skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The first one was really to the point in its abstract while another tells stories in it. Made me grin incessantly when I saw it.
Taking a deal akin to what was offered would have been a poor decision in light of the profits Autodesk was making at the time. Additionally, the concept that shopping around between investment offerings is dissuaded at all is a serious abuse of the market, distorting said market heavily in the investor's favor.
I understand it's early in the project and you are still nailing things down, but please consider open sourcing your project. Not being able to support things like smaller protocols (Spark, MS Teams, etc.) and legacy platforms (IRC) go away when others have the ability to contribute. Don't get me wrong, nothing comes for free and managing contributors is often times very difficult. Regardless, I think it's worth it. Plus, being able to see the source and build it ourselves is very important for this type of security sensitive project.

Thank you for your effort and I'm looking forward to using Eul quite a bit in the future. :)
Radiolab: The Ceremony (Zcash's public key creation)
Reverse Engineering a 433MHz Motorised Blind RF Protocol
I love you man! What great feedback. Thank you very much.

As many have already posted on here, there seems to be several solutions to the problem already. I will definitely take these suggestions into mind! I might just create an MVP to test for any demand first, though.
I'm no expert on Erdogan but I understood him and his party to be centre right/right wing. This sort of action seems fairly characteristic of authoritarian regimes rather than just leftist ones.
Interesting input, thank you. I do admit I haven't seen anything like it. I'll keep that in mind.
And if your Google or Facebook account is hacked...?
Most people can agree in the goal of militaries. Not on companies. Valve, apple and github work in very different ways.
Ironically, a lot more on-the-ground investigation has been done on Mars than the moon. I suspect there's a lot more useful stuff waiting to be found. All we've looked at from the moon are a few pounds of rocks from a handful of sites.
8 iPhone 6S Secrets That You Did Not Know About – Onenaija Blog
Hackshit PhaaS platform, even more easy to power #Phishing campaigns
'Robots will be able to do everything better than us'. Which begs a load of questions.
Located in Germany where the company AVM has a very high market share. As a result, I use a Fritz!Box 6360 for Cable Internet (400 down, 25 up) with a Fritz!Repeater 1750E on every floor connected via gigabit ethernet. Manually set up 2.4 and 5 Ghz SSIDs to segregate devices like printer an other ancient stuff to the 2.4 SSID while using the 5 GHz SSID for my modern devices. I cannot imagine a better setup.
> Weird, kinda like the US.

Which part of aytekin (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14780685) 's message reminds you of the US? Whatever else one may say of the current state of US politics, this:

> the other half of the population took over the country and started applying middle eastern and Islamic ideals instead. … the islamists see west as evil.

doesn't sound like it. (To be fair, I didn't quote:

> They believe in secularity and many other Western ideals.

and

> they have so much ambition and hatred in them.

(different 'they'), which maybe fit some groups, according to your leanings.)
Not necessarily. Case in point: Its language regarding patents is what made the OSI reject CC0 (or discuss it to death until its application was withdrawn):

Without an explicit mention of patents, it's up to the courts to decide whether the grant of usage rights includes an implicit grant of patent right. With an explicit mention, you're hosed.
Hey, thanks for commenting! :)

I'll have to disagree a little with you though. As we have heard many times, "time is money" and you can save a lot of time by buying templates of some sort. Of course, this brings us back to whether or not the marketplace will be filled with Wordpress templates, thus making my website identical to Themeforest.

Thank you for your input though, I wonder if there is any data I could also have users sell on the marketplace. I'll have to think a little about that.
Ah, but you see, you were the one who actually did do it.
>a start up that builds an artificial intelligence platform for financial services.

I didn't even started watching after reading this sentence. That's like saying "System using Applied Mathematics in Financial Service"
First paragraph of BSD license says: "Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright-notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer".

I agree you can add the Apache 2.0 license on top of that, but you cannot discard the BSD license unless you own the code.
Even without defender activated, the fact that the binary is not signed is triggering windows 10 security. Not an issue for me but you might want to sign the binary to avoid this.
Think of it as if the Queen speech was about the excellent job the British people did on the Brexit referendum, defeating the traitors.

Currently, a little bit more of the half of the population supports Erdogan and the other half hates him. Though admittedly the anti-Erdigan half did not support the coup as it is believed to be orchestrated by another islamist, but still...
> The same of parts of the US.

