skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> If you feel like a law is wrong, look at why it was passed. There might be reasoning you aren't thinking of, like environmental damages. If you still feel like it's wrong, look at how likely the action it forbids is to hurt someone else by intent or accident. If you feel like that's extremely unlikely, and don't think you'll get caught, break that law!

I feel like vaccine schedules are wrong, so I asked my pediatrician about them.

I feel like global warming is a hoax, so I asked a scientist about it.

I feel like a law is wrong, so I asked a legal expert about it.

The next step to take is up to me, but in each case I'm confident I'd be starting with stronger footing that you would be with your process.

Furthermore, I can pass that process on to others in a way that is less fragile and more efficient than your process. Ask your pediatrician. Ask your scientist colleague. Ask your law professor. In a world of good faith actors you'd still be reading primary research papers on epidemiology for years before moving to the second topic. In the real world you'd likely skip the necessary steps, risk making misguided decisions, and spreading that misguided decision-making process to others.
> No, he's describing conservatism (at least the U.S. variation) which is largely classical liberalism.

US conservatism is not classical liberalism. It's classical conservatism in the context where the the established elites are the products of capitalist politico-economic systems rather than pre-capitalist ones.

Like classical conservatism, and unlike classical liberalism, it rejects secular rationality and empiricism and relies on appeals to nationalism, ancient religious tradition, and authority figures to protect the interests of the established elites.
That's what I was saying.
Indeed, this is from the world economic forum, yet some of these predictions are more likely from 2130 more than 2030.

And nothing about social change, economic power shifts, etc - The pampered American calling in to see how the minions in China have done the day's work.
> It's much less likely that you'll be liquidated without cause.

Well I'm sure the AI would prefer behavior modification devices to liquidation as humans are too expensive to grow from scratch.
This is not about Germany, please don't get defensive and apologetic ;-) Please read my comment again and substitute Germany for some other nation. Would that change your perspective? What post-war Germany did is admirable; now we are discussing two other nations which don't adhere to the same principles and don't go to same great lengths to fix it. Germany was used just as an example of a "repentant nation" which might deserve forgiveness. Would that be different if you weren't a repentant nation, which was the previous question?
The is a concept SORELY needed.

There is another app called "Breaker" which I think is similar which I have tried. Breaker is a bit buggy and there isn't enough of a network yet to up-vote episodes and make the discovery valuable.

Whoever can get a big network of users and some solid auto-suggestion intelligence included will win this space.
What???

You can not trademark echo for different areas. And podcast is different.

This way of reasoning makes me speachless.

P.s. goodreads might be a case though.
That's not a flipside. That's a restatement of my criticism of these subreddits. There is a difference between constructive criticism and/or correction (which I am all for), and belittling, demeaning, insulting, and cursing at people.
Linux Journal Archive: 1994 – 2017
That's the important distinction between criminal and civil forfeiture as I understand it. Criminal forfeiture is when property is seized as proceeds from an unlawful act following a guilty verdict.
Care to explain further for an interested American?
As one who isn't familiar with all this: "not exactly true" means very little. How does it behave in practice?
The way the Saudi's have been behaving is atrocious and indefensible.

But the ability of the Houthis to strike Riyadh is a pretty significant development. If they show the ability to keep doing it consistently it will certainly change how the war is going.
Structural unemployment is a first symptom of 'post-work'.

Of it and a lot of other things, but it's something one should expect to see.
Is that something like the sense of smug satisfaction that people who don’t have any children get from making condescending comments on Internet forums about parenting decisions made by people who do?
for what it's worth, we do it for fun too, not just for getting rid of the annoy-a-trons :)
DevOps Enterprise Summit 2017 top takeaway: Adoption rapidly moving beyond IT
Jony Ive: The Future of Design
AWS Cloud9: cloud IDE for writing, running, and debugging code
I think the link was updated. There is more information than was previously available. It includes more details now. Either way, my statement still stands. Whether or not it would have made a difference in this particular instance isn't important. What's important is that you should never offer up any information to uniformed officers without a very good reason to do so. Playing nice may or may not get you a break on some minor traffic violation if the officer is in a good mood, but I'd much rather be viewed an a polite but uncooperative, rights-loving hard-ass...because it just might save me one day.

