skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
TDP can apparently be configured to be higher or lower (12-25W).

See https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-7-2700u
> Most regular BIOSes contains IPv4 for PXE anyway.

Indeed. But that's UDP only, not TCP which is a lot more complex. UEFI contains TCP as well (IIRC recent versions of UEFI support boot over HTTP, similar to iPXE).

> UEFI just allows you to do PXE a little more cleanly directly from firmware without needing a disk to bootstrap the process with other stuff like iPXE.

That's correct. OTOH when your firmware + bootloader stuff requires a TCP/IP stack, HTTP, support for booting from all kinds of software RAID setups, filesystem support in order to be able to find and load the kernel, and whatnot, replacing all of that with a minimal Linux kernel + userspace doesn't sound so crazy anymore.
Mathematics and Computer Science: Celebrating Avi Wigderson's 60th Birthday
Fire one administrator and suddenly you have the budget to bring two teachers up to 90k.
Is there a version of this that doesn't split it over three pages to try and get me to load ads that ad and script blockers will just break anyway?
Alright, that is rational. So, why are there so many exceptions to this rule?For example, why is this limited to America? Is this because America has such a free market? And if that’s the case, where did this overwhelming inequality and monopoly dominance come from?

I’m sorry, but this is just incredibly simplistic reasoning and i think deserves some testing and scrutiny. Maybe you’re right, but please explain.
Ask HN: I'm 28. Is it too late to get started with AI/Machine Learning?
If no, what are the great resources for starters? Any tips before I get this journey going? Thank you.
And then there’s this headline today on my local news website...

Candy laced with bath salts poses risk this Halloween

http://www.wral.com/candy-laced-with-bath-salts-poses-risk-t...
> Even in raw JavaScript, it takes boilerplate to make an observable property, and libraries can generate that for you. Why are you holding Web Components to a higher standard than JavaScript?

Because WebComponents are not raw Javascript. It’s an API.

There’s nothing stopping you from providing an API with good DX. Except one fact: you are entirely blind to the fact that WebComponent API is bad.

It’s also funny how you call me disingenuous when your line of defence is “DX criticism is invalid because see how easy it is with Polymer”.

If for every single point your answer is “use polymer/helper”, it only means one thing: the API is bad, and you don’t care.
Top 4 Perl Programming Books
So what happens in the case that England (their place of business) issues trade embargos with any of those countries?
https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2013/02/20/snapdragon-wake...

https://developer.qualcomm.com/blog/using-qualcomm-hexagon-s...

"Industry wide adoption"

2013

The rest is PR.
Yes -- otherwise they are squandering their long term Internet freedom for short term access to addicting garbage (Facebook).
I'd call it a loss of the ability to pull together for the common good, part of the continued fracturing of western society into individual-sized pieces.
Good question, how about if FB was a library, and free access was granted, but the selection of books was controlled by one person.
Even actual dogs wouldn't recognize that image as a picture of a dog. NNs have approached at least animal levels of intelligence which is amazing.
There's a "Download PDF" link right before the start of the article.
Are users stupid? (2001)
Book: Math and Computation (Avi Wigderson, 2017) [pdf]
If anyone knows of a good general technique to persuade a person that their fear of something is overblown, I'd be interested in seeing a link.

In my experience, trying to do this results in anger.
I thought your original quote was direct quote which is why I was confused. If it was a direct quote I likely would have had a very different interpretation of what the presentation.

I would like to give constructive criticism, but feel I still don't understand exactly what what you are trying to say in the presentation.

As it stands the message you seem to be trying to convey in the presentation is that the Copenhagen interpretation leads to a contradiction. This comes from having the "clearly false result" followed by the "Copenhagen is untenable" later. But it seems like from "The thing I am about to tell you is clearly false, but it seems to follow logically from the things they tell you in quantum mechanics 101. The trick is to figure out where the flaw in the reasoning lies" that your true belief is that there is a flaw in the logic instead which changes the meaning of the presentation dramatically.

