skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Clintons seem to excel at taking care of the Clintons. I think they'll be just fine.
Landing.AI aims to help enterprises transform for the age of AI
Spam, scams and badvertizements have been around seemingly since long before the internet.
I was going to say something similar to this. Usually such abstractions are leaky. I don't know the target market for this product. The one's who know CUDA will just use C++. The one's who know C++ won't use this. The one's who do not know CUDA will probably not use this because they will need to learn CUDA first anyway.

(Same story with those C# to Javascript compilers)
The human brain’s bandwidth for visual images is severely limited
Stop losses don't protect you if the fall is rapid enough and there are no buyers. Your order simply won't get executed (at least not where you want it). That's what I think will happen if the Bitcoin bubble bursts. Being 'intelligent' doesn't protect you from reality. But I'm sure you knew all that, and don't _deserve_ to lose your money.
List of conferences on ML (in no particular order)
1. NIPS
2. ICLR
3. ICML

List of Conferences on CV (in no particular order)
1. CVPR
2. ECCV
3. ICCV
shhh... that’s antisemetic and islamophobic
>Also when I get a haircut they give a big discount for cash

“discount” ;)
Nice euphemism for tax evasion.
Amtrak train derails from bridge onto Interstate 5 near Olympia, WA
Personally I don't really care if it takes 5% longer to get where I needed to go or not.

Especially if I get the huge benefit of not having to drive.

Driving risky really doesnt speed up your commute very much.
The counter argument is that if you make an error using the CLI, you end up spending more time fixing it than if you just had the GUI open and watching your repo already, and simply switch to it when you need to commit/push.
Ugh, I really wish everyone contributed to OpenStreetMap and shared its dataset. I don't want map accuracy to be a competitive advantage.
Tipping is often associated with both corruption and racism:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/09/05/study...

http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic...

I have actually almost entirely stopped using Uber after they made tipping part of the app. I've worked in a place with tipping, and my experience directly corroborates those links.
NIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR. Can't recall which are will be jn Europe off the top of my head..
replays are available to people who purchased tickets, I dont think they were posted publicly anywhere. But you should keep your eye on them to see if they have another conference. It is suuuper cheap and online so its convenient (maybe not the highest quality talks, but still good).
You could hold n amount of dollars in an escrow account that would donate it all to charity if you didn't make solid grades if you really wanted to.

All the other problems you cited are instances of baseless bias or could be addressed in an online setting. I suppose it depends on the university you attend but I never experienced "doing exercises under supervision and guidance" and indeed, people who can only work/be motivated in that setting woulud probably make terrible professional developers.
I think "digital" is more accurate than "tech" now. And even then it's not always accurate. Is Uber a tech company or a taxi company? Is AirBnB tech or hospitality?

Very few of the companies we call "tech startups" are actually producing tech as an output. More like they are solving technical challenges to increase efficiency or create market niches in traditional industries.
Yes, caliber and grains matter too (in addition to barrel).
A rim fire .22 is so different from a .223, that it's comparing them is almost useless (but not quite). Just look at the cartridge and it becomes very clear...
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2011/05/03/guest-post-22-...
Use without understand it
Why not judge the concerns on their own merit?

Blocking a chip or other technology that's hard to vet is one thing.

Blocking mapping when the same is already accessible from space via spy and public satellites? Does not really makes sense.

Now, of course these cases can and should be compared, but so far it seems that citing national security issues in one case seems to be pretty baseless excuse, whereas in the other case it seems to have some merit, even if the actual ban of Chinese sourced components is ridiculous, because a lot of other things are sourced/imported from China with the same or more severe espionage potential.
Funny, but clearly not possible. For all the real examples of Chinese copying, I think we're starting to see companies in China level up (DJI, Huawei, Xiaomi, etc.). When I was a kid, 'Made in Japan' was scorned as junk, by the time I was in college, it meant Sony and Toyota. I don't see any reason Chinese goods wouldn't be on the same trajectory.
I'm aware of donations through apps like GoFundMe, but does there exist any services for making digital donations to homeless people I might encounter on the street? I've thought about how the lack of cash is affecting these people, quite a lot but haven't encountered any solutions.
Truly right
> Avoiding the debate of whether there are any widespread real-world usage for cryptocurrencies...

That is not debatable. Some of our customers pay our company in Argentina in BTC and at the end we have more money that if we use wire transfer via banks and with all the legal support. This is because banks in many countries don't offer a fair exchange rate and via Bitcoin we can reduce the difference.

Most people in HN don't see benefits because they live in well developed countries with highly developed financial services.
Ohhh, this is exactly what I want, minus emacs.
What sort of market share does OpenEMR have? How many customer installs are there? 10s? 1000s?
I just read this. Here's my biggest objection:

"In both sets of photographs, the subjects' faces were obscured. See figure 1 for sample photographs. Set 1 photos included both front and side views; Set 2 photos had only front views."

