skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah as the comment below notes, I should have been clearer. They manually check, however I can't see it as too much of a stretch that an operator might check the feeds every now and then for such a thing. I know in the Northbridge Tunnel (Perth) they don't send fines for speeding infringements, yet if you are seen driving dangerously through the tunnel they'll get you for everything they can positively identify as illegal if they want to follow you up - i.e. in the event of an accident etc.

Source: My brother is an officer and have discussed with him about what they do and don't monitor.

Edit: old article link as the other commenter seems to have removed theirs http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/sa-police...
A metric or imperial ellison?
> Apple, what were you thinking?

They were thinking that AirPods and similar are the future of audio.

And for those who have more discerning needs they ship a dongle with the phone that you can leave permanently attached to your wired headphones.
<tries to decide which is worse, privacy violations or having all app icons on the phone desktop somewhere>
My understanding is that he didn't do a lot of drugs and seldom drank to excess. I also am going to guess he got a lot of exercise.
If it is not land based, it would make no difference to the ocean level. Ice is less dense than water and as it melts there is a volume decrease, so one would expect a decrease in the ocean level.

So no, it would not do anything to the coastal states of the US.
This. This is the reason I love HN :)
If the issue is truthfulness, then they should complain about that instead of labeling things as "problematic". The word is terminally underspecified, and its usage should be avoided for that reason.

The fact that it's so popular is a sign people using it are not used to articulating their objections concretely, which is a red flag.
He was known for smoking a pipe. And that many sex partners has to be dangerous
Or Kotlin? It sounded like this would be ”no” but ultimately it employs Eclipse JDT with this information:

”JDT Debug implements Java debugging support and works with any JDPA-compliant target Java VM. It is implemented on top of the language independent "debug model" provided by the platform debugger.”

... so I’m not sure anymore. Maybe someone with more experience can comment.
No, there's plenty of utility to clothing besides making being naked special.
I completely agree, and given their competitors' stances on privacy, it most certainly gives them a way to differentiate themselves and provide an advantage in ways that others can't (or don't/won't).

If they can provide value to customers through privacy and security in their products, that adds customer value to their products, which ultimately improves their bottom line.

Privacy is privacy no matter what the motivation.

Edit: We can ponder whether or not their motivations are sincere or not, but it may be a good business move in the long term as well as a genuine value for a person's privacy.
A portrait of the artists as a pair of young wastrels
This one relates to both hustling and horniness, so a pretty safe bet.
hmmmm, good point. But if i was a car designer, I'm not sure I'd be comfortable compromising on safety features that I know are possible.
I am an Android user and I feel more safe with my data there than on an Apple device. I'm open to being wrong - why is iOS more safe?
Exactly. I try not to be so cynical, but this is so clearly a marketing tactic that research and emerging trends have shown is a winner for them, since they are so far behind in the AI race (and AI can't succeed without data, so by harming people's acceptance of data harvesting they in turn reduce their competitors' advantage).
All the more reason to curse Apple for its "courageous" step :(
You're not really addressing the point of the person you replied to.

Increasing wages does not help if the housing supply is the underlying problem, since everyone is still bidding for a fixed resource. It just means everyone pays more rent. Wage increases in the bay area are always at least partially wealth transfers directly to landowners. Facebook can't solve that by paying more, the housing policy in the bay needs to change to allow more density.
Great tool for pirates yeah?
This is exactly what's keeping me in Apple's garden... I hate how they're moving core MacOS services away from open source, how they don't document their APIs, how they lock down their phones... and yeah, I miss my headphone jack, too.

Obviously they know damn well that there are people like us who value privacy enough to buy Apple in spite of all of the other unpalatable stuff. I just hope the demand gets high enough that other companies start catering to it as well.
Android Pay is almost always as slow as chip transactions here in Minnesota. The app seems to work quickly but the POS machine is always slow to complete it's part of the transaction. It seems to vary depending upon the POS machine - for example Trader Joe's is always quick but those in the larger grocery chains or local sandwich shop are painfully slow.

From the downvotes I assume it's a regional thing!
At one point, they announced, shocking everyone who heard, that they'd no longer be posting nude women on their website. They even made their magazine nude-free. I think they reverted their magazine.

Here is a citation:

http://ijr.com/2015/11/468636-playboy-ceo-explains-their-rea...
In a bedroom situation, physically disabling might be a good idea, unless your into those things.
When have iCloud users been hacked outside of phishing attacks?
Ask HN: What's the state of the art in template matching?
Is there anything better than normalized cross-correlation based image matching?
The heap need only be accessed if the visibility bitmap indicates it ought to be. (Otherwise index-only scans would be pretty useless.)

