skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
By the way, I run the https://reddit.com/r/ponylang subreddit. I mentioned it a long time ago on the mailing list trying to get someone from the Pony team to join as a moderator, but don't think it ever fully panned out. If anyone on the team is interested, feel free to PM me on Reddit.
Note the use of America_s_. The s there is something i have seen often used to encompass all the nations of the American continent.
Ruby, Ruby on Rails, and _why (2012)
I am sure this article has touched all the internet people, its really really nice piece of writing on building up new web site http://www.y8gold.com/
Internet media is the new media. Check out DrudgeReport.com, breitbart.com and InfoWars.com. If you're looking for something on your TV, your only hope is OANN, but most cable providers don't carry them yet.
The original bug report is already on Hacker News as https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14681377
Are you implying that the lynching is only of potential bombers? Because that's not true.

Innocent people are the ones being killed with zero consequences for the killers
> The problem with these six mega-corporations is that they are controlled by a handful of billionaires and a few distasteful foreign governments that do not have the best interests of Americans in mind.

I'm curious about why you've got the US government out of the equation. Do you really think that those "few distasteful foreign goverments" play a bigger role or collude more than the US government with those media corporations?
I can always read WSJ articles by searching for the title in Facebook search then clicking through from the official WSJ posting.

That workaround is often mentioned in the HN discussion threads, so it's fairly well known.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTJZEK4JP0k
Own your server is convenient in some ways. What if building HSR is like building an IaaS?
Surrogate escaping has been part of Python since 3.2 or so which pretty much solved this.

Python's behaviour is only problematic when all of the below is true:

- Running on Linux and,

- using glibc and,

- glibc's locale files were deleted or the locale is otherwise not configured and,

- you try to read/write non-ASCII file names. (In this scenario Python falls back to the only locale it can process by itself, which is 7-bit ASCII -- the problem is not ASCII, rather the 7-bit restriction. I believe there is a bug open that suggests changing this fallback to UTF-8, which would solve this problem.).

The only time I saw that was with rear which did all of the above on purpose to save like 5 MB on the generated images. In all other cases there is no problem with any kind of file name.

Note that this is a severely broken system configuration where a lot of other stuff falls apart as well.
Thanks for your personal marvelous posting. I truly enjoyed reading it, you happen to be a great author. I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back in the foreseeable future. I want to encourage that you continue your great writing, have a nice morning!
http://www.friv.live/
Everything I've said is civil.

If expressing opinions outside the norm are not welcome here I am happy to be banned.

If anything working for certain companies that VIOLATE human rights is the only uncivil thing going on here.

Please broaden your mind and look at what people are trying to express with their words, your poor interpretation is the result of your poor communication skills.
Really i appreciate the effort you made to share the knowledge. This is really a great stuff for sharing. Thanks for sharing http://www.juegosfriv.live/
Great information. I recently found your website and I read your articles. I thought I would leave my first comment. Thank you! http://www.juegosfriv2018.live/
I would have bet money Obama would have moved it to Schedule III before leaving office.
If a mutation is useless it is unlikely to proliferate.
Thank you for sharing with us your article, I must admit that I found very useful. Keep sharing such ideas in the future. Thanks for giving me useful information http://www.juegosfriv2017.live/
Of course. A guy with karma score 1 would know. And NSA spying if entirely fiction too!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham–Minkowski_controversy if you want the gory details.

However, IMO none of these explanations are particularly satisfying because none of them (AFAICT) explain where these two different formulations come from. They all leave you with the impression that two physicists just pulled two different equations out of their ass and now they're arguing over which one is right as if it were some sort of theological discussion. (This is a common problem in physics pedagogy.) I would really love to hear from a physicist who understands and can explain the basis for the two different formulations.
Funnily China seems to be treated more like a capitalist oligarchy these days (and may well be operating like one as well).

The last remaining communist nations to be "feared" seems to be Cuba and North Korea.
Even after reading the intro, knowing what was coming, it still somehow surprised me to bump into the word "funnel" referring to job applications. Good way to think about it if applying for lots and lots of jobs is the goal!

> Having lots of offers takes a lot of psychological pressure off of the process.

This intrigues me the most, I'd love to hear more about it. I personally would have expected the opposite before reading this. Often having multiple job offers makes me freeze up and worry a lot about which one I should choose. But maybe that's because I'm worrying about 2-3 jobs I want, as opposed to 70. I'm often optimizing relationships and my own happiness potential rather than compensation. That one sentence does make me want to try an approach like this.

