skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Same. I'm a little surprised that their focus on "compliance" doesn't cover things like de facto theft of your customer's money. Are there no financial regulations requiring the honoring of withdrawals within a certain period of time?

Either way, we still have the option of buying BTC and transferring it to a company that doesn't defraud its customers, then withdrawing from there.
According to the article, it is safe and recommended to take one of those 5000 IU capsules per day.
If the website is free then you are the product. Not sure why it’s a surprise these companies aim to maximize the value they can derive from their product (aka our data).
I'd argue that classes with a single field are a worse code smell. A using or typedef would be better, at least then your code isn't littered with unneeded field accesses.

I agree that these methods should just take rvalue references, though. Doesn't really matter for unique_ptr, but for other things like shared_ptr it adds up quick.
Ultimately you don't sell your bitcoins to Coinbase. You sell them to the people who are buying bitcoins on Coinbase. The point where buyers and sellers meet is the current price on Coinbase.
I just tried the userChrome.css hack and it breaks a lot of stuff. Tree Style Tab stops being able to tell which tab is active, my address bar only affects the first tab, and my window buttons are all blank. Looks like I'll have to wait for the tab hiding API to try this out.

edit: Nevermind. I was just using the wrong hack. Using this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15870894
+ using Customize to reenable the title bar works great.
I think you are fetishizing rationality in a world that is intractably complicated.
Independently of the time frames, I also believe that the merge is our specie's only hope for survival.

With apologies in advance for the self-promotion, here's a paper where I present my arguments for alternative scenarios:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02009

In short, I argue that non-evolutionary superintelligences are not stable (they eventually go inert), while evolutionary superintelligences are a very serious existential threat to our species.
From my understanding (which may be entirely wrong but it's not like that stops people on the internet from writing things as if they're correct in all knowledge), Coinbase itself does not give you the $10,000 when they sell. Rather, they are merely a pretty front end for a standard exchange; probably GDAX, the one they also own and operate. So when you go to their site and tell them to give you $10,000 for your 1 BTC, what they actually do is go to their exchange and create a sell order on your behalf. When that order is fulfilled by someone else buying 1 BTC for $10,000, Coinbase takes a cut and then puts the rest into your account.
I find smart pointers super valuable for scenarios where you pass memory through a pipeline. A while I ago had to pass measurement data though a pipe of customizable filters and it was really nice to know that the data would be freed once the last filter was done without writing tracking code. But I agree that they tend to get overused.
False. The best "normal" source is foie gras.

Natto is not "normal". It is an acquired taste. The acquisition of said taste is a difficult, nauseating, and extremely stinky path. Besides that, most of the vitamin K from natto is as MK-7.

Animal-sourced vitamin K is mostly menatetrenone (aka menaquinone MK-4) whereas vitamin K from fermentation bacteria is various lengths of menaquinone, of which only MK-4 and MK-7 have good vitamin K activity in humans, and the MK-4 form is usually nearly absent. Plant-sourced K is as phylloquinone, which has to be converted to menatetrenone in the body.

So also-good sources are egg yolks from free-ranging, pastured laying hens and butter from free-ranging, pastured dairy cows. Basically, you need to eat parts of animals that were raised by traditional, non-battery farming, particularly the livers and adipose tissue. Poultry animals such as geese, chickens, and ducks are good for this. Apparently, the oil from rendered emu fat is also high in vitamin K.

Cheeses have some MK-4 from the milk and some MK-7 from the bacteria, but a lot of their K is in less easily assimilated forms. That's probably good enough unless you have some rare and nigh-undetectable enzymatic deficiency that interferes with conversion of MK-9 to MK-4, or something.

I suppose that if you force-fed some geese a bunch of natto, and then mashed up their livers into a paste, that would be a great vitamin K pate. I think I'd rather just swallow a pill.
https://www.coinbase.com/ is down
I'd really suggest watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG1OZ69H_-o
You actually get those benefits, differentiation and integration, in the usual classical analog circuits, but, except for a few kinds of analog tricks, they’ve not outperformed their digital counterparts in precision, accuracy, or speed. You can make for neat demos, like wiring up integrators to solve the Lorenz attractor equations to make a nice oscilloscope plot, but the circuits fall short practically for anything more difficult.
The way things are moving it seems no one is selling and that's what baffles me. Crypto market is something we have never seen before where people are buying and not selling that is what is driving the price of Bitcoin.
To get your fiat cash out, you'd have to sell that 1 BTC for $10,000. Someone needs to be on the other side of that trade buying it. You get their $10K, and they get your 1 BTC (and coinbase takes a small percentage for facilitating the transaction).

If nobody wants to buy your BTC at $10K, you don't get "your" money out, until coinbase can find a buyer to match with your sale.

In your example, all 10 of you start lowering your asking price, and "the market" goes down until you make a sale.

