skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah this works for cron jobs .
Let me explain my requirement ,
say i have social media platform and users will schedule their post , and i need to schedule it in my scheduler and i have to persist in the databsae too . Because if the server is restarted all my scheduled jobs will be gone ..

So i am looking for a hosted scheduler where i can send a rest API request with a webhook and a small payload . During the execution time the hosted scheduler will call the webhook with the payload , so that i will publish the post .

Pros is that i dont want to worry about the scheduled jobs .Right now i am unable to find a scheduler with the good admin UI ( to pause all the jobs ) to delete the trial users post .
I just found this: https://sonarwhal.com (seems to be unrelated to Sonarqube) ... I thought it might help anyone stumbling on this Q in future.
But the "progression" doesn't really buy you anything other than "cooler" cards. You'll still win and lose at similar proportions, because you get matched against more skilled players or players with even better cards.

It means that yes, if getting to the top matters to you, you'll likely spend a lot of money, but spending money on it doesn't really alter whether or not the matches themselves are fun.
Well...

* It's slow

* There's little sense of its overall abstraction (or how the abstractions you find fit together)

* Its configuration language is undecipherable (if you want to use operators liberally consider the hoops people who need to search up `<++=` have to go through)

* It's hard to work through the documentation. I can't put my finger on it, but I think because the abstraction(s) are hazy it's hard to work out how the documentation fits together

* Writing plugins is non-trivial

* Speeding up compilation is a non-trivial exercise in futility

* It's too clever by half...

Did I mention it invokes the compiler on its own project definition? :)
Perl used to have fans with meetups and so on. I've not heard of these for a long time.

IMO three things killed Perl, leaving it as an unpopular legacy husk:

- loss of ecosystem. The high points for Perl were CGI.pm and its use as a "super awk" by sysadmins. The first was obliterated by other ecosystems, better and worse: PHP, Rails, Node, Go, and so on. The second was obliterated by "servers are cattle not pets": people have moved from meticulous hand-administration to the use of containers, Ansible, etc - or away from systems administration altogether to AWS or "serverless".

- Perl 6 transition. Second-system effect at its highest. The long wait for this to be completed absolutely destroyed incremental improvement because everyone was waiting for a big bang that came very late. Python managed to avoid this level of community damage but has still split into two languages, Python 2 and Python 3.

- the "two Perls" of style; one was the Wall-influenced style that looked a bit like English. The other was sigil-heavy and incomprehensible. Eventually people decided that it was easier to put up with syntactic whitespace than remember all the $? and $| and so on, so a lot of the Perl audience moved to Python.
I need a scheduler where i can dynamically ( via api ) schedule a job , with the admin UI to manage the jobs .

I Think these are not part of application development and it can be offloaded to hosted services .
A data-driven analysis and visualizations of the Smart Cities innovation landscape
Very unconvincing article. Would have been better if it had stuck to the core assertion that "The fall, like the rise of a civilisation is a highly complex operation which can only be distorted by oversimplification. It may be taken as axiomatic that there was no one cause of cultural collapse."

Yes, the actual causes of civilisational collapse are complex and varied, and do not exist to satisfy any particular narrative. And yes, these stories (most notably Easter Island) have been distorted and by modern polemical desires. And yes, with a few exceptions, "collapse" doesn't mean the total obliteration of a culture or their way of life.

But to twist this into "Do civilisations collapse?", with the answer being "no", is wrong. If you were living in Rome in 477, then your civilisation was collapsing. The fact that Latin would still be the language of the elite for more than a thousand years, or that Corinthian capitals would never cease to be carved, or even that there were people in Constantinople, thousands of miles away, still contentedly calling themselves "Romans", would provide very little succour, or otherwise argue against the fact that the civilisation you grew up in and depended upon was comprehensively fucked.