It'd be equally easy to spam without a script, right? This one looks like it hit "Apply" 1300 times in 1.5 hours - I'm looking at the 4 second delay. The script might be a 10-20 minute job, but I'd be paranoid enough about running something like this with my name attached that testing it and making absolutely certain it didn't go haywire would very likely take me a few hours. I probably would have done something that didn't scale, and clicked 1,300 times manually.

I did chuckle a little when creativity was mentioned multiple times, for a process that is automated and "spam". It is a bit creative, so I don't mean to judge - I'm seeing the word spam in many comments here - but I feel like there are some much more creative ways to get exactly the job you want, and the idea here might be more about DIY than "creative" per se.
It's called practicing good op-sec. Sexual harassment and assault are things. As a woman you don't want to put yourself in a bad situation or send false signals; as a man even the whiff of impropriety can destroy your reputation so you'd best play it safe.
For a great podcast leading up to this, you should listen to

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/05/10/527803742/episo...

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/05/12/528181998/episo...
More that it weeds out all the scammers hiding behind fake adresses.
My first name is hyphenated. I run into online forms all the time that don't accept my name. Or won't accept it because it is "too long."
"A majority of women, and nearly half of men, say it’s unacceptable to have dinner or drinks alone with someone of the opposite sex other than their spouse."

This is a crap article. The situation is entirely different for married and unmarried men to have drinks alone with a woman, and yet it's failing to distinguish...
So the more correct statement is that Apple design review does not know or does not care about math typesetting.
Personally, I've found that the type of program I run on Windows does not lend itself well to tiling -- they all need to be pretty big to work well, and if I tile two programs, then on average each will be 50%, which is too small for the Windows programs.

So instead I came up with a number of window positions and sizes that I liked and I use AutoHotKey to invoke each of them with a hotkey. So for example, I have a setting for a full-height, 80% width, window at the left edge, and another one for the same size at the right edge. Now I can put my browser on the right edge, and my ConEmu on the left edge, and while reading HackerNews in the browser I can see when the build I've started in ConEmu is done :-)
I'd be cautious of answers to questions like that that sound like a story. But it's worth pointing out that the ancestors of whales started out on land and it's not necessary to imagine they jumped straight from that to fully aquatic.
First route is essentially the only way of doing it, especially after you've been in the field for a bit. Either you're doing amazing work, and companies are after you, or you're a kid out of school. In between is ALL about who you know.
This is not what Americans believe at all. This is what the corporate media wants you to think that this is what Americans believe. You have been propagandized -- you've taken a false consensus and turned this into a false conscious. This is exactly the danger of having such a concentrated corporate-controlled media.

A bit more than half the country consistently votes for more government. The so-called "blue states" (really, urbanized states) consistently (and strangely) vote to increase their own taxes so that the government can be a bigger part of the environmental regulations, healthcare and education.

As for the red states talk to these people. Many of these people only enjoy any kind of decent quality of life because of extraordinarily generous transfer payments... from the federal government. Cut off medicare, SSI, SSDI and whole towns would disappear. This is why when people actually saw Trump's budget they freaked the fuck out. Severe cuts in the federal budget would be beyond devastating to these states [1] and many of them know it. (This may be why so often politicians push for tax cuts but very rarely talk seriously about cutting spending.)

But something interesting happens almost every second of day in the US. Though many people benefit enormously from the government's generosity the media reports purely on the "harm" caused by the government. The result is precisely this narrative "the best government is no government" -- parroted by a people who's devouring of government largess would put the Romans to shame. It's a farce but as you can see it's a very effective farce.

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/2...
Here's a long list of YouTubers who cover the news. Some of these people I've never heard of, and some of them I'd stay far away from [e.g., Alex Jones]:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/which-youtuber-channel...

For online news aggregators... He's overly right-wing for my tastes, but the best truly independent aggregator I've been able to find is Drudge. I'm frankly stunned that after 20 years, the powers that be have not yet found a way to shut him down.
Just to clarify, (not that I care about votes in either direction) I meant you do seem to have a good understanding of stuff.
Eh. Tough question. You don't want to make the mistake of using sources with an opposite mindset to the prevailing media.

Prevailing media has a strong democratic bias. Opposing media has a strong republican bias (breitbart, oann, etc).

Better media doesn't give a shit. I suggest sott.net, global research, strategic culture, mises.org, the intercept, reason, opslens, the unz review, counterpunch, zerohedge.

KEEP IN MIND: all of these sources require a STRONG BS filter. It's like startups v established companies: lots of bullshit with diamonds in the rough thrown in. It's your job to find the diamonds. When you find them, they're totally worth it.

