skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That would be true if 1 + 1 = 2 but stock pricing changes by the minute/day/good news/scandal/hiring/firing, etc. Some of their valuations may have been on the money for the minute that it was determined but so many factors come into play even a huge over-valuation could even out next week based on a great quarterly report or a contract signed or if the right CEO is hired on an otherwise adrift ship.
and in other countries they can't even do a background check.

some countries even wipe criminal records after some time.
Woah I never said anything about feeding a baby cow milk! We're talking about an 18 month old here.
Yeah but if it's not flattering that might not be worth it.
Another electric car – a Honda – debuts in Tesla's backyard
Network of Donald Trump's Tweets in 2017
The idea is that a felony is so egregious that you permanently lose some of the rights of civil society. Another right taken away forever is the right to own a firearm. The problem is that everything is a felony now.
All parts of DRM bother me equally.
Or: What is the lowest hanging fruit, err security threat, that I can easily counter? Scotch tape over the camera - check. What's the next lowest hanging fruit?

<tinfoil_hat> Driving a car which has an unknown number of cameras, microphones, and is constantly connected (and can not be disconnected while still retaining the ability to drive the car)? Perhaps that's not a car I would ever be able to trust, and perhaps its not a car I should buy. </tinfoil_hat>
It also depends on the state.
bcachefs seems especially exciting because the built-in crypto uses authenticated encryption in the form of ChaCha20Poly1305. Most disk encryption operates in an unauthenticated mode (such as XTS) which means the ciphertext is malleable on disk. This makes it's useful only for the case of your laptop getting stolen out of your car in the parking lot while turned off, but not for many more complicated scenarios (like trusting the data once the police recover your stolen laptop). With authenticated encryption, you're able to guarantee the authenticity and integrity of your files, in addition to encrypting them. Really great. The authentication tag naturally, then, doubles as what ZFS people refer to as their "checksums". I'm watching bcachefs closely to see how it matures.

http://bcachefs.org/Encryption/
mb doesnt use a camera.. it's based on your steering wheel inputs.

There is at least one manufacturer doing it though: DS has "driver attention monitoring" which does use a driver facing camera.

wikipedia has a good list of what manufacturers are using:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_drowsiness_detection
Plain old scotch tape works stupidly well too.
FWIW getting into tech as a stereotypical white male is also an uphill struggle. Years of ostracism as a nerd, discrimination in school and early social life. It wasn't a pleasant experience for me and not I expect for many. If anything, computers were a respite from the unpleasantness of social life.
How would you set up a btc lending (for shorts) contact with eth?
Yes. The second amendment is using the comma as an "and". It means that we have the right to both a well regulated militia and for the citizenry to own and bear arms. It is not for the purposes of conscripting the citizenry into some militia. It is intended for the citizenry to defend themselves, against tyrants and assailants.

If the second amendment was just about having a well regulated militia, then they would not have mentioned the second part about citizens bearing arms.
American here. I just don't understand the line of reasoning used above you.

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

If the intent is only a well regulated militia is to own arms why does it specifically call out the people in that way? Isn't "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" the justification for "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."? Its worded very oddly, if the intent actually was "the right of the government to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." why not say that?

Also, if the intent is to allow only governmental actors to own arms why does that right have to be specifically called out? The purpose of the constitution was to protect the people from government over reach has there ever been a nation where a totalitarian regime prevented his own army and police from having guns against the wishes of his people?
That article shows a graph indicating that Gas is taking over for the lack of coal plants, and wind/solar are plateaued.

People want a high return on their energy investment to power modern society.

I'm sure solar will get better, and I encourage the fledgling consumer market and small-scale deployments to improve the tech, but it's not ready today, and the longer idealists keep peddling the idea that it IS ready, the longer we accelerate global warming.
> At the same time, baby boomers are approaching retirement

It wouldn't have occurred to me that Japan had a baby boom. I suppose soldiers returning home in despair or in triumph are all looking for comfort and stability.
I'm certain he is up to at least two things: 1) getting paid 2) lending the credibility of his name to whatever google is up to
Lack of salary ranges up front is the main reason I only work through recruiters. Recruiters always know the salary and if you tell them your minimum salary requirements they won't bother you with jobs that are below that range.

