skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Quite likely yes they are the owners of your data.
It has always surprised me how rare, at least here in the bay, washer/dryer hookups are. I can't remember renting a place (even my shitty student studio) without them before.
Sending is not the tricky part, implementing it right is probably another story.

I wouldn't call it massive overkill. REST is extremely simple as well. You have to make an request anyways so it's just a question of preference how you connect to that the email sending service.
Great Info >>> Appreciable job
or Urectum
I suspect we don't need your permission as under the terms of use of this sight you forfeit your rights to this user generated content, and the rights now belong to Hacker News.
My dentist tells me to floss specifically because it's good for the gums.
> Very functional site.

I see what you did there.

On topic, this is a great resource. I used this as my primary learning tool back when I was just starting to learn Elixir.
FWIW, there is a package for .Net, Fody Costura or something like that, which allows you to embed dependencies as resources in the executable file.
It's like Rudd and Abbott are competing in which will come up with more ridiculous notion. And you'd think they would choose someone competent for bloody home secretary and shadow home secretary respectively.
The vast majority of terrorists are clowns who, if they happen to use encryption at all, will mess up infosec in ways that are trivial to compromise. So if the Home Secretary is saying that message encryption is a "problem" then there must be something else going on which has little to do with terrorism.
Show HN: Storybook 3.2 – Vue Support, Story Hierarchy, React Native On-Device UI
The Linux X86 ORC Stack Unwinder
Well, this time frame is based on the assumption that they roughly mange to deliver the 500k preorders till then. So the plan is to have about 1 million Model 3 built by 2020.
Analysis of EFL Core Libraries
The one installing an ad block plugin solves.
> I wouldn't call it massive overkill.

You're running a web server to emulate telnet. It's a massive overkill.
Samsung TV Won't Play MP4, Fixed
yeah, if you don't mind having by far the slowest browser around unable of such basic thing as pull down to refresh
I have not looked at this in detail, but I can't see what advantages this has over just sending a simple http request like this:

https://api.telegram.com/botTOKEN/sendMessage?id=YOUR_ID&message="your servers are on fire"

because that's all you need as far as I know. Works via GET, POST, PUT, everything.

Only thing I could see is being able to switch it out for other services easier.
There hasn't been a competent Home Sec since ... what ... Ken Clarke perhaps? Why should they start now.
I feel like the people who understand encryption and privacy advocates (myself included) are not engaging enough (or maybe effectively enough) with the public in communicating the concerns around trying to 'backdoor' encryption or giving up more of our privacy.

While I think these political statements are often ridiculous, they actually have widespread public support, if my cohort of friends and family are anything to go by.

Do we have people who are better communicators? I don't think even Cory Doctorow's posts/talks are aimed at the non-technical audience.
he loves it so much he wants to buy shares, I can't think of other reason.
Despite countless protests from politicians, the laws of mathematics trump the laws of the land.
Hmm.. because the cost of the driver goes to zero, self driving smaller trucks might take over the entire market of trucking.
> The vast majority of terrorists are clowns.

Perhaps if you're referring to home grown Islamic terrorists. However Britain does have a problem with an experienced group of rather professional terrorists called the IRA.
Whilst that is your opinion, it is not a fact, nor is it legally valid.
We must have read it entirely differently.

The second link, which is far briefer, highlights that Hempton has finally found an example of inventory loading by millennial members of the Mormon church. But he regards that as an edge case. So I don't read that as making the point that you seem to be criticizing.

More important though is the first link which is extensive and addresses many of Ackman's claims and includes Hempton's own front line documentation. None of that has to do with defending Herbalife on the grounds of "Mormon end of the world hoarding".
To really make the case they aren't evil you have to pretend that those running these businesses are unaware of their own business plan and buy into their own marketing, while they carefully craft the marketing and contracts to break the law only so much as to remain profitable while paying settlements and fines.

