skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Folks push it because it's Indian and understood by most. Folks resist and protest because it's not their native language and somehow worse than having English everywhere.
You're working on Synapse right? I've been following that project. I really like the vision.
They were filming in a caffé macs. Hopefully a current employee can clarify, but I think you can take pictures and film inside (that) caffé macs.
Edius Pro 8 Crack 2018 and Serial Number Full Version Download
I've never been married, but I don't quite know if it's even possible to be with someone for the long haul and not be close friends. It would be very much unpleasant otherwise. A business transaction of sorts. Having said that, from my personal experience, I think seeing your partner as your only best friend is something comparable to putting all of your eggs in one basket. Nothing lasts forever and as amazing as things look today they might not be all that great tomorrow and all of a sudden you're all you've got. Just for that reason alone I think it's healthy to maintain a close friendship with someone other than your partner.
Not OP, but there are still blue laws on the books in many states [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_laws_in_the_United_States
The Scientific Case for P≠NP
Company Added the Word ‘Blockchain’ to Its Name and Saw Its Shares Surge 394%
Since the parent was deleted and I couldn't comment by the time I finished typing, here's the non-tl;dr:

The main advantage is non-hierarchical routing. Your ip address is in fact the fingerprint of your public key, which is used to encrypt all traffic.

Because of this the address allocation works a lot different and there's no need for a central authority. The lack of a central authority is usually a problem if you ever tried to merge two large internal networks you might have run into the issue that both networks have used 10.0.0.1 for something. This isn't possible in cjdns because you can just generate as many key pairs as you want, which would map to one out of 2^120 possible addresses which are very unlikely to collide. Merging two networks is just a matter of configuring one or more peers and the networks are able to see each other (this is so easy, it might happen by accident).

The main difference to other projects is that you don't need to write code to support it. If your application supports unicast ipv6, your application is able to run on top of cjdns.
Have thought about building a similar service in the past however more focused on IOT. This is definitely a very interesting space and one of the few areas where tokens make sense as an integral part of the offering.
Gmail on my AMD FX-8370 at 4 GHZ with 32GB RAM (and 60 MBit connection) takes... 5 seconds to load.

Gmail (HTML)... takes 0.5 seconds. (And about the same on my Netbook with a Celeron)

Guess which one I use? It's like the entire world has forgotten what productivity is.
Yes the standard is about a process, but it's a process to meet specifications. The process is followed to repeatably meet them.
And it will now be, on average, a hair less right, or less confident, or maybe just less confident in sildur’s classifications.

Either way I think being a bit adversarial towards this kind of stuff is a healthy, albeit small, protest.
Schools are pretty wacky for all sorts of reasons. Post-Newtown, the entrance to my son’s school is dictated by the easiest door surveillance and ability to limit access.

As a result, you can’t really ride your bike to school and lock it up unless you’re going to walk around the building. About 80% of the training for volunteers is child molester training and school shooting/lockdown drill. It’s pretty depressimg.

It’s bizarre contrasted to my growing up in 1980s NYC. We walked to school in groups but usually alone, and the only drills were fire drills. And there was real scary shit going around in that neighborhood!
Sounds like the world's okayest product. No wonder it garnered so much apathy.
I would disclose it. Disclosing it is the right thing to do and would give me a stronger position when negotiating, along the lines of: "If the offer isn't compelling enough, I'll just walk over to this thing that I have going on here..."

Ideally, I would be able to plan ahead for time off and stick with (pre)allocated (un)paid amounts, all within reason. Especially if I actually have employees who can communicate with clients, attend meetings etc.
Unfortunately not. It's an inseparable part of the Reason syntax. You can however use either the desugared form:

([@JSX] div(~foo=bar, ~children=[child1, child2], ()));

Or a preprocessor that'll give you a JSX-like syntax, but without the type checking: https://github.com/cxa/ppx_bsx
As it stands western democratic governance exists in no-mans-land where everything is too little too late. This was always the case however as the pace of change has accelerated the old institutions and structures of governance are now totally unfit for their purpose. This is perhaps why the Chinese autocratic model will succeed in the 21st century and traditional western democracies will fail (NB: not a value judgement on my part, just an observation).
And they don't check their sources. Several of the most popular "awards" from the early years were fake, e.g. the "JATO rocket strapped to pickup" thing.
Is there a word for it? If not we will soon need it. There are many such long tweet sequences I have seen, some by journalists. So it's becoming a common thing like web logs -> blogs two decades ago.
> More transparency would help...

I would advocate for the ultimate transparency. The dissolution of privacy altogether.

Nothing benefits the incumbents more than the subjects being passionate about not giving the information they give them to anyone else. This has the same effects as employees not disclosing their wages: it only benefits the employer, in the game of assymetry of information. If the information is public, then the little-start-up that could would effectively be able to attack the giants.
So, how do you hold up your pants?

