The same old arguments.

"Inequality is totally OK"

"But if many people have total food insecurity and bad health outcomes, that's bad right?"

"Well hey but in the long run people got wealthier overall than if we redistributed wealth and no one would have an incentive to work like a dog"

"That would have happened anyway because it's not capitalism but science and technology that drives wealth forward"

"Look, Capitalism works far better, the USSR didn't have a choice consumer devices or food while the West did"

"Fine but the USSR actually lifted more people out of poverty faster and its GDP grew faster than the USA, plus they endured two world wars on their own soil and still were able to bounce back and expand ... and China just lifted the most people out of poverty ever, wages increased 25x over 20 years, all through central planning and building entire cities"

"Yeah but China is a hugely authoritarian state and is not free. Plus they adopted some capitalist principles and that's why they are so successful. Look at Venezuela and North Korea. Socialism does't work."

"Well China is quite centrally planned as was the Interstate Highway system and other infra projects. And all those were a success. As for Venezuela did you forget the sanctions and oil prices drop? And North Korea has had sanctions for decades just because they are communists."

"Redistributing just destroys all incentive to work."

"We are automating everything anyway. We will need to redistribute money to a growing unemployed / underemployed class."

"Universal health care results in death panels and long waits. The government dictates how much doctors can charge and this stifles innovation --"

"-- and the USA is an outlier in how much we spend on healthcare, because there is no collective bargaining the prices down"

"Yeah and also no death panels. Look at the wait times in other countries--"

"As opposed to the infinite wait times in the USA for those who have 'access' but can't afford to even do a basic preventative checkup? And even if we remove those, the wait times in the USA are atrocious too. And other countries have more doctors per capita and more hospital beds too. Medicare gets better prices than almost all smaller insurers."

"We get BETTER doctors and beds. The USA leads the world in medical innovation precisely because providers are not squeezed like they are by Amazon, Apple and other monopolies, so it attracts innovation from around the world and peopel vote with their feet"

"Well maybe if you abolished drug patents innovatio could come from all over the world instead of the chilling effects we have today. Open source beats closed in the long run and Open source Drugs would beat big pharma in the long tail whose plight isn't even worth pursuing for these guys. Newton said he stood on the shoulders of giants, why is medicine different than science?"

Ayn Rand: "Stop robbing a man of the product of his own mind. I DID build that!"

"But living in the 21st century who do we compensate for all the advances throughout human history that preceded us? Can't we accept that this is a free gift and redistribute the wealth?"

"Socialist!"

"You support Billionaires!"

"No I don't, billionaires are the product of government favors and I want to shrink government"

"Then abolish patents"

"No that is intellectual property"

Etc :)