skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Difference is that PageDash can archive pages that require authentication because it uses a browser extension to retrieve page assets (it doesn't just delegate the work to a server to do the crawling). It also can grab stuff within iframes. Basically the main feature is "archive the page exactly as you saw it".
Hey nice work, checked the DEMO at the bottom of the README, awesome!
Explanation for StumbleUpon is, that I am sending X-Frame-Options DENY, so it never loads there. This explains no traffic from there.
Here are some Googlers' responses on their internal G+: https://imgur.com/a/S48QN

Some go beyond propaganda and get close to calling for violence. Quotes include: "…you deserve what's coming to you." and "Yes this is silencing. I intend to silence these views. They are violently offensive."

As far as I know, none of these people were fired for their posts.
Different strokes I guess. I liked that the authors took great pains to stick to highlighting the nuanced nature of the debate. They agreed with Damore where pertinent, but also disagreed with a lot of the conclusions that he derived.
Dowel Jigs easy way for drilling
Logos are typically shipped in SVG or Adobe Illustrator format aren't they? Even the old style ones had technical specifications. Seems odd you'd have to hand trace a JPEG.
Easiest way to deal with this is never say anything when you pick up.. the line just goes dead after a few seconds if it's a robo call
Its interestingly what these machines, free of mans limitation will do.. it boils down to a war of guessing.. he who can percive and manipulate the futures ahead of all others, while calmly managing the present will walk out of all turmoil a grown - thing.
Very clever idea to use the block hash as result, its indeed impossible to guess, people will have lots of fun when they understand it.
> Would someone please explain what this means, wouldn't an anti-regressive be a progressive?

Kind of, but just like skeptic the word "progressive" was hijacked by groups like BLM that started advocating for things like a return to segregation.

I used to be happy to call myself a skeptic and a progressive, but that was 10 years ago when the world made more sense.
Having some "feature" that means the concurrency model is sound (aka without undefined behaviour) isn't irrelevant to concurrency models. (I quoted feature because there's a variety of different ways to get this guarantee, some of which don't feel like language features, per se.)

On the other hand, it's fair that the convention/tooling is usually good enough; this is a stronger argument and probably a better one to be making than a dubious one about being irrelevant.
Send form data without a fuss – diver.js
Bezos himself asked for advice. Here's the tweet:

https://twitter.com/JeffBezos/status/875418348598603776/

A news story: "Jeff Bezos Wants Ideas for Philanthropy, So He Asked Twitter"

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/15/technology/jeff-bezos-ama...
They don't mention if it's possible to build saws without sawstop patents. Is this guy lobbying for all saw companies to be required to license his technology?

EDIT: It appears that they're currently suing Bosch for developing their own similar technology.
I've seen many blockchain lotteries therefore I decided to check this one, the code is very simple and easy to understand, I believe it has good chances of turning up.
Surely telcos can do something to block calls coming from sources that don't own the number they are providing as caller id. Internet provides started doing this years ago with alien packets.
This is a sensible question. Not sure either why the downvotes. I'm curious as to the answer myself. Although, I don't know if we'll ever see sub-nanometer. Maybe that's the reason for the downvotes, that sub-nanometer is not really in the realm of what's possible with current CPU architectures and the physics of silicon. Although, that's simply based on today's physics. Who truly knows what the future will bring.
Also on HBO (Game of Thrones S05E04):

Stannis Baratheon to his daughter Shireen: "My father used to tell me that boredom indicates a lack of inner resources."

Shireen: "Were you bored a lot too?"

Edit: formatting
Rising Federal Funds Rate vs. Treasury Yields
怎么去赚很多钱
好难啊
Yeah, it's not for crypto. But I think it's for more than simulation and rendering. It's meant as a general purpose PRNG. It's just as good for randomized algorithms like picking the pivot in quicksort, or playing games, procedural content generation (PCG!), or whatever you want to use it for.