Those should get you started. In general, I tend to also follow a host of individuals on twitter of varying backgrounds to get a greater variety.
I personally do not avoid women, but I do deny them my essence
Second hand smoke is dangerous, no matter what the source is. You're burning a fuel into carcinogens. Just because Marijuana might combust into something slightly less, doesn't mean anyone wants to breathe it.
Most western european countries have public media that operate independently from the government.

Many forms are possible: the British BBC single broadcaster model to the fragmented model of my country with many competing broadcasting associations. I think most models work out well enough.

Of course, comparing to Pravda is a straw man argument: I was promoting a balance between (independent) public and commercial media
Best i recall, the kernel will offer POSIX compliant interfaces, but then also offer parallel interfaces that fix potential problems.

Similarly they will retain previously introduced, but flawed, interfaces etc until they are damn sure that they are no longer in use.
Hermann Hesse on Little Joys
It's funny how it is being hailed as Modi's achievement, while during last govt he and his party were one of the major roadblocks to the rollout of GST.
Wetherspoons has about 4 apps to send you news anyway and most people who would sign up to the newsletter probably end up in a spoons frequently anyway.

At least you can order food to your table without having to move which is lazy but pretty cool.
Why did you say tech is worse than other industries and what industries are you talking about?

If you don't think a comparison to other industries is important, why did you bring it up to begin with?
Here you can see some bench results comparing the most popular reactive javascript libs https://github.com/GianlucaGuarini/reactive-libs-bench icaro included
On all distros and computers I always had the occasional PDF or image that crashed the document or image viewer. OpenOffice or LibreOffice also crashes from time to time, especially if it's used for long, or has to handle big documents, and especially if those documents were imported. I've seen all sorts of stupid interactions between media software, e.g. pausing a video in Firefox while running mplayer in the background somehow corrupted buffers on one machine. More than once I saw Flash, when it still was a thing, show garbled frame-buffer contents etc.

I think your general observation is correct, though.

Most spurious crashes are likely incorrect combinations of software by the distro that are only very slightly incompatible. This is way more likely on a distro that in principle just ships "the latest of everything".

Many are in software that handles complex formats or interacts with the graphics / audio system. Many/all of the former have a very poor security track record which matches up with the crashes: a parser full of vulnerabilities is more likely to choke on the occasional flipped bit or on a slightly incorrect file.
Google, apparently the smartest tech company in the whole wide world, still hasn't figured this out for drive
If you are not replicating, than it not a distributed system and cap doesn't apply. Sharding just gives you two centralized databases. Talking about durability is just adding more confusion IMO.
Shallow Perception in Hard Times
This might be what I want, and it looks awesome in any case. Thanks for the link, I will be calling my insurance company to see if I'm covered.
The pricing was never three years. And built into that is expensive instructors (hailing from Stanford, Berkeley, NASA), small class sizes, potential default, and the ability to attend all other LambdaSchool classes in perpetuity.

So for about the price of 1 semester of private tuition (or about 50% more than the top bootcamps), it's not unreasonable, especially when attached to a guarantee you'll be paid $90k/yr while you're paying for it. It's capped at $30k so that's the maximum payback.

Not sure what the pricing will be long-term.
> Monopolies and oligopolies are crippling capitalism.

There's nothing happening now that is new. That has been repeating for 150 years post the Civil War industrial boom in the US. There are few examples of new, high competition industries not consolidating down to several big companies that stand above the rest.

Retail? Mom & Pop shops -> Walmart, Target, Sears, Amazon, BestBuy, Kroger, Costco, CVS, Walgreens, etc.

Software? Little companies circa 1970s, 1980s -> Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, SAP, etc

Search engines? Lycos, Hotbot, AltaVista, Yahoo, Excite, MSN, Inktomi, GoTo, etc. -> Google

Steel? Dozens of steel makers -> US Steel

Oil? Dozens of refiners -> Standard Oil

Automobiles? Hundreds of car makers -> Ford & GM

Thousands of radio stations -> SiriusXM, Pandora, Spotify, Apple, Google, Amazon

Hundreds of auction companies -> eBay

A thousand newspaper classified ad sections -> Craigslist

A thousand computer makers -> Dell, HP, Gateway, IBM, Apple, etc

These are all the same conceptual scenario playing out.

That process is not in fact a bad thing. The only bad thing is if you allow the enlarged companies / winners (ie the companies with superior products/service/price/combination), to then prevent new competition through regulation (or direct violence). If you do that, then you get obnoxious airlines, or companies like Comcast, or crap automobiles such as what GM and Ford were producing for a few decades until a wave of foreign competition arrived (GM and Ford being prime examples of utilizing government to aggressive prevent competition).

