skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ah okay, interesting. Is it because wasm doesn't yet add any new functionality over asm.js that using asm.js as an intermediary step isn't inherently worse?

In that case, it sounds like the LLVM backend will only yield clear user-facing benefits when new features like pthreads are introduced?
I'm pretty sure y'all are saying the same thing. :-) my favorite way of describing it is "Rust lets you build safe abstractions, even if its core uses unsafe."
Cobra Driver Pack 2018 ISO Crack Free Download [Updated]
[Disclaimer: I don't play golf.]

I was expecting that I can upload a video and you see it and provide some feedback. If someone can describe clearly the problem with the swing, then they have more than the 50% of the problem solved.

Perhaps some free Q&A or some general recommendations will encourage more people to create an account.
Well, it's a sliding scale isn't it? If you have less traffic/paying customers you can pull that back down.
> I don't really think you want to live in a country where the IC influences elections.

We already do. One of the contributions to the Democrat's nominee loss was the FBI director's letter.
The point of the article (as I understood) was precisely to explore every other angle except for the financial statement (since that's what every other article about TSLA covers).
You've brought this up before. [0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12013088
I suppose I was saying that not all breaches are created equally. The Target breach that I vaguely recall was initiated by some IoT devices on the far edge of the network (then escalated into critical system). That doesn't make it right, by any means, but somehow it seems a more complex problem to control than simply encrypting core data, specifically if said data are your crown jewels to begin with (credit card numbers -- Equifax' core business). I didn't study the details of the particular Target breach, so I may have things wrong, but I'm merely trying to illustrate that I could have more sympathy for some breaches over others.
_If_ they are still performing as they are now when that happens, they will be in trouble. They predict to have a healthy cash flow from the model 3 soon, though. 5000 cars a week at the end of Q1 2018 would bring in at least $175M a week on income or, ballpark, in the range of a billion a year in margins. I don’t think that would be enough to warrant their share price, but it would be enough to keep the company running.

(minor negative: $1000 of the money paid for each model 3 sold already is in their bank account)
LibreOffice is the one you want to use. OpenOffice is so undermaintained that they have problems patching security holes, nevermind improving
Create a new loopback interface for testing? No reason you should be using your actual loopback for testing bad networking. Especially since the loopback interface is used for far more things than the one application you are testing these days.

Setting up a new interface is pretty easy on most unix OS's and then you can increase the latency on just that interface without impacting the interface most software on your machine is built to expect to be blazing fast. And you can mess with that interface to your hearts content knowing the only thing affecting it is the applications you are running on it.
a good way to do this is chosing a very unique username.

- sincerely, meatsock.
> The basic idea is that's its an editor friendly content management UI for persisted data stored in a GitHub repository.

Since it was discussed in a different subthread: If you would describe it like that, why isn't something straightforward like that the blog post title?
Maybe more specific examples would be useful. If my lungs are failing, my brain gets less oxygen, and functions differently. When my childen are hungry, they definitely behave differently, and I attribute the cause of that to their lack of food.

If my wife or friend is in a lousy mood, my mood may sour too. If my team scores, I cheer in excitement -- even when the team is playing hundreds of miles away.

The brain surely plays a role in each of these cases, but I would assign causality outside it.
Lol, you realize that the government would have to pay current shareholders the value of their shares, right?
Likely a considerable group of users will ignore a "bad" flag, as much as they have been ignoring all sorts of flags in the past. The less black and white (red or green) the flag is, seems to me, the more people will ignore it.
This is subtle and breathtakingly obvious (in retrospect, now a band of geniuses have thought of it): reversing the tables on what is the “main processor” and what is the “accelerator”, and making the customised computation silicon the baseline resource that utilises the CPUs if the need to do so arises rather than the other way around.

I am very impressed. And I am also impressed that their next machine will have ARM processors serving as the CPUs.
If you like this, you might like Lisp interpreter written in assembly in a single file. It is one of the best commented code ever written imo.

https://github.com/marcpaq/arpilisp
For one, quantum physics describes the entire universe as discrete, if I understand it correctly
I think you are mistaken. There is much to learn from implementations such as this, and the techniques used form the basis of much more complex systems. The technology remains very relevant.

FWIW, I didn't downvote you, as I don't downvote someone simply because I believe they're wrong, or because I disagree with them.
Wait a minute…

https://static.iseeme.com/photo-upload-templates/BKC400/dedi...
I've fainted a couple times and I've done hallucinogens. The experiences aren't anything alike to me.
> Or more reasonably, nearly every major site or service that has ever existed.

The interesting thing is that this is absolutely not true. Just think Facebook or Google.
Here are my experiences which seem to match what you describe:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8540946
Creating a REST API with Python and the Aiohttp Framework
Your site is basically empty. Current content:

Welcome.

