skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why is this dupe? I posted the source. I noticed someone posted the twitter link after i posted but I (and hopefully others) rather read this than some (imo biased) opinionated article/tweet from blog/twitter/news agency.
Type=forking
ExecStart=/opt/apache/apache-tomcat/bin/startup.sh
ExecStop=/bin/kill -15 $MAINPID

All of the same errors as in the systemd House of Horror entries.

* http://jdebp.eu./FGA/systemd-house-of-horror/tomcat.html
Razer Unveils Project Linda: Turning the Razer Phone into an Android Laptop
JQuery jest lepszy niż React
The asymmetry of list concat validations in Erlang
This hypothesis could well be true, but it's somewhat difficult to falsify; you can always posit an effect that only appears in the small statistically-underpowered cohort that Scott sampled, and which would be swamped by the average of the population as you start to increase the sample size to verify the effect.

As a counterpoint, Scott went the other direction in his post, arguing that the true effect was more general, but the metrics previous academics used was broken, and therefore undersold the strength of the effect they were detecting:

> I think the most likely explanation is that tests for Openness have limited validity, which makes the correlation look smaller than it really is. If being an eldest sibling increases true underlying Openness by a lot, but your score on psychometric tests for Openness only correlates modestly with true underlying Openness, that would look like being an eldest sibling only increasing test-measured-Openness a little bit.

It's simple to falsify this (though it requires some work); just do more experiments on the general population using the metric that Scott likes [1], and see if that detects a stronger birth-order effect.

[1]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230787941_Construct...
That’s my hope. Yesterday a 12 year old kid on a bike was hit by a car where I live.

It was dark, and I don’t have the exact details. The kid was coming from behind a parked car, it was 7pm so night, so I guess it’s the same kind of story that happened (beside the fact that a lot of people here are really bad drivers).

I’m so looking forward the time when human will stop driving by themselves. Of course there will be trade offs, most surely on the tracking side, but I’m deeply confident that accident rates will fall drastically.

No one should have to live with the feelings of having killed anyone, especially if not responsible. Let’s hope technology will finally prevent that.
Why the IBM PC Used an Intel 8088
You're talking about a country that is the size of a large state. I really wish there were state initiatives to work on infrastructure that makes sense for their territory and people.
No support for SQL, to quickly query through complicated data structures?
I have a suspicion that is Oracle in general. (-:

* http://jdebp.eu./FGA/systemd-house-of-horror/
Fair point, but wasn't zero-day back in June when this was first reported to the chip makers?
Open source API to validate digital signatures
This is just back of the envelope math here, but I think it will cost the US a significant amount more dollars per fatality reduction. We have a huge number more cars and a very different culture and driving mindset. One relative small country with a pretty singular culture and a much, much smaller amount of roads is just going to have an easier time addressing the issue. It is still worth pursuing, but the scale of it is tremendous. I am hoping technology can outpace the politics myself.
Exactly like that - try buying that film nowadays. Using copyright, Disney has prevented old stuff like that from tarnishing their brand.
You Just Need to Speculate to Exfiltrate
According to that site, I also have DNT enabled, however https://amiunique.org/fp says it is off ("NC" == not set).

I have tracking protection in Firefox set to off, as it uses the same Disconnect.me lists that you can enable in uBlock Origin. I guess Privacy Badger just forces through DNT, as per EFF's stance on the matter. I think it's somewhat counterproductive.

Nonetheless, DNT on/off is absolutely secondary to simply blocking all tracking through uBO and Privacy Badger.
Intel CEO Comments Indicate Chip Issue May Cause Bigger Slowdown
As far as I can tell, Terry Davis has been given multiple chances to get well. He chooses to be sick.

It's tragic, but you can only lead a horse to water, you can't make it drink. I've been on the side of trying to help a family member get better. It's impossible to help someone who doesn't want help. And it's one of the hardest things in the world to give up on someone who doesn't want help. You question your decision for the rest of your life. And sometimes you go back, and get reminded almost immediately you did make the right decision.

Also as far as I can tell, the only reason most people care about anything involving him is because of some stories about him being a "heroic" programmer. Not that they've had any realistic confirmation of that experience, because they almost certainly haven't tried any of his software. So there seems to be this perverse, backwards reasoning that "Terry says terrible things, but it's ok, he's sick, but he chose to be this way, but it's ok, he wrote his own OS".

