skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If this is rhetorical, and you know the answers, do share. Because I have no idea. It sounds like you do?

Additionally: why are those numbers relevant? Just for context?
Thanks for this, and for recommending going straight to the paper. It's vastly more readable than most of the simplified explanations of the attack.
You will notice over time how Stoicism is actually philosophy, it grows on and with you through the years. I know you did not mean it deeply but it is not self-help, no need to leave it behind after you finish your readings; and it's okay if you see it as self-help too though, no dead classical greek dude will come after you to question it :-)
So you're saying those "outraged" parents don't like it either and don't like to see people freeloading and not taking their share of the pain? They're "outraged" because some people are getting off scott-free?
Most critiques of "self-help" books ring hollow if you've actually read any of the lampooned works. I feel that authors of such critiques are mostly trying to make themselves feel superior to those hapless plebs who are ready to throw themselves prostrate in front of this year's fad guru.

Count me on the side of the plebs. I've read numerous "self-help" books, including many of the ones named in this piece. And nearly all of them have useful information that has aided me. I recognize myself as deeply flawed. I would be a fool to not look for information on how to deal with that from those who have learned something about it. Are there charlatans with bad information? Sure. Does that mean I should disregard everyone with something potentially useful to share? No.
Former prison inmate here.  some stuff about books in the joint
be wary of "normal functions", aka "stateless functional components". They are always re-rendered, unlike PureComponent: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/5677
Uber Hires Former Tesla Battery Engineer for Flying Taxi Program
Fair points, but does it follow that because human communication is significantly different from animal communication, that therefore all other aspects of the human experience must be equally remote from those of animals?

I think that’s an inference too far. The parts of our brain responsible for language are quite different from those of animals, but the parts of our brains responsible for body image, sight, hearing, locomotion and emotional experience are pretty unremarkable compared to other higher mammals. Therefore it seems likely that our experience of those things is unremarkable too, at least when it comes to mammals. It’s just that we can talk about it, and they can’t
The photo seems to remind me of someone saying, "that's all you get suckers" coupled with an evil grin.
The patent helps sensitive equipment work (think like an EKG monitor) during a lightning storm.
After Logan Paul incident, Preferred YouTube videos will face further vetting
My brothers and I (we all have quite 3-4 kids) joke that kids ruin everything. It's hyperbole, but feels true a lot of the time.

They are also fun, goofy, beautiful, and potential life long friends. It's also hard to see that sometimes when you're kids are screaming at 2am and you're seeing a shitty day at work or caring for kids ahead of you.
It may have been meant as a joke but it has a purpose. but it's become a base market in several exchanges.
The code loops through an array, has side effects and returns nothing so forEach would be more descriptive IMO.

As for simple/readable it’s the same code but s/map/forEach.
I agree with your other points but, every person having one child would not even sustain the population. The birth rate per woman needed to keep the population stable is 2.1 as each parent needs to be replaced and some people will die before having children
Sounds like you were quite junior and working in an environment that didn't support remote working well, which obviously wouldn't end well. Great that you are able to take that experience and use it to help others and your organization grow remotely though, I can see why you are a people leader.
It's interesting to think that every CPU comparison benchmark online is invalid now. With these number, I wonder how AMD is shaping up to Intel?

When I bought a 7700k over the summer, I went by benchmarks which showed it over Ryzen for most non-parallel workloads. I suspect these numbers bring Ryzen much closer if not beyond. With all these old benchmarks online, CPU shoppers are likely to be misled.

Thinking further, I wonder how benchmarkers patch machines? Will they keep anti-virus enabled so that they receive the 2018-01 patch?
If your workspace is inflexible then I would say making some changes to your commute asap might be important for your well-being.

Chit chat at work wasn't always annoying and disruputive. Well maybe to some it always was, but the workplace is usually an intersection of some interesting parts of your personal community, ie the mutual suffering everyone else goes through for whatever reason, to be here in this office 8+ hours a day. Sitting around all these people existing in chairs, who in their digital worlds totally forget about the noises they're making in the real world.

Your work chit chat is what you make it, is what I'm trying to say I guess. If your office is totally extroverted and won't give anyone any peace, look around for other people who aren't into the prescribed "work culture" and work together to make one of your own. At least your work days might be better.
Did you film this yourself? What camera are you using?
It's also naive. Most of the things I have to hide are other people's secrets. Closeted people's sexual orientations, secret pregnancies and cheating, porn fetisches.. sure, none of these things are a huge problem (though illegal in some countries..), but they are vulnerabilities of the people that shared them with me, and they are not mine to disclose.

Currently that probably means to never even mention these things in combination with anything internet (unless it has strong encryption, maybe).

edit: mental health issues, drug use, compromising pictures and situations, ...
Why would you need to wait for it to confirm? Make sure to have access to liquidity so you can set the trade the second it is likely the transaction will confirm at some point. That's how the big payment processors do it.

