skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The more income you report, the less "universal basic income" you receive, [.

This is a misunderstanding. Under UBI, everybody receives the same monthly UBI. The size of the UBI does not depend on income.

> ..] while your taxes will skyrocket to pay for all of the new UBI spending.

Well, yes. Of course. Somehow this has to be paid for. But this will more probably be paid for by taxing corporations and shareholders instead of labour. For example by using the ~$2.0tn of US companies cash reserves.
There is nothing inherently wrong with a lack of diversity, but it is almost always a symptom of an issue with society or systems limiting people. For example, I would argue that primary school teachers being almost entirely women is indeed an issue with systemic and social sexism.

You have completely missed my point. The point is that everyone should have opportunity if they want to do something and are capable of it, not some kind of homogenization. Women are currently actively pushed away from the industry. If women don't want to be in tech, that's fine, the issue is that women that do get pushed away, discriminated against, or never get the opportunity to learn they are interested in it.

There is no attempt to make everyone the same - the attempt is to try and allow everyone to embrace their own differences - to give everyone the same opportunities.
That actually might help me!
Have people done this?
I'm on the demand side of this question. When I hear "hire a team" I think "that will cost more".

With early stage business/startup capital is scarce.

We're hiring one off, using contractors for focused products that ship. Modules of the whole.

100% of the solicitors of team things all have the same juggling and sorting I have to do with individuals. But the cost is more. And the work expectation is more. We'll build your whole app!!

Great! Now I've spent a bunch of time and money to build expertise in my problem domain yet nobody is on MY team.
Interesting fact: this is important for US too, because pound is defined as exactly 0.45359237 kg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(mass)#Current_use)
What I really want is a music recommendation system that scans my music library and using a combination of likes, play counts, genres and what I've played recently make a list of recommendations. Even more awesome - let me explore new genres. Say I'd like to explore more Jazz, let me explore Jazz and using the aforementioned information make a recommendation for what I'd like. The awesomest would be to let me stream the recommendation(s) a few times - I'd even pay for that - so I can decide if I like it and want to add it to my library. Ideally it would use my likes/dislikes on its recommendations as input to future recommendations.
Pizza places need more drivers than anything.
How power profits from disaster
We love Wagtail CMS (https://wagtail.io/)
It's a free, beautiful, versatile and fast Django (Python) based CMS.

Check out the sites which are made with wagtail at madewithwagtail.org

cheers,
ralph
With this kind of task, how do you verify that you didn't just overfit and start reproducing the input data?
If you're interested in trying something new - request for an invite at https://pragma.build

You can read more about the project here - https://www.laktek.com/2016/11/29/introducing-pragma/. We'll be sending out more beta invites in the next couple of weeks.
I've been reading about Erlang recently, and guards (the when clause) seem much more expressive than something like type annotations for function parameters. For example, TypeScript's annotations can't express something like this (which also shows Erlang's pattern matching):

right_age(X) when X >= 16, X =< 104 ->
true;
right_age(_) ->
false.

http://learnyousomeerlang.com/syntax-in-functions#guards-gua...
Yes, I find the whole "Explain this in any other way!" sort of a bizarre demand. You've got your choice of 5 or 6 decent isomorphic explanations. Preference for "many worlds" seems to boil down to "it annoys my common sense less than some of the others", which is a very personal concern rather than a scientific one.

Personally, I actually think retrocausality, once you twist your brain around it, is another perfectly sensible option that doesn't involve multiplying the universe into a near-infinity of inaccessible, unobservable parallels. The solution in my mind is that retrocausality actually isn't; what it means instead is that what "the present" is is even less like what you thought it was, and is even more of a partial order than relativity already told us it was. The answer to the "double-slit" experiment, to my mind, is that there simply isn't a "before" and "after" and some sort of "retrocausal self-interference" of the wave... the whole thing is simply one atomic event that doesn't have a before and an after, and your imposition of a temporal order on the events is much simplified from the reality. The mystery lies in your attempt to impose a global temporal order, which is appropriate enough at scale, onto a single local event where it doesn't apply in the way you expect. The results of the double-slit experiment itself is not that mysterious, merely counterintuitive, once you release the small scale from your imposed large-scale idea of how time flows.

It means that "the present" is actually quite complicated in a quantum universe with as many qubits as ours has, but, just as QM may be counterintuitive but eventually looks classical at a large enough scale, time may in fact be massively complicated but at scale it still works as we expect.
I get this (mostly) but it also seems like there could be a larger plan

The company is going to need another new vertical to keep getting bigger. It's got a LOT of competitors out there now in the VOD space.
Elixir uses pattern matching for its functions. You can define multiple functions with the same name, and which function is used depends on which one "matches" first, based on the arguments.

