skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It can't possibly be pure coincidence that a major llvm release is timed about one week off from the annual major apple macOS/iOS/toolchain + iPhone hardware release, with their history of employing big llvm contributors?
Not really. It's only a "great" among critics because critics were more favorable than audiences (or rather, the movie was less polarizing for critics). But the criticisms that FiveThirtyEight has are still valid, and you can easily imagine a movie that is polarizing among critics with 50% of them giving a 10 and 50% of them giving a 1.
>Using your example, using coercion to defend yourself or your property (a case of water in this example) is in fact coercion, but it's justified. Self-defense and defense of private property are the only times when I believe coercion is justified.

We are talking past each other a bit so let's get back on track. The quoted above is what I'm getting at. What is the moral foundation for your belief that coercion is justified in cases of property. Why is coercion justified when defending your $100 case of water but not justified when the government taxes us?
Google Drive Becoming “Sync” and “Backup”
This is all kinds of unethical.
If they did that because of this, the SEC will likely nail them for it.
So, does this mean just the transparency via regulatory filings is enough to absolve them of any legal liability?
You mean Dice.com, the recruitment company?
Yes it would, and that (the extra friction) is exactly what should be done to fix the identity theft problem. It's far too easy to get credit in your name, so easy that it can be done by others.

But the change won't happen by itself unless a shift of liability away from the users makes it so that every company doing anything on credit sees that it obviously makes business sense for them to implement the extra friction (and suffer from it) because otherwise they are paying out money to fraudsters instead of trying to collect that from the impersonated people.
> irredeemable garbage

Very few movies fit into this category. "The Ridiculous 6" has a 0% (!) on RT, yet apparently enough people watched it to warrant Netflix producing more Adam Sandler movies [1]. I think the implementation of the match system is pretty awful but it is the right idea.

1. http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/24/entertainment/adam-sandler-net...
If you're curious to see NLB in action, here's a live demo: http://nlb-34dc3b430638dc3e.elb.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ , it took about 5 minutes in the console to set it up and no changes on the targets/backends.

Massive disclaimer: I work on NLB.
LA Noire Remastered Is Coming to PS4, XBOX One, Switch and HTC Vive
I think you can learn how your tastes will align with aggregate scores too. In fact it may be easier to understand than with a single person, because the outcomes are averaged out a bit more.
Does a credit freeze stop you from accessing your free credit scores (e.g. CreditKarma, Mint etc.)?
IOTA is traded on Bitfinex, which I think allows shorting, although I've never done it.

One thing to keep in mind though is that the market is not particularly rational, so even though I think IOTA is doomed in the long term, in the short term it could go up, because markets. So if you do decide to short, make sure to figure out what degree of leverage is important, and what your appetite for risk is.
Thomas Edison was the first to invent a light bulb for the masses. In many ways, that is a more impressive invention than a one-off that only illuminated a single room. But Edison didn't invent the light bulb.

Likewise, Babbage was dealing with the primitives of computation. He couldn't even get those primitives working. So both his UX and backend were unusable. So what should historians do? They give credit to Babbage for his work, but then talk about the work of 20th century scientists and engineers separately. There are a lot of people who made contributions to computing.

I think there is a difference between "wrote a great email client[0]" and "invented email." Writing a great email client is cool. But I think trying to inflate that accomplishment into making it sound like email didn't exist beforehand (thus diminishing the contributions of others) is wrong.

Take a look at RFC 733[1] from 1977. It sounds a lot like email. As a bonus, they are talking about interoperability, which I think is a really important feature for email. A feature that I suspect Ayyadurai's client did not provide (but I could be wrong).

From the arstechnica link, it sounds like the earliest Ayyadurai started the work was in summer of 1978. At best, he can claim he independently invented and developed concepts that were publicly understood (even if he was unaware of the work going on elsewhere).

But the truth is that the public doesn't care about someone writing a piece of software (unless the author became a billionaire for doing so). So the only claim that would get any attention is "inventor of..."

[0] I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assert the email client was great. With 500 users[0.1] it certainly didn't popularise the technology.

[0.1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/06/shivas-war-one-m...

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc733
freedom vs oppression.......

That is the sort of mentality that has always toxified this whole matter. This is an engineering issue. NAT wasn't created to enslave anyone.

The author isn't arguing in favor of NAT. Only that NAT is much more than an address scarcity kludge and is actually an expression of real requirements that neither IPv4 and IPv6 can address well sans NAT. The concept of a fixed, routable, global address number is possibly naive considering mobile hosts, privacy, multi-homing, security and other issues. Maximum liberty may be to decouple routing from any particular routing number scheme.

