skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That makes it sound easy. For some, trying to cut back is not giving up on a few pleasures, it's embarking on an incredibly effortful, emotionally and often physically draining undertaking.
How I made a validation library using ES6 Proxy
That's where `mosh` comes in.
Pulldown-cmark – a pull parser for CommonMark, written in Rust
to be clear, white foreigners are treated like minor celebrities.
A list of resources would be hard to exactly recall and become outdated.

It's more about the idea that resources are available and to heres a starting point to find your own.
I bet a little bit of it in the modern world is rationalization for eating and generally mistreating animals.
I think Christopher Nolan is the best all-around modern director. His movies are huge critical hits: most of them are in the IMDb Top 250 (most directors would be happy to have one film up there). His films are also huge box-office hits, which means that the audience, not just movie nerds, like his movies.

I think the distribution for films is bimodal, one huge peak for box-office/mass-appeal hits, and another smaller peak for critical hits/film-nerd-appeal hits.

Nolan would be right in the center between these two distributions: he pushes cinema forward while keeping it accessible to all.
Jesus christ yes pleas
The definition of 'arranged marriage' today has been neutered. Until 2 generations ago, arranged marriage meant that women had absolutely no say in their marriage - it was at the decision of the parents and to further the desires of the parents.

Today, arranged marriage means that the woman's parents will present her with prospective marriage partners but leave the decision making to her, including veto or asking the parents to 'arrange' for a man that the woman fancies - kind of like Tinder but the matching algorithm is parents. That version of arranged marriage is straight up better than the (serious) dating scene in westernized countries.

The original version is definitely considered evil by today's morals.
>“Most papers are now freely available somewhere on the Internet, or else you might choose to work with preprint versions. Clearly our negotiating position is strong. It is not clear that we want or need a paid extension of the old contracts.”

Awesome! It's going to be fun when Elsevier eventually tries to go after SciHub in Germany for copyright violations. I can imagine state prosecutors asking: "So you want us to prosecute someone for not paying you for access to public research?". One can hope...
Fines are not for breaking laws, but for torts. Violating rules. People do it all the time, and its not unethical? Like paying a fee for filing taxes late. Folks in a bind do that all the time. Getting a parking ticket because you have to be by your spouse while the baby is being born. Renewing your driver's license late because you forgot/got busy.
I wouldn't be surprised if all of these killed less humans or even creatures than the humans (and their cars) combined.
As I said elsewhere, I could make do with 16 gigs but I sometimes need to run things like development databases or Windows VMs (plural) on this too and I like the breathing room.

I already said it's a trade-off. Even with multiple instances side by side, VSCode barely registers. A gig of RAM may matter to you but I'm going to guess your needs are very different from mine and VSCode helps me do my job better than the alternatives I've tried.

Also, as you might be unaware of that: you're being a bit of an ass.
They didn't add the K80s until February of 2017, did you really think they'd literally throw out hardware after less than 12 months? "Accelerated" means 18-36 month shelf life, not 10.
Managing+big+data+storage+–+options+for+2018
Proxy support in major browsers is here, time to unleash all the power it brings.

I’ve wondered for a while now what was this Proxy thing I kept stumbling upon on MDN. I’ve read the description and the API many times. However, it wasn’t very clear to me what were the use cases where I could take advantage of it. Anyway one weekend I made some time to dig deeper into it, read a bunch of blog posts, and decided to experiment a little bit.

The result was a declarative approach to validation with ES6 Proxy in its core. Go check it out on GitHub!

https://github.com/sorodrigo/proxy-validator
Anyone living in the West who looks down on certain US politicians for their anti-immigrant sentiments but is fine with China's state enforced ethnic nationalism might want to stop and think deeply as to why.

It's essentially impossible for a Westerner to gain anything more than a temporary visa, even if they marry a Chinese citizen.
If we instead go onto crime;

If you look at violent crime we have 6 times more robberies, 4 times more murders and 18 times more gun crime in the USA compare to China (per capita)

Does it mean you're going to be seeing people getting shot everywhere all the time? No.

Does it mean general safety in the US is much worse? Yes.

Things are much worse in USA in a variety of meaningful respects. Does that mean it's impossible to live there? Not at all. Well, if you can stand having Trump as the president of the country you live in.
Wouldn't be surprised. The more we learn about the animals we eat the more we seem to learn that they're sentient, have a full range of emotions, and they most definitely experience suffering because of intensive farming and other things we put them through.
The human immune response and the impact of age, sex, and genetics
paper: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2017/12/26/1714765115.full
Jekyll (and other similar projects like Hugo) will let you do custom styles. You have to write your own theme, but this is just HTML+CSS with a bit of templating. Far larger projects I would recommend using a CSS framework such as inuit.css with SASS, but for smaller projects you can get away with plain CSS.

