skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You really have to pick whether you want possible additional copies or possibly zero copies. This isn't really a problem with this particular implementation. I think it's interesting to have the possibility of additional copies versus the standard web form behavior of at-most-one copy.
Personally I am excited for a CoC-oriented Node fork so I can watch how they string up one person after another for crimes against humanity.

Pretty disturbing when a CoC is not a means to an end but the end itself. Codes of Conduct as the end never end well.

Most extremely disturbing how the evidence has been removed and now secret while the accusations are public.
interesting, i wonder how cryptocurrencies will react.

Som are clearly booming like the regular stocks are.
But some are also built to resist inflation.
At this point it's mostly certification cost and liability insurance cost that's keeping the tech back. You can easily modify modern aircraft engines to be more reliable and efficient (PMAGs) but you need an STC (certification procedure) to make the switch so the experimental home builders are the only ones who actually benefit.
Bitcoin didn't exist during the first recession, but other virtual currencies did such as Linden Dollars in Second Life.

Apparently the Linden dollar crashed not long before the 2008 financial crisis hit - A virtual bank in SL went bankrupt because of a virtual 'run on the banks'.

I think the same might happen with crypto-currencies but they'll bounce back.
I'm not sure what a page even means anymore. There are some works that may only be available electronically, especially if they are on the shorter side. In that case the page size would be dependent on the Kindle or phone model, etc.
Connections to the Mozilla Telemetry server are done over HTTPS, so all an interceptor would know is that you are sending Telemetry and not what that Telemetry is.
> You need to consider that Common Lisp includes a runtime, and this is a essential part of the goods of Common Lisp. Whenever you create a Common Lisp program, you also "embed" the runtime, and the runtime allows you to do wonderful stuff within the running code, like for example, compile code on the fly, replace function with new version (while the program is running), replace class instances with new versions of the class (while the program is running), all sorts of enforcements of the required data type for actual data* (while the program is running),

Lots of other people do this without massive executables to distribute, though. CLs are inconsistent on how they can distribute base images and executables. For example, Java's compiler is a code segment you an link in if you want to carry it with you.
I called it a couple weeks ago:

https://twitter.com/zachaysan/status/895197582586261504

Forward P/E, yields, EPS, everything is just too frothy right now in the US. In my home country (Canada) it's difficult to see how the short term oil market will turn out, since it's such an inelastic market, but in the medium term oil is effectively over - especially for resource intensive extractions like the Alberta oil/tar sands.

The only major company that I'm still in on is Facebook, but that's only until regulators start coming down harder on them. Even so, Facebook has a huge amount of growth ahead of them.

I've been able to make around 18% YoY, even after the fact that half my portfolio is in bonds and low-risk consumer staples. I don't do anything too fancy. I sell before busts (like in late 2006) I put a little money into put options on the S&P500 (SPY) well out of the money for an extra boost if I've timed it right, I move things into actual cash and then I wait until people are panicking and then I buy back in.

Split exposure to 1/3 USD, 1/3 CAD, 1/3 Other (basically Bitcoin, startups, bit of precious metals, Asian / Euro stocks) when things are undervalued and move most things into cash when things are scary.

When choosing investments I generally do:

1. Tech I understand (in the past Amazon, Tesla, Apple, Google, Shopify)

2. High dividends stocks (Apple, then a bunch of boring ones with no appreciable downside, since I don't like buying declining industries).

3. Short term commodity plays (since in the long run clever humans invent better mining techniques).

4. Strategies that anticipate the catchup effect. Last decade it was China this decade it will be India and Africa.

I'm not perfect (SQM and Etsy were two stocks I was quite confident in that didn't pay out for a number of reasons) but I'm confident and careful. I really think I would have been wealthier if I'd gone into finance instead of machine learning, since I seem to have a knack for it, but we'll see how the chips finally land in the future I guess.
> (and better than paying more for an in person advisor that provides zero value)

that isn't the only other alternative to betterment, etc. https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/target-retirement...
I'm pretty far on the sidelines here but I don't really understand the CoC hate. Code of Conducts feel like unit tests for a community along with a plan of action if one of those tests fails.

