skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I know that there is a terms of service and I also know there are some projects that succeed, but the failure rate is extremely high. Yes, there being zero responsibility for the project which got funded through the Kickstarter like platform where hundreds of thousands of dollars is being handled and having zero responsibility is absurd and should never be allowed, that's what my argument is. As a customer you can only do so much about due diligence about a project and its creators. When Kickstarter like platform is the one which is handing the money over to the project creator, naturally it is their responsibility to do a due diligence about the campaign as they are the ones who are handling a large sum of money on behalf of the backers. When Kickstarter like platforms put that responsibility on the customer to due diligence, it leaves the customer to the mercy of the project creator which is what I have saw in most of the projects which I funded or backed out. Because Kickstarter like platforms suck 7-8% of the campaign as their commission, it seems its easy to have a TOS where you claim zero responsibility and just walk away with the money safely and also just blame or not have any control on the project creator with the money they raise from these sites and the project creator can also walk away free and clear without any repercussions but taking hundreds of thousands of dollars for free.
I just don't see it. I mean these three things aren't "everything you know."

Even then I have a major issue with the concept that people are going to be reading Ulysses, or watching a movie on the drive. Car sickness is a real thing and affects a sizeable enough portion of the population that it's not going to overhaul entertainment.

I think what it is going to do is make people who drive for a living obsolete and have better flexibility in transportation for the working class and poor, making it into a better version of the bus.
Yeah, he should probably change the title from Garuda to something else (even 'Garuda: Learn Phoenix by building it yourself' is better).
I never knew what code post-80's NASA regulars actually wrote. When the MCC was moved off of the mainframe (MOC), it was all contractors. A crazy mix of skillsets in C/C++. A lot of subsystems/silos. Working across silos, it was incredible the brain trust you could meet from the old crowd (often retirees brought in for 2AM tests). I learned a lot of kids were afraid to say wtf. These old coots would love to talk for hours if you asked why something was done that way.

Considering the TRAJ assembly probably went back to DEW Line, I have no idea how they peeled that logic off. I still run into LockMart folks running ancient ATC code on Unix variants that have been out of service for over a decade.

Our code will never last that long.
Easier than code written in Go for example? And what about handling exceptions in asynchronous code with generators?
Incorrect. They literally declared "we were phished", in plain words, describing how they were phished and the resulting attack. To say this does not "accept responsibility" is bullshit. You don't get to light the torches and grab the pitchforks to go chase some stranger who exposed you to vulnerability. They are human, they failed, and they're dealing it with professionally.

I'm assuming from your tone of "I demand his head" that you were running the compromised extension, and wish to extract your pound of flesh from the person who compromised you. (EDIT: If not, what's your beef with them? Are you a competitor? Please explain!) This, too, is wrong. And here's why we don't play the blame game when it comes to human failures:

You chose to run a Chrome extension, from an untrusted source, with only machine automation vetting its contents and auto-update ensuring that you get the latest attack. Of course you got compromised. What else did you expect? How could you place ultimate trust for all content in your browser in the hands of an OCR extension?! What on earth could compel you to accept such a ridiculous risk in exchange for this?

Everyone's human, you included. They clearly stated and accepted responsibility for the incident. Now you need to stand up and accept responsibility for running unvetted code in your browser. (EDIT: Yes, it's machine-vetted. How's that working out for you?)

There's more than enough blame to ensure you get an equal portion. Being human is bad enough without people coming to destroy you because they'd rather not confront their own failures of judgement. Get over your immature desire to get your vengeance for being compromised and build a better approach to your own personal security.
Gawker died because when someone asked if they had any decency, any concern and respect for a person's private life, they responded with a resounding absolutely not. Gawker died because they basically became the media version of Roy Cohn.
Yes, it's deeply frustrating. I can confirm what you're saying and I only run about 30 miles a week, but I can run a six minute mile and a sub-20 5k (none of which are humblebrags by the way, that's at most a year of consistent training if you're younger than 50 and starting with a healthy weight). I find the exact same sentiments from people all the time. It's maddening having people telling me what they believe is good for my body with no attempt at research.

I'll offer a few of my favorites:

"Wow, your maximum heart rate is way too high. You should slow down."

"Your resting heart rate seems pretty low, are you alright?"

"You're going to develop arthritis running that much."

"You shouldn't run outdoors on pavement that much, it's bad for your knees."

"You shouldn't run on a treadmill that much, it's bad for your knees."

"Your stride is too short."

The worst is when people take legitimate science, or attempts at legitimate science, and use vague pseudoscience that resembles it to prescribe something I don't need. No, my heart rate is not too high at 215, I assure you, despite what your catch all formula says. No, I don't need to go barefoot running. No, I don't need to run at exactly 140bpm to be at my personal "fat burning zone."
There will also be people that have a good reason to own cars - like if you have a dog, or a baby (so you essentially keep baby stuff in your car nearby), or just need to lug large amounts of stuff around that you need handy.

