skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's sort of a weird way of looking at it. Don't Musk and Ahuja own like 10% of the shares? Is there an easy way to get non-insider, non-institutional numbers?
Dispatched from the bubble.
I tried that too. But it made no difference whatsoever.
One survey found 40% of women never experienced harassment,

http://fortune.com/2016/01/11/survey-sexual-harassment-tech/

Of course every survey may be flawed or mistaken, and we need to read carefully how they define harassment, etc. But based on that survey and others, and my own anecdotal experiences, I don't think we should be surprised when a woman says she never experienced sexual harassment.

This is a large industry, with lots of different cultures and experiences.
>There is no reason to believe, that we can't do this. A brain is part of our world, governed by physics.

How do you know consciousness is "governed" by our contemporary understanding of physics?
Cryptocurrency Has Its Potato Salad Moment with the Useless Ethereum Token
PROST a Protocol Buffers Implementation for the Rust Language
Refocus:The Go-To Platform for Visualizing Service Health
Is seems that Racer is still missing support for auto-complete on basic code snippets:

let x = vec![1]
x.<no completion>

Even if they special cased vec! or all the std macros, it'd be a good on-ramp improvement. But I thought RLS was supposed to step in where Racer can't handle things - is that not the case for macro support?
SO interested in this as I am in the same boat, but I'm Mexican
http://primecoin.io/ is an example where the work being done is useful - it is used to discover more prime numbers.

However, regardless of the "usefulness" of the actual work, it ties the value of bitcoin to a very tangible resource: the amount of mining power available in the network. This is actually more similar to the gold standard than fiat currency, where proven reserves are needed to print more currency.
They list an email that you need to send a message to, which auto-replies with a link to their website where you can cancel. I unfortunately don't have the link handy to share, but it's easier than needing to go through the rigamarole of you canceling upcoming shipments.

The cancellation set up they have is clearly geared towards people who won't want to bother doing that--and then forget to cancel a shipment.
Those are good questions. I guess I didn't find it implausible on its face, because I've never known any company to do reviews in a prompt and timely fashion.

It would help if we had an inside perspective on how their reviews work from someone who isn't invested in this specific story.
> However, once cars are fully automated, the entire game will change. Market leaders of today will be up-ended. That's when I believe Tesla, Google, and anyone else who has driverless technology will take over the industry.

> That goes double for the taxi companies like Uber, Lyft, Juno, etc.

The interesting thing is that you didn’t mention Mercedes Benz.

Mercedes Benz owns a few carsharing and Taxi apps in Europe, almost all Taxi operators lease cars from Mercedes Benz (which, in return, gets better deals with them), Mercedes Benz licensed the entire Tesla IP and has used it already in one model, and they’ve got their own electric cars and self-driving prototypes as well as self-driving trucks.

Mercedes Benz is the most likely candidate to build a vertically integrated Taxi solution. They’ve got deals with all major cities, with Taxi operators, they own the IP, they’ve got the apps and the infrastructure, and they’ve got the required prototypes.
Other detectors around the surface of the globe will be oriented on different planes. The two we have now give error-rejection and, I suppose 1-D detection. Add another in Europe and one in Australia, do some trigonometry, and bob's your uncle, no?
This has been discussed quite a bit, and there are very good reasons why not[0]. But I suppose things can always change.

[0]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/crates-io-package-policies...
> So what about their execution is required here beyond "cheap and available where you already shop"?

It's not 20 years ago, and “online for home delivery” is increasingly where people already shop. And, it's easy to displace a business that requires a trip out with one that requires a trip out, but one you were likely taking already. Harder to do that with something that doesn't require a trip out at all.

> No one can use Blue Apron without a regular grocer in their routine already.

