skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, in one of these ways [...]"

"You" in this context meaning the licensee, not the licensor. I don't see anything in Section 6 (or elsewhere) that creates any obligations for the licensor. My naive reading of the license indicates that the licensee can redistribute ("convey") the software only if they also convey the source code. But if they are unable to do so (because the source was not conveyed to them) then they simply may not redistribute the software at all.
This is a good idea. I'm going to implement it as a timeline I think.
Can we wean Elon Musk off government support already?
I'd love a fact-based comparison of bitcoin mining vs gold / nickel / aluminum production, in kWh spent per $1000 of value mined. I suspect bitcoin would look relatively favorably, especially if you factor in no space being taken to store the waste, and nearly no water consumed / contaminated.
Would this not be down to the GPU, if it's told to use full screen without windowing, then it'll be more efficient?
Don't put too much weight into his analysis. There are folks who spend their entire professional careers studying the economy and they haven't, on average, ever correctly predicted how the stock market will perform.

I don't want to knock on OP's analysis here, but it's important to remember the famous quote (maybe by Keynes?), "The market can remain irrational much longer than you will remain solvent"
I feel as though the "stock market" following the 2008 crisis has become further insulated from the larger economies fundamentals. wages can continue to not keep up with inflation, savings rate continues it's downward slide, household debt service payments consume an ever increasing slice of disposable income, etc... all the while the type of dramatic dislocation event similar to 1929, 1987 are unlikely to occur. the market "circuit breakers" ensure any crash is a slow moving trend and not a single calamitous event.
That's a very different machine though. I'm talking about the T460s.
Wonderful to see people reinventing taxation from the first principles: "awesome country to live in, with great education and social security, but these are expensive countries, from a Tax perspective"
Maybe you mean venomous in a way that threatens a human.

That's true of every continent.
This looks cool! I wish I could afford an Echo Show :)
This is a good post, many people adopt using this kind of "services" package already. Most of the Time I call mine a 'manager' however.
Show HN: Jot – REST API Documentation Generation for Laravel
> If the world's economies ran on bitcoin we would need a stupendous amount of energy to keep the miners running.

You've misunderstood something about Bitcoin if you think this is true. Bitcoin miners use resources based on the logic of competing with each other for the value of the mining reward, not based on the number of transactions they process. If Bitcoin solved all its scaling problems so that everyone in the world could use Bitcoin, but mining rewards remained constant, the resources the miners expend to collect the reward wouldn't be any different from today.
TL:DR; because Firefox adopted the Web Extensions format and even links chrome.* to the same browser.* api, so all you need to do is change a couple of things in your manifest.json and you're good to go.

What they don't say how long it takes for Firefox to approve your extension. I submitted an extension and I it took almost 3 months to get approved. I got put in a queue of about 300 at the time and the queue moved very slow. I think this is because an actual person is reviewing the extension and not some automated tool (I assume, maybe that live person is using an automated tool and then hand-checking the results)
Because it also means that you don't care if your driver doesn't have proper insurance or basic rights that workers fought for a century ago.

Most regulation is not the result of "idiot politicians", it's the result of customers demanding protection.
Show HN: Cryptofeed – Hacker News RSS Filter for Cryptocurrencies
Exactly. That's how it should work. I searched "love" and got passages "Lord Krishna [...] grieve" which the search included because of LO (from LOrd) and VE (from grieVE) - no mention at all of "love," so not what I was looking for. Just go with standard search.
As another commenter has said, student loan debt is included in household debt.
Do software engineers predominantly lean left? I think the left / right debate is quite outdated, with both sides having equally good (but also bad) ideas about certain subjects.

Why can't you lean left on healthcare and LGBT rights, yet more right on certain economic policies and tax issues?
How is the heat matrix diagram calculated? It seems to be wrong. Public Debt has a 3.7/10, while it looks like its around 8.5 in the heat diagram.

Looking at the individual ratings:
- Household Debt: 5.5 / 10
- Market Overvaluation: 9.1/10
- Market Volatility: 0.3/10
- Public Debt: 3.7/10
--> SUM = 18.6/40 or 46.5%

Also I noted: Drawing a linear trend line through the "Market Overvaluation" diagram, does make it look a lot better though. One could argue that people get used to certain levels, hence a growing trend over time.

Taking only these factors into account, it does not look like the market is gonna crash soon. In my opinion it's likely going to be caused by another factor not listed here ;)
This is at least partially true, but ignores the "reality on the ground." Even many entry-level jobs require a college degree now, and forgoing a college education makes you unhirable in many markets. Until that changes, "college you can't afford" is pretty much a mandatory expense.

