skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not a complete remake yet, right now it can just load and display cities.

> Currently a lot remains to be implemented but the basic framework is there for importing and viewing cities. Lots of stuff remains completely unimplemented such as the actual simulation, rendering of many special case tiles and buildings, support for zoom levels and anything else that exists outside of importing and viewing.
In the original article Hari doesn't claim depression is always caused by life events. Rather he says this:

"The more I investigated depression and anxiety, the more I found that, far from being caused by a spontaneously malfunctioning brain, depression and anxiety are mostly being caused by events in our lives."

Emphasis on _mostly_.

At least in the article above, Hari never claimed life events were the sole cause of depression. But he did claim---in my experience accurately---that doctors around the world push the idea that depression does have a single cause, "chemical imbalance". My doctor never asked what was going on in my life---and there was plenty. He just gave me drugs and told me I'd have to take them for the rest of my life. That story is very common, and that's why I find value in an article like Hari's. And the mischaracterization of normal human reactions to painful life events as "illness" is odious to me. It's like saying a suffocating person is "ill" because they're not doing well without oxygen.
Ah you're right, I had that mixed up. matmul should generally be the desired behavior anyway I'd think, the previous behavior of dot was a bit weird IMO, especially the behavior with a scalar. It's not backwards compatible, but I think it'd be better to prefer @/matmul in the future anyway.

I almost think it'd be nice to make matmul undefined for ranks higher than 2, since it's not really matrix multiplication and if you want to do that (or the previous behavior of dot) it can be achieved with einsum, with the advantage that you have to be a lot more explicit about what sort of tensor multiplication you want. That's probably a bit too purist though.
not sure if that's obscurity. changing the port means you have to scan the whole port range. port knocking gives you another 2-4 bytes of entropy. (a determined attacker will try all the port knocking permutations)

Seems like putting bars on the windows. You're taking a couple of well known steps to make things a little harder for an attacker.
Agreed. Nav systems usually don't do address lookup right, can't "take me to the nearest in n' out" and generally are years behind GMaps/AMaps UX.

They also don't know (unless they slurp) my contacts addresses - and I'm not going to willing give up that info.

Give me Android Auto/CarPlay and call it a day. I'm happy I can pull a lever on my steering wheel and let my phone guide me through the head-end display - esp. if I want to pull up directions not using car speaker and instead through my BT earbuds (think: night driving - kids asleep but I want step-by-step directions).
> Why is there this underlying theme that Careers are more important than Children?

Because, to a corporation and society's ruling class, all that matters is having productive workers. Having a life gets in the way of that.
Pets in the cabin seems insane to me. I'm allergic to cats and can't imagine the discomfort of cat dander circulating throughout the cabin.

Flying seems unpleasant enough with making it a petting zoo too.
Yes! I just volunteered as a parent helper to a scientist in the school program. I was gritting my teeth as the "scientist" explained that light was "pure energy".

I think people use this to mean "insubstantial" and to contrast versus matter. But that still leaves the problem of light pressure. I.e. a flashlight is like a very very weak rocket engine.
Notaries, at least in Italy, are a plague on the system.

https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/2164680...
I ran cross country and track and field with no trouble while wearing normal prescription glasses, as did several friends. I wear my glasses fairly snug, but unfortunately everyone's ear and face shape is odd in their own ways, so it might not be possible to get a secure fit that is also comfortable.

Worst case scenario: Companies make what are essentially prescription goggles, like you can see in the NBA
What you seem to think it is and what it actually is are two different things. "Sweetie" is a traditionally Deep South term of endearment or mock-endearment applicable to both genders and used almost exclusively by women. I can't remember the last time (if ever) I have seen it used by a man other than in imitation of women from the Deep South.
It's a little bit tricky with the protons, as free quarks don't exist. One could argue that the mass of free quarks is infinite, which explains hadronization: it is energetically cheaper to produce quarks out of nothing so that the quarks are not free.

What is certainly true is that, writing down the QCD Lagrangian, there is nothing which tells you the scale of the proton mass, nor the somewhat different scale of the pion mass. This is in sharp contrast to the Hydrogen case, where the masses which appear in the Lagrangian are very close to the total mass of the Hydrogen.
1. If you need a support animal, you should leave.

2. If you're allergic to a support animal, you should leave.

Why is one of those more acceptable than the other?
Fathers can take - plenty do here in NL - take a day off to mess around with junior...
Show HN: AI to quickly learn about new legislation
How is that aspect not already incorporated in what I've said?
I really don't understand the obsession with small docker final images, unless you're doing something silly like export/import and throwing away the benefits of layers. Removing temporary files from layers is great, but you get very little benefit from starting smaller. Especially so if that means your final layer is bigger. That's actually a lot worse storage-wise than having a fat base image and a bunch of tiny final layers.

