skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ask HN: How do you handle composite UIs?
In the situation where you have something like a shared header across multiple SPAs or domains, what strategies do you use?

In simpler terms, how do you do an iframe without using an iframe?

I'm roughly getting at the ideas described here[1], but wondering how people deal with it tactically as well as the interaction with front-end frameworks.

1: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/microservices-architecture/architect-microservice-container-applications/microservice-based-composite-ui-shape-layout
High Speed Rail Now Rivals Flying on Key Routes
There are many more rules that just red, yellow green and the stop sign. It would be nice if the highway code was that simple though.

For example, how to navigate a busy multi-lane roundabout safely as a cyclist, such as Old Street roundabout in London, which looks like this: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dc/Old_Stre..., or this roundabout in Bristol, UK: http://c8.alamy.com/comp/B2NMCH/aerial-view-looking-down-on-...
Children's Hospital Los Angeles is already using VR to help train hospital staff. As automation coupled with new technology increases we will see an increase in the health related verticals adapting to new cutting edge tech.
https://latechnews.org/childrens-hospital-la-vr-technology/
That cost of doing business seems to be getting more expensive all the time. At what point do we have to subsidize that cost with our own privacy and freedom?
What other grouping would you propose?
antibiotics (natamycin, in particular) are now routinely used in packaged shredded cheese, to inhibit mold growth.

A sustained low-level dose of antibiotic is proven to foster antibiotic resistance.
And maybe add some "defence in depth" by splitting really sensitive ("tier 0") stuff across multiple channels/apps, such that any one breach doesn't compromise it.
> Citation? What you fail to realize is that lower efficiency can induce more spending.

Please explain to me how a $1 ad which generated $0.01 in marginal profit, but now generates -$0.01 in marginal profit will continue to be funded. I'd love to know.
Which is fine. He's a great investor on his own terms. But the complete counterexample to Buffet is George Soros -- a different way of thinking and operating.

Both lines of thinking clearly work for some people.. your investment style is tied pretty closely to your personality. There is no perfect solution, and everyone has to find their own way.

I would never put money in a railroad or an oil company, because I can't properly assess what drives the stock price and which unexpected issues might pop up. I can more easily do that with tech.
Nah, they list all the models around it, like the L5640. This is basically the same CPU with 100MHz shaved off it.

They're system-pulls off eBay, and appear to be some specialist OEM part - note they don't appear on ark, they go L5630 straight to L5640.
Some places have the worst of both worlds in the form of HOA dues. You pay yearly for the upkeep of common areas that are so far away from your front door that you never even see them unless you make a special effort.
You dismiss it because "one party isn't as bad as the other" (paraphrasing): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16116176
I've seen plenty of people calling this a FOMO craze and that may well be the case, and demand may eventually fizzle out. But I think it's far more likely investors get spooked.

Compared to market investors, relatively few of the people investing in cryptocurrencies understand the technical underpinnings. All it's going to take is a spate of high value hacks, another central service provider going down (MtGox v2) and thefts, or even an act of terrorism funded by Dogecoin... and you'll see a run. It may not be sustained, but I think this is an important difference from standard investment theory.
I'm very skeptical of their claims of "unparalleled safety". Thanks to "autorotation"[1] regular helicopters can safely land in most situations even with complete power failure. The claims of safety of this craft seems to derive from N+1 battery redundancy which isn't that impressive. They say they have 8 independent motors, but don't say how many are needed to stay aloft.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorotation
Some of the better funded tech-driven biopharma startups might be interested. Recursion pharma, pear therapeutics, freenome, grail to name a few off the top of my head. I don't know too much about their dev ops tho. Can message me if you want to know more about them
I've always been bearish about the appeal of chatbots but I did see how they could seem to be a useful interface for many users, especially on support-type sites. They basically seemed to function as a friendlier-version of site search. Yes, ultimately they are an unnecessary middleman facade -- in the same that writing a Google search as a formal question -- e.g. "Where are the best pizza places near me?" -- is unnecessary when you could simply query "best pizza"

But perhaps the perception that your question was being interpreted in an intelligent human way caused users to think differently and rephrase their questions in a way that made it easier to find the most relevant help/support links? I remember how interesting Ask Jeeves seemed to be -- though to be fair, Google wasn't much of a presence in 1997.
Anyone remember way back when this was an option in Bing's navigation system, to avoid high crime or high risk areas or something like that, and it invariably avoided every single low income and for lack of a better term, "ghetto" area and was accused of being racist?
Exactly, cool tech doesn't make something valuable. Solving real world, widespread meatspace problems makes something valuable. I have yet to see any real-world, widespread problem in meatspace that Bitcoin or the blockchain solves.
We pay more into the state then we get back. And upstate/albany often times sabotages us (like the MTA subsidizing some politically ski slopes).

