skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think there is any uranium to be had there. For such heavy elements to get deposited in ore near the surface takes special circumstances, such as those of Earth.
SAML is kind of the solution that is now pretty well supported in the SaaS world. So you "just" have to setup a SAML provider with your LDAP for authentication.
The replacement machine will start pulling its data from the remaining nodes when it joins the cluster. However, it's recommended to migrate the failed node's data first if it's greater than 50MB: https://github.com/coreos/etcd/blob/master/Documentation/op-...
Not that i understood much of what you just said, but you're the first person I've seen say gravity is a push force, so i have a question.

Does it me any sense to say mass repels spacetime? So imagine a spring on the surface of a massive sphere. Imagine that you compress the spring and release it. The spring would compress outwards, the sphere not moving (especially if an another antipodean spring was set up with a compression release cycle occurring at the same time).

What if spacetime was like that spring, constantly being 'pushed' away or repelled from mass as it tries to return to an uncompressed state . The local effects would seemingly be the same, objects would travel the same curved paths through spacetime around the sphere as they would if mass was attractivly warping spacetime. Or perhaps we xould set up the conditions so that was so.

Maybe ive misunderstood, but in most depictions of gravity its a point like a bottom of a well that's sort of stretched the 'rubber sheet' of spacetime. I know it's just an analogy but almost all layman explanations show spacetime elongating as it moves closer to the mass, the elongation depicting the 'warping' of spacetime. It's possible the real maths tells a more accurate story, but to me the more correct mental picture would be to think of circles around the mass spaced at distances where crossing between them takes time=1. For the outside observer it seems time slows as you draw nearer the mass, that would suggest the circles become 'closer' or you'd cross more space per unit time. It would also suggest the outside observer would see you eventually slow to a stop but locally you continue to accelerate along the curved spacetime, so it doesn't seem to violate special relativity.

I'm not sure if mathematically space and time are treated separately, but if they're the same then thinking of mass as repelling spacetime 'outwards' from the surface of the mass seems to still work but might explain on larger scales where some of the expansion of space comes from - i.e. mass repels spacetime but the curvature this creates causes other mass to follow paths through spacetime that appear to make the two masses attract each other.

I get that im no doubt wrong but ive not seen anyone adress this possibility (probably because it wrong!) but id be interested to hear where it breaks down, as i dont see it!
They are selling the last remaining CEO production slots. They are mostly doing it by giving steep discounts on those planes for airlines that buy large numbers of NEOs. However they do not offer the 318ceo as an option to fill those slots, only the 319, 320 and 321.
I am astonished that the OP comes to his conclusion. Since when is it a good idea to:

- skip due process

- punish people on unverified accusations
> most trusted

I don't personally know anyone who actually trusts Wikipedia. Everyone uses it for sheer laziness, as they admit.
60% of the world’s saiga antelopes wiped out in three weeks
Fine...

I should have said "or" instead of "and". I think it's a valid question in the context of your code size comparison.
I thought the same until I actually tried Rust. The compiler will complain in a some places which are ok if you know what's happening. It was probably easier to implement the borrow checker that way. At the same time a lot of the error messages are very cryptic if you haven't seen them before. It is in that sense hard to please. A lot of this might become better with coming iterations though.
Do We Have a Free-Market Medical System?
Google’s Fuchsia OS on the Pixelbook: It Works It Actually Works
> I say FUD because I see helpful blog posts promoting new tools and software when they should be promoting techniques.

Please do not try to redefine the meaning of an existing term. "FUD" already
has its well-known meaning, different than what you tried to use it as:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD
It's disheartening enough to see your well-crafted bug-report go unanswered.
NPR does this. I don't like it. "... blah blah. For more on this story, Joan Smith joins us via Skype."

The sound quality is often terrible, and this being radio they could have easily done this over high quality phone.

But I'm sure NPR gets "support" from Microsoft for this.

How soon before "Joan Smith joins us via Verizon, with her LG phone."
People don't seem to understand how prohibitively expensive it is to develop new drugs and get them approved for use.
Yeah, drug companies charge huge premiums, and they don't like generic versions of their product, but with a good reason: they spend huge amounts of money not just to make the drugs, but also to make the process more efficient, and before they even know whether a product will be successful, they spent a fortune on research and development.

Take for example the case of Matuzumab, a medicine which was to be used against various forms of epidermal cancer. In 2007 a clinical trial failed and they had to give up on the idea. This company spent tens millions of dollars on the costs of this research, only for it to fail.
FDA could give overriding authority to oblige manufacturers to provide a sample to the generic manufacturers for drugs older than <x>. Of course this is bad for business.