So far, it seems like the conclusion should be that upper body strength accounts for variance in attractiveness when the only available information is visual imagery of a man's body, with the face obscured.. That's a big enough qualifier that I think the conclusion in the title is misleading, and claims a broader conclusion than can be justified from this study.

The study authors did address this somewhat in question d:
"Research on facial attractiveness reveals that some women prefer more feminized and less dominant faces". It sounds like they way they studied this was to see if preference for more feminized faces might translate into a similar preference for bodies, and they found that it did not. However, this doesn't address the possibility that faces might count for more variance if the raters had seen them, right? Again, I may be missing something here, but I'm not seeing it so far from the study.

Lastly, does anyone know how the study specifically controlled for upper body strength? Were there any images of men who were athletic but had most of their strength in their lower body? I'm not seeing it here, may have missed it.

At this point, I do think that the claim in the title is too substantial given then evidence from this study. I'd say that there certainly does appear to be evidence that upper body strength accounts for variance in attractiveness when a rater has access only to non-facial physical features, but even then, I'm not entirely sure the study adequately controlled for other athletic physical traits.
Your examples illustrate perfectly how government regulation establishes monopolies and cronyism
Is security a job that you want compensated mainly by tips?

"Hey, I've never seen you before, what is your business here?"

"That's right, you haven't seen me before." Slips them $100 and walks by.
this is great. for your next trick can you do a few transactions in the tangle iota by hand too?
>If somebody lost a commit after a rebase, and nobody nearby could help them recover it, they should consider spending a few hours learning about git.

GIT is the only source control system where you can completly loose commited data by actions (or commands) available the non-admin user. It's funny to see that this is considered a "feature" and not a design failure.
That overengineered part is the beauty of it. If you explain this to anyone outside the field, there eyes will glaze over, the will nod vehemently when asked for agreement and sign the consultant hours.

Sometimes its just enough to appear clever.
The gap is less extreme than you might think. You can get a pharmacist for less than 4 teens making 15$ an hour.

But again mostly you need to get your drugs in the day.
No idea. I just went into the bank and said I needed to send money to China.
I think it's because we (global powers) are more civilized these days. In this modern era it's harder (not impossible) to go to war when there isn't an egregious threat/harm present. The populous now needs to feel it's justified.
Finally, something productive for the kids in Africa to do!
Sure eventually, but most pay out dividends over their lifetime that are greater than their current value or get bought out. Growth companies don't, but that's because they think they'd do a better job reinvesting.
HBO Go's interface has its issues, but it makes it relatively easy to see what's new this month or so. Well, I can tell usually it's not enough to justify staying subscribed. So I subscribe ~4-6 months a year watch what I want to see and then unsubscribe. I'm pretty certain I'd follow a similar pattern with Netflix if there isn't wasn't obfuscating their catalog.
I cannot give enough thanks to everyone that works so hard on Kubernetes. The speed of these releases, community support, industry adoption, feature set, and ease of use are beyond anything I could have asked for.

I started a startup about 18 months ago and our product requires a massive amount data pipelining. The infrastructure we have running on Kubernetes is beyond what a small group should be able to deploy and maintain by ourselves, but Kubernetes makes it not only possible, but enjoyable (really).

To everyone involved (and there are a lot): Thank you SO much. I can't wait to see what 2018 looks like for Kubernetes.
Comparisons of powerful API testing tools
I wonder how that would work in reality. There are so many exchanges. You’d have to do a massive coordinated effort. Any “massive” drop on a single exchange would be seen as a great arbitrage opportunity and get eaten up.
Bubbles are fun. People are enjoying everything you mention because of the volatility (see, e.g., the rollercoaster meme), and because they are making money. The same reason people in the 90s enjoyed day-trading Internet stocks, people in the 1600s enjoyed talking about Tulips, or people in the 00s enjoyed talking about flipping houses.

At some point it will pop. People will despair and move on, except for the true believers. They will build something lasting, and less volatile, but no, I don't think the speculators will continue to find fun in something that is no longer moving up so rapidly (even if it's steadily increasing and creating value).
I think we can rule out lyft given how much money they lost last year, but more importantly because they started out as a long distance ride sharing business (zimride in 2007).

Vox media started out as a sports blog in 2005.

I don't think there were any billion dollar fantasy sport companies back in 2012 when Draftkings started.

Oscar and Wish I am not sure as they are impossible to search for.

I am not sure which billion dollar company The Honest Company copied.

