skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm all for net neutrality, but it feels important to note that this is for mobile service:

https://www.meo.pt/internet/internet-movel/telemovel/pacotes...

Also, it looks like the same company provides gigabit internet for $50/mo:

https://www.meo.pt/pacotes/mais-pacotes/fibra/net-voz

Again, I support net neutrality, but it's still technically better than my Comcast.
Probably not any more dishonest than someone who knows that a lot of "organic" food is grown with manure, but would prefer not to see (or worse, smell) the animals actually defecating, with the feces then being applied to something they're going to eat.
Yes, because it looks like government overreach and against natural justice. I think US government should buy the wires from these companies and allow anyone to use them as ISP.

Then there is a second lot who use peering agreements and CDNs.
Apparently, when wielding numbers for outrage, the quantitative details are merely a trivial annoyance.
How Could Artificial Intelligence Change Assisted Living Facilities?
I wonder how many shares of Verizon Pai is sitting on.
In Europe it’s pretty common for phone providers to offer a package that includes access to a popular service that won’t count towards your data limit. Here’s another example from O2 UK:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/how-phones-changed-the...
Other than common sense?

Targeted policy?
Can you point to any of the recent high profile allegations where the accusations are of behavior that was ambiguous? They almost all seem to be totally clear cut cases of inappropriate actions or worse. These aren't mild flirting with a colleague.
People might disagree on the line itself, but many of these cases that are publicized are... if you read the details of the interactions they are clearly way over many reasonable people's lines.

We might not need a hard line. An acknowledgement of those that went way over the line is proving to be a huge step forward for society. Hopefully we can be left _only_ with ambiguous cases when they occur.

It's not normal for someone known by everyone around them to be a harasser to be able to continue their acts.
Those are flat rates for unlimited access to certain services.

If you scroll down there's also per/mb pricing with no services listed.
So if we get rid of net neutrality, we get less ads? That’ll be the day.

The “infrastructure industry” huh? The internet, of course, should be treated as a utility.
Yet common. Stephen Elop (Nokia back to Microsoft) $25m https://news.slashdot.org/story/13/09/19/1834224/nokias-elop...
Massive data spill as Uber was hacked.. maybe email address is not so importat but ride history and wherever location data is something quite sensitive .. shift delete!
No... it’s an invitation for harried parents to show up with an IOU, a store card, or the cheapest ripest milk they could find.

Charging them double fees is more like it.
I don’t think many people intentionally commit secrets to source control. Frequently, it’s a matter of committing a bunch of work and accidentally missing the credentials you stuck in some prototype code.
Dumb question: What's the best practice to share authentication credentials across the team for services that don't have an IAM feature?
That's a misleadingly vague description of what the page is for. Mobile data providers in US already offer similar deals, like T-Mobile's "Binge On".
Next logical question: net neutrality has existed for a very short amount of time. The Internet & Web did extremely well before net neutrality, with few instances of abusive carrier restriction over the prior decades. What is the very strong supporting evidence to demonstrate your scenario is the likely outcome? If you want to regulate something so important on the premise you're suggesting, you need to present equally significant proof of harm.
It seems they didn't learn from their mistakes. It sounds that the 2014 breach was caused by the same mistake.

"That gist is believed to have contained a login key used by a hacker to access an internal Uber database of 50,000 drivers."

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/28/uber_subpoenas_gith...
You can always refer to long data by URI. Either a locator where the data is available, or other kind of identifier that names a previously created resource.

You can make it more human-readable than a "wall of parameters" too, if you succeed in naming the parameter data that way.
My understanding is that Paypal eventually developed a system to prevent fraud; they didn't just revert all fraudulent transactions. If Coinbase can eventually prevent fraud then irreversibility doesn't matter.
But it tastes good.
Is anyone arguing that? Links?
Something nice is also the fact that the people impacted by the breach must be told 72 hours max after the company is aware of the hack.
And when you are rich and famous, do you suppose the initiation doesn't occasionally start on the side of the subordinate? In that case, they may have some complex thoughts like, "what is the morality behind this rule if we both clearly desire one another, and they've already told me so first?" So now the complexity is at least similar to: do you still follow rules whose spirit seems not to apply to some present case?

If the situation actually matched the father/daughter analogy you gave, it would be super simple. Unfortunately it doesn't look like that analogy works.
The research is concerned with sex, not gender.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_gender_distinction
I don't think the 8-meg phrase was ever the official name of the program that "emacs" stands for.
https://github.com/Maratyszcza/PeachPy
Lack of competition is because:

1) ISPs agree not to compete; and

2) It is expensive for new entrants to build infrastructure.

It would be ideal to solve NN with free market.

But the ISPs have monopolies that prevent competition.