Your other option is to use something like Laravel or Rails or Express, and just do server-side rendering. A lot of people are still doing this, and it's still well supported.

The advantage of the static site generators is much better performance / lower resource usage, at the cost of flexibility.
6 times!? I mean it's such a good film but it's like 3 hours long!!
Many people can't handle the pacing of older sci-fi movies. I remember watching the Andromeda Strain with my wife when we were teenagers. She said it was the most boring movie she had ever seen.
How to Validate Your Innovative Product as a Business
First direct proof of ozone hole recovery due to chemicals ban
I find X-over-ssh unusable over anything non-local, even over local wifi it stumbles: the latency is especially painful. There's Xpra, which makes this somewhat bearable even on mid-level residential connections (unimpressive speed, high latency, horrible jitter), but for single kB speed, even plain ssh is really bad (with mosh making it just bad). This would make the result not-quite-horrible.
Personal integrity? Calm? Harmony with surroundings?

I wonder if there are animals that produce ElsaGate videos, or come up with rationalizations for them. I'm sure there's animals who eat their offspring in certain situations, but are there any that just bite them to death, to then proceed to run in hysterical circles, counting symbols and telling themselves "narratives"? Where can I find such a pathetic thing in the wild?
Except medallions are goverened by rules and regulations, not so much law. Violating the medallion rule isn't breaking a law. You pay a fine. If you're good with that, then go ahead; we all pay fines of convenience from time to time (late payments, overstaying in a parking space etc).

So I'm fine with rule of law, and fine with getting fined for violations of medallion regulations.
Someone should use this to download all the papers available for 'archival purposes'.
1) They aren't going to have to pay a fine
2) This would just screw the shareholders, making the stock worth less
3) Open source doesn't have the people, skills, or finances to utilize Intel's internal design data - the only beneficiary from this would be other chip manufacturers and nation-states. I'm not sure who this would benefit?
Learn React with the React Starter Kit
Possible, but I think it's more probable that security agencies took advantage of those bugs with the help from Intel than intentionally putting those there in the first place.
While this is true, they have to be weary of setting taxes too high. There is already a lot of infrastructure set up for the black market and you have to makes sure the taxes aren't so high that the legal market can't compete with the black market.
I was under the assumption that it's worse than just sharing cores or servers. Even machines that do not share cores but share a common hypervisor are cross-vulnerable.

From Wikipedia [0]:

Spectre has the potential of having a greater impact on cloud providers than Meltdown. Whereas Meltdown allows unauthorized applications to read from privileged memory to obtain sensitive data from processes running on the same cloud server, Spectre can allow malicious programs to induce a hypervisor to transmit the data to a guest system running on top of it.

However I have also read that Spectre is confined to userspace, so I'm not sure who is correct.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectre_(security_vulnerabilit...
> The nationwide deal sought by scientists includes a open-access option, under which all corresponding authors affiliated with German institutions would be allowed to make their papers free to read and share by anyone in the world.

This is a very good clause to the German institutions. Everybody will like to exchange letters, informations, get in contact with German authors. And when we have communication, we have knowledge and data sharing, and everybody benefits from it. Specially the corresponding authors.
the idea of a bird intentionally carrying fire instead of fleeing it seems a bit odd

Small prey flees fire -> raptor associates fire with food -> raptor is attracted to fire -> raptor picks up stick with fire -> raptor drops stick since it isn't actually food -> small prey flees new fire -> raptor associates dropping fire stick with food.
How do you know what the ant imagines it is dying for, when it dies for its colony?
Need help on What kind of startup do you want it to be?
Under this title the writer is trying to say that the kind of startup needs to be thought of. I've read it multiple times but I don't get it why is it important to decide on the type of startup.

https://www.amazon.in/dp/B00TACMNTU/ref=pe_386221_57731711_pe_520732_50917562M1DP

Can someone please help me understand why is it important to decide on the type of startup?
Interesting move, to give free access. You would think that, withholding access is a great way for Elsivier to increase pressure in the negotiation. The fact, that they are not doing it, shows how weak their position really is.

Researchers will (and have) find effective ways to share research results w/o traditional publishers. This would surface very quickly once access was temporarily revoked.
My neighbor of mine used to work as a bookie, letting people make illegal bets on sporting events. He said the toughest part about his business was the piles of cash he had to manage. He said once you take in around $500K USD (or something like that), you have so much physical cash that it prevents you from scaling. He needed to keep the cash on hand to pay the winners, and getting robbed would probably have been fatal. That gave me a new appreciation for digital banking.
I don't mind "not getting" newer stuff. What I came to learn was that
a) I liked a lot of mindless pop culture when I was young.
b) There's still a lot of good, meaningful stuff released these days, it's just less popular. Of course this is subjective, but I doubt something like, for example, Pink Floyd would enjoy the same mainstream appeal today.