It's a ridiculous idea. No one accidentally tunes a dark pattern so perfectly.
The plastic covers used in Blair et al. are 90% PVC covers. Richardson suggested PVC being digested by the fungus as the cause. So it's exactly the situation that should cause SIDS and it results in lower incidence of SIDS.

The mattress wrapping suggested by Sprott is wrapping using polythene.

So the results are totally incompatible with the notion that PVC mattresses causes SIDS as suggested by Richardson and Sprott.

There are other reports too, such as that conducted by the British government in 1998...
Even maths![1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill
>You spam this sub claiming you are for free speech and yet all you have done so far is to peddle anti-free speech rhetoric.

Nonsense. Nowhere have I said that Gawker shouldn't have had the right of free speech. Just that they should accept responsibility for the consequences of that speech. That they chose not to, just means they're unable to defend their own rights when faced with justice for the harm they actually did cause while exercising that right.

I'm completely okay, for example, with you insulting me with your vitriol - as long as you're prepared to deal with the down votes in a responsible, adult-like manner. That isn't what happened with Gawker - they flaunted the law and demonstrated time and again that they thought they were above the law, "just because".

Alas, all these rights are for naught if we don't have a social system in place to protect them.
Oh god, I despair of this country. After a decade of conservative I have never been so disillusioned. I feel like I am stuck in a rut or like, I don't belong here. It is a horrible feeling. Deep down I know that the government is stuck in 1740 and by the time that millennials walk the halls of power, their parents will have signed away all their rights.

The very last thing I love is my country, that is for sure.
Interesting micro-optimizations... For example the use of lookup tables and nested switches in uri.rs and method.rs.

Is this common practice in Rust? Shouldn't the compiler be smart enough to do that for you? Such code seems quite sensitive to typos.
> implementing it right is probably another story

Do you implement your own HTTP communication every time you need it or do you use a library?

Just as for HTTP there are many good libraries for SMTP communication that you can easily use. No need to roll your own.
Right, but the expected value of the gamble is negative.
Well its a Database Right, which is a property right rather than copyright.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right

As with all rights, it varies with jurisdiction.
To fuel growth, they have been subsidizing the free tiers from the money they get from paid subscriptions. I believe they could actually make profit if they wanted to. Of course it might then hurt their future growth.
For a minute there I thought you were talking about Australian prime ministers. What a coincidence!
All foreign terrorists have lived under some repressive government and privacy is unlikely to be one of their assumption. I wouldn't be surprised if they simply used the existing tools by convenience but with the same assumption the government can access their conversation as with every other medium.

Home grown terrorists may be different, but they are already consistently detected by regular police work long before they act.
The tale of The Orwellian Kingdom continues...

No really. I've written about this before, but I sincerely refuse to believe that the government are doing this out of ignorance anymore.

There's been too many people telling them how it actually is, but they persist.

That leads me to conclude that either they're severely mentally dysfunctional, or there's another reason for doing this. PR maybe? Votes? Something more sinister?
>I was inclined to favor Google... but your comments have changed my mind

That doesn't even make sense. The op made no argument for or against google in any of this thread, and has only tried to clarify that. Defending yourself against the Google hating bandwagon is clueless hole digging? Did you even read any of the op's comments?
> all of this only for making alive a GUI.

All of this for making alive a GUI using the 2017-summer-season toolchain. Meanwhile, plain HTML with <form> elements and server-side processing miraculously continues to work.
I would have had the same conclusion if Ryzen was not also a 14nm LPP with GloFo.

It is just sad AMD could not get both Graphics and CPU momentum at the same time.
thanks for the mental image of clown-terrorists :( as if either weren't bad enough on their own.

Isn't it obvious? This has got f-all to do with terrorism. The bad guys have always hidden their communication.

What's getting the security services all riled up is that ordinary law-abiding citizens are suddenly encrypted.

