skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Is it a gas heater?

Yes.

> Where does it end?

It's all contained in the building codes and the local ordinances. It's pretty well defined actually.
From 2016 (according to the url), or 2015 (according to the article).
Cool. Nicely put.
Sure, everyone wants convenient things, but why do they need fancy tech development (they're planning to use computer vision), and what makes them think they will be able to make the economics work?

Putting these inside building lobbies means they can serve far fewer people than a regular vending machine; their costs have to be far better than a regular vending machine for this plan to make sense.
Foreign exchange, many government bonds, even some institutional bond markets—none of these have a single exchange and thus all trade 24/7. A minority of markets, e.g. the public stock markets, have “market hours”.
OP, I’m curious when you tried it in 2015? Of course, a lot has changed since then, but Jan 2015 vs Dec 2015 are worlds apart as far as React Native goes.
Link to the paper (pdf):

http://research.nvidia.com/sites/default/files/pubs/2017-02_...
The Lil license seems to have a patent grant [1]:

> Permission is hereby granted by the authors of this software, ... and including usage rights to any patents the authors may hold on it, ...

And CC0 does not [2]:

> No trademark or patent rights held by Affirmer are waived, abandoned, surrendered, licensed or otherwise affected by this document.

That appears to be the motivation of this over other existing, minimal licenses.

[1]: http://lillicense.org/v1.html

[2]: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/133/how-could...
When you refer to people in your comment it mostly likely means the Bitcoin enthusiasts and not a normal person looking at it from the perspective that it's a currency. It's volatile and has seemingly no leadership with realistic goals. People aren't going to take it seriously until it matures in multiple ways. But like I said it's still experimental so maybe the kinks will get worked out in a few years and it will become viable, but it has a long way to go and it's not moving very fast.
Condorcet Voting and multi-member district representation would go much further toward a more egalitarian political system than the stuff FairVote focuses on.

None of these things, however, is as effective as sustained, direct action. Even with our broken one-party-two-factions system this is so.
it could be carried by X chromosome.
We have a 15-person engineering team and converted our mobile app to React Native at the beginning of this year. We do not regret it. Our pace of delivery is much faster with React Native than what we were able to achieve building natively. Our app has over 100 screens, and only needing to implement features once to have them on both platforms is nice. The feedback loop when making code changes is much faster, especially when writing unit tests. There are some rough edges, but the benefits far outweigh the costs for us.

Our iOS app: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/root-car-insurance/id1021256...

Our Android app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.joinroot.r...
And by size, do you mean volume or height?
Equifax linked customers to a phishing site impersonating equifaxsecurity2017
The snow could be cleared off with a shovel, but then you have to either pay someone to do it in the case of industrial solar, or in the case of home solar, go up on your roof when it's covered with ice and snow, not the safest maneuver. Defrosters might be possible but that might use more power than the panels generate. You'd have to raise the temperature of the panels to above the freezing point of water, which might be a change of 20 or 30 degrees F on really cold days. Some years are worse than others- 2014 was really bad, I didn't see bare ground until late April.
> it will never make it as a legitimate source of money

yes, but because it's far better to hodl and profit instead of spending it on a pizza. It's an investment right now, not a currency.
Were you swimming with a band that uses a magnetic clasp?
there is a catch, if Microsoft ever sell any of the patents to a third party, this is not binding to them.
I'd recommend reading this article about the licensing language that's being disputed now: https://medium.com/@dwalsh.sdlr/react-facebook-and-the-revok...

The author is the same person that has an article on the front page currently arguing that the license for Graph QL DOES have issues (and is following through with Facebook through Github Issues to resolve them), so I think this position is really worth considering.
Meanwhile in reality; they were about half female, and about half male to begin with.

The word "girl" used to refer generally to young children, probably because they don't really start to differentiate much visually before puberty.
This affected my service as well. Where does the root of the problem lie, with the .IO service itself or somewhere else?
I've had the impression lately that people are overly scared of licenses. Like, on the level that a forgotten dot or so at the end could completely change the meaning as seen by jurisdiction.

IANAL, but I don't feel that's the case. I'm actually pretty sure you could just put "You're free to use this software for whatever you want" in a somewhat obvious central location, and your users would be good. The obvious intent counts. The BSD licenses don't seem to do more (besides adding a few restrictions for the user).

WTFPL is another good example license. I haven't really heard that it's a bad or jurisdictionally "invalid" license.

(But sure, for "big" stuff I guess the comment by adrianN applies).
I suppose so. I guess I'm just arguing this is a bizarre feature request.

He is out on a run. Will it need a separate processor for image stabilization because he is running?
Define "legitimate source of money".
> Germany's generous subsidy and build out of solar, while solar was still really expensive, was key in driving the cost down

You wanted to say China, didn't you.
It says this has something to do with connecting to unsecured Wifi networks. That seems, amazingly, like something Apple testing might overlook. Who has unsecured networks these days?

