skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, APFS is much better suited to this kind of workflow. Create a space shared logical volume inside your container and turn spotlight off on that particular volume (and if you’d like, make that volume case sensitive ). There’s no need to separate that out on a diskimage
GDPR will require informed consent for much of the tracking you've suggested to be done. How many people will actively opt in?

The regulatory environment for FB will change dramatically on 25 May for the data of all EU citizens.
That's different. Go will rerun all tests (for that binary)
GDPR will prevent that unless there's an active opt-in, so you can strike out EU citizens from that scenario.
> paralyzed but still "aware" in whatever sense a lobster is aware of anything

Radiolab spin-off More Perfect recently discussed the “cosmetic” presence of a paralytic drug in lethal injection concoctions. I can’t help but see a parallel.
Why would you assume that's file system corruption?
The original has more recent commits:

https://github.com/ngn/apl
I’m surprised no one has started a “perpetual storage for upfront cost”.

With hardware costs going lower and lower, and rate limits enforceable to keep this for archivig, you could model a price with a suitable profit margin.
My problem with LaTeX is that a ton of programmers think it's a good idea to use LaTeX instead of, say, Word or Writer or plain text wrapped at 80 characters or a Wiki for things like process or project documentation.

Programmers love to use LaTeX, because they get to feel like they're doing something exciting like writing a computer program when what they're actually doing something incredibly boring like writing documentation. They get to use the same plain text editor they're familiar with. They get to use the same version control that they use with their code. I've seen programmers try to use many justifications for why LaTeX is important for their doc because LaTeX has some feature that everybody knows they don't actually need to use.

The truth is that unless you have a literal need for actual true typesetting, you should absolutely not use LaTeX for documentation. The reason for this is two fold:

1. "First, you need a properly configured LaTeX build environment," are never, ever the first words that anybody wants to hear when they need to read, update, modify, and manage documentation. Documents that are not going to be published outside the company should never require a build environment.

2. No matter what your job is, you're not going to have it forever and someone will probably be in it after you. If all your documentation is written in LaTeX, then suddenly, "Ability to write, modify, and maintain LaTeX documents," is a mandatory requirement. That's a significantly higher bar than "Ability to write, modify, and maintain Microsoft Word documents." Congratulations, you just added significant complexity to your job for essentially no benefit to the company.

The only time you should favor LaTeX is when you're writing a document that will be published and is essentially entirely text. You're a mathematician or some other discipline and actually need to write extremely complex symbology. You have extremely complex and numerous references to manage. You're writing a high level research paper. Congratulations! You're the intended audience for LaTeX.

If you're a software engineer writing standard documentation, put the text editor down and use Microsoft Word. Documentation is meant to be read by everyone, not make you feel good about being forced to write it.
Thank you for articulating it in a way I've never been able to. Although I do agree with other commenters that this might not explain every single case of depression, but personally your comment rings true. I still struggle with it from time to time, most recently a few days ago after what I felt like months of peace. Reframing it to this reinforcement model makes sense to me, instead of thinking I'm totally out of control.
> Do you think i am entirely wrong, and suffering is worse than death?

Yes. Read reports of torture victims. They frequently request death over continued pain.
> and there’s no way to have that without the notch.

There is, the notch could instead be a black bar that extends across the width of the screen. whether that's a better decision is arguable, but it's definitely possible.
Capital One?
You're either very confused or trolling.

I have directly responded to the comment I've quoted, as evident by looking at the parent comment that my comment replied to.

> Maybe, maybe not. But that's not what you said.

That's exactly what I've said, you've even copied it verbatim, which was in response to your comment pointing out the very obvious fact that personal experiences are anecdotal, which you've somehow tried to contradict using your own anecdote. It should not surprise anyone that most comments are anecdotal (especially those beginning with 'I') but which should at least count for 1 data point with experience which is more than enough to respond to unsubstantiated claims.
Pandoc's tex_math_dollars, tex_math_single_backslash and raw TeX mode makes it possible to fallback to TeX whenever you need: https://pandoc.org/MANUAL.html#math-input

A Markdown -> LaTeX -> pdf pipeline was how I wrote all of my algorithm assignments in college. I wrote things like:

* **Basis**. Prove for $n = 0$...

