skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
He definitely knows it's the customer that tends to forget weather intentionally or unintentionally.

At the end of the day it's bad for both parties even if they don't realise it I mean he did say he doesn't want a family because of all the shit he puts up faking it although he framed it more politely.

Because of his work he thinks that all families are like the ones he pretends to be a part of but is that really true?

You choose your partner but not your customer so it's not the same and a important distinction.
You know, us programmers like to refer to ourselves as wizards but I really wonder if non-programmers think the same or is it just like any other profession they're not knowledgeable of? I don't know anything about chemical engineering but I've never considered chemical engineers to be magical.

I do like thinking of myself as a wizard, though.
It looks like Kabbee is a front-end for minicab firms, not drivers.
Accepting the risk of being downvoted heavily...

Young men + new to browsing + some imagination = Pamela Anderson was epic by then.
Probably seemed like a safer option if there was no legal precedent for returning cryptocurrency. Also, prices could have dropped just as easily as they went up.
Well. The firmware update process does, which now makes me wary of it.
If you've used twitter for the past few years, there's no speculation. The amount of spammers running around peddling porn links and whatnot is out of control... tie that with Twitter's stagnant growth numbers, and it's pretty obvious why they haven't done anything to crack down on that "user growth"
Tell that to Justin Bieber and Hannah Montana.

If your kid begs for something they just might get it. The tween market is valuable and easily influenced.
AMD and ARM have 'TrustZone', which is not the same, but if you don't trust it maybe you're in trouble.
The article makes it seem like capsule networks are cutting edge general replacements for regular neural nets. The problem is that capsules only work on limited types of data, and are not fast enough for deployment. The regular neural nets are still the main workhorse. Capsules are a hot idea that might lead to a leap in the future. It's like Intel announcing memristors.
I'm confused about what would be implemented. Is it a database engine that supports the SQL dialect that SQLite uses. In which case, (at least) two browsers have already implemented it, right?

If you're referring to SQLite itself being implemented multiple times, I don't understand why that's relevant to Web SQL. You wrote that Web SQL shouldn't be supported, i.e. implemented, until there's a spec. It seems like there's a 'spec' now, if not an official formal spec. But now you're claiming that Web SQL can't be a standard because there aren't multiple implementations. But it certainly seems like there are already multiple implementations:

- [Can I use... Support tables for HTML5, CSS3, etc](https://caniuse.com/#feat=sql-storage)

But still, your logic seems circular: Web SQL shouldn't be implemented for all the browsers because there's no spec and there's no spec because there aren't multiple implementations.

I imagine there's a distinction you're trying to convey that I'm missing. What is it?
Filters in Vue.js: What are they, how do you use them, and how do you make them?
My personal opinion is that bitcoin originally was meant as a transaction medium, and that could have been very valuable. However, as it stands, it's obvious to me that bitcoin cannot become that, as scaling is proving to be very difficult, and for more reasons than technical.

Also bitcoin has heavily failed in its "decentralized" dream, as most of the hashing power is under the control of very few individuals.

This seems to leave its only purpose as some sort of strange "HODL" and speculation machine, and I don't believe that is worth burning an entire small nation's worth of power to promote. In fact, my opinion is that such a system is actively harmful.

Even if you believe that bitcoin is not some eternal pump and dump, that just leaves it as a valid investment vehicle. I don't consider a single investment vehicle to be worth the energy spent to maintain "trust" in the chain
Roche Launches NAVIFY Tumor Board Solution
I suspect he may end up using a chunk of that on litigation defense.
Her videos show her engaged with various hardware projects-- making them and explaining them.

The article concerns the slander that these projects aren't hers; that she is merely a mascot presenting the work of her (male, engineer) boyfriend.

To notice "a mind at work" in the videos, is to suggest that the videos are her authentic work.
Just look at murder rates in countries where it is more difficult to obtain a gun ( Canada, Europe) and compare those nbrs with US. What more evidence is needed?
Here's the presentation slides of the guys who figured it out:

https://www.troopers.de/downloads/troopers17/TR17_ME11_Stati...
You could have just read the blog post:

> Q: Are you censoring the words “class action lawsuit” in your Logitech Forum?

