skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's happening, it's just happening slowly.

Point of fact, addiction is a disease and must be treated like a disease. This is pretty mainstream and not really all that controversial. The issue we're working through, glacially, is that in the US healthcare is for-profit and junkies are not profitable. So we just.... throw those people in the garbage. I think that's both immoral and economically wasteful. I know former junkies. Personally. And they're not garbage-- they have value and if you can get them well, they want to live a productive life.

The plain fact of the matter is that there's no business case for treating these folks-- the government is going to do it or nobody is going to do it. And the status quo is "Fuck it, send them to church. I'm not paying for a bunch of crackheads to get clean. They need to find jesus." Which is another way of saying "Let them eat thoughts and prayers."
I think that a mainstream company starting using Tokens and showing the potential of Blockchain to others is more important than the ICO. In this moment, we need a successful case of use of Tokens in large scale.
I believe this is already the case with hyper-v, is it not?
Magic Leap somehow feels less sketchy than Theranos for some reason. Definitely have my popcorn out though.

It's almost comforting to read about negative to neutral gossip from ex-engineers.
> Sources also told Bloomberg that Magic Leap will likely begin shipping devices

For $6B I would hope you would use a stronger word than "likely". Such as "definitely".
Apple Says Face ID Didn't Fail Onstage During iPhone X Keynote
I think the responses you get here is largely due to the "language jumping" which instantly turns it into a language comparison.

If you'd stuck to one language, and implemented the "machinery" in that, it'd perhaps be clearer that the point wasn't C/Python/Ruby vs. Haskell.

E.g. here's a generic version in Ruby that to keep it simple just treats an Array as Maybe, with the empty Array as Nothing, giving us mappend and fromMaybe (we could make this more convoluted with a lazy "mappend" too, but it'd make the code even more un-Rubyish) like these:

def mappend(*args) args.map(&:call).compact; end
def fromMaybe(default); [yield].map{|m| m.empty? ? default : m}.first; end

And so fizzbuzz becomes:

def fizzbuzz(i)
fromMaybe([i]) {
mappend(
-> { i % 3 == 0 ? "Fizz" : nil },
-> { i % 5 == 0 ? "Buzz" : nil })
}
end

(1..100).each {|i| puts(fizzbuzz(i).join) }

And just as clear and extensible as the Haskell version.

I think the issue with using this as an example is compounded by making it one where you can make the lambda's generic over a simple hash lookup, as well, which makes it easy to overlook that the above can also handle more divergent rules (e.g. ones not relying on remainder, for example)
It is going to require a magic leap for that company to ship anything! Sorry, could not resist...
An annotation processor does not seem to be a good fit here. Annotation processors can only generate new classes, not modify existing ones. So you would have to make all classes abstract and then generate non-abstract ones that have a #children() method and refer to the generated classes everywhere in your code.
The Saturn System Through the Eyes of Cassini (NASA Ebook)
Same here. That's the original layout of UNIX keyboards, after all.
Can Cops Force You to Unlock Your Phone with Your Face?
But how do you access the original AST in your python?
Weird I've been cloning git repos to an external NTFS drive mounted in /mnt and never had any issues.
My father is 74 and he uses ubuntu. I installed it for him and he doesn't know the difference, really.

Most people are just using browsers and I don't know, maybe a spreadsheet once in a while? Primarily browsers. My dad casts videos to his chromecast and reads a few forums, checks his email.

Ubuntu just works for "normal" users. I installed it because I have to help him far, far less than I did when he had windows.
my point is that who claims amazon is data driven are usually pundits and outsiders.

in this thread the person who (claim to have) worked there said otherwise. and in your second link Bezos also said otherwise.

amazon is as data driven as any other fortune 500.

quit fetichising it.
>Search at the border for the purposes of detecting contraband has been considered reasonable from the moment Constitution was in force.

Is this really true, though? Would you be able to provide a sourced example of this -- Searching a person's personal effects and papers at the border, ideally in a case that went to the courts?
How does the divisible-by-five case suppress the numeral output, when `i%3` is nonzero?
> They also have a CPU that is as powerful as anything you get in Desktop PCs.

