skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Just to be clear, are you arguing that you worked harder/smarter than every person from your hometown who has seen less success than you?

Yeah I'm arguing that. I used to try to help these people. I spent a lot of time doing it in fact. I would try to teach people in my town about computers but was told it was "geek stuff". I would try to get them to read books but again...that's for the nerds. I'd try to tell them there's more to life than football (was told there wasn't). I would tell them that maybe it wasn't a great idea to use crystal meth (this was before they all got hooked on opiods). I'd tell them that joining the military wasn't a path to success. I would tell them that they shouldn't be afraid of people from other cultures and that maybe they could learn from them and teach what was unique to their culture.

It all fell on deaf ears or was met with overt hostility. Even when I started to become successful and it looked like maybe some of this geeky stuff was actually valuable, all I got was anger for "abandoning" my roots. So at some point I just said fuck it. They don't want help. They are lazy and afraid and if you try to help them they will bring you down too.

Fast forward 20 some years and I see very privileged, successful people (such as yourself) making very well meaning but very misguided arguments about how to help underprivileged people. Do they, I and nearly everyone else face some systematic biases? Yes!! I've hit multiple glass ceilings and currently reside at one I don't have the energy to break through. That's not the main problem though. By far the biggest thing holding people back is their own fear of trying to succeed and the lack of strength to stand up to their own community who holds them back.

I don't know your background, but if it were practical I'd suggest actually going to live with some poor people. I think you'll find it's not the "myth of meritocracy" or the "patriarchy" holding them back. It's for the most part their own bad habits. I think most people who have escaped poverty would agree.
Evaluating the Nuclear Posture Review
I'd imagine all OAuth tokens associated with an account are rolled when it's transferred.
Official Statement Regarding BitGrail Insolvency
It's not a concern for Linus, but maybe it should be? If SHA1's security properties don't matter, why was SHA1 chosen and not something faster? What about signing commits? This is affected by SHA1 collisions.
The thing is that money stands for everything else.

What do you really want? Security? Money can get you that (within limits). Identity? Money can get you that, too (again, within limits). Experiences? Money can get you those (pretty much without limit). To not have to work? Money can get you that. So no matter what you want, it's pretty easy to convince yourself that you could have that, if you only had money.

> What amount will make you satisfied?

Legend says that, when asked how much it took to be satisfied, John D. Rockefeller said, "Just a little bit more". He was the first billionaire, and the richest person in his day. If it took more for him to be satisfied, well, you're never going to have enough money to get there.

Now, as I said, this story is legend (so far as I have been able to determine). Still, the problem is that real satisfaction doesn't come from money. The best you can hope for is to have enough to provide for your needs and at least some of your wants. That's as good as it gets, because beyond that, more money doesn't seem to increase happiness/satisfaction.
S/MIME is extremely well suited for this, because it's already supported in many clients natively. You could make it possible to obtain a validated identity (e-mail validation) from a CA. Many of today's clients would natively be able to verify and trust this identity without previous key exchange.

You could still slap arbitrary additional verification on top of this - trust-on-first-use, WoT, whatever you feel like - but an attacker would first have to overcome the (relatively weak) CA validation and then the additional fancy thing, while it would be usable for normal users immediately.

The only open issue would be multiple identities and joining them. This could be fixed by sharing the key (i.e. if you generate a key on your phone, tablet and PC, you'd have to take each of the three keys and place a copy on the other two devices).
To paraphrase one of my favorite quotes (from the guy who developed Comic Sans):

If you really love the Oxford Comma you don't know much about writing and need a new hobby. If you really hate the Oxford Comma you don't know much about writing and need a new hobby.
This has several big implications:

1. Women will soon not need to go through the painful (and expensive) process of freezing eggs. (soon being when this is shown to be safe and equivalent to existing eggs). This will enable older women to have kids and solve some reproductive issues.

2. This will lead to a massive rise in availability of human eggs for scientific research, accelerating many fields. Lack of availability of eggs (as they get prioritized for other uses) restricts things like embryo research and other genetic analysis of human germline

3. Potentially this could lead to gay couples being able to have genetically descended children (obviously male couples here, but similar work on sperm is being done that could potentially enable lesbian couples to have kids too). This can be done as skin cells can be turned into pluripotent stem cells, and then maybe into the eggs (still some missing pieces in this process)
Thank you. I was (obviously) very far from a Ceph expert, and I never had to implement it, in part because we could never get a satisfactory approach to this problem. Nobody I met with had an answer, and I couldn't find one after doing quite a bit of research. However, as usual with these kinds of things, simple document reading and keyword searches won't always find you the answer -- you need to understand the technology in depth to even understand which questions to ask.

