skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The response to that is surely very simple.

"Since government has absolutely no faith in community development we have loaded the contract with sufficient margin to employ lots of people who will specifically maintain the code used in the project.

Which is precisely what any closed source developer has to do.

But by supporting this bid the government will make government maintained code available for free to any other enterprise that wants to use it and gain the benefit of any development they may choose to do to that code.

This eliminates duplication across the economy and makes the economy more efficient overall.

PS. I hope you none of you are using Android phones"
Maybe until we explored a bit more, than a few areas on the surface? Mars is HUGE.

Potential areas for life might be in vulcanic areas underground.

Might not be a high chance, granted. But the chances that anything from your project survives are far lower - but it would definitely damage research on current or historic life on mars a lot.
I'm working on something along these, lines. If you or anyone else is interested in early access, please contact me (email in profile).
Thanks for feedback, did not aware of different type of keyboard layouts!
i would love to see 2 meepo bots go head to head mid
I agree with you but I would say that programmers are not the problem but are the "technical" part of it..
There is a huge loss in usefulness for immutable objects when immutability is not a default and you have that many different implementations.

The thing I like about immutability in languages that implement it by design is that you know that if you get an data structure, it is immutable. In the world of javascript, you not only have to worry about whether an object you get from a library is immutable, but which kind of immutable implementation is using. Moreover, that information is not easily available in the type signatures, so you have to go to the library author's documentation, if any! That, to me, is a complete mess.
The videos were flagged by AI for human review

The training parameters of that "AI" were set by a human too. Someone said to it "here are a bunch of videos that I PERSONALLY THINK are to be banned, learn from that".
Although most of the pieces that have ended up on the frontpage (based on my subjective impression) actually were critical of what happened. I wouldn't imply that HN is overrun with people who want to surpress striving for the truth.

I also had a tex flagged. It seems to happen to articles about the topic which mostly include a personal oppinion and not much more.
I had an undiagnosed condition that caused symptoms similar to chronic fatigue for years, and had even been linked to depression and bipolar - celiac. Your advice would not have been helpful at all. Now that I'm eating gluten free i am fine.
After reading all of the Sapolsky books, I'm fascinated and saddened by how much impact long-term psychological stress can have on Human health. It seriously wrecks havoc and can subtlety restructure the brain in ways that can be difficult to reverse.

But, yet, Humans also seem to relish in displaying how much stress they can withstand while acting like it doesn't effect them at all. It's a sick badge of honor. I've seen people tolerate and even feign enjoyment of high-stress lifestyles for decades before finally succumbing to it.

Nowadays, when I even feel the slightest bit of stress response continuing for longer than a day, I try to completely remove myself from the environment that could be causing it.
Just a guess: if you have an expression language that lexes numbers in a few bases, then when parsing some commands you no longer know which base the number token was, all you know is that you got a number, and in case of the break command you interpret that as a line number unless prefixed with a * token
I downvoted because I _knew_ the words patriarchy and feminism would derail the conversation and hoped to bury your post before it could.

Just like it's annoying for someone to chime in with "what about men's XYZ!" in a conversation explicitly about women, it's annoying for the inverse to happen.

While you're 100% right and gender roles (patriarchy) mean we're actually having the same conversation I would love to be able to have those two conversations independently without descending in to whattaboutism and explicitly gendered language.
This is a side effect of Google employing ADL who are only interested in doing political cleansing. "AI" let's them have plausible deniability.
True. I don't run Tor exits from home.
I think the argument that they're trying to lick you into their ecosystem is a bit dishonest.

I don't recall FB doing much for lock-in. They basically have only three products, and two of them are just as integrated with things like Twitter as with FB (modulo inline picture expansion of Instagram, which is Twitter's doing)

Google uses your emails to put reminders into your Google Calendar. Uses your Google Calendar to add context to Maps.

The simple reading is just that they had an opportunity to integrate their products. In theory they could offer this integration with other mail providers or calendars.

In practice , do you think MSFT or Yahoo are going to let Google check your emails? Probably not.

Not that Google hasnt done a couple uncompetitive things (Chrome advertising when using FF is a bit much). But the reality is that Google has access to data that can make better usability. And it's kinda hard to do with third party services that are all also building Google-like ecosystems too.

But I have a bunch of third party calendars in Google calendar. I email other people with my Gmail account. I can install Firefox on my Android phone. I can Google search through DDG.
With Inline Math (\inline-math), there are some symbols will be displayed smaller (by default) than Display Mode (math-container). This is because I implement it to be the same with LATEX style, maybe most of people dont want that behavior, so may possibly change in future.