Is this actually true?
Seems like sth I'd like to try, if some day I was responsible for hiring people. But, from my perspective, one piece of info is missing: are the people OK with working as contractors/freelancers, rather than being permanent employees?

(B.t.w. what if companies could post questions to the maybe-applicants? and other companies could see the answers too. The questions and answers would appear at the bottom of the profile page.)
Few Lessons Leaders Can Learn from the Movie Inside Out
Rhino 5.3.2 Mac Crack 2017 Plus License Key with Keygen Full Free
Developing Oculus Medium's Move Tool
I wrote an annotation processor for [0].

If you use Kotlin instead of Java it's way better because no nullability-issues and it's super-useful standard-library.

And once you've figured out how to hook it into gradle, IDEA etc., which admittedly cost me an hour or so, you can reuse that knowledge for every annotation-processor to come.

I made it a habit to set myself a time-limit EVERY time I start touching the build-process. After the limit has passed it must be faster, more automated, or in any other way more useful, or I will revert the changes.

[0] https://medium.com/@spitzwegerich/generated-json-serialisati...
> Because it's Anonymous. This is part of what it is. Sucks, but that's what it is. It's an important part.

Dude, there is no reason you can't collect medical data responsibly and with respect to privacy. Cmon man. We do a whole lot of this, all over the place. They can, they just won't.

> But there is solid science that backs AA. Even if it was started without a scientific underlying idea.
> People love to bag out AA, but as your last line says it is working for some people, studies back this.

It would be untrue and unfair to say that there's nothing to AA. It's been successful, but how successful? Compared to what? IMHO, the greatest aspect of its success is its ability to let people off the hook. This is just a way for politicians to throw some 'thoughts and prayers' at a hard problem and call it good.

It's not good. It's not all bad, but you start digging into the social science research and there's a lot of progress that's been made since the 30's that AA just won't touch. AA isn't working for a whole lot of people.

But it's cheap and it doesn't trigger certain populations within our democratic society, so it's gone on and on. I think we're running out of road here, but... well, we'll have to see.
> It maintains an accessible record of the insurance contract itself within a smart contract

And why would I want details of my insurance contract on a publicly visible blockchain? What am I missing here?

edit, to elaborate:
A currency ledger blockchain has to be visible to all participants, that's how we can all come to an agreement on who owns what. What I don't get is why my insurance contract has to be visible by any parties other than me and the insurer. Hence, what value does putting this data on a blockchain bring?
It's not about forking, it's about forking with the intent to compete (which this was, as it was advertised as an alternative here). In that respect, regardless of the Github.com terms of service says, federal trademark law is likely to supercede it.
Where can i find cab booking app similar to uber
It's a low information market with zero competition. Allow import of drugs. Allow insurance to operate across state lines. That's what Trump was suggesting during his campaign. I'd go further, though, and stimulate the flow of information. Picking a doctor right now is a freaking nightmare, all you have to go on is what the doctor says about herself, yet insurance companies sit on tons of data they are unable to use and unwilling to share. Costs, outcomes, malpractice rates - it's all there, you just need to give a shit, which insurance companies do not.
Providing a really well supported platform (CUDA) which only had payoff far in the future did take some foresight. That it could be applied to ML was a good guess, but the fact that the DL revolution happened mostly on NV hardware wasn’t just because the hardware was good. The CUDA environment investment paid off.
Yeah, I'm running Windows on my laptop and have Linux on my desktop.

I've tried Bash on windows multiple times and it's simply too slow. I ended up just running Linux VM as my development environment when I'm on my laptop.
The ACPI assembler if I remember correctly.

BTW, an easy way to block Bluetooth is blacklisting the kernel module. RPM only got soft dependencies recently, so maybe you can check whether Fedora uses them for Bluetooth userspace packages and similar.
I think he means he hadn't heard about it being phased out.
> To prevent these mistakes from happening, add 'use strict'; at the beginning of your JavaScript files. This enables a stricter mode of parsing JavaScript that prevents accidental global variables.