* **Induction**. If \mathcal{G} is a graph ...

\begin{equation}
...
\end{equation}
> further optimization in terms of mental bandwidth is to avoid even forming a view on matters

I sympathise with the idea - but I think the problem is, a lot of the time opinions are a predicament, not a choice. Without consciously taking a position on a topic, you're often implicitly accepting various components of it - its logical dependencies, its framing of the problem, and so on.

My gut feeling is that people don't all have opinions ('everyone's a critic') because of widespread foolishness, but rather it's a basic characteristic and consequence of thought - just like you have to make assumptions to make a proof.
Im very sorry to hear this.
I sincerely doubt that any online plattform can change the outcome of a IRL meeting.
Networking by definition is not anonymous, so if one gets to know people, the same scenario will reapear again and again.
I will try to think about a solution for this.

I must apology for im usually one, vehemently defending freedom of speach. The reason for this is that i love the internet, before the whole world decided to crash the party. It was a great place- insofar, as people who usually would be shunned by society could meet one another and create works- overcoming social isolation.

Let me expand on this- they guy who lifes over the street from my aunt. He is nuts, never goes outside, except at night to smoke - where he runs screaming in panic, should anyone on the street come even close to his door.
In some poorer country he would be homeless- and for society useless. Now turns out that- even with shizophrenia - he has a state that cares for him- he has a sister that cares for him, and he has the internet, to work and communicate. And thus he can contribute to academia.
Now, such a social mess- will never fullfill the needs for a social silod suburbia, in fact he cant. So if i promise to try to solve your networking and integrating problem- will you stop trying to harass the social misfits and otucasts who are incapable of fitting in?
> Maybe I’m alone in this, but I feel like if you’re going to break up a company with antitrust regulation you should at least be able to point to a way they’re abusing their power or are making a worse experience for customers.

How about selling shitty eclipse glasses that hurt peoples eyes and making it impossible to order the real ones?

How about combining counterfeit and genuine products in the same SKU to make it impossible to order the real ones?

How about the fact that Amazon are not held liable for selling counterfeit products period? If WalMart attempted to sell a counterfeit product on their website they'd have a class action against them yesterday.

Are those not "worse experience" for consumers?
That is brilliant.. please feel free to fill the notches with bright flashing blink ads! It will be beautiful!!!
Why would Macdonald’s pay for that? Tom is already in McDonald’s and is going to buy what he wants. There’s no incremental value in making the menu confusing by changing it all the time.
Space shared APFS volumes inside a container give you the “table partitioning” you want. You can even set them up to have different case sensitivity options. All your dev work in a case sensitive volume for instance and Adobe software on a case insensitive volume on the same space shared container.
I don't think knowing the chances of winning would change behavior of the consumer, much like knowing the lottery payoff is abysmal doesn't stop people from playing. That was my point.
Sparse bundle disk images [1] are a more efficient way to store disk images on an underlying file system. They are a completely separate concept from the file system in the disk image itself (besides HFS+ apparently doing some intelligent free space reporting) and are definitely not implemented as APFS snapshots.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_image#Sparse_bundle_dis...
Yeah, same. I couldn't stomach the port situation on the new macbooks (and the High Sierra issues) so ended up with a 4th gen Lenovo Carbon X1. Wiped Windows 10 and installed Mint. The whole process was dead-simple and I couldn't be happier with it.
Yeah. Frankly, the APFS rollout was incredibly smooth for a new filesystem.
>> non-zero index origin (⎕IO)

eeeh, that's kind of an issue. A lot of apl assumes ⎕IO←1
The €1 coffee is possibly more prevalent across the border in Portugal.

