skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm pretty sure you'll be able to follow the Servant docs, which are quite nice:

https://haskell-servant.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

There are definite advantages, and if you're willing to put in as much work as one, say, unconsciously puts in while setting up JS frameworks, understanding libraries like this is definitely doable. (Without the dissertation.)
I find monads much much more easy to reason about, because they give you a "plain old values" perspective as well as an effectful perspective; most of the time you work like you would with effects, but if you ever get confused you can drop down to seeing what the values are doing. The one mainstream example of something effect-like is Java checked exceptions, which are widely regarded as a failure (and I think for good reason).
so, listen to an ebook. you can also do that while you wait for an uber and walk to your office.
> Especially when I also hear stories about companies like Whatsapp and Instagram being able to scale their businesses to hundreds of millions of users using very small engineering teams

very diferent business models Netflix is probably spending Billions on creating original content.
> no real purpose

That is a loaded statement. If you ask a monk whatever you are doing in life has no real purpose.
ghcjs is a pretty heavyweight environment. It's actually translating the compiled core IR from GHC into JavaScript, and including a port of GHC's runtime system.

It can run basically any Haskell library. That includes the ability to run multithreaded Haskell code -- the JS RTS includes a scheduler. You also get Software Transactional Memory. Lazy evaluation works just as usual -- and so on.

The tradeoffs become worth it when you have a sufficiently valuable base of Haskell code that you want to run in the browser, and when your users aren't very constrained by page load time. Say, if you have some complicated tricky logic that you don't want to rewrite in another language, but you want to use it in your web app.
By then, the old guard will have a large back catalog of owned content that no upstart could ever dream of competing with. Crosslicensing (and lack thereof) as an oligopolistic moat. Even a perfectly made "House of Thrones" would utterly fail in the market if it was launched as an effectively isolated subscription.
The difference is that Canonical know when their time is up. Microsoft will steam roll everyone with marketing, blogs and noise.
Is there a wikileak bias or do conservatives have better infosec?
They won't tell how many of those are free trial users who keep rotating in assumingly very high numbers..
Yes, but it is all just speculation. And when you compare it to how poorly our bodies handles running now I would say it is a weak argument.

Also the "we can run the prey tired" argument clashes with the observations of hunter gatherers where large animals plays a very small role in day to day diet.

Also there is a very large opportunity cost for running after large pray.

Imagine 5-10 hunters running after a big pray, and not catching it. Now they have been running a half marathon. They might be far from water. They have expended a lot of energy and will be hungry and tired and will have to walk home to camp. With nothing to eat.

I think there is a good reason that hunting aminal usually just sprints for short durations. The other approach is simply too risky.

Nope. Walking it is.
It's probably a little late on this discussion, but I've just discovered that qbrt can also run XUL
Demonstrate a pair of tutorials aimed at the same level of reader, one in JS, and one in Haskell, where you end up with a better understanding of the idea of a monad reading the former (as opposed to the implementation of the Monad instance for a list).
I went part-time recently so I could spend more time on my side project. So far I've wasted most of the extra time procrastinating. :(
Startups CAN Work: MOG CEO David Hyman Responds To imeem’s Dalton Caldwell

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1817845
This is silly. People have home cooked for millennia because it's cheaper than outsourcing it. Although traditionally women were stuck with the task and not compensated for it. In some ways now we're seeing the end of uncompensated domestic labour and people reaching about for ways to replace it - robots? Temporary labour of strangers from the precariat?

Maybe a lot of the traditional home cooking stuff isn't as good as what you'd get from takeout. A subtle form of inflation. For really cheap stuff the early blog posts of Jack Monroe are a good read; https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/oct/02/jack-mo...

Home cooking benefits from amortisation. Cooking more servings is often only a little more labour, up to the size of your kitchen. You don't need to shop daily either.

I do my own cooking and it rarely takes more than half an hour of actual work, plus up to half an hour (longer for weekend roasts) of semi-unattended cooking time.
> “People who spent money to buy themselves time, such as by outsourcing disliked tasks, reported greater overall life satisfaction,”

People in here complaining that they like to clean or cook so the study is wrong. Focusing on the wrong part of the study. Which tasks you'd outsource is up to you. If you like cooking, then obviously don't outsource cooking!

But if there's something you dislike doing, outsource it! You'll be happier than if you spent the money on junk.
Streaming audio from a Node.js server to HTML5 “audio” tag
Cloud services don't save you money, they buy you focus.