You need liquidity to process payments on a non trivial scale, but that's par for the game for banks, credit cards companies, paypal, and everyone else in this space.

Waiting for a confirmation will do you no good anyway. No exchange accepts any less than six, which would have you take the exchange risk for over an hour. That's not a very good business case.
> In the end, the stress of remote working or working inside a cubicle is caused by the same group: everybody around you.

let me rephrase that for you

> In the end, the stress of remote working or working inside a cubicle is caused by the same group: you
Maybe. The cost-benefit of kids never really seemed to make much sense to me. Perhaps I'll live to regret it or change my mind in future. Either way, I make my bed...
I believe that the equation editor was third party coffee to which Ms never had the source code.
No kidding - their front page is literally black text on a white background.

They don't have a single person who can use Photoshop and put up a proper maintenance page? They didn't already have a failover maintenance page? This shit is Web Hosting 101 stuff from decades ago.

This is new levels of amateur idiocy.
you are correct, I actually looked it up, and meant sandy bridge (hence why I wrote "limited to those arches, or others"), but brain farted while writing.
I pretty much only read the comments and far better than I would expect.

Lots of comments why are employees not focusing on actual work versus all of the politics.

One was from someone who indicated he has no idea who the guy in one cube over voted for and the way it should be at work.

All of this Google stuff of late with Damore and this one just stresses why that is how it should be today in the US.

Work is for work.
5 reasons Kubernetes is the real deal – Opensource.com
Meaning permeates my life, regardless of any pending heat death of the universe. I can't deny this.

Nihilism thus loses its muster.
Would you please link to the original paper? Been looking for it myself
Almonds are brought up because they take up 10% of California's water (https://newrepublic.com/article/125450/heres-real-problem-al...).

A single almond takes 1.1 gallons of water (http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/02/wheres-califo...) to produce.

Any argument for limiting marijuana growing based on "it takes lots of water!" has to address why we already permit stuff like almonds to be grown in drought-prone areas.
You can't say it's a viable hedge given its extreme volatility. Africa and South America maybe, but if you're expecting dollar hyperinflation you have a very strange set of assumptions about the world.
Economics is the new alchemy, and should suffer the same fate.

There is little in it that isn't better handled within the fields of systems engineering and business management.

Agent based models are all very well, but what we really need are simulators - where people can actually get involved in virtual world and virtual nations operating under different policy settings.

Games in other words.

And if anybody fancies helping build such a set of simulation games, drop me a PM.
Correct, bookmarks/pocket are not a good UI for this.
Confirmed, I live in a mess of various "towns" around the larger Green Bay Metro area in Wisconsin. Anyone from out of the area would say I live in Green Bay, but where I live you could say is in up to three different towns. shrug
I read Shannon's original papers and have been trying to grok information theory off and on with only limited success for several years. The book "Information Theory: A Tutorial Introduction" by Stone really helped the principles sink in. For anyone who'd like a textual introduction, I highly recommend it. It's semi-technical - high-school level math helps explain much of the foundational concepts.

If you're feeling more adventurous, Cover and Thomas's textbook is the information theory bible. It's very dense but absolutely packed with insight.
Quantum? Let's start with using complex adaptive systems thinking.
Philosophically I envy animals bred for food. These animals have an objective "purpose" to their lives: provide themselves as food for humans. That's a lot more of a clear cut, virtuous vector to their lives than any human could ever wish to have.
The reason it drops the T is that the word came to Russian from French (as did so many other words). And the French word "restaurant" is pronounced with a silent 't' at the end, in the typical French way. So the cyrillic rendering of that sound ends up without a 'т' on the end.
Intentional Denial of Service – Load Testing with JMeter
Much maligned on Hacker News though it is, this is precisely the killer application that what3words is good for.

It works offline on cheap android devices with GPS for discovery, which can also be done with a satellite map. Directions via an intent into another app with nav is now built into the main apps.

In fact, it's already used for doctors finding women in labour in improvised settlements in South Africa.

Disclosure: former employee, who wishes them all the luck in the world getting people to use it!
>Yes Bitcoin Cash wouldn't have to exist if the original bitcoin just accepted the 2x blocksize increase.

the segwit2x fork was planned for AFTER the bcash/bch fork. also, there were 2 issues at the time: block size increase and segwit implementation. the segwit2x fork didn't occur, so everybody is pigeonholed into either [yes blocksize increase, no segwit] or [no blocksize increase, yes segwit]
Oh man, we went through a lot of this. We've moved to different states, not countries, but that selfish aspect of 'what happens when I get old' was definitely a topic.