Sure you can grow into a billion dollar company by copying the model of an existing large company, but I don't know of any startups that have grown to a billion dollar by starting out just copying an existing billion dollar company's model without bring something new to the table.
Well, sure. But that feels like a bit of a dismissal of the issue. New tech has enabled our much more convenient cashless society, but it's left a gaping hole for certain members of that society. It doesn't seem unreasonable that tech might also think about ways to fix that problem too, rather than deferring the awkward stuff to someone/anyone else.
> The argument is focused on those who can not learn how it works.

If you're a software developer who uses branches and merges, you absolutely should learn how it works.

If you're an artist, git is not for you. It can neither store large binary files efficiently, nor merge them. There are other VCS that supposedly can, but I haven't tried them.

> Also, it's important to note that everything on that list is something that actually happened.

I can assure you, no data was permanently lost. What did happen is somebody couldn't find it, because they didn't know where to look. And I argue they should have, because git is not really that hard to learn (as a developer).
Another concern is that Satoshi probably passed his coins to his heirs. Whoever they are, they could emerge a de-facto world power since they alone control ~5% of wealth.

And there's no way for society to decide that should change. They can act as evil as they want with no fear of losing their coins.
Thank you so much! These are pretty useful tricks. Just a question: What's the difference between reflog and using git log to later checkout to a given commit?
The Current Sex Panic Harks Back to the Era of Coddling Women
Tile38 – Realtime geofencing and geospatial index, v1.10.0
And then you still have the commits, but no branch pointing to them. Don't worry, they're still there.
There's a lot of permutations of this story including life support systems in hospitals I find them all apocryphal. The cleaning staff would notice right away if they just shut down a huge computer. Esp. in the 80s I doubt it even used the same outlet as a regular vacuum cleaner.
> For example, in a scriptless world, your HN up/down vote can't be done without a full page load, which would come with the added headache of changing the state of the world on your page because stories and comments have changed their ordering. Solution? Return of the chronological thread (no thanks).

I don't see why it would have to change the state of the world on your page. Sites like HN in a scriptless client world would still be programmatically generated on the server, and presumably could still keep track of state via cookies or via adding parameters to links when they generate the page.

Up/down vote could reload the same view you had before voting, with only the effects of your vote added.
That's pretty obviously not how tips given to doormen work, come on.
"This time it's happening to white people (gasp!)" (lol)
Yes, that is correct, but it was always happening to them, simply not in a forceful enough manner for them to counteract the counter-messaging that told/tells them how exceptional they are.

Anyone who is actually interested in understanding American class dynamics should look at the history of the social CONSTRUCT of race and "whiteness." Who was and wasn't "white" has always changed based on the needs of the uber-affluent to create a protective buffer between themselves and everyone else. (And this isn't exclusive to America. Similar dynamics have played out pretty much non-European area that Europeans 'civilized'.) Digging into immigration policy implementation and development a little can teach one much.

Unfortunately, after having had so many years of being able to tell themselves that no matter their respective situations, at least they weren't N-----s, it is incredibly difficult to convince certain people to conduct an objective review of facts. At its 'settling' what was to be America broke down between those who owned stuff and those who would work for them, period. As I said above, once the numbers got a little hairy for the owners, the workers were broken into groups. Workforce and union membership expands to excluded groups as market needs change, i.e. as one group of workers becomes too expansive for employers and/or union membership flags among the initiated...

As automation progresses there is less need for any of the people and as such, I believe we end up where we are today.

Anyway, I only logged in to ask you (and other sharing your sentiment) how you'd feel about working for $15k a year?

I'm in D.C. and recently attended an event at which an 'educated' person working for a big name think tank floated such jobs as a solution to all this angst (particularly among the downtrodden "white" people, since, after Trump's election and all, they are the focus group du jour).
Thanks! Didn't know that.
Actually, the founding fathers had a lot to say on this topic: https://pastebin.com/SfhHWVPb
I dunno about you but my middle school makes me come back every 5 years to go over newly added content. Flying all that way really is a pain.
I think a big part of it is that common libraries do it and ask you to do it more. Spring and Tomcat and etc are, imo, abominations of complexity -- but you still often find yourself buying into their ecosystems. Especially if you're working on code that's a few years old.
Door keepers in NYC are actually unionized: http://www.seiu32bj.org/who-we-are/
US Rep. wrote editorial on warrantless searches at the border
> protocol-level technologies for preserving historic data, for search, for offline use, for authoring and publishing

It does [1][2][3]. It's not the most elegant, it's not without flaws, but it's there, and enough to build against. Proprietary services weren't bound by having to code against a standard, so they cranked out something quick (and mutually incompatible), skinned an attractive interface, offered it for free (!) and attracted lots of users, who in turn attracted more users with the network effect. This is why Facebook, Wikipedia, Google Docs, Github won, and protocols like WebDAV lost.

