skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's the 40nm process of the BCM2837 SoC in the Raspi3 that really makes it so [comparatively] hot. That's stone-age lithography there.

Modern phone SoCs are not only etched down at "10nm" (FinFET et al, making things seem smaller too), they also get to sink their heat into adjacent and highly conductive components like the screen and battery.

Raspi3 has air on one side, and a [comparatively] thick PCB on the other. Thermally speaking, they're in different worlds.
And cURL isn't just a HTTP client, it does loads more.

"[curl] is a free client-side URL transfer library, supporting cookies, DICT, FTP, FTPS, Gopher, HTTP (with HTTP/2 support), HTTP POST, HTTP PUT, HTTP proxy tunneling, HTTPS, IMAP, Kerberos, LDAP, POP3, RTSP, SCP, and SMTP. The library supports the file URI scheme, SFTP, Telnet, TFTP, file transfer resume, FTP uploading, HTTP form-based upload, HTTPS certificates, LDAPS, proxies, and user-plus-password authentication."
From an internal Basecamp announcement re: pings/IMs
This seems a lot to me like Docker Inc. caving in to what has been painfully obvious for a while: K8s won and Swarm/Mesos lost the battle for hearts and minds in container orchestration. We can argue about why it happened, but I got the impression Docker Inc. were desperately trying to wish it away.

Now reality has intruded and I am glad, though I predict they'll continue to maintain that Swarm is a first class platform for a while, then quietly let it wither on the vine until one day it's forgotten about.

Also of note is Rancher 2.0's dropping support for Swarm and Mesos and focusing solely on K8S going forward.
Sure. Visit Amsterdam, and you'll find most joints have filters. Of course, they aren't "proper" filters, just tubes of paper rolled up and placed in the smoking end.
You have a good point but remember that there are other factors that affect stock price completely external to the company -- the biggest one is interest rates.

Also, external happennings in other companies such as competitors, purchasers, suppliers have an impact on your company. So those should technically feed a model some factors (and in fact they do at hedge funds.)
I had similar feelings until I realized that work would pay for my monthly cellular bill (including data roaming while abroad).
It's a specific thing but the evidence is questionable. IIRC most of Dweck's studies and findings have failed to replicate.
Yes, if you shoot a politician or a journalist you're not only doing it to kill them, but to deprive their constituents or their audience of their services. That's why assassinations are considered worse than straight-up random murder.
Isn't affiliation a sort of a pyramid scheme?
Oh sorry .. multi level marketing .. ?
PDF version : http://web.archive.org/web/20151004200748/http://law.indiana...

I got it from the comments!
On curved surfaces, under varying lighting conditions.

If you want to show that standard OCR can cope with the images they have on that page, then go for it. But I suspect you'll have issues.
I'm getting downvoted but am genuinely curious if that is a possibility.
The UK is a good example of the difference between public and private corporations controlling public transport in buses. In London they are publicly controlled and very popular while outside of London they aren't and are terrible. London has service through the night and very high frequency while outside of London buses stop running very early and are very infrequent. They are also significantly more expensive outside of London.
120+ Great Cheat Sheets for Developers and Designers
AMZN ist the stand-out example, but AMZN, FB, GOOG are exceptions. Think back to 2006/2007 when PE and activist investors would take board seats and force companies to over-lever and do stock buy-backs while stocks were all-time high. How many companies can survive short-term incented PE or activist investors?
whatever, who knows who did the deed. These guys do this for a living. You do websites /apps, they deal drugs, launder money and kill anyone that interferes with their business and doesn't stop.

Call X and call for the favor he owes us or send him 2 more kilos and kill Y. Politicians that protect the criminals can also call in favors...
When the mirror is a faster-loading page (as experienced by normal users who don't have javascript blockers), then that makes perfect sense, no?
The quality of this title is terrible as well, the title should say 'Vulnerability in WiFi handshake discovered, its name is KRACK'
You are thinking of the extreme end when talking about debilitating and deadly sunburns, and is not within normal variance. Death by sunburn is a extreme rare event, generally caused by other contributing factors such as dehydration.