I think one of the realizations that helped us was my wife's experience working in a nursing home. She gets grief all the time for not having children, meaning most of her patients do have children.

The thing is, most of their children rarely visit, or don't visit at all. Having children is no guarantee that they'll be there in the end, and once their adult, that relationship is completely different, especially in the world of cheap travel and communication that we live in.

There was lots of things that went into our decision, not all of them within our control, but ultimately we decided we should focus on our lifestyle, making good friends, and saving enough to afford and quality retirement lifestyle.
Stealing Money by Diverting Shipping Cargo Paymente
If a senior Senator from the Select Committee on Intelligence says he has been unable to get even preliminary, basic information on the impact of this program from the military, I for one believe him.

The recurring narrative sounds completely correct & shocking & egregious. It sounds like the military is operating completely out of control, with no oversight, because the Senators in charge of oversight say they can't get even basic preliminary information.

Your statement seems dangerous and misleading @willstrafach. If the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence gets nothing, not even basics, something is deeply awry. Who are the cleared representatives? Who has gone and asked serious questions? What does Wyden, who cares deeply, need to do to get whatever clearances you wishfully suggest as magic remedy here? This is fradulent bad misdirection @willstrafachs. It's all suggestion, with not a shred of backing to it.

It's an unacceptably bad and insubstantial reply to one of the most serious, can-kicked-down-the-road the longest issues, a terrible spectre still haunting us from Bush II years. This issue seems never to have been at all handled at all properly, since it's inception, and things are still fast & loose, the basic measures of oversight & responsibility seem deeply obstructed. That's a threat to Democracy, and it constantly throws into peril American trustworthiness under essential programs like EU Privacy Shield.
Yes, and some animals "think" in even more remarkable ways then humans, for instance the octopus can "think" and "see" with each of it's arms.

We fundamentally cannot comprehend how to think or see with our skin. That makes life on this planet even more amazing. So much to learn about life.
Lots of people will suggest that Altheide was disruptive in the workplace, regardless of the merits of his arguments. And he will likely experience career consequences for his actions.

But things don't change without people like Cory Altheide.
I agree that the quantum analogy is terrible but, as a physicist, I don't believe anything like a classical theory is possible for economics. At least not for getting the kinds of results that people want out of economics.

Physics is different because there are measurable fundamental laws that apply in all systems - or at least we have been able to determine some set of laws or approximate laws at scales where we can calculate useful things with them. Finding analogous fundamental laws in economics just won't be possible. There is no version of gravity or electromagnetism in economics where indivisible (or approximately indivisible) objects have known masses or charges. The closest thing you have is game theory, which is still very far from universal - I can't enumerate all the possible options available to each individual agent in an economic system and assign an objective utility to each option for a given agent. Not even a single individual can do that for themselves.

A better physics analogy, which still falls short, is the study of emergent phenomena in complex systems. When you take large numbers of objects with well-understood properties and observe them in certain environments, large scale processes can occur across the system which cannot be easily explained by the known properties of the individual components. The sum is greater than the whole and just because you find an empirical relationship of the system in one environment doesn't mean you necessarily understand anything about its behaviour in other environments. This is what is happening in economics but we don't even understand the individual components. Assuming that game theory is the correct way to understand the dynamics of individuals, we would need a more complete theory of psychology to fully describe them, which would probably require a better understanding of neuroscience, etc.
they want to be sure you know to scroll down
NEW INVENTION REVOLUTIONIZES TRIGONOMETRY
This is how I browse HN:

- middle-click on a bunch of links from the front page
- pick a tab to read
- lather, rinse, repeat
- get interrupted, leave some tabs lying around unread or to comment on later
- lather, rinse, repeat

Don't tell me which tabs I care about.
If growers are willing to break the law to grow an illegal crop, what makes you think they won't break the law to bet better yields?

Plus, in the current political climate, it feels like regulations are being struck more frequently than they are being created. And the regulations that are left have nobody to enforce them.

I don't think the legal status of the crop makes much difference.
I tend to agree that addressing the problems at the roots is better than dealing with them when they manifest in the classroom. Most of the proposals you put forward, however, boil down to a transfer of resources to high-needs communities, which is (so far) politically untenable in many places.
Not to mention all the old pages that were made entirely in Flash. Want to get back to where you left off? Have fun clicking through menus for ten minutes...
I think these two parts sum it up nicely:

> "Where Damore had argued that Google's diversity policies went too far, Altheide argued that Google was doing too little to promote workplace diversity."

