skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't have to erase the whole history, just duplicate it.

What we do is to have a developement branch, with the real history. When ready for merge/review, we duplicate that branch, rebase -i (on the same origin) to clean it all up without making any changes -- changes aren't allowed, only history split then merge the clean branch in the dev one (no conflicts: no changes!) and THEN ask for reviews on that clean branch.

If there are further changes, park the 'clean' branch, continue working on dev branch as before, and make any changes needed (typically we use the 'autosquash' naming convention), and re-do the cleanup before re-submitting.

Once the review is complete, just merge again dev<->clean, and merge that in the trunk.

That way you have the whole history complete, and you also have a set of 'public' patches that have been reviewed and potentially can be upstreamed.
I found the Proof of Work Captcha on Coinhive's signup page to be quite interesting:

https://coin-hive.com/account/signup

https://coin-hive.com/info/captcha-help

I'm not super familiar with the inner workings of the world of spam protection, but I'm curious if people think increasing the cost of spamming through extra workload for the machine as opposed to the human in this manner would be helpful to deter spammers in general? Seems like the lack of a human intervention requirement means that the spamming workflow can still be automated, but maybe the extra workload could cut into profits/throughput enough to make the site an unattractive target?

The other aspect of a solution like this where you can potentially recoup part of the damage done by spamming through their contribution to your mining operation, so you say hire a human moderator, is super interesting as well.
As a parent you would have had to have been insane to leave your kids to live with MJ, not to sure I'd call it lucky.

This information got leaked to the press,
and Jackson found out about it, and ended
up inviting this family to Neverland in
the US where 2 of the kids ended up staying for years.
You that old saying - you make your own luck.
I think this particular family lived it.
ASK HN: Does Apple store the facerecognition images on their platform?
If they do, they have your personal info and an image of your face ( several ). I cant even start to explain the dangers and power they gain with this.
Maybe I didn't express myself accurately (English is not my mother tongue). I don't think depression is simple thing, banality to be solved by philosophy. I don't know how you read that from my post. I said it helped me _curb_ some instincts to 'let myself go' when things aren't going my way.
Regarding 'cowards' - again, you misunderstood. I meant that people who take the slow suicide path are cowards. It's a subset of mental illnesses as a much bigger sphere.

1. It takes courage to take the blows life gives you and keep going, ("Do it for her" photo)
2. It takes courage to actively take your life, hurt yourself physically
3. It _doesn't_ take any courage to just let yourself go and fade away

I've had close family members 2 and 3
Other quite interesting item in this museum is a former ballistic missile [1] that after its retirement started an academia career as an university, general-purpose computer [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-30_Minuteman
[2] https://www.flickr.com/photos/108786967@N03/29376655486
Good points, but continuing with the thought experiment, I think you fail to consider what might be a reality for your psychics. What if the psychics don't have perfect information, nor perfect control, but have, perhaps varying on the psychic in question, some amount of power that lets them see or control future numbers with some amount of probability, but not certainty?

In that case, they might win more often, but not every time. Given that so many things in nature follow a power curve or a bell curve, I think your presumed psychic abilities, we can assume, follow the same curves, and if most of your psychics then have "some ability" to predict these numbers, but not a certainty, then I think they are more likely to be frequent smaller winners.

For example, if you have an ability that let's you see a 4/8 of the future numbers, with 33% certainty, then one time out of three, you will win 4/8 of the numbers, and sometimes more than 4/8 if you're lucky.

TL;DR -- your presumed psychic abilities probably exist on a spectrum ( bell / power curve ) and likely most of your psychics do not have "perfect" future information.