If we take the extreme end of everything, practically all in life is deadly. Salt is extremely deadly at high doses, but it is also suitable as food. Pure oxygen is deadly, but also suitable in medicine. Looking at the extreme part of variance is unhelpful to determine suitability when suitability is in the 99.99th percentile and unsuitability is outside it.

> don't people do a better job when it's something they enjoy?

If one assume that people pick jobs which they enjoy, then that issue is a bit moot. If 10% of the population like a particular activity, then it seems naturally that those 10% will do a good job. There is no logical argument that say that the 10% are not suited for the job just because 90% don't want the job and thus don't seek it. Preference of the 90% don't dictate the suitability of the remaining 10%.
That's doable. Never underestimate the power of metodical work.

People have great appreciation of "it was a wonderful little scheme but it doesn't work nowdays".

What's really charming to them is your cynicism, it's what they invested in.
Giants Standing on the Shoulders of Other Giants – Who Influenced Eric Ries?
AI at Coca-Cola... and it actually makes sense. Nice!
This is exciting!

I wonder how long until it gets hardware support.
many reasons, the first being that public entities would not be in a rush to spend a fortune on ill advised light rail systems which have run some systems into the billions with even more in deferred maintenance. light rail is great for connection distant suburbs or major points of attraction like an airport to the city center. however it cannot adjust for changes population needs. only NYC has ever shown real ridership increases in the last fifty years. US light rail has a nearly sixty BILLION dollar backlog of maintenance because it cost to much to build, run, and maintain. what private company would even be allowed into that mess while serving the public?

it also probably would not take the NAACP for force a privately run bus line for a city to serve minorities but it did in LA against the government run system.

want to extend it further, most public systems are bastions of nepotism where friends and families of politicians place them in positions they are not qualified for to earn big checks and pensions.
I think I can understand "We have both and need to manage them more easily" as a request, because it's about pain right now.

The thing I'm unsure about - and it would be really interesting to get your perspective on - is what this means for Swarm longer-term. Is there still going to be a reason why people will want hybrid? Is it a migration play?

In a hybrid, over time I'd want to two to behave the same, and getting k8s up and running is a one-time cost and likely decreasing maintenance. It seems like a point solution.
This article kind of makes Casper sound like the Uber of mattress companies.
How often does someone decide they want to sell (buy)? Market makers are reacting to demands for immediate liquidity in a distributed marketplace comprised of multiple equities exchanges.
How to link performance management and leadership development
Seems that people think Docker has gave in, but I am not that sure. If you can switch between Swarm/Kubernetes transparently, then why wouldn't you start with Swarm? (I'm talking about small companies who're just starting with containers.)
No, let's not.

Talking about the Dark Ages and failing to mention the Eastern Roman Empire is like talking about the Cold War and failing to mention the USA.

It means that the article is a kaleidoscope of mismatched, unconnected memes instead of something holistic and grounded in reality.

Some reality-based facts:

a) The western part of the Roman Empire collapsed a few centuries prior to the fifth century.

b) The southern shore of the Mediterranean and the Middle East collapsed during the Muslim invasions. (And never recovered, even to this day.)

c) The eastern part of the Roman Empire only started collapsing during the 13th century, give or take.

d) The flow of civilization from the eastern part to the western parts of the Roman Empire was blocked by Muslim piracy. (There is no overland route between Italy and Greece.)

e) The German-speaking parts of Europe were never any part of any Roman Empire, and saw no collapse. (Only improvement.)

