skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right. I have an analogy I prefer in many of the cases where there is a clear smell of gross negligence, which does seem to be most.

Consider if a bank that takes safety deposits has accidentally given open access to their vault to the street and none of their employees or customers seem to have noticed. You will get people oblivious, you'd imagine you'd get thieves in there, but you may get people just poking their head in in sheer wonder. Then you're going to get people who are slightly more curious as to how this bewilderment came to be.

I have been that latter person on two occasions. Once when a friend was restoring an e-commerce site from a backup (including customer details) and didn't initially see what was wrong with the backup being publicly accessible until I pointed out there was a link to it where the home page might once have been.

The second involved a university network outsourced to a multinational engineering firm; a DHCP server; Windows Vista's DHCP client; the DHCP broadcast bit and a power outage. I can't remember the specifics but I realised that I could restore connectivity to people who had mysteriously lost it by responding to their DHCP requests after relaying them to the real DHCP server and repeating the response as a broadcast. I was naturally cautious and gained permission from the laptop owners. I only realised the implications of what I could have done to everybody affected on the network after the fact.

If anybody ever wants a real-world example of how a MITM attack can be carried out by somebody other than a network admin, consider what would happen if your DHCP server didn't respond in the expected way and the client was waiting for a broadcast.

It is only recently that I realise how exposed I was. I had no ill intent, but was merely seeking a better understanding of the world as opportunities arose. The latter experience is deeply important on a personal level as it turned coding from something vaguely interesting but too difficult to do anything useful into something more like a microscope, telescope or oscilloscope to me.

The problem is that intent is hard to measure. In the mock trial that plays out in my head from time to time, was I poking my head around or casing the joint? I believe that the evidence could have pointed to either.
12 Steps to Managing Docker Swarm Using Ansible
print_endline was here but someone already got it:

https://reasonml.github.io/docs/en/let-binding.html

lib/js was here

https://reasonml.github.io/docs/en/quickstart-javascript.htm...

but someone got that one too
If I am alive 2118 I will be quite ecstatic by that fact alone.

I don't mind voice command, but I don't like the privacy implications of an internet connected system that's always listening in my own home.
I've had that happen to me a few times (no collisions, fortunately, but close calls) where a driver makes a u-turn from the right lane. What on earth possesses someone to make that decision? The best I can figure is that they need the width of the entire road to do the u-turn, and they don't check the lane properly.
Why the Humanities?
Bias is an input, and almost never the fault of the person who has it. It's just the way that brains work.

Discrimination is an effect. Bias may cause discrimination, but bias in itself is not malicious.
Nice false premise there. It could easily be caused by other things.
> The parent didn't say they didn't look like rocket scientists

That's exactly what the parent said. Let me quote it for you:

> He doesn't look like a TV star, he looks like an engineer, a rocket scientist. He looks real.

The implication being that the other hosts looked fake, not like engineers or rocket scientists but like PR people.

I think you're being overly charitable here, but even if you're right and your interpretation is correct, the original phrasing lends itself towards a worse interpretation that many other people (including me) picked up on. Precise communication is especially important around areas that are problematic for tech like diversity in our workforce, so if he had meant to compliment the rocket scientists on their poise he should have said exactly that, not implying that they don't look real (unlike the older white guy who fits all the stereotypes of being a rocket scientist).
Wow, that paper needs a tl;dr.
When Design, Engineering and Mathematics Come Together
Two-Dimensional Materials for Thermal Management Applications
Seeing how a harmless comment on a man 'look[ing] like an engineer, a rocket scientist´ leads to yet another long thread about 'bias' and similar concept is worrisome. The more speech is stifled, the more people have to weigh every word, every expression before they dare to utter it for fear of being accused of violating something, somewhere, making someone feel 'harmed', the less open and welcoming society will be. Less open to new ideas and new concept, less welcoming to those who come forth with those ideas and thoughts.

