skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>I think the proper understanding of those principles is "when in doubt, choose this over that", and not "always choose this over that".

That's exactly how the teams I worked with applied it. They were in doubt and they decided on individuals and interactions.

>That said, the problem you described isn't really with the manifesto, but with people refusing to use common sense

It absolutely is a problem with the manifesto and it isn't a common sense decision.

Expending a not insignificant level of resources on automated regression testing and CI, or indeed, any other kind of tooling or process is far from a common sense decision - it's a pretty delicate trade off, in fact. Some tooling is worth it, some isn't.

If the manifesto said "think carefully about tooling and recognize the delicate trade offs involved" then maybe the problem wouldn't be with the manifesto. It doesn't. It says "individuals and interactions over tools and processes". Ergo meetings > tools.
Unshakespeare - To semanticate(simplify reading) or not, that is the question!
And that is precisely when the trickle begins... nothing ”at once” about taking them out.
Is life meaningless?
It seems odd that you would forget whether or not this event precipitated you quitting a job.
Electron – Another part of the JavaScript ecosystem
The 40+ years the Voyager probes have stuck around for is impressive... but the actual primary mission duration was about 12 years (for Voyager 2), and that was with two (planned but not guaranteed) extensions for Uranus and Neptune.

The RTGs on both probes have decayed A fair amount at this point and are producing a lot less power.

10 years may seem short, but combined with an electrically powered thruster there is potential for doing types of missions we have not really been able to do before. That 10 years could be spent doing propulsion.

If you want to use it more in the science phase, use chemical rockets to get up to speed and then boot up the reactor in time to say, decelerate into orbit and you are looking at having the majority of that 10 years used at the destination.

My main concern isn't really the duration, but the reliability of the moving parts. But without plutonium, there are not a whole lot of other options for powering missions to Uranus and Neptune.
We have real-time monitoring for that inbox and a 24/7 ops team. We have corresponded many times about this issue, and have made many changes over that period.

It's not as simple as just shutting down the open proxy because we need an open proxy to adequately protect users' privacy on our site. It just needs to be more locked down and more obvious it is a proxy, which we are doing right now (half done already).
Deloitte (or at least part of Deloitte) have a charity day. I don't think it replaces their Christmas party though.

Anyway, according to one of my colleagues who used to work there, everyone really liked it, it was a way to get help out the community, with the added bonus that you're still getting paid.

The cynic in me assumes that they just do it because it's bloody good PR.
If your game is executing js (as for the example given by the GP), you are transmitting sensitive data. In that scenario not only confidentiality but even more integrity of the data is important.
Any place where heuristics and arbitrary constants are used.
Agen Poker Online Uang Asli Resmi Terbaik – Pokerqq81 Situs Poker Online
This is right, a convolutoonal network is the right choice for images, but images are not the right choice for “vectorising” the genomic data, because vectorising it in a 2D grid and then using a convolutional network on it (a network designed to exploit spatial hierarchy) is introducing unnecessary and arbitrary constraints on data locality.
Definitely a souped up Honda Civic - love the metaphor
Can someone explain what I'm seeing? As far as I can tell, both those links really do leave me on DDG webpages. The only requests according to firebug are to duckduckgo.com. What am I missing (or has this since been fixed)?
If richer exporting industries are richer than hundreds of millions farmers, doesn't it mean that they are more effective, and may be a large industrial farm would be more effective than individual farmers, too?
We have corresponded many times about this issue, and have made many changes over that period.

It's not as simple as just shutting down the open proxy because we need an open proxy to adequately protect users' privacy on our site, e.g. for image search. It just needs to be more locked down and more obvious it is a proxy, which we are doing right now (half done already -- CSP rolled out fully, new domains in process).
As it says in the paper, this might be useful for data warehouses. But, it’s not coming to postgres anytime soon. Index updates on the order of seconds to minutes would be too much for a transactional db.

There is also the cold start problem. How do you start to lay out the data on disk as you begin inserting it? Do you have a pre-trained net and use it at first (inserting where the net thinks the data should be)? The strategy probably differs by index type.
One good option is to intern somewhere. We have a great software engineer who started as a PHD student in Chemical engineering. He found that he was interested in software development in the course of his work modeling CHE stuff. He started with us as an intern and then we offered him a SWE position. It’s been a year since he came on full time and so far everyone seems happy.

We offered him the flexibility of ~day a week to finish off his PHD until he graduates.

Good luck!
Looks like this site put more effort into the "Design" part than the "Principles".
It has since been fixed.
Miners are nodes and therefore verifying transactions, and they're the only nodes writing transactions to the blockchain.

