skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If they can, why don't they? How many annual site-wide pentests have you heard of that failed hard? And those are the people savvy enough to conduct annual site-wide pentests!
> their support for ES6 features beats all the other browsers

That's really grasping for straws. All modern browsers almost fully support ES6 features. Tail optimization are more controversial because they can actually lead to a performance decrease in some cases.

Far more important are things like custom elements and service workers on which Safari is lagging behind.
No. Especially since Trump is a master at projecting emotion on a mass scale. Zuckerberg could not rely on photo ops and videos to convey an emotional message when Trump is going to be shouting to audiences of thousands. He should just sit this one out, don't jump the gun on this one.
Remember when black people were terribly oppressed in the South, so big companies rationally took advantage of this to hire labor for cheap and out-compete others, thereby ending racial discrimination through the power of economic rationality?

Do you seriously suggest that bias should be evenly distributed? For every person biased against women in some field, there's another person equally biased against men?

After all of these discussions about this topic on HN, I'm starting to wonder if HN actually has users posting from a parallel universe. Because some of the things being described don't match the one I live in at all.
In Sweden your social security number is public information. What's the reason for it being private in the US? Sounds like a horrible thing to rely on for security anyway.
There's no one-size-fits-all answer for this: CDNs have their place. As do individual, SSD-based servers/services.

Why the artificially-false dichotomy?
Because that not only adds operational expense but also requires engineering teams to have a level of systems engineering expertise and diligence that virtually no line-of-business software project has.
Your example is hyperbolic and inane. An "Uber for contract killing" is already illegal under existing law and such a service would quickly get shut down.

Similarly we already have regulations for malicious software and I consider everything else akin to an instrument like a hammer. Just because a hammer can be used to hurt someone doesn't mean we should ban all hammers or require special "hammer licenses" to own one.

Another example besides bitcoin is tech like TOR. Some use it to buy drugs; others to evade dictatorial regimes.
Like I said, the fact of the tradeoff probably does have implications for how we regulate companies like Equifax.
I think it has less to do with C and POSIX, and more that Unix from day one was multi-user, you can't have someone "bitbang" hardware when there are multiple users accessing.

Also, i think perhaps you conflating issues here.

While sure they may be more interested in the GUI (though you will find plenty of TUI programs in the Unix world, and even some in Windows that has been inherited from DOS) the newer generation is less likely to be interested in the actual hardware beyond that it works to run their precious "apps".

And IMO the demo scene were largely "dead" by the time Linux come on stage anyways.

This because the fixed hardware models of the C64 and like were being supplanted by the mix and match PC, where the only commonality is the BIOS and the CPU ISA.
Spend some time on their docs and API references: there's a lot in there that could benefit you :)
I'll happily offer $50.
Yes: twice in San Francisco during the first bubble, with competing applicants in the room with us, first in SOMA and then in Noe Valley. Also once in Santa Clara during the same time period. (Also 4 times in Chicago, and 2 times in Ann Arbor, but those weren't as challenging.)
Did they also look at the reasons why men are paid more?

Because "men are paid more than women" alone simply says NOTHING.

In the company I used to work there were HUGE salary differences between men with the same job title, and the difference sometimes could run up hundreds of euros. The main reason was that the better paid men negotiated their terms of employment WAY better than those that got paid less.

I suspect to see something very much alike here. Also, I would like to see the salary distribution within men and women, because I can almost certainly guarantee that some women are paid more than some men, but I don't think we will ever see that because that would destroy the entire "all men are paid more than women for no reason other than they are men" narrative some people are still trying to push, while it is related to a LOT of other things other than just pure gender.

BTW, if a salary difference is SUCH a big problem why stick with the companies who do this? Why not find employment somewhere else, or start your own company with better working conditions? It isn't like you are FORCED to work for Google or any other of the big corps in Silicon Valley if you don't like how they treat people there.
Why would one of the other two sell it to them?
As a user, I hate having to open Chrome[1] because of some "critical feature". Honestly, I sometimes wish you "developers" would find some other way to implement your application.

[1]: http://i.imgur.com/NcPu5IU.png
Anecdotal, but this doesn't match my own experience. When developing for the web I usually develop on Safari. More specifically for a first-gen iPad running Safari Mobile. And then, for whatever reasons, it almost always works on other browsers pretty much as is - the main exceptions being very old devices running ancient versions of IE.

