skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can't follow whether you're arguing for or against interpreting the first amendment as prohibiting restriction of speech by private entities. (Your 2nd paragraph seems against, but your 3rd paragraph seems for.)

Regardless, I'm not arguing either, I'm stating facts backed by case law as outlined in the linked Wikipedia article to support the thesis that the phrase "free speech" is used to mean many different things, often to deliberately confound discussion on the topic. If supporters of "free speech" clarified what exactly what flavor of "free speech" they are talking about (1st amendment prohibition of federal restrictions; imagined prohibition of private restrictions; ability to override rights of protected classes) I suspect we'd have fewer, and more productive, discussions.

Unfortunately such precision of language is hard to come by in this brave new world of emotion-driven discource and deliberately confounded communication.
Fortunately for Hacker News, most of that economic windfall goes to middlemen.
The article is not click-baity. It uses analogy to make a point.
I get paid the same for all the code I write, but none of it ever has any chance at all of still paying me three years later. None of it. Ever.
If it has a Broadcom wifi, then you're probably SOL on that front
I can't seem to find a definition of "Partial disclosure" on either the website or the IETF RFC draft.
> Surely identifying phone numbers via the camera and inputting them that way would be easy and a measurable improvement over the current method of mashing buttons.

Not many people really dial phone numbers these days though - dialing via contacts, history, a link on a website or Google Maps are far more common in my experience.

The issue is already pretty much solved without the need for any OCR - of course Google Goggles does do that too if you need it.
Milo is referred to as a Nazi because of his actions and his statements. It has absolutely nothing to do with his race, or his husbands race, and to try and say otherwise is completely missing the point.
Whoso belongs only to his own age, and reverences only its gilt Popinjays or smoot-smeared Mumbojumbos, must needs die with it.
- Thomas Carlyle
>How about you address the similarities

Because it diverts the topic. It is literally introducing the fallacy seen in "And you are lynching Negroes[1]" to avoid the subject. Because of people like you we cannot discuss being victimized today because of deeds in the past made by unrelated entities.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_you_are_lynching_Negroes
Common Lisp:

(defmethod collide ((object1 space-ship) (object2 rocket))
"Inline documentation for this method..."
(the debris
(create-debris-from space-ship))

SPACE-SHIP and ROCKET are types and classes. DEBRIS would also be a type and a class.

Use DEFTYPE, DEFCLASS, DEFSTRUCT, ... to define new types. Use CHECK-TYPE and ASSERT to have runtime checks, integrated with the condition system.
All this does is extend the jail terms. Where were you when the law was initially created? It's been on the books for years.
Popper is indeed the best articulation of the caveat of the OP. We must be intolerant of intolerance. And intolerance is defined as ideas that attack others based on inalienable aspects (skin color, lineage and the like) or intrinsic to our understanding of self determination that does not impinge on the rights of others (religion, beliefs, sexual orientation and the like).
As in, there was a legitimate possibility in the 60s or with OWS that the movement would pick up enough momentum to really shake things up, power-structure-wise.
Boyz II Men is my guess
It's usually pretty clear

Is it?

Seems to me if I wanted to preach hate I'd wrap it in allusions, hypotheticals and you-know-what-I-mean

Maybe letting that stuff through is the cost of free speech?
Yea if I could give you a script to run which made setting up your own version of those would you?
Nope, just pushes it out of public view.
> I don't have access to the full story so might be missing some context.

https://outline.com/AbbLRj
I think I could see myself using the last one. Felt as natural to use as the current dial pad layout is compared to it's options.
> It's native in the sense that it doesn't bundle an entire Chrome browser runtime with it.

So it's not native.
In the case of, say, social media platforms banning violent threats against their other users, is that a bad thing?
Isnt it part of FF nightly?
There's a big difference between "I stopped contributing because people said things that upset me" and "I got arrested for saying something." I don't accept the premise that people who are upset by what they read are somehow shut out of the conversation.
"And then, for no reason anyone ever understood, Omega created a bunch of factories that produced an unstoppable army of robots who rounded up all the humans and turned them into paperclips."
I was very unclear in that comment, I apologize.

I was myself confused by the comment I was replying to. I don't like when people say "hint, most people x".

I wanted to get better information about what the actual statistics were, because I didn't know what percent of the prison population were sex offenders, which was 15%.

This is my source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/16/sex-offender...

I'm not sure what my position on this issue is. But it appears that a decent percentage of people in prison in California are serious criminals, and although some are definitely marijuana offenders that should probably be released, I don't think its fair to call that the majority of the people in the prison system.
>I agree that price discrimination can be a useful thing, but question the idea that only very large or wealthy companies should pay anything at all.

