skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
usually it takes a few years for a new framework to take hold, since the react devs are probably still working on their projects and wont be switching in the middle of it. but in two years, who knows, you might be glad you picked up vue when you see almost everyone starting their project in vue come time being.
The SEC doesn't actually regulate bitcoin. So that's not true, at least as far as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) thinks.
> Except, those things are purposely portrayed as bad.

They're frequently, especially in US TV and film, portrayed as good things done by the good guys.
Right now a great option with "forward-compatible" applications would be to go Polymer.
> If you have a patent, and use React, you can't sue Facebook if they use your patent.

Citation needed. Let's say I have an awesome VR patent, and a React based website. I find out the Oculus violated my patent, what happens next?

Answer: I sue them. :) Nothing about the React license stops this; I will even still have a right to use React. What I won't have is a right to use any patents that Facebook might have on React. But Facebook, as far as is known, has no such patents.
List of colleges and universities in the United States by endowment
I dont know about offline. But this ICOs are investing heavily in various advertising platform. Reddit, FB & Adwords full of ICOs ads if you just search anything about blockchain.

Shameless plug: https://www.cryptoground.com/what-if?amount=1&coin=all&month...
You can check returns of currencies here :P
>Except, those things are purposely portrayed as bad.

Many lolicon manga do the same. Why is whether or not it is portrayed as bad the problem? Many are actually made interesting by portraying the siuation as morally ambiguous, such as in popular television shows.

>nowhere near as common and lustful as sexual and emotional abuse of individuals, young or not.

Why is that relevant?

>Normalization in causation to action requires that the actions already be happening and already be acceptable to some extent

Murder, violence, and war already happen, and war is acceptable (to most, though not I) - yet we have people who complain that violent videogames "normalise" violent beahviour. You haven't really provided evidence that (i) this "normalisation" is bad (beacuse this would be implying that it's bad for people to think or have opinions in a certain way) (ii) this "normalisation" has any effect upon the incidence of violent crimes, sexual or not.

>Again, distopian, which is very differnt from your own culture or beliefs.

Sherlock and House probably "normalises" drug use, even though it's set in present conditions. There are probably other examples of people doing bad things that are portrayed in media, but I'm not well versed enough in popular culture to give examples. I'm still not so sure why being dystopic has any effect or not. Would it follow that if lolicon TV/manga/art was set in a dystopic universe like the Hunger Games, it would be fine for you?

Or if the argument is based on being realistic, what is there to say of the many non-realistic things that happen in lolicon TV/manga/art, and indeed the unrealistic body proportions? Many, many anime are set with large towering robots controlled by little girls, for example.

Finally, many lolicon manga portray what is happening in a sad or twisted light, similar to how Breaking Bad shows Walt's activity, for example. There is one manga in which a girl is violently raped by a man claiming to check radiation levels in her house, for example. And this is of course ignoring the fact that many people are attracted to the material beacuse it is taboo in the first place, which is what's behind many kinks you or I would consider normal. As such, they don't want to make it real.
You answered your own question re: the connection between the problem identified in article and Mastodon's structure. A major premise of the article is that Mastodon solved usability issues common to decentralized platforms, and provided a functional space for Pixif's content that wasn't possible with Twitter's rules.

I say this as someone who really wants Mastodon to succeed, and hopes for the emergence of mastodon-esque alternatives to Facebook and reddit. A problem with decentralization is that it tests the limits of our tolerance for noxious content. (If you don't think Lolicon qualifies, substitute whatever counts for you as noxious.)
Congratulations to Noam Chomsky!
I remember when he was giving a talk at Columbia university and the line for entry was literally around the block !

Great man.
So you're using that plastic cup that comes with the first order? I always thought that cup's just a gimmick that people use when trying it out for the first few times [1], and if they like it, they would start preparing it with a blender.