> Our intention is to ensure our forums help our customers when they need support. This includes keeping the conversation productive by monitoring the language used and automatically blocking profanity or personal attacks. This is common practice. The words “class action lawsuit” were blocked as our Community Terms of Use do not allow solicitation, including legal solicitation. We have unblocked the terms and are reviewing our list of blocked terms.
Why anyone would take UX advice from Google (or Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Microsoft) is beyond me. I have this rule that I don't take UX advice from companies that have shitty/dark/manipulative UX.
Cynical Bill Shows Why Public-Sector Abuses Are Rampant
I disagree. I thought it was very clear and concise.
This is fantastic news. I expect to see some reliable and easy to apply (usb?) solution to wipe and tame ME.

Greatest news is that it works for latest Intel processors so even if they change protection (they certainly will) we at least have very good processors that can work without spyware. All the previous tests I read about only tackled first few generations of Intel ME, for processors/boards over 8 or 10 years old.
Note that readline is GPL, not LGPL. Alternatives with less restrictive licenses include editline and linenoise.
Millennials with Bitcoin FOMO are going all in on cryptocurrency
Let's give props to Seneca:

For we are mistaken when we look forward to death; the major portion of death has already passed. Whatever years be behind us are in death’s hands.

https://www.lettersfromastoic.net/letter-1/
have you met any designers?
It depends on what those "wizards" do. If it's just making some formula in spreadsheet work, it's not too awesome. If it's stopping time[1], that might be more "magical".

[1] https://hackaday.com/2017/11/09/stop-motion-with-the-time-gl...
Intel ME is not new. You don't need to imagine it, you could google it.
Hey HN!

Craig from YC here. Ramon Recuero and I built SpeechBoard.

Here's how it works: you record a podcast and upload it to SpeechBoard. We run it through a few speech to text APIs to generate a transcription for you. From there you can delete words from the transcript and we cut them from the audio.

Then you can download three files: your edited audio, your original file with cuts marked in metadata for importing to Audition/Audacity, and labels for importing into Audacity.

Nailing the in/out points of words was the hardest part, which led us to create the Audition/Audacity import feature and now I think that's the best part :)

Let us know what you think!
UPDATE:+WhatsApp+to+support+Blackberry+till+December+2017
Getting hit pretty hard. To very briefly summarize, the article reviews an occasional trope in writing about our field, namely that it has some interesting correspondences with old-style conceptions of magic - from hermitical study of certain esoterica granting access to powers and principalities beyond the ordinary ken, through potentially hostile reaction to same among those lacking such secret knowledge and frightened by the prospect of a world increasingly founded on it, to "do not call up what you cannot put down" in the context of modern AI and ML research and the applications thereof.
The idea might be cute but performance is not there yet. Specifically they were able to achieve state of the art performance on MNIST, but got 10.6% test error on CIFAR 10 which is comparable to state of the art of 4 years ago (and if you're in the field, 4 years is like a century ago). It's important to stress that there's ABSOLUTELY NO theory backing anything so everything we're doing including this idea of capsules and dynamic routing is just brute-forcing, trial-and-error. Even though the idea is cute, there's still ALOT to be proven for this method. So when I see all these articles, I feel a little bit uneasy.
How Jonah Peretti built the modern social media content industry
A Great Final Cut Pro X Demo by Russian YouTubers
> they could also prevent them from driving for their rivals

They'd have a really hard time having such a clause stand up in court, especially in California where non-competes traditionally don't stand.

Many courts have determined that non-competes only stand if your company is actively paying you(and expecting you to work - in the case of moonlighters working a job after their 8 hour job) unless exclusive knowledge/power exists - which must be compensated for accordingly. Knowledge/power might exist in terms of surging locations; but uber drivers are currently only paid for their time after they accept a ride.
Looked at another way, does this mean that all parties involved in Bitcoin will be made 100% whole (in Yen) as of the day of the Bankruptcy?
Ah, thanks for clarifying that.

