skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
this reminds me of the Built to Spill song "Randy described Eternity":

>Every thousand years
This metal sphere
Ten times the size of Jupiter
Floats just a few yards past the earth
You climb on your roof
And take a swipe at it
With a single feather
Hit it once every thousand years
'Til you've worn it down
To the size of a pea
Yeah, I'd say that's a long time
But it's only half a blink
In the place you're gonna be
So I can assume I'm usually right?
For another small rust text editor project see Iota: https://github.com/gchp/iota
In case anyone is excited about spherical wheels, they have been looked at many times. They have the unappealing feature that the area of tread making contact with the road is minimized, giving bad grip and high pressure.

They are used occasionally in robotics on very hard, smooth, dry surfaces.
Meanwhile paid email clients are probably the most successful group of apps on macOS store...

But I'm sure you have analytics sources to prove your assertion :)
Wasn’t there another one in there called “ko”-something or other during the slashdot days? It’s funny how in all my years of internet, I’ve probably been reading comments by people I first read when I was much younger.
I use this site when trying to find good places to go camping. When I moved back to Chicago, I was pleasantly surprised to find a few decent stretches of night sky within a 4 hour drive from the city.
The author wrote the tutorial as he pleased. Nobody stops you from submitting a better link.
Suggestions on how to improve it?
When will the lesson be learned! You cannot reason with China when your head is in its mouth!
So then the chain continues: You need another hardware wallet to secure the seed phrase?

As someone said earlier in this thread - Hardware wallets are simply another computer that stores your private key. There is nothing inherently different about its "Hardware".
Suggestions on how to improve it? Whether it's kingdom or not, it's just a cluster name which can be anything.
Lobsters has a nice little rant on upwork's humiliating experience.

https://lobste.rs/s/e0uh2y/we_re_hiring_developer_work_on#c_...
Yes, hard lessons and the funny thing is we were oblivious to that name and paid a lot to acquire the domain name.
This whole Brexit thing is sure working out well, isn't it?
Agreed, it would be excellent to have someone with opposing views actually have a proper dialectic conversation with him. So far we've only seen rhetorical counter-arguments which accomplish very little - and have in some cases pushed him, out of necessity, into also using a more rhetorical approach.

I'm sure there are some reasonable qualms with some of his views - and further, I'd be willing to bet he'd be willing to explore them with someone who's actually offering an open conversation to discuss their concerns rather than an attack.

It's just not the common approach, especially in public dialogue.
Where is Hubble now?
Honestly, I could see HR legitimately reprimanding inflammatory statements, regardless of context, that were strong enough to get them involved. It's an escalation of a disagreement and employees should be expected to behave more professionally.
None of those are meant for locally curated, user generated content.

Bulletin doesn't compete with any of those except in the broadest sense.
Whatever happened to that giant library of scanned books that Google created?
Exactly. I hope my manager sees this article because I die a little inside every time we have to explain something we've already discussed in that meeting or previous ones because he got distracted by his laptop. Sometimes the same thing multiple times in different meetings. Sometimes even in 1:1s (tbf I'm remote so we use webcams).

If you can't pay attention to the answer to the question you just asked or the meeting you scheduled ditch the laptop or close Slack and email. The tiny things you do are picked up on by your staff.
I tend to write my blog posts under my own name. Then tend to guest post on other peoples blogs under different names if I don't want something linked to me (I actually did that for a couple years).

Now, I'm at the - I really don't care if I cause some offense level. I don't want to blow anything too out of the water I guess. However, doing an actually analysis about how violence isn't caused or even made worse by guns isn't going to be too bad in my own name.

You're welcome to guest blog on some of my other blogs (if it's a related topic lol):

https://austingwalters.com/

Have one for my company related to NLP, Sentiment, etc:

https://blog.projectpiglet.com/

Finance (haven't used in a while):

http://topfinancialadvisor.org/

And some others I guess, DM me if interested.
> I thought US monopoly laws were more about dealing with unfair profiteering off customers?

