skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Quite obviously not a woman, looking at the picture. Hope other people don't think that's a woman.
I've been in enough of these conversations to know replies like this are just trolling and/or white-noise.

Why NOT separate yourselves into an "us" vs "them"? Why should oppressed people try to "work together" with their oppressors?

If you're so interested the effectiveness of social movements, why haven't you looked at cases like Susan Fowler's to see how little it accomplishes to "work together", or within the system, "to find a solution"?

What rulebook, exactly, should people consult when organizing to stop awful shit from happening? Let us know so we can tell which methods are kosher with you. In the meantime maybe start holding the perpetrators to the same rigorous standard of moral behavior.
it seems crazy and impossible. But it reminds me that the Japanese built the two largest battleships ever created, by far, and sailed them for years until sunk at the end of the war, and for decades there were no known pictures of them except those taken during their sinkings by US aitmen.

They were pretty good at keeping secrets under wraps.
My 2007 Sienna has the same problem, a blown LED. Luckily it lights a part of the dash I don't need often.

I don't understand how LEDs can blow out, they're solid state and should last nearly forever.
How ‘Critical User Journeys’ can help a product take off
In feminism's the "motte and bailey" belief structure, that's the motte (the thing people say when challenged).

It's not the bailey (the thing people actually want to say and do) though.

One example of the bailey in action: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-tria...
> Looking at the headers via curl, I see "expires" with the current date and time (ie, it's already expired), a max-age tag of 50 minutes. I'm not seeing one year anywhere.

Take a look at the version of the doc which is served from the AMP cache: https://cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/lolware.net/2017/07/04/amp-bl...

I like to think of PageSpeed Insights like the output of a good linter. No linter is or can be perfect. The issues reported are good things to consider and are correct for the majority of times that they trigger, but not in all cases. This is one of those cases.

> CORS

The best fix here might be a more useful response in the dev console. Plenty of sites, especially on dev servers, don't have any CORS headers at all, so this does work in those cases. I'd still recommend one of the other validation methods which work fine with any CORS setup.
We can support GitHub Enterprise with a self-hosted appliance. If you're interested I'd love to talk.
>> even with todays technology there is plenty of everything to go around.

That was probably the case 100 years ago.

But UBI is an economic/political question.
No problem.

I should specify. I did get an error the first time it happened. Then, when I tried again, it failed and that's when I came across the issue stated above. I tried Force Quitting and trying again twice. It seemed like something got hung and it couldn't make the request after it failed the first time.
They are just afraid.
How exactly are cryptocurrency markets less "corrupt" than our current capital markets?
You forgot one of the most unfortunate offenders: Google.
(I wonder if the lovely gentlemen here realise that being a victim of harassment is stressful enough to impact performance.)
Or, maybe we are looking at it and deciding it is worth it.
> Observed reality/experience -- which is what the author invokes -- is not "first principles" though.

You're missing a huge point though, which is the difference between "observed reality" and calling out BS.

The author simply says that all these other things should happen if the hypothesis is incorrect, without any experimental data behind it. There is no evidence behind his assertion that all these other things should happen, so he's reasoning from his life experiences and his personal biases.
>"Any time that when that information falls into the hands of attackers and enabled them to make more effective plans."

You mean like announcing a laptop ban from flight originating in 10 predominantly Muslim countries? Do you think terrorists don't pay attention to the news?

>"I do not know if this is that case, but there is a class of information that when made public reduces safety."

Please provide an example of this.
> However, we will never be able to understand the thought process down to each individual activation of the neuron.

Is that true in general, or are you specifically talking about human brains?
If you can't see the number 45 in the first image you probably do have red/green colorblindness. But you can still see the other color dimension (blue/yellow) just fine - so most likely you are seeing some but not all of the colors in the second image.
I'm using a generic charger, and while you do have to position it correctly, I find it fairly forgiving. Basically as long as I vaguely line it up with the pad surface it works fine, and there's an LED that turns green to let me know it's correct.

I didn't know the official Nexus 5 charger used magnets though. I passed on it because IIRC it was a weird cylinder stand that looked less stable than the generic flat pad I bought. (That and it was a good bit more expensive.)

EDIT: I just played around with mine now, and the margin for error is at least a couple of cm. I think my sense of neatness objects to the offset before the charger does.
The optics are reflective because almost everything absorbs EUV.
There have been NICs that integrate TCP/IP offload features[1]. I'm not sure how widely used they are anymore. It seems when CPU clock frequencies leveled off, and core count started to increase (~10 years ago), there was less rationale to use dedicated hardware versus consuming more available CPU/core resources to deal with the network protocol processing in software.