Yes I know a lot of non scummy recruiters. I only deal with local recruiters and I form relationships with them before I'm actively looking.
But can't you be only either undervalued or overvalued? There is a knife's edge at properly valued but seems like almost all companies are one or the other.
I would not have expected Larry Page to have such a severe "I mean" verbal crutch.
Depends on the language.
> In my home state, you can get a DUI as a 100% sober driver

That is insanely stupid, if they're calling it an actual DUI. If you're not Under the Influence... how can it possibly be a DUI?

Ugh... Make up another regulation about open containers, but don't call it a DUI, because it's not, if you're sober.

If someone opened a container, in the backseat, while you're driving, perhaps without even your knowledge, you can get a DUI. Insane.
Be careful about making the incarceration debate a non-violent offender issue.

The issue is more complicated: plea bargains, additive sentencing, predatory prosecution, lack of public defense, and many issues..

You Americans have a lot of things to fix, there is no simple solution.
And you've seen nothing. Try out the functions APROPOS and INSPECT !
> Audio, not so much.

"
Haldeman: That the way to handle this now is for us to have Walters call Pat Gray and just say, “Stay the hell out of this…this is ah, business here we don’t want you to go any further on it.” That’s not an unusual development,…

Nixon: Um huh.
"
I like that rule, but I would extend ever so slightly:

If existing providers are anticompetitive, blockchains allow you to bootstrap an alternative without the same capital requirements you might need to compete with, say, VISA or Wells Fargo.

I'd also note that transacting across borders can easily make legal remedies cost prohibitive, especially for smaller transactions, even if both countries have mature legal systems. So I expect cross border activity to be more typical than the illegality example in the long run. But that fits your conditions as written, so this is just a quibble.
Kitchen Tile Catalog Complete
Charting Her Own Flight Plan
I'd say you don't really understand what you're critiquing; you think those things are bad because you heard they were, from someone else who likely doesn't understand it either. There's absolutely nothing wrong with short selling or high frequency trading. Short sellers help keep prices fair and companies honest, HFT makes trading cheaper for everyone.

The markets are worse without them, the market was worse before HFT which is the only thing new here, trades used to cost way more due to wall street middle men taking a big cut of every trade, far far bigger than HFT's take now. The only people who have a logically valid reason to hate HFT are the old school manual traders who were displaced by them and can no long make a living trading chart patterns. As late as the 70's and 80's there were people getting rich with strategies as stupid simple as buy the 10 day high and sell the 10 day low. Those people hate HFT, it took away their cash cow.

HFT is a sign of a healthy free market, better traders came in and offered to take your trades for far less money than the manual traders could, and took over; that's healthy competition, and they competed with each other driving the prices lower and lower until they hit the penny. Now they all fight over that penny to see who can be fastest because congress won't let them compete on price anymore (the sub penny rule) so they compete on speed instead.
I'm having trouble seeing this in Chrome, it seems impossible to interact with it? I', extremely interested in your project if you want to gmail me.
Instagram daily use surpasses Snapchat
I didn't notice any disparagement toward the other languages, only toward a kind of code dilettantism. But I can't tell from the video - what does this have to do with Lisp? Wouldn't any non-sandboxed repl do this?
ok, I missed it. What's basic robot? The author never defines it as far as I can tell.
Why? Being caught committing a crime is less a sign of committing a crime but in doing it in a way that got you caught. Serial committers often go years uncaught... from petty burglars to assaulters.. a lot of people get caught their first time, its the ones who dont get caught that are more dangerous...
The original block was way too wide, now they just block gist which is obviously used by dissidents to spread unlawful propaganda. The whole family of pastebin and pastebin-like websites is blocked for the same reason.
Because there will be times when you don't want to say "awesome, thanks," and now you have to strip the email clean, and be sure to catch it. And who knows what other quirks the AI might mirror, like poor grammar, misspelling, etc.
I feel like comparing Racket to Common Lisp is an insult to all of the people who worked on Common Lisp. I don't think the makers of Racket would have the hubris to compare their work to that of the authors of Common Lisp.
There’s nothing wrong with it, but it won’t happen.