It's impossible to discuss any of this rationally; the anti-NAT camp has its dogma and can't be engaged. Two decades of this myopia headed into three...
There's a reason why there's Lawful Good & Lawful Evil. Lawful != In the Right.
Now you would think we need more body cams and recorded videos... and guess who is advertising free body cams to all US police officers: Axon/Taser.

https://www.axon.com/info/offer

Axon is actually the new name of Taser... which makes now money by selling systems archiving, managing, and analyzing police officers body cam videos.

https://www.theverge.com/2015/11/16/9724644/police-tech-body...

There is an obvious conflict of interest here: it could be so easy to conveniently delete a video incriminating a Taser device...
I would disagree that Minneapolis is disqualified for the reasons you gave. They already have a fulfillment center about half an hour from Minneapolis and a small development office downtown. The real question is whether there is enough local talent here to fill their needs.
I am the maintainer for a dev env for our team. We are on Mac OS X but we develop for RHEL so the vagrant image is centos. Building an image takes a few minutes but we love it.

We will probably research docker in 2018.
This to me seems like the major point. If we imagine we own a restaurant and a customer refused to leave, forcing us to call the police. Then the police show up, over react and shoot the customer. Surely the law enforcers doing the shooting are the responsible/guilty party?
HTC offers no value add to Google. The future, as seen in financials, is in vertical integration.

The Samsung and LGs of the world make their own screens, storage, RAM, ... They can compete at the lower end on cost, and their vertical integration allows them profits to innovate at the top end. HTC has no expertise, either in a particular component, or in software.
I'll second this. I recently spent some time in Sweden and, on the whole, really enjoyed the shrimp. In particular, the shrimp salad sandwiches. There were bad ones, of course. Bröd & Salt was a fast-food/bakery chain whose shrimp salad wraps weren't very good at all. However, I had some at other places that were good enough to inspire me to try my hand at them once back in Canada.

The results with Canadian shrimp? Superior to anything in Sweden, but probably because the shrimp went from frozen to cooked and on the plate in under an hour, while the sandwiches I had in Sweden probably had shrimp that had been sitting in the fridge for a while. The taste of the shrimp was very similar. In any case, I strongly recommend trying your hand at making Swedish shrimp salad sandwiches. They're easy to make and delicious!

Edit: It would appear I used "Wild Atlantic Prawns", which were likely Pandalus borealis. So, probably the same species. They're very common in Canadian supermarkets. I didn't realize how lucky we are!
Incron: inotify cron system
But MQDs.
I am sorry for your friend and I hope this doesn't come off the wrong way because I really don't know - what stops you from holding down your friend and getting her help?

I'm lucky to never had to deal with this, but if someone I'm close to is addicted I would get them checked into rehab even if I had to physically detain them.
My opinion of RT went down significantly when I tried to actually login and post a review. It is so horrible to use, I'm now convinced the site is deliberately setup to favour bots over real people.
This is actually a major inconvenience. You won't be able to apply for credit cards or get a loan to buy a car if you have a credit freeze. You have to unfreeze and re-freeze each time you apply for a credit card, and this costs about $30.
Netflix personalizes rating scores (based on your ratings). Rotten tomatoes should implement that instead.
With five upstream providers you're at the point where you really should have a proper router with it's own address block in front of your network.

To put it bluntly, people like you are the reason why the IETF resisted standardizing any form of NAT for IPv6. They know that if there's a half-assed solution to a problem which makes the immediate pain go away but imposes negative externalities on the network as a whole, lots of people are going to take it.
It means that someone from the SEC should probably be looking into the trades. It would take a court to decide any legal liability, and charges would be the result of such SEC action. Having not reported the transactions in the first place would have likely made the sales less defensible -- good ol' "why were they hiding if they aren't guilty?"
By enrolling in the free "Identity Theft Protection" you waive your right to "PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION, CLASS ARBITRATION, OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVE ACTION"
https://trustedidpremier.com/static/terms

What a scam!
It is my impression that things have been changing at SpaceX over the past couple of years. No doubt they are demanding to work for, especially if you are in the direct path of launch deadlines, but as the company's grown they also seem to be paying more attention to things like work-life balance.
What do you imagine that proves?
You can already sell votes, see this start-up: https://www.votebuddy.de/
Well, the AVR backend is being actively developed, I have no idea how good it is. (Although some tooling for embedded systems is rather poor, so one would imagine that LLVM with the right heuristics couldn't do badly).

rustc is apparently (https://github.com/rust-embedded/rfcs/issues/3) not far of it being usable.

However, I don't regularly write code for uC-ers - and when I do, it's usually simple enough to be in assembly - so I can't really say anymore than that.
Canada produces a lot of Pandalus Borealis too, which is fairly common in Canadian supermarkets.
The Credit Reporting Databases likely have information on loans, accounts, history of delinquent debt, etc.
It seems nonsensical to me that Taser is making a distinction between whether or not the electric shock was responsible for someone's death. If they hit their head on the fall, that is still because someone shot them with a Taser. Drug use, health conditions, etc. all are the same: An officer is still applying a weapon to someone, and if the result is death, then the Taser was responsible.