Because the more developers use a piece of software, the more valuable being able to use the software is. It's a classic network effect. Being able to write your commercial web app in Ruby on Rails is more valuable than being able to write it in a functionally equivalent framework with much fewer users of the software. This is straight from being able to hire developers familiar with RoR, access Q&A discussions, use third-party RoR tooling, etc.

Large companies tend to not be early adopters anyways, and they have the fattest checkbooks to raid for the value you're supplying, so it gets the most financial gain for the adoption loss you're causing.
Developers talk about how they use Mithril.js
This is one of the best features of new Firefox for me.
Normally I had to start up gimp, select an option, set few seconds timeout, grap the screenshot, and then edit it to show only the part I wanted.

Screenshot in firefox is aware of the page, you can select the appropriate html tag visually.

Actually I thought they removed it in recent Nighlty and was looking for it, after few days I found it in the triple dot, (just next to the start and pocket icons).
Geeks are taking over Iceland
The article (and study) makes a leap that doesn't appear to be supported in the data. Namely, that the social capital (“connections”) built in a fraternity are the reason for higher income.

I would propose an alternate hypothesis: that men who seek out and/or have been a part of a fraternity are better at building unrelated social capital that does affect income. Or, put another way, that men who build a network of fraternity brothers are going to be better at building professional networks as well. While the former may bolster the latter, and while the two may not be mutually-exclusive sets, the career benefit comes from the latter.
Looking for Summer '18 Internship Oppourtunities. UMass Amherst Grad Student. Specializing in Machine Learning.

Location: Amherst, MA

Remote: Open

Willing to relocate: Yes, preferred.

Technologies: Python, R, Octave/MATLAB, C/C++, Java SpringMVC, Django, HTML/CSS, Javascript (AngularJS, D3.js), AWS (EC2, RDS, SNS, SQS, S3) Relational (MySQL, Redshift), NoSQL (DynamoDB, Redis), ORM (Hibernate, SQLAlchemy) Tensorflow, NumPy, CUDA C++, LaTeX, SVN/GIT, Jekyll

Resume/CV: https://www.dropbox.com/s/xs1eq7ivm7v58od/cv-one-page.pdf

Email: gauravanand25@gmail.com
Those diagrms come from here:

http://scotthurff.com/posts/how-to-design-for-thumbs-in-the-...

though even there I cannot find any explanation for "ow-space".

Maybe a reference to some game?
Lose money?
Discussion at the time of the death: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15204772 (322 points, 27 days ago, 150 comments)
> It's worked so far.

As far as we know. Who's to say that there wasn't an advanced civilization of humans hundreds of millions of years ago that wiped themselves out, and now we're re-inventing everything they did up to the point of the apocalypse, where the cycle will begin again?
Nope, you're absolutely right. We'd just adopted the colloquialism internally compared to the Yubikeys, and I'd lost context for the whole purpose of our key ceremonies was originally to be able to treat those IronKey devices tacitly like HSMs.
The factory that one starts shipping a product with is never the same as the factory 100, or 1000, or 10000 units later...
Nothing is stopping anyone from granting a license for $0
> then when you navigate to the site it immediately says the announcement/law is actually about watching videos promoting terrorism.

Huh, is that somehow better? Can I not watch promotion videos for whatever reason and not go to jail? Research and journalism are obvious examples, where the politicians will say "of course those people will not get prosecuted" (until there is a journalist publishing negative stuff about said politician), but even for plain old curiosity's sake, trying to understand those people better, or whatever else you can come up with, it should be totally legal.
Not sure exactly what simulation you're referring to with the position example, in most of my code that would either be fixed in the next timestep or make the whole thing blow up immediately.

Anyway, I haven't argued against using ECC memory in any of these comments. I've argued that you should know your needs and choose accordingly, and that ECC memory isn't free and therefore cannot be a universally optimal default for everyone.

For much of my physics work I've found ECC memory not to be worth the cost at all. For other things, like most database servers (and perhaps voxel rendering, I don't have enough experience there to comment) ECC memory is clearly worth it. I just think people should invest some thought into the question before evangelizing for or against ECC in the general case.
Paradigms are quite orthogonal to type systems. Mozart/Oz and AliceML implement more or less the same set of paradigms. One is dynamic the other is statically typed.
> putting the burden of proof ('reasonable excuse') on the viewer

A parent who lost his son due to terrorism would be put in jail for doing online research into the killers.
I think the question is. Do you believe that we can have good government policies that can be improved overtime. Or do you just want to have the smallest possible government.

Because the conversation in the right hasn't been about what policies are the best, it has been about getting rid of the government.
Get and use a chemical assay kit of some kind. Trust but verify.
> By "commercial use" the majority of software engineers take that to mean selling.

well there aren't many open source licenses that restrict commercial use. Especially since it would violate https://opensource.org/definition part 6, well basically such definitions should be taken with a grain of salt.
however even agpl3 can be used for projects where you do not need to share the code with the outside world. if you only share the code with the users using the project you are already doing everything correct. basically internal software.
That's asserted by the OP, but I don't think that claim is supported by the OP or by his sources.