In an ideal world, we would have had multiple people to dedicate to building the kind of cluster they wanted to build. In the real world, after a dozen people left, I'm afraid they may well have ended up in a situation not much better than the University in question.
It should be pretty easy to identify this based on value of package, etc.

A driver could steal one package, but anything consistent would be quickly detected and dealt with harshly (eg, predict when a sting will be most effective and coordinate with police, etc).
Hello, that sounds useful? Wouldn't happen to have the source code somewhere?
Since we're listing issues with K9: It's pretty easy to setup if you know what you're doing, but the lack of any sort of autoconfig for non-Gmail mail servers make it very difficult to give it to a normal user and have it just work. Thunderbird has a standard autoconfig file to do this, and there is an open issue on K9 to add support for the same format, but it's been open and stagnant for years[0]

[0] https://github.com/k9mail/k-9/issues/865
Yes, but only if they are dispersed and not in a swarm. Once the agents are interacting with each other in the swarm, the usual RL methods slow down because now the 'environment' looks like it's changing every timestep (because your fellow robots are executing slightly different policies than you and your policy has been learned on the assumption of older policies).

But of course there are various RL algorithms for dealing with having multiple interacting agents, for example, for Starcraft environments (in SC, there's only one player/mouse/keyboard, true, but the idea there is that multiple-agent RL methods have the advantage of, instead of learning one giant master NN to do everything, you can let individual smaller NNs control a few or just one unit and then they can coordinate for attacks).
The article is not a very comprehensive look at what's going on. The thread running through the comments - that the case Waymo had against Uber was flimsy - is questionable.

You don't toss someone a few hundred million dollars because your case is 'flimsy', and 'winning or losing' in court is too simplistic an analysis of the impact of the lawsuit on both sides as well as their third party competitors.

The Jeong article reads like someone read Uber's submissions to the court, phrased them in common vernacular, then ignored everything that didn't fit their narrative.
Hah, ur fase is a bad comment that deserves to be flagged!

The original comment suggested part of the analysis by a reporter and lawyer who is closely following the case got something wrong because hey, they can apparently outline 8 technical trade secrets in 45 seconds by knowingly typing gibberish. The poster wondered whether they are fooling themselves in doing that. By their own words, we can answer that in affirmative as well as recognize they have not, in fact, outlined 8 trade secrets in 45 seconds.
For my use case, account sharing isn't something anyone would want to do, and I totally agree about not even thinking about using social logins (I hate them too).

The multiple sessions is a very good point that I didn't think about.

I think to properly implement passwordless logins you would end up still needing a DB lookup on each login because you would need a way to invalidate / blacklist tokens on the server side (for disabling accounts on demand).

So with that said, multiple sessions is likely a solved problem by just seeing if a token is already set for that user, and if it is, write that one back to their other device's cookies instead of generating a new one. Seems fool proof?

My reason for wanting to ditch passwords is mainly to protect users. I've coded an end to end password based login solution in like 4 different frameworks about a dozen times so I'm cool with doing it either way, but I do really think passwordless logins have real advantages outside of just eliminating crappy passwords.
If you want a card-based planner, take a look at our Hyper Plan software:
http://www.hyperplan.com

Where it differs from most other card-based planners is:

-any number of custom properties per card

-powerful visualization (layout and color your cards automatically by their properties or connectivity)

-powerful filtering

-supports dependencies between cards (including support for PERT type project scheduling)

-store different combinations of layout, coloring and filtering as 'views' you can swap between with a mouse click

-highly customizable appearance

-runs locally on Windows and Mac (which makes it very responsive) but plays nicely with DropBox
If you put that kind of money in a savings account, the bank will call you twice a day until they have made you move the money into something more profitable (for them.)
That clever bastard dropped an Oxford comma right from the very first sentence of the article.

(I understand the Times style guide advises against it. I'm still pretty sure he did it on purpose.)
> Have you dated online in a major metro within the last 2-3 years?

If that sucks, why do it? Almost everyone I know that is actively dating (major metro or no) has had better experiences meeting people through meatspace activities centered around interests than online.

Online dating seems to be the modern iteration of the singles bar scene, which sucked for much the same basic reasons.
At the end of the day, Alphabet is just another lawyer-driven company.

Gross.
Which is laughably easy to work around. We've known that for years.
> I kind of wonder what they spent all that time doing.

Putting tape over all their LEDs?
Nowadays the electronics has code in it.
‘Writing software is not difficult. Anyone can do it’

The drop out rates from programming courses suggest otherwise.
I can't wait for humanity to build an "unmanned" spaceship filled with human eggs that only get fertilized 1,000 years from now when it reaches [insert exciting destination] and then the babies are raised by AI and trained so they can populate other worlds.
Would you mind elaborating on this? What scenario are you envisioning where this is an issue? I'd caveat that with "in practice", but I'm willing to set that aside to avoid derailing the conversation into what's practical or not.
'fraid that's something else entirely. That was part of a uni assignment.

