skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
More likely, I would think, is that people rarely need to refer to muphobia, especially specifically muphobia, but that it is acceptable to refer to 'fear of the letter ~' by '≈phobia', where ≈ is the anglicised name of the Greek letter from which ~ is derived.
We take protecting our agriculture very seriously. You don't want an outbreak of something in one state to spread to another.

It kinda makes sense. We're so isolated geographically, when something happens in other parts of the world, we have a very good chance of protecting ourselves.

I believe Australia actually has the oldest vineyards in the world. Something took out the vineyards everywhere else in the world.
I don't understand this business about Goleman being a "journalist". He did a PhD at Harvard under psychologist David McLelland.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Goleman#Biography
I'm saying discrimination, meaning non-equal results

I think you may want to reconsider the word you use for that, because that isn't a widely shared definition.

To be clear, when you say "discrimination.. [snip] is fine" most people hear that as "making hiring or promotion decisions based sorely or primarily on the gender of the person is fine". That's what the dictionary definition is too.

This isn't discrimination, and (almost) no one says it is. Unequal outcomes have many sources, and provided they are non-discriminatory that's defensible.

The issues arise when unequal outcomes occur and no one can agree on the cause, because there is a (very good) chance that there is an inequality of opportunity somewhere in the process.

I suspect there is a miscommunication here and your defense of the possibility of unequal outcomes is being confused by the wording.
> It's a desktop app, so you can manage your pages anywhere. Take a laptop to the beach, write in comfort, then sync with one click once you're back online.

Really? Wouldn't a web app be better for this?
Hawaii does not play around with its own agricultural (et al) quarantines. Every time you fly into the state, you must declare items on a special state checklist, for exactly the same reasons.
100% - the delay is as low as I can get it.

Twitch uses RTMPE for the most part, it's always going to be a little delayed. It's a decent box, compression is on, connected to fibre internet.

If anyone has any ideas of reducing latency I'd love to hear it!
The latter. After a "scourge" of knife crime that reached the level of almost one death a week (mostly gang-related) the city cracked down on knife crimes and arrests for possession of same. This is the substitution that carries with it a slight bit of anti-immigrant dog whistle given some previous high-profile cases of acid attacks being used in "honour" crimes against women.
Anyone besides stripe/atlas operate a service like this that comes with a bank account?
> The likelihood that anyone who sees this will also ever have physical access to their phone is astronomical.

Presumably you mean (that likelihood)^{-1}.
This has been my favourite part of the entire stream, didn't expect factions forming at all!
This Zunger person is a pretty good example of a conflict-(mis)handling approach which I've seen a lot in the past years on tech-oriented social networks:

* public humiliation - check (casting doubt on the engineering skills of the individual).

* threat of violence - check ("a good number of the people you might have to work with may simply punch you in the face").

* retribution through firing - check

* speaking as a champion of all that is good, castigating the evil "outlier"

Basically trying to completely destroy the career of someone whose opinions are for different reasons unpalatable.

The author should go to a psychologist to have their anger managemnt issues threated. They think they've taken a stand, but instead they've just shown they're unfit to be in any leadership position, can't control their emotions properly and can't even make a cogent argument.
The argument seems to be that there is no such thing as EQ because it is not a workable conceptual model whereas there is a thing like IQ because it is a workable conceptual model - definition of workable conceptual model that it can be used to make good predictions as one generally likes to do with conceptual models.
Showing the executed command and who on screen for syncing purposes is a great idea, I'll take a look at that now!
I think EQ was invented to make those with low IQ to feel better.
If it was a web app, you'd need to install it, probably with a database for settings, etc., which would invalidate their security claims.
If you have a web app, wouldn't you be publishing with a traditional CMS from there? This is for static websites.
You are right regarding my broad claim - I stand corrected. You are also right regarding my lack of authority, but experience shows that authority (professional or otherwise) is not always backed up by a broader understanding. If I'm wrong I'll be the first to admit it. The professor is saying there is no such thing as EQ. What I understand he means is that there is no such thing as EQ in psychology, and therefore the concept does not exist or is worthless. I'm in no position to argue with a professional in psychology on psychology. What I'm saying is that psychology doesn't have a monopoly on defining what traits exist.
I've had a similar experience with Electron apps. Quality (in terms of "nativeness") varies a lot.

This article lists many things Electron developers have to be careful about: https://blog.avocode.com/blog/4-must-know-tips-for-building-...
Yeah this would be a deal-breaker. I can imagine the devs will be working on a way to "convert" one to the other, but I can also imagine that comes way down the priority list, so I am not disturbed by this fact, at this time.

This is required, I assume (after 5 min scan so can be wrong), that in order to speed things up, information about the CPUs are embedded in the filesystem.

