skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No answer to my question as to why as a white man I am the worst enemy of the SJW.
Never ever compromise salary for equity.

The equity is what you get in exchange for the risk that the company will not be successful; and for all the extra hours you'll probably be working.

The salary is what you get because that is how much your position pays in the market.

Things to compromise salary for:

- You need a job badly. You're already planning your own exit.

- If you were to get a higher salary somewhere else, you'd still prefer to work here.

- You don't need the money.
They love Mickey Mouse already for 90 years. Merchandising, too. That started already in the 1930s.

Daffy Duck was referenced in Babylon 5 which plays in the 2250s and it felt believable. Shakespeare plays are still popular and adapted today, that's even longer ago.

I don't think that Disney and its IP will go away any time soon.
https://www.designer.io not open source though ...
I agree that it is almost certainly not worth the time and effort to create a great Rpi + qemu experience out of the box. But we disagree about the problem. The problem has nothing to do with user mode and emulation overhead and the CPU of an Rpi. The problem is running x86 apps on the Rpi because that is the user's problem. That's the beginning and end of it. For most people, qemu is the wrong solution because qemu is not designed and developed for most people. It is developed for industry. Its use mostly depends on an institutional knowledge base and technical culture in the places it is deployed.

To put it another way, if a hobbyist has an Rpi then "buy an x86 board" might be kinda sorta be missing the point...part of the point is often running things on the Rpi. Even at the technical end, running an x86 board to make LED's blink or to warn when the ficus needs watering requires engagement with a different culture. x86 boards are not marketed and sold and blogged about and Youtubed like Rpi's.

One of the features of the Rpi is that it is accessible. There is a well established channel and culture around selling them one at a time to people who will only ever buy one. That's not the world that most open source projects live in.
A lot of it's an observation of where we already are, not a warning about what's coming.

[EDIT] in fact I'd class a solid 4 of the first 6 episodes as mostly about general human nature, or about where the interaction of technology/society is currently at. The new season's (well, also the Christmas special) kind of a departure in that it's latched more firmly onto the warnings about the future and Twilight Zone-ish aspects of the series, which had previously been more subdued. Be Right Back and The Entire History of You are the ones from the first 6 that I'd class as mostly about what future technology might do to us, though I'd be open to arguments against that classification for Entire History, certainly—I'd have to re-watch it to be sure, but my recollection of it is that it's only marginally in that category.
"... eroded democracy and social justice, and savaged the welfare state with austerity...". The article just reads like very modern terminology like it was written by someone in their twenties or thirties. Not that people's vocabulary cannot change over time but it seems odd.
It sure is annoying, but that has more to do with the programmers ourselves, not the Web.

If anything I think the push button web app publishing has done more good than bad. For example I can't imagine how I would have taught myself to program if there weren't things like AWS or heroku.

We shouldn't make value judgment on the technology because of the bad actors that take advantage of it.
def memento(x=Float::INFINITY)
memento(x-1)
end
United States Camel Corps
>Bitcoin is very anti-anonymous.

That's correct. It is very anti-anonymous by its design; its security rests everyone verifying the transactions. The distinction you make is the same one I attempt to make by arguing against anonymity as a goal. Both Bitcoin and Tor are, in the mind of the public, construed as ways to be anonymous on the Internet. That is dangerous.
Ah yes, now to update a few million lines of code. Be right back.
Is this restricted to the UK? From the US i get warnings this isn't allowed in my country.
It doesn't seem sensationalized to me, but I don't know much about the domain. Other ways to phrase a comment are "This isn't very dangerous in practice" or "This won't work on modern hardware" or "The risk in this article is exaggerated".
Submit Free Infographics to Infozyum.com
Any load balancer can be configured or modified to target routable Pod IP addresses and skip node ports altogether. You'll have to integrate with the Kubernetes Endpoints API[1] and support dynamic backends. Another option would be to leverage Kubernetes' DNS and the SRV records[2] backing each service.

The reason node ports are used in the Cloud today is because most Cloud load balancing solutions only target VMs, not arbitrary endpoints such as containers, a limitation that will go away over time.

[1] Envoy with Kubernetes Endpoints integration: https://github.com/kelseyhightower/kubernetes-envoy-sds

[2] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/dns-...
I usually just write Graphviz dot files when I need something in a hurry.

Edit: nevermind, misunderstood; this isn't what you're looking for.
Imposter Syndrome is pretty common in CS/Software dev. I try to recognize it for what it is when I feel it and move along.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome
The question I have is whether or not Disney is willing to kill their golden goose: DVD sales. If they are willing to cannibalize these sales, then their service is going to be very good. If not, then it probably won't have a competitive price.

And don't think they also don't have staggering content costs. ESPN paid $3.5B just for NFL and NBA rights alone[1].

Ultimately their share holders will decide how much their willing to subsidize the service.