There's no scenario where even bad Capitalism (usually a combination of abusive government and abusive companies conspiring) doesn't kill itself. US Steel for example was killed by potent, nimble, cheaper foreign competition. GM and Ford had to figure out how to make higher quality cars again, as Toyota (and others) stole a huge amount of their market.

I can't think of even a few examples where such consolidation has occurred, resulting in a horrible dominant product/company, in which the government hasn't played a primary role in ensuring said company's survival via regulatory protection. External to that, the market topples the eventual winners time and time again.

Kodak was a monster in photo/camera, now where are they? Sears, toast. US Steel, toast. Pennsylvania Railroad? Doesn't exist. Pan-am? Doesn't exist. Standard Oil? A bit player, split into pieces, in a far larger global oil market. Microsoft? The Windows empire has been largely neutralized by Apple, Android, Linux in general, etc. Intel? The ARM army has put them in a box. Cisco? They're being made increasingly irrelevant by innovations such as those by Facebook in the datacenter, software is eating their pricey hardware. IBM? Who? Xerox? Irrelevant, largely toppled by Japanese competition. Alcoa? Smashed by China etc. Ford and GM? A dozen big foreign competitors took half their market.
It is not wrong, but maybe poorly phrased. It just means an ID which Nevada considers valid, not that it was actually issued in Nevada.
You're literally contradicting yourself. Something cannot be both liberal and fascist (a philosophy characterized by authoritarianism and limited individual freedom)
And?

What is going on here is that an admin thinks he has shored up the service defined in the service file, because hey, it runs. Only to later have the server 0wned because apparently it was running as root the whole time...
It might have to do with the transition animations in OSX. I found a long time ago that turning off the animations in Windows makes a system feel a while lot more responsive.
Both KDE and Gnome automatically restart the desktop shell if it crashes. systemd includes a watchdog that instantly re-locks the session if the session locker crashes. D-Bus activated services are automatically restarted as well, when in use. There are probably more of these mechanisms.
NSA spying on citizens:Traffic shaping allows spying on Americans
No, personal attacks are never acceptable. Doubly so if you're an outsider who has done nothing for the project except attack the main developer.

The legitimate way would be to take part in the development and convince based on technical reasons. If people disagree with you, consider that you might be wrong. If you think you're right anyway, fork it, and see if /other/ people agree with you. Chances are they won't.

The people actually maintaining all the distros didn't all switch to systemd within a few years for no reason.
> It's motivated because the HR screen is the hurdle to overcome, and there will be no opportunity to have a genuine conversation with you unless he gets past the HR filter first.

If everybody starts doing automated résumé spamming, then nobody will get past the HR filter, even if for no other reason than the volume of spammed résumés will become overwhelming. HR recruiters will respond by putting up other roadblocks to return things back to a manageable volume, most likely by requiring one of the much-hated automated coding tests as a screening step before a résumé will be considered, and then everybody loses out.

What this person is doing should be considered highly anti-social and inconsiderate.
In all this analysis we seem to be glossing over the fact that what IBM is selling in their Watson platform is not what played Jeopardy. The original point of criticism is that "Watson" in its current offering is little more than marketing hyped technology that is quickly becoming a widely available commodity. That criticism stands true and this article seems to agree that Watson is a joke.
My bad, I though this was somewhat standard.
Brietbart and oann have strong republican bias but mises and reason don't? /:
That is like arguing "I'm just saying there should be equal rights for white people" on a post about white-on-black harassment because MLK Jr had "much to say about equality."

Taken in context it is an attempt to deny the imbalance of power that exists and which civil rights / feminism seek to dismantle.
Are you just using the max mind data?

What percentage of those 250,000,000 is from paid plans? Even if it's only 20% you'd be doing $xx,xxx per day. Is that in the ballpark?
Nakedcapitalism.com
The point is that big companies with financial backing will use market advantage to stifle competition before it gets a chance (e.g. buying up the spectrum for cell phones, lobbying to prevent broadband competitors, patenting very basic concepts, buying up competition in its infancy).

You can argue they missed the boat on buying youtube and putting it to their own ends (e.g. YouTube prime is only comcast subscribers). It sounds like you want to disagree with me, but my two points are [and you haven't really provided arguments against either]

1. There is insufficient competition in the market (cell phones, ISP, computer parts, and many others). Much of this is due to deliberate actions by larger companies to protect their pie.

2. The consolidation of media is bad for consumers, and its death is good. The level playing field of a public internet made all the difference.
He seems to prefer various alcoholic drinks when posting not posting under his own name though...