skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, but those are 'war words'.

For example - some people view borders as an institutional immorality. Nancy Pelosi has said that America goes from the 'Rocky Mountains down the Andes' and Hillary Clinton as openly called for a borderless North American society.

This represents an absolute and fundamental shift in view of citizenry, nationalism and identity.

Such views should be allowed in America surely - but should we allow people with 'extremist' agendas to integrate them subtly into our government documents etc.?

Those words are banned because they might be used to further a specific political agenda.

One could argue it's 'defence' instead of 'offence'.

Anyhow - I don't like it and I don't want to defend Trump ... but I do prefer efforts to keep things generally neutral.
Neither end of the political spectrum is interested in free speech right now, they just use different justifications to ban the undesirable thought.
Apparently this story is one such thing, as it has been flagged.
> The law is about the government, not private actors.

So, what are your thoughts on compelling speech in this case?

https://aclu-co.org/court-rules-bakery-illegally-discriminat...
On a side note, I was hoping to look up the subsidiary under the Japanese companies register out of curiosity but unfortunately they don't provide free and/or unregistered search like the one here in my country.

They also don't run their service on weekends meaning they quite literally shut down registration and other functions. I feel like that defeats the entire purpose of having a website!
Didn't see that coming
More likely Tesla understands that charging will increase congestion, not reduce it. See http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/15/books/chapters/freakonomic...

The article actually does a horrible job of explaining the moral of the story, which is that charging a fee to discourage undesirable behavior can signal that the behavior actually is desirable or at least not disapproved (after all, you paid it, so you should get to enjoy what you bought), causing even more of the behavior.

Tesla is not trying to make money; they're trying to stop the behavior. So either they raise the price so high for commercial users that it's outright punitive, or they just say it's prohibited and skip all the money mechanics.

They chose the simpler option.
Why is CS different from other disciplines and why did that only emerge in the mid-80s?

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/0*H5PrnnEAD7GteRHf.
Wow. I was literally talking to someone in the CS department at school that had a large investment ($20k+) in this "coin". I heard about the transaction issues, did not know the coin had so many technical issues.

Be safe out there.
Good thinking. I like that.
>Relentless oppression must be broken.

I am going to quote the man who has arguably done the most to end oppression in the USA.

"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." - MLKJ
You trust 538? Lol their polling is terrible: they over sample Democrats in their own polls, and over weight polls from other sources that also overweight Dems.

Lol. They though Hillary was gonna win in a landslide.
I think you're bluffing. I think this particular case is one that is so deep into the processor that no compiler stands a chance of modeling this exactly. :)

But one optimization I'd like to see is convincing the compilers to do better on "macro-op fusion", which let "INC/JCC" type operations be treated as a single µop if they are one after the other. GCC/Clang don't seem to be aware of the benefit of this, and often gratuitously break it by splitting them up.

It's a reasonably rare case where it makes a big difference, but it almost never hurts, and frequently is a small positive. Who would I need to convince to change this? What sort of benchmark would they need as motivation? Would pointing to Intel documentation possibly be sufficient?
So deer are nature's equivalent of an off-balance washing machine?
Confusion metrics for Amazon,Google,Microsoft OCR
This hardware requirement will slow adoption
Deep Learning for Cancer Detection
I'm a full stack dev now, but I graduated with an English degree. First year out of college I worked as a freelance copywriter. Picked up code while automating boring parts of my workday and realized I enjoyed coding more than copywriting.

IMO has nothing to do with subjects and everything to do w/ attitude.
Nations need to think about strategic interests beyond the capitalist trope that motivates most of us.

It’s not in Canada’s national interest for Toronto to be a remote suburb of the US east coast. If and when relations between the two nations degrade, Canada needs to be able to continue functioning.

That’s the danger of the mercurial Trump administration. The random shit that speed out of the US is making everyone question everything.
If he hadn't sent those "innuendo-laced messages" he could have gotten away with it and your post would not be misrepresenting what happened.
+1 for BitWarden
1) Certainly possible that that's the only mutually beneficial component. We see that with marine animals quite often. The deer in the video totes doesn't give a fuck.

2) The photo also stuck me as a little weird. Could be because the man seems simultaneously more sweaty and more excited than the woman. That sort of pose is something I'd do with someone that expect to reciprocate by doing the same or leaning in. That said, it's also likely that the photographer wanted a photo and expects some sort of pose. Could have been more awkward to just there.
#3 is how I have allocated my bets as well.
Highly unlikely, but in theory it should be vulnerable to birthday attack
Since the work was undertaken in China, can you flesh out how the fact that nodes verify consensus resolves the China-coin problem? A 51% attack dictated by the chinese government would verify just fine.
Facebook is a technology built to facilitate social interaction. When problems arise, Facebook naturally finds technological solutions to solve these problems. Perhaps the underlying cause is the technology. We did manage for many many many years without it.
I Second that. The south is much more accommodating of opposing views.