And, of course, there's no way out of this. Either encryption is secure, or it's broken. If it's secure, it's secure for everyone. If it's broken, it's broken for everyone. Now we have open-source encryption methods that are trivial to implement, anyone can build a securely end-to-end encrypted communication system. [1]

The cat's out of the bag, spooks. You can't read people's mail any more. You'll have to find other ways of gathering intelligence.

[1] within reason - clown-like incompetence will always mess up. Or even just ordinary-coder levels of incompetence. But it's still harder than plaintext.
nit: it's a WebSGML thing eg. an XML feature factored in to the revised SGML spec for accomodating XML-style empty elements, which was necessary so that XML could be DTD-less, yet still have a compact idiom for empty elements.

Classic SGML only had a shortform syntax such as

<elmt/content of elmt/

and WebSGML introduced NETC and EMPTYRM to extend this into a (rather idiosyncratic) way of achieving support for XML-style empty elements within the SGML framework.
Javascript going down could just be a case that the job posters are assuming for all the JS libraries (node.js/React) that you know JS and not posting it in their Ad.

I don't think that the rails hit, is the result of fewer web jobs. I think it's more a case of the web is transitioning into more JS led architecture.
The way I see it and it have stated before is that it's about control and keeping in power. By being able to listen in on any communication and being able to track who is talking to whom, they are able to catch and suppress leakers and whistleblowers. Thereby making sure that if they themselves do anything wrong it can be covered up easily and indefinitely.
When was the last IRA attack, Manchester 1996?
There are many other cars that could be compared to Model 3. Mazdas, VWs, Hyundais, Hondas. If we take only size, price, performance and interior quality into consideration then Model 3 is certainly not the best choice. But it's an EV. And others are not.
>>the company is literally re-writing all of its code
>
> Wow.

Good to know they are "literally" re-writing code instead of "figuratively". Why is the adverb "literally" overused so often?
Someone with enough karma should adjust the like to the non amp?
CO detectors are in pretty widespread use.
Thanks, I missed that part, I thought drop in means it handles most of the things :)

I'd welcome that too, it's kinda sad nobody succeeded with "email 2.0", sure we have lots of attempts but I can't recall any major players. The best solutions to "fix email" were companies that advocated to not use email and use their closed platform.

What I can think of would be cool is something XMPP based with email fallback.
Did some stoopid bot right that article?
It's a reactor designed to produce large amounts of plutonium. Any reactor produces some amount of energy, nuclear reactions are famous for their energy creation.
Calling it an adblocker is pretty dishonest when it's main purpose is to enforce Coalition for Better Ads standards. It is not an alternative to wide spectrum 3rd party content blockers at all for people who care about a clean browsing experience.

It could block competitor ads, assuming it will be default enabled later when it hits general availability and the majority of Chrome users do not care about tweaking their settings.
Wow, complete redesign? Sounds dangerous. Why dont they make incremental changes and ab-test the impact?
I don't have a handle on the politics. Is this part of the purge of people who may have had sex with / propositioned founders? Or is the timing just coincidentally bad?
I have a friend who is building a new Wt application just now, and he's very satisfied with it. (Just intranet, though, so I cannot share any links.)
Also, isn't the first medical surgery in history, we have evidence of, related to the teeth ?
This makes me sad. Being European, Spotify is one of the few European companies I'm proud of,
Agreed. Those semi regular approached by Work to relocate perhaps shoudln't be dismissed out of hand. Would love to leave the country until all this brexit shit washes over
SEO Services
The JURY don't have any powers without THE JUDGE, whose ratification of the decision the jury made is the only means by which the law finds force in society. Without the Judiciary, no Jury. That's how the law works.

Gawker gambled on their ability to stay in business while also committing vile acts of hatred using their right to free speech. They lost the gamble. They weren't told "you can't have free speech" - they were told "you caused this amount of damage, by exercising your rights" - and it was Gawker themselves who decided they could not take responsibility for that damage, so they shuttered themselves.