Good advice on MIME types, thanks.
Presence isn't really the an indicator of amount.
Any syndrome, almost by definition, isn't a highly meaningful diagnosis, as it's diagnosed by symptoms and exclusion. Once the mechanism is better understood, it'll become a disease and not a syndrome, but most likely it will split into multiple diseases (and even then many people will be left out, untreated).

Imagine having Crohn's disease the year before it (or UC) was 'discovered.' You had a debilitating disease, but you were just told you had "really bad irritable bowel syndrome". Certain doctors would tell you that it was all in your head. Or at the least, they would be wholly unhelpful. The general public would be much worse.

In my extensive experience, doctors are really, very much just people. Actually, they're often less helpful than regular people because they have extreme constraints on their time and against thinking for themselves (example of the latter: a close friend of mine was hospitalized for attempting suicide and they wouldn't give him benzodiazepines because of the __risk of addiction__).

Sorry for the rant...
Do we really know what makes us healthy? (2007)
What's your ultimate iPad app loadout?
He said he'd dropped her off at an island though right?
That's certainly one type of Black Swan. Taleb's example of that sort of thing being a Turkey predicting they will be fed (because that is what happened every other day of their life) but who is actually slaughtered.

However, it is not the only type. There is also the stock market, which demonstrates major unpredictability every few years, but which can also be approximated the same way between each of the Black Swans. (And they keep being Black Swans because the gap between them is large enough for people to convince themselves that "This time it's different, this time n̵o̵b̵o̵d̵y̵ ̵w̵i̵l̵l̵ ̵h̵a̵v̵e̵ ̵t̵o̵ ̵b̵e̵ ̵n̵a̵i̵l̵e̵d̵ ̵t̵o̵ ̵a̵n̵y̵t̵h̵i̵n̵g̵ growth will be eternal!")

Edit:

Point is, it generalises as how wrong you are in your predictions, and the closer your estimate of your error rate is to your actual error rate, the better your model is.
the single vast space-time would already be locked in a state of maximal entropy, nothing moves, the illusion of time is just the universe recalling a memory.
That's my point. This island that he dropped her off at - does it have a dock?
Is this... a thing?

Surely you can escape it by just not going?
Is This the End of the Bullish US Stock Market
Not particularly, even though somehow even being asked caused a slight twinge of guilt in me. To be honest I didn't even read the article till after I made that comment, as I was mostly replying to the other commenter on a much more general subject than this particular article. It's a subject I've thought about quite a bit actually, so seeing the GP comment I replied on that basis.

For example, I think the twitterization of information has been bad in the sense that it reduces information in it's deepness, I think part of the reason for the success of twitter is that in the modern age we have more and more things competing for our attention, and therefor less time to dedicate to various pursuits. Twitter answered this problem by placing a hard limit on characters... which reduced time needed to consume, but failed to provide mechanisms that provided good content, in favor of short content.

The tldr being a better form that fills this niche, perhaps, would be the kind of thing that would assist those of us who value content quality but still don't want to spend too much time on something that is of unknown quality. Medium did something interesting in this regard by giving readers time to read estimates. They still lack quality indicators, as do most information outlets. Some of my ideas for solutions would be machine ratings of strength of logic, or argument-map generation. So I'm coming at the issue in a more abstract way.

All that said, and despite my original no, I will give my version of the tldr.

Loneliness is an issue that seems to disproportionately affect men, but it shouldn't be confused with social isolation. One can feel isolated and lonely despite social connectedness. For the most part it boils down to a lack of trust, and therefore intimacy in conversation and other actions which are failing to meet emotional needs of men. While most indicators show that a relationship such as marriage often meets the emotional needs through a partner, they also show that once in a relationship where emotional needs are met social isolation increases. Hope is not lost though, there are techniques that can be used, such as reframing or CBT, to help lonely people get out of that rut, and much of it will need to be not just singular but cultural. If you're lonely, just know you aren't the only one, and the situation can improve, and knowing others often feel the same way despite hiding it (like you hide yourself) is likely to be a threshold that can help you overcome the fear needed to make the positive moves needed to progress.

