skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've started getting the ringing in the ears a few years ago. However, it gets more pronounced when I twist my neck certain ways -- and it seems to let up a bit by stretching my neck in a different direction. Seeing as how I also have periodic neck pain, I wonder if pinched nerves there are contributing to the tinnitus symptoms? Also, there are some days on the drive home from work where the tinnitus is completely gone -- but it comes back strong the next morning, especially if it feels that I didn't have a good sleeping position.
Have you seen Vue's single file components?

It's a (single file), which would look something like (idk how to format code on h/n lol):

<template>
<ul>
<li v-for="message in messages">{{ message }}</li>
</ul>
</template>

<script>
export default {
data () {
return {
messages: ['hello', 'world']
}
}
}
</script>

I realize this is a completely trivial example, but is this what you're getting at? Everything related to that component is in a single place. The template itself handles any UI specific logic: conditionally showing an element, looping, binding an event.

Any real logic is going to be handled from the component itself.

That said, Vue actually supports using a render function as opposed to using a template. You can even use JSX if you want (though I certainly wouldn't consider JSX a first class citizen in Vue).
I worked at EA for years and have worked at other AAA studios, I've seen the big companies from the inside and know pretty well how they work, what they do well and what they don't.

Sure, EA continues to exist because it has more hits than misses (and is helped in that regard by huge, reliable annual franchises like FIFA) but I've seen plenty of projects with relatively low expectations become huge hits (like the original need for speed underground) as well as titles with high expectations crash and burn (I won't name names). The big companies do a good enough job to be fairly consistently profitable but they by no means have a foolproof formula for success. Show me a famous studio without titles that didn't meet expectations.
If you've tried Postman (https://www.getpostman.com/), how would you say Insomnia is better?
Why are you spreading this FUD about blackballing people? Do you have any proof?
The syllabus of the course contains sectionsbclearly regarding big data, and name them so.
So, I often listen to podcasts in bed with earbuds. It's night, and it's quiet, and I've found that I actually _bottom out_-- I'm at the lowest volume setting, with the next lowest being "mute", and I wish I could lower it a few more times. I need finer control over volume. (I'm on android, if anyone has any solutions...)
Ouch, looks like he's right: https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly .
The problem is that it's not just your email. If you send an email to a Gmail user, Google is now building a profile on you (or was until this move) as well as your recipient. Did you give explicit consent to Google? Did you sign a EULA or SLA with them allowing this? No, they just did it anyway. Even someone who makes a point to keep themselves off of Google's radar will end up indexed and sold to the highest bidder if they send even one innocent email to a Gmail user.
Mainly the list you stated.

Practicing basic arithmetic and judicious application of the distributive property (much like decomposing complicated problems into smaller subproblems) will take one very far in this sort of thing.

I was introduced to dimensional analysis in my high school physics class. We generated an expression off by just a constant for some property (which I don't recall) of a large scale dust cloud simply by identifying pertinent quantities (e.g. density, the classical gravitational constant) and resolving the powers each quantity must have in order to yield the correct units (corrected due to below comments; thanks) of the property. It made an impression on me, and I used the technique often as a guesstimate to "motivate" or provide a calibration for a solution to various problems all the way through grad school. It's not infallible, and can even be wildly misleading, but it's a fantastic tool.
From the article:

"Know that machines can be racist (or sexist, or otherwise prejudiced). Computer models designed to predict individual criminal behavior have shown bias against minorities, possibly because the data used to “train” their algorithms reflect existing cultural biases."

So, more postmodern garbage. Who's bullshitting whom here? It's irrefutable that Blacks commit murders and other violent crimes way out of proportion to their relative numbers.
I'm in no way defending anything who requires people to accept particular roles. Have respect for all roles. (Right now the traditional roles, and the people who choose them, are being aggressively being bashed)

My point is that traditional gender roles solved a lot of problems and attempting to just cherry pick what you want (just because you want that) or to expect different behavior has lead to many bad/toxic relationships (which affects others and creates even more of a barrier to a relationship) and sociality issues. (If you'll allow for me to stretch it that far)

I'm of the opinion that if you want to change something, you should be very sure that it is a good change. Previously these kinds of changes took forever as that adoption is slow, but it prevents massive breaking changes.
I figured that by providing examples of where C++ was required that cases near those were it is used but not required would be evident.

In pretty much every type of application domain there are a large number of C++ applications. It is used in finance, business, games, medical, as you point out it is used very close to the hardware particularly when that hardware is custom and image the web with many fewer browsers and servers. The only kind of developer that might outnumber C++ devs is Java devs because there are so many custom internal enterprise applications that place higher emphasis on being barely functional than performant (and they are largely correct in their decision).

I find no need for your needlessly specific separation of limited vs whatever my wording used. I hope that whatever your take from this, should you choose to continuing nitpick, is that C++ is hugely useful in many places it just is new and glamorous so it doesn't get much press.
the templates rendered. There is a singular state, because data flow is one directional. mutating properties is an anti-pattern in vue.
>You are hiring programmer

Am I hiring:

(a) A programmer
(b) Someone who considers themselves a programmer

There is a difference between the two and hiring (b) when you meant to hire (a) could bite you in the ass.

>Also, plenty of people are shitty at their pastimes.