"Visibility information is not stored in index entries, only in heap entries; so at first glance it would seem that every row retrieval would require a heap access anyway. And this is indeed the case, if the table row has been modified recently. However, for seldom-changing data there is a way around this problem. PostgreSQL tracks, for each page in a table's heap, whether all rows stored in that page are old enough to be visible to all current and future transactions." [1]

But you are right regarding UNIQUE. No reason it couldn't be implemented for hash indexes.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/indexes-index-onl...
"You gotta have quick keys to say 'Your Mamma' or.." "We're gonna have macros in there. You're gonna be able to set em up in the setup program... ...so you just hit it real quick and it will say 'Screw you faggot!' or somethin"

Man things never change. That is hilarious and what a great environment to work in for them having to work late hours like they were.
Yup, privacy is a right but controlling a gadget you paid $1000 for isn't. Cool story bro.
Maybe. But it's hard to know how much of Apple's current stance on privacy comes from Tim Cook, rather than simply being a natural evolution of Apple's direction under Steve Jobs (iAds began in 2010).
Luckily for consumers Android is a diverse ecosystem not controlled by one single manufacturer. There are many devices with headphone jacks to choose from.
I'd think about switching to Cortana, since it can run on iOS and has Alexa integration.
And the 1st ensures the second. Government is only ever afraid of large numbers of its citizens, the "lone armed guy" is simply too easy for the government to pick off individually. The NRA is feeding you large helpings of boondoggle in thinking the 2nd is important on its own. The founding fathers put the first two amendments together for a reason. They work together, not apart.
I agree. I wonder how many people are in this same boat. Judging by the strength of this particular marketing push, I'm guessing it's a lot. I've had an Android phone for years now and it's getting a tad too creepy - which is a shame, because I much prefer Google's services to Apple's.
I understood “evil twin” as “twin who happens to be evil”. The example they showed was Spock’s evil twin which would match your interpretation, though.
> Ice is less dense than water and as it melts there is a volume decrease, so one would expect a decrease in the ocean level.

Ignoring thermal issues and salt/freshwater, floating ice melting won't do anything to the sea level.

It's lower density, but it's floating in such a way that it's only displacing a volume of water which weighs as much as it does.
I've always wished the "voice web" would have taken off -- maybe it is about time for it again.

Alexa, Siri, Google Home, Cortana.. they could all use the same standards to become interoperable.
Postgres uses a visibility bitmap [1] to avoid hitting the heap merely to determine visibility of stable data.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/indexes-index-onl...
> we record whatever we want, and use it how we want

Where are you getting this? They explicitly list what they do and do not collect, and the purpose of it.
A major problem as far as I can see is malnutrition not undernutrition, poor people aren’t eating enough vegetables, protein and other important nutrients and mostly filling up on grain.
Or if you plan to use your app for more than 7 days. https://www.reddit.com/r/jailbreak/comments/4hotx3/news_free...
Makes some sense. As a result of fast-growing corn, areas previously planted to wheat are switching to corn instead. This has increased the supply, and thus decreased the price, of corn -- but wheat, on the other hand, would see a corresponding decrease in supply, and increase in price.

This is also why cash crops can cause food shortages.
Have used Android for years (I have been using devices like Pro, rooted, custom ROMS, skins whatever you might imagine). Shifted to Apple's echo system 2-3 years ago. It took me some time to get used to iOS but integration across devices (my mac, my iPad, my watch) is simply amazing. I am not going sound like broken record or fan boy here. Apple got me on this video where Steve Jobs really showed how much they care for privacy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39iKLwlUqBo the other day my wife got a notification from Google Photos that it prepared our Album from our trip to SFO. We have turned of location tagging and everything, turns out Google is not content with me asking them to leave me alone, they would use ML and whatever they have built to figure out where I have been. In this day in age, while Apple might sound outdated to a lot of people, nothing can beat the sense of security with privacy Apple carries with itself now.
No Hugh Hefner, no Shel Silverstein. The dude probably propped up a lot of people's careers.
> A dirty old man is dead. A long time ago he helped make some progress away from destructive societal and legal ideas

If you still categorize someone that enjoys the female form as "dirty" then maybe we haven't made much progress at all.
The privacy is great but they also really know how to sell it. The picture of the child at the top wasn't chosen at random.
Maybe this is late night and I need to get some sleep, but you seemed to solve a big mystery for me. Almost all of my girlfriends either freely admire another woman's breast/body or showed a great deal of jealousy. I felt they were a bit bisexual but this makes a lot more sense.
In light of this comment, the sibling comment with the joke link to a space-sim video game cargo scanner seems fitting; pretty sure in-game piracy is the primary use of a cargo scanner in that fictional world, and I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up the same in the real world.
Never ever thought of reading about Larry Flynt, but just did, interesting person. He did get shot and was paralyzed, never charged the shooter, and even spoke against his death penalty. A big supporter of the first amendment, claims the media coverage in Hustler is more accurate then modern media, and this awesome quote of him:

> Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper.