I haven't heard anyone realistically call a Taser "non-lethal" in a long time. They're called "less lethal" for a reason: They're less likely to kill someone than a gun. (You can survive gunshots too! Just... less often.)

It's hard to imagine a reasonable case for firing ANY weapon at a graffiti artist. Using a Taser is just one of many levels of a use of force, and it's hard to imagine a justification for it with such a minor offense.
It is stupid to expect a technical recruiter to know everything, especially in this ever changing world of languages and frameworks.

I like how easy it is for people to blame someone else here, rather than try to understand it from the recruiters position. I understand, we all hate recruiters.
If only someone could invent a way to verify their identity without sharing their secret key...

But in all seriousness, we need to find ways to make real identity authentication user friendly, a la Yubikey, and then drive companies to replace this insane SSN-based system.
Also Jabber. From Cisco, it integrates nicely with your Cisco phone. i.e. you can play voice messages, make calls.

Otherwise it's probably less featureful than the ones you mention.
Securities laws in the United States prohibit trades made with "material non-public information". A 10b5-1 plan is an affirmative defense to insider trading. The basic idea is that before you get access to material non-public information, you decide "I want to buy/sell X shares on the second Tuesday of every month" or similar. Because the trades are made in a way that was determined before you had access to material non-public information, this is not considered insider trading.

(IANAL, this is not legal advice, etc etc)
Or I can read the impressions of a dozen people and fill in a lot of the blindspots that I'd have to be aware of reading the opinions of that one person. Then it doesn't matter if I can trust any particular reviewer.

I've occasionally enjoyed some low-tomatometer movies. But generally, I can see why they scored so low, and what parts of the movie I'm unusually willing to forgive. Reading a few reviews gives me enough information to see why it's low-rated.
I visited the Czech Republic while they were still communist. The most hilarious thing I remember was a price stamped into loaves of bread. It appears they had official price brands distributed from a central point, since they looked the same everywhere. This means the price was probably unchanged for long periods of time.
Hi there, I work on the protobuf team at Google. A friendly note that protobuf 3.0 and proto3 are actually two separate things (this is admittedly confusing). Protobuf 3.0 was a release that added support for proto3 schemas, but Protobuf 3.0 continues to support proto2 schemas.

proto3 was designed to be a simplification of proto2 schemas. It removed several features such as extensions and field presence. Each .proto file specifies whether it is a proto2 or proto3 schema.

Protobuf 3.0 added several features such as maps, but these features were added to both proto2 and proto3 schemas.

Sorry this is kind of confusing.
That doesn't answer the question. We all read that the trades were not planned in advance. The question is, is that by definition illegal? Or were the trades only illegal because they had insider knowledge that the price was about to drop?
John Gamble (CFO) has been dumping heavily since May 20th (http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/insider-trading/EFX?sy...).
News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017
This is a great point. Without heavy fines and penalties, it seems many companies are happy to be lax on security just quietly become another "victim" company. They just need their breach to smaller than Yahoo's (which is easy for most companies).
$1k, $100, that's far too low in my opinion even for a warning shot.

As someone who has had their info leaked by two universities before, both of whom subsequently paid for multiple years of credit/fraud protection, the sheer pain and stress of having random credit cards frozen and need to be replaced is worth far more than that dollar amount of my time. This is potentially messing with people's livelihoods with long term lasting effects.

If monetary sums are given out, then I hope a fair amount is given out instead of a warning shot. Those tiny figures won't help at all and effectively send the message that companies are more important than the people they serve.
By enrolling in the free "Identity Theft Protection" you waive your right to "PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS ACTION, CLASS ARBITRATION, OR OTHER REPRESENTATIVE ACTION" https://trustedidpremier.com/static/terms

It is a scam to get people to sign away their rights to sue the bastards.
Insider trading is any trading performed using non-public knowledge. Theoretically even a pre-scheduled trade could be insider trading, if it relied on non-public knowledge which remained non-public until the time the trade executes. Of course, that's a pretty hard scenario to concoct, so generally pre-scheduled trades 3+ months out are considered safe for even high-level insiders. Not to mention all the extraneous movement that might happen within that same time period that could very well nullify any knowledge advantage.
I was amazed to read that they didn't even intend to remove it and place it in a museum. They just buried it again. Apparently, an early 17th century ship wasn't a significant enough find to justify the costs of preserving it!

