skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean, being anti-business is a huge part of the hacker ethos. The whole pro-startup thing being associated with hackers at all is pretty new. So, by returning to anti-business sentiments, HN returns to the hacker ethos of ~1994.
Also have a young family. Having a semi-passive source of income is a massive sigh of relief on family life. Been married for 10 years and my wife has never been happier.

+1 on slight premature automation. In my case, there are 70k signed up users, so doing anything manually at this point is out of control.
Hey Lord,

Thanks for the comment. I reiterated that it was not an apples-to-apples comparison for stock exchanges...but let's be honest. NYSE and Nasdaq are far and away the leaders.

Aboslutely agree on sending the orders off before someone else does. I mention that in the "pitfalls" section.
Great idea , but for many react apps (both native and JS) domain models doesn’t exists. Redux + graphql apps let me eliminate even more logic. So what we actually share between react native and react JS apps are : graphql queries, reducers, saga middleware. The rest is just UI. In my usecases there is nothing to share using Kotlin.
We have tackled a protocol to solve ad-hoc mesh network data transmission in P2P environments.

It is MIT/ZLIB/Apache2 Open Source licensed: https://github.com/amark/gun

I explain how the P2P logic works in this tech talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fCPRY-9hkc&t=3s

We also have end-to-end encryption now working: https://github.com/amark/gun/wiki/auth

What we're missing, is we need adapters for Bluetooth, etc. Andre Staltz (of CyclesJS fame) has already added React Native bindings ( https://github.com/staltz/gun-asyncstorage ), which I'm hoping some of those tools (like Phonegap, Nativescript) have bridges for Bluetooth?
heart Destigogo!
Yes! Where’s the law? The money behind these moves doesn’t want NN. If a law is passed, this move by Pai is unnecessary. Sadly, it is likely any law that is proposed is weak and full of loopholes. But it will have a spectacular Orwellian title.
And you've entirely missed the point that there is always sacrifice; you glimpsed the green pastures on the other side and are convinced the only bad in this world is on your side of the fence, somewhere distant over the horizon. You're asking for an umbrella on a clear day, for the fear that its raining somewhere in this world and the water would be your end.
So in all of the cases listed in your citation, was it the FCC that censured them in order to get the corrective behavior?

I'm cherrypicking here, but as an avid Bittorrent user, I remember there being significant debate with the community about the extent and methods that Comcast was using to "throttle" Bittorrent. (And I can honestly say that I was never impacted by them.) And I say this as someone who despises Comcast (regretfully, I'm stuck with them even today).

In any case, it doesn't pop out at me that many of those violations were actually mitigated by the FCC. E.g. Google Wallet got blocked, but Isis(sic)/Softcard was just terrible. By the time it was dying, carriers were letting Google Wallet through and then Apple Pay paved the way for Android Pay.

And actually a few of them (like zero-rating in the case of MetroPCS), aren't negative in my mind. I get the "startups can't compete" thing, but particularly mobile data cabs are still necessary today, and I'm okay with innovative, pro-consumer pricing models that get mobile internet into the hands of more people (which is intuitively going to happen when non-incumbents are the ones doing the innovating).
In firefox, change the dom.webnotifications.enabled config to false. Type about:config in the address bar, accept the warning, search for the key and toggle it.
This isn't an answer why DRM is making these customers choose Netflix over piracy. These people don't even know what DRM is.
Have a look into implementing a glazed shader, it has some super nice results; it can give some surprisingly nice results for a very simple shading model https://imgur.com/a/TcliH .

There are more details on: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs4620/2017sp/
It's part of this whole thing which is a rabbit hole unto itself:

https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6c5e97/e...

tldr version: There were very large subsidies paid to expand broadband as well as the Universal Service Fund. The companies actually built out broadband lines to a lot of areas with minimal coverage and then didn't build the last mile because it was expensive and provided "separate but equal" services such as WiMax, UVerse, or other less equitable services.
First Title II doesn't make the government start offering Internet service, it is similar to FDA preventing companies to include poison in our food to cut cost (and you can be sure that especially the public companies would do that if they could. This happens when individual people are not liable and #1 goal of a public company is to improve earnings every quarter).

I have an exercise for you right now.

Let say you are pissed at your current ISP and don't want to use them anymore, who would you switch to? If you have 1 extra choice of high speed internet, congratulations you're one of very small percentage of people. If you don't have other choices (like me) perhaps now you see the problem.
On the advice of a friend, I bought https://www.amazon.com/Daily-Stoic-Meditations-Wisdom-Persev... a month ago. It's been an enjoyable morning read and a very approachable introduction to the philosophy.
The rules did change between 1996 and 2015. The FCC reclassified DSL and cable ISPs as information services in the mid-2000s, ending line-sharing rules that enabled competition and common carrier rules that were more stringent than the net neutrality rules that replaced them. In 2014, the courts ruled that the FCC couldn't continue enforcing net neutrality under the post-2005 classification.
If I had to choose all or none, I'd choose none.