Coinbase may provide some liquidity, buying your BTC at "market price" with their cash reserves, but only if they think they can resell it at a higher price.

The risk they take on in doing that, and the liquidity they provide, is the nominal economic reason you are paying their fees.
It is not a sequential perfect information game. Information is imperfect, actions can be taken by both sides at the same time, there probably will be action limit per time/game frame and the network will have to determine not only its next move, but also manage time for calculating that move. It totally changes the challenge.

As far as I understand (and I am no expert at all), AlphaGo basically creates a heuristic of what move to play in a given situation (which heurisitic is created by playing against itself many, many times). Instead of trying to "break" the game, they just decided to simulate playing and results were good enough to outmatch humans, but we have no idea how close to the "perfect game" AlphaGo actually got.

But - whole input to a network is 19x19 array with 3 possible states per cell, plus maybe turn count and one bit for determining whose next move is. S2 network should process graphic stream (lets say 1280/720), needs spatial awareness(minimap), priority setting and computational resource management. And it has to be fast enough in the first place just to follow the game.

I'm not saying that won't happen (who predicted Go breakthrough?), but it at least seem like a much bigger challenge.
Replace BTC for EUR, CHF, GBP or any other currency (or even a physical good, like an ounce of gold) and see what changes. The fact that BTC is a cryptocurrency doesn't change anything in how trades happen. And the fact that 1BTC used to be 10USD but now is 10k USD is no different than 1USD being 0.95EUR one year ago and 0.85EUR today. The difference is larger, yes, but that doesn't matter.
Aigent hires backend engineers in Amsterdam: Ambitious voice recognition project
If it didn't matter, why is there such a big push to kill net neutrality. It matters. They want to do something they aren't allowed to do today, and doing something they aren't allowed to do today means its not in the interests of the Internet as a whole. Don't let this propaganda fool you.
They do not "require it", but I try to honor request when they raise it.
> Hopefully this convinced the last person still gullible enough to believe on Google's interest to maintain long term (let's say, more than a decade) any service that's not Search, Ads, YouTube, Gmail or Android.

Presumably, anyone who was going to be convinced of that by this move was convinced when it was announced 16 months ago.

https://blog.chromium.org/2016/08/from-chrome-apps-to-web.ht...

> I wouldn't build much on GAE either...

AppEngine has just about hit 10 years, and it's still growing and deeply integrated with the rest of the (even more actively developed) Google Cloud Platform, so it's probably nearly as secure as the other core itemss you mention.
You mean those spaces are on purpose?
Coinbase's exchange GDAX matches sellers with buyers. The buyers bring the cash to the party, not Coinbase.
Why is it different? What makes YouTube different from TV or radio or newspapers?

Someone always says ‘but the internet is different’ but I’ve never seen a good explanation for why. Just things along the lines of ‘that’s how it’s been’ or ‘TV and radio are wrong’.

How is paying money to support something not an endorsement?
It is not just "less capable" or "less expert" but also the result of how "normal science" progresses by harvesting low hanging fruits.
they do exist - consider the gamifying elements of Khan Academy, Duolingo and other e-learning sites for example. The problem seems to be that they are out-earned by the sites that feed into our narcissistic and negative impulses - social media, addictive games, "recommendation engines" on shopping sites and such.
It's more of a technical note, but probably the last really important change was the accrual basis, which, as far as I know, was popularized in the 20th century. This is the system of accounting where you record revenues and expenses when you become aware of them, rather than when you pay them, so many things end up being recorded as debts. Notably, this is the currently-accepted way of doing accounting.
Well drones have really captured the imagination of the public this time, and we have very public and popular tech leaders warning the public about AI.
Combine that with the 24/7 media clickbait cycle, I think we have a unique situation.
>Once you hear the plan going forward,

Well, what is it?

> the ask-for-permission-in-advance model of regulation is stopping literally everyone in the local market

So fix that, keep net neutrality until it is fixed.

You and the author of the article seem to be arguing that these companies have been lobbying with massive amounts of cash to get rid of rules that they won't be breaking anyway. That seems so absurd as to be willfully dishonest.
I believe the merging Sam is referring to here is augmenting human intelligence with non-intelligent (but better) machines. Kurzweil talks about this as well, and was one of the original options in Vinge's "Singularity" (https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html)
When you buy or sell on an exchange, you're not transacting against the exchange, but against a counterparty, via the exchange; someone like you, but making the opposite transaction. If you sell a Bitcoin for $10k, then someone else brought $10k to the exchange and offered to exchange it for a Bitcoin.

The only way an exchange wouldn't be able to honour deposits is if they lost them, or because of fraud. A surge in price shouldn't affect the solvency of the exchange.
It’s not a surprise, but it is a certain kind of schadenfreude to see a bug caused purely by the sheer amount of trackers they’re forcing into their users’ browsers. It might have been a good time for them to do some internal reflection.