Hi, I'm Viktor. More to come, in the meantime you can contact me via twitter, linkedin, or via email at <my name> at <the domain this site is on>.

More links and a pgp key at Keybase.

Made with ️ in Nice.

Should say something more like:

Welcome.

Hi, I'm Viktor Vojnovski. I do (stuff you do, reasons why people would look for you online). You can also find me on twitter @vojnovski. Here is my linkedin profile. You can email me via ViktorVojnovski at <this domain name>.

I can also be found on Keybase.

Made with ️ in Nice, France.

As others have said, it really should be ViktorVojnovski.com.

Edited to reflect updated location info.

Re your update. My suggested edits don't add a lot more words. But they do replace completely empty fluff ("More to come, in the meantime ...") with actual useful info. That empty fluff is apparently also a lie if there is no intent to actually add more info.
"Growing Signs of Mainstream Adoption" LOL

Bitcoin is unusable for any transactions and has been for some time. That's why the shillers are calling it a "store of value" now.
Improving the plants that Africans eat and breeders neglect
"Look, I love laughing at game professionals flailing at games as much as anyone. Remember when that unnamed Polygon writer tried Doom and showed no signs of ever having played it (or any video game) ever before? That was a hoot.

(My favorite bit is when the player unloads a full shotgun blast into a health pack resting on the ground, in what I can only assume is a post-modern deconstruction of late-stage capitalism.)

But some people watched that video and said, "Wow, I should never buy this game," and were right to say it. So the video was useful after all."

I feel like he brushes this criticism off without really confronting it.

A reviewer who's experienced with gaming and good at it can gauge difficulty, one who's inexperienced and terrible can't reliably. Reviewers shouldn't be perfect mirror images of the people they represent. They need to be above average to have cogent criticism and to communicate that to gamers effectively. Terrible analogy: No one is arguing that war correspondents don't need to know anything about geopolitics because "most people who read about geopolitics don't understand it, and they deserve correspondents who advocate for them."
Do you trust Russian purchased platforms and apps?
I was reminded today of ICQ, so I went over to download it. As it asked to download from a .ru domain I stopped and was a little surprised. ICQ was sold to a Russian company. So that got me to thinking: ICQ, Livejournal, how many other internet properties have been sold to Russian firms, and wold you trust them still?
Goku would be proud.
IANAP but as far as I understand, neither time nor space are believed to be discrete in the mainstream physics model.
From http://david.li/
The Truth About Sex Differences
I think it's collaboration by choice vs. collaboration by dictate. I had an awful time having to work with people that weren't at my level. And the work (not calling it "my" work, btw) always suffered as a result.

Then in my most recent project, I've done some of the best work of my life in conjunction with a collaborator. She was someone I chose, and we both brought our respective disciplines to bear. We were both quite open to and respectful of each other's input. But a lot of our work was done in solitude. Sometimes one or the other would bring a surprise to the next meeting, a distinctly different yet more elegant solution to the problem we set out to solve. It was easy for either of us to cast aside prior agreements and accept the more awesome result.

In previous jobs, I would be chastised for "going rogue" if I took a side journey to make something awesome. Some managers are blind to benefits like reductions in customer support/general headaches, increase in usability, reduction of time and motion, or just the general wow factor, when they are looking at meeting minutes.

IMO Collaboration is like any other tool. It can work fantastically when employed by skilled practitioners. And will produce shoddy results in the hands of the unskilled. Ego, pride and self-obsession also contribute to failure. It takes a somewhat enlightened person to be willing to let someone else in to their creative process. To accept criticism as a necessary part of the process of making great work, instead of taking it personally. To go to the mat as the lone dissenting voice when they know they're on to something great. And to know the difference when their own idea is something really great vs. gratuitous crap.
> in fact, using Phoenix for a while made me miss a lot of the available libraries, plug-in solutions and wide range of community knowledge.

This is my main reason for focusing on Rails rather than Elixir at present. The sheer breadth of gems available for rails to quickly build sophisticated applications is hard to beat for any up and coming language/framework.

That said, my gut feel is that many of the developers who build and maintain these gems have moved on and that Elixir is the new hotness and will probably catch up in the next few years.
Is your "garbage meda blacklist" only a metaphor or do you actually have one. if that's the case, how do you maintain it and how do let it affect your browsing (e.g. do you block the site or simply have a document somewhere sitting on your computer containing the list)?
You reacted to the following phrase:

> that their success in this society will rely on using and stepping on others who will now have less as a result, if not in their own community then in the international stage.

by saying that if the teenager in question properly understood economics they would understand that "most... businesses become successful by creating value, not siphoning it from others" and therefore not hold the opinion in that quote.