The same goes for the Maya, the Mycenaeans, the Harappa, and innumerable other civilisations. Any time you see population levels in precipitous decline, accompanied by a dramatic loss of technological and organisational capabilities, you are seeing evidence of some extremely unhappy individuals whose civilisations are, for them, collapsing. Arguments to the contrary -- on the basis that it's unevenly distributed, or that there will be elements of cultural continuity -- are academic. Experiential reality is that civilisations DO collapse.
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=663504

Site's not ready for 21st century.
JavaScript was written in 10 days, Gmail in 1 day
If your interested in the opposite there is always the VICEX EFT.

"VICEX, as the ticker implies, holds a basket of stocks specializing in alcoholic beverages, tobacco, gaming and defense/aerospace industries"

Just missing CXW and its 6% dividend to round out the fund.
Wire, for end-to-end encrypted conversations
I think you may be misunderstanding the core point.

Linus describes two choices: 1) add warnings now to give developers a year to fix security issues, then add panic 2) skip warnings, add panic now, and start crashing everything for all users.

For example the chance of a kernel bounds error leading to an actual kernel security breach is vanishingly small in practice. This is because the vast majority of kernel bounds errors are just bugs, not actual kernel security breaches that harm an actual user. Whereas an immediate kernel panic will harm a user immediately 100% of the time.

If you prefer to run an immediate-panic system, or you have a different kind of threat model, then you can choose to catch the warnings and do your own panic, alerting, shutdown, etc.
Perhaps you should add some information about who you are and why you see a need for a GAN book.
Astable Multivibrator (Oscillator)
Jenkins has scheduled jobs and an UI. It can also be accessed via API.
https://jenkins.io/
There are some "cultural differences" here in the US that are used by the two corporate parties to distract and divide the people, but when it comes to substantive issues, there is no difference between the two. The same generals preside over the same endless wars. The same rotating crowd of FED chairmen, SEC lawyers, and supply-side economists hold sway over our "economy" (see lifelong Democrat and Goldmach Sachs alumni Gary Cohen who is making economic policy for Trump). The same crowd of insurance and drug company lobbyists run our for-profit healthcare system (whether or not we call it "Obamacare" and offer insubstantial subsidies to people mandated to buy insurance they can't afford from for-profit companies for policies with massive deductibles that render the insurance largely useless). The same crowd of authoritarians are appointed to prosecute the "war on drugs", which is really a war on the citizens and civil liberties. The same group of CIA agents are appointed to run the same police-state domestic (and global) spying programs and group of other various police-state agencies that are steadily eroding what few rights and privacy we have left.

All of these things remain exactly the same no matter how much people cry about Trump, or wear pussy hats, or scream about 54 different genders or how "white supremacy" is the problem. All of these substantive policies would have been identical (and run by many of the same people) had Hillary won the election. In reality, the .00001% of the people who own this country and both corporate parties are laughing at all those people while they continue to rape the people and steal our freedoms.
I've never seen that care to share an example - but non native speakers can often make accidently offensive mistakes using the informal Du verses Sie.

I also saw a Swedish guy suggest (on a Stack Overflow Site) that some one with the first name Mohammed change this to his "White" name of Martin - they seemed totally oblivious of what they just sugested
Rust calls it shadowing and throws this example:
fn main() {
let x = 5;
let x = x + 1;
let x = x * 2;
println!("The value of x is: {}", x);
}

Sure this is a syntax example and you shouldn't be creating Immutable variable x and then adding +1 to it for no reason. If you did have a reason you should add it to the variable name so it's more likely developers say let xPlusOne = x + 1;
Or a kitchen example:
Let cream = getRefridgeratorItem(cream);
Let whippedCream = blend(cream);

So you reply no sane language makes you do this but why didn't the author show that? His goal was to make things more readable but lets be honest functional programmers would judge you all day for making a promise and then copying over that promise with something else. You may do it at work but the purist trolls hate reading it.
But cron isn't highly available/distributed with consistent state/scheduling
A quick tour of the BridgeOS 2.0 image
The brushed designs have been completely outclassed by the new breed of micro brushless quads. The Hoverbot Nano is one of the best examples of lightweight brushless design.