As a matter of fact, it already has. I had a major police event earlier this year that came to be because I pulled my own car off the main road late at night because I have an old car and it was making a strange noise (and the main road had no shoulder). There was a cop hiding down this road and immediately approached me and then called for backup (for no reason) and 4 cars and 6 officers in total were there harassing me for almost an hour. Telling me first that I was drunk. Then telling me that I am a drug dealer there to meet someone. Then telling me that I was a drug user there instead to buy drugs. None of which was true. I even played nice and explained why I actually pulled off the main road in an attempt to expedite the stop. They didn't believe and once it became clear they were out to screw me over any way they could, I stopped talking. Then they asked me to perform sobriety tests, which I refused. They eventually let me go free and with no tickets (because it wasn't a traffic stop to begin with). If you're wondering why I refused the sobriety test - it's because I know those tests are used to justify the breathalyzer and other things like searches (which can lead to confiscation of property). I know this because I had a friend years ago who drank nothing, blew a .00 and was arrested because "if it's not alcohol, you must be on something else so we're taking you in to take your blood and have it tested". My friend got arrested, spent the night in jail, and then had to pay a lawyer to show up to court to have his case dismissed even though everything came back squeaky clean. They would have done the same with me.

Never give them an inch to work with. I'll take the $25 tickets in the meantime if that's the price of possibly avoiding major litigation at some point.
Locally Hosted Multi-User Keepass Password Server
You can always utter the words "I am already working remotely", irregardless.
"Cracking Philosophy" 400 pages, 2/3 pages for each philosopher or philosophical idea, with illustrations.
> You probably also found their performance pretty crap when they were cold.

I did find this to be true.

We tried "baking" them several times at the shop. It did help some for a few days and then went back to squealing. I just put up with after a while.

When I finally switched over to SRAM I didn't get any more squealing.
Intuitionistic logic
The article is about a missile fired at Saudi Arabia. Is every article like this obliged to insert an amount of irrelevant filler equivalent to which side is worse by some arbitrary definition?
Facebook didn't have to write this paper. They could have done the research and held onto it. They could have not bothered to do research at all. To me, this says that they're willing to do sociological research regarding the implications of their platform, and to share it publicly.

It might be an unpopular opinion, but I think this shows transparency, a certain sense of social responsibility, and at the top level some semblance of understanding of the scope of the effect they have on society.
> The burden is on you to prove it in a way the government is happy with first.

A jury, actually, and it's not "first," it's after the fact, if you get charged. As far as I can tell the law in CA is that you have to be able to substantiate it with scientific evidence. Granted, I was thinking about statements advertising your services as a doctor, not a drug company.

As a drug company, in many environments you still have a right to flat-out state you've got a pill that will cure cancer -- go ahead and say it when giving a talk somewhere. Edit: which is losing the plot a bit, yeah, because you could ask salaries in a different environment too.
I'm not sure of that. More than a few intellectuals supported the regime.
Did I not account for that? Candidates of all parties can present any number of candidates. People in rural areas would still have a choice. In Illinois, it wouldn't just be Chicago liberals voting. There are conservatives in the whole state. They would elect their share of representatives.

My design may not balance everything, but adding to it could resolve those issues. Redistricting, in its current form, will always be hyper-political and abused. There has to be a way to take that out of the equation.

My number one comment is that "districting" is not a constitutional guarantee. If the current system is broken, as it so clearly is, why not look at alternatives?
Emojicode
If there's enough DNA for a DNA sketch, then there pretty much has to be enough DNA for a regular DNA test. Nobody is going to go to jail for looking like a DNA sketch. There is a risk here where innocent people with no connection at all to the crime might be compelled to give a DNA sample. If the DNA from the "suspect" is tested, excluded, and then all information about that DNA is then destroyed, maybe that's not a big deal. But I don't think we have that guarantee now for DNA samples.
I could be wrong, but I believe bank checks are treated as cash because they are certified by the originating bank. They aren't like a regular check. They are considered to be a cash equivalent because it was issued by a licensed banking entity with a charter. I am pretty sure the funds clear immediately, or could be made available immediately with a request to the depositing bank.

UPDATE - It seems this used to be true (or they would clear next day) but this has changed after an increase in fraudulent checks so many banks now wait until the check actually clears the originating institution.
the title of the post and the subtitle of the website
Loveable Digital Kittens Are Clogging Ethereum's Blockchain
just periodically hold down left and space to get lots of points awesome future ahead for games!
Not really. If you can live with the same OS X you installed first, allowing only fix updates, you can be totally fine on XPS 13/15 (given you have Broadcom WiFi). Everything else works like on real MacBook. The same holds for most Zenbooks (those without NVidia).
who's going to arrest the offenders, the police?

on a related note: stob! its da bullies!
That's totally false. The American IRS, at any rate, is extremely prone to negotiating, cutting deals, and agreeing to payment plans, over disputes large and small.
Hitler was an art student, Mussolini a journalist.
I'm going to hazard a guess that it's actually very hard to make a sub-sonic rocket!
The business guys who are into watches tend to buy fakes that can fool people like them.

