skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is, with a lot of the range code in D you can't actually specify the return type since it's an internal struct or similar.

Seeing MapResult!R map(R, alias fn)(R range) makes it seem like MapResult is a thing you can reference/use. But it's an internal struct, so it's neither accessible not documented. That's a whole lot more confusing than having auto and documenting that the result is an input range.
Nobody in Seattle thinks of Redmond or Everett as part of the city. This is a bit like going on an article about Manhattan office space and talking about random places in Newark.
Sorry, joyfulmantis, your comment appears “dead”, so I can't directly reply to it.

Haskell's standard type classes represent algebraic structures. And to understand algebraic structures, you need the axioms that define them. There is no way around this. Of course, you also need examples, but they are by no means a replacement for definitions. If you don't understand the definitions, then you don't understand the abstraction at all.
Honestly, fakemeat products have become so good that I'm not longer interested. Their biggest failing is cost, and lab products aren't cheaper.
This is correct. Everyone knows what everyone else is making. Part of why rank and the "pecking order" are so much more pronounced and obsessed over.
Of (overly pedantic) note: It's actually "bellwether".

A wether is a castrated ram. (Like a steer, speaking bovinely.) In a flock, a wether would be outfitted with a bell to serve as the lead sheep and herald the flock's motions, which is where we get the modern-day term.
Yep, same problems with many other services:

* Kinesis Streams: Writes limited to 1K/sec and 1 MB / shard, reads limited to 2K/shard. Want a different read/write ratio? Nop, not possible. Proposed solution: use more shards. Does not scale automatically. There is another service called Kinesis Streams that does not offer read access to streaming data.

* EFS: Cold start problems. If you have small amount of data in EFS, reads and writes are throttled. Ran into into some serious issues due to write throttling.

* ECS: Two containers can not use same port on same node. Anti pattern to containers.

AWS services have lots of strings attached and minimums for usage and billing. Building such services (based on fixed quotas) is much easier than building services which are billed purely pay per use. This complexity + cost optimization pressures lead to complexity and require more human resources and time as well. AWS got good lead in Cloud space, but they need to improve their services without letting them rot.
Geiser is fine. However, we can’t compare it with SLIME. The integration of the latter is much better.
See… I really don't care about the ideology here. If people want to get in bed with someone who doesn't have their best interest at heart that's their choice.

Borders and Toys'R'Us both decided to partner with Amazon for a while. I'm not sure why they thought that was a good idea, but that was their choice.

What I care about is the user experience. That's where I'd be happy with an option to simply disable it on my devices.

I think it's kind of unfortunate that it's not possible for people to discuss AMP without both issues coming up and confusing things. But that's life.
It is technically correct in that there are two parsings (syntax). One of them clearly isn't true (semantics)
Nothing there?
I've thought this too and I bet it could be done for far less than half the cost.

You'd have a lot less debt and roughly equal job prospects when you "graduated".
Agreed, I was just trying to point out what the sentence meant while being friendly :)
> If the general public would learn and implement even one out of the below list items, they would significantly improve their online security

I wonder if companies could do their part in improving online security by allowing the option of authentication through client side TLS certificates. That, in itself, would eliminate the necessity of the first 3 items in your list.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45972/mmap-vs-reading-bl...
Maybe because it increases the security significantly. Say a large government pays top $ for an exploit. Chances are pretty good that the vast majority of the black hats on the planet will not have it.

Additionally publicity generates incentive to fix the problem. More apps/OSs/libraries will try harder to be secure. Apps could start wearing high exploit bounties as badges of honor.

Much like how ransomware likely has increased security more and changed user behavior than an infinite amount of suggested security training. Some users even gasp ask about how to protect against ransomware and as a side benefit actually protect against mistakes, dying disks, and other flavors of malware at the same time.

Seems better to trot this kind of stuff out in the open than to hide your head in the sand and try to hide security problems from the public.
Interesting product. Small nit, but in the screen shots, "your" should be "you're" or "you are".
The most important change we could make would be to consistently upvote comments that are explicitly abstracts/tldr's, rather than downvoting them based on the mistaken thinking that this will force people to read the entire article and improve discussion. There is latent desire to supply this service for free if it isn't penalized.
Really well-written and engaging article. It seems the main point of an article like this from Google's perspective is gaining the public's trust. I'm sure most people are worried about the edge-cases that are so hard to run into in the real world, but are so important to get right. This is Google saying "we may not see that edge-case exactly, but we know when it could happen and simulate the situation a million times to make sure we get it right if we ever see it again."
I lived in Seattle for a year and I got the same impression.
5 Steps to Create a Marketing Plan for Your E-Commerce App
The authors have put out the datasets: https://github.com/shensq04/EKLAVYA
My novelist friend behind this writes 700-900pp books and complains he has to switch between Word, Project and Excel to keep everything straight. They're hoping it's useful for complex universes, fan fic and investigative journalism too.
Somebody get the New York Times on the line - this guy knows a bunch of poor white dudes in West Virginia.
Here are my thoughts:

I think the burden is on the author - any author - to establish that their arguments are worth responding to, rather than on me to prove that they are not. There are far too many authors and arguments to give them all credence by default. Readership is not a good signal - plenty of absolute nonsense has far more readership than the War Nerd.