f) Spain has its own history and its own historical cycles.
They can also decline to fully cooperate with the FBI later on, if it gets too close. Right now it's great: who doesn't trust the FBI...we have nothing to hide, call them in to find the truth. In reality, unless local police guide and allow them, they can do jack.
This is undoubtedly incredibly impressive as a feat of engineering. Detecting codes on those sample images with >95% accuracy is no mean feat. No doubt Google uses its muscle for many worthier things than this, and the learning from this project will be applied to many more 'serious' problems. I think what this blog post triggers for some people is just a further step down the road from Google as it was - a tech first solutions later company that solved interesting problems because they were interesting - to Google of today/the future - a big corporation that acts pretty much like any other, but with a few neat tools in its toolbox.
K8S is looking for all the world like it's becoming the One True Container Orchestration Platform. Obviously Docker can't admit that because it has investors, and one thing you can't afford to do with investors is be honest. But reading the runes, it sure looks like Docker are providing a migration path from Swarm to K8s.
This is the type of crime, that by definition, nobody who has the power to investigate wants to investigate.

This most likely was payback for exposing someone's offshore holdings, and the response was chosen to send a message: "Do not expose", and was done in such a bald-faced way that this crime's occurrence presupposes the existence of the very corruption needed to facilitate getting away with it, that any investigation would need to uncover.

TL;DR - that a crime like this, which requires corruption to execute and get away with, can happen, presupposes the investigative apparatus is unable to investigate it, with high probability.
Right? Probably moved up a couple places under the promise we'd not let British Leyland tape together any more vehicles.
Journalists' investigation of russian “troll factory” activity in US
Related: Newton's spinning water bucket

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucket_argument
Can't they consist of people from all countries?
New Pluralsight Course: Emerging Threats in IoT
Two DevOps Advantages of a Serverless Architecture
Why wouldn't you start with the one with the strongest mindshare and reputation? Even a cursory amount of googling shows there's a strong sentiment bias towards K8S over Swarm, it's not surprising that's what most people pick.
FBI uses it's budget to spy on its own citizens (Prism) and interfere with political process. The budget is supposed to be small.
I am not trying to get away from COGs by saying Medicare covers it because I agree it does not. I am saying the overhead included is misleading because it includes a portion of unpaid bills from other patients. Yes, it's part of a hospital's overhead, no it's not medicares responsibility.
Try to get multiple Knowledge transfer sessions, focused on the following aspects:

Current System
===

- End to end flow of the system (what is the first point of contact to your server for a HTTP request)

- How is the architecture laid out (services talking to each other)

- What are the front-facing services

- What are the back services (crons/queue consumers)

- How are the domains managed, how are all the domains setup

- How is the deployment setup for across services

- What are the background activities they were silently taking care of (manual crons)

- What system is responsible for which business activity

- What are all the 3rd party services your system talks to

Future System
===

- What are the current parts of the system they were actively working on

- How were these new services going to fit in the current architecture

- Were they planning of refactoring some parts/services

- Were they planning of rewriting any part of code
It looks like Arrow utilizes FlatBuffers internally [1]. Seems like using the Arrow project builds a lot of scaffolding that'd otherwise need to be built for this particular use case.

1: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/metadata.html
In addition to the president doing this against a critic, you could also do this as a third party if you wanted to incriminate the president!
The attacker gets a Man in the Middle position on layer 2 (data link).
So every step in the handshake goes through the attacker.

The attacker couldn't just MitM the protocol on layer 3 as it cannot authenticate with the WiFi router. Of course, the attacker already could just pretend to be the wifi router and then forward and inspect all traffic to the internet. What is scary here is that it breaks into a Local network as opposed to the internet.
I see and almost understand what you are writing, but how does this help the original business.

Say I'm business A. I'll offer a portion of my business (say 40%) with the offer that you will reap 40% of my profit. (Assuming one person pays in for that whole value).(edit: I offer this as the income will allow me to expand where as otherwise I'd have to wait longer depending on profit)

At what point does almost anything else you mentioned help the business?

