skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
She is trying to get a service going and doesn't need to deal with shit.

However, later on maybe use "Rachel" as a way to start banning "customers".

How about selected comments are attached to their videos as metatext :-) ?

There needs to be less internet witch hunts and more corrective action.

On the internet, response goes from 0 to 100 with no steps in between.

Its either ignored in the hope anti-social behavior gets corrected or it turns into a full on witch hunt of internet shaming.

I really wish Google would age out search results on people.
Fair enough, so don’t publish them. If you can’t replicate results, it really isn’t science.
Awesome.

A related thread from two days ago for those who missed it:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16372454
This advice also applies to more advance mathematics at the high school level, such as AP calculus BC or even linear algebra.

Source: have followed this technique indirectly for the past few months
Here is a Chrome Extension that adds back View Image button: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/view-image-button-...
If you read your own link, you'd find a strawman is refuting "an argument that was not presented by that opponent". Can you tell me how that applies to the post above?
TBH, the problem is they put this stuff in the checkout dialogue. They could put it on posters etc, but they put it in the way of the purchasing utility (checkout) so you can't avoid it. and it gets in the way, slows you down.
At least on iPhone, one can view images using 3D touch. I guess long press should do the trick on other touch devices??
Also, residents of East Nowhere tend to carry guns and shorten the careers of professional muggers dramatically.
money doubling is a tried and tested scam. They used to do it a lot in EVE Online. You don't just have one mark and that's how it worked. Likely he was doing lots of money doubling with others that was feeding this one to finally get the $200 million. Its possible he even transitioned this particular mark into a different scam where he just got direct access to their funds and was able to sign stuff off without authorization.
You're proudly declaring how easily you are manipulated.
Real Time Apps with TypeScript: Integrating Web Sockets, Node and Angular
> Republican voters will forgive every outrage because they've been brainwashed.

"It's only an utterly rigged primary, nothing to get your panties in a bunch over.", "I swear none of the records I destroyed after generating them illegally were sensitive or scandalous", "Come on guys, I didn't sell that much uranium to Russia at cut rates.", "If it weren't for that stupid video that nobody watched, nobody would've attacked the facilities in Benghazi", "It's perfectly okay that Clinton Foundation money marked for assistance to Haitians was instead used to fund my daughter's wedding."

Edit: or how's this for some fun: http://archive.is/ZX27N

If you think habitual (D) voters are any more reasonable and unforgiving than (R) voters, I don't think we're looking at the same country.
The NIH budget has declined 20% in the last 15 years. Not only is there a strong downward trend, but the movements in funding levels are gradual. I'd say that tripling the NIH budget is not just politically difficult, but politically impossible
Until a few weeks ago I had never bought a programming book, instead electing to learn on the job. I've noticed that since I'm not a novice programmer anymore, by far the most efficient way to learn is to use the method in the article. I've been working through K&R C and have been doing exactly what the article says--read the code, understand how it works, then write it. When it breaks, go back and learn why. After a few exercises, you'll find yourself adding your own flair and style, which is essential for your growth as a programmer. Plus, it's a much more fulfilling feeling of accomplishment when you can create something from scratch, rather than copy-pasting.
The main gem of wisdom that I took away is that we need an army of reading tutors at a very young age, like K-3. The Reading Partners group that I belong to in Dallas, TX is exactly the prescription that the doctor ordered. We allow the children we tutor to pick a book to read to them, we do some phonics teaching as to pronunciation, word meanings, and then have the student read to us. 45 minutes, usually twice a week. The only thing I'd change, if we had enough tutors, would be to make this a DAILY one-on-one until we got the child up to proficient. Nonetheless, if you want to help out in a big little way, check out Reading Partners and help a child get that reading edge... incidentally, many third world countries have already realized that we need an army of tutors to make sure no kiddos are left behind.
The 2 sets of numbers to decide if the article is accurate are:

The rate of technology failures has fallen by more than 90 percent (from .64 to .06), unsafe driving rates decreased by 25 percent (from .16 to .12). The ability of cars to analyze situations on the road and respond has barely shown improvement since the beginning of 2016. In key categories, like “incorrect behavior prediction” and “unwanted maneuver of the vehicle,” Waymo vehicles actually did worse in 2017 than in 2016.