PS - I have a feeling that psychics would prefer to play the stock market, than lottery. I just sense their expected payoff is higher in that case, probably because there are a lot more factors that affect a stock price, so even partial information across a lot of these seems to provide a better advantage, than partial information on 1 single list of numbers.
GPS Navigation and Maps Sygic Full v17.2.13 Patched [Unlocked] Here
Odd, I would rebase develop onto my feature, resolve conflicts which is easier as I'm dealing with my changes, then merge to eg develop. When time comes for integration I'd probably squash commit changes to the integration branch just to keep that a bit easier to track/undo, but preserve full history in my feature and develop branches do can revert specific commits etc. As always useful comments are a must so I disable automated merge commits.
`git rebase --exec {rebuild project}` solves the issue of invisible errors in commits. I'm a big fan of Gerrit's review workflow, which requires every commit to build in isolation. I also usually try to squash my changes into logical independent commits before review.

I like rebase because it's prettier, but I also think there's an issue with the non-rebase case that the OP has missed: unless you rebase, you're setting yourself up for failure in the `git bisect` case: when you step back to find the source of an bug you're tracking down, the worst possible case is that you find it's introduced by a merge and not present in either of the parents. That's much more likely if your merge commits contain fix-ups of their own, which in turn is much more likely if you've got overlapping branches. If you rebase-and-merge then the merge won't have any extra changes, and if you rebase-and-fast-forward then you won't have any merge commits at all.
I don't see that anyone has yet referenced this article.

https://www.wired.com/2011/01/ff_lottery/all/1

It explains how to win (an old lotto), and more importantly why there is a way to win.
Of course I would rather get irrelevant ads than have irresponsible firms tracking the patterns of my online behavior. That seems like an extremely obvious choice.

Ads are not there for my benefits, they are memetic weapons deployed by corporations to nudge my subconscious. I haven't voluntarily clicked on a single ad in my entire life. They are 100% obnoxious, and these days, privacy violating to a staggering degree.
How much does the average user actually use Facebook, specially nowadays?

I'd be rather surprised if the total amount of time spent on Facebook didn't have something like a power-law distribution. The only reason I have an account at all is so that, in the unlikely event that I might be notified of something that I actually care about or that someone might try to reach me, I'll know it. And I'm sure that is true of at least a portion of other users.

Having Facebook today is like having a landline seven years ago. I wonder if in seven years Facebook will only be used for marketing, too.
Okay, so, what about the New York Times:

https://www.confluent.io/blog/publishing-apache-kafka-new-yo...
> would you rather have ads from services which know nothing about you?

Yes, absolutely. Advertisements are not something I seek out. In fact, I do my best to minimize any exposure to them. If they know about me, they are more effective.

I understand that I am not immune to the ability of advertising and marketing to influence behavior. I'd rather start a purchasing decision with zero information than from a biased position because of brand familiarity or other psychological tricks.

If you consider advertising to be the commercial implementation of psychological tactics designed to manipulate your behavior based on decades of data and research, why _would_ you want to provide advertisers with greater ability to manipulate you?

If it's just "show vegan ads to vegan people" why is advertising such a cornerstone of modern infrastructure? I trust the big advertising networks less than a sleazy used-car salesman.
A major problem is that there are no consequences whatsoever for the judge that rubberstamped this ridiculous warrant.
I like to note that a smartphone is indeed a computer with one huge difference: the phone does break more often.

It's no fun dropping a $1000 phone in the toilet or down the stairs.

A lot of people forget this.
I am in a weird situation where I have to teach people about Facebook, pages and ad campaign while I myself haven't logged (not even for a sneak peek) or posted in a year. That thing is a cancer and one of the aspects of my job is basically to be a Facebook evangelist.
Actually, we did through our YC SS network. We talked to Kan's co-founder who confirmed that lawyers do have this problem, but kind of they themselves don't know how to approach it. The reason: It's hard to make them switch and use new technology.
Please people stop it.
They will inject they agenda on everything.

Trying push they political agenda.

They steal your private information and sell it.

Follow, locate you with they mobole apps.

Prosecute you for liking anything, expose your information to government / CIA officials..

Just take a moment and listen all CIA whistleblower statements..