It also does not mean people will actually change in such a way that they won't think someone 'looks like an engineer' or 'looks live a TV star', they just won't say it out loud. Instead they'll say it among friends they know they can trust, more vehemently than they'd have done if this type of speech were not taboo.

I can only hope that the hyper-sensitivity currently found in the public sphere will pass when enough people from enough parts of society speak up against it. If it doesn't we're in for troubled times as it touches something which lies at the core of the enlightened western society, freedom of speech and expression. Those are precious things, too precious to squander.
Sometimes, Beetles Make Toads Regret Their Meal Choice
I wasn't talking about little offenses like bumping into someone. I was talking about things like making insensitive remarks or unfairly directing negative feelings or anger at someone who doesn't deserve it or wasn't the cause of the original stress factor that led to the anger. Or maybe even worse things than that. Generally, things about which a person might come to feel some kind of deeper remorse.

I do think it's often possible to identify the first person who lost their cool or decided to project their own internal conflict onto someone else. This can sometimes turn out to be oneself.
The unspoken point in Musk's comment is that SpaceX doesn't actually care if they get these particular rockets back. They want to prove reusability, of course, but no matter the outcome they never plan to re-fly these cores. They will focus on the not-yet-flown Block 5 cores, and standardize on that going forward.

In this flight, the side boosters and center core were Blocks 3 and 4. So SpaceX definitely wants to recover the boosters, to perfect reusability, but they never intend to re-fly any of these boosters, so better to get back the one with the expensive and reusable titanium grid fins.
> I have yet heard of a any really serious bugs that can survive chlorine or just pure heat.

prions. not sure if you consider them "bugs" though.
This is unfortunately abused to hell and back by unscrupulous marketers.
No, it merely illustrates why you want your AI properly bottled up

Instead of a daemon, call it a djinn?
Just to hone in on one example, do you really not see any benefit to using Airbnb over Craigslist for short term rentals? Even in the beginning? I can argue the other side, I think quite clearly, but I first want to make sure that's actually what you're claiming because it seems so demonstrably untrue.
> VR is probably more applicable to buying items for the home, rather than clothes.

Ikeas ar app actually does a pretty good job of this. It's a bit quirky but works well enough to get an idea of how something would look in the space.
Awww yeah, go snap. Right again.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15677666
In theory I agree, but in my experience the 'IoT' bits are less reliable than the underlying physical component that's being monitored.

What's more likely? A brushless motor fails, or my wifi password changes when I replace my router, I move my router and its out of range for the pool pump, the pool pump pushes out a bad update, the pool pump company goes out of business, some IoT specific electrical component fails before the actual pump fails, or something of that nature.
Cycling isn't that great. Humans are about 10% efficient at converting food energy to power. Plants are about 10% efficient at converting sunlight to food energy. So that's 1% efficiency from solar to pedals. Once you count the fossil fuels used in farming, which I forget the numbers for, I think a motorbike works out better for greenhouse gas emissions than cycling. Electric bike is probably the best.

That's assuming you don't reduce other workouts to make up for it. So riding your e-bike to the gym defeats the purpose.
Why Musk put his $100,000 Tesla in the inaugural Falcon Heavy flight
First, forgive yourself. You examine the situation and see how the actions you took met some of your needs (which is why you took them) but not others (which is why you need to forgive).

You’re basically coming clean with yourself first so that you can be solid with the rest of the world.

The way you forgive is to understand how these actions served and how they did not and recognize that at the moment of taking them you weren’t present to the second part, or deprioritized it etc.

And you spend a minute feel the emotion associated with that lack of awareness or choice. That’s the alchemy which changes your state and the state of the world. It’s simple but I usually need to teach it face to face.

Then, after you’re clean with yourself, you can communicate with the person who you want to apologize to.

- what happened, in factual, concrete language (“in the Wednesday meeting I said I’d be surprised if your code didn’t bomb, in front of the team.”)