Work for hire (producing something to begin with) would still be a thing.

For a broader discussion I'd prefer to reference the actual text for the basis of US Copyright.

"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

With the meaning of those words at the time of their writing:

* limited to scientific works
* and methods of doing things that have direct industrial benefit.
* ONLY by the author/inventor (not corporations)
* LIMITED time, I think 5 years is probably plenty and 10 is a maximum.
* I like the idea of a short default term, and paying (active effort) for longer renewal.
* Consumer protections (trademarks) are a different matter entirely.
HP is number 1 in worldwide notebook market https://www.idropnews.com/news/macbook-sales-push-apple-no-4...
UCLA is actually important to note, as from a NYTimes study, they turn the largest population of students who grew up in the bottom 20% to people who are in the top 20% of income earners.
Melissa Chen: How Postmodernism Attacks Enlightenment Values
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._...
Can you talk a bit more about your company? What does "Upbeat is a software-powered PR agency" really mean?
How to Design Your Ideal Workday Based on Your Sleep Habits
How We Migrated from Heroku Postgres to AWS RDS
One thing I've noticed about Firefox, especially on mobile, is that transform animations are pretty janky.

Does anyone know if this is being worked on? Should I submit a bug report?
I've gone from checklists to a Kanban (for daily work tasks) in MS OneNote using a variation of this https://www.highmonkey.com/Blog/February-2013/OneNote-Kanban...

In addition to a backlog table I have a Waiting and a Someday table to capture things that are out there but not actionable yet.
Um, so why should Facebook be baked into the ROM?
Are Ivy league graduates really the students who will have the most problems with finding employment sufficient to enable repayment of high student debt?
Of course Apple is nowhere to be seen. Bad enough their refusal to support VP9 is locking Safari and Apple TV users out of 4K Youtube, it's only going to keep getting worse going forward.
no he's fucking not
Uber is the Trump administration of the Valley.
I have seen it written down in print somewhere more eloquently (probably one of his interviews or conversations); the thing I was referring to (incorrectly) was not an entire talk of its own, but a passing brief remark (a few seconds or a minute) during one of the “Internal Details of TeX82” lectures about the source code of the TeX program (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbqY1mTwrj8&list=PL94E35692E...). Sorry I don't have a more exact reference right now.
doesn't simple frequency hopping with the OTP in the fob and the car solve this problem?
post hoc ergo sher lock
Completely agree.

It is further warped by the fact that although the anti-interventionalists are probably right, the interventionalists are the ones who do all the consulting and take all the jobs and give all the advice - because they are .. interventionalists. And who wants to pay a consultant to tell them "don't do anything, and there's nothing you can do."
"Community as a whole" is keyword for the State/Goverment, as the practical representant of the community. And the dictator is/controls the state.
> In some sense, the W3C standards are the opposite of the RFCs by the IETF.

sorry to burst the bubble here but..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Address_Redundancy_Prot...
Me too! I feel like it's a really versatile setup, and definitely de-cluttered my desk at home.
This is a very operationally-focused list, since it's meant to be a guide for what to do next in "triage" modes. I almost never reach the bottom.

During this operationally-focused mode, I don't let myself innovate too much, though I'll take down notes with ideas. The "jump discontinuities" would be things like making a common sequence of responses into an autoresponder, outsourcing a common research task, or making a case to my team to add or cut a service offering.

In practice, the above strategic work happens during times I allocate and protect in advance, where I focus on improvement instead of running down the operational list. Typically for me these are 2-hour blocks, about 1-3x per week.
The major issue with this "robust competition" (which I would tend to agree with) What do you do when one entity (perhaps unfairly, or with taxpayer's dollars) already been given one heck of an upper-hand? What if they've lobbied to make it impossible for you to dig in the ground and run your "tubes" along side theirs?

Has Comcast proven that they're open to "robust competition"? If I could somehow find another way to pipe data into someone's home, do you think Comcast would _not_ try to find some way to litigate against it? For an industry that started as a community shared antenna, what do you think they'd do to another group that tried to do basically the same thing? (read the result of Aereo court case for the answer)
Actually, this has stopped being true in at least some sense. All Universities that take a part in the coalition application are need aware at least for students applying in that way.
Are you running free trials? Giving potential customers an adequate period of time to evaluate your product can be a good way to get them past some of those early hang-ups, especially if you're there to hold their hand.