Alex Jones have been talking about this now over 10 years and still.. there people who just follow the mainstream liars.. quite unbelievable

Why people ? I really wonder so many times the ethos of these companies.. google, facebook, twitter .. all just same big brotherhood company ..
This is a great point. Canada has a long history of developing branch plants to the US and selling mid-sized companies rather than growing them.

I mean, there are worse things. It took a long time before the country realized that inward flowing FDI was not a bad thing.

On the other hand, we live in complex times and Silicon Valley companies aren't making a great reputation for themselves as trustworthy partners.
I liked the style of writing, but the lack of knowledge of the author made me create this account and adding my first hn comment.

Thanks to all others who explained technically what upset me so much.
Sour about what? Using Signal instead of Messenger?

Facebook's DAU numbers and engagement metrics just keep on rising

and OP's

*If Facebook makes people unhappy, and the more they use it the unhappier they are, why does usage continue to grow? Not only are more people using it, a higher proportion are checking Facebook at least once a day.

are also true of heroin. And no, I'm not saying that Facebook is like an opioid but it just isn't a convincing argument about its value.
Generally speaking, Container Tabs try to make you look towards the internet like several users while on your end it behaves like a single-user experience. So, things like history, bookmarks and add-ons are not separated by Container Tabs.

And the technology behind this was developed by the Tor Browser devs and then uplifted into Firefox and reused for this, so this is a proper security/privacy feature, not something that only works on the surface.
If what you want to maintain is contact with all those people, you can deactivate your Facebook but keep Messenger on. They're separate apps. It's worked wonders for me.
Yeah, that was a whole other story. Initially, the family jumped to MJ's defence in the local press, then when the lawsuits started happening, they filed one too, saying that the son had been interfered with (!) - it was all really surreal and odd. Lost touch completely with that family now - no idea what they are up to, but I hope they lost that infatuation with winning prizes and accolades and are happily settled somewhere...
A billion images of the same person would be worthless.
Besides, there exists the level of mismanagement which deserves to tank the company.

Investment in security costs money. Ignoring it saves money and gives company advantage against competitors who invested into it - untill breach happens. If we then effectively ok breach, we practically ensured that only bad security companies will remain living in the long term.
Ship Driving Simulator 3D
Welcome to Ship Driving simulator 3d Game where you will travel from one port to another in a specific amount of time. In this driving simulator you have to work as a transporter for carrying passengers, luxury cars and dropping them to their destination point
Consider what's cheaper, paying for Caddy under its current pricing structure or paying for a consultant to configure NGINX? If the key selling point of Caddy is that it makes web hosting easier to manage, but you can get around that cost by paying a one-off cost for someone to set up a free, high-performance web server, you've taken away the most of the potential benefits.

As a reference, you can see the current pricing structure for Caddy here:

https://caddyserver.com/pricing

Note that the limited time introductory price is still more expensive over a year than paying a consultant for a couple of days to tweak NGINX.
This is not close to being the world's largest electric vehicle. Early submarines were electrically powered and more than twice the size (60ft vs ~30ft), eg. the Nautilus of 1886.
100 Images from Cassini's Mission to Saturn
Dropbox is cool and all, but i hate their pricing model. I just want to keep about 50-100 GB there (i don't hoard stuff). I don't wanna pay $10 / month for that.
At backblaze i pay less than $0.5 / month. I could pay quadruple, since Dropbox is a lot better service (and quite a different one, too). But not 20 times as much.

I know that Dropbox doesn't care about my tiny dollars and all. But why not let customers pay for what they use? This "constant growth" bullshit is probably the reason they don't care.
BeOS was single user and wasn't it also preemptive multi-tasking (like Win95). BeOS had innovative features like BeFS filesystem with metadata search engine, etc.

