skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The OP means that the publication appears in one of the Elsevier journals, and the link goes to an Elsevier-affiliated website.

The OP provided a link that doesn't go to an Elsevier-affiliated website.

Elsevier is an academic publisher that is a relic of a pre-digital world. Essentially, it leeches on universities, charging money for access created by academics,funded by the state, and peer-reviewed by volunteers for free. They justify their need to charge money by reasons such as hosting costs, but whenever someone tries to host their articles for free, they pull out the big guns.

Such actions, in particular, led to death Aaron Schwartz (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz ).

Elsevier is not liked around here.

Speaking of resources that anger Elsevier by hosting articles for free, Sci-Hub is one. In particular, you can read the full text of the article by going to https://sci-hub.cc/ and looking up the paper's DOI (10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.040).

This full text is not available for free on the original publication link (nor on the NIH website). The study was funded by: the Extra Foundation Health and Rehabilitation, the Norwegian Celiac Association, the Throne Holst Foundation for Nutrition Research and the
Wedel Jarlsberg Foundation - neither entity being Elsevier. (You can find this in the paper once you pay Elsevier to access it).

So yes. Oh, Elsevier.
Then use it only for images below the fold?
Britney Spears' music used by British navy to scare off Somali pirates (2013)
oh ho ho ho ho
Google corporate policy, to the best of my knowledge (I do not and have never worked for Google but I asked lots of questions when evaluating an offer), is that it's significantly easier to let Google retain copyright on your open source work, and if it's on GitHub you have to host your repo at github.com/google if Google retains copyright.

("Forks" with no code changes ending up at the top of HN, as if they signaled a major shift in corpprate strategy, are an excellent example of why I think this is a bad policy. For all we know some Google employee PR'd a typo fix they noticed one weekend and has since deleted the branch.)
There are some 1500 people in the Google organization, so presumably just one of them pressed fork and selected the org accidentally. GitHubs UI makes this super easy.
Can you link to which resize library you're using? We'd love to see a 90% further reduction in instances
This is pretty Android/iPhone-only, wish it can be more flexible to be used on other edge devices such as home routers or other embedded products where resource is constrained.
How hard do you think this would be to implement on top of the Venmo or stripe API?
Free Download Top Printable Thanksgiving Word Search in PDF
They integrated Kotlin with the very recent 3.0 version of Android Studio.
I'd wager that even at $0.01 per article that your time deciding whether or not to pay would "cost" significantly more than the actual payment.
After 1000 cycles or after 4 years, just have the battery replaced by Apple for $199 + taxes, then you will have a good macbook pro, as apple will replace the keyboard and trackpad, along with the battery for $199.
We specifically addressed this question in our post. Not only did we reduce from ~25 instances to ~12, we also added new features.
This is being used as a staging place for putting patches so they can be turned into pull requests, nothing more. Sorry to bust any conspiracy theories.

(You can see this happens on >100 of the swift forks :P)
What is a "headless CMS" at first place? why do you assume people even understand what it means? I went to your home page I still had no idea what your product is supposed to do.

I went to the docs:

https://www.sanity.io/docs/introduction/why-headless

I still have no idea why you call your product "headless CMS".
I only just briefly read the doc for autograd, but automatic differentiation is the strong default in TF if that's what you're asking.
maybe 'was'?
kotlin is the official google's recommendation for android now...
(and kotlin can have multiple 'backends' -- e.g. build-to-java / native / web / etc)
If I were Google I would just invest into the native, LLVM-backed Kotlin thing. I guess the advantage of Swift would be using 1 lang for 2 platforms but at the end of the day the APIs are different enough that idk if it would matter.
React Native hasn't lost its PATENTS file yet, so no other large company would bank heavily on it.
I feel like tech workers are already highly engaged, just very selectively with the causes that matter to the tech world. A good example of this is EFF. EFF has a huge presence both in the community and at every industry event I've ever been to. Most tech people I know donate to them.

