skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is just baseless dogma.

The most nutritious and healthiest foods you can eat are organ meats of ruminants, particularly liver, but also brain and kidney. You can live indefinitely on pemmican, which consists of nothing but muscle and animal fat. A lean person would last no longer than a year, probably much less, on fruits alone.

Frankenfruits, i.e. modern cultivars, which bear little to no resemblance to their naturally-occuring predecessors, have a relative dearth of nutrients. They are as artificial as bread, chocolate, or cookies, and likely just as harmful.
Pixellu SmartAlbums Serial Number for Mac OS X Free Download – Crack4Mac
After so many years of government indifference the housing situation in Vancouver is so incredibly screwed up. Hard to say whether it'll be possible at all to undo the damage.

The expectations for action on housing in the first budget of the new NDP government tomorrow are sky-high.
Reconsider Blogging on Medium If You Care about SEO
They've been doing shady shit with JS for years like auto-reloading their home page and other shady practices. The only solution to sites running bad JS like Salon is to block the JS. uBlock origin, NoScript, etc. The only downside is that none of these tools is user-friendly enough to run without any user input. The idea that other entities should be able to run their code on my computer was a bad one to begin with and still is. I think people are slowly coming to that realization as this default begins to show just how dangerous it is.
Big rigs and repurposed cargo containers don't make sense as a comparison. All production costs of cargo containers are a sunk and they don't generate any waste on their own. Vehicles do. It's not just impractical - it's wasteful. Apples and oranges.

Electric cars are still massively wasteful. You could make ~250 e-bikes batteries with the same amount of lithium it takes to make one Tesla Model S battery. Then there's efficiency. In general - an e-bike goes around 100 miles per kWh where as a Tesla goes around 3-4 miles per kWh. So you're talking about massive waste in terms of material and energy efficiency. An electric bike is around 6300x more efficient than a Model S. Most of the time people are just using their big ass cars/trucks to haul their big asses - it's unnecessary. Telsa's powerwalls also use lithium. Cobalt supplies are heavily bottlenecked now and for the foreseeable future. Just because Musk wants to market his company as a solution to global warming doesn't make it at all true but I guess his advertising was effective on you.

You suggesting that somehow utilizing an entire electric big rig for yourself seems even more preposterous though. Tesla's electric big rig has a battery somewhere around 1200 kWh putting it at ~14 times more wasteful in terms of production resources than a Model S (assuming we're just talking about transporting <5 people). So you're essentially talking about offsetting 13 of your world saving cars or 3600 electric bikes worth of batteries just to haul yourself around at around 0.5 miles per kWh (putting your around 5-6 times less efficient than if you drove a Model X with a trailer).

To the belief in physics point - there is more to pollution than just the gasses created. There is also heat pollution. Most electricity in America still comes from coal. Even though you're not burning anything while you're running the vehicle doesn't mean the energy you're using isn't coming from something being burnt. While Tesla might also be working on stuff like Solar City - it doesn't change the fact that his solution is grid tied - meaning the infrastructure has to be built by existing power companies to deal with the load which they have no inherent incentive to do. Not to mention every ~21 hours or 1260 miles of driving you'd be using enough energy to power my 3 story house for a year.

Also - common sense check - what's the point of a road trip if you're going to try to be in the trailer the whole time? If you're going to skip all the scenery and stops anyway, you might as well fly. And have you tried doing a road trip in a big rig? They're not legal on a lot of roads and they're a major pain to find parking for unless you really enjoy camping at rest stops.

To your condescension - don't worry, I am, and have fun playing with your "Big Rig". You're probably right about electric cars magically fixing global warming. Enjoy your magic kingdom, pal.
Unfortunately, that is usually understood as what is easier for the front-end engineer who only knows js/html/css and doesn't want to learn other tech.
without false positives and negatives.

To be fair to Twitter they are consistent here. What looks like false results to an outsider is clearly policy.
The best way to prevent this in firefox:

1. Run Noscript extension

2. Run RequestPolicy extension

3. Keep your adblock/ublock rules updated as they block miners

4. Don't ever visit Salon

The first three also work on most other websites that have miners or were hacked and had a miner injected.
sugar is never good for you

Sources? I mean, I always thought just like with most things out there, in moderation it's not harmfull. But you are saying any amount is not good? Also by that logic fruit is also bad because it does contain a certain amount ('not a lot') of sugar, no? tldr; I don't completely get the point you are making due to possibly incorrect definitions (what types of sugar?) and seemingly contradicting/overly generalizing statements.
Are you sure that moving, oncoming traffic is seen as an obstacle under that definition?