In the end NeXT OS was the more advanced OS with a OO UI based on Unix. The first "MacOS X Server 1.0" still very much resembled NeXT OS and its in-between Rhapsody OS. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhapsody_(operating_system) and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_Server_1.0 (unfortunately someone deleted the screenshot on Wikipedia, use Google)
Firefox Profiles function like a multi-user experience whereas Container Tabs function like a single-user experience that only looks like multiple users towards the internet. So, for example browsing history, bookmarks and add-ons are not separated by Container Tabs.

Also, you can (obviously) use them in tabs, not just in separate windows like profiles.
I see no reason not to. My reasons are:

- To see how well dotnet core 2.0 works

- To test Rider support of dnc 2 with a smaller project

- Have access to standard IO libraries that already handle all fringe edge cases and give meaningful exceptions

- Have access to a JSON encoder without adding an external dependency

The point of my side project is to learn and break things. This is not a product.
I'd imagine it uses a lightning network or something.
Because in life, all prices are subject to change. Maybe you wouldn't expect the hot dog to double in price to $10, and conversely the vendor wouldn't expect you to become bored with hot dogs and now are only willing to pay half at $2.50. The only right each party has here is to say no.
This is just a grab bag of BT vulnerabilities they found. It's pretty likely that there are vulnerabilities in iOS BT, they just weren't found in this round.

(Remember that these vulnerabilities have been around a long time, laying there undiscovered).
No. Otherwise- Google's car doesn't have my favorite steakhouse, where I am going to meet my friends. I'm buying a Mazda.
I imagine that you have to use an Event Sourcing architecture because if you use Kafka as a primary datastore you need to add a lot of complexity outside of Kafka to make it usable.

For instance, you cannot query Kafka and this is a basic requirement of most data stores. To get queryable data, you could build up state from events in some external component and then query that external component.

From what I understand, this building of state from events is an example of an Event Sourcing architecture.

I think event sourcing as a primary datastore is a cool idea. Its fun to play with such ideas on small projects and then scale up. The downside is that Kafka is a distributed monster that is hard to run locally (you need multiple docker containers for a basic setup). I'd be very interested to see if anybody else answers your question.
Face ID requires looking at the phone, and then swiping up. The swipe is what takes the extra time. It means that your phone is not ready to use by the time you look at it.

Touch ID lets you do the touch before you look at the phone. The phone unlocks while you take it out of your pocket, so by the time you look at it, it's already unlocked.
you really trust your family to be in car that doesn't have a steeringwheel and it's controlled by "don't be evil" google ???

Seriously people, wakeup!
They do generally tend to keep things very quiet until they launch.
Surely, there are people out there who overpay for AWS resources. But the truly deluded are those who purport to understand the sheer width and breadth of organisations and their wildly different requirements and priorities well enough to to brand them suckers.
Even if they wanted to remove him the rights to use their game, they should have warned him first to remove it himself and if he did not comply then it will be somewhat moral to dmca him. Without warning he did not break dmca because they say on their website that it is ok to stream their game for everyone.
Inside the Equifax Hack
The difference with new NN-based systems is that they are trained end-to-end, learn the syntax and some form of "reasoning". Check Memory Networks, by facebook, for example (two NNs, one for "reasoning" and one for storing long-term data, quite impressive).

Now, it's still an area of active research... and I'm not sure what "state-of-the-art" means for this library, somebody said that they rank #27th in some commonly used dataset.
Chrome/Safari/Opera all use the WebKit/Blink font renderer, so yeah, those will look similar. Firefox relies on your OS' font renderer, so maybe try to tweak the settings there.
> Since almost all of us agree that sexual preference is something that is innate

Whatever one's opinion may be, it's pretty difficult to arrive at solid conclusions if the premise is such a sweeping assumption.
This is the only one I've used, it's compatible with S3 API, but has limitations of its own:

https://www.minio.io/
Correction: someone else.