There is also the FSF, numerous hacker camps and conferences aimed at women (Grace Hopper Celebration, etc).

I'm very skeptical on the need for a broad coalition of tech professionals.
that being said I could see myself upgrading in two years or so
Glyphosate is banned from organic wheat farming and organic wheat flour is cheaply and widely available for experimenting. "Bobs Red Mill" and numerous other brands, etc.

Glyphosate is popular when growing non-wheat non-organic produce; if a glyphosate allergy existed, it would likely not appear like a gluten allergy because most products that once contacted it are not gluten-containing.

You can buy glyphosate products at home depot for experimentation.

It would appear to be a cheap and simple hypothesis to test.
How would gaining a 3% spread lead to 50% revenue increases?
Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow.

(I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)
Hmm...still several seconds in my neighborhood.

If it were 0.1 second I think life would be quite a bit more pleasant.
Match Group is still in talks to acquire Bumble with a valuation over $1B
parent's HN bio:

> I run all the production and cloud programming language teams at Google, and am also an open source lawyer.
Three compiler codegen bug war stories:

1. libdivide found a gcc 4.8 vectorizer bug in high multiplies. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61108

2. Circa 2001, I decided to learn Java. My first-ever Java program performed a right shift by -1 (for some reason I can't recall but was probably really stupid). The spec requires this to be equivalent to >>31, but the compiler wrongly optimized it to >>0. My confused post can probably still be found in comp.lang.java.help.

3. I wrote a Python script that generated a large set of test cases for an FFI (NSInvocation). The test crashed inexplicably on PowerPC64 with a nonsense backtrace. Turns out the PPC64 jump instruction has a 24-bit literal offset, and my functions were so large they overflowed it. That got fixed (also in gcc).
yeah but we're not talking large companies
Ok I misremembered some things but this is my source https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c...
Won.pe – Free Url Shortener, Short Link and Earn Money
Lets assume you are correct and his predictions are no better or more accurate than anyone else's. Even better let's assume they're all wrong and always will be moving forward. Similar to what I posted above if his mathematical thesis of the Law of Accelerating returns is correct how does he fare in your perspective?

From my perspective as someone who has read his works but albeit likely not researched rebuttals as deeply as you this stands as my clear takeaway.
The tech solidarity is at odds with the progressive causes. I would probably join a solidarity group, but I would not join one that pushed causes other than 'tech worker interests'
Those words are pretty literal, actually.
Which means I don't own Swift at Google, i just know what they are doing because i approved it another capacity :)
Yes, I'd much rather authorize automatic payment to sites… say give the Springfield Shopper the right to pull $0.01 each time I read one of their articles until they hit a $1 limit, or up to $0.25 per week, or something like that. There needs to be a throttle to keep someone from looting me, but as long as they stay in their budget I'm happy.
Anyone else think it’s dumb that you have to fork a repository just to submit a pull request? Why doesn’t GitHub let you do it in one command like ‘git push origin master:refs/pull/new’?
Did you feel like you understood what your friend was saying?
Yes, I made 40% ROI in 2 months using the Coinbase API (buy when threshold met or price < x, sell when threshold met or price > y).

Just add in some kind of intervention system is the sell/buy is high because the volatile nature of the currencies can see major drops/gains which can cause all sorts of bother.
Sibling comment recommended opening a bug. I concur: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?format=guided#h=b...
The power that EFF and FSF are able to wield is miniscule in comparison to what is possible with a broad, industry wide union of tech workers.
my 2 favorites:

Weiser’s original Ubiquitous Computing paper.

TCP RFC. 86?
Watsi (YC W13) is hiring mission-driven engineers
That would be great for developers like you and me -- after all, our skills are most valuable when they are portable. How much more can we get done if we don't have to support multiple platforms?