They must have a lot of old ships around there to not want to bother. Anything like that found in the United States would end up as the star attraction in a museum for sure.
How does it make sense to suppose it could lead to recovery in 50% of cases, if a drug that does nothing has a 5% chance of producing the same result in your study?
> customer is on the hook for 7 years

7 years? Are you sure it's not something like 7 days?
The crisis is primarily that many J2EE projects are fundamentally cost center projects designed to be written once and maintained by a low-cost team and are thus focused more upon compliance to standards and consistency than creative problem solving. If a business domain is well understood and documented, it is very straightforward regardless of software platform to codify its rules and conventions - this is not what happens in most software developed today. The culture in the J2EE community (that does have value, not devaluing the approach) along with its participating community of typically old, established companies with cultures not favorable to certain personalities (regardless of skill) has caused a huge brain drain from making usability (and therefore consistency IMO) improvements that could have been possible. It'd be really interesting to see what would have happened if half of Silicon Valley's engineers contributed to the J2EE ecosystem, but we will never know given the trajectory of the industry.

From my years doing integration projects for a lot of the F500 I've confirmed your assertion that technology hardly matters for them, but this makes it very difficult to grow as a developer because you're not solving technical problems anymore as much as business level ones. The "learning" involved at technical levels tends to become more about trivial (API inconsistencies from implementation, names of properties) or specific, proprietary knowledge gained from basically reverse engineering other parties' code. This also does not require any skill or much training either. Combined with mostly straightforward coding requirements, this drives down the skill level necessary to be successful in a usual J2EE software shop and thus the labor pool drives toward commoditization.
Any thoughts towards integrating Docker's VPNKit with Vagrant to provide transparent networking services to the development VMs?
One often neglected risk is the risk to the ramp crew from lightning. For a quick turn around in the middle of a storm like this, someone needs to neglect their own personal safety. Many times lighting is less risky to the plane but even before the storms roll in the lighting picks up.
Credit reporting agencies are the cancer of the modern economy. They are rife with inaccuracies, and on top of that, highly vulnerable to hacking , as software engineering is just a cost for them, not their focus.

Their entire function needs to move to the blockchain. Their only value is that of a distributed, trust less ledger, and they charge horrible fees and sit in the middle for doing that terribly
Most likely yes. Actually if this doesn't count I don't know what is. However just like you, don't take my word, not a lawyer.
Criminalization only increases the attractiveness of the drug trade. The government's stance doesn't merely ignore the trafficking, it makes it ridiculously lucrative.
When I used to ride the train to work a few years ago, one of the happiest appearing people I met on the train was a young (30 something) COBOL programmer. He was examining a green-bar fan-fold printout of COBOL code that was part of the back-end of a gas station point-of-sale system. He told me that there had been an issue with a transaction the night before and he was going to try to solve it that day.
http://annualcreditreport.com/ is the "official" site for this, per the FTC [0].

There's info on that page on how to proceed to get yours via snail mail (along with a link to the form).

[0]: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0155-free-credit-repor...
There are people whose epistemic hygiene I'd trust enough to think that their independent research would bend the outcome of the case towards truth. I don't know if the average person would though.
Isn't the entire point of having 264 address space is to make it hard to scan? Basically you're looking for a needle in a haystack.
They traded based on material, non-public information, so I would have to say yes, this is definitely insider trading, but I'm not a lawyer...
The other thing is, when you build physical things the way you do things is constrained by, well, physics.

Nobody goes and builds an MVP Golden Gate Bridge and then just shores it up in production or piles crap on top of it, and anybody with a shred of sense builds a solid foundation before they go and put up a skyscraper. In software it's too easy to get things in to working state that are hanging by a thread.
The federal government should pay Amazon to open an HQ in either Memphis, or New Orleans.

Or let's say any metro area over 30% African American and over 1 million people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._metropolitan_area...

The major issue is that typically states ignore the needs of critical infrastructure in those cities like Tier One Carnegie Classification Universities.
> Bad filmmaking is bad. Do not make excuses for it.

Well, I'll agree with your statement, if you agree with mine:

Different people have different opinions, and you can't make an objective claim of fact about something that is purely subjective.
Baywatch had a ton of potential to bring back nostalgia of the 90's and yet they went with some sort of shitty terrorist/mystery/villain story plot completely shitting all over what the baywatch tv show was all about.

Hollywood just wants to be able to make something quick with low quality and a few big names and print money. They are just crying because people don't want to see their shitty movies.
Look at a case like Shkreli's [1], where the case (and it's facts) are generally unrelated to most media coverage and public opinion. Is it an impartial jury if they decide to convict the defendant based on evidence which is irrelevant to the case (and thus excluded)?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-26/shkreli-m...
The Secret to Startup Success? Fudge Your Age
They mentioned King Arthur. I didn't want to see it after seeing the RT score, but my wife saw it anyway, and now says it's one of her favorite movies.

We both decided to see the new Planet of the Apes because of it's 90+ RT score, and both absolutely hated the movie.