Just like there are bad unit tests, I'm sure there are bad Codes of Conduct, but on the whole it seems like a positive thing to clearly state how things should go in a community.
The savings vs spending views were demonstrated beautifully in the 80s and 90s with the Asian crash: east Asian nations, as a whole, are savers, whereas western nations, as a whole, are spenders.

But due to international demand - especially on Japanese production) - in the 80s and early 90s, those nations didn't spend on infrastructural improvements (factories running at 95-100% capacity (sometimes bursting even higher), so when they inevitably had to spend on capital improvement (expansion, new tooling, etc), they had to take production lines offline, which led to production drops, which led to their economy crashing.

"Spend" and "save" (where "save" is a mix of capital investment and so-call "rainy day funds", and "spend" is consumerism) are far too often viewed as independent factors, when they rely on each other being in balance to keep the economy working well.

When an economy spends everything it has (or more - which happens with credit that is too easy to come by), and forgets to plan ahead, it crashes in predictable cycles.

When an economy saves "too much", it never grows (or crashes due to having too much capital investment and not enough demand).

The US' coming out of the Great Depression - largely due to WWII production - was a giant case study on this: factories, production lines, and employable people were massively under utilized, so when demand was created (by gearing up for war), all those people and production factors were "available" to be used. In other words, they had been "saved" (from the economy's point of view) for a decade instead of "spent" (again, from the economy's point of view).

This is part of why there is a "healthy unemployment" value that economists toss around ... generally in the range of 4-6%. Those "saved" resources (human capital, in this case) are available to be "spent" when needed.

If you run at an unemployment level (regardless of whether that "employment" is production capacity, personnel, funding, etc), that is too low OR too high, you run into boom-bust cycles.

That's what central banks try to regulate (albeit not very well, when viewed in the long term).
> There must be reasons other than "VCs are greedy!" for employees not being able to sell off their stocks immediately.

Well thats not what I said, so I don't know where you got that from. Strawman much?

I said there are legal problems for selling stocks... of the privately held company variety if that wasn't clear. Those legal problems aren't stipulated by the VCs, well, at least one of them is, but it applies to them as well. The others are from the federal government. I'm not going to bother writing a dissertation on that.

VCs have many ways of getting their money back, and many of those ways are at the expense of employees even if they bought their options.

> The most obvious way to abuse this would be to join or create a startup, go through the ICO process, then sell off your shares, and, well, exit

What? Just to clarify, are you conflating ICO tokens with equity shares? Or saying something like "your share of the ICO"?

> You're rich, now - why keep working to build the product you (or your boss) promised to deliver?

This is where the consumer and investor protection concerns come from right now from various regulator perspectives. ICOs are much like Kickstarter, the answer is you don't have to deliver. Reality is also much like Kickstarter, people have a dream and want to deliver. People do deliver. People that have never touched millions of dollars in their life, go out and play business person until the money runs out.

Many technical dreams that wouldn't fit into a VCs portfolio are able to get funded now. Thats really all it comes down to.

People put their reputation on the line. That doesn't mean much to all people, and they have bad reputations now.

There are several advantages in the ways to mitigate these risks. First, these communities come with a big open source culture. If the team starts messing up, there are still ways to contribute or even carry on the project, a lot of the times. Most of the projects have a big decentralized component to them, which does enable others to carry the baton.

Secondly, the token obtained in the ICO has an exchange rate. You, the buyer, are able to exit your position while a market still exists. Most coins, even "dead" ones, have a market, or CAN have a market. Even if they have their own blockchain, they can be revived with the participation of just a few computers, and exchanges will list them.
This is a great example of the daily minor enrichment we get from being connected.
Er, yeah, a more legible description is "virtue cheap talking" and not "virtue signalling".