Making net neutrality necessary today.
Analyze website stack from the terminal
Thanks for the insight! Really appreciate it!
Apple acquired augmented reality headset startup Vrvana for $30M
What a terribly written piece.

«First, I know of at least one instance where it appears that a wash trade was not charged a fee for a trade.»

Absolutely zero evidence is provided. Just the author saying "trust me, I've seen it."

«Second, even if a fee is charged, that doesn’t mean a wash trader paying fees is really paying fees. If you’re a shareholder in Bitfinex, you’re allegedly paid dividends.»

This is mathematically false. Even if you hold, say, 10% of the shares (huge shareholder) you will still lose ~90% of your fees.

That's it. It's a thousand+ words post with ZERO evidence of massive wash trading.

The rest of the post is just ramblings on unrelated things.

I don't disagree there are shady/unethical practices occurring at Bitfinex, but wash trading is not one of them.
I really hope this doesn't end in a fatal crash... allowing conspiracy theorists to proclaim that the fellow was killed by the big government scientists in order to prevent him from spreading the truth.
From what I've seen on youtube you're right, the one thing they all seem to have in common is that the have no understanding of gravity. Everything else seems to be an elaborate set of logical contortions to overcome this lack of understanding.
> Why on earth would you think this would not happen?

How about the fact that in the prior 20+ years it did not happen. Comcast was just as powerful five years ago, as they are today. The access market was just as limited in terms of competition, 5 or 10 years ago.

Your premise is that due to limited competition, it must occur. If that were how things actually worked, it would have occured before net neutrality in a very big way.
I think the commenter meant the new CEO will not tolerate unethical behavior.
Read the article "Google is not what it seems" by Assange.
> the NSA appears to have demanded an "off switch" for the ME).

This is not incompatible with them encouraging or exploiting a back door, and it is strong evidence that ME is a security risk.
Over 100k now
>I'm all for net neutrality, but it feels important to note that this is for mobile service:

The current net neutrality regulations apply to both fixed and mobile broadband.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07...
yes it is, and in this case I think we're probably still figuring out the actual cause

But one assumes that in this case the cause might be that the pheromones that people all hopped up on testosterone give off is different those given off by people who aren't .... those people would likely be cis-males, trans-males who've transitioned, trans-females who haven't transitioned, and some trans people who are currently transitioning in either direction .... we don't really have one exact word that encompasses those categories
Structural Regular Expressions
HN seems to be very negative towards crypto currency in general lately. Disappointing really.
There are a few SaaS offerings that will let you do that. LastPass or onepassword are two commonly used.

One you can use something like keypass to store a database in a shared location if you don't trust the SaaS offerings.

If you are looking at storing credentials for automation purposes, and don't have a secret store built in, you could look at something like Hashicorp Vault to help provide this for you
> I guess oracle has the cash to just buy it to lessen competition?

> So I guess I just don’t see any reason for oracle or ibm to buy them.

These two statements are at complete odds with one another. The only reason Oracle buys anyone is to kill competition against themselves - they are the penultimate 600 pound gorilla in the Enterprise Software space, with eyes on Microsoft's fast approaching taillights.

They bought Sun because it was the easiest way to get to MySQL. They wanted to buy MySQL because they thought that they could kill their single largest market competition in the FOSS database world simply by strangleholding it the same way they do with their other database products - fortunately it was protected by the GPL long before they got their hands on it. But the list goes on for as many companies as you can name that Oracle has acquired - Oracle is where tech goes to die, and where tech laborers go to retire.

And in some ways, that's okay. It's healthy for the market to have trusted, long term minded players - enterprises love companies like Oracle because they know what to expect. Big price tags, but phone support and a deep ecosystem of people skilled to fix and deploy their junk. It's healthy for employees not to be looking over their shoulders and hoping Wall Street's next sneeze doesn't put them on the bread line. It only becomes unhealthy when Oracle uses its multibillion dollar cash reserves to stomp the life out of a market because it can no longer compete against it.

But, all of that said, the argument as to why Oracle might want to pick up HPE is a bit dull, I must admit. Unless they want to go for a complete vertical integration play and make it so you have to also buy their hardware to run their database engines, I can't imagine anything sticking. I also can't imagine that play working without regulators crying Unfair Competition, even with the current state of the DOJ and the constant hum of megamergers being rubberstamped. But HPE is not currently a competitive threat to... anyone? Oracle buying HPE would be a very long winded mercy killing, just like Sun.

(obligatory "my words, not my employers, yadda yadda")
Amazon Web Services’ computer vision gets real-time face recognition
We use 1password for teams.
I imagine the daycare will make an exception in the case of a family emergency.
It occurs to me that ISP's would not be the only people who would want to get in on the game. Suppose Facebook saw that ISP's were selling Facebook access. This practically invites Facebook to charge the ISP's for access to Facebook.
The very strong inevitability of industries, relationships and societies to develop, change and adapt over time, and in such a way that lessons learned in the past inform strategies used in the future.

