skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Forgive me but I still have no idea what that means. What's a UAHF coin? Why would I have access to them? How is the process of moving the coins at all related?

The connection between UAHF and bitcoins is not established nor is the entitlement of getting UAHF coins via a bitcoin private wallet.

Given that explanation, I don't know what they are, how to get them, where they come from, how it applies to me or why I should care. It sounds profoundly irrelevant.

Besides, those forked coins still exist, and I know who has them. It's not that they aren't supporting it, they decided to keep them for themselves. All that obtuse language is just legal CYA.

They just did a hustle. A wall-street white-collar style one, but a hustle nonetheless. I'm not getting them no matter what happens because they're probably already sold.
What worked for our SaaS (https://ipapi.co):

- Extremely responsive and flexible with customer's requests. We've implemented some features overnight in response to a customer query. Turns out, some of the features have helped us with revenue growth :)

- Honesty. Even though you might lose a subscription in the short run, word of mouth helps to win back a lot more. It's delightful to break your rules if it eases a cash strapped customer. We frame such "thank-you" e-mails for motivation.

The goodwill garnered has helped us grow by word of mouth.
JavaScript doesn't even have a static type system, let alone one that tracks lifetimes, those are left to the garbage collector.

How is this similar to anything JavaScript does?
Modify Gantt Chart View Text Style and Project Files Loading Enhancements in .NET
Also, they might not have been directly above the A340 at lowest altitude.
How do you propose to get to and from the runways?
Seems like requiring an electronic copy when one is available originally would go a long way. Is it court's prerogative, or do we need a Congressional amendment for this to become commonplace?
Nebosh igc course in Ahmedabad
Transform the Body Fat into Energy with the Best Quality HCG
The amazing part of Spain being a poor country is that all Arab countries combined have a lower GDP than Spain.

The Bay Area has a larger GDP than the country of Mexico.
Non-AMP version: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-40708421.
Yes, and many people consider NVIDIA kernel module to be in violation of GPL.
Builder design pattern in Ruby
So what did they have?
I agree with you thoughts now I am thinking of turning bots for customer service i.e. automatic short replies in response of tweets and private messages.

Thanks
He runs a $100B a year business.

You think he has time for every little detail?

If you read page 24, he said it's not unusual for people to be paid $100M. Do you expect him to remember all the people and amounts paid?
I agree. The key to grokking this is the difference between a function's execution context and its lexical scope. If you don't explain that I don't think you've explained anything, and if you do then there's no need to think about separate cases like the article suggests.
Kubernetes running on DCOS is mentioned, but not treated as a real alternative. Kubernetes can run as an app on top of Mesos the same way marathon can. Note: I am a heavy user of Kubernetes, but not Mesos, so I can't comment how well it works.

Kubernetes uses "two phase scheduling" and Mesos can be plugged as a second phase (e.g. https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/kube-mesos-framework... seems decent). For me it seems like a perfect combination - on the cloud you utilize cool stuff like GKE or https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-azure-cont... for phase 2 of schedule, but if your client wants to run your code to run on their servers you can run it on their mesos/dcos deployment.
"Just like most people on earth today, former VP Al Gore apparently never practices what he preaches."
Other powers have nukes too, so using it is out of the question. If nukes are not used, technology and economic capacity will determine the results.

Russia has a lot of good engineers and scientists but they don't have the industrial capacity to compete with the US. China's current capacity may already be double that of the US but its technology is still catching up (fast).

Winning wars requires intelligence not raw calculations. A nation with 10 extra IQ points on average would have many times more people with 130+ IQ needed to build and improve on advanced robots.

Btw, have you checked the list of top supercomputers in the world? The top two are in China. The top one has 4-5 times the power of the top American machine, which is #4. It also uses Chinese built microprocessors.

https://www.top500.org/lists/2017/06/
My personal feeling is that "the right thing to do" is to evaluate applicants without any regard to their criminal history. There should be no box to check on applications and background checks should be prohibited from returning an applicant's criminal record. A person's debt to society is supposed to be their prison sentence and that sentence shouldn't extend beyond their time in prison. If we're giving second chances, we should be giving full chances, not half chances.

I'm not advocating for preferred treatment, just a lack of discrimination against ex-cons. The person who never went to prison should still have the advantage of work experience gained during the period that the felon was in prison. Anything beyond that is, in my view, unfair. I personally believe that the current system is designed, largely by lobbying on behalf of the for-profit prison system, to make it difficult for ex-cons to re-integrate into society and encourages recidivism. Society should want these people to be successful, if only so that they are no longer a financial burden.

I also believe that once people have finished serving their time, their right to vote should be restored. If you're expected to pay taxes and follow the laws of society, you should have your say in how public policy is made.