It's terrible that anyone should have to live this way, even the worst people in the world. But I'm not terribly convinced that the concern I see expressed is anything other than asshole programmer worship. Take away, "he wrote his own OS", and I just have a really hard time imagining very many people giving two shakes.
Right. It is interesting to read the early history of the automobile in the U.S. Many of the pedestrian deaths in the early days were children. Speed governor laws were proposed but ultimately rejected. Motordom won the day. Now it is built into our society that people have to be super vigilant whenever we walk outside. Kids have to always be careful and limited to where they can play. It is sad how much of our freedom to roam has been lost in the U.S.
Bitbucket Service Degradation
This sentence structure and syntax is making my head hurt. I think you accidentally some words.
Change Healthcare's Enterprise-Scale Blockchain Solution for Healthcare
Aspergers is a walk in the park compared to what Terry is dealing with.
Plenty of content producers make money. Sure it’s the companies that employ the artists that make the most money, but that’s a general feature of our economy, not anything unique to copyright. I think Netflix is a huge vindication of copyright. It started out as a middleman simple peddling other people’s content. But copyright forced them to start producing their own content, and they’ve turned television on its head as a result. It’s probably s bigger change in the TV market than cable studios.

The thing about copyright is that it’s existenxe isn’t preventing the alternative models you’re talking about. Unlike any other form of property, copyright covers an individual’s own creations. Owning land is staking claim to something that existed for eons before you were born and will exist for eons after you’re dead. But copyright is over something unique you brought into the universe. With recording and distribution being so cheap, nothing prevents creatives from giving away their work and making money on their own unique contributions with performances or Kickstarter. But people want AAA production values. Just like how Kickstarter can’t raise enough capital to design and build something with mass market appeal like a MacBook Pro, it’s not suitable for making something like the new Star Wars movie. (Which I refuse to watch because blockbuster movies are dreck, but the public wants what it wants.)
I agree that it is backwards, but it's heavily ingrained in US politics that decisions revolve around classes

I think it's made to seem that way by media coverage and political propaganda(especially from the left) more than it actually is. The problem is that it's easy to analyze something by arbitrary groups but in doing so often if not usually miss things (indeed this was one of Damore's key themes in his original essay).

The rhetoric may be actualizing, but I still think it's more a case of bad analytical generalizations than actual decision-making. Although, it's getting worse, as the whole drama with Jordan Peterson last year over pronouns demonstrated. At the core of his concern seemed to be he growing number of increasingly narrow and increasingly arbitrary suspect class definitions (or whatever they call it in Canada).

The original concept of a suspect class in the US was codified to serve as a legal guidelines for determining whether discrimination had taken place. The idea was to balance the ideal of democratic freedom to enact laws with the political reality that some clearly identified recognized groups (mainly Black Americans) had not been allowed to participate in the democratic process that produced the laws under which they had to conform. Many of those laws were shown to be prima facie discriminatory and evidence suggested plenty more were intended to be discriminatory in practice. And by virtue of minority status, they'd be unable to effectively challenge those discriminatory laws through democratic means. Women classified as a quasi-suspect class by virtue of historical disenfranchisement, despite their not being a minority.

But, it has been at least century since women were granted the right to vote. "Women as a class" have been one of the strongest political factions in the United States for decades. Roe v. Wade was 1973, a decade before any Millenial was even born. Pandering to women is pervasive in US politics on both sides.

The narrative that women had no voice, political will, or influence until Last Thursday is persistent and massive historical revisionism.
>It's not fraud, it's a victimless crime,

Wow, I've always considered american libertarianism a mental disease but this really takes the cake. So you have someone standing there saying "Hey, want to buy these stock? They're great!" knowing the value is about to dramically drop (and that the other party can't possibly know that!) and for you that still isn't doing anything wrong? Out of curiousity, are you also lobbying against punishing people for selling fake iPhones claiming they're real, etc.? Completely victimless crimes, right?
Daniel Rozin’s interactive sculpture is made of 832 moving tiles
The point that the op is making is that this is only looking at the "successful" trades. It is not looking at the set of "attempted" trades. So it is only looking a selection of the possible trades, and so there is a selection bias involved in the data set. This is very much a form of survivor bias.

It is likely that it also "only" includes those that managed to buy a house at under market rates, and sold at, or above, market rates within 90 days. Anyone who is buying to live in is likely paying as much or more as the "sale" price.

This is further stated in the market, since the annualised rate of return is 650%, but house prices are _not_ going up that quickly.

Which, in turn, means that distressed buyers are not necessarily going to see a 15% increase in the price of their house in 90 days, nor are they going to see a ~30% in 180 days, since their property may not be "undervalued".
>on average, if you sell your home within 90 days, you’ll do it at 15% higher than what you bought it for.

Uh, well, what I think this probably means is that people who _aren't_ going to make money _don't_ sell a property within 90 days. Even if they were buying it as an investment/flip, if they aren't going to be able to sell it for a ~15% profit... they hold on to it longer. Until they can.

Realizing this confusion of correlation with causation makes the rest of the "advice" in the article somewhat suspect too.