I've been to Alabama with a large group of friends that were very liberal and I have to admit...the people were incredibly friendly. (maybe not always willing to engage on the issues - but clearly friendly).
I think what might be being referred to as "analog telephony" is actually the "original digital" system using 64Kbps "uncompressed" PCM, vs. VoIP compressed audio at much lower bitrates. It's like the difference between CD and MP3.
What If You Go to Harvard and End Up a Nobody?
Free trade is impeded if the ISPs are putting tariffs (paid prioritization) on Canadian services.
It's easy for companies to fire people at the lower levels or even top management who are for the most part replaceable.

The question will become more difficult when people who are essential to the success of a company or product become entangled in allegations (and perhaps eventual convictions). But let's forget the high bar of convictions, for a moment.

If we soon begin to embroil anyone and everyone who may have said something inappropriate or who had someone interpret something as inappropriate, we'll end up including people who are _essential_ to a company or companies.

When that time comes, I think companies and society will have to reach a consensus on how to deal with borderline cases (things uncouth but not illegal). Will society ostracize and black ball all cases, or pursue ways to rehabilitate people --like they rehabilitate drunk drivers, etc.

Else, a less discerning competitor could scoop up problematic talent.
I worked with Clawdia Chauchat once, she changed my opinion. Harassment must be dealt with sternly and harshly.
Interestingly that seems to be a result of the CDC's own political leanings. They seemed to pursue the research with an explicit political goal, rather than research the effects of gun violence, and then find a goal[1]. Further, the Dickey amendment doesn't actually force the CDC to avoid researching the issue but rather preventing it from using federal money . to promote gun control:

"none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) may be used to advocate or promote gun control"[2]

[1]https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/12/why-we-cant-tr...
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickey_Amendment_(1996)
If you can get hash collisions, then this issue is only one of many and that isn't exclusive to pruned modes. Bitcoin and friends rely pretty heavily throughout on the assumption of no hash collisions.
Maybe because it's not true outside of certain high-risk neighborhoods? (And those are also higher risk for earthquake damage for the same underlying reason.) People who are buying property in SF can and do look up these risks.
> Three of the top 5 cities -- Humboldt, Lander, and Eureka -- are in Nevada. All are known to contain multiple, active gold mines that collectively release hundreds of millions of pounds of toxins.

Here's interesting tidbit for arguing with people who say bitcoin is killing the planet.
i do not misunderstand what you wrote. and you still haven't answered the original question.
I'm not okay with letting brilliant people be harassed. Even from a purely cost/benefit standpoint, allowing a toxic environment will drive out more talent than we'd lose by eliminating the harassers.
You’ll never get a replacement system that is truly universal. Every replacement produc has been proprietary.
Policy has a way of shaping character. When people get away with a lot, they think it's OK, because experience shows that it is.
"Communist _regimes_ have killed a a lot of people."

And Nazi _regimes_ have killed a lot of people. So you're saying that Nazis are okay, then?

"I'm not sure why the American Indiana genocide is in quotes."

Because most of the Indians were killed by diseases, not by deliberate genocide. Most of them died without ever seeing a white person (e.g., the former inhabitants of some of the Missisippian culture cities). There were certainly genocidal incidents, some of which were horrifying, but that's not what caused the large-scale depopulation.

In any case, that had little or nothing to do with "capitalism". The colonization of the Americas (and, indeed, much of the world) was primarily driven by mercantilism, not capitalism. I'm trying really hard not to sound condescending here, but do you even know what "capitalism" means? It doesn't just mean "not communism".

Besides, my argument had to do with current threats, not things that happened hundred of years ago. That Nazis (the real ones) no longer pose a threat while Communists do was the whole point.

Can you name a Nazi regime that is constantly threatening to launch ICBMs at the United States, as North Korea does on a seemingly daily basis?
A few reasons Tim Ferriss decided to leave SV (his own words)
He means that this seems like a submarine PR piece (http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html). Journalists on a deadline will frequently publish what a PR firm sends them, and it's worth being on the lookout for articles that probably started that way.
i see the point of your statement. but it is not an answer to the original questions.
Eye for an eye, no mercy, no forgiveness.
Limba mielului PLANTA MEDICINALA
Unrelated: the font chosen for the article body is way too thin to read comfortably. I've noticed this trend over the past few years and it makes for appalling UX.
1. Why are you not answering my question?

2. Why are you saying something patently false about 538? They gave Trump the highest chances to win across most polls pre-election. They wrote several articles about how Trump could still win despite the polls.