E.g

############

# no args

def my_func() do: (something) end

# an array arg, assigning the first to "head and the rest to "tail"

def my_func([ head | tail ]) do: (something) end

# two args, so you'd call this my_func/2 instead of my_func/1.

def my_func([], %{key: val}) do: (something) end

# definition with a guard clause, so it checks the value of the arg when determining whether it matches

def my_func(val) when (val > 10) do: (something) end

# wildcard matcher for any single arg passed

def my_func(_) do: (something) end

############

Pattern matching was my gateway drug for getting into Elixir, and it's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what makes the language great to work with. It's particularly elegant when pattern matching responses from HTTP requests, using switch statements. No need to put try catch blocks around everything, just pattern match against a tuple with :ok and a tuple with :error
Tools Our Remote Team Uses to Stay Connected, Productive and Sane
There are no photons. There are only photon-like events, with associated probabilities and scattering processes.

It's a lot easier to assume that reality is the visible output of an heroically counter-intuitive but relatively tractable probabilistic calculation process, than it is to assume there are infinite universes with poorly defined boundary conditions between them and even more poorly defined properties, and that by some magical process some, or maybe all, of those universes conspire together in certain situations only to create quantum effects.

The Shor's Algorithm argument is irrelevant. There's a huge leap between saying saying "Qubits can handle superpositions and we don't know why yet" and saying "The only possible explanation is that qubits exist in multiple universes at the same time. Because they just have to. Obviously."

The problem is simple - you're inventing entire multiple universes out of nothing just to explain the behaviour of a single qubit.

That may indeed be how reality works. but it's a very strong claim and it needs some correspondingly irrefutable evidence to support it.
The atom is a wave, which can interfere with itself.
And this is where the rubber hits the road.

In theory, yes, some actions are 'not allowed'. But this isn't an mathematical excercise it involves real people.

e.g. Who get's told the 'offers'? Do they get separate salary offers, or is it a single pot? If the latter, how do they decide what's fair? What happens if evereyone's extremely happy but one person? Or two people? What happens if there are competing offers that different members perfer unequally?
How do the ongoing salary reviews go? Can individual members be fired after being hired?

It's going to be very messy, and I would imagine may not work a good proportion of the time. I would imagine a lot of the answers of the above questions would start looking like the answers given by a union, something that the tech community as a whole has avoided so far.
Check out all the other federal, state, and local costs associated with an employee. A $1/hr wage increase costs a business more than $1/hr.
Overview of the RomanceTale Dating Site
The US is very big - a lot of the US has extremely good integration.

The reality is that integration follows a similar pattern - bigger cities mean better integration. Find a vote map and you've basically got a map of how good integration is.
Statamic is absolutely fantastic. Great features and functionality that allows for you to easily extend and customize as needed.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Referen...
you better have unlimited bandwidth to try 10G))
This is plausible, but I still have a few concerns. EV will need battery replacement on some routine basis. How will that effect the TCO and lifetime of the vehicle? One of the advantages of gas vehicles is that I can buy a vehicle very cheap and operate it for many many years. Furthermore, I can park it outside (it doesn't need to be in a garage). I expect and usually see lifespan of 20 years and 200,000 miles on gas vehicles.

It seems like there are still too few EVs to fully understand their lifespan and long-term maintenance costs (including battery replacement).

I also want to see how fast "fast charging" will be and what kind of adverse impact it has on the battery. Is it acceptable to the usability and lifespan of the vehicle to routinely charge on fast chargers? I don't want to sit at the charging station for 45 minutes when a gas car can be fully fueled in 5 or less.

At home, my expectation is that a vehicle does not need a garage, so charging at home may present a logistical challenge (OR, weather-proof outside charging stations might also be deployed). Likewise for apartments and condos with shared parking.

I think all these issues can be overcome, but they will need some thoughtful approaches to ensure that EVs are reasonable for as many people as possible to own and use, not just the wealthy.
Do you mean people buying phones, or do you mean some enterprises (and govt's like India) weary of their Firmware backdoors?
I wonder if there's some business opportunity there. I would guess a pool of drivers that serve more than one pizza chain might be more efficient than ones assigned to a specific company. Or maybe the pizza companies have some vision to leverage their own driver networks for things other than pizza?
Get back to me when robots have the same level of sass as my goto pie place. Not to mention kitchen bs-ing.

Technically, it sounds like it's a pain in the but.

How much better is a machine made pizza if it's not been frozen?
Sounds a bit like a simplified "Chaffing and Winnowing"[1], where the chaff identification is pre-shared through your custom compression parameters.

