skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They're still there in places like greenland and antarctica!
I think the phrase "...which will continue until the circular path brings it back down" requires a bit more explanation. At this point, you seem to be switching from treating the rotating ring as a stream of independent particles to being a rigid body, but if you treat it as a rigid body from the start, the first part is no longer obvious.

I think that once you establish that angular momentum is a vector quantity that is entirely consistent with Newton's laws, then the particular case of the gyroscope becomes straightforward.
I can tell you from experience that web hosting affiliates like this are absolutely the most "faked" of any industry out there. Affiliate payments from webhosts can equal 100x what a referral pays monthly, and the payouts are an ever increasing "race to the top" as hosts attempt to pump their customer numbers up
> What matters in an assassination is the motive, not the weapon.

Motive isn't always clear right after the event occurred. Could very well be speculation at that point.

Anyone can be a journalist btw. It isn't a protected profession with a title or degree requirement. "Professional journalism", OTOH..
That’s kind of the point of public services. They have to service everyone equally. If that makes them inefficient, so be it. It makes them more fair. The efficiencies of the private companies you speak of also disenfranchise portions of the population. If we privatize schools, poor kids wouldn’t get an education, because their parents couldn’t afford it. As a society, we’ve decided that isn’t fair, so education is a public service. And that analogy can be applied to a lot of services. Sometimes some of us have to give up a little quality so that others can have anything at all. That’s my 2cents.

Edit: I don’t think I had enough coffee before I wrote all that, because I didn’t read the above comment well enough. Part of what I wanted to say is that efficiency doesn’t have to be about how well it serves an individual. It can be measured by how well it serves a population. Which then factors in fairness. We can’t measure the efficiency of a road based on how many cars can drive on it, whe what matters is how many people can move on it. (Buses and bikes allow for higher throughput.) The mail system can’t really be considered efficient if only some people can use it. It may get one letter from point a to b fast, but the systems effciency depends on serving everyone.
On a more abstract level it is the same in every system. But money, tax, company ownership are the attributes it has in capitalism. And this Malta Papers and Panama Papers topic is about tax, money and company ownership.
Uhmm, I'll watch the video tomorrow
Apple has really dropped the ball on the Mac mini (and also the Mac Pro, though that got some attention in some official interviews). It's a shame that the company, even with so much money, is unable to segregate work among different teams and get things done. Since a Mac is a required machine for iOS/tvOS/watchOS development, pushing out new MacBook after MacBook and pushing out new iMacs once in a while just isn't enough. The Mac mini is a really great machine by itself, and the older models that were also easily upgradeable on RAM and secondary storage were fantastic (the Intel CPU based models can still run Linux if they do not have official support for the latest or recent versions OS X or macOS).
Yeah I feel the same way. Instead of actually making better, healthier products this industry actually tried to trick people through marketing. If your business relies on deceiving your customers (or worse, their parents) then frankly you're doing something wrong.

I don't know how it is elsewhere but in France (maybe the whole EU?) they were forced to drop the "weight loss" argument from their marketing materials because it was unsubstantiated. So now they merely imply it.

I enjoy eating cereal from time to time and I actually used to eat some every day but I decided to cut my consumption drastically because all my favourite brands are basically 50% sugar.
A bomb is most commonly indiscriminately targeted at larger numbers of people, such as in cases of terrorism, which is by far the most common association for a bomb these days.

Assassination implies a very specific target. A bomb does not inherently and more often implies the intent of broad targeting.
Newspaper issued gag order after covering shady business dealings of Iceland PM
Enforce against Joe citizen. The government, the bureaucracy and big money have always been above the law.

But of course you are welcome to continue the work of Caruana Galizia.
Or it could be they aren't stretching and simply taking lessons from other parts of the world, in which marijuana is usually mixed with tobacco or a herbal smoke blend. This is in part because it burns better and more completely and not really due to wanting to stretch their supply.

Well, yes, my friends and the other people in their social groups could be lying to me for some mysterious reason, but barring further evidence, I'm going to believe them. It's true that tobacco burns better, but the general agreement is that they would smoke pure marijuana if they could.

That said, there is no reason to force folks into giving away healthier filler herbs. Tax tobacco more, fine, but folks can buy their own fillers.

Fair enough. Just having it available at the shop, even if people had to buy them, would be a great improvement. Currently it's not easy to find around here.

And honestly, without testing the safety of the fillers, there isn't a real way to know how the safety compares to tobacco, especially if folks aren't using tobacco daily or regularly.

Right, so we should test them.
Yes each of them is worried about losing here. But the system is the system. That is what "next" means. You discover a few, but it doesn't change the system.
Funny how 2013 discoveries are tried to be forgotten and not mentioned:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encry...