So is this not a classic "hardcode for speed" vs "generic but slow" trade off?
The Independent cites some figures from the Metropolitan Police. Most of the victims and suspects are male. Most are between 15 and 29 years of age and at least some of it is gang related.

https://goo.gl/sPgr7x
Not entirely sure I agree but talking to your point:

Doesn't this support the idea that Google needs to improve their people-interaction? And one way to do that is to hire for people who are better at it?
He quotes an interesting sounding stat - "In fact, if you could choose to be born at the 95th percentile for wealth, or the 95th percentile for IQ, you would be more successful at age 40 as a consequence of the latter choice."

Does anyone know the source?
If I were to sign up for this I would make it clear that it is not my luggage. In fact it is the first thing I would say to the airport staff: that I'm carrying this package on behalf of this company and everything is supposed to be arranged an in order. If anything is off and airport security would decide to confiscate / disallow the package, that is not my problem. I'd shrug and say "do what you've got to do". It's the Airmule's responsibility to make sure that whatever papers need to be filed are filed.
This seems like an area where a trusted organization (perhaps the EFF?) could do a lot of good by creating a "for dummies" webpage where the vulnerability disclosure process is explained in layman's terms (i.e. with suitable car analogies...) from a website owner's perspective. Those who discover a vulnerability in a company's IT infrastructure can then submit a link to this page with their reports.
These aren't greenhouse gases.
I think that it can't work like that. Checked bags are tied to your ticket, so you're responsible for them.
Maybe.

As a white male who agrees with the general themes of the manifesto (even though it lacks nuance an depth) I refuse to work in the "valley" precisely because I will be an ideological minority; and therefore likely to be ostracized for my views.
Marvin GPP – Expert Partner in Chatbots for Business
Side note: Just a few days ago I flew domestically within Australia just a week after some anti-terror arrests and increased security screening (which has since been lifted). As my bag went through it got flagged and the security officer flagged the aerosol can. I was already pretty nervous already, so I apologise profusely for the mistake.

Turns out the security officer was just a Regular Person, claimed deodorant cans are his "bread and bitter" and had a little chuckle as he found it in my toiletries bag.
Disruptive Technology Chatbots Part 1
Kickstart your next Android Application in 10 seconds
It's a bit of a cats and dogs problem - there's mutual incomprehension. An introvert's nightmare is when the dogs judge the cat show - e.g. modern justifications for open-plan working environments.
2-3 blocks "some hours" is not good enough, and most exchanges require 20 confirmations.

Anyway, there was a difficulty adjustment in the last hours, so things should improve.
It's true, but this is not the tone you would write a journalistically sound article with.
Let's just call it what it is. It's blogging, it's great and sometimes even more effective of what we journalist can achieve, but it indeed has different standards.
My personal opinion is that the Twitter interaction was enough as a comment. If that's the case, tho, I wouldn't report anything more than strictly necessary, i.e. Co-Founder answered on twitter like this, failing to clarify my question. No further comments, no innuendos to unsaid liabilities.
The founder just doesn't understand the risk, hence this behavior.

He's the average victim who would fall for a $99 fare. He certainly can't believe the risk would be that high, hence he's upset with "a hit piece"; He probably just read a bit on the internet about what it means to be OBC. He may not even have a lawyer and it could be a side project. They describe themselves as average bros, probably not because they've thought it through for marketing reasons, but just because that's their identity. Simple guys organizing something cool, patching a genius opportunity that no-one has taken before, and targeted ad hominem by a blogger. He just can't understand it any other way.
The funny thing is that it loads faster and has higher fps than many websites that display simple blogposts and a couple of images, but pull in literally megabytes of JavaScript and other bloat.

People, learn from this. Seriously. The web doesn't have to be slow if you put effort into it.
What happened to French Guiana in the first couple maps of South America? I think there is something missing here..
You forgot another possibility which is that the organization might have a bad office culture and the person is just instinctively protecting their turf.
> An Apple from Sydney to Perth

Wait, what? There's no screening or security on domestic arrivals in Australia. There's no customs. There's no signage warning about this. This is the first I've ever heard of this and I have trouble believing this.
HTTP+JSON API hosted inside the 1993 DOOM engine
You realize that the "punch in the face" line is a philosophical point about how angry the author made people, right?

If someone did actually punch the author in the face they would (and should) be fired and charged with assault.
Thx. By the way I reached 200% yesterday with those shorts :D

Regarding BTC, I'm trading various cryptocurrencies depending on the opportunities I see ;)
>It's the Airmule's responsibility to make sure that whatever papers need to be filed are filed.