If no one had ever cared about performance in browser engines, we wouldn’t have the problem of massive pages that we have now. Things like Facebook would have to be more efficient about how they do things.

By making loading faster, you reduce the incentive for them to reduce their own bloat.

Of course, on the other hand, if browsers were still slow, there are various things that people can do now which they wouldn’t have bothered with before. A vector graphics engine or sound engine, for example, would have been impossible with the browser functionality of now but the performance of ten years ago, because they would have been unbearably slow.

You win some, you lose some. Mostly you just end up with an unhappy balance that keeps no one really happy.
Short selling is an incredibly important piece of any reasonable stock exchange. It also dates back to 1609 so it's not exactly a new technological innovation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_(finance)
You have yourself one heck of a strawman there. Never did I say it enabled execution of arbitrary code injected from outside.

What I said was that if you are able to hide arbitrary computation of an obfuscated form into what looks like a bunch of innocuous type definitions then run a program that takes over from that point, you can potentially hide malicious code in the type declarations before the program proper even begins to run.

A Turing complete type system can theoretically change the initial state the rest of the compiled code starts under.

Picture this: you clone a repo. There's a file that contains operative code in some paradigm (non-OO imperative, OO imperative, non-OO functional, OO functional, logic, whatever). There's another file that's just types used by that first file. How much attention do you honestly pay to the types before looking at the operative code and then compiling and running it? Now, let's assume someone's found a bit of a bug in your compiler that lets this Turing-machine equivalent type system change the memory addresses of some structures or fill certain parts of memory with machine language. After all, you've not written your compiler to check everything a Turing complete language might do. Then the operative code you're counting on, that you've assumed starts with a clean slate other than the types assumed to be straightforwardly declared, copies that memory somewhere, or seeds a state machine or eval with it.

A Turing complete language means you can do anything any other Turing complete language can do. And having a Turing complete type system without making that clear to language users potentially means it can be obfuscated and effectively hidden. In TypeScript we're talking about a Turing complete subsystem (the type system) that feeds into a Turing complete system (the rest of the language) that translates into another Turing complete system (JavaScript), that gets compiled down to another Turing complete system (the JIT code for the VM). In all that complexity there be dragons.

You might not be familiar with the concept of multi-layer attacks or think they're unlikely to work, but that doesn't mean they don't exist or aren't used in the field.
That's a fair analogy. I think implementing the features some people are asking for creates a myriad of additional issues that should be individually considered.

Dealing with this on a case-by case basis (as they seem to be doing) makes more sense.

It might have been nice if they gave more advanced notice, but in my opinion they shouldn't be expected to give ANY notice of this type of thing.

I think they're handling it well.
Anybody read the words sensitivity, specificity, or gold standard? Just because it doesn't show up on PET doesn't mean squat if PET has a low sensitivity.
I think much of the American sentiment is prejudicial -- if you broke the law once, you can't be trusted not to do it again. We love to grab our pitchforks and burn an 'evil-doing criminal' at the stake. It doesn't matter that they 'paid for what they did' -- they might do it again, so why ever let them see the light of the day? Inhumane? Yea sure, we can be nice to 'them' if you want, just NIMBY! I have CHILDREN for heavens sake!

Just look at the comments on any news article of anyone being arrested. As far as the general public is concerned, they're already guilty and are lucky we even let them keep breathing. Rarely will you read an article about the charges being dropped later, or the person acquitted. Nobody cares at that point.
> So when they ask a question you are taught to answer precisely what they asked and no more.