It's interesting findings, that there are significant numbers of owners managing to flip a house quickly for profit. But I'm not sure it can be extrapolated into a "what you should do".
Yes.No.

Schizos have the wanderlust, they try to discover new territories- but they end up socially self isolating- and to reduce the suffering - drugs.
I disagree. Disney has money, and all politicians spend at least half of their working hours soliciting money in exchange for the promise of writing laws. It will be extended.

The founders idea of patent and copyright as being meant to last as long as a working lifetime (20 years) died a long time ago. This is just one more evidence of the democracy moving to plutocracy.

Let's watch it get renewed. Then, up-vote my comment.
Sure. But the right (market) price 30 days later might be the same price you bought it at (or less), meaning you'll be selling it at a loss after various transaction fees.
> Yes there is, there's an email embedded in the paragraphs I outlined

Yes, at 188; I addressed it. It's evidence provided for something, but not the thing you claimed.

> It says explicitly in paragraph 179: "Upon information and belief, the Google employee was not selected due to the fact that the hiring managers were looking solely for “diverse” individuals, and as a Caucasian male, the Google employee did not help fill their mandatory (and illegal) quotas."

Yes, that's an allegation. No evidence supporting this allegation is included (and, further, it used the “on information and belief” language which indicates that the party filing the lawsuit does not have first-hand knowledge that the allegation is true, but expects to have evidence—e.g., attained through discovery—to prove it should the case go to trial.)

This is perfectly normal for a lawsuit complaint, of course, but does not support your claim of examples (or even an example) with evidence in the filing.
Making errors part of the equation
I still use Bazaar for personal projects and sometimes as a frontend for Git repositories.

Things that Bazaar got right that I find missing from most other DVCSes:

- Branches (including remote branches) are first-class citizens. I can add and remove tags for remote repositories as though they were local, I can diff against and merge from remote branches, I can view a log for remote branches. It gives me most of the essential GitHub functionality on the command line.

- It accomplishes that by properly abstracting over the transport layer. This also means that you can use any computer that you can use ssh with for remote repositories/branches via the `sftp` protocol without having to install Bazaar on that machine. While this is not recommended for large projects, it makes it pretty easy to share and collaborate on your projects if you have some old server lying around (e.g. in an academic setting).

- Unlike most other DVCSes (except Fossil), Bazaar put some thought into how to present revision graphs to users; rather than dumping the raw graph, it uses hierarchical logs, which I find generally more intuitive.

- A particular benefit is that there's generally no need for rebasing; while Bazaar has a rebase plugin, you can generally avoid rebasing, as linearizing history is unnecessary (and arguably counterproductive).

- Another side effect of hierarchical logs is that there's an intuitive canonical revision numbering scheme. You don't need hashes, any revision is uniquely and globally consistently identified by the pair (branch, revision number). This also makes `bzr annotate` more readable.

Downsides of Bazaar:

- Bazaar didn't have the development efforts put into it that Git and Mercurial got, so it still has some rough edges for advanced use cases. For example, if you do `bzr uncommit`, `bzr commit` does not give you the option to reuse the commit message (even though it's saved and the GUI version of commit will properly prepopulate the commit message box).

- Customization is cumbersome, and generally requires writing a plugin rather than templating (unlike, say, Mercurial, which has superior customization options).

- Like Git (though for different reasons), Bazaar requires you to periodically repack your repository, and for large repositories with a long history that can take a fair amount of time. For example, the Dart SDK repository (50k+ commits, 17MB checkout) can take several minutes to repack. While this is infrequent (I think the really expensive repacks occur only every 10k commits or so), when they happen, it's a pain.
Per the CDC[1], "Low-income persons consume more sugar drinks in relation to their overall diet than those with higher income." In fact, individuals with an income of 3.5x or more of the poverty level consume half as much as those with an income of 1.3x or less.

Levying a tax targeted at the poor does not "benefit" them.

1: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db71.htm
Attempted transactions do not make a market. Completed transactions do.
No, I'm not advocating for any Plugin, but for extending the standard (or creating a new one) with common acceptable functionality that we now use JavaScript for.

For example, we can do tables in HTML. We need no scripting nor plugin for that. For a contrary example, without JavaScript or plugin we can't serve our website as a torrent that is then loaded by the visitors from other visitors. But we can standardize that functionality and add it to the browser. The code for that functionality would then be developed by the browser developers as a part of the browser, and delivered with the browser. The website would just deliver the torrent file and the necessary meta information for it. That way no code or script from the website would need to be executed to have the desired functionality.