What happens if your aim isn’t where you want it to go, and therefore you need to use a hand (or finger) to fix that? And then you have to wash your hands a second time?

This also doesn’t address the issue of drying your hands after you wash them.
I've genuinely enjoyed switching to D for hobby game projects. There's some new problems that I haven't quite figured out (like GC allocations ONLY occur at specific points, however, ANY GC could still blow up ANY object which means if you're not careful, you've added an entire dimension to problem solving over that of a C++ project when a finalizer gets called and does something it shouldn't.)

On the otherhand, ranges, native strings, an insanely straight-forward and powerful template engine, compile-time evaluation, native contract programming and unit testing, modules (read: what's a header guard?), make C++ feel like clanging rocks together to make fire compared to D. Actual direct support for multi-dimensional arrays without insane levels of nested template boilerplate code is worth the price of admission alone.

I could honestly go on for paragraphs listing just the features I use on a regular basis that don't exist in C++. C++ is basically "D, a decade behind." Because half the greatest features they're adding to C++ have already been in D for at least a decade.

C++ _finally_ added numeric separators (that Motorola C had ... in the 90's? Or earlier?) 1 million is 1_000_000, not 1000000. Surely, there's no chance of user error in the second version! (Be honest, how many times did your eyes check to see if the second number actually added to a million or had a typo?)

And I say this as someone who programmed C++ for decades until I found D. _It's by no means perfect_, but it's sure of a lot more enjoyable to program in.
Oh, and you still have to put your equipment away after you use it, button or zip up your pants, etc....

You want to do that after you’ve washed your hands and they are now wet, or before?
Summary: Kill cells that have stopped dividing, but that are still alive. (Called: Senescent cells.)

Don't prevent them from entering this state (which could cause tumors), just kill them if they do enter this state.

Hard part: Each organ/tissue has different types of cells, so each needs a unique medication to kill those cells.
The tone of this article seems to particularly demean the students in the beginning; I understand it's supposed to bring them to light but holy shit:

>They all ended up in West Virginia, not exactly the America you dream of when you come from Chennai or Bangalore. Probably not even when you come from Biel.

>Since then, their careers haven't really advanced in any significant way

>he looks less like an emissions specialist and more like a South Asian IT expert
When discussing adversarial attacks on neural nets, everyone seems to just kind of take for granted that the human visual system is immune to this kind of fudgery. I'd be very interested (and a little afraid) to know if this is in fact the case - we know of a bunch of optical illusions that are perceived differently to what they "ought to be", so it's not too much of a stretch to figure that we could come up with a technique to generate more extreme examples.
Not OP, but:

> If companies are permitted to create law-free zones for their customers, citizens should understand the consequences. When police cannot access evidence, crime cannot be solved. Criminals cannot be stopped and punished. There is an alternative. Responsible encryption can protect privacy and promote security without forfeiting access for legitimate law enforcement needs supported by judicial approval.

> Technology companies almost certainly will not develop responsible encryption if left to their own devices. Competition will fuel a mindset that leads them to produce products that are more and more impregnable. That will give criminals and terrorists more opportunities to cause harm with impunity. Sounding the alarm about the dark side of technology is not popular. Everyone who speaks candidly about “going dark” faces attacks by advocates of absolute privacy.

> Some advocates are motivated by profit. Others demonstrate sincere concern about the benefits of privacy. They are not concerned about preserving law enforcement capabilities. Those of us who swear to protect the rule of law have a different motivation. We are obliged to speak the truth.

> The truth is that “going dark” threatens to disable law enforcement and enable criminals and terrorists to operate with impunity.

> Allow me to conclude with this thought: There is no constitutional right to sell warrant-proof encryption. If our society chooses to let businesses sell technologies that shield evidence even from court orders, it should be a fully-informed decision.
In addition to raw data, the processed data is also valuable. It might be good for trained ML models to be available to all, for example. Those are the competitive advantage.
Perhaps. Actually I was referring to the possible use of portable gas vs. electricity. In the top image it seems the left-side container may be an emergency power unit with fuel based generators.
So what about the governments that use these corporate "giants" as a front for upstream data collection?

Yeah… I don't see things changing unless people start voting with their behaviors en masse.
If your salary is public information, then any future employer can peg to it, rather than the market rate. It is to your benefit for your compensation to be privately held.
This sounds like a lot of fun. How high do they go? Do you have to do anything regarding air traffic safety?
If everyone's salary is public information, you can see what they're paying everyone else and get at least that much for the same job.
I really want to try this, but it doesn't progress from "loading" on my iPad.
I was curious as well. Looks like he worked on Mira, an AR company that is working on shipping hardware that works with your phone. Reading the about section (https://www.mirareality.com/about), it's kind of funny, lists only three founders, who are not him, in the copy, but the photo at the top of the page has 4 founders. Looked like it could be an interesting product, though I'm sure the right AR glasses that customers will purchase need to be far less bulky.
I assumed that for simplicity, but the logic doesn't change.

