skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> They won't politely tolerate you. Deviants will be chastised, expelled/expatriated, jailed, or killed. Ignoring prudence (preservation of self and the society at-large) is perilous.

Except I never really seen a 'neonazi' saying "punch a communist" I never seen mass media encourage such behavior either.

Do you not realize that this is cyclic reinforcement of behavior? (Antifa says punch nazis, nazis punch back, antifa ups their game with HIV needles and guns, nazis up their game etc)

Both sides are disgusting, but the fact that the media covers up for the leftist violence makes me stand on the side of the so called "right wing extremists".
The problem with that is where you draw the line, as most will simply learn which words not to utter and will signal their support in other ways.
Maybe you should be the one who chooses what a private company can and can't do?

As for the slippery slope arguments, come on.
Is the site up? I can't connect. And googling hidora gives me French results...help? Am I in the twilight zone?
I don't understand fighting fascism with fascism.
New Relic's Lee Atchison at Futurestack
Your comment is spot on. Muh in life happens because of tradeoffs on available resources over time.
Mute Me - Probably, your first useful Touch Bar app
There were the tweets of an NYT reporter, Solberg or Stolberg I think. NYT is not very far to the right.

You could also look up the case of Berkeley antifa Eric Clanton, although he was not in Charlottesville- that would have violated the terms of his parole for the upcoming trial of his: 4 counts of assault with a deadly weapon at a previous rally in CA.
These are _exactly_ the rules of Dota 2 1v1. This scenario was not specifically built for the bot. See here: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Dota_2_Asia_Championships/2...
True, it's like if someone helps you with a favor, say helping you to move, then you turn around and offer them three bucks for their help, you're likely to get a rather negative reaction. Small tips are really not going to provide any more incentive for people who can provide valuable answers. But I'd love a way to attract attention to questions even if it meant having to put up significant money. Stack Overflow sort of does this with the reputation bounties.
Hey,
There are a bunch of ways to find out what makes up a webpack bundle (and by looking at that you might be able to find code which is not used by your app or which could be replaced by a smaller dependency). Basically, webpack can give you the stats via:

webpack --profile --json > webpack-stats.json

Based on that, other tools can help you analyse the bundle, ie:
https://webpack.github.io/analyse/

Have a look at this post explaining the details:
https://medium.com/@joeclever/three-simple-ways-to-inspect-a...
AFAIK SQLite doesn't achieve atomicity by virtue of its global write lock. It does so by using a rollback journal (default) or WAL.

So it's not really all that different from PostgreSQL in that regard and the authors point remains valid :).

You might also enjoy this talk by the main author of SQLite: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvmMzI0X7fE (SQLite: Protégé of PostgreSQL)
It's SoCal surfer/skater slang, which sounds unprofessional in a formal business environment. So, stuffiness.
The corollary to that is that many technical types will make things work despite management ignoring the fundamentals. Sometimes its better to let something fail sooner than to make it work, when it's clear the fundamentals will eventually overtake the effort.
I meant the whole linux system, not the kernel. I guess I'm wrong since it's not gnu/linux from scratch. But the two are entangled.
Maybe Geo-locked in South Africa. I can access through hide.me
Wow, nicely done. Feel sorry for the people who bought a Trezor.
There's more to suing than the likelihood of winning. War of attrition is a big one. If you have a lot of resources you can sue just to cause financial damage, emotional distress etc to the defendant without having to actually eventually win the case.

So it's completely fair that when a layperson talks about the ability of suing, they're talking about net losses from that process and not necessarily about the final verdict.
it's not team-oriented behaviour. I'm not talking about face-time, but about having the attitude that you're part of a team.

The "10x" works 16 hours a day for 3 days and produces a chunk of code that works, does what it's supposed to, ahead of schedule. So far, so awesome.

But the rest of the team is working away on the rest of the project. Suddenly they're lumped with a huge chunk of code that they don't understand. They weren't involved in the design decisions, they didn't pair-program or brainstorm any of the code. It's pretty impenetrable. And the "10x" who wrote it is now unavailable after that "heroic" sprint so they can't even ask questions.

Teams work together. Heroic sprints of productivity followed by absence is not working together. It's leaving other people to clean up your mess while you claim the credit.
If one wants their counter protest to be accepted at face value, maybe the organizers should institute a buffer zone. It seems like proximity foments violence, one way or the other.
the reason they'll rather hide 4x people that are half as slow, is that they have bums in seats that are available for whatever hairbrained idea they come up with. the x10 (sic) coder will get bored of the mundane stuff surrounding the complex stuff s/he loves
Udemy: https://www.udemy.com/learn-devops-the-complete-kubernetes-c...

