skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
OK, fair. It's still worth a look! That was my point. If you compare it to other alternatives and find it to be the best thing, it would be a shame to put it on the shelf instead when there are no alternatives that are as technically strong.

If you don't look at it, you have no basis to compare it to the alternatives that you're evaluating. I would rather pick a really good solution than a supported one. If I have to pick a supported solution, then I would rather at minimum compare it to a good one, so I can be honest about what shortcomings it has. It is telling that most of the recommendations in this thread are Helm.

Helm is great, but it ain't no Deis.

Deis Workflow is rock-solid and worth evaluating, even if support is a requirement for you. Other competing solutions are not as good. I don't even know any other that are really comparable. Maybe OpenShift, but it is not "really K8S"
Google is also protected by the first amendment which means they do not have to facilitate speech they disagree with.
In the last four years or so, we've (rightfully) had about 300 semi-annual reminders to consider donating to eff.
I'm guessing that parents connect through Facebook groups.

Today, being the first day of school here in Colorado, my wife told me that the parents decided to organize a Facebook group to share information. My suggestion was a Whatsapp group, but I guess that's Facebook as well :).
Fascinating that a recruiter actually told you that. I wonder if it's actually true or if the recruiter was saying that because...they are a recruiter and having people on LinkedIn makes their life easier.
No, they are seeking available personal information on 1.3 million visits to the site.
I find it a bit ridiculous that on HN you are damned both ways: if you rarely use fb to contact folks, you are still contributing to fb stats and still addicted (actual claims from other threads regarding fb), and if you aren't you're ignoring a (valuable) message channel.
I said "likely", not "certainly." Satoshi Nakamoto is the exception that proves the rule; part of his infamy is precisely due to the fact that he has not yet identified, which is extraordinary.
The headline was edited from a "Dreamhost resists demands..." sort of construction.
The results of studies like this depend strongly on the context... both the method used, and the existing hiring environment you're comparing to.

We've run a similar study and for the company we were hiring into we found blinding in that specific case had no effect on race or gender but drastically improved socio-economic diversity. The hiring company already had equitable hiring on gender & the candidate group wasn't racially diverse enough to make a conclusion.

Would I generalise that result to all organisations? No way, and neither should you.

If you can find the study you're thinking of I'd be interested to look at it.
I couldn't get access to the video. How do they work around the error correction and wear leveling algorithms?
So the thought policing extends to humour now does it?

Apparently so!
It is a lovely world when you can do this.

In microservices-driven-architrctures you often have to appeal to multiple services to service a request.
Oh you mean like this?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/06/19...

And people still say they are worried about voting from an app with cryptography.
Sexual orientation is (or at least should be) protected so it cannot be used as the basis for discrimination, neither can race or religion. Being an inflammatory racist is not (and should not be) protected.
"No Nazis" is a perfectly fine side to draw the line on, in my book.
The echo chamber disenjoys dissonance.

I use FB to keep in touch with family and friends, and as a way for them to invite me to events. I avoid the "news" feed like the plague, and strongly prefer Imgur's User Submitted for a feed of "what's going on in the world today".
> Once you start to scale, the bottleneck is rarely the application layer. For the typical crud web app it's likely to be the database.

You seem to be downplaying the importance of an efficient app layer and I respectfully disagree.

1. Using well-optimized tech for the app sends you right at the DB scaling problems phase, so you never go through the "our app layer is too damn slow" phase -- which can kill a startup pretty damn quick (and history knows examples). So, it's a huge win in my eyes.

2. Most apps never even take off to the point where the DB is the bottleneck so a strong app layer is a godsend; I'd estimate 80% of the apps struggle with optimizing backends and caches and not DBs -- at least judging by my 15 years of career which, I admit, is anecdotal evidence and doesn't mean much.

3. Those apps that do scale that far are very grateful to their backend engineers who spared them all the "tune our Java / Ruby / PHP / Python VM's memory usage and GC behaviour parameters" dance (and that dance can last for weeks and weeks almost without sleep!).
edit... i stand correct, didn't read closely enough
Transplanted example of this same line of reasoning:

JimBob's Cake Bakery also has a constitutional right not to do business with same-sex couples (or really, anyone else they disagree with). You are protected from the government restricting your speech, no one else has any obligation to put up with you.
I get your point, but I'm not sure if it still applies if the joke isn't relying on support for your position, but vehement opposition.

And I mean that in the literal sense of I'm really not sure. This type of humor, if not new, seems to have at least been extremely fringe in the past.
> If you want to sell F# to enterprise developers, show them how they can write their C# code in it without having to pretend that it's object oriented anymore, and how that's a good thing.