The real trick against gridlock is to equate the switch to green not as "go", but as "go, once the previous wave has cleared the intersection". The "don't enter before there is room for your car on the far side" is only an optimization on top of that.
Why make that assumption and leave users without blockers out to dry?

Why not just halt all payouts to the old software and only pay out to versions which are using the Authedmine.com version?

Why not do KYC on people who have a very high likelihood of using your software to violate the law?

Salon is the kind of magazine which will call (justly) for corporate responsibility in all sorts of industries, but when it comes to software makers just totally not doing the basic, easy things when it comes to respecting web security, they'll pay them.
Well, better articles might work...
Base16 shell with Pure prompt has been my favorite for some time now. Whatever theme I choose in my shell, it is automatically matched in vim (so I don't have to go in and edit my .vimrc).
It wouldn't be so bad if Salon were using 5 or 10% of your CPU, but they are pushing it to 100%. Check out the discussion on r/BATProject[0] which is apart of the Brave browser. Brave is actually fighting the mining situation whilst also trying to help publishers and creators gain money.

Brave are actively blocking ads and background miners, but they offer verified publishers and creators to be donated Basic Attention Tokens (their own cryptocurrency). Users of Brave will be able to gain tokens either by purchasing them or by viewing ads within the browser rather than on the websites. If you're interested, I would recommend you check out their browser which is based on Chromium.[1]

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/7y7tvy/bat_comm...
[1] https://brave.com/
„Of Good and Evil“: A Visualizing Game Experience
Want a simple nutrition tip? Just eat the food that you can recognise at simple sight, the ingredients it's made from.
And lower meat consumption to 30% of your diet.
Avoid ultraprocessed food and eat what you'll burn.
Agree with letting the team choose and adapt it over time. Seems to correlate with my experiences and insights that I've cataloged here https://leanpub.com/agileforleads/ ( <- also FREE )
For starters, because you can much more quickly and easily eat "300 calories of table sugar" (e.g. by drinking sodas or some sweet) than 300 calories of watermelon.

Second, because 300 calories of watermelon will come with all kinds of vitamins (including C and A), and lots of water.
Thanks!
I was surprised when I wasn't forwarded to an existing thread when submitting the URL.
Open source alternative to Salesforce, SuiteCRM, releases version 7.10
Fruits are artificially high in naturally-occurring sugars. Fruits we have today are all fruits of artificial selection of the most sweet.

Fruits arent that good because of this.
"users must do special stuff" doesn't scale, which is why Chrome has had to roll out default blocking for egregious ads.

But using user resources to mine fadcoin? That's borderline Computer Misuse Act, in the UK, I reckon.
The video should be watched at 0.25 speed to get the realistic impression.
(just a note that you replied to the wrong comment, in case you want to move it)
i don't think it is a right question. it's like asking why did we evolve to get high on morphine?

sure, there definitely are evolutionary benefits to being able to taste sugar and like it, as that will help you to spot nutrients, but this has little to do with the way we industrialized sugar production and consumption in last 200 years. rice, wheat and potatoes are not even sweet but in some countries those are primary sources of glucose.
Like any coin, if the others dont see value on it, it's worthless.
The fact the the authors of the paper rush for innate explanations (hormone levels in the womb...) that they have no expertise to comment on instead of much more obvious behaviors (maybe self-labelled gay and straight people upload different types of pics or take care of themselves differently, on average), is a clear violation of Occam's razor.

The "average gay face" is similar to the "average straight face" with glasses on, a better angle, and a couple of pounds less.
> Anything that's rigid is by definition not agile.

Disagree only in that you need some rigidity for some time in order to get consistency and value. Agile dictates that this time-boxed rigidity should be routinely inspected and adapted over time. Does that make sense?

More of my views here https://leanpub.com/agileforleads/
The less legit it is for a website to mine crypto, the easier it is for adblockers and security to block all such scripts without inconveniencing the user (less tradeoff of usability for security).

But when some sites use it and others doesn't, it makes security complicated and hacks are able to slip through easier.

Also, the more users get used to sites mining on their browsers, the less likely they will be perturbed by and reporting CPU usage spikes (which are used to determine which sites have been hacked by cryptojackers) because they are used to seeing legitimate such spikes from sites they frequent.
Because you take sweet ultraprocessed food since your a baby. Then, children don't like veggies.
I agree. There's probably room for an actor and competitor to CoinHive who takes this very seriously.
That's obviously unprovable rhetoric, why are you spewing it?