Same at the federal level. That's more complex since the region gets bunch of money back due to "security".
Except you are assuming it will just magically go up. If you are the unlucky person to do that at the peak, then you will lose most if not all of your money.
> Why did the democratic process fail? Because people are being tribal.

I think it's more of a vicious circle. The system encourages people to be tribal, so they act tribally, which further reinforces the system. Politicians with the power to change the system have zero incentive to do so.

> No one seriouly considered whether there might be other, better, candidates in other parties besides the big two.

Given that Bernie Sanders wasn't even a member of the Democratic party until 2016, I'd say he is a good example of a third party candidate who people would seriously consider, if the system allowed it. But it doesn't, so he won't be.
Short = Is "naked" operation, the maximum loss is unlimited. If the bitcoin goes to U$ 1 million then $0 next week you probably will be eaten alive by margin calls in the process. This is a very dangerous way to bet by nature.

Put option = The maximum loss is the paid premium.

[*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Put_option
Could taxes be drastically increased on rental properties in this area to incentivize owner-occupied homesteads?

It seems like neglect by absentee landlords is a big part if the problem, so the money could also be used to increase enforcement against neglected properties.
> Effectively, they’d be to TVs as studio monitor headphones are to audio. Enthusiasts would jump all over something like this despite inflated prices, I have no doubt.

Have several studio monitors. Can confirm.
This idea sounds like a good use for ‘choose’ [1]. It’d be a bash script that uses curl to get a list of the languages with gitignores, pipes to choose to let the user choose one, and pipes it into curl again to get the gitignore contents and sends to stdout.

[1] https://github.com/sdegutis/choose
I did not mean to imply I don't like the suburbs. I was implying that too many we're built to quickly with the expectation that the economy was going to be different or that it could sustain these new build outs.

Maybe self driving cars will help. But I see that being a thing for those who can already afford to live in the city. These people are going to likely prefer new stock over run down hoods.
That's one side of the coin, but on the other hand I can also envision self-driving cars enabling more urban density. Presumably self-driving cars don't really need to be parked on-site at the destination and could instead drop off their rider at the destination and park in some centralized parking garage. The car could even make money for its owner by being an automated uber driver while the owner is working or shopping or whatever. American cities give up a lot of space to parking lots, it'd be great to be able to reclaim some of it
> With the incessant lobbying you've done in this thread I think it's fair to ask the advertising industry for some donations which you could then use for your other big passion, offering poor people access to information.

Nice ad hominem.

I hate ads, but I know that ads fund a lot of the services and content I consume online. I always have the option to now use those services or consume that content and avoid the ads.

Heck, half of HN's commenters would be unemployed if not for ads. Which might actually be a net win for society.
Don't mention Trump on this forum even if you preface what you say with disdain. You'll never go positive.

I agree that the US/EU needs to be harder on China. Its been very one sided in recent years. The real issue, I think, is their disregard for intellectual property. You bend over backwards to get into their market, then a year later a government backed firm with an identical product puts you out of business. They won't get away with that for long, believe you me.
You could do it the Settlers of Catan way.

(Suppose four players, P1 to P4. They each get to place two settlements, and there's an advantage to getting first pick. You place settlements in this order: P1, P2, P3, P4, P4, P3, P2, P1)

Now, there is a cake (map) to cut, and 4 parties. P1 draws one line, then P2, then P3. Then, each party picks one of the 4 slices, starting with P4.
I do understand and sympathize with the motivation, I'm not sure if that's in keeping with what the mods are hoping to accomplish on HN. The guidelines are quite clear on what's appropriate:

> "Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Ideological or political battle or talking points. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic."

While the question of what is politics or (even what is appropriate) for HN can be thorny and not always clearly demarcated, actively working against what the mods and the community as a whole are working towards might very well help weaken the fragile strengths HN currently enjoys.

It's tough, because I think there are a lot of important topics that need discussing; however, not every forum is well-suited for such discussions. What makes HN valuable for a lot of members is, in part, that there is some curation by mods and members going on. While you mention only showing content so "people don't miss out on discussions", encouraging discussion on the topics can all-too-easily spill over into other threads. I also think it's questionable whether people are really missing out: many political threads continue to be active even when falling off of the front page.

I'd love for people to be able to discuss everything reasonably, calmly, and rationally, giving everyone the benefit of the doubt and engaging in good faith. A lot of the social cues and reinforcements that encourage this off-line aren't present on HN by its very nature. If this type of discussion is truly what you want, there are plenty of places online where one can find it. Members sometimes mention they value the opinions of those on HN in particular, that they aren't necessarily present on other fora. One of the reasons for that, in part, is that many on HN are here because of the forum it currently is. Changing that environment can all too easily change the fauna that populate it.