Take any method to determine the closeness of a cut to ideal. That method also describes how much a cut exceeds minimum spec.
What are we supposed to be competing for? Reason is a tool that makes different trade-offs than some other tools. These trade-offs might work for you or they might not. It all depends on what YOU actually need.
People do generate optical illusions of the time the red green gold dress is a modern example.
It just means that there's less sex than in the first few months, but if there's no physical intimacy after that initial time, it may signal trouble.

In other words, I read it as descriptive, not prescriptive.
Ash HN: What's different between industrial research and academic research?
> After all, if your spouse is your best friend, then whom do you complain to your spouse about?

I agree with you, with just one small tweak: if your spouse is your best friend, you should complain to your spouse about her. That's in fact what separates a "real friend" from an acquaintance for me - the presumption that my friend really cares about me and is willing to modify their behavior to improve my happiness, within limits.
That is sick.
Rumors That Facebook Is Secretly Recording You Refuse to Die
It's not to my benefit at all. In every salary negotiation past my first job out of college I have said "I expect to be paid $X to switch jobs" and I was paid $X (or very close to; obviously, sometimes you kick a little back) to switch jobs or I didn't switch jobs.

What you do is what's important. Make a proactive argument for your value and you don't have to fall back on your current compensation.
If it were memorizing training data, it would due poorly on a Wasserstein critic trained on a validation set drawn from the same data distribution.
I cured my tech fatigue by ditching feeds
The benefit of an exe is you can simply keep it on a USB incase it needs installing elsewhere. Also you know for sure it's offline and isn't fickle to a browser history clear out.
Is that the gentleman who mangled housing in London and swindled the UK into voting for Brexit with lies (and then washed his hands of it all and walked away)? Hard to feel sorry for a person of such character.
It is quite feasible to try to brute force you own users passwords. Run a background job that tests against common passwords and close variants, and if it is too simple, either force a harder one, or force email auth if any of their metadata changes (IP, ASN, browser fingerprint).

C.f. https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords
You're absolutely right. But this is still a huge step forward. There has been work on the VC dimension of neural networks for a long time (and it's been shown to be finite), which is a necessary but not sufficient condition for efficient PAC learnability.

If it can be done for 3 layers, then maybe it can be done for more. And I happen to really like it when my problems have polynomial time guarantees.

[VC dimension is a quantitative measure related to the complexity that a model's parameters allow it to express. I think of it as analogous to entropy for physical systems.]
OK, nice article. I'm a chess player myself and so yes I did make some connections.

However, when I opened the article, I was looking for what those lessons were. At least glimpse of them.
Yet... there has been no monetizaton mechanism described that doesn't involve us releasing code, as we have been very clear that we refuse to do a token sale until such time as we have a fully working system. So, I am not sure how your theory works out here, but it will be interesting to see if you comment back here once we release code for you to actually run.

As for why we want whitepaper feedback: that is because we believe in peer review of design.
How Social Media,AI Affects Communication-Impact,Effects of AI,Media Over Life
There are lots of successful but useless or nearly useless products. This is a nearly useless fashion product, but really it’s just something you’d buy for fun. Most fashion products are in that territory.
I am perhaps irrationally annoyed by people calling spouses their “best friends”. We get it: you chose to marry the person so obviously you like this person “best”, therefore someone else should be your “best friend”. A friend is a different thing. You can behave differently with a best friend. You shouldn’t feel like you’re somehow undercutting your spouse just because someone else is your best friend.
Every comment in this thread is ideologically driven. It seems that if you don't want people commenting with political opinions, there shouldn't be political submissions.

As far as substance goes, how is my comment less substantive than the top comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15575704) on the thread? I said that it was foolish to consider protesting fascism to be worse than fascism, and that commenter said that protesters should be expelled. They're equally substantive comments that express opposing views on the issue in from the article.
So, I might be wrong, but my understanding of these attacks is that they require you know what the model of the classifier is.

If my understanding is correct, I guess my question is: how general are these attacks? Can we ever say "oh yah, don't try to classify this penguin with your off-the-shelf model, it'll come-up iguana 9/10"
There's a lot to learn about biology I guess.
Other than for informing the user what went wrong (which is specifically one of the things you called out as a problem)
Those programs are infrastructure, or a nearly universal benefit. Corporate welfare to a specific sector of the economy is totally different. There’s also no reason a farm subsidy couldn’t exclude tobacco.
Monitoring Cloudflare's Global Network Using Prometheus
Ah, I see what you’re getting at. I agree.
I had sex 2 to 3 times a week for 20 years with the same man. The most hot and heavy sex did not occur in the first few months. It occurred when I crossed the country to see him a few years into the marriage when our kids were still little.