They charge extra for milk, as black coffee is typically drunk as a side dish to iconic pasteis.

https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/08/da/d6/7b/...
This is most like the most important thing I haven't read.

Aside - this is good stuff, I find myself in this 'mode' all the time. I used to read 100+ books a year, now it is like 5. But, I read all the time ...
From my (limited) experience of writing a documentation page for a library I made, Markdown is pretty limited (speaking of CommonMark here). Even basic things like table or image need HTML to be done. The gain in syntax is lost on the coherence side as the document mixes two languages, and an additional step of processing the document is required to transform it in full HTML.

It have it use cases but writing long and complex documents is not one of them.
Pretty much this. It’s a rough trek and requires a lot of saving. And even once you get there, you don’t feel rich — not with a few kids and more expenses. Having said that, I estimate around 30k passive per month should do it if you have a family and are living in a major city.
Even if it’s funding education, it’s doing so through what is essentially a tax on the poor. Why not tax those that can afford it instead?
> Fundamentals like: generates fast code, compiles quickly, has garbage collector, array bounds checking, excellent concurrency, great standard library, lots of third party libraries, generated binaries use little memory etc.

Why doesn't Java count?

* Because it doesn't have "excellent concurrency"? (I posit its concurrency is far better than C, Python, Ruby, JS, or pretty much any mainstream language)

* Or because "generated binaries use little memory"? (That's the stereotype and arguable, but Java is used as the primary user space language on low end, memory constrained mobile devices. AFAIK, Go can make no such claim.)

* Or something else?

FWIW, Java has other fundamentals
like custom generic collections, standard package management system/conventions, nullable types/optionals, and a workable error strategy.
You've successfully referenced rumor sources with click bait headlines published before Apple announced their actual results:

> “We’re thrilled to report the biggest quarter in Apple’s history, with broad-based growth that included the highest revenue ever from a new iPhone lineup. iPhone X surpassed our expectations and has been our top-selling iPhone every week since it shipped in November,”

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/02/apple-reports-first-q...
https://github.com/Jam3/math-as-code

Take a look at this. It translates a whole load of maths notation into Javascript, which makes it all surprisingly straightforward and non-mysterious, at least as far as the symbols are concerned.
> r authenticate the library with a durable subresource integrity (SRI) hash while still remaining valid

According to the discussion, there's concern this creates large scale hard to fix security issues. The alternative is to build something like AMP into browsers themselves, and then the normal Chrome/Safari/Edge/Firefox release process could fix issues.

But in lieu of that, what's your suggestion? Wait years for standards committees to hash out something at the W3C so that browser vendors implement it, all the while users suffer and Facebook Instant Articles or Apple News soak up more and more web traffic into native, or, ship something that creates an unpatchable security flaw across the web without millions of pages being updated?

If not AMP, then what? XHTML Mobile? We've been down that route and it didn't work. Bring back RSS and force mobile publishing to just be RSS summaries for fast loading?

Lost in all of this geek fighting is the fact that there's a billion users out there who don't care about the Web vs Native, they only care that shit's slow as hell and their data plan is expensive, and despite all of this, there was apparently no forcing function enticing publishers to make their pages load faster, if anything, right before AMP, it seems each and every "redesign" of top level mobile sites got SLOWER and loaded even more JS.

I don't really care about AMP, I care about the Web and I hate closed App Stores soaking up content and making it DRM'ed. In my view, we were on a path to the web collapsing under it's own weight, and AMP is a much needed band aid.

If someone can produce a competing framework that does the same thing, can be easily and wildly adopted, and solves all of the problems people are complaining about, I'd wholeheartedly support it in lieu of AMP.