If I may ask: aren't there mechanisms that prevent the French State from lying so blatantly to its citizenry? How was this ultimately found out?
Take something like the Rubin Report [0], which is reasonably family friendly but that covers socially/politically controversial topics and/or speakers.

Not too long ago, a large amount of their back catalog was demonetized. It's not 'advertiser friendly' because sometimes even just the presence of a controversial speaker is enough to bring a hate mob down on anyone advertising on a video with them in it.

0: https://twitter.com/RubinReport
CMU Database Systems class
A place for developers to find and share open source projects
The judge will almost certainly order the return of the car (or a cash restitution) as part of the sentencing. If you don't return the car or don't pay the restitution you are in contempt of court.

More so, "possession of stolen property" is also a crime. The car doesn't magically become unstolen just because the theft went to jail.
I don't recall having requested Yen at any time. There was a form to be filled out and I clearly stated that I prefer to be paid in Bitcoin. But I guess I am not big enough a fish to have a say there.
My Top 6 Common Weaknesses Every Programmer Should Know by Heart
Your world is narrower than you realized.
Well no. What he owes was based on the price of Bitcoin at the time not today. he owes the same amount in yen regardless of the price of Bitcoin.
When I was a preteen, I'd watch Notch's ld48 programming streams, and I'd just be confused. I had read the basics of if-statements, for-loops, and functions, but he was using them in a way beyond my comprehension.

Later I discovered MIT's Scratch, and it let me figure things out on my own: games, physics, genetic algorithms.

I think programming is portrayed to be more difficult than it is. It's a mixture between programmers trying to find the most efficient system, and the public's half-uncertainty of computers being magnified.
Of course FT employment comes with vacation and sick time, but why would you get the same flexibility? Uber is 100% in charge of determining where and when you work, and you get paid the same hourly/salary regardless of how much work there is, so they'll optimize for riders as much as possible.

In the long run it might be better for Uber, more tightly controlled supply will mean cheaper and better rides while drivers make less. I can see surge pricing becoming pure profit when you can just order drivers to be at a certain place instead.
> If it's just making some formula in spreadsheet work

Excel functionality is on part with some programming languages.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nbkaYsR94c
Show HN: HN Status Page in the style of HN with detailed metrics
They should make a FOSS tool for configuring their devices. Current approach is a horrible mess. Using some on-line server to configure a remote is very wrong.
> Opinion: a log like decrease in happiness vs income is basically consistent with "more money doesn't make you happier".

I think you mean log-like increase.

Assuming so, then more money does make you happier (although at a decreasing rate per dollar per year.)
At this point the biggest issue I have with the X is that the home button gave a clear sense of phone orientation, so I could flip it around immediately if I picked it up backwards. I've stopped trying to push the home button for things, but I still have to look at it to tell which way is up.
Am not. "Harmony Link allows you to use your Apple mobile device (iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch)
or Android mobile device to control your entertainment system. Using the Logitech
Harmony Link app, you can launch activities and control devices with a single touch. " That, in my opinion, falls under "home automation" - consolidated, remote control of household entertainment system is a part of that, IMNSHO. Also, while 6 years might be hopelessly outdated for a mobile phone or a tablet, here I am, typing on an even older computer (which has been only upgraded slightly), and don't get me started on the car.

For home automation, I would expect the appliance's lifecycle to be closer to the refrigerator and oven (20 years and still going; EDIT: this applies to audio as well, my previous A/V setup was mostly older than me while it worked, and I'm no audiophile), not to "get your ass on the HW upgrade treadmill and replace again with iWhatever2017 or suffer the consequences." There's the point, as you note: the expectation to keep working, as opposed to an endless pile of discarded gadgets.
Run and Debug Java 9 in Visual Studio Code
Three questions if you don't mind (and feel free to speculate yourself or anyone else):

1. Many features have options to be disabled (e.g. bios settings). Why doesn't this, even to this day?

2. You may have been involved in implementation, but do you know why it still exists on every board regardless of backlash?