> "I respectfully ask that everyone stop engaging on this thread," Ramaswamy wrote. "Google is not a debate club or a philosophy class. We are a workplace and we have an obligation to make sure our discussions remain respectful."
https://meltdownattack.com/meltdown.pdf

https://spectreattack.com/spectre.pdf
Here's the PDF: https://meltdownattack.com/meltdown.pdf (I found it extremely readable as well, adding a note on the post)
It's clearly incompetence. I suspect someone dropped a table they weren't supposed to and they started scrambling to restore a backup they've never tested and discovered it wasn't working.

Going to kraken.com tells you all you need to know about these folks, all bad.
or some owls?
Breadcake
You have never written a spec have you?

Not only is the 5% important, as every "only 5% left" tends to be, you are completely ignoring possible developer questions.
This doesn't seem like an exploit to me, it seems like saying that your WIFI AP has a security flaw because you didn't change the default password from admin/admin.

And it is worse than that, you have to have physical access to the machine. If you give a hacker physical access to a machine it's pretty much toast.

Am I missing something or is this just clickbait?
Because unconfirmed payments can be trivially rolled back.
5 practical tips to finally learn React in 2018
Not all suburbs are the same. I live in suburban Minneapolis and most things seem to work pretty well. The schools are great, the houses are fairly large and comfortable, the commutes for most people I know are not very long, the yards are big (and enjoyed), there are lots bike rail trails, and weekend summer days are full of people walking, riding, etc.

The big downside is that kids do need to be driven places, which is less true "in town", but it's not like the suburbs don't have lots of advantages too.

Even the millennials are now starting to finally get married and have kids, and guess what: they are moving to the suburbs too.

I don't begrudge anyone their preferences, but all this hipster trashing of the 'burbs just flies in the face of what most families actual want.
Do you offer visa sponsorship?
Ok I can hardly compare “x litres per plant per day” vs “n gallons per almond”. How long does a plant live and how many “portions” does it have? I can guess almonds would be, say, a handful for a “portion”? So that’s.. how much in litres?

See this is why I’m not super stoked about that original comment. Instead of making a clear point, I just get thrown some random hints and a “you go figure it out”. It’s like I’m supposed to make ones argument for them, and it might turn out to be completely irrelevant (maybe almonds are orders of magnitude more [e:less!] thirsty!) and then I can’t even reply because the actual argument was never made!

Just give me the numbers. Do your own homework :) (well, not you, but op)

(Edit: as someone else mentioned, this is assuming op was being rhetorical. If it’s a genuine q: I completely second it)
I recognize the devil's advocacy and will refrain from judgement on your position. In response, there are a few options (probably more that aren't occurring right now; it has been many years since I was researching this in university):

- A "need-blindness" system a la financial aid at US universities, as well as those in a few other countries. This gives deniability as its primary benefit, when people ask "why was the person with a 'self-inflicted' (replace those single quotes with very sarcastic finger wags, please) need above me?" That deniability is imperfect, and causes political problems.

- A formalized ranking of factors that influence priority for care, performed by formulae as public and precise as possible. This could potentially include 'self-inflicted' conditions as something exerting downward pressure. Much like sentencing guidelines, there will always be some subjective/human leeway in the application of those formulae that draws accusations, founded or not, of bias. Also, in libertarian political climates, this will draw accusations of governmental meddling in personal decisions.

- Pricing care at a level likely to ensure that only a number of patients proportional to available care-giving resources are admitted. This would require massive changes (mostly removals) to subsidies that exist for healthcare. This is unlikely to succeed politically, and from a humanitarian/ethical point of view is likely to be viewed extremely negatively (a view I share). It would have the advantage of making the "real" problem (lack of caregiving resources, including skills and general awareness) directly apparent, but only as a form of shock therapy.

Those are ways to address your question directly and narrowly. Secondary solutions/those with knock-on effects (preventative care etc.) are out of scope of this answer.

EDIT and as to the "when is it ethical" portion of your question (the above answers are logistical, not ethical), it's a crapshoot. It boils down to the ethical questions of the trolley problem plus the determinism problem, neither of which are generally considered to be tractable alone, much less together.
(Not the person you're replying to, but) Thanks for the link. I get CAPTCHA's all the time and it turns out my IP address is in the spfbl.net blacklist. Now to work out how to get taken off it...
Because this is fundamental to how I want to browse the web, and I don't think I'm the only one. My initial comment on this above has something like +40 upvotes -- that seems to reflect that others want this too.

Besides, this seems like a lot easier to implement than tab warming (which, reminder, I don't want).

I don't want to have to install an add-on for something so basic.
"The study, published Thursday in the journal Avian Conservation and Ecology..." I tried to find the publication but their site only shows December and says that next issue is still in production. On another note, we use plastic tubing to keep rodents from chewing or "girdling" young trees and shrubs up here in Canada, it's the deer that really cause trouble.
Could we make it better though? a lot of heat must be lost gassifying the wood? Perhaps we could use that for thermometric power generation too.