Yes, you can. Cooking oil, salt, and black pepper—the only ingredients BA doesn't usually supply—don't require a traditional grocery or even one of the limited-area perishable delivery services to acquire. If BA is your only home cooking, you literally never need to enter a traditional grocery store, or order from a similar full-grown online delivery service. Google Express or Amazon in one of the areas where they don't have grocery delivery will work fine.
The startup scene in Romania: €11.3m raised and €72m in exits, in 2016 alone
> Creating an environment in which some people are justifiably afraid to speak

Those who you are appearing to condemn would just as easily use the language of "justifiably afraid to speak" in the context of their own political issues, but I am guessing you would disagree with their particular justifications, yet the implication you seem to be making is that they are "more free" to speak, even though both sides are equally capable.

The particular topic is irrelevant, there is certainly a venue in which any opinion would antagonize a particular crowd of close-minded ideologues, but just because a certain group of people are closed-off to certain types of ideas, doesn't mean you are any less free to speak them.

Imagine Obama giving a speech to a crowd of Trump supporters.

Imagine Trump giving a speech to a crowd of Obama supporters.

Both sides would claim "they screamed our guy down and didn't even give him a chance to speak, the [right/left] are killing free speech"... well, they'd both be wrong because freedom to speak doesn't mean everyone will agree, and if you broadcast an unpopular opinion in the wrong crowd, you get an angry mob; this doesn't mean your freedom is being trampled on, because there are plenty of places you can go to speak your ideas where everyone will clap and cheer and exclaim how enlightened you for sharing the clearly-correct-opinion regarding topic x.
That was my take on it too. It's also why I think her post missed the mark for me; she simply doesn't have experience with what she's writing about, because she's living a different society that doesn't experience the problem on the same scale, so her proposed solutions don't carry much weight to workers in Silicon Valley.
Love to know how far they would have got without all the assistance.
On a side note...

> The FAA recommends havinga child strapped into a seat for the duration of a flight.

...have the people who wrote that _ever_ flown with a toddler? I mean, yeah, I agree, but good luck with that!
Hash lookup on the total number of events. But in JS this is basically dust given how often this occurs.
Ford seems like a bargain at this price.
(Disclosure: I've been in F around $6.)
The TechCrunch Podcast: E-bikes and the slow-burn disruption of cities
As a counterpoint to the "deadlifts fix everything" folks, I regularly (4-6 hours weekly) do deadlifts, squats, overhead squats, air squats, goblet squats, pistols, weighted pistols, muscle ups, snatches, situps, pushups, handstand holds, handstand pushups, power snatches, toes to bar, toes to elbow, thrusters, pull-ups, planks, couch stretch, pigeon stretch, vinyasa yoga, kettlebells etc etc etc. Pretty much total insanity.

I've been a desk jockey for nearly a quarter century, and have had constant low back pain for nearly as long. My back feels terrible every day, particularly when deadlifting, or standing up from sitting on the throne for a bit. Chiros haven't helped (100% quackery imho, I've tried a dozen, and really want it to work), X-rays show nothing wrong.

The only thing that has helped has been classic "80's ladies" leg movements (bird dogs, fire hydrants, movements like shown in the linked video), along with foam rolling out tightness in the hips.

I suspect my hip flexors are extremely strong in one direction, and extremely weak in the opposing direction (medial glute), pulling my pelvis out of whack, and thereby hosing up my lower spine.

Anyway, sometimes barbell work doesn't help. YMMV.
>> Buy inferior battery packs at a higher cost from a different supplier? Try to replicate Tesla's battery technology and then convince your board to build a gigafactory so you can produce them at the required volume and cost?

Why not another option - battery manufacturer notices that if they build an equiv. battery they can sell to every car manufacturer in the world. With the higher volume they'll be able to do it for less than Tesla if they are only building for their own cars.
So FreeBSD should keep shipping rlogin in the default install to support people who might be installing an OS for which the last major version was released in 1998 and the last minor update was in 2005? Man, nerds really like to "Well, actually..."
I liken this stock to the first few quarters of GoPro leading into Christmas. Investors are making it pop up and down, but the moment the possibility of massive growth and revenue meets up to reality, it'll slide down to a reasonable price.

