skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hi! Have you come across research on interaction between an individual's molecules and the medicines so that customizable dosages can be prescribed to the patients.
Tabs is way older than Sierra. I started using the terminal about 5 years ago and have always used tabs.
I'm wondering about the legal side of this. Is it OK from LEGO side to have stuff like this and other similar tools?

And what if when you start printing stuff like that?
For the throughput I created a file with 1 GB of random source code and ran `time cat file`

Latency for input: https://github.com/pavelfatin/typometer
The blockchain keeps track of who owns what, even as those things change hands, without requiring some central body to keep track of it all. The easiest way to think of it is an instant, incorruptible market that somehow magically just works.

To know why that matters you have to understand the problem(s) it's solving - it's something people have been working on since the beginning of money, but there are so many edge cases we usually ended up just going back to a centralized authority. In the past you've needed something like a bank or a government or a company to have the authority to declare, with authority, "Person x owns the title to that house."

There are a few problems with that: They could do things to screw everything up (a government printing currency and causing inflation), be corrupt (countless examples), or perhaps not even exist because it's too much effort to create, set up, and monitor some body.

With the blockchain, the software everyone runs keeps track for everyone else in an incorruptible way (yes this is a simplification), so you're free to make changes (or transact) without having someone in the middle to wait for, and with no one that can really screw things up. Just boom, instant marketplace.

The most obvious thing you'd trade on a blockchain is some kind of asset - a cryptocurrency is the main example, or titles or stocks or something valuable.

Say, for example, I have some loans that people owe me on. I can throw those loans on the blockchain, and without a clearing house somebody else can buy them, and when the loan payment comes due you can easily see who owns the right to be paid.

It seems trivial, but allowing people to seamlessly make transactions of any kind without the overhead of a bank or clearing house is a big deal, and has a ton of applications.
It depends how you use a terminal. If you type a lot of commands, and you use emacs keys to jump around within the current line you're typing (like ctrl-p to go up to the previously entered command, ctrl-a to jump to the beginning of the line, replace the first word, etc.), those latencies add up.

Basically we want the stuff in our brains to be able to manifest itself as fast as we're thinking it. Already having to drive human hands to make this happen is a big penalty; we don't need unnecessary extra latency if it can be helped.

Still waiting for that neural interface... plug me in please.
Really glad to see intended support for remote engineers.
Hmmm, thanks for the additional info. Still seems like a bad idea. Based on your assertion, what happens when the RTOS/microcontroller does not receive a "decision" before the scheduling deadline? Many things can hang a Linux box... the reason why RTOS exists is because nothing can stop the scheduler. I would be very curious to hear from the Apollo developers. What is the intended platform and developer audience? Is this intended to actually run in a vehicle?
You might be able to catch images/videos just by the fact that suddenly a lot more data is transferred. Or part of the metadata is not encrypted, uploads might happen over a secondary connection, ...
Another site totally unusable without JS enabled, where it could be just used to add dynamics to otherwise nicely generated HTML..
Ironically a lot of suckless stuff kind of sucks. I don't know of any that are particularly worth using.
A good quick overview of OOP.
It depends on the bucket location. Some work fine but others do not.
There's a lot doctors just don't know.

You should always be your own advocate, and you should always consider the treatment plan suggested by your doctor and ask questions. Note, please understand I _not_ telling you to be a dick. Doctors have a tough time of it and are expected to give "solutions" that make the patient happy. However, I say prescribed treatments should have an expected range of observable effect(s). Also treatments almost always have additional side effects. Ask about both of these.

Others have already said, but doctors can and do get things wrong.

I broke a collar bone. In the course of recovery I've seen three different physical therapists and while their suggestions overlapped some, there was a wide range of recommended exercises and stretches. One of them was great and super effective, one was meh, and one was down right useless.
There always has to be a moment when you lock in the bids, and a non-infinitescimal window before that time when bids are accepted. As long as that window has a start and an end, there will still be traders who write algorithms to deliver their orders at the final microsecond the window is open. 99.999999% of the time, nothing happens. But, in that one case where the articles of impeachment are released just before the window closes, those algos will pay for themselves a billion times over.

Separating the last moment when bids are accepted from the time when the auction closes has no practical effect, other than just a simple time delay.
Thanks! No, I don't have benchmarks. My guess is that FSet is not as fast as the Clojure collections, which use a newer data structure (Phil Bagwell's Hash Array-Mapped Trie) that I didn't know about when I wrote FSet. -- Um, that's for sets and maps. For seqs (functional vectors), I'm not sure but I think the Clojure data structure is very similar to FSet's. I think the odds that FSet is significantly faster than Clojure are small, though I suppose it's worth checking.