However, the interests of vendors are diametrically opposed to our interests as developers -- it is all about vendor lockin, and making it as hard as possible for us to support competing platforms.
It's scary how much of this could be done 10-15 years ago with exactly the same tools. They really haven't changed much. The difference now is that everyone has a mobile computing device in their hands, with the power to run this stuff.
>There certainly is hardware acceleration in Firefox on Linux, more then likely it has been disabaled because of your configueration/set-up/drivers. To turn it on go into your "about:config" and toggle the entry "layers.acceleration.force-enabled" to "True" and restart.

Implying that it wasn't deliberately disabled. HW acceleration on Linux isn't enabled by default, and for good reason. Until those underlying reasons are changed, Linux does have a hardware-acceleration-on-Firefox problem.
That's OK, just continue to work as a contractor where you pay your own holidays, sick leave, etc. Don't expect any of the benefits unionized workers win to come your way.
I wasn't aware anyone was still maintaining mochiweb, thats actually somewhat comforting to know!
Need to make a formal correction; I recalled this information incorrectly.

7.5 Years into the project they were at 1% completion. 15 was the total amount of time targeted.

"Halfway through the genome project, the project’s original critics were still going strong, pointing out that we were halfway through the 15 year project and only 1 percent of the genome had been identified. The project was declared a failure by many skeptics at this point. But the project had been doubling in price-performance and capacity every year, and at one percent it was only seven doublings (at one year per doubling) away from completion. It was indeed completed seven years later. Similarly, my projection of a worldwide communication network tying together tens and ultimately hundreds of millions of people, emerging in the mid to late 1990s, was scoffed at in the 1980s, when the entire U.S. Defense Budget could only tie together a few thousand scientists with the ARPANET. But it happened as I predicted, and again this resulted from the power of exponential growth."

http://www.kurzweilai.net/ray-kurzweil-responds-to-ray-kurzw...
Google's policies are actually mostly open too, so you don't have to guess :)
(they are linked from the open source page).

They are now a bit out of date, a few things have been simplified/relaxed (generally, the goal is as little process as possible).

Then again, people also like to super-duper parse the words in the docs, which are not really written to be parsed that way.
Stinks to high heaven: Top cops pot startup(former Toronto Police and Fire chiefs)
The article mentions another Coding Horror one at the bottom [0]. I found this tidbit from there interesting:

"In Code Complete, Steve McConnell cited two studies that proved it:

"A pair of studies performed [in 1973 and 1984] found that, of total errors reported, roughly 95% are caused by programmers, 2% by systems software (the compiler and the operating system), 2% by some other software, and 1% by the hardware. Systems software and development tools are used by many more people today than they were in the 1970s and 1980s, and so my best guess is that, today, an even higher percentage of errors are the programmers' fault."

I'd really like to learn how to track down hardware bugs, or mess with things like Christopher Domas does.

[0] https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-first-rule-of-programming-...
Duplicated in my other reply, but the Weiser paper on ubiquitous computing is excellent.
I don't know but I'm working on an Ethereum implementation right now, and it's pretty easy.
Congestion avoidance and control, by Van Jacobson looks at how TCP, the fundamental protocol behind the internet, works (or didn't work to begin with). It's a pretty easy paper to digest without too many dependencies, especially if you skip the maths (which is explained intuitively anyway). And it's a fascinating read. I highly recommend it!

https://nsl.cs.sfu.ca/papers/Jaco88.pdf
People in other countries routinely face much greater threats of reprisal than those faced by most activists in the US.

In other countries you have people resisting in the face of totalitarian regimes which brook no dissent under threat of death or torture for activists and their families. Yet people still resist.

As far as I'm aware, we're still far from a state of affairs where joining a union in the US means facing those kinds of risks. Yes, it might affect your career negatively -- but it might also affect it positively, as there are among us people who actually look at union membership as something to be proud of rather than hide.

Yes, there are libertarians and economic conservatives who froth at the mouth at the very mention of a union, but I haven't heard of many of them actually going as far as killing people for joining unions in recent decades.

So what kind of risks are you realistically going to face if you join a union?
It should be pointed out that the solid-run machine, while in theory a decent machine isn't going to run Redhat, or for that matter much beyond the image its shipping with. That _may_ change, but right now its not quite done cooking.