This finally seems to be starting to shift.

> What monopoly regulation would apply to a dominant market position delivering value at no cost to the user

Look at what is happening to Google in the EU.
And Intel NIC's in servers, which are doing great lately because they support extensions that allow virtual machine isolation levels in hardware. (I know a big cloud provider that uses this, but I'm not sure if they told me under NDA)
I find this pretty exciting for (hopefully; someday) wider adoption of alternative protocols:

Starting with Firefox 59, several protocols that support decentralized architectures are available for use by extensions. The white-listed protocols are:

+ Dat Project (dat://)

+ IPFS (dweb:// ipfs:// ipns://)

+ Secure Scuttlebutt (ssb://)
Men also smoked more often that women at that time.
"almost certainly" does leave room for some cases.

Also, that was a music CD with malware, not a software application. I'm sure the DRM for many games was comparable, but they still had to mind their manners somewhat.

I miss when my money mattered.
Not sure if this is their reasoning, but Haswell introduced AVX2 instructions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#Adv...)
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
DVDFab 10.0.7.9 Crack and Keygen Download Here [Lifetime]
Well okay, but there's a big difference between code and literature, which is that the end user of software doesn't read the code: the code isn't the product, it's what the code does.

It could of course be argued that in literature what is said is more important than how it is said, but at least it has to be understandable. You don't have to have a wonderful prose to be a great author, but at least people need to be able to figure out (some of) what you are saying.
Intel’s Glass House Is Definitely More Than Half Full
+1 for linode. That's what I use for DNS. Previously I used dns.he.net which is free. I highly recommend it if you don't want to pay anyone for anything.
Cannabidiol May Help Reduce Seizures for Those with Treatment Resistant Epilepsy
Cruel to the insurance company?
NonPetya ransomware forced Maersk to reinstall 4000 servers, 45000 PCs
I don't want to discount your experience and preferences. I hear and understand that you are using desktop email less frequently. I use desktop email extensively, and I suspect others do as well.

I do not know where Mozilla sourced the metric of "25 million users," but let's assume it is within the right order of magnitude. Even if that number is projected to fall, it's sufficient to warrant significant resource investment. I'd argue, as I did above, that the mission statement of Mozilla aligns well with email, so from my perspective a healthy full-time development team seems reasonable for this product category. I don't want Mozilla ceding desktop email as it did desktop browsing; and I especially don't want Mozilla by way of inaction helping cede email generally to centralized alternatives.

Your concern about desktop clients is an echo of Mozilla's challenge with web browsers—namely, they can't achieve a solid foothold on mobile because mobile is (currently) a walled garden. Until that is sorted out, Mozilla should redouble effort in the desktop space, where it is strongest. But for whatever it's worth, having not yet seen something like PAO [1] from Microsoft, I would love to see Mozilla move in that direction.

[1] http://tiamat.tsotech.com/pao
> Every DNS host I've ever used has offered full control of DNS records

Every tried to publish SSHFP records? Infoblox doesn't, seems like many of the wrapped DNS service with a cute website for customers doesn't allow publishing SSHFP records.
Yeah, this is unfortunate situation.

And getting back to Damore memo -- from what I know about large european IT companies (and I do know something), if such memo was published on some intranet in, say, Netherlands or Denmark, you will end up with some flamewar (not even guaranteed) and maybe locked thread, thats it. Nobody would be fired, and it's absolutely impossible to imagine such case resulting in nation-wide news story. Zero chance. Nobody will really pay attention, because why.

But when you have two opposing ideologies, even a symbolic victory matters. So even if the reason is just some words some random dude typed on some private intranet (lol), outrage on national scale ensues. Soldiers from both ideologies armies are recruited, downvotes fired, and we have something NYT and Wired writing articles about. Just because of some post on some corporate portal.

Good thing that this is still contained to online flamewars. Still.
You're being taken in by a basic accounting trick.

Let's suppose I buy 100 USDT on an exchange.