Waymo estimated “simulated contacts,” or the number of disengagements that would have likely led to crashes. Based on these data, last reported in 2015, Google/Waymo vehicles would’ve crashed .02 times per 1,000 miles driven without testers.

Department of Transportation data show that Americans get into around 6 million crashes a year and drive around 3 trillion miles each year, implying that Waymo vehicles are 4–5 times more dangerous than human drivers.
Yeah, it was in hindsight definitely the right choice. No regrets there! I read that copy a good 4 or 5 times.
Why call `(map eval inner)`?
Its because of people being rude and aggressive that I turn off chat in the multiplayer shooter games that I play.

When I see rude chat messages, I just instantly block that person.

Its not enjoyable and it makes it hard to use chat to coordinate the team.
Am I the only one who finds this quite amusing?
It took quite a lot of knowledge what blacklists are out there and time to
check them all. It's hardly "just a few minutes to write an e-mail".
Polacode – Polaroid for your code
I agree, OO is ultimately good enough. Problem is, coding using OOP is like printing ideas on paper: you dont wanna do that because it's hard to discard ideas that's been printed on paper. You wanna use post-its instead because post-its are easy to discard. Refactoring is hard using OO and refactoring is the key difference between waterfall and good software development. Refactoring is easier, even fun, using functional programming because the medium is more malleable.
People are always so quick to jump to this line of reasoning when popular opinion agrees with them.

Would you be fine with losing your job for wrongthink if - or rather, when -
social opinion swings the other way? It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong - you should be punished for disagreeing with society!

Societal retribution for "wrongthink" is not the right answer. It's how you end up with LGBT losing their jobs where it's "wrong" to be LGBT - because the actual wrongness/rightness doesn't matter, just that society doesn't agree with them and that it's okay for society to punish them for being "wrong".
Do you still use it? If so, why?
Does wix/WordPress have the application level UX capabilities of VueJS/react before becoming a plugin writer? I find the comparison grossly disingenuous. If you were asked to write a TodoMVC in VueJS/react vs WordPress, you'd probably figure out how to start (and/or have already finished a proof of concept) in an hour with VueJS. In WordPress, you'd be 6 hours into the introduction to WordPress plugins and still unsure if a TodoMVC is possible or if WP is the right tool. If you legitimately think what people do with VueJS can be done just as well by juniors in WordPress, then you don't understand what VueJS/react actually do.
I am happy that things are finally moving in the right direction. A person stalks you and they (rightfully) get punished. {Google, Facebook, ad networks} stalk you across the net, recording information about your interests, your fears, and your secrets, without permission. And they get away with a free pass. In fact, we celebrate them as startup success stories and want to work for them.

We should at least have a choice on whether they can track us or not. And when we say 'no thank you', that should be respected.
Not sure how you can disconnect the internet. Basically would involve disconnecting all comms. Lest someone uses a modem. Then what about long distance RF?
In Canada we have Chpaters-Indigo instead of Barnes and Noble. They stock very expensive, but very attractive, home design crap (think pottery barn minus the furniture). They also sell scarves, mitts, slippers, fragrances, purses, chocolates, and children's toys. Basically a convenience store for these items, and they have a regular turn-around so they always sell new versions of all this stuff. It's working very well, and I don't know if Barnes and Noble does this too but Chapters-Indigo is actually expanding where I live. People still like going to the store for physical books-- it's something about the atmosphere-- but they definitely need a little push to stay, and another reason to be there.
State of WebAssembly in 2018: Browser support, devtools and specifications
Are we even sure they're Russian bots? If so, are we sure that they're hired by the Kremlin and not the NRA or the Yanopopoulous Youth or something?
I'd rather not run heavy opaque Ansible magic that also adds IRC bouncer and
checks kitchen sink to configure e-mail server.
The transition toward the Narrow Walled Web is almost complete, one lawsuit at a time. The last two decades were a blast, so long and thanks for all the fishes.
That's brilliantly stated. A natural first cousin to 'a lie told often enough becomes the truth'
Long address in not the only problem of IPv6. Mass adoption is also slowed by complexity of IPv6. There is rationale for this complexity (more features, more flexibility), but in most networks this complexity comes with little or no practical benefits.
What does it mean to "put driverless cars back in the slow lane"?