And btw it’s not free; there is a paywall and you can subscribe to the NYT.
Would what you're asking for even be possible for a human? For instance, if I plop my child down in front of a game and tell them to figure it out without telling them the rules, would they be able to figure out the complete set of rules even by trial and error?
This is stupid, i'm saying that as someone that holds a small amount. People are just speculating ,instead of adopting ,and undermining it's utility.
This is another one of those moments in cryptocurrency where time seems to freeze and everybody holds their breath.
OP said it was funny, not that it was a surprise.
Situs Poker Online Indonesia Terpercaya Agen Judi- Pokerqq81
People don't need to understand everything, but they should understand that nobody has the answers and that's why independent thinking is so important.

Independent thinking is simply about questioning everything you're taught.

Most people believe that if some idea is popular, then it must be right; but in reality, most of the time the opposite is true.
So this guys says let them do it and see what happens? And then what? This is the most moronic article I ever read on nytimes. I hope the paper got good money publishing this propaganda.
>Double exponential functions get away from you fast.

Still exponential, though.

Also, as a general criticism, there's a big difference between people getting addicted to the internet, getting dumbed down by it and sucked into things like a youtube hole, and my idea of The Merge. The things you describe sound more like an automated soap opera or opiate addiction than the singularity.
Back at $16k. Big banks are pulling support for a futures market for bitcoin due to volatility.
Bill Clinton was a centrist, and that's part of why I think he was so popular as president.

I had not considered what you say as a possibility. I always thought the Marxists were the real power in the Democratic party and they implemented their policies slowly and incrementally.

Does neoliberalism really hold sway in the Democratic party and what I considered incremental marxism was really just left-of-center Clintonian politics? How does the constant ratcheting up of identity politics stuff fit in to your theory, though? It seems integral to Democratic power and is ideologically not Clintonian.
I'm one of the founders of Origin Protocol (https://www.originprotocol.com) and we're hiring good developers regardless of their experience with blockchain technology. There simply aren't enough devs out there with experience in this space. We're hiring smart people and helping them get up to speed on the technology. Ping me if you're interested. :)
The best reason to dismiss this article as propaganda is it does not give a reason why repealing Net Neutrality is good. All it says is "trust me, it won't be that bad". Garbage.
People are selling, otherwise there would be no market.
"All these awful things have happened in the past but trust us, it's not going to happen in the future"

Bullshit.

Also, competition? Please.

I need 25mbit+ to do my job, if you think phone companies are offering a viable alternative I've got a bridge to sell you.
Can Elon Musk make subway tunnels cool again?
It might just take one genius like Albert Einstein to create a new paradigm, so I could believe it happening sooner rather than later with the more people are working on it.

I suppose it depends on your view of the theory of scientific revolutions.
How to Improve IoT Application Performance with CockroachDB
Yeah when the price starts falling, the first thing that'll go down is the exchanges, causing more panic. It's not like these sites don't go down all the time anyway now, just wait until there's an actual panic.
True, but there's a lot of things being talked about in this blog post (e.g. superhuman AI, genetic enhancement, and brain-machine interfaces). These are all different things, and I was genuinely curious as to what the OP found to be "a little out there".
Not true. For each buy that happens, there must be a sale. There are more buyers than sellers right now, not no sellers. Each time the price goes up, that's a sale _that happened_

This is something we've seen many times before. It's not new. It's a classic bubble where demand (buyers) greatly outstrips supply (sellers).

The big question is why. Crypto currencies haven't suddenly gotten more useful. The current rise is fueled by speculation of the ability to resell at a higher price.
Building and attacking an active directory lab with powershell
In regards to the volatility? sure.

But coinbase goes down for maintenance all the time
The AI research space is still a pretty green field. Right now you can basically take any random paper and combine it with another random paper and you will be able to find a use case where that succeeds and write a new paper about it. More experienced researchers will, of course, have a better intuition/knowledge of what techniques to combine to get more impressive results.

As long as it stays like that (and by opening up new sub-areas, it could stay like that for quite some while), adding more somewhat qualified people to the field results in all the useful combinations being discovered faster and thus exposing new potential starting points. Probably no exponential growth in the strict sense, but quadratic growth isn't bad either.
So how are you contradicting his argument? It looks like you are keeping in line with his gun nut stereotype by openly admitting that you like to stand there to take a beating for your beliefs. Similar to how you exposed yourself now except I'm not referring to your position on gun policy, I simply find no value added baiting like this to be a waste.
>and my overall wellbeing improved greatly.

Just a counter-point. Vitamin D didn't help me with SAD. SAD seems only addressed for me by a proper full spectrum lamp for 30 minutes a day in the winter.
Number of humans that can leverage computers to beat Stockfish: At least the number of humans on the Deep mind team.