Edit: I see in your other comment that it's related to lead gen at trade shows, so see if you can convince customers to use a free trial at a trade show so they can actually see the value (and have invested in the platform with real leads by the time you come knocking with a bill).
Title II isn't terrible and all the arguments that it is (including this one) rest not on the actual regulations adopted under Title II in 2015, but on either vague handwaves, regulations that could in principle be adopted under Title II but have not, or naive assumption that regulations nearly identical to other Title II markets would be adopted for broadband with the FCC ignoring market differences.

This article also ignores the problem with regulation under Title I in that it fails to recognize that the courts have both subsequently struck down both the case-by-case enforcement of neutrality principles under Title I and the ability of the FCC to adopt meaningful general regulation aimed at neutrality without Title II reclassification. Yes, one can argue that either the 2010 Title I regs or the pre-2010 case-by-case approach were sufficient, and that if they were continued, Title II would be unnecessary (it's not clear to me that that is accurate, but it's a defensible position in either case.) But the courts ruled against the case-by-case Title I actions in 2010, and the 2010 Title I regs in 2014. So, whether what the FCC was doing previously under it's understanding of Title I was sufficient is irrelevant to present policy options. Title II is, literally, all that's left for the FCC without abandoning net neutrality entirely.

Yes, it might be argued that a properly crafted new, internet-specific neutrality statute would be better than Title II. Great. Get one passed through Congress, and then we can discuss the FCC acting based on it. But in the world we live in, there is only Title II or surrender.
Sure, if you look at it from the closed mindset that nobody improves or can "git gud".

It's been proven time and time again that humans can learn and adapt to achieve their own aspirations. Take one quick look at the special olympics; you'll see a very large group of individuals who have all overcome amazing obstacles to become olympians.

Similarly, highly intelligent people may not have the domain knowledge required to understand how to bootstrap a company. Their knowledge domain may come from a completely different environment or culture which has its own mindset on how to bootstrap a company. Being smart does not necessarily make you more equipped than "dumb" (and highly motivated) people, but it does give you a decent head start.
Just submit the blog postings as links on HN.
Prof. Hagino has uploaded the original implementation of CPL
I did my PhD with this group (Rob Wood). When I was there, these kind of actuators, and the robots you would put them in, were just getting started. It's great to see how far they've come.

One of the great benefits of these soft actuators is that you can embed them in soft structures and then get smooth movement in multiple directions. Instead of a rigid robotic arm with a few degrees of freedom, you could build something like a snake or an elephant trunk.

Another exciting area of research (my focus) is that since these actuators are fairly cheap, you could make lots and lots of robots with them. Think thousands. If you had a swarm of 1000 small robots, each of which has minimal power and sensors, what would you do with it? How would they coordinate their behavior? How would they communicate? For that matter, how would you even turn them all on? Swarm algorithms are fun to think about on robots, but are also useful for other problems out in the normal world.

(Don't focus on the "1000x" claim. It's true depending on how you measure, but it's not the exciting part.)
I thought that by now we've already established that everything is sexist, and it's all patriarchy's fault. Those dirty males, they post links carelessly just like they pee standing.

Obviously, we need more strict control over communication channels, more social justice trainings, to make everything safer. Safety is obviously the top most priority.

That virtual signaling at the very end was precious. Look how beautifully they've bonded over Trump-hating. I'm touched.
Television's Most Infamous Hack Is Still a Mystery 30 Years Later - Max Headroom
why is that ?
Indeed! Evan was a great member of the Erlang community. In addition to those qualities, he is just a very friendly and likable dude.
You don't understand. The problem is the letter itself, not even necessarily what it says. The letter should have been handed over as part of discovery. It wasn't. It only came to the judge through an independent case.
It's similar if you look skin deep. Differences emerge once you start using it on daily basis.

The coolest thing FF has over Chrome is the little [ev] icon next to an element that shows what events are connected to it. Saves me lots of time trying to track things down.

The coolest thing Chrome has over FF is that stepping through code is so much faster. There is no lag at all, while there is one in FF. It also has a "Search All" mode where it will look through all your code (html, js, css) to find a string.
>Not much detail yet. I'm hoping for some more as time goes by...

This has ben just posted with some more details:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15799737

http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Uber-Waymo-case-...
Straight up this company should be dissolved. Is there any precedent of a corporation having its charter or whatever allows it to exist revoked for bad faith? It seems obvious now they completely indend to break the law as part of doing business.
This theory is called panspermia for those who are interested.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia
Verizon was the annoyance that sparked my question.
Exports contribute to GDP but sales between foreign subsidiaries do not. So a Toyota made in Toyota-owned Kentucky factory contributes to the US GDP. This is in contrast to GNP; that US-made Toyota would count towards Japan's GNP.
There are no known issues about this. You should submit a bug report.
Anyone have experience with this? Making some money in my spare time sounds nice.
In this case it was Verizon, who for sure knows my phone number ;)
Really? my key fob (Ford Fusion) has a separate lock and unlock buttons. Also, the auto-unlock feature can be disabled through a setup menu on the car dashboard. Furthermore, the spot where a physical lock stem would normally be has a red LED that lights when the door is locked. Finally, it if you touch the outside of the handle in a certain, the doors lock. Really nice feature.
I was just starting to think Waymo didn't have anything to win this case, but this is incredible.
Ive had it referred to as a full screen quad.
I admire them - they use 20+ SaaS products, and most of them are extremely useful for automation leading to saving tons of time and effort. Unfortunately, they're quite expensive for people just starting out with zero funding.
The truth is that they should evaluate need not based on your parents income, but on their net worth - the price of their home. If you struggled to make ends meet for 15 years at the beginning of your child life but then suddenly started making 200k a year, you likely don't have the savings you need to pay 200k over 4 years to send your kid to college.
Hi thisisit,