I think that the whole point of the prediction difficulty stuff is that a library (e.g., C++11's) with general purpose PRNGs can't know how they'll be used. Maybe some idiot write code for a gambling machine in C++ and use whatever PRNG is to hand. There was a story in the news the other week about people going around casinos predicting slot machines, so maybe this has already happened! PCG is trying to make your simulation and rendering code fast while trying to offer at least some defense against egregious misuse.

Basically PCG is trying to be a good all rounder. As you say, it's meant as a replacement for the Mersenne Twister.
Why would that apply here? He didn't discuss anything illegal.

Sorry I'm unfamiliar with California state law, and besides I don't really know why it pertains to a misunderstanding of speech protected under the 1st Amendment.
I started having that during my PhD, and I got into a mild alcoholic habit because of that. I was so brain-tired at the end of the day that I felt the need to "reset" it with a couple beers. Mind you it worked great, but I definitely recommend against it.

I find physical activity (walking, biking, going to the gym) to be the best, with the added benefit of the "Eureka" moments you get when you're NOT at your desk. I now try to go for a walk for at least an hour if I start getting that. It took me some time to find a job/boss who understands that.

So yeah, it happens to me every time I concentrate too hard for too long, especially when coding / working on logical problems.
Sorry to nit-pick, but I didn't know the exact definition of 'petit bourgeoisie' and Google says it's actually lower middle class:

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=petit+bourgeoisie&oq=petit...
If you could highlight some of the more onerous claims in the TOS, that'd be appreciated. I've thought about using Nomorobo.
One's choice of first job is of great consequence, however, and it is greatly influenced by social group.
Libraries do not all follow those rules. The existence of my local library, as I discussed, shows that.
at least you can ponder the mysteries of existence while working your two mcjobs to pay rent.
Just because someone makes points that have some relationship to facts doesn't mean they can't still be held responsible for disparaging things you say. Imagine if he had written a 10 page paper about how they shouldn't hire so many fat people because they cost more in health insurance, with all sorts of facts and numbers to back up his claim.

Or if he wrote it about short people, that they, on average, were worse coders. I am sure you could find some semi-reasonable sounding studies showing some correlation between height and some definition of success.
Google is a complete joke when it comes to understanding people.

Allo
Duo
Google Chat
Google Meet

Four. Four different chatting applications. Whatsapp has one. Facebook has one. Apple has one. WeChat has one. Google has four.
And people keep falling for it

See:Itanium

Never compare an existing product to one that is not yet being sold. Never
I see perhaps 1.5 movies per year, mostly because the value proposition is not good.

To see a single movie in the non-shitty cinema, with a drink and popcorn will run me up about $35AU. I still have to watch 20 minutes worth of ads at the beginning too, so we'll boost that up to $40AU for wasting my time and brainpower. That gets me about 2hrs entertainment.

Why would I do that when I can pirate your movie in a few months and watch it at home, infinitely cheaper? Only the rare exceptional movie is actually worth the "cinematic experience" (ie. Dunkirk). Something like Guardians of the Galaxy or Deadpool is perfectly fine watching on my TV and Soundbar.

You can skip the ads and tell people off for talking during the movie in your own home too.
You forgot YouTube chat
Well actually I think it's more a case of "increase in performance is becoming harder and harder, the technology leader (Intel) is slowly becoming stuck and the competition (AMD) is catching up".
Everybody will be more or less at the same level as it requires huge investments to only get a marginal advantage.

Apart from games, I would not be that afraid to install recent pieces of software (browser, office suit, os) on a 10 years old computer (2007 core 2 duo). But in 2007 I would not have thought for a minute that I could do the same on a 1997 computer (Pentium II), and installing 1997 software on a 1987 computer (80386), just no.

Last time I replaced my CPU (i5-6500 in place of i5-2500), I only saw a marginal improvement.

Even at my former job, I worked with some decent servers (32 to 48 cores, 128GB of RAMs) to build Linux masters from scratch (Gentoo based). The oldest server of the bunch (which is 5 years old now) is still the fastest to build a master from scratch, it has less cores but faster clock and even on parallel tasks like compiling stuff, clock is still a more determining factor than cores.