I do understand the desire to omit unnecessary attack surface, but if you have a good common base image, then you're not incurring any additional storage beyond once per docker host for all the layers your images have in common.
My first run in with this was on a flight from Charlotte to St. Maarten in the Caribbean. There was a couple behind us with a "service dog" beagle. The guy was 25 and in the international med school there. There were 2 other couples on the flight, all in the same med school with "service animals". I watched them while getting their luggage, their dogs were terribly trained and jumping all over the place. I guess there is no requirement that a service animal is well behaved (outside of seeing eye dogs etc), but it was so obviously an attempt to get their animals to their temporary home for free. They all had the same, fresh out of the package, eBay "Support Dog" vest.

If you have $100,000 to go to med school, you have $250 to fly the dog properly.
I agree. It seems to be an oversimplification to say that, given the choice, women choose non-STEM jobs. There is centuries of inertia behind the expectations of males and females with regards to career choices. Over time, it is likely that these gender-based expectations will erode and only then will we see if there is true gender-dependent preference when it comes to career choices.
> If you live in a dump why not litter?

How do you think it got to be such a dump?
While SCUM has some merit, A Modest Proposal was satire at the rationalism of economics.
Oftentimes I see people with a Superman t-shirt waiting to board at the airport. Similarly to these birds, I wonder why they need a plane to fly.
Priority Bicycles: How a Startup Builds a Better Bicycle
It's actually worse now because there's no easy way to block them!
ballpark cost?
>Violence is patriotic

Surely that depends on the form and intent of the violence.
I skipped to page 12 and got "Would you like to live 1,000 years?", so I see what you mean. A tenfold lifespan increase is quite comprehensible and seems like a flat yes.
I'm actually a big fan of Vault and greatly respect/look up to the Hashicorp team :)

I think Vault can be great for teams that are sufficiently large and sophisticated on the DevOps front. I felt there was a need for more of a Heroku/1Password-style tool for teams that want a secure way to manage secrets without undertaking a big project to setup/maintain their own secrets server.
I think thats for each individual to decide for themselves.

My career is more important to me than children, because I don't particularly want to raise a child and am not intending to have any. Plus I think there are already too many people on the planet. Doesn't mean I can't love others around me.
Interesting that they chose red as the display color. One of the co-creators of Google Glass said that they initially all thought red would be good, but after trying different colors the consensus was that it was terrible. This was because there wasn't enough contrast with the background environment.

It sounds like Intel's tech is fundamentally different—they paint your retina with a laser—and this may make the background issue irrelevant. And it was certainly part of the safety pitch, which was that this is a very low-powered laser. If it had blue or green in it they couldn't make this claim.
Hey guys! We were super frustrated not being able to understand the laws, organizations, and people that affected us. With over 8,500 bills/resolutions in front of Congress and only 7% that pass on average - there was a lot to unpack (not even including the states!). So, we used our background in AI/NLP to build a product that brings government affairs into the modern world.
Apparently the CSS committee didn't have a resident Steve Jobs.

https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Round_Rects_Are_...
really nice doxygen theme!
"Speaking the language of your customer".

One, the customer is always right. This trumps all.

Two, many people (customers included) don't know what "jargon" means.
Basic YouTube SEO Guide for B2B Businesses – 21 Handshake
> If you tell certain people that you don't own snow tires because you usually commute via train and you drive maybe two days a year with snow on the ground and they'll tell you you're a menace to society and if you can't afford to go all out you shouldn't own a car.

This seems reasonable to me, is this supposed to be some absurd conclusion? A car that is out of control can easily kill people. If you don't have the equipment to safely drive your car when there's snow on the ground, drive zero days a year when there's snow on the ground. If you're risking other people's lives because you want the convenience of driving a car, yes, you're a menace to society.

> As much as people need to be considerate people also need to not be snowflakes when others are inconsiderate.

Does the word "snowflake" have a coherent meaning any more? I thought the original idea was that snowflakes were unique, which means that as an insult, it would be better placed against the person who's doing something unusual compared to the rest of society.
I started building a tool like this for internal use last year, but it was too busy to actually get something noteworthy done, now I would have to get motivated again.

The idea was to have a simple encrypted storage of markdown (or something similar, I actually prefer Asciidoc myself) files, with possible binary attachments. I wanted to build in a break-the-glass function: if something goes wrong somebody authorized can click a button at which point all alarms start ringing but the person can read the contents (perhaps after a certain time delay during which opening can be prevented).

Would be great for secrets, emergencies, and also for non-tech uses.. wills for example :)

(if someone decides to build this just let me know because I'd totally use it :P )
That sounds like expected behavior. Both users are incrementing a value of 100, which would be 101 in both cases. It's not atomic.

If User A incremented 100, and saved it down; then User B loaded this saved state and incremented 101, it'd be 102.
>The same cannot be said for cooking fats/oils and the sewer system.

