skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sadly, but a morally speaking you're then getting into the same territory as it is with the sex offenders; who having offended once are stained for the rest of their lives.

There is a reason why there's a statute of limitations, but neither does it mean that the current punishment is enough.

Let's talk children, as you say - you would punish a child, yet you would not mark him as a morally corrupted person forever; the punishment just needs to be severe enough.
Since the issue is only domain based, Could they start with a list of domain names instead of every IP?
I imagine your suggestions would cause more deaths than they would prevent by sucking all the joy out of cycling, causing more people to just use a car instead, leading to more dangerous accidents and more obesity.
New York City plans to divest $5bn from fossil fuels and sue oil companies
Forget Lazarus. There is no (finished) Cocoa for Mac. Development is not on Github. Syntax has no common style. Documentation is uneven. The whole ecosystem feels (well, is) dated.

Of course, Lazarus/FPC is still quite nice. But to really shine and be a valid alternative, it would need a large infusion of money and manpower.

Thus, don't hope too eagerly...
That time of year again Pornhub 2017 Year in Review
Yeah, this is a good point.

The arson seems to have been done to get rid of squatters, drug dealers, and places children might try to go play. So it's lowering the community impact of the building, but doing nothing (or less than nothing) to make actual cleanup or development there possible.
Reminds me of this recent demoscene production....backwards fluid dynamics that generate bad poetry text in 8kb.

https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=62974
Awesome feedback , we were unsure between complete free-form and a grid system but seems like many people prefer a more rigid grid
It is not just MPEG LA BTW.
thanks a lot for your input! I'll use it for making that section in the text more clear for the readers.
Who are you suggesting will be giving all these babies index funds, and with what investment?
Those innovations were generally gradual, incremental and spread over centuries. They also did not really failed to innovate as Roman empire transformed into Byzantine empire, and then, eventually to the modern Europe.
Each of the frauds identified in [0] in the 2016 cycle, for which Republicans were criminally charged, affected the vote count.

“Quit playing for your side”, indeed.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16118842
Is Angular still cool in the JavaScript world? I have to take over an Angular 1 site. We have to make some big changes so we pretty much have to start from scratch no matter what.
That would work if people saved money, but they've been taught to spend rather than save. Most people believe that if they earn $1 they must spend that $1 as soon as possible.
I was thinking the same. Many links on the page are behind a paywall (ex: https://www.statista.com/statistics/225342/export-value-of-b...)
Curious on kind of people who use this, journalists maybe?
This really should have (2013) in the title, it's severely out of date at this point in regards to the current status of LLVM
This is a very odd quote:

"It was easy for M’s leaders to win internal support and resources for the project in 2015, when chatbots felt novel and full of possibility."

Chatbots were new in 2015? I think it might be more accurate to say they were new in the early 1990s, but they had a revival of interest around 2015, driven by the possibility that advances in AI and NLP would allow them to do more.

One place where chatbots still have a large opportunity in front of them is in automobiles. The driver is not suppose to hold their cell phone while driving. But they can talk to the phone, and voice-to-text allows them to interact with chatbots. Someone in the industry told me that Toyota has inked a deal with Pandorabots:

https://www.pandorabots.com/

Likewise, during and after my time at Celelot [1], I talked to a lot of salespeople, and they told me that was the #1 thing they'd like to see, as an interface for SalesForce. They wanted to be able to meet a client, make a sale, and then drive home, and while they were driving, they could talk to their cell phone and the Celelot service would put all the data into SalesForce for them.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Destroy-Tech-Startup-Easy-Steps/dp/09...
Doesn't really solve the problem because people will just sell their shares in the fund to buy whatever they want as soon as they can.
This is not true in general. Linux Desktop UIs like Gnome 3 have taken a lot of criticism precisely because they have not been copying Windows and have deviated considerably (due to patent concerns). Of course, there are some fringe "garage effort" Linux distros that don't care about patents and do just give some part of the community what they want.