(Admittedly I aim to make sites that degrade well and work without JS, so that might be an important caveat in an age of Angular and what have you. Perhaps I'm stuck in y2k and still think a site should render in 0.2s on all but 10+ year old browsers. [Shrugs])
Junior developer gone rogue then, using a hacking story to cover his tracks.
A baseball card has a sentimental value that makes it more valuable then the actual paper it's printed on. Virtual goods can also have sentimental value, like a cool hat in team fortress. Stock shares has a value because of future dividend. A house have value because you can live in it or rent it out. Now think about a crypto currency, it only holds value because someone is willing to buy it, so think about why you want to buy it and what will happen when people want to liquidate their "investment".
A machine learning paper with actual code? Hah! Not likely.
cynicism == obedience
The day Steve Jobs dissed me in a keynote (2010)
I have now placed freezes [1] on my accounts with each of the four agencies.

It is perplexing to pay $5-10 to each of these companies that have collected my data without my permission to stop the sale of that data. In particular after they have mismanaged that data and put me at risk.

They will probably see a large surge in revenue based on this breach.

[1] https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0497-credit-freeze-faq...
To understand rising inequality, consider two janitors
Yes, a boolean value can be checked for the three possible values, TRUE, FALSE or NULL.
Your users are hitting your DB server directly?
The banking industry decided to, in effect, use it as an authentication token. Even though it was stated that it should not be used for such.
> Tail optimization are more controversial because they can actually lead to a performance decrease in some cases.

How exactly can the tail-call elimination optimization decrease performance?

Sounds more like an implementation problem.
I recommend Think Stats by Allen Downey http://greenteapress.com/thinkstats/
> The problem is that Equifax put within webserver's reach information that had no business being there.

Can you please link to your preferred tutorials (or other sources) which explain how to set up the most secure server architecture, with regards to this story/subject, for those of us who would like to do a better job?

Thanks a lot!
> I remember reading in a reputable publication quoting sources that Trump is considering him as the most serious candidate.

Strategy wise there are plenty of reasons to make a candidate that you think you can beat appear to be a threat to you.

Let's take a business example.

Say you have 5 competitors. Do you want your customers comparing you to the strong competitor Or one with weaknesses that you think you can beat?

Saying he is a serious candidate makes it likely that that will get bandied about instead of someone is actually stands a better chance of winning.

(Doesn't matter if this is actually the case here I am using it to illustrate a point of how things that are said have to be taken with a grain of salt..)
Ditto - the bug appears to have been fixed in Safari 11.
Blockchain technology would prevent a web app vulnerability? What on earth?
Yes, the SWT / Swing divergence previously existed as the IBM Smalltalk / VisualWorks Smalltalk native-widgets / emulated-widgets divergence.
I understand the functionality, but what are actual use cases for a calendar CLI?
Why not simply just
div { height: 100vh }
though?
No overflow rules on the body needed
Where did you get the dataset from? Adding a link to the source would be nice
Chrome's renderer started as a fork of WebKit. Last time I checked nobody was able to fork any version of IE.
Can you provide an example of when this would be useful? For example:

if (foo.bar.length >= baz.buz) {
...
} otherwise {
// what am I supposed to do here?
}

How do I disambiguate if the "broken" type coercion was actually what I wanted? How do I tell what circumstances conspired to make this statement not-clearly-true?
This is only going to get worse as newer iOS versions drop support for older hardware, especially iPads. It is doubly concerning since Apple bans browsers from the app store unless they just use the iOS-provided webkit engine for, so these devices are stuck with legacy Mobile Safari versions for the end of time.

As more and more modern iDevices become legacy while still being perhaps "powerful enough", I think we will start to see a persistent population of web users similar to the clan of IE6 users that took forever to shake off.
No, if you get/set methods that doesn't imply javascript with jquery! I am using React, but not ReactRouter or Redux. I hold my application state in a tree, and the tree nodes have get/set methods. My state tree is not immutable. I think "immutable way of changing state" is an oxymoron.
avoid the public scrutiny of themselves and the industry

They'd probably give it to them for free if that would avoid a huge public disclosure.

Though the proposed scenario is impossible, if Equifax really did lose most of their database, asking users to type in their current name/address/SSN (or buying it from a competitor) wouldn't help them, the valuable data is in the credit history, and without that data, Equifax has no business, so they'll go bankrupt. Even if they asked consumers for the data, few people know all of the data that the credit agencies have on them.
Web fragmentation, unfortunately is built in to our community, but my hope is that we won't ever see an era of fragmentation like the HTML5 era. I'm okay with Chrome-isms, as long as they're not too radical.
"New York attorney general Eric Schneiderman has hammered Equifax for using language meant to discourage arbitration and is asking Equifax for answers over the data breach. The company has stated since it would not bar consumers from joining breach-related lawsuits."

Is anyone else mortified that this is the reality? Where companies are allowed to dictate how much legal privilege we have to seek legal recourse if they legitimately screw up?
Don't they have to use the iOS rendering engine?
The Nitrogen Problem: Global Warming Is Making It Worse
>"I hold a contradiction over Zuckerberg. He would work harder than most to understand issues, fundamentally transform government to embrace tech, ..."