3. I am a bit ignorant, does the chip fabbing process justify putting this on every board instead of just on enterprise ones (especially since you can consider it a feature worth upcharging for)?

Pardon my skepticism, but its continued use without the ability to disable speaks to ulterior motives regardless of original implementation design.
>I don't like how people upvote her projects simply because of girl.

Why does that matter to you? Why is that important to you?
> It seems similar to Haskell, except with parentheses

That's the point: In Haskell, the parentheses (and especially the comma) are meaningful, and "foo(x, y)" is not the same as "foo x y". Reason jumps through extra hoops to make the two syntaxes mean the same thing. To a Haskell (or OCaml, or other ML family) programmer, the Reason syntax suggests an uncurried function.
Ok I'll rephrase. Given the events of last year (the part with message hashes and public keys changing), what gives you faith in wikileaks and Assange?
The TPM is actually implemented as an Intel ME applet on a lot of PCs... >.<
You're only responding to the part after "dumb claims," right?

And your (valid) refutation of that part in no way implies spending less time reverse engineering and disabling ME, nor being less excited about this tweet. Correct?
My favorite unsung readline default is ctrl-o, for "operate-and-get-next”. If you’ve gone back and found a command from your history, ctrl-o will run it and then tee up the next command. And, if you hit the end of your history, it will cycle back to the point you initially searched to. So if you have a set of a few commands (e.g., foreground your editor, run make, test the results) that you tend to keep repeating, it will replace “up up up enter” with just “ctrl-o”.
The GP is saying it may be negligible at a certain point, compared to any other conceivable factor.
Yup, that's AMT, enabled on vPro-series and Xeon chips only though
Right, but he wouldn't have had any money to pay that amount in yen if the price had crashed, no?
Intel created a product (Similar to Dell's iDRAC) which has a co-processor for system admin type stuff. This product and/or associated modules have security flaws. Those flaws can be potentially used to takeover the machine and allow malware to exist outside of the CPU/RAM/HDD architecture and stay undetected.
Considering how many programming abstractions most programmers work above now, I'd say it's more like magic now then ever before. Draw the circle (add the boiler plate code), recite the words (dig up the proper API method), perform the gestures (compile with certain flags) and your spell (desktop app) will work. If you don't, it'll do nothing or worse, blow up in your face.

As a side note, if anyone's interested in looking a bit more into "programming as magic" there's a great book series called The Wizardry series about programmers being transported into a fantasy realm where magic works similarly to a programming language. The main character ends up writing a compiler based off (IIRC) APL and revolutionizes magic. The first book is called Wizard's Bane and it's light and fun reading.
I think 90% of the difficulty of learning to program is building and interpreting your mental models of how everything works. This is unfortunate, because everyone's mental models are different, and it's the same problem we see in math teaching, where things are extremely difficult until it "clicks" and suddenly it's so easy
And would he have had the cash to pay you?
You could also have them delegate the _acme-challenge with an NS record
Yeah, sure, compared to routinely beheading people for witchcraft, this might even seem civilized.

My point was that when it's murderous tyrannical allies like Saudis, the mainstream response is just like yours, "eh, what am I supposed to do about it, that's how it goes".

When it's adversaries like Saddam Hussein, it's "wtf, let's bomb the shit out of them".
Because they only recovered a fraction of the bitcoin lost, so there wasn't enough bitcoin to be distributed. They wanted the equivalent price in cash, which seemed like a more obtainable goal but still at the time was greater than what could be met by selling the 200K bitcoin they recovered. Who knows, maybe they thought they could get it from insurance or something like that. Of course, now that the 200k bitcoin are worth more than the 800k lost were at the time of the hack, they want more money.
You don’t “need” carbs. There’s no such thing.
I find it at the very least a little ironic that the author used consumer technology to simulate magic abilities (to such an immersive state that he had to put a low-horror mode) and uses his success in this department as an argument that consumer technology doesn't very closely convey the feeling of magic.

