skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hmm. We use Phabricator, and while you're free to skip unit tests and linters locally (on by default, but can be skipped) or ignore Jenkins build failures as you iterate over a diff, the expectation is that you get all the tests and linters to pass before landing to master (and usually before soliciting reviewers).
How about a system where accusations are entered and kept encrypted until enough actual people enter similar ones and the info is released (maybe to a Wikileaks type organization for verification) automatically? The subject could be notified if they get n complaints. The accusations would have to be enough that there would be an excellent chance of conviction. I think it is an issue for all people in power, not simply media types. Because of the power of the subjects there would have to be some way to avoid the courts shutting it down too though. Perhaps an Ether smart contract? It would never catch all the bad people in the world but could at least put some checks on or even stop the powerful serial offender.
I know this is a bit "Pollyanna-Technical" "solution" to a human problem but it is the best I can think of given the adversarial court system, inequities of money, and all that.
Also, I don't think one should limit it to particular crimes.
On my phone: apologies for such a disorganized post.
Aluminum Sheet Metal Stamping Parts
Aluminum Sheet Metal Stamping Parts

Are you looking for high-quality Aluminum Sheet Metal Stamping Parts? Are you tired of waiting months only to return samples because the parts are of poor quality and don’t meet your needs? We are your solution for metal stamping .

At FRIMA , material inspection is the most important step in our process— even more important than CNC machine operation on some occasions. We test each part against a check list of quality control requirements before the CNC Stamping is even fired up.

At present,FRIMA holds the shares of four hardware manufacturing companies.It not only provides high quality metal manufacturing services by itself, but also has specialized departments for integrating all manufacturing superior resources in Ningbo to reduce costs and obtain qualified products and services for customers. With a good reputation in local chamber of commerce and government, it is a metal manufacturing partner worthy of your trust.

For many customers, especially for the overseas companies who have purchasing task in China for the first time, the cooperation with FRIMA even means the increasing credibility of the other suppliers to your company in the future cooperation with other Chinese suppliers and it will lay the foundation of developing more business in China for your company.

Aluminum Sheet Metal Stamping Parts

Our design team, tool building abilities, and metal stamping technology is fully integrated. If a change occurs during the job process, we have the ability to reconcile differences quickly in-house. We control every aspect of the stamping process to ensure efficiency and offer our customers quality and cost-effectiveness.
What does one validate that a trained NN has learned a correct method?
Should self worth be tied to success at all?
More: firms like Sequoia and Accel have tools/or buy similar data. But the more significant point is, Facebook has a pulse on the market and can compete or buy out anyone the moment they see trends that have a considerable potential.

This is a paranoia acquisition to kill a future competitor. If this works, and I think it will under FB’s strong leadership, its a win win for the tbh founders and FB.

If you care for a non-monopolistic future where privacy is valued, go work for Snapchat and push some sense into them; diversify and acquire companies like this to compete with FB (Even if you don’t like Snapchat).
kubelet v1.8 collects volume stats, the proposal linked in the summary was forked, and the fork accepted & implemented: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/930
Hackett (https://github.com/lexi-lambda/hackett) seems like an interesting project in this regard.
To be completely fair, the risk of nuclear war shouldn't be priced into the US equity markets. If a catastrophic nuclear war happens, the only way selling stocks can help you is by excessive short-term spending on frivolous luxuries. The risk/reward profile simply doesn't make sense for even a significant risk to substantially alter investor behavior.
I'm not a physics major. So I may have made a major booboo in explaining this.

I get what you're saying. We know what inertia does. We have the math to estimate is effect. We can measure it's affect. To be clear, we don't know how it works. In the vacuum of space, if your body begins to spin, a force will pull your arms away from your from your body. No one on this planet can unequivocally explain why this happens. No one can explain the mechanism for how gravity works. No one can explain why when something starts spinning, there is a force that makes it continue to spin, or why there is a need for force to stop it.

These are basic forces and our lack of understanding shows just how little we understand about the universe. This, after the smartest people, over 2,000 years have had a crack at it.

Steve Jobs said that people who have made everything are no smarter than you or I. Einstein said something similar. I find it a bit reassuring that some of the worlds most basic forces are yet unexplained. We are still in our infancy of figuring things out. Everyone should get to work. There's a lot to do.
Automotive CNC Machining Precision Components
To all those that provided more suggestions, yeah there are other ways to deal with this.

You could carry a portable ashtray, sure. But your pockets are already stuffed, you're carrying your cell phone, wallet, keys, cigarettes and a lighter already. Plus those things stink. As a smoker, you already stink, and you're washing your hands, eating mints to futher ensure you don't bother the people around you with the smell of it.

