skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Better tools to connect women and men could have a major impact and increase the chances that couples connect with each other. Tinder and other dating sites are absolute shit (plenty of literature on their problems for both men and women out there) and in person interactions are becoming more rare. Improving these tools might help some of the people who would otherwise not connect or find suitable mates to do so, though it can only address the problem partially.
Aren't muons terrestrial particles created by cosmic ray impacts on the atmosphere, though?
Looks great. Mind if I DM you re:set up? Having some trouble
Oi! Thanks for this. I am going to start using it from now on.
OP is trying to do something about it! He is setting up video chats with people.
Nitpicking, in Erlang-lingo supervisors do not monitor but instead link the worker processes. This is important when the supervisor itself fails as monitors are unidirectional and would keep the (then) unsupervised processes alive while a link is bidirectional, so all workers will be killed if the supervisor goes down (and they are not explicitly trapping exits).
Steelcase Leap > Aeron
If you'd like something with less amazing, but more striking visuals then give Orozco el embalsamador a try (NSFW).

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0982908/

It's on youtube, but it doesn't have subtitles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xG60-lk0o_U
I am just a random Facebook user, and I already noticed the same effect on my wall: stupid things get liked and shared, anything of value is mostly ignored.

It happened a few months ago when as a result of reading some online stories, I decided to delete everything I posted on my Facebook wall; but then I changed my decision to "everything, except for the few best (highest quality? best ratings? maybe a bit of both) things". So I spent a few hours deleting stuff from my wall, while paying attention to the quality and number of likes. And I noticed the pattern that I didn't actually notice before.

I was already aware that I sometimes post smart content and sometimes stupid content, and that sometimes I get a lot of reactions and sometimes barely any. But only now I noticed how strongly are these things anticorrelated. It is almost always the stupid stuff that gets most reactions, and the smart stuff that remains ignored. Dozens and dozens of my old posts, always the same pattern.

After seeing this, I am no longer motivated to spend any energy on my Facebook interaction. Once in a while I share an interesting article, but I don't bother posting a summary anymore; I already expect no one will care, if even someone will see it. And once in a while I share a family photo. And that's all.
This is addressed in the article: "Mating psychology may not be that malleable." i.e. Biology.
There is so much wrong with this.

Do you think HN knows the future (or anyone does for that matter)? Flattering if so, but nonsense.

You say you sold all of your BCH, but hearing one person say it will go up makes you want it back? You are gambling with stuff you don't understand and doing it based on rumors.
"In many states, presumption of innocence is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, and it is an international human right under the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
I think when you start opposing human rights you cross into fascism territory.
This drives me crazy. It’s ok if we’re talking about a liquid, I guess, but what is 1 cup of cheese? Or 1 cup of broccoli? 1 cup of walnuts?

Using volume for those, the amount you’re actually using can vary by a factor of 10 depending on how granular it is, how finely chopped or shredded it is, or how it fell that day.

I do everything in grams, but with some recipes and labels it’s just not possible to know how much of something it’s talking about. Which is unfortunate because that’s the entire purpose of a recipe or a label.

Why can’t we stop this?
I use Password Safe as the manager and OneDrive to share to my other devices.
#event “Secrets of Silicon Valley Teams: From Dysfunction to Peak Performance”
Are you a fantastic team leader?

For most people, the answer is "no." Because the sad truth is that most of us are never taught how to be an effective leader. And it's often hard to learn from our own mangers, because they've never mastered the best practices of management, either.

But it doesn't have to be this way! In this free 90-minute, highly interactive program, Jim McCarthy shares practical strategies and methods for you to get the most out of your teams. Gain precious insight from an Internet pioneer who has had to make companies actually work, and businesses actually deliver results and be sustainable. Whether a manager is new or very experienced, this program gives leaders the tools to take their teams to the next level — starting immediately. Jim shares his unique lessons — as a Stanford MBA, early employee at Yahoo, and global manager. Learn more about Jim here: https://jimmccarthy.com/

You'll learn
The essential skills of time management, communication, delegation and execution
Scientifically proven ways to inspire and motivate your team
How to create a culture of flexibility and innovation
The three basic aspects of leading people – and how to avoid common pitfalls
The three vital questions which you must discuss with your employees every week