[1] I still have to try it out. I can't quite get myself to order the smallest pack (a full week's supply) when I don't even know if I like it.
Couldn't agree more, a much better investment of anyones time. C++ won't suddenly refuse to solve your problems because they don't fit into an arbitrarily limited view of the world. And some of the stuff coming out of standardization lately is simply awesome.
Lot of new languages try do to everything which is imo a big mistake.
I've created library `transmutable` for performing automatic copy-on-write behavior in JS (you just write imperative code which is transformed behind scenes into immutable updates
https://npmjs.com/package/transmutable

This can avoid boilerplate traditionally associated with immutable updates in JavaScript, because you just write

const copy = transform(original, stage => {
stage.someArray[index] = 42;
});

and it returns immutable copy of original object with appropriate mutations.
> I've seen it pointed out before though that it would fall back to just the BSD license and others countered saying that was definitely not the case

Those others were wrong. Facebook have made this very clear in their FAQ [1]:

> Does termination of the additional patent grant in the Facebook BSD+Patents license cause the copyright license to also terminate?

> No.

[1] https://code.facebook.com/pages/850928938376556
Fluter has two widget styles, "Material" and "Cupertino", but I agree it would be better if Cupertino was backed by UIKit (then you'd get accessibility, UIAppearance, font sizing, etc. for free).

I recently prototyped an app in both Flutter and React Native. React Native feels incredibly fragile. Half of the month spent on a React Native app has been spent fighting with React and finding the right combinations of node and npm versions. Update some component and everything can fall apart.

Flutter's developer ergonomics are so much better. Time to first-running code was faster, and time spent due to broken shit outside my control was way smaller.
> sue over software patents

The grant isn't specifically about software patents, it's about all patents.
Oh, I had it for four days straight. Shaking, soaking two beds, destroying the bathroom, 30 liters of water, a trip to the doctor($8 total btw). It was only a five hour train ride!
"Writing this makes me think it deserves a footnote / warning: if while reading these remarks, you feel that modules -- or anything else I'm going to mention here -- are a "simple thing" that's easy to get right, with obvious right answers, I'm going to suggest you're likely suffering some mixture of Stockholm syndrome induced by your current favourite language, Engineer syndrome, and/or Dunning–Kruger effect. Literally thousands of extremely skilled people have spent their lives banging their heads against these problems, and every shipping system has Serious Issues they simply don't deal with right."

Amen!
> There is no complex project or package tooling to learn either.

Question, how do you handle dependencies without them ending up checked in in your git? I’ve had no success yet with go and dependencies, there’s no simple way like in the Java world to just define a list of dependencies and have the built tool automatically fetch them in some dotfolder, and take care of the rest, is there?
No. Just the part about fighting corruption.
Actually it's the other way around.
Post WW2 the allies actually removed most of the censorship laws.
But the premise might be correct tho the material predates Allied occupation by 150 years.

Major NSFW https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tentacle_erotica
What about it is disappointing?
I guess it depends on the app. Google's own apps on iOS don't strike me as feeling very native. I would think they'll get closer to nailing the Android behaviour. In a way these toolkits fill a space like Electron on the desktop where the developer won't, or can't, for all in on a native experience.

As someone who built some mobile apps with web technology I can see how Flutter would have an appeal because going into the project you've already given up on the native experience. There are still (unfortunately?) a world of marketing-driven apps with the brand overriding design choices which would be suited to this. Tools like Xamarin probably have a lead for line-of-business apps inside companies due to the MS ecosystem integration, but I could see people choosing Flutter for these apps if it's easy to build and maintain apps.

