skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sounds like mental masturbation.

http://wiki.c2.com/?MentalMasturbation
Thanks, I’ll do that!
What I'm trying to say is that you should be using software security rather than hardware security.
I don't know, but this reminds me of something I always wanted to do:

Buy a small, white, Chevrolet van, plaster AT&T logos on the sides, put a flashing yellow light on top, and mount a holder for some orange road cones on the rear bumper. I figure with a vehicle like that, you can park just about anywhere, wander around, poke at stuff, and do all sort of shit, without anybody batting an eye. Especially wearing coveralls and a safety vest and hardhat, and carrying a clipboard.
...and every Jihadi is our government's wet dream to use as propaganda for endless war... that generates Jihadis. Think about the big picture next time.
Vanguard is a mutual company. Whatever savings that they can extract from efficiency gains they pass along to their customer base.

Also, Fidelity's index funds are loss leaders to retain funds that were flowing out to Vanguard.
Very little of the physical (the lithium). However all of the precious materials (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_recycling#Lithium_ion_...).

It's not worth it to extract the lithium, monetarily speaking.
All good points, but the only real answer is...
Paying for an education is a gamble and gambling with our future is dumb.
If we pay taxes for anything, anything at all the number 1 priority should be to provide an education to anyone.
That doesn't mean pay for their housing, or anything else. One has to invest their time into an education, its already very expensive.
Let me add this to your theory (which btw I agree with). Fracking! It was allowed to hockey stick - despite the ecological damage - because without historically low fuel prices the US economy would be into the weeds. Ultra-cheap fuels is a (temporary?) fix to hide plenty of ills.

Keep in mind, much of the hockey stick'ing happened under Obama, who was and still is perceived to be a green prez. Yet no one has really stopped to ask why is gasoline so cheap? Why would we sacrifice the planet for fossil fuel burning? The answer is simple: because we have to.

p.s. Low oil prices also puts the screws to the Russian economy. That probably isn't a hig deal but it's certainly for some a nice bonus.
Adjunct professors make less money than just about anyone, college educated or not. Many skilled trades can easily make $25/hour. The median wage for an electrian, for example, is $25/hour based on a quick search. That will depend on location and experience, but college is not the only way to get a decent paying job.
I wouldn't personally use IKEA in that case but an unfurnished house/apartment takes a lot of stuff to become usable.
Can you implement your own ideas?
There was a time when i would obsessively check John Carmack's .plan for any new updates. It was pretty cool to see it all unfold.
Yes, that is what I was thinking of.
Faster Java startup for microservices
This is nice. It's not going to replace Vim for me, but it's definitely a nice quick editor, being cross platform is great.
King County (especially Redmond/Bellevue, home of Amazon and Microsoft) is one of the wealthiest, low-crime areas in the country; I remember someone telling me that Redmond has the highest density of millionaires in the country.

If anything, King County's judicial system doesn't need this kind of help, yet I saw the high budget of the police force when I lived there a block away from the station with its top-of-the-line equipment, education programs, and community involvement. We should be trying to bring this kind of judicial reform and fairness to areas that really need like it like the south-side of Chicago, where there are at least two murders a day.
One of the most common fallacies you hear voiced by software people is that polynomial/exponential is bigger than linear, because they ignore the constant factors that matter in the concrete cases in the real world. The same fallacy leads to bad engineering choices and bad business choices.
I'm curious, then what makes you hate Emacs?
> In fact the vast majority of Americans that have a vocation work under a corporation.

I'm curious about that. The total # of government employees is about 22 million. Add to that over a million in the military. The total # of employees is about 127 million.

The number of people employed by the Fortune 500 is about 27 million, or 17% of the workforce.

http://fortune.com/2015/06/13/fortune-500-most-employees/

Corporations can be mom&pop companies, so how far down from the 500 do you want to go to be part of a "corporate agenda"?

Also, if corporations control the media, how is it you are able to post here?
Even on brand new high efficiency setups I'm doubtful crypto mining is cost effective unless you're doing it somewhere you don't pay for the electricity bill.

Depending how old they are, you may find charities that will accept them.

Or use them to learn about clustered systems?
You are making a lot of assumptions that do not apply to my former marriage. For example, there was no money for each of us to have a fun budget. We just were not that well off.

I don't disagree with the general principle that, in theory, you can find other alternatives. In practice, that is not always true. Furthermore, you are taking an example from my actual life and telling me I am wrong about my own life, in essence. And you are doing so very much after the fact. I am not even married to him anymore.

Plus, your solution sounds a bit like "Well, there are always alternatives. Like you could just burn the house down rather than clean it!" Sure, you could. It is also utterly ridiculous and impractical for the vast majority of people.

The reality is that if you are married and cannot get their cooperation, some things will negatively impact you. Period. There is no clever hack that lets you stay with an inconsiderate, uncooperative person and somehow not get crapped on by that fact.