You could extinguish it fully on the sidewalk. The same sidewalk that is pissed and shit on daily in San Francisco. I'd rather not touch my hands to it.

You're constantly demonized by the people around you. Random strangers call you callous in public forums. You're subject to the passive-agressive coughs, the glares from passer-bys and the occassional snarky comment.

The life of a smoker is one of constant inconvenience. Eventually, you just decide you've had enough. It's not worth it anymore. You throw your cigarette on the sidewalk and move on with your day. You don't feel good about it, and you wish you could of done better.
But is the doctor really a third party?
Global stability is just a localized illusion enjoyed by nuclear powers and their allies.
“Hello, World”: Snapdragon X50 5G modem makes its first 5G data connection
" and who deserve to work in tech as much as anyone"

Is working at a "tech" company, a social benefit that we should be "doling" out evenly to all groups as a reward? What does that mean "deserves to work in tech"?

The only measure why anyone gets to work anywhere is they have the skills and mental ability to perform , at the minimum, the necessary tasks. We should simply be ensuring that we are not systematically biased against any candidates as to hire the best possible workforce.
to be fair, trump is fucking up a lot of you guys' institutions, like foreign policy, immigrant policy, ecological policy, gender & racial (civil) policy, etc.
This is a pet peeve of mine - you're mixing Christianity with Platonism. In the Roman Empire, it was Plato and his intellectual descendants who had the idea that reality was an illusion. Christianity was influenced by this, but only somewhat, because it's a core Christian teaching that the saved will enjoy eternal, bodily life ("I believe in the resurrection of the body and life everlasting"). If you believe that reality is an illusion, like a Buddhist, this form of eternity would be a bad thing, not a good one.

More specifically answering the historical question, the Church was just as strong in the Eastern Roman Empire as in the fallen West, so its presence does not really distinguish the one (lasted until 1453) from the other (Dark Age).
Oh so how do you know that? Did they publish some article stating a change in control?
I think you are right! I am curious about the research behind this one. I do see a lot of tech companies consciously looking for all kinds of diversity - gender, sexual orientation, varied college majors, different cultural backgrounds etc.
> and assuming that insurance companies negotiate deals on par with medicare

They can't. By law, they can't reimburse less than Medicare does. In reality, they end up pegging their reimbursement rates to multiples of what Medicare pays.

> In fact the opposite is true. If hospitals could get 100% of their patients to pay their bills at medicare rates, they would save money on defaults, billing overhead, and the people who spend hours on the phone fighting with insurance companies.

No, and there are multiple links downthread that disprove that claim.

> But medicare is currently reimbursing at break-even rates,

Medicare does not reimburse at break-even rates, or anything close to that.
Are you sure about that? From the paper (section 3.3):

> Note that the adversary cannot replay
an old message 3, because its EAPOL replay counter is no longer
fresh.

And a related update from the TLDR post you originally referenced (which I believe is causing confusion):

> Update: An early version of this post suggested that the attacker would replay the message. Actually, the paper describes forcing the AP to resend it by blocking it from being received at the client. Thanks to Nikita Borisov for the fix.
Ok, so if that's the case, why can't objects be relative to spacetime rather than other objects, as discussed in the article?
"Precession" is just another word for rotation. It sounds like you're thinking of a spinning top, whose rotation axis will precess (rotate) around another axis (usually the local vertical).

In the context use here, the precession in question is the rotation of the perihelion (or, if you want to think of it more akin to the above case, the semimajor axis of the ellipse) that rotates in the orbital plane (around the normal vector to the orbital plane).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsidal_precession
Experience shows there is a wide range of behavior available to adherents of the same religion, and adopted by them. Saying, for example, one is a Christian, says virtually nothing about one's behavior - Christians participated in crusades, Christians burned people at stake, Christians refused to even touch weapons, Christians founded major pieces of modern physics and mathematics, Christians owned slaves, Christians actively participated in abolitionist movement... It is not a good predictor of behavior. And thus, hypothesis that their behavior is explained by their religion sounds extremely weak. It's like saying Romance and Germanic languages are bad because (many) people in Europe spoke Romance and Germanic languages and they had Dark Ages, so clearly these two are related, while in China nobody spoke these languages and they were just fine. Clearly the theory sounds just as plausible?
Correct, but at the same time what happens to EU companies selling software services in the US? If the EU companies don't fork over data will they get restricted too? I'm not sure if isolating every jurisdiction into its own tech ecosystem is an achievable (let alone sustainable) direction. To a certain extent, Microsoft (and presumably others) are attempting to do this for their data[1] by hiring data trustees in other countries. Essentially, Microsoft still develops the technical services but hires another company, which does not have US presence, to hold that data and is subject to the (presumably stronger) privacy laws of the country it is located in.