https://hoverbot.io
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?2806620-Hover...
Um, no? Biological explanations work great. Want to explain the social phenomenon of people going home every night? It's biology: they have to sleep. Want to explain why people smoke? They're addicted. Want to explain why grown up adoptees behave more like their biological parents than their adoptive parents? Genetics.
I was taught in elementary school (college age now) that people thought the Earth was flat until Columbus came alone to prove everyone wrong. That false statement that has some widespread consensus. My parents were taught it also.
The Romans where known for building roads :-)
Agreed. The article also made me think a little too... I mean there must be some seriously... Um, dedicated, people out there working on this stuff, and somehow it trundles along, and the end result is pretty damn good. Life I guess.
> From a stoic standpoint, Linus' words have nothing to do with anybody but himself, so it says a something about me or you if we get bothered by him.

That's just a rephrasing of the old rhyme "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me." -- which has been shown to be wrong. Sure, you can go around and try to block everything away, but it will still take its toll.
This is not with respect to devops or build .

My app has schedule functionality for example a scheduled report , so if it where like a webhook call then i dont want to waste the cpu cycle ,now i am using quartz scheduler in my java app .
Point 2 is kind of nonsense. The ecosystem is incredibly big and keeps up with most things. Name something then search here https://metacpan.org/ The main missing stuff is anyone marketing heavily their libraries and there being communities around them etc. Like probably no one knows what PDL is, even though it was around long before numpy+scipy etc. Before data science trended in the mind of hipster VCs and coders. The naming was to try and win over people from the IDL language, used mostly in image analysis in physics/geography. A niche crowd to be sure. Perl sort of never caught on to the modern style of advertising what its got. In the same way no one really advertises grep, awk or sed but lots of people still learn and use them.
Considering that large number of breaches are through social engineering that statement is largely off.
I found Odersky's comments and concern less useful than Li Haoyi's. Li's focused on the unclear - and broken - abstractions, while Odersky's seemed to focus more on the misapplication of language features. Am I reading this incorrectly?
I'm often puzzled by what things Americans find offensive, and how random that gets. Americans range from "tough," to ones who just can't wait to find another pretense to claim themselves being offended by something.
Why do you write it in all capitals?
The idea of toxic behavior in tech deriving from Linus is completely hyperbolic. If you want to pick someone to hang that on, look more to the Steve Jobs and Steve Ballmers of the industry.
So Google wants to monitor my mood. They really do have the Creep routine down by now.
It is bad, but this is what happens to major open source projects. Especially when security is brought up.

I see a bunch of github issues where Alice comes up and tell the developers their code is insecure.

Of course code is art, so developer Bob takes it to heart and say something along the lines "what do you mean? Can you prove it? I don't think I agree, the code is nice like this".

And then Alice and others start becoming aggressive, Bob starts getting defensive. At the end nothing is probably fixed but Bob is now sour and will probably become someone like Linus.

What I'm saying is that Linus must probably have had, and still has, to respond to a bunch of "f*cking morons" (to quote his words) and he's developed a thin skin has well as a wearable douchitude as a result of that.
I could see it either way. Only a little later Scotland was suffering from severe deforestation, which was only reversed in the 20th century by plantation forestry.

Samuel Johnson, 1773: "From the bank of the Tweed to St. Andrews I had never seen a single tree, which I did not believe to have grown up far within the present century. Now and then about a gentleman’s house stands a small plantation, which in Scotch is called a policy, but of these there are few, and those few all very young. The variety of sun and shade is here utterly unknown. There is no tree for either shelter or timber. The oak and the thorn is equally a stranger, and the whole country is extended in uniform nakedness, except that in the road between Kirkaldy and Cowpar, I passed for a few yards between two hedges. A tree might be a show in Scotland as a horse in Venice."

