skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
About $450 a pop with dock. Storage is expensive though. Cameras on all times and retention for 90 days is what this particular department had.

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2017-09-24/police-wei...
And I'm not gonna play the "Guess other peoples' arguments" game. The pictures are sexist because they're sexist and if I want to know what makes them sexist I should find some resources that come to the same conclusion?

Sorry, it's just stupid.
Google has a natural monopoly. I am a big supporter of penalties for monopoly abuse but not all monopolies are bad. They do all need thorough oversight and regulation. But having a monopoly is not strictly bad. The illegal actions done to maintain them are strictly bad. They should be allowed to come and go as the markets demand.
Elon Musk Is Digging a Hyperloop Tunnel in Maryland
If it was you that wrote it, then it has some legal weight. It doesn't indicate that you read something, but that's not the point; it indicates that you're agreeing to be bound by whatever was written.

There's inherent difficulty in proving that it was actually you, but that gets handled as its own problem. Someone forging your signature could get you dragged into court for breach of contract.
What CMU Snake Robot Team Learned by Searching for Mexican Earthquake Survivors
Well maybe mceoin is a smaller person?
We have done some preliminary tests. We need to tweak the configuration before we formally support them. When we officially release os-x support we will also support Intel GPUs (should happen in the next two weeks)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterrence_(legal)
How recent was this? I've been using PIN only for at least 7 years. The limit for just tap and no PIN is $100.
The best religion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
I was expecting TempleOS getting a new jit
> I don't remeber ARM, MIPS, x86 or x64 having a good GC history either.

Typical client programs intended to run on nascent versions of those architectures were not intended to be delivered and installed very often. In contrast, web pages might get changes deployed to production multiple times a day. Needing to deliver a compiled runtime solely in order to run your client side code is going to be a nonstarter for the overwhelming majority of developers.

Now, at best, we can hope that many developers will collaborate to make caching easier by agreeing to only use one specific version of each runtime, delivered from a single well-known source (though experience with e.g. jQuery means that we shouldn't hold our breath). In the meantime, extending WASM to obviate the need for delivered runtimes will even the field between Javascript and every other managed language.
When you're in a hole, stop digging.
You probably wouldn’t need to review every video – videos from YouTube partners such as Disney or VEVO partners could probably be exempt in the first place.

Then you probably could let an AI pre-sort most of the videos, and have humans only skip through those videos to verify the AIs decision, instead of having to analyze them all at 1x speed.

You’d probably only need a tenth of the manpower in that situation. And YouTube might even still be profitable with that.
That is a really naive view of market share. The market for phones is tiered, and Apple dominates the tiers it wants: The profitable ones. It doesn't take 51% market saturation to have monopoly control.
Finding minute differences between pictures is a much harder problem than matching voices to those you've heard before. In the second one there are lots of possible heuristics you could use, and the attacker would have to prevent all the most common ones at least.
Do you find that vaping gives you the same high as smoking?

When I switched to vaping I felt a bit more anxious and "head high" than when smoking, and I ascribed that to inefficient vaporization of CBD vs. THC. Granted, I generally go for sativa/CBD-light strains in the first place so the effect may be amplified.
Further, in some fields (biomedical) research takes so long, and top-tier journals are so selective, that a lot of work just never gets published. Slowing that process even further would wreak havoc on already way-too-long graduate careers. A really pernicious effect of some bosses who 'only publish top-tier-quality work' is many students get stuck with years-worth of negative results, and do not get to either move on or publish their work.
Agreed. I thought that any "nudge" factor was secondary to getting reliable reporting at the scene rather than relying upon corruptible testimony by officers after-the-fact. All the problems stated elsewhere in this thread around discretion in deactivating cameras still exist and need to be addressed.
The governor of Maryland seems more excited about it than Elon Musk, but this is apparently the first 10 miles of a tunnel from Baltimore to Washington DC.

More details about the site in this article: http://www.govtech.com/fs/infrastructure/Maryland-Issues-Con...

"Hogan administration officials said Thursday the state has issued a conditional utility permit to let Musk’s tunneling firm, The Boring Co., dig a 10.3-mile tunnel beneath the state-owned portion of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway, between the Baltimore city line and Maryland 175 in Hanover."
Every Apple You Eat Took Years and Years to Make
Microsoft has been behind all sorts of anti-Google lobbying to have them regulated as a utility, enforce anti-trust regulations against them in EU, etc.

Anyone court watcher or MS watcher around since the late 90s knows they are entirely deserving of suspicion.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I think a more accurate description of your politics might be something like "an economic nationalist" instead of a liberal.

By any global metric you look at globalization is doing amazingly. "A U.N. goal to halve the poverty rate in the developing world between 1990 and 2015 was nearly achieved twice over."[1].