- what you feel in the moment of the apology. Needs to match what you actually feel (not think) or its a lie. (“I am feeling some sadness and shame.”)

- what values/universal needs did the actions not accomplish, and possibly, hoped to accomplish. You figured these in the self forgiveness part. (“I realize it’s important for me to be respectful to my peers. And inclusive. The way I want to be respected and included. These words were not either. I tried to make a joke, but forgot about the rest. I apologize, wish I hadn’t done that.” And, if your introspection had this element, “I must admit I was annoyed by the issues in your last two commits because I had to stay after hours to do fixes. My remark communicated some of that but was not clear nor constructive nor respectful.”)

Then, you can

- check if they understand (this may be too formal for casual environments but can vary from “can you tell me what you heard me say?” to “how is it for you to hear this?”)

- check if you need to make amends. (“Would you like me to have a conversation with Bob and make it clear that despite two commits with issues, I do believe that you produce good quality — because that’s what I really think — and that I’d do a code review with you?”)

The big picture is: reconnect to yourself, come clean with yourself, connect + come clean with the other. Be and make it clear that you’re in the same side.

When you are clean with yourself and have grieved (strong word but actionable even in small situations. It takes one honest sigh. ) the repercussions of the actions, you are able to own up to them because you know why you took them. Very hard to manipulate / shame / guilt.

It is based on NVC.

Edit: fixed typos.
> the knowledge we have gained about long-duration human health in space from ISS is utterly beyond price

The knowledge was valuable, but not priceless. The same data could have been gathered, many times over, with long-duration multi-member orbital missions. We could have probably gotten an interplanetary flight in, too. The staggering cost of the ISS crowded out a lot of good science.
Maybe more specifically, the value of all these networks lies in the network part. The tricky part is convincing the people that will use it to become part of the product.
+1.

It's not even inside our cities, getting between our cities is a complete mess. I'm ~15mi from the nearest big(2k pop+) city. There's zero buses that run these routes.

Getting to the large metro area? I'd burn 7 hours on the train for the same drive that takes me ~2.5 hours to go 150mi. When I have to travel into the office I literally can't make a day trip of it(train arrives at 12:30pm, leaves at 1pm) if I didn't use a car.

Steps in the right direction is the key.
Let's call it a human assisted electric motorcycle then.
My feel/understanding is that chamber design is something that gets more difficult as it increases in size (obviously), but also by combining multiple smaller chambers you only suffer minimal downsides from a reliability perspective. After all, it's not like multiple smaller chambers result in heaps of extra moving parts, so a lot of the risk of duplicating components is gone.

You're right, though, the R-7 is a fantastic achievement not only for the chambers, but also considering how many engines and pumps it has. All those spinning, moving parts are another point of failure and they're all necessary for success.
The linked article about the problems with battery storage is from 2011 and battery technology continues to change at a rapid pace that couldn’t have been predicted then. The article uses lead acid as the example of cheapest batteries that still can’t scale but science wasn’t looking to solve that st the time. I’ve see several new battery options built from simpler and more available materials. Assuming storage is viable the arguments against solar and wind don’t hold as much weight.
Wonder if it would have been >100m away had all the engines failed. One engine working may have resulted in it attempting an approach?
In addition- bicycling is incredibly energy efficient. According to the citation in this Wikipedia article it is The most effecient means of movement available! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance

You could say bicycles and vim are my favorite tools.
It must feel pretty cool to be right.
Even a car that produces no emissions would still pollute.

How? by lifting dust on the floor, aka airborne dust or particulate matter.

In cities with no street cleaning, this amounts to a large amount of pollution.
tl,dr: twitter exchange between someone online and elon musk

@highqualitysh1t
My only thought on this is "Why?"