As for innovation, Linux desktop UIs had virtual desktops and window tiling features long before Windows and MacOS.
risks? We're well down that path, aren't we?
Yes, but they can be hit or miss, and I simply don't have the time or funds to be testing multiple models.
PrecisionFDA Consistency Challenge
https://precision.fda.gov/challenges/consistency

PrecisionFDA Truth Challenge
https://precision.fda.gov/challenges/truth/results

The challenges themselves are closed, but perhaps we can ask for access to the challenge data and evaluation criteria to produce unofficial responses.
To put it another way, my reading of the article is that it only provides an acceleration vector directly away from the nearest star.

That can be used for propellant-massless acceleration (leaving solar system) and deceleration (entering solar system), but cannot power any other maneuvers.

(But of course auxiliary drives of a different type could)
First, there’s a bit of a myth that through indirect holdings, like holdings of stock in a pension fund, the stock market has become democratized, and everyone’s all in. Not so. Wolff’s data shows that while stock ownership has increased over the past few decades, in 2013 (his most recent data point), less than half — 46 percent — of households owned stocks, either directly or through their holdings in some sort of fund (e.g., a retirement account). Contrast that with the 94 percent ownership rate of the top 1 percent.

But even that 46 percent ownership rate gets misunderstood, because it doesn’t differentiate how much stock is owned by different income classes. Less than a third of all households hold at least $10,000 in stocks, compared to 93 percent of those households in the top 1 percent.

The figures below show that, since the late 1980s, about 80 percent of the value of the market has been held by the top 10 percent. Within that top 10 percent, the share of stock wealth held by the top 1 percent is about equal to the share held by the 90-99th percentiles; both groups’ shares are twice as large as the share that the entire bottom 90 percent holds.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/02/...
Grandaddy of them all was the Tucker Torpedo...
Please don't post unsubstantive comments here. Especially on divisive topics, it's somewhere on the flamebait-troll vector and usually leads to worse.
There are a handful of these already in Philadelphia suburbs (King of Prussia, Phoenixville). The KOP development is a billion project with 300+ units. Nice counter measure to the millennial migration to the city. Most of the jobs are in the suburbs so if this catches on should ease some of the nightmare commutes in the area.

https://philly.curbed.com/2017/8/22/16084002/king-of-prussia...
But it doesn't work like that.

Where are you going to get the funds you "give" to the children?

There is no free lunch.
You need to know to do nothing at all. Even when presented misleading UX.
Norway successfully implemented a sovereign wealth fund - currently work nearly 200k per citizen - on the back of their finite natural resources (oil), and I think that is the model that the UK (my country) should have followed

Are you only interested in Norway and the U.K., or do you not see a likely fallacy of composition here?
Apparently this isn't just two guys: https://twitter.com/rauchg/status/951185263698391040

Another interesting bit: https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/7phc5q/a_fast_r...
Better Novel Project – Deconstructing Bestselling Novels, One Doodle at a Time
Also around Denver. The most obvious current example is The Westminster Mall: https://goo.gl/maps/E3sJxEpMcCx

It used to be over a million square feet of retail space, but a few years ago it was almost completely demolished (only J.C. Penny remains!). Now they're working to redevelop it almost exactly like this article describes: http://denverurbanreview.com/2015/05/new-plan-for-former-wes...
Indeed but if you need security it’s a good solution.

I must have upset the hive mind by sharing a link. Oh well, hopefully someone finds value here.
First baby take 9 mo, but with a pipeline you can get the average close to 1 mo.
Redesigning Nodejs.org – Part 1: A Competitive Case Study
When I watched the last campaign the main message I got was that Clinton is not Trump and a woman and that's good enough to vote for her. I think she could easily have won if she had made a real case to vote for her.
What about teaching people to save then instead?
This sounds a lot like the idea of a social wealth fund: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/30/opinion/inequality-soc...
If the interest of individual business is to automate away your workforce but the interest of general society is to increase employment we're at a bit of a crossroads aren't we?