I don't think using strict will prevent accidental global variables, such as this.var in global scoped function calls. Strictness main goal is to prevent inadvertently misspelled variables from going unnoticed.
Conscious thought is far more liable to interpretation than the apparently encrypted nature of unconsciousness, whose contents I'd estimate would elicit great surprisal in me if I could simply magically gain full access. If it was capable of a meaningful representation, and if I could consciously analyze unconsciousness in a way without disturbing the structure of my unconsciousness because of a kind of self-referential paradox, then the relative entropy of learning "no, actually this is a more accurate view of my mind" is something I'd expect to contain a lot of information that could possibly lead to a new approach of me being me.

Some might say "even if you knew what was inside, it would simply be meaningless - in fact, the only part of your unconsciousness that you could understand would end up being exactly the same as your conscious experience". Wittgenstein gave the answer "it would lack any sort of meaningfulness to you whatsoever" to the question "what would we understand if we could listen to a lion speak?" It's not unreasonable to assume that a memdump of unconsciousness would actually provide little insight into itself. If interpretation of unconsciousness is impossible internally because it has a kind of illegible presentation from inside your mind, then there might not be a guarantee you would be able to recast into an internal and understandable grammar just as result of seeing it appear outside of your head.

Maybe consciousness and unconsciousness are the ends of a spectrum that measures something like "the degree of sparsity of error-correction (ie. error-correcting codes) necessary for providing the illusion of singular focus while recovering information from billions of sources". Maybe there is a compressive sensing-like sampling method that allows neurons to recognize a cat through pretty short chains of neurons because of an object recognition approach that greatly reduces the amount of computation necessary for the sparsity of that signal..?

Hell, maybe consciousness is even way trippier than that, and emerges from neural approximations of dynamically reconfigurable circuits that verify zero-knowledge proofs..

Problem is that none of these explain where and why what is felt feels what it does, though!
It was accessible because they invested in CUDA. That wasn’t a small decision.
Here's one that's 150 kb Javascript on page load, instead of 300 kb: https://www.kajmagnus.blog/new-embedded-comments — and innovates a bit when it comes to features for the readers. (I'm developing it.)
Disqus seems to be 600kb (I summed the size of the "disqus" scripts on a blog that uses Disqus).
> Could you mention what you're likely to be printing?

To paper? Never. To PDF? I've printed to pdf to get nice looking formatted code for presentations.

I see print as more a brute force bazooka feature to get nice vector graphics out of apps.
mess is the word
Whats the advantage of this over the profile you can build in stackoverflow?
Exactly! Plus, even before CUDA existed, people in numerical computing had already noticed that GPUs were ideal hardware for certain classes of problems and were doing awkward things like embedding numerical calculations as shaders and other tricks to use the graphics APIs as a way to encode computations. I recall colleagues who worked on those pre-CUDA systems meeting some resistance from NVIDIA in terms of opening up the low-level APIs that would make the hardware more directly accessible, versus the encodings that they needed to go through to use graphics primitives for the work.

NVIDIA got lucky by having the right kind of hardware, and created CUDA not due to some insight into the AI world, but based on the needs of scientific computing. Just look at their early papers on CUDA (E.g., Luebke's 2008 paper "CUDA: SCALABLE PARALLEL PROGRAMMING FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING") - AI was nowhere to be seen. They were focused on traditional high performance computing problems.
> The stereotypical Gray Tribe position is, "This government program is poorly-run; let's debug it"

Just skimming google for Gray Tribe stuff and seeing that it's basically another name for 'libertarian tech workers', this isn't their stereotype. The stereotypical libertarian position on government programs, poorly-run or not, is the same as the right-wing position: "let's get rid of it".
Blender sorta did that. It was a closed source project that the authors said they would open source if the community raised €100,000. It succeeded and the software was subsequently made open source.
Yes it is, at least when using Geekbench as a measure. The A11 beats some of the Intel processors in the 2017 MacBook Pro models.