Register here:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/secrets-of-silicon-valley-teams-from-dysfunction-to-peak-performance-tickets-37764486596
Complete and utter nonsense. But you should know where this bullshit comes from.
Well I guess it's a straw man if I was supposed to address some other topic, but this WAS my topic :)
Why would we give a title that's pure spin?
SO! it never made it to China
LOL
Wish I could connect to Hipchat over my Weechat client :)
That's probably what'll end up happening. Right now people have a hard time imagining it because we've been living in a patriarchal society, but I'm willing to bet that in a generation or two there will be fewer hangups about house husbands.
The military cannot pay the salaries that are required to keep qualified people of certain professions/specialties. Surgeons and hackers, but also some other things too. so they must outsource to the private sector. But they certainly can require the contractor to use military provided/mandated security oversight. Mandate and verify good security practices, not tick checkboxes.
The onerous onus to find the educated.
For what I know that effect is negligible. Here's a review of some studies on the topic:

https://nutritionfacts.org/video/who-shouldnt-eat-soy/

See my other comment on T-level being higher in vegans (Even higher then in vegetarians). There's a huge vegan-fitness movement going on, and it rapidly moving into professional sport in general. They simply self-report to perform better, thus stick to the diet.
I’ll take your wager at 1:1 odds. How does 0.01BTC sound?
> but I've never found an actual study with significative results proving this.

There aren't any.
The link mentions learning through play, not "deliberate" play-based learning as I read it. Play is available at any daycare, at home, with grandparents etc.

The assertion was kindergarten was valuable because it taught reading. I was pointing out that if reading was premature, then kindergarten had no educational value.
Sure, but isn't 1 atmosphere pretty small?
Care to explain why you feel that way? From your statement I hope that you're extremely enlightened on the topic or have first hand experience being an educated woman trying to date.
Moving several EDGs and support system a couple kilometers is a small task in comparison to the design, qualification, construction, and training associated with a new power reactor design.

There’s nothing very complicated about the EDG buses that supply safety-system components.
This is a denial of service attack against the user, at most should be an innocuous overlay that alerts the user when an application using a privacy reducing api when that user has it disallowed.
It seems to list a whole bunch of currencies when I make a query : http://vectorspace.ai/recommend/app/crypto_discover?query=vt...

Otherwise it seemed interesting? Just confusing, but thanks for the link
Sounds like you are using it right but yeah you can setup the bindings or do an arrow function.

I've been preferring just setting up the bindings in the constructor over arrow functions.

So for the author's example I'd just do: constructor (){ this.increment.bind(this); }

Then the template can stay cleaner with just onClick={this.increment}
Rolling Stone was never solely about music, they always ran political reporting. In fact I would argue it's legacy is more known for the work of Hunter S. Thompson than their musical coverage.

The only times the magazine has gained interests has been solely due to their journalists and what they cover, rarely if ever music.
hmmmmmm if you could host as a text or even a json document somewhere and somehow get it to update that would be super useful. Happy to share my personal trading algorithm outputs if you do.
I don't know, where?
the right for a fair trial with a Presumption of innocence IS A RIGHT. trial by media does not honor that right.
Women tend to desire men who are older, richer and more educated. Men tend to desire women who are young, hot, and of good character.

Men can't always get what they want, either, but nobody writes articles about how that's a crisis.
If transparency is good, then these reporters should be more transparent with the information they have. That's not too much to ask. Doling it out like this isn't very helpful.
He's talking about the "factory farming/animal cruelty machine", thus ethics.

You are responding about "energy use", this environmental impact.

Two separate reasons to go vegan. (besides the issues of pollution, scarcity and health-impact)
Thank you for sharing this. I had read about it when they were still building it and marvelled at the scale and ambition of the project. That structure is so large it apparently has its own weather system inside.
U.S. DoE Releases National Student Loan FY 2014 Cohort Default Rate
I still don't understand why you felt the need to reply about this to my comment about victims. I wasn't talking about false accusations or third parties, and it isn't a long or complicated comment.
Just like ipv6 they are over complicating things that need simplification.

End to end encryption and chat room backlog would be nice. DCC and CTCP need to go away. A simpler protocol that does more with less would in my opinion be optimal.
> Most people's health issue is too many calories.

It's like saying the issue of a murdered man is too much metal inside the body. Technically correct but misleading.

If you replace the carbs by exactly the same amount in fats, most people will lose weight. Many of them would be unable to eat so much because they would feel stuffed and stop feeling hungry all the time. And for those that eat the same amount of calories, they would not be in fat storage mode so excess is secreted.
> If men can increase their pool size, why not women?

Women can, it is just they don't want to due to what the majority express as desirable characteristics. It is a sad state of affairs that make both men and women worse off. I know several women in their mid-thirties who adamantly refuse to consider long term partnership with perceived low status males (along lines of status, power, wealth and education).

The main issue they seem to run into is this. The small pool of highly educated, high status and wealthy men are essentially at the top of the sexual marketplace. Considering the purchasing power (excuse the term, but it makes sense) these men have, they tend to optimise for traits many men find desirable.

