skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That is why they use scratch, logo, beebot or something similar.

The real programing would mean teaching them how computer really works or network protocols or html,css,javascript etc -which makes less sense for kids and muddles what was supposed to be lesson in technical details.
Well, I mean, generally, any tools you create on company time, with company resources, are assigned to the company, if you're an employee.
Its only luck if you consider every person independent of their ancestors, rather than a product of their ancestors.
“So you guys will post about PORNHUB but won't promote startups with no funding or backdoor channel to TC journalist.. Clap for yourselves”
I don't think anyone here is attempting to fathom what a court or jury might decide, that's inherently unknowable. We're discussing what should be decided.

Frankly I think this is a textbook case of Fair Use by a combination of parody and commentary, and it seems as though it would be trivial to take Zillow to task for attempting to enforce copyright law on property it doesn't own the rights to.
Yes, I think the lawyer here is essentially admitting they don't have a copyright case directly. A C&D is basically just asking someone to stop doing something, so it makes sense that they would throw in every theory that sounds plausible. I don't blame them for this, it's not the C&D sender's job to be the recipient's lawyer.

Only the state can enforce the criminal parts of the CFAA, but there are civil parts as well.
How is this his tool if he made it at work, on his employer's dime?
Flip your premise around a bit: what kind of world do you live in where "obscure code" makes it to a production environment after hours?

Do you not do code reviews to ensure good quality?

Do you not test your releases before launch?

Do you not have a release strategy that allows you to launch code when people are in the office?

Why aren't you fixing that rather than blaming your coworkers?
Some people will simply not engage in a project if there is no set code of conduct for it. The logic presumable being that even if there is no problem now, problem may come in the future, and a agreed upon code of conduct can nip such problems in the bud.
So, no more DRM free ebooks, no more multiple format ebooks and Safari subscription cannot be used offline and cannot be used out of their apps.

Difficult to buy more O'Reilly books
I find it interesting that they were okay with you adding a new commit to clear out everything, but you can easily get to the code by looking at the history. Do you think they just didn't know Github keeps a revision history?
Something that I added to my bash profile is this simple `cd` override that triggers `workon` from `virtualenvwrapper` if the folder I'm accessing has a `virtualenv` with the same name.

cd()
{
command cd "$@"
[[ "$OLDPWD" == "$HOME"/Work/* && ! -z "$VIRTUAL_ENV" && "$OLDPWD" == *"${VIRTUAL_ENV##*/}"* && "$PWD" != *"${VIRTUAL_ENV##*/}"* ]] && deactivate
[[ -z "$VIRTUAL_ENV" && "$PWD" == "$HOME"/Work/* ]] && next="$(sed -e "s/^.*Work\///" -e "s/\/.*$//" <<< "$PWD")" && [[ -d "$WORKON_HOME"/"$next" ]] && workon "$next" && unset next
}

Yes, too many one-liners and short-circuits are usually a no-no, but it's not like anyone else is ever going to use this and I like these shortcuts.
Under which legal framework? Common law? Civil law? Old Testament law? Sharia law? The framework laid out by the Constitution of the Soviet Union? The US codex of law, circa 1953? Circa 2007? Circa Citizens United?

Should everyone get a chance to vote for choosing it? Should we decide based on population of respective countries? Or do a one-country-one-vote thing? Maybe one dollar of GDP, one vote? Why should Chinese commercial law have any bearing on a trade dispute between Honduras, Belgium, and Spain?
Once the New Madrid fault has another good shake all anyone will be talking about in the US is nuclear. And it will definitely be changing the climate of the entire midwest as those 15 nuclear reactors along the Mississippi suffer the consequences.
People still do.
Same here. I bought when it had just launched, wasn't complete yet and there was no mention of the license not being perpetual. Disappointing, but I did get a lot of value from it though!
You can do Rust + rumprun today, or at least, it worked in the past.
Ask HN: Working in startup where you value system is different from team
I am a part of the startup which has recently joined an accelerator. We are on the verge of signing a Founder's Agreement. But in last few days I have experienced a difference in the vision about the product and in general the value system of the team. I also think the had some meetings behind my back to deviate from the path we initially all agreed upon, which is fine with as long as I am part of this decision. At this point I have 2 options:
1. Either I quit the team.
2. Create a founder's agreement which protects my input towards the product and vision of the company.

P.S: The team size is 4 and expect me (7 years experience) all are recent of current graduates.
That is wonderful, but I feel that employers with the wisdom to implement policies like yours have been shrinking in number. I think this is something of the consequence of making every person individually carry their own financial weight, resulting in bad public and private policies in a number of areas.