You cannot victimize yourself by sharing pics of your own self.
Yes, the walking movement is one of a newborn's 9 primitive reflexes. [1] However, developing the fine control skills required to balance while walking is a skill that babies learn, and it takes a long time to do so.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_reflexes
Define 'platform'. Do you mean on their servers? If you do, then no, they don't. If you mean on the device itself, then yes, they do. They do it in such a way that it is inaccessible (using the secure enclave).
Oh, boo-hoo. I maintain a bunch of FOSS projects too and I endure entitlement too, and I yet was still there calling you out for this. What Caddy has done is deliberately mislead and disrespect both new and established users. Other groups have added commercial licensing options to their software without facing (as much) vitrol because they didn't mislead or disrespect people while doing so. Don't think Caddy is in the same league as them. You got hate because you did it wrong, not because you did it at all. Your post is mining for sympathy because you got hate for being a jerk and it demonstrates that you've learned little from the event.

You may not owe your users anything, but guess what: they don't owe you anything either. That's how open source works.
When you imagine the archetype of a person with both the desire and ability to throw teenagers in prison for sharing pictures of their own bodies, it's hands-down an old rich white guy.
Heterotopian spaces
Can someone be kind enough to explain how they filtered the results to produce the resulting page linked by OP?

https://www.nordnet.dk/mux/popups/marknaden/aktiehemsidan/av...

There seems to be an identifier, but not sure what it pertains to.

Thank you for your help !
I If I tried to carry a desktop computer and monitor around with me all day, it would probably get broken. Thankfully mobile device are... mobile. I'm glad it ever fits in my pocket! You can mitigate the issues you detail with a heavy duty case, waterproof phone, and/or insurance.
Are PWAs and phone gap good enough now?
It's not better, it's different. They cover different use-cases. Container Tabs function like a single-user experience that only looks towards the internet like multiple users, so things like browsing history, bookmarks and add-ons are not separated by it.
How is it any different than Hollywood becoming a centerpoint for making movies, even though most decisions are made in New York? At least, that was how the first several decades of Hollywood worked. And still, some studios or their executives who approve projects are headquartered actually in New York.
Clearly these people that chance a substantial risk of 6 hours of pain followed by paralysis or death have made a wise decision and must not be interfered with.

Truly a travesty that the state invests its resources into peoples lives and then cares when they throw it away in selfish stupidity.
They don't need those reviews in these cases. There are PLENTY of real reviewers in a high profile case like this.
I don't think you can press a rape charge without the consent of the alleged victim, assuming the victim is a competent adult. Anyone can claim you were raped, but if you stand up and say "bullshit", then nothing can come of it legally.
Probably someone working on the place where you go to get the money.
Advertising Groups Ask Apple to 'Rethink' New Cookie Tracking Standards
"Linear Algebra Done Right" is a fine book but its enduring popularity leads people to recommend it as a universal default answer.

The parent asked if there was a LA book that covered the material in the same style as 3Blue1Brown's videos. If that's the criteria, Sheldon Axler's book isn't the best book. One can compare a sample chapter to the youtube videos and realize they use different pedagogy:

http://linear.axler.net/Eigenvalues.pdf
It's true that different index codecs are being designed with different tradeoffs (index size vs postings lists access time and cost), but the work is very incremental IMHO, no huge advances to speak of. Also, can you talk about the top-k challenges you mentioned? Priority queues are not optimal enough ?
That may be part of good parenting, but teenagers simply do not have that as a "right". The OP asked simply "What is the rationale behind defining child porn age < 18?" I gave the rationale, and people are jumping to all sorts of conclusions about the day to day reality of how I raise children. The law in these matters is about objectively boundaries.

Perhaps the age of majority ought to be changed, perhaps the placement of all convicted on the registry ought to be lifted, perhaps the record ought to be sealed if good behavior can be maintained for X number of years, but these are all "oughts".

Write to your legislators and put your morality into law if you want to see changes. Don't ask judges to use their discretion and open the door to widespread Brock Turner justice.