would you want McDonalds to give dietary advice, while at the same time pushing burgers and fries down the world's throat?
Not the end of The World: the return of Dubai's ultimate folly
Facebook censors 30,000 year-old Venus of Willendorf as 'pornographic'
On the other hand, we have stuff like this: https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh/blob/master/dnsapi/dns_a...

Duuuude! There's an awscli out there that does all that for you, is maintained by Amazon, covers all the edge cases and is forward compatible cause Amazon takes care of that. Instead we have hundreds of lines of gnarly shell script code to compute hashes and prepare HTTP requests :(
>>Abusing python can really save your life sometimes.

I thought, preventing Abuse in all ways was the biggest point behind Python.
My internship (trying to compile graphs into cobol) involuntarily ended up abusing java exception because I didn't know how to write graph rewriting systems, induction and backtracking.. I think my employer never ever used that.
Reviewers are not enthusiastic.
They also have the Dash buttons. The whole process is literally pressing the button next to where the TP is kept, going out to work, and coming back to find twelve rolls of your brand sat in your hallway.
I have to have a blanket, or at least long sleeves, otherwise I am greatly disturbed by my own breathing as it reflects from the wall back into me.

My partner think I'm nuts.
That's a really big IF, and semi-popular Youtubers have even more to lose from association with the existing content on there than most of us.
No. There is no valid reason to do so.
At the moment (and for the next 5 years I think) WASM is just a way to write code you'd write in C/C++.

Not some support for other languages on a first class basis on the webpage just like Javascript (which direct access to the DOM and everything).
Success Story of Microsoft [Infographic]
An overblown title -- non-protein-coding genes have been known about for a long time.

However, the transport of micro RNAs on sperm is a pretty cool mechanism - hope it is correct!
NetBalancer v9.12.1 and Crack Free Download
This is trivial. From one's frames of reference this very one is always stationary =].

What is interesting from photon's frame of reference is the image of the rest of the world.
https://about.d.tube/ - A landing page presenting and explaining DTube

https://github.com/dtube
Datastream.io – Real-Time Anomaly Detection Using Python, Elasticsearch and Kibana
This isn't the US, the law is enforced by governments, not lawsuits.