skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I also thought zebrafish we're also considered at the same level of "popularity" as the choices you've listed but I don't actually know for a fact if they are.
According to your logic, we should expect to see more hate crimes.

This amounts to putting words in my mouth. The only point I was making is that the stats you were citing were somewhat disingenuous in their framing. Your framing still comes across as poison pen material.

I'm not arguing that the US has it all figured out. I have plenty of criticisms of my own country. But this kind of venom essentially makes your words hypocritical. It amounts to decrying the hatred here while being hateful.
IGN covers a lot more than just games nowadays. (Movies, etc.)
why would it be different than wifi's 2.4 and 5 ghz bands? those are open, but don't penetrate far because they are high freq. it works but there's tons of things making it unreliable.
I could have sworn that hashing the pub key was all the way back in the whitepaper. In any case are any "naked pub key" coins still left unspent? I'd reckon that if they are actively owned by someone than that person can forward to a secure address when QC becomes practical and if they are "lost" then who cares if someone with a QC comes and claims them?
If his name is being used he obviously wants it to do well because he has some insentive in it. he wouldn’t use his name and want it to fail.
I don't think so. Pretty sure IGN was still a vaguely independent-ish (or at least not owned by any specificly video game concerned parent company) reviewing site between the launch of Steam until it's inescapable crowning as the default bway to buy games.
+1 for the thought process. You left out "Damn, I suck at interviewing. I can't believe they want ME to help decide who we hire. I'm still trying to figure out how I snuck in the door."
I honestly had completely forgotten about their charity contributions. In my mind they had become another digital game shop.

I'm curious, does it say somewhere what the total amount they have contributed to charity over all the years?

EDIT: Found it on wikipedia:

> By September 2017, the total charitable amount raised by the Bundles exceeded $100 million across 50 different charities.

That is pretty impressive.
There's got to be some kind of Muphry's Law about talking about downvotes, and I ought to know better by this point.
Probably should have thought about it a bit more before I put my first point first.

The major problem I have is with the implication that you can make your own drugs at home and it's safe, secondarily it's pretty concerning that there's actually a reader base for this information due to the countries healthcare system.
تحميل اربع نسخ انستقرام بلس معربة رياض الرفاعي instagram plus
And here is Jonathan Blow and Casey chatting on Handmade Con two years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpkrx1osuLc
My OpenBSD story (2011)
Of course, it could simply be that the increase in sea ice is due to global warming. Rising sea temperatures generate more humidity, which causes more snow, leading perhaps to more Antarctic ice.
> If your output of products is about to dramatically shift there is no reason to think employment should remain stable among all departments.

Among all departments, of course not. But the job of administration and sales for the old model of car is a tremendously close match to administration and sales for the new model. If they didn't have a sufficiently large desire to fire these people, they would transfer most or all of them over.

The solarcity firings would possibly represent a shift in labor requirements, but even then they are strongly denying it with the claims of performance-based firings and not layoffs.
how is it billed?

Go ask the people who get jobs as billers - most hosptials have more billers than beds, they can sort it out.

Before you go to surgery agree on the price of everything and ask for a video so you can verify the work was done as billed and there wasn't any padding. In an emergency situation, you're entitled to the price they advertise. IF you can't afford it, the government picks up the bill and maybe you pay for it, maybe you don't. If you want insurance, you can buy insurance but let the insurers use every actuarially relevant bit of information so the insurance works as insurance
It's worth noting that Humble Bundle is YC W11 and raised $4.7M in venture capital in 2011.

I am assuming this is not a 10x exit.
> Who said that just because you don't have a social life you must be miserable or depressed?

Well it depends on how one defines social life. But historically a lone human is a dead human. Depression does have an evolutionary advantage in that you are less likely to approach potentially violent strangers. The lowered energy levels make you sleep longer and reduces your visibility. The misery is probably just a motivating force so that you seek out your tribe.
Flawed assumption being presented as logic here. The only logical reason for firing would be if the model S,X skills were completely irrelevant to whatever the new model is - which is unlikely.
Building a Spotify-Lyrics GUI Application for Linux – Codementor
Did you read the linked article? A generic maker of generic drugs in dramatically increasing prices with no sign of the entrance of competitors. Competition can enter but the barriers are too high - even without any government protection remaining on the generics in question.

The competition doesn't pay the cost of duplicating production - not after the competition has lowered the price. At least the chance of that is why no one tries to enter.

To make even the generics at a reasonable quality is a barrier sufficient in an of itself. And a competitor risks the incumbent lowering the prices to cut off the incumbent - no investor is signing up for that expensive fight as evidenced by the article... generics are rising in price to reflecting the effectiveness of the barriers. (well and lack of price regulation by our healthcare system)
The Hieroglyphics Initiative
Guerilla Open Tube: A Distributed, Censorship-Resistant Backup of YouTube
“Life time use” and “one time use triggering latent psychological conditions” are very different. Of course those who use over a long period of time aren’t showing adverse conditions. The ones who were triggered stayed away.
I like when people practice what they preach, and I don't like when people practice what they accuse others of doing. You know, leadership by example?