"People don't buy what you do, they buy why you do it."

https://www.ted.com/talks/simon_sinek_how_great_leaders_insp...
I think the story was that she learned about the depression on the same day or just after the negative performance review.
It seemed like a legitimate question. The parent comment said pretty much every selectivity group is okay except for white males and the child post simply asked why is that the case. At least that's how I read it.
Day 100: Summary of the past hundred days
In my experience, Redux seems to fit better with those coming from a FP background, and MobX seems to sit well with those with OOP backgrounds.
For EV to replace cars you need to have superchargers along the main roads (already getting there) for long trips and also some place for visitors to charge in small towns (either superchargers or chargers at hotels, campgrounds, rest stops, etc.

There will still probably be areas of the country where it will be hard to find charging stations (although gas stations are infrequent in those parts currently, its much easier to bring some extra gas in a can then an extra battery).
I'd really like to understand why -3 for such an innocuous comment. Live-editable code is an important tool for just this reason.
That is why media struggles making money--it gives its audience for free to Facebook and Google with all that "free" share buttons and analytics. Why would an advertiser pay to a brand name media outlet money for displaying an ad if it could buy exactly this audience on Facebook or via Google much cheaper?

Media did it to itself--it just gave away it's audience for free. No wonder it can't make enough money via advertising.
"Overvalued" is a funny term -- how can you overvalue a company who's competing on innovation? Remember people said the same thing about Facebook when they were worth $50b and Google when their only products were search and gmail. I agree that it's a risky buy, I disagree with the notion that there's something fundamentally wrong with high-value speculation.
It's perhaps worth noting that musk has said:

> I will announce locations for between two and four Gigafactories later this year – probably four.

This puts them in the range of around 175 (35 * 4 new + Nevada) gigawatt-hours annually. They are certainly looking to compete in this space
And specifically, that the impossibly large effect has no plausible psychological basis, putting the onus on the researchers to perform additional due-dilligence in the face of data that is completely outside the bounds of the theoretical model(s) under discussion.
Interesting! Do you have any source for this? According to the Redux page, it only claims to take inspiration from Elm and Flux[1].

[1] http://redux.js.org/#influences
Don't you use `setState` only for UI state, i.e. react components?

As far as I understand it with redux you end up having all of your application's state in the store. Unless you split it?
Well, Paypal's been getting away with pretending to not be a bank for over a decade now...
Indevin | ICT Administrator | Blenheim, South Island New Zealand | ONSITE with travel required to other supported sites throughout NZ | NZ Work Visa

Indevin is New Zealands largest winemaker, it operates over five sites in New Zealand and you will be based at the largest site and main winery in Blenheim supporting everything related to ICT and so you will need a real can-do attitude. We are still evolving the ICT infrastructure as we discover better ways to operate and you will have a big say in that, the infrastructure has changed significantly over the years, the core business software runs on MySQL 5.7 and current systems are implemented on VMWare/Windows Server 2016, Windows Clients, Cloud based MS Exchange and Office 360. You will be supported by contractors and Internal developers and possibly another administrator who will support you day-to-day. Marlborough is NZ largest wine region and has a population of about 50,000 and is a great place to live. Serious Applicants can get more details from Sandy (sandy at indevin dot com)
One of the things that I'd like to see for the Rust Book is some form of "Here's how to use it in a function".

For example, Taking a random piece of code from the Rust Book

let buffer: &mut [i32];
let coefficients: [i64; 12];
let qlp_shift: i16;

for i in 12..buffer.len() {
let prediction = coefficients.iter()
.zip(&buffer[i - 12..i])
.map(|(&c, &s)| c * s as i64)
.sum::<i64>() >> qlp_shift;
let delta = buffer[i];
buffer[i] = prediction as i32 + delta;
}

How would one break part of this into a function

fn get_part ??? What might go here ???

let buffer: &mut [i32];
let coefficients: [i64; 12];
let qlp_shift: i16;

for i in 12..buffer.len() {
let prediction = get_part(&coefficients,&buffer,i)
.map(|(&c, &s)| c * s as i64)
.sum::<i64>() >> qlp_shift;
let delta = buffer[i];
buffer[i] = prediction as i32 + delta;
}

[Exercise for the reader] I'm not sure If I could write the code to do this without taking a few wrong turns.
I probably wouldn't use it again now that I feel a lot more confident in the kitchen.