The whole process of relaxing limitations on trade has been a huge boost for developing countries who are currently on a runaway growth trajectory. E.g. look at the GDP growth graphs for the developed v.s. developing world in this[2] article.

Yes we could do better, but it's already great. Yes as some jobs move to developing countries people in developed countries are temporarily displaced, but there's no suggestion that we can't continually recover from that situation.

After all our societies aren't overflowing with jobless ex-steelworkers, ex-textile workers or any other industry you might want to name which has predominantly moved abroad.

Instead we continue to lead the charge in economic development, but because of globalization we're increasingly dragging the rest of the world with us.

1. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2016/01/20/the-globa...

2. https://oneinabillionblog.com/energy/energy-policy/a-common-...
Android is a very bad example in that list. Most of the rest makes sense, but Android doesn’t.

Android is a project where nowadays not even the dialing app is open source anymore, nor the calendar, email, home screen, nor camera.

Android is a project where OEMs are banned from shipping competing forks of Android as long as they ship a single device with Google’s Android.
Pricing power isn't defined by descriptive categories, it is defined by behavior (whether they can increase prices without sales moving to competitors.)

It's a test that exists because there are an infinite number of ways to construct named categories of products, which can create any appearance you want, but none of them tell you if things in that category are genuinely competing with each other.
Trade in and Get $20 Off Fire Kids Edition Tablet and Amazon Gift Card
I think you're moving into territory in human psychology that nobody really understands.

For the time being, the answer is probably "if it works for you, then keep doing it." If power posing before an important meeting is how you psyche yourself up to be unafraid and effective in the meeting, then why not keep doing it, even if it doesn't seem to work for everyone?

Knowing the replication problems, I won't suggest power posing as a general thing. Maybe I will tell someone to try a bunch of things including power posing, and tell them to keep the things that they think are working.
Cities around US offer billions in tax breaks to be Amazon’s HQ2
> You claim there is a wage gap, and have no "backed it up" so show me your research because I guarantee any study you post I can show you how your are misinterpreting the data.

Sorry, you cannot respond to a request for proof with a "well you prove me wrong then!" You entered this conversation with the positive claim divergent from the consensus. The burden is on you.

And again, this shows a profound bias in your thinking. You pre-discard any and all evidence. You're here to demand people assume your point of view, not to have a conversation or expose truth. You're here to browbeat people.

> The reason for women are on lower paying job roles can be debated but it is outside the topic of a pay gap.

So demonstrate, with the data, that women's pay follows the same distribution as men's pay. This is not proving a negative, you made a positive claim. You can prove it. Lots of data is public. Go present the evidence and your analysis and demand people refute it. You cannot simply assert it by force of will and expect it to be taken seriously when so many studies exist on page 1 of google that suggest otherwise have survived scrutiny.

> What this conversation is about is an employer paying a female lower wages for the exact same job simply because she is female.

And yet every refutation you have offered takes this substantiated claim as already disproven then searches for a hypothesis for why the average exists. That's bad analysis.

> Again you have conflated 2 things.

I am trying to focus on the wage gap but you've repeatedly broached alternative hypothesis. I'm just trying to keep up.

> You seem to want to expand this discussion to more than just a gender pay gap

Given the substantiation of the existence of a pay gap, I question the value of listening to hollow and unsubstantiated refutations which as a preconception dismiss any evidence as "misinterpreted."

I think you're being intellectually dishonest here. I think you want to disprove the pay gap because you don't like it. But you lack the techniques or motivation to do so, so you are trying to push that forward via pure force of will, inverting the burden of proof as if the null hypothesis is not a testable and verifiable claim.

I've given you a great deal of my time and been as gracious as I know how to be about calling you on these tactics. I will not reply further unless you bring concrete data to the thread. Good luck & good day.
In the many years the NYT has had its most recent firewall I have never been blocked. My secret:

Firefox: clear history when Firefox closes (including clearing cookies and cache). Also NoScript: no JS allowed on NYT website

For real laughs, an earlier incarnation of NYT paywall allowed access to everything except for the editorials. Wow. Talk about tone deaf. If there's anything from the NYT I would pay for it would be to block all their editorials.
And now in the coming decades you get to watch the slow process of people becoming increasingly nostalgic about Holden cars as survivor bias ensures that only the best specimens survive.

"Look at that old Holden! Hasn't needed a repair once in 30 years, not like these shitty foreign imports you get today!".
a truly amazing show. it became one of my all time favorites
Oh I was talking about single-user mode really. There's no way I'd ever want to be responsible for maintaining a server with other people on it.
It's a class thing. Working class people say why can't my government protect my and my friends and my town's livelihoods? Middle class people say, why can't my government make my disposable consumer tat cheaper? That's why we have revolutions.