Alternatively the generic manufacturer would have to run a phase 1 and 2 trial. (Skip requirement for phase 3)
Expensive, but much less than full R&D.
> Most popular alternatives to Wikipedia, commercial and non-commercial, work with ownership of articles, or a stricter editorial policy.

I'm currently doing an inclusionist fork of Wikipedia -- http://www.wikifork.org/mw/index.php/Main_Page . Wikifork (when I get it up and running) will have much looser policies on notability than Wikipedia has.
> best products

Agreed, somewhat, but you are conflating "product" and "architecture". I specifically meant architecture.

Intel was usually at least one process generation ahead of competitors, and often more than that. With Moore's law still going at full tilt, that meant not only more transistors, but also faster transistors, completely overwhelming the architectural deficits.

> occasional superior alternatives but "often" is kinda silly

Hmm...just off the top of my head: Motorola 68K, MicroVAX, LSI-11, SPARC, AMD 29K, Power, RISC, MIPS, Transputer, Alpha, HP-PA, ARM for desktop, Motorola 88K, Fairchild Clipper, etc.

I'd be hard-pressed to name an architecture that wasn't superior to i386. But architecture did not matter. With Moore's law no longer also getting us faster transistors, it might matter again: https://rodneybrooks.com/the-end-of-moores-law/
I read that as "it's important to understand how much we can gouge you for".

Sorry, I wouldn't even consider using a service that isn't up-front about pricing.
Mindset baggage is a valid criticism. However I think Rust is a lot noisier and less obvious about many things which you have to get accustomed to. It's a very different mindset baggage in Rust.
Visualize the development time of Git repositories
When you people will be able to scale git to accept the number of revisions Wikipedia has, and add several new ones per second with millisecond latencies, please let me know.

Also, only a programmer could think git is a friendlier interface than a wiki.

There are things that are wrong in the wiki comunity, none of which would be solved by using github instead.

Not to point out that the forking model would lead to fragmentation and GitHub is actually a privately owned for-profit platform, of course.
Marines Need to Train Against Realistic Adversaries
On top of that they explicitly lied about the connection between Bitfinex and Tether. I'd say that's a huge red flag.
I would be fine with a pretty high false positive rate when you are getting such vital and useful information.
Doesn't this depend on the universe being not entirely discrete? If the universe is entirely discrete, then it should be possible to represent the exact state of it?

In any case, I don't think it follows that an infinite amount of information is necessary to describe e.g. a dog to the extent to which it could be transferred and there being no functional difference to the copy, even though the exact state is not represented.
> Wikipedia has had a visual editor for years.

Also, it is not the lack of a visual editor that turned Wikipedia editors away. It was the projects anal notability policies. The number of wikipedia editors peaked in 2007-2008, long before the visual editor existed.
Indeed. I've had non-technical content writers feeling comfortable adding files directly to GitHub and writing Markdown in the them. Basically using it as a CMS.

Pull Requests and Branching remained confusing issues for them though.
I mean, I get it. Leftists are famous for making this point. Famous leftists of the past that turned out to be monsters responsible for millions of deaths ... deny that they were leftists. Stalin ? Not a leftist. Lenin ? Not a leftist ! Mao ? Not a leftist. Pol Pot ? Not a leftist !! Soviets ? Never any real socialist policies !

Now you are trying to make the point that Hugo Chavez ... wasn't left or right. Seriously. Does that justify a response any more than the "theory" that the Soviets weren't socialist ?

I can certainly understand why western leftists wouldn't want to be associated with Hugo Chavez these days. Amazingly, they don't seem to feel the same about Che "kill all doctors when we arrive, so the population depends on us for survival" Guevara.

Leftists have a long and sordid history of supporting monsters, even back when left actually meant left (ie. the time of the French revolution), and then abandoning them and claiming they're not really leftist when the result of -always the same now declared "not actually socialist"- policies becomes clear. I mean you wouldn't recognize the names these days, but the leftists of the French revolution ... I may recognize (some of) their accomplishments ... BUT they were loathsome monstrous mass-murderers who massacred their way through Paris, killing in estimation >20% of the whole population.

But the fact that they're unwilling to distance themselves TODAY from someone like Che Guevara, just because he's popular in a certain crowd, really tells you enough about leftists, doesn't it ?
I am yet to see any open source project subjected to the same high quality workflows as commercial propriety software targeted for high integrity computing deployment.

Could you provide an example?
StartupMate – The best 750+ Resources for Startuppers
> mandates that all new development from a simple three-story building to a 100-story skyscraper has retail at its base

This presumably drives things away from market equilibrium (a mandate wouldn't have been needed otherwise). What is it that gets to bear the cost of this? Does the cost come in the shape of, say, fewer homes, or fewer offices? Is the intent to make the city a better place, but for fewer people (compared to what a market would have done)?
Are you sure you can take a loan in the US and then pay it back overseas? That would be effectively transferring money from abroad. The whole point is to avoid that.
I’m always amused by arguments of the form “but this isn’t just a tech problem”

Well, it isn’t. You can’t take a problem that is universal to all workers in all industries as evidence that one demographic in one industry is discriminated against.