That said, outside of the 10G Ethernet, its pretty much bested by just about every m-itx x86 board in that price range. Plus, if you happen to need the 10G, its still probably less expensive to pick up a G4400+motherboard+10GbaseT board (new dual port on ebay for about $100) and best that machine in most cases.
Actually the whole Argentina situation has helped evolve how sovereign debt is issued. Argentina's bonds lacked what is called a collective action clause which allows the bonds of all bond holders to be restructured if a predetermined percentage of the bondholders vote for a voluntary restructuring. It was further complicated by the fact that the swapped bonds had a clause that said that granted them most favored nation status if there was any further restructuring.
>Can those amounts of gas realistically be shipped to Europe?

Wait, isn't that why we're funding Al-Nusra and all manners of terrorists in Syria and overthrowing the Ukrainian government? To stop it from happening.
StageFright was patched on a LOT of devices that "no longer received updates". The concern with embedded web views is overrated, as Android actually updates those via Play Services now.

For all of the talk of how awful this is, actual exploits are almost unheard of.
Yeah, you have to use the function modifier for those. Function + up-arrow = page-up is easy to learn.

Chords can remain easily learnable down to about 65 keys, but on a smaller layout (~40 keys), you have to memorize multiple layers for dozens of keys.
While it's been ~18 years, this doesn't at all sound correct to me. BeOS was a commercial product from its very beginning. There were free "developer release" versions, but it was sold as boxed software from R3 on. The last official release, BeOS R5, had a free version called "BeOS Personal Edition," which ran as an app inside Windows or Linux, but the full version of R5 was still commercial, at $69.95 (with an upgrade discount). I don't recall any licensing requirements pinned to the amount of RAM you had.

A large part of what did in BeOS was a combination of Microsoft's OEM licensing requirements and Be's steadfast belief that the only path to success was pre-installation on a major PC brand. IIRC, if you offered Windows pre-installations at all, you had to pay for every machine that Windows could be installed on whether or not it was actually installed, and you couldn't offer machines capable of dual-booting. Be concentrated their efforts on BeIA, an "internet appliance" version of the OS, which was dead in the water -- according to a lawsuit Be filed against Microsoft, MS pressured their OEMs not to partner with Be on both BeOS and BeIA. (Microsoft settled the suit for around $24M, IIRC.)

Personally, I think BeOS might have been able to survive as a niche OS if Be had kept their focus solely on it, kept the price competitive with boxed Linux distributions (those were a thing back then), and not been dedicated to the "go big or go home" mantra, but I don't have any inside info to prove (or disprove) that.
That document mentions that R5 Personal Edition had a disk partition size of 512MB. That's disk, not RAM.

R5 PE had that partition size because it installed to a 512MB file within your Windows partition, then booted from that file. Personal Edition was meant to give a way to try BeOS without having to have a second drive or do any partitioning. Once booted into it, you could just launch the Installer app and install to any size partition you pleased.

Be was essentially dead decently before R5 was released, so I disagree with the author's conclusion.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=k4RRi_ntQc8&t=0m49s
Do these really have RAM-like performance or is Intel calling them DIMMs as a marketing ploy?

I still remember when Optane was first announced Intel hyped it as a replacement for RAM. When it was finally available it turned out to be about 1,000x slower than RAM and barely faster than other SSD. So much for RAM replacement...
Another WoW streamer like the guy from the article (this ones named Zach) was streaming to 8k+ concurrent viewers for over a year without taking the offer to become a Twitch partner. He turned it on and got some ~3k subscribers in the first week.

He was probably making alright donation income, but suddenly having your monthly income jump ~$12000 a month from just flipping a switch is pretty nuts.
Open Source AI Consulting Contract
One downside is that there isn't a replacement for the tab wheel scroll add-on. Very annoying.
Oh sweet, lots of new enterprise features, along with "give us your contact info so we can figure out how much you can afford" pricing.

fuck that.
There is a strong social expectation to stay married. Many times the marriage itself is arranged by the families. It doesn't occur to some that splitting up is a possibility. Also they usually see it a combined venture of both the spouses.