That's the big flaw I see in their product model - it's inherently self-limiting.
A quote I remember: "Given enough time, Hydrogen will begin to understand itself".
Yes! https://www.amazon.jobs/en/jobs/433643
`setState` doesn't actually care whether you've mutated your data or updated it immutably. In fact, I just ran a quick test, and you can even directly mutate your state object and then call `this.setState({})`, and it will update. `setState` is basically a combination of "queue an update to `this.state`, and queue a re-render along with that". So, if you mutate `this.state` and then re-render, your render output would be "correct" because the state object was updated.

Where immutability really comes into play with React itself is optimizations via `shouldComponentUpdate`. The fastest way to determine if a component needs to update is shallow equality comparisons of current and next props/state, which requires that you do immutable data updates to produce new object references. Two good articles on the topic are [0] and [1].

[0] http://reactkungfu.com/2015/08/pros-and-cons-of-using-immuta...

[1] https://www.bennadel.com/blog/2903-why-should-i-care-about-i...
Self-Validation Is the Key to Unlimited Motivation
Something not really mentioned here is that many of Telsa's investors aren't in it necessarily because of what the financial statements show. They're pouring money into a company they fundamentally believe in -- into a movement which they feel obligated to contribute to.

The stock price is probably overvalued by the books, but for humans desperate to embrace a company who's making an attempt to make a better, cleaner world, there likely isn't a value too high. Ecological returns > monetary returns?
One could imagine just putting a text entry field for gender, so as to not other any gender identity that doesn't align with the male-female binary. One could also imagine putting other fields in for respondents to self-identify as trans, should they want.

That said, it seems a very neutral approach to gender self-reporting is self-defeating (consider that, at least for bathroom laws in some US states), the very notion of something that's not on the assigned-at-birth male-female binary is itself controversial. I guess if your gender choices included "deconstruct the male-female binary" or something, that'd be overtly political, but at least in this political climate just acknowledging the existence of some people seems to be a political act. (one I'm in favor of, fwiw, but I'm one of those people that argue that being "apolitical" is just cover for being politically in favor of the status quo).
The reason you see such an obvious false positive in this case isn't because people who bought vacuums are likely to buy another, but rather that people who look at vacuums are likely to buy a vacuum, and the model hasn't accounted for whether you've already bought one.

A different recommended might use different types of conditionals (items bought instead of items looked at, for example), and also have success in different areas (like recommending iPhone cases for iPhone owners). In order to converge the models in a Bayesian framework you'd have to deal with the combinatorial explosion of products and event conditionals which might be pretty gnarly. But some convergence work would be better than none, otherwise you end up with 20 different recommender widgets on a page.

Overall I don't think amazon's approach to date has been bad...it's just time to clean up a bit.
I think it's that we don't have materials that can focus x-rays with refraction the way we do visible wavelengths. The alternatives are tricky.
It's called a factory. Gigafactory is a made up word.
Somewhere in my ancestral line I have a relative that can read and write the sort of math that is in this paper.

I have given myself the OK that I will never be able to do a gosh darn thing even close to what I just saw.

I just hope that somewhere in my life I am able to do something that is just as awe inspiring to someone else.
As of February Elon owns 22%. He and other board members/early investors are individuals so I don't see how it is weird to include them, though.
Does it need to reach that level for it to be worth doing?
> Bitcoin will probably still be used as a medium of exchange for illicit goods but that's about it.