There are ways to minimize the cost -- basically two years at a community college and two years at a state school -- but the days of being able to afford college by working a part time job are long over. The reality is, if you want to participate in today's job market, you probably must take on at least some college debt.
You've just described lifestyle marketing and the entire lifestyle segment. There are exceptions, of course, but there's a lot of money sunk into messaging mass produced items as something other than that. It's really interesting.
all culture is brainwashing. it's just if someone agrees with it they don't call it that.
And we also need to make the loans dischargable and place some of the burden on educational institutions. Aside from universities that can be very selective, all other schools have an incentive to bring in as many students as they can. They have no financial risk if the students drop out.
For market overvaluation, it says: 9.1 / 10 "DEFCON 4"

DEFCON 5 is peacetime, DEFCON 1 is imminent nuclear war. For example, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US reached DEFCON 2. Should this say DEFCON 2 instead? Or is "above" normal readiness the intended meaning?
Apple does it very well:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/david-pogue-on-iphone-voiceov...
I've never seen market valuation expressed as market cap as % of GDP. I'm not an economist, so I'll leave the detailed arguments to them. But it would be at least useful to explain why you think this is a meaningful metric as compared to those typically used to measure market valuation (e.g. P/E ratios etc.).

Your graph also ties your valuation metric to the 2000 peak and the 2008 peak. However, there were crashes in 1990 and 1987 as well. Should readers conclude that the 1987 peak level was also too high, and that therefore the last ~30 years have also been too high as well? (Abstaining from investing in the stock market at levels above the 1987 crash would have resulted in the loss of tremendous opportunity for wealth creation.)

There are a lot of opinions implicitly expressed in this site; it would be good to try to make those explicit.
Globalization is the cause of inequality. Technology just facilitates it. Capitalism leads to a concentration of wealth in the hands of a few and periods of globalization have resulted in high levels of inequality. Inequality today is comparable to the levels during the gilded age and there was no IT back in the 1870's.
DSW has a rack in the back of every store with heavily discounted (50+%) shoes. Good quality, great price, limited selection. 10/10
> I had a status problem that was presenting as loneliness.

There is a lot more to loneliness than a superficial fixation with status.

You could be the president of the US or achieve all you hoped for and still be afflicted with loneliness.

I'd argue that success is leads to loneliness as much as the lack of success.

Also, I think rather than a psychological/therapy problem, loneliness is a philosophical problem. We all have friends, families, networks, etc, but the more aware we become/the wiser/more philosophical, the more we realize that we are truly alone. No matter what, we were born "alone" and we die "alone".

There are coping mechanisms ( religion, new age life force, etc ) but from a philosophical point of view, it is the understanding that we are all "consciously" alone. Nobody can truly know us and that we are ultimately all alone.

Sometimes, the loneliest place on earth is at a holiday gathering surrounded by your friends and family.
The person from Ukraine is in the loop anyway, except currently they are employed by BigCo1 at $1/day and still BigCo1 charges you $100/h for services taking all the arbitrage profits.

The goal is to dis-intermediate, to enable person to person (customer & supplier) to profit from the living cos / efficiency arbitrage.
That’s my experience as well.
Good example and cool product. But we have a SaaS product with a pretty clear vision and are trying to hook some early users. Does this mean we should keep building functionality?
> Shrugging it off with “what good does it do?” is only possible if you aren't affected by that and it's not a neutral position since it's effectively saying that the reactionary position is okay with you.

You know nothing about me.

I work in academia. We have one of the largest "Gender Studies" (Read womens' studies, men need not apply). Yet our IT in my group is 100% sausagefest.

I know of women who've applied. I'm not privy to the interviews at my time and tenure... but it's completely bullshit to say that every woman is not competent to do my job.

What can I do? I'm sure I could do an email campaign like this. But I'm 1 person, and I'm looking to work elsewhere due to managerial "issues". It's not MY problem to solve ineffectual and bad management. But my solution is to leave.

> It also ignores a lot of good which has come out of these discussions. I've seen a number of colleagues become far more thoughtful about interaction patterns, social structure, etc. in response to this discussion and they've uniformly reported that this has improved the quality of work, too.

If one of the most "Liberal" universities can't get it right, why would I expect most anywhere to?

> That should not be surprising: after all, do problems in your applications go away if you don't monitor or discuss them? You may similarly have to deal with the guy who's really defensive to protect his perceived status but … he's not going to cause fewer problems if you don't.

The nail that sticks out gets the hammer.
So a quick calculation. 1 zettabyte if stored on 4GB HDD, that's 250 million hard drives. That's without any redundancy.

Quarterly production of hard drives is around 100-140 million. That's quite a big slice of global production.

The buying operation of this scale should be visible somewhere on the price charts.
Right, but this chart ignores that (as far as I can tell). If US listed companies are going to eat more of the global GDP, then it wouldn't be crazy that the value of the stocks will exceed GDP of the country in which it's listed (i.e., the fact that the value does exceed GDP might not be a precursor to a crash).
As far as I understand the GDPR, email hashes wouldn't be "anonymous" data at all, they'd be considered pseudo-anonymous (and therefore still PII)

I mean the problem is that this makes good-willed sites like haveibeenpwned.com illegal in the UK (with criminal sanctions) as they attempt to re-identify data that comes from a breach.

