skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"How does having social life prevents you from doing what you want and when you want?"

Let's say you want to go to see one movie, but all your friends want to see a different one. Or maybe you don't feel like seeing a movie at all, but your friends are going.

Or there's a party on Friday, but you don't feel like going out. Or maybe you just want to stay home and read a book.

There are countless other situations where you might want to do one thing, but social obligations, situations or friends are pulling you to do something else.
New law bans California employers from asking applicants their prior salary
Big Data Finance 3.0, the Value of FinTech and the Evolution of Retail
Numerai's Master Plan
Regarding secret plans, I apologize for writing unclearly. I did not mean to imply that candidates lack secret plans, but that voters lack them. I was pointing out that in a criminal interrogation, the interrogatee (if guilty) likely made secret plans for the crime that they’re now being interrogated about, and may have some primal urge to show off by explaining how good those plans were. However, there’s no directly equivalent motivation for a voter to switch to a different faction, since the voter likely doesn’t have any secrets to show off to the new group. There may be exceptions.

(There are also other motivations to reveal one’s secrets in an interrogation besides showing off, and perhaps I should have been more general. In the first example in the article, for instance, it seems less about showing off and more about finding a willing recipient for Diola’s political diatribe - premised on explaining why he did it, but apparently including enough of what he did and planned to satisfy the interrogator. But anyway.)

Regarding othermkn’s comment, I’m not sure what meaning you think I incorrectly read into it. The first paragraph is pretty neutral, as it talks only about what voters perceive - and it’s inarguable that many voters in 2016 felt ignored by the ‘political class’ or elites. However, the second paragraph states outright that “the parties seem to want to continue in their disdain for voters”, which implies that the parties objectively did disdain voters, something I question (at least when it comes to the Democratic Party). I further stated:

> The comment also implies that future candidates like Bernie would be “good news” who could overcome the elite/ordinary rift

The comment makes explicit that continued disdain is “bad news”, implying that overcoming it would be good. It technically doesn’t state outright that Bernie’s message itself was “good news”, as opposed to the fact that his candidacy showed that outsiders can get “as far as he did”. But I thought it could be reasonably inferred, given the resonance between the rest of the comment and the message of Bernie and many of his fans.

I went on to be slightly more speculative:

> presumably by blowing up the existing establishment as Bernie meant to (and to some extent did).

But I don’t think it’s a reach to say that if (a) you think the elites disdain voters and (b) you praise outsider candidacies, then your goal is indeed to get the elites out of power (not just change their minds or something).
I think I know what you're talking about. I've seen teams where everyone tries to look exactly the same way and is expected to have exactly the same interests and hobbies. That usually ends up being quite toxic and demotivating.

The trouble is - once the company starts setting quotas and special rules for enforcing diversity, it attracts the type of people that focus on gaming those rules instead of bringing in added value and this quickly creates another form of toxicity.

In my opinion the ideal work environment is somewhere between those 2 extremes.
Those are two totally different things. Windows take a screenshot of everything visible. Cmd+shift+4 on a Mac allows to select a region to save as a screenshot. Finally, if you are on Mac, this update provides node level acreenshot, allowing you to save an image of a HTML node with just one click, no need to drag the cursor. This is especially useful if the node takes more space than the viewport since before you had to stitch screenshots together.
Promotion of the useful arts and sciences is the language the framers used, but the framers didn't know much about economics. The economic function of IP is to address the market distortion that could result if people were permitted to free-ride on the capital-intensive R&D or other people.

The economic definition is also far more useful. Who knows what specific policies will result in "promoting the useful arts and sciences." Preventing free-riding is a more concrete issue that can be addressed with specific policies.
my thinking on this is that science fiction authors are lazy and are not often scientifically trained; so they haven't been thinking about these topics at all. This is why science fiction is so dry and boring compared to neuroanatomy, molecular biology, neurophysiology, computational neuroscience, synthetic biology, etc.
Hmm, though this is cause to doubt, it is still only one cause.

However, it seems that their business model is then catered, at this time, to employers and they have made themselves a niche area in the reputation management sector. Though not alarming at this time, I can see this going south quickly and without warning (Equihax for example)
>Surely the idea of overt, explicit labeling about the risks of using these devices is to create the possibility of competing brands using their better security/privacy as an advantage, and thus promote more secure and private products?

Which is more likely, that companies will actually create more secure devices, or that companies will simply label their insecure devices as required knowing full well that most consumers will ignore the labels? How many people read the TOS for anything they sign up for? How many Hacker News users, who should know better, read the TOS of anything they sign up for? Do people stop smoking because we put cancer warnings on cigarettes? Some, maybe, but enough for cigarette makers to make their products healthier?

