skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It actually isn't incumbent on you to do it. As a non-white person, it isn't incumbent on me to be a model minority either. What you have to understand is what the author did is above and beyond the call of duty (if there is any), and as you have found, there are mixed results when you aren't the object of hate.

I know this is not a popular opinion here amongst most HNers and probably not for you, but you can't change a majority of people. Some people will never agree with you, despite your best efforts. Nonetheless, you just need to shave off a sufficient amount to win politically and in terms of policy. People forget Trump's win was a marginal one, a couple of thousand across a handful of states. In many ways, his victory was just that, convincing a handful to vote for him, while a large number of people on the left were suppressed for various reasons.
I just don't think it's a good idea to so closely relate taste and identity. And let's not even get into the "first-rate brain" stuff, ay yi yi.
Check Amap, they have coloured 3d maps of all global cities with photo textures.

http://www.navibiz.com.cn/e/NewsFocus/nf-123-02.html
Whoops, I guess word games have proven that it's wrong to speak out against Nazis. /s

Personally I like this page's description of the word tolerance, which solves this word game: https://extranewsfeed.com/tolerance-is-not-a-moral-precept-1...
It honestly sounds like the author is desensitized to sweetness and dislikes bitter things in general. It's amazing how cutting out sugar/added sweeteners in general can greatly increase ones sense of taste. A little sweet can go a very long way. After a few months without sugar, eating a typical U.S. sweet treat feels like complete overload.

I've noticed this in a lot of my friends also. The ones that have attempted cut out sugar have all experienced the same.

Of course she could just dislike wine, which is completely fine. But all of the other things mentioned lead me to believe this might be a part of it.
> Do you maximize the experience of a fine meal with a flight of six different orange juices? No, nobody ever does that.

I love orange juice, but I don't want it with my steak.
Frankly this is a situation I find myself in at every extended family gathering.

The majority of my family are simply unrepentantly biased and have no desire to change.

I don't think expressing zero tolerance for it helps, in my experience. The thing that I do is simply express my opinion on the matter, rather than my judgement of their opinion. Nobody will listen when you attempt to criticize their opinion, but they will hear you if you provide a contrasting example.

Take the example of my Aunt, who used to say "jew them down" or "got gypped" routinely.

I don't think she's antisemitic or racist per se, but man, when I said "You know, it's funny, most of the Jewish people I know are very generous and kind, they don't usually like to haggle over prices", she stopped and thought for a while, and asked me about them.

She simply doesn't know any Jewish or Romani people, so had never thought about those turns of phrase or what they implied.
The Google account needs to have rights to view stuff in Google Analytics.

There definitely could be problems with the Google Auth, and it probably only works on newer browsers (I have tested on Chrome and Firefox).

Do you see any errors in the console logs?
Antifa is tolerated - often more than tolerated - despite being a violent hate group. They aggressively use violence, they aren't subtle about it, and they practically worship extremist left ideology. Everyone should be asking why that is being tolerated. It's solely due to the media having an extreme left bias. They've conditioned hundreds of millions of people in the developed world to regard the mass slaughter & genocide of left regimes in the 20th century as dramatically less important, and not fundamentally evil, versus what the fascists did. Michael Bloomberg had a nice article about the increasingly broadening ideological bias problem on the left:

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-09-28/jeff-sess...
Well neo-nazis believe that they are the alpha race and everyone else is subhuman/inferior. And who worships a regime that tried to exterminate quite a few of them. I’m not sure what the equal and opposite extreme to that is.

This is like the equivocating 45 is currently doing by framing fascists and antifascists as opposite sides of the coin.
a friend helped :)

https://github.com/andreicristianpetcu/HNMarkAllRead/release...
The skill you're talking about is called listening. Listening with intent. Listening with the intent to understand, not just to formulate your response.

"We typically seek first to be understood. Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply. They're either speaking or preparing to speak. They're filtering everything through their own paradigms, reading their autobiography into other people's lives." - Stephen R. Covey
Grouping tolerance with tolerance of speech muddies the issue of free speech.
My grandfather suffered a lifetime of PTSD after having to shoot Nazis during WWII. I went to a few of his unit's reunions and have met a number of other veterans of that war.

One thing I've never heard from a single one of them was bragging about shooting a Nazi.

They suffered years and years of nightmares for having to shoot persons. They were looking through their guns sites and saw people -- young men who looked just like themselves or their brothers.

Maybe there were some who came home and bragged, but to highlight those stories does an incredible disservice to the vast majority of the others. There were things they bragged about, but shooting humans wasn't a common reason for pride.
Dishonest Customer Logos
With very likely negative consequences. The vote is unconstitutional and intended to disturb the Spanish state. Puigdemonte is a populist playing with the people of Catalonia, as he is well-aware of the impossibility of this project, but hey it put him in charge. Remember also he is leading a minority government.