Gawker lost because they flaunted the law, and in spite of having a court order to cease their attacks on an individual, continued regardless. TMZ and MANY OTHER SITES did not flaunt the law, nor were they required to - as they were not the targets of the suit.

"You are anti-free speech": No, you are simply wrong. I'm pro-free speech. I just don't think that its the golden get-out-of-jail card that you think it should be. There are other rights granted us by society; when one set of rights is used to impinge upon another, that is a case for the legal system to administer. You are yet to demonstrate an understanding of this fact: You can say what you want, but if it causes me harm, I also can say what I want - and when a multi-million dollar company goes up against an individual, I'm very glad of the fact that these rights are adjudicated in court.

>Apparently, it's for the billionaire's.

Gawker=multi-million-dollar BUSINESS. HH=(admittedly wealthy) INDIVIDUAL.

Just whose side are you on there, buddy?
Show HN: An Italian-POS-Tagging (Viterbi, CYK, PCFG) Lib in Python
Monitoring DNS in Cloud-Native Applications
don't understand why you got downvoted, it's a pretty legitimate concern.

You may however see the whole thing a bit differently :

- node popularized single loop event on the server side, which is great for fast low cpu request processing

- go evangelized simple design, coroutines , unique code formating, and has arguably one of the best stdlib. That's still true today and it's great

- Rust made people realize writing concurrent truelt safe code was possible. Huge advance.

- Elixir helped the community focus again on actor + message passing concurrency. It's fantastic.

All of those concepts are beneficial to learn, for you as a programmer, no matter which language you use.

If for example look at swift evolution, you'll see the current threading model (based on event loops, like node, because of iOS) discussed and compared to the actor model ( like erlang / elixir), but also that some web framework reimplemented go-style concurrency.
You'll also see that they're talking about adding semantic for detecting memory sharing patterns (much like rust).

If you've followed all the discussions on those languages for the last two years you know exactly why those conversations are taking places. So all in all it's a good thing communities are advocating the strenghts of their language. It helps everyone improve.
2019: JSON decoding in Mahogany-lang is hard…
Local SEO Services
i think the problem is it's a highly technical, mathematical and social problem that isn't easily explained. well, the technical part is even comparatively simple. but the negative implications are usually harder to communicate. the "slippery slope" argument only gets one so far and non-criminals usually can't imagine how it would negatively affect them. "only metadata" doesn't sound too bad!

the opponents of full encryption though have it quite easy by name-dropping the FUD buzzwords - i.e. security and terrorism. and anyway, it's only metadata!
If we fuck up Brexit badly enough, maybe we'll see them back in action.
OTOH it has become more true over time, because C and C++ based hardware and software platforms became dominant and processors are now designed to just run C(++) as well as possible.

CPUs no longer commonly implement integer overflow checking, granular hardware based memory safety primitives, efficient user level exception handling, etc.
Let's talk. I've been thinking about building something like this for my own use; I think I'm not the only one.
There's something deeply dysfunctional in the UK Home Office. People who've been through that mill seem to come out with a really weird myopic perspective on the world, May included.
> It feels like someone looked at all warnings in a compiler and said, I'll just explicitly define exactly how I want each warning to behave, so that it is no longer dangerous behavior.

I get the impression you're saying this in a (rightfully) despairing tone as if it only seems that way, and noone in their right mind would actually do that in reality. But this is actually the stated mission of the HTML editor. This was literally his intent with HTML5. That is what it is.
[x] No sample I can download to hear how it sounds?

[x] First thing I try to upload tells me price is calculated based on number of words?

[x] No information on what will happen?

[x] close site
I found the John Oliver episode about Snowden to be very good at conveying the ideas of privacy.
Just mention that the govt can decrypt your dick pics and sexting if these laws pass.
Low pressure sodium lamps (SOX) are negative, -44. High pressure sodium lamps (SON) are positive, +20.
Yeah, firefox has been a pretty abysmal experience for me on android, it's slow, scrolling is janky, it crashes almost every time I try to use it... it's just been a bad experience all around.
Steps for Replacing Sprinkler Heads
Ah yes - well spotted. I actually did mean the main Microsoft API rather than the specific AAD one....
> like for example how cloudflare protects ALL requests to the domain.