Actually, there are more forests in North America than there were 100 years ago. Caveat: there are fewer old-growth forests and the tree diversity is not as great.

https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stori...
Actually, that is something I thought as well! And the marketplace wouldn't be limited to only selling website code, it could sell app code too. Thanks for commenting. :)
I've not seen anyone use any UML for years to be honest except for class diagrams or something similar to give a high level architecture overview or to explain how major components interact.
Playing devils advocate here as I agree with you, phone call intrusion is worse. TV in the U.K. has to be paid for (with money that has her face on it) and the queens communications are pro-establishment, so it has a little of the creep factor.
No love for Common Lisp? Please add Common Lisp :).

Anyway, pretty nice collection of languages you have there; a lot of which I want to play with but don't feel like installing a proper toolchain yet. So I'll definitely use the service :).
Can you yell us more? It seems quite interesting
Macron -being a former Rothschild investment banker- could tremendously help firms and individuals in relocating to Paris.

They just removed entirely the tax on standing capital (only real estate will remain taxed), and more could be following. To me, the government is taking Brexit very seriously and is intent on making the most out of it; including producing new legislation to attract businesses relocating out of London.

Bankers not only have Paris fighting to have them, but the whole government as well.
I don't think Google is doing the same - look at Polymer for example. You also have a patent grant but it expires if you try to attack possible patents related to Polymer itself - its like in Apache 2.0 which is more sane in my opinion.
New wording: "This source code is licensed under BOTH the GPLv2 (found in the LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License" (emphasis on "BOTH" mine).

-> IANAL, nor a native english speaker, but shouldn't it be "EITHER" instead of "BOTH" ?
That's how I understand the patent grant too. Are people here really confusing a grant with some sort of restricting of their freedom or do we miss something? I frankly don't want to believe everyone, including apache foundation, believes this without getting their facts straight..?
The majority of Canadians became Canadian by being born there. Pretty sure the swearing wasn't coming from the new citizen.
This is incorrect. Here's the full text of BSD license:

Copyright (c) 2011 The LevelDB Authors. All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
met:

* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
distribution.
* Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
this software without specific prior written permission.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
View

The first list item disproves your statement.
How we migrated a 200K+ LOC project to TypeScript and survived to tell the story
I’ll try to find the source. I guess it must have been mistaken given what you said.

EDIT: Haven’t found the source. I did find that the existing ViaSat-1 latency (on Exede, and actual ping times not satellite->ground latency) is 600 to 700ms, so that’s roughly in line with what you said. Exede do a bunch of latency compensation where they can so people often report lower latency, but for eg online games that obviously won’t work.

I also know that what I read before was specific to airplane in-flight internet, although I doubt commercial flight altitude make any difference to latency, so that’s likely an irrelevant point.
For me personally (I have worked 80% of my professional life of 25 years from home) it is all about time management. Doing traditional office hours would and does basically squash my productivity. I see that with many people around me: they work but not in a way I would describe as productive. The work gets done eventually but there was way too much interference. That is required for a team to work sometimes, but if you need to produce, quiet and your own comfort zone is probably preferable. Depends on what you do ofcourse. Mixing job roles in one open office (sales, product dev, pm and software dev) is one of the more efficient ways to get very little done in the alotted time. That is why I think, if someone has the discipline and the right job for it, working from home is efficient.
Thanks for the honest and detailed response. It definitely makes it easier to engage with an opposing view :-)

Firstly regarding the size of China. I do take the point that this makes administration easier. A counterpoint is that it also makes internal markets smaller. China's protectionist approach to the internet for instance likely wouldn't work in Taiwan. I'm unclear of the effect of protectionism in general here. It certainly seems to have worked well for China so far but what will happen if or when these markets are really opened up to foreign competition?

The effect of China's rise on the Asian tigers is almost certainly true. Although you could make the same argument for China benefiting from economic integration with the West. I don't think it diminishes either achievement.

I think I certainly disagree with the notion that the Chinese system is more honest. Chinese media very much gives me the opposite impression. The Great Firewall (protectionist reasons aside) doesn't speak to a "transparent and honest interface to the population" nor the state controlled media. That said, I can align with some of the things you say about democracy in the West. We would certainly do well not to delude ourselves into thinking that the West is free and China is not - though I have no doubts about which society I would choose to live in.