As enterprise consultant, for the types of customer projects I work with, lack of tooling support for Blend, WPF, UWP, EF, ASP.NET is a no-go to move from C# into F#.
If you search on linked in, there are plenty of leads and head ofs that is actually their job title, but they dont manage and not necessarily be the head of something.
So there's a million or so people that visited that website and they want to unmask all those people to attempt to find 200 alleged rioters?

That sure sounds like an overreaching fishing expedition.
> To put it another way, if you really think that building more housing will make things worse, then why not argue for the destruction of existing housing stock to make things better?

I don't personally believe that. I think capacity solves shortage needs, consistently. But most don't.

Most people really believe your reasoning is valid, and they advocate for the exact destruction you've mentioned (see "Road Diets" / freeway removal / any article from CNU / etc).

> The difference between housing and cars-on-the-road is that housing is generally seen as a positive thing that people get real value out of, whereas cars-on-the-road are an unfortunate side effect of people not having housing near where they live

I think most people agree with you, but I personally believe this is a very dystopian view. Transportation is an inherently positive thing too, that real people get real value out of. Even if every single human lived right next to their work place, it's still a good thing that people have fast reliable easy freedom of movement in whatever method they prefer.

Even if you live right next to your workplace, your next job won't be. Your spouses job, or next job, won't be. Your parent's home won't be, your children's school won't be. Unless your constantly moving every 2 years, this idea of "transportation is just a bad side effect of not living inside your workplace" doesn't really hold up to regular life, in my opinion.
500 points or something.

Before undown was available my plan was to create a new sockpuppet every time my last one crossed 500.

That way I wouldn't have to worry about accidentally downvoting anyone.

The scary thing about this is there are a number of old matured accounts in good standing that seems to be defending nazis.

It might just be people with stronger/different principles than me though.
No, but it's not a constitutional issue. Likewise, you can host your alt-right views on the internet, but you don't have a right to a domain name and third-party hosting.
Facebook isn't new anymore so it's not cool to like it. I also find it vastly more useful than other social media sites.
No it's not legal. Additionally, is against net neutrality. Do you believe in net neutrality?
The reason being sexual orientation is a protected class. "Belief in white supremacy" is not.
But there is nothing to rebut for a scientist without an agenda. Look around you; the plan of egalitarianism transitioned from experiment to propaganda decades ago. We do have scientific evidence of predictable gender differences in ability, the issue is that people like you are SO DESPERATE to deny these cracks in equality theory that such research into gender or racial differences has become taboo. Which means the scientific establishment has been biased and subjective in handling this topic.

Want more proof of bias? The google letter writer was attacked for his writing style and choice of discussion venue, not the contents of the letter. His subject was taboo and so people are still adamant about not discussing it, because in their mindminds, the science is settled. Thats the propaganda talking.

We can give people equal treatment before the law, but we need to recognize that differences in hiring ratios for not have to be indicitave of race or gender bias. It is possible for the numbers to be an emergent effect of group differences.
I have free calls to anywhere in the US, Canada or Mexico. I can call any number in any of those 3 countries and talk as much as I want for no extra charge. (except for a few pay per call "services" but that is not a phone fee that is the caller collecting the money and easily blocked). For a small fee I can get the same for both "cell phones and land lines in 30 countries"; and land lines in 70 countries. The reason I don't get cell phones cell phones in those 70 countries is they are caller pays.

Once again, caller pays used to make sense. However now it is just a money making scheme for cell phone companies that hurts those of you who have it.
How the Partition Changed India's Food Cultures Forever
My honest opinion here (as a QEMU dev) is that part of the problem here is that a lot of the people who want to run x86 apps on their rpi don't really appreciate that even if they did get it working the end result is unlikely to have satisfactory performance, simply because of how much slower an rpi is than an x86 desktop system and how much overhead emulation adds. So it doesn't seem worth expending a lot of effort on trying to make it much easier out of the box to do this, because if people get past the initial hurdles of getting the thing running, the next thing they'll hit will be "this is a complicated multithreaded program and it probably tickles qemu usermode emulation bugs", and if they're lucky enough to avoid that then they'll hit the insurmountable hurdle of it just not being fast enough in the end anyway.

If you have an x86 app then by far the best way to run it is on an x86 box, because there's just so much x86 hardware available and it will just work. If none of the people familiar with a problem space have felt it worth the effort to make a simple writeup of a particular technical approach, there's probably a reason why not...
I like it but as noted the lack of an exit path makes it scary for a long term business contract.
What incentive did Google have that skewed HTTP2 vs smaller sites?
Thanks, svgbob looks really interesting; but what I'm missing is a tool to produce the ascii file to provide as input to svgbob/dia/etc.
You're right! Which is why such a case is going to the United States Supreme Court, because it's not a settled question.

But let's say, refusing to bake a cake for a black couple?