Everything else seems likes gambling, imho, and I still can't wrap my head around why it's allowed.
5 Steps to Finding a Quality Wholesale Product Supplier
HMM and AHA DO THE TURING TEST
Why wouldn’t you start with Kubes? Less vendor lock in and a much bigger community.
> Outside of Google, there is no solution like this available anywhere.

Then why not use Google service (I think it is spanner)?
Do you not 'trust' your home wifi router?
Yeah even the title "bomb kills" sounds like a bad joke. Next newsflash at 11 will be like "bullet kills X" instead of using the right words.
Because it is hard .. and in the way they are doing it, unethical.
The title makes it sound like other nations had criticised the Malta for having these ties, when it actually was about an individual doing something _against_ the law of Malta (I presume).
Why the Hell Do People Delete Your App
How many people are actively working on it and maintaining it? From my experiences with Vagrant and Packer, I get the feeling that there is not much development effort (by Hashicorp employees) allocated to the free Hashicorp products so I hesitate to even consider using Consul.

Vagrant and Packer feel like early alphas and while there is little competition, I do not feel comfortable using them. Because of this bad experience in the past, I have not even tried out Consul and Vault and am unlikely to do so in the future.
There's a very big difference.

Assassination = murder of a prominent person for political reasons, often carried out by a third party (an assassin).

Slaying = a killing. That's it. Besides not having any political motive, a slaying isn't even necessarily murder; killing someone in war, in self-defense or on accident is still a slaying.
Isn't the message more like "expose, but anonymously"? Well, I mean, hopefully that's how people would understand it.
This just proves it: the worst thing a company can do is to underestimate the stupidity of its customers.
The medium used, a bomb. Is typically associated with assassination. We are not talking about someone stabbing someone else here.
"That’s right: a dozen white men"

And there was I thinking using arbitrary categorisation with stereotypical labels was the very definition of prejudice.

Clearly I need sending for re-education.

What happened to the notion that we should treat people as individuals rather than sticking them in pre-labelled boxes?
"U.S. hospitals provided $41.1 billion in uncompensated care in 2011, according to the latest data from the AHA's Annual Survey of Hospitals. That's $1.8 billion more than in 2010. The total includes "bad debt" (services for which hospitals anticipated but did not receive payment) and charity care (services for which hospitals neither received nor expected payment because they determined, with help from the patient, the patient's inability to pay). It does not include Medicaid and Medicare underpayment."

So, no this is not all 'underpayment' but I agree it's relative to charges not costs.
Email-First Startups
They do, it is just that they get throttled before the temperature gets too high.
Just look at all the issues with the Snapdragon 810.
Depends, it can be a http connection over tcp without curl being involved or it can be a curl request wrapped in underneath the hood, like in guzzle, for example.
Europol's function is basically just coordination of the police forces in EU countries. It's not even close to a federal police force.
I did not say it would be easy ... Only that it's easier then producing and selling the products/services/needs yourself. It will take much less work if you figure out a clever way to stand in-between.
Is onavo that popular ?? I had never heard of it before, and noone around me uses it..
But the thing is that as a developer, it doesn't matter what you start with - you have both and you're using compose files, etc. So Docker is trying to make the orchestrator less relevant now, and says that 'don't worry about the orchestrator'. You, as a developer, are using Docker and Compose.
(Or at least that's what Docker is trying to do here, I think.)
ES proposal: class fields
you can raise capital by selling more shares.

This allows you, as a business, to not have to turn a profit and still be in business.
My most sincere congratulations. Good job Daniel.
I must admit to not being an expert in these matters, and I therefore defer to this comment by JoshTriplett, where he talks about ECC as being inferior to FEC:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11604918
That is not how you build XML document in PHP. One of the reasons people hate PHP because it gets abused like this.
Perhaps. I think the line is drawn when you don't have a choice as to the nature of the work. Which raises the thought-provoking question of how little choice is too little - freedom to choose which section of field you pick cotton from is obviously at one end of the scale. What's at the other? What about "you can work at any job you want, as long as you never leave the country or speak ill of Glorious Leader?" How many choices do you need to be offered before it doesn't "count" anymore?