Scotland was also to be transformed by sheep farming.
Corel Painter 2017 v16.1.0.456 Serial for Mac OS X Full Download
A customizable countdown timer for tasks/events
Because they don't know much about contemporary Perl. It's actually a really good indicator of if someone actually knows anything about the language post the 90s. I used it as a soft hiring filter on CVs. You knew almost as matter of fact any dev putting that on their CV was self taught from monster nests of legacy.
> Python managed to avoid this level of community damage but has still split into two languages, Python 2 and Python 3.

The fracture is very slowly healing. Outside of some huge corporate hold outs with a lot of Python 2 code (Google & co.), Python 3 will win out.

Perl 6 vs Perl 5, on the other hand, I don't even know if you can call it a fracture. A new start would be more fitting.
A standardized list is also on coursebuffet.com
Which is why make sucks for any language that isn't C.
Electronic Management of Data Can Deliver Better Patient Outcome
Healthcare providers today, unanimously agree that maintaining patient records is an essential process in healthcare.

In the 1960s, most hospitals and healthcare providers in the US relied solely on paper for maintaining such records. This resulted in heaps of paperwork, making the process of managing patient records a mammoth task.

Some progressive leaders in healthcare soon realized that only an electronic medical record system can solve this issue. However, creating and maintaining such systems proved to be extremely costly at the time.

Much has changed since then. 98% of hospitals in the US have now been known to demonstrate meaningful use of Electronic Health Records (EHR). Also, according to a report published by Markets And Markets, by 2021 the EHR market is expected to reach $5.2 billion.

This growing popularity of EHR might make you wonder how it can be beneficial for patient outcomes. Her we’ll take a look at some of the ways in which Electronic Data Management can deliver better patient outcomes.

Use this link for more information ==> http://www.thepsi.com/how-electronic-management-of-data-can-deliver-better-patient-outcome/
This isn't Google's patent. They just host patents.google.com.
It's more caused by the toxic climate amongst it's maintainers, paired with technical and management incompetence.

When Larry Wall was still the lead a lot of progress was made, but then it reversed course in the last 20 years. Every single competent developer left or was booted, and not a single of the many designed features for Perl6 were properly implemented in perl5. Perl5 is now purely a religion, with the heresy to express of loss of faith in the supreme leaders gets you booted, whilst uncivil name-calling and technical destruction by wannabe middle-managers took over.

The undecidedability problem is caused by the dynamic lexer. It's actually a feature to drive the static parsing rules dynamically.
This sounds like a terrible way to achieve your goal.

Save the future posts to the database with the required publish date/time.

Run cron every $X minutes where $X is the smallest interval you allow (ie if you force publish date to be rounded to 5 minutes, run cron every 5 minutes) and check for "future posts" where the publish date <= now(), and take action.

This is pretty basic stuff and that you want to offload it to a 3rd party by capturing all the details into a request to be made back to your app is a huge red flag IMO.
When you think of it Diablo 3 is also a clicker game and it costs 35€ + 15€ if you want newest hero.
Perl is designed to make life easier for the guy who writes the code, not the one who reads it.

The motto "there is more than one way to do it" is telling. It allows beginners to write code the way they are most familiar with and give experts a large toolbox to be most efficient in many situations. The trouble is that while the writer only needs to know a subset of the language, the reader has to know everything in order to read other people code.

This philosophy make it very suitable for quick hacks, and that's its primary use. The problem is that quick hacks have a tendency to stay, and some poor guy need to maintain that mess. And when your experience with the language is to maintain the unmaintainable, hate is totally justified.

Note that is is possible to write clean Perl, but it requires effort, and unless you are writing Perl modules, there are probably better languages for that.

Compiler undecidablity is not a problem. Sure, it is not intellectually satisfying, and it may be troublesome for some application where formal proofs are required, but for a language like Perl that is all about practicality, no one really care.
Yes, It Matters What You Wear to an Exam
>Much of the toxic behaviour in the tech industry can be traced back to Linus "getting away with it".