There are very little companies today that need custom buildouts, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep an eye on portability.
In addition to mikechar's sibling comment, keep in mind that the blockchain technology can still be used for all kinds of stuff even if Bitcoin and Ethereum completely collapse to zero. They are just specific implementations and there is nothing particularly unique about them technologically compared to any given fork of the same code.
Credit cards are totally unnecessary in the age of online banking. Why does it not die already?
Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality
instead of making this (even more) illegal, which would solve very little as its still apparantly trivial to do, they should instead work on making that address book.

that way when everything is transparant, paedophiles can be caught and we might choose not to vote for somebody with a cocaine addiction.
Thank you for your supports guys!!! I hope I will attract some others Go guru to work with!! I truly appreciate your interest, it's a little step, but I promise I will Go (haha) through it!
Google Search: Inurl:server Filetype:key “-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----”
> I wonder where the $20B figure came from, Google finance says that they only have about $3 billion in debt

The numbers are from Netflix's QE reports [1].

I don't know exactly where Google Finance gets the information, but IMO it's always better to get the data close to the source :)

[1] - https://ir.netflix.com/results.cfm
Misleading users with product name Xiaomi 10000 mAh Powerbank has just 6900 mAh
The phisher just shows you a "password incorrect" message on the first attempt. Assuming you made some typing mistake, you enter your password and 2FA again...
That is their theory, but I see a lot of trouble in their analysis.

A different take on their data is:
Not doing things is becoming ignorant and in the short term ignorance of the negatives in life is bliss. In the longterm, not knowing how to do the things that are happening so you can survive is a larger stress for people. Consequently, people are happy when they are choosing to outsource, but it does not last and they choose to cycle back. The noveau rich outsource willingly and the other rich outsource more reluctantly as they are more familiar with the eventual costs of short term stress reduction.
How Will GDPR Affect Your Web Analytics Tracking?
And apparently the BBC thinks it needs to explain what the word "trivial" means.
> The main limitation right now is that we aren't quite there yet on battery tech

That might be the main tech limitation (don't agree with that either because flight coordination is actually a bigger problem.

The actual MAIN limitation is that in an urban area (where 95% of jobs are) no resident is going to stand for helicopter noise by thousands of commuters at all hours.
And creating a drone/copter that is quiet while transporting people-sized payloads is a much bigger challenge than creating one which is fuel efficient.
China : "Jump!"
Apple : "How high?"
But not mention which extensions were doing the harvesting...
Unit test angular controller with JsTestDriver
I feel like this article could've been a third of its length, and was going to great lengths to fill space.
Seems like something similar would happen in Russia this Fall too. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-internet-idUSKBN1A...
It's more convenient because I cook many meals at once so have several containers worth of meals in my fridge almost all the time.

Also, when meeting people, I have them over for lunch or dinner more than before learning to prepare food from scratch, business and personal, so meeting gets easier. And cheaper -- I save money cooking them and me dinner compared to eating out and just paying for me, though they usually bring something with them.

Plus it deepens the relationship faster to cook at home and share, so there's a convenience in shortening the get-to-know-each-other part of a relationship.

The picking it up takeout on the way home part is an inconvenience. As is dealing with paying for it. I pick up my CSA delivery once a week, but it's one of the highlights of the week. Seeing all the fresh fruits and vegetables, the anticipation, the creative challenge of figuring out how I'll combine and prepare them... I'd choose it over going to art galleries, movies, or many social things. In fact, I bring people with me to pick them up as a social event.

In summary, food becoming an enriching part of my life replaces a lot of time wasters. Healthier food means less exercise time and cost for the same fitness, etc.
If you need a code generator to generate boilerplate... something's wrong with your language
It is not our model. But if you ready pay for this, we will think about it.
Basically the only integration with Brunch is these two lines[0] that come with the default template, along with the .js files. Just switch those bad boys out to whatever tool you want, make sure the tool outputs to the directory Phoenix wants and you are good to go!

[0] https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/blob/20e2826587b...
I'm not suggesting they didn't return it, but that they specifically didn't hand it in. Why did they have to hunt down the owner? There's no reason they had to maintain possession.

> Finder tried to locate the owner, and then contacted Apple multiple times

Give it to the police. No consumer-electronics publication required.

Is this the device? : http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone

They take the thing apart? So they "said they would return it", but not before taking the opportunity to fully evaluate the thing they decided to keep hold of?

Also, how diligent were they as self-appointed owner-finders?:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/7731500/Steve-Jo...

https://www.cnet.com/uk/news/how-gizmodo-escaped-indictment-...

It's not Gizmodo's business to handle lost property, especially when they intend to gain something from the possession.
You cant be leaked on if you do not use technology! runs away
GOLD Recovers Further,Looks to Extend Upside Pressure
You can't really do that when you're hiring headcount.

I'm curious, why not? Can't you do it on a regular basis, like refactoring?
1. I can use the ride to drink coffee and wake up, so I wake later and am more productive through the day. Plus I can use the time to generally relax, listen to music, listen to a book, read news, and so on.