None of this changes the fact that for best-of-breed apps in a public store you'll need to use the native toolkits.
A co-worker who came from AmEx related that they were so unhappy with OpenShift that they dropped the 'f' from the name for nearly every internal discussion.
Cheers, I intend to try it out. Curious to see how their React Native equivalent works, huge selling point for React IMO but I should try the alternatives!
I used both react and Vue, and I would always choose Vue.js over react. beside all the features Vue has, its the documentation that I really like. it makes you want to read more and more.
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_and_dump
Good point about the whitespace, but I'd still rather have the templates inside my code than separate the two, mentally parsing two separate languages with different syntax and stitching them together is a lot more mental overhead IMO.
What makes you say that Angular is dying? The chart seems to show a significant grow in downloads.
- Real concurrency without having to deal with spawning multiple programs that communicate over some higher level process

- Good concurrency primitive (channel), although asyncio Futures in Py3 aren't that bad either

- Strong typing

- Easy byte-level manipulation

- Extremely easy to learn

- Simplistic error handling compared to exceptions (there are problems with this I won't go into, but it's easy to learn at least)

- Amazing tooling (gofmt forces your codebase to be consistent regardless of who is writing it)
> Google's own apps on iOS don't strike me as feeling very native.

That is true, but does anyone actually like the feel of google's iOS apps? I personally think they're awful, but the content they present is so useful that people use them anyway.
> Anyway, hopefully that justifies it somewhat - I think it was the right decision all things factored in. There's a lot of CSS trickery/hackery to make the type tester work (native support for advanced typography stuff is poor) so making it x-browser wasn't easy. The messaging to users of other browsers could probably be improved though :)

It doesn’t even work on Chromium, in the same version as Chrome. There is literally no excuse for that, it’s literally the same browser engine.

On top of that, even back in the "best viewed on netscape navigator 4.0" era there was a solution for this: Show a message that it was only tested with browser X, and that your client was too cheap to pay for anything else, but at least allow the user to bypass that.

As said, the excuses convinced me even more to never do business with you.
No. I don't think Golang is "less complex" because it has less features than ABAP _if_ you plan to use Golang to write GUI applications that interact with databases to track enterprise data of sales, purchase orders, manufacturing, inventory control etc.

"Complexity" is not a useful label unless you look at what you're actually building:

- If the goal is to show "hello world", yes Golang is "simpler".

- If the goal is an ERP system, Golang is way more "complex".

Between those 2 extremes requires analysis on a case-by-case basis.
> Yeah, and if Facebook DOES infringe on a patent you own, and it's a valid case? You then have to rewrite your frontend code base as fast as you can?

In that case, you have two other options:

* Quietly swap out your frontend before you file

* Continue using React and dare Facebook to produce a patent they can actually claim

This, of course, is based on the assumption that your frontend is a significant portion of your product. If your frontend is a trivial portion, then "rewrite your frontend code base as fast as you can" is also trivial.

Edit: fixed formatting
i was in the same boat as you regards to syntax but in 10 mins you will grasp everything about vuejs.

of all the frameworks, vuejs has the simplest syntax to learn. its no where as complex as angular and way more elegant. also beats jsx in terms of making your code more cleaner and prettier. im never going back to jsx.
Unfortunately I think that is what the average young woman wants, and that seems to be the target demographic.
Here's the uncropped image. I don't think it qualifies as lolicon, it certainly is not tagged as such.

https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_i...
Voting Machines are still very Easy to Hack
In ES2017 this gets substantially better:

const arr2 = Object.values({...arr, 3: 'New Content'});
Gambit-C. [0]

Development is slower than most, because it's mostly a one-man operation, but it's fast, can statically compile, can make tiny binaries and is mostly compliant, and the dev fixes compliance/bugs fairly quickly.

Docs can be lacking at times, but the code is fairly clear.

[0] https://github.com/gambit/gambit
> To me, this is a little weird. One of the downsides of Webview based apps is that it's harder to align with the native OS look and feel.

I'd agree with that in 2014 but this has been much less of a problem since the last few years. The fast pace of mobile OS's have slowed down to a halt. IOS has pretty much the same looks since version 7, Android since version 5.

The metro/material/flat design fashion has been the best thing for cross platforms apps, be it desktop or mobile, any platform or any framework.