I argue that banning speech (as a speech act) and banning ideas are different things. To pick a sort of pedantic counterexample, banning me from yelling a racial slur at you in public more than once isn't making anything unthinkable. I can yell it once, other people can yell it at you, I can yell it at others, people can record the yell on YouTube, etc.

So, I agree with OP's argument that we should not ban ideas, and I do agree that speech is necessary to communicate ideas (of course), but I think that banning some speech acts can be entirely defensible.

(Also, remember that every functioning advanced society bans several forms of speech already - a good example is that I am banned from using a trademark without authorization from the trademark holder, or from reproducing copyrighted material, or from making defamatory claims.)
This sort of comment comes up every time there's an article about poverty.

It's an almost comical copy of itself, posted over and over again, written by people who have 0 frame of reference of what it's like to be poor.

Unsurprisingly, the value of such advice is still nil. Even if it was possible for these people to save a life-changing amount of money, they still won't see it here, on HN.
One of the principle authors (who had long since left AOL) tried to get the proprietary kernel and the distributed computing components open sourced 4-5 years ago, got almost to the finish line and then everyone in the executive chain of approval was axed/moved on. I doubt anyone else has the will and connections to try.
How to Build a Self-Conscious Machine – Backchannel
The Super Micro SuperServer 8048B-TR4FT lists that it supports up to 12TB DDR4 ECC RAM (which could have 4xE7-8890v4 for 96 cores / 192 threads). And the 7088B-TR4FT lists that it supports up to 24TB DDR4 ETC RAM (with a corresponding 192 cores / 384 threads).
If you're considering this, please consider responsible disclosure steps. Here are ones I use with consulting clients.

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/responsible_disclosur...
I think a large part on why Truecaller is so successful is because of the same model. It is slightly worse, as by default a user is visible.
Talk to potential customers, and pursue whatever seems to have the most traction.
Could you please start commenting civilly and substantively?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Here's something I've wished I'd had over the 20 years of web development efforts I've been involved in: for production sites, a site that crawls a path regularly and saves a copy of the site in a timeline fashion.

How many times I've thought, "Man, we've made a lot of changes in the last 9 months and no one has a visual narrative of all of those changes..."
"Ex. free speech rights might be restricted in a library"

These are "Time, Place, and Manner" restrictions. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Time%2c+Place%... . These are pretty well understood.

You also don't have the right to go through a neighborhood at 2am with a bullhorn talking about your political platform in the upcoming election.

What's at issue is that most internet sites are privately held, and such things as "free speech", which is a prohibition on government interference, have no real meaning. Groups, including companies, also have the right of association, and that includes the right to kick people out.

The government has some ability to restrict that right of association, as with the various civil rights protections regarding businesses. However, none of that analysis applies to, for example, one's ability to post videos to YouTube. In the US, the government can't even prohibit private clubs from discriminating on basis of race.
Many aspects of the law are algorithmic. Even though there is no one, settled formal definition for algorithm, statutory and common law meet many informal definitions. Laws usually lay out an ordered, (theoretically) unambiguous set of steps for deciding a legal issue. When lawyers talk about "elements of a test," they are referring to this structured logic.

For example, the elements required to prove a negligence claim are:

1. Duty

2. Breach of Duty

3. Cause in Fact

4. Proximate Cause

5. Damages

When evaluating a negligence claim, a lawyer first tries to determine if the defendant owed the plaintiff any duty of care, then whether the plaintiff breached that duty, then if that breach was the factual cause of a harm suffered by the plaintiff, then whether the causal relationship was close enough to be considered legally proximate, and then, finally, whether the plaintiff actually suffered measurable damages.

Arguably, that superficially algorithmic process frequently breaks down in practice. For example, it's often easier to start with the damages suffered by a plaintiff and work backwards by identifying the causes, then who was responsible for those causes and any duties they may have owed to the plaintiff. However, regardless of how the lawyer and plaintiff identify whom to sue, they must frame their pleadings to allege the elements of the tort in the order specified by their jurisdiction's law, so the actual practice of law in court amounts to an algorithmic exercise.
George Carlin and his sketch about rape would have begged to disagree.
Show HN: Build a Serverless Golang Function with OpenFaaS
We probably would have found remnants of their society. Also if there was, they would have consumed all of the easy to reach resources, and we could have not have made it this far.
He states typing is orthogonal to the chart. But obviously there are many ways to slice the cake.
abuse@: yes. postmaster@: no.

If people have trouble contacting a business by email, they don't try to use email to fix the problem.