Globalisation is not OK because arbitrage of cost of living, regulations, etc. The solution is tarriffs to even it out. Want to ship the factory overseas? OK, but there will be no financial advantage in it because the profits will be taxed away and the price will end up the same anyway. That's fair.
There is a decent privacy argument to be made against body cams. Not just for the officers themselves, but also for the people approached by the officers.
In many cases, when police need to get involved people aren't showing their best sides. Recordings of that kind of stuff are rather sensitive.

You gotta remember that body cams can't just be used against corrupt police, they can just as easily be used against the public. Consider how a closeted gay person reacts when caught drunk with a boyfriend and how the presence of a camera effects that.
> There are dozens more MLM scams than the one you describe, and in fact they're more prolific.

"You pay to sign up, then you get paid for signing people up" is basically the definition of a multi-level marketing scam.

> 'Give us money and we'll give you a chance at making more money.'

You have just described investing, lending at a variable interest rate, all forms of commodity and currency speculation, universities, craft fairs, conference booths, commercial real estate, manufacturers paying retailers for shelf space, salesmen buying leads, the entire marketing industry, etc. etc.

> That's quite recursive, and in some states, it's in fact a form of illegal gambling.

The fact that you can do something more than once in a row doesn't make it recursive. The problem with multi-level marketing is that A has to sign up B in order to make money, but that requires B to sign up C and so on recursively, which necessarily means there is someone at the end who pays but doesn't get paid.

> If you want to use ANOTHER BUSINESS and their facilities to do your work, then yes.

A landlord who hires a plumber to fix a burst pipe will claim they're a contractor. So will Uber. So will the perpetrators of the MLM scam. You can't use something to distinguish cases when it's the same in all of them.

> Cosmetologists can work right out of their own home as long as they have the relevant license. They don't have to rent a spot at a barber shop.

Their house doesn't come from the house fairy. The fact that they also live in it doesn't mean they didn't pay for it. Moreover, finding one person who got a house from the house fairy wouldn't get rid of all the other people paying money for space.

> Strippers don't have to work at a strip club - they can advertise on Craigslist and do private parties instead.

Drivers don't have to pay to get extra money, they can just take the normal rate.

> Some states require that if you require a specific tool or item for an employee or user of your services for the purposes of conducting business, you the employer or service provider are required to provide it. Here in CA, where Uber is HQ'd, we have that codified in law.

Even in that case, you will still have people working on commission who buy items themselves which aren't "required" but increase their effectiveness and therefore their commissions.

Also, my employer requires me to wear pants at work, but they have never provided any. Are they in violation of California law?
This article seems to be focused on what happens when that number is non-zero, whether 4 or 104. Given a bug, how to ensure that an exploiter does not gain privileged access?

So yeah, Edge clearly has a way to go in patching holes, but CVE count is not the entire story, either.
wow didn't know that, cool.
Weird, the porn seems to be PERFECTLY censored and the ads are laser-targeted. Google is a world leader in ML and AI. You really think this is so difficult for them?
When I google I only find the One Price Law any tips?
When you are forced to use their eco-system it makes them the dominant position by default.
The 4% number is a common retirement rule of thumb. It assumes a 7% return on your investments with a 3% rate of inflation so you can take 4% out forever without touching your inflation adjusted principle.
> I'm continually surprised by how often people insist on putting struct definitions right in their header files, defeating the whole idea of type abstraction.

In general, I totally agree with you that it is best to keep the structure definition in the translation unit (the .c file) and opaque structure declaration in the header. However, there are some cases when it is not very practical, e.g. when you you want to embed the structure into another (for performance reasons or cases like on-disk structures, etc) or when you want to separate out some logic into another .c file (think of separation of concerns), instead of having one massive .c file.

When there is such need, I generally create two headers files, e.g. foo.h (for the public API) and foo_impl.h (structure definition and related stuff), with something like:

#if !defined(__FOO_PRIVATE)
#error "foo_impl.h should only be included by the internal foo modules"
#endif
TIL there are still people who think Google brute-forces anything.
Oh how the internet has changed things. We are so much better off now than we were back then. Information then was totally controlled by the network and newspapers. No such thing as mass optional news sources. Like blogs. Or videos. Or direct contact with author.

This poster time warped me. Recalling my father saying while at the wheel of our Impala, "Look at that girl," to upset my older sibling. The boy had long hair like in the picture.

Teens and young adults died in a war. The news machine was all citizens had. I suppose you could say it was all fake news to some point but we never new any different. The draft was a ticket to potential death.