This future was crafted by the makers of web browsers themselves: first by shifting the focus onto rendering arbitrary mediatypes delivered by HTTP from focusing on the intrinsic builtins of HTTP as a protocol, and later by trying to "standardize" the rich interactivity offered by the likes of Shockwave, Flash, and Silverlight, creating more and more APIs inside the browser that allowed client-side Javascript to communicate with the underlying system. Web developers aren't blameless, but today's web is exactly how Google, Mozilla, and Microsoft, in reverse order, steered it since the late 1990s.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4918 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3253 [3] https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relatio...
Typing Toccata
A year ago, I gave up my multi-monitor/multi-tasking. I was deluding myself that it was more productive.

I now do everything (including code) in a single window that is no larger than the focus of my field of vision.

I keep all my windows stacked in the center of my screen and CMD-Tab through them. I have become very fast with CMD-Tab (and related shortcuts).

I used to code with multiple windows -- IDE, preview, logs, StackExchange, etc. all open in multiple places. The lack of focus made it less productive for me.

Now, I keep a small log window open in the lower right section of my screen, then have my code editor and preview window stacked.

My workflow is basically: code, code, code, CMD-s (save), CMD-tab to preview window, CMD-r (run/refresh), CMD-tab to the log window so I can view the errors, then back to code to start bug fixing.

My head never moves. My neck is always at the right height and my eyes are always in the right place. I use a standing desk and this setup has helped prevent neck and shoulder pain.

Another big benefit: I am 100% as productive when using my the 27inch monitor at my desk as I am at my laptop 13inch screen - the workflow and screen setup is exactly the same.
Germany subsidies its rail network by €17b a year. The UK subsidises by €4b.

In the UK we have decided to go for lower taxes and lower subsidies. We do that while still subsidising lines that are good for the country but not profitable (old mining towns in south wales which would collapse if people couldn't commute to Cardiff etc, cornish rurual lines which attract tourism and offer transport for local residents who may not have 1 car per adult, etc). This means that on the profitable lines which would make commercial sense (say Manchester to London, or some London commuter lines) we have to charge more.

Remember commuter tickets are twice the price of business tickets - as they are paid after income tax (which varies from 33% to 60%). When I was offered a job based in the office, I wanted an extra £10k a year for the commute -- £2200 for the ticket, £3300 for the extra tax to pay for that ticket, and £5k for the time out of my day. They decided that I didn't actually need to be based in an office after all, and I go (to that one) about once every 3 months, which costs them £20 return (but would cost me £45).

This is offset by the massive discounts. A season ticket from Nuneaton to London, 206 miles a day, about 1 hour in each direction, is £9000 a year, for 230+ days of travel, or 47,000 miles. 19p per mile. If you're willing to take a little longer and travel on London Midland it's £6500 per year, 14p per mile.

On the other hand, a day trip from Nuneaton is £154 in peak time, £104 on the slower train. That's 74p per mile - 3.5 times the price of the commuter.
Instead one person opens one restaurant and they have a 90% chance of failing. That's so much worse!
Common sense, perhaps?

Large militaries will create their own up-to-date maps for every region of the world where they could possibly expect to be operating. They will, of course, keep strategic details in such maps secret, but with a bit of marginal effort, the maps deemed to have low military relevance can also be sold to civilians for their business purposes.

In order to keep a location secret now, it can't be visible from space. And it can't have surface roads leading to it, or even change the surface significantly from historic aerial photographs of the same location. And it definitely can't have radio signals coming out of it. That basically means tunnels and submarines.

There exist people whose jobs are to stare at satellite images all day, classify them, and draw shapes into a database. There is no longer any credible military rationale for restricting by law the creation of surface maps.
I don't really ask. They advertise it on the window though, so it's not like the IRS would be all that fooled.
I believe the "super" in "super hero" refers to super powers, which Jones lacks. Also, vigilantes typically break the law, whereas Jones does not. In the videos I've seen, Jones is usually taking advantage of Washington's "mutual combat" law and challenging wrong doers to a fight. Then, he takes advantage of the fact that he is/was a professional MMA fighter and his opponent is a drunk jerk.
Users don't have any idea what they want.

They weren't the ones creating Ajax to try to fit Outlook into the browser, and everything that came after that.
This will sound absurd, but https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/ is the best place I've found for rational and serious discussion of bitcoin (and yes the occasional butt joke).

Try posting a serious question there and see what happens!
There are a lot of exchanges. But YOU (or any person in particular) trying to cash out at any point in time will need to move your coins to that exchange (and create an account, etc), and then try to sell. There aren't a lot of buyers when a bubble is popping. And not much potential for arbitrage when everything is going down. And with Bitcoin's slow confirmation rates, I think it would be worse than a typical stock market. No, if the bubble pops, it's going to be bad for everyone involved.
Jixipix PuzziPix Pro 1.0.4 Crack Mac OS X Version
Super Mario 64 : Walls, Floors, and Ceilings Physics
Mobile Payment Risks and Prevention Steps