skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure. I would happily pay my 7-10k for it, but not 20-25.
T-Systems has a third option: blame it on russian hackers! Works all the times!
Yes, exactly. And if the did away with that military, the whole country would become a giant gulag within a few years.
If like me you were wondering how the Smithsonian replied, there are links to other letters on the same page. The next one is a letter of thanks for sending certain pamphlets and recommendations, enclosing one dollar for another book.
Human Enhancement
Spotify Premium Code Generator No Survey
Or, The City and the Stars by Arthur C. Clarke, though it is was not exactly computer AI.

That book still makes me goosebumps every time I remember it.
> It has much of the same functionality

You could use both to accomplish the same thing, sure. But their concepts are quite different.

Rake works on tasks, which you define (or import from some gem).

Make works with file targets more than tasks. You define how it can make a certain (type of) file and it does the job.

Personally I mostly use Make if I want to generate files from something else. Otherwise I find small scripts easier than Rake or equivalent.
ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΙΣΤΟΣΕΛΙΔΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΩΝ ΜΕ WORDPRESS -
Render – Swift React-like library introduces inspector companion app
Sharing your Opinion. If price is low, then a lower range is ok, too. It is just that for the price of the Smart you could get a real car (Renault ZOE, which in in my opinion has the same revolutionary traits as the Teslas) with large electric range for the same price. They are missing almost every opportunity.
If he does not report it, and somebody else does, then he runs the risk of being rightfully accused of hacking, as the motivation can be understood as financially motivated.
Trapping Hackers
Hygiene and safety, I would guess. A card in a lanyard can get caught up in all sorts of machinery and even a wristband can be slightly difficult to keep clean.
Automated marketplaces are generally really efficient, which means that they drive the end-user cost down until it meets the cost of supply (ie. they drive the profit for suppliers down to zero). This is what's happening with Uber, even with their subsidised ride prices. (And for a virtual example, this is what happened in the Diablo 3 auction house, and basically killed the 'grind bosses for upgrades' endgame until they removed it.)
Create impressive and professional websites
You've never heard "I wonder where she gets her money"-type rumours?
That's a weird comment on his part, but I think there is often a large mismatch between the cost that a carless person assigns to "bumming a ride" and the cost that the car owner assigns to that. If you are not a car owner, you may not realize how much of a pain in the ass it is to stop whatever you are doing and play taxi.
Depends. If you have a statically typed language, you can usually just delete the class and fix all the compile errors. With a dynamically typed language, your point stands and I very much agree.
Moment / Lodash are JS utility libraries for both browser and server-side runtimes.
Anthony Burgess' lost dictionary of slang
GIMP has Script Fu (and a newer Python interface) which has been used for wonderfully time-saving things (e.g. process a thousand images with the same plugins and settings and such, implement your own custom processing tools by combining existing ones, etc.)

I'm sure the same sorts of things can be done with Krita, though I'm not familiar with it.

As for LibreOffice, that seems obvious. An easy/automated way to get data into and out of it for processing in other programs. An automated way to process lots of documents that need to stay in LibreOffice but need the same change performed on them (currency conversion, date format normalization, copyright update, etc.).

It's the same reason you'd want anything to be programmable: Automating away the tedious stuff.
Automated file conversion, e.g odf to pdf, comes to mind.
Surprising that this is the first mention of Apple Pay in the thread, given the upcoming release in iOS 11. I wonder how they'll resolve these issues. Will commercial transactions be technically forbidden? For how long, and for what reasons, will transactions be able to be reversed? When can we feel comfortable that the money is "really there"?
The last version, Belle, was quite nice to use.
I love your website. My experience (web app for heavily regulated industry):

- Customers don't want major versions to be continuously deployed. Each deployment involves validation and training. They want the software to be left alone, perhaps with the occasional bug fix.

- The business needs new features to stay competitive.

- So you're left actually needing to host multiple versions. All the major versions the customers are on, and want to stay on, and one latest-and-greatest version for winning new business.