Perhaps Marx was right and it's time to move to a new phase of history.
I have always liked this paper. Pat Helland is a fountain of ideas. Another good one is "Immutability Changes Everything." http://cidrdb.org/cidr2015/Papers/CIDR15_Paper16.pdf
You can easily develop trains and create a series of nodes linking the outer suburb region to denser urban cities.

This has been done around the world for nearly a century, it's literally a solved problem but there is a distinct set of politicians in the US that don't want to spend any money for the public goods and would rather give the money out as corporate welfare.
Free software is obliged to use technologies that make contributors enjoy their job, especially for a project like Atom where you can't expect an individual or small group to do all of it.
Just to caution you, data structures aren't a great way to learn Rust. See this recent discussion, for example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16072630

Algorithms are fine, though.
Friday is actually the day most business travelers fly. Thursday evening has demand as well so we're looking into possibly offering some times Thursday evening too. Thanks for your feedback.
At least in the US, the “labor share”--which is the fraction of income that is paid to workers in wages, bonuses, and other compensation--has already been steadily declining. According to the Economic Report of the President (2013) [1], the labor share fell from 72 percent in 1980 to 60 percent in 2005. Increased automation can only make this problem worse.

1: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ERP-2013/content-detail.html
Isn't the transfer of income from labor to capital a good thing?
Would this logic be applicable in reverse?

For example, do users explicitly consent to myriad shady practices by advertisers and others when using the www simply because they use the www?

Do they "explicitly consent" to all these practices by not objecting?

Can a user "consent" to some practice without knowing it exists? How can she object to it without knowing what "it" is?

Terms of Use only covers the actions of one party. It does not provide assurances that those terms will be upheld by all the third parties that the website is profiting from when it gives those third parties access to the websites visitors.

Opinion: To be adequately informed in order to give "explicit consent", the user would need to see the terms of all the third party ad networks and others who are contracting with the website. Those companies are largely hidden from users. The easiest thing for the user is to just ask not to be subjected to the actions of these third parties.

Every website that opens its users up to an astounding number of third party servers1 can and likely will disclaim any liability from the actions of third parties.2

As others have stated, dealing with this problem on the client side is the viable alternative.3

1 Others have posted casual studies to HN of developers/users observing how many DNS requests or connections are made to third party servers for the "average" website by users with the popular browsers that automatically request resources. I leave it to the astute HN reader to find the web citations.

2 Random example of website terms: "FACEBOOK IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTIONS, CONTENT, INFORMATION, OR DATA OF THIRD PARTIES, AND YOU RELEASE US, OUR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY CLAIMS AND DAMAGES, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH ANY CLAIM YOU HAVE AGAINST ANY SUCH THIRD PARTIES."

3 Block access of third parties via client software. The counteraction by the advertisers will be to try to control the client software. Choice of software is important. If the authors of the software earn their quid from advertisers, then what happens? Users may succeed in stopping websites from selling them out, but they also muct succeed in stopping the software they use from selling them out in less obvious ways.
The cryptocurrency is their product actually.
I wonder if you could argue that running the algorithm on a virtual machine doesn't violate the patent...

I think Transmeta tried that by arguing that an x86 JIT doesn't infringe on patents for x86 processors.
All: if we're to have non-boring discussion on a hot+divisive topic like this one, please have the restraint to not post anything unless you have something thoughtful to say. Most first reactions are reflexive, i.e. predictable, i.e. uninteresting, i.e. off topic for Hacker News. Repetition is the enemy of curiosity.

A good antidote is to stop and ask yourself if your comment engages at all with anything specific and/or unpredictable in the article. If it doesn't, consider not posting it; odds are you're moving discussion quality in the wrong direction for this particular message board.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
It wasn't in the US back then but from Germany it looked like they lost their minds during the Clinton years. The Levinksy thing was just ridiculous.
I've seen these developments, but they have been designed from the start with such use in mind, are in prosperous areas, and have (at least by US standards) decent transit options and civic facilities. They aren't so different from Santana Row.