What I find worrying about the comments on the movie was why it was disliked. It sounds like the movie doesn't contain enough "action" to spark interest.
“Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly;
Man got to sit and wonder 'why, why, why?'
Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land;
Man got to tell himself he understand.”

- Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
Except they don't mean to do anything. They're carrying an acorn, they pass a juicy spot, they feel compelled to stick the acorn in the spot. At no time does the squirrel think "I'll sacrifice this food now for food later!" So it's not reasonable to call it a sacrifice except metaphorically?
> If the SFPD isn't going to arrest you for smoking joints or selling potklava in Dolores Park, what's the federal government going to do?

Target the successful state-authorized businesses (and key individuals in those businesses) selling pot (and those businesses, and key individuals in them, knowingly providing key services to those pot businesses) using, among other tools, RICO, the Continuing Criminal Enterprise law (popularly known as the “drug kingpin” law, with mandatory 20-year or, for.more successful businesses, life sentences), and the regular drug trafficking laws and the full panoply of civil and criminal forfeiture provisions associated with all of those laws.

A state-licensed industry isn't going to survive when most of the evidence that the feds need to secure major felony convictions—and seize all the assets of the businesses—against operators is available in state licensing and tax records, and a tiny bit more work lets them do the similar things to supporting businesses.

State-legal marijuana regulatory schemes—and businesses participating in them, even at one step removed from.the direct marijuana trade—exist through federal prosecutorial forbearance, and one of the reasons that state-legal marijuana businesses have had so much problem with access to banking and other support services is that there is wide knowledge of this fact and the lack of guarantee that that forbearance will continue indefinitely, with potentially devastating consequence for anyone who participated in that market even while the forbearance was the executive policy.
yup, I've heard many stories of expats turning around and leave the second they found the internet frustrating, which is strange that they didn't do their homework before coming.

Also, the food I found ok; lack of variety (hot pot, shaokao, dumpling, repeat), and no good international cuisines. You can also get safer Chinese food in Taiwan or Los Angeles. As for weather, it's usually made worse by pollution. And recently, foreigners have been treated with disdain by locals because of nationalism.
I see where you're coming from, in the past I've gdb'd... gdb itself to figure out an obscure bug. It gets a bit confusing at times (better use different prompts at least) but this way you could step through the debugger's code itself instead of deciphering strace's output for instance.
It's polarizing for me as an individual.

I absolutely love most of that movie. The pacing, the set design, the score - fantastic.

The end with the nutty lights -- I hate. It's hard for me to believe it's all in the same movie because I hate it almost to the point of anger. If that part wasn't in the movie I would probably have watched it a lot more than the two or three times I have.
Syscalls are complex beasts, the patches for Meltdown only affect the bit where you transition between userspace and kernel space - this a static cost. Thus, when Avid Media Composer stats a few hundred files on a NAS far, far away from your CPU, the performance cost these patches incur will be negligible.
Television licencing property checks are normal in the UK as well - I've had a few inspectors demand access to my home to verify that I wasn't watching TV illegally.
For a long time there used to be "TV detector vans" that would drive around areas supposedly detecting TVs in use in unlicensed properties - I believe it was ( still is? ) illegal to publish any information surrounding the efficacy of these vehicles ( Obviously because they don't work ).
Of course not, but there just has to be one apart from ours, right? Besides we will all be extinct anyway before that because evolution takes billions of years.
he's responsible for his actions, but the way you word that makes it sound like he's the only person responsible for the morally reprehensible things Uber has done, which is not true.
How on earth do you know that?

And what difference does 'knowing' make? Do they make the sacrifice or not? They clearly do.
Well, this isn’t my point of view but the US largely subsidizes the medicine and research for the rest of the world when it comes to health. Just look at the number of medical innovations year coming the rest of the world COMBINED vs the US. Clearly there’s some free riding happening by the rest.

Furthermore, don’t ever say “excellent Cuban” anything. There’s a reason why people try to cross shark infested waters on dingy rafts from Cuba to Key West, Florida. People vote with their feet and wallets.
By reading, being educated.
Its far to late to be mystified about how animals work. Its a couple of centuries of study by now, about their instincts and behaviors.

And recall, 'understanding the concept of sacrifice' was the topic.
I had that problem with magic a long time ago, when I learned a fair amount about it (a friend of mine is a magician and I learned while he did, though only casually). I had to retrain myself to watch a performance with the intent to just enjoy it rather than try to figure it out as it happened. Ignoring the how and just enjoying the what makes it a lot more fun.
if they dont have a bank of cash available, are they really a bank? (yes, i believe it's a bank too, but to me it's a head scratcher)
It's about Apple, not the developer.