But on the other hand, I don't see why processing PII that comes from a data breach with the intent of de-anonymising it should be legal.

Maybe protections should be in place for security researchers, but how do you distinguish between them and malicious actors?
Did you listen to the podcast "Crimetown?"
Paris Aims to Overtake Frankfurt in Race for Brexit Bank Jobs
Army removes DJI drones
You should always use separate validation data anyway.
this isn't news, app nap existed in macOS when it was still called OS X
Can someone with an actual economics degree explain to me whether it's a valid criticism of the "Market cap as % of GDP" metric that many US companies derive value from multinational labor and consumption, and if not, why not? Thanks in advance.
>> and it's no more harmful than any other use of electricity
> That's a tautological statement.

Sure, if you take it out of the context of the rest of my comment. But OP asked if Bitcoin would stop being an ecological disaster, and my point is was that Bitcoin's ecological costs are primarily about the source of the electricity, not the amount of electricity.

Bitcoin mining uses about 170 MWe, continuously. That's really not very much in the grand picture of things. A few medium-sized fields of solar panels isn't an "ecological disaster".
Thanks for pointing to this one. I haven't seen the movie but there's some good representations for dense volumes of data there. I'd like to build some network health representation around this.
Yeah was trying to communicate "moderate risk", but it's kinda tongue in cheek.
mmhn not. Europe has examples in all those categories for example. Venomous mammals are rare in any case, but a few shrews have poison.

I wonder if in the case of the guy with wounded legs there was more than one actor involved.
It seems like the issue with manufacturers doing this is that optimizing for battery has diminishing returns (going from 11 hours from light load to heavy load) and most importantly people buy pretty.
What Is Hashing? Under the Hood of Blockchain
But while the household debt is huge, isn't it naturally balanced by the equally massive collateral the banks have in the houses themselves? I mean, sure Joe America has a $500k mortgage, but the bank has first position on Joe's house which is worth $675k.
So...you're agreeing with the point you replied to? They went the hard route and became successful, that's great for them! Do you think it would be the case if they stayed on benefits that they would be where they are today?

It's hard to go back in time and do that experiment, but I'd say with certainty that some stress and pressure leads to a net gain in the long run. Clearly in the short run that's not the case.
> Surely he had security clearances and made an oath not to break them

This is what I'm countering, perhaps something like this needs to be discussed as it's in the public interest.
How are you liking React Native? Kind of on the fence right now with learning it
I'm most impressed by the Ryzen 7. Only the i9 is faster and it's less than half the price of the i9 7900.

It outperforms the i7 5960 and it's similarly less than half the price.

AMD can compete well in the enthusiast-on-a-budget segment of the market.
Recently run into this in uni.
God save me from the highly educated minority who are always right and love to argue (with tenure). Basic fact: You don't know anything except what you are told by what I design.
I completely agree, this is going to be a problem for our generation. For those of us who are lucky enough to not have any student debt, how can we take advantage of this?
Strategy for Migrating Partitioned Tables from Oracle to PostgreSQL
These might be useful for you:

https://www.apple.com/batteries/maximizing-performance/

http://www.macworld.co.uk/feature/mac/17-tips-increase-mac-b...
This is a feature that has been called out by Apple in the past with regard to battery life. Even iPhones get better battery life when just doing video as opposed to other things. In part, it's because of specialized hardware for decoding. Even the headline here is misleading. It's not full screen mode. It's explicitly using features Apple has made available for some time now.

That this is surprising is really interesting. I honestly thought this was a known thing.
I wish there was some sort of full intro tutorial on finding strategies; ie: an example of a former signal (now traded away), the thought process, the data sourcing, statistical analysis, trading/signal strategy, etc..
It's hard for me to follow exactly what you're getting at here, but (to make an analogy to cryptography) it seems like you're saying it's hard to find a signal because we only have the apparently random output of a function, not the seed itself.

It's fairly true that (at least these days) you're not going to identify a signal just by looking at a timeseries of prices, no matter how granular your dataset is (up to and including tick data). There are pockets of repeating patterns but those are vanishingly small and fleeting; the prices themselves may as well be stochastic.

Essentially all funds are empowered with significant amount of data, and the prices themselves are just used for backtesting and sanity checking. It's the source of truth, but it's not the way in which new insights are identified. The signal comes from other types of data that is far more reversible.
I don't think that solopreneurship or option trading make sense giving your starting point. You are better off refreshing your skills and looking for jobs most downmarket.