@elonmusk
Replying to @highqualitysh1t
I love the thought of a car drifting apparently endlessly through space and perhaps being discovered by an alien race millions of years in the future
One issue is that in the United States, bicycle fatality for mile traveled is around 3-10x worse than for cars.

https://bicycleuniverse.info/bicycle-safety-almanac/

Given the prevalence of cars in the United States and the lack of protected bicycle lanes in many places, it is probably safer to go to where you want by car than by bike.
How do you prevent this phenomenon though:

https://www.xkcd.com/927/
I am trying to make a distinction between fully powered vehicles and not.

You could also make a distinction between fully protected vehicles (two tons of steel around you in the form of a car) and not.
You're already taking a huge step by not coming into the office everyday.
scope_exit is just not very idiomatic C++. If used, It's for quick'n'dirty I'm too rushed to wrap it in a class times.

It's use in C++ implies that you are worrying about something at the wrong abstraction level too.

With that though, I would think that the default > c++11 implicit noexcept is proper. Crash hard when an exception is thrown and maybe even static assert on the result of noexcept( on_exit_cb ) so that it gives a compile error, lambda's can be noexcept and c functions cannot throw(thinking fclose and friends)
It can be done with essentially a recompile as long as it's all digital, but the result won't be great. If you want to use area well, get high clock rates and power efficiency, you really need to spend a significant amount of effort on physical design.

Technically speaking, you have to worry about these things on FPGAs as well.

But FPGAs and ASICs are quite different, so you'll have to adjust the design for those differences. In fact, you may have to adjust the design when switching fabs, because of process differences and resulting standard cell library differences.
Different purposes, really. The steripen is for refilling your bottles, the straw is for drinking directly from a suspect source.

For camping I much prefer my steripen, it's far more convenient especially with multiple people. But it does require batteries and it feels breakable to me (although mine has survived some abuse with no problems) so you have to be aware that you might need to boil as a plan B. The life straw requires no power and is somewhat more packable, making it ideal for true emergency situations where you want something with maximum reliability.
Sounds like a bank or venmo type service...
Productive VR Work Environment – VSpatial
> I know people who...

First of all, anecdata doesn’t count.

> ...have been drinking unfiltered stream water for 20 years with no ill effects.

Yes, typically people who suffer ill effects are much too dead to tell you about them.
Demonstration that incognito does not make you anonymous
I made a few apps with PyQT. I certainly wouldn't do it again.
The ABC's filing cabinet kowtow to ASIO and the government was gutless
It is, in fact, extremely hard, even in theory and more so in practice, for most countries to replace most energy use with energy from renewable sources, unless we go with nuclear energy. See e.g. [1].

With world wide effort, electrical connections spanning the globe, tropical countries selling solar power to colder regions, huge and cheap energy storage facilities, we could maybe achieve that, though I'm really rather rooting for fusion, which should be economically available in only a few decades.

[1] - http://www.withouthotair.com/
What framework handles the primary key data type for you? And what frameworks in general do you think were any good in the year 2000
If BFR is as successful as Musk hopes (_especially_ around the reusability aspect), I think BFR would replace the F9 and Falcon Heavy as a lift vehicle.

If BFR is actually fully reusable it would be cheaper to launch than the F9 (due to the non-reused second stage).
Anecdotal, but I've been driving for over 2 years and no one has offered me a job. I've met women who drove for a few months and said that over 50% of the old men who got in offered them a job, obviously most of them are just coming onto them and there isn't really a serious prospect of a job, but the difference is amazing. All I get are snide remarks the smug old men think I don't pick up on.
I think the emphasis on US cities is key here. I've yet to live in a european city where a car is a requirment. Agree with you on the short term however.
There’s still no way to describe your build as code or configuration in your source repository like travis.yml, Jenkinsfile, etc. which I consider a key feature of a relatively modern CI/CD tool.

Your build and deployments are just a JSON file that you can export and import either from the web or the API.

The other parts of VSTS are obtuse. But since my chosen workflow is Kanban, it's quite easy to setup a Kanban board with WIP Limits.

