> Raiden is a comprehensive implementation

Is the lone implementation which is still on testnet and no ecosystem surrounding it.

> ERC20 tokens, something that Bitcoin doesn't even have.

Bitcoin has no interest in implementing an equivalent as a layer-1 feature. This should be a surprise to no one. Off-chain scaling is the official direction of the Bitcoin community. There's no interest in adding bloat to the layer 1 protocol. Ethereum is the "everything including the kitchen sink" approach. Anyways, saying Bitcoin does'nt have ERC20 is factually incorrect: Rootstock implements ERC20 tokens as a second layer network.

> Your information is incorrect. Ethereum's proof of stake is close to complete conceptually and the first version

It's not any where near complete, which is why the difficulty bomb was rolled back (which in and of itself is hilarious -- Ethereum only pretends to be decentralized).

> Vitalik Buterin addressed how the Nothing at Stake problem can be solved in 2014

He described how to solve it 4 years ago, yet they still can't release even a hybrid PoS solution. Slasher does not solve the nothing at stake problem, it merely obfuscates it. Long range attacks are still possible.

I noticed you completely glossed over how PoS systems will agree on randomness. Good luck. I'm sure it's just another 4 years away.

> Bitcoin's lack of Turing Completeness at the base layer is a critical weakness that limits the range of second layer solutions that are possible.

Lack of Turing Completeness is a feature and intentional. If you want a general purpose distributed computer use rootstock. Which, by the way, is 100% compatible with the Eth VM.

> Sharding enables massive scaling while preserving the ability for consumer grade nodes to contribute to validation.

That's cute. Ethereum doesn't even have any "consumer grade" nodes today. Anyways, sounds like you're taking the long way around to agreeing with me: Sharding sacrifices security.

> That is highly misleading. SSDs have been syncing fine. HDDs have been having syncing problems,

Again, taking the long way around to agreeing with me. A full archive node currently requires a 400GB SSD! You're only option is to run a light node, which further contributes to your networks centralization.

> Disingenuous FUD.

Eh, you'll see. The monolithic approach of Ethereum is very naive.

> with 30X more developers working on it than the next most active platform

Easily proved false, anyone reading can take a look at the respective github repos. Bitcoin currently has over 550 contributors, Ethereum only has 200. Bitcoin has over 16k commits. Ethereum has only 9k. This doesn't even take into account the larger ecosystem of software Bitcoin has.

> Ethereum is the primary Dapp platform,

A little early to make any of these claims...the only popular Dapp in recent memory is cryptokitties and it brought the Ethereum network to its knees. Anyways, like I've said, Bitcoin has a fully compatible Ethereum VM running as a layer 2 network.

> It has a multipronged scaling strategy that is in an advanced state of development

I wouldn't call it multipronged -- Vitalik has it all hinging on PoS and that has been officially delayed until late 2018 at best.

> dwarfs that of any other blockchain.

Well, until you look at actual commit and contributor count. Then it's clear Bitcoin has far more development happening.

> It is now the most widely used blockchain in the world, processing 3X more transactions per day than #2 Bitcoin

I mean, bitcoin is operating at capacity. I'm sure Ethereum has more spam transactions though, I agree. Saying Ethereum is the most widely used blockchain in the world his hilarious. People know Bitcoin. A small fraction of those people know Ethereum.

> And in all of these categories, its momentum is growing.

As its network continues to crumble. Best of luck. We'll reconvene when Casper finally launches...hopefully while we're still young.