- Never force a new feature on a user. It becomes obvious that you're building things that most of your customers don't want. This means don't create a major version and automatically deploy it.

- Moving data between systems is hard. Plan to never move data between systems, or major versions of the same system. Users prefer to see their data where they left it, looking exactly how they left it. A major version should be empty. If you constrain a new version of your software based on old data, sooner or later you're stuck, either because of schema or because of volume.

- So if you have a big new feature, you save it for the next rewrite.

- Once you've decided that at some point in the future you're going to do a rewrite, things fall into place nicely...

- You avoid the situation where your dev team is mostly useless apart from the few guys who originally wrote the system.

- You avoid the endless accumulation of data.

- You avoid being commanded by the product team.

- You avoid being hated by your users, and your clients.

- You avoid spending huge amounts of time and money on things you didn't really need to do.

- You avoid the end of your business, which is inevitable given ~10 years of 'current best practice'.

- The part that I don't know yet is... developers have been avoiding rewrites for so long, we haven't really got good at it. We need to do it, do it often, learn how to do it well, and share that experience.
See the price point again... compared to the other engines. This is not priced to sell, this is priced to showcase.
Technically you're supposed to hold on brakes or a hand brake while idle, which makes both points moot. Especially important in clutchless cars or other auto transmissions.

The brakes will hold a slipped clutch and a rear end.

The clutch has an added benefit of you get rear ended and drop it - engine braking is a thing. Not good for the engine, potentially good for your forward bumper when you get reared.
The main question to ask if you really need to use make. If you do, there practically no limit of what you can do with it these days, including deployment to different servers, starting containers/dedicated instances etc.
But unless you are already using make or are forced to, it's better to check one of newer build systems. I personally like CMake (it actually generates Makefiles).
The EU now has a pull system too, thanks to SEPA Direct Debits. The receiver only has to send an XML file to the bank claiming that the client signed a mandate authorizing them. The client does have 13 months to make a claim and get the money back, but it means that one has to carefully read the statements, rather than trust that every transaction was initiated by us.
AI, AI, captain.
That is literally what bill splitting is
I have a desktop publishing background and I'd say that CSS is way less convenient than the common desktop publishing styling model. In desktop publishing you assign styles to certain classes of page elements (paragraphs, character runs, graphics, tables, etc.) and you can base a style on another style, that's all. There's no element-element inheritance, only style-to-style inheritance. This is not ideal, I think, but you never get any surprises that are so common in CSS.

If I were to design a better styling model, I'd take that desktop-publishing model and added multiple inheritance (something you can model in XSL-FO with XSLT attribute templates) and maybe tried to have pattern-based rules, but not hierarchical as in CSS. What you normally need is to be able to specify that "add that much space between a table and a paragraph", "remove first line indent if the paragraph comes after a picture", "do not add space if the paragraph is at the top of the page", and so on. All this seems to be based on a particular arrangement of sibling elements, not of parent-child relationship. The only exception I can think of are tables, but they seem to be special anyway.
End of an era.

p.s. Paint.net is now part of the Windows Store
How about taking some existing smart contract, and also reviewing it also carefully? If it is used already by lots of users, people have already trusted it with their money.

I'm pretty sure that developing your own has much, much higher risk than using some pre-existing solution.
...unless you want to support more platforms and discover missing dependencies you never heard of before.
With Dynamic, yes, but not with existential quantification. The type is a proof the type-class is implemented.

I also didn't yet know Dynamic, thanks. I'm not that fluent in fp.
Well one reason to build native UWP apps is that you do animation on the composition layer, thus ensuring 60 fps. It makes quite a difference in the feeling of animated UI, side menus etc.

I agree though that app stores for desktop apps, seems to be the case for OS X as well. Not quiet sure why.
Although deeply unfair, this is not unusual, there have been many reported cases of companies shooting the messenger.

Unless the company concerned has a well documented and trusted bug bounty procedure, it can be very risky to report a bug in a system, if it involves any kind of hacking.