I think a lot of people here ignore the seriousness of the matter and have very naive views on separatists.

That said, the unemployed youth of Catalonia (37%) probably find the whole thing very attractive.
I can only describe it as "chemical-ey". I think there are several "notes" in red wine that fall into that group (red wine is different from white, because the skins stay on longer in the process).

In my case my dad was into wood-working so my childhood memories include all sorts of solvents and other chemicals that had complex aromatics. So when I pick up a memory when I'm drinking wine, I know there's "something" going on at the molecular level, I just don't know what it is.

I don't think anyone knows in some cases, I mean the wine industry employs chemists, obviously, but no one can really put their finger on how wine develops and changes over time. That's why it's more of a craft than a science.
It gets a 403 on https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/management/accountSu... after logging in. I am signed in to multiple Google accounts, although the primary account is also the one I use with analytics.

"{"error":{"errors":[{"domain":"global","reason":"insufficientPermissions","message":"Insufficient Permission"}],"code":403,"message":"Insufficient Permission"}}"

I wasn't prompted to approve any permissions so this doesn't seem surprising.

Looks like you need to replace "scope: 'profile'" with "scope: context.SCOPE" in your gapi.client.init call.
Uhm, why the downvote?

Just because someone took a formal course in something does not give them the right to say that I have nothing further to learn in a subject.
"subjected to"? They're the ones calling themselves Nazis. We're if anything humoring them.
Hubspot CRM is free, Hubspot Sales has affordable tiers, and they also have special discount programs for startups. I don't have any affiliation with them.
> And also at least a basic understanding of how IP is managed in chip industry - like "IP core" is a term that I frequently hear but due to the myriad interpretations available online, I don't really understand what an "IP core" really means.

I'm by no means a veteran but my understanding is that "IP core" refers to a design you buy from someone else. Say you want a video encoder on your smart fridge SoC. You can either spend a whole lot of time, manpower and money developing one yourself or you can license the design from someone else who already has one and just dump it in.

You'd only do this when you want to integrate the design into your own (likely mass manufactured) chip. You can also often buy a packaged chip that serves the same function for much less but doing that is a tradeoff. You can do it at very low volume and cost but you potentially lose a bunch of efficiency in terms of space and power.
Everything I have personally witnessed would categorically reinforce the idea that dialogue is productive and that lack of dialogue and data is precisely what breeds hate, distrust, and misunderstanding.

I have yet to witness a person who was shouted down and denounced say "gee, that sure changed my mind about the issues". People don't work that way.
My favorite part of the article:

> The show’s producers showed mercy on the “zonk” winners, however. After the taping of the show, they would be offered a substitute prize, such as a television, and most would take it. “In 1 percent of the cases, they didn‘t,” Hall said. “There was a time when a farmer won five calves and he wanted the calves. That cost me a fortune because when you rent them from the animal place, they’re expensive.”
While you do have a point, it's not much of a stretch to go from that point to sacrificing your overall life satisfaction for the sake of the job/work/whatever arbitrary societal standard exists. To elaborate on that (I'm not suggesting this is your message, though it may be), when I was only a few years younger having lucked into a lucrative job, I took work hyper seriously. I looked down on and distanced myself—intentionally and unintentionally—from those that didn't do the same. A year and half ago I lost my job and couldn't find other work (still jobless) and now have a different perspective. Now I look at people who work like I did with bemusement. What I see is people not putting themselves first, or at least not high enough. To do the same again, I'd need to convince myself that this is idea of success is better in some way than my own. That's not about ego, that's about honesty.
Every big production that is a step above Transformers is hailed as a masterpiece these days. I don't know how the movie majors can convince critics to write what they do, but I'm sure it's marketing. I'll go to watch this movie anyway (the director is an interesting one) but I'm quite confident it's just formulaic commercial crap (you could see it from the trailers, really).
Sorry, but "Surely you can see the flaw" is not meaningful contribution to the discussion. It's just a passive aggressive way of saying "you are wrong so please think until you realize the superiority of my opinion".

There is two simple truths.
1. If a group decides that it doesn't want to be ruled by a certain body, it's hard to legitimize the continuation of that rule.
2. If any group, especially very small ones can refuse the ruling body, all big groups will ultimately split down to individuals with no rules at all.

Democracy only works when balancing these truths. Trough opposition in parliament, minority rights, local and regional governments, regional independence and so on.

I.e. the whole situation in Catalan is blowing up because the reginal independence wasn't granted (or not enough in the opinion of the Catalans). Look at South-Tyrol in Italy for an example where things are working better. Even the American states are a good example - liberal, rich California wouldn't accept Republican rule without the independence the states have.