Flutter seems to be at the right place at the right time.
That's a very un-Wikipedia article.
nil is always equal to nil. You might be confusing it with comparing a nil pointer to a pointer to a nil pointer, which are not equal.
There were girls who made more than ¥100,000 (about $880) per day through prostitution

Business owners and employees who do not comply could face up to a year in prison or a fine of up to ¥1 million ($8,900).

These numbers make the risk analysis interesting.
I think you bring up an interesting point. Big corporate advertisers are demanding of youtube the same predictability and sanity checks which they have with traditional media buys such as television, print etc. However part of the appeal of a medium like youtube is in much of the unscripted, random, spontaneous, esoteric content. And these two interests seem to be at odds with each other.
It goes back much further, to the early westernization of Japan.

Or so I've read. I'm not really a historian.
Why not sketch out the picture in a little more detail than he did (he wasted entire paragraphs on veiled insults anyway) and refer the kid to a better source?
I feel that we, as a society, should try to apply this idea in a lot of areas..
Furries, BDSM and well rule 32...
Ebbs and flows.

We've had the tabloid 'yellow journalism' since at least the late 1800s with the Hearst media conglomeration[1]. One could easily make the argument that if it weren't for the US capitalist interests and the tabloids' depiction of the USS Maine going down[2], McKinley wouldn't have approached Congress to seek war. Nonetheless, the Washington Post's coverage of Watergate in the 70s was a case-study in fantastic journalism. More recently, The Rolling Stone's coverage of the financial coverage by Matt Taibbi was better than the NYT's in the late 2000s. The Manchester Guardian broke the Snowden story (which itself was just a masterpiece of journalistic execution, following the Watergate 'staggered release' model).

I thing what is new here is that 160 characters or a Snapchat emoji isn't a format conducive to conveying the nuances behind something as complicated as geopolitical affairs and sectarian violence culminating into factions like ISIS breaking out, due to the vacuum of power which existed after the stereotypical 'despot strongman' gets thrown out, leaving a void of power entirely disrupting two countries, dozens of ethnic groups, leading to three major fronts all vying for power in addition to what can easily be argued as a modern US/Russian proxy war. Sure, a 4 minute feature on NPR won't begin to do it justice, but sometimes you'll get 12 minutes of syndication from the BBC and let Lyse Ducett run with her on-the-ground coverage. If any demographics' primary (or worse,) sole method of news consumption is a 'headlines only' format, as it may be for the 14-21 demographic, I might be slightly concerned.

Tangentially, now that 24 hour cable news exists, you have the converse problem of having too much time to fill, so you'll get talking heads in an echo-chamber[3] consumed by the 65+ demographic. Cronkite and Morrow (and arguably even up to Jennings, which is what I remember watching as a child) at least had 30 minutes of airtime with a captive audience to go into the nuances. (And while the "big 3" were not without their biases, they certainly did an objectively better job than the disservice MSNBC and Fox News is doing.)

--

[1] I suggest anyone interested in the media's influence on policy to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_Spanish%E2%8....

[2] While still inconclusive as to the cause, most historians regard this as not an act of war or sabotage but a ship design defect, evidenced by other ships of the same design failing in the exact same fashion.

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cP74QzyrLw Allow Jon Stewart on the O'Reilly factor delineate why the Fox News & MSNBC model is so harmful.
There certainly is a minimum, especially when bringing in another language entirely. The point of the google closure compiler, with advanced opts, tree shaking etc etc is that the size will grow slowly as you add hundreds of your own source files and dozens of 3rd party libraries.

Choosing libraries shouldn't require careful examination of their output file size, especially if you only want half the functionality.
But you can still sue Facebook. Nowhere does the PATENTS file require grantees to waive their right to sue. But if you do sue, Facebook gains the right to counter-sue you with any react related patents.

I.e. the exact situation you would be in if you sued Facebook and there was no PATENTS file.
From the FAQ:

>We are aware of apps built with Flutter that have been reviewed and released via the App Store.