What does this mean?

Do you believe that the US government doesn't currently "embrace tech"? Look up 18F and the USDS.

Do you not think that every law maker in Washington doesn't have a smart phone and an ipad?

Would "embracing tech" somehow result in less pork barrel politics, partisan gridlock, deficit spending or kicking the can down the road on policy making? These are the real structural issues with Washington not the lack of tech in the workplace.
iOS doesn't have anywhere near the market share that Microsoft had/has on the desktop
This is stylistic. It's basically setting a scale factor for you, that this isn't a small breach, but a noticeable fraction of a billion. I could have written it as 1.34E+08 though fewer people would have understood this, though it would have been as correct. 134 Million is obviously "alot", though from a psychological perspective, the billion gets more attention than the million, even though the number isn't changing.

Again, stylistic.
I'd guess that it didn't rely on the security of a web server, but the entry point was the "thin end of the wedge" for probing and deploying more sophisticated attacks.

At some point, the front end of any web application has to go to the back end database to get information. So there's just no way to cleanly and completely isolate the front facing parts of an application from possible breach.
Most transactional websites need access to the core customer database, otherwise they could not function. Just DMZing everything is not always possible.

Maybe segmentation is the only possible defence - customers A-C served out of this DB with a different stack to limit the damage.

But once they get in, they get in, right. Its just a matter of finding the next vulnerability.

As long as you are providing a rich customer experience, with the ability to generate reports based on historical information, you have risk.
A lot of the things being said here are true. I gave FF a chance again (after nearly a decade) last month. I switched back to chrome for two reasons:

1. After a couple of days of use, page interaction began to 'stutter'. Every 2-3 seconds the page would lock up.
2. They still don't sand box tabs, so a crash brings down everything. I lost work because FF locked up on one tab while I was working in another. Everything came to a screeching halt.

That was enough for me to forget FF all over again. #1 consistently happened on two different machines, but I couldn't find a fix (just similar issues related to graphics HW acceleration from two years ago.) I have no idea how isolated these incidents are, but if I can't rely on FF to work > 99% of the time I can't use it.
Was this thread deleted because it was rising too quickly, and wasn't going as well as Mark's reputation management team was hoping it would?
> what made it Smalltalk's git

Nothing obvious. What made it more than "Smalltalk's CVS" was fine-grained method-level control of versions and configs.
Doesn't matter who the president is. The current election cycles and the kind of panderers that get propped up remind me more of third world democracies than anything else. The outcomes of whomever has got elected in the last 30-40 years have been so pointless that I'd be happy to have decisions be taken by a random number generators, than these time and resource wasting clowns.
This is nonsense. If typeof(x) is 'boolean', then x is either true or false.

Now, if you don't know the type of x and try to use it as boolean without being careful, it might look like it has four values. That comes partly from being dynamically typed and partly from performing coercion instead of throwing errors. So one might argue that Javascript encourages people to write code that's not careful, or that it's very clumsy to write careful code in Javascript, but saying booleans have four values is just nonsense.
>higher income brackets and budget cuts on education, infrastructure, health care, and environmental programs. These budget cuts adversely effect the working class.

No, the budget cuts do not adversely affect the working class. The working class collectively pays more taxes than the richest because working class makes a much larger portion of the population. That money is being wasted on education which is useless as far as getting employment after it is concerned and other government programs let the corrupt politicians decide who gets the business. Tax cuts on the rich doesn't affect the amount of money collected significantly and in addition to that encourages the lower income people to justify earning more.

>Sanders wasn't really aligned with the democratic party

Even the Democratic party was not in favor of Sanders because socialist and communist parties in failed countries, the DNC understands that socialism doesn't really work. They pretend that it does and might say it for votes, but seeing someone who would actually go ahead and try to do it would make things much worse for the country. As evil as Hillary is, everyone should be thankful that she made sure Sanders didn't get a chance.

>Sanders was the working class' best hope.
>He was in favor of raising taxes in all brackets

Yeah right... because if you want to help people, you should take their money forcefully and then give it to a slow, inefficient bureaucratic system which will solve all their problems.

>However, these programs were shown to be successful in other nations in Europe and also in Canada.

No. All big healthcare programs around the world are costing a bigger chunk of the budget every year and have thus far been sustainable because most of the healthcare innovation happens outside of them i.e. in the US, which they simply import.

>Sanders was the most honest and squeaky clean candidate that has ever run for the office.

Except for the corruption he is being investigated for.

>He legitimately believed in his ideas

Having no experience in anything else outside of mindless activism and politics makes one delusional, so while I also think he legitimately believed in his ideas, I can't see it as a good thing.
I know it's extreme,but no there is no law about a murder for hire tech platform, just laws against various types of murder, all distinguished by the criminal intent.