1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_offload_engine
I'd pay $40 for this. Can I pay you $40 once instead of $5 a month?
You know who is going to kindly donate the money required for this grand bipartisan plan? Thats right mr. Z. This is the best example of 'put your money where your mouth is'.

Secondarily and importantly Alaska may be conservative but its so far north and so cold that it requires an alternative approach, which is exactly what is going on here. Look at any cold place and you will see initiatives aimed at keeping people from freezing to death. Scandinavia, russia, Canada are similar on this matter. Ideology gets pushed aside when your neighbour cannot keep warm through winter. In the end humans are social animals.

Paying dividends to everyone out of a natural resources fund is of course not the usual 'small government' approach. Not at all, because it is essentially a state owned enterprise in all but name. The usual 'small government' approach would be privatisation: to simply sell the rights to oil to the highest bidder.
Awesome deep dive into the space. The two positions I object to are:

> In some ways, Bitcoin could be considered the first decentralized application since it runs on blockchain technology, is fully open-source, and runs without a central authority.

Decentralization is not a new thing that only came into existence with Bitcoin... Torrents are decentralized, the email protocol is decentralized, Tor is decentralized, etc. Decentralized protocols and applications have existed before the blockchain and what the blockchain adds as a decentralized application is decentralized transaction validation. Basically decentralizing the validation of what can and cannot get written to a database. If you make your "writes" application state, then you can generalize the validators to be not only validating database-writes, but program execution steps as well (Ethereum).

> By no means do I believe that decentralized applications have no benefits. In fact, I foresee a future where applications are 10x more secure, 10x cheaper, 10x more efficient, or 10x more on some dimension than the current ones.

Decentralization is always costlier. Netflix is faster and more reliable than torrents, Facebook is more reliable, faster and easier to use than Diaspora. Fiat and credit cards are faster and easier to use than Bitcoin. AWS is faster, cheaper and more reliable than StorJ, and on and on. When you decentralize something, you must add coordination and communication costs such that your overall costs will always be at least as high as the centralized alternative. So the claim that the decentralized applications will magically be faster and cheaper definitely needs research and a [citation needed].

If we realize that the decentralized application will always be costlier than its centralized alternative, we must ask ourselves: why do we need decentralization? Then, we will really know what blockchains are for!
It would be great if there was more part-time work in tech in general. Seems as though this would be something everyone (mothers, single or married men/women) could benefit from.

Not to be too personal, genuinely curious, what do you hope to gain by 'toughing it out'? A better workplace for your daughters? Or to set an example or something? Coming from someone with a mother who 'toughed it out', I rarely saw my mother growing up, and only really saw her when she became a consultant much later.
This is probably closer to the fatal flaw in my argument. Even AppleCare, which is manufacturer-based, only allows two screen replacements, and charges you for both of them.

I guess a middle ground could be to force (through regulation) the companies to offer a manufacturer's warranty, but I'm not sure that this approach is any better than the recommendations that the EU is calling for.
Any guess at how much faster the tests are running?
I am hoping AI can answer these questions more definitely than people second guessing. In general, legends tend to live longer than they may have made out to look.
Regarding the pricing model and server usage:

A major design goal for Ship is to have everything you see be live. I love it when a colleague updates something from the web, or the app, and I see it instantly on my screen. Receiving real time updates from GitHub requires us to have a server on the public internet listening for events from them.

I also personally care a lot about CPU use and battery life on my Mac, and being able to offload a lot of work to a server is a benefit. Ship needs to consume basically every bit of information that GitHub makes available, and just the overhead of doing the http requests to GitHub is noticeable if you run that locally.

I hear what you're saying about the benefits of a one time purchase app that doesn't require any third party server, and I've spent a good amount of time thinking about how to make that work, but I feel like I'm not able to offer the user experience I want with that model.
I think at some point you're going to have to present an argument that user-serviceable RAM makes a perceptible difference in making the laptop thin/light going forward. Several assumptions - The RAM itself can't shrink or be made to be more energy efficient, or socket design is static, can be challenged. However a manufacturer without a mandate/incentive will probably never invest their efforts to making that happen. They're going to optimize for the commercial aspect of selling the product in a way that maximizes their bottom line via market segmentation and price gouging on storage. Obviously, making money is not something that I'm against, but I simply would like to see an acceptable compromise made between making money and making it repair-friendly. Like you said, everything is a trade-off.
Did you try Truffle? I understand it's the goto for that.

http://truffleframework.com/
I live in a central European city full of restaurants that would be sued out of existence if they were in the states for ADA violations.

The ADA also means that a lot of hole in the wall establishments you see in Europe simply can't exist in the states. Society is poorer for it.
I agree. The article was welcome and well-written.