I find this interesting conceptually.

Can you elaborate where this is being taught? or, if not of general knowledge, who, when, where taught you that?

Not a deposition, just an internet question.
"Embrace, extend, extinguish" was Microsoft's strategy for destroying open software interoperability standards. I understand what you're saying, but it's not nearly the same thing.
This kind of reminds me of having a few favourite VHS tapes and watching them over and over as a little kid.

I used to think it was disconcerting, but I also had peers that did the same and turned out alright, so I wonder if it's part of figuring out stimulus/work/gratification/reward/effort as a child and eventually growing into an adult.
is there a link to the video?
The last century of Japanese history looks a lot like that of the Western developed nations. (Probably because Japan made itself into a Western-style empire, then got involved in WW2 big time with the Western powers, then got a Western-style American occupation, so…)
related : The Algorithm That Makes Preschoolers Obsessed with YouTube
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14910125
Florida has a process for felons convicted of certain crimes to have their civil rights restored -- right to vote, own a gun, etc...
Audio is far less embarrassing/incriminating?

A camera pointed at my face will, at worst, catch me picking my nose or something. A microphone will pick up all sorts of stuff I really don't want other people hearing. Audio is way worse.
Heh. I am pulling this example straight from Hy's tutorial. They are the ones claiming that this syntax is superior to Python's. I do have a hard time with parsing it in my brain.

Long ago, I internalized what I believe to be true about programming languages: they should be optimized for the humans using them, not for the machines that run the programs or the compiler authors who create them. This leads to less bugs. Maybe your goal is to see past syntax to understand language semantics. My goal is to get code shipped with as few bugs as possible as quickly as possible. Python and ES let me do that pretty well. Also don't meant to be catty, to each their own interests.
Amazon are starting to push 'new' features and services to Ohio pretty quickly if you still need a non-Virginia AWS East Coast location.
I was never any good at math in the first place, order of operations always screwed me up, still does. Order of operations actually makes no sense at all (if you really think about it). So yeah, lisp is easier for me.
Here is a link to blog post about it with a link to PNG file.

https://www.alexkras.com/mapping-donald-trumps-tweets/

What platform are you on? I've tested it in Chrome on Mac and it seems to work.
Was that tagline from Hamilton, or no?
Before Bitcoin Cash, all (afaik) other alt-coins weren't based on BTC's blockchain history. Ethereum, for example, raised development money by selling off the early coins on the chain.
Since I can't edit, I'll reply to my own comment. This is not my example, but one I pulled straight from Hy's tutorial at https://hy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorial.html#basic-intr.... I don't think I could have dreamt up code like this.
why is so many pages completely redacted? how do you read the unreadcted original
I am pleased to see that in women led businesses, at least to some degree, the wage gap and an attempt to right this wrong is seen. I have to wonder why women only shortened the gap rather than eliminating it in those businesses they run. I know that wages are ever changing but I have to wonder if you know what men are paid for the same work in your company, what is the justification for not paying women equally if all other factors are equal.

Any thoughts?
Indeed. In the US, it does because manufacturers have gamed the system. Through bundled contracting with hospitals etc, for example.
Also someone else to blame when the sensitive info is exposed.
Microsoft's Clippy the paperclip is BAAAA-AAACK!
Any macros that expands to code that will reuse a value. You can't do common, and valuable, constructs like once-only without let.
I guess I'd always assumed that the Baby Boom was the result of a victorious end to war, but the other makes sense too.

Was there a baby boom after WWI, or the American Civil War, or other wars that siphoned off a major part of a country's young men?
Compare to:

1 + 3 + 88 / 2 - 2

Or
(1 + 3 + 88) / 2 - 2

Or
(1 + 3 + 88) / (2 - 2)

If it comes down to it, I'm going to fully parenthesize the stupid thing anything else is difficult to parse. If I'm using all the parens, prefix is fine.
What does that have to do with the case? Are they just asking him personal questions to invade his privacy?
One of my coworkers on a previous team has been at Google for 17.5 years, has employee ID #7X, almost certainly has enough money to never work again, and is still an SRE carrying a pager with a 3-minute hands-on-keyboard response SLA.