Finding an "equal" man in your mid-thirties as a women is very hard. Funnily enough, polygamy in societies partly resolves this distribution problem for women. The problems it causes amongst a perpetually single mass of men are catastrophic however.
Show HN: Kubernetes network firewall rules recipes
1) I'm running server 2k16, pretty sure i can mostly do this right now

2) I'd also be surprised if the feature ever migrated out of server/enterprise editions
That Twitter page is NSFW. Although the username should have warned me.
Data set referenced by the press release can be found here:

https://ifap.ed.gov/DefaultManagement/DefaultManagement.html
"Paradise Papers" should be in the title.
> Why is the onerous of lowering their standards being pushed on educated women?

A single person looking to find a partner is in essence selling something: themselves. When selling anything it's important to consider the target market.

If the market isn't interested in what someone is selling there's a few options:
1) Change the product
2) Find a different market

Changing the behavior of the market is not an option because, unless it's a really really desirable product, the market isn't likely to budge.

So educated women that the article is referring could decide to not lower their standards but the risk they face is being alone.
What a class act. Dougherty really did her dirty. It would be absolutely understandable if she didn't accept this apology. It's inspiring to see that she has, and is wanting to move forward amicably. She's comes out as the better person here. Bravo!
That anyone uses UTC for anything where it isn't relevant is insane to me. If I schedule a meeting in local time, then it's in local time. It has nothing to do with UTC. It's local time at the beginning, middle and end.
> It shouldn't be hard to just write a damn algorithm to divide the state into maximally compact, equal-population regions.

It's trivial. Getting people to agree that “maximally compact” is the right thing to optimize about districts is the hard part; of he many things which have been suggested should be maximized in districting are compactness, competitiveness, preservation of communities of common interest, and expected partisan proportionality of the resulting system. Each of these conflicts with then others, and has predictable partisan advantages and disadvantages compared to each of the others and the status quo; the first prevents any consensus algorithm among participants seeking an ideal without consideration of partisan advantage, the second guarantees that at least one of the major parties will oppose any algorithm because accepting it will lock in a permanent disadvantage. You might overcome the second if you overcome the first, but good luck with that.
Back in the old days, when we actually manufactured clothing in this country, there was this concept of "piece work". You weren't paid by the hour, but instead by your work output. E.g. if you were performing some sewing step on a blouse, such as adding buttons, you might be paid $0.25 per blouse for that work step.

Of course employers tried to cheat, by setting the per-piece rate very low. You had to process many pieces to get a reasonable wage.

The Federal government was forced to step in. They required monitoring of all this activity so that "all employees, including piece work employees, earn at least the minimum wage."[1]

If only the people running the sweatshops in the old days thought to call their people "contractors" instead of "employees". They could have avoided most of the pesky regulation.

I'm being sarcastic. Clearly those people were employees under any reasonable definition. Same should apply here. This whole gig economy crap has gotten totally out of hand.

Fundamentally, an Instacart worker only has flexibility of when to work. The rest is more-or-less predetermined. Should that person be a contractor instead of an employee because he has his choice of the order in which to traverse the supermarket aisles? Should that person be a contractor because he has his choice of which streets to drive on from store to destination?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piece_work#Minimum_wage
> There aren't any.

Here a good overview of what we do know:

https://nutritionfacts.org/video/who-shouldnt-eat-soy/

The "bad soy" story originates largely from Kaayla Daniel and has been thoroughly debunked.

http://gofitu.com/food-myths-debunked-great-soy-debate/
Another Media Fake News: Independent News Paper Fake 'live' Video on Facebook
In addition to what's mentioned in the article, Kinesis (the last time I checked) has a low hard limit on the number of consumers. It doesn't help to split into shards as each message has to be consumed by each type of consumer.
Months should always be 1-indexed. Years are, days are, why not months?
I'm not trying to incite a flamewar here, and this will probably be downvoted to death.

Well, the argument here should be:

Men don't find education and accomplishment as attractive as women do - they find youth and beauty important also.

Therefore, in order to attract a mate, logically women should try to attract a mate when they're younger, and try to improve the way they look. They should not be trying to get more educated or accomplish more in their careers.

They can of course do whatever they want, but I have very little sympathy for people who recognize how reality is and don't try to act in ways that will optimize the probability of the outcome they want.
> Why not increase the pool like men do: go for more younger, possibly less educated men (as the article implies for men)?

Because it takes women thousands of times longer to produce a child than men. It's just game theory.

Keep in mind also that the average woman doesn't have any magical ability to figure out which men will be successful in advance, otherwise all the top venture capitalists, producers, publishers, etc. would be women.
The top jobs that computer programmers switched to are all other computer related jobs, some nearly identical depending on how you treat the term programmer, vs developer.