Lastly and most importantly for your argument, I really think its too early to say that China has avoided the stagnation that has afflicted the Asian tigers or WLDs. China's GDP per capita is only around a quarter of Japan's. I think if China were at half or three quarters of that figure and still achieving such impressive growth, I would be more convinced. Until then, we need to compare it to much more distant points in those countries' histories, when they were still posting spectacular growth figures (and in the case of Japan, also predicted to surpass the USA). The experiment needs more time to run in my opinion.
I dunno "every single large company" seems like an overstatement. Maybe thats the reason some of big enterprises are still on Angular and Polymer - some go for Vue. Some of them also have BSD+Patents but its less broad.
If crypto researchers would try working on actual user facing software they would probably come up with more useful designs. As the moment (1) you have to be insanely smart and careful to implement any reliable crypto (2) the crypto needs constant updates because researchers initial ideas are always full of weird unexpected holes (3) virtually all proposed crypto comes with multiple human interaction fails.

I wish it were better, and I completely understand that it's tough to both research higher order mathematics and keep in mind human level interactions, but without something like that , I think we're going to stay stuck with the current state of overly technical, fragile, normal-user-hostile tech.
Also, the amount of tweets is show if you hover over the charts and on the side bar next to the charts like most graphs.
There is no mention of this supporting XMPP, but I use profanity for XMPP, and love it. The fact that it's a console application may or may not suit your tastes, of course.
Designing a P2P Lending Platform with Elixir in Mind
> no large company is every going to agree to such an assymetrical deal.

The thing is, if you just use react for something inconsequential, and can live with the fact that you have to cease using it when you sue Facebook, then it is fine.

You shouldn't base your business on Facebook's (potential) patents, and then attack them with your own patents - but that is true with or without the patent grant.

Of course, what would be great would be 1) a finer grained, symmetrical patent grant, or 2) a bilateral agreement between your company and Facebook instead of the patent grant. If you are big enough and have patents, you can probably negotiate something like that.
Pony, too.
Best health insurance company in the world
I agree with pretty much everything you just said, but I don't think your conclusions are supported by your argument.

The problem is that you're implicitly assuming that Britain will be no worse off and then concluding that businesses will spot that so that we're no worse off.

Let's be realistic: the pound is worth 80% (give or take) what it was before the referendum. That isn't felt in your pocket immediately, but the effects works their way through the economy. Sure, purchasing power parity and the economy rebalancing will ameliorate that, but it's in no ways going to eliminate it.

Now, there's a problem with this analysis, which is that Brexit hasn't happened yet. This cuts both ways: the final state hasn't been reached, but also the economy's a lot more resilient inside the EU than outside, because the lack of tariff and non-tariff barriers helps with the rebalancing you describe.

So, for the future, a good question is: how are our preparations going? Well, the NAO says that they're barely going at all, the repeal bill says we're basically going to have to put up with direct monarchial rule to survive and to date we seem to be capitulating on every point of contention. What's worse is the points we're not capitulating on, because we're an 1/8th of the way through the process and haven't even got the status of EU citizens sorted out.

Even if the negotiations go well, we're talking about ripping up 40 years of settled U.K. law and replacing it with... well, ministers haven't decided yet, but they don't want parliament to have a vote when they do.

So, as I see it there's basically two possible outcomes here: 1) the EU retains most of the benefits of U.K. membership 2) hard Brexit. Die-hard Leavers have long argued that the EU is too complex, and the EU shows no inclination to make it more complex to suit Britain. Either way, we will be worse placed to trade with the rest of the world.

You're right, even in the case of hard Brexit the economy would eventually grow again. Would it grow as fast as it would within the EU? There's no reason to believe so. So we're looking at a huge one off hit and permanent reduced growth.

Sorry, this is quite long and probably not as clear as I'd hoped. I've also probably missed a fair number of important points. I haven't even touched on the _non_economic problems with leaving the EU. But I think it's clear that, while there are always ways to make money, Brexit is likely to be a negative sum game.
The model where rich countries keeping paying to poor countries in exchange of not cutting down their own forests is unworkable. If people there are looking for genuine progress then they have to build schools, bridges, cities and so on. You won't be able to say that hey you guys live like how you used 1000 years ago and here's few dollars.

However the bigger issue I think are the few evil people in those countries who look at its natural resources and see dollars instead. They just want to log, mine as much as they can, export it all out and basically make free money. Their business strategy is simple: buy off government personals, acquire natural resources that was supposed to belong to people and sell it off to other countries in the world. You are not going to be able to prevent this either.