There exist groups in the United States we consider protected classes, and the state or federal government passes laws to protect these classes, or court precedent protects them from discrimination.
Mods, please change URL to original source: https://www.usenix.org/conference/woot17/workshop-program/pr...
That's incorrect. Sexual orientation is a federally protected class. Belief in white supremacy is not.
Doesn't it have a disparate impact on race?
I took CS221 from Andrew in 2006 (or was it 2007?) Even more has changed since then ;-) It was my second ML course, after taking Daphne Koller's punishing CS229. Right then though I knew ML will sweep the world pretty soon.
Facebook wants you to believe that it "enables" communication with friends and family, but in practice they work hard to maintain a stranglehold upon that vector, excluding or absorbing alternative tools to ensure that they can gather personal information and insert advertising.

Communication isn't a problem, but communication mediated by a predatory middleman and augmented with addictive mechanics absolutely is.
You sound awesome and are, in this regard, better than me. I never had WhatsApp, Instagram, or Twitter, but I still have my Facebook account. However, I am not active. I log in only when I receive a message or some alert I actually care about (which is exceedingly rare these days). I see no reason to actually delete my account since I haven't posted anything in years and have barely communicated privately on the platform.
Bingo.

I think you see now why things are so crazy in the CA property market then. For a few years after the repeal, you'd be kicking a LOT of older home-owners out of their homes. My folks, likely, included.

However, what is the alternative? My siblings and I moved out of state a long time ago, due specifically to the housing issues. Most of my former HS classmates do not own homes in CA. They simply cannot afford it. Prop 13 'ate the seed-corn' of California youth's property aspirations. We simply cannot afford to own homes.

This is why I said that GP's ideas were only band-aids. The giant elephant in the room in CA housing discussions is Prop 13, something that is abhorrent to continue on with and something that cannot possibly be removed now.

CA will have to remove it someday, to give the youth any hope at reasonably 'owning' California, and everyday that it does not, things will get worse for when they do remove it. It's a quagmire, but it is the thing to talk about, not higher density band-aids.
Yes - a moral line. However, censoring speech, however vile the said speech is, is illegal and not compliant with net neutrality
Get 10% OFF from your next purchase with Code: Welcome10
This comment basically ensures that it will be difficult to really discuss what's going on with Dreamhost and the DOJ, and that we'll all instead have to grapple with some other issue you prefer. That's not a polite thing to do to an HN thread.
Forced psychiatric treatment for political extremists is pretty disturbing.
ISPs are common carriers, requiring them not to do this. (Same thing with airlines, as another example; they would not be allowed to deny someone transport because they became aware that that person was participating in the Charlottesville thing, like Airbnb did.)

Google and Facebook are not common carriers, so they are under no obligation to be content-neutral. (If you're arguing that they should be common carriers, that's a perfectly fruitful discussion to have.)
Currently only PDF printing of the entire page view-port is available. File an issue with your use-case so the team can assess whether or not to look into including that kind of behavior.
That bakery was not forced to do anything they didn't want to (sexual orientation is protected from discrimination in some contexts but is not a fully recognized protected class). That decent people think that they're assholes for their decision to deny service is orthogonal to whether they had a right to deny service. And, in turn, Nazi symps and merchants of false equivalency can think Google and GoDaddy are assholes for refusing service to Nazis.
Publish date of the document.
The embedded system only contains the web _server_. The user has the browser on their desktop/mobile system.
This is not true. Sexual orientation is not a protected class in the constitution. I hate it but that's the facts.
No one has a problem when they remove sites affiliated with ISIS but apparently Nazis should be given a pass because "free speech". Uh huh.....
There's no planet on which you can lump those three together. One provides access to the internet, one provides a service on top of it.

ISPs can and should be regulated... in fact they should pass a law... maybe call it net neutrality.

That is where we should draw the line, beginning and end of story. If google deems a site offensive and doesn't want to return it in search listings, I'll find another search engine. I don't use facebook and couldn't care less what they do or don't display. If it's vital to you, pick a different social network.

ISPs on the other hand are a utility and should be treated as such. The DOT doesn't get to tell me which stores I can visit before I pull onto the highway. My ISP shouldn't have any right to tell me which websites I can visit either.
This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Google is well within their rights to terminate these accounts.
[didn't read the article yet] I can't help but think that's like asking if yoga is bullshit, and should be called a hobby instead of being considered spiritual. Yoga is yoga, whether you're doing it spiritually or not.
They said just that-

"However vile and despicable the views expressed on the site, they have a constitutional right to it"

They have a constitutional right to express those views. They do not have a constitutional right to express those views on a GoDaddy-hosted domain.
It's not that hard, you've just forgotten how to do these things without Facebook.