But what I don't want to see is more and more of my content forcing me to download stuff from the App Store, or run inside Facebook only. That's a far far worse situation than what we're in now.
The video embedded in TFA shows md5 reporting identical checksums before unmounting the disk image, so it must be reading the data from a cache.
Not many go into LaTeX "loving it". Many of us try Word first, and are just unhappy with its output. If you need something that is well typeset and don't want to spend a few $10k on professional typesetting software, LaTeX fits the bill well. Everything else about LaTeX is a pain, not a joy.

Is a lot of documentation written in LaTeX? I would never use it for that. Paper that is going to be submitted to a conference? Sure! Blogpost? No, documentation that is read only online...also probably not. But I don't think I would use Word for that either, Word is a pain if you need something other than very standard formatting.
The Age of Unregulated Social Media Is Over
> or to remove a tooth?

The point of tooth removal in dentistry is to end pain, not to cause it.
if (...) {
...
} else if (...) {
...
} else {
...
}

is pretty good 99% of the time
Kramdown is far and away the best Markdown implementation at the moment. It doesn't have the problems you describe (but does others).
I'm thankful to have my subway to commute to work, at least. On a good morning/evening, I can snag a seat and sit down, and sometimes get a chapter through if I'm lucky. I've finished most of the past few books I've read over the past few years this way. Unfortunately, I haven't gotten any further than 5-10. It's unfortunate.
Rene Ritchie is very biased. He has to be as his livelihood depends on Apple. I take his words with many grains of salt. The only reason he's quoting Sinofsky is because it gives him a way of excusing Apple's software stumbles of late.
That's terrifying.

At least for the lobster, we're not really sure how they interpret pain. They don't have a brain in the same way the humans do. As a vegetarian, I personally would go back to meat if I just knew my meal had a good life and did not suffer needlessly in order for me to eat it. But for the prisoner, this seems like the worst combination: internalized suffering and externalized indifference... So minimize the the deturrence to crime while maximizing the suffering in society. Isn't this the opposite of how it should be?
For testing there are quite a few good remote solutions. Here are a couple I'm familiar with.

https://developer.github.com/v3/guides/building-a-ci-server/
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/examples/README.html

My simplified workflow is: do work locally using whatever IDE I desire -> create a pull request -> server runs the tests and puts the results in the pull request. Much faster than running the same tests on my local machine as well.

With the tests being done remote you will also likely not need to commit such large amounts of data that it becomes a problem.

> Working with a local environment and 4g connection is fine, because 4g is more than enough to look up docs. But working with a distant environment and 4g connection is very slow and unreliable.

Normally even if you are working remote it's expected that you have a stable, decent, connection. But even without one there are plenty of great options.

For documentation I actually keep that local using https://devdocs.io/.

Without internet you don't have sites like stackoverflow and that's a downside that really can't be fixed without some serious work.
i haven't, but i have forgotten how to hold a physical book.
The author is lamenting short attention spans, something people have been complaining about since the advent of radio at least. The author can read and write perfectly well, he just finds reading book boring. Conflating interest with literacy is at least a novel (no pun intended) way to make it seem like the author has something interesting to say about the world. I'm sure sitting too close to the TV and not respecting our elders enough will be the end of us all, too.
You have to understand the phrase in the context of the Russian language and culture.

Take for instance the english expression "I will beat you."

Am I talking about physically beating you or winning in a competition?

It's the same with 'we will bury you'
From the Readme:

"While developing Ariane it has become evident that, in order to support Linux, the atomic extension is going to be mandatory. While the core is currently booting Linux by emulating Atomics in BBL (in a single core environment this is trivially met by disabling interrupts) this is not the behavior which is intended. For that reason we are going to fully support all atomic extensions in the very near future."

Is the atomic extension mentioned here something like the LOCK prefix in x86, i.e it just lock the bus for the instructions that follow? I'm guessing this is non-trivial to implement?
In any system where an actor can be either honest or dishonest but certain qualities of correctness can be probabilistically ascertained, consensus is often a great replacement for trust.