It also sounds like a bugfix that could come shortly and make the review seem pretty dated.

EDIT: To clarify whoever is downvoting me, I’m not arguing that Apple shouldn’t have tested this. They really really should have. I just can see how they might not run across too many unsecured networks in their employee real-world tests.
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen duck/goose?
> And yet, no one has. :)

I would be surprised if most people noticed the amount of CGI that goes into regular TV

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDjorAhcnbY

Plenty of it is composites but parts of those are rendered
Well, the idea is that boys and girls are actually anatomically identical in the womb and then various hormones / enzymes / whatever make the various base structures develop into what we'd recognize as either male or female sex organs.

So imagine if there was a simple way to delay that process until adolescence, when children could choose for themselves whether they wanted male or female anatomies.
The 10nm moniker comes from ITRS (International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors). You may be thinking of e.g. memory technology versus CPUs versus FPGAs or something -- but in this case they're roughly comparable. It's true that the specifics are arguably less ambitious (fin height and pitch, gate pitch... are all tighter) -- but that's only if you compare Intel's marketing material to TSMC and Samsung's actually extant wafers :)
On-Camera Interviews: Interviewer Mistakes to Avoid
With my limited knowledge of javascript, I don't think it can be done as any code to change font will be lost when new page is loaded. You might want to look into greasemonkey or their official chrome extension(I haven't tested it out).
If you look at the most recently public posted qSearch report on Feb 2016[2] you'll notice it talks about "Explicit Core Search" and "Powered By Reporting."

Powered By Reporting is listed as any search that is handled by Google or Bing. "Google’s “powered by” share is composed of searches conducted at "Google entities", as well as searches on AOL and Ask’s MyWebSearch "[3]

In Comscores qSearch product that you can subscribe to, when you hit "Google Sites" it provides a drop down detailing the breakdown of all the properties. Search is hard to define when companies get to that size, and searches on other Google properties are indeed 'searches' but they are also different than searches on DuckDuckGo.

[2]http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Releases-...
[3]http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Blog/comScore-September-201...
Back in the day, Chez Scheme was pretty damn fast:
https://github.com/cisco/chezscheme

Dybvig went to Cisco and open-sourced it. Last I read, Racket lang is swapping over to use Chez as its foundation: https://racket-lang.org

I've also heard that HN is written in Arc, which is a Lisp dialect that runs on top of Racket.
This is great news, I didn't know there were BIOS updates available for the C720P! I'm not going to use UEFI if it's avoidable.
If you do it right it doesn't matter.

The default ip(6)tables rule: drop all packets

For example to access my least secured public facing server you need to do the following:
17 port port-knocking to enable
crypto port knocking
Which enables ssh
Which requires a 16K RSA key and TOTP
The only accounts that can be logged in have 18 character randomly generated usernames and 255 character passwords.
The login accounts have no access to administrative functions.
So you'll need to su to an administrative account and guess the 255 character password or have a zero day exploit that can bypass SELinux and cryptographically signed white-listing of binaries.
If deficient plants have been operated successfully for this long, the implication to me is that their operators have proven responsible enough to handle it.

A lack of air bags is not noticable until your car crashes.
Ahh, darnit. I was too late, but I had the same comment basically.
I have been leading two React Native projects for most of 2017 with experience using the platform since early 2016. I would definitely recommend it today.

The two pain points have been 3rd party native modules and platform upgrades but both situations have improved greatly in the last year. Both the platform and the major 3rd party native modules have stabilized a lot, and platform upgrades are pretty easy via the react-native-git-upgrade tool.

I've used React Native with a number of languages: JavaScript, JavaScript + Flow, TypeScript and ClojureScript. All of the above, and soon, if not already, ReasonML, are viable language choices. My personal preference is TypeScript and ClojureScript.

The projects I have worked on professionally tend to be highly company branded with a common UI, and I am able to share ~100% of the JavaScript code-base between them (ignoring platform entry points).

An anecdote: recently one of the applications (React Native + TypeScript) was audited by a respected independent security consulting firm to rave reviews by the security team. On the spectrum of risk (Info, Low, Medium, High, Critical) the worst reported issue was a Medium that was due to the platform default ProGuard setting that disabled binary obfuscation for development; enabling required a 1 line config change.
Wasn't the American GMO's studies bullshit for decades as well? If anything, Europe has led the way in strict and unbiased testing.
You do get different (and better) results if you search "What is Σ" rather than "why is Σ" or just "Σ". Like the other commenter said, it's better when you'd rather find a forum or SO post matching that title, rather than getting back Google's own answer.
Some people have a creative impulse. They get inspiration and want to express what they're feeling or get an urge to make something. And he doesn't even mention sharing the photo.
Tusk: Refined Evernote desktop app
> If something breaks, it's likely going to be our own code, and much easier to diagnose and fix.