There was a HN story[2] on Chaffinch[2], which is where I came across teh idea.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaffing_and_winnowing
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14408757
[3] https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/Chaffinch.html#Chaffing
Intuit dethrones Google to become India's best workplace
Wouldnt the opposite be true as well?

I can imagine some one staying away from certain ecosystems because they are too nice to inconpetence. For example, say, how pythons standard JSON library intentionally and likely well intended, breaks the the standard and causes hours of debugging nightmare.

In a less friendly world this wouldnt fly and if i need something that actually works ill have a strong bias for the products of the "mean people"
And a lot hotter and more expensive - hence why they didn't replace normal bulbs.
Here you go! This is as close I could find. It was a while back.

https://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/CYEG/1998/1/15/...

For the week of January 7th, the highest temperate was -28C. Lowest was -37C.

The prior week had a high of -25C.

Go back another year to 1997 and the temperature for the week of January 19th was a high of -30C and a low of -41C. I remember it fondly. The temperature never got above -30C for almost 10 days.
Recent versions of the OSS Cyrus IMAP server should include JMAP support.
Show HN: A spreadsheet I made for tracking habits
Look at you, you're the checksum tool now.
I was simplifying to try and make a point relevant to the topic at hand - obviously it's not literally just about complete inability to live your life - we have more rights than that.
You continue to ignore the weak points of Deutsch's argument that I've pointed out.

You can create a computing machine by assigning physical states to any physical behavior, quantum, classical, hamiltonian, etc. The proof is trivial and it is not a proof he came up with.

It further follows, there is no computation happening during the creation of an interference pattern until we assign it our own abstract semantic states.

This quantum woo is helping neither science nor quantum physics; in fact you are hindering it. Ascribing causal responsibility to non-observable (explicitly unknowable)† entities used to be criticized as dogmatic dribble, now it's embraced as popular science meant only to provoke reaction. Science is about establishing useful models of the world to make physical predictions.

† See common fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
I turn my phone to landscape first.

And, yes, if any meaningful comments are needed I wait until I'm back at my laptop.
Technophobe or technophile?
This machine would have been designed regardless of minimum wage salary.
You could just feed the individual kernel symbols in a canonical order (i.e. sorted) to the checksum algorithm. It's a bit more involved, but since boot loaders like Grub already have ELF parsers, it shouldn't be too hard.
Maybe the only differentiator they might have is that the pizzas can be customized to very specific preferences, but I kinda doubt it.

There's an episode of How It's Made on Youtube on how supermarket / frozen pizza is made, very satisfying content.
Because this is hackernews and not libertariannews?
You're being downvoted - maybe because it sounds like a snarky answer? I've thought about your response and after some thinking, I feel that it's a legitimate answer. I reflected for a moment and have decided that I am starting to do the same - using the computer with the expectation that I am not the only user. It's paranoid, but it also helps me sleep at night.

Maybe working at a large insurance company, where every keystroke could be replayed by a perfect stranger, has rubbed off on my home usage. But I come from a networking field and know perfectly well that our little home routers are not things we should rely on to be on our side. Maybe they are, but I think there's a bit of luck. A lot of planning and a bit of luck.
Bohmian mechanics is just many worlds in denial, for people with prior ontological beliefs they can't give up.

The entire wave-function is there in the theory, containing all the "worlds" and it's responsible for 100% of the dynamics.

Additionally, Bohmians add a single "world particle" indicating which world we are in, and it's guided by the wavefunction. They claim only that particle is "real", but since it has no effect on the state of the universe, I would call it the only part of the theory which isn't real.
I think that what I would tell new people would be "more than ten lines, OR using more than two variables, OR any flow control constructs". Bash can make even simple conditional statements difficult, and while my rule is absurdly restrictive, Bash can still be amazingly useful within those bounds. Probably mine is the lower bound for "anything less complex than this is fine to write in Bash" and yours is "anything more complex than this should definitely not be written in Bash", with the middle ground being "have a good reason why Bash is the best tool for the job".
Frankly no. The problem is not with distros, but with upstream.

Having tried to self-maintain a distro that allows me to do so, Gobolinux, i have witnessed first hand the kinds of mess upstream makes of dependencies.

All too often even a slight bump in minor versions will cause subtle bugs and breakages in behavior. Update some underlying lib just a few notches and suddenly your file manager's trash can is gone. Downgrade the underlying lib and it returns.

But then some other program you want to upgrade insist on using the latest and "greatest" libs, or have depreciated support for one protocol in favor of another, just because the maintainer likes it better.

Thus even with Gobolinux offering me the ability to stack lib versions and whatsnot, all too often i just simply have to freeze everything in place once i have it reasonably where i want it.