For the domain I work in -- compilers and static analysis -- the additional overhead of functional collections has only rarely been an issue in practice. It's different from numerics, though, in that a lot of our collections are maps keyed by nonnumeric objects; the time spent hashing the object and testing it for equality with other objects is relatively much larger than when the keys are simply integers, and therefore the time spent traversing the data structure itself is a smaller part of the total. I concede that designing functional collections for use in high-performance numeric work is a harder problem, though I still suspect that solutions may exist. See my reply to your other post.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that's all.” - Lewis Carroll, a mathematician who wrote stories in his spare time.
Wow, that brings some memories. I spent quite a while playing with it in the early 2000's.
Bash Shell Scripting
I heard Maersk were using it for container shipping forms.

Because a shipping form gives you global ownership of a container and because corruption, the security required to handle shipping forms pre block chains meant it was more expensive to ship the form than the container, and still it wasn't completely secure.

The block chain shipping form solved this issue completely because you can never fake forms or hide when ownership of a container changes hands.

You could frankly do something similar for public records of landownership, which might not be important in the west where corruption is low, but could revolutionize the third world.
Look in your "Purchased" apps list, it will still be there.
I wish pilots flew for free so I don't have to pay so much for something that's so critical to my career. What's wrong with you? Do you genuinely believe that stuff like open source (especially critical one) should be created and maintained for free? By who?
Specifying Location for a Custom Font and Enhanced Presentation Conversion to PDF
Do you mean on or after?
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/trustless

How is the average person going to respond when they hear a new form of money is "trustless"? (I know what it really means in this context, but think about slope of adoption).
Ask HN: Is TDD or BDD used in AAA gaming industry?
TDD, BDD, or any other form or development driven by tests first are very popular approaches in web development or even non-web developments.

I'm curious to know if these approaches are also considered a MUST for AAA game development.

Is there anyone that has worked with these approaches while developing games or know any big AAA game company that uses test first approaches as something required during the development?
I don't think those scheduling constraints exist on the Mill. Certainly the ones illustrated in figure 6(a) don't. Add operation number 5 could issue during the empty slot on cycle number 5 instead of 6 thanks to deferred loads, or thanks to the fact that the Mill uses a multitude of specialized execution units rather than a handful of general-purpose execution units—a busy load unit could never stall an independent add operation to begin with.

It looks like add operation number 5 can't use the empty cycle on lane 2 because compare number 3 would already be queued in that lane. The time-reversed/consumers first scheduling heuristic that a Mill compiler uses wouldn't paint itself into this corner the way the this model's dispatcher does.

Figure 6(a) for a Mill would look like an ALU pipeline doing an add operation every cycle without stall, a load pipeline issuing a load operation every cycle without stall, another ALU pipeline doing compare operations every cycle but lagging behind by several cycles instead of just one, and a branch unit doing the conditional jump every cycle immediately after the corresponding compare. And on a mid-level or high-end Mill there would be plenty of execution units to spare for a non-trivial loop body without reducing throughput, and the whole thing would be vectorized too.
This is simply ignorant of the plans. Firstly, there are levels of functionality, being able to provide service being the highest one. Out of service satellites are still most likely to be able to execute a controlled re-entry. Secondly, these satellites will be in low Earth orbit. If they become completely inoperable they have an orbital lifetime of only a few years before they re-enter. Only with routine station keeping maneuvers can they stay in orbit for even their sub-decade planned lifetimes. So there's very little risk of a Kessler syndrome type situation developing. At any given time the number of derelict satellites in orbit would be quite small if not zero.
> despite having an innovative piece of hardware, they still treat the software as heavily proprietary as well.

My client created an innovative piece of hardware without investing in proprietary software. In a couple of months, he found cheaper clones offered on aliexpress and taobao. While the design was good, the product failed commercially. Then the company found me, I’ve created heavily proprietary software for the next version of their hardware. The product sells OK so far.

In addition, creating software from scratch specifically for the given hardware delivers better overall value for the end users.
Binary AST proposal for ECMAScript
Start working at home with Google! i think It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474this - 4 weeks past.
.... http://www.joinmate2.Com
You sure can (I assume you meant opt), and have been able to since the NeXT days. There are many Emacs users at Apple (look at the Emacs key bindings in the text widgets)
our co worker's sister in law makes 64 an hour on the internet. she has been fired from a job for 6 months but last month her paycheck was 19332 only working from home 4 hours every day. check out this

http://jar.ma/24RmAN
The business case for a blockchain is when the alternative is creating some neutral organization to act as an intermediary. Depository Trust Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers are examples of such intermediaries. Such organizations tend to become centers of power in their own right, and start acting like they own the thing for which they keep records.
Will you find acceptable a plane crash because of technical failure?