3. Why are you equating election predictive polling with aggregation of approval ratings?

4. What's with your hostile tone?

You're a very unpleasant man, aren't you, calling people "you dummies", being overtly aggressive and playing the victim? Maybe it's time for you to face that you're being downvoted not because you "have different opinions and mental models of how the world work", but simply because you're a nasty person. After all, you haven't actually expressed any opinion yet, and you're still being downvoted, so it can't be because of your opinions.

Here's something for you to think about: I have different opinions and mental models of how the world works. I often enough say controversial shit, and yet I manage to do so mostly without getting flagged. Clearly, your approach is wrong.
There is more than one 'central news source' here. CP24 gets more play than CBC in my neck of the woods.
In Ethereum, you can track the account balances; in Bitcoin, you can choose to track just the unspent transactions. The decision is pretty arbitrary from the pruning perspective.
I'm gonna continue to be part of the actual silent majority that thinks people like you should be sterilized :)
The question will become more difficult when people who are essential to the success of a company or product become entangled in allegations (and perhaps eventual convictions). But let's forget the high bar of convictions, for a moment.

You mean like Weinstein, Spacey, and Singer?

When that time comes, I think companies and society will have to reach a consensus on how to deal with borderline cases (things uncouth but not illegal). Will society ostracize and black ball all cases, or pursue ways to rehabilitate people --like they rehabilitate drunk drivers, etc.

I haven't seen people get fired for just saying the wrong thing. These cases are mostly way beyond that. Some people have gotten accused (Affleck) but they have been brushed off as either not having evidence or not being serious.

This isn't "oops I made a mistake" behavior, it's predatory behavior and predators are hard to rehabilitate.
"Eye for an eye" - so she can 'touch his thigh' back?

All of this requires a lot of context.
This is getting crazy. Guilty until proven innocent. Seems overly sensitive to me.... there's a huge different between rape / assault and crude jokes or attempted flirting.

Maybe I just don't understand the other perspective enough.
Defend the unjust status quo, squealing at the most minor affronts and drawing false equivalencies. It will last as long as you live, and you'll never give up. Society will just have to leave you behind.
" it's predatory behavior "

Most people call it flirting (I mean the touching of a thigh).

Let's not make guys stupid romantic attempts out to be like rape.

If in a professional context, it's definitely inappropriate and must be called out.
>Edit 2: someone is going through my post history and downvoting. Good job, ladies, you're proving my point.

I just checked your post history. The only comments still eligible to be downvoted are in this thread.
Of course, Weinstein, Spacey are pretty clear-cut predatory [I think]. On the other hand someone who "hits on" or "chats up" colleagues because they are single or because they are cads, isn't necessarily predatory --however can become harassment, non-sexual as well as sexual, if boundaries are crossed.

My point isn't that this case isn't bad behavior, it's that we will get closer to a grey area or undefined area and will have to have a more nuanced response to those (mis)behaviors.
While maybe a bit poorly described, this isn’t wrong and touches on the underlying truth. The #1 complaint everyone has on their ‘internet’ is directly related to contention ratio and it’s associated monetary value (which often is not understood by consumers).

I run a regional ISP (CTO). Boiled down, we compete almost solely on network contention ratio and the resulting price per Mbps to the consumer.
"The question will become more difficult when people who are essential to the success of a company or product become entangled in allegations"

There's already a big precedent. It's Mark Hurd at HP. He was basically asked to resign for less severe incident than what these guys are facing, even though he did spectacular thing to HP stock price after years of Fiorina mismanagement.
Forcing countries to regularize their trade laws with each other is.. kind of the entire point of a trade agreement. What even would a trade agreement that didn't impose laws on its participants be? "Let's be nice to each other and buy each other's stuff if we feel like it?"
At a minimum, he's got the right to say what he wants. Works for the SJWs.
I see absolutely nothing weird with the photo.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but what irks me is how, on the one hand, one can claim to accept evolution, a process that works precisely by variation and natural selection, and at the same time rule out, not the actuality, but the very possibility IN PRINCIPLE that there can ever be statistically significant sexual or ethnic variation. If you are of a secularist, materialist bent, you are absolutely bound to accept that possibility lest you fall into holding incoherent beliefs.

To be clear, I am neither rejecting evolution nor advocating racism or sexism. I am merely pointing out that secularism-materialism binds you to accept the very real possibility of things being true about sex, race, ethnicity, etc, that those holding secularist, materialistic views categorically and in principle reject (at least verbally, if not in action) as a matter of principle even though they are bound BY THE VERY PRINCIPLES THEY CLAIM TO HOLD to accept these things as possibilities, if not present actualities.