Not the kind of wikipedia entry I was expecting at all.
I was thinking of the iCloud celebrity hack, but you're right - Wikipedia explains that it was initially thought to be a hack, but turned out to be due to phishing. (Though it does mention an exploit that could have been taken advantage of at the time.) I've edited my original comment to remove that part.
Curious, Javascript being a first class citizen in VS Code, what does your "real" Javascript IDE does that VS Code can't do?
iAd was a failure because Apple wouldn’t give advertisers the user data they demanded and dictated the size and locations of ads.
On long flights, don't we expect the light to arrive after the gravitational waves because it interacts more strongly with the particles that both sets of waves traverse?

Both kinds of waves are slowed when passing through media, but because EM is much stronger than gravity, the effect from interstellar dust should be much stronger on EM than on gravity.

Even a 1-in-a-million slowdown of the EM versus gravity would mean that everything outside of ~100ly would arrive at least an hour later. Every intergalactic bit of light is passing through at least a few thousand lightyears of galactic dust, and potentially much more.
The fact that protecting users' privacy becomes a marketing strategy other than the basic principals of tech companies makes me feel weird to live in 2017. Not sad. Just weird.
Let me unpack this starting from here:

>I'm asking this because your TLS implementation seems to be about the whole works - including the CA system. Which needs a CN.

Yes, I am leveraging the standard TLS design, it includes the defaults as specified by the underlying TLS implementation; currently this is openssl, native-tls, or rustls. Like DNSCrypt (Curve), the server must be registered out-of-band if it is not signed by one of the CA's registered in the system. I thought about this for a while, and decided it was best for ease of use to rely on the system CAs and allow additionals to be registered.

> Which needs to be resolved (I initially thought it was just about the key neg + transport part of TLS with a hardcoded IP address in the config file)

This isn't accurate. The CN is only used by the underlying TLS library to validate the Subjects in the X509 cert returned by the server. There is no additional lookup required for that name. Honestly, since that name isn't being used for resolution (i.e. your using IPs in DNS config), this doesn't provide as much value in DNS as it does in standard TLS connections where a name was resolved to an IP, but at least it would validate that the NS servers are named what you expect.

> How are you handling the DNS request for the initial TLS connection? I'm talking about this:

>

> 1. Want to make DNS query for X.com

> 2. Connect to personal-dns-server.com over TLS connection
for DNS request.

> 3. Want to make DNS query for personal-dns-server.com.

> 4. ?

Again, there is no "DNS" request for the TLS connection, this is the order:

1. A direct IP connection to the remote TLS server based on configuration,

2. The TLS handshake is performed with that server, using the associated CN on the connection, and validating against the associated CA list

3. Standard TCP DNS request is performed from this point.

Does that help clarify this impl?
A) Your ad-hominem is out of line.

B) You know nothing about me. Not that it matters: not only have I lived in Germany, I have lived in France for many years, I earned a Graduate Degree in Europe, worked for the European government (EIB), 'lived in Luxembourg' in all practical reality, speak three European languages, and visited nearly every European country. In addition to having lived in two very different American states for several years, and have visited more than 1/2 of them, and visit the USA regularly.

C) Not only am I entitled to my opinions, in this case they're neither novel nor contentious, and they are more or less correct.
Just popped in to say Wireshark would have made short work of this bug.
ham not HAM
I grew up on Playboy. While I enjoyed the pictorials, I also read it. Frank Herbert, Asimov, Stephen King.

And then there was the Playboy Advisor. People wrote in with questions about sex, sexuality, and relationships. To my young mind, this was both fascinating and impactful.

What I took away from it was that women should be respected, treated as our equals.

You can enjoy the sensuality of a beautiful woman and still be a feminist.
We clearly have different views on what sleaze is. Sleaze has nothing to do with sex or nudity in my mind.

I could concede it could be tacky or distasteful, but even that is subjective.

If Huffington had claimed to be the elegant and foremost professional news source and subsequently used nudity to sell papers then that would be sleazy. If they sold out their position of high viewership to sell advertising for cheap psuedolegal pharmaceuticals or fad diets and spin sites that would be far more sleazy. Huh. They do that.

In fact when I tried to confirm the crappy advertising practices of the Huff, it popped a new tab and an alert box as I tried to leave with another advert. I know that's normally the ad providers problem but how pertinent the timing.

Before it's said, yes I do realise most other news sites use similar advertising and I yet I still find the practice far more detestable than a magazine open about its love for nudity.

Nobody was ever under the illusion that Playboy was anything other than what it was.
Just saw this Feb 2017 op-ed tweeted by the NYTimes: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/opinion/how-playboy-expla...