As the article says, it doesn't work like that in countries like China (and I suppose it doesn't work like that in many other countries). You're 100% responsible for the package you're carrying unless this happens:

> One of those exceptions is to be the authorized representative of a “common carrier.” These are companies like FedEx, UPS, or DHL, or the airlines themselves

So, as the article says, if someone decides to fill your bag with heroin up to the top Airmule will have nothing to do with it, the death-sentence will be all yours.
I always suspected if you answer 'no' to that question then they'll just refuse to check the luggage.
Good points. I have removed the scare quotes (not intended as such)
It goes the other way around mostly, IMHO. Those arbitraging bots will dampen any attempt to control just one exchange.
If they wanted a tongue in cheek name, they should have called it RectalExpress.
R.R. Wilson’s Congressional Testimony – Fermilab Archives
It was not so long ago that the CBP stopped a business courier off a flight from Guatemala who happened to carry nine pounds of heroin. Because he was a courier, he was not criminally charged, nonetheless he was barred from entry and banned for at least five years. And that's the USA, not China.

http://www.loudountimes.com/news/article/cbp_officers_seize_...
All awesome stuff! I'm currently working in the travel industry and immediately after seeing this I'm planning on using the globe for a flights dashboard. ;)
If you're planning to trust that strategy with your life, first check with a lawyer to make sure it will actually work. Remember, making an argument about how you think the law should work, and a prediction about how it will work, are two completely different activities that it's very easy to get confused.
Carrying a knife in a public area is generally illegal, whereas a bottle of something that looks like water in a casual inspection isn't sufficient grounds for concern. Also, the use of police stop and search powers have fallen dramatically in the past year because of a concern over ethic bias in the statistics.

An offensive weapon is any article made or adapted for use for causing injury to the person, or intended by the person having it with him for such use by him or by some other person.
Perhaps to allow self selection to do its thing and interact only with those stupid enough.
There comes a point in these things where someone always comes in with their thoughts on what the term under discussion must mean.

If there were a thing such as EQ I would suppose it is just intelligence with a focus on understanding other peoples, their feelings, goals and how to get them to work together.

Often this use of intelligence is not found in people who have focused their intelligence on technical mastery of particular non-human areas, although it is not impossible.

I believe people often neglect areas for intellectual achievement based on finding those areas difficult or their subjective feeling that those areas are not important or just not suited to them, thus some intelligent people may neglect math because they are "not good at math", and some intelligent people may neglect learning to understand people because they "just don't understand people", while other intelligent people may not care to read or understand poetry or programming because that stuff isn't important or is for a particular kind of person that is not the kind of person they are.

Time and intelligence being limited for any one person that person will in some way have to choose what they will use them for. I myself have devoted more time and intelligence to logic than most other people do, and I have found that in periods where I devote extreme energies to logical analysis that my skills with humans are diminished by a commensurate degree.

In conclusion, I agree there is no such thing as EQ in the standard formulation, but perhaps there is a usage of intelligence that would counterfeit it in practical experience.
The founder should team up with Ja Rule and make a music festival on a remote island...
300k+ hacker news titles trained with LSTM neural net
Yep, although they don't use Btrfs RAID but instead run it on top of LVM which provides the necessary RAID functionality.
Your world view too is a conceptual model.

But as we know - all models are wrong, but some are useful...
Not necessarily -- there's an argument to focus on their comparative advantage and not bother wasting energy improving their people-interaction (something they are comparatively bad at).
Hmm, I'm not a native English speaker, although I do consider myself fluent at this point, and I'm not terribly bright, so I fully admit I could be misinterpreting things, but the quote didn't seem particularly philosophical to me, it read quite literal. I suppose I might categorize it as hyperbole, although even in that case, I typically don't like the use of such hyperbole when it comes to violence. It has a habit of detracting from otherwise sensible points.
Just like dyslexia ought to be easier to spell, I don't think I'll be using that word.
Finally an alternative to Netscape Composer.
> Caveat emptor

The hell with that, the company should be shut down. Some poor soul will think it's a sweet deal. They're putting people at risk of the death penalty without telling them and implying everyone is A-OK.
It's not silly at all! Please do!
I wonder what percentage of these people end up recording themselves getting their asses kicked instead? Imagine you are in a foreign city and someone sprayed yourself or a loved one with an unknown substance. I'm not talking about a child with a squirt gun innocently playing around, I mean another adult behaving differently from social norms. I have to think the probability of a violent reaction is pretty high.
Yes, fair point. Although the parent seemed to be arguing that it was the human interaction that was holding them back.
WV?
You are also not the same person as 1 millisecond ago, since numerous neuronal connections changed.

So it definitely comes down to the definition. You would also be you if your brain were just in a glass with wires and you could process input and give output through a computer maybe without all the gut bacteria.
I think part of ops problem is having a purpose. There is nothing like having a company to force that.
Sort of reminds me of how it's actually impossible to accurately value real estate.

If you measure square footage, people will just fill the building with superfluous Hilbert curves.

