skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>. I was thinking more in terms of law enforcement and organized crime having a common cause in keeping foreign criminal syndicates out of Japan.

But let's be honest, the yakuza want to keep foreign criminal syndicates out of Japan because they want a monopoly on organized crime in Japan, not because they want to keep the Japanese people safe from foreign criminals. The yakuza deal in extortion, blackmail, drugs, guns, prostitution, human trafficking, all of the same criminal activity any other syndicate does. They may not be as openly violent as other mafias, but they're not nice people.

Claiming they have a "common cause" with the police is to assume that the police have no issue with crime in Japan so long as it's Japanese committing those crimes, which I think cannot be true, and would be a sign of dereliction of duty if it were. From what I understand the yakuza are losing power in Japan because the police have been effectively cracking down on them... they're not comrades in arms.
Sexual harassment is not a very civil approach either.

She states that she was inspired to share her experience (with photographic evidence) base on accounts of other women coming forward in a similiar manner.
Yeah that's a comparison I drew down-thread as well (w/r/t a stream cipher). "Seed" was a poor choice of terminology on my part there - the point I was trying to convey is that you'll need a non-deterministic source, which is necessarily outside of software. I used the term "seed" as a shorthand for that (as if it were a stream cipher), but strictly speaking as you say that's not correct, as you'll be taking the random data directly as a key.

So no, you're not misunderstanding - I just communicated poorly!
Web Browser: Chromium

Email Client: gmail

Terminal: terminator

IDE: Sublime / VSCode

File manager: terminator

Basic Text Editor: Sublime

IRC/Messaging Client: irssi

PDF Reader: Chromium plugin

Office Suite: Libre office (I'd prefer Microsoft one)

Calendar: Google calendar

Video Player: vlc

Music Player: YouTube :D

Photo Viewer: basic gallery

Screen recording: -
It better be attached well. If there's a windy day, and that thing flies off and kills someone, you will not only be liable, you will have to live for the rest of your life with it.
Well 1.05x0.85x1.30x1.10x1.00=1.27

Wow, so they are ~27% off the mean!

The part that isn't clear is how this compared to typical performance variation - then we can run our p-tests. But I suspect its pretty good, given the news worthiness of the article.
I signed up and played with the app. I think this would be better implemented as a library or wrapper on top of one. The "code using a mouse" idea has been tried and almost every time the verdict is: code is the preferred interface for programmers.

That said, clearly standardization is coming to the world of APIs, and code reuse/generation along with it. Have you looked at Django REST framework? They have a pretty good approach. http://www.django-rest-framework.org/
I'm not sure I understand your question correctly but KDE's terminal (konsole) warns you if you try to paste large amounts of text
Emacs master moves quite fast.
I recommend that everyone watch the Netflix documentary "13th." The central theme is that slavery has never stopped being legal in the United States it just moved to the prison system. Below is the text of that amendment.

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Yes, you lack standing. The FSF owns copyright.
Your swimming-with-the-sharks Assistant
This is a legit/acknowledged way to meet the FSF's requirements.
> consider what the average users of those apps think. They don't care the apps are non-native, they don't even know what that means.

Just because the average user is unaware the shitty UX, performance or battery-draining is your app's fault, doesn't make it a good or professional choice. It means you can get away with it, because the user is unaware there was a choice, who's making it, and based on what criteria.
Well, thank you, and let me clarify then. I absolutely think there should be a shorter cheaper path to entry. I just think it requires great teaching and some critical analysis that is honest about what it is getting wrong. I'm sick of the "be positive" model that is designed to keep people quiet while they are paying for stuff that won't really help them and they know it mid-class. And also-isn't 12 weeks of software development really just the beginning? If it isn't then why do so many senior devs with years under their belts know so much more than junior devs with 12 weeks under theirs? Nothing against beginning, in my view, we should all always be learning, and that definitely includes these camps.
The bans in question are on the state itself, recognizing such marriages. Unlike anti-miscegenation laws, there is no criminal sanction for those who enter a relationship that they consider marriage.

>No, they were struck down by the Supreme Court, and only in 2003!

Strictly speaking, that's a law against sodomy, not homosexuality. But I can agree that such laws can be construed as anti-homosexual, given that any sex practice between individuals of the same sex could fall under the sodomy category.
They exist. They are called writers who know how to edit.

Most writers need editors because of the two d's:
1. Distance
2. Deadlines

Distance is necessary to read your work as a reader and not a writer. In order to polish your writing you have to have an insane amount of empathy for your reader. It's hard for people to edit their own work because it's hard to forget what you know. You know what you've meant by a phrase, of course, but your reader, coming from who knows what background, may not. Your diction, metaphors, etc. may be more idiosyncratic, arcane, limited, or just plain confusing than you realize. We're talking a whole tabula rasa situation which is not easy to pull off.