That is true regardless of gender. But, certain social norms mean women tend to be subjected to certain problems of that ilk more consistently than men. If a woman actually wants a relationship and doesn't want to just suck it up and feel victimized, asking him to change some is unavoidable.

It is a question I wrestle with: Do I ever want to get involved with a man again? Because women get horribly vilified for even trying to talk about the problem space. I am very much a conflict avoider. If just asking nicely for someone to be considerate makes me some mega bitch in not only his eyes, but the entire world's eyes, I dunno. Maybe sex isn't that important to me.

Because that is what it boils down to: Women can put up with this kind of crap, they can try to sort it out with their man while he and the entire world act like that is just bitchy of her, or she can sleep alone. The first two both feel like being a professional victim.

Such questions actually make me suicidal because sleeping alone is not my cup of tea. So, in my book, those all look like terrible options. But, hey, I am menopausal, so sleeping alone is beginning to look less like a reason to go jump off a bridge.

Anyway, I think it would be wise of me to bow out of discussing this further. It would be super nice if your future hypothetical examples do not implicitly suggest I was just an idiot and if you had been there to advise me, all of my marital problems could have been readily solved with some little hack or other. Thanks.
Sure but it seems a little inefficient to send them individually is my point.
If they are less powerful & efficient than a Raspberry Pi then probably not worth trying to use them for anything other than nostalgia.
In all fairness, Teletubbies had no dialog. With enough creativity, you could read whatever you want into it.

When an insubordinate train car is bricked up "for always and always" and the narrator comments "I think he deserved his punishment, don’t you?", well, um, I think it's OK to say there's some seriously old-school moralizing going on.
Return them for a refund.
Agreed. They all have the same incentive. There's no need to full conspire. The insentive is strong enough for most of those involved to act in a conspire-esque sort of way. Emergence, if you will.
Priests are the public face of the most totalitarian dystopian corporation ever to menace humanity. I guess if we're talking about an English priest he probably worked for a different such corporation that split off from the original about 500 years ago... They didn't split in order to cut back on the dystopian totalitarianism!
It is a model, not a simulation, and it is traditional to argue the flaws in the methodology or assumptions of the model if you seek to invalidate. What I heard you to say was: “what if you have to knock down N affordable units to build M market-rate units?”

And the model exactly models this, showing that as long is M > N, everyone will will get more housing. If you run the simulation you can see how it does this, market rate housing captures people who can afford it, they move out of mid-tier housing, which captures the folks who want mid-tier, which frees up affordable units that were being occupied by people who could move up.
Is there any benefit to having your own clustered system vs just using AWS or other cloud services?
> I'd be open to tips on how to do it.

Some things that can help (in no particular order):

- excel in your role as an IC

- Take on leadership responsibilities in your role as an IC. Don't just do stuff, own things

- Work in a growing organization in constant need of new leadership

- Take the initiative to start something new that succeeds to the point that you need additional help to keep it going

- Mentor an intern

- Ask your manager for leadership responsibilities

- Be connected enough to the wider organization that you know when opportunities arise on adjacent teams and leaders of those teams know you well enough to think of you when filling them
They include a Google doc version so I think they are sincere. But it could also still be an unintentional parody.

What I find fascinating: here is someone’s attempt to show that they have planned for absolutely everything needed to make the startup successful. But very little thought given to how to sustain their biggest asset:

> We are stretched really thin though and while it’s been awesome seeing everyone step up, I do worry about fatigue setting in at some point.

No plan to deal with something that’s totally foreseeable.
That makes Australia, Zealandia, and Antarctica be one continent. Since all three names are 4 syllables long, with the stress on the second, in English, perhaps it should be called Stralantarc.
Yeah, exactly. That's why I suggested he look into how it works (since "the idea ... seems foreign" to him).

I didn't mean to suggest that they had some revolutionary new unique way of handling service discovery or even that they were the first. I think maybe you misinterpreted or misunderstood my intentions.
Elon Musk Shares Images of “Moon Base Alpha” and “Mars City”
> the weird little pockets of the Internet

> it vanished for Comcast users whose DNS servers at the time enforced DNSSEC.

I would hardly call Comcast a "weird little pocket of the Internet".
This was already addressed in another comment, they aren't charging for it. The preview is only available to enterprise but it will be in the 1.8 release later this year.
To me, it seems that one could read an (unsaid) implication in your original comment that is “and those advanced features will only ever be behind a paywall” — as I think in nginx’s case that’s actually true for some features (but I might be remembering incorrectly!), and by listing and comparing HAproxy and nginx in that manner I can see that implication. But that’s being kinda nit
picky, though if I was an HAproxy dev and all features were developed in the open and released into the mainline for free in a new stable version in the future, I would probably read it that way and be a little miffed, I suppose
I've seen Enterprise projects become open sourced in the past and the biggest problem that they face is that no community builds around them. It is not trivial to get other folks to hack on your project and contribute code or use your code, it takes some marketing (hackernews, reddit, etc) and a lot of patience and answering questions. For most projects I would not bother open sourcing them, because trying to build a community around them can be just as much work as what was spent coding them in the first place, but there are a few gems that I would if I could.
Your response is all over the place and off the mark.