But it's quite likely that usage of the latter term has always been a sarcastic jibe about the fraudulent/low-investment quality of the 'virtuous' acts that are being performed.
Thanks. And yes, this will fix that problem for good, and should be quite a bit under that budget for Cordova apps!
Does it work with Graphviz only?
How am I being pedantic? You mentioned that Friedman was not considered part of the "Austrian school" which is true but I pointed out that wasn't what was claimed.

I'm not arguing the nature of the facts, just pointing out the fact. Hopefully you can relax a bit, this is just a dialog and not a debate where I'm trying to score points against your claims.
Ultimate guide to the world of time-tracking
100% agreed. After using syntax-parse, it pains me to use anything else. It's a gem.
Put money into your Roth IRA regardless of the market. Your annual contribution limit is likely to be $5,500 like most folks. Keep it in cash if you're worried. Just consider: if you max out your contributions over the next 40 years of your life, the most you can ever contribute to your Roth IRA is about $220,000. That's it.
Open Source Software:  What They're Not Telling You
Storm breaks over AccuWeather phoning home without consent
Introducing the Pikachu Programming Language (A Language Made for Pikachus)
So, reading a bit, it seems to work like this.

There is a jury duty in the sense that if you are asked to serve as lay judge you can not refuse. However, in practice the system is set up so that only volunteers get asked.

Every 4 years, each municipal council (kommune) provides a list (grundlisten) of candidates for lay judges (nævning). The list must be representative of general demographics. To be eligible for the list, you must be "suitable" for the role (which seems to mean you should not have a criminal background), and you must not be a lawyer, prosecutor, judge, or police officer. The cities can use their own procedures to compile the list, but in practice the way it works is you write to the selection committee giving your name, age, job title, and motivation for why you want to be a lay judge.

The lists are combined, and about 10,000 people are randomly selected from them. If you are selected you have a duty to serve. You serve for a period of 4 years, and will typically sit on 4 to 5 cases per year.

https://www.frederiksberg.dk/politik/kommunalbestyrelsen-og-...
http://www.domstol.dk/saadangoerdu/tildigderer/naeavningdoms...
Anyone with a control systems background or even just audio experience will recognise what happens when you have an undamped feedback loop: it oscillates.

Technology can make the problem worse by reducing the time taken to economic changes, exaggerating the feedback loop. However there has been one big success of formal macroeconomic control modelling: inflation. Almost all the Western economies have a good system for controlling interest rates in order to maintain an inflation target.

I don't think anyone has really invalidated Keynes' work on business cycle theory, although it is recognised that it doesn't quite cope with a heavily financialised economy and there is huge political opposition to counter-cyclical fiscal policy.
Damn, I see that as unnecessary tight coupling, but a lot of our current technologies have survived that way.
You are correct. 956-003 won LeMans in '83, and won five races overall.

Regardless, most "classic Porsches" sell for under $100K. As I mentioned in another comment, the bulk of what's sold are 1978 - 1993 911s. 964s trade hands around $50-65K, and SCs more around $20-35K. Yes, there's stuff outside of that (Very good 993s commanding ~$100K now, 930 Turbos definitely not cheap, all RSs definitely not cheap due to rarity, 993 GT2s very expensive as well), but the bulk of non-supercar classic Porsches are very affordable until you get into the rare top-shelf stuff or the very old: in which value is dictated by pedigree, condition and rarity.

Additionally, with ~22 million used cars sold and registered in the US every year, a single 8-digit sale does not materially affect the average selling price of used cars. Never mind the fact that no used Porsche commands anywhere near $30M (and I believe only five Porsches are in the Top 100 most expensive cars sold of all time), which is where I had serious issue with the OP.
Introduction to concurrency models with Ruby. Part I
Actually, Graphviz, Video, Font, Microsoft Office.
The Bay Area only has a lot of self-driving cars because the engineers are there, note that WayMo is letting people take rides in Phoenix, not the Bay.
The name seems ripe for confusion when spoken in conversation. "Ayo" sounds like "io" to me, which I understand is another fork of node.
This is what you're looking for. Blocks everything except whitelisted sites:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/whitelist-manager/...
Yes, but their terms of service are absolutely preposterous (unjustified and unannounced termination at anytime).