Non-mining nodes can only verify transactions for themselves , which helps them stay on the chain of their choice but does not extend any chain.
I worked at a bank and that place was full of people that really enjoyed that kind of parties. Those parties were really kind of legendary in all kinds of regards, there were always a few people that had to be fired because of their behavior at the New Year's Party. But I did get swept up in the atmosphere even if I didn't like the music or even generically spoken bank people.

The IT companies I worked for were always notorious for the same 20 people going to every event and the usual 100 no shows. If they know there's a lot of the kind of people that don't like social events where you stand around with a drink in your hand and loud music just go to the local bowling alley and mix the teams up a bit. If you didn't talk to people at least you had some fun.
Surveillance inside the Body
Huntingdon's  breakthrough may stop disease
Sure, but you still need to put funds into the exchange to buy the coin in the first place. And likely you would leave the coins there in case the trade goes the otherway. Managing that many coins in your own wallet is a whole other headache. But I guess your point is to not leave much on the exchange at any one time.
The article is about a reactor that does not use plutonium.
Circle's CENTRE Raises $20M in SAFT Sale
> But mostly, between echo chambers, fake news,

But is it really so? Echo chambers and fake news are as old as civilization, only we used different words for them in the past. The villages in which our great^n-grandparents lived were even more of an echo chamber - all the opinions you've ever heard were the ones of a few dozen people you could communicate with. "Fake news" existed in the form of hostile gossip then. Newspapers gave us access to more information, and with it, organized fake news - and the choice of which paper you read created your echo chamber.

The real problem is, the world is just too complex for our minds to handle. It's only becoming apparent because progress of technology gives us more of the world to see.
btw, here is an article about the management UI:

https://www.suse.com/communities/blog/introducing-stratos-ui...
Did it ever occur to you that a cash subsidy might be a lot more acceptable and humane answer that the current water subsidy?

You're framing this as a question of "should we give these peasants free water, OR just let them starve?" That's not what's being debated, and is disingenuous at best.
Yeah the Wifi story is pretty much the same between the two chips. I agree about Android, I don't think I'd have much problem configuring it there, but my first focus is on iOS. There seems to be some better support for that in iOS 11 though:

https://developer.apple.com/library/content/qa/qa1942/_index...

So that might be a good option in the near future!
Once you've done enough theorem proving, you'll really start to appreciate the core benefit of functional programming and understand why academics abundantly use it over imperative coding: it makes programs an order of magnitude to reason about for both you (when you have to write manual proofs) and the machine (if you want proof automation).

To make it practical to verify imperative programs, you're likely going to end up imitating a functional and stateless style to get anything done anyway.
1998 was the previous high average in the last 20 years. Look in the bottom right side of the graph I linked to.
Manufacturing piecework has existed for hundreds of years, you're right, but there are some crucial differences.

If you're assembling widgets at home, your throughput - and hence your workload and earnings - will be about the same from day to day and from week to week. If you're sick you don't earn money - but you're not otherwise punished.

On the other hand if you're delivering for Amazon, your earnings vary with their sales, which you have no control over. And if you can't drive due to poor weather or sickness? Sometimes you owe your employer money!

I agree it's not new for companies to structure themselves to incentivises breaking the law and unsafe behaviour. What the gig economy adds is transferring business risks like poor sales, bad weather and sickness to hourly paid employees also.
I agree. It would be inaccurate to say that the invention of the electric guitar was the sufficient cause of rock'n'roll. On the other hand, the electric guitar is clearly a necessary cause. I think the best model for this interaction is a feedback loop (in the systems sense) where technology influence culture which influences technology.
We use Azure Storage Queues for this:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/queues/
It's all done via REST calls but we use their C# API so it's all transparent to us.

An item is queued with a specific visibility timeout (it should take 10 seconds to process so we give it 10 minutes), a job picks up that item and it disappears from the queue for 10 minutes. If the job succeeds, the job explicitly deletes that queue item. If the job fails, the item reappears after 10 minutes for another instance of the job to pick up.

We've been using it since April 2014. There's more information built into the queue item, like the number of times dequeued and original queued timestamp, so we can send trigger alerts if items are getting old.
That's one trick I had somehow missed. Mind you, that's extremely barebones, not as much as a link to any image-search or options.
Recommending "The Inevitable."

Bloomberg's recommendation list last year was superior.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-bloomberg-book-list/

Also check the recommendations from McKinsey,
https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/leadership/what-ceos-...
CBOE settles to Gemini's spot price, not GDAX. The prices between exchanges differ dramatically currently.
I’ve worked with such service providers. Your words echo my thoughts :)
Plotting Sentiment Analysis in Lord of the Flies
As party to one of the organizers, the dollars per head runs slightly above a wedding. Thus expect $120/plate/head.

Not a great bonus.