What Tether claims happens:

0. Bob and I own $100. Tether and Bittrex own nothing.

1. Bob sends $100 to Tether Limited.

2. Tether limited sends Bob 100 USDT. They now have $100 in their bank account.

3. Bob transfers 100 USDT to bittrex.

4. I send $100 to bittrex. I buy 100 USDT using that $100 from Bob.

5. Bob withdraws his $100 from Bittrex. I withdraw my 100 USDT from Bittrex.

6. Now, I own 100 USDT, Bob owns $100, Bittrex owns nothing.

7. Tether Limited has to hold $100 in reserve. It's not their money - it's supposed to be backing USDT. In addition to having assets of $100, they also have $100 of liabilities.

The reality:

Steps 0-6 are the same.

Step 7: Tether Limited buys a vacation to the Bahamas with their $100, and ignores the $100 liability. They are actually insolvent, and I have no recourse against them, because the Tether TOS make it very clear that I cannot redeem my USDT for USD from them.

The whole point of tether is that it is supposed to be backed 1:1 with USD in Tether Limited's accounts. They have not proven to anyone that this is actually the case. For all we know, all that money went to the Bahamas, or a Swiss bank account, and they are just issuing USDT, pocketing what people pay them for it, and keeping none of it in reserve.
Having some screenshots might be nice.
"Why build one when you can build two for twice the cost?"
If a number and the process used to arrive at a number were completely equivalent, then going through the process to arrive at the number would never be worthwhile. Yet people are often interested in actually going through these processes to generate numbers, when it's practical to do so.
The Cyber Incident Tsunami – Time to Get Ready – Online Trust Alliance
> And I agree, it's not very nice to use

That's... that feels like the road to accepting mediocrity.

> A solved problem is not a sports car, it's the 10year old car that costs 1k. Very few people want to pay for a mail client

I fully admit that I drive a '91 Ranger :). I don't know that I call it a solved problem though, because 4WD would be really nice to have in the winter.

The mail client thing is interesting re: paying for it though. I guess I technically pay for Outlook as part of my Office 365 subscription, although I don't think much of it. The really hard part for me paying for a mail client is that most of the new paid ones I've seen come out in the last couple years have all been Electron-based, and memory/battery hogs. Outlook's not much better on that front (I think the Mac one, which I use occasionally, idles at about 900MB of RAM).

Thunderbird isn't a great solution to my problem. It's just the least bad, and there doesn't seem to be anyone willing to take my money for something better.
One could argue that it offers more transparency.
Title should be "The startling potential link between elevated sugar and Alzheimer's"
My first exposure to computers was in elementary school. We had a couple Apple II computers which had Logo installed on them. We had fun typing in commands to draw Spirograph looking images on the screen.

My parents got me a Commodore 64 when it first came out. I had a tape deck to save stuff onto. When you turned on the machine you were at a BASIC prompt. It came with a manual that had some simple programs in it. One of the programs drew a piano keyboard on the screen and mapped keys to keyboard keys to let you play. I remember going through the code and changing values just to see what it did. That kind of got me started on programming.

We subscribed to a few magazines (Family Computing, BYTE, etc) that would have program listings in them, which I would sit down and type in. I would then go through the same process. What happens if I change this peek or poke command? What is GOSUB doing? What are all these numbers in the DATA section?

I got to the point where I could write my own programs, including a couple simple games using sprites and joystick controls.

I enjoyed it enough that I'm still a developer now at the age of 46 and plan on doing it for as long as I can.
U.S. ITC rejects Boeing injury claims on Bombardier
> It is 100% reasonable for me to expect that those words mean what they say.

Sure, because when someone says "put your money where your mouth is" you eat your wallet. When someone says "keep your chin up" you walk around looking at the sky.

If you ever, in your entire life, encounter someone who believes all men should be killed, do you really think you're gonna notice their "Kill All Men" pin before they get you?