I only found out about this post because the alternative (unofficial) interface https://hckrnews.com/ manages to surface this given the number of votes it has received.

I appreciate HN's moderation, on average. It's a shame the process of moderation isn't more transparent. I have no idea why this was flagged.
Static site hosted on GitHub Pages, or S3. I can't figure out whether auth0 supports that.
Focus on Infants During Childbirth Leaves U.S. Moms in Danger
20 years and they still think I need more than one vacuum.

ht: https://twitter.com/kibblesmith/status/724817086309142529
The first is an actual test meaning it's meant for someone who is colorblind to fail. The second is an example that some of those that failed the test, would have problems seeing.
I think that's why TFA suggested only doing this in CI (with a known compiler version) and not for local builds.
I don't see anything wrong with aspiring to spend time that way.

At the end of the day it's just indulgence, not actually using your potential to the fullest. Going through life simply for pleasure is the sure fire way to have no lasting impact.

If that's what you want to do, then great, but I get annoyed when mediocrity is touted as the greatest good.
You've just precisely depicted the rich countries of the world.
A fair number of ethernet chips will handle all the TCP protocol themselves, the upper layers just pass in the address of a large buffer and the chip will take care of chopping it up into packets.

The feature is usually called a "TCP Offload Engine".
I am curious why "human compatible" patterns would be only found in primates etc.? Aren't these about molecular mechanisms and proteins? Is it hard to translate the results to humans if some promising mechanism is found in more basic molecular level?
It's starting to be difficult to differentiate "good quality and expensive" from "bad quality and expensive".
Those consequences are only present for women or people of color: white men don't take the same reputation hit for promoting diversity and fairness: https://hbr.org/2016/03/women-and-minorities-are-penalized-f...
> If you check the thread you'll clearly see my interest wasn't whether discrimination happens at all, it's whether it is to the point of being literally ostracized, as was stated.

You don't think putting the kid who was being 'uppity' in a coma doesn't cause imply ostracization for the others like him? Particularly when there was no repercussions from perceived authority figures?

> Perhaps don't impersonate other people if you don't want to be mistaken for someone else.

It's hard to 'impersonate' on a forum where every post has my username on it. Are you new to the internet or something?
Even when you don't get new models so fast, you'll get manufacturing updates on existing products that can affect their reliability both good and bad. The best you can do is identify the manufacturers who have a reputation of building good stuff, and hope they don't sell their name to someone who wants to make a quick buck by trading on their reputation.
Why thank you for that clarification! I'm quite busy but can definitely submit a PR within the next few days. Feel free to do it first and I'll take a look, though. :)
The dialog boxes remind me about space-team. Totally nonsense instructions. :)
I am not impressed by the "expensive" products, as an example I own a Nexus 7 tablet, touch input stopped working reliably, I searched and found many similar issue, the solution is to open it and plug back a connector that got lose and maybe add some paper to have the thing pressed on it's place, so this is not a cheap, no name product, the problem could have been avoided maybe with a few more cents investment per product.
I have similar experience with brand name keyboard and mioce that were not cheap and did not perform.
That was my confusion as well. I think that 99% of the working world would kill for the kind of conditions where mildly harsh words get you fired. Okay, maybe that wasn't the best metaphor there.

What I see in this is a sort of passive transphobia. It's not that anyone harbors any grudge, it's that they harbor no kind feelings. The idea that someone deserves whatever happens to them, for good or ill, is just an excuse to turn a blind eye to any harm that occurs to them. When the best response you get from people is indifference, you're probably not going to have a long and happy life.

I think Coraline has more passion than good judgment, but on the other hand. I'm glad someone is out there to raise these issues and take the resulting flak. I worry about what kind of similar discrimination I'm going to face. If this is what goes on in the enlightened liberal utopias we've all got a tough row to hoe.
Do you mean this one?

https://engineering.coinbase.com/may-22-24-downtime-post-mor...
"Cars generate roughly 5,000 liters of of CO2 per gallon."

That is a typical passenger vehicle, which is also quite old.
Not a current vehicle. SEe the calculations, which explicitly states:
"This is representative of the light duty passenger
vehicle fleet as a whole, including both new and existing vehicles. "

I'm kind of uninterested in participating in this global hate fest further, but let me quantify this for real for you:

I have a lab certified co and co2 monitor i use as part of a supplied air system (For spraying wood coatings that contain isocyanate).

If i take a car from the late 80's or early 90's, put it in the garage with the monitor, and start it, the monitor will go off in few minutes telling me it's unsafe.

If i take a car produced today, and put it in the garage, and start it, it takes many hours before that happens.
In fact, depending how well sealed the garage is, it won't happen at all.