Surely you can see the point I'm trying to make?
Bad example IMHO as grpc building is painful even with 0 involvement of Python. That is, If you have any prerequirements either for build environment or 3rd party libraries. And while I did get things done in reasonable time, while doing research I noticed quite a lot of people where echoing about same thing.
I suspect the biggest difference might be between one-to-one and in-a-group. In a group, other people will move the conversation in ways that distract from one person finding out the reasons why the other person holds the views he/she does.

Unrelatedly, in a group, the returns to signaling that you dislike the hated outsider are much higher, as are the costs that come with treating hated outsiders like neutral people. See also: Twitter dynamics.
It's not clear to me from this article that the author ever understood why they hated him. From this account, it seems as if he just kept hanging out with them for decades till they magically weren't hateful any more. Not sure if this is very scalable.
This is exactly the type of belief I was talking about in my last sentence. All speech is not equal. That may be a hard truth for some to accept, but it is the truth.

Once your speech starts to infringe on the rights of others it is no longer deserving of protection. Your rights are not more important than the rights of your fellow citizens. I don't understand why libertarians don't agree with that. I thought the whole point of the government was to protect the rights of the individual.
Personally I find the idea of setting out to muddle the perception of reality terrifying. I've had sleep deprivation hallucinations and I think everyone should do whatever is in their power not to hallucinate.
I find it deeply, deeply ironic that you speak out against open discussion of "vile theories" in one breath and then, in the very next, object to HN's readership demonstrating to you in the most direct way possible what the consequences of your own position against that kind of open discussion would be.
Mexico's 7.2 Earthquake from a transit camera
You are otherizing. Who are THEY? What are the things that are valued? Please explain how did the coastal liberals attack you.
No, the trouble is that it's wrong.

We knew[1] it was wrong in the 1990s, but /usr/local is a "best practice", and these people who believe "best practices" are more important than solid engineering breed faster.

Camacho for president 2020.

[1]: http://cr.yp.to/slashpackage/studies.html
The blades will come out radially.

If you're concerned about which seats are safer, the ones in steerage in the back are the safest. They tend to arrive last at the scene of the accident :-)

Good shoes can save your life, because you can walk out over hot, burning wreckage.

Wear cotton, not synthetic, clothes, and you'll have less severe burn injuries.

And, of course, pay attention to where the exits are and the flight crew's safety instructions. They really do know what they're talking about, and they're well trained.
The world is never black-and-white. It’s unfair to judge a man on how we interpret him at the end of his life. He came from a time when “consent” wasn’t really a concept a lot of men understood. He more than anyone helped to normalize human sexuality as a natural part of life in the US.
I'm with you, I'll take chocolate milk over port every day of the week
Printing Butterflies – A feature length film exploring the nature of AI
I finished reading Ben Franklin's autobiography earlier this year. He was notorious for sparking (and usually winning) debates with the people around him. After getting some negative feedback from a friend regarding just how insufferable he was to be around, he adopted the Socratic method of asking questions so that people would see their own folly.

Eventually, it got to the point where his acquaintances and coworkers would refuse to answer even simple questions of his, out of fear that he'd follow up with more questions that would prove them to be incompetent or illogical.

He later changed his methods to something you might read about in a book like How to Win Friends and Influence People. Rather than leading people to see the logical error of their ways, he moved toward displaying much more diffidence, which allowed others to save face when changing their opinions. Phrases like "certainly X" and "undoubtedly Y" became "If I'm not mistaken, X" and "I imagine that Y."

That change worked out well for him throughout the course of his career in winning many rich and powerful people (along with ordinary citizens, of which he was one) to his side on various controversial issues of the day.

Another benefit was that he opened himself up to helpful suggestions and feedback as well. Most people abhor argumentation, and will allow overly-confident people to persist in whatever mistaken beliefs they hold. But when you display humility, others feel safer telling you what they think of your ideas.
I have certainly been to parties where we are standing around drinking wine, and my eyes glaze over as people talk about wine for a lot longer than I'd like. And they talk about going to tasting events and whatnot where they can presumably talk at even more length about it.
> Do you normally get up in arms about large scale B2B arrangements?

No but this is not 'B2B arrangements' were talking about here, this is 'pay us protection money or we'll effectively eliminate your business'

I do get up in arms when a company buys a drug that used to cost $10, makes no improvements to it and ramps up the price to $700, but this is even worse, since in the former case there's at least still only the customer being charged for the product, not also the delivery driver for the right to deliver it.

What value are the ISPs adding that the customers are already not paying for?

> Are you upset that magazines and newspapers collect payment (twice!) from both readers and advertisers?

The cost of a newspaper doesn't usually cover all its production costs via customer sale, so the ads fill the rest, whereas here Comcast is already a hugely profitable company from customer sales anyway.