2. I spend zero time at gas stations, washing the car, servicing it, warming it up, changing to winter tires, or cleaning the windshield off. I also spend zero time doing driveway snow removal in the winter.

3. I have to find parking with my own car.

4. I am more likely to use my feet as my primary mode of transportation. This means I am less likely to need to schedule separate exercise time. And I can still listen to music, news, or an audiobook.

5. Because it saves money, budgeting is a little easier (especially if you are poor) because you aren't as tight.
If you're counting asset value, pretty much every middle-class person with a home and a pension is a millionaire, in Euros or dollars. Doesn't mean they have a million in free cash, but it's what you need if you're going to live 20+ years after retirement with no employment income.
I've been really enjoying the pragmatic studio series as well. I highly recommend it if you're looking into getting into Elixir.
Barefoot on the natural concrete?
I tried to find if someone is compiling the list of these extensions, but I couldn't find anything.
For anyone considering running in Vibrams, take note that the evidence suggests they actually promote injury. I haven't researched it deeply, but this article seems like a good starting point:

https://deadspin.com/the-scientific-case-against-vibrams-fiv...
Don't they get some kind of bulk discount on those cards? A deal to pack them in bulk and ship them straight from the factory seems kind of obvious.
Perhaps part of it is because it's such a heavily regulated industry that change takes a while/is hard to initiate.
Well I don't think the food comparison is entirely fair (it would take me a long time to learn to cook all the kinds of food I want to eat), but my point is more about perceptions.

In most service industries, you have people serving many different customers at once in a way that's usually more efficient than every individual doing the work. But if I pay for a cleaner, I'm paying someone to spend time doing almost exactly what I would do otherwise. They're probably slightly faster than I would be, but otherwise there are no economies of scale obscuring the inequality, and that's what makes a lot of people uncomfortable with it.
One claim is as good as another.

They aren't, which is why we have things like journalism.
TIL there's some "idea of a monad".

Basically this is (in my mind) what's wrong with Haskell: it's overly concerned with the Platonic ideal.

Meanwhile that one page on jargon has shown me that I effortlessly implement any and all of those things daily (and understanding what I'm doing) without the need to understand "an idea". I just use the tool that solves the problem. If someone insists on calling this "monadic composition", or "lifting over typeclasses", or "zygohistomorphic prepromorphisms", so be it.
I think you could fill a season of TV drama.
First impressions: looks unfinished, needs serious design work. Looks deserted, no sense of community.

Reading tools are pretty useless: autoscrolling gets my eyes tired and the slowest speed is too fast for me. Also I don't think people use desktops/laptops to read books. Better to optimize for mobile.

Progress bar, daily wordcount and all that only annoy me as a writer. It's a creative process, sometimes I write 1000 words, sometimes 0, sometimes I delete 1000 words.

But before spending any time on extra features I think an interesting question to ask would be: if I were a writer why would I choose fictionhub to publish my stories? You want to attract writers first of all, how are you going to do it?
That would be a very restrictive programming environment, or type checking might fail or produce ridiculously large runtime bounds. It is not decidable whether a given Turing machine has runtime O(n^k) for a particular k, even if you're given the promise that such a k exists.
Facebook shuts AI system after bots create own language
Databases, Kindness, and Building a Learning Culture in Tech
Dynarchlib – A professional JavaScript framework
One person above suggesting produce, then someone responded about pasta, hot sauce, and other things that aren't produce.

Even letting slide that moved goalpost, some things requiring packaging doesn't merit disparaging the idea of reducing packaging.

In my case, I stopped buying pasta and mostly replaced it with legumes, which I buy from the bulk food store with bags I bring with me, so I've achieved the same effect. As best I can tell, the legumes are healthier and taste delicious in my stews. Plus I've learned to make more foods in the process.
I was referring to the act of interference, not the motivation behind it.

The government may not need to decrypt or block most traffic, but telcos will want to extract a levy for various uses of their circuits. Using the argument used against Netflix, why should your employer just be able to benefit from pushing ActiveSync down to your phone without paying Verizon?
Yes exactly, say you are on a 12month refresh cycle of your GPUs at Nvidia/AMD - 2 months is nearly 1/6th of that.

AMD or NVidia could 1up them by air shipping, which is very low cost considering the value per kg of the shipment.
Correct me if I am wrong but I thought the US already had (creditcardless) internet banking. It seems credit card inertia is hard to overcome. What is more frustrating is "trends" from the US keep washing up on our shores like a bad dream and upset any advances we have made. Case in point: Netflix India does not accept anything else other than credit cards. A similar phenomena can be observed in the healthcare industry. India is already moving towards the way (IMO) the broken US healthcare system works. It gives me nightmares. I hope the Indian government clamps down heavily on this unscrupulousness.
Pricey internet and nostalgia keep Alaska video stores alive
No but you can dissociate content creators and providers. Like Universal Studios wouldn't care whether people are viewing their movies on netflix, HBO, amazon, apple, as long as they get the royalties.

