skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Patriarchy is a model whose name alone understandably offends and antagonizes an entire gender. It is clear that the people backing the model will not be effective in helping men because they are either ignorant about or do not care about the feelings of men.

> There are unfortunately people who try to hijack this to push their agenda

Hypocritically, you're using the topic to push your own agenda here. Which further shows how adopting the patriachy model will not help.
Kenya opposition claims #election results manipulated in cyber attack
> For example, the amount of articles about programming languages like Rust or Elixir is disproportionate compared to their actual relevance in the industry.

But not to their possible relevance.
I have noticed that too. Churchgoers have an instant network wherever they go. I am not a believer but that's a nice trait. I don't know of anything else that can be compared.
Not, but you have to be prepared for not touching your investment for 5 years because of the high volatility (which means the price could go down to $1000 for a year temporarily, than back up to $10000).

Here's a logarithmic graph of the price over the last few years, the slow price drop from $1000 to $200 was painful for most investors:

https://bitcoincharts.com/charts/bitstampUSD#tgSzm1g10zm2g25...
I'm on safary (iPad) and can't read the article. Page is blank.
Speaking of hacker-friendly email clients. Snackis offers editable threads, full-text search and encryption in a single, convenient package with a GTK GUI on top.

https://github.com/andreas-gone-wild/snackis
My fear going down farther than about ten feet is how long it takes to reach the surface. 30 feet is a long way underwater.

Rescue is related. I doubt anyone could pull somebody out that's passed out at that depth. You're just not going to have enough air. I had to help someone out of a pool once and the only way I was able to manage was by walking along the bottom with them on my shoulders to shallower area. They panicked and tried to climb me, pulling me under if I did anything else
One of the most interesting developments in AI will be watching how we respond to human rationality detached from human morality. Programs that optimize for practical outcomes are going to come up with a whole host of solutions that we consider abhorrent, not least because the mere notion that that solution is a practical one riles our sensibilities.
It's not, actually - the total value of all physical $USD (M0) is only about $3.8T, vs. the figure of $100-300T given for total wealth (which seems low to me, BTW).

The actual truth is even weirder: if Bitcoin takes over as the world currency, its value in $USD will be infinite, but the question will be meaningless, as the dollar will be worthless. Currencies tend to be winner-take-all within a society; if one takes over, its rivals lose all value, as their only value is in being a medium of exchange and store of value.

This is perhaps a contributory factor to the Bitcoin's volatility: if you actually believe it's going to succeed, unambiguously, the rational thing to do is to move all your wealth to Bitcoin. And similarly, if you believe it's going to fail, the currency by definition is worthless.
Can you get an IRA portfolio based on cryptocurrency? It would be nice to be able to invest in btc with the same kind of tax benefits you get with a traditional stock based IRA.
You're assuming an efficient market, when many deficits of market economics are already well-known. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_failure

The information economy has fixed some of those, but it would be more surprising if there weren't new types of deficits to take their place.
I feel there's a really enormous market for this kind of non-religious gathering. And not centered in any particular activity either: when people lack religion they usually go for hobbies/sports, but that's an entirely different affair that doesn't necessarily relieve loneliness (especially if it is competitive, 1v1 or solo). Not everyone has the necessary skill for a hobby, the necessary funds, etc.

What we really crave is a place for discussing ethics, morals and general life guidelines.

Church has many interesting properties that have been abandoned (due to obsolescence of the content, but not the form!): you can be just a passive observer in Church. You're with other people, which generally act supportively in this environment, and you can just be there amongst others without speaking, only hearing both comforting and hopefully useful ethical guidelines. You're hearing that you're loved and that everyone should love eachother -- which is usually true in the first case, and generally accepted in the latter -- but sometimes a reminder is really due.

Then if you have a problem you don't feel like sharing with anyone else, you have this guy, the priest, which has essentially a confidentiality agreement that you can safely tell him whatever. If you have a problem you can ask for guidance. The priest can usually pull some strings to get other churchgoers to assist you if necessary too (especially easy but important things like emotional support).

What we have today as non-religious individuals are for the most part psychologists, which have many issues:

-- You don't get the participation feel from joining a large group of people, and interacting with the ones you are interested in that group;

-- They tend to view your problems as disorders, when sometimes all you need is the presence of a group of people for alleviating light emotional distress;

-- They don't feel too confident giving advice, and they probably shouldn't, since they may not have experience with your situation (whereas some churchgoers might);

and very important:

-- They are expensive, while church is completely free.