Pluralsight: https://www.pluralsight.com/courses/getting-started-kubernet...
If you'd ever been to Germany you'd realise they have faced it, they just don't want anyone celebrating it
Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA
No, we just have been yelled at for soo many reasons and so long, we concluded that whoever yells at us is always wrong.
Study of 4 Money Class Designs, with Fowler, Kent Beck, Cunningham Designs
Convenient relabeling? I beg your pardon? Aren't you just conveniently making up shit right now?
Cloudflare is not bound by regulations, but that's not the issue. DDoS is a relatively new phenomenon and so no regulations exist.

The question is, should the Internet be a free and open public forum or not? Should we permit mobs to knock legal servers off the Internet?

That would seem to run counter to the idea of an open internet embodied in net neutrality, upon which certain laws have been developed and passed over the years. It would be a mistake to merely look at the current laws on the books without grasping the underlying general principles.
But time took care of the cost of a given hardware unit.
A book recommendation: https://www.amazon.de/Heretics-Guide-Best-Practices-Organisa...
> They neither call it unbeatable nor mention hardcoding anything.

What about this tweet from OpenAI?

"Our Dota 2 AI is undefeated against the world's best solo players" [1]

Also Musk called it more complex than Go,

"OpenAI first ever to defeat world's best players in competitive eSports. Vastly more complex than traditional board games like chess & Go." [2]

[1] https://twitter.com/OpenAI/status/896157788908290048

[2] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/896163163581825025?lang=...
Thanks for these choice quotes.

I completely agree for the need for boundaries, but I think we've done a most excellent job of setting them!

The current boundary is speech that immediately incites violence, I believe the supreme court interpretation has been very generous towards the notion of free speech, including hate speech, as it should be!

Here's why:

We should let the radicals be racist and make radical statements as much as they want. At the point at which they turn violent or call for specific acts of violence we should step in and shut that stuff down.

A blanket militant action against the whole ideology will no doubt show better results on shutting down the movement on a short term.

But the notion of freedom of speech is not meant to protect these radicals, it is meant to protect ourselves and the integrity of society! We cannot make exceptions to these rules just because it's more convenient to us now, because this weakens the principle. This is the whole slippery slope argument.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

If you wish to change the lines on which we use force, you must make a coherent case based on principle, not on convenience or anecdotes, as the principles themselves already account for, in a deep way, the history to which you allude.
Is the greenhouse infinite in size? (ie. the economy)

Are flowers grown the primary metric of success? (ie. revenue generated)

Do the non-Vanilla plainfolia seeds on-average prefer different growing conditions than the existing greenhouse conditions? (ie. working with people instead of staring at a debugger for hours on end)

Are the Vanilla plainfolia seeds much easier to find (ie. students graduated from college at an 80%+ clip)

Is the competition for non-Vanilla plainfolia seeds fierce (ie. many companies have diversity programs)

----

The productive suggestions surrounding diversity interests focus on increasing the pipeline of seed varieties making it to the greenhouse and adjusting the growing conditions as the way forward.

Arbitrarily throwing out as many seeds as you need to reach a 50/50 split today ignores non-negotiable market realities. One of your competitors will use what's leftover to grow more flowers than you with the aim of shutting down your wing of the greenhouse.

Let's focus on discovering where we can find more seeds instead of discarding the ones that we already have.
How Java 9 Incubator Modules Will Change the Future of Java
Not untill you are the one getting censored, then its a slippery slope again, right?

The double standards you guys have. Just fuck my society up fam.
"Reorganizing seemingly for the sake of reorganizing"

These things often to be the observable consequence of political battles between executives. From what I've observed there are always clear winners and losers in these battles (although it may take a while to work out who lost and who won). From the perspective of the execs who were for the re-orgs and who come out on top these reorganizations are positive things even if they are bad for the company as a whole - typically they don't care about the company as a whole only for what they can get out if it.

Edit: A colleague once said that the behaviour of executives became far easier to understand and predict once you found out their individual bonus calculations were done (which, of course, we weren't supposed to know).
How a board game about bitter legal struggles became a bitter legal struggle
> unspoken critical pieces of the puzzles

Is it actually that rare to hear military histories avoid discussions of supply lines? It seems very common to me. The phrase "an army marches on its stomach" is in the popular imagination, right?

Even post-WWII, discussions of Vietnam usually talk about the Hồ Chí Minh trail, don't they?

EDIT: Actually, there's a more general question I've been wondering: What is a good way to figure out if something is common knowledge or not? I've occasionally found myself assuming something was common knowledge and while "No feigning surprise"[1] is a useful rule to try to follow, it would be better if I had a way to train my intuition to be more accurate about how well-known facts are.

[1] https://jvns.ca/blog/2017/04/27/no-feigning-surprise/, though the rule should be "no acting surprised" because I think the common case of it is an expression of genuine surprise.
Thinking functionally
I like NewLisp just for syntax (http://www.newlisp.org/) also OwlLisp (https://github.com/aoh/owl-lisp).
>And I will argue that communism is fundamentally a good ideology.