Another alternative to look into would be a coding boot camp with good follow-on support. You'll breeze through the technical stuff, get up to speed, and have help getting introductions to companies.
> Mass automation doesn't remove the underclass; it just makes it a non-working underclass instead of a working underclass. That is not an improvement.

How is that not an improvement? So we have a certain segment of the population that doesn't produce, when we have such a small portion of the population producing such wealth, does it really matter? This whole argument is based on the predication that everyone must "earn their keep" and in the days where the hunters would leave the village daily to kill food, that was true, but when 2 of the hunters in our village bring home enough daily to feed the entire village 10 times over, is it really relevant the contribution of the other 20 hunters? Or is it more beneficial to the village to have them doing other things that while not intrinsically valuable, could improve the lives of the other villagers, the 2 hunters included?

It's a little hyperbolic I admit, but I'd like to think that once we reach the point where less and less actual work is required that we'll branch out into other things, not simply let people who aren't working die off in the streets. Man was not made to toil daily for his meager wage and die.
>The difference here is, if you have a society/governance structure that rejects the notion of using violence to enforce certain beliefs on others, there'd be no mechanism for keeping people in slavery.

Slavery is based on using force to have others do your work, serve your interests -- not in enforcing certain beliefs in others. So it's not enough to have a "a society/governance structure that rejects the notion of using violence to enforce certain beliefs on others", but also to have a society that it or individuals also don't use force to serve their private interests.

While looks unlikely. How would such a society would enforce no slavery if people still profited from having slaves? It should punish those that do to prevent that (and thus it couldn't fully embrace the non-violence thing).

>(A society rejecting violence in the absolute sense would barely even support notions of property, yet alone slavery.*

Is such a society possible? Only if it has everybody's agreement (not to be violent, use violence when it suits them, etc). Else the society would have to use violence itself (that is, some kind of police) to maintain the non-violence in its members.

>The difference stems from the fact that neglect is a passive harm; if the person doing the neglect didn't exist, the neglectee wouldn't be in a better situation. If the man watching the downing man didn't exist, the drowning man isn't more likely to be saved. Violence is an active harm: if the person doing the violence didn't exist, the victim would be better off (at least from the victim's perspective); if the slaver didn't exist, the slave would be better off.

Well, if the "man watching the drowning man" was punished for his non-involvement, then future drowning men would be better off. So it might seem like it's a totally passive harm, but it actually affects the future of what's acceptable.

(Not to mention that the drowning man, assuming he eventually managed to escape, would probably rejoice in seeing the "man watching him" getting punished for not trying to help him).
How would you calculate Market overvaluation?
> So now we have click-baity academic papers?

As academic paper titles go this is pretty normal.

> Can someone summarizes to me the genius behind the idea?

I'm reading quickly, but I think the idea is that the reason we need proof-of-work is to prevent Sybil attacks, that is, a single entity pretending to be 50% of the network via spoofed identities. So you have a concept of persistent identity for each (apparent) member of the network, and you require nodes to solve a computational problem when they join the network and also periodically while they're in the network. This puts relatively little computational load on each participant, but puts a lot of load on a long-term attacker, and even more work on a short-term attacker who's trying to claim a bunch of identities in a hurry.

I'm not sure how much this actually helps Bitcoin, since my impression is that the computational load is what's needed to match the abilities of the legitimate members of the network. I guess the trick is that maybe you can make the block-mining difficulty scale up less aggressively over time, but I'm not following that logic yet.
PyTorch Examples in Vision, Text, Reinforcement Learning
> As they note at the end, this only applies to OS X with QuickTime, but not to Windows 10 on the same hardware.

> > Using the Windows Media Player in Bootcamp, power consumption was at a much higher 28.2 W, and we found absolutely no difference between regular and full screen playback.

Windows was less efficient overall, just with no difference in full-screen.
Check out the improved level of gaming on Retropie
On that note, China is not remotely as understanding as the United States when it comes to these things.
DWM is gimped compared to Windows Vista/7 for battery life reasons. That’s why blur (Aero theme) went away in Windows 8.

Apple started implementing variable refresh in iPads, but not on their Macs as far as I know.
How to get 10K views in 7 Days – [With Proof]
Sure, but what's the big difference between the S and the 3, other than the insane mode (at +100k)? The S will cost 2x much for not much added features.
Having served and learned to use weapons in the military. With a hell of a lot of training both as a solider then as an instructor, being around civilians and watching how badly/unsafely so many of them use weapons, I always find myself slightly nervous. Though as military I would also same the same about police :)
IIRC it's rather AVX-heavy.
Hedge fund 13-F Replication
The answer is of course: YES.

The more important question is when, and the answer to that is "who knows".

The market is a chaotic system, with severe non-linear responses. As such, it can remain stable much longer than people think, and crash much harder than anyone expects.
I'm working on a small solidity/Ethereum project.