FTFY
When I said there are several axiomatic principles and they conflict that's ^^^ precisely what I was talking about. Reducing duplication at all costs is harmful.
The difference with salary is that it's going to be illegal to ask in CA.
How does one start a Montessori school? Would love to read about your experience :)
Hey, I am not affiliated with Amazon. Fair point on using Goodreads. I'm just using that name so people quickly get an idea of the product ex) how people pitch their ideas as Uber for X
Winklevoss twins become (first)* “Bitcoin billionaires”
selectodude was referring to the GDP of the US, not the national budget. I was referring to the way that foreign influence is exerted is felt in nearly every industry: finance, the petrodollar, contractors who make deals selling weapons and surveillance around the world...
Did you talk with VirusTotal? That's probably the largest dataset out there that isn't controlled by an AV company.
More jobs and work for us?
My Pixel 2 XL comes tomorrow! Shipped a week early.
Hey guys, working on a fix atm. I think it has something to do with me not recognizing the file as a proper XML. Will fix and push an update.
I don't think it's that pedantic a point. IMHO, I agree this study is incremental and thus too preliminary to draw generalizing conclusions on. Even the paper itself acknowledges a number of major aspects that further research should focus on.

But consider that threads here are already drawing parallels to Montessori education, personal anecdotes, etc. People are used to big bang results and will happily draw conclusions that aligns with their world view even if the wording in a paper isn't exactly what a scientific study actually means to say.
It's a hard read given what's happened with all the waste and excess in the social safety net. The social workers in my neighborhood live in nicer houses than me and lease vehicles that people purchase when intelligence isn't the limiting factor (e.g FCA products), and they leave for work after me and arrive home before I do. Yet I see stories about their clients needing winter coats and socks.

I look at how much of my paycheck goes to taxes and it seems like there should be enough to ensure that kids don't go hungry but apparently not.

But the solution remains the same as always. The bureaucrats bleat "we need more money" - I don't think I've ever heard one say "we need to do a better job with the budget".
Can I ask why? I’m a little baffled, maybe I’m just brainwashed that everyone loves apps because they use mobile devices more often. Especially for listening.
IPvlan overlay-free Kubernetes Networking in AWS
The tale of former Governor Lester Maddox's campaign of harassment against a corrupt south Georgia police force is an amusing one.

http://www.oxfordamerican.org/magazine/item/1023-the-ludowic...
http://www.atlantatimemachine.com/misc/ludowici.htm

You know it's bad when a rural town attains national infamy in the pre-internet days.

Besides gaming the stoplights, the police would hide behind billboards and trees with their radar guns and target out-of-state motorists with tickets for +1 mph over the limit. Since most were just passing through the town, nobody had the inclination to wait around for a court date to fight the tickets, and all were essentially forced to pay without a chance to contest it.

He eventually succeeded in passing some legislation to curb the abuse. To this day local police have to sit in plain sight on flat ground (within a certain tolerance of grade) when running radar/lidar, can't write speeding tickets for less than 10 mph over the posted limit (does not apply to state troopers or school zones) and a slew of other technical nitpicks that make it easier to get "sane" speeding tickets dismissed.
Plexcoin, summarized:

>"Security is very important to us. That's why we invented a new type of encryption system based on your private virtual currency address, so it is unencyptable."

Come up with a new encryption system and tell the world it's unencryptable... I'll just leave this one hanging. Source: Plexcoin blog (https://www.plexcoin.com/blog/important-statement)
The description on iTunes says "Top Epidodes" which you might want to fix. I like the concept a lot, but you should probably explain it a little more clearly in the description and documentation on your own site.
I asked a GDPR consultant we hired about backups. The answer was basically that the letter of the law requires data to be deleted from backups, but people aren't going to do that, and there is some language about "reasonable" effort or something like that.

This might be useful: http://www.davidfroud.com/does-right-to-erasure-include-back...
As a Recruiter who has been in the industry for 11 years, I can tell you that companies are well aware of the going rate for a Recruiter. So whether a contract is signed or not, they know that by telling the Recruiter they would be interested in reviewing and/or interviewing their candidate, they are not only accepting the solicitation (thus can't claim it was unsolicited), they are also indirectly agreeing to pay a fee. If they had concerns about how much that fee would be, they could have asked before any interviews were set up. But it sounds to me like they never had any intention of paying the recruiter, otherwise they would have made sure to address/negotiate fees upfront.
Additionally, I'm sure the Recruiter would be willing to negotiate with them on the fee, especially if the alternative is not getting paid at all.
As you stated, you wouldn't have known of this opportunity without the recruiter's efforts and likewise the company wouldn't have known of your existence without the Recruiter's help. So there is no question that this recruiter is owed a fee. What the company is doing is immoral and should definitely raise some red flags. Throughout my career, I've unfortunately had a couple of companies try to pull a similar move, but was lucky enough that the candidate had my back in those situations and therefore I did receive the fee I deserved.
It's very well written, but feels a little like it doesn't quite make the point it set out to make. It's a good read from the perspective of a richness of language and insight into a lifestyle many here will not have familiarity with. But, I don't know, when I was homeless, a hotel stay was a brief foray back into civilization. It was a chance to get a proper shower in a proper bathroom facility, unlike the homeless showers back in downtown San Diego that I was all too happy to leave behind. It was a chance to watch a TV like normal people do.