That said, I do believe - if the technology proved successful - it will have an enormous impact.
I'm not up-to-date on all things Thiel, but a rudimentary search on him doesn't bring up anything noteworthingly heinous.

I believe it's just a classic case of mixing literal and connotative meanings of phrases. The poster does not mean Peter Thiel is inherently an unlikeable person, but that the poster himself believes Peter Thiel to be an unlikeable person, i.e "I don't like Peter Thiel."

E-prime doesn't have this problem.
Like Philippines then. I imagine it came from the Spanish?
Baldness is fundamentally about cellular senescence. If you are arguing your startup can solve a major problem in getting you (and your cells) to live longer, solving baldness would be a great, objective proof of concept.
Are you arguing that nobody goes there anymore because it is too crowded?
How come he have only 3k? Why didn't the plaintiff fight for more?
I've been wondering lately how feasible it would be to build an e2e encrypted social networking service. Just give people a completely secure place to store their photos, build a network of friends, message people, and promote social events without having their data mined for advertisements and government subpoenas.
Reading HN, Smashing Magazine, and A List Apart will pay off greatly in a few years.
Your heel doesn't have leverage to lift your body off of the ground. If your heel is leaving the ground it's either your knee lifting it or your toes pushing it. In the gif you linked, and in proper running form, you push with the balls of your feet. Your ankle / heel system is solely a fulcrum that doubles as a dampening spring.
bit.ly addresses don't keep their URL in the address bar (Eg. http://bit.ly/19y8wyr for HN), so it's possible you might not notice it once you've clicked, depending on how realistic the malicious target URL was.
reading comprehension? did you read what I stated about exceptions?

Get out of the touristy areas, and everywhere in china, crap starts to look the same...
Ah, the delightful irony. Install a chrome extension to warn you if you get owned by a chrome extension.
I've gotten this phishing e-mail 3 times over the past month or so. The first time I almost fell for it.

Looking at the attacker's code, they are currently trying to steal cloudflare api keys in addition to stealing cookies from all sites the extension users visit :(
> We can't see or think anything concrete. We have never touched anything 'physical' or 'real'. It's all abstract representations in our brains.

This is some sectarian preaching in my opinion. The whole thing including these very Western philosophical sects are possible exactly because something concrete definitely exist. The DNA and the laws which make it stable and the whole life on top of it is the consequence of the fact that something concrete is out there.

This, BTW, is an millennia old debate between some branches of esoteric Eastern schools and should, perhaps, be a part of seconady school lectures.

As for definitions of infinity, the theoretical possibility of infinite series, infinite small numbers or infinitely many real numbers between 0 and 1 is nothing but mental constructs. There is not a single "concrete" infinity.
You won't be able to buy a working used GameCube system for $50 forever.
Well, kind of. I don't want to be that guy, but the reason you can go to those fancy resorts is precisely because the vast majority of people cannot (like the resort service staff).
That's a pragmatic theory, but in a reality there's also a little of irrational need for eye-for-an-eye revenge in an act of the punishment of a wrongdoer, people need that to feel that the justice was really met. It's an atavistic urge, lynch mob instinct to hate those who you see as a danger to your group. And yes it's not very rational or ethical, certainly not very civilized, and we can pretend we don't feel that way, but it's a part of a human nature. People who follow the rules expect to see those who break them punished as a proof that the system works; it makes them feel safe and content (and also reinforces social norms, as you've said).
Parse BPF_ARRAY macro in bcc
I assume they're saying it's hard to read, type, etc while driving.
Metroid Prime was so good.
By reading a book while in an uber
Funny, my thoughts exactly
Yeah. People who plant cocoa and get paid one half of one tenth of a cent for the material for each 2$ chocolate bar should thank you and their corporate overlords as well, because at least they're getting their $0.0005, right?
How to Register .com.np Domain Freely – DIGITALAMPLE.COM
What I Learned from Making CoolHue and Getting 1000+ Upvotes on Product Hunt
It's interesting to see WhatsApp held up as an exemplar of private communication, since Facebook is extraordinarily aggressive about mining the message metadata and linking your WhatsApp use to your Facebook account.

But what this article misses is the large neutral space of semi-private conversation that has disappeared over the last few years. More and more social spaces now come with a permanent transcript (whether public or held by a private party), and political organizing in particular has moved to sites like Facebook and to email mailing lists. It takes special effort and a fair amount of technical savvy to create spaces where people can speak in public, but not have their words live in perpetuity.