It's like saying many jurisdiction had laws against unlicensed taxis and illegal rides for hire, and we know Uber willfully operated in those jurisdictions...drivers have been arrested and fined, but nothing happened to Uber.

So using real world examples, yes I would like to see platforms be liable where they knowingly and willfully operate to break the law. If people could interpret that reasonably, they would understand I'm not suggesting what is obviously being interpreted or projected onto my comments.
While maintaining human induced climate influence, I think it's important to remember coastal areas were not as populated 50, 100 years ago. So what might have affected 100,000 people 70 years ago might affect 500,000 today, given pip increases and urbanization and paving over (as opposed to historical gravel).
Sorry, to me that's an unsatisfying answer. You are not saying what problem redux is solving for you. "It is like functional programming" does not even attempt to explain what the problem being solved is.
In the US, a combination of personal information is taken by most as proof that you are who you claim to be. If you know enough of someone else's information, you can steal money rather easily. We need a better identity solution, but it's what we have right now.
This proposes cutting the streaming platform host out of tip profits entirely, do I understand correctly? What incentive is there to the developer to create the streaming platform if there is no stake in profit? Did I miss something?
I am a shareholder in BigBank. I was therefore profoundly displeased when I learned...

This is amazing. It is also trivially true for anyone who holds an S&P 500 index fund or similar when dealing with American Express, Bank of America, Capital One, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, US Bancorp, and Wells Fargo among a few others.
Hey now. Accenture is a totally different company. They have reliable analysts who do good work.

/s
Honestly, there are so many libraries out there that abstract away issues like this. By building an app from scratch, custom rolling logic, you automatically opt-out of the good tools that negate all of the tiny differences in browsers. I've had my share of Safari issues, but over time, the amount of libraries I've co-opted into my dev strategy has helped me bypass the majority of browser issues.
I don't have a problem with it as long as the ideas aren't harmful.
Chrome won't allow AdNauseum. I also hate how it collects all my data^#. I've started using Waterfox, a Firefox based browser that won't collect my data and allows all extensions.

# admittedly, I don't quite understand what all data it gathers and how. But I know it does because my FB feed is littered by ads based on my chrome browsing. And I feel sooo exploited when that happens.
In my lifetime I've seen football go from a minor sport to the top one. I agree with the writer that the NFL is in decline but it is far from dead. For example college football is as popular as ever. My alma mater even after a three win season isn't having any problems selling out the stadium this fall.
Amazing Videos about a partial decoding I'm tempted to believe in: https://youtu.be/4cRlqE3D3RQ (there is also part 2 and an update)

Maybe the two should work together :) would make sense that parts are copied latin in a script of another language, while a fel stars are labled in the original language the script comes from.
Here's the Alisa 1387 album it mentions at the beginning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K9g0Kmznxc
There was an Ask HN post about earning in Europe.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15088840

Original Responses - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cjwB_s4ya57auTjIw-OV...

Then I went on to refine the data for my purposes - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AAJmOWOE-zYydNR_HzLU...
This article does a good job of answering one of the questions of "Where is this inequality coming from?"

The short version is that even though a janitor makes a comparable amount in take home pay today as they did 35 years ago, structurally today a company hires their janitors through a service, not directly. And as such the people doing the work don't get the other benefits that full time staff of the company hiring the service do.

As a result, improvements in working conditions that were won by Unions in the 60's and 70's have been completely erased for those people who can be employed indirectly.

It is a part of the problem I hadn't considered and it raises a lot of questions.
> Trump won because Hillary and the DNC in general is full of corrupt crooks

Trump won because people like you think that, because of a massive smear campaign.
He could have also said ~2% of the world's population.
To confirm your comment, groundbreaking work doesn't go to PLOS.

On the other hand there is value in confirmation.
you are completely correct, I'm surprised it even needs to be explained.
> Do you live in the United States?

Yes, we moved here after 15 years of living abroad.

> Marital status affects your credit worthiness.

They asked for this information.

To paraphrase our mortgage broker, "having a 4 year degree makes you much more creditworthy." And I just confirmed it with a family member who works in Fannie Mae, says it's true.

Have you looked at a 1003/residentialloan application lately? You and I both agree they shouldn't be asking these questions but those questions are on the application.
> 1. Understand which supporting frameworks and libraries are used in your software products and in which versions. Keep track of security announcements affecting this products and versions.

This issue is solved by having your server OS download and install security updates automatically, which amounts to more or less uncommenting 1 line of config.

Edit: Downvoter(s), please comment.
Let me borrow an Archer-ism: how is it not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spG-Yj0zEyc
صور+جميلة+2018+اجمل+الصور+حلوه+صور+خلفيات+منوعه