I'm not sure how resilient this is to coercion by the US government. Maybe the US government could forbid Microsoft from doing business with the data trustee unless the the trustee gives up user data.

1. https://news.microsoft.com/europe/2015/11/11/45283/
It also takes all the "fun" out of programming, as so many seems to approach it like some grand display of mental prowess. Never mind the whole "agile" thing...
That's rather anecdotal. Counter anecdote: I do not hover my fingers, mostly because I have Cherry Clears, I hammer the key.

Most people don't partially depress keys to my experience.
If there's a huge influx of outsiders, then that alone would increase traffic accidents without needing to appeal to drugs as the culprit. The OP seems to be looking a little too hard to fit data to his beliefs.
Well, that cost is almost certainly lower than building a solution to figure out who is reading stuff or anything like that. Sending emails just isn't expensive resource-wise.

As for spam detectors: Just forget about spam detectors. If people employ someone to throw away their emails for idiotic reasons, that is not my problem. If they want to be subscribed to my mailing list, they should not employ people who throw away my emails.
"... a fraction of what they paid."

Strike that. Obviously computers were far more expensive in decades past and the prices have come down dramatically. What I meant is a first user with an older computer who is achieving better performance, e.g. lower latency, than a second user having the costs of acquiring the latest hardware and software (who discarded her older computers).
Or stop treating programming like some grand joust...
That sounds like saying "well, if you only care for Russia, Ivan the Terrible is surely an appropriate term, but he wasn't particularly terrible for Africa or Americas, so using this nickname betrays you are exclusively interested in only Russian history and don't care about the rest, otherwise you'd call him Ivan the Fourth Vasilyevich!". Doesn't sound very convincing to me.
its rotation in the orbital plane changes due to GR.

Actually, it would change even without GR. The orbital ellipse is only constant in the ideal two-body problem. The fact that planets aren't perfectly spherically symmetric, and the presence of the other planets, also cause the orbits to precess.

From the Wikipedia article I linked in my other post: "For Mercury, the perihelion precession rate due to general relativistic effects is 43″ per century. By comparison, the precession due to perturbations from the other planets in the Solar System is 532″ per century, whereas the oblateness of the Sun (quadrupole moment) causes a negligible contribution of 0.025″ per century."
Just to clarify a question I had when reading about KRACK - If you are using a VPN over WiFi, you still have some degree of safety, right? Any way that the KRACK vulnerability can be elevated to sniff and decrypt VPN packets in transit?
Try selling pounds of it and tell me that it's only "technically" illegal. Or try being non-white, in which case your chances of being arrested for even personal-use amounts go way up. Or an ex-con failing their piss test on probation and going back to jail, or a manual laborer denied work-related injury insurance claims because they smoked a joint on the weekend. I know many people fucked over by the legal system over this drug that you seem to think is not actively prohibited.
You're implicitly claiming that crows have second order desires (what you "want to want", as opposed to first order desires, "what you want"). If crows don't have second order desires then this doesn't matter to them, it's just another way of getting food. They're not bothered by whatever it is that's the problem with cigarette butt food, they're incapable of being bothered by that: they want to food so they want to pick up cigarette butts, and they have no capacity to reflect on whether they want to want to pick up cigarette butts, so they're not bothered.

If crows do have second order desires, then it's possible they might be bothered, and then you have an ethics problem. And we actually have more reason to think crows might have second order desires than we do for other animals: crows recognize themselves in mirrors, which requires an awareness of self, therefore they have an awareness of self. An awareness of self is necessary for having second order desires. It's not enough to conclude that they have second order desires, but it's a shred of evidence. However, we usually consider young children to not have second order desires, so I'm fairly skeptical of the idea that crows have them.

It's not clear that there's any ethical violation even if crows do have second order desires, but if they don't, there's no ethical question at all.

Edit: no ethical violation where the crows are the victims in the sense that we're discussing.
Who proposed anything about carbon in relation to regolith? [1]

[1] http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant...
>so long as your wages keep pace with inflation.

That's a big if, though, depending on your (or "you" in aggregate) market power. And if you've got less than $1K in savings, you probably don't have a lot.
That KFF quotation is saying literally the exact opposite of the point you're trying to make. Though I guess if you don't understand how Medicare Advantage works, it's easy to make that mistake.

> Anyway, I still disagree with how many of these things are calculated. You need to look at the indirect cost part of COGs critically and in context of other related government spending.

Medicare doesn't cover COGS. Private payers do. You can't get away from that fact, especially when you've now provided two separate links that corroborate it.
The solution is to move the company to the country with the least restrictive rules.
On linux, after keyboard has decided that a key has been pressed, and is ready to tell USB about it.