Change anything, and i have to change everything, and thus a full reinstall may well be in order.
It's the other way around: he was critiquing what was popularly not accepted as "art". He submitted Fountain to the Society of Independent Artists, who claimed they would exhibit any art submitted to them, and was rejected.
Tech Lead  Medical Center NY
> Apologies if this was long and off-topic, but I hope it's left some kind of thought somewhere.

Yeah, tl;dr - confirmation bias and sample of n=1

There are data points available for median wages of bricklayers and they are nowhere near the figures you described.
So the main emission reduction will be from the much less number of cars produced and used. Almost all big cities in the world have plans to reduce the number of cars.
A Spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down
Now I wonder if there would be a business in just putting frozen pizzas in the oven and having those delivered.

Could put the oven on the back of the delivery scooters they use around here for fresh-out-the-oven pizza.
In a world where i know nurses often perform doctors dutys and jobs, while new doctors stumble around clueless.

Knowledge on adjunct fields and skills can accumulate in a person over time, thus allowing them to perform similar feets.

Like, a bright pupil might learn from a master, if it is not intended. It has happend- since medieval times- apprenticeships, although a attack on caste-think can happen today. Yes, they did not jump through the money hoops, that are suppossed to keep them away- but some of them studied what happens around them. Those servant peoples.. they might not be automatons.
On a Fedora Linux laptop, I occasionally boot from USB and verify the RPM package database.

On servers, try to have secure remote logs. Use a different administration SSH key for the log server so that even if your user account and ssh-agent was compromised the attacker can't use it to edit the logs.

Have your firewall log new connections that aren't part of normal, regular service. Especially outgoing connections from servers. If a web server suddenly starts sending email on port 25 to France, it's probably hacked.

Audit the logs for anomalies such as SSH connections from new remote IPs, etc. Or known user accounts at weird times. Why is your sysadmin coworker suddenly logging in at 4 am? Etc.
Crybaby and crappy coder.
This is a submarine article (http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html), an ad for zume pizza. Food manufacturers already have frozen pizza down to a precise science, and automate more than this startup. I've been watching the food technology space for some time, and this companys only innovation is putting pizza ovens in delivery trucks.
> In general I would say: if you need to debug — you’ve already lost your way.

Ok guy. Sure.
Well that better be the case or else the ban of ICE would have no chance of succeeding!
The JP Morgan Whale incident [1] was a classic recent example of huge amounts of cash being managed in spreadsheets.

[1] http://spreadserve.com/blog/entry/saving-the-whale-excel-spr...
We were using the equivalent to "emoji" in our 1980's computer labs as teens.

People were using typewriters to expand on the standard character set long before that.

We finally have a platform-agnostic, expressive symbolic language to complement the written word - a triumph.
>Instead you chose to argue the point "everybody experiences at least some discrimination". You're probably right, but in doing so you choose a definition of the word "discrimination" so broad that it becomes much less meaningful.

I grew up in a poor, primarily black/latino urban community. Not to anyone's surprise, the minority groups of the area (whites/asians) received far more discrimination than the majority groups. That's going to happen basically anywhere. Classic in/out group dynamics that humans display in every society across the world that I can think of.

This idea that white people only suffer "small amounts of discrimination, under a broad definition" is a joke. Ever been beaten up just because you were white and walking through a black neighborhood? Is that "small discrimination" or am I spreading the definition too broadly? Because to me it sounds like you grew up in a primarily white suburb and assumed because white people don't experience much/any discrimination in an area where they are the majority that they simply can't experience any meaningful amounts of discrimination anywhere.

>You admit that women and minorities experience more frequent and severe discrimination.

And the point that was trying to be made is that white people can be a minority. So nothing is contradicting this statement or the experience of white men who have faced discrimination. The problem is that in modern dialogue, white people are assumed to be the majority always and as such have no say in discrimination because they can't "possibly have faced any meaningful amount".
Scrubs don't want you to know!

Read article. Wishy-wash.
That's exactly what I'm saying! All other explanations say something confusing and obfuscating like "there are no photons". Many-worlds keeps it simple and says "there are photons, and the reason they behave like that is because they're interacting with parallel universes". You can't explain why they behave like that, so you say that the photon isn't really real, and have a complicated explanation of it.
Legacy behavior nobody bothered to update ;)
Direct link to the crossword:

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/976xn/p057t19t.jpg
Sounds like a really, really over-engineered solution. Especially since, as the article states, people want hand-crafted food nowadays.

The pizzerias that are thriving right now are the ones making neapolitan style pizza in wood ovens, Pizza Hut and Little Caesars barely exist around here anymore.
Maybe Amethyst is your jam: https://ianyh.com/amethyst/
The acquisition mechanism is a bit of head twister. Once you're on top of it you can be very productive with Zope.
In fact OpenBSD already generates a checksum for each kernel.