1. https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2017/06/26/espn-sports-righ...
iOS 11 has an option to disable this even when the app explicitly says they only support background location access.
I can't imagine the world where Netflix, Amazon, Disney, and HBO all coexist.
Show/Ask HN: Anonymous Global Product Manager Salary List
Do you mean Basic Attention Token? https://basicattentiontoken.org

Looks interesting. Thank you.
In that case, it does not help.
Think they will kill their golden goose?
> So if any charges are brought against anyone as a result they could most likely get any evidence from it thrown out because the initial warrant was too broad and violated their right preventing unlawful search?

No, IIRC, because you can only get evidence excluded if our were the target of the unlawful search; an unlawful search of Art's papers that turns up evidence used against Beth doesn't qualify for the exclusionary rule.
In C# 6.0 you can also make them properties instead of fields, though I have no idea if this works with your "Record" class.

public class TestClass
{
public int X { get; }
public string Y { get; }
public Guid Z { get; }

public TestClass(int x, string y, Guid z)
{
X = x;
Y = y;
Z = z;
}
}

And C# 7.0 shortens this to:

public class TestClass(
int X,
string Y,
Guid Z);
Aaronson would far rather take option 3. The only reason he doesn't is that his fans won't let him.
Apple has it's own hedge fund, so why not?
Note that something else also happens to the inode when it's not the only reference: removing a file changes the "nlink" counter on the inode.
"It’s interesting how differently the same topic can be explained by someone optimizing for status vs one for clarity."

From: Florent Crivello‏ @Altimor
https://twitter.com/Altimor/status/873648344425299968
I'll give you an upvote for that and continue to disagree in this particular case.

(But as I already mentioned I'm well aware that any possibility to censor speech seems likely to be abused.)
Well, you are really reaching there. Hitler liked Beethoven and so did Obama is not a valid comparison. I gave specific examples of undermining democracy. Building a healthcare system is not undermining democracy nor is bombing Libya. Bombing foreign countries is an American tradition like Football on Sunday
But he didn't just come out and say it; he was responding to numerous people who were asking him about it.
what's the point of your comment ? is it intended as art ? was it made simply for the fun of commenting ?
Most people came from CA are too liberal that is out of touch with reality, they ruined CA then came to TX for its next victim. I suggest them moving to North Korea directly instead. Without them Austin will be a much better place for sane people.

I can not wait for CA to become independent from the states.
>For Google, the hijack is the prime feature

what does google get out of it? The experience is better for users who like fast, lightweight pages, but as far as i can tell there's no tangible direct benefit to google when you load an AMP page. The only benefit to google is if their users like the experience and continue to use Google search so they can access AMP-cached pages. If users don't like AMP, google gets no benefit.

or am i missing something?
I think the meme of "never say anything harsh lest you make someone sad" is counterproductive. It's very important to productive discourse that people are able to express the entire range of intensity with which they may feel an opinion. In particular, if something is stupid you should be able to say so.
And once again you ignore the elephant in the room. The neo-nazis and white supremacists irrespective of any violent acts are wrong and should be vehemently and regularly denounced as unamerican detestable organizations. BLM has a good mission and purpose. Yes there may be some individuals in the organization that have reacted in inappropriate and violent ways, but the organization as a whole is a positive thing. By not denouncing the neo-nazis and white supremacists in general, and specifically in this case where they resorted to violence, Trump is tacitly approving of them, which shows he is wholly inappropriate to be the president of the United States.
Key highlight:

"Of the 54 men who have graduated from the six programmes run to date, there has been an 80pc drop in offending rates, and as many as 80pc of them have found employment or gone into further education."
ZCash is not Monero, is not fungible, and does not have complete privacy. I was very clear about this distinction in the previous post because ZCash is not the right answer, and every time something is said about Monero the next comment agrees about everything that makes Monero valuable, and then goes on to talk about ZCash as if the two are interchangeable. This is a false equivalence that can confuse readers who don't care to research better.
> I think the greed mentioned here is that SawStop is lobbying to make it mandatory for saws to use their technology

I don't think they are lobbying for saws to use their technology, but rather for saws to use -a- technology to stop the saw.

They just happen to have a patent on a technology with proven results that it works. The patent probably covers the sensing, the stopping of the blade, and reactive retraction system to move the blade downward quickly.

Another manufacturer would have to come up with alternatives to all or more of these to implement the same safety feature; or license the tech from SawStop.

Manufacturers have done the math, and have come to the conclusion that they want the profits over their customer's safety; maybe they also got input from their customers, and found that most wouldn't pay over a certain amount extra for the feature, and that amount was much lower than what R&D for a new method, or licensing SawStop would cost.

So - what's going on can be looked at as either SawStop being greedy, or they really want some kind of this technology to be put on saws (and other tools could benefit likely) - whether it is their's or something else. You can't fault them, though, for pursuing a lawsuit on patent infringement, if the it is being infringed. That's the point of patents.