And, it is easy to generalise: Workers on one side, bosses on the other.
If you abuse the site and get banned, you can't just create a new account to keep doing the same things. Shouldn't that be obvious?
It's been a while since I haven't use wine. Actually, it's been since Steam started its push for linux support in games.

But it still happens that I will use wine for games I really want to play and which do not have linux support (it's extremely rare I want a game that bad, the last one was No Man's Sky). Being able to launch them just like a native app when I feel like playing is a huge advantage (not even sure it would work properly in a virtual machine, with its dedicated RAM and CPU limits).

So I guess my usecase for wine is "gaming fallback". Not that I speak for the majority, obviously, let see what other people have to say about it. :)
Pozzo and Lucky, a root backdoor you won't see coming
Male is relevant, since men are more drawn to being Wikipedia editors than women. it has been argued that the deletionist policies of the people running the wikipedia project put women off to a greater degree than they put men off; I've no idea whether that is true.

White isn't relevant -- it's mainly just because most native English speakers are white. I would imagine that for the Japanese Wikipedia, most editors are Japanese.
The problem here is the scale of harm and manufacturing of inert or ineffective products, not even too mention harmful ones. This is why every formulation has to be approved.

GMP etc. Requirements have been added after some scandals with tainted stuffs making people sick instead of better.

This would be not compared to mom and pop food stand but a big supermarket chain or food manufacturer.
Most OEM's do not have the money to buy ARM IP. Those that have money, i.e, Samsung, Huawei and Apple, are doing it.
AFAIK open does mean that I can fork and make whatever changes I want to the original design. I cannot use the name, but i can use everything else.
> but the value is in the fact that there is one Wikipedia

Why?
Photopea is not open source [1], it is a free SaaS. Photopea's Github repository [2] is only for bug tracking apparently.

[1] https://github.com/photopea/photopea/issues/45#issuecomment-...

[2] https://github.com/photopea/photopea
He never says he likes the way the system works, but realistically as an individual you can't change Amazon and you can't change Customs.
This is the purpose of the GPL and copyleft licenses: to create a commons that companies can't exploit in the manner you described. The problem with Android is that the parts that aren't the kernel are not copyleft. This allows vendors to shove stupid stuff in there and not release the code. If a chip spec uses copyleft correctly (e.g. no sacrificing to LGPL style things on the edges) this won't happen.
But why not actually try it then, and come back with what you got? I.e maybe he's here because they solve most of the pressing issues.

(I myself have no skin in the game either way)
The comment was edited after I posted that. Originally it said, "is the most highly-selected-for trait in tech".

It always shocks me when people silently do that to undermine someone's reply; it seems so blatantly dishonest. Do we need to make comments non-editable once they have replies?
so you agree that the state is almost always the initiator of aggression? if so, it's simply immoral to allow it to exist, just as you wouldn't allow organized crime to exist.
my opinion about the state stems fully from morality, as presented in the non-aggression principle.
As someone from a neighboring country to Denmark, this to me is a sign that their system is working.
It is. The kernel is GPL; the copyleft license protects the commons from exploitation without releasing the source code, which allows people to fix these things. It does happen to Linux userspace though because a lot of that is not copyleft (which is fine, people should decide each component themselves).
here at Liip, we usually tend to give people full access, so roles are not so relevant, except for my wish to have "billing users" so that we could create a 3rd party like cleanshelf a billing account so that they can extract only the data relevant to their service.

Beyond that I really love the usage based billing approach of Slack, where we could just give all our employees access and we get billed on how many actually use the service. Access would be managed via Google Auth or SAML.
> Suffolk County criminal intelligence detectives received a tip from a Bay Shore-based computer company regarding suspicious computer searches conducted by a recently released employee.

So I guess don't do that if you work for someone who's going to send the police to your house over it after they fire you? Not sure there's really a larger point to be made here about watchlists, surveillance, or indeed anything, considering the only element of that story which couldn't happen in 1930 is the part about Google.
Suspected by algorithm from what I understand as well. There was lacklustre human involvement in the decision-making process.

He created a world in which the children of certain countries are afraid of clear, blue skies, because it means the drones will be operating.