Slightly off-topic, but I wonder how much the chilling-effect of the surveillance society has increased this loneliness due to lack of trust (perhaps of the medium and not of the person on the other end).
> The technology we have to send signals today will look completely pathetic to us when we look back on them in 50 years.

the technology doesn't matter, either yesterday, today or tomorrow it will still be electromagnetic waves which is what SETI is analyzing.
Culture relishes how much stress one can handle. Not humans. It's a learned behavior.
Side Project Marketing Checklist
Ask HN: What problems do you have that could be solved using software?
Can he be deported?
It's mitochondrial dysfunction

Fairly obvious if you look enough at the research

mitochondrial disease patients rarely get diagnosed as adults and they often suffer a lot of complications unnecessarily as a result

Our medical system is awful at dealing with it - chronic stress and anxiety are certainly related to metabolic disturbances as well according to research so that makes it an easy target for doctors to "explain away".

also antibiotics cause mitochondrial dysfunction (particularly bacteriocidal antibiotics)

chronic stress and sleep deprivation "raise your susceptibilty" to chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia - yeah becuase they lead to excess oxidative stress

CFS patients are probably surgery risks as well then since propofol and the like inhibit mitochondria
This is really awesome, I'm going to be trying it out over the next few days. I'm by no means a Latex expert, but it seems like it could make writing Latex a bit faster and more wysiwyig-ish.

One question - if I want to write a^(b+c), I'll normally write in latex: a^{b+c} to group the b+c as part of the power. I can't figure out how to do the same in the editor - if I write in a^b+c, anything after the "b" will go back down and will no longer be superscripted.
But again that will lack the latest features that you will be getting with a Threadripper system, but I guess that might not matter to you. Bargains to be had I agree.
Can he be deported? Does he understand this is america -- no caste system. Get the hell back to India if you want to be an asshole.
even worse: it's full of aliens!
A.I. in Prisoner's Dilemma
? I've always thought that ML/AI for me was about learning the languages that could express my idea of how it could work. In order to do that myself, I started reading about algorithm types.

http://machinelearningmastery.com/a-tour-of-machine-learning...

There was one particular study piece that I remember reading that I believe was written in the late 70's early 80's, but I can't remember its name. It was a HTML unformatted uni course-work document that the guy who wrote it said he'd just keep changing it as required. Really wish I could remember his name.

I have a slightly different bent on what is discussed here, because my particular implementation reflects what I think is important. There are an infinite number of variations. It depends on what you think you think it might be good for.
See, though, this is the thing. It's great that you're not being all "lol male tears", have a cookie, but you're putting a lot more effort into defending your conception of feminism, and into drawing a distinction between yourself and "lol male tears" and making sure we all know you're not like that, than into addressing the topic at hand. That's what is getting you downvoted, not some imaginary knee-jerk reaction to a word.

It's not accepted to derail a women-centered discussion with "but patriarchy hurts men too!"; why do you expect anything less in derailing a men-centered discussion with "but feminism is for men too!"? Granted you're not being That Guy in the usual direction. But you're no less being That Guy for it. Maybe consider not being That Guy.
Check out the nath package

... de­lim­iters adapt their size to the ma­te­rial en­closed, ren­der­ing \left and \right al­most ob­so­lete.

https://www.ctan.org/pkg/nath
All of these organizations operated at their zeniths during different time periods, governments, cultural norms, and a variety of other factors. The problem with the conversation you're describing isn't moral relativism or that everyone in it has equally valid points, it's that none of them seem to be capable of isolating the elements of those organizations that functioned/dis-functioned without endorsing/criticizing the organization as a whole while still presenting a cogent argument.
>The root cause of depression is chemical

I wonder if you were speaking generally here, or if you were referring specifically to the Chemical Imbalance theory of depression/anxiety.

Often espoused by the marketing departments of Big Pharma, and by now firmly lodged in the public consciousness, the idea that abnormal monoamine levels (e.g. serotonin, noradrenaline) in the brain causes depression, is (to say the least) highly controversial. Some might even call it "debunked". Or, more charitably perhaps, just a highly persistent meme that's never really had much to do with science from the get-go.

BTW, I say this as someone who saw successful results using SSRIs (Citalopram) as a treatment for depression some years ago. Given that the relationship between serotonin and depression seems subtle, indirect, and poorly understood at best, I don't pretend to be able to explain why SSRI treatment "worked" for me! Placebo? Coincidence? Genuine effect which empirically exists but we do not yet understand the mechanism (a bit like lithium)?
Mostly I'm only going to watch it once, so I'm happy with a rental model; cheaper as well. And not to different to a streaming approach, but only choosing and paying for what you actually want.
Have you used LyX?

https://www.lyx.org/
Type \power.
Wait for it ... :)
Travel influencer community
Travel influencer community! Click to join today travelbook.com
○ Become a travel influencer
○ Book hotels and flights
○ Earn rewards & travel swag
Be Awesome! Please SHARE & INVITE Friends.
IBM Fast Track Your Data 2017 – Podcast Series Talking with Lillian Pierson
Credit cards always have a cost. You get 1.5% to 2% of your money back in rewards for a 3% fee.

In Europe, fees are limited to far below that, and the European debit cards are limited to below 1% in fees.