"$250m-a-year US program works covertly with tech companies to insert weaknesses into products"

"The documents show that the agency has already achieved another of the goals laid out in the budget request: to influence the international standards upon which encryption systems rely." [emphasis mine]

Now compare with the details from KRACK regarding Android and Linux:

https://www.krackattacks.com/#details-android

"Our attack is especially catastrophic against version 2.4 and above of wpa_supplicant, a Wi-Fi client commonly used on Linux. Here, the client will install an all-zero encryption key instead of reinstalling the real key. This vulnerability appears to be caused by a remark in the Wi-Fi standard that suggests to clear the encryption key from memory once it has been installed for the first time." [emphasis mine]

Sometimes adding an innocent-appearing remark, and later acting on it would be all that's needed for a rich and mighty adversary.

I don't claim it happened this time, but I worry when the possibility isn't being considered and properly investigated.
this is not related to Trump, companies/lobbyists behind this are in business for a long time, regardless of who sits in white house. and since no recent changed anything, you can as easily blame Obama, and maybe even Bush jr.

why do people still believe that US presidents hold all the real power in the country? that doesn't even make sense.
Of course people have friends based on what their hobbies are. In my childhood and teenage years I was only allowed to play computer games during the weekend. While my friends were online chatting and gaming together, I was sitting alone in my room reading books and watching TV. That affected my social skills, the lack of which I still suffer greatly from. I'd be careful with denying kids things that are important in their social circles. The damage done by FPS games or other similar things is nowhere close to the damage done by social isolation.
My style of argument is to disagree with you on the ethics of using the criminal justice system to dissuade entirely personal choices on one's use of their own resources. For my disagreement, you label me a fundamentalist. It's nothing more than you attempting to stigmatize me for holding social and political views you disagree with.
Well, I don't trust whole the network (internet) in general, as I don't know where and how things are routed, and by whom.

The only situation where trust in the router would be relevant to me is for communication within a local network, so I'm controlling every device involved. And there, this attack might actually be harmful, as far as I understand.
You can imagine each particle being somehow tethered to the center, without any need for the particles to be connected otherwise.

You’re totally right that gyroscopes are straightforward if you understand angular velocity as a vector quantity, but it’s not quite so intuitive.
The economics of most private torrent sites is fucked beyond belief if you haven't participated. I've only seen one paper on it from Microsoft research. Maybe more has been written on it that I haven't seen.
Well I started with Swarm because Kubes had additional learning to do. Swarm worked from the same docker-compose.yml files I already knew.

Looking at moving to k8s but that was my reason for swarm at the time. And it was the right one as it just worked with minimal effort.
Because the EU should absolutely not become a superstate like the US, it should remain firmly an economic and political union and the less force it is capable of exerting, the better. That means no army and no police force? How Democratic can such structures be really? Also don't tell me western and northern states won't be privileged in such a scheme. It's us in the south and the east that are corrupt and can't handle our organized crime groups obviously.
It's slightly different tho because they clone startups from U.S. and bring them to EU.

I don't think they would have success using same method if they were just U.S. based.
You can apply policy top-down. But actually the higher one rises the ranks the more it is about pure, immoral power play. This again leads to the best psychopaths being at the top, which again means policy won't exclude their main methods of action. So really, what do you want to do about it? You can't enforce policy bottom up. That's why someone is above you in the food chain.
You are using an internet troll forum as your source of data??!
That depends on who and where you are.

The 3.4 million American citizens living in Puerto Rico probably don’t feel like everything is normal. The president has mocked them as lazy, criticized them for straining the budget, made a joke (Christ, I hope it was a joke) that all the money being spent is a loan that Puerto Rico will have to repay, etc.

Things probably don’t seem normal for a lot of our allies. Trump has pledged to decertify our nuclear arms deal with Iran, despite the fact that virtually his entire cabinet is begging him to stop. Trump says he wants to decertify the deal because he doesn’t like it, but that’s not how deals work. Once you enter into an agreement, you have to abide by it. If you routinely break your agreements, why would anyone ever enter into an agreement with you? This kind of behavior could damage our ability to negotiate with other countries for decades.

Things probably also don’t seem normal for the 20-30 million Americans whose health insurance premiums are about to go up by 25% because the president defunded ACA cost-sharing payments for no discernible reason. Cutting the payments will increase the deficit, and make life worse for tens of millions of Americans. The only reason I can see for this is that the President wants to undo all of his predecessor’s accomplishments, even if his changes make things objectively worse.

Then we get into bizarre things. I don’t remember previous presidents feuding with sports teams, saying that Neo-Nazis were “very fine people,” nominating a drug czar who was deeply involved in the opioid crisis, or any number of other things that are unimaginable from any other president. None of this is normal.