For Apple to make $99 of your sales (not accounting for taxes etc), you'd need to generate a volume of sales of which 30% would amount to $99, i.e. $99 / 0.3 = $330.

If you're asking "how much does a developer need to make in sales every year to recoup their membership fee" that's different: $99 / 0.7 ≈ $142 (rounded up). But that's kinda orthogonal to Apple's interests.
Hmm I haven't really thought about this but I was hoping there was some new development in the understanding of animal communication. I'm not a linguist but as far as I understand communication is not language. Language is communication however.

I guess I was hoping that this section of the language wikipedia didn't exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language#Unique_status_of_huma....
SciHub is not located in Germany so there's little they can do.
International Box-Office Surprises of 2017
Because non-technical staff are expected to access, interact, and keep up to date with developer workflow using git now. Seems like abstracting some of the higher-order functionality away while adding project management amenities and making git friendly for those people might be an opportunity.

For instance, I'm thinking of products like Conveyor: https://wildbit.com/blog/2017/02/14/our-next-product-conveyo...
How did you end up at $165? That's $99 / 0.6, not $99 / 03. Apple's "tax" is 30%, isn't it?
Ask HN: Building a new website monitoring service in 2017?
I always wonder if "disrupting" existing markets is possible, for example the monitoring website business. Is there any point in building a new service in that space or is better to look in other places?
This also applies to other common web services, what do you think?

I
Meh. Thanks to the technological and cultural advancements of the Afro-Euro-Asian human cluster, we could wipe 99% of these “threats” tomorrow if we wanted to. In fact, we did have comparable dangers in other continents in the past - we just had no qualms with killing every single one of them or burning their ecosystem to the ground, because we had no concept of “ecosystem”: everything in nature was a threat to be dealt with, and that was that. Back in the day, you could be attacked by rabid wolves while sitting in your garden! So we killed them, we hunted them down systematically until they were no longer a threat. We had terrible insects, killing and spreading diseases! So we removed all swamps and invented chemicals to massacre them. Etc etc.

Australia, for geographical reasons, simply started the process too late, when we were already getting cold feet. Now that we understand how Nature works a bit more, it’s become difficult to justify large-scale efforts to remove these threats to human life. We find it more acceptable to suffer a potential spider bite here and there, than to risk irreparable losses to the variety of life and the quality of our planet’s natural state.

If anything, the fact that Australia manages to slowly expand human footprint while still maintaining a balanced truce with our predators, is testament to the level of emotional maturity that our animal race has reached.
Wouldn't Content ID just be a civil matter if the revenue is under a certain amount, given that it operates outside of the DMCA?
Occam's Razor suggests to me that intelligence agencies have not had to push for processor bugs, on the grounds that A: we can adequately explain the initial existence of these bugs by normal engineering, marketing, and management considerations such as almost everyone here has experienced personally and B: the field of the bugs that come from my first point is so ripe that the intelligence agencies are better served by examining them carefully and finding their own exploits. The primary reason for this is that the best hidden paper trail is the non-existent paper trail; by finding bugs independently and holding all knowledge within the agency, there is zero risk of it ever being revealed that they deliberately inserted bugs into the CPU, which would be a PR disaster for all concerned (and to a non-trivial extent, an act of war).

Given that we know that intelligence agencies have asked for backdoors before, in both hardware and encryption standards, do not interpret my post here as a claim that they would never ever even think of asking for plausibly-deniable CPU bugs to be inserted into hardware. I am just saying that Occam's Razor says we should prefer the perfectly plausible scenario I gave above where they do not have direct involvement in these bugs, not because of their pristine ethics, but because given the circumstances on the ground, actively intervening is not their best choice from their point of view using their valuation function, when they can attain all their goals without active intervention.

(I'm willing to believe in things that might be labelled "conspiracy theories"; history is rife with proof that they have existed in the past, such as the aforementioned cases where we know backdoors have been inserted into crypto standards, as well as other things such as the way in which the Soviet Union was created which essentially involved what was initially a small conspiracy, and I see no reason to believe they have ceased in the modern times. But I want to see how the conspiracy theory passes Occam's Razor; many of the conspiracy-minded, in my opinion, underestimate the randomness and everything-is-always-correlated-a-bit-ness of the real world.)
Even if the universe is deterministic, its future is still unknowable, as in to predict the future of the universe you would need something to simulate every subatomic particle of all matter etc and so doing that computation would need something bigger than the universe.

I like to think of the universe as a deterministic computer that is calculating its own outcome - there is no shortcut to jump to the end.