I don't feel I am misreading the article. I stand by my horror. Downvotes for saying it don't make me less appalled.
> 3. Build the entire front end first with absolutely no backend wiring at all and slowly add the connecting db functionality and take your time adding security checks along the way.
This also fails because once PMs and stakeholders see the pretty stuff, they assume it’s almost done and have no tolerance for “slow” progress.

It sounds like this approach should work, because you can sell a bunch of reasons rather than just security. If you don't take the needed time to develop the code, you will have correctness(not enough testing) and maintenance(not enough refactoring) problems alongside security issues. If the company's leadership shuns all three in favor of quicker deployment, then security is most likely not going to be the biggest problem, it would be all the bugs you have to chase down in spaghetti code.
We believe, as do many people as far as I have seen, that if a country like China could block the entire world of Internet, they would. Regardless: I consider it my mission to make them have to seriously consider doing just that, and if I read a news report saying "in a shocking turn of events, China has decided to cut off all access to the Western Internet in an attempt to shut down Orchid", I will consider myself to have won that round, not lost ;P.
This is one of those areas where I would take every statement and even study with a pound of salt.
Why should I use service workers to cache urls as opposed to using checksum urls with cache control (I.e. script.hz15cbsj.js etc...)

Unless my site can actually do something offline, service workers for caching is just an extra headache
I applied a few things in that field but my knowledge may be a bit rusty.

Still, learning 3 layer NN in polynomial time is a big step forward because this entails we don't get stuck at an error (or at least we now know that we got stuck) which entails a probably non-random weight initialization. This is a big advantage for using and testing simple NN.

It might also finally lend a concrete interpretation to any NN, removing its black-box nature and increasing their adoption.

That said, I haven't read the article.
You'd be surprised: when I worked in retail, I was told that the sunglass stands in the theme parks were 3 of the the top five grossing stores at the time for the luxury sunglass brand that I was working for. Admittedly, this was...almost 20ish years ago, but, I'd still think this would be true today.
Will look into it. For now, most of the UI is geared towards mouse and keyboard, however. I can recommend Astropad [1] or some similar app, I regularly use it and Lively for sketching and notes.

[1] https://astropad.com/
You don't necessarily need to know the whole model, but you need accurate enough prediction score outputs for each category. I think if you have that, that's enough to numerically approximate the gradient of the output scores and perform gradient descent.
are you an auto-summary bot?
I had to change a few more settings to get it to work properly. I should blog about it at some point.
can you imagine if they just gave everyone a pair for free, instead of letting them rot in a warehouse?
"...who believed that his field should acknowledge that people rarely behave as rationally as economic models predict."

So, umm, maybe your models are bad?

If you base your economic model on the silly idea that all (or at least most) economic actors are inherently rational and act in their own self interest then perhaps the model will result in a different goal than planning every tiny detail of people's life like some Soviet Commissar.

I know, heresy...
It’s still conjecture but the chances are good that photosensitive epilepsy[0] as triggered for example by the famous Pokemon episode[1] is conceptually similar to the unstable responses that adversarial attacks produce in computational neural networks (and yes while there is some debate about the total number of seizures triggered by the broadcasting of that episode there is no debate as to whether the medical condition exists and is an real risk factor for a surprisingly high fraction of the population, particularly males and children[2])

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosensitive_epilepsy

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennō_Senshi_Porygon

[2]https://www.epilepsysociety.org.uk/photosensitive-epilepsy
This is the real problem stated in the article:

> The investors’ goal over the next roughly 24 months is for the company to become worth at least three times the post-money valuation

The investors have promised this goal to their customers (err, "LPs"), or at least need it to get their overall IRR up to what their customers need. So like a jockey they will crop and spur the horse to get it over the finish line faster.

This growth rate is not a problem for some business models (or if it is a problem means indeed the business is not viable). But for others, for example most hardware businesses, it makes little sense.
DemoCRACY IS a PHANTOM OF AMERICA GOD KNOWS IT DOESN’T EXIST
Those aren't religion-specific laws though, since no matter what your religion, the law still applies to you.
I completely agree. Griping about every slight your wife makes against you is a good way to make yourself more resentful. Recounting the offense deepens the tracks in your mind the same way a carriage going over the same path several times would.
The chance of a crash sometime in the future is 100%. That is credible. Those predictions are completely credible for what most people take as credible, they just aren’t very useful. Markets that rise just because of inflation and population growth aren’t necessarily healthy in the long term. The current great consistent performance of index funds suggests something is up.