But that's me, and we live in the "Do as I say not as I do" times.
I had been hacking the open source quake 3 engine while in the community of Urban Terror, a closed source game on top of it. I believe a problem that studios would face with what you are suggesting is that there is still a lot you can control at the low level, ranging from cheats to game behavior.

PS. Of course one could claim you can never be certain of those (hacking disassembled code is always an option) but in any way you look at it, if you do have the resources to have your own engine you retain more control.
Let me clarify - the US's regulations are the reason the US has expensive healthcare.

IF we regulated single payer health care into existence, we'd have cheaper care. The problem isn't regulation per se, it's our current regulations.
If it is a GET request, just open it in a new tab. Firefox has a built-in json viewer (no extensions required).

Eg. open this in a new tab: http://httpbin.org/get
>>"failure" and "success" are notions relative to goal achievement, and biology doesn't have goals - it's a mechanistic process.

Of course biology has goals. Every living organism's goal is to propagate its genes to the next generation. For details on this, read The Selfish Gene.
I want to point out that the website has a search tool. Good if you are looking for some specific stuff. Examples:

https://hero.handmade.network/episodes/search?#light%20rende...
https://hero.handmade.network/episodes/search?#sucks
PureVPN’s ‘non-existent’ logs given to authorities, to arrest alleged stalker
I wouldn't qualify them as that, and neither did Tesla. Not everyone is the right fit for the job they are currently working. People can struggle with a job for any number of reasons.

Companies will very rarely propose a pay-cut, but more likely they would just rather find someone else. Because they have specific jobs that needs doing and can't afford to have something done poorly.

Even if hiring was perfect there would still be rational reasons to fire sometimes. And hiring is far from perfect.
Serotonin and brain function: a tale of two receptors by Robin Carhart-Harris and David Nutt[1] suggests that the main affects are due to the conscious impacts on behavior, but that those impacts don't depend on the experience of being high so much as the long-lasting effects of the stimulation. It basically comes down to whether or not you believe them though.

[1] http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/10/10/ssc-journal-club-seroto...
You mean GameSpy? Yes, that merged with IGN and subsequently went into oblivion.
So it turns out that these metrics don't exactly follow a Gaussian distribution, so it's hard to get these algos to work right out the box. Additionally, speed was an important component for us (for training and evaluation), so we had to toss out a lot of the fancy, but slower, techniques.
I found that greatly amusing, though I'm not sure that the comment was just concerning physical traits. After all, who doesn't like honey?
What have I contributed?

I am now more confused than I was originally.
I'm intrigued too, what's the 20-10% that's missing that was present in the LispMs?
Yes, that I'm okay with. If users are properly informed, then they can make an informed decision for themselves whether or not to use the service. And a responsible version of this would place an upper bound on the amount of mining done, so that I don't leave a tab open overnight and come back in the morning to find that my laptop has melted a hole through the floor.
Actually not fired because then Target might actually have to pay out on unemployment, I would simply have been scheduled for 4 hours a week in perpetuity.
I don't disagree, I did that back in university. My problem with the brackets is that it lends itself to a 'write-once-read-never' style when a function ends with 12 round brackets.

I think S-expr trees and their macros are the right way to write code, and that a S-expr diff is the one true way to do git-diff. But so far I haven't seen a language that integrates into the toolchain like that.

Go has gofmt that at least acknowledges that style should be consistent, but I would argue 'who gives a fuck'. The expression tree is what really matters.
well it was a good run.

for a while it will be ok due to them wanting to have good pr.

but slowly over time it will get worse and crappier. eventually paid placement, advertising, spin and death by blandness.
When Art Meets Science
i've bought far more books than games from humble
Who, besides dementia sufferers, are being cheated by those rich people? Anyone with a sounds mind is surely making a rational decision that they probably benefits themselves. If they're just trading at better prices than the market, that still means they're providing value by actually being available to trade with.
Looked at it. I've got 192MB in that machine, and apparently there's a bug in the game that causes it to react badly to over 32MB of RAM, with an error like "Error allocating XMS".

I can have Windows 98 expose less memory to the process, and the game launches, but no OPL3 audio then. Apparently there are some XMS-eater programs that would consume all the spare memory, but I haven't experimented with those yet.