Some people just love what they do.
> In tech, it is still impossible to get your first job after a career change as a woman, a person of color, or a person over say 35.

Nope. This is hyperbole (although not completely unfounded).

My department hired a junior female of color coder of color after she completed a coding bootcamp. She wasn't a diversity hire, she was simply the best person for the job at the time. We legitimately needed to fill the position and luckily the company was willing to take a risk on a junior dev. In her previous short career, she was a public school teacher. She's not a "rockstar", a "ninja", or a 100x programmer (neither am I), but she's reasonably good at programming and is curious and driven enough to teach herself whatever she doesn't know.

BTW, we are an early-stage, funded cybersecurity company with a fantastic product in San Jose, CA.
Actually it does, in Quebec it's a civil law, in the rest of Canada its a common law, big difference.
but that's the point; it doesn't insert anything into the email for you. it just provides a simple button click to say that, making the common case easier.
> my boss assumed that it would be sourcing the bride.

Yikes.
(Korean)AirBnb: host wasn't intentional (though be attempted to rape his guests)
Will Google?

"The law is the law" is a very simplistic way of looking at things.

Laws can be challenged in court. Google is doing that with a Canadian law right now[1].

Laws can be found unconstitutional. Laws can be overturned. Laws can be repealed.

Laws can be unenforced. For example smoking weed in Colorado. A simple "the law is the law" outlook might conclude that it's illegal to sell weed in Colorado, and any business doing so "will simply be subjected to massive damage".

Laws can be interpreted and misinterpreted by judges, lawyers, prosecutors, etc. Smart people can disagree about what a law means. Some interpretations say anyone under 13 who reads the New York Times website is a criminal under the CFAA[2].

Some people argue that the average person commits 3 felonies a day[3].

[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/google-sues-in-u...

[2] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/04/are-you-teenager-who-r...

[3] https://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp...
Quick googling leads to this StackExchange question regarding WWI. Apparently it didn't see a boom (at least, not in the US?): https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/1026/did-ww1-pro...
tldr:
1. Some months ago, a Korean woman was drug-raped by an airbnb host.

2. Airbnb did not block the host nor did it tell anyone about the host

3. The host tried to drug-rape his guests again

4. Japanese police found about 'white powder remains in the cup given by the host'

5. Airbnb's 1st reaction: he didn't intend to do it.

6. Airbnb's 2nd reaction: Japanese police said he's ok

7. Airbnb's 3rd reaction: We'll educate the host on the matters

8. Airbnb's 4th reaction: We'll do something about it (...but what?)

I chose HN because I saw some Airbnb founders/employees hanging around, and I'd expect them to solve these kind of issues.
Maybe the Korean / Japanese Airbnb customer service is not doing their job/etc...?
I suspect that AD diagnoses are driven largely by caregiver frustration with unhappy old people. Just as ADHD etc diagnoses are arguably driven by caregiver frustration with unhappy young people. The simplest solution is drugging unhappy people to keep them manageable.
How does this differ from the existing FaaS frameworks on top of Kubernetes?
Japan may have been the loser, but it also had a big postwar economic boom. To me this seems like the more obvious cause.
Postgres, MS SQL Server, Oracle... and more exotic ones like Google's Cloud Datastore and Spanner. Probably many more.
Wow. Choosing your wife for you? Who and where was this company?!

My experience with a traditionally Japanese run megacorp/zaibatsu in the heart of Tokyo is much more like a traditional western company. The minutia of HR is very Japanese and hard to get your head around, but the broad strokes of salary/bonus/non monetary benefits (I had to look up what pecuniary means) is basically the same.