Thanks for the comment. If you would have read through the entire article, you would see fees mentioned in the "pitfalls" section.

I am glad you brought up the NBBO, as it is an extremely important regulation for newer traders to understand. However, the comment on mergers and consolidations still stands...just look at the Philly Stock Exchange: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Stock_Exchange
Ah, thanks for the update! I figured as much, since the ICO site had been down all weekend, but at least this trainwreck has been halted for now.
I don't know if I would quite put it that way, but I do remember techno-libertarianism being the dominant paradigm on HN at the beginning and for more leftish views to become common over time.
Cause Area: Human Rights in North Korea
It's not a numbers game.
Not exactly correct.

The illegal ones are not "just as good" - they faced the competition and got better in the past few years, learning from others successes.

Remember the Popcorn Time. It dropped a bomb because it was an evolution from "go to some tracker, find what you want, download it, wait, watch when it's done" to the modern standards of "think of a title, grab the popcorn and start watching".

(Just in case - I'm not approving or condemning of anything. Just stating the facts what had happened.)
Aurelius, at least, doesn't rule out or condemn immediate physiological or knee-jerk emotional responses IIRC. The idea is to stop feeling the ones that are, it turns out, something you're choosing to feel past those initial couple seconds, assuming feeling them is unpleasant and/or unproductive (usually they're both).
>which operated over phone lines... which meant they were covered by Title II.

Do you have a source on this??

I've seen this claim made a few times in this thread and have been unable to find anything to back it up. I was under the impression that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 dictated that all ISP's were information services and exempted them from common-carrier and the like.

The phone services themselves were of course under title II but I've not found anything that indicates the ISP's that created a network on top of the phone network were.
So when do I get my Doctor Octopus style robo arms? :-)
Movavi Video Editor 14.1.1 Crack and Serial Key Free Download
The language is not hard. What's needed is the OA kind of explanation to teach

1. understanding the breadth (pitfalls, hidden gems, whats there) of the "std lib".
2. the ErlangVM / runtime.
3. Esp the OTP/whatever it's called.
4. Erlang tooling how to build, test, deploy, redeploy a non trivial project.
Sounds slightly surprising, but the exterior of the ISS is not a sterile environment. There are thousands of ways terrestrial bacteria could have ended up there. I guess the interesting thing is that the bacteria seem to be able to survive the extreme environment. But that's hardly a new discovery about bacteria.
Serverless Aurora (MySQL) Announced at Amazon ReInvent
I agree that non-London folk swung it. But it is a bit of a stretch to think either

a) that makes everyone outside London working class

b) that other cities didn't vote Leave

I see lots of landed gentry and farmers who were big on Leave (back then). Lots of Tory home counties types too. I don't think it is even slightly helpful to consider it a class issue.
The Northeast is pretty crowded so if you're going to lay down tracks that are straight enough for high speeds you are going to displace somebody. Politically that is not easy to do.
You seem very fond of Kotlin.

I hear a quite a bit about it lately, but as I haven't had the chance to play with it yet, I was wondering why would one choose it over Scala.
IE9, luxury.

At least we don't have to support IE6 any more :)
Yep, the EULA/TOS on Dell Ubuntu images is egregious to say the least. In all cases you should reinstall yourself.
Because it is a rollback

"The FCC will vote on Dec. 12 whether to roll back 2015 rules that prohibit internet service providers from blocking or throttling content, or from selling “fast lanes” so major companies can get speedier access to consumers. Net neutrality activists say such rules are necessary to prevent the internet from being walled off, where access is restricted by ISPs or where certain sites have an unfair advantage over others."[1]

Today, certain sites already have an unfair advantage over others due to peering and PNIs. Can my startup afford to put a CDN box and colo @ Verizon? Of course not. So my startup is already at a disadvantage to Google, Amazon, Facebook etc.

The end result is that Netflix will have to renegotiate their peering rates. How does this affect the consumer? The short answer is it doesn't.

[1] http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/fcc-ajit-pai-net-neutrality...