Most mail providers can terminate users for any reason, but at least with a few days of notice, allowing you to move the data elsewhere.
That works better in real life, doesn't it? It's harder to have a computer game enforce obsessive compulsion, or alcoholism, or kleptomania.
This makes the navigating by page thumbnail all the more confusing. I really think this idea really needs some rethinking.
His mention of Scrivener in the intro was so brief that I have difficulty believing he even read the interactive tutorial, much less wrote one or more books using it. (I've written and published about a dozen novels using Scrivener, via imprints of Penguin, Macmillan, and Hachette, and I'm a beta-tester for the forthcoming Scrivener 3.)

While Scrivener doesn't really emphasize page-by-page thumbnails as a navigation tool (what does, aside from Word or Pages, these days?) it just about throws the kitchen sink at the problem of how to structure a long compound document, with corkboard, outliner, and multi-select scrolling subdocument views of a project (in the current version: the next release is considerably more powerful).
I'm wondering if a future version of NodeJS could be based on other JavaScript engines than V8. For example Mozilla's engine.

I'm not sure what the technical advantages are, but I want to stay/move away from anything related to Google.
Avionics companies have very complex rules. They can use any of the above, but generally a subset.

For example you might use C, but ban malloc, and recursion. There will be static analysis tools that look through your code and calculate exactly how much memory you are using using in the worst case of function call tree, that way they know they cannot run out of memory or stack.
Algorithmic trading with Julia
No I am not using software called Ayo, and I will not type "ayo" to initiate commands.
>Anyone feel free to correct or add info here as im not an authority on historical economics in the united states, but i have always found that the instillation of the federal reserve to be an 'epoch' of sorts for the US economically.

Sure, it's just totally untrue, this wikipedia article will help:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_Unit...
99.99% of Node.js users don't interact with the core platform, so the Ayo.js team is going to have to stick to their guns for quite a while if they're going to see any benefit to this move.

Until there's enough of an accumulative technical advantage to using their version, most people are going to completely ignore it. Almost no one actually used io.js in production, it was mostly a vehicle for the PoC of using the latest V8 engine.

That being said, Node.js steering has been completely taken over by IBM and Samsung, through their thinly veiled use of StrongLoop and Joyent. Anything that shakes that up even a little is A-ok in my book.
thanks for the recommendation!
How to mentally prepare for the Coding Interview?
Opportunity for infinite recursion.

http://i.imgur.com/9PGlGOG.jpg
It is obvious, but the code examples in the original link scare me.
You forget the devastating depression of 1893, among several others. Depressions were common and severe throughout 19th century America, and it wasn't until the New Deal reforms that they became remotely manageable.
Whenever I see Ayo I think of the Chris Brown/Tyga song. Pretty sure that isn't the kind of lyrical content they would support though... but it does make me smirk a bit every time I read it.

Edit: Not a lot of Chris Brown fans on here it seems...
Correlated from the introduction of QE of course. I made that chart a year ago:

http://imgur.com/kOXtm8N

The correlation only started to break a couple few months ago, with the S&P skyrocketing. But many suggest this is bubble territory.
I guess - but I feel like you'd call it an "error" rather than a "smell". Better to just teach people data structures rather than which constructs they should be afraid of. Approaching it "sideways" like this just leads to people going "I heard that loops can be bad, so I copied and pasted that line 25 times instead".
That's kinda off-topic, but yes, there are plans for Node to support other engines: https://github.com/nodejs/node-chakracore
I don't know enough to understand why "apologizing to a contributor who had been repeatedly moderated" is bad (or what it even means, really).