That's the easy solution, but I'm tempted to find the error in the code and patch the binary.
That could be. Why has YouTube not showed up as a Twitch competitor?
China has 5000 years of ascending to superpower status, not all of it very peaceful. If you mean China hasn't invaded another country since 1979, well, sure, I'll give you that.
But only kind of. Even if you could get a strain of yeast to produce a specific antibody 100% of the time, how reliably could you get the yeast to grow? If you can get it to grow, how reliably can you extract a enough of the antibody to form just one dose? If you can extract, can you get it into a formulation that is pharmaceutically viable? Its not just about synthesis.

There's so much tooling and expertise that goes into front end, back end, deployment, db, QA, etc ,etc, etc just to get one app going. Why would would drug deployment be any different?
Mysterious Pyramids of Mauritius and Tenerife Built by Aryans?
That happened right when I started a new job so I haven't touched it that much. R# used to be absolutely essential though.
It didn't look great when I asked about it here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ada/comments/6avcy4/odds_of_ruststy...

I do hope you're right with them figuring it out. It's a killer feature Ada and/or SPARK need. The alternative is basically separation logic. That isn't going mainstream or significant commercial haha. For me, I prefer both to adopt each others' strengths to increase diversity in batteries-included, safe/secure, systems space.
Hahn died a year ago, age 39, likely due to fentanyl.

Wikipedia says he died of alcohol poisoning[1], however the actual medical examiner's report says, "intoxication by the combined effects of alcohol, fentanyl and diphrenhydramine."[2] It goes on to say that the blood alcohol concentration was 0.404 mg/dL. Unless there's a misplaced decimal point, that level is almost nothing; it's a trace of alcohol. The legal limit for drunk driving in all 50 states is 80 mg/dL, or two hundred times greater than what he had.

Diphenhydramine, also mentioned by the medical examiner, is an over-the-counter anti-allergy medicine. It is apparently used as an intensifier for opioids (like fentanyl).

So it seems his death was really caused by fentanyl. The medical examiner mentions alcohol only because he has to state all factors no matter how minor.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn

[2] https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3517279-1-Page-Fax-F...
Finally it's true: http://37prime.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Futurama-...
Agda gets the do notation
Make sure the “resource abusive” filter is enabled in uBlock.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/maste...
That is so but the subset of x86_64 that you'd use for code generation is pretty much the same as the subset of x86 that you'd use for code generation.
I don't think it's ever been the case that C front ends used lex/yacc. Whether it's "best practice" I suppose depends on who you ask! (You'll certainly learn it with parser generators in university because writing a hand-written parser takes too long for an undergrad class, and they will only cover a tiny subset of C if anything.)

You can see here that the original C compilers use a hand-written expression parser using the Shunting Yard algorithm, and I'm sure the rest of the front end is hand-written too:

http://www.oilshell.org/blog/2017/04/22.html

C predates lex/yacc so the syntax wasn't really designed with them in mind.

Some other potential problems:

(1) Distinguishing types and variables in C:

https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2011/05/02/the-context-sensiti...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_lexer_hack

(2) The preprocessor. While it doesn't prevent you from using lex/yacc for the C parser, this is an entirely separate lexer and parser that is always written by hand AFAICT.

Awk, on the other hand, is almost always parsed with lex/yacc. The language was almost designed around those tools.

I think if you're writing say your first compiler you should try to use lex and yacc. I think you can solve the context-sensitivity problem but I haven't done it myself. Operator precedence probably requires some extensions or maybe you can encode the many levels of C precedence in the grammar.

One thing I found from implementing a shell parser [1] is that the POSIX spec uses yacc grammars, even if the languages aren't best parsed with bottom-up parsing. For example, all shells except bash use top-down parsing.

Analogously, the C grammar may "manually" encode the operator precedence, even though the original C parsers and current ones like GCC/Clang actually use an operator precedence algorithm like the Shunting Yard algorithm, not yacc's shift-reduce algorithm.

e.g. this grammar manually encodes it:

https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html

Not that yacc can't parse expressions -- it's just something interesting I found.

Also, for shell, there are a bunch of parsing rules that are necessarily listed separately from the grammar, and I'm sure the same is true for C.

[1] http://www.oilshell.org/blog/tags.html?tag=parsing-shell#par...
I thought left alt-science got mentioned sufficiently. Linus Pauling features, and from the article ...

> Pauling, who arrived there in 1968, was about to make a sharp left turn in his career, to pursue an alt-science theory of his own

Although Pauling was already well to the left.
I just bought their crypto book humble bundle - first for a long time - decent price for 11 ebooks... about 1.50 each if you want all 11.
It seems to me that the firings were probably more in the sales side. They have had problems with sales people who refused to do things the ‘Tesla Way’ by either being pushy, or by offering discounts to make their numbers look better.
There is that, but it also appears that he had a poorly managed mental illness - this is as much a part of the sad outcome as anything else.
Reliance JIO Diwali Offer – Full Cashback
> As a matter of fact, China's ascending is the most peaceful and constrained among all past super powers in the world history.