There's Amazon Kindle 'with special offers (ads), but the device is cheaper than the version without ads. I don't think the plan is for ISPs to make broadband any cheaper for customers by starting to charge businesses for the thing they already were paid for.

I don't think my argument should be this hard to understand, unless you're a Verizon lawyer.
I'm sorry, maybe I'm misinterpreting you. Are you suggesting that the biases I'm noticing are motivated by accurate assessment of the groups in question?

I think you're making a sort of Bayesian argument for racism, and I can see how consumption of a particularly odious media diet could cause that. But I don't buy the idea that it's rational to hold racist views toward, say, Barack Obama and call him names.
...and HiFrames [1] and HPAT [2] will kill Spark ;-)

HiFrames and HPAT are built on Julia [3] and use the Julia packages ParallelAccelerator.jl [4].

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02341

[2] https://github.com/IntelLabs/HPAT.jl

[3] https://julialang.org/

[4] https://github.com/IntelLabs/ParallelAccelerator.jl
> We get somewhere by bringing them out, and talking about why we disagree with the points made, in a respectful manner.

It's not as if Neo-Nazis are "making points."
CppCon 2015: Chandler Carruth “Tuning C++: Benchmarks, and CPUs, and Compilers”
The NFL graphs are not graphS. It is one graph. In the NFL case, each graph is a snapshot corresponding to monthly activity.
> Freenet basically has hash-addressed content plus some relationship between human-readable strings and the hashes, so you/can/refer/to/stuff/like/this making it easy to use HTTP on top of Freenet for navigation. In contrast IPFS makes the hashed content itself in charge of navigation by using git-like objects [..] on Freenet particular files are immutable, but that's as much as they guarantee.

Actually there isn't that much of a difference here. Freenet manifests are analogous to git trees; knowing the chk of a manifest file gets you to the metadata that identifies all the files under the tree. It's all immutable.

There are some noteworthy differences though. One that stands out in particular is that freenode breaks large (>32kB) files into chunks. Everything is encrypted too. So finding a file you want is not quite as simple as taking the hash of the plain, unencrypted file.

Either way, you can easily build a git-like hierarchy of immutable content (and history) on Freenet, and this is more or less what happens under the hood anyway with manifests and splitfiles.

As a slight deviation from the norm, Freenet also can also address (signed) content by its public key rather than content hash. This is one way to enable mutable data; not entirely unlike heads. They can still link to immutable content hash keys.

> They also differ in the way routing works. On Freenet you ask a (mostly) random neighbor whether they have a file with the hash you want. If they don't have it, they ask another (mostly) random neighbor. This can go on for a while, until it either finds the content or hits a maximum number of hops, in which case it backtracks. The only point of these rube-goldberg shenanigans is anonymity.

It's worth pointing out that Freenet does have a simple but powerful routing system. Each network node has a virtual location, in key space. Requests are routed towards the nodes that are most close to the requested key. With careful selection of peers, the network topology can make for very efficient routing. E.g. one could have a small number of nodes "far apart" in key space, to faciliate routing towards far-away keys. Then you have a larger number of relatively close nodes, so that when a request comes in "your general direction" from a far-away node, you're likely to have the right peer to route to.

It is true that some randomisation helps with anonymity.

EDIT:

I'll add that the flipside of a network that essentially enables leeching is that it's also good for retention of popular (or "popular") items. Requested data is cached en route, so it's sort of automatic load balancing. Soon enough popular resources are likely to be held by whoever is nearby. People won't need to manually pin the content, and it's hard to directly DoS those who share the content you're "after." Asking for it just makes it more available.

I think this is important to consider if we're discussing reliability of distributed networks.

I'm not saying what the implications are -- for they can be good or bad.
Not I, though Dr. Shulgin says;
"The second question relates to yet another beta-carboline alkaloid, Harman. This is a structural analogue of Harmine that has been stripped of its methoxyl group. It is widely found in plants and foods, and has been shown in experimental animals to be a vasodilator and a hypotensive agent. It also interacts directly with DNA and is thus a possible mutagenic agent."

Courtesy of the wayback machine you can read the article,

https://web.archive.org/web/20020325022732/http://www.alchem...
Neither do you see the government of California or Vermont organising a binding vote to secede from the US in 48 hours (while maintaining the US citizenship!).
Rewording that, other than convenience, does it make a difference if you manufacture a widget by hand or with a machine?

Utility classes. Utility patents, issued under 35 U.S.C. 101, protect any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.

Software is a process. Now there are judicial exceptions:

laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas

The business method patents getting nuked by Alice [1] are abstract ideas tied to a computer with a shoestring. The software patents getting issued by Enfish [2] "improve the functioning of the computer itself".

Stallman, as always, is too simplistic.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_Intern...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enfish,_LLC_v._Microsoft_Corp.