This is a dangerous thing to say publicly! As you mention yourself, the United States has had red scares just a generation ago. Who is to say it won't happen again? And that is exactly why you should support freedom of speech and tolerance of differing ideologies. Or the next red scare will be even worse.

>statues of Lenin and Stalin were removed without much second thought, only USians would keep statues of their (war criminals)|(rebels) for 150 years.

As far as I know most of the USSR world war 2 monuments are still standinding. The US is removing even monuments to soldiers that don't feature any specific general or leader. By your logic we should tear down the famous Vietnam war memorial because the US lost the war.
Sure, that's a discussion worth having. But, I think it should be in terms of how we end white supremacist violence, and not in terms of how we defend white supremacists up to the point where they commit violence.

I'm not suggesting white supremacists don't, or shouldn't, have freedom of speech. But, unless you're also suggesting that Al Qaeda, Daesh, ISIS, whatever, should be able to hold recruiting rallies across the US as long as they aren't commiting violence at the rally, I think we probably agree that there are and should be limits to free speech if the speech is an incitement to violence.

Neo-Nazi groups are organizing and training for the violent overthrow of the US government to institute a white ethno-state. Right wing extremists are responsible for more terrorist attacks in the US than any other group (including Muslim extremists). Without acknowledging the violent nature of these organizations, we can't have a useful discussion about where the line is drawn.

That Al Qaeda can't get a permit for a rally tells us there is a line. So, why do we let Nazis step way past that line over and over?
> Encapsulation, allowing to change the internal representation without requiring clients to update or recompile their code

This benefit is exaggerated. In practice, classes end up being either record-like where you need visibility on all the actual fields, or they are protocol-like/more fully encapsulated with few public members and more methods. The addition of properties was a big mistake IMO.

Read/write fields should just be part of interface specifications. There is little value beyond that.
> Hardware capability increases exponentially, but software somehow just bloats up, using the power and space, without providing much more functionality or value.

I disagree. Our baseline for software has increased dramatically. If you don't care much about the added functionality or value of the new software, use Mosaic or Netscape 4.0 to browse the web.

There are obvious improvements in browsers which you are so used to that you forgot them: tabs, ability to zoom, process-level isolation for websites, support for newer protocols, CSS, Unicode support, font rendering things I'm probably not aware of, a built-in debugger and inspector in the browser, and so on.

Again, if you think that software hasn't advanced much, simply use the software from 10 or 20 years ago, and see if you can stand the experience.
In many companies you get paid for status, not for productivity or value.

Management doesn't want super-performers, because they can upset the power dynamic.

Developers must have lower status than management, and super-performers can challenge that.

Companies are actually social networks. Instead of gaining status by posting selfies of yourself in exotic locations with cool people, you gain status by making high status noises in emails, talking in a high status way, having many people reporting to you, and having equity.

Sometimes getting things done is relevant too, but not as often as it should be.
In the US, browsewrap enforcement is debatable, but my conclusion after looking into this question is that properly-formed clickwrap is enforceable in most US jurisdictions that matter.
As an old AI researcher, I was expecting some words on how everyone and their grandma try to solve every "AI" problem applying neural networks nowadays, and how other algorithms (e.g. nature based, genetic, hive minds) are not even given a glance anymore.

Instead I get some racial and sexist controversy... Disappointing...

Edit: We have a diversity crisis in AI indeed, but it is in everybody thinking and trying to solve things the same way. Give a chance to other algorithms, not just what the big guys shove down your throats.
yeah, I completely agree. There are people who are amazing at this out there. But they tend to be pretty humble about it, too, in my experience. And the best of them are really, really, good at bringing the rest of the team up with them.
I think donations will be massively used when the necessary conditions are met:

- One platform/standard to donate to or receive for any content on the internet.

- Ease of use, secure online wallet.

- Very low transaction fees, accepting donations from say 10 cents.

Flattr is subscription oriented and most people don't like having a recurrent expense. Steem.it, like Cent.co are limited to content on their site, and there is much better content in the internet that most people would donate first.

So the question is how to make this platform/standard and get youtube, twitter, facebook, quora... adopt it. Some rely heavily on advertising and I don't think they are interested to change that business model yet.
Isn't perjury a crime? What about death threats? It's all speech, and it's the type of speech hate groups use - the type that is already a crime and we want to protect under some strange interpretation of the first amendment to your constitution.

If a group is threatening the security of non-white people, some even going to the extent of carrying guns (as is their right) whilst they make said threats and spread lies, I don't know what else you need to shut them down.
> Proof of useful work?

In the Bitcoin industrial space most of us are of the belief that only the marginal value of the work matters for security.