The social bonds are so strong, I know plenty of marriages where the husband is living abroad usually middle East and comes home literally for few days in a year and the marriages still survive
This still leaves open speculation for why Google developers are working on Swift.
But what does the link help?
"just a bunch of weights and layers and parameters" -- I think you and the GP are agreeing. That's the definition of standard: If the model can be expressed using the currently-blessed set of layer definitions in CoreML, then yes. But if you're doing nonstandard stuff with weird control flow behavior, or RNNs that don't map into some of the common flavors, then all bets are off.

An example: Some of my colleagues put a QP solver in tandem with a DNN, so that the neural network could 'shell out' to the solver as part of its learning, and learned to solve small sudoku problems from examples alone: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00443 The pytorch code for it is one of the examples I like to use as a stress-test for doing funky things in the machine learning context.

TensorFlow is a very generic dataflow library at its heart - which happens to have a lot of DNN-specific functionality as ops. It's possible to express arbitrary computations in it, whereas CoreML and and similar frameworks make more assumptions that the computation will fit a particular mould, and optimize it thereby.
I love my X220. Still do!
Back when I was binge watching a lot of TV shows I would do the same thing -- run them at anywhere from 1.6x to 2.5x (though most often no more than 2x), with close captions on. In fact, I was surprised to hear that the "super-fast" listeners were in a similar range to me, because it doesn't feel like anything "super" after you do it for awhile.

At one point the article remarks on a relationship between playback speed and pitch, but in my experience most speed-altering playback software now keeps the perceived pitch the same while altering playback speed. It's true that if all you have is a cassette deck or a record player that's what happens, but not in vlc, in the browser or in podcast apps.
YouTube creators frustrated over bot that keeps demonetizing videos – The Verge
What Technology Can Do for Africa: The Leapfrog Model
And yet somehow the web doesn't break when one programmer uses \r\n while another uses \n. What was your original point about line terminators in this context?
Exactly.

Previously (sometime last year, IIRC) Jack Dorsey asked developers for a second chance. I don't see how this lines up with that, is it that now we can pay them to access artificially capped functionality? This was never the problem for me, and in the meantime, nearly all of the devs seem to have [wisely] moved on.

I'm not interested in participating in another one-sided relationship with a company who behaves as Twitter has -
changing the functionality and rules at the drop of a hat.
Slaughterbots
EFF and FSF aren't politically neutral in the broader sense. EFF is broadly libertarian, and FSF is, from what I can tell, generally leftist. Neither of those are bad things in and of themselves, but you should be aware before deciding to collaborate with them.
Download the Sims 4 Digital Deluxe Edition (NO TORRENT) (DIRECT LINK)
> Which means I don't own Swift at Google, i just know what they are doing because i approved it another capacity :)

Are you sure you didn't mean ";)" there?

> I run all the production and cloud programming language teams at Google, and am also an open source lawyer.

Smiley-face to you as well, friend. You get paid well into six figures to do this, while I just try to figure out how you're screwing me on evenings and weekends. I don't pretend to understand the technicalities of what you're typing, but I suspect that I will lose.
The Sharing Economy, Africa Style: 4 Legs Good, 4 Wheels Better
Yeah, same here. I'm not willing to stick my neck out for putting tech money into progressive causes (or conservative causes, for that matter). I'm willing to stick my neck out for better working conditions, retirement plans, professionalism standards, and fairness in equity compensation.
Or you could add a circular buffer to distribute the writes over the whole EEPROM as per Atmel app note AVR101: High Endurance EEPROM Storage [0]? :)

Just kidding...

[0]: http://www.atmel.com/images/doc2526.pdf
This would be illegal (in US) right? Basically you'd be selling lottery tickets for 1 cent each.