What we've ended up with is a world where private parties can communicate securely one-to-one (through messengers like WhatsApp or Signal), companies and political parties can micro-target segmented audiences in ways that are invisible to outside observers, but the broad public is not able to have casual conversations online that are not permanently recorded.
Have you tried putting the ironing board in front of a TV or something? I hate going to the gym, but bringing an iPad with some downloaded videos makes it bearable.
Since 1998, the number of children who died of heatstroke in vehicles has been around 30 to 50 a year [1]. Before that, the number was a bit lower (10 or less) [1]. Around that time, the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) mandate on new vehicles having passenger side airbags as standard equipment came into effect.

To address the issue of children dying due to airbag deployments (which were designed to protect an unbelted 50th percentile size male in a frontal crash), the NHTSA recommended that children in car seats be placed in the rear seats in the vehicle.

Due to the fact that it's much easier to not notice a child in a rear facing car seat in the rear of the car, as opposed to one in the front passenger seat, the number of children who died of heat stroke each year increased from 10 per year to 40 per year.

[1] https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/media/images/76289000/gif/...
Remo Recover 4.0 Keygen Plus Crack Free Download
I think some significant breakthroughs need to happen re: homomorphic encryption for this to be feasible at all. Search, recommendations, and integration all would be significantly degraded otherwise compared to something like Facebook.
My wife had completed a computer science degree before we ever met - although she changed career entirely and is now a (medical) doctor.

I don't try to teach her anything, nor have I tried to teach any previous partner. If people are interested they'll ask, if not I thinking trying to force knowledge upon them would be misplaced and unwelcome.

Reading the replies here I can see that it doesn't seem to end well most of the time. People are different, have different interests, and different tastes.

(Now I wonder what partners have tried to teach you, that you've rejected?)
There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom(1959) [pdf]
"Failing hard" and "severe dysfunction" probably aren't the most realistic ways of describing it. The situation isn't good, but it also isn't bad enough for terms such as those to apply.

While it isn't exactly a pleasant tool to use, it's not like it's totally broken either. I've used other similar software that was much worse to use than pgAdmin 4 is.

It's slightly better than pgAdmin 3 in some ways, but it's also worse in other ways. Overall, it's mediocre. That might be the underlying problem: it doesn't live up to the high expectations that the rest of the PostgreSQL ecosystem tends to set.

If I had to give it a grade, I'd say it's a B- or a C+. It could be a lot worse, but it could also be a lot better.
Such a powerful sense of Deja-vu. I'm old enough to remember in 1998 when everyone was saying "The Internet will effect everything you know" and yet lots of people would say "Really? I get along fine without email, I just use a FAX machine. And everything I want to buy is right down at the mall or in one of the mail order catalogs on my shelf. Internet hah! All that so I can get a chain letter of jokes I learned in middle school. No thanks."
I don't see why you can't just drive with bare feet? That's how I usually drive, since I wear flip flops everywhere, and driving with flip flops is a bad idea.

If I'm wearing boots, I'll often drive with bare feet too, depending on the vehicle.
Well,

It's true that self-driving cars will/would change a huge amount. But the article seems to make a lot of assumptions that may or may not be warranted. Will this facilitate population spread or population density? I think there are a lot of paradoxical factors which may come up.

One change someone pointed out here a while back is self-driving-ability increases the willingness of people to idle their cars in traffic. It stands to reason that an owner would have little disincentive to send their car out to idle in traffic and pick them up a few hours later, if it was convenient. It seems the final result would be gridlock.

Roads today are a free or low priced good whose use is limited by the ability by each person's ability and willingness to drive. Driverless cars could consume this good with fewer limits creating a "tragedy of the commons" type situation.

So it seems like either you will have regulation or you will have an unregulated situation where traffic grinds to even more of a halt than it is at today in major metropolitan areas.

If you have regulation, you may find eventually everyone forced into an Uber/Lyfte situation (self-driving cars become smart-buses) since that would optimize the use of street space. This would facilitate density imo.

If you have no regulation, you might find some folks going further out despite the time and because of the not having to do their driving. But that seems hard to know.

And generally, the change would be big enough that indeed predicting all the results seems hard. What level of autonomy is achieved when is a big factor, etc.
It's not absurd just because it is the statu quo.
Mysterious craters blowing out of Russia could mean trouble for the whole planet
Yep. That's what I was talking about.
That too can be fooled. Much better to login to your relevant account by manually opening a new tab and navigating to it. In this case one they saw no link and call to action on their Google developer's website they should realize something was a foot.
For GPU instance, I would suggest https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/ex51-ssd-gpu?co....

It is only 99 euro/month.
script blocking may be built in but I don't think noscript is.
I think that the core concept of the article is somewhat misplaced.

What used to sell WhatsApp and other IMs wasn't privacy, it was SMS at no cost and without limits. Then came the better UI, emoticons, group chats and network effects.