If it means to slow down investment, research and development, that strikes me as foolishly shortsighted. I don't think I've talked to anyone with even a modest understanding of the relevant technologies who doesn't think most driving will eventually be done by robots. Having a financial stake in those robots is reasonably likely to pay off.

If it means that robots should have to pass a driving test before being allowed on the road without adult supervision, I don't think many people would argue against that.
Why we were the first Medium publication to move 100% to Members
motivation for sharing: this talk is a weird experience with a feeling of fascination and cringe at the same time. This recording is from just over a decade ago. Yet we were unable to forecast or envision how the Web turned out at all.
That maybe I’ll get a burrito.
Ask HN: Which tools do you use at your startup?
There's nothing wrong with pumping the brakes on this a little and letting the hype bubble dissipate.

As the article states, driverless cars are involved in 4-5 times more accidents. The companies promoting these cars say that it's ok, since the driverless cars were in most cases not legally responsible for the accidents, but that misses the point that driverless cars perform unorthodox manuevers in certain situations, at least by current driving conventions, and that more people are getting hurt.

If we could identify a human behavior that was causing some people to be involved in 4-5 times more accidents, there would likely be interest in doing something about that.

It's more a case that the laws are currently designed to counter inappropriate human drivers, not inappropriate machine drivers. We don't even know what inappropriate activity by machine drivers is at this point.
> There are plenty of people who are saying implicitly

I understand you think they are saying all men, but unless you can read minds over the Internet, that’s just your opinion.

But more than that, saying “men are sexist” does NOT imply “all men”. It means “a large-enough-to-be-generalized number of men are exist”.

If you think it means literally all men (and hence feel attacked by it), in my opinion, on some level, you are sexist and are just trying to avoid discomfort/guilt by spouting #NotAllMen.
We're not quite ready yet, but later in the year, you should check out Rust and wasm. We explicitly are interested in catering to the "am super intimidated by it" case. Right now, it all works, but is not super nice to use; it's under really heavy development though!
I was called racist, even in person. It was always for fun from both parts. So it might be ok, although in 99% of online "bad behavior" is actual bad behavior.
>What's the reasoning behind that?

They want you to be at each others throats. Same reason they assisted brexit.
Yep. Some employers are really good to their employees, even if they do layoffs and downsizing. One place I worked had an employee with terminal cancer, in the later stage he told them he'd never be able to come back to work but they kept him on the payroll anyway so he didn't lose his health insurance, right up until the day he died. Doesn't mean they didn't also close unprofitable locations and lay employees off sometimes too.

Businesses are cold-hearted machines, but they are staffed by humans. And sometimes those humans make good decisions.
Black Mirror did an episode on the consequences of voting for truth. Or was that The Orville? In any case, Lott is using data to support the unpopular side of the gun control debate. It is not surprising to find a gazillion hit pieces undermining his character and credentials. None of which erodes his data.

His research was one of the reasons I moved my family to the suburbs where violent crimes are excessively rare and committed predominantly by visitors from the urban centers.
>passport or equivalent

there is a big difference between passport and normal ID, EU citizens dont need passports.
GC interaction is not needed for DOM stuff. That was originally the case, but the "host bindings" proposal lets it shed that dependency. I pasted a link downthread.
> And then when it goes wrong you're violating array bounds which is a crashable offense.