Determinism rules for aeronautical engineers (software and hardware), and thus, today, flying is the safest transportation mode.
I need that Pierce book 20 years ago. As a self thought I often regret that I did not have the luck to stumble upon some amazing book instead of learning fragmented bits from blogs and tutorials.
Right now, it seems like the number one problem solved with blockchain is "how do we convince investors our startup is an unicorn in the making".

It's like XML in the 90s or Web 2.0 in the 00s. Gotta use the technology to get the funding, regardless of actual suitability to task.
Appdexa Analysis on the Current Wave of “Micro-Apps” Trends
Micro apps have taken mobile app development world by storm. The concept has offered a new opportunity to developers to create a new app delivery process.
Agree a lot more is possible with remote sensing. I worked with it in ag in 80's and 90's, the biggest problems were:

1. Price was to high for the value we could offer

2. 40% chance we wouldn't get a usable image of the field due to cloud cover

3. Its one data point, you can see a problem but can't always figure out what's wrong.

I'm really hopeful for drones that can operate below the cloud cover and AI that can take bare soil images, tile maps, soil tests and provide a more intelligent answer for fixing the problems.

What the farmer wants is a prescription with a shot at a decent ROI.
Recensione Samsung galaxy A3 2017
A lexical environment being syonymous with "a set of 0 or more variables accessible from within the function, but not passed as arguments." The key piece of that being 0 or more. The null set is still a set.
I would prefer other sources of information. Like papers from 60s to 80s.
What Insiders Say About Yahoo's Problems
These days MongoDB more or less (finally) works as advertised as well. It actually has worthwhile backend options (plural!) and the new (v1 vs v0) replication protocol is actually correct. Eight or so years of development has led to the most egregious of the bugs and corner cases being rounded off.

So, it started as a shitshow on the back-end and people who had to maintain systems based on it hated it, but it got popular because it was easy to get simple systems up and running with. Then, over time, it slowly became less awful as it was substantially rewritten and large portions of it redesigned. I'd say PHP is a very, very good comparison.
'Dirt Is Good': Why Kids Need Exposure to Germs
There may be other ways to approach this from a moral point of view. High prices for medicines are defended on the basis of high research costs, not high manufacture costs.

A case could be made for legislation that obliges free replacement of out of date medication for the original purchaser, perhaps with a small surcharge.
It's strange that ECSs only have traction in game development. I agree with all the advantages you mentioned, but additionally, they solve the structure-of-arrays/array-of-structures performance discrepancy; this is something Jon Blow is working on with his Jai language.

> I spent quite a lot of time exploring ECS before building my own ECS library for developing 2D games.

Is it publicly available?
That's not a fair assessment. Let's say you are doing well and actually investing $1000 per month into the market. Now let's say you are diversifying into three index ETF's, and you buy those quarterly, so that's three trades a quarter on a total of $3,000. If the commission is $35/trade, you are being taxed 3.5% of your investment up-front to get into the market. If the commission is $4/trade (a more typical fee these days), then the up-front loss is 0.4%. You'll pay those same fees again on the way out, and assuming that you sell on the same schedule, that's now 7% vs. 0.8%.

Yes, there's some nice compounding in between, assuming that you buy and hold with no further trades. But, there's a wide gulf between "day trading" and active stock-picking. Assuming that your average hold time is 5 years per stock, you're still going to rack up a lot of commission costs at $35 per trade.
Not in the world. The options depend on a use case. For a website C++ and rust would be far down on the list. For a web server, even, there is a plenty of competition.

Similarly for an embedded scripting language or rapid prototyping.
> NVMe

Even there the CPU can be the bottleneck. I have a Samsung 960 Pro that's theoretically capable of 3GB/s reads but when you use disk encryption even with AES-NI the processor can only do ~2GB/s.
I was just snooping ;) and look at what occurs when you try this: https://spoopy.link/api/spoopy.link/api/spoopy.link/api/spoo...
i <3 jamison hes so dreamy
I think the real problem is not that AI will take over but that we will use AI against each other. We are terrified by Nukes but the real danger is that we'll create weapons that will be quick to kill and never ask questions all in the name of defence. Nukes take lot's of resources but AI powered weapons don't necessarily take that much money and the ability to make them is not prohibited.
A lot broken-ness is still left for the sake of compatibility (especially since HHVM's open-source), but Collections and type hinting make a huge difference.
And so... how does blockchain make money?

Because you just described how a bunch of businesses can make money in a way "Blockchain" cannot. From a financial feasibility perspective, it only demonstrates that a decentralized store of information is going to be innately unprofitable.
Hi, this article [1] isn't quite what you're after but you might be interested in it anyway.

