skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. I just have had very strong, close relationships throughout my life. Talking to someone for a mere 45 minutes is not a big flipping deal.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14732892
I use to listen to music often. I use to play guitar, harmonica, drums and bass. Over the past 10 years I stopped caring. The music industry just turned me off. I stopped playing along. Then I stopped listening. I got so tired of the ads and money grabbing that I turned to NPR rather than a local DJ. In the end I found that the music wasn't me. It wasn't necessary.
This would involve a selection bias. For example, evidence is mounting that endurance athletes die earlier than non-endurance athletes.

UPDATE: I have provided a more detailed account, with some citations, below.
Your brain also works finding patterns. The only difference is that your brain works for a lot of domains and can translate information of one domain to other. We have not find a good way to do this in deep learning yet. But once we find it, it will know that answer C all the time probably is not correct.
Lingscars.com
It's more like the exploit buyers will always pay more than what Apple would, so if Apple raises its bounties the exploit buyers will raise their amount too. Zerodium could just offer 2x as much as Apples bounty, and Apple can never win on price. It's a losing game for apple to play.

What Apple can compete on are the non-monetary incentives, such as prestige, rewards, access, etc.
I learned React and Angular 2 at the same time during resume padding for a desperate job search :).

Angular2 is a massive pile of needless shiny objects. On one hand, I LOVE Typescript to death. When you turn on all the strict compiler checks it's hard to write broken JavaScript for once. Combine it with TSLint and it has resulted in the first "nice" JavaScript development experience and codebase I've ever seen.

That said, Typescript was the best thing about Angular2. When I figured out how to use it with React a lot of excitement faded away. A prime example... Angular2 has its own web client when Fetch polyfill is small and works great.

All this needless complexity and replication of browser API's has bloated Angular codebase to the point that it's basically unusable without "AOT Compilation" which makes debugging hell and isn't compatible with a lot of libraries.

What the web really needed was Typescript and a nice UI library. React + Typescript fulfills those needs. Most of Angular now has nothing to do with UI and IMO is needless bloat.
Yes, it is well-understood to be acceptable. In the past, most commercial Linux distributions were developed behind closed doors in private revision control and pushed out as "complete" source packages. We had these conversations back then (~20 years ago), and the community and the companies involved came to mostly agree about what is and isn't OK. That's opened up a lot in recent years, such that these days "open source" usually means, "we have a public git repository", but it does not have to.

The GPL provides you some basic rights: you can request the source in a usable form, you can change it, you can redistribute it under the same terms.

It does not require access to the process that produced the software.

These days, Red Hat develops almost everything way out in the open. Contrary to all of the talk in this thread where folks (mostly just one guy, actually) keeps implying RH are violating the license or making it hard to get and distribute source, you can see discussions and the actual code being worked on months in advance of what will be in RHEL by following Fedora development. Fedora is developed entirely in public repositories and mailing lists, and it is where much of RHEL development takes place (RHEL trails Fedora by about 12 to 18 months, in terms of versions, and things that will be in RHEL next year are in Fedora today). Red Hat is an excellent OSS company who do damned near everything right, IMHO. Any complaints I might have about some of their practices (like I said elsewhere, I liked having a kernel SRPM that was the mainline kernel plus listed patches, and I miss it being that way) pale in comparison to the good they do for the OSS community.

Just because they make a lot of money doesn't mean they're cheating the community out of anything.
One thing that never seems to be modeled is variance or risk of repair.

F.ex. adding something like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11879869

Buying a super complicated engine with high reliability is a different risk than buying a simpler engine that has lower reliability, but that can be repaired much more cheaply.
something else interesting is that these companies all have zero or minimal product costs, so these egregious growth spurts aren't really anything but signups.

No retail company can really utilize the same techniques. Imagine a hardware company or physical product company that got a 75,0000 customers over night. The only thing happening the next day would be customer support emailing order cancellation notices.

I don't know why this strikes me as relevant at the moment but it does.
Sounds great. But you - like the other sites in that space - have no pricing information online, not even after registering and trying to look how it would go on after the free trial. If I can't calculate what it would cost, then I can't use it.
>... as well as the fact that people design trading software specifically to exploit other trading bots these days.

I figured modern ML would be the first thing firms use for that purpose. Might be interesting though with bots trying to learn the behavior of their counterparts and vice versa. The ensuing feedback loops are probably quite interesting.
Front https://frontapp.com/ might be what youre looking for. If you want to do the plumbing yourself, Smooch is more at the API level.
Don't just down vote this guys, that doesn't help.

No, your naive understanding is not correct.

'Deep learning', and by that I mean a neural network, works at a super high level by generalising some input (say X) into some related output (lets say, Y).