Why is this a crashable offense? Probably a bit naive as a C# application developer, not a system developer, but shouldn't all this code be in the equivalent of a try/catch? If it throws an out-of-bounds error, just log the error and return, rendering what you've got.
AI-Moderators Fighting AI-Generated Porn: Harbinger of the Fake News Apocalypse
I'm reminded of a quote from the show, "Peaky Blinders":

Tommy: "Why do you fuck with people when it serves no purpose?"

Tatiana Petrovna: "In Russia, because we were bored. In England, because we don't know how to stop."

Knowing a group of Russians (and calling them friends), this quote seemed so apt.
Anecdotally, I am completely unable to work at home. I need an office, or a cafe, or some space away from my personal private spaces. Keeps me accountable, and removes a large class of distractions that (from experience) I would be unable to resist.
Bookmark Applet:

https://d3vr.github.io/viewimage/
Its absolutely to sow division and partisanship. Other analyses of Russian-bot propaganda during the presidential campaign showed that while the majority of content was targeted at conservative leaning positions, there was pro-Clinton content as well.

Russia certainly was hoping for a weak-on-Russia Trump to win the election, but just as important to their aims is to create discord in American domestic politics. If a country is entirely preoccupied with issues and perceived enemies at home, they won't have the focus or political willpower to interfere with Russian plans on an international stage.
Pride cometh before the fall.
It's apparently legitimately affiliated with RealClearPolitics.
On a positive note: Harvey Wienstein issue broke in September and October and there has been a lot of WM-behaving-badly who have lost their jobs as a result.
Search engines which still allow to open images directly:

DuckDuckGo: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=google+ceo&t=hg&iax=images&ia=imag...

Bing: https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Google+Ceo

Qwant: https://www.qwant.com/?q=google%20ceo&t=images

Yandex: https://yandex.com/images/search?text=google%20ceo
Even if it were the same schools, year after year?
Yeah, you are.

I'm saying that this crash _also_ applies to vowels with one form.

র‌ু was the original Bengali crash, and that has two forms. I'm saying it's less likely to be related to the zwnj-vowel interaction because it also occurs for vowels where such interaction doesn't exist.
Your personal views should not affect your employment. Take your facism elsewhere.
RUSS v6.1 released – Services for Unix/Linux
I'm not sure that accounts on sexual harassment alone can be used to argue that being a female tech-person is a less pleasant experience than being a male tech-person. Women do experience more sexual harassment in tech industry than men but they do not experience more harassment or workplace bullying overall. The harassment that is not of sexual nature is not necessarily less upsetting than sexual harassment. In fact the opposite might be the case:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bullies-work/workplace-bu...
I’m a 24-year-old female

Could've stopped the article right there. No more justification needed.
> China is solving this problem

China is run by a authoritarian oligarchy that wants to suppress any challenge to it's power. The planned "social credit" system is part of that suppression.

FYI, this oligarchy has a list of "perils" that include:

> “Western constitutional democracy”; others included promoting “universal values” of human rights, Western-inspired notions of media independence and civic participation [1]

It's not trying to solve your problem with people's online lack of manners, and any imputation to the contrary is part of a smokescreen.

> It's a solution... but i'm not sure if it's the right one

It's the wrong solution, full stop.

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/world/asia/chinas-new-lead...
{ * unless the man is the US President }
There is also mail-in-a-box: https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox
Feedback welcome, here or via the contact.
Proof assistants are not magically bug-free.

As others have said, an exhaustive model checker failing to find a counterexample is a proof. That you trust proofs more because you haven't yet seen a bug in a proof assistant speaks only to your personal experience, not to any logical truism.