Kind of depressing that once you become a computer programmer, you can't really escape computer work. Id like to hear more about people that go on to do something totally different successfully, like baking. Maybe its too uncommon. Also interesting, the top non computer jobs are lawyers and judges, and then accountants.
This is misleading. If they don't eat as much due to higher satiety, then you are not replacing with equivalent calories.

Calories are meant to be and are calculated as the lingua franca of macronutrients. 5 calories of one really will have the same effect on your waistline as 5 of another, holding all else equal.

Regardless, the grandfather is discussing macronutrient distribution and you seem to be in favor of optimizing it as well, so I don't think there's disagreement here.
It's not too much related to the "culture of the whole" - it works amazingly well in Vienna too, it's considered really rude to not queue up at the sides of the door in the subway/tram, or to stand left on the escalator - and mostly people really respect it.
A month isn't a very long time. Despite the occasional story you see in the press about some new site that is a literal "overnight sensation", you should probably give it a bit longer. Most "overnight sensations" take a LONG time to become such.

That said..

but do you think the idea is stupid and I should try something else?

I spent a few minutes looking around the site and still don't really know what "the idea" is. I mean, yeah, I see that you can share videos and stuff, but I don't get what makes this site distinct. I can share videos on Youtube, why should I use this site? Are you trying to appeal to a certain community or topic? Is the key element the monetization aspect, or is just the sharing? What's the "leaderboard" link at the top for and why would I care about a "leaderboard"? And how does it go from videos to the stuff about flipbooks and what-not?

I just feel like you need more / better messaging, right front and center, that articulates exactly what/who this site is for and why they should use it.
One of Hunter S Thompson's most famous works was a series of articles in Rolling Stone covering the 1972 presidential election of Nixon/McGovern. It was good stuff, very readable, and yet he was clearly biased towards McGovern (which was clearly an unpopular opinion as he ended up losing in one of the biggest landslide loses in presidential history).

Nothing wrong with their writers being political or biased. The bigger problem is whether they can talk about politics without being heavy handed, preachy, or trite, like much of politics being pigeon-holed into all forms of media today.

It seems many journalists today have lost their sense of humour and everything is overly serious and self-important. Especially when compared to the writings of HST vs what they put out today.
No one is entitled to being in a relationship. No one is entitled to having a partner.
I also referenced the cruelty? The point being that to get the same amount of energy out of milk/egg based products you'll need fewer animals than for meat based production (where animals have to grow for multiple months to years just to be slaughtered). Which means fewer animals will suffer to feed one person. It's obviously possible to reduce further.
My opinion here is highly biased, since I developed it while working at Netflix, but I think you're dismissing a lot of non-technical benefits of microservices.

I'll start off by saying that I agree with you in that when it comes to small teams, microservices is probably not the best option, as it adds additional unnecessary complexity.

But one of the best benefits I saw of microservices was that it allows small teams to work together mostly independently. It meant that each group could run in whatever way was best for the four of five folks in the group.

If the auth group really thought Go was the best solution for their problem, then they could do that. If the API team wanted to do a deployment every two weeks on Wednesday, they could do that. If the tools team wanted to deploy on every checkin, they could do that.

It meant that the 1000 engineers didn't have to all agree on a particular language, development method, or development cadence. Each team could do whatever worked best for that team, and was most in control of their own success or failure.
s/ATI/AMD/

ATI has been dead for 7 years, and part of AMD for 11.
Well, yes; but calling them "exotic-in-the-sense-we-don't-talk-about-them-very-much-even-though-they-pass-by-all-the-time-that-got-created-when-an-actual-space-particle-that-wasn't-that-exotic-like-a-proton-or-helium-atom-hit-the-atmosphere particles called muons" doesn't quite roll off the tongue. :)

They ultimately (and not in the we're all space dust sense, more like 2.2 microseconds ago sense) are caused by interactions with particles from outer space, so calling them space particles, isn't that bad. :) But yeah; it's does elide that aspect of them.
What about the amino acids? Aren't those more important to a vegetarian diet than protein?
>They can of course do whatever they want, but I have very little sympathy for people who recognize how reality is and don't try to act in ways that will optimize the probability of the outcome they want.

Yep. I recognized that I was ugly, and I thought that this was the primary obstacle when it came to dating. I fixed that with surgery, and I was right.
Both sides are lowering standards along different dimensions. Assuming the perfect mate is someone who is young, attractive, educated and accomplished -- men choose the young and attractive and women choose 'educated and accomplished'.
Biological explanations for social phenomena are generally frowned upon these days, and they certainly have a poor track record, historically.
>Finding an "equal" man in your mid-thirties as a women is very hard.

Finding an "equal" woman in your mid-thirties as a man who doesn't want to date down in terms of education, status, wealth, or mental health is just as difficult.