In the case of an anonymous decentralized marketplace, vendor attributes like product quality can be ascertained by achieving consensus in the form of ratings and reviews.

Ultimately, without running the product through a mass spectrometer yourself, you are going to have to defer trust, so consensus aims to reduce the likelihood of dishonesty over an average.

For people in some parts of the world, the level of trustworthiness gauged from online marketplaces can supersede the level of trust given to local vendors.

Take Amazon for example, which, while not anonymous, uses consensus to assure quality in the form of validated reviews. Many people already prefer shopping by reviews than by trial-and-error at brick and mortar stores.
Money is fungible single-use funding doesn't exist in reality.
Source article with fewer typos and less political babbling: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/dc-...
What does bullet 3 even mean
For starters, I specifically said NYC which is very different from NY state. I've lived here a while and the last year before a new law took effect was in 2013. Streetsblog covered the deaths of 134 pedestrians and cyclists in 2013 (out of a total of 178 killed city-wide). Of those 134 killed, the drivers were unknown in 19. "Of the remaining 115 crashes, nine motorists were known to have been charged with homicide. In five of those cases, the driver was also charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. One crash resulted from a police chase. In two cases, the driver was accused of running over the victim intentionally. Only once in 2013 was a sober driver charged with homicide for killing a pedestrian or cyclist in a crash that did not involve a personal dispute or fleeing police."

Source: https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2014/01/31/nypd-16059-pedestrian...

Of the 96 cases covered of a pedestrian being killed by a motorvehicle that didn't involve a DUI, a police chase, or premeditated murder, only a single one was charged with vehicular homicide. So yeah, it's been bad for a while. The most drivers used to get was a small fine and a moving violation and then go about their lives. Heck, I watched a woman get killed by a cab maybe 15 years ago and nothing happened to the driver at all.

A law finally passed in 2014 to address the legal precedent after a 9 year old walking with his dad in a cross walk with the light was run down by a cab and the drive got a small fine and a minor traffic infraction. Here are some details:
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2014/10/the-outrageous-unjust...

In my original post, I should have said more than a few years ago rather than in the last few years, but I can't edit it now.
If other Aztec cities are anything to go by, no. They separated clean/dirty water and made use of waste for fertiliser and dye.

http://ws.iwaponline.com/content/7/1/147
iPhone sales were down 1.24 percent year over year. They made more money because the phone is more expensive. Also, nothing in that statement negates anything said in the links I posted.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/1/16961562/apple-q1-2018-ear...
I buy books all the time. Haven't read one in a couple years because I'm too busy. Some day though....some day.
Is that not what it says? The last sentence of the first paragraph is "By reaching first for Markdown, then for LaTeX when necessary, writing is easier and more enjoyable", which would be that premise but applied to any situation where LaTeX is overdoing things.
The OP provides no justification, so in his mind, yes. And when AI develops, or a new race of genetically engineered humans, they can eat us, too. But I'm sure the OP wasn't thinking about being boiled alive when he made his comment.
Okay... But I'm saying the industry is losing money to far easier-to-use pirating.

I don't see how the current size matters for that.
DMCA takedown? Or if you can afford it, call a lawyer.
Careful - overuse of ketamine can destroy your bladder.
Author here! I'd like to take a second to point out that the audience I had in mind when writing this article was mostly my fellow classmates in college. In school we were hastily introduced to LaTeX freshman year and were required to typeset our homeworks before submission.

The point of the article isn't "you should never use LaTeX" but rather "hey, there's this other, simpler tool that you might like better!" plus some starter templates to make the transition easier.

Importantly, I encourage everyone to use the tools that they feel most comfortable using!
I'm not sure what the solution is, but it's definitely not doing nothing. The 2016 election has proved this.
"I do eat meat without thinking, and no I've never seen the inside of a slaughter house"

You should go. It may start you thinking.
Situs Agen Poker QQ Domino Online Terpopuler – Situs Judi – Qqpoker99