You sound like someone who has never had to pass advanced exams to proceed with much higher levels of education.

I have relatives who are dentists. They are extraordinary in their precision. If you think it just requires time and money you clearly will never pass med school.

Awful dentists? Yes, every field has people of bad ethics. The very word "mechanic" conjures up images of incompetent lying men who will rip you off and ruin your car. What's your point?

Arrogance - nobody said anything about better. Just better at being a dentist and that learning how to flip burgers is easy.

I know a doctor who can rebuild engines. He is also a painter and a soldier. What's your point? The intersection of dentists and people who want to mess with engines when they can easily is small. It has nothing to do with ability. Changing oil takes five seconds to learn. Have you ever diagnosed an error on a chip with an oscilloscope? I have. Does that mean you are stupid or simply haven't cared to do so?

Everyone who makes burgers is less intelligent, less capable, and less creative than me is a different statement than "making burgers doesn't require the same level of intelligence, capability, and attention to detail as dental work".

Tell me, since you're so good at rebuilding engines, how good are you at rebuilding without turning it off? Without making a mistake? Fixing engines and dentistry aren't comparable, much less flipping burgers.
Try chrome on a Mac, it constantly revs up the CPU and eats way more memory than safari
But why is it lagging, what feels to be, so far behind? Perhaps there's a reason to delay the truth? Because it's not pretty? Obama sold hope for 8 years. Trump is making America great again. This perception ponzi scheme can't keep going forever. Or can it?
"Thomas the Tank Engine" was written by Reverend Wilbert Awdry, a minister in the Anglican church.

As is the Christian tradition, he understood the ultimate authority of God, the creator, and as is taught in the Bible, the necessity of teaching obedience to children.

Since most of the early stories were written to his son, Christopher, it makes sense to me that they were about some of the key themes of his faith and his views for raising children.
Ask HN: Why would you want to make your site work without JS?
> You've never drawn a linked list? A Venn diagram to think about your logical sets? A Hasse diagram for showing set inclusion? A function to see its growth? Never visualised numbers as being on a real line, with in-betweenness properties?

I never said that I don't visualize things. Just that it isn't the only (or main) way that I think about things.

By all means, methods of visualization can be very powerful. Designing different ways to visualize things can make more ideas easily accessible. Many things are also illuminated by logical proofs, sound visualizations (for lack of a better word), or narrative.

I think it is hard to extrapolate from a single experience what the best way to understand is for most people. You may be a very visual learner, and not realize that many other people don't gain as much from visualizations as you do.

> Even when you're doing symbol pushing "blindly", you're still using visual skills to place symbols, different fonts, you align variables, superscripts, subscripts. There's a certain geometry to mathematical notation itself.

The particular symbols and syntax matters little. I certainly am not considering different fonts when I work things out. Often manipulations I am doing are only in my head and don't have a concrete image until I need to write it down.
It really depends on what kind of apartment you live in. for a luxury one, it can easily burn you 3k+ for a 1b1b, however, if you are ok with sharing space with the landlord and other roommates, for one bedroom, it's usually around 800 including utilities and internet in south bay. And you probably don't need to pay for food or gym, most big companies provide that.
Well, someone needs to take the responsibility on for making sure you eat. Generally that's yourself. Flipping a coin is making a decision. When in a relationship, however, that could be your partner, especially if you are male and your partner is female. Because it's generally expected that partners/families eat meals together.

There absolutely is, with any responsibility a give/take about how you handle those responsibilities, especially if they involve another person. How you handle those decisions can be critical to your relationship. If they have very high standards, and you have very low standards, then you either compromise, or one of you changes your standards. Ideally you would talk about it, and come to an agreement, but that doesn't usually happen. Usually the high-standard person just takes responsibility and keeps it up to their high standards and stays upset with the low-standards partner.

> The conflict is that one side cares and the other doesn't.

So definitely there can be conflict here, the question is, does the conflict stay hidden, or do one or both of you bring it out, talk about it and reach a mutual decision around it? If you want a nice healthy relationship, I would hope you would talk about it. :)

I know I have definitely felt upset about lower-standards before I finally wised up; now I force communication about it whenever I find myself owning responsibility for something because my partner has lower-standards than I do about something. I hope my partner(s) do the same thing, I know we have talked about it, but I don't get to control their thinking... yet :P haha
So what bad things are women problems? Or is it just men...
For learning, perhaps. The power costs would likely exceed your AWS bill very quickly, though.
Or anything written by an Anglican minister, Reverend Wilbert Awdry. Surprised me as well.
Take a look at your states health exchange and get the plan that you think is right for you. I got a silver plan thinking I would save some money but one trip to the emergency room meant that I could have easily bought the gold plan.
Ikea will take back (refund or replace) even the most pathetic attempt at assembly. I had one embarrassing fail and didn't expect sympathy and was really just hoping for a destroyed part replacement (even buying it). They just gave me a whole new unit no questions asked.