But it's the pressure on businesses to extract maximized profit in their 'core competitve area' too... it leads naturally to the thought that employees should pay their own time and money for their own training. I think every suffers a little loss of efficiency in that way.
I'm not sure I follow - canada.google.com is a domain, as is google.ca.

What are you actually suggesting?
Tu quoque isn't a valid argument. More importantly it implies you actually do think his behaviour is unethical.
References: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6319086/are-gcc-and-clan...
I’ve been using them the last few weeks, and it massively improves things for certain complicated build situations, provides better security in some situations, etc. I’m REALLY happy about this new feature. Having to hack around not having it was very, very confusing in some cases.
> Google voluntarily removed hundreds of webpages from its Canadian search results on Google.ca. But the material continued to show up on Google's global search results.

> So Equustek obtained a further injunction from the court ordering Google to remove the websites from its global search results.

> Google appealed and argued it was not a real party to the dispute, and that a global injunction would violate freedom of expression.

Google didn't object in principle to removing the listings from google.ca but did object to removing them from the the main site results. What does that mean, there's actually no objection in principle but there's enough technical challenge or cost to modifying the global results that they're willing to fight it in court?
Yes. they must. be men. If there were a bunch of women in suits cruzin around I would be kinda stoked. haha. I almost didn't reply to this because I understand that you're trying to make a point but because your post has no value I decided to reply with a post of equal value.
We should be looking at ways to reduce the cost of college. Education doesn't need to be a hand-holdy 4 year summer camp, and I think the expectation that it should be is based on cultural expectations. The loan based payment model is only a problem because it's leaving a certain subset of students in a lot of debt with degrees that don't enable them to pay it off. I definitely don't think we should just give everyone unlimited money to study, nor do I think the solution is going the Western-Europe route of making college free, but only for the X% of students that do best on entrance exams.
This is total bullshit. Relatively benign ruling but sets a dangerous precedent.
As a purely hypothetical example:

*

The vault7 trove could contain documents on CIA minimization and targeting rules, which show that they carefully avoid US targets and only go for high value targets with these tools, and further could contain mostly exploits targeted at industrial/military targets.

Wikileaks has focused on how they could use the (selectively) released tools to target civilians.

By selecting to release only tools that (could) target civilian appliances, hiding the fact that most tools are built for, eg, industrial/military targets, and that CIA procedures focus on industrial/military targets, Wikileaks effectively shapes the narrative to be about how the CIA is targeting civilians, when the reality is that they're targeting high value, perfectly appropriate things (which just happen to occasionally use technology others do as well).

*

Sowing that kind of distrust between US civilians and one of their intel agencies would be a perfectly normal PSYOPs goal, and in-line with what you'd expect from, eg, RT.

That Wikileaks has decided to editorialize their content in such a way means that you now need to evaluate those kinds of scenarios when thinking about the things they release, instead of just focusing on the content. It reduces their brand value significantly.
I like Firefox and I would switch, if it had a "duplicate tab" feature like Chrome. For readers who haven't used this sublime feature, when you duplicate a tab in chrome you get everything - history, tab contents, etc. A straight fort() of the current tab. I use it constantly - google something, click on first link, read a little, duplicate tab, hit 'back' on the duplicate tab and find another result I like.
New Zealand constantly ranks among the top countries in the world for Maths, Science, and Literacy. It's started to fall recently but they're still much better than any other anglo country like the US, Canada, Australia, the UK, etc. So they do have that base of math to build upon.
Well, that or look at your headers and serve the googlebot what it expects, and show everyone else what you actually want to show - as long as it's not too different content-wise.
I think OP is not talking about the kind of owners you're thinking of. "Owner" of a startup, or "Owner" of a unvested equity package etc. are not his intended group.

I think its more like people who can easily meet their needs/wants even while holding something like a dividend fund or w/e. Owner of sufficient passive income assets that any extra effort or income or ROI is only gravy.
Vendors come and go. Standards don't.
They don't address the most important part: you can't obtain this order in other jurisdictions. Of course in exactly these liberal jurisdictions it is also exceedingly unlikely Google would be in violation for removing something.

They also of course don't address the most most important part, which is that a Canadian court ruling on something that is no longer even happening in Canada (since that is where Google already removed the results) has very dubious jurisdiction.

This must be about the only good part of treaties like CETA, it gives Google the ability to sue Canada for this nonsense in a court that can't even spell "product relabeling".
Interesting analysis, but what do you get for Lisp? The Lisp version is available at https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life#Common_...