It could be argued that this is somewhat about greed, though, because SawStop has been pursuing this with the FTC since they came to market with the tech. But I doubt that they are trying "regulatory capture" here - that would be fairly blatant, and I doubt even the current FTC would abide by that. It could turn out, though, that their tech is (so far) the only way to reliably stop a saw blade from spinning instantly.

Ultimately, we'll know what the truth is when the patent runs out:

If all the table saw manufacturers adopt a similar system, but charge only a little extra (but not the huge difference that SawStop does - which is likely a combination of R&D recovery, plus being a small manufacturer with different margins to recoup) - then they care about their customer's safety.

I'm cynical, though - I guess I've lived too long. I expect they'll either adopt something then charge just as much or more as SawStop does currently, or they'll not do anything (but likely increase their prices anyhow).
It's a toy project. Looks like a fun way to brush up on pthreads and play with self-modifying code. The fun part about reading it (for me, at least) is the novel idea of using the plot of Inception as the "spec" for the program's behavior. :)
> Designed a national healthcare system with a close analogue in Hitler's national socialist healthcare

And this is bad... why?

As a European that has lived in 3 countries with free public health, I always find this argument baffling.
"In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
You don't typically comment, so I'm unsure if I should consider this as some sort of a (pre?) warning.

I'm a leftist. But what I see right now on the left deeply concerns me and makes me reconsider, stuff like black people advocating black only areas or events, which is ironic, because in the 60 they were fighting exactly against this, or leftists justifying and advocating violence against the extreme right, using the all time favorite excuse that "bad people deserve to be beaten".

FWIW I also got the impression that certain kinds of articles quickly disappear from the front page, and you can see on them more comments than upvotes, which is in general unusual and which suggests heavy downvoting. So to me it doesn't appear that the community is balanced. Which is not to say that this is a bad thing, many times some views are better than others.
As amazing as it may sound to you, much of population of the world doesn't have a CC. And not everyone trusts or likes to support Paypal.
+ Hulu
Can you short sell bitcoin?
> It would be true for all practical purposes.

But that's not how mathematical proofs work.
And then there's the ability to sleep at night without your roommate having a conversation next your door at 2 AM, a different set of roommates that expected only you to take out the trash, another roommate that blasted tv next to your door at 2 AM, having to switch out a good roommate with someone who might also be terrible when they leave, not having your own space to work and focus on the job and hobbies, etc. etc. There is no delayed gratification when there is nothing to work towards to as you slowly go insane living with people who have no idea what it means to be "quiet" at night nor have a basic level of accountability/self-awareness, even if they say they do.
The purpose wasn't to prove that Google is using its diversity programs for nefarious purposes; only to raise the question that Google's diversity aims might be misguided and even potentially harmful per their stated goals. He supports his argument by pointing to studies that suggest men and women may be differently interested, in which case we shouldn't expect 50/50 distribution.

Perhaps whether or not Google's diversity programs are lowering the bar is the more important question; it's also one he likely wasn't well-positioned to tackle (it requires a lot more resources to prove/disprove bar-lowering compared to writing a memo to express a concern).
Uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
Every SSD works that way? Is that a standard?
You aren't addressing the issue people have with AMP though. There's no reason Google couldn't boost site rankings and provide the little logo to compliant sitea and still allow the sites to host under their own domain.
I'm not sure how this is a reasonable conclusion given that over 500 nuclear weapons were detonated during above-ground nuclear testing.

It's also worth mentioning that air burst detonation will suck up virtually no debris from the surface, and also produces very little fallout.

There's a lot of good information at this site:
http://www.nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
> Most early humans cooperated and shared because they spent their entire lives surrounded by the same a few hundred people.

That and, as far as I understand, when they went hunting, only a few get lucky, and those couldn't eat all the meat themselves before it spoiled.
> You know, if I was invested in eg IPFS I would post night and day in all forums subtle not too obvious hints how great IPFS is (pump) and then I would dump them.

Credibility is much more apparent than you may think on sites like HN/Reddit. Shameless self-promotion without any substance won't get you far.

Fortunately software doesn't live or die on name recognition via random posts on social media but on whether people actually find it useful.

If this was someone's plan to make money on their investments they are wasting their time. Unless, maybe, they are a minor celebrity with a lot of reach.

Disclaimers on whether you own some tokens in a company is of marginal interest to me (authoring news stories is another matter), I'll judge the value of it by the proposition being made. Otherwise I'm pretty sure anyone who's been on the internet for a long enough time knows better than to take any recommendation at face value from comment threads. And being an investor is a sign of confidence, it doesn't automatically mean you are deluded by the idea or are only motivated in pumping it up for a cheap profit.