It seems to me that the most likely result of labelling IoT devices would be to consumers and businesses to accept that lack of safety as an acceptable tradeoff for whatever features the device offers.
Autopsy of Cooperation: Diamond Dealers and the Limits of Trust-Based Exchange
>Argubly regulation is the problem we're in this mess.

No, that's not even arguable. Other countries with even more highly regulated healthcare manage to provide it for much, much less. You're just regurgitating mindless libertarian talking points that have no relation to the real world.

The particular form of regulation in the US may be a problem, but regulation in general is demonstrably not.
Make them both, sell them on the dark web, see which has repeat customers?
Clemson vs Syracuse Live Stream Free
https://ed.ted.com/on/lXeIp2W5
Uggggghhhh, it's all fun and games to read about these wackos until you have to experience them in real life. Until you witness the deaths their bullheaded stupidity cause first hand it's humane to be apologetic to their plight. We're all ignorant, only the stupid defend their ignorance. This is what makes them dangerous. It's hard to admit you're wrong when your entire sense of self is wrapped up in your world view.

Here's a Feynman chasser/refresher on what science is.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=OL6-x0modwY
Sexual assault allegations against high profile security researcher and activist
Oh... oh my Gosh..... it's full of... he globally declared his LOOP INDEXING VARIABLES?!

I really appreciate him making that available, fantastic little cautionary tale, clearly from an enthusiastic and thoughtful learner of Java - glad he's made good progress since then, though, that's... I mean, dang it is REALLY bad, but it is also amazing as a sort of exercise in him just knowing what he wants to do and finding (bad) ways to make it happen. And that's admirable, even if it is also horrifying to see unfold. :D
Agreeing on 100% of that. Just wanted to point out taking screenshots in windows isn't "harder". (You can also alt-prtscr for just the active window, or use the snipping tool to screenshot a region).
I've been rejected from jobs because I was over-qualified. Then I got accepted to one, which turned out later that I was over-qualified for that one too. I did get bored, I felt like the job wasn't a good match for my skills, and I went looking for a new job.

So the concern is indeed very real and can cause unneeded churn for a company.
SSL certs for .onions exist for years now, here are two examples: https://www.facebookcorewwwi.onion and https://protonirockerxow.onion

Also v3 onion services are available now with Tor 0.3.2.x-alpha.
Thanks for the link. I have come across this in the past, and I think it's great, except it appears that it still deals directly with CSS primitives.

I'm thinking more in terms of: I have a data structure for my "theme", which styled components has, but this data structure requires no knowledge of the inner structure of the component in order to style it properly.

What I'm thinking is, if there were some common interface, there wouldn't be any need to know anything about the structure of the component.

It definitely seems like it would be a difficult problem to solve. I think one of the first steps toward something like this would be to build up a vocabulary that represents slightly more generic, composable concepts than what the CSS primitives represent.
Have you used wisp? I'm actually just about to work on a small github project to learn it, and was wondering if there's an editor with wisp syntax highlighting out there.

I tend to use VS Code, but it just has a plugin package named "wisp" with no documentation, looks for ".w" extensions, and is on version 0.0.1...
This article portrays "alt-science" as a right-wing phenomenon, but there are certainly left-wing flavors as well, including:

- anti-nuclear sentiment (1, 2)

- anti-wind sentiment (bad for birds) (1)

- blanket anti-GMO (2), overly focused on organic products

- homeopathy (2)

- overconfidence in some forms of birth control: condoms as actually used are only 85% effective (3) birth control per year per couple

- poor understanding, or at least wording, around prenatal development. Developed human fetuses are both human and alive. Scientifically, the abortion question isn't whether a human life is ended, it's clear that one is. The question is a philosophical (not scientific) -- whether the termination of a life is justified and who gets to determine that.

I expect that some of these sentiments could be very true. Just like storing up thousands of samples of urine could provide scientific advancement. But the discussion on each issue is not scientific. In some cases, scientific inquiry itself can be seen as dangerous and harmful.

(1) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-liberals-war-...

(2) https://newrepublic.com/article/139700/democrats-party-scien...

(3) https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom...
Easiest way to raise the level of discussion in a team is to model the behavior you would like others to adopt. In the situation you describe you could do the following: when you express your opinion briefly summarize the basis for it and when you see others doing good work or providing useful insights praise them both privately and in front of the team.
The Role of Emojis in Consumer Relationships
Great article! Also I found it funny when it showed the illustration from 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea due to the fact that "Nautilus" wrote it :)
ROCKWELL TABLE and STAGE PRESENTS: THE Musical Parody of HOCUS POCUS' (REVIEW)
Hire 1M Friends.
I imagine this will be useful for taking screenshots of arbitrary elements via the headless mode.