What happens is once the "bug" is reported, someone inside the company asks "How did this happen?". Now the person responsible has 2 options, admit it was their fault and the vulnerability exists and risk being accused of incompetence, or say that the system was hacked.

Human nature being what it is, one tends to complain of being hacked, thus snow-balling effects, which lead to the arrest of an 18 year old just trying to help.

My advice: Don't report these types of bugs at all, or if you really feel you must, report anonymously.
> And why would any developer make native Windows apps?

For the same customers that require WPF/Windows Forms nowadays, and there are tons of them in industrial settings.

Their Windows XP and Windows 7 computers won't last forever, but they still need to plug hardware devices, OS specific APIs, and COM based drivers into their native apps.
This is surely the main feature of what's euphemistically called "the sharing economy". It's so frustratingly cynical.
while you could install Paint.net or another alternative, IT departments block Windows Store from their machines meaning having something built in really did make a difference.
I think the gig economy is just a modern addition to day labouring, peacmeeal work and such. These segments have always existed. In many cases, they have played a positive role.

When "Labour" (unions and political movements) get heavy handed, they try to kill off these segments. They don't fit into the model. They want to promote job stability above all else, where workers have a right to their job in as close to perpetuity as they can achieve.

I don't think gig economies (and peacemeal or day labour) are completely without merits. The biggest advantage is a lack of gatekeepers. This has value.

Anyway, "uberization" is not going to replace the whole labour market. It's going to become a small segment of it. We need regulation that preserves it's character (low barriers, low committment, worker independence..) while bringing in standard worker protections.

There are many parts of the labour market that do not provide a middle class family income. The solution is not to kill them.
Please could it be possible to view a snippet - just to get an idea of how you do this. Cheers!
Serious question: We all know PayPal has a penchant for freezing/seizing PayPal balances, but is there actually a single known case of them actually initiating an unwanted bank account transfer without the user initiating it (or someone otherwise losing money via Venmo)? Is this fear even rational?

I can understand not wanting to support the company as a matter of principle, but I'm not sure I buy the risk angle.
Many newer cars don't have a manual clutch anymore, so the brake is the only reasonable way. Idle only will typically coast in those. Parking gear/brake will work but is annoying to use - and it is better to use the foot brake anyway most of the time.
Ha. Also worked for Cartridge Save. Remember them buying those pixels.
So much for the tip system ensuring better service. I can't imagine a server doing that around here. Then again, we use Chip&Pin, so it's not like they could take them all anyway.
Check out Mailinabox. This Project does most of it for you. https://mailinabox.email/
UWP cannot run on Windows 7 because it requires a container model, which I doubt they could just patch on Windows 7.
I tried describing here https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6oxra8/using_h... why I think that this is theoretically a TSP problem, I don't consider that necessarily the best way to treat it. tl;dr is, that at least to me, at the time, for this problem, the speedup of an optimal solution wouldn't have outweighed the additional thinking time to get to that optimal solution (and, most importantly, to actually make it useful; after all, I wasn't actually drawing a path, I was outputting a list of names).

You can even see that in the argument I added to the post; while a zig-zag line might've been, in theory, a stupider, easier way to solve the problem, in practice it would've meant spending some time thinking about the right discretization. With a Hilbert-curve, I could just choose some n that is definitely large enough and be done with it and the additional cost of the more complicated curve doesn't really factor in, as I could just copy-paste it anyway.

But yes. The theoretical problem is a TSP and with the right set of tools, I could've added some efficiency to the search by viewing it as such.
Programmable smart contracts are a great idea in a world where programmers write bug free code. That world does not exist yet. Until we have near-perfect code writing AIs every new smart contract is just a disaster waiting to happen.
The problem I see with Ethereum is that it is way too complex. I have read perhaps at least 10 times on their home page without even understanding what it does, what problems it solves etc.