(as an aside, this also means it's become much harder for people to commit car based suicide unless they have a very well sealed car, etc)

So i'm going to go with "This statistic is true but grossly misleading". It tells you nothing about what converting a newer car to an electric car does in terms of emissions.

Worse, given that it is mostly caused by existing vehicles, and even there, it is mostly caused precisely by the vehicles this subsidizing will do nothing to replace.
It is precisely the people i talked about you need to get to drive electric cars.
Not the rich people driving very up to date low-emissions vehicles anyway.

So you can cite this kind of stuff all you want. It doesn't make the plan of rich people lanes any better for the environment.

(Which is why people go for these very silly proxy and indirect support arguments to make themselves feel better).

"But even if you were right, what's the point of this comparison? We can eliminate the CO2 emissions from cars, but we can't do that to people, and we really need to cut these emissions a lot, or the earth will cook.
"

I actually completely agree, but that's completely irrelevant to giving special treatment in HOV lanes to people who mostly owned cars that were not the problem anyway!

IE you'd be much better off saying "if you trade in your car from 1970 for an electric car, you get a sticker", instead of "if you trade your 2016 PZEV for a 2017 tesla, you get a sticker".
And of course, many of the products we code are inherently political. It is no more possible for a social network like Github to be "politically neutral" than it would be possible for a bank to be "security neutral".
I once heard a quote attributed to Henry Adams that endeared me to him, something like: "philosophers are people hired by the rich to tell them everything is alright."

But now I can't find a trace of it online.
Reminds me of this quote supposedly said by Andrew Jackson: “If you have a job in your department that can't be done by a Democrat, then abolish the job."
Thingi10K
>"In other words: this sort of logic is by no means unprecedented in American history, for the simple reason that gathering information from the general public of a nation is a basic and common element of espionage against that nation"

Please way what the precedent is then if this is not unprecedented in American history.

>"... there's every reason to believe that there are "enemy spies" among the general population, and therefore that the less information the general population receives, the less information the enemy can gather (at least through that particular avenue"

That statement is absurd - "keep all the citizens in the dark just in case one of them is a terrorist!"
Because there could be related resources, e.g. "/repositories/1/users", or "/users/1/comments".

I agree it's not necessary, but having /actions just makes it more clear. For example:

"/repositories/1/bans" shows me all bans

"/repositories/1/ban" ban action

I know it's a bad example, but you could end up with other similar related resource and action names that could increase chances of silly mistakes.
All Intel NICs do TCP offload, they are quite widely used.
Who said anything about working in an office?

Out of all the HN readership, I'd guess that less than 5% actually does anything that's lasting and useful to society.

I'd put it at closer to 1% - and that's the point. You have the causation backward though. If the purported goal is this mundane, hedonistic "retirement," then nobody will ever do anything lasting and useful because you can find an easy niche to fall into that lets you maximize your "leisure time."
Pretty and fast shell
The policies are better than nothing, because you meet people facing the same biases you do and realize you aren't a lunatic weirdo.

But in my utopia, everyone takes the implicit associations tests, has the courage to take in the parts that make them feel bad about themselves, and starts working on those things.

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/selectatest.html
Same experience. I ordered a pair of speaker stands from Amazon on Monday.

This morning they sent me an email saying "Amazon.com has new recommendations for you based on your browsing history." It was a bunch of other speaker stands.
"This stuff happened before at a smaller scale by everyone," is a terrifying argument of normalization. It was wrong then. The norms were to crack down on that sort of thing when it happened. Now it's an excuse because the past wasn't perfect that we should normalize the worst excesses of wrongness as the new right. That's frightening.
Where is the neuron cell body? Would they be at the outside where the fibers (axons?) seem to terminate?

I wouldn't have guessed that it would look so linear. I was expecting a much more tangled appearance.
Happens more often than you think. It's not something that comes from the lawmaking side, but seems border agencies just have shitty cultures, uneducated officers and too much authority since they're part of the national security apparatus.
Those damn Japanese ^W Mexicans ^W Martians ^W Klingons ^W Cardassians ^W Borg!
I agree that it's normal to pay a social price for saying crummy things. I'd argue that the climate of our times is such that even reasonable opinions that conflict with a certain point of view are demonized and punished. We've become ultra sensitive and overbearing as a society.
About Hooks: When the last user using an Organization or Repository logs out of Ship, we do clean up the hooks. See more details at https://www.realartists.com/docs/2.0/uninstall.html

Without the explicit logout, Ship has no way of knowing you're done.
No, Power & Wealth = Freedom. The freedom to act as you want and to prevent others from acting on you.

Retirement means you have taken yourself out of the power dynamic and limited your wealth potential.