Stackly isn't public yet, and probably won't be until I finish the type-checkers.
http://up-for-grabs.net is a consistent source for open source projects that could use some help.
Nope I never have. But the best time is to negotiate for it is when you're hired. They are more likely to agree since they've already decided to hire you. At separation, they've already decided they don't want you so the only reason to offer it (besides being nice and humane) is b/c they'd be afraid of a lawsuit. Execs, VPs and some directors negotiate this in their hiring contracts as well. They call these golden parachutes. Some of the bigger companies have this stuff in their company handbook. This is what you might get by default e.g. 1 month for every year of employment etc... but it depends on the company.

The problem is that most people think, hey I'm a hard worker and I'll never get laid off, so they don't prepare in advance contractually. Otherwise you take a big risk that you can just drop into another job.. That risk changes as you get older and with the market. People harp on unions all the time but this is something they do for its members.
So all of the questions had some kind of context/primer that I'd talk about before asking them, but the actual questions were:

Priority Setting - Have you ever felt overwhelmed by the work you've been given? How do you manage the work so that it gets done on time?

Self Development - How do go about seeking feedback from those around you to facilitate your personal growth? What is something that you've learned about yourself recently that you found helpful?

Compassion - Tell me about a time where you worked with someone who was struggling, for whatever reason. What were some of the challenges? How did you go about helping them deal with their struggle?
Project crowdfunds effort to bring Allwinner VPU support to the Linux kernel
style guides are not laws and if the style guide changes it changes the meaning of the law.
This article doesn't explain why a "low-level" employee would have access to this code to begin with. Apple certainly doesn't give everyone access to everything. What role were they actually in?
It is useful to feel bad so that one can change what it is they can about their situation that causes those feelings. But to continue to feel bad beyond that, yes I completely agree, it is of no use.
YouTube and Twitch helped to create an inescapable era of provocateur culture
I think you've won the gold for the most useless comment on this thread. Congratulations, I'll take silver for this one.
This is more of a friendly compromise.

"Nice open Internet you've got there, no gatekeepers. Be a shame if something were to happen to it."
> To be clear, while we do not believe that any trade secrets made their way from Waymo to Uber, nor do we believe that Uber has used any of Waymo’s proprietary information in its self-driving technology, we are taking steps with Waymo to ensure our Lidar and software represents just our good work. [0]

> Uber didn't use any trade secrets from waymo, thats why waymo settled.

This is still unclear.

> There is no part of the uber tech stack that needs to be retired as an outcome of this case.

Honestly, no one knows for sure, everything here (including my statements) is pure conjecture. Here's the reality though - Uber did not explicitly say "we absolutely 100% did not steal trade secrets". Outside the court of law, that tells me they are going to lose something of value...to what extent, I guess only Uber knows.

[0] https://www.uber.com/newsroom/uber-waymo-settlement/
European Parliament to Rethink Daylight Saving Time
Can I connect to SQLite file over ssh? I could not manage it through the "Connect with URL"
The Kochs did literally aid and abet the Nazis:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/us/politics/father-of-koc...

Along with a significant portion of other U.S. industry, including IBM, AT&T, Coca Cola, Ford, GM, and more.

This isn't the quality of reference I'd generally provide, but it's a quick find and seems generally accurate in the basics:

http://www.ranknfile-ue.org/uen_nastybiz.html

And:

https://listverse.com/2013/10/24/10-big-business-nazi-profit...

(Several of the listed companies are in fact German, which isn't surprising. There are several American firms as well, including Kodak and Standard Oil.)

Washington Post on Ford and GM:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/n...

The IBM case is exceedingly well documented:

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/b/black-ibm.html

Getting back to the Kochs and various Nazi, anti-semitic, and Holocaust-denial elements:

Reason Magazine, almost wholly backed by the Koch Brothers, ran a Holocaust-denial special issue, and doubled down on it when called out:

https://pando.com/2014/07/24/as-reasons-editor-defends-its-r...

Regnery Press, strongly associated with Chicago School economists (it published Milton Friedman, George Stigler, F.A. Hayek, and others), and long a standard of the conservative Right and Libertarian movements, is strongly associated with the alt-right:

Regnery has become major figure in the white nationalist movement, having founded the National Policy Institute, a white supremacist “think tank,” and the Charles Martel Society, which publishes The Occidental Quarterly, a racist, anti-Semitic and pseudo-scholarly “journal.”