> you will not even attempt

Even if Dolan's arguments are worth addressing, it's not my job to personally address every argument. I think I added something valuable to the discussion; other people can contribute too.

> Going ad hominem just gives credence to his unspoken assertion that the US military is an old-boys club clinging to their preconceived notions

That assumes that I'm representing that old boys' club, and I'm certainly not a member. They wouldn't let me into the foyer unless I was delivering dinner, nor do I desire to join. I could get into Dolan's club, however, if I wanted to.

> in the absence of an actual war to fight

The U.S. military is fighting wars and has been continuously for almost 16 years, the longest such period in the nation's history, I think. The wars have transformed their approach so much that there is a major concern that all they know how to do is fight counter-insurgencies and not high-end near-peers (e.g., China and Russia). As they shift back to the latter, everything is being re-examined in light of AI and the wide availability of precision munitions (e.g., rockets accurate enough to reliably hit a ship) along with the accompanying sensor networks, which used to be a U.S. monopoly.
Im in the camp that also hates AMP with a passion. It feels weird not liking much of what Google has been doing lately but AMP for me gets in the way of me sharing articles with my friends and family. It also gets in the way of me sharing a clip of the text so the people I'm sharing with including myself have the proper link and some context to get them to read further.
I was interested to discover fonts with programming-specific ligatures when they were discussed last month. I haven't experimented enough yet to know how well they work out in the long term.

https://www.hanselman.com/blog/MonospacedProgrammingFontsWit...
> Also their well-known frugality principle

Like subcontracting all their warehouse staff so they can keep them off the books and not have to deal with their benefits.
I'm not so sure they'd cut TWU - it seems like a fairly economical way to train up new grad consultants who get charged out at high day rates when they get back home.

If you do the math, it probably works out as a pretty good investment.
I have a 2- and 3-year-old. Give me all the Disney things at $10/mo and we're good. I'd prefer they be included in Netflix, but Netflix+Disney and I'm still better off than cable, and hopefully there is some better curated content as a result.
Yeah, I got that. Sorry if my comment looked like it was arguing with you rather than with the theorists.
> Even coal which has long been the cheapest but dirty option is having trouble competing.

*with $2 Natural Gas

The solar/wind $23/MWh production tax credit is not really something that's easy for anyone to compete with, except natural gas. [1]

You're right that nuclear needs to get its costs down, especially to play in the west. We know it can be done because the French electrified nearly their entire grid with nukes in 10 years for reasonable costs, and the Koreans, bless their hearts, have been building Gen III plants at very reasonable prices. (Alas! their new president is riding an anti-nuclear platform.) With the recent Toshiba/Westinghouse issues regarding the US AP1000 plants, it's pretty unlikely to see any big new nukes anytime soon. But the world moves on and China is building lots of nukes.

Fukushima will be really expensive. Building tornado-hardened designs in tsunami zones does not pay off, so we should not do that. But building appropriately hardened designs is a pretty solid non-emitting solution. Nukes produce 65% of the carbon-free electricity in the USA right now; they're already our climate champions.

[1] https://energy.gov/savings/renewable-electricity-production-...
You could always port it.
I'm not even arguing that they're too low, I'm arguing that they should not be used as a fund-raiser.

The particular section of highway I'm talking about is about a half-mile long, on a downhill grade, and changes down 10mph.

The cops sit in the middle and ticket people as they're decelerating. It's a racket, plain and simple.
Different articles are worthwhile to different people. Abstracts help people find content they are interested in, reduces incentives for clickbait and burying the lede, and focus discussion on the main points. Of course bad summaries can be bad for the discussion, but that's what downvotes and criticism is for. The same is true for normal comments.
As a DevOps consultant I've actually worked with clients migrating stacks to and from GCE/AWS (Yeah, both ways, not the same client).

What I've found in aggregate is that GCE is a bit easier to use at first as AWS has a LOT of features and terminology to learn. When it comes down to it though, many GCE services felt really immature, particularly their CloudSQL offering.

One client recently moved from GCE to AWS simply because their CloudSQL (Fully replicated with fail-over setup according to GCE recommendations) kept randomly dying for several minutes at a time. After a LOT of back and forth Google finally admitted that they had updated the replica and the master at the same time, so when it failed over the replica was also down.