I recognize that my views are predicated on the idea that our justice and prison systems should aim for reform over punishment. Others will have a more vindictive goal for those institutions. I think the "changing attitudes" that I mentioned are people who are being converted from the vindictive camp to what I see as a pragmatic camp that believes a more compassionate approach will reduce crime and reduce the amount of money the state spends imprisoning people.
Technical question: when I send over my DNS requests to you (do I actually do that?), aren't those requests unencrypted going over the internet so everybody can sniff on which pages I visit?
When it comes to fairness and equality. No doubt, Canada is doing wonderful job. System treats everyone the same. Any country interested to improve should certainly investigate Canadian system.
Looks like you vapor-locked on the physical/digital point before you finished reading.

Let's stay with purely digital. There's an app on your phone that you bought for $1, which seemed like a fair deal to you at the time -- you paid $1 for something you thought was worth $1.

The author adds a feature to the app. You like the feature, and now if someone asked you what the app were worth to you, you'd say $2. In effect, a dollar of value just appeared out of thin air. No magic needed so far for this to happen, I hope.

Same situation but you don't care about the feature -- it's something you don't personally use. But now new buyers are more interested in the app, so more people pay $1 for it. Again, some extra wealth got created just by coding up the new feature. Bubble? New paradigm? It's different this time? Nope.

A new feature got added to Bitcoin. The market says it's more valuable now.
If arbitraging is impossible, can we really call it a single market? If I can’t seek exchange A’s BCH on exchange B, and vice versa, aren’t we actually dealing with two instruments, rather than one? Looks to me like multiple different BCH IOU markets currently exist: one for each exchange.

This really has nothing to do with the Bitcoin Cash blockchain, since there’s no connection between it and the tickers on the exchanges (you can’t convert one to the other).

An analogy would be ten different commodity exchanges who all trade “steel” instruments, but neither allow you to either sell “steel” instruments and receive actual steel, or deposit actual steel and receive “steel” instruments. In this case, can we really say these exchanges are trading steel? Why would their steel prices ever reflect the actual price of steel, when the two markets are not connected in any way?
I have! I think and so have others:

- http://nonelang.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dataformat.html#nak...
- http://readable.sourceforge.net/
- https://github.com/boxed/indent-clj
China is practicing “one-click take down” by taking down randomly chosen website
I really appreciate the effort put in to a library like this, fantastic work.

However I would strongly warn anyone considering using it to do massive amounts of testing in their real production network. Implementing against the current version is easy, but lets remember: this is a protocol old enough to buy cigarettes. It not only changes in behavior between versions, it also has edge cases where things behave differently when the version you are running is an upgrade. Or an upgrade in progress. Or part of a forest that also has... etc.
As programmers we really like to automate away the mundane stuff, and we're not too fond of human interaction. I'm grossly exaggerating, of course, but for a lot of us, this was the push and pull that originally drove us to hack away at computers. Creating a big and shiny automated processes is almost a no brainer for us.

Yet, I believe that you are absolutely right. We should fight our inclination to see everything as a nail for the hammer that we master. The ROI on automating everything from the outset is not worth it, and if the business flops, it's just wasted effort. Worse yet, it's a missed opportunity for learning about the customers and about the domain.

So yes, do things that don't scale. If and when you get in the air, profile the business processes and only then automate the bottlenecks. It's the only sane way when you think about it.
Yes. Its a company I'd invest in long term as long as I stay a delighted customer.
The infographic in question specifically referenced thoracic surgeons, who are considerably more likely to experience on-call rotations or emergencies than, say, a family physician.

I honestly don't know what your second sentence is referencing. I was simply stating that, contrary to some claims here, many high school teachers absolutely get the entire summer off and don't work much more than 40 hours per week during the school year.
Or if you're a fan of cli tools, check out dc!
DDI+Utilities+Review
Well, analysis is simple, but it does make inference algorithm considerably more complex. (Analysis generates constraints, inference solves them.)
At what point do you know if it is useless or not? Who decides? How long should Coinbase wait to decide to support it..before it becomes useful or after?
not specific to depositions, but a piece that might help: api for pdf's https://www.pdfotter.com/
Budgeting in SCRUM book
Some aspect of the singularity is kind of undeniable. There's some information thing that's happening right now, and it's growing exponentially, and it just looks like it (for all intents and purposes) asymptotes vertical at some point, approximately 20 years from now.

What actually happens at that point, I think that's up for debate. Are we going to become immortal? Probably not. Are we going to have AIs who are better at everything than expert humans? Probably not.