(That said, most models are not finite, and thus cannot be exhaustively checked. This is where proof systems do have a leg up. But that has nothing to do with bugs or representation of the system under test.)
A | B and A + B are only "the same" (but not identical) if A and B are disjoint (i.e. there is no value that is in both types). That's why + is also called disjoint union. You can simulate + with | by introducing artificial tags to make A and B disjoint, but in the end they are different operations. TypeScript doesn't really have first-class support for sum types because it needs to remain interoperable with JavaScript, so this simulation is the closest you are going to get.
Just like any large company there is a huge variety of work being done and varying degrees of competency among employees. Sure, there are some people who fit your description, but there are also lots of people doing cutting edge work that is absolutely impressive.
Confirmed works in Firefox (Nightly) via the “Chrome Store Foxified” add-on (which lets you install Chrome extensions) https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/chrome-store-...
Glossing over the "real lisp" part ;-)

Struggled to start with, sure. But ultimately for me those are the best parts. Immutability particularly. It takes a few weeks learn how to solve problems again but I do think it makes things simpler and removes a nice category of bugs.

Actually maybe Java interop was the best part. Without that I doubt we could have picked up Clojure. It's far less true today but this was almost 6 years ago. Back then knowing there would be a library, even if we had to quickly wrap it was essential.
If you use Firefox or Chrome you can change default font sizes in preferences on a per-language basis. You can also change the default font used. It's pretty useful, lets me replace shitty system fonts with better ones and also bump up the size for Chinese.

It does not apply to text using absolute font-sizes however, just text that uses things like font-size:medium (or inherits the document default font size, which is also medium)
>they are not doing it for the greater good, they are trying to find a competitive edge

thats just fine. they don't really need to publish anything, but if they do want to publish it, it should be done in a way other people can reproduce their findings.
You know VueJS has multiple react native alternatives (both the native performance kind and the native look and feel kind and an actual bridge library to react native itself and also support from NativeScript)? I admit that VueJS is probably a minimum of 12 months of maturity behind react at this time, but at least do your research.
MIT Self-Driving Cars: Sacha Arnoud, Waymo
Blaming the executive here makes sense. But saying the "company deserves to fail" ignores the livelihoods of everyone below that person in the hierarchy, who gets fired because mgmt has different incentives than the workers.
you and me man but the client verifies the server has a certificate at least according to https://github.com/thibauts/node-castv2
You do realize that half of the things you listed are demonstrably untrue for anyone with Google and critical thinking skills?
I'd love to see this.

Who could play the man?
OT-ish: for such questions there is an excellent web-app:

https://alternativeto.net/browse/search?q=unsplash

… reveals several services, but personally cannot judge. (TBH, haven't known even Unsplash -- thanks for that.)
As a kid I grew up playing video games. Around the age of 13 I switched on to online video games.
I spent too much time on games like w3/wow etc. As a kid being exposed to such an environment wasn't good at all.

After years, now being in my 30's I can totally understand how online gaming changed me and my interactions vs people that haven't played online games etc are completely different. I used to have a complete disregard about anything in life, I wouldn't mind saying to someone 'get cancer', which is quite awful. Only now that I grew up and reduced my online presence by a lot, also understood that life is life and games are games, I understand how awful of a thing is to wish cancer to someone or even joke about that. People losing families and friends over that thing and I used to just have it as a word.

I can't blame it on my parents either. They tried their best and they gave me everything they could. If it wasn't for them I would be a total loss I guess. Its just that they couldn't stop me from playing videogames or convert my life into videogames. That thing was like a junk during my teens.

That said online games definitely helped me mature as well, I mean its not all bad, I definitely got some good values out of interacting in online video games, and some bad.

Just wanted to bring my personal experience on the matter and what you commented.
I wish any news commentary about Twitter or Facebook or similar would include a big disclaimer about the 1% rule and sampling bias.
I've not used sieve, but afaik fastmail supports sieve, and according to this:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5173

It might be possible to match on non-empty text/plain?