Anyway, that's likely more than what you were expecting :) (and Pascal† would likely have something to say about it, too). And you may very well disagree. I encourage you to use HN search to find what 'dang and 'sctb have commented on the subject. They have a lot of experience viewing what happens on HN, what their goals are when "tending the garden", and how they go about doing that, and both because it's interesting, and whether what you're looking to do works with or against those goals.

† https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/04/28/shorter-letter/
Seconded. Certain level of protectionism is good for business, Trump has proved that. We need to decentralize/democratize the tech industry across the globe, not concentrated in US.

EU should start providing incentives to local companies to build their own business that serve its own people, other than becoming US's satellite states.
You don't need to wait for BIOS updates to install microcode - install sysutils/devcpu-data and sysrc microcode_update_enable=YES
In Apple's case, as the Apple manufacturing base is largely Chinese, the government has considerable leverage regarding corporate decisions.
LaGuardia is funny because you go to terminal C and D, newly renovated with nice restaurants and fancy tablets at every table

...Or you could walk 10 feet to terminal A and B and get drenched by the gallon of water leaking out of the ceiling
I walk on the road all the time, having grown up in an area with plenty of rural roads without pavements.

I would get into a ton of shit should I visit anywhere that had jaywalking laws, though in the places they exist and are enforced, they presumably get by without a dedicated licensing and testing regime.
Average weights (no median, sorry) from the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/body-measurements.htm):

>Men: 195.7 pounds

>Women: 168.5 pounds

So this could carry an average man, average woman, and under 36 pounds. At that point, the weight of your clothing or a bottle of wine becomes very important.
Didn't we give telcos a ton of money in the 90s to ensure fiber to the premises everywhere? How did that work out? Privatization still requires oversight.
Just because you can fork, copy, and derive tokens doesn't mean that scarcity doesn't exist in that particular market. I think the point was never about true scarcity, but that as long as the market has consensus over which blockchain is the source of truth, the internal scarcity is achievable without a central authority.
This seems a bit unfair. Outsiders who agree with Yudkowsky are more likely to become insiders.

Anyway (speaking as an insider) Inadequate Equilibria doesn't intersect with Yudkowsky's theories about AI. It's about how to tell the differences between the circumstances where you should trust your instincts vs those where you should go with the crowd.
any plan for atlas like program in asia?stripe is now supported in SG as well and taxes are way lower as compared to US.
Welcome to Bitcoin trading. It's indeed very sketchy.
This is how things work in Texas. You are allowed a homestead exemption to reduce your property tax by 1% or so.
My handcuffs are for three years.
Yes, making these "improvements" completely useless to anyone who occasionally plays videogames (and therefore most likely leaves their TV in game mode).

I'd honestly pay extra for _less_ processing: give me a 65" dumb monitor with as little latency as possible, please.
I recall there being two competing community built editors. JKEdit and JED. I believe I used JED to make a few not so good maps. Good times indeed.
Most users did not want flash. Most users don't want web apps or apps inside web views, but they'll use those if they have to. Why switch phones to get flash if you really wanted a native experience in the first place?
This could be very useful given the docker images are increasing day by day.
I can't imagine how immensely powerful it would be to have a game like Diablo leverage block chain for its items. This would eliminate the risk of dupes and ensure a fair system.
I disagree with this analogy. As software engineers become more experienced, they start avoiding patterns or obviously flawed software constructs which they recognize as potentially creating bugs in the future.

Things like marking fields of objects final/const, requiring immutability of objects, reduce bugs interior to objects. Immutable objects also reduce multithreading issues. That’s one pattern that can be used to reduce common bugs.

Nature doesn’t do this. For example: Southern California has a fire season (natural) followed by a wet season (natural) which tends to cause sever mudlides. These natural processes never learn from experience that large fires before the rain is more destructive (I know I’m stretching here and fires would be smaller if we didn’t put down the small ones initially).

My point is that humans, software engineers included, learn from past mistakes. Ideally we improve from those, not just throw our hands up and say bugs are a “natural” result of the software development process. Software will always have bugs, but ideally you as an engineer never make the same one twice (with the exception of off by one errors ;)
> This is a crazy way for young people to think though and the opposite of how they should be thinking

I dunno, seems like this sort of risk is the only way to get anywhere now.
Social mobility is far lower in the US than in European countries.
China is one country where the majority speaks a handful of languages (please don't attack me if this comment is ignorant, be nice)

But is it easy to get the EU countries to even agree on any of this stuff? (Genuinely asking, cuz I imagine it's insanely hard because each country has their own culture and priorities)
> I have a fairly simple Node project at work; it pulls in nine runtime dependencies, plus 13 development-time dependencies (most of those are babel or eslint-related).