In most places, that can be said. In places where it can't, you need a more comprehensive solution than "don't do that".
It depends on the org and I guess how substantive you're referring to, but there are a lot of small decisions that get made this way and those add up.
Weaker job growth, increased supply slowing Seattle apartment rent
This seems easy enough to solve: just charge people for an extra seat if they're taking an emotional support animal.

Then of course have a (strict) policy where that fee can be waived in cases of medical need.
> Sending children to day care for large amounts of their youth has been shown to be highly detrimental to their development.

Can you give me a few links on this? Our child is in daycare, and we both work.
Rod Rosenstein Should Be Fired and AG Sessions Should Step Down – Larry Klayman
> Since this led to a lot of local interpretation and variance (many -- perhaps most? -- priests were illiterate at the time) by 1000, I believe, the popes started insisting that the priests use Latin and turn their back on the audience.

It a congregation, not an audience, and in Roman practice before ~8th-9thC it was the audience whose back was to the priest. In both Eastern and Roman practice, services had both the priest and the worshippers facing East; in the East the priest was at the East end, facing the altar at far Eastern extremity, with the congregation facing the priest and altar. In Rome, the priest was at the far West, facing the altar and, beyond them, the congregation.) Later, the Eastern approach was adopted as the norm in Rome and the West (and eventually the invariable East-West orientation abandoned), but in neither were the priest and congregation facing each other as in the modern Roman mass

The universal adoption of Latin (and the Roman rite) in the West was, IIRC, driven more by Charlemagne and subsequent Emporers than the Popes.
And, to prove this point, the gender ratio is much better in STEM fields other than computing and engineering. Biology, for example, has more women graduating nowadays than men, despite the fact that a lot of biology work is actually CS (and more intellectually challenging than most software engineering jobs at tech companies, which to a large extent involve creating CRUD apps).
Is there any East/West cultural tension in Germany lingering from the country being divided for a few decades?

The US still has some undertones of North/South culture clashes and our civil war was over 150 years ago.
Also if Germany is similar to Switzerland, there's mandatory training for dog owners, and dogs are very well educated (e.g. they are not supposed to bark).

Nice thing is that kids are also taught to e.g. always ask the owner before interacting with a dog.
There are lots of "lies" told with fine art photography. I'd see a photo of a cool bird in an awesome tree and wonder how long the photographer had to wander around the woods to get close enough to a bird to photograph it that well. Then I learned the trick was to cut off a branch from a nice tree and put in on a tripod near a bird feeder with another large photo as the background. I use a similar technique with macro photography, bringing bugs into my kitchen and creating a small scene for them. Yet, even when I tell people how they were done, they're still impressed. And I'm still impressed by good bird photos, as well as photos taken with many other "tricks" I've learned.

But I think there's a clear difference in what Lik has done here and all of the other styles of tricks. It doesn't have anything to do with "in camera" vs. Photoshop. I can take an impressive photo of a spider standing on a sheet of paper, the scene I set up is more to avoid adding distracting things into the photo rather than to "lie" to the viewer. Also, virtually every photo you've seen of the Milky Way with a clear foreground view is a composite, but it's a composite of at least one, possibly two impressive photos that could stand on their own.

When you look at Lik's photo in the linked article, the individual photos are completely unimpressive in every way. The only thing that makes them impressive is the composite. The reality of it is, any rank amateur could have produced that photo. And I think that's way so many more people consider this type of "lie" worse than all of the other "lies" that appear in all types of photography.
I order material cartridges for my lab's Stratasys Connex 500. There are a lot of different materials at a lot of different pricepoints... but generally $125 - $250/kg of material.
I would expect HP to price in that range.
Sales is the hard part.
Right, I know what the term means. I'm wondering what kind of direct action he's suggesting, because "direct action" is often a euphemism for "violence".
I can't believe that in 2018, people are still upvoting posts with lines like "A woman does not equal a man, and she shouldn't.". What the fuck.