The only things that are normal are things which generally change slowly. The economy is still strong, unemployment is low, gas is cheap, and the stock market is high. Some of that has to do with big investors and companies expecting hefty tax cuts. Should that plan fail (at least one senate republican has come out against the current tax plan, so they can only afford 1 more defector) then I think we’re going to see a sea change amongst investors and employers.
Mobile version doesn't have ads. Great work, I'm bookmarking this :) Congrats on making it.
It's extremely valuable for large IT organizations. Most of them have at least one deployment of each orchestrator, because of the proliferation of container projects in their various teams. They are very eager to adopt a single platform to manage it all. Now Docker EE can be that platform.

In general enterprises don't like to be told "throw away your existing system to adopt my platform".
In theory that's a big deal. In practice most people are looking at days to weeks to liquidate stock and that's not a big deal. As your holdings go up, into the billions, it can take months to years to unwind major investments without tanking the price. Further, having ~six months of living expenses outside of the market is considered prudent anyway.

However, the reality is if the market disappeared today informal markets would quickly take it's place consider what happens to pre IPO stock.
> despite the fact you can directly purchase their shares

Actually, most people could not directly purchase their shares if we didn't have a stock market. Companies in general would be owned only by relatively wealthy people or by other companies. Stock markets allow more ordinary people to share in the profits of companies. They democratize the ownership of the means of production in society.

> (which they offered to gain temporary income to make purchases before their cash flow allowed)

The income raised by stock offerings is not temporary; it is not a loan to be paid back. That capital becomes part of the company. The company might use that to purchase assets that stay part of the company or to buy inventory which it will then sell resulting in getting that money back plus profit.

> Once the business sells a portion to investors, those portions can be resold.

Without a stock market, they could not be resold without great difficulty. Investor A, who wanted to sell his share, perhaps after new management had taken over and was now driving the company into the ground, would have to find other another investor, Investor B, to buy it, and if Investor B didn't want to purchase the exact amount Investor A was selling at a mutually agreeable price, Investor A would have to begin a new search to sell the remainder of his share. This is one way liquity is such a big help.

> making me wonder how it was ever allowed.

The buying and selling of things has never needed to be explicitly allowed; in most modern nations, individuals are free to buy and sell things they own.
How Much Does It Cost to Make an App? Part 1: Time
Great to hear! Thanks for the feedback!
Assange offers €20K reward for finding killers of Malta’s ‘one-woman WikiLeaks’
This research is getting misused badly and is a very lucrative business selling to cancer patients in the „alternative medicine“ sector.

I lost my uncle last year to small-cell lung cancer (age 40). Doctors gave him 12 months after the diagnosis, turns out he barely had 3 months (mostly due to a very bad response to chemotherapy). In his last months he turned to one of these alternative medicine gurus who told him that the tumor (quote) „would eat itself“ if he stops eating sugars.
Google News shows multiple uses of the word. Here is an example:

https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20171016/local/fo...
I would be extremely surprised if fork on a unix-like takes 1ms.
Voodoo Black Magic
Nope. But the attributes used in this case (money, taxes, company ownership) are core elements of capitalism. Therefore the reference.

I'm happy to present this in whatever terms you prefer. In fact it's the core of all systems, but people don't like to talk in abstract terms. Think about how people would react if you tell them feudalism, fascism, communism, capitalism is actually not so different.
Maybe "Waves" (wavesplatform.com) by using chrome lite client https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/wavesliteapp/kfmca...

cheaper (1Waves) & easy to use
Refusing to provide the password to a BitCoin wallet found on a computer you own is probably going to fall under that particular doctrine. I look forward to the first test case...
> If I want an investor to purchase 20% of my company. For 20% profit, why should any sort of bonds, currency devaluation come into fact.

You'd have to find an investor who wanted to purchase 20% of your company, which is quite a big ask in a lot of respects: they'd be very heavily exposed to one single company, their risk requirements would have to align exactly with yours, they would have to be using the same currency as you. Bottom line is, you'd get a pretty poor price - which is why the institutions that end up buying 20% of companies are the big banks who can slice that exposure and find buyers for the different pieces. (Just like if you're trying to source a given component for manufacturing, you may well end up going through a broker and an importer rather than dealing directly with whoever makes that component). If the banks weren't able to give a better price, no-one would sell through them.

> What the value of my countries dollar happens, has no effect on the percentile of my company.

Sure, but if I'm a Japanese pension fund and the value of my investment drops by 5% because the dollar has weakened against the yen, my investors are going to ask me some awkward questions.

> At what point is it not about the investment about the business, and gambling about how it will go in the future(eg shorting).