Number of humans that can create AlphaZero:At least the number of humans on the Deep mind team.

Number of computers that can independently create AlphaZero: 0
Shouldn’t a futures market ultimately reduce volatility by enabling (synthetic) short selling?
I think that if at this point one does not understand the importance of net neutrality, one either is simply not capable of understanding it, or simply wishes not to understand it.

There's nothing left that has not been explained in detail and any sort of argument with someone who claims to understand the matter is futile: they either can not or will not understand.
Really great!! Are you working in some company or just living happy life from your side projects and games.
"Some markets may have just one cable provider, but phone companies offer increasingly comparable internet access"

No, they don't. Not at all. I am by some miracle grandfathered into an almost affordable unlimited data plan, and even it gets throttled after a certain limit.
Is Bitcoin vulnerable to a “bank run”?
I don't think it is wise to trust monopolies who have a history of doing the wrong thing.
What utility? It has no intrinsic value.
It will all be sorted out (to some degree).

I don’t understand how YouTubers expected to never have advertisers try to scrutinize what they’re supporting or putting their name next to.

And yes, good people are getting dragged down by association because there are other things on YT that are toxic to advertisers like the weird copyright infringing kids content or the seemingly abusive kids content.

But if YT is going to host that stuff (they are), and you’re going to use their site too, then you’re going to get lumped in.

It’s the same problem as the dark web. Yes, there are a handful of legal sites that may be useful. But when a huge chunk of what it’s actualky used for is horribly illegal things you’re going to to get lumped in.

I’m kind of surprised YTers weren’t pushing YT to clean up a lot of this stuff earlier so this wouldn’t have happened.
Don’t blame the election on fake news. Blame it on the media
Testing Angular 2 with Jest
The author was a former VP at Rogers Communications, Inc, a Canadian ISP.

https://ca.linkedin.com/in/kenneth-engelhart-591a204
Biosphere failure forensic report by agent 359348349 in outer galactic sector 17:

"The third planet began its ascent to technological singularity but became terminally fixated upon the repeated calculation of an obscure cryptographic mathematical function. Nearly all geologically sequestered carbon was rapidly oxidized to provide energy for the computation of this function, triggering a runaway greenhouse effect and transforming the planet's climate to one resembling that of the second planet in this solar system."
AMD Reportedly Allows Disabling PSP Secure Processor with Latest AGESA
You will see here how Stockfish improvements are tested.

http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests

Some code or weight is changed, then they have it play to see if it leads to better performance.

An exhaustive, sort of manual work. On the other hand Deepmind's bot is fully automated and they have it just running day and night improving itself on a large hardware configuration.
Last time I checked they would only pull the price once a day. Not sure how much that would actually help
There are Rust, Go and D bindings to QtQuick afaik.
from the article:

> The good news is that we will soon have a real-world experiment to show who is right and who is wrong. The United States will get rid of its rules, and the European Union and Canada will keep their stringent regulations. In two years, will the American internet be slower, less innovative and split into two tiers, leaving Canadians to enjoy their fast and neutral net?

Isn't this already happening, even with NN?

The big players in the US have already shown they don't care at all about competing and are perfectly content giving the US substandard service compared to much of the rest of the world.
Wonder if they'll be a consulting market for IT engineers from the stock market exchanges for the cryptocurrency exchanges since they have experience handling a large volume of transactions etc.. All the current crypto exchanges seize when high volume, stop losses etc.. are triggered at the moment.
Generally speaking. For example, Nicehash, which had been chugging along for a long time, went belly up yesterday after what seemed like a regular maintenance period.
Quite dramatic. It's changing faster than we can react.
Correct, if you maximize the window, there’s otherwise no way to drag it back down without clicking on the maximize button.

As many users rely on the functionality, they had to be added back.

You can configure them in Customize → Drag Space (on/off)
It has no utility, only intrinsic value.
How to get started with Spring Boot
Imagine how extremely frustrating it would be to have a bad base position in comparison to your enemy, or your enemy having an island-like terrain when you build all ground units and could not scout quick enough...
> These incidents are troubling for anyone who wants on open, neutral internet. But keep two things in mind. First, these are rare examples, for a reason: The public blowback was fierce, scaring other providers from following suit. Second, blocking competitors to protect your own services is anticompetitive conduct that might well be stopped by antitrust laws without any need for network neutrality regulations.

Except BOTH examples provided were not stopped by antitrust regulations or public blow back, but by the authority of the FCC to enforce net neutrality.

> I know that it simply is not in service providers’ interests to throttle access to what consumers want to see.

Which is why they've been fighting so hard to have the ability to do it...
Genuine Leather Watch Strap 18mm 20mm 22mm
is it possible to buy and sell bc, as quickly as one buy and sell stocks (aka speculating)? last time I checked there were ways but it would take some user verification process to buy, and selling seemed to be very well hidden.