But I think it's strange if someone denies that it's even happening. Just look at the amount of information that's flowing around, by any metric. It's exponential, and you can fit the curve and plot where it goes vertical. If we were talking about physical processes, I'd understand the skepticism. Maybe that exponential levels off. But I don't see why there is any physical limitation on how much information can flow. Or at least: if we hit that wall, things will be VERY different.
Is it? The way I see it, it's the consequence of financial regulations, and proves nothing - you can't really compare traditional currencies spanning hundreds of years with one that was there for just a decade.
> but will add another safety catch.

The problem with these things is how do they interact: what do you do in the cockpit when several alarms are going off at the same time? Just adding "one more alert" seems easy but... This is actually a deep problem with automation, how do the parts interact. When writing software this is a constant battle, between modularity and connection.
Believe me, all use cases there are based on actual user complaints and this is in no way "because we can" feature.
VASAviation made a video on this with radio traffic from the incident.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW-ETmZU0u8 (1:33)
Don't store your coins on an exchange then.. like you've been told over and over and over again
Xcom 2 Console Commands Complete List. – Android Nucleus
Those 70 are not controls but each may have a different disease.
You need a third model to map facts from one model into facts in another model. Doesn't really solve the problem.
I sent you a query about one and half months ago, no replies at all.
“Ping” – A Social Network That Keeps You Safe Is RELEASED
As a Python-lover who previously played with Common Lisp and Clojure, lispy syntax took less getting used to than having no end tags, but I'm still not used to prefix math.
Actually, as the text of RFC makes clear in "What this proposal will not fix" section, this does not fix "self in closure" issue. Actually, "self in closure" is explicitly listed as an example.
I've seen people mentioning this could be a big disaster, but I'm curious exactly what the effects could be. Specifically, ignoring the wheels for the moment, would the hull of the landing plane slide off on contact at all, or would the planes just get squashed? I have no intuition about friction / stiffness of materials at that scale. (I'm also assuming the planes were at least a little bit offset to the side)

With the wheels down, they would just tear through the hull of the lower plane, right?
"...the minimum altitude recorded on the FDR was 59 feet above ground level." [emphasis added]

AGL (elevation above ground level), not MSL (elevation above mean sea level). The runway/taxiway elevation is already taken into account. They were 59 feet above the taxiway.
RS codes are a sub-class of BCH codes, where the subfield and field are the same.

RS codes, where they exist, achieve greater distance than BCH codes... but they have a far more restricted set of parameters than BCH codes.

Many applications are moving to things other than BCH codes because even though they are a much better class than RS codes they are still limited and the existing BCH codes at many sizes are not as good as other kinds of codes.
Chicago cab drivers were the worst. Uber drivers are leagues better.

Last time I was in a cab in Chicago the driver ran a man over in the street and just kept going. When I jumped out to see if the victim was okay the driver yelled to me that I was fare dodging before he sped away....
In which way(s)?
10 Simple Ways to Meet Lesbian and Bisexual Women
I had a similar experience with the deposition (instructed by my attorney to keep things simple and single-syllable if I wanted to get out of it quickly), and the switch from on-record to off-record was pretty weird, as the opposing side knew my attorney pretty well, which inspired a lively exchange about weekend plans, common acquaintances, etc. In a few minutes we're back on record with just dry "Yes"es, "No"es and "Do not recall"s flying around.
I'm not looking for someone to keep me safe anymore, I figured out that what I really need is the power to keep myself as safe as I feel like. Which is why I wrote Snackis:

https://github.com/andreas-gone-wild/snackis
IANAL, and I'm reading between the (redacted) lines. Did anyone get the sense that Uber's lawyers line of questioning was leading towards the possibility that Alphabet let this theft of their IP happen to catch Uber with their pants down?

There are questions about how Larry felt about Mr. Levandowski real contribution to Waymo/Chauffeur(p21 Line 15).
They are asking about David Drummond's position on Uber's Board(p40 line 13).
This leads to questions about when Larry knew Mr Levandowski was leaving the company(p45 Line 14).
These lead to questions about Mr. Levandowski's attempt to spin off a team from Google/Alphabet (p64 Line 2).
...
Setting up the dates on a redacted email, they to be talking about Larry's knowledge of IP and people taken by Uber for autonomous cars (p181 line 10).

Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but what are the implications of Google getting sloppy with protecting itself at the risk of catching a competitor steal your work?
An explanation of Reed-Solomon ECC decoding, using field arithmetic and linear algebra, with runnable code: https://www.nayuki.io/page/reed-solomon-error-correcting-cod...
It's not much better than searching for the cure for all illness.

Drink enough, sleep enough, eat well, do some sports, meditate. If that doesn't help, good luck with going to the doctors.
Perhaps I misunderstood the parent comment.