Those prior decades were the infancy of the internet. When children go 16 years without wrecking a car, it doesn’t mean they are perfect drivers.
Internet money is made by the "over-the-top" (Google, Facebook & co.) leaving ISP to pay for the infrastructure. Net neutrality will allow ISP to bill users not only on bandwidth, but also based on what you do on the net. Ie: do you want a fast Youtube? Someone will have to pay (google or the users). They will be allowed to slow down some websites and speed up others, and that's really bad.
You could flag it for moderator attention I suppose, but that may not be considered a good reason for a flag.

In practice I simply don’t read articles from most paywalled sites because the free content I’ve gotten from them hasn’t been compelling enough. Your mileage may vary. I am happy to pay for things that I know will have a lot of value to me, such as scientific papers and databases; even though, all else being equal, I’ll always prefer to get papers free (gratis & libre) from the authors if possible.
GDPR seems to be particular to europe. It might be better to say it differs between countries, rather than companies.
What a refreshing read. Lovely kids, awesome scientists.
10 Best LaTeX Editors for Linux
There really isn't a sound argument against net neutrality.

Many do argue that the FCC shouldn't have the authority to regulate the internet, and often argue that idea to subtly change the subject.

If someone argues to abolish something, they should either argue in favor of a replacement, or argue that that thing should not exist at all. Unfortunately, I haven't heard even a flawed version of either argument.

Another faux argument I hear is the classic, "I am libertarian, and therefore must be against regulation of any form, and you can't change my mind." Obviously, that isn't an argument at all, and abusing libertarian ideology to look like an argument like that is seriously disappointing to any serious thoughtful libertarian, such as myself. This problem isn't specific to libertarianism either, but it is very popular in that community.

The core tenet to every position (not argument) I have heard against net neutrality is simply a position against regulation. The problem is that in the United States, we need to regulate ISPs, for several reasons:

1. There isn't enough competition: There are 6 ISPs in the US that control the majority of the market, and the majority of Americans are left with only one choice for >20mbit internet.

2. Net Neutrality is necessary to cultivate a free market of businesses that use the internet. Without net neutrality, the already centralized market of ISPs would cultivate centralized markets for each type of business that uses the internet.

TL;DR It is totally reasonable to be wary of regulation, or of the implementation of regulation. It may even be reasonable to consider net neutrality to be worthless or unnecessary in a truly free market, that has real competition between ISPs, but that isn't today's reality, so we would need to tackle that problem first.
I have my doubts that his orbiter has the delta-V to make it into orbit. He needs more boosters and far more struts.
The problem of course is them storing private credentials on Github despite numerous highlights on the site to not do so.

Private github sites are private as in hidden. Not as in digitally encrypted bank vault.

What sort of tech company doesn't go for a self hosted git option anyway!?

Like Gitlab which comes with CI to keep the whole thing private.

Also self hosting allows an arbitrary level of security..
If you were in a car accident, chances are that the day care would waive the fee. The fee doesn't exist to be needlessly cruel, it's there to encourage parents to pick up their children before closing.

As far as passing out in your home for a few hours. If that were really an issue for you, then potentially paying $600 might motivate you to actually go see a doctor. Otherwise there could come a day when you pass out and never wake up (and your children never get picked up by you or see you alive again)...
I'm pretty sure that "international incidents" tend to be the result of, rather than the cause of, international tensions. If one or the other countries wants there to be an international incident, then there will be one. Usually something ordinary-ish that can be expanded into one will be promoted into an incident. If they're lucky, something that needs no exaggeration will happen at a convenient time. In either case, the real cause of tension is something else.

On the other hand, if neither country wants there to be incidents, than any potential incidents will be ignored and hushed up. Nobody will make any noise or volunteer any information about it. If a reporter happens to get information about it independently, it will be minimized and dismissed. Maybe the American pilot gets a slap on the wrist, the French pilot curses Americans a few times in his local bar, and everyone forgets about it soon after.
He's not wrong. People are lead by how they feel and not facts. There are responsible ways to make pleas to emotion on a large scale and there are manipulative things that bad actors can do with it as well. You will not win hearts and minds with pure rationality when your opponent doesn't give a shit about that. Emotional lives are just as real as cold hard facts, and as we've seen, can be so real that they manifest the expectation.