So is your intent that everything after 28:00ish is completely accurate? Because that is the sense I get from it, and I think there are issues after that point.

At 43:19, you say that the Copenhagen interpretation is scientifically untenable. My understanding is that all the different accepted interpretations are mathematically equivalent so if you are trying to say something true "scientifically untenable" is a very poor choice of words.
It’s an important conversation to have and I was disputing your characterization that people routinely plead out when innocent, which is a tenuous claim and strongly argues for reform which perhaps we should be slower to adopt. It’s a key point. I’m trying to remain civil and substantive, and I wish you’d extend me the same courtesy.

(Edit: I’m out of posting quota for today, but I at no point said what you’re claiming I’m trying to tell you in even the most uncharitable interpretation.)
The only iOS app I can recall that integrates with 1Password is HipChat. Integration requires using AgileBits' extension (https://github.com/AgileBits/onepassword-app-extension). The password manager doesn't have any OS-level hooks that allow it to work with any app.
Coincidence is a less sinister explanation. You never take note of the adverts if they weren’t immediately relevant.
My kids are very aware that Halloween candy may be poisoned. Every year, after they finish trick-or-treating they will lay the buckets of candy on the table for inspection[1]. I will then taste several packs to make sure they are safe. If I do not show any side effects we conclude that the candy eaten was good. The kids wait patiently for a couple of weeks as I repeat the process and certify that all the candy they brought was indeed safe. Then I serve the kids salad.

[1] https://instagram.com/p/BMQMFqAjuKr/
Nah, Meo has been doing this crap for a while. Plans by other operators (like Vodafone) also have zero-rating, although with a fixed set of apps.
makes it cheaper for everyone else
Coding “Snake” in 4 min 30 sec (plain browser JavaScript)
Bug reports are a way to measure how well the behavior is approaching correct. You seem to not be satisfied with messenger.com's experience; valid, it seems. It's a large app with bugs. But your point is obscured by the fact that you seem to be poo-pooing one of the few ways that the development team can get feedback on what users actually experience on a day-to-day basis.

chenglou is doing a bit of massaging of the numbers; the claim that there's "only been 10 bugs" isn't quite true. Their code base is 50% ReasonML and 50% JS, and in the ReasonML portion, they've only had 10 bugs - a signification reduction! But they haven't commented on how many bugs are reported in the JS side; we can probably infer that there is many more (since the implication is that there were many more bugs in the old JS code they replaced).

You seem to be frustrated that the messenger.com experience is not up to par and have latched on to the idea that, since the team says they're seeing improvements since introducing ReasonML, that they think they're perfect now. I guarantee you that's not the case.

It sounds like you have some very valid complaints, though, and as a daily user I bet they'd love to hear your feedback. So maybe fill out a bug report with what you just wrote? :)
And I disagree, because the average consumer would not want to pay for what it would cost if the ISPs priced that into their fees.

There’s no need for an ISP to throttle, they could just charge consumers the exact cost to build out as much capacity as they need. But that cost would raise rates to one that consumers don’t want to pay.

To me this is about idealism meaning the real world. In a perfect would I’d love for ISPs to be dumb pipes, but even in your example, Electricity companies don’t charge you like a dumb pipe and offer time of use pricing, pricing based on zones, discounts or rebates based on energy efficiency. Likewise different sites generate enormously different costs on the ISPs side, and consumers are benefiting from ISPs balancing being a dumb pipe, with not charging the consumers the price of a pipe that can carry every type of load at every time at perfect speeds.
South Park is so much worse since it switched to its new, faster production schedule and a more topical focus. The show was better when it focused on the characters, like the LOTR episode or Scott Tenoman Must Die, rather than the topical episodes.

If they’ve run out of non-topical ways to explore the characters, then they should end the show.
> It will ultimately employ a vast number of average engineers.