There are still tons of things to improve in CPUs: power consumption, cost, embedded functionalities (SoC)... but performance improvements seem a huge cost for low gains adventure right now and for the foreseeable future.
A while ago I read a review of a book called "The trouble with diversity" by Walter Benn Michaels. I was struck by his claim that universities serve to "launder privilege into qualifications".

To me, this helps to emphasize the importance of class in America. Rich kids go to Harvard, after graduating from wonderful high schools, helped by private tutors, and, most importantly, knowing that their wealth and their parents' connections will guarantee them success. But since America is supposedly the land of equal opportunity, those kids must put on a facade to the world, which tells other people a lie: I succeeded because I'm smart, not because I'm rich.
Really wish stock android had an easy way of blocking all calls/notifications from callers without caller ID information.
The Longest Email I Ever Sent (Programmatically)
But to do that they have to consider and then discriminate using the gender of their applicants. The position in your example seems to be that two wrongs make a right - discrimination favored men at some point and so discriminating against men in the hiring practice is reasonable.

I strongly disagree with that position - as far as is possible that conversation has been had and settled; companies shouldn't be discriminating on gender. I dunno what the law in California is but my stance is that discriminating on gender should be illegal. Even if the people doing the discriminating might feel they have a moral right to it :P.
It does seem weird that they are using SDR instead of much cheaper DVB-S equipment. There are even cheap Android STBs that you could run a Bitcoin node on.
From what I saw, the entire system is more or less single use, resulting in a destruction of the sawblade and the catch.
As well as severe shock to the drive.
I'm not one bit surprised there is serious opposition to the idea, capitalism and all
> women graduating in software engineering is decreasing over time

That's right, but what's the cause of that?

Is it solely down to sexism and discrimination, or are there other causes?

For example, studies have shown that the more egalitarian a society becomes, the greater the difference in personality between genders is, which affects things like job and career selection. This makes sense because in an egalitarian society, men and women are more free to choose careers based on interest rather than on preordained acceptable roles based on gender [0].

I'm not saying this is what's happening in tech, but there's enough research around it that it's a plausible explanation for some of it. And if you're spending hundreds of millions of dollars but are not in any way interested in investigating (or even contemplating) whether this might be one of several factors leading to a decline in women entering software engineering, then that's probably a problem.

0: http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exagger...
The memo contained assertions like

"women are more neurotic"

I'm a bit baffled why the author isn't being criticized more for the childish sexism in that sentence. (This is coming from someone who despairs over the politically correct left).
Same for me, since my phone number is more than a decade old and I haven't lived in the city where I obtained the number since 2012.

I know people with numbers in the same area code, but definitely not with the same prefix. That said, just about every actual person I know texts before calling, if at least to check when might be a good time to call. Almost nobody calls outright, and if they do and I don't answer, there's always a follow-up text.

The same code and prefix thing really seems to have picked up significantly in the last couple months. I have an app that catches most known spam calls, but tends to let these through, which I assume is one of the the underlying reasons for this type of spoofing.
Scalability too. You could even boast a crazier achievement like a full node capable of running on every smart-phone, but the potential is handcuffed as the network can only handle ~7 transactions a second.
Why Losant and Not AWS
That's not because women are incompetent. It's because the workplace is putting so much pressure on engineers that even some men prefer to be promoted to management level after a decade of technical work.
I trusted Wikipedia (which says otherwise) without checking the references. Argh!
It actually is. Request treatment documentation.
If they screw that up, they will screw up treatment.
“Things of science” – Computer (1968, PDF)
Wait, how are problem solving and critical thinking not cognitive skills?
To pair program or not
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15020532
You're assuming that speed of consuming information is the goal. Plenty of people prefer videos over text because it communicates emotions and feelings better. Others remember more from people talking to them versus reading text on a page.
I took the CSM from Scrum Alliance (https://www.scrumalliance.org/certifications/practitioners/c...). It’ll run you about $900 to $1400 depending on where you’re at and what instructor you choose
Your mileage from the course may vary (depending on how good your instructor is), but in the end what the course helped me do is internalize the scrum process and Agile principles better. I really got to see the value they bring to a development team.
I think the greed mentioned here is that SawStop is lobbying to make it mandatory for saws to use their technology while trying to stop others from bringing similar systems to market, all so that they can price-gouge a captive market.