But conversely, common problems and issues with frameworks are easy to find via Google and StackOverflow.
It does, but that doesn't mean you can't choose a decent stack and stick with it
...and we don't know how to build a fusion plant that can operate as a viable plant... and we're not just a decade away from that.
Just delete the PATENTS file. There is nothing that says you can't do that, and you then have a plain BSD licensed project.
If you want to run any software besides what's on the iOS App Store, you need a 64-bit x86 CPU. Apple hasn't released a macOS toolchain for ARM yet, and they need to do that a couple years before releasing such a computer. Otherwise their computer will launch with zero third-party applications (besides the open source ones available on brew).

I did check the Geekbench scores, because I was curious about your speed claims... https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/search?utf8=&q=7360u and https://browser.geekbench.com/ios-benchmarks/ seem way too close to equal for me to believe. Maybe that's the way it is, but I'm assuming I'm misunderstanding the tests. The A11 couldn't possibly be that fast, could it?
How to define a QA process?
Can someone answer this question, please?

https://softwaretestingboard.com/qna/2241/how-to-define-qa-process
I don't think there's that big a problem with how many front-end frameworks there are, and the pace of development. I think the problem is people who feel they have to use the latest and greatest feature and they have to know all the frameworks.

At my company we picked a stack and stuck with it. That happened to be React and Redux. I hear Angular 2 and Vue are really great frameworks but I feel under no pressure to really investigate them because we're doing fine as it is.

Two years later and we've barely changed aside from some package versions. We've got a very stable front-end with high code quality and component reuse.

You don't have to listen to the hive-mind. Frameworks don't rust.
COBOL is old and increasingly rare but not necessarily unsupported. That makes it a different kind of issue.
Do you guys actually read this website at the default size? The sites much more enjoyable at 150%...
To me this kind of thinking sounds so strange.

A framework is (like it's namesake) a frame that you can build around, it's a tool that enforces restrictions on you by design. Obviously there is some overhead to learning that framework, but the idea is that the framework is built by someone who spends their day-job building the framework. They are going to do a better job of designing a framework than you will in most cases.

Yes, you can build something great without them, but for any moderately sized project, you will end up re-inventing a set of rules and restrictions to apply to your own internal code. You will in-essence create your own framework.

And that's fine, I'm almost positive that your "framework" will do some things very well, probably better than most of the competition, but you need to ask yourself what your main goal is. Are you setting out to build a framework? And/Or are you trying to build a product?

If the answer is that you only want a working product, time spent on building your own framework is time wasted, as in my experience you will spend significantly more time writing your own from scratch than you will ever learning one. Doubly so if that framework isn't designed to be reusable at least in your organization. Not to mention the overhead of having all new devs have to learn it anyway.

However if the answer is that you are setting out to build your own framework (because the current ones have a limitation that you can't deal with, or some problem that you need to solve yourself), then by all means go for it! But that can't be given as "general advice" as for many people (I'd guess most people), as they don't have those same goals as you do.

Frameworks are a tool, and telling people to forgo "pre-made" tools and create them yourself is going to be the wrong advice in most cases. (but not all cases!)
I have a Series 0, and will be upgrading to a Series 3 nonLTE (once Target/Best Buy offer discounts) since my watch is too slow to do anything other than serve notifications. (many of the new WatchOS 4 features are not present in the Series 0 either)
> Real-time video is significantly different than still-frames. It's why video compression uses completely different algorithms than jpeg compression, for example.

You are right that video is different than still images, namely there is a lot of temporal redundancy that can be used to compress things to an acceptable level. But h.264 and whatnot are, at their root, a series of jpg frames (the "I" intra frames), and various temporal compression techniques are used to interpolate between the I frames (P = predicted, B = bidirectional reconstruction).

Motion jpg is a thing, and it is often preferred in video editing over h.264 or whatever because each frame is self contained. It is essentially nothing but a stream of I frames.
Screenshots! I was looking for some examples of use and screenshots, but I couldn't find any.

