If you don't know anything about cable news, then please don't make inaccurate blanket statements about things you don't know anything about. Especially when you're so reluctant to answer questions and provide evidence when asked, right after you yourself demanded the same level of evidence and specific examples.

Were you aware that Rachel Maddow got an Emmy for her coverage of the Flint water crisis? Or is that a big surprise to you?

Since you apparently were not aware of Rachel Maddow's coverage of the Flynt water crisis or the award she won for it, why don't you watch her Emmy-award-winning reporting for the answers to those questions you asked me to deflect from answering the questions I asked you first, to see if she's already answered some of your questions?

MSNBC’s complete coverage of the water crisis in Flint, Michigan – the health threat to residents, and the response from Governor Rick Snyder and others: http://www.msnbc.com/flint-michigan-water-crisis

Rachel Maddow wins Emmy for Flint water crisis coverage:
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2017/10/rachel_mad...

"Maddow persistently reported on the city's lead-in-water crisis in December 2015, weeks before Gov. Rick Snyder declared Genesee County in a state of emergency."

"A month later, the cable news host visited Flint, holding a live town hall broadcast at the Brownell/Holmes STEM Academy on the city's north side to speak with residents, educators, researchers and politicians, including Mayor Karen Weaver, Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha and Virginia Tech Professor Dr. Marc Edwards."

"Maddow also spent time speaking with Flint residents, including master plumber Harold Harrington and activist-turned-mayoral candidate Arthur Woodson."

Since you presume to know so much about RT's "less biased" coverage of the Flint water crisis, then please tell me exactly when RT started to cover the Flynt water crisis, how many minutes of coverage they gave it, and what awards they won for their coverage, if any.

How does their coverage compare to Rachel Maddow's, and how is it "less biased" as you claim without proof? Give me SPECIFIC examples of how they were better and less biased. Links to evidence please, not diversions.

To quote your own words: "you really have to back that statement up". I will. Won't you?

Some more specific examples and links to evidence for you:

This article shows when other media outlets like MSNBC started covering it, but it doesn't mention anything about RT. You seem to think you know what the facts are in regard to that, so will you please share them with us? Again: Post evidence for your claims, don't just make more claims without evidence again!

ANALYSIS: How Michigan And National Reporters Covered The Flint Water Crisis:
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2016/02/02/analysis-ho...

"Among national media figures, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow stood out for her extensive coverage in December 2015, when she devoted far more time to the situation in Flint than every other major television network combined."

"More Than 68 Minutes devoted to the crisis on MSNBC's primetime programming in December and the first four days of January -- all of which took place on Rachel Maddow's show. That was far more than all the other broadcast and cable networks' primetime coverage of Flint, combined."

The evidence is overwhelming:

https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/uploader/image/20...

https://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/uploader/image/20...