Either way if someone's plan is to engage in pump and dump schemes they'll always be at a high risk of being in a race to the bottom trying to exit before everyone else with the same half-baked idea of getting rich quick. It's not as clever as you make it out to be. There is always a far higher probability that they were the actual 'bigger fool' in any scheme than they people they hoped to recruit.
That is a thin line if anything is.

When you're glorifying and trying to restart a regime that has killed a few million people and only didn't kill more people necause they failed that is veeery close IMO.
Using Zuckerberg/Jobs/Bezos/Gates as archetypal examples of founders is a terrible idea as they are extreme -- and I mean EXTREME -- outliers.

I also don't get how Jennifer Lawrence fits in any of this. As a counter-example, Chris Pratt, an equally-successful actor, was discovered by a stroke of luck when he was waiting tables in Hawaii.

Listen, I get it. It's cute to come up with pseudo-mathematical models that justify one opinion over another and that might help us make decision-making easier (Startup A vs. Startup B), but allow me to make a controversial point: if you're thinking about working for a startup, don't. Starups traditionally underpay (due to offering equity), often have brogrammer cultures (and no real HR departments), will fire/lay you off at the drop of a hat, and working late hours with little recognition will be expected. The only exception to this rule is if you're one of the first ten-ish employees -- and, obviously, if you're a founder.

For obvious reasons, cap tables highly favor early investors and owners. If you have a high-risk/high-reward type A personality, start a company! If you just want to have a career for a few dozen years and then more-or-less comfortably retire, join Google, or Facebook, or whatever. It makes absolutely no sense to join a startup if you're not even getting one point of equity.

Further, vesting will absolutely screw employees -- with either inflated share costs (if you leave the company) or with unfair lockout schedules (if you ever IPO). Not only that, but equity is utterly opaque: you literally have no idea how much it's actually worth. It's important to understand that startups are a gamble for founders and for investors -- which is exactly why I love startups: it's a perfect mix of skill and luck. With that said, in my opinion, for mid-to-late stage employees, the opportunity cost no longer makes sense. Unless you need a job to pay rent -- I've been there :)
Are you saying that global latency is not measurable?
How we built the unbeatable Dota 2 bot
Eventually, yes. In 2019, when Disney's service is set to launch, how many people do you think will still be buying DVDs? There'll be a few collectors and old people who will never switch to streaming services, but the potential for cannibalization sounds fairly low to me.
I think we're talking past each other and don't actually disagree. To clarify my last post: I don't approve of what Aaronson did. I think it was a dumb thing to say and (assuming my hypothesis is correct that he did it out of frustration at constantly being pestered to comment on CS news) he instead should've cooled off and, as you say, taken option 3. I think he was aiming his statements at his fans, not academia, and in his frustration forgot that there's no such thing anymore as a message only directed at one group.

I just want the problem with his behavior to be accurately diagnosed, because I think (again, I could be wrong) the solution is "better manage your temper with your non-academia fans" and not "rethink your relationship with other academics".
One works and one isn't maintained.
If you want to go that route then Google, Facebook, and Amazon aren't tech companies either.
I'll check out apis for this. I do have a few ideas if I can position via a GPS signal only.
This is making waves in the Dota 2 community over at https://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/6u2xvm/more_info_on_...

My favorite part:

The first step in the project was figuring out how to run Dota 2 in the cloud on a physical GPU. The game gave an obscure error message on GPU cloud instances. But when starting it on Greg’s personal GPU desktop (which is the desktop brought onstage during the show), we noticed that Dota booted when the monitor was plugged in, but gave the same error message when unplugged. So we configured our cloud GPU instances to pretend there was a physical monitor attached.

Dota didn’t support custom dedicated servers at the time, meaning that running scalably and without a GPU was possible only with very slow software rendering. We then created a shim to stub out most OpenGL calls, except the ones needed to boot.
Explaining why they moved to San Francisco in the first place?
I noticed that also.
Content actually seems like an area where you don't have overwhelming network effects. You're mostly funding a bunch of individual creatives and production companies on mostly a project by project basis. A lot is about personal relationships.

If you take Disney (less ESPN) and HBO specifically, they're pretty much diametrically different brands so it's pretty easy to see them coexisting.
Oh and the copywrite on seeds. Which even if the GMO "patented" Monsanto seeds blow onto your property and grow; can still cause problems for you
I had rectal bleeding similar to the OP. My GP dismissed this as probably just a hemorrhoid, and due to my age at the time (42) didn't refer me to a gastroenterologist. Almost cost me my life. A year later, the symptoms persisted and he finally made the referral. The gastro doc knew instantly upon exam that I was in serious trouble. A scope turned up a 5cm tumor that required a full resection. Luckily I survived to write this post; 12 years that have been a blessing. To anyone with rectal bleeding of any type, see your GP and ask for a referral to a specialist, regardless of age!