It's not just random choice; it's like defining a programming function:

foo(x) -> y { ... }

Where the '...' is implemented by a set of statistical weights and training data and so on.

...but ultimately, you raise a valid point.

Training models is incredibly time consuming, and incorporating 'corrections' as new training data is extremely non trivial.

It's one of the issues with deep learning.

I would even go as far as to say, 'You need to regularly update your training data with new examples and counter examples' as a 'when not to use deep learning'.
An affordable API or platform to build live streaming communities such as twitch.tv
> Sometimes people imagine they are close to me when they are not.

Ah yes, my greatest fear interacting with people confirmed.
> small group of early adopters who really care

Reminds me of Kevin Kelly idea of 1,000 true fans.

http://kk.org/thetechnium/1000-true-fans/
Top quality hybrid mattress in a box
There is also mounting evidence that running a consistent caloric deficit can increase your life expectancy

[1] http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170601-the-secret-to-a-lon...
Comparing different password lists to Livesshattack.net's Pt. 1
If the giver is allowed to choose, it's not random, by definition. You'd need a computer or some other reasonably good randomizer, like dice.
You fear people will imagine you are close? Or you fear people won't feel close to you when you feel close?
Wouldn't the black market always be willing to pay more?
Can't stop reading it as Pee teridactyl
I agree with you here, you can get to other parts of the OS with this ability and will find different flaws. I would say that this comparable to an external penetration test vs a more formal internal practices and code review. Both are acceptable approaches finding different results.
I don't think Prime users have a particularly high utilization rate of the video service, though this might change with time. If you look at how many ratings on IMDB any of their originals have gotten, I see just tiny fractions of shows on broadcast or Netflix. The Man in the High Castle is perhaps their most popular show and it has ~50k ratings which isn't bad, but say, House of Cards has 365k. Stranger Things has 315k in a year. Fargo has 210k.

Mozart in the Jungle and Transparent have won major awards, and they both have ~16k ratings.
...my bad. Not sure about HN etiquette—should I delete my comments as off-topic?
Do they? Good grades indicate grit in getting good grades. The question is whether that translates to other areas of life.
Estonia is trying to convert the EU to its digital creed
Ask HN: API to order pizza? Does it exist?
Where can I find an API to place an order for a pizza?
Graphs are usually much better at concisely describing numerical data, actually.
The same goes for SUSE as well. Not only that, but the openSUSE community created an entirely new distribution based on the SLE sources (openSUSE Leap).
What will be the definition for this healthy minimum?
Justice
> The entire premise of TARP was that this is true and economists on both sides of the aisle largely agree with it.

The premise of TARP was that allowing large institutions to fail and trigger a cascade of bankruptcies would have resulted in too much collateral damage to innocent parties who reasonably assumed that large financial institutions and insurers would meet their obligations.

Putting restrictions on bank lending is very different than allowing them to default at scale.

> I don't think so. I think it has much more to do with tax law.

That is a widespread belief but it has no basis. The rich have never paid high taxes in the US, even at times with nominally high tax rates. During the period in the 20th century that the highest individual rates were >80%, there were also so many loopholes that rich families regularly paid no taxes. And if the taxes actually paid haven't gone down then it has to be something else.

But "the power to tax is the power to destroy" as I'm sure you know. What difference in result do you imagine between a law discouraging lending and a law taxing it heavily enough to prevent wealth concentration?
The demonym for Florida must then be Floridiot.
One of the things that annoys me about all these Socrata Open Data Portals is that they all look the same. Part of me thinks that this is great for consistency for users going from site to site, but it makes it all feel very disingenuous and template-y. I much prefer when portals have a custom feel that represents and encourages people to interact with the data.
Maybe it's because I find this research area intriguing, but I did not think that this summary adequately captured the efforts of the original paper [0].

I think it was unfortunate that this piece did not begin by conveying that the original study's authors specifically state their goal "was to develop a temporary feeling of closeness, not an actual ongoing relationship".

Additionally, like many social psychology studies the nuances of the design and methodology are extremely valuable, yet this piece deems them as "dry" and mostly "devoid of enthusiasm". Anyone who has contributed to the design of substantial social psychology studies can tell you just how carefully each of these details is considered in design, implementation, and analysis. The original article [0] is full of detail, context, and discussion, and is definitely worth a read.

[0] https://psychodramaaustralia.edu.au/sites/default/files/fall...
Mostly because I was was illustrating that point with certain archaic details (Computer Shopper magazine, OS/2, BeOS, etc.) and it just came out that way. But yes, your point is valid, you certainly can still "do that" in the PC realm. I should have said something like "Compare the smart phone world to the PC world where you can build a PC ..."
I wonder what would happen if every 20 or so rounds, each player is given a new set of dollars (say 5 dollars), to sort of simulate UBI.
TL;DR: "I like Kotlin, it makes me happy, i know there are better languages out there , but I don't give a sh..."