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/indi...
Can someone explain why these exemptions exist in the first place?
The amount necessary to employ and enable every willing capable mind on the planet in the mission of ending aging (and, subsequently, mortality). Silly to most, I'm sure.
You might have been implying this with your parenthetical but, just to say it, the irony is that the same guy created Comic Sans.
This says it all: https://i.imgur.com/fycHx.jpg
Apple doesn't even let you turn off your own wifi

https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/20/16340460/apple-ios-11-con...
This feels like Google Fiber aka something that seems easy and ripe for disruption but has many insanely complex and intertwined subproblems that prevent most new players from actually disrupting it.
At least for me the reason I’m fine with my phone is that it’s a metered connection. If it was sending that much data to the mothership you’d probably hit the ceiling on your data plan really quickly. Since my home connection doesn’t have such a ceiling it’s a bit scarier.
7 crypto projects during parental leave
Amazon to Take on UPS, FedEx via “Shipping with Amazon”
At the end of the day, it's the same reason most people go broke: they know nothing about money. Unfortunately, Money is the most important thing in the world because you can't get anything without it. And yet, it's not even a primary subject taught in k-12. Where are people supposed to go for a decent financial education? Instead k-12 teaches kids about useless butterflies and countless other things that are of lesser importance. You would think, they'd at least teach it in college. But, I know MBA graduates with 3.8 GPA who don't even know what a tax deduction is!

I recommend basic financial classes for everyone k-12, everyone should have the right to basic understanding of personal finances and basic economics.
You didn't say "responsibility", you said "personal responsibility". "Personal" implies that they should take sole responsibility for their circumstances, ignoring any other agents involved.

So, yes, it does appear you're talking about right and wrong.
The dot I was developing for today has a mute button and the LEDs show red when it's on. Pretty sure I've read that the switch disconnects the mic. Is this comment sarcastic?
"monopoly" is just a moral classification for something that is "big" now. It doesn't mean lack of competition or have any other strict definition anymore.
I have some previous experience with this.

It's okay to lose passion in the business. From a logical standpoint your best bet may be to find someone to replace you (since you clearly want to leave anyway).

The new person might decide to take the company in a different direction, liquidate, who knows. But it relieves you of the responsibility. The responsibility you have right now is to decide what is best for the company.

If you want to chat about this privately just PM me.
But a style guide in effect at the time the law was written would clearly help disambiguate the intent of the law. That being said, I'm an Oxford comma fan.
Wait, in the UK all outlets have to have physical switches. Is it not like that in the US?
But doesn't that make "storing" ambiguous? It could mean "storing" of the 3 following categories, or "storing for shipment" of the 3 following categories.
Uhmh, can anyone elaborate on exactly why someone driving perishable food should be exempt from overtime pay? Isn't it a bit ass-backwards: exactly those who need to work overtime so the food doesn't spoil are the ones who cannot get overtime? Am I reading that correctly?
(10) PAUSE IT 66
Taxes are especially pernicious for athletes. Beyond the fact that they can't structure their income to get out of the top tax brackets like those in the business world (there's no stock compensation, dividends or anything else that turns their compensation into capital gains), athletes also have to file a state return and pay taxes for every state that they work in, and away games count as work.

But it's not really taxes that are the problem. ESPN's "Broke" documentary covered it well and it's a combination of many factors. Financial literacy is high on the list. One story told in the documentary has a rookie cashing his $500k signing bonus at a check cashing store because that's the only thing he knew to do with checks. When you're underbanked, simple things like t-bills or index funds and even checking accounts are a part of a completely separate world.

The second is lifestyle. When you're new to the league, everyone is buying expensive cars, jewelry and other frivolous purchases and there's pressure to keep up. And since you're traveling with your teammates, they're your social circle as well, so expensive meals out, clubs and other distractions on the road end up costing money. And being known to have lots of money makes you a target, both for people you knew before going pro and for women who see child support as a ticket to a better life.

And the common pattern is that players live it up and don't save much in the first half of their careers and then realize that there's going to come an end to the high income stream and that they need to make it last the rest of their lives, only to find that simple, stable investments aren't going to get them to a point where they can provide for everyone they feel responsible for once they're out of the league. So they end up chasing long-shot investments that almost always result in a total loss, making the problem even worse.

Some of this isn't much different from most people in other professions. The main difference is that athletes have their prime earning years during a time in their lives where they're still financially irresponsible. I know most of my friends didn't save much during their early-to-mid 20s. We spent way too much going out to bars and clubs, bought toys that were way more than we should have been spending and basically lived paycheck-to-paycheck despite the fact that we could've been saving a bit. These guys have that same period, just with a lot more money. But whereas the rest of us get to keep earning until we retire in our 60s/70s, often with the highest salaries coming near the end, these guys have their prime earning years end, often abruptly, usually well before the age of 40.
Typically techie :)

Babies die or have extreme developmental issues without physical contact
https://www.google.hr/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/blog/bor...
U.S. Secretly Negotiated with Russians to Buy Stolen NSA Documents
Around 5 carbs per cup, which can push from 20 carbs / day cap for keto diet.