I'm not an expert, nor am I an activist, but I have been reading about people studying 4chan's tactics in a post prez45 world. How a culture of open dialog to extreme gave a small group of people a weapon. Erudite "rationals" considered this sort of thing to be stupid nonsense, but it trained an entire culture to be massively effective at steering people's emotions. Their ideas can move faster without the absolute need for sensitivity or maybe because of a pathological need to offend. The current interest is in finding ways to work that radical acceptance into progressive discourse. It's important but I don't think anyone has a playbook yet.
I’m sure that’s true. I wonder if you know of any data on the performance of ads featuring diversity (in skin color, age, regional/cultural attire, etc.)

Ads and marketing images featuring such diversity is also pretty common. Apple is a great example of a company that does this. My guess would be that it performs well for some people and poorly for others, based on a number of factors.
"use an operating system that has a stacking window manager"

Exactly, one more reason gnu+linux is the superior os.
If we were to implement some form of insurance, I worry that executives who make bad decisions about user privacy won't ever see jail time. This needs to be something you can go to prison for.
This problem sounds familiar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incumbent_local_exchange_carri...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local-loop_unbundling
Remembering that people are complex and nuanced is a thought terminating truism; this is built into the definition of people. The _italics_ doesn't make your comment more poignant.

What the quote was eliciting is the idea that we are, "all flawed" and you should look at yourself before you judge, which is utter bullshit. I am flawed (a person), but I can still judge the others and what is acceptable socially to a higher standard than my own (assumed) actions. To not do so is to enter in a pact where we race to the bottom lest be judged to a higher standard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

We each embody multiple simultaneous facets that don't always agree, but they all need to hold society accountable while being individually flawed. And we cannot turn an eye against the flaws for the protection of our selves.
I believe its important to interact or ask your doubts upfront instead of keeping it to yourself. I'm currently reading Haskell and I use freenode irc channel to ask my queries. The channel community is so helpful in clearing my doubts, in fact they could give much more easy / right approach for the problem than the text book solutions.
Cool post, I didn't know the part where the plane was retired shortly after the Soviets managed to put together an aircraft and missile combo, along with well-organized operations, that could plausibly shoot down the SR-71.
Pretty high actually.. I mean it's a lot of money at stake.
I just wanted to add another anecdote (because the plural of anecdote is, as we all know, data) that your profess isn’t the only one. I’ve heard a few similar stories about guys not being allowed to enter the rodent living chambers besides an initial, introductory visit in the past.
I was able to read this article without problems.
That sounds really inefficient
In addition to all the other things mentioned (helm, projectile, magit, org), I've found org-ref and interleave great for managing my notes when I read papers or articles. Roughly, I save the PDF to disk and create an org node for it, then add the metadata like file location and bibtex info. Then I have emacs open the PDF and as I'm reading it I can press 'i' to open a note on that page, and then close the note and keep reading.
Kudos to you for not having strong opinions. Is there ANY place you recommend for information in this space?
I completely agree with you, and didn't mean to imply otherwise.

Although I do think there tends to be a broader overlap on the "conservative" side, for reasons for that are complicated and don't necessarily have a lot to do with being conservative, the "liberal" side does indeed have its vaccine deniers, MSG paranoiacs, and so on. (However, they don't have TV networks dedicated to these things, available in every hotel and airport in the country...)

I try to judge media organizations (and people) based on their commitment to truth and openness to empirical evidence and new information. Their political leanings may be interesting, but are a (much) less significant data point.
> Apparently investments fell by 5% or so over a period of time since the Title II classification.

That is a correlation expressed as a causation.
You can call AppleCare and have your Apple ID deleted any time you want.
>>>If Comcast is going to try to charge me more to be able to access Netflix, I'm gone.

If you have competitors to choose from, sure. If you don't? Or if all the competitors do the same thing?
Facebook tried such a system in India [0].

"Called Free Basics, it provided only limited access to the Internet through a suite of websites and services that, unsurprisingly, included Facebook"

https://www.cnet.com/news/why-india-doesnt-want-free-basics/
Show HN: Never look up a font name again (iOS)
PC vendors scramble as Intel announces vulnerability in firmware
How do you turn around a hardware company, you dont. But it wont die either ... software rises and falls like a deritive stock, but hardwate is like the gold tgat is always good to have a stake in

My suggestion would be to become the mysql of hardware, be compatible with everyone, what if an hp could go from pc to mac? We have never had that direction. Impossible you say? That why theres profit , the market doesnt have it yet. (Mac to pc is there)

Cheaper hardware , but same env. Make it worth apples wild. Hp seems to have good salesmen and bizz connects. Big contracts are not just about tech.
There's just not anything more we can say.

Or do.

They're taking away all of our rights and there's nothing we can do about it.
Proprietary, closed source, centralized tech is the evil thing people accepted, for various, often compelling reasons. FOSS decentralized tech is the future that will free us from the dystopia.
> 3b pro-trump media

Look up "wikileaks piedpiper candidate" and decide whose fault is it