1. Wait for USB to poll.

2. Handle interrupt urb generated by keyboard.

3. Propagate the urb to the correct driver for completion

4. Create input events for each key event in this urb. Don't forget to use this to add to your randomness pool!

5. Pass the key event to user space, and wake up readers.

6. Some library reads the input event, and calls some sort of handler.

7. Application logic updates the internal state as a result of a key press.

8. Tells some library to redraw.

9. Library redraws, and writes to the X server using x protocol.

10. Magic occurs. I assume this magic is mostly just compositing windows and copying to a frame buffer, but who knows?

11. The magic pixies run across the wire from your PC to your monitor, and at some future date, your monitor displays it.

Honestly, I am impressed that all of this gets done in less than 100ms.
Can you think of any particular circumstances where quality would be of paramount importance?

I'll wait.
You may be underestimating the market of Californians who want to drive fast. For a long time, to sell a car in California at all, you had to put a special emissions package together, with was a lot of overhead, but manufacturers still did it, because losing the California market to save overhead doesn't make sense when selling cars.
Seems like you’re mostly trying to push an agenda with that comment.
what makes you think that there is more corruption in public transport related agencies than car traffic related agencies? Why would vote system and election costs be allocated more to public transport than car drivers? (In economics parlance, externalities are quite well defined concept. Practical applications of course are always a bit more muddy)
Big thanks to the Consul team! We have been using it for a year with basically 0 maintenance.

* Decent REST API

* K/V store

* Service discovery

* Single Go Binary

* Geographical failover

* Load balancing

A real Swiss knife.

Haven't tried different things (e.g: ZooKeeper) but don't feel very compelled to since everything just works.
>Certainly if you were alone in the universe, he thought, there would be no way to tell if you were rotating, so there could be no centrifugal force if you started to spin with respect to, say, another person.

Isn't that... intuitively wrong though? If you were spinning fast enough in space, your body would be ripped apart. If you were spinning and let go of an object near you, instead of floating in place, it would appear to retreat away from you rapidly.

I understand the example of how a person in a falling elevator can't tell if gravity is acting on them or not ... it's intuitive and there aren't any obvious contradictions. I don't get why these two examples are brought up together as similar obviously-true things that inspired relativity. It feels to me like it (the article / Mach / Einstein / physicists) is reaching for a parallel where there isn't one between cases that are only superficially similar.

Maybe the idea is that no other bodies around means that your own body would be uncontested in "frame-dragging" such to define that you aren't rotating? But what happens if you hold your arm out and throw a ball perpendicular to your arm? I can't imagine a type of rules of motion that would result in anything but your body being sent spinning slightly, with you seeing the ball retreat while appearing to orbit you and you being able to feel the blood rush a little more to the ends of your body away from the axis you're spinning on. The blood in your veins has inertia, and by changing the inertia of parts of your body, then of course you're going to get pushback from your blood. Maybe the ball being a separate body is now dragging the frame a bit such that you're now rotating relative to the frame, but if the ball has much less mass than you, it seems odd that the ball would have a great effect on the frame compared to you, and possibly continue to, no matter how far away it is from you. Every other effect at a distance rapidly diminishes with distance! This effect wouldn't be necessarily nonlocal (ie. faster than light), but it would seem to have a disrespect for distance not commonly found in physics. (Maybe the effect just diminishes outrageously slowly over distance, but I'm not sure this assails all of my concerns with the concept.)
progress, it seems to generally be exponential

Unclear how one would measure this, but assuming one could...

One would definitely expect some kind of accelerating rate of change: it would be very rare for innovations to be lost completely, and fairly common for one old piece of innovation to be waiting on a new innovation to unlock a subsequent change.

Assuming a constant rate of "raw innovation" would give an accelerating rate just by combining new innovations with existing technology.
Short answer: because tachyons don't exist (i.e. haven't been found)

Slightly longer answer: To be relative to spacetime would (most likely) mean having a means of transmitting information faster than the speed of light, but information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. * "The world line (or worldline) of an object is the path of that object in 4-dimensional spacetime, tracing the history of its location in space at each instant in time." [0] Something that would exist relative to spacetime (as in, would not be confined by the laws that dictate spacetime) would have to be outside of a light cone [1]; "In flat spacetime, the future light cone of an event is the boundary of its causal future and its past light cone is the boundary of its causal past."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_line

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

* I don't know very much about quantum entanglement, so if anyone would like to comment as to whether entanglement might appear to violate transmission of information faster than c, that'd be neat, but i have a suspicion that it doesn't because either because of (A) a reason depending on the fact that qubits aren't like bits or (B) that the separation of two entangled subsystems would constitute the actual transmission of information but would still necessarily be no faster than c.