I suspect that yorwba has a good point re. identifiers (note too that *, + and - are allowed & quite common in Lisp).

Also note that Racket is not Scheme, so using '.scm' as an identifier for it is a bit misleading:-)
Improving the experience on Windows might increase reach as well. Reading this thread, there appear to be some issues: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13974238

Specifically, openssl dependencies, more win32 bindings, and better official docs on how to get it working.
Isn't that global consistency in effect frequently weakened because applications have to batch writes to get throughput? It's great to be able to have consistency, but in many other cases the source of inconsistency will largely just moved to outside of the data management system.
nor is there a combination of bad
choices that could conceivably put
me in their position from my starting
point.

Guess again.
We have been developing a SaaS app for two years now and the most serious issue is that Firefox Nightly shares the profile with the stable build. Sounds harmless, but it is not if you have installed Nightly and stable and the website uses indexeddb! The indexeddb, once modified in the Nightly, cannot be opened in stable build anymore. So you are trapped in Nightly forever if you access websites with indexeddb. The only way back is to completly erase your profile. That's why we actively warn users not to install Nightly on their system.
I'm pretty sure that billing two companies for the same time is the difference between unethical and highly illegal.
No, alpine. But running systemd in Docker has never /really/ worked (except if you're running on RHEL because they have a bunch of patches to make it work) due to how much shit systemd does that makes it hard to run in a container. Even systemd-nspawn (their container runtime which runs systemd inside the container) doesn't work in a lot of cases.

LXC is the only runtime I'm aware of that actually runs systemd inside containers well, but they had to do a lot of unholy shit to play nicely with systemd.

runc has had countless issues with systemd thinking that it owns the system and it messing with container cgroups.

And don't get me started on the fact that cgroupv2 is specifically designed to only work if you have a global management process for cgroups (can you guess what management process that is?).
It is actually a population and lifestyle issue, manifested by energy use.
“Natural” is overrated – or, why Soylent is a Good Thing
Yeah - I think this is just inherent in the transmission of academic work to a broader audience. Nuance and caveats get stripped away, in part because the journalists themselves aren't capable of assessing these features.
Why do you hope that an entity gets sued for something that they have not done yet?
If Google doesn't remove this Canadian website from global searches, Canada can force Google to leave the Canadian market and even block google.com in Canada. This - of course - will not happen any time soon...
i think the idea is more that they want to keep it in the headlines for a matter of months instead of a single day. the juiciest stuff was in the initial release, anyway.
Canadian here. Would you be so kind as to elaborate on your sweeping allegation regarding free expression? As it is, this just seems like some random stab that doesn't concern the topic at hand (which has far more immediate concerns tied to it).

Section 1 of the Constitution of Canada (1982) outlines freedom of speech. Just about the only thing you can't do, outside of pursuing damages in the court system for specific cases, is stand on the street screaming "Let's kill all white/black/asian/aboriginal people right now". For that, you might land yourself in some trouble.
You seem pretty sure you'll have real customers.
Kawasaki H2R reaches 400km/h (249mph)
This wouldn't be the first time a government is requiring Google to modify their search results. This case parallels the "right to be forgotten" cases brought against them by the EU several years ago. There is a reason that civil liberties and human rights organizations like the ACLU are concerned about this precedent.

In the US, with the murders of unarmed civilians by law enforcement and subsequent acquittals occurring at an alarming rate with increasing public outrage, it might be only a matter of time before a court somewhere rules in the favor of a person found innocent who is suing to keep as many details of a particular murder off the Internet on the grounds that his or her constitutional rights being violated (i.e inability to find employment, friendship, etc), and companies such as Google being forced to comply with the court's rulings.
Can't imagine the operations over at a place like Pornhub - "Hey Bob, our teledildonic websocket latency keeps spiking, see if you can't lock it down."
It's not so much that it benefits people who get income from investments as protects them from inflation. If you hold on to something for ten years and sell it for the same amount in constant dollars, the tax you pay on the increase in actual dollars is really a wealth tax.
Of course not. They also don't need to be in suits. The wording is just meant to evoke particular imagery. And the comment that you replied to just used that quoted section from the parent and grandparent, anyhow. If you have a problem with the wording, then you have a problem more directly with the grandparent than with this comment, IMO.
Just got into rust a couple weeks ago - thanks for pointing out Tango. Had no idea what it was until it finally clicked. Pretty awesome!
Since the raise in Seattle was higher than in previous empirical studies, one would expect a larger observable effect.
> You can't realistically, under the laws of physics, have a hard notion of transactional ordering (did the account's money come in before it went back out?) without pinning down the concept of an account to a location

You've just made me realise that the universe itself is only eventually consistent - that's what all those weird quantum observer / wavefunction collapse events are.
I wonder if they bought some sets, and are selling based off known contents - since they're technically pre-sorted.
Ultimately one company can't do business in, and be subject to the jurisdiction of, two countries whose laws require them to do opposite things.