As to our second d, deadlines, they prevent writers from being able to address the first d alone. As with any art, critiquing your own work from the perspective of the audience takes 'fresh eyes', 'fresh ears'--when you're grinding on a piece you become so involved it's hard to look at it from the audiences perspective unless you have sufficient time (sometimes months) to step away and get your brain out of creative/obsessive mode. you're blessed if you actually have the time to simply take off from your writing like this. As such, an editor is your stand in--a set of fresh eyes that can vouch for the audience while you keep grinding away and ensure your hit that deadline.
The main core value proposition (at least for me) is as an consensus layer for creating truly decentralized applications with a truly distributed and decentralized infrastructure, these applications don't necessary have money involved (ENS being an example). In this sense "smart contracts" are actually just pieces of code you deploy pretty much like one would with aws lambda, which is why the term "contract" is a bit confusing, but alas we're stuck with it now.
Sean Spicer Resigns as White House Press Secretary
Probably just the concatenation, like beautifulyetreprehensible.
That is how we were trained in typing class.
Seems like adding these stickers would be useful: http://thesource.metro.net/2013/02/13/new-platform-decals-re...
Benefit Focus from everyone I've known who has worked there pre-public said the company is absolutely terrible to work for from the engineering department perspective.
Web Browser: Chromium, Firefox, Chrome

Email Client: Gmail web

Terminal: Gnome Terminal

IDE: VS Code

File manager: nautilus

Basic Text Editor: gedit

IRC/Messaging Client: xchat

PDF Reader: Evince

Office Suite: Office360 web, LibreOffice

Calendar: Gnome Calendar, Google Calendar web

Video Player: smplayer

Music Player: cmus, Spotify non-free

Photo Viewer: Eye of Gnome
> Stop with the personal attacks. They're utter nonsense and completely irrelevant.

Oh the irony.
Anecdotal and varies by physician and care center. My folks can get booked and seen quickly and efficiently.

I should add that while the extra data capture may now seem like an issue, when federated access is better supported it will be a boon to healthcare.

Aside, since when does PBS write such clickbait? The article clearly gives advantages and drawbacks with the current system compared to old. Why not give a professional quality title?
Making a full language with 120 words
The only times I've seen EHR's work well is when a 2nd person is at the computer typing and the doctor sits with the patient.
Using Culture Mapping to Analyze Trump's Tweets
Emergency doctor and hacker here. The closed systems and lack of support for interoperability between EHRs upsets me the most because it leads to patient harm.

I just had a patient transferred from an outside hospital for abdominal pain and somehow their CT scan was lost in transit. Because it was an emergency we had to CT scan them again which doubled their radiation exposure and their risk for a kidney injury from the iv contrast. It was midnight so it would have taken until business hours to obtain the scans from the hospital.

Things like this happen almost daily.
Some terminal emulators / shells use some heuristics, but the most reliable way is to use a combination of a terminal emulator and shell that support bracketed paste mode. This article (https://cirw.in/blog/bracketed-paste) lists some terminal emulators that supports bracketed paste, and a zsh plugin that makes zsh handle bracketed paste in a safe manner.

As an alternative to zsh, Elvish (https://github.com/elves/elvish) supports bracketed paste out of the box. When you paste anything that includes a carriage return, Elvish will insert a literal return instead of executing it.

(Disclaimer: I am the author of Elvish.)
Mine was neither, just a contract gig at a crappy company.

There were no technical measures in place to stop me from compiling my own binaries (that was in part what I was there to do), and bringing my own elisp also would have worked.

Except for the "breaking my contract" part, if it was unapproved 3rd party code. Given that actual FTEs respected the rule, it seemed unwise to test it.
I don't consider something that remember the login URL for a site (which most password managers can store) a marginal improvement at all.

Also, "marginal improvement that many people might use, or a perfect system that nobody will?" is a false dichotomy. I'm saying we should make better systems (not perfect ones) easier to use.
>Because -- believe it or not -- some people actually approve of some or all of those mandates and regulations.

How does people approving of these mandates/regulations (which I dispute, but let's go with it) invalidate my claim?

If the cost of enforcement increases, regardless of the popularity of the law in question, it stands to reason such laws would become less common and/or less effective.

>So. Why in god's name would people who disagree with you agree to use a system that actively undermines their genuine political preferences?