All this nonsense about "I believe those words" is bananas to me. Get out of here.
#speakURtruth UR Enough Campaign Teaser
Things I think I know about Cryptography
Anyone else reminded of the The Laundry Files series by Charles Stross? Am now expecting ICOs for occult based startups . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Laundry_Files
Meltdown and Spectre Patching Has Been a Total Train Wreck
a $10,000 median annual income is higher than I would have guessed for a saturated, hit-based industry.

I suspect the only reason this income is listed that entirely failed writers aren't included. And I suspect there are more failed (or "aspiring") writers with zero income than all the successful writers put together.

The article's only story is that successful romance writers are getting substantially more than they used to (it seems demand for romance novels has increased for cultural or cyclical reasons). But trying to be writer is a less reliable way to survive than an average sketchy gig where you get paid on a semi-regular basis.

The whole thing is in the "they made it, why can't you" genre.
It's not bizarre at all when you have decades of research on your side. We know that taking the human out of the equation reduces their response times and awareness dramatically. This isn't a new area of research.
Intel CEO: New chips will have built-in protections against Meltdown, Spectre
Yup, and mr. Soros is such a nice guy.
It's manipulating the society a bad thing, not the tools the bad guys use.
Social media democratized manipulating the society, made it cheaper, that's all.
> But you can't have your cake and eat it too. Google and the recent crop of SV startups are what they are, we hear, because they don't have the culture of of the stodgy old multinationals

You could just as easily say they were successful despite this or that aspect of their company culture.
I've wondered about this. It's interesting that no matter how powerful the function, this sort of thing can always be done.
iPhone SE 2 Rumored for Late Spring Launch with Wireless Charging Support
Email me, we're hiring and happy to go remote.
You may be right, I coulda sworn it was showing amounts at some point in time
Good idea. Or even just make mutiples of the rare/expensive/long-lead-time components, optimize for a second build rather than actually build two.

Better still, use a swarm of cheap unreliable satellites for the same function (often not possible)
U.S trade body backs Bombardier against Boeing
Its used in alot more industry than just web design. I've seen it used for both robotics and ML as well. If I'm still writing server side code for the foreseeable future, I'd like to practice skills in a language that can translate to other uses, whether that's python or javascript via node.js
Finally, a full time developer on Thuderbird? What was it all thsi time, zero fulltime developers? Embarrassing!
Google is not a charity, but their core business - Search - depends on the web having content they can index. This is a play to defend their existing business, not a revenue opportunity.

I think AMP is a good thing for the mobile web. It makes web pages actually usable. People get a bit wound up about the fact that Google hosts the content on their CDN, but there is always a real URL backing it, the content isn't locked into Google's platform.
I like http://www.moonofalabama.org/ and https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/
That this is even a sentence one can utter is :face-palm:
On the plus side, do you really want to communicate with anyone who uses a SBCGlobal email address?
That's partially why I like the idea (if not the implementation, apparently) of Mr. Yuck and his friend that I just learned about, Mr. Ouch [0]. To me, it looks like he gets the point across pretty well-- come near here and die. There's no need for left-to-right reading and the cause and effect are in one clear image.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Ouch]
Unbound is pretty slick as well. Not sure if dnsmasq supports DNSSEC, but unbound does.
PyCUDA is more of a wrapper type, performance won't be good compared to native cuda.
Legacy and greed.
Happy to see that Mozilla was serious about their intentions to extend the WebExtensions API in post-57 Firefox. I'm also happily surprised at the section about user notification of extension overrides; having a nice UI for this sort of thing is a difficult yet worthwhile problem (and I'm also a big fan of the new Preferences tab in general, it works far better than the old popup window). Hopefully some of this will make it in time for the next ESR so that people who are still on Firefox 52 ESR due to unsupported extensions will have the option to upgrade (though I don't see anything that will satisfy the vimperator users, I'm encouraged by the new mouse gesture APIs). Kudos to Mozilla for conducting this process with an eye towards keeping the security threat of addons reasonably manageable, even if the overall process is slower than we'd otherwise like.
That sort of makes sense. Lets say that you are housewife that believes female purpose is in being housewife. Automation freed up time quite a lot, but did not changed your believes about your own purpose. So what you gonna do? Doing crosswords for hours or watching tv for hours is lazy. So, you just continue to spend time on what you perceive as your purpose, to be better at it.