And that creates less vendor lockin, more competition on content.
> Two German researchers say they have exposed the porn-browsing habits of a judge, a cyber-crime investigation and the drug preferences of a politician.

So how long before we as a society stop making a big deal of things like that? Everyone watches porn, most people enjoy drugs[1].

Why does anyone still care? Why do we make such a hullabaloo if a judge watches porn? Why is it a big deal if a politician smokes some pot to relax? Who cares if a detective drinks a case of beer on the weekend to blow off some steam?

I'm all for privacy and there are things I wouldn't care to expose on the internet (like my home address and exact apartment number)[2], but I promise you future generations will not give a shit about each other's "super secret internet browsing habits". My fav porn site is RedTube, my drug of choice is caffeine, and I hate that ThePirateBay has become hard to find in recent months.

There's a lot of memes out there about deleting your browser history before you die. But honestly who cares? And if you're doing illegal shit, use a burner laptop. They're $100 on Amazon [3]. Don't be dumb.

[1] drugs as in psychoactive substances. Legal drugs like caffeine and alcohol count, as do prescription drugs.

[2] you can probably triangulate those from my YouTube videos if you really want to

[3] https://www.amazon.com/Performance-RCA-Touchscreen-Quad-Core...
Sharing new framework to Manage Container cluster
Swan is a new container framework from China team, https://github.com/Dataman-Cloud/swan

it now heavily developed, welcome to use it and give some feedback.Pls read the following installation info:

### Installation

clone Swan source code from github.com:

```
git clone git@github.com:Dataman-Cloud/swan.git
```

Then you can compile Swan with:

```
make
```

### Run

Single

```
./bin/swan manager --mesos=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/mesos \
--zk=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/swan \
--listen=192.168.1.193:9999
```

Cluster

```
./bin/swan manager --mesos=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/mesos \
--zk=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/swan \
--listen=192.168.1.193:9997
```

```
./bin/swan manager --mesos=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/mesos \
--zk=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/swan \
--listen=192.168.1.193:9998
```

```
./bin/swan manager --mesos=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/mesos \
--zk=zk://192.168.1.92:2181/swan \
--listen=192.168.1.193:9999
```

```
--mesos : mesos address.
--zk : zk address.
--listen: listen address.
```

More comand line flags, see
```
./bin/swan --help.
```
Seeing as he is running his own projects, I would say he isn't limited to 8 bankable hours a day.
Seems like a bad idea. This would also, for example, out tons of LGBT people.
How does that not fall foul of the "I have nothing to hide" fallacy¹², and its various dangerous consequences³?

1: http://falkvinge.net/2012/07/19/debunking-the-dangerous-noth...

2: https://steemit.com/privacy/@tomkirkham/i-have-nothing-to-hi...

3: https://jacquesmattheij.com/if-you-have-nothing-to-hide
The docs are nice, but they complement the code :)

Basically to actually understand what's going on, I'll need to learn DataKinds (at the very least).

And just to implement something as simple as BasicAuth, this is what I have to start with (https://haskell-servant.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorial/Au...):

{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-}
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverloadedStrings #-}
{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}

You rarely need anything beyond regular JS to understand the inner workings of most libraries.
Think one Millennial can change the world of Minecraft? Marius Metzger did
I agree partially, but I stand on my point. Having no shoes will change how you use your legs and feet. Also tech and market may influence people into thinking they need cushion to run without injuries but they have incentives to do so.
It's code reuse for concepts. Wouldn't you agree that reusing intuition about things is good? It's the same as knowing what big-O is instead of just memorizing "bubble sort is slower than insertion sort, insertion sort is sometimes faster than quicksort but usually not", or knowing what concurrency is instead of memorizing the API of a library in your favorite language.
So, assuming Netflix goes belly up at some point, I am MUCH happier they spent $20B making shed-loads of new content (i.e. paying out to creative and production people) that will live on than e.g. putting it in a pile and burning it like the Facebook / Whatsapp $16B "valuation". That value just disappears IMHO.
Im sure most of the $9 a month I used to spend went to paying for licensed content but I watched probably 80% original content. I left because of DRM. I don't know if it would be a money making venture for them but, for $5 a month, I would subscribe to a Netflix Original content only, DRM free service if they offered it. Seems like it'd be easy for them to do a trial run of such a thing.
There's a difference between loneliness and solitude. We introverts tend to value the latter more highly than extroverts do. The former still harms us all.