It is investment: no-one's doing this for fun (well, maybe a few people are, but they're only hurting themselves if so), they're doing it to make money, which means figuring out what's actually valuable. At the end of the day the only money going into the system is business profits, so the only way to make money is to do something that makes more money for the economy (or, sure, you can do zero-sum bets - but that's not a profitable business to be in in the long term).

> That and the whole system akin to it, is the part that is making me wonder how it was ever allowed.

There's no "allow"; it's a free country, you can buy and sell stuff you own. But the reason the markets are active is because they're productive.
But most native English speakers, or any language speakers for that matter,
don't think about what makes an overqualified person to work below their
skill level.
While I'm sure you're right about the root of the word, this notion of entrepreneur itself comes from the french verb "entreprendre", which means something similar to undertake or enter a task/business.
Less privacy, once again. If you look at all the legislation that has been put into place over the last two decades to combat money laundering and terrorism financing -- was this really necessary? Did it really have an impact? I still hear about terrorists blowing themselves up every day.

Yes, high level political corruption is bad and this assassination is tragic. It should be fought. But do you think that by just introducing another body, things will be much better?

People will be people. Corruption, dealmaking and scheming, together with greed, is as old as mankind. It will happen regardless, and it happens in Western countries as well (Belgium, France, the UK, etc); just in a different way.
You do realize how bizarre it is to blame lack of rigor in CS on the author of "On The Cruelty Of Really Teaching Computer Science", right?

http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd10xx/EWD1036.PDF
ApsaraCache: A Redis branch originated from Alibaba Group
Might be good to start a thread on this rather than hijacking something tangentially related.
We're going to support Linux also. But we want to careful not to disrupt the users of the original container engine, as we transition it to Moby. In the future there will be a cleaner separation between "Docker CE, the developer tools" and "Moby engine, the open-source container engine". The last thing we want is someone to upgrade their production Linux engine to find an unexpected and unwanted kubernetes distribution wedged in.

That separation is already in place for Windows and Mac, so we're starting there.
It seems that an exclusion zone could and should have been established in the vicinity of this approach, but to say that the boat operator was not "exercising any caution at all" is quite a stretch. Boats traveling in channels have a set of regulations to follow, which include keeping to the side when not crossing.
It's an old laptop. Instead of throwing it in the trash, I kept it around.
Hey everybody, Eric Ries here, founder of the LTSE. I am coming late to the thread as I’ve been focused on launching my new book and am only seeing this now.

I love a lot of the comments here. I think many of the assumptions both in this piece and in the comments are reasonable guesses about what we are doing - but in a lot of cases wrong.

Part of the reason it has taken me more than five years to figure out how to build this company is that we have to be able to:

1. Offer companies full liquidity and full protection from short-termism even if their stock trades on another exchange or they dual-list

2. Build support among many financial system stakeholders and regulators to get approval to do this

3. Build a multi-disciplinary team that is literate in the arcane ways of SF NY and DC all at once

We aren’t quite ready to take the hood off and reveal how we solved all of these problems quite yet. This is stil a sensitive regulatory process and I’m limited in what I can say publicly. But to the extend I can, I’ll try and answer questions in this thread. Please keep them coming.

Thanks for taking a look at what we are building!
Disregarding the swarm compatibility bit (which is irrelevant because swarm is kind of irrelevant), I don't really like what this "support" really means. As others mentioned minikube and k8s-cluster is already providing dev-to-prod compatibility.

Kubectl was already providing docker cli commands like "exec" "logs" etc. So you can execute some of these commands on a k8 cluster with the docker binary too? And why would you do that?

All I see is struggling for relevance, duplication of functionality and a very unnecessary vendor lock-in vector.
> Why would gambling on a companies future ever help anyone

Most transactions in the market are not gambling. Trades happen, yes, but that is because the prospects of companies are continually changing. When it became apparent pretty much everyone would move to Netflix and streaming video, would you want to continue holding Blockbuster stock? No; you would want to sell it.

People who simply "gamble" in the market lose money about as often as they gain it, and soon stop. Hedge funds and mutual funds generally try to invest in shares on a longer-term basis rather than continually trading them; trading incurs transaction costs, and if an investment was correct and is generating better-than-benchmark returns there is no reason to sell it.

The "day trading" books you might see at your local Barnes and Noble are get-rich-quick books and are not representative of the actual professional investment industry.
But that could be 200 ms? 100 from your keyboard and 100 from sleep.
If each particle is only tethered to the center, how does the circle bring it down again? If the tethers are all fixed to one another, we're back to rigidity.

Edit: I'm trying to think of a way to bring in angular momentum without having to derive it in full generality...