I don't blindly trust developers. I nearly exclusively use packages from my distribution. These programs are maintained and signed by people with recorded track record of their behaviour as a maintainer, and they are vetted for by others. They don't have an interest to track or montized me, and it is a limited set of people I need to trust. Also, I can hold back on updates, and refuse them, if I choose to do so. Programs that come from other sources are carefully looked at by me. there is a big difference to automatically downloaded and executed code from some website.
> Is this actually inevitable?

Yes, it's actually inevitable. You either have free press or you don't. It's a binary value, one or zero, there is nothing in between. If you are willing to handle for the price of the free expression then we have fundamentaly different ideas about what freedom represents.
Your description applies precisely to a farm or vacation property too. And at least a copyrighted work is something that exists in the universe due to your parent’s effort. That farm is just some land that your parent’s predecessor stole from the Indians. The government helped someone enclose land that had not existed as private property before, helped defend it by driving out the Indians, and then gave legal protection to the chain of transactions that led to you inheriting it. That’s a government monopoly as much as any copyright.
I might believe that stance if you can think of any human scenario where there is value and nobody tries to take advantage of it.

We can’t have nice things/utipia as long as some people are evil.
Once you adjust per capita (which I did when I said the rate of fatalities), most of the usual excuses fall away. Sweden has areas with similar population densities to NYC and to Alaska, a more diverse population than you'd expect, similar per capita income, etc.
Thank you for the suggestion! I will add that feature today. I believe that the project will be more useful if it can be easily integrated into CI pipelines!
Honestly, its just very difficult to find talented people right now. 99% of your effort will be spent on recruitment. Not on the hiring design process. Which, you are probably right. Its biased, unfair and skewed against inexperienced candidates. But ultimately, it is an instinctual decision. "Do I wish to work with this person?"

Of course, to attract the top talent in the first place. You have to build something they would be proud to be a part of ;)

Good luck and keep iterating!

Also, check out CNBC's The Job Interview. I am sure it will hit close to home:

https://www.cnbc.com/the-job-interview/
There's selection bias at any time scale. Those who manage to sell their property at all are getting better prices than those who fail to do so.

The point is that you can't calculate a probability of making +15% within 90 days just by looking at how many of the houses sold within 90 days were sold for +15%. Or any +X%. Or any time period.

If you really want to calculate such a probability, you need to buy a bunch of houses at random, then try to sell them, and then see how much you made and how long it took. The data used in the post is not suitable.
I haven't seen even the used ones go less than about 800 USD. Where are you looking? (I'd honestly love to know...)
> To maintain a healthy weight you have to monitor your weight, and what you're eating, and adjust the latter in response to the former, forever.

Yeah, this is the part that people don't get when they talk about weight loss. They make it out like losing weight is the greatest thing, you'll feel better, have more energy, get more attention from the opposite sex, etc.

Truth is those benefits aren't guaranteed and are mostly exaggerated, but worse is the part they never talk about: what you're giving up to get there. Personally, I have to avoid (or leave early) social functions where free food will be available (you wouldn't believe how pushy people get, insisting that you eat), or that takes place at a restaurant (order a salad and everyone acts like you shot their dog). I have to suppress the urge to hit people who bring donuts to work. I spend three nights a week exercising and I eat a single meal a day of steamed vegetables and fake meat. I weigh myself every single morning and I make n effort to count every single calorie. And I have to do this for the rest of my life if I want to maintain where I am.

Weight loss is not a panacea, the tradeoffs aren't going to be worth it for everyone, and I really wish people would stop being such dicks about the whole thing.
KetoHub Update: Month 3
Almost all animal testing is done on animals that manufacture L-Ascorbic Acid in their liver. L-Ascorbic Acid is an incredibly powerful hormone and completely discounting it's presence is foolish at best and negligent at worst.
> Even US has differing gun laws across states, so whatever mechanism is used to enforce those can be extended to enforce this

Ah, so stopping minorities to shake them down for soda.

In all seriousness, you can't just set up border checkpoints in the US. You'd have to have probable cause to stop an individual, and even if you stopped everyone you can't search them without a warrant (which requires probably cause) or their permission.
> Be aware that Adblock doesn’t block all JavaScript code.

That's fine as long as it keeps the annoying stuff to a minimum and Privacy Badger seems to do a good job on the tracking stuff.
Say hello to the offspring of Anon...
American road infrastructure is owned and controlled at the state/local level. The Feds don't even own the Interstate system, and the standards for it are set by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
It is really scary to think about it. But don't focus on what you might loose. Just be grateful for what you have. Try to enjoy every moment you have with them.
Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Spectre CPU Vulnerability Online Checker
A Crypto Website Changes Its Data, and $100B in Market Value Vanishes
I think thats too general of a statement, plenty of people take issue with inherited wealth. The USA for a long time had extremely steep inheritance taxes for instance.
Could you expound on how the culture and mindset is different? I can imagine what it would be, but don't want to just jump to stereotypes..