We have no reliably accurate data on deaths and illnesses caused by the nuclear power industry. From the mining to the waste disposal, and the plant operation - they all have very significant mishaps putting cancer-causing radioactive materials into the environment where it circulates for generations. There is no way you can honestly make such a statement because we have no way of knowing how many of the people dead from e.g. thyroid cancer are the result of nuclear energy related activities.
The steam of newsletter never came to be.
New Wine-Staging repository, maintained by Lutris
yeah but I guess the data isn't bad in that way in that the sexual orientation of people on the site is probably labeled accurately (in fact I would expect there it's more accurate than, you don't want to lie about what you want on the dating service), the data is bad in that it is perhaps not a representative sample of the population as a whole?
Airbnb and the Unintended Consequences of Disruption
Because when you hear ASCII art, it rings a bell.
Witnessing the Collapse of the Global Elite
You are allowed to enter the intersection on yellow in California.

21452. (a) A driver facing a steady circular yellow or yellow arrow signal is, by that signal, warned that the related green movement is ending or that a red indication will be shown immediately thereafter.
"stakes out America's bid" implies that this is intention and not result yet, so he's not claiming that it's happened yet.
>He's seeking research or data supporting your claims and conclusions, not for you to repeat your claim again.

Culture isn't really very quantifiable, if anecdotal evidence coming from living and working in that particular society is unsatisfactory, feel free to disregard the argument.

>For example, it would be useful to provide supporting evidence of secretaries declining in numbers/ratios related to cultural preference, not technology advances.

But that's not what I claimed. I think that's what's happening, but I never claimed to know how strong the cultural component is compared to the technological and economic ones.
Micropayment is the way to go. There needs to be a two-sided market. Free isn't the market clearing price and whatever the content producer wants to charge also isn't.
Issuu is (or was?)

Don't know if that's where op is going though :)
You are right, I need to update the readme.

I have started the series of articles about learning Phoenix and the Prater is the example application I'm using to cover different topics in my learning way.

Prater is the chat application which should help me to cover many different topics about Phoenix and Elixir.

The series of articles are starting here http://whatdidilearn.info/2018/01/14/phoenix-first-steps.htm... or you can filter by [Phoenix] tag to see all related articles http://whatdidilearn.info/tags#Phoenix
> Sources?

https://www.google.de/search?q=sugar+insulin+resistance+pubm...

> in moderation it's not harmfull

define "in moderation".
How about the user experience?
As someone said "make it harder for the database, easier for the user".
As a user I prefer products which are joy to use, not which required minimum development effort. Also, I do not normaly use the same product on different platforms.
It really was. I still have my Pebble classic on my wrist, and patiently wait for a similarly priced and spec'd (B&W eInk screen, HR sensor, simple look) watch to the Pebble 2 so I can retire it. I was genuinely bummed when they announced they aren't going ahead with Pebble 2 shipments because of their closure.
I bought a Pebble 2 and it was delivered just before the sale to Fitbit. It's great value for money, and I love the battery life. It's too bad they couldn't figure out a way to become more independent.
#MyBet – #Slots – #SportsBetting – #LosAngeles
I reverse into parking spaces as often as I can, but I like my gratifications like yesterday. I just enjoy showing off my mad parking skills.
Qt is really easy to start with. You can have primitive crosscompiled touchscreen application in couple days without prior experience.
They can pay in shares.
> It's more like eating a free buffet and the host asks you to listen to his annoying friends while you eat...

That already exists: a church-operated soup kitchen.
"If you want an optimized application for minimal hardware then surely HTML isn't an alternative anyway?"

That was the question on linked article. These days HTML becomes viable even on low-end hardware, it's even standard on some appliances (i.e. home routers) and this question is very common.

"Not sure I agree that QT is harder to develop and maintain, it depends on what you are used to."

General census is that writing clean C++ (QML was still lacking the last time I used Qt, though it might have changed since then) is a bit harder than creating HTML page.
What Smartphone Has the Best Camera?
The difference I see is that historically automation was used to increase productivity. I don't see that in the current wave of "AI"-based automation. There's an emphasis on speed, accuracy, and working with more unknowns, but there isn't any talk of getting more work done. That makes it scary.
I would strongly second this.

I had some down-time between jobs a couple of years back, and used it to volunteer at a charity to help out with some basic IT work.

There was some indeed an element of fixing and securing their WordPress-based website, and sorting out their AdWords campaigns. However, the vast majority of the work (by time, not by difficulty) was cleaning up crapware from Windows laptops, getting Dropbox to work correctly across their machines, and sorting out their software licences after they'd been screwed over by a shady ISV.
Would like to add Solaris (Stanislav Lem) as well. Not only Tarkovsky has directed a movie based on Solaris as well, but it definitely has that soviet russian desperate hope of ones achievable freedom. Also the sci-fi part is also very organic as it was in Roadside Picnic
I think you mean easier. Being hard (taking a lot of time) to digest is good.
Nutrition isn't a solved problem

This is very true, and a fact that we have trouble digesting, pardon the pun. This jumping around between completely contradictory nutritional prescriptions is nuts. Then a moderate minded person comes in and hedges their bets with an impossibke compromise (reduce both fat and carbs).