In a web jargon, psychologists don't scale very well. Suppose everybody went to see a psychologist, and each psychologist had 10 patients. Then at least 10% of the population needs to be psychologists. Instead you could get k -- a lot better than 1 -- mutual confidants by connecting with a k person subgroup out of a larger meeting. And when you can't find a suitable subgroup, you have a speaker giving general advice for a very large number of people.

We need non-religious churches.
>This means they would get treated less like a book publisher and more like a telephone company.

Huh..how about we start treating cable companies more like telephone companies first?

I see the argument for more anti-trust regulation against FB and Goog, but considering how this administration views Net Neutrality the irony and hypocrisy is beyond absurd here.
Not yet. Winklevoss twins ETF got denied after four years.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/business/dealbook/winkelv...
Are there good Deep Learning tutorials or blog posts with code (github) in Java, NodeJS, PHP, Lua, Swift or Go ?
There are other dangers besides "taking over the world". In fact, Elon Musk should know, since his company's AI already got people killed.
It doesn't really need to. That tremendous increase in supply would push wages to minimum wage. When devs are making minimum wage, they won't be in the bubble anymore.
The demand seems to be "institutionalised" since a couple of years. VC-like money coming in through cryptocoin service startups and disposable income from rich nerds and richer finance types looking to beat the market.
It'll pass and/or stabilise.

It's the notion of what is stable here that's novel and interesting
Unfortunately, the use of irony on HN often fails, because apparently we don't trust any more that the members here are intelligent and ethical.
I enjoy this and History on Fire, but I've had a hard time getting into other history podcasts. Any recommendations welcome.
Hello, interestingly governments and private industries have invested a very large amount of money in the launch of satellites, development of supercomputers and code and the training of forecasters to interpret them.

Many years ago I actually seriously tried to do what you describe above, I tried out all sorts of things around seasonal analysis and other features. What kills it is the chaotic nature of UK weather due to the jetstream and NAO.
How 0Auth2 Works
In the short term price and value don't have to align.
Outliers were removed to get a better measure of the "accuracy" of the price targets.

10 day windows were used to reduce the amount of volatility/noise in a time frame

Return horizons for 1 years was used because price targets are for one year.

Theres only 15 or so analysts I looked at.

I was doing this as an exploratory data analysis and didn't want to pull out my old stats textbook.

Cutoffs were chosen to reduce volatility of measurements since I was looking at percentages. A stock going from $1.5 to $2.0 is a 33% increase whereas the movement of $100 to $133 is significantly more impactful. Stock with lower market cap have more volatility. The minimum analyst rating was chosen to eliminate analysts with very small number of ratings as they would be unreliable.
The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity
Terrorist induction videos would clearly fall into Not-legal category. I think NSA can easily stand up resources to scan new videos as they arrive and tag as legal or not-legal. Or, we can demand a judge's decision on taking away someone's freedom of speech as the constitution clearly indicates.

And, I have a hunch that three letter acronym gov organizations dealing with keeping us safe would rather know who is interested in terrorist induction videos, and track them, than just remove the videos and let opinions fester at an isolated individual level (lone wolf).
Top 10 performers out of 16 or so analysts in the analysis is not survivor bias.
How do you measure top ten if you don't have a ranking system?
What about using google in an incognito tab?
From your link : "Why are weather forecasters succeeding when other predictors fail? It’s because long ago they came to accept the imperfections in their knowledge. That helped them understand that even the most sophisticated computers, combing through seemingly limitless data, are painfully ill equipped to predict something as dynamic as weather all by themselves. So as fields like economics began relying more on Big Data, meteorologists recognized that data on its own isn’t enough."
They are still liable. They unleashed it upon the world.

Can't wait till they are sued out of their bubble.
"We" don't do anything with people - we don't own them. They do whatever they want to do with themselves. Maybe art and crafts. Maybe some meaningless but interesting research. Maybe just live a life of pleasure. I suspect there'd be a lot of different answers. None of them are wrong.
Not just Jared Diamond. There's a whole school of thought (albeit very small and disrespected) built around the concept. From wiki:

>Anarcho-primitivism is an anarchist critique of the origins and progress of civilization. According to anarcho-primitivism, the shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural subsistence gave rise to social stratification, coercion, alienation, and population growth.
As someone who suspects I may at least somewhat suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, you're... not even all that wrong.

I know that science is now saying that "decision fatigue" doesn't exist, but I think they measured the wrong thing. It's straight up "give a fuck fatigue". It isn't work that does it to me; I can go to work, enjoy work, get enough shit done that the money keeps coming in and my customers are happy with the service I provide.

You know what drains me? The boringness of being an adult and having nothing to actually really look forwards to.