IIRC last time it was discussed here, they were trying to charge ~$100 per saw to license their tech, when the usual margin on a saw was about a quarter of that.

If they just accepted a reasonable licensing fee, their tech would be ubiquitous already and they wouldn't need to try and use regulatory capture to force people to use it.

Relevant quote from TFA:

> CPSC Acting Chairman Ann Marie Buerkle said she was also concerned that the rule might force companies to license technology from SawStop, which she said might create a monopoly.
I like that idea. It would mean intel had to show its hand a bit early with large promises in the near future. I admit i am a bit nostalgic for the crazy days of cpu clockspeed doubling every year. Then the early Gpu wars.
They often can't. A call can come in from any number of sources. Not to mention call forwarding and all that stuff. Telcos would love to kill robo dialing, but they usually do it by requiring a certain percentage of calls to complete and last longer than 6 seconds. If you want to hurt them, answer and hangup immediately.
With number portability there is no solid "owner" of phone number blocks any more.
I'm a woman in tech. She has nothing worth hearing on this subject.
One of funnest projects I worked on at Corel was called "Smart Graphics Studio" (I'm guessing most of the people who worked on it also read HN, so "Hi!"). It was an absolutely stupid idea: Some insane PGM read that XSLT could transform any XML into any other XML. Then they read that SVG was XML. They put 2 and 2 together and got a billion: You could draw a picture in SVG and then modify it intelligently (through XSLT) using some XML data set.

Of course the opposite is actually a brilliant idea (at least at a time when XML was still popular): Take an XML dataset and visualise it in SVG using XSLT transformations (well... yeah... doing it all in XSLT is still insane, but you get the idea).

Anyway, we built a very high performance SVG viewer (for the time, anyway) from scratch. We built an SVG/Javascript widget library. We built an incredibly impressive data manipulation library in XSLT (ok... yeah... insane).

Fun times. And all nearly 20 years ago. It really was ahead of its time. Of course the end finally had to come. The PGMs sold this thing to a certain aviation company with the promise that it would automatically build circuit diagrams from their XML chipset database (because.... XSLT!)

When Vector took over Corel, they very rightly dropped our division like a hot potato (we had something like 3 PGMs per developer). It was quite unfortunate because the developers and QA people I worked with there were some of the best I've every had the pleasure of working with. I've always waited for something to come of SVG and really wish we had been able to release something that wasn't crazy so that people could see what the potential was.

Edit: In my old age I'm losing track of time. It seems that Vector acquired Corel in 2003, so that's only 15 years ago :-)
Two US solar manufacturers ask for tariffs on imported cells
>>If what you say is true then in workplaces without affirmative action programs we should not expect to find any workers who thinks the women that work there are less qualified than the men who work there. (Because the "cause", affirmative action, is not in place.)

Sadly that's not the case. Affirmative action makes prejudice rational but it's not the only reason people display prejudice.
If A implies B then removing A doesn't make B false.

>>Yes, this is what many of Google's diversity programs are intended to do.

Good for them. They really should keep discrimination when hiring away from it. "We don't lower the bar but we look for more candidates among X group" is discrimination.
The same way "We don't lower the bar but we look for more candidates among white people" is discrimination based on race.
Guys. I discovered a sinister rehab clinic in Portugal after an online cry for help was discussed on the Reddit Bureau Of Investigation (yes, it's a real thing, /r/rbi ).

It was mentioned that after being "admitted" they were held there against their will.

The treatment method was to "break the patient down" and then "build it back up".