> Though following in their legacy, the Playmate models differed from the pinups of World War II. Hefner wanted images of real women their readers might see in their everyday life — a classmate, secretary or neighbor — instead of the highly stylized and often famous women of an older generation. The sexualized, yet familiar, “girl next door” was the perfect accompaniment for soldiers stationed in Vietnam. This conception of wholesome, all-American beauty and sexuality acted out by largely unknown models reminded young soldiers of the women they left behind, and for whom they were fighting — and could, if they survived, imagine returning to.
I've hoped and said for awhile that Mozilla should take this approach. And while they do talk about privacy, their messaging just doesn't seem that strong and clear.

Perhaps they can ride Apple's coattails to a degree, using some of the same language and messaging. Note that Apple and Mozilla both are differentiating themselves from the same competitor.

(And Mozilla can add that they are open ('we develop everything in the open, so you can see what's in our products'), non-profit, and end-users have ultimate control, not Mozilla.)
> I find it interesting that in the span of 3 comments it’s gone from “this company is only looking for the best of the best” to “beggars can’t be choosers”.

Why is that weird? The "beggars" I was referring to are people looking for jobs, not employers, so those actually seem like things that would go hand in hand, since if all companies only want the best of the best there will be many people without a job. Thankfully it seems like companies all have a different idea of what the "best" is so I am still employed
So set a longer password? You’re not limited to 6 digits, there’s an open ended ‘custom alphanumeric password’ option.
Seemed pretty complete to me. This reads a radio broadcast ships identifier from an attached SDR and looks up the cargo manifest in an API.
It's much less about being hacked, and much more about what Apple will do with your data vs. what Google would do.

Apple sells hardware, resells apps and media. Google sells advertising.

The hardware company's interests are much more in line with the interests of your privacy than the advertising company. It's about what Apple will do willingly with your data and what it won't do.

Google's entire purpose is classifying and measuring you so that the ads it serves you are the most effective. In other words you are their product, or more specifically, they sell the ability to manipulate you to the highest bidder. Ok that's a little harsh, but with the last election a large (and seemingly apparently growing) factor in the result was the ability of each side to manipulate populations of voters. It's not too much to want as much as possible to minimize the attack surface for organizations to profile and serve you information tailored to shape your behavior.

The issue with how far Apple apparently went to protect the data of one of it's (mind you, entirely guilty) customers[1] makes a person think that buying Apple is a preferred choice. I'd like the ability to own my devices and data to the extent that the government or the manufacturer cannot give it away without my agreement.

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/29/apple-vs-fbi-all-you-need-to...
whoosh would probably not be a very constructive statement here, but I think that was an intentional humorous post...
What do you find creepy about your phone? The difference between Android and iOS is that with the former, you get to choose which services to use. If you want maps that track you to show traffic, you have multiple options. If you want offline maps that don't send any data off the phone at all, you have multiple options there too. Any of them can become the default maps app that gets loaded whenever you click a location link. Same for browser, email, phone calls, contacts, etc.
Siraj Raval - A guide to building your first decentralized application
Isn't it the case that basically every keystroke is stored in iCloud? Hardly true privacy.
I think you might have misunderstood what I meant - I was talking about the index insertion case, to verify uniqueness. And that indeed checks the heap regardless of the VM bit. Check _bt_doinsert() invocation of _bt_check_unique() and the latter's content. Therefore there's no fundamental problem with having to do the same in hash insertion cases, even if more heap fetches are likely to be necessary.

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f...
I've got a significant amount invested in the Google ecosystem, but I think when this S8+ stops getting updates I'll be going to Apple (it was a tough choice between an iPhone 7 and the Samsung this time). Besides, I can always get a ~$150 phone from AliExpress to hack on.
I think their primary motive is income. The way they do that is by being good for their users, or appearing to be good for their users.

If morality were their primary goal, I strongly suspect they'd be financially structured in a more honest way. From the way they've gone after unintended leakers to how they've dealt with vulnerability reports, I'm not able to believe their motives are altrustic.

I'm not displeased with them, and even will buy a couple of their products to show my support. I'm just unwilling to believe, without further evidence, that their reasoning is anything more than a concern with their bottom line.

They are, first and foremost, a business and their main goal is profitability. While not laudable, it is understandable. Because I agree with their stance, I'll do a little to show that I support their actions. I already own shares, so I will just buy a couple of devices.
the US has a reputation of being puritanical but the truth is we have a high variance of behavior and standards.

and in many cases i would think the source of admiration would be obvious. many men would like to live a life of constant sexual variety
> when choosing between having every action tracked and keeping some things to yourself, unsurprisingly a lot of people want privacy

Do they? I hope that's true, but the fact that Apple is selling it doesn't mean people are buying. Most people I talk to still have zero concern for privacy, unfortunately.