Sometimes I'll sleep 10 hours straight and get up tired. Sometimes I have to do the mental equivalent of grinding my transmission gears because I'm not paying attention to the clutch, so the flow state never, well, flows. The mindless activities are hard to concentrate on, but they need to be done, so I exert far more give-a-fuck-ium than I should have to.

And the thing is, I've always been this way. I didn't become this way, I didn't slowly turn into this, I didn't become burned out. It's part of me.

I mean, I'm most certainly an introvert, so are a lot of the HN community; being with people in social situations are extremely taxing at times... it, too, burns a lot of my precious give-a-fuck-ium.

You know what recharges me? Having a good time with someone I know, where we both enjoy each other's company, where its a nice relaxed thing where neither of us have anything to prove to the other.

Problem is, women are people too. I mean, we're a male-centric community here, we work in male-centric environments, sometimes people like us forget... women have all the same problems we do. They have just as many problems connecting as we do., and we keep circling around in these holding patterns and just grinding their gears because they never find that one person to connect with just as we can't.

You can't just give someone that beautiful woman. They need the right beautiful woman. I think the problem that keeps happening for a lot of us is we keep finding the wrong women... not bad women, just wrong for us. It really throws a wrench in things because humans seem to need those close relationships with others to function properly, and we're not making them... and it's sapping our ability to regenerate our give-a-fuck-ium.
Ah, but there is. Because if the smart contract "enforces itself" in a way that contract law doesn't recognize as valid, then the law can force the reversal of said contract.
>Sure. And former Google CEO Eric Schmidt famously remarked on the subject of privacy, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."

This is constantly posted out of context.

"If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place, but if you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines including Google do retain this information for some time, and it's important, for example that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act. It is possible that that information could be made available to the authorities."

He is talking about not using their services because they are subject to US law, which specifically violates privacy by its very nature.

Schmidt also said:

"You have to fight for your privacy, or you will lose it. Whenever there’s a conflict, the logic of security will trump the right to privacy."

There's more nuance to him than that quote.
Tech Companies Shouldn't Embrace Ideologies
>If you're so sure why not short Bitcoin? I dare you.
>I believe in Crypto, I believe it has a future and its need in this world.

What do you make of people who fall into both categories? I use bitcoin as part of my payment processor in some cases and in that way I recognise its use as store of value (if only transiently).
However, I also recognise that there is a market for the token that we call bitcoin, with a wide variety of people willing to buy and sell them in reasonable volume at a (very) dynamic price for my use case.

Why do you seem to propose that bitcoin does not behave as other assets that can be described in the same way?
I fear that it's becoming a catchall-diagnosis for illnesses the doctors don't understand and can't cure. The current catchall is "it's psychosomatic" or "get over it already you lazy *". Most doctors can only handle diseases that can be cured by pills or cutting up the patient. With CFS we have something that seems to cleverly evade all attempts to cure it or even define what it actually is and how to properly diagnose it. I surely do hope that this changes soon!
So does YouTube want to look like an ISIS supporter? Or at least, that it doesn't approve of criticizing ISIS?
You're thinking of Gödel numbering which is an elegant technique used extensively throughout that proof. He uses it to map logical symbols, statements and entire proofs to natural numbers and then proceeds to prove things about those statements and proofs by referring to them via their Gödel numbers.
Omega Tau - Interviews with tech and science people talking about their area of interest. Lots of episodes on aviation, and space exploration in particular. It has a good level of technical depth. Highly recommended!
I've read nothing new from this article, but I've never heard of that app RYL and the concept that you can occupy the mic with one app at the time.

Apart from the fact that that app will be listening all your day and that will make your phone containing sensible information anyway, I could be leaked as easily as that information is also stored as compressed as possible, for easy and non noticeable way in your internet footprint.
Yet you can trust an app who's not open source, if your read their manifesto.

I wonder if this article was all about RYL anyway.
The advertisers would find it suitable to chase a bubble e.g. greens, nationalists, globalist, feminist, religions etc.

I think a good strong case can be made to advertisers that their ad will only be served to people opting into a certain bubble. Or reverse of that i.e. show my Ads to all people except those who are in this bubble. Inclusion list and exclusion list.
I haven't voted in this article either way, but my take on why people might be downvoting you are twofold:

1) You've come into a thread that is specifically looking at men's problems, and made it about feminism and your own highly female-oriented viewpoints: "As a feminist", the (justifiable) fear that people make this out as "men's problems are more important than women's problems", "allowing women to be strong and independent, I think we also must allow men to be weak and to ask for help if they need it.".