Which apps? I'd like to try them out and see how they look and feel.
I wouldn't go as far as to compare the minds behind ICOs to the people involved on LKML.

The linux kernel developers that have jumped ship from LKML to bitcoin can be found on the bitcoin-dev mailing list: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-d...

Also, bitcoin/linux developers should not be blamed for these ICOs -- many of these schemes are totally unrelated and would just as easily be using centralized databases for their shares.

Altcoins exploded in 2013 with their initial offerings listed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0

.. and since then you can go look up "ERC20" and find some Slack stuff.
Adoption from Apple? If you mean on their internal services, then that's irrelevant as to the rest of us "having to use it".
Use dep, which they're planning to add to the official tools like 'go get'. Then add your vendor directory to your gitignore, and you're done.
These misterious investors could be the people who have large amounts of etc to invest and not interested in mass selling, you know, just a thought.
I don't think it's bad. "If we give you free stuff and you sue us, you no longer get free stuff"
Spark also has the flaw of being MacOS and iOS only. Sadly I need Android, Windows and MacOS at the very least but I'm much more comfortable knowing something is fully cross-platform wherever possible. Realistically this means browser + Android native + iOS native (unless the browser version is extremely well coded and runs satisfactorily on a mobile browser)
You include an untrusted, proprietary binary from Google. Not directly, but as a recursive dependency: com.google.android.gms:play-services-analytics

So, yes, you give data to Google. The Google analytics dependency you include could literally be malware, and you could not test, or know. And you never know if it doesn’t just decide to steal your data and transmit it all, be it by Google’s decision or because an NSL was issued to demand Google do that.

So, yes, as soon as you include this dependency, the entire browser has to be considered compromised, and you might as well just use Google Chrome.
Richard Florida Is Sorry
That's one factor, the other is the culture around youth appeal through drawings. Mangas were filled with teenage erotism. So lolicon is not a huge stretch from there.
i assure you, you will get over that phase real quickly. you will come to appreciate how nicer it is to write your code this way. because the same thing happened to me.
But that's kind of the point with react: it's just a view library so you're forced to add things to the tech stack until they click together. Of course it helps a lot of you know how all the layers work on their own.
Please re-review the licenses.

> Apache and GPLv3 both tackle this problem because the copyright license is terminated if anyone sues a copyright holder (and GPLv3 even more so because it's copyleft).

This is not true of Apache 2.0. Filing a patent suit against someone over a piece of Apache licensed software means the plaintiff loses the grant to patents held by other contributors to that software, but that's the extent of it.

> If Facebook sues you over a patent unrelated to React, you cannot counter-sue them for any patents they may be infringing

This is also untrue. Your ability to file a countersuit for other patents is explicitly protected by the React grant. This has been the case ever since version 2 was published.

See https://github.com/facebook/react/commit/b8ba8c83f318b84e429...

> If Facebook became a bad actor, would this patent license be better or worse for the community than Apache 2 or GPLv3

Either better or the same, depending on your values, but definitely not worse. The license termination clauses in Apache 2.0 and GPLv3 are so narrow they don't offer any greater protection against bad actors.
It's a matter of personal opinion, but I guess I'm more used to server-side templating languages, which Vue's looks much more similar to. I have the same problem as you for JSX - I keep trying to read it as HTML, except it's not, and mentally translating it is annoying.
Pretty sure VueJS has Weex
(https://weex.incubator.apache.org)
Well, cocaine does that too for some families, so "houses us and puts food in our mouths" is hardly an argument.

Especially since one can pay the bills even easier with more popular languages (e.g. Javascript, Java, C#) with more job postings, so that's not a particular argument in favor of Go.
Xamarin.Forms is another option to consider in this space.
Sexist or just "statistically likely"?

And aren't assumptions the very thing one has to base on statistics?
If you want whitespace, the proper thing to do is to use &nbsp; HTML entity.
As cited at multiple other places in this thread, Facebook's own FAQ on the licensing explicitly states what GP just did.