>I personally hate facebook's mobile apps and some it's policies ( Internet.org comes 1st to my mind), but it's hard to completely stop using it.

Try it! Deactivate your account for a week. Do it again later for two weeks. Maybe for a month. When you learn how to live without it, delete it.
No webhost is obligated to host anyone who asks. That's not what net neutrality is about at all.
If they broke the law then each instance should be dealt with. We are not on the precipice of war, no matter what the MSM would have you think - until we are I think the tactics of war i.e. censorship are not the answer.
Hard to say for sure, I think being in the right places has a lot to do with it, luck too.

My "break" was when I was at the time freelancing for an agency/ production studio (about 3 years ago). All the project managers and other developers I've worked with said really nice things about me to the tech director and the person in charge of staffing projects, and when they had a project that they didn't have a tech lead for, they decided to take a chance on me, even though I'd never really lead a project before, wasn't even sure myself if I could, and I've only worked with them for about 3-4 months at the time.

That first project came dangerously close to flustercluck territory (partially my fault, partially because we were understaffed), but everything actually turned out pretty great. The projects afterwards went much smoother - always delivered on time, usually ahead of schedule without having to crunch, and they liked how I mentored the other devs; so when a a client pulled a project (through no fault of ours, they had some internal restructuring) and I started looking for contracts elsewhere, they offered me a senior developer position instead.

It's a really cool place with amazing people (still hang out with them), atmosphere, and some breathtaking projects. Leaving it was one of the hardest things I've done, but I couldn't say no when a cancer research place asked me to be the architect for their front end projects. The story about how I got that offer is actually even more random. Maybe I'll write a post about it one day :p
> We enhanced GLB, our internal load balancing service, to support Kubernetes NodePort Services.

Everyone does this - because Kubernetes Achilles heel is its ingress. It is still built philosophically as a post-loadbalancing system .

This is the single biggest reason why using Docker Swarm is so pleasant.
If people had "skin in the game" with regards to the housing market you'd see a lot more people out ensuring an adequate supply of houses are constructed. Instead, you have large amounts of people living off of Prop. 13 and rent control "subsidies" who are actively opposing new housing construction. We need to slowly phase out these "subsidies" to ensure that people making the policy decisions also live with the consequences (whether they be positive or negative). There are many other metro areas in the U.S. that don't have Prop. 13-style controls or rent control, and have a much larger supply of affordable houses.
Netflix Plans to Spend $7B on Content in 2018
More likely than the population at large, but it’s still a minority of CEOs who are sociopaths.
Maybe they should also be hiring some sort of customer interaction expert as well.
While we remain on the off topic, what happens if it is a private company providing a service that seems very similar to one the government provides? Imagine if eventually USPS went away, could FedEx/UPS decide to not do business with a group they didn't like (say no mail for anyone under 30)? What if all public libraries were eventually replaced by private ones and any pro-liberal material removed?

I think discussing Constitution protections from the government should include discussions on protections applying when the government allows the private sector to take over some of its work. If privatization reduces constitutional protections... that feels a bit like an exploit, not an intended feature.
yep, an SSD and perhaps more ram is the only upgrade most machines need these days.

I'd rather use an old machine that's been upgraded with an SSD than a brand new machine that only has a mechanical hdd
This a completely arbitrary exemption. Not in the US Constitution either.
Yes, that set a very frightening precedent. The people replying to you by nitpicking the fact that companies are not legally obligated to behave in a certain manner are totally missing the point (not to mention repeating a very tiring trope that occupies 40% of the thread any time free speech comes up).

If we start biasing registrars and holding them accountable for the content hosted by all registrants, we get some content put into an "IP only" ghetto, and that fundamentally destroys one of the internet's most important components (even worse than it's already been destroyed by walled gardens like Facebook et al): the convenient ability of anyone to publish anything instantly and accessibly.

Do we really want to have to use IP addresses to access anything that is contrary to corporate-approved narratives? Use a rogue "politically incorrect" DNS server?

ICANN should really step in here and strongly insist that registrars never do this kind of content policing again.

EDIT: This post was not flagged when I started replying, was flagged after. Vouched for content/to counteract what I assumed were reactionary flags, unvouched based on others' assertions that this is derailing the parent thread which is not technically about this issue, which I guess is probably correct. Mods, please consider whether this is really too far off-topic to be allowed.
This isn't outlawing. As the GP noted it's a private company.

I have no obligation to be part of the platform for a position I don't support. It's not censorship when I don't give my support. It is when I try to exert control over others. It is when the government exerts that control over us all.
Rockford Need More Leads or Paying Customers for Your Small Business?
Nice use of a 400 year old idiom.
You can print a Curta calculator, which I suppose is a sort of computer. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1943171