That's sick and totally devoid of humanity.
Hardware is whole completely domain as software. Sadly one cannot throw a hardware bug fix to github and expect mass adoption next day. Hardware cycles are way longer and the associated cost (take alone mask set!) is too high. How many users would be capable of reviewing these millions lines verilog code? Integrated circuit openess is an utopia.
Some of these techniques (like tweaking and repatenting a formula) are definitely used worldwide.
I agree with @Vorticalbox in the comments:

>(and typically white male) that is an unnecessary comment. Sex or gender,
>even if they are the majority, has very little to do with the way wiki works.
>
>Even the minority groups will act the same way.

I would go further and say that it probably depends on what article you are editing as to what gender/ethnicity causes "disappointment and annoyance". I have no idea why it is suddenly popular (and not disputed) to make remarks like this in otherwise good articles.

That said, I think some of the ideas in this blog are not correct. One of Wikipedia's benefits is that it is consolidated into one effort, rather than many forks and a major distributed effort. Also as a number of comments have suggested, PR's can sit for a while before being rejected depending on how active a repository is. Other than having to use wiki markup (which in my opinion is confusing and terrible), there's a reasonably low entry barrier for contributers to jump over. Expecting people to use a form of Git (even with a UI) could end up being a lot of hassle.
This is the first time i see this word so I'm thankful.
they can falsely diagnose the wrong type of cancer?
My personal feelings about getting 3 years of solitary for marijuana possession are that I got screwed because of a failed social experiment, to be honest.
My solution has always been to use a VPN, not just on an untrusted network but on any wireless network (for any comms using an insecure protocol any wireless network, even one run by yourself to the highest standards, is an untrusted network anyway). When WEP was broken it didn't affect me because the WLAN was just a transport and my traffic was protected by the VPN. When WPA was broken it didn't affect me because the WLAN was just a transport and my traffic was protected by the VPN.

Of course this creates two problems which make it impractical for the man-on-the-street: choosing the solution and host (in my case OpenVPN with end-points running on my home network and a hosted VM as a backup in case that link is down) and keeping yourself (your server, your client, your configuration) up-to-date as new exploits are found. But I'm not a man-on-the-street in this instance so it works for me. There are a number of solutions that claim to provide out-of-the-box methods that the untrained can use without any effort, but there is still the "which service do I trust?" issue to contend with from both security and reliability points of view.

A side problem is client support on devices, particularly mobile phones, though from my selfish PoV that is a lot easier now: OpenVPN seems reliable on my Android devices, Windows Phone is effectively dead, and I never had an iDevice so haven't needed to care. The final problem is a human one: remembering to turn it on if you don't have ti on all the time automatically.

The same works when providing wireless access to or via a network you care about, such as wireless access in an office environment. The access point could be left as open as open can be (though security in depth: there is no harm in turning WPA2 on as an extra layer of protection) but don't let it route anything that doesn't look like your VPN traffic and let the VPN handle security.

If you need to provide wireless access for guests (visiting clients for instance) have a separate WLAN with all the usual protections that doesn't route to your other local network legs at all (without going out and back in via a VPN of course). Beyond that, their security is their problem.
S04E03
This is illegal right? Warner Bros. had an FTC settlement because they paid youtubers for video game reviews, and that fact wasn't disclosed by many of the youtubers.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/07/warne...
Because the compute power for consumer CPU nowadays is good enough, the effort has been in reducing energy consumption. But if you look at the server / workstation side, you can get 20+ cores in a single dice.
No you're conflating two different issues here. An open architecture with a copyleft license would be resistant to the abuse you just identified. An open architecture that allows closed changes would do what you're saying, and is the major fault of Android.
I rarely had problems with customers using a credit card. Had to be sub $10k/month otherwise we did an invoice. Invoice weren't difficult, just required a little more effort.
JSON Schema
This resonates so well with Engineering in an unexpected way for me: the "production" version is orders of magnitude harder than the prototype. I kist expected it to be plainly harder.

I'm not talking just about programming. At my University I used to make robot arms and RC stuff with my classmates. Polystyrene, Arduino and a lot of duck tape were our friends, winning even a NASA competition. It was actually quite fun and fairly easy.

After finishing and while I was freelancing, I tried to take it to the next level. Once you get to rigid pieces and tight couplings, there is a huge amount of details and gears that I don't even know how to start searching for. What I learned at my University (Industrial Engineering) won't work as well, since I am not ready to order 10000s of pieces.
Maybe it is time to rethink how computers are built?
For example, that the kernel is running on a dedicated cpu, with dedicated cache and memory.
It looked more like reading material, aka a blog post, and the guidelines explicitly say that those aren't Show HNs. Tutorials are borderline, but tend mostly to fall on the wrong side as well.
Estimations are that 28 unknown individuals were killed for every 1 targeted 'suspected' militant.

https://reprieve.org.uk/press/2014_11_25_us_drone_strikes_ki...

Not a good track record no matter how you try to spin it.
Best Online Project Management Resources: A List of 100 Useful Tools