For example, if you can combine mining the Bitcoin chain and calculating ads for google, and the Bitcoin mining pays $1 and the ad crunching pays $5, then this process is really only providing $1 in security. The reason for this is that the for the security of the chain we care about your lost opportunity to mine one chain vs another, which keeps you working to say on the eventual winning chain so that you get paid that $1.

It's also inaccurate to describe mining as not useful. It makes Bitcoin secure. This is very useful, at least to those of us who use Bitcoin!

From a practical perspective the general constraints on what makes a proof of work good for a system like Bitcoin (e.g. that it must be largely optimization and approximation free and that you can randomly generate instances all with roughly equal hardness and that it be cheap to verify) broadly exclude most classes of work you'd likely call otherwise useful.
I can see how that criticism isn't completely invalid. I just don't see how it connects to this case, considering the website in question chose to name itself after a well-known Nazi propaganda paper (as in the realest, 1930s Nazis in Germany: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Stürmer)

There's also some confusion about terms, obviously. The meaning of Nazi has morphed and includes more than actual, card-carrying party members. The dictionary lists "a person with extreme racist or authoritarian views" as one of the definitions. It is also meant, and generally understood, as an insult, and a reference to a certain mindset (cf "Grammar Nazi"). And while neither Trump nor most other Republicans would be considered Nazis, there are some obvious tendency at play in the party that invite the comparison, such as the attempts to disenfranchise groups of voters, or, more recently, the Presidents' encouragement of police officers to "rough up" arrestees.
Exactly that : diminishing returns are everywhere.
> The idea that I'm seeing any of these comments arguing to the contrary means HN is already infiltrated by /pol/ and other Nazi sympathizing groups.

Infiltrated? You talk like having a different opinion than you justifies social stigma and exclusion, do you really think that helps anyone?

I didn't realize that HN was full of 16 year old communists.
It's also childcare for working parents. I know it's not supposed to be but it's a side effect that's widely taken for granted.

I believe you're correct about young people being turned into debt slaves. The rich and rich-aspirational in the UK are encouraging/implementing this here as quickly as they are able.
Brand is more important for commodity goods than for non-commodities. It's the only distinguishing feature.
Also, what I'd you receive a satisfactory answer and agree to pay the bounty.

Now the ten better answers never get posted.

Currently, the default timeframe for answering and voting on a question is 24 hours. This may change in the future, and we may also allow question askers to choose their own time durations.

What happens if my question receives no answers?

If your question receives no answers and the answering period has expired, you will be re-funded the bounty amount less any transaction fees. Keep in mind that Cent is all about timing - try posting your question again when you feel the moment is right.

I live in Tasmania (+10hrs). How am I going to know when global domain experts are awake and ready to respond?
You should probably count your blessings if the asymptotic behaviour is better than break-even.
On the design of distributed programming models
A free society can be nice as well!

"nice" and "free" are not symmetrical concepts.

Being nice but not free works for today, but has no guarantee of working for tomorrow. Being free means that we have the ability to evolve our ideas and work towards niceness for all of the future as well.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

An unfree society gives up the ability to evolve and dies, even if it buys us convenient niceness on a short term. An unfree society lowers our chances of being nice tomorrow.
Review our generated reports by PENTESTON and tell us what need add here
We have created new SaaS service for scan host by automated tools and generate one report.

PLease review our generated reports by PENTESTON and tell us what advantages need add here.

PCI DSS Standart
https://dashboard.penteston.com/report/PENTESTON_Executive_Report-test-php-all-tools_2017-08-17.pdf https://dashboard.penteston.com/report/PENTESTON_Vulnerability_Details-test-php-all-tools_2017-08-17.pdf

PENTESTON Standart
https://dashboard.penteston.com/report/penteston_developers_report-test-php-all-tools_2017-08-17.pdf
You're missing out on option 4: People can't discriminate on properties that the person they are doing business with can't pick or change (gender, sexual orientation, color of skin, hair, size of nose ...) but can discriminate on properties that the person in question did choose or could change (voicing the desire to kill or suppress large parts of the population, affiliation with nazis or just being an idiot in general).

Your notable groups are not required or regulated in any way that would require them to print a swastika on a cake or a Hitler face on their pizza if the customer ask so. They are, however, required to serve queer and non-queer people of all skin tones. There is indeed a difference between these kinds of discrimination.
Inciting violence is already illegal and no one is defending it.
Top Cybersecurity Issues at Black Hat
Some people are intersex (typically this means they have ambiguous genitalia or internal sex organs). Therefore, there are people who are neither entirely male or female biologically. You can have an XY person who outwardly has female genitals, but has internal testicles (Androgen insensitivity syndrome)

There is also some question whether some things we don't consider intersex are actually a form of intersex, such as homosexuality. A lot points to homosexuality being innate, not learned, and I personally think this points to it being a form of intersex that affects the brain, not the genitals.

Some disorders can cause both. For example, females with Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) can have ambiguous genitals and also are more likely to be lesbian.