The idea looks very generic, so I think you must make very clear the specific advantage of your app to convince people to try it.
I just happen to think there are better ways to improve the world than buying expensive laptops to run a browser based OS.
not to dispute the concept of an easy solar install, in theory, but i note add that, in Los Angeles at least, it's hard to imagine a quick, low-cost, DIY solution.

to the LA Department of Water and Power, home solar is basically competition. and the DWP is an important cash cow for city workers and the city budget. they will find ways to add customer fees and reduce the customer's energy bill savings. (e.g. limiting the amount of electricity a home is allowed to feed back into the grid.)

the agency and the city simply need that cash.
Can you specify the reference? If you're talking about feature sizes like fin height/pitch, tor pitch, IC... sort-of -- but only if you believe Intel's marketing material on what they are going to ship. Because they haven't shipped anything, they haven't had to commit to what that process _actually means_.
Very recently I used libgit2 in an application. It was quite nice. Then I noticed my build was failing because I make static binaries and my setup couldn't handle libgit2 via Haskell for some obscure reason. So I rewrote my Git layer to use the Git porcelain shell tools (git mktree, git hash-object, git commit-tree, etc) as a quick and easy way to get it working again. I find it quite typical that using native libraries via FFI instead of shelling out to programs leads to tedious problems. And that's part of why I cherish the Unix tradition of combining different programs; shell scripting is one manifestation of that.
Breaking News: JavaScript sucks
Strings (and arrays and sets and dictionaries) are neither mutable nor immutable in Swift, they're just values. Mutability is a property of where they're stored, not the types themselves. They work just like numbers do in most programming languages: you wouldn't say that Java's `int` is mutable or immutable, it just is. It may be stored in a mutable or immutable location, but the type itself doesn't have that property.
I love having a camera with me everywhere I go. I love seeing something weird or amazing and being able to share that with my friends or family in seconds.

There is value in not letting devices control us, but there is also value in shared experiences that were previously impossible.
... with the exception of Bitcoin Cash. It seems to be doing okay.
Can it be painted over, or does it serve a purpose?
> I think that hashing out the intent and reasonable/practical limits of a law based on its language is a job for the judicial branch, not Congress.

It is the job of the judicial branch to apply law (after the executive branch pursues lawbreakers).

But look at simple, clear, concise laws vs things like the US tax code (which is annoyingly precise in some places, yet ridiculously vague in so many others) - the simpler, clearer, and - often - shorter the law, the better for everyone involved.
Medical Device Security – Current State of Play
Yep, that's a fair point. In particular, because Intel isn't actually shipping anything at 10nm, all we have to go off of is their marketing material for what 10nm means.
Don't think of it as a split. A fork is a new creation with new properties and new value, made to solve certain problems. It doesn't multiply anything, it's a new entity. Just because they both have "bitcoin" in the name, doesn't make it the same. Quite the opposite, actually, they are competing.
> I think you're being very uncivil.

I'm sorry. I see how my questions come off as questioning your experience, and I didn't mean to do that.

> I think you're taking this too personally.

I think your reluctance to admit that you needlessly insulted some class of devs is exclusionary. Casual readers of these comments may think it's bad to write bash, or that it's ok to bash people who do.

> The buffers don't just sit in the kernel, they are copied between processes (via write/read.)

Yes, that's right. I know how pipes work, thanks.

What you call 'parsing' I would call processing. Parsing has a well-defined meaning in the context of computer science: turning tokens into a data structure (like a syntax tree).

> parallelizing unnecessary work doesn't remove it

Is unnecessary work a problem? If you're being charged by the second, perhaps it may be cost-effective to eliminate it… but most of the time, developer productivity is a bigger cost.

I see that you are mindful of the performance implication of your code. I usually have to think of developer throughput, so I'm very tolerant of inefficient use of hardware if it means someone gets their job done faster.
Just pick one and stick with it. There's some serious FOMO going on in the JavaScript community. When you read articles talking about all the great benefits they see from switching frameworks, what you don't see are the gains they'd have if they just rewrote everything in the same language/framework, taking advantage of the increased experience since the original write.
I have the band that comes with my watch and I lost it carrying luggage (thankfully someone found it and I got it back). It's easy to lose it.
Medical science has to be interpreted by doctors. If the science isn't convincing most doctors in one direction or the other, more research is needed.
That's not exactly right. You have to consider the depth of the market and the size of the demand. However many BCH are in existence, there's no way that the market will support liquidating them all for USD. An order of that size would crash the markets instantly.

The $8B in value created is entirely nominal, because of the size of the pre-existing supply. In reply the real value created could well be negative or at most in the millions and not billions.
My comment was slightly tongue in cheek as I get where he is coming from. I suppose it could be an optional feature, or a way to differentiate the product.
Title: "I significantly underestimated the power of Jeff Bezos"

The article never discusses Bezos directly. He has a reputation of being a micro-manager, but was Bezos even involved in what the article details? The whole story seems clunky from that point forward because the title makes no sense.
Right… so if you’re up for some conspicuous consumption, you better shell out for the more expensive model.
Using MacOS Instruments to Profile Go Programs
Seeing the same issue
I'm from Germany and germans see politics and also populism here is a bit different. I think it's a way of viewing it.
Do you have a source for this? I'm interested in reading more.
Average people can use it to purchase legal goods and services.
Having same issues
> Frameworks don't rust

Unless the framework is iron [1], of course

[1] https://github.com/iron/iron
I'm done with other oses
Struggling with work-life balance? Try eating dessert first