This is the sole reason why I don't think it will be successful in it's current state. With most successful tech or services or whatever the core idea is often super simple to grasp and you can instantly see the benefit. I don't see this with Ethereum.

Even with bitcoin which is complex the benefits are instantaneous for the common man. Decentralized system, no single entity controls it. It is a fixed amount of bitcoins so like a mineral it's value is probably going to be stable in the long run and also each bitcoin will increase in value when more people get interested. It's easy to send coins to anyone in the world, at any time.

What does Ethereum do? Smart contracts is probably the key word but I don't understand how it works or how it will benefit me. Why bother?
5 Technological Trends Shaping Up Connected Beauty in 2017
Maybe we're just not capitalistic enough. No cash without capital: http://Catallax.info
lushhat, zinghelm, usedgrue.
Things like "Don't use the passive voice" whilst using the passive voice in the same paragraph and other egregious grammatical errors sprinkled wildly through the text.

Basically the same kind of dumb and wrong prescriptivism the linguists and dictionaryists hate about it.
Interview with Dario Forte, CEO, DFLabs, on Security Orchestration and Automation
The Geth client is still widely used as it's kind off the standard implementation of the Ethereum EVM and Node Mechanics.

The Go based client isn't that much "older" either, both are actively developed and received some code overhauls.

I've also found the go client's web3 console to be much more reliable and complete than Parity's.
A lot of people have messaged about performance, so if there's interest I can do a follow-up with some load testing.
The Right Social Media Image Sizes for Each Network (Infographic)
Flame graphs are based on high frequency linear sampling of a (at least conceptually) single thread of execution, where each sample records the stack.

SQL query execution does not follow this structure. Query plans are executed in whatever order or degree of parallelism is appropriate. And linearising an SQL query plan is actually wrong. If you've ever watched SQL Server's Live Query Statistics play out, you'll know that the engine does whatever work it can when possible. It would be incorrect to think of the query execution as a stack the CPU can get stuck deep down in, and a flame graph would create an incorrect model.

As an exercise, where would you put self-time in a flame graph representation of an execution plan for a filtering node, or a sorting node? The engine doesn't report that, because filters happen inline (at least in batches) and sorts are optimised to happen progressively and can be scheduled in between IO handlers. Ask an expert about this, I'm not your guy.

Also, the data you want to see isn't represented by one dimension on the flame graph (how wide is this function call?), it is represented by many more: cost, CPU time, number of rows, IO operations, and estimations of all the above. The execution plan needs to be roomier, and include all this information, not merely wall clock time.
People looking for easier ways, Nextcloud/Owncloud already does this and you also get with file sync/backup/share for computer/smartphone and more as a bonus; all you need is just a LAMP server.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus International Giveaway
> [old technology vs. electric cars]

Just a quick remark that electic cars aren't exactly new either. I have a bunch of engineering magazines from inherited my grandfather, dated to the late 1930's, where a new electic car is written about in a way that show readers are expected to already know about this development.

Edit: Wikipedia says even those magazines were 40 years late: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_electric_vehicl...
Yes, but we wouldn't actually walking the whole snake, just as we are not walking the whole Hilbert curve. We are walking the point cloud in the order dictated by either, and those will, in general, differ.
I've tried to get into Rust but I've found the syntax alone to be impenetrable despite reading through several guides multiple times.

If Rust was less complicated I might consider it.
Check out jobserve.com, 369 developer contracts paying => £500/day posted in the last 7 days, 11 of which paying => £800/day
Have you considered looking at full-spectrum lights which may have some influence on your symptoms?
Did you health check include Vitamin D check?
It is not about scams, but lost earnings from PayPal services which are expensive for a wire transfer.