It sits a bit uncomfortably with me that the meaning (of hotel stays) for those living precariously is cast in such negative terms. Perhaps that seems necessary to motivate people to try to do something about the problem, but I am not so sure that works. The pity with which other people clearly saw me when I was on the street rarely motivated anyone to help me, though I was only asking for help with figuring out how to effectively make money online. The pity itself seemed to be a barrier to the connections and useful information I desired. The pity seemed rather corrosive to my finances and not some means to channel assistance my way.

While I can understand the strong feelings people have about how galling our high rates of homelessness are, I am not so convinced that this framing is particularly helpful to some cause of trying to make headway against such things.
Not only toddlers
Sites like this pop up every week. What's different about WECO?

It's always the same story, a new site popups up claiming to be a perfect reddit alternative, yet brings nothing new to the table beyond the promise of "we have better morals!".

Fast forward a month, the site has failed to generate a community (what would drive people to switch?) and instead has attracted the dark corners of the web and become Voat 2.0/3.0/X.0
Sure, call it that too. I think that that word is a bit unwiedly in today's political dialogue, because it means something different to everybody.

To some, "capitalist" is an attribute of a society that resist state intervention in economic collaboration. It is equal to the phrase "free market" and viewed with great skepticism.

To others, "capitalist" is more tantamount to greed and cronyism; it is understood in a way that's contrary to traditional anarchic theory about the state.

You might detect that I usually find myself in the second category.

Because of this dichotomy, I like to think of the procession of ages of humankind represented by the dawn of the internet being from "statist/industrial" toward "humanitarian/information-driven".

But you can also certainly think of it as being from "capitalist" to "humanitarian" or whatever may go in that second slot, sure.
But he did sign a form 'releasing' the money to them.
Liquidity: high-level typed smart-contract language for Tezos
It's in large part the choice of topic rather than the details of the article. They could have chosen to highlight how Yemeni defenses work in light of a US backed Saudi bombing campaign.
Yes all of those are "allowed" in en_GB. However, the second example you give would almost certainly be rendered as "He'd had problems ...". Yes, really!

Thinking about it, it depends, for your first example:

"Who on earth has three bicycles?" Tom asked, incredulously. "Well, I've got three", replied Jim.

"I've three bicycles up for sale today" or "There're three bikes ..." or "There are three bikes". Some people find there're (there are) a bit dodgy.

I don't think that en_GB or any other version really gets too hung up on things like that anymore. That said, some constructions do seem more natural than others.

I have never heard or seen anyone try to use "have'd" in any modern form of English. You can get "I've had" from "I have had" or "I'd 've had" from "I would have had" or if you really want to drop the aitches then I'd 've 'ad. The last two are quite common in speech but not written.
Stats of Podcasts and Episodes by year/category/language
The 0.5C for the PCB is only the case for stripline in a Er=4 dielectric. Microstrip is faster since some of the E field is in the air.

Need neutrino comms, straight through the earth.
Yes. We have the concept of "inside voices" or "outside voices".
They're also willing to perform mass psychological experiments on hundreds of thousands of people without consent. I suppose we should be thanking them for that as well?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/10932534/Face...
There is barely any software in the hot path of competitive equity HFTs these days. Even the most finely tuned C++ is probably on the order of single digit micros tick to trade, but the goal is sub-micro.
Depends what you mean by all, I assume you mean money but many have lost far, far more than money and go on to do amazing things.

All this tells me is that is attitude that counts for everything.
> After pleading guilty last week, Voits now faces up to ten years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. Voits also had to forfeit all the electronics equipment he used to carry out his attacks — a laptop, four phones, one circuit board, and an undisclosed amount of Bitcoin.

1. This is a real shame; he's clearly a fairly intelligent person who has possibly just wasted a decade of his life. I hope the sentencing will be lenient, and he'll be able to enter society without too many hiccups upon release, though the U.S. isn't great at either.

2. What does the bitcoin have to do with his attacks? If it was just in a wallet on his forfeited computer, what will happen? That could set an interesting precedent, in regards to unrelated bitcoin on seized electronics, if there isn't a precedent already.
You're not alone I was totally disappointed that there was no website component as well. I also am confused with the usage of Echo. This has nothing to do with the Amazon Echo and there are a lot of words to choose from so why not pick something that is unique? Especially since it's handling a typically audio format that the Echo would be entirely capable of playing.