The primary purpose of cloudflare is to hide the IP address of the server and filter packets on IP level. It does not magically protects from any attack, especially on application level.

It is wrong to assume that there is a universal automatic solution against DDOS. Neither CDN nor Cloudflare nor REST API (how?) can help with this.
This is good news. Waiting it to be merged with hyper including the http2 support. With both of them it will make Rust the perfect choice for all my current use-cases.
Nah, they aren't driving the mlm. Their skills are leveraged more for the door to door giants like Vivent and most every other door to door sales company you can think of. And on the darker side, Utah also houses a great deal of very legally dubious boiler room sales floors. You will find that almost every single "I make $900 at home" that originated from the US will lead you to a high pressure sales floor in Utah.

The mlm seems to be the stay at home moms and maybe a mix of others that are able to leverage their church network.
Also, this is beyond ridiculous. Have fun having those "private conversations" on a backdoor-riddled machine.
Google Search Interest in Eclipse
I'd love to know how to do that without eschewing Chrome altogether.
There is a growing misconception that it is the role of the government to "keep their citizens safe".

Although that it is often the intention of legislation to prevent behaviour which may lead to unsafe situations. For example, making it illegal to drink and drive. You can arrest someone for breaking the law, but never can you arrest someone right up to the point of breaking the law. For example, You cannot arrest someone for being drunk and having their car keys in their pocket, or even being asleep in the car while drunk.

This is the problem with the government demanding to read all communications... the idea that they have the right in order to prevent you committing a crime. Its not only impossible to prevent someone committing a crime (anyone can snap and do truly horrible things without prior communique), its insane to think that you can arrest someone for pre-crime.

The role of the government is to pass laws. The role of the police and the justice system is to enforce these laws. It is not their job to spy on all their citizens for events which historically kill fractions of a percent compared to something as trivial as car accidents.
I've read so many arguments advocating strong encryption, all of which I agree with, and many of them are simplified as best we techies can - check out some of Troy Hunt's posts. But even avoiding the tech aspect completely, there is one thing the government simply refuses to accept.

Banning strong encryption will not stop people using it.

It will stop the 'good' and generally innocent populace using it and severely infringe on their right to privacy, but the 'bad' people will just fork an open-source messaging system that uses E2E encryption and start using that.

As commented in the article, strong encryption cannot be 'de-invented' now it's out in the open. Each and every one of these government statements is a drastically oversimplified knee-jerk reaction to the problem. Bet they think they can get tech companies to implement RFC 3514 to stop hackers.
Are you law enforcement with a warrant?
Yes, afaik this was the purpose... to prove the creator had not pre-mined a bunch of coins and was then going to cash then in later.

Which is incredible foresight, because that's what ended up happening with some altcoins.
Power and control.
You're right, but you'd need your own specific Telegram-internal user id so that your message will only be routed to your specific chat. With my little piece of code, n people can register at 1 bot. Without it you would either have to figure out your user id first or have n separate bots for n people. Of course, the advantage is not too dramatic ;-)
And yes, the ability to link the bot to further services than only Telegram is another plus.
Maybe because Mercurial is GPL? I saw that too, and wondered as you did.

https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/file/tip/COPYING
Daily Mix is intended to work this way. It's ought to give you songs that you already know and like, not the new ones.
Ather Energy S340
Best Books on How to Learn UI/UX Design
Maybe it's a little different depending on your creator status, who you're partnered with, etc - but from my experience of monetising videos, there is very little control over the ads, for example, here's what I see when I choose to monetise a video.

http://i.imgur.com/wTbpa8a.png

Excuse the dark theme, it makes the checks a little hard to see.