Only few people understand the privacy differences with SMS. Proof: how many security codes did you verify compared to the number of your active contacts?

About Twitter, its growth is limited not because of privacy concerns but because everybody understands that it's a public chat. Privacy is not even in the equation, nobody expects it so nobody is concerned about it. It's really down to the I don't have anything to say in public thing. People have a lot to say to friends but little to strangers. Not everybody is a blogger or has to send press releases, and even them, maybe only in their working persona.

To recap. Not only it's comparing apples to oranges (the post acknowledge that) but privacy is not a factor in both IMs and Twitter, unless you think that parents' advice "do not talk to strangers" is about privacy.
I feel like javascript could be in real danger when webassembly comes out, meaning any programming language could be compiled to webassembly so really there would be no reason to keep this ugly mess around.
If you aren't too pedantic about the definition of nobody it actually makes sense though. In this case "nobody" could be 5 billion+ people not going because it's too crowded, yet there would still be large crowd.
This is a duplicate of a previous, very, very lengthy discussion. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14819622
The problem with this kind of legislation is that it is unsustainable. The complexity and rate of emergence of digital markets will easily outstrip the governments ability to regulate them over the coming years. Of course, (slow) regulation like this will be disregarded by the community and progress will continue. It's possible that the rate of growth and profitability inherent to these markets will enable the market-builders to re-write government before government can write software to enable effective regulation.
> The fact is most discussion happens on reddit and HN so there's little real loss of intelligent discussion.

HN has the opposite issue. There is no want of sophisticated dialog here, but it borders on discussion for the sake of discussion.

One of many such exercises in futility that has overcome this specious neo-hacker culture.
> For mathematical object to 'exist' only thing required is logical consistency under the rules used.

This is precisely the rule which establish existence of gods, accelerating time, higher dimensions, and other mental UFOs.

Disconnected from reality (from what is) abstract, seemingly consistent logic is what supports all the chimeras.

Read some Indian or Tibetan tantras, look at some mandalas - everything is logically consisted according to a particular sectarian logic.
Or trust people's willingness to make money. Because of that fight in the end nobody developed that idea, and the money that both sides could have invested into development instead went to the lawyers.
If this is truly the reason the coder went overboard in parsing it up IMO.
I don't think that it's unique to the Spanish.
Agreed. The notion (expressed in the article) that most people don't require training to run correctly is patently false.

Most people aren't even breathing correctly, the idea that you can pick up after decades in schools and sedentary jobs and start running miles with no input in a way that won't get you hurt is rather dangerous.
Given it's a team account might have made usage a bit more complicated, but this sounds like something 2FA would have prevented, as even with the passsword the hackers wouldn't have been able to login.
Is it also means that no tor-browsing, No wikileaks from Russia ?

Did this affect to ransomware collector too?
Do you understand the situation with Gawker at all?

The “chilling” effect is really just not publishing private sex tapes (just for views, mind you) and refusing to take them down when ordered to... also not outing gay people. In other words, a bit of common decency.

There is a monumental difference between that and writing a negative article.

The “chilling” effect is not self imploding your news organization by doing stupid things over and over.
I have no idea about the veracity, but I have read a number of comments that state he likes to inject the blood of young people because he believes it will help prevent aging.

Now, that sounds insane and unlikely. However, I've seen it mentioned a number of times. I guess the claim is that it is from an interview. I'm unwilling to invest more time to look into it. I don't actually care and I'm not sure why, if true, it would make him a bad person. I have to assume it'd be voluntary, if true.

To be clear, it sounds rather unlikely. I share more to show what folks are saying, than to pass any judgement in his character.
Sorry, I've had a personal thing come up. I'll help you out soon.

Small world.
Free Will is an Illusion
Why would you not correct your original statement instead of putting it in an edit footnote? Some people may not read that far and you are giving bad info.
There's a lot of self-policing here. If a comment or submission is obvious spam, I am very quick to flag it (as are many others, apparently).
Haven't tried it, but the Google Jamboard looks pretty nice.
It's confirmed that next iPhone has face unlock (PearlID)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Unveiled
(I built Crestle.)

The downside is you don't get as much control over your environment (you get a terminal in the browser, but no SSH or sudo access, for example). If you have the inclination and ability to manage your own instances, EC2 is more flexible.
I think this article misses the point of Georgism: that the land tax replaces all other taxes.

In other words, while land belongs to the government (people), individuals are entitled to the entire product of their labor (as well as returns on capital). Georgism is simultaneously extremely Communistic and Capitalistic.
Perhaps. But I suspect that it's more general than that. Maybe it violates the ideal of equality. At Starbucks or Walmart, it's easy to pretend that workers are paid well enough. But when you're paying, it's in your face.
I learnt to drive in the UK without my shoes for better tactility. It helps.