You don't get rewards from credit cards in that situation. In fact, credit cards always end up losing you money.

Credit cards are the tragedy of the commons - if no one used them, everyone would profit. But as long as some use them, everyone gets an advantage from using them.

> I challenge you to explain why the easy availability of credit and a highly functional credit market is a bad thing instead of throwing out blanket statements like that credit scores are "crazy."

Because it is risk. You have insanely high interest rates, high fees, you have a massive risk, and the security is basically nonexistent.

To pay money online, you usually use a standardized API that uses proper cryptography, and signs with a key embedded in your device or your debit card on a reader.

With a credit card, you pay with a simple number that anyone can just steal, and if you don't take care, you're fucked.
As a bit of a person that enjoys quit times. Jump into a crowd every now and again. Just to keep the blood running.
SunBurst Visualizations
It's less the availability of credit cards (they're highly available in a good many countries), it's more the assertion that if you're not using a credit card every day, there's something wrong with you. It's the fact that if you're not using a credit card in everyday purchases, you're losing the rewards and so essentially paying more for everything you buy - you're structurally punished for not participating.

Debit cards have much the same protections as credit cards in much of Europe. It's more likely that any benefits your bank wants to give you will come attached to your bank account (in return for depositing a certain amount of money per month) than that they'll push a credit card on you. Interchange fees are low enough (0.3% for credit cards and 0.2% for debit) that there's not much they can profitably provide, anyway - which means our prices aren't quite so inflated to cover the expense of serving credit card users.

Credit cards aren't bad, but the system of incentives that leads consumers in the US to believe they're the most rational choice is.
In a town near where I used to live there is a country house set in a beautiful deer park. While owned by the lord of the manor, the park had traditionally been open to the locals to use. Until one day the lord at the time decided he'd had enough of the riff raff tramping through his grounds and put big iron gates over the entrance. This was so unpopular that the locals ganged up one night and threw the gates from their hinges. Wisely, the lord took the hint and the gates have remained open ever since.

Rich people limiting access to previously public spaces has rarely gone down well.
Perhaps replace both subscription forms with a single link in the header? They take too much space and are distracting.

I'd also reduce font sizes. This is not a presentation page, but an information dump. The more there fits on a single page, the better.
really i will love love to hear your story.i have feeling that there is more to it ! wow , i am impressed.please what is your email?
Hi, that's intentional, because we see that most of the time superscript input is only one character, you can press arrow left to go back and input more characters.

Maybe in future I should have a setting to turn off that feature/behavior.

Thanks.
I remember an SG1 episode, they turned up on a planet which was a frozen wasteland for as far as the eye could see, no evidence of any life later than microbes.

Turns out the planet was earth - they were in Antarctica.

Clearly not comparable, but there's a big difference between salt flats in Namibia or the seater in Antarctica and landing in downtown manhattan or the Brazilian rainforest.

We've successfully sent half a dozen probes to mars, we've barely scratched the surface.
I'm not sure I understand the conclusion you're trying to reach here. At first I thought your point was that lower prices are somehow bad for the consumer but you never expand on that point at all. The only coherent thesis I could get out of your comment was that consumers make decisions that are sometimes self destructive like the decision to smoke. But no one thinks cigarettes are good for them, I would still argue that people who desire cigarettes have a right to purchase them in the same way that I would defend people's right to purchase any number of digital services they might not actually need.
Germany also heavily uses debit cards, actually. Like 90%+ of the population have an EC card (a German debit card network), in comparison to below 8% for credit cards.
I am not grumpy but your talking points are based on an ignorance of history many people share.

I genuinely do not care if I convince you. I just don't want people to buy into people like you like they did with people who promoted the past couple of bubbles as sure things.

I understand you are a true believer and nothing I say will convince you.

As far as shorting Bitcoin? I don't expect it to implode in the next 3-6 months.

If you don't expect something to drop substantially in the next 90 days, shorting is a terrible idea.

I am not sure why I should buy a lottery ticket when I can reliably make substantial returns in other markets.

Bitcoin is ultimately intended to facilitate transactions and other crypto currency does it better.
> then object oriented code reflects the way we think because we write it

There are non-linguistic modes of thought that more naturally capture our intuition of evolving systems. You don't linguistically think through a baseball play in the moment. The most intuitive programming paradigms are actually event-driven [1].

To summarize, you can compute by thinking and you might be able to think by computing, but thinking is not like computing. Any particular programming paradigm is a mode of computing, not thinking. A programming paradigm that more closely aligns with thinking is more intuitive and natural, and will lead to fewer errors.

[1] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~pane/IJHCS.html