Add ons that were cut as the budget was cut; Open Bar: (paid at end, but think cocktail rates $11-$20 per drink), "white glove hors d'oeuvre" $13/person.
I'm 34 and living in Berlin - I know a low of people within ±10 years of my age here and MANY have no kids and aren't planning on having any. The norms are changing in a lot of major urban areas.
I understand that this is a libertarian place that dislikes the idea of shared-anything in society, but some things really are handled better at scale and this is one of them.

Both turbines and drill shafts have positive returns to scale, so unless you're living somewhere where the hot rocks are very close to the surface this is not practical.
I'm sure that someone telling an academic jerk "I think there is a misunderstanding" also happens, but I doubt I would have the patience and strength to always do that when it happens often. Also, someone else saying it has a greater impact on changing the overall harassment culture than if just the victim themselves said it.
Former Facebook exec claims social media is ripping society apart
There should be laws against creating a metric-based system that clearly causes people to work for less than minimum wage and to violate standard employment conditions (e.g. required breaks.)

This type of gig is just a means to exploit poor people by one of the riches, most successful companies on the planet.
Meat tax ‘inevitable’ to beat climate and health crises, says report
It is dark to wonder how many of these failures that perpetuate evil in the world may have been intended? When Eisenhower warned of the creeping power of the military and its network, was that what led to these circumstances today? Like the War on Poverty has shown, bureaucratic inertia is a more powerful force than the good nature of people. Crazy world. We've inherited technology capable of solving the scarcity problem of food, housing and basic needs but still find a way to create more BS and misery in the world.

I hate the modern idea that "doing that which is in your best interest is acceptable. That was very true of the average war-age male during Nazi Germany. The radical ideology, as was mentioned above of ISIS's origins, likewise probably played a secondary supporting role to the economics.

Killing people for profit is not OK: https://theintercept.com/2016/09/09/wolf-blitzer-is-worried-...
I am actually super pleased that SUSE have picked up where HPE left off. I am hopeful it will avoid too many distro-level monoculturisms.

The link to the UI blog post has turned up in our private chat channels :)
Rosalind is a great intro to the fundamentals like graph and set theories, efficient string algorithms, combinatorics, etc.

My one criticism is that the examples for some problems are trivial and don't adequately account for any of the complexity of the problem. It can feel a bit like the "Learn to Drawn an Owl" meme: Step 1) Draw an oval. Step 2) Draw the rest of the owl.
> ... my point is that people pick on Facebook for privacy concerns but we all know it's an advertising company ...

More accurately, it's a surveillance company (with some behavioral testing and manipulation as well), and ads are just the best way to monetize information for now. As ad blockers and banner blindness become more common, they'll find another, probably worse, way to monetize that information, like pre-interview employee screening or pseudo-credit-scores.

Also, unlike Google, which at least built an innovative search engine back in the day (remember Lycos, Alta Vista, and "portals?"), I can't think of anything particularly novel or valuable created by Facebook.
It's called "empirical evidence" probably from experience and observation.
Probably. But you'd have to be a specialist to infer the implications. I gather they wanted to be accessible to a wider audience.
Less than 1% is possible on a reputable exchange.

It's entirely possible to put $1,000 in, end up with $995 of bitcoin, sell when that doubles to $1,990 and get out $1,980.

Then you have tax :)

I am in Australia but I am able to sell for less than 1% quite easy. I think it's easier for Americans.

Also you shouldn't have to worry about slippage with bitcoin unless you're selling $1,000,000+ in one go.

If you observe the order book orders put in at limit around a volume of $100,000 will fill at the limit within minutes or on lower volume exchanges like the ones in Australia you'll be filled at the limit within a few hours at that size.
That's why products are becoming progressively more expensive including things which traditionally became cheaper with generations.

Why focus on the 'fluff' who have lower incomes and will have soon have even less, when you can focus on the 'cream' with high margins, hence $1000 phones and $800 billion cash reserves with no use.
I think in general going out just isn't as much fun anymore as it used to be. You're constantly monitored from all sides by people with mobile tracking devices and any misstep will be broadcasted to billions through YouTube because people think it's fun to show your drunk ass claiming you're the Queen of England to everybody. Preferably with your name and LinkedIn profile in it.

Of course that scares the shit and fun out of people.

I don't think any records exist of my (innocent) missteps thank god, but I do feel the pressure if I'm at an event like that since smartphones became more common. I see people filming other people dancing while commenting negatively about it. Really intimidating. Better make sure we don't stand out in the crowd, unless you're the minority of people that really craves other people's attention in any way.
Most of current storage backends have Log-structured Merge Tree implementation or something like that.

The larger layers of LSMT have enormous size and should be accessed/built as rare as possible.

Being able to predict that given element exists in the larger layers at all is quite a bonus. You can skip reading megabytes of data.

The rareness of building of the larger layers justifies training deep neural model for them.