Anyway, why would it be harder to take screenshots in Windows? Have they restricted the Win32 API recently (I haven't kept tabs)?
Learning a programming language doesn't translate into other language, but the principle of programming in general does.

In another language you may not be using classes, objects heavily, so learning about how to make class factories mean very little. What matters is, through this you might learn about good abstractions and its power, and that's what is important.

And that is what universities should be teaching with the use of any language/tool. I am not sure what you mean "non-tech" class, i am pretty sure there aren't any such things in CS programs. If you dedicate yourself to one particular tool, you will have a very narrow view of software development. Don't need to go to university, you can learn it by yourself and save both time and money.
But DigiCert says they are no longer issuing them. Probably because the .onion is an 80-bit truncation of a SHA1 hash so it doesn't meet baseline reqs?
You are under the impression that everyone shares your opinion and then go for the dismissive #fakenews. I guess you assume anyone who thinks ill of your view must be a Trump supporter and that is some type of slam that can dismiss without thought of others.

> Because they're acknowledging and disallowing abusive behaviour?

They might have a bit more of a leg to stand on if their abuse council had a wider political spread or they actually policed threats that are illegal in a consistent manner. They are so ham fisted that they cannot even point out a rules violation with suspending an actress's account.

> Or of course that's just all #fakenews - the abusive behaviour?

The whole "threatening nuclear war violates" as abusive behavior is a losing argument. The President doesn't like a lot of people and doesn't conceal that information. The idea any of his tweets go beyond hurting someone's feelings is pretty absurd. In contrast, Twitter allows actual threats of assassination without consequence. Nevermind all the threats of rape, etc. directed at women on Twitter without any answer. Look at any popular, conservative women's timeline and see all the crap the abuse council and twitter support lets through. Actual threats versus hurt feelings shows what should have action taken.

All of this is just some people's desire to remove a direct outlet from groups of people. It has nothing to do with actual threats.
I'd think so as well! But as we have seen in healthcare and other sectors, regulatory capture is possible, if not probable. Though, to be fair, the credit bureaus are in a similar niche and they are frankly a catastrophe. It seems that any 'word of mouth' type business or board that is of any use will eventually become useless as they try to squeeze blood from turnips. Subscriptions/payment may be better, like The Negro Motorist's Guidebook of the 1950's.
Not only “from scratch”, he even did it from widely available household products.

I think he said in the last video that it would have been cheaper and faster if he had bought some of the precursor chemicals directly instead of having to make them first.
Facebook's hidden service address is particularly impressive: https://facebookcorewwwi.onion/

It seems like everything except the 'i' is a prefix, a lot of computing must have went in to generating it.

One tool to do it is called 'Shallot' https://github.com/katmagic/Shallot

The readme includes a table of estimated computing time required. A 15 char prefix like Facebook's is not even on the table, and a 14 char prefix is estimated to take 2.6 million years. There is also a GPU version which should be an order of magnitude faster: https://github.com/lachesis/scallion/blob/gpg/README.md

Also, technically. the onion addresses not public keys, but derived from a public key. It's actually a hash of the public key.

It appears that the hashing algorithm used is SHA1. Source: The last few lines of the easygen function https://github.com/katmagic/Shallot/blob/master/src/math.c
2 years is nothing for a video game project. Also, keep in mind he's only working on it while he's streaming, which is 5 hours a week (max. sometimes, it's less). He's also been making a game he intends to sell for money for the past 2 years (1935[0]).

[0]: https://mollyrocket.com/news_0023.html
I have lived with my girlfriend for around 5 years, but recently took a job in a different city. I have been living away during the week and it has been very much as you describe. I'm not sure she sees it that way though.
My take: "a statically typed language can GUARANTEE the same things a dynamic language can GUARANTEE, but not the other way around. A dynamically typed language can PERMIT the same things a static language can PERMIT, but not the other way round."
> iCloud, Messages.app

At least you get to use macOS at work, mad jealous!
This is properly solved by the switch to stronger encryption, the new v3 onion addresses protocol (available with Tor 0.3.2.x-alpha) replaces SHA1/DH/RSA1024 with SHA3/ed25519/curve25519. Onion addresses are now 56 characters long, example: http://ffqggapqevcmylx6vtk5357i7bfjwbb6qchds3hlohangshxrwvdd...