I'm less convinced (though open) that suburban malls in economically depressed areas that are in the path of the retail apocalypse can be retrofit to this purpose.
From 1910-1945, each country's richest 1% lost a lot of their wealth, all falling to (somewhat) similar levels. But in the time since, different countries 1% have built up wealth at very different speeds.

This suggests that a country's policy can actually have some effect - a lot is beyond each country's control, but it's not hopeless.

This is based on reading Thomas Piketty's "Capital in the Twenty First Century" (I'm halfway through) - really good read if you are interested in this.
In what way is a labor strike almost terrorism?
I'm sure this is technically possible, but it may never be practical. Much like human operators, you're going to want to drive the user down a certain path, because order is often extremely important.

What if Dominoes doesn't have green peppers? What if they don't like the pizza brand? What if they're asking because they have a coupon? You may end up repeating sections of the conversation multiple times, and in the end the user will just end up so confused they give up.
> I think that is the model that the UK (my country) should have followed.

I agree, but we do have to remember that Norway had roughly the same amount of oil as us, but a tenth of the population.
Famous Sports Logos Reimagined
> A nice key word there, arrested.

Given the Republicans arrested for voter fraud (yes, the kinds that actually affect the vote count) in the 2016 cycle, the more key phrase seems to be “I can't remember”.

It's not that it didn't happen, repeatedly and recently, it's just that fortythirteen doesn't remember it, perhaps because it clashes with a preconceived worldview.
santana row is a plastic disney downtown but with no real public amenities (library, community hall, park)

it is a mall with residential units, that is it

a very tacky pointlessly upscale mall
It blows my mind that there's market for this kind of frequent air travel when we have such a climate crisis on our hands.
I would wager that the two World Wars impact on capital had a lot to do with the decrease of the 1%'s wealth.
Capitalism is pretty much defined by placing a dollar value on production and seeking to maximise returns. The inevitable outcome is increasing profits by reducing the costs of production.

There is no “perhaps” about it. There are no policies that will stop a capitalist economy behaving like a capitalist economy.
Nice. I'd suggest automatically adding a todo list that had tasks about discovering all the features when a new user first loads the app. Having an essentially blank screen is going to cause a lot of users to bounce.

Also, I'd set

.workspace { overflow: hidden}

as I'm getting a double scrollbar in Chrome (Windows 10).
Indeed, I believe "National Park" in the centre of the North Island was the world's second national park. And Goat Island Marine Reserve was the world's first no-take-zone. The story I've heard of the latter is that we (as a society, globally) didn't even know the scope of the recovery that was possible before Goat Island. And the mere existence of DOC is promising.

And yes, I have relatively (to the previous government) high conservation hopes for the new government. Fingers crossed. (I should give some credit for the Kermadec Islands marine reserve here!)

Just to clarify though, my comment was about public sentiment. My anecdotal experience is that Brits are more concerned about conservation than New Zealanders. Which I was quite surprised to discover. And largely I wanted to commiserate with the parent of my comment.
That's correct about the use case. We're thinking about offering 8 flights/month but didn't think there would be that much demand for that option. Could be wrong though
I selected a successful example of an attempt at a sovereign wealth fund (in fact the only example that I know), and an example of a country that chose not to implement a sovereign wealth fund despite being the same situation. I'm not entirely sure if the examples I chose constitute a fallacy. I was merely suggesting one approach that could work for some countries to establish equal funds for their citizens. Some countries may not have access to abundant raw resources though.
Miami Bitcoin Conference Stops Accepting Bitcoin Due to Fees and Congestion
Please don't post unsubstantive comments to HN, and especially not ideological flamebait.
We might not be better off, but the rest of the planet sure as hell would be. Not to mention that the history of overpopulation would be very different without those things.
Perhaps discharging her (or not hiring her in the first place) wouldn't change all that much in the grand scheme of things. Maybe, opposing a well-known proponent of a shady agenda in such a position is just a feel-good measure, a drop in the ocean that ultimately doesn't change anything.