What I really hate is the Wiki. It supports basic Markdown without all of the bells and whistles of Atlassian but its okay.
I don't. What's the difference between solving a problem and finding a better way of doing things?
Wiredcraft | Front-end, Backend, Mobile, DevOps | Shanghai, Shenzhen & Berlin | FT ONSITE & REMOTE, INTERNS | https://wiredcraft.com

Wiredcraft helps the largest organizations in the world design, build and grow digital solutions. Think software to run the election of Myanmar,
mobile strategy for Starbucks in China or Business Intelligence for Apple.

We care mostly about transparency and getting sh*t done. More about our culture in our playbook [1].

We're in Shanghai and Berlin, growing fast and expanding to a couple other locations in the next year.

We use React, Node.js, Docker, Ansible, Golang and Python among other things [2].

You can see all of our open positions on our website: https://wiredcraft.com/jobs

[1]: http://playbook.wiredcraft.com/article/culture/

[2]: http://playbook.wiredcraft.com/article/technologies-tools/
Pardon my French, but that’s a load of bullshit in this context. SpaceX is privately funded and only receives money from the government from the launch contracts it sells.

That amount is for Tesla and SolarCity combined. To put things into perspective, GM received a $50B bailout, Ford got almost $6B for “energy-efficient” cars, as did Nissan with $1.6B.

Finally, almost all of those are loans, tax credits and incentives, not money 'out of pocket'. The goal is always to generate more wealth than was “spent”.
> Some of it may be progress for progress' sake, but try running a machine with full-disk encryption on a Core 2 Duo, without the AES engine - the new hardware makes a lot of difference.

I have been running full-disk encryption on my Linux boxes since 2003, and the performance hit has never been significant. With an old computer, the most important thing to do with your hard disk is replacing an old hard disk with an SSD. That alone will significantly boost performance, and compared to that, encryption isn’t a significant factor.
You know, you can keep the same computer and get even more of a performance improvement by replacing the CPU (and motherboard, of course).
Maybe you've overlooked the complementary evolutionary traits of both, or perhaps it is all coincidence.
> City planners assumed everyone would have one, engineers overbuilt roads for them to the detriment of walking or biking, and businesses and residential areas are often far apart from each other.

Close. More like "rich white people had cars, rich white people control local zoning and planning decisions, ergo cities and suburbs were planned to accommodate those rich white people's cars, and then we all had to get one just to survive because density and infrastructure support dollars dropped to a point where other modes became unviable."
I don't know about others but the reasons why I bike to work have nothing to do with reducing carbon or being green or being healthy, it's simply that I find it a lot more fun to get to work by bike than drive. It actually takes 20 more minutes by bike (and that's without including the immediate shower and changing clothes afterwards) but I can get a nice workout, feel refreshed and full of energy and it feels nice to be fit (ex. taking stairs at work I don't gasp for air like my coworkers).

I don't think people will start biking unless they like the activity but lots of people simply like to drive. The problem is that even those that like to ride (or would like) aren't being encouraged to do so. I'd rather focus on improving the biking infrastructure (make separated lanes, over and/or underpass bridges for big intersections, better public transit that allows to carry bikes on board) and improve the tax situation so I don't have to pay for car-only infrastructure even if I don't use it (car-only infrastructure costs such as building and maintaining freeways is mostly payed out of property taxes, not gas taxes). That way more people will feel safer to ride, feel like they are saving money while doing it and maybe even discover that they like it.
> They don't know whats best for them if there is a user who wants something different.

Obviously. But that's not how Apple works. You do things their way, or you get an Android phone/Windows laptop. They make the choices for users, and judging by market share a very solid number of people are very content with that arrangement.
They were two feeds from two cameras on the same rocket.

Since they are on the same rocket, you see them land on the same pad.

The rockets have redundant cameras, and through a probable misconfiguration we saw two feeds from two cameras on one rocket.