Just to clarify: you're suggesting people will actively avoid adopting cryptocurrency in order to ensure the laws and taxes they support remain effective? If that's your opinion, we should agree to disagree. Time will tell who is right.
RecyclerView in MVP – Passive view’s approach
It has nothing to do with the quality or content. There are plenty of Hollywood Blockbusters that are awful, most in fact, but they still cost a lot of money to make.

Budget is a good indicator of audience numbers regardless of quality.
What I can't understand is why anybody still used Newton's notation. Also, at least for me Leibniz notation tends to make pen-and-paper symbol manipulation simpler.
Also, hasn't been tested under bear market conditions... I'm skeptical that past returns prove future gains here. I can take any small subset of something and say its beating the market.
It's interesting, but it doesn't surprise me one bit. It's exactly like what the article posits: that women marry equal or up, and men don't care that much. Obviously, it doesn't matter if the men are gay or straight; in both cases, they're quite likely to marry someone with a much lower-paying career.

Also, the premise that women only want to marry up (or equal) really explains why I see so many women on the dating sites in the DC area with high-powered careers (their positions are frequently shown right on their photo in Tinder), who seem to be perpetually single and whose profiles I see over and over. They're obviously not interested in me because 1) I'm a software engineer: software engineering is not seen as a prestigious career at all in this country, despite the pay, and 2) I don't have an advanced degree; many women are degree snobs and won't date someone who didn't go to an Ivy League or doesn't have a Masters or PhD, even though I likely make as much or maybe more money.
FWIW: the term in the industry for that is "electronic signature". "Digital" signatures usually refer to crypto.

And one reason for worry, historically, is that international law for paperless/signatureless contract enforcement is sort of a mess. Wikipedia has a page here with links to various nations and their requirements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_signatures_and_law

Not a lawyer nor speaking for the FSF. But it seems not entirely unreasonable to me that a conservative approach to copyright assignment would have picked the path they chose. It's just a hard problem.

If you want to ding the FSF, ding them on the copyright assignment requirement. Whining about the process seems a little too much to me.
A 3 year sample with only one impressive year.
I have a 45 min to 60 min commute one way to work each day. If I take Metro North it turns into a 2 hour commute.
It really consumes a ton of time if you add it all up across the years.
What part of IGNORING THE PATH ENVIRONMENT VARIABLE you didn't understand? Magit is too clever for its own good.
A Tale of the Mirror World, Part 6: Total War
EHR = Electronic Health Records
> You know whats really cool? Inventing stuff. Using the power of your mind to form matter into a new thing that the universe has never seen before. Whats really cool is starting a business that adds enough value to the world to hire people. Feeding them with the power of your mind and a little bit of shared elbow grease.

You know what's really really cool? A lot of people inventing stuff. Not only the ones that have parents that can help them live until their late twenties without have to work for a living. Socialism/communism aims to fix this. What I see is that China is having a tremendous creative boom right now.
Peach Beta Launch: An app to organize your work
GM now lets developers test their in-car apps running in actual cars
VLC is indeed superior in comparison with Totem but it does not integrate nicely into GNOME as Totem would.

MPV is also a very capable player. There is even an GTK frontend which obeys GNOME HIG and which is called gnome-mpv[0]. Maybe it would be a nice pick for the default video player.

[0] https://github.com/gnome-mpv/gnome-mpv
> Imagine you live in a country where there's no where else to go for miles around, and you're young, and you want to see the world.

And you end up seeing crappy suburbs from a crappy suburban train 3 hours a day, 15 hours a week (that's like 2 working days a week).
Another thing is that multiplying and dividing by 2 and 5 is easier in base-10. For example, to divide by 5 you multiply the number by 2 (just add it to itself) and then divide by 10 (a right shift).

On the other hand, to divide by 3 you basically need to do long division.
The pipelines of many animation and entertainment studios use Linux. If Nvidia just wants to sell to gamers, that's fine, but it seems like the work to have Linux drivers would be worth it just to keep selling hardware to studios.
I agree with you. Bitcoin was a cool prototype with many oversights and inadequacies that got bolted to a runaway hype train. Some later cryptocurrencies have made modest improvements, but I don't think cryptocurrency will really be able to break through until a) the difficulty mechanism is fixed and b) reliable transaction confirmation is practically instantaneous.

I got into bitcoin in early 2010 right before it started to show up in mainstream news. CPU mining was already dead but I could GPU mine on my desktop and generate about 1 BTC/day. I ran this for the novelty for a few days and then turned it off. Not quite enough to get a skeptic's consolation for "years to come", but it was fun anyway. :P
> Good god, if you don't care about the project enough to not sign a piece of paper and scan it.