One effective way to discourage this is put a worldwide ban of exported wood from Amazon. If major countries can come together on this then this could actually work.
Is that Gmail (as in email) or Hangouts? Is there Hangouts support?
You work in vacuum?
All contributors to RocksDB signed Facebook's CLA https://code.facebook.com/cla/individual which states:

2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, You hereby grant to Facebook and to recipients of software
distributed by Facebook a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge,
royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative
works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute Your
Contributions and such derivative works.
Filco Majestouch MX Red keys
Kingdom of the Sky- 'Lesotho' – Exploring Motherland Africa
The paradigm is everywhere, so just use another library that uses that paradigm, like Inferno or Preact, or even something slightly different like Vue if you want.
The trick is, what kind of jobs are being destroyed and created.

With current wave of automation, unskilled jobs are being destroyed, and specialized jobs are being created. The people leaving the former can't access the latter.
"A free trade agreement does not require being in the EU." which is only offered to NON European countries. Please see the deal that Switzerland and Norway got. Deals that the UK does not want.

"there way of punishing the UK"
Look, If you are going to have a divorce and tell your wife: "Look, we are going to have a divorce but I don't want to pay alimony and we are going to stay fuck buddies and the cottage in Italy that you inherited from your parents, I am still going to use this."

Then all this sounds like an excellent idea but if your wife says "I pass" this does not mean that your wife is going to "punish you". She is just passing on the deal.
Yes (it helped) and speed, i.e. querying and indexing performance, for sure is only an USP if you also have relevance.

I'm confident the relevance is as good as or better than Lucene. I especially like my phrase queries and how they seem more relevant compared to that of a Lucene phrase query. The scoring is a half-way implementation of word2vec (in a lot of ways similar to the scoring mechanics of Lucene's tf-idf scheme). I'm aiming for full word2vec implementation in vNext.

I have only my own benchmark tests to tell me I'm faster than Lucene. Which is why I'm contemplating writing a formal proof both of ResinDB's performance and of it's relevance.

My test data has been the English verison of Wikipedia plus Project Gutenberg. I suppose I could publish those indices to the world, as a demo search engine. I don't think a soul would care about a proper searchable Project Gutenberg though. Looking into common crawl now.

I'm a part-time father of two, employed doing tedious unmotivating work, focusing completely on my spare time project. I need some advise as to what the next step should be, if I wanted to make this into a business that I could spend all of my time with, not only nights and weekends. Formal proof? Demo?

Side note: one of the most approachable people in the database building community is Oren Eini, creator of RavenDB. He's reviewing ResinDB on his blog. I've read a preview of the entire series of posts, implemented solutions for the best parts of the critique and just released v2. Blog is here: http://ayende.com/blog
> I'm sure it's entirely different this time though.

Of course it is. Which is obvious if you look at how automation before differs from automation today.

And I'm going over the obvious memes now, but:

> Replace the word automation with: horseless carriage

Yes, and replace the word "human" with horse", and tell me the invention did not have a dramatic impact on the population that was doing the work.
Reading a bit more the thread, it's quite surprising. The assignee is Chris Mattmann. From his webpage, he is not a legal counsel. The only evidence of a problem they show is that BSD alone implies a patent grant but coupled with an explicit patent grant, this is not the case anymore. The other evidence is brought by Roy Fielding who does not appear to be a legal counsel either about a discussion (oral?) with Facebook's legal counsel that the license is incompatible with ASLv2.

The whole decision seems to have been taken by "not-a-lawyer" people with their own interpretations. Doesn't the Apache Foundation have some software lawyers they can ask?
I think there is a legal layer, and an ideological layer. From the legal layer, this is a non-issue. You are not in any way worse off than if the license was public domain or BSD (as far as I understand it).

From an ideological or appearances point of view, it seems a bit clumsy. People see it as a submarine to get access to their patents, rather than an insurance to prevent unnecessary patent litigation costs.

I wonder what other companies do with their patent grants, e.g. Microsoft. I remember MS had one that said, you may use our patent for the Ribbon UI, as long as you follow our UI guidelines and don't make an Office competitor (which I find pretty restrictive). But maybe there are other options out there that people would find more agreeable.

I think a unilateral patent grant for React in the license would be nice, but unrealistic. Maybe they should restrict the kinds of patent actions that trigger the invalidation of the grant, say only to certain patents, but it is hard to find a good compromise.
No it should be BOTH. You can use it under the terms of either, but it is licensed under both. If it was licensed under EITHER the obvious follow up is - Well which is it actually licensed under?

IANAL either but I am a native UK English speaker.
Shameless plug for my own attempt at writing a software renderer in swift... https://github.com/kosua20/PtahRenderer

The readme lists a few useful resources; in my opinion the most difficult part was implementing clipping.