Also something you may be interested in: OnionNS https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/onion-ns-pets2017.pd...
As do engineers designing for reliability.
Interviews are not (just) advertising yourself: it's a date, and a two way street.
Ah, so yeah that's probably why they were waiting for v3 onion services which are 56 characters long now (which are available now as mentioned above).
I've had several interviews that were pretty practical. They do exist but there's unfortunately no way to know in advance unless the company advertises it.
> Pick any conservative original idea and you can pinpoint the moment when it tries to make the public/social irrelevant and the individual worthy and perfect.

This doesn't mesh with the abortion issue. Or opposition to gay marriage.
That does not solve anything. It just means the addresses are so long you are guaranteed no one is eyeball-comparing them. This makes phishing easier.
Seems inevitable that more governments will follow china into the digital identity business. Just because Black Mirror made a dystopian version of this doesn't mean it's a bad idea.
Right, but when I get paged... the first thing I do is look at dashboards and logs.

At a sufficiently large company, looking at dashboards can be difficult because:

1. there are so many dashboards to look at... for so many different services

2. spurious correlations between two graphs showing unrelated events can lead you down the wrong path, if you don't confirm your dashboard-generated hypotheses with log statements or other information.

#2 can be solved by a stronger reliance on logs, http://opentracing.io/ style distributed tracing, and other information.

Something like this Show HN would be useful for problem #1 though.
Aren't patents published publicly? So you could just check the patent (Although it may require some knowledge of biology/chemistry to understand).
Inspiring a future Clojure editor with forgotten Lisp UX
ZOMG, no, IMHO. More seriously, 'UE' is a pretty standard abbreviation in the context. But yes, typing it out would have been better. lol.
Ask HN: Looking for local peer discovery solutions
I'm in an internal network with a somewhat strict firewall, looking for a protocol/aproch for local peer discovery (e.g. like bittorrent) after distributing an app with GPO.

I cannot use a seed server, nodes need to find other nodes by themselves.
Doesn't really work because the gifs lazy-load as you scroll down. So you'd either have to run it repeatedly, or scroll through the whole post first and then do it.
Facebook said they just looked for Facebook and got very lucky. corewww does not have a lot of meaning.

We tried the same thing for PinkApp and got all sorts of much-longer matches that we could retcon into meaning something.
I couldn’t agree more. We were in the process of building our intuitive wiki platform (https://www.wikiful.com) when Marijn first announced ProseMirror. Seeing what a powerful tool it was, we decided to make it the backbone of our WYSIWYG editor.

Our goal was to create an editor intuitive enough to be accessible to the tech-unsavvy, while also curing the ills (slowness, plugin overload) that frustrate our tech colleagues who use current enterprise wiki products.

You’ve clearly put a lot of thought into what makes a great editor — any comments you have on Wikiful's editor would be much appreciated.
The original comment said .biz when they may have ment .bit
The Intuitive Guide to Data Structures and Algorithms
It was a great review and at the end of it I had this realization that I could be a masternode and earn some Dash. Then I looked up the current price and no, I couldn't. I'm glad you did though and it would be awesome to see a followup on how much Dash you've earned as a masternode.
There are a few ports to other systems, but there's a small part of the process that will be opaque because someone other than Casey has done the legwork. By which I mean that you won't get any insight into how windows are built on OSX, how input is handled etc. because it's not part of the stream. As I understand it most of the code is platform agnostic, but the development process is windows biased and won't get to be cross platform until the engine is finished. I would love for someone to go over the unique pieces for mac in a supplemental video series the same way Casey does.
Did you look into the OnionNS paper?
Be Your Own Boss
do it with checkers
The E in E. coli now stands for electronics
Do people stop smoking because we put cancer warnings on cigarettes?

It's hard to separate effects, but certainly here in the UK where we now have aggressive labelling restrictions on packets and visible displays in shops and strict limits on smoking in most public places, smoking seems to be much less of a problem than it used to be. In particular, culturally among younger generations, social smoking is no longer the norm in the way that perhaps it was for their parents or grandparents.

I see no reason that similarly explicit labelling requirements for dangerous IoT devices couldn't help, particularly if also combined with restrictions on use in contexts that could affect others.

Failing that, I personally have no problem with powerful regulations that pose an existential threat to businesses that are deliberately and flagrantly cavalier with security or privacy in the online era (and I write that as someone who is typically very cautious about regulatory over-reach and unintended consequences).
>Is a game "not open source" if all the business-logic code and game assets are open-source, but it relies on a closed-source engine (that it doesn't ship with)?

Depending on a closed-source engine at all by definition makes the game not open source, when you consider "the game" from both a developer and user point of view.
One thing to take into account is the quality of ones potential associates.

I could share an apartment with my best friend (we deployed together so we’ve lived in close proximity) and be happy but if I had to suffer just one evening a week with people who weren’t great friends I think I’d be a lot less happy.
do tell