As if this was a small use case...
"... insanely expensive, incoherent, dim, and an operational headache". i'm near bursting with off-topic jokes.
It's up to you how much of your data you put into Redux. Quoting the Redux FAQ at http://redux.js.org/docs/faq/OrganizingState.html#organizing... :

> Using local component state is fine. As a developer, it is your job to determine what kinds of state make up your application, and where each piece of state should live. Find a balance that works for you, and go with it.

Some common rules of thumb for determining what kind of data should be put into Redux:

> - Do other parts of the application care about this data?

> - Do you need to be able to create further derived data based on this original data?

> - Is the same data being used to drive multiple components?

> - Is there value to you in being able to restore this state to a given point in time (ie, time travel debugging)?

> - Do you want to cache the data (ie, use what's in state if it's already there instead of re-requesting it)?

I've seen some people say that you should put literally every single value in your app into Redux. You certainly _can_ do that, but I would see it as overkill. I'm much more pragmatic about it - put it into Redux if it makes sense to, per the rules of thumb in the FAQ.
They're not a taxi company. They do not take street hails and as such, their regulation needs are different. For example, there's no need (or at least less need) for the government to regulate fares since people trust the Uber app to give them a fair price (whereas if you're a tourist and you were to just hop into a random unregulated car you hailed, it would be difficult to tell if you were getting a fair price).
What type of consumer products? And I'm not sure what comments you're referring to.
Hash lookup is O(1)
Also -Wextra, but I haven't tried the hyperpedantic options that need to be enabled individually.
Well, do you happen to know how many other people are repeat buyers of similar products? Maybe a large number of buyers end up buying a second set of speaker stands because they don't like the ones they just bought or because they're enthusiasts who gift them or have multiple audio setups. Just because it seems unlikely someone would be a repeat buyer in a given product category doesn't mean it isn't profitable to target every buyer as if they might be.
I agree with everything you say, but the run up on TSLA has been pretty amazing. As a TSLA fan, even I finally capitulated and took some profit.
The Human Diagnosis Project is hiring software engineers
> This is obviously speculation, but I think Amazon could come up with something better if they felt it pressing i.e. recommending the same product category was no better than random products.

You'd think they'd have so much data on buyer behaviour that they could recommend you e.g. other cleaning products that vacuum cleaner buyers tend to buy like mops, dusters and sprays. I can't imagine how recommending you the same thing you just bought over and over that you're not likely to get again for years is going to yield the best results and even manually selected recommendations would do better than that but willing to be convinced as obviously it's in their best interest to be smart here. You'd think you'd even explicitly build in a rule in your recommender system not to recommend something that has been recently bought.
Scroll further down the page :) There were a lot of influences, including Elm, Clojurescript, Om, Cycle, and NuclearJS: http://redux.js.org/#thanks .
> How do these folks get groceries from the store now?

Either via home delivery (so, not people who would use a curbside drop off), posdibly, in some areas, through Amazon Prime Fresh, or in smaller, more frequent trips walking or with a bike, or they don't regularly, and they just eat out and work with non-perishables at home.
Not sure why this is being downvoted. Maybe it came off as harsh? Pushing yourself to continue studying when you've lost the motivation would certainly require discipline though.

I've considered signing up for classes before but instead I find coworkers or friends interested in the same subjects as me and we do online courses together. Groups are a helpful tool to keep you (and others) moving forward for sure.
Question for HN people who know better: how generalisable are these attacks on deep learning networks. I know it's trivial to optimise for a class on say the InceptionV3 networks trained on ImageNet; but can I perform the same kind of attack if I don't necessarily know the what the network looks like? What if I don't know the details of the dataset it was trained on?
Musk owns ~20.5% of the outstanding shares. Ahuja does not appear to own an appreciable number (directly, at least).
Go isn't even remotely close to strict. They optimised for speed vs correctness checking.
Interesting article, but should be marked with a [2015] tag.
In what sense am I glossing over anything? Obviously, Poles have a strong Catholic tradition. But so do Mexicans.
Raspberry Pi's smaller, cheaper rival: NanoPi Neo Plus2 weighs in at $25
That's your fault for not using uBlock Origin.