https://www.macrumors.com/2017/09/13/a11-bionic-chip-geekben...
Insects are never gonna be killed mechanically, those are too small and too many in count. Modern trend is to use biological controll: you "plant" organism that eat them or eat their eggs.
accessible/visible could mean the details of the contract encrypted (or more likely crypto hashed), not publicly readable as plaintext

later if some authority needs to validate/litigate, it would be easy to decrypt the pertinent data with the key or by comparing hashes

that said, simply letting the world know that you did enter into a contract - regardless of the details - is leakage of privacy so buyer beware

EDIT: elaborating in response to the above edit...on their FAQ they say they use blockchain to speed the process - instant gratification and automatic payment. i am sure this is merely a marketing PoC to gague consumer comfort levels with blockchain apps. and buzz, which it is obviously getting here. but long term, think about the cost savings if you automate claims processes. in Florida and Houston right now they cannot find enough insurance adjustors to process claims for victims. in 5 years you can likely use a fancy AR+AI mobile app to do self-inspection, which would trigger a smart contract for payment of the claim. feel free to apply to YC with that :)
1. They didn't have the power that the 1 percent do?

2. They realized how difficult is to reverse a situation?

3. They realized they don't want to pay more for stuff, especially when you're unemployed, or underemployed?

4. I'm still kinda confused. I definitely don't have the power(money) to take a stance. Hell most Trump voters only way of saying, "Hay wait--something is definetly wrong?" was voting for this idiot. And yes--they are probally blaming the wrong elements in the problem. The 1 percent will just ride it out, while getting a tax break. They will be just fine, as usual.
Hmm. This website doesn't seem to work well on iOS.
So your complaint is that it is hard for users if you make a breaking change in your library, big surprise. This is why breaking changes in libraries should only be done with utmost consideration, preferably after first deprecating the usage.

And if you make a breaking change to the interface, you better be damn well breaking it at compile time and not hiding it with reflection shenanigans.

In the example of the OP, it's easy to think of an example that would totally be broken by the author's reflection approach, while the user has no warning at compile time and no reasonable way of knowing that what he's doing isn't allowed:

class MyWeirdNode extends Node {
private final int i = 1;
public IntNode asIntNode() {
return new IntNode(i)
}
}
It's saying that the operation can be made parallel.

Applying an operation to a total workload is identical to:

1) Split the total workload into smaller workloads.

2) Apply the operation to each smaller workload.

3) Apply the operation to the results from step 2.

Each smaller workload in step 2 can be run in parallel.

While that may seem obvious for adding numbers or money it may be less obvious when you have different operations for example a method in an OO class hierarchy.
It's worth noting that this is some guys educated speculation on the matter. Nobody knows how this will actually work without signing an NDA at this time.
Go install ifconfig somehow and try again, Debian ships with a wrapper I believe.
Aha, I had that eerie feeling that I saw those crappy patterns somewhere else. So, Android it was
I got the impression that there are some improvements with moderation tools and banning / blocking people, that is, things that aren't directly visible to the reader.

Here's an alternative to Talk, with some new features / "techniques"?, directly visible to the reader: https://www.kajmagnus.blog/new-embedded-comments

E.g. makes large discussions simpler to read / navigate, by using arrows, which one can click, to jump to the parent post (if it's far away), and then Back to jump back down and continue reading. (I'm developing this.)
Yup. A few days ago we (60 people) got bought by John Deere for $305M b/c our machine reduced herbicides by 90% using CV/ML. Our only moving part was a solenoid. Would not have survived if it had been more complicated. You clearly get it.
App Promo Video: A Technique to Viral Your App
App promotion through videos is a way for mobile app developers to viral their applications among general masses.
Well, that makes the CPU as powerful as some processors in mobility focused laptops, not as powerful as "anything you get in desktop PCs".
Wouldn't be surprised if Apple R&D is also working on AR Glasses considering their ambitious attempt in making AR the big in the newly launched iPhones. In fact they need a new product for masses just like their iPhone.