And maybe, Betty over the street did the above reasoning, has cleaner house and you want measure up. You wanna do right by your family. Maybe there is a piece of you that is competitive, which is pretty normal among humans, although you don't use that piece often.

For automation to really free time the women's time, the next step is needed - women finding the reasonable socially accepted thing (most people want to do socially accepted things) to do with that time. Eventually it did happened, just not right away.
My children loved to invoke googol, like most children it seems. "I want to eat googol cookies!" But I always sternly warned them it was a big number—most of their invocations pretty much entail the observable universe immediately collapsing into a black hole. Then of course they caught wind of googolplex, which is just nuts, and I keep telling them "that's nuts!" Now they're onto Graham's number, and I've run out of tools to convey how insane it is. I'm relegated to saying things like "Remember googolplex? Well that's peanuts compared to Graham's number." I don't think I'm getting through to them.
Their whitepaper's explanation of how this works is horrendously complicated. There's no way you can encode that sort of logic into a cryptocoin in a bug-free manner. Steer clear of this.
I've tried never been able to achieve this with my hands and knives.
I trained a word2vec model in the past using the EVA transcription if someone is interested: http://blog.christianperone.com/2016/01/voynich-manuscript-w...
Amos-6 was an interesting one only because it blew up in the ground days before launch. Ultimately, it was SpaceX's responsibility, but does it count as a "launch failure"?
Much, much cheaper than 25c.
They are excellent in integrating respect in communication. Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years.
What I see in Jordan Peterson is that he's not espousing an yet-another over-reaction, but a careful examination of ideas that have may have been discarded prematurely.
There are a lot of assumptions in your post and I hope my response clarifies my position.

>There are plenty of people out there teaching us about feminism. Trolling Twitter to find straw men to burn is not constructive. It's not every woman's responsibility to teach us about feminism. They get to be angry and frustrated; they don't have to be perfect ambassadors at all times.

I was not referencing Twitter, I was quoting what was in your post. I did not say anyone was responsible for teaching anyone about feminism or how they should function as ambassadors. I do not feel like I need to be educated on this matter and do not care about how ambassadors conduct themselves. However, if you put yourself out there as an ambassador, it's natural that people scrutinize things you say a bit closer than others. When people are able to say that you represent something or are a spokesperson for a cause, they are going to attach your words to it. This ties into the next quote.

> These aren't tactics. These are just people fed up with the patriarchy.

Tactics, messaging, whatever you want to call it, I'm just trying to understand the intent. If people are fed up and this is just venting, then sure, do you I guess? I personally just think it hurts the cause more than it helps it and am wondering if that's a concern or if there's something else going on.

>Mostly because I find it hard to believe anyone's actually worried about male genocide, and false outrage is like the #1 tactic in discussions like this. You can see it in other responses like "well well well, who's SEXIST now?!"

I have not expressed any concern about male genocide. I have been upfront about asking about the intended efficacy behind the type of language used in this. That's all. Assuming ill intent when it's presented upfront is a really good way to lose people who might have been otherwise agreeable to a cause.
If MS contiues the way they are going, anyone stuck using Outlook web client and has to do anything mildly advanced, like copy text, will be seeking out a desktop client.
I've been hiding any page that anyone shares: memes, animals, jokes, fails, vines, overly-partisan political, bad pop-science ("OMG look at this projector in a wristband that lets you use your iPhone in the tub!"), stupid "quizzes" that prove you're a genius, ad nauseum -- all the garbage that swamps one's FB feeds -- for the last few weeks. It's improved the quality of my feed dramatically! People do post things, it's just that you never see it because shares are so highly prioritized in the feed (anecdotal, but that's how it seems).
Sound is the next frontier for VR