Meanwhile disproven myths like nutricional cholesterol still affect people's eating habits.

It just does not seem possible to doctors, health nuts and everyone else that we just dont know much about nutrition. It seems like we should and that our best theories should be reasonably certain, but they just aren't.
>The report linked above is from Ball State University, and argues that, while manufacturing has thrived, automation has reduced the need for workers so much that lots of them have been laid off:

>Had we kept 2000-levels of productivity and applied them to 2010-levels of production, we would have required 20.9 million manufacturing workers. Instead, we employed only 12.1 million.

>The report gets summarized in a few places as “13% of job loss is due to trade, 87% is due to increasing productivity/automation”, which seems like a fair summary of some of its claims.

It's a fair summary of Michael J. Hicks and Srikant Devara's claims, but if you take a closer look at the study's model, they conflate cost savings from offshoring with cost savings from automation, which would naturally make job losses from automation seem relatively larger.

They also lobby for a reduction in corporation tax on page 7.
I'm not sure what you mean.

"Speed" is almost directly exactly analogous to "increased productivity" isn't it?

Also accuracy - reducing scrap means more can be produced with less materials in less time.

"working with more unknowns" - doing things that couldn't be done before.

These all seem to be kinds of "getting more work done".
Because one will leave you wanting more while the other one will leave you full, so you don't get (or at least get less) fat.
Why would eating processed food be bad? What does it matter if the ingredients are recognizable.
3 word locations for the whole Earth
Sure, but every process is corruptible. The point is there was absolutely no reason to create and grant a monopoly in this case.
I beg to differ. I've tried Coinhive's miner, it used all of processor's threads and making my browser unresponsive, couldn't even move mouse pointer or close the browser. Mining coins on a browser is bad for everybody involved, especially for the users.

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2018/02/13/salon-mines-...
Prehistoric wine discovered in caves forces rethink of ancient Sicilian culture
We do to an extent: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202303
>And yet we do live in a Citizens United world. Candidates do need money to win

Many of these candidates already proved that money didn't end in a win. And what does their winning matter if they can't represent your interests?

>I have my issues with the Democratic party but I don't take nearly as dim a view of them as you do. But even if I did, just opting out of the process as you suggest would just do even more to support the status quo.

War is a primary issue for me, and the status quo is basically the same voting R or D there. I'm not opting out, I'm refusing to support the current situation.
> is probably labeled accurately

> the data is bad in that it is perhaps not a representative sample of the population as a whole?

Yeah that's my thinking too
It might be easy for programmer, but try to explain cross-compilation and hardware specific optimizations for your designer or front-end developer. HTML, on the other hand, is reasonably easy for everyone.
For example Lenovo notebooks have optional battery saver regime that keeps battery charged up to 60%.
Yes, but compare that to hours in HTML5

Also consider a QT app is much harder to style and make it look good

People with HTML5 experience is much easier to find

I'm not against QT, quite the contrary, but it's a technology that has a higher entry barrier and fewer people with experience on it
The problem is not the junior developers. The problem is your lead engineer.
So there's no scientific consensus on what's healthy or not, but surely hamburgers are not healthy? Isn't that a contradiction? Hamburgers can be very healthy. Maybe that's why people make such eating decisions--there isn't enough good information and everyone thinks they have it figured out when they don't.
Back in my academia years, I was really frustrated with that group of researchers, "cult of power law" I called them - mainly centered around Santa Fe Institute.

In all their talks, the pattern was always the same:
1) take a dataset from some random system, and strip it from all its domain context ("interdisciplinary" research)
2) brag about being a "physicist" thus applying a "physicist's" approach to new areas of research
3) plot data on log-log scale - kind of looks like a power law
4) make a toy model and use it to "simulate the system"
5) plot simulation vs real data on log-log scale -- kinda look the same
6) promise that your trivial little model will reveal whole new horizons for that field you know nothing about - because others are stupid and you're a "physicist"
7) write a grant proposal
I think they’re asking when we can expect to see it used clinically. By analogy, vaccines are created in a lab, but they are used outside of one. Clinical CRISPR use would almost certainly require some lab work, but not really much basic science.
Who told you that I wasn't seeking help? Or that I was wasting time? You don't know anything about my situation but you are already judging it.

That's typically what can do bad remote managers. Don't ask any question, don't know details but already judged the situation. :-)
Never HAVE I EVER FUNNY