Venmo has a similar dispute system and you can often bounce on credit card too.
Then you should be using the toolbox for metalwork when trying to weld two steel plates instead of using the one for woodwork.
Has anyone played with the tool they mentioned, diffoscope? Sounds interesting and wonder how good it is at, for example, comparing excel files with VBA code and formulas etc.
digital assets like small projects, build a small consultingcompany to share your knowledge, repair computers or get into investing in stocks.
Not only have not done enough. They effectively killed electric car, because it was cheaper to maintain status quo rather then innovate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F
Nobody uses 512-QAM for WiFi, and for some good reasons:

1) it's not part of any current or draft standard;

2) it only encodes 9 bits vs. 8 bits for 256-QAM. Plugging this into GP's formula gives us:

1/3.6e-6 × 468 × 9 × 5/6 = 975 Mbit/s

3) current WiFi QAM constellations are all square [1,2], and there is no way to arrange 512 points into a square.

4) that would require an unrealistically clean channel, and give no advantage over lower-order modulations otherwise [3]

[1] https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/31607/why-are-qam-co...

[2] http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/rf-technology-design/q...

[3] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/QA...
And killing people is a great way to reduce the unemployment rate.
Another benefit is wealth redistribution from richer to poorer countries, at least for gigs which can be delivered online.
keyword being "easy"
Making things cheaper is another way of solving it.
Or maybe just "Support"
We've seen two[1] cases[2] of this in Denmark in the last couple of years surrounding systems that kindergartens are using. The second one is currently (still) being investigated, but the first one was rightfully concluded earlier this year with the "hacker" being acquitted.

In both cases, it was dads of children in the institution that noticed the bugs when they were rightfully using the system and were ignored when notifying the responsible party about it until they "shouted it so loudly" that they couldn't be ignored anymore, in which case they were reported to the police for hacking.

Links below are in danish, but they can probably be translated if needed.

1: https://www.version2.dk/artikel/boernehavehackeren-frifundet...

2: https://www.version2.dk/artikel/interview-hacker-tiltalt-jeg...
Actually, Rake has both. You can define file targets using "file", but I found that for smaller projects it just becomes a more verbose make.
I don't need to have better ideas to point out flaws. But in this case I do know who has a better source of data: AirBnB, DoorDash, Etsy, Fiverr, Getaround, Lyft, Postmates, Taskrabbit, and Uber.
I said "modern". Python 2 is not modern. Python 3 is.

And the keyword in my schema validation sentence is "easy".

I love rust, but a low level language cannot be compared in productivity to a high level language for this stuff. They are much, much easier. That's the whole purpose. You trade easiness for rigor.
I do something similar, here's my Makefile -- I have scripts that build figures in a separate directory, /figures. I'm sure it could be terser, but it does the job for me.

texfiles = acronyms.tex analytical_mecs_procedure.tex analytical_mecs.tex \
anderson_old.tex background.tex chaincap.tex \
conclusions.tex cvici.tex gold_chain_test.tex introduction.tex \
main.tex mcci_manual.tex methods.tex moljunc.tex \
tb_sum_test.tex times_procedure.tex tm_mcci_workflow.tex tmo.tex \
vici_intro.tex

# dynamically generated figures

all: main.pdf

main.pdf: $(texfiles) figures/junction_occupations.pdf figures/overlaps_barplot.pdf \
figures/transmission_comparison.pdf \
figures/wigner_distributions.pdf
pdflatex main.tex && bibtex main && pdflatex main.tex && pdflatex main.tex

figures/junction_occupations.pdf: figures/junction_occupations.hs
ghc --make figures/junction_occupations.hs
figures/junction_occupations -w 800 -h 400 -o figures/junction_occupations.svg
inkscape -D -A figures/junction_occupations.pdf figures/junction_occupations.svg

figures/overlaps_barplot.pdf: figures/overlaps_barplot.py
python figures/overlaps_barplot.py

figures/transmission_comparison.pdf: figures/transmission_comparison.py
python figures/transmission_comparison.py

figures/wigner_distributions.pdf: figures/wigner_distributions.py
python figures/transmission_comparison.py

clean:
rm *.log *.aux *.blg *.bbl *.dvi main.pdf
Richard Dawkins deplatformed by Berkeley radio station
Make the band from the right metals and it keeps itself hygienic