A well known German blog just claimed that creating a new skeleton project using @angular/cli results in 31 direct dependencies, almost a thousand dependencies in total and 300 MB code.

That's just wow.
There’s also a parachute.
Ask HN: Type systems in natural languages?
After learning Chinese and reading through Aditya Mukerjee's "করো: Translating Go to Other (Human) Languages, and Back Again" [slides][0] from Golang 2017, I was reminded again of the curious resemblance of [Chinese classifiers][1] (especially measure words) to a type system of sorts.

I was wondering if anyone here had done any reading on comparisons, what we can learn, or whether any experimental programming languages had been implemented using natural language classifiers.

[0]: https://speakerdeck.com/chimeracoder/kro-translating-go-to-other-human-languages-and-back-again-golang-uk-2017

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_classifiers
I was going to comment that I think the question referred to what course of action /Apple/ should take, but maybe fundamentally changing superstates is not off the table when you have multinational megacorp resources.
Did the optometrist say why that size and curvature specifically?
It seemed obvious that it was and would remain a cost-center, but I figured it would be the kind of loss-leader that would eventually turn into a service that would be scalable and profitable. It sounds like the scope of M's service was too ambitious, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it couldn't eventually provide insights as to the optimal (and profitable) balance between AI and human intervention. Given Facebook's overall profit margins and ability to throw money at moonshots, maybe M's losses were extreme to the point that a monetization effort was seen as unlikely?
Gold is the only metal that doesn't rust, even if it's buried in the ground for thousands of years. Gold is rare. And gold has the color of the sun. It's crazy if we think about that, it's like money made by the gods for us.
This is exactly my problem with Bitcoin. The process for securing Bitcoin was fascinating to me because I thought mining was a clever way of staggering the growth of the currency. Unfortunately, you quickly realize that there's nothing to back the value of the currency and anything that could is disproportionately devalued when China builds farms for nothing but mining and the exploitation of the currency.

Blockchain, on the other hand, is awesome and will continue to be a key piece of tech for things like voting and records where trust can be shared amongst all the users.
My issue is that it is still not clear how much you are going to pay in term of taxes. It seems like my first company that I created here in my country: You start discovering taxes as you move on.

Could you for example create an article that demonstrates these following cases:

1. Exactly 0 activity. Cost to incorporate + yearly cost.

2. Some International sales (credit cards). Say 20k in sales

3. US sales. Say 20k in sales.

4. Example of deduction and how much it saves in taxes.

These example can be very helpful. For example, if I'm expecting $20k in US sales, and have $15k expenses; I know that my taxes + accounting expenses will be between X and Y. I know that every situation is different but it kinda brings the feet back to the earth. It is not going to cost just to registration and the yearly franchising fee.
Trump may deport thousands of Indian H-1B visa holders waiting for green cards
What is it that Bitcoin has that any other cryptocurrency doesn't, or is unlikely to have in the future?
Penn Station really sucks. It feels like the third world where trains are always delayed, passengers are shoving and pushing each other. Imagine the plight of employees working in Manhattan having to tell their upper east sides bosses why they are late every other day.
If it can be enabled in 58 beta, you'll likely be able to enable it in 58 release. But there may not be any stability guarantees on it working correctly.

I believe the target is 59, though it might stretch to 60.
Around here it's generally solved by having separate traffic lights for cars, pedestrians and the bike lane, and having some extra time every cycle of lights where it's red for bikes and pedestrians but green for cars to enable those turns.

E.g. this shot in google maps - https://www.google.lv/maps/@56.9578862,24.1189538,3a,75y,240... ; it's green for cars, but red for the bike lane on the right side.
They can legally bind the revenue to expenditure purposes when they pass the spending bills. I have actually seen this in a few states and municipalities. I believe NJ passed something within the last year or two legally binding revenue from a specific tax to be spent by a certain legislative authority. If I recall, it was related to the gas tax - they increased it and they said everything must be spent by whatever government entity is responsible for highway maintenance (DOT I think?). That way there is no legal way (without another bill being passed) for politicians to use the money for some other purpose. It's still possible that the DOT squanders the money through mismanagement, but at least it would still be spent on roads and infrastructure, as intended.
They exist in some parts of New England and in a few shopping centers in Texas. You're right about them confusing motorists though. New Englanders generally understand what to do, but I've seen many Texans just stop in the middle of the roundabout for no good reason. Maybe if more were built behavior would change.
The risk of dupes meaning that the company that created the game may release duplicate items? A centralized database can eliminate that risk as well.