Your reading of the teenager's statement is, it seems, willfully narrow. It's true that if most businesses simply screwed their customers, they wouldn't survive long, with the exceptions that you mention. But I'm sure that's not what the kid in question meant, teenagers these days are smart cookies. They know that you can treat your customers well while screwing them sneakily (productize their data), screwing their community (use market dominance to force suppliers to lower prices, thereby accelerating offshoring and killing jobs), screwing some other community (locking in cheap resource contracts by bribing weak governments and thus fanning corruption), and the list goes on and on like that.
Did you read the article? Firefox is not going to tell you if a site is good or bad. It is going to tell you:

“Firefox is working on the feature in collaboration with "Have I Been Pwned," the popular site that can check your email and tell you if your credentials have been stolen by hackers.“

There is nothing subjective about this. If your email is in the HIBP list you are possibly screwed. This is very real, based on real data.
I'd say im mostly libertarian, but not totally.

There is one fundamental difference between the (modern)church and the state. You can choose to not go to church. You cannot choose to not pay taxes.

The fact that the state has the power to imprison you unless you pay is a powerful medium. And some would say you cannot get good results through bad means.

The State is not society. It's a social construct and organization like any other, and society predates a functioning State. It is definitely not owed anything because its not a person. Its like saying you owe the earth, or the stars. The taxes however, are levied by people. How do people get the benefit to dispose of your income, against your consent, in the name of society?
:D I get your point. The specific reason I said it "wouldn't take much at all" to convince me otherwise is that under a negative result, we do not know:

-> Was Facebook listening under previous versions?

-> Did the researchers adequately trigger ads?

-> Are subjects able to notice all direct ways in which listening data is being used?

Instead, I would simply accept a negative as showing that no, Facebook isn't listening. (I'd happily accept false negatives.) Instead, what is really interesting is that numerous people decided to do an informal experiment such as put their phone next to their TV set to Spanish-language programming and then, to their shock and horror, Facebook began showing them Spanish-language ads.
Show HN: Ocular Offline Dictionary – ML CORE, Computer Vision
If we're being honest, Python lists aren't arrays either, they are arrays of pointers which need to be unboxed before using. If you really really need array performance, then drop down to c, or use a language like Julia. Lists give you the ability to quickly pass these structures as immutable objects, which in turn, you want because of safety guarantees in concurrent environments.
Edit: Thanks to replies explaining that in fact AKS doesn't charge for the master! I'm leaving the rest of this comment standing because it's an honest reply to the article posted - Microsoft isn't disingenuous, this article is just wrong.

> Be that as it may, Microsoft is offering AKS for free. You will only pay for the virtual machines (VM) that you use for managing your Kubernetes cluster. Microsoft says, “Unlike other cloud providers who charge an hourly rate for the management infrastructure, with AKS you will pay nothing for the management of your Kubernetes cluster, ever. After all, the cloud should be about only paying for what you consume.”

This is disingenuous. We're talking about k8s, so GKE is the comparison point. Yes GKE charges a flat hourly fee for cluster management, regardless of the number or size of the nodes[0]. But GKE doesn't charge for the master instances (which are hidden away behind the GKE product). So AKS will not charge for the cluster management, but will charge for the master instances. Neither pricing model is more "for free" than the other.

Also, if we have to think about the master instance sizes on AKS because we're paying for them, then that's one thing we have to manage on AKS that we don't have to manage on GKE - GKE adds more value by more completely managing our cluster.

[0] pedantic: there's actually no fee for clusters of less than 6 nodes.
> If you were targeted by Russian hackers, and you happened to be a high level government official, would YOU admit to it? This is like asking a room full of thieves if they robbed the bank.

Its more like asking a bunch of banks if the FBI has warned them of plots by thieves. Being targeted by hackers (or being informed of that by the FBI) isn't analogous to thievery.
Since you have a real world example of this solving your problems, I'd be curious to know if having the CMS funtionality available in an Electron desktop app, using a VPS (e.g. Digital Ocean) to host your metalsmith instance, and fronting it with Cloudflare would be of interest?
... no mention of how much liability insurance would cost.
heh, funny name collision http://fasteez.free.fr/app/lil/
Currently at 19 years at my job, but that includes acquisitions, and many role / job description changes. Even though I'm up-to-date on modern languages, frameworks, and libraries, I expect this to make finding a new job much more difficult, due to biases against long-term empooyment and being older than 40.
Other possibilities: Neutron lifetime, Newton's constant (twice!)
The whole article doesn't make any sense. It's clickbait for people whose brains have buzzword recognition swapped in for critical thinking.

He talks about how falsehoods and doctored photos are being spread on Facebook, and that government officials are posted them on their pages. In the absence of Facebook, _only_ those government officials would have a platform. Why on earth would that be better?

He even pays lip service to the fact that this communications platform has enabled positive forms of communication as well (ie human rights organizing), and then quickly switches back to a complaint that Facebook didn't remain optimal for the specific workflow that Cambodian human rights workers employed.