If people came into a thread about sexism in the work place and explained an opinion with similar words with flipped gender, they would be criticised.

2) For the worse, the terms you pick out yourself have been coopted by an unfortunate group who use them to push their own agenda, who go around with mugs marked "Male Tears", gleeful in the support of a minority of people abusing the term and the quiet tolerance of many more. They don't represent feminism or progressive values. But they do use the words most loudly, and that develops unfortunate connotations.

Overall, your points may be valid, but your expression of them alienates the people this article is about and addresses.
It's possible to get open-source software with support contracts. Red Hat and Canonical are two companies that offer this. However, there does seem to be a gap in the market for a company that offers similar support contracts for open-source software running on Windows and OS X.
Ver is a convicted felon. He's also the guy who posted a video saying he'd looked at Mt. Gox's records and they had all the assets they said they had.
Calling it "CLIs are hard" is trivializing it but anyway, it depends on what your common case is. For C/C++, CLIs slow me down tremendously. In an IDE, You don't need to type a single command to view program state (automatic + local + thread storage), call stacks, memory usage, CPU Usage, Heap activity, unpacked C++ containers, GPU state, etc. But this is not even that impressive TBH. FME Windows in general is better at debug symbol management than Linux especially when it comes to shipped binaries. The post[0] sums it up nicely:

"I can take a crash dump file from a customer running an arbitrary version of our games, running on an arbitrary version of Windows, load it into the debugger and have all of the symbols automatically show up. I don’t need to know or care what version of the game or what service pack of Windows the customer was running, and I don’t need to think about package names or new repositories. The symbols and binaries Just. Show. Up."

[0]https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/symbols-on-linu...
I mean, why not wait till it is deemed illegal by the authorities and due process? How can you take away someone's freedom of speech?

It's not like the AI has absolute idea of what is 'extremist' content, it's just enforcing someone idea of what it is. AI is trained on data, and whoever labeled that data is the person/s who are winning here.
I sold mine a few days ago around $3100 which is slightly annoying. I did buy most of them at about $500 though. At this price there is definitely going to a be a sell off and I'll get in again then.
> which means the price could go down to $1000 for a year temporarily, than back up to $10000

I'm bullish on Bitcoin, but you should also acknowledge the price could go to down to $1000 or $100 or $0 and stay there.
Yes, the private sector has a right to hire or fire.
The root cause of depression is chemical not psychological. It's a natural process and everybody gets depressed sometimes. If you get depressed, you can fix it by behaving like a normal person following normal person schedules and doing normal person things like sports and eating good food. Well... unless you can't because you're really sick and not just depressed. Those with CFS have tried following the recipy of getting cured and failed. Time and time again. Sometimes they succeed for no good reason but mostly after some time of being normal it all falls apart again.
Well, some ISPs have in their contracts a free custom mail and webserver for every customer (for example, mine does).

This obviously diversifies the options quite a bit.
"great things about code review is that it diffuses blame"
Yes! A code author and code reviewer(s) have equally signed off on it.

Personally I always want to know if something I did has affected people in whatever way so that I can learn from it.
Sending money is a good use case.
2010 flag!
This isn't necessarily about efficiency, or economics, but rather more about power, and influence. It seems that technology has so far acted as a consolidator of power rather than a distributor of one, even though it has fundamentally changed the economics of many things by making tasks more efficient. Technology has yet to affect change in the fundamental ways we govern ourselves, and control our economics. So the problem isn't economics, but who controls it, and who profits from it.
Well, do you have it spelled out somewhere? Want to spell it out? Otherwise, what's the point of bringing it up? Me too am completely unchallenged in my actual viewpoints, but I gotta run. That's pointless.

> Basically your argument lies in the "virtue ethics" category of philosophy which argues that man-qua-man should be the best man possible.

No, my argument is what I actually wrote, in short that I want the psychological problems and the obedience to them sorted out before we magnify it all so much it becomes impossible to sort out.

It's like we're driving this car at on a perfectly straight road at 80 mp/h, and some say "steering locked in, activate nitros" and I'm saying "actually, we're slightly skewed, if we use the nitro before correcting that we'll smash into a tree". And in response I get "oh, so you don't like Jazz" or something equally non-reassuring.
This company lets you set up a self-directed IRA and buy Bitcoin or Ethereum with your IRA https://bitcoinira.com I don't know if this is legitimate or not.
Umberto Eco defines a novel as a "machine to create interpretations".
You might want to check out "The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate" by Peter Wohlleben. It's an enjoyable book that covers similar topics, also available as an audiobook.