Just what I said: it will become the next blue collar job, but you're right, there always be enough tools for average engineers.
I'm still not convinced if a new company would hire a 50 year old instead of a 25 year old 'average engineer'... though, I would... more experience beats more technical knowledge (for the latest buzz worthy framework/language) in my book, but maybe that's just me?
You could also use guix or nix for this.
It's time for people to 'Look up':

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7dLU6fk9QY
Its proprietary software, I have no idea if its malware or not, so I stick to the mobile website and do not install their apps.
I used to live on an alley with a 1/2 in the address, people always had trouble finding it.
I work for an indie ISP, so I really hope the big incumbent ISPs in the U.S. start doing this.

Customers will flood to my company instead, since we would never package like this. And I'll be rich!

The reality is this isn't going to happen, because the incumbent ISPs know it will destroy them.
More like it's incredibly sad that we've basically given up on rural America. We have no issue with paved roads in the biggest cities in the nation, but if an area isn't economically profitable in a global marketplace, it's being left to wither and die.
Is it sad? Perhaps there's a middle ground between Manifest Destiny and no infrastructure at all. Iowa has recognized that its infrastructure costs far exceeded it's tax revenue, and with a dwindling population, it no longer made sense to continue to maintain roads that were acceptable as gravel [1].

A sibling post mentions "giving up on rural America". I think we need to continue to find ways to keep quality of life high as progress marches forward; run fiber to rural America, but gravel roads aren't too much of a sacrifice (as long as we keep the interstates maintained through rural areas).

It appears in a lot of cases, a gravel road is just as good as a paved road [2].

"The decision to pave is a matter of trade-offs. Paving helps to seal the surface from rainfall, and thus protects the base and subgrade material. It eliminates dust problems, has high user acceptance because of increased smoothness, and can accommodate many types of vehicles such as tractor-trailers that do not operate as effectively on unsurfaced roads.

In spite of the benefits of paved roads, well-maintained gravel roads are an effective alternative. In fact, some local agencies are reverting to gravel roads. Gravel roads have the advantage of lower construction and sometimes lower maintenance costs. They may be easier to maintain, requiring less equipment and possibly lower operator skill levels. Potholes can be patched more effectively. Gravel roads generate lower speeds than paved surfaces. Another advantage of the unpaved road is its forgiveness of external forces. For example, today vehicles with gross weights of 100,000 pounds or more operate on Kentucky’s local roads. Such vehicles would damage a lightly paved road so as to require resealing, or even reconstruction. The damage on a gravel road would be much easier and less
expensive to correct.

There is nothing wrong with a good gravel road. Properly
maintained, a gravel road can serve general traffic adequately
for many years."

[1] https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2015/7/6/iowa-dot-chief-...

[2] (warning: pdf) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents...
* Multiple machines are a larger attack surface and a larger surface area to get things wrong.

* Overhead. It might be getting smaller but it's certainly still there. Not just the application but all the OS services that are duplicated are extremely wasteful when you're billed for your resources directly.

* Your vendor distributes applications as docker containers.

* Your developers are building and testing in docker.

* Clustered resources are dead simple with swarm. It can obviously be done with VMs but it's work.

* Devs and sysadmins alike enjoy using off-the-shelf services that are maintained by someone else.
Under-building of new homes, high construction cost perpetuate housing shortage
That's part of it, but it's also a question of who bears the tax burden. Some of these places have lost tons of manufacturing jobs and can't afford to do improvements on a local level, and I imagine there's a more generalized dejection that makes collective infrastructure investments repulsive.
> You probably don’t even have the mental tools necessary to start thinking about that kind of pain.

As I don't know your story, you don't know mine. Get off your high horse before you lecture the peanut gallery.

With great sympathy to your wife, to those who've had lives taken and families destroyed by an addiction which started with a doctors over prescription, maybe hobbling to pee in a cup doesn't sound so bad.
Not particularly reassuring, can't someone just create an open system with a similar concept and release the mapping.
> Where have the prices been shown to rise?