Do you have any idea how much social/cultural conditioning influences men and women's "biological" decisions to go into whatever field? I am immensely grateful to my parents, who told me that I could do anything I wanted and put me in math and science camps as a kid. I am not surprised that little girls (and boys) who are not given that kind of support don't go into "competitive" "STEM" careers.
One thing I find healthy, is that many companies beyond Tesla are trying to build this technology. Even though the story thinks the data may be suspect at this point, the competition from a variety of sources gives us good chances for some breakthroughs occurring.
This is basically southwest. Because you choose who you sit next to, people with service animals board first then people who like dogs, etc... board and sit next to them. It works really well.
Parent doesn't seem to be arguing that babies shouldn't be allowed on flights. Rather that people who don't like babies or dogs should find an alternative means of transportation.
It's as useless as bashing node.js in an unrelated conversation.
How Much Would You Pay to Cure Your Kid’s Learning Disability?
Dow plunges 1000 points
I've seen HappyOrNot terminals in airports (typically at airport restroom exits: "How clean was the restroom?"). This seems like a terrible idea from a health perspective! These terminals could be a serious vector for spreading illness, especially for people leaving a dirty restroom in a high-traffic international airport.
There is a fascinating series on Netflix right now called Animal Airport. It's about animal control that takes place at Heathrow. It's a glimpse of what goes on behind the scenes. At a few points, you'll see these "emotional support" animals (which still have to go through proper procedures). It seemed to mostly be all American travelers. You get the sense that the staff thinks they are mostly bullshit, but this is a family show and they are a bit too polite to say it in front of cameras. One of the dogs was a tiny little chihuahua (I think), which was stretching credulity for me. This dog, like most small dogs in such a situation, was already a nervous basketcase. How is that calming anyone?
How many people with allergies equates to one challenged person who requires a service pet?
Human interaction is both under- and over-rated by tech companies.

On one hand, we spam the ever-living shit out of people with email ads, push notification ads, etc to try to generate engagement.

On the other hand, we sometimes go out of our way to remove the human element from other parts of the loop: consider how rare it is to see a prominent "never ever recommend me this [show|song|book|whatever] again" button. With the massive number of potential features to choose from for finding similar pieces off content, I'd like to have more control there. Like a way to tell Spotify "I want my Discover Weekly playlist to only pull from songs that are less than 5 years old" or such.
Holy cow. Thanks so much for sharing this!
From chemical reactions (breaking chemical bonds), as opposed to nuclear reactions. There's a certain amount of energy required to shove a bunch of stable molecules together into a (more) unstable molecule (fuel, explosive). When that unstable molecule (fuel) is burned, it breaks apart into more stable products and releases the energy that was required to combine them in the first place.
I'm not who you replied to, but we're currently sitting on about 15% ie11 which is a hard no from management.
Corporations do actually discriminate against married women of child-bearing age, versus single women or women who have older children.

Fact is, having kids means taking time off. And while fathers can take time off if they want in many countries, most take less time than women so as to not interrupt their career.
Q. Hey, this won't just try to show me
more Twitter bullshit, will it?

A. No, no, no! Heh heh! It will show you
Yelp bullshit. Much better, yes?

Q. Ah... so the advertising will finally
be the kind we all yearn for?

A. Yessssss!

Wow. Thanks guys.
> Aside from a farmer in a field

While not constant, farmers probably do have cameras "pointed on them" in their fields - land surveys using aerial and satellite photo capability are common. I'm sure competitors also overfly each other's fields using drones and whatnot to keep tabs on who is growing what and when. Plus there's the fact that some farmers use drones on their own fields for a variety of reasons (though this last doesn't really count).
I think this is one of those things that "sounds true" but if we analyzed more deeply and for longer time-spans, we'd find out it's at best half-true, while the other half involves many other factors.

Not disagreeing that gender doesn't play a role in making such choices, but I think society, education, and culture play at least as big of a role. People want to be "seen" a certain way among their peers. A man doesn't want to be "seen" as a nurse, for instance...

This is not because of gender. It's a cultural/societal issue that a nurse job is not an "appropriate" job for a man. So the man "chooses" whatever is "more appropriate" for a man in his society to obtain. But was it really a true choice?
I'm not convinced that there still is that full sense of "freedom to choose" that you suggest. In your argument that genders naturally tend towards certain careers, how certain are you that you've eliminated systemic bias that may still cause inequalities in occupation and opportunity?

For example, I suspect a similar argument could have been made a few decades ago about why women tend to be nurses not doctors, or why women tend to teach only in elementary but not university settings.

For your argument to have full merit, you'd have to run an experiment in a truly unbiased, gender equal culture. One does not exist. Therefore, your argument rests largely on a hypothesis that, "see, this is the way things are and that says something about the innate nature of gender."

To really challenge yourself, take your comment and swap out gender for race. Would you still feel as comfortable to suggest that, "... where all races have the highest levels of equality of opportunity, education, and choice in the world...is that that racial effects are actually maximized. Whites tend to choose professional careers and competitive paths because they are free to choose, and Mexicans tend to choose to become gardeners and low wage workers of any kind, because they are also free to choose."

If that feels uncomfortable, then perhaps your premise needs reevaluated.
Crackme0x06 Dissected with Radare2
> If you need a support animal

People are contending the claim of "need". Nobody is seriously contesting the right to fly of service animals, as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act [1].

[1] https://adata.org/factsheet/service-animals
I think he is referring to the research work of Simon Baron-Cohen?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/belinda-parmar/sugar-and-spic...

The general conclusion being that men tend to focus on ideas and woman gravitate towards people.