I think it means the contributor said something that was not allowed, got moderated, and then "Rod" apologized to the contributor that he was moderated for that.

Basically, undermining the moderation philosophy.

I'm not sure that's what happened, but it's the only way I can make sense of that statement.
Gear, Perks, and Stats are 100% under your control and you can buy training. So, you might have twice the levels of stealth and archery, but be a better mage.

Skyrim's biggest issue is the gear / classes are not balanced overall. Mages end up spamming high level spells endlessly while doing vastly less damage than an archer with good gear.
European developers salaries survey; How much a developer earn in Europe?
"Professional Mantagonizer."
Node.js - the JavaScript runtime with a flair for drama.

At some point in the future, maybe someone will come up with vaccines for developers that suppress gender characteristics so we can all go back to shooting down bad ideas without being criticized for being sexist, racist, or biased.
> The path of least resistance is the one your money needs to travel.

what is that even supposed to mean?

if the price is dropping, the market is full of shares for sale. it is somehow easier to sell your shares when there is an excess for sale?
The End of Human Doctors – Radiology Escape Velocity
My hope is looking at your phone/social media account will become like wearing fur.
Going through an editorial process is an additional gatekeeper that the Internet removed, yes.
Sets have a very specific use case: they only contain unique values and (unless using a specific implementation) they don't have any defined order. Switching from arrays to sets just to get rid of an iteration doesn't sound like fixing a smell to me. Also, insertion, iteration and memory usage are less efficient for a set.
Can I ask, do you and your partner both work?

What sacrifices are you making to get to 50% savings?
> This is part of why there is a "healthy unemployment" value that economists toss around ... generally in the range of 4-6%. Those "saved" resources (human capital, in this case) are available to be "spent" when needed.

> If you run at an unemployment level (regardless of whether that "employment" is production capacity, personnel, funding, etc), that is too low OR too high, you run into boom-bust cycles.

I don't think this is a good summary of the theory - it's recognised that reaching the limits of capacity causes inflation, but no mainstream economist would refer to unemployment as a form of saving. Labour is a "wasting" good; you either spend a day or waste a day, you can't save up time while unemployed and spend it later.

Economists prefer a minimum level of unemployment because it effectively prevents labour organisation being used to drive up wages.
https://github.com/nodejs/node-chakracore
It's Animal Farm out there right now. Purges are in full swing.

One of the transgressions that caused this split was the retweeting of an article that suggested codes of conduct can be ableist, because they don't account for the eccentricities of people on the Autism spectrum. It's now controversial to suggest that we have compassion for people with mental disabilities instead of throwing them to the wolves.
Why would you call the parent post a misunderstanding? It was merely a reduction of the same thing you said.
I'm going to be honest, economics and finance has never been my strong suit. But a long time ago I did study a lot of math and one of the more intriguing parts of mathematics was the theories by Paul Levy (alpha-stable distributions), Gaston Julia (patterns under iteration), and of course Benoit Mandelbrot (it's kind of hard to talk about one without talking about all three).

Mandelbrot is rather well known for the Mandelbrot Set. But interestingly he started his study down this path as he looked at markets and the apparent predicability in such a chaotic and unpredictable environment. He studied wool markets but extrapolated that out further to many financial markets and then economics as a whole. He would say that financial markets are anything but quite unpredictable, just that the models we use are rather wrong.

I would suggest checking out the book "The Misbehavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Financial Turbulence". It's quite good.
The Moral Voice of Corporate America
It would be naive to think that people move from x.y.z because of social reason. Most people don't care about those issues.
> The name seems ripe for confusion when spoken in conversation. "Ayo" sounds like "io" to me, which I understand is another fork of node.

io.js was merged back into node.js (or, depending on how you look at it, node.js was merged into io.js, since they adopted some of the governance structure from io.js).

Either way, io.js is no longer a separate entity, which is why Ayo intentionally riffs on the name with a homophone.