Now, anyone with a keyboard can publish anything and anyone with a phone can read it. No more Walter Cronkite or NYTimes to dish out news in a manner they believed was fit.

Growing up in a midwestern university town life meant you believed your happily married parents; They were conservative. Voices that disagreed had to be sought out. And it was very hard to do so. Like if you really didn't believe in the war or wanted to learn more. Where could you get it? Look, Life, Time, Newsweek? The Library? All forces with editors.

Now, we don't need them. We have Facebook to get others' thoughts; we have email to direct connect; we have web pages of groups positions; we can meet virtually. Want to know history, Google is my personal librarian.
I confess, I actually chuckled out loud.

I haven't seen any of their posts for a while. I hope they are okay.
And the same process will occur with the memories of their jobs. In X years, a politician will harken back to the days of a strong local economy where high-quality products were produced internally and provided a living wage. Slogans will be created ("MAGA" works in Australia) and campaigns will be run.

Nostalgia and lies are tricky bedfellows.
location /analytics.js {
proxy_pass https://www.google-analytics.com;
expires 1d;
}
Deepoly is optimizing FPGA with EDA design
They did? I recall their penalty being entirely ineffective, and a subsequent decade of more Windows ecosystem hegemony. Every workplace I've been in remains ruled by Windows ecosystem, even where they have bought Google Apps for the whole enterprise.
It's all the same loony speculation and will age just as poorly.
Considering that Herbert and Marion Sandler pledge $10 million every year, a one-time donation of $250k is at most 0.36% of their budget from then until now. Saying its funded by George Soros seems like a misrepresentation.
I'm well aware that Microsoft invented AJAX, I don't see how that has any relevance to my point.
Tangent, but a good story: Early in my career, in the CRT era, I was working late at a client's office. One of the executives stopped by to chat; he was telling me that his house burned down the past weekend (!) due to a wiring fault in an SUV in the attached garage that somehow ignited something ... whatever caused it, holy shit. His family all got out ok - in the middle of the night - but everything they owned was lost. As we were walking through the darkened office on our way out - the last two to leave - he said, 'do you smell something burning?'

Poor guy; he must smell it everywhere. For all I know there was still smoke residue in his sinuses. Anyway, I have to humor him - I'm tired and really want to get home, but there's no question of trying to talk sense to someone in his state. So I make a show of looking around the office with him - and sure enough, there was a CRT monitor, plugged in, off (or maybe asleep), and literally smoking. I never saw anything like it before or since, in over 20 years in IT. But he must still smells smoke everywhere he goes.
> people could not get good enough performance

PyPy and Graal show good performance. The can be considered special cases of partial evaluation, where the first Futamura project works. They are not generic enough for the second and third projections, though. They even require some help (e.g. annotations) for the first.
> The Air Force needs about 1,500 pilots more than it has. Bonus programs and other incentives have not made up the shortfall.

Because they haven't been offering enough? I find it hard to believe they couldn't find 1500 pilots to come back for a million a piece, surely if something's important enough to sign into law as an EO it's worth the price of ten F-22's.
> You can install Linux distributions and then run them in Windows

Ooook, sounds like you weren't around for the bad old days of Microsoft playing dirty tricks with their OS to sabotage application competitors. This friendly new open Microsoft is the result of decades of market pressure.
The post you are responding to does not indicate anything about my belief in what Google currently does (well, except that it makes the amount of money it's financial reports say it makes.)
This one just to thank you for everything, Dom!
BTW, your book is on its way to my desk. I briefly skimmed the pdf, but can't wait to get the dead tree version!:)

Don't forget about embedded systems: they could be the killer platform which makes Nim mainstream overnight.
Police catch a child-rapist in the act. Does that go online? What about a normal rape?

Someone's husband falsely but convincingly accuses them of domestic abuse, later they are cleared of all charges. Does this accusation go on youtube?

Someone attempted suicide, and then called the cops because he didn't want to go through with it.

Someone was inadvertently caught on camera in a gay bar when it was raided for drugs.
Sounds like a complaint that Google has open-sourced the OS they derive their product from, rather than open-sourcing their proprietary product.
IMO it’s a better choice than ever to have your own domain for email. It’s basically impossible to get a good Gmail address. And now you have plenty of great, inexpensive email hosting choices.
Yes, but generally those will average out, and other than carbon emissions the environmental impact tends to get pretty well priced into the end product because it tends to be more land or resources that are required.

I put "carbon emissions" in parentheses there because the reason for this "buy local" fallacy to begin with is because people intuitively assume that it's the transportation of the good that makes all the difference, when the reality is that that's just 1/10 of the cost.

The environmental impact of the transportation is almost exclusively carbon emissions.