I appreciate the argument being made, but I can't say that I accept the premise that (sufficiently advanced) consumer technology is often unlike magic.

Hell, just sending out an invisible beam of light towards a magic black box so that it can remotely open up a window to a lands that may or may not exist is an awfully cool reality to hide behind the rather normal sounding acronym "TV", and that's hardly cutting edge technology.
GSA Proxy Scraper 2.31 Crack Serial Final Download
Looks like it's starting to buckle, mirror just in case: http://archive.is/Vx9u7
ME can see everything coming in on your ethernet port, with no accountability to the host OS. It's like a wiretap, ostensibly for remote control commands, but again with no accountability for what it is up to.
It's one thing to say "reasonable minds can disagree"; I can empathize with the FBI's position, though I think they are fundamentally wrong.

However two things are striking about this speech, and similar recent (over the past few years) ones in the US and UK at least:

1 - Rosenstein is no dummy, so must be perfectly aware of the doublespeak in his statement that they don't want to make things easier for criminals yet companies must provide accomodation for alleged non-criminals. The pre-GWOT NSA took information assurance seriously and, at least in some cases, made encryption stronger for everyone (consider the RSA S-box) even (perhaps) at the expense of the NSA's SIGIINT efforts. I don't know if the Information Assurance Directorate is even staffed any more.

2 - The propaganda is at its most flagrant with the Sutherland shooter: Apple reportedly offered its help but the FBI ignored that until the 48 hours had passed to lock the phone, and then excoriated Apple. Meretricious malpractice, as far as I am concerned.

Neither of which makes me in any way supportive of the FBIs position, no matter what actual merit might lie in it.
Your "company" is not Justin Bieber or Hannah Montana. It does not have a product for them.
That's cool, I didn't need the $50,000 in bitcoin he fucked me out of anyways.
100 years doesn't really equate to "several generations"...
Honestly, it was an off-the-cuff joke. Perhaps this guy is right. I think mostly I'm saying that perhaps this man is slightly biased, in that he will make more money if more people believe that bitcoins are worth more money and here to stay.
Here's what I don't understand: I specifically requested to be repaid in BTC at the time, you could state this on the claims form. I even opened an account on Kraken for this? So why would I not get the full amount in bitcoin?
We're talking about deliberate government backdoors, and it's my opinion that those are highly unlikely.

The ME is a really bad idea because it introduces massive, unnecessary attack surface and vulnerabilities are inevitable, but no conspiracy.
Having been a sys-admin once upon a time (2006-2008), these answers are straight forward. Servers used to have discrete ME cards which were paid add-ons. Competition in the early 2000s drove these ME cards to be integrated in the motherboard in order to better compete on the low end of the market. I’ve had servers I was only able to remotely fix due to the out of band management interface (more than once). They pain they fix is real.

The same techniques for managing server farms are useful for managing hundreds/thousands of corporate desktops. Being able to power up a desktop (“lights out” management) and re-image it at 3:00AM is very useful for example. You could also install 3rd party security products to the ME to provide higher level threat detection that’s hard for a rootkit to hide from. So once the work of getting an integrated management engine production ready was complete, it made perfect sense to use it in corporate desktops. It’s expensive to produce chip variants, so doubtless that further cost pressures on Intel lead to them putting the ME their core shared across all products. Plus, now IT admins can let the VP of Sales get the laptop she wants knowing they can leverage their System Center/OpenDesk/etc. console to manage it via ME.

So no, they aren’t a Fed backdoor. Those of us who worked in IT 10 years ago remember how the market drove Intel to add the ME. That is doubtless why many are silently conflicted. They don’t want to take a big step back. They likely are expecting/hoping Intel will “fix” the problem.
hn@ycombinator.com
Repeating cycle of "medium gains mass acceptance from open and unmoderated communication, somebody starts to abuse system, people call for moderation."
So much buzz/hype with multiple articles even though the early results are only on MNIST.