You do realize that the result is the same, whether you first reduce your prices as costs decrease and then raise them again, or just don't bother reducing them in the first place, right?

> US carriers didn’t raise prices when they introduced their “soft” zero rating on video traffic.

So, are you saying that moving around the video traffic doesn't cost them anything? Or how else are they paying for that, if not by keeping the price for other traffic artificially high?
Can using a block chain a good solution for it?
You can't imagine a less sinister explanation other than Facebook or some other entity is secretly recording your voice and the voices of millions of people, in violation of numerous state and federal laws, through their smartphone microphones, uploading it to their servers surreptitiously, performing voice analysis on it to determine who is speaking out of 350,000,000 possible cases (presumably they've already cataloged everyone in the country somehow?), and then use that to serve you more targeted advertising?!

I mean, really?
I feel like he made a joke.
Moto g5+

It's alright and cheap and once support runs out you can probably root and switch to cyanogenmod.

bonus: raw camera when you root (google how)
Ah, so all you need is a perfect simulation of a brain?
It's javascript, not a link.

Though I did miss that the single page option wasn't actually JS, because I stopped looking.

https://harpers.org/archive/2017/11/bumpy-ride/?single=1
Another, complementary lesson - If you have an automated system doing stuff, have a kill switch.
This is a terrible idea, and it makes me sad that it is having any success at all, limited though it may be.
What larger speeds? Yours, and overall bandwidth remains the same regardless of what you access.
I’d think that still stifles competition.

If netflix and youtube don’t count towards your data cap (which seems to be how this particular example works), surely that’s going to influence how you view other streaming services? “I could use amazon prime, but my data cap will be blown after two movies”, etc.

It’s not really competition if the ISP picks the winners.
If the forgiveness program satisfies the debt then it isn't true that people working through it aren't paying their debts, they just aren't doing it exclusively with monthly payments.
> For someone worth 10 figures, no bail amount reasonably imposed by a court would be sufficient to serve in practical terms as forced remand

Sure it will. Put a 50% net-wealth bail on him (500 mil). Accept shares if he doesn't have cash.

You will say it's not reasonable.

But then it is reasonable to put a $50k bail on a poor person, which doesn't even have that money? In this case the bail is >100% net worth.
Except that people who write software to be put in containers cannot write that Makefile to save their life so for something that should be a ten line dependency they manage to build entire Linux, entire X and all unneeded tool chains.
You're both right, size of company doesn't matter.
Some companies hire the first engineer that goes to the interview (I actually know companies that do this.. God bless their mysql injections), but other companies:
Do you think they value experience over knowledge of the latest framework/language/way of doing things?
Me too. I find others like Feedly completely unsuitable. Yet, some Google Reader refugees are absolutely happy there.

So the first lesson is that there are very different usage styles in consuming RSS feeds. Some focus on text, others on images, others on podcasts, and still others on video. Some like to get hundreds of items every day and manage them in folders, while others prefer only few items but look at all of them. Some consume stuff right away, others use "read later" functionality.

The second lesson is that apparently Google Reader supported all those styles reasonably well. It was good enough that no serious competition emerged. I would assume that this would be different today. Due to the flourishing wealth of feed readers, every style has probably found one that works even better than Google Reader did.

It took a while (one or two years?) but now Google shutting down Reader has turned out to be positive. Some considered it the death of RSS, but it works just as well as back then.
Moto is poor with updates IME, security patch level lagging 6-10 months.
Have you considered approaches that achieve your goal of qualified teachers without the downsides mentioned above?
> When Hulka started the job in 2003, asphalt cost between $24 and $27 a ton. “We’re seeing sixty-four dollars and up right now,” he said.

We've heard so much about the impact of today's dirt-cheap oil prices versus the $100+ prices of 2014, but petroleum was substantially cheaper in 2003 than it is now.