This is but one of many absurdities in vogue in circles like the SV circuit and its allies. You can't have your cake and eat it, too, and you can be sure that repeating mantras and going on the offensive only works for so long. You have to reexamine your foundational beliefs. The truth will, sooner or later, exact its revenge and come for its pound of flesh. The tension forces of contradiction will cause the facade to cave no matter how much stucco you use to conceal the growing cracks.
I think the main part that you are missing is that there are two layers of cache below the instruction loading that would also have to be defeated. Modern processors don't actually execute assembly instructions, rather than convert these to micro-ops. There is a tiny "loop cache" that holds the tightest loops like this one, and then a larger "decoded instruction cache" that holds a few functions worth.

This means that the second time through a loop you almost never need to reread the binary instructions, and thus in a small loop like this you almost never have the potential for an instruction cache miss. You can check this with 'perf', and you'll see that neither version has any significant number of icache misses.

The other part you are probably misconceiving is that the processor doesn't actually proceed linearly through the instructions, but rather decodes them into µops, and then throws them into a "reorder buffer". They then get "issued" to execution ports as soon their input registers are available, then "executed", and then "retired" once it's confirmed that the inputs were indeed correct. The execution is actually happening at many points at once, based on the processors best guess at to what path the execution will take.

That is to say, current processors are "speculative", "superscalar", and "out-of-order". The net effect is that they don't really "slow down" in the way that you are picturing. Instead, they usually fail by guessing a wrong path and executing it quickly, and then have to throw away the work if they guessed wrong. The case that you mention isn't exactly impossible, but usually only happens with (extremely rare) self-modifying code.
Yes, but he's still replaceable. Imagine you have a biotech. The main or _the_ sr scientist there which the whole company's future depends on, gets embroiled in something like this. So they kiss the company good bye, or do they seek to rehabilitate?
I'm not trolling: I have 50Mbit connection and specd out macbook - probably most powerful laptop you can expect from a user.

This Mist/Wallet thing does. not. work.

Maybe if i tweak or use light client it would, but as a user I don't care.
And you, me, and 98% of readers and lurkers on HN will continue to use Uber tomorrow. Whether it be to work, to the grocery store, or to the airport.
It's interesting how the tenor of comments suddenly becomes "wait a moment" when it's hitting our own industry.
I found a link which shows on slide 6 that it's about 41x cheaper, but mostly because you can fit more stations on it.

http://www.gatesair.com/documents/slides/2015-09-Anderson-Ad...
Downmods and flagging aside, it's at least a positive sign that these article that don't toe the line of the current groupthink keep being posted and keep getting upvoted. Don't lose hope; keep upvoting and arguing for the positions you believe in.
That's . . . not what happened in this article, though. The individual supposedly grabbed her around her waist, torso, and thighs without permission while in a swimming pool. This in addition to his other comments seems reasonably clear cut to me.
> you can run your own node if you want, or more likely, a bunch of public nodes can exist and you can pick the one you trust to work with

Still not getting it. If I don't trust CoinBase, I can go to any other online wallet that manages my private keys. With some effort, I can even start one myself. If Chase is running such a wallet, I can use them.

How is a decentralized protocol not a superset of a "federated" one?
Has a company ever gone bankrupt due to bad ethics where it wasn't also a financial fraud? The core Uber business seems to still be doing well and resetting the taint of bad ethics is as easy as putting up a "under new management" sign - which what they've done
Vice News: Mesh Networks / Occupy Wallstreet
Is McCarthyism in Silicon Valley real?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15937836
You speak as if this browser is used solely by elite software developers. Mozilla markets this is as a browser for the common man, indeed, the common man concerned about privacy. These people have no ability to review source code to see if a new release has inserted some stupid theatricals that the user has no interest in, merely because these users, in good faith, thought they were helping collect usage data to improve this browser.

This has nothing to do with open source development at Mozilla or anywhere else, it has to do with what Mozilla the organization portrays itself as. If Facebook had pulled something like this, well, I don't think anybody would have been surprised. For Mozilla, I think it's inexcusable, and after the major marketing push on Quantum as 'Chrome without spying!' it's an amazing own goal. I really want Firefox to succeed, and marketing retards at Mozilla are going to sink the whole thing by garnering exactly the kind of publicity they don't need.
> I'm not totally okay with blackballing brilliant people for touching someone's thigh.

Are you saying you'd be fine with it if they weren't brilliant? Or that touching the thigh of a junior in your organization, who you are also hitting on in texts, should just be OK in general, for both brilliant and non-brilliant managers?

I mean either way I think you were born a few decades too late, but for clarity's sake, I'm curious what you're getting at.
538 doesn't do polling. They aggregate and analyze others' polls.

538 gave Trump a ~30% chance of winning, where virtually all other outlets (Princeton, NYT, HuffPo, etc.) were giving him a 1-5%. They appear to have had the best handle on Trump's chances.
Did we read the same article? More than touching her thigh, the accusation described a prolonged unreciprocated infatuation with her. That would surely make me uncomfortable in my workplace.