It changes the behavior in the sense that there is no w=1 option. All whitespace is significant. The idea of ignoring whitespace would be like the idea of ignoring angle brackets in html. Whitespace is an essential part of TN and ETNs and is never ignored.

Diff tools then can benefit by showing not only aggregate line diffs but aggregate node and word level diffs without knowing anything about the meaning of a program.
I loath that it's a thing. But in this context I'm not sure it's comparing apples to apples.

Comparison aside, I do think social media platforms have a negative net value to society due in no small part to optimising only for this kind of metric. Everything is designed to be addictive. We know addiction isn't healthy but it's cool because users can choose to not get addicted to this thing which is designed especially to take advantages of human weaknesses.
Not an incorrect article, but my opinion is that the focus should be informing people to not use this at all and more education on immutable data vs confusions on this
Eh, there's definitely a limit, but if the maintainer of a major piece of software didn't remember how a particular feature first started or if they were in the OWNERS file of a particular directory, I would consider them to be a completely representative member of our species.
Hand off to the secondary.
What I don't understand (and I'm being honest here) is that between GPSs, computers, and HUDs, how do these errors still happen?

I mean that if your GPS sees you're aiming at the wrong runway, why can't it alert the pilot (and/or tower) that it's going to miss.
Speaking as an Indian, I think Canada is well poised to be the next big super power, replacing the USA. The only other country that looks like can pull this off is Germany.

Education together with freedom and tolerance always gives the best return for the money you invest. These days its a given that most Indian students who originally opted to go for US to do their MS degrees are now flocking to Canada. Also a whole range of working professionals are going to Canada to work, start companies and contribute to the economy of Canada.

Your economy and overall national ecosystem always benefits when you get highly trained, hard working people with a strong work ethic as immigrants. Not only do these people contribute to the economy disproportionately in return for a good life, they also impart similar values to their kids.

At the same time its sad to see US take such a protectionist and anti-immigrant stance, totally forgetting the important role immigrants have played in the rich and success journey so far.

More dangerous than all these awesome immigrants not coming to your country is they going else where. There is no infinite supply of great talent in the world, and given how priorities align not everybody can be trained to be good enough among your existing citizen-pool. The only real way of having a disproportionate set of awesome people in your country, is to create an environment where you can attract them from outside. Without these awesome people no country can last a long time in front of a competition.
Stargazing: The Invention of Celebrity, 1750–1850
Why cough up the answer so soon? Make them specify the time zone.
Equality of opportunity is what is important, not equality of outcome, which is what some people try to conflate it with.
You can still monetize it right? Look at what happened so far as a market validation and build a "better" paid variation of it that includes support and maintenance. Wouldn't that be possible?

Could learn from the Pharma industry where they use techniques like changing the formulation or introducing a new drug administration route to "renew" the patent.

Instead of debating it, if it were me, I would just give a people a reason to pay and see if it works.

You could have the same product presented as:
Lil Papa "recommend for individual use" - FREE/DONATE
Fat Papa "recommended for business use" - 1 MILLION/month (the same thing but we send you one emoji a month and give you a proper invoice)

Looks like you already have people trying to pay you and they could easily do it if there was invoiced paid option.

If folks can make money off of "Laundry Balls" there is no reason you shouldn't off of work like papaparse.
Do you read Classical Greek? Have you read Gladstone's book? In my case the answer to both is yes. And, with a Hindu Indian parent and much time spent there through my life I am quite aware of the ancient cultural ties between those two cultures.

There is plenty of work in cultural anthropology, biology, and casting that people are incredibly alike in most ways even in regards to things that appear to be learned, and yet also have elements that are strongly dissimilar despite seemingly being innate. What about people with innate absolute orientation and no concept of right/left. That's not a "historical" phenomenon but a contemporary one.

Sometimes things can be scientific and not ideological you know.

Why was an oxe the color of wine?
The fallacies of the armchair venture capitalist:

1. Hindsight -- it is much harder than you think to determine not only what could be profitable, but also what is impactful. A lot of it is character judgment -- it isn't like Facebook was a revolutionary new idea, but it was the competitive team with (some) vision and (a lot of) execution that brought it to new heights.

2. Just because unicorns get the majority of the media attention doesn't mean they are the majority of startups.
Steganography is a separate issue. The art of hiding data is a great tool for hiding data, encrypted or non.
My son is smart enough to change DNS IPs to google public DNS servers and the most ridiculous thing is that he studied it on the khanacademy site. :)
It's not overvalued if people are still paying the price. Only the last fool in a long line will get hurt.
Hmm. Can't argue against this. I agree, this is a legitimate case.

Probably I'm a bit too stuck on "the python way" on this clash-of-cultures to see such cases that are clearly part of "the lisp way"...