There were other instances of unexplained downtime that were never adequately explained, but overall that experience was enough for me (And the client) to totally lose faith in the GCE teams competence. Even getting a serious investigation into intermittent downtime and an explanation took over a month. By that time our migration to AWS was in progress.

GCE never did explain why they would choose to apply updates to replica + master SQL at the same time and as far as I know they are still doing this. I asked if we could at least be notified of update events, was told that's not possible.

There were other issues as well that taken together just made GCE seem amateurish. I'm sure as they mature a bit things will get better, and it is cheaper which is why I wouldn't necessarily recommend against them for startups just getting going today. By the time you are really scaling it's like they'll have more of the kinks worked out.
It will be a replay of the 1970s when a combination of new emissions and safety standards locked a lot of niche manufacturers out of the US market. Pre-1975 exotics held value and even appreciated. The gray market, which imported high end used cars, became popular until NHTSA banned it.
Consistent Sales System Review
"Will the Last Person Leaving SEATTLE — Turn Out the Lights"

http://www.historylink.org/File/1287
Backstory on the debate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_proposed_as_rene...

Regardless, renewable is a less important concept than clean (how do you renew the sun which is a big nuclear reaction?).
It's not really Nim's fault that cmd.exe has crap Unicode support.
It is amazing how folks have to plan when their vehicle is ‘non-optimal’. For the almost opposite effect, I had a Ford Ranger (passed unwillingly to me) that even with 700lbs of weight on the back axle and good winter (non-stud) tires sucked in winter. I was very careful about my route anywhere.
Âssf
Interesting post! Curious about two statements made in your post:

"Our proprietary methodology and results have been officially reviewed and approved by clinical Alzheimer’s experts at Stanford..."

What is an "official review and approval" process?

"The most challenging part of our journey so far has been to get access to the largest MRI databases for Alzheimer’s disease..."

Which dataset is this?
I can't go into details, but in general we closely track analytics for our product (like most companies with websites would) and run AB experiments to see how changes impact user behavior.
Alibaba's Jack Ma wants to help Hong Kong become 'fashionable' cashless society
Google seems to only have gotten the address coverage it has by sending vans around with cameras and then making people type in the addresses for CAPTCHAs
How would you compare the Bose QC35 to the Plantronics? I know Marco Arment has fantastic things to say about the Backbeat Pro series, but I've never seen or heard those in real life, or even seen them mentioned in most reviews. I've tried the Bose a couple of times: the ANC is excellent, and I like the sound (but I'm not blown away by it).
>Students who now go to schools who do nothing for them and have no chance of paying their loans -- or spend most of their adult life trying to -- would be dissuaded from making that incorrect financial choice.

The feedback loop for that is incredibly slow and incomplete. University reputations move on the order of decades, and only a handful of universities enter the public consciousness by way of reputation. Most students also don't have the freedom of choice to go to any university of their choosing (or everyone would go to the 'best' one). 'invisible hand' arguments just don't work on this one.
1. See the entire history of the Web so far. Obviously the observation about browser market share and "Don't break the Web" has been made many times, I am not going to rehash it for you here.

2. Standards are a tool to improve interoperability.

When standards are disconnected from reality and cannot be implemented by any actual players in the market, interoperability is harmed. It is not even neutral.

The kind of attitude you are showing here is what got us the idiocy of XHTML2. That is, many of the people who cared most about standards and semantics on the Web went and threw their collective efforts into a black hole for years because they were too blindly idealistic to engage with or even acknowledge the actual industry, that, in their arrogance, they thought they were standardizing. Meanwhile everyone else happily ignored them and all their efforts had no real-world impact on anything, except that by taking attention away from other, more realistic, standardization efforts, they probably set real interoperability back several years.
Địa chỉ cấy chỉ giảm cân ở đâu tốt
Couldn't the same argument be made about a thriving market in ways to break into your house at night and kill you?
Are you kidding? Cupertino is like hide-and-go-seek except with Apple offices. Almost every office building is Apple.

Go down a residential side street? Oh wow there's a little Apple office between those two houses.
Be careful, the neck position may catch up to you eventually! I spent about 75% of the workday in bed with my laptop over the past 5 years. Earlier this year, I experienced my first pinched nerve - chronic pain is horrible; the doctor, medication, and especially the physical therapy are no fun :)

I recently started using a
lap desk laptop stand with multiple adjustable angles and comfortable bolster cushion (in case you're curious, the brand I purchased is Halter - $19.99). I now sit on my couch with the laptop screen directly in line with my eyes, to prevent the typical downward neck tilt common with desk use.
> I assumed "clean" referred to the fact that lab-grown tissue would have a much lower risk of disease. Animals have digestive tracts full of bacteria, and farms aren't exactly pristine. Every year in the US, meat-borne pathogens kill thousands and sicken millions.