I think you're grossly overestimating the impact Linus' rants have on the industry.
The BBC also had an documentary claiming that it was environmental collapse back in 2012 which is mentioned in the aeon article. They have now produced another with a separate view point.

Irrespective of the BBC bias I still think that disease + slavery + 70,000 sheep was more likely cause for collapse.
Djay Pro 1.4.5 Full Crack for Mac[Full-Activated]
Mutability invites bugs, so immutability is important in the general case, not in special situations.

https://rjbs.manxome.org/rubric/entry/1929

https://blog.plover.com/prog/perl/DateTime-Moonpig.html
how does tetris work then? You press button in response to what's on the screen. The clicker does have _some_ choices you have to make - it's just an easy choice most of the time.
One size does not fit all. Any debugging safety net will have a cost in terms of performance, and you usually have to pay that cost regardless of whether your code has bugs. It's why we don't release debug builds to customers or use them in production.

If it is vital to your application to detect a certain kind of bug in production, then turn the checking on in production and pay the cost. Maybe it is not vital to my application or my application does not have these bugs. In my case it would be needless to pay the cost.

To me, essential to delivering a good product is detecting and killing defective code before delivery. I recognize however, that this attitude is becoming more and more old fashioned.
“Scientific.” “Scholarly.”

Given its, uh, content, this particular paper can really be classified as anything.
Flexibility is at the heart of human intelligence
Run cron on all your boxes, have them pull a job at a time from the database. Or shit, go full tilt with a clustered Redis job queue.

All of these are better options than "embed the entire job info in a URL and hand it off to a remote scheduling service".
Opus Magnum player makes computer
perl works fine, and you aren't going to unexpected trigger an infinite loop due to some bug in the language definition.

What you can't do is tell how to parse a piece of perl without running the program.

http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=663393

These are an expounding upon this link. In most languages, you can at least tell what things are. This is a function. That's a variable. In perl, there are constructs whose parsing depend on what a given bit of code was defined as previously, and that definition can be predicated on code execution. This leaves you in a situation where you cannot tell if something is a division and comment or a regex without knowing whether a function takes arguments. ( see link )
Hostel App Development: do you need your own App?
If I was really pissed of id have written to the CEO and HR director pointing out that there procedures needed "some improvement"

I almost did this after a disastrous interview at AKQA a while back.
with the recommended parts, minus the camera/vtx combo ($20), your total is roughly $70. for $60 you could get an eachine qx90 which is almost identical.

or you could even get much, much better quality/control out of a brushless build with the babyhawk, which goes for around $100

if you're new to flying drones, i wouldn't recommend this at all
Lots of them in Britain still exist (in modern form): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_roads_in_Britannia#List_...
Sounds like you are not offering enough or have a poor recruitment consultant
Statistics say that total revenue from travel sales made using smartphones has grown by 105% for the 2017.
PC gamers have suffered generally because of the cryptocoin boom eating GPU supply and inflating the price.

Doesn't really apply directly to the laptop market, people probably aren't buying laptops for mining, but presumably it has some impact.
That question was asked on reddit. Most commenters seemed to think it was too high. The devs said they spent $2 million to make a clicker game, and therefore needed to price it high to recoup their costs.

Personally, I feel they should have managed their costs to a more reasonable price point, but I didn't feel like engaging in debate on reddit over the point.
Both times, the performance boost of the new architecture significantly offset the emulation overhead. It's going in reverse this time, emulating the old instruction set with a weaker processor.

Further, there's a lot more focus on battery life these days, and while many apps will be tolerable from a UX perspective if you halved their speed, that also means the CPU is spending twice as long at the highest turbo states. Ouch.

I also think Apple could pull it off, and actually want to see it happen for the health of the PC industry. But I haven't seen anyone declaring it's not possible, I think that's a bit of a straw man.