Wouldn't it make more sense to sign an agreement form with one's GPG private key rather than having to show a physical signature?
Even if you are not religious, you may want to reconsider church. It can be good for people and communities in many ways, and often for reasons you don't understand.

Sometimes I feel like American culture is being sterilized. Just like white bread and a multivitamin, we only take what we understand and leave everything else behind. And then when we encounter social problems after eliminating church (or health problems when we eliminate natural foods), we are puzzled.
I don't understand what you're arguing. Of course most startups fail. What does that have to do with how people view NeXT?
How to Start Animating for Free by Today {Beginner Course}
Web Browser: Firefox

Email Client: Thunderbird

Terminal: Gnome Terminal

IDE: Emacs / Sublime Text 3 / Geany

File Manager: Thunar / PCManFM / Caja (Anything but Nautilus they stripped to many features after 2.32)

Basic Text Edtor: Gedit

IRC / Messaging Client: Hexchat / Pidgin

PDF Reader: Evince

Office Suite: LibreOffice

Calendar: Gnome Calendar

Video Player: VLC / SMPlayer

Music Player: Deadbeef / Audacious / Rhythmbox

Photo Viewer: EOG

Screen Recording: ???
Web Browser: Chromium

Email Client: Geary

Terminal: Gnome Terminal

IDE: Gnome Builder

File manager: Gnome Files

Basic Text Editor: Gedit

IRC/Messaging Client: Polari

PDF Reader: Evince

Office Suite: LibreOffice

Calendar: Gnome Calendar

Video Player: Gnome MPV

Music Player: Lollypop

Photo Viewer: Gthumb

Screen recording: Peek
Yeah. Prop 13 massively depresses housing turnover and reduces property tax revenue, which means they need to collect more from income tax. Malcom Gladwell's excellent podcast on golf courses has a great discussion of this.

http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/11-a-good-walk-spoile...
Exceptionally doubtful.

My guess is that this is about monetizing YC. YC Core is relatively illiquid, while a $1b fund provides ~$20 million per year on management fees to be used for operating costs/salaries.
Paying people to preserve forests seems to work
Why is Switzerland considered neutral?
I'm using the latest Ubuntu GNOME, and I can say that I'm pleased with how it is. Using GNOME's own software where available is going to be better IMHO.
Wouldn't 1.27^0.2=~1.05 be a better indicator?
Firefox is multiprocess now.

I find it uses probably 50% of the memory that Chrome does in my typical use-cases as well (4-5 windows open with around 10-20 tabs in each).
I don't understand the confusion here. It's not rocket science.

> So you concede that it doesn't matter if you wrote over half the code?

There's just no way you can conclude that from my comments. I explicitely said I could enforce copyright on my code, even if it's only half of the project.

Again, the comment I was replying to said this:

> If someone uses a portion of your code you don't have copyright over,

Does no one see the logical contradiction in that statement?

YOUR code that YOU DON'T OWN.

Uh... then it's not MY CODE, is it? Is that really that hard to figure out?

I'll explain using simple examples, as people apparently aren't getting it.

* If a third-party contributor to my project re-uses his own code elsewhere, I don't care. It's his code.

* If someone violates copyright on a third-party contributors code, again, I don't really care. He's responsible for enforcing copyright on his code. I'm not.

* And if he's contributing code to my project, I'm pretty sure that code is integrated into my project, and is largely useless outside of it. So the odds of a violation of just his code are pretty small.

* If someone infringes on the project as a whole, then I own copyright to the majority, and I can enforce my copyright, independent of anyone else.

* [edit] And if I submit code to the FSF and assign copyright to them, then it's their responsibility to enforce copyright... because they own the copyright. And yes, I have no standing.

Is that clear? Can people please stop down-voting me for pointing out logical inconsistencies?
No wonder young Americans feel so important 1/2 finish high school as A students
Aside from whether this actually works reliably already or not, from a principal point of view it makes sense that computational biology adds something to the mix.

For the last year I've only been a glorified webdeveloper working for molecular neurobiologists at the Karolinska Institute, but from what I understand it is all about untangling vast quantities of high-dimensional data: data sets of tens to hundreds of thousands of individuals cells, where for each cell the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes are being measured (in what stage of development in which tissue was the cell harvested).

If you can find algorithms that somehow make sense of how these cell populations and genes interact and develop over time, I think it is not out of the question that the same algorithms could make some sense of the aggregate behaviour of the stock market, give a decent data set as input of course. Especially given that most of these algorithms are forms of machine learning, so don't necessarily require an a priori model of what is happening (I mean, if I understand correctly, uncovering that model is precisely what the biologists are after).