They very sensibly go to the web site and try by phone or Twitter or some other medium that isn't the one that isn't working.
It's not like investors keep investing in the same company all their lives. They are probably happy that AOL made so many millions, and they probably invested in something else when they stopped making so many millions.

The execs are probably not as happy as the investors, but they are still somewhat isolated from the fate of each individual company via their golden parachutes, and they can find jobs as experienced execs in some other company.
Being Jewish, or adhering to Orthodox Judaism, doesn't prevent you from adopting or espousing fascist or racist ideologies. And smart people are often better than most at crafting self-serving rationalizations.

It's inexcusable the way some people on the left throw around the term Nazi, just like it's inexcusable when conservatives use it. But surely you understand that with both liberal and conservative usage the epithet Nazi has a much broader (not to mention often incoherent) connotation in modern culture.
Typing is hardly a new thing, its lack definitely can't be blamed on the age of the chart.

It has this comment though

> Axes that are orthogonal to this chart are typing, aspects, and domain-specificity. Typing is not completely orthogonal: it has some effect on expressiveness
I suspect I'll be on 56 for a very long time as well. I ran on nightlies for many, many years but that ended at 57. At a bare minimum, noScript must be shown to be fully and consistently functional. But I have quite a few other extensions that appear to have been dead ended - self-destructing cookies and session manager are just two.

I think mozilla failed to understand that extensions were the prime differentiator and that a faster Chrome is far down the list of requirements.
Do you use a browser on your phone?
I thought nukes... you know... or DIY Bio, nanotech or the myriad of other actual threats
I've never heard of this. I wonder how many websites implement this. I tried a bunch of sites, but the only one I could find that had a humans.txt file was google:

Google is built by a large team of engineers, designers, researchers, robots, and others in many different sites across the globe. It is updated continuously, and built with more tools and technologies than we can shake a stick at. If you'd like to help us out, see google.com/careers.
Here I thought it was eye-rolling boredom.
Yes, of course - happy to discourse further. tyler at wso2 dot com.

In seeing your response, it does occur to me that you may be tackling an alternative form of monetization that is suitable for micro-payments, or for open source project leaders that do not desire to oversee the more traditional commercial business aspects that you must under take to monetize a project. These are things such as support, consulting, and training. There is an investment (sweat, not monetary) that goes into thinking about how to deliver such services, meeting an SLA, and whether there are associated assets that must be created to support such a delivery. This is a lot of effort and maybe not commensurate with the time or objectives of the OSS developer. There is also the challenge of commercially transacting on such alternative forms of monetization (or value added software that is proprietary). So while these are profitable endeavors, there are any number of reasons that it may not be interesting to pursue them. It may not have to do with size of the project, but of the cost to pursue the alternative monetization strategy.

So in that case, it may be interesting for a project to have different forms of licensing at different phases of development that are more conducive to either micro-monetization or classic-monetization, for which WSO2 falls into.

And so perhaps it benefits us all to think of licensing for monetization as a spectrum to be applied given the objectives of the project leaders.
This is why this is an article:

"And when that happens, they come to buyers such as Vance who dry and resell the roots to processors, which pulverize and resell them to natural-supplement manufacturers, which resell them as herbal products to retailers, which market them to health-conscious consumers."

To me, this is what the article was leading up to. The poorest Americans, the most vulnerable Americans, are breaking their backs (literally) and risking their lives (literally) with no benefits, while rich American are buying up the result for health products that may or may not have any real effect for them.

The real story here is that a significant portion of Americans have enough to money to essentially light it on fire on a regular basis while another significant portion is trying to stop from getting kicked off of SSDI.
Yes and no. Matt oversaw search spam efforts and was an engineer. I won't be doing that. And I'm definitely not an engineer. Matt was also a lead on webmaster relation issues. That's not going to be my focus. There are good people who have already been doing that. Matt did often address broader search issues, and the role will encompass that. It also will be taking in feedback from the public and sources and seeing what can be done to promote change. I'll have more to share after I get through a few weeks of settling in.
postmaster@ exists for many, many more reasons than non-deliverability. Again, multiple RFCs dictate its existence and management. Advice to the contrary demands a better rationale than you're providing, and is ill-advised.

If you operate SMTP and I can't get through to you on postmaster@ ("yo, back off your retries," for example), I'm probably going to blacklist you. I'm not unique in the slightest. The decentralized nature of SMTP demands that I have a hotline to you, the MX operator, without having to navigate a Web site to maybe find you.
In a seminar on hiring, engineers were surprised when I highlighted that in CVs one should mention numbers whereever possible: https://youtu.be/5hsTnTeZk-k?t=1013

(btw. Europeans are much worse at "selling" themselves / using numbers compared to their North American counterparts)
Show HN: StreamRecap – Searchable Automatic Esports Highlights
Making good comics is hard.