However, that doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing something on principle because ethically it's the right thing to do. Obviously, I failed to do so myself in that case because I still have a Dropbox account. After all, one specific name on the board perhaps really isn't all that important for users to switch to another service that might not offer the same benefits as Dropbox.

Still, it's a slippery slope. I think both shareholders and customers have to hold companies accountable for their behaviour.
They would need to resolve all of the domains, and compile a list of IPs.. but one problem that jumps out to me is geodns/round robin policies/etc. If LE makes a dns request, they can't be guaranteed that they're seeing all of the IPs for a domain.

For example.. if a number of domains are at a CDN (that does not use anycast)... they may all resolve to a single IP (to LE, from the location they're requesting from)... but really that CDN may have hundreds of IPs that are all valid for those domains. LE would then add that single IP to the list as a shared IP, but LE verification requests sent to those other IPs would still be vulnerable.
exactly. it is a mall, not a town

do you really want to live in a mall?

outside of santana row is winchester blvd and steven's creek blvd...aka nothing
http://cppcast.com/2017/05/bjarne-stroustrup/
A podcast. He mentions it at around 42:00.
You own a downgrade + a response :)
Angular doesn't have to be cool to works.
It's a mature framework. I find it very useful and I can do anything with it by now.
Since it's ok with object oriented concept, and still actively backed by google, it will stay attractive in enterprise, most than any other js framework.
Is it really bandwagonning to be annoyed that so many bits of software, which many people run simultaneously, use a tool where a Hello World is over 100MB in memory?

At least the Electrino idea is more reasonable. Using a framework already loaded into memory by the OS and sharing it would go a long way toward reducing the bloat...though not toward the horrible battery problems it introduces. Seriously, people are still brushing aside issues with something where a blinking cursor caused CPUs to crank up to the max...
The difference in centralization is striking. When I lived in Wales, the "no smoking in bars" law went into effect nationwide. Such a concept is nearly unthinkable in the USA.
More generally, the issue is that it solidifies control to the two political parties participating in the "I cut you choose" game, which are both incentivized to marginalize any 3rd party.

I wonder if the game can be fairly expanded to X number of parties?
That might just create yet more problems. You can't just plug a new CPU into your motherboard--it has to match the socket, chipset, memory, installed OS, etc.
It must be tough to see how quickly the community turns on you when something better (in some ways) comes around.

Atom clearly offered something that struck a chord when it initially appeared. I remember having an idea, and implementing it as a plugin, all within a lazy Sunday afternoon. This allowed the ecosystem to flourish, and new ideas being extremely easy to at least prototype.

It also allowed unprecedented[0] access to almost everything.

The latter turned out to be somewhat of a curse, unfortunately. Because the wide-ranging access allowed extension authors, and their users, to shoot themselves in the foot: It often lead to performance degradation, instability, murky UIs etc. Such troubles would usually be attributed to Atom itself. This was the groundwork for the narrative to almost instantly flip when VSCode appeared.

VSCode itself took the lessons from Atom, which must make it even more painful to now see it glorified vis-a-vis Atom: Extensions have to work through tightly defined protocols, and are never run on the main threat. This works well to avoid performance issues and to keep the UI from disintegrating. But it is also a severe limitation on the freedom to experiment, which is why that extension I once tried my hand on could not possibly be build in VSCode (it renders block comments written in Markdown as HTML right in the source code, including images, diagrams, links etc.)

[0]: Yeah, I'm sure there's some other editor that did it before. But somehow Atom got it right with Javascript as the language, and maybe the UI and documentation steering people to actually try it.