His argument is fundamentally "don't give the unwashed masses a platform", but he doesn't have the courage/intellectual honesty/self-awareness to say so. I can imagine a contemporary counterpart of this idiot writing the same article about the printing press or the telephone.

I've got a very low opinion of Facebook as a company, but these complaints literally boil down to "allowing people to communicate more effectively". Newsflash! People are shitty. They do shitty things with whatever technology they get their hands on. The idea that the pre-Facebook world would be more or less likely to have the norms you like only makes sense inasmuch as the norms you like are oriented around limited communication options for the masses.
So they're switching from LiMux to W10 and will run LO on it?
The article brings up DSL, but I thought DSL was a short haul technology (you have to be pretty close to a branch office or something)? Would it really affect rural customers anyway?

I'm also curious if the newer faster fiber technologies are sort of "subsidizing" the carrier's copper business.
I really, really hope aws joins the game. re:invent is around the corner.
This explanation ought to be correct at low energy, just where most LQCD work occurs (attempting to predict even lower-energy observables, like the proton mass, etc.).

At high (collider) energies, it is okay to work perturbatively.
I live in a retirement town where many of the retirees have put their entire life savings and more into USI Tech. As far as I can tell USI Tech has properties of a classic pyramid scheme. I wonder how much this and other similar schemes are driving the price of bitcoin. I also wonder what will happen when entire towns get wiped out without recourse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length
> Or more reasonably, nearly every major site or service that has ever existed.

So maybe this could help change practices to be safer. I think this mindset that "90% of companies don't prioritize security, so we should just accept this" is dangerous. As a consumer, data breaches can cause massive headaches - if you've ever dealt with identity theft, you know this. The security with which companies store their data should be factored into your decision of whether or not to be their customer, because it does affect the value their product provides you.
> that life doesn’t look good for them, that they cannot look forward to retirement, to a stable long term career, that the amount of education and debt they will need to accrue is ever-increasing

> attends one of the best schools in the nation

um, what?

I get this feeling if you don't go to one of the best schools in the nation - like me - but I'd be very surprised to see the same attitude at Harvard or Stanford.

Those guys are so happy!
Yes, that. Thank you.
Please read the README before you call this the “current implementation”:

https://github.com/nhnt11/BreachAlerts/blob/master/README.md

Specifically:

“This is only meant as a vehicle for quick testing as we iterate on the design, and to help visualize different ideas. In its current state it is in no way meant to represent actual production code, or how the feature will work or look like when it ships. Pull requests are welcome but please keep in mind the highly experimental/volatile nature of this repository.”

And:

“The third goal brings up some privacy concerns, since users would need to supply an email address to receive notifications. Who is the custodian of this data? Can we avoid sending user data to haveibeenpwned.com? Can we still offer useful functionality to users who opt out of subscribing their email address? While the project is still in infancy, the idea is to offer as much utility as possible while respecting the user's privacy.”

It is easy to jump ahead and come to some conclusions but this is an experiment currently. If you think Mozilla is going to send your email to a third party without your consent then you are wrong.
Bitcoin jumps above $8,700 to record high as largest exchange adds 100,000 users
I suppose the corollary here is: Would you still trust software created by or sold to American firms?

Suffice to say that judging all companies in a certain country by the actions of their government would leave us in a very strange position indeed.
My post isn't really about Rhodesia per se, and I don't intend to suggest that the whole concept of Rhodesian identity is illegitimate. The kind of people I'm talking about tend to be very keen on apartheid South Africa as well, usually without showing any signs of intimate familiarity with either country (many of them are also apparently too young to have direct experience). This is part of a larger pattern of appropriation. There are many, many examples of white supremacists latching on to iconography and terminology from other places and cultures and declaring themselves the "true" Christians/Pagans/Nordics/Celtics/Aryans/Israelites/etc..
Agreed. Hallucinogens tend to increase synesthesia and sort of "remove the filter" on our brains imagination potential.

Being sedated tends to just "turn your brain off" in my experience. To make an analogy to computer vision: fainting lowers the resolution and increases the noise in the original image, psychedelics change the decision threshold for detection of objects.
AT&T has basically been bullying customers out of their POTS lines for the last few years. Instead of paying, saying $34.95 for a line they'll increase it to $89 or $135 per line.

Then they'll sell you a 'bundle' with a cellular phone or tablet with data plan at a lower price than your old rate for just the old analog line alone. Not sure how the math works out.

Since the contract is up after a year, then you have start a new bundle or pay up. They're selling WebEx, Office 365...everything.
GKE does charge for the masters for clusters of 6 or more nodes. See https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/pricing. Microsoft's offering does not seem to charge you for the masters ever, so that does seem like a differentiator.