I cannot verify existence of LSMT backend for major SQL DB engines, but NoSQL engines use it a plenty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-structured_merge-tree
You can now let a prospective buyer know that you accept Bitcoin on Craigslist
I'd highlight that these thoughts did not produce your depression, but your depression produces these thoughts.
I end up believing similar perspectives on life when I'm stuck too deep in depression, too.
If you want to be happier again, work on the root of your grief. With the help of a professional, at best.
I'd be happy with more turn speed on all aircraft. Or maybe dual-stick control. :]
Belief Reasoning with Subjective Logic
Thanks for your kind words.

I try to remind myself that I'm still young-ish and have plenty of time but some days it's too rough.

I've seen everyone around me at least go through one loving relationship. I've never had someone who cared for me. When I look back at my relationships, none of them actually cared for me. Hell, even my own mother was abusive and told me she wished I was never born.

I know I don't need someone to complete me but I'm only human.
Yes it’s a good interview. Though it got very weird for a minute when he was asked about the health issues with button mushrooms and refused to answer because he said it put his life in danger. I wanna know what that’s all about!
The Ethereum network is imploding under its own weight. Running an ethereum node has become quite expensive and requires very state of the art hardware just to keep up. There’s a reason bitcoin chose the constants it did.
Wuzz: Interactive cli tool for HTTP inspection
I don't think New Horizons received any protestors either.
For an individual? Not really, no * . The residential geothermal you refer to is actually not geothermal at all, but more accurately a ground source heat pump which is relying on the fact that the soil temperature a couple meters down is about the average annual air temperature. Actual geothermal-powered applications typically require engineering at depths well beyond the grasp of an individual household, and at costs that almost certainly wouldn't make sense for any reasonable payback period that was only covering household energy consumption.

MIT/INL had a nice overview ~10 years ago[1] on enhanced geothermal systems across the USA. Even the commercial power plants that rely on this type of resource are typically situated only in areas with very nice conditions. You also need to be mindful of the heat extraction over the area underground vs. the natural recharge rate. You can draw down the resource if you don't have a good model of recharge, which is particularly problematic for something you probably want to just run constantly once in service.

* Obviously, it is possible for there to be exceptions based on extremely fortuitous resource access (in terms of both the heat and personal capital), but for almost everyone this isn't going to be the case.

[1] https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/MITEI-The-...
I see, I've been looking at 1988, isn't it more interesting, looking for the biggest difference, not for the smallest one? Why do you believe is the small difference supposed to trigger anything? Can you quote something relevant?
Weren’t we making the same arguments with weavers in the early 1800s and with the assembly line?

Same story, different century.

The auto made horse traders and blacksmiths redundant, automated weaving looms made weavers redundant, high yield farming made many small farmers redundant — yet worldwide poverty is lower than it has ever been, unemployment rates are fairly constant.

New industries form when others decline. Who would have thought in 1920 that there would be an entire industry centered around home recording technology or that car alarms would be a thing or that home automation installers would exist?

Everyone always thinks that their age is the pinnacle of technological achievement — only to be proven wrong within a single generation.

This clamor for UBI and sky-is-falling fear is textbook Ludditeism. Identical arguments were presented by the Luddites, yet everyone can agree that England was a pretty rotten place for normal people in the early 19th century.
A collection of Microservice Architecture resources
THANKS! I was totally braindead when I wrote that. My 4% is actually the 8.1% you mention, and the way you phrase it makes it much clearer too :)
Yes, but many popular modern platform facilitate very transactional interactions, this-for-that. They are also generally high-frequency, low-"touch".
People will strive to find those rarer valuable connections, and many will succeed - now with digital platforms, as before without them. But I can't help the feeling that platforms are seeking more to exploit the human need for connection than to actively support it.
I personally totally keep my hopes high. I just don't hold my breath.
So what happened? Did you manage to convince the CEO that the work was shoddy?
Purely because there are more people wanting to make transactions. The speed of the network is always ~10 minutes per block.
Can you go a bit deeper into this please?
Very curious what type of work you're doing where atomic tasks can run for weeks at a time.
Regarding the first, this article says in August they only had $6.6B from the $15B they raised: https://venturebeat.com/2017/08/23/uber-is-still-burning-cas...

Regarding the second, it's my opinion based on what we know of them vs competitors. The software may be good, but it hardly justifies a difference of $60B compared to Lyft's $11B valuation, let alone Cabify's $320M. I'm pretty sure their offices are not worth that much either. So most of their worth comes from the stuff I mentioned in the previous post, but that can't be sold.
Hey! The interface looks good! I'm mostly interested in Python talks so I searched for 'pycon' and only saw 2 results. Is this because you just haven't indexed pycon talks or ...?
FWIW, they probably spent more than 30/person on just food and drink, but regardless I agree anything under a couple hundred dollars wouldn't feel genuine.