Alternative facts, maybe. Just look up the South China Sea, Doklam, constant agitation with India and Japan to see how peaceful China's rise is.
I don't think @Boothroid sounds bitter. I frankly think your comment is just bizarre because all 3 examples you listed make it seem like you're looking for a benefactor, not a friend whose company you enjoy over a cup of coffee while laughing at mundane, stupid shit.
No plan, just some dictatorship in action. They see trouble coming and make some random moves
I believe that most anyone who has been in a managerial position has experienced some of what you have described, some people handle it better than others.

I don't know the specifics of your situation but I will attempt to point you toward some resources that might help.

The fundamentals lay within the issue of Dominance hierarchy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy) whereas if you are placed in a position of Dominance, these people will at least challenge, if not wanting to replace you.

They might be insecure about their capabilities/knowledge so with time they have developed a "fake it till you make it" survival techniques.

One of the solutions is for you to become more assertive and therefore have more/better skills to maintain your deserved Dominance within the hierarchy.

It might have to do with your Personality Traits (https://www.verywell.com/the-big-five-personality-dimensions...), scoring too high in Agreeableness (higher than the people you're talking about).

Prog. Jordan B Peterson talks often about this issues, you might want to go on YouTube and search "big 5 personality traits Jordan Peterson" and watch some of his videos for some highly interesting material on the matter.
Your work is a lot more predictable than that of either the folks doing the hiring or the folks being hired.

Well over 99% of my work has been thrown out. (I'm a software engineer & entrepreneur.) I think I calculated that when I was at Google, the half-life of my code was roughly 1 year, i.e. after a year, half of my code would be ripped out and deleted. So after 5 years there, 97% of it was gone. The remaining 3% had made a few hundred million dollars in revenue. It's been similar (but worse) in the startup world, where I had 4 ideas that all failed in my startup before Google, and 10 so far in the startup after.
Whee, the best thing to say about "... just because something is moving relative to another thing does not necessarily mean it is hot ..." is that this is unsettled. ;)

Ott 1963 shows T' = T / {\sqrt{1 - v^2 / c^2}}, or for short T' = \gamma T, where \gamma is the Lorentz factor, T' is the temperature calculated by an observer in a set of coordinates Lorentz boosted with respect to the coordinates in which the system is at rest with a temperature T.

Asymptotically one would expect that as \gamma -> 1 \RightArrow T = T' and \gamma -> \infty \RightArrow T = \infty assuming one is measuring temperature using photocalorimetry (consider a blackbody radiator...).

However, there are different proposals that depend on how and if one makes the first or second laws of thermodynamics Lorentz covariant, and how one goes about measuring a distant object's temperature. All of this is also in the context of Special Relativity; a general relativist could say that the whole matter comes down to a choice of gauge anyway, and temperatures are only directly comparable for two objects at the same point in spacetime (and even there you get a can of worms because they would then be "in contact" at the point p on the manifold, and even then there is a choice of gauge and some interesting cut-offs in which they could equilibriate (T_obj1 = T_obj2), dissipate excess stress-energy (T_{p} > T_obj1 + T_obj2), or collapse gravitationally).

Unfortunately the matter is not wholly settled and there is an absence of firm experimental evidence, and moreover the debate is confined to flat spacetime.

However, one has to do quite a bit of twisting to assume that T = T' (Landsberg did this in 1966 & 1967).

Here is a nice recent set of slides on temperature in GR: http://www.dpg-physik.de/dpg/pbh/aktuelles/pdf/Andersson.pdf

Q. Is a moving body hot/cold?
A. Yes/no/maybe. The discussion is "pointless".
SolarCity is an albatross of debt around their neck... no surprises. They have to raise debt for a long time just to get financing these obligations. No dog and pony shows, just paper to pay off paper.
I think the larger lesson is to stop assuming that whatever confirmation bias laden evidence you've collected to date regarding the benefits of your new compound do not present a full picture of the dangerous repercussions.
https://github.com/ShareX/ShareX
Their main things has always been the charity aspect of their work. The folks obsessed with the idea they exist for Linux games or whatever seem to miss that point.
I'm not a fan of this style of management at all. I won't knowingly go to work for a company that behaves in this manner. I've read that Netflix does it, and I've seen inferences that they acquired the practice from Disney.

If you have a low performing employee that you want to get rid of, fine. Arbitrarily destroying the lives of a percentage of your workforce in an annual purge is not OK.

People always seem to put Musk on a pedestal. Personally, I've always been (and always will be) leery of a company run by a PayPal founder.
Go try to wrestle a caveman for his fur pelt and see if he considers it to be a protected object.

Force protects the object, sometimes the government exerts the force sometimes not.