No, seriouslty. That's what the whole article is about.
The footer says powered by OpenGov and ckan.
> It's more like the exploit buyers will always pay more than what Apple would, so if Apple raises its bounties the exploit buyers will raise their amount too.

That is not how supply and demand work.

(Furthermore, it's also not as simple as exploit buyers paying more, because there are reasons for researchers to sell their exploits to Apple even if other buyers might pay more - the problem described (badly) in the article is that the disparity is currently too high).
Which adblocker do you use?
There is so much wrong with this article.

I don't think anybody has a unit for entropy.

They are falling a fallacy.

Just because you entered the world, you have increased entropy. Every time you eat, you increase entropy.

I can't believe this got published.
This [1] is a study which attempts to quantify the diminishing returns of exercise. Compared to no exercise, people who do 1-2 times the recommended 75 minutes of weekly intense exercise or 150 minutes of moderate exercise have a 31% lower chance of death across a median 14 year follow up period. Those who complete 2-3x the recommended amount had 37% lower and 3-5x a 39% lower chance. There was no sign of negative effects of 5-10x the recommended amount, however no additional benefit either.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25844730
...We're not talking about actual people in an actual room with actual dollars.
Sure, I mean Star Wars was/is such a cultural phenomenon because of timing, but it was so much more than that. It was a great story, it blended old style movies with new style movies, it had great music, great special effects, etc. 10 years earlier and it's Buck Rogers, 10 years later and it's Flash Gordon. Lucas went over budget and had to deal with the executives who wanted to bail and pulled it off.

The article just wasn't very insightful, and it was on the top of the list. It's obvious this was a clickbait article to puff the guy they were interviewing. I suspect he is looking for clients and is using HN to get eyeballs and got some people to up vote it. That's more insightful than the article.

I dunno, maybe I'm just grumpy today.
No they don't. That's the lie the corporate world wants consumers to believe.

They indicate a different priority system.
I was looking for a new phone right before the OpenMoko was supposed to ship, and so I pointedly switched carriers to AT&T just because they were rumored to be the carrier where it was easiest to get an OpenMoko working. I bought a Motorola Atrix to use "until I can get an OpenMoko". Sadly, I never did get my hands on one of them. I don't even remember why now. Either they never shipped in volume at all, or the price was never within reach, or something. Anyway, I've been waiting a long time for a truly open smart-phone... and I'm still waiting. sigh

Maybe one day.
I work at Google, and get pull requests from people on other teams fairly frequently. It's usually stuff like "I found this particular pattern results in a memory leak, and fixed it Google-wide", but sometimes it's "hey, I used your code, and fixed a bug". It's a bit like how things work in the open source world; it depends on the situation and the individuals, but patches are usually welcome.

The only case where I can imagine someone getting into trouble would be if they spent a ton of time fixing a random bug when they're meant to be working on something else, and it resulted in something important getting held up.
This fits nicely with my observation that people who major in Management Information Systems are the ones who couldn't cut it in Computer Science because of all the math.
Still a poor colour combo
Funny you mention those.

I've been really excited about Edward but when I tried it for a project last year I could never get it to come together in the right way. I got the sense that it wasn't quite ready for prime time yet, although very promising. My memory of it was that a lot of claimed flexibility in how to specify models wasn't really implemented fully. The experience also turned me off of TensorFlow a bit. But that was a year ago, so maybe it's improved?

I ended up doing it in Stan in part because I was more familiar with that, and it worked out fairly well.

Just a personal anecdote.
Great. I was hoping there was some other class of minor crime we could cut people off from society for committing and it looks like this one fits the bill.
Right here:

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?cycle=ALL

I think you'll find that's what has been used instead of the Constitution in the US for some time.
Square wasn't the first by any means, and in fact Square's first card readers were unencrypted (cc data sent plain over the audio jack) while most of the industry had moved on to encrypted readers.

What they did was make it cheap, reliable, and iPhone styled. Many of the swiper sources cost upwards of $40/unit and were prone to failure, not to mention black bulky and ugly.