If push really came to shove Google would leave Canada--no offices, no ad sales, no shipping physical product there. Maybe even put a clause in their ToS saying that their products couldn't be used from Canada. If they did all that and Canadian courts still tried to fine it or award damages against it then other countries' courts would refuse to enforce those rulings.
Kafka with selective acknowledgments (kmq) performance and latency benchmark
*Berkeley
How does that differ from what (I suppose) is the common way of doing it, i.e. go through the Google results page and open new tabs for each interesting result?
Few of the people on the list have any, at least obvious, position outside of their field. The purpose of seeking input is to make sure that this isn't 72 "climate change deniers" in fringe positions or with their own "custom" organisations.
I genuinely don't understand - how is an agreement for payment of services rendered exploitation? Value is generated for both parties of that exchange.
70% you say? I can do even better, about 98% accuracy by saying "straight" every single time :)

And what about other 30% of cases, when that genome predictor fails - isn't that an indicator that there are actually multiple causes of homosexuality?
For me it was mentioned, but I read on HN that the main reason for the "6 month" restriction is that the author wants to avoid complaints and reclaims in the case that he stops providing the website after 6 months. In other words: there are legal reasons why this restriction exists, but it will not be restricted to 6 months. So I trusted the HN crowd and paid the price that I considered as "a little high".

Lesson learned: Don't trust the HN crowd.
Nice! Subscribed
Or create problems, since they give a huge amount of leverage to those interested in dominating others through purely institutional/bureaucratic power games.
> Fun little extension that changes the word "now" to "meow"

I can't believe in my eyes.
Genetics of course are not the sole determining factor in expressed traits or conditions; they contribute heavily though, as do environmental factors.
residential service? how much from Comcast?
Unchangeable can be said about a persons religion too, yes?

Humans acquire biological predispositions via development of neurological structures, among others. Reinforced over time by their local community giving them pats on the back for living up to the rules

Sure people do break away from their culture of origin, but that many (most?) do not seems to make the notion that it's simply "choice" nonsense

It's no easier for Muslims to ditch their beliefs than it is for me to ditch capitalism
It's great until you realize it costs $50. A year.
At what age is Informatics\CS first compulsory, and when does it stop being compulsory? Are there specialist teachers or is the maths/music/English teacher being pressed into service to teach computing too? Sorry for all the questions, but I'm keen to know how the compulsory education in CS works!
Are you... er, missing a d there in the Domain name?
Look, just read the article and you'll see it:

"After several months, he had recovered enough to be discharged. But, out in the world, his life was simply another hospitalization waiting to happen."

Hospitalizations can cost thousands of dollar per day. So this stay cost in the several hundred thousand dollar range.

[skipping some paragraphs]. He is given a stable housing environment:

"I spoke to Hendricks recently. He has gone without alcohol for a year, cocaine for two years, and smoking for three years. He lives with his girlfriend in a safer neighborhood, goes to church, and weathers family crises. He cooks his own meals now. His diabetes and congestive heart failure are under much better control. He’s lost two hundred and twenty pounds, which means, among other things, that if he falls he can pick himself up, rather than having to call for an ambulance."

The entire article is about this sort of thing and about many cases.
Look, just read the article and you'll see it:

"After several months, he had recovered enough to be discharged. But, out in the world, his life was simply another hospitalization waiting to happen."

Hospitalizations can cost thousands of dollar per day.

[skipping some paragraphs]

"I spoke to Hendricks recently. He has gone without alcohol for a year, cocaine for two years, and smoking for three years. He lives with his girlfriend in a safer neighborhood, goes to church, and weathers family crises. He cooks his own meals now. His diabetes and congestive heart failure are under much better control. He’s lost two hundred and twenty pounds, which means, among other things, that if he falls he can pick himself up, rather than having to call for an ambulance."

The entire article is about this sort of thing and about many cases.
Point taken re copyright.
Re similarity, it may be possible to write some sort of imagemagic filter that makes the bricks appear more realistic somehow. (But yeah, this would probably only be useful as a starting point for training the very rare bricks)
Cool work, missing a "Why Cryptocurrency is Bad" section though