This clinic is the one which was mentioned. http://novavidarecovery.com
> Why are women disadvantaged by the fact that men outnumber them as programmers, but women aren't disadvantaged by the fact that men outnumber women as Mechanics, Architects, Electricians, Sheet metal workers, Engineers, and Lawyers?

I don't think I made that claim, but still it has merit. Women face challenges in workplaces where there are few of them, sometimes benefits don't handle birth control, or maternity leave is non-existent or laughably short, or there are few women in leadership roles, or there is a workplace culture that is overtly sexist, or there are persistent sexual harassment problems, or they get paid way less for the same work, or they get stuck with "women's work" and treated like secretaries and assistants.

> Why aren't men disadvantaged by the fact that women outnumber men as Speech-language pathologists, Dental hygienists, Physical therapists, Counselors, Nurse practitioners, Hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists?

Men actually do face their own set of challenges. Consider all the jokes in popular culture about male nurses or male cosmetologists. Or consider Mississippi v. Hogan where a man sued successfully for the right to be admitted to the Mississippi University for Women School of Nursing, a historically all-woman school: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/81-406

I'm not super clear if I understood your question, let me know if I didn't get it right and I'll try again haha.
So this is what was happening... I have a "desirable" prefix and had been getting tons of calls from numbers with the same prefix - was wondering why the heck they would be calling me.
If big companies won't adopt it, startup a company and build a better saw and people will buy it. Table saws are dangerous, I remember in high school having a piece of wood splinter and fly past my head hitting the ceiling. People don't seem to have problems buying safety with cars, I see it as just an industry full of cheap ass power tools that constantly need replacing.

I'd buy such a saw just so when my dumb ass neighbor borrowed it he wouldn't cut off his fingers. I laughed at him when he asked for the chainsaw.
I wrote some shitty code based on the official data of cs graduates in 2015-2014, every candidate was assigned a random competence score based on a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 100.

these are the results:

"there are 48840 males, we will pick only 25000(51.187551187551186%)"

"we will pick all females to represent the company reaching out to them"

"let's say the company is going to hire 5000"

"hiring based on competence and taking females when equal"

"results:"

"male: number: 3505 percentage: 70.1% average score: 123.81256204767604"

"female: number: 1495 percentage: 29.9% average score: 123.75346343448992"

"if we force the 50% ratio"

"the average male score: 126.26036797470225"

"the average female score: 119.60577230318559"

so forcing a 50% ratio does indeed lower the bar. data for
males and females were generated using the same function so arguments about biological factors are not even needed.

the code:https://jsbin.com/nogujuqewe/1/edit?html,console,output
Sure, but that is a different point entirely. Even if Google was getting that wrong, it isn't really that controversial to almost all of us; programming has always been prone to misrepresentation and taught in wrong ways to both boys and girls.

Incidentally, working in a big corp, programming these days is more of a social activity than it once was for reasons completely unrelated to gender. The day of the lone wolf programmer is long past!
> The carriers could do something about it. I'd consider switching service to a carrier that demonstrated they block these kinds of calls.

T-Mobile blocks a lot of spam callers, but they do not seem to block these spoofed caller ID calls.

Thankfully these spoofed calls are so easy to spot that they aren't even a real annoyance to me.
This is like trying to run a business by having everything done on TaskRabbit or Upwork.
First time project manager?
you can use this javascript snippet as a bookmarklet:

javascript:window.location.href = 'https://www.facebook.com/flx/warn/?u='+location.href

and it will let you avoid paywalls
Addendum to my sibling comment, since HN won't let me edit it:

So the parent's concern does seem justified. It seems conceivable that Damore didn't have any beliefs that most would consider sexist, and didn't have any ill intentions, but was still fired. Hence the throwaway -- it feels like us men have to be extremely cautious when discussing gender.

But again, I recognize that discussing P risks promoting Q, which is the harmful stereotype, so perhaps it's for the best that we don't discuss the topic more freely.