Source: I made an early MVP for a potential Square competitor.
Being unable to tell the difference between someone that likes you versus someone who is just being polite, and if you consider them a "friend" and act "accordingly" they would consider you a socially incompetent weirdo.
I ran a web agency, 2008-2014. Parents were middle class. I had a unique strength of being able to explain technical solutions in an easy way to CMOs/CEOs and give them ideas of what value the technology could provide that they hadn't thought of before. I also understood what would make my clients successful and how to design a tech project to align with those goals. Everything else I think I was pretty average at, but there seemed to be a lot of value in bridging the knowledge gap between C-level execs and programmers. I just kept doing that until the money wasn't fulfilling anymore.
Why must there ALWAYS be an auto playing video at the top of every article, that does nothing but play music, and show text.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=order+pizza+api

https://ifttt.com/blog/2017/05/pizza-party-dominos-is-on-ift...
Worksnaps Features and Benefits
Where are you located? Domino's has an API apparently: https://github.com/aluttik/pizzapi

I rather like Domino's surprisingly, compared to their pizza in the early 2000's its quite delicious now. I'd say its on par compared to Costco, though still a step below your average local pizza chain.
So, it's an enterprisey company, for sure, but for just Technopedia API access, I think that the rates are fairly approachable -- in the order of a couple hundred bucks a month maybe.

That said, I no longer work there, and companies often tinker with prices, and to boot, they were reengineering the API that I originally POCed for the company, so it could be substantially cheaper now (or substantially more expensive -- but the goal was to make it more accessible, so I'd guess cheaper.)

If you're actually interested in giving it a spin, shoot me an email, and I can probably put you in touch with someone willing to let you do a test-drive. My email's in my profile.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/apples-cash-hoard-swells-to-r...

I don't know, but I'm fairly sure, that Apple _could_ outbid the other exploit buyers if they chose.
Vietnamese, Japanese, Javanese, Senegalese
I guess that's my question. We're talking about companies with hundreds of millions of customers here - which would make me think that any minor security issue's impact is magnified. Which I would think would mean MG/Amz/Goog/Apple would be willing to pay more.
> evidence is mounting that endurance athletes die earlier than non-endurance athletes.

Please provide a citation for that extraordinary claim.
THat's why your parent said "in that form factor", I think.
>Zerodium could just offer 2x as much as Apples bounty, and Apple can never win on price.

I'm a die-hard Android fan, but even I'm forced to admit that iPhone has much better security. And security is a big selling point.

Raising the bug bounty to $10 million and it would still be pocket change to Apple, but it would result in:

1. Free advertisement

2. Good PR

3. Outbid the black market for iOS exploits

4. Encourage more white hats to look into iOS security
It's a mental model thing. Speaking freely (and probably self-disclosing along the way) is usually a sign of getting/being close. They see that behavior and think if they exhibited it, that's what it would mean. Which I think is a great example of how there are different "types" whether it be personality types, attachment types, what have you. Once you recognize there are types and that to a first approximation there are a finite, manageable amount of different types, you can learn how they differ and not get trapped by mistaking your mental model for everyone else's mental model. It seems obvious yet people seem to repeatedly make this same mistake as demonstrated by OPs experience.
https://virwire.com

Continuous stream of socially curated news, formatted for mobile.
> Also, you should read the fine print from any other Linux vendor – RHEL, Oracle, etc. You don't have to go on "my understanding from several reliable sources", the documents actually state they'll terminate you as a customer if you redistribute their stuff.

While that may be true for Oracle (I doubt it), it's absolutely not true for Red Hat and SUSE. Not only are most of our projects developed in the open under free software licenses in the first place, we provide corresponding source for every package (regardless of the license terms, as long as it's a free software package) through our package manager as source RPMs.

The only restrictions that companies such as Red Hat and SUSE have is related to trademarks and distribution of the binaries that we compiled.

* Trademarks are a completely separate set of laws to copyright, and it has been long accepted in the free software community that as long as it is reasonably easy to remove trademark branding then this is acceptable (in Red Hat's and SUSE's cases, all branding is placed in separate and clearly marked packages -- so you can remove it by replacing those packages)[1].

* As for distribution of binaries, this policy exists for practical reasons and doesn't affect the community (the sources are available and we also provide an entire build service [Open Build Service[2]] that you can use directly to rebuild all of our sources and ISO images if you wished to).

openSUSE Leap is a community distribution created from the SLE sources. CentOS is similarly a distribution built from the RHEL sources.

[ I work for SUSE, and am also an FSF member -- I find spreading of misinformation like this incredibly harmful to the wider community. I would not work for SUSE if I felt that our actions were mistreating users. Opinions my own, obviously. ]

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guideli...
[2]: https://build.opensuse.org/
It wasn't just telemetry. It was a software installation unauthorized by the user. I shouldn't have to explain this on HN.
The core application is a little C++ shell for reading messages, Maildirs, etc, and drawing the screen. Everything else is built upon that.

So Lua is used for pretty much everything:

* Drawing the UI.

* Responding to key-presses.

* Responding to events.

You can write scripts to do many things, such as training messages as spam, deleting all messages from "Bob" which are unread.

I have a bunch of servers that get backed up every day, I have a script which deletes all but the most recent 100 messages in the folder "Automated.Backups" whenever I open it, for example.
Why do I want to minimize biological entropy? What does this mean?
Yank isn't related to the name of the US.