[1] https://engineering.riotgames.com/news/automated-testing-lea...
Is privacy a fundamental right in India?
The authors explicitly said they want to build something more free: "We hope to see those interested in this technology build on it in both commercial and noncommercial ventures."
And they did port Unix (Berkeley flavor) to the 386. I remember using it in the nineties, it was a great adventure. And its progeny FreeBSD is arguably the best alternative to Linux, should something go terribly wrong.
They'll probably respond in the same way they respond to hearing about TCP handshakes. They won't. The implementation details are unimportant to the end user.

Just like today you probably don't ask your doctor the details about how they securely store your health records, nor do you talk to your bank about how they clear transactions.
Xoogler here. You are very, very wrong if you think there is no dissent within Google. There's plenty.

That said, this is a company that has massively succeeded with other bets that were "absolutely predictable they would never work." So just because something looks questionable doesn't mean it gets shot down.

(Now, IMO, Glass was a mistake - but for entirely different reasons than you describe. An elite fashion product cuts against Google's reputation as something for everybody, even IF it had succeeded.)
I have a SSD and fast internet with low ping. Besides, the start menu shouldn't need to connect to the internet.
muh api!!!!!

Don't worry, i limit redirects to a max of 4, because tbh if something redirects more than four times, its probably spoopy.
> How did they come to an expected shelf-life of 2 years in the first place?

By storing it for 2 years and testing it after.

> I wonder what other environmental controls could extend the shelf life of common, expensive medication?

Common, expensive is an oxymoron. The vast majority of all medication in use is practically free to produce. The packaging of drugs typically costs more than the drugs themselves. Drug discovery has long concentrated on small-molecular-weight drugs that can be mass-produced for a pittance. The reason drugs cost so much is that proving that they are safe and that they work costs so much. Because of this, there is little economic sense in trying to preserve drugs for longer (which would require more extremely expensive trials), when you can just trash the drugs and order up a new batch that has a combined msrp of $100M for $5k.

In their economics, small molecular weight drugs share more with software than with, say, bread. That is, practically all of the economic cost is upfront investment and the replication cost is non-existent.
Very true. No one has built better tooling since. If webassembly can be the better endpoint..
Experiences differ. A guy I knew started trading BTC and pretty much the first customer did a chargeback. And he wasn't the only one.
PowerPoint on Cruise Control: Automatically Update Reports
Hot metal casting on a small scale isn't complicated or expensive, just messy. Desktop Metal is trying to do this in an office environment. Because nobody has a shop any more.

(The "maker movement" may have run its course. TechShop seems to be in financial trouble.[1])

[1] https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=177391
Tbh I can't actually imagine the measurements in a cookbook were ever really intended to be precise, at least in the kind I've seen. Like even 4 cloves of garlic is vague; it'd have to be given in weight, but no one actually reading a recipe would prefer 30g of garlic over 1 clove.

Maybe differs in a restaurant or business, but for home cooking thinking of recipes as precise seems absurd to me. Its 600g... a number that was clearly rounded, and I would bet they eyeballed the amount they wanted and then measured it. Theres too much imprecision in a home kitchen to pretend to be precise
Compiler does not help you. It is not a proof suggestion system like Isabelle/HOL or the like.

In fact error messages rust produces rival the terrible nature of ones in older C++ compilers thus far.

The compiler only prevents you from making mistakes. Intentions do not even enter into it. See, some of the performance critical code in our apps has to work around even the lax C++11 rules. It is completely impossible in rust without using unsafe stuff liberally - specifically gets about 1000x slower and this matters a lot.
Compilers know nothing about intentions, nor can a borrow checker enforce intentions unlike a type system.
Is it open-source project? Are you looking for contributions? I am passionate cook - designer - frontenddev. I struggle with recipe sites and where to save mines. If this was somehow libre and had future i might want to contribute.
Google Glass smart eyewear returns
In my experience no. Testing was not even considered. I worked on mobile games 5 years ago so things may have changed.

Most of the time we had strict timelines with feature milestones. We were building mobile apps of licenced titles.

The lack of TDD was replaced with full time QA, sometimes multiple on the one game.
uport and reputation systems aid this
I worked for a AAA game company in the game server department and I would say that with the schedule and how the shop was directed it was nearly impossible to do TDD. I can't speak for the engine side, but my guess is that it was not possible over there either.

I bet like anything through, if you go to shops that have strong direction, can work with a small team and over deliver, those standards paradigms are used.

Check out the tests in the Quake3 Source Code. It is a shining example for sure.

https://github.com/id-Software/Quake-III-Arena
LEGO’s patents expired a while ago, and competitors such as KREO have replicated the shapes and some of the models already.

That said, no one is going to print LEGO – actual LEGO is a lot more robust and stable than anything you could print yourself.