Maybe there is a non-petroleum binder that could be used instead of bitumen to make asphalt cheaper.

The article mentions chip sealing, which should cost half as much as asphalt. On a motorcycle trip in Mexico, I encountered a four-lane highway where the left (passing) lanes were of lesser pavement quality than the smooth asphalt right lanes. The idea being, you don't do distance travel on the passing lane so why not reduce the cost by paving that lane in a less expensive fashion. Of course, even that level of pavement would be farfetched for many degraded county roads, but it's a clever way to reduce the cost of a four-lane highway.
Not really but Im into crypto and this is one of the few projects I think makes sense.
Most ISPs are currently dumb pipes. The net neutrality fight is to keep them that way. The average consumer is paying for what it would cost, given that ISPs generally turn a profit.
But that's so much less entertaining to speculate about! Why should obvious truth get in the way of our fun?
There is a line in here that the $70,000 he's already paid amounts to nothing, but what does that mean? That the $70,000 doesn't count towards his loan forgiveness, of which some amount has to be reached? The article, or at least one of the quotes, made it sound like it didn't count in general, which I find hard to believe. Was he really just paying the interest all this time?
A thing about long lasting relations is, both parties are comfortable discussing anything under the sun. So you must open up a channel around this and express your concerns.

In my first startup
, my cofounder was interested in design and would spend needless amount of time on it while his core job was to go out and sell. Honestly I couldn't get my thoughts across to him and left the startup. Probably a noob move now I think about it.

Have a discussion about mutual exclusivity to get most done as a team. Tell him you believe in MECE and what his thoughts are about it.

Also sometimes you can be more accepting to his coding interest and let him do a few stuff. But you must remain gate keeper for the final version of product. Have processes setup for this. You could mention that you are not comfortable having more than one person handling releases.

I have learned from my experience that it's important to have most difficult discussion early on with your cofounder.
It's also arguably about not wisely routing and specking civic infrastructure.

The 'who pays' also goes towards the increased operating costs and lost time (forced slower travel speed) of users.

I can't help but wonder how much other alternative road types might cost, nor lament that we don't put nearly the foundation and engineering in to these things that many parts of Europe do. (I've heard they build things /once/ really well, and that maintenance is then lower after that.)
At this point, everything should be encrypted and ISPs shouldn’t even have the ability to discern what kind of traffic is going through their pipes. We’re a bit behind schedule on that...
where do you stay now?
> part of the continued fracturing of western society into individual-sized pieces.

For the US, yes. For (some) European countries, not so. There's still a strong concensus around paying taxes and getting your money's worth in education, social security and paved roads.
> But unlike physical sports, GM's don't exactly suffer from physical deterioration do they?

The mind is just as physical as anything else.

It's a deeply complex question, but generally speaking most forms of cognition -- including processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence -- decline with age beginning in your twenties:

https://www.quora.com/Intelligence-and-Genetics-Can-does-IQ-...
>If I were more cynical

You'd need to be more than cynical to believe that.

>"how about we make sure that their high school teachers are all people who can't manage to effectively manage their money"

How does this follow? If I'm aware that becoming a high school teacher ensures that I can borrow money to go to college that will be repaid by the government after 10 years of working, and I take advantage of that, how exactly does that show that I can't effectively manage money?

>creating a strong financial incentive to become a teacher but only if you can't pay your debts

That doesn't follow either. It has nothing to do with whether you can pay your debts or not. Most of the people who qualify for this program would have paid their loans off had they not been aware this program existed.

Instead they chose to make minimum payments and use the money saved for other purposes. Nothing about that demonstrates financial illiteracy. In fact taking advantage of a rather byzantine aid program demonstrates financial literacy.
You assume that there's a quantitative definition of necessary. Pain is subjective.
What if they don't keep their word? A lot will come to depend on this.

Geohash is patent free btw. I am sure something can be done here as well.