If the trip is worth your time.
>And in fact his stories are about one of the main symbols of modern corporate industrial society: The train.

He liked trains. He made up stories about them as a child, imagining them as characters talking to each other, then wrote those stories down for his own son years later. He didn't consider trains to be a symbol of corporate oppression or dystopia.
I'd like to add that a first cut as infrastructure-as-code could be as simple as putting your manual setup tasks (including SSHing into a host) into a shell script and committing it to your repo.

But it takes a only trivial amount of additional time to set up an Ansible playbook (which abstracts away SSHing to a host) and then runs a shell script that's only concerned with actual setup tasks. Enough for shipping code and a good starting point for using the declarative aspects of Ansible to make your setup/deploy processes more automated and less error-prone.

It is possible to cargo-cult infrastructure best practices and make the mistake of investing too much engineering resources in making your deployment practices perfect (for some definition of perfect). Infrastructure-as-code should be understood as a continual process, not something to get completely right on day one, but that applies to any part of your code/product/infrastructure.

Edited: typos
Ok, you're just shitposting.
Monoids deployed
Have you ever submitted a payment or received a payment and seen it marked as "pending". That's likely the result of a delay due to interbank transfers. Real time settlement is something theoretically possible with central banking using something like Fedwire, but in practice most banks use a third party clearinghouse like CHIPS. Additionally, if you have funds in USD and you need to make a payment in EUR, you'll probably need to work through a third party bank that deals with forex settlement. This all adds delays and costs.

With Ripple, realtime clearing and settlement happens automatically even between currencies. If my bank and the vendors bank both use ripple, I can use USD to pay the vendor EUR in real time, and the transaction completes in seconds.
That's a step up from the 2 sentences plus 20 tweets approach.
I can tell you from experience that it wouldn't take long to learn enough vim to make you look back on that preference and wonder why you didn't learn sooner. It's a shame that for many of us our first experience with it involves Googling how to quit out. That and a higher learning curve than most editors put a lot of people off, even after they've become familiar with it.
From a bit of searching:

Setup: https://web.archive.org/web/20170630125155/http://www.advoga...

Manuals: http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/symbolics/software/

Code: https://archive.org/details/SymblicsOpenGenera

I learned OO programming on a Symbolics 3600 using ZetaLisp+Flavors around 1987. It was a cool system (when it did not have hardware issues). I used a Symbolics to implement perhaps the first simulation of kinematic self-replicating robots (and accidentally invented robot cannibals -- another story as a cautionary tale...)

Genera may be interesting to play with for fun and learning -- but Smalltalk is much more of a living thing with ongoing communities around Squeak, Pharo, Amber, and more.

I liked Genera but I loved Smalltalk (first with ObjectWorks/VisualWorks and then other variants). After using those two environments, pretty much everything since has been disappointing and felt like big steps backward.

(Well, the Newton OS was cool too including with "Soups"... Sad Apple killed the Newton OS just as the MP2100 with the StrongARM was good enough hardware to run it well... I also liked HyperCard which Apple also killed... And I also learned Forth before any of those and it was cool within its niche...)

Still, when I squint, I can kind of see a huge distributed Smalltalk-ish/Lisp-ish/Newton-ish/HyperCard-ish/Forth-ish system spread across all the networked browsers out there processing JavaScript/HTML/CSS. So, that's why I do JavaScript stuff right now -- and try to build an thinking/coding environment for the web inspired by those sorts of ideals (and others); some work in progress: https://github.com/pdfernhout/Twirlip7

I tried that before with Python and also Jython about a decade ago, but did not quite get it to be as interactive: http://patapata.sourceforge.net/critique.html

But using JavaScript seems more likely to succeed somehow than Python all things considered (warts and all) --
especially when you consider JavaScript's ubiquity. I figured if Dan Ingalls could swallow his pride and use JavaScript for the Lively Kernel, I could give it a try too (but approaching it from a different direction of more native DOM interactions via Mithril.js and Tachyons).
Wait until you see the nomenclature used for Ethereum units: Wei, Kwei, Szabo, etc https://etherconverter.online

Buterin couldn't possibly have made it more complicated.
If there is Direct Primary Care in your area, that might work. Info:

http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/01/direct-prima...

http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/01/direct-prima...

If you are under age 26, you might be able to get coverage through your parents.