OK, let's check the numbers.

According to the CDC https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/attribution/attribution-... from 1998 - 2008 from the total of foodborn illnesses 46% were linked to plant based, 22% to meat and poultry, 20% to dairy and eggs and 6% to fish products. From the total number of deaths 23% were linked to plant based products, 29% to meat and poultry (19% to poultry).

You can see a more detailed graphic here https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/attribution-image.html#f...
I am not sure what that means in this context. I will assume I have touched a nerve and you wish to rebut. Your rebuttal asserts that a black woman would enjoy my brothers' advantages, and vice-versa. Except the saying is advice to stop worrying about one's life situation, which seems counterintuitive to whatever point you were trying to make.

If I'm incorrect, I'm sorry for misreading you.
It’s processing, which is what you were knocking meat alternatives for.
I really question drawing a conclusion from analytics saying people are using it versus actually liking it. I know some folks at work have used it and they regard it as broken enough to call in a ticket about their device being broke.
The general principle here is right, but I was kind of curious about exactly what your gains would be.

I curled the last 90 days from http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3021-gainnyse-gainer...
and if you selected the largest percentage gainer every day for the past 100 days, given you started with $10, you'd have about 828 million after 90 days. (It's worth noting however with 2,800 stocks on the NYSE, that 2800^100 is much longer odds than winning the lottery. Actually, your odds of selected the very highest percentage stock gainer three days in a row are lower than your odds of winning the powerball, assuming such a thing is random).

Unrelated, this has really been a winning quarter for logistics and trucking companies!
Yeah Azure is like that too.

Stuff is just really immature and you'll get blocked by lots of things that make no sense.

If you have to get vendor locked in your quest to not have to manage servers while learning unintuitively misnamed parts of a computer, choose Amazon.
>some states they claim to use lottery proceeding to improve math education

About that, this video is worth watching. No that is 100% true, but good enough to start a conversation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PK-netuhHA
In the speech now known as the "energy dominance" speech, Trump promoted fracking, nuclear, offshore drilling, and coal (including exporting coal).
Artificial Intelligence at Any Cost Is a Recipe for Tyranny
> Eventually... everyone has Netflix.

Or even more critically, everyone has seen everything they want to see on Netflix, and Netflix itself cannot produce enough original content fast enough to justify the sub. Especially when they are competing with what is often free and immediately accessible.

I don't have a Netflix sub right now because nothing they make is compelling enough to pay the $10. Sometimes they release a show I want to see, so I sub for a month, watch that, and unsub again. For like a year. But we are only getting more content online over time, not less, and I'm finding way less need to seek out something to waste time watching, especially if I have to pay up front for it.
As a .net developer these sound like sensible changes, but not profound like async-await and Linq. What's the next big thing on deck for C#? Compiling to Web Assembly?
This hypothesis of "what's in it for google" bends over backwards ascribe altruistic motive, and also relies on the (deeply alarming!) idea that AMP use leads to better search rankings.

It's worth noting that since your comment was made, the idea "AMP use leads to better search rankings" is now directly contradicted by the TL of AMP (cramforce)[1] in a comment this thread [2].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15086192

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15087277
I created an AUR package for this if any Arch users want to install the font:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-interface/

This package only installs the OTF version currently.

Let me know if you have any problems installing.
This doesn't seem like a reasonable worry really. We will continue to innovate at a more rapid pace until we have real AI or there is a massive disaster(runaway global warming of 8-10 degrees or nuclear war are the most probable), I personally think it will be AI though because I suspect we might be looking at 20-30 years until that happens.

Once real AI comes I'm not really sure what will happen because it is unpredictable how the AI will be made, but if the past is any indication it will be made recklessly in a race between a bunch of companies. Idk how long our current world order will continue to exist and how much the AI works with us after that event. Hopefully the zoo it keeps us in will be nicer than the way we have treated animals, and hopefully that takes 20 years after the birth of real AI.

I wouldn't worry about innovation slowing down, I would worry about the end of meaningful human innovation that we are clearly headed towards.
Okay, I stand corrected. Sorry about that. After some googling... Are you referring to Tinderbox? https://oduinn.com/2014/06/04/farewell-to-tinderbox/

(It looks like Tinderbox predates CruiseControl by 3/4 years.)

Also, the CI Wikipedia page should probably be fixed to also include info about Mozilla's CI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration
Meg Whitman, Carol Bartz and Sheryl Sandberg come to mind as adult supervision.
Diamonds are pretty simple from a chemical point of view, atoms of Carbon linked together in a particular structure. You can't compare something as complex as creating animal meat with creating synthetic diamonds.
First image of SpaceX spacesuit