Agriculture itself must have felt like slavery to hunter-gatherers - work the fields, or get killed by those who do.
Well then, if everyone else is doing it!.. I don't buy it. People don't have friends based off of if they're on social media, or play specific video games. If they do, you don't want them as friends. It's the same reason I don't let my 3rd grade boy play FPS games even though he REAAALY wants to, and all his friends do. An 8 year old should not be running around in a realistic game shooting people. When his brain is more mature, he will have plenty of time to play such games.
What I see from this is a while bunch of hand waving to say that 'there are a whole bunch of people between you and x business', despite the fact you can directly purchase their shares(which they offered to gain temporary income to make purchases before their cash flow allowed).

I still don't see a reason why these people between you and the business have any useful reason to exist. Unless for gambling, Wich as far as I can tell is what it is. (And I'm not talking about initial investment, I'm talking about people gambling o weather the value will go up or down).

Ontop of all that, what benefit does it provide to the initial company if people are gambling if the value goes up or down by a few percent? That just seems like a different form of book making.

Edit:

You know upon second read, it seems there is so much hand waving to mitigate investor risk, that completely ignores the idea that you are purchasing a piece of a company, that really seems that the entire system is beibg rebuilt to keep certain people making money.

If I want an investor to purchase 20% of my company. For 20% profit, why should any sort of bonds, currency devaluation come into fact.

As far as I see it: you are directly purchasing a portion of my company. That is a share right? If the value goes up, assumably your dividend will increase. Otherwise it will decrease. What the value of my countries dollar happens, has no effect on the percentile of my company.

All I can see is a lot of hand waving to make things different.

Side note: I'd really like to see a logical reason for any of this.

Edit to lostboys: I think the thread is too long and I can't directly respond, my apologies.

Once the business sells a portion to investors, those portions can be resold. This I get, where all the shorting and everything else comes from, makes me wonder about the entire stock system. At what point is it not about the investment about the business, and gambling about how it will go in the future(eg shorting). That and the whole system akin to it, is the part that is making me wonder how it was ever allowed.
We are using this for addon synchronization in our community through Arma3Sync. On server side we need to "build" repository - it just generates .zsync files, then clients are downloading just diff. Update size came down from 10-15GB to <3GB.
Personally I don't, because my ISP owns it.
From what I understood, there are two ways to block step 3. The most obvious way is to jam it, that is, send noise at the same time so the radio fails to receive it. The other way (and the one which makes attacks easier) is to pretend to be the AP but in another channel.

Suppose the real AP is on channel 1. The attacker is nearer the victim than the AP, and is on channel 6. The attacker repeats on channel 6 everything the AP sends on channel 1, and repeats on channel 1 everything the victim sends on channel 6. The victim sees the same AP on both channels, channel 1 and channel 6 (the attacker modifies the part of the AP beacon/responses which says "I'm on channel X"), which is a perfectly legitimate and normal thing, and chooses channel 6 because it has a stronger signal.

Since now the attacker is in the middle, it can modify anything. Change the AP beacon to say "I'm on channel 6", drop any packet it wants, duplicate any packet it wants, and so on.

> What happens when I disconnect from wifi to a mobile network and back to the wifi?

The wifi negotiation starts from scratch, with a new step 1.
> No doubt Google uses its muscle for many worthier things than this

I hope this doesn't sound too negative, but since Google's main revenue is ads, "worthier things" ultimately means "improved ad targeting", doesn't it? In that case, it is not so different from the demonstrated application.
And the benefit of liquidity is to reduce your risk. If you change your mind, need some cash quickly, or even simply want to know what the market thinks your stock is worth, you need liquidity. If you don't have observable and executable prices, you may struggle to find a buyer for that stock when you need it (delaying a home purchase or exposing you to future changes in market sentiment / health of the company) and will have no idea who to trust to tell you how much you should ask when you sell your position.