That must be a day when Magic Leap could face the fate of Blackberry or Pebble!
Yeah I mean if you think improving ethanol and malt production is cool.

As far as actual food I'm more impressed by small scale open source farm bot projects and some of the innovative stuff permaculturists are doing without tech.

Factory farmers = Microsoft/Windows

Small scale farmers = Open Source/Linux
Why software projects fail – Part 1
What Happens If Robots Take the Jobs? [pdf]
I had one vineyard planted this year using fully automatic planter using gps and laser mavigation. There was driver inside, but he was just a controller: once he moved few cm out of the path whole thing just shut down and he had to drive back to spot.
If you have “generalized multicore computing”, you still need to generate a code schedule for your grid / hypercube / what have you of CPUs or PEs, unless you want to program all that stuff by hand. Compilers 30+ years on still aren’t super good at generating good code for parallel machines from abstract expressions of a mathematical problem for CPUs and GPUs, despite all the loop nest transformations with tiling, reordering, vectorization, polyhedral techniques, what have you, outside of some restricted forms of expression (like, say, Halide) or manual annotations you give the compiler as hints along the way. Scheduling code across multiple processors is more or less the same problem, with or without synchronous exchanges of data between the processors.

The modern GPU is a “generalized multicore” machine anyways. Nvidia GPUs have, say, 60 SMs with many warps per SM concurrently resident, giving you hundreds of hardware threads (warps) available, each with 32-wide SIMD units. You have multiple memories you can play with for data locality (the multi-MB sized register file and shared memory space, the smaller caches, global memory). It’s a hard enough problem to use all of that well for all but simple problems.

If you want to change deeper behavior, there's always Verilog.
From what I understand the WSL team is small, with only a few people working on the kernel parts. I'm sure they honestly intend to deliver blazing performance but they're still busy delivering basic compatibility. Maybe microsoft should allocate more resources, since it is probably the cheapest way to gain developer mindshare.

I do node development on windows, but not in WSL. I would advise doing as much as you can with native built software and only using WSL to fill the gaps.
Hyper on windows is buggy AF tbh. cmder or conemu are more popular.

More options @ https://www.slant.co/topics/1552/~terminal-emulators-for-win...
I disagree. Just my personal bias but I don't care for Windows on the desktop at all. It's just... annoying. The slashes face the wrong way, can't resize a terminal. Weird file system. WTF is this registry thing? What's wrong with config files? Too much junk in the interface. It's just not... clean. I like clean.

I suppose it comes down to what one knows and is used to, but for my part I don't see myself ever working regularly with Windows again I dis-enjoy using it that much. So all this talk about how bad Linux desktop is nonsense from my perspective. I like KDE. I like Mate. I like i3. I like Gnome. Doesn't really matter, a terminal and web browser and a small handful of tools is most of what I need. Especially if I can set it up as I'm used to. Which if windows were kept simple would probably be ok as long as Bash or like is around somewhere. But no. It has to be all gooped up and just... controlled. Not what I'm looking for in computing at all and not what I enjoy.
Next up evercrack er Everquest.
> Would the US govt [...] ask [Kaspersky] to spy on behalf of the US in Russia

Why would they? Wouldn't they just ask Microsoft instead? I don't see what particular value or access Kaspersky would bring to the table here. They have no particular "spy" channels into the Russian government, they just make software.
How Can We Find Best Iphone UX/UI Design Services India?
Greenhouse the entire mid-west? With big enough structures to run tractors? Not sure the ROI is going to work out.
Honestly, I like the lightning port and connector a lot more than USB-C, from a physical engineering standpoint. I think USB-C is really inferior.
maybe the top 1%is having meta fun, but from what I seen the rest might as well be playing Excell spreadsheets
Gray Tribe is wildly different from Libertarian. The former supports universal healthcare, free high-quality public education, and generally a strong social safety net paid for by high taxes on the wealthy.