If you try to measure number of bathrooms or number of bedrooms, people will just make apartment complexes filled with dollhouses.

If you try to measure profit(directly or from imputed rent), people will set up fake corporations and pay themselves outrageous sums of rent.

So all of these measures are worthless and it's impossible to value real estate, because they can each be gamed and so are unable to be used to make any predictions.
Can't speak for Perth, but flights into Tasmania absolutely go through another round of biosecurity screening.
I doubt people place the same amount of rigor into Quora posts and HN comments as they do into academic papers.
You and I should go bowling sometime.
The first two are not contradictory, the first refers to communication between the client and server and the second to the browser's communication with a remote server. Maybe that wasn't clear from how I wrote it.

On further investigation, I think I was wrong on the second though; it might be that it's built into Chromedriver, not Selenium, which would explain why you didn't have the same issue with Firefox.

SSL between the client & Selenium server would be of benefit to keep any bad actor on the network from man-in-the-middle attacks on it. I'm not familiar with how I'd set up an ssh tunnel for that, I'm happy to believe it can be done, but it'd be a lot easier if it just supported HTTPS to begin with.
I agree it has clearly detracted from the point as this discussion shows.

But it's pretty important to realize that "punching someone in the face" is a crime, and no company can allow that.
I think pop media needed a phrase to describe someone who was obviously smart but had a lot of trouble interacting with others. I am sure we all have run into Bob or Alice the cave troll who for lack of a better word can't pick up on any of the needs of other people no matter how hard they try. Pop media isn't going to go for words with academic rigor. They just know IQ = Smart and Bob is obviously smart, but Bob is also an idiot when it comes to reading social situations so Bob is also an idiot. People realize that Bob can't both be smart and an idiot at the same time so society created a way of differentiating that Bob is both an idiot and genius at different things aspects of life.
> Intuition and experience.

...

> I'm sorry to say that if you don't understand this, you haven't really understood what functional programming is...

you can't be serious can you ?
Though most stars will have burnt out in a couple
of billion years and heat death will come, where no cellular life can exist, so not sure if this is more useduo than now.
How to Hack Windows Service Pack Within 1minute
So you would have no qualms about stepping into a Star Trek-style transporter, having your pattern scanned, your matter destroyed and recreated at the destination? If so, I would ask: what if the destroy step malfunctioned? There would be two of you. Which one would you be?
> and that clarity and limitation has practical advantages for things like parallelization and distribution,

and how many of these "parallelized and distributed" map and reduces actually exist out in the wilderness of javascript code ?
You'd be better off trying to smuggle heroin than getting caught taking bananas to Queensland.
Yeah - at the end of the day your brain is different from mine on a physiological level. Just like your muscles and bones. And your gut bacteria too, and we are probably on different drugs.
By saying EQ doesn't exist he's saying there is no "emotional intelligence" trait that determines how good you will be at various emotional/social aspects of life. Instead, testing EQ just looks at those various things and combines the results. There is no reason to believe that, for example, a person who is conscientious will also be agreeable. They are separate traits. A test which tests both (and other things) and combines the results and calls them "EQ" is not useful.

Contrast this with intelligence, for which they they test something very specific which you can test even in children, and we know this ability, even though on the surface unrelated to any real-world skill, strongly correlates with how they will perform at many different things later in life. It is an actual trait, not just an average of how good you are at various things.
Reminded me of top unixporn post https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/comments/2sz5xo/bspwmofxoc...
Never heard of 'acid attacks' in my life (kid of the 80s, teen of the 90s) before reading about the beautiful culture of Pakistan (2001 and after). It seems London cloned its own mini-version. Horrific.
At least he is kind-of-honest about his motives.
The Forbes articles is confusing.

The article is in reference to (but doesn't mention) the "Individual Investors Act (Act 22)"[1], which exempts you from Puerto Rico's own income tax, and limits your IRS liabilities for capital gains tax on long term investments sold within the first ten years of your residency.

Regardless of if you take advantage of the above, you are exempt from Federal taxes.

This is just an incentive atop it.

[1] http://businessinpuertorico.com/en/profit/individual-investo...
I'm curious how different the results will be if you could bring your dog, or maybe Kindle , or music player or instrument , or you're a praying person ,etc - what are the minimal conditions where many could learn to live happily alone ?
Also check out zerotier. It works really well, and routes traffic through the local lan if available. It also supports other protocols than ip.
If airplane companies take into account that certain percentage of passengers will not arrive and overbook flights wouldn't they also take into account that most passengers will have less than maximum allowed baggage?
This kind of thing would make a great screensaver
Cryptocurrency Fibers based Hybrid Deep Learning maps for High-Performance Regressions that are Realtime Socket powered by Scalable Event Queue design rewritten in Rust.