I'm not arguing against that. My argument is (a) vs (b).
Why Do Bird Eggs Have Different Shapes? Look to the Wings
It's not trivial to match any arbitrary profile with an offline identity, but it is possible to cluster pseudonymous profiles into "almost certainly the same individual" by patterns and peculiarities in how they use their devices. If the same patterns later show up for an identified user, they can be linked with high probability.

With the sites Google runs plus running their own JavaScript on a sizable fraction of other people's web pages, they can pick up a lot of patterns, many of which would be inaccessible to police and intelligence surveillance.

Some people have nervous habits like moving the mouse around, clicking/tapping on whitespace, scrolling up and down, etc. Some always/never use the scrollbar. Some always/never open links in new tabs. Some tend to put the adjective before/after the noun in their searches. Some will rapidly open up the first 5 search results in new tabs. Some always disable instant search, and some of those change their settings to 20 or 50 or 100 results. Some use search features like the calculator, searching for "weather", stock symbols, etc, and others never do.
Why Are these undervalued
Thanks for sharing. The possibilities for this kind of technology are endless. Maybe one day we'll start having crystal clear conversations over telephone :)
I take a can of V8, if they have it. A bit of nutrition and elctrolytes. If the water is a concern, then I guess it'll be a can of mineral water to go with it, instead of "tap".
> And the question is "were they wrong?"

I think the more-useful question is whether folks knew the tradeoffs and made an informed decision in the first place.

Should someone have made more effort to determine the tradeoffs before widespread implementation? Were any facts withheld or investigation curtailed? Did one group (wrongly?) benefit from another group's ignorance?
Thanks for mentioning. Any links to your (or relevant) work?
No, it had nothing to do with women, and I resent that implication. I notice you saw the subthread where I articulated that it had nothing to do with women yet still posted a comment insinuating it does: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14621640

It's not a controversial observation that rich and powerful people can acquire enemies, and some of them have been slandered by the press.

It was difficult to separate that situation from this one. I assure you, I'm a reasonable and thoughtful person and it's not fair to say that I basically said there's no amount of evidence that can satisfy a claim against a powerful person.

The original comment was "Maybe we should wait to see how this plays out before making any judgements." Nothing more.

This whole conversation was a request for more information, so if you're going to throw me under the bus for it, you'll just push those who want to ask harmless questions further into the camp of "I shouldn't say a word." And when people have beliefs that seem reasonable to them, this can be a harmful situation when those beliefs are false.

For example, it seemed perfectly reasonable to me that a journalist shouldn't wield the power to destroy someone's reputation without any independent oversight. It's a simple proposition with simple, obvious consequences. But pointing out that no investigation is going to occur helped me realize that it's an absurd standard.

EDIT: Also, most of my comments received around 8 upvotes. They've been bouncing up and down, but the point is, clearly a lot of people felt similarly. So by voicing these concerns, it probably changed a lot more minds than my own. Talking this out and being open with it seems like a good thing.
I perceive it similarly, and marvel at some of the judgmental, parochial readings I see in comments above.
Sorry, but that's really ugly.
> But what about configuring additional libs in VS

I'm not really following. Just add the other library's project to the solution?

> or autoincrementing the version in the resource file

There are probably multiple solutions, but off the top of my head you can add pre/post build steps to a project, so you can invoke a script that will autoincrement the version for you.

> Or when you import and very old VC++ project and the auto conversion process only sort-of fixes things?

I agree, this sometimes causes problems. When that happens, creating a new project from the existing source code can be better than trying to fix the imported project.

> VS works great out of the box using the Wizard, but the learning curve gets real steep right after that.

As far as IDEs go, I feel VS is tolerable. I agree there is a learning curve once you start customizing your project, but in my opinion it's not as steep as it is in Eclipse, for example.
Yes, sorry, I meant virtual DOM. But other than that, my point still stands.
On a ms surface running chrome 59, that pinch zoom feels nice
A recent example of cross-platform app/game made with LambdaNative: https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/6hng3q/i_developed_...
But how many of the people who say money isn't everything do so from their self-made hut in a farm living off of food they have grown / killed themselves etc.?

I don't mean to make an ad hominem, but I think it's fair to say that lofty pronouncements such as how much money does or does not matter from people who have basically never actually had to experience extreme poverty sound a little hollow.
FaunaDB Serverless Cloud only bills for actual usage. So it's probably comparable in price to a standalone Postgres instance for the kinds of traffic and usage you're talking about in development.

The plan is to make using cloud so easy that there's very little pressure to run your own instances. We are also working on a free single-node Developer Edition to run on your workstations.
Airlines That Haven’t Gone All-App Are Stuck in a Holding Pattern
Saved by Alice
I've tried a few different attenuator earplugs, and the most compelling I've found are the Earasers. ($40 https://www.amazon.com/Earasers-HEM001-Musicians-Plugs-Mediu... ). They're very comfortable and low-profile. If you're the kind of person who prefers not to advertise that they're using earplugs (silly I know, but a consideration for a lot of people), these are great, because they're basically invisible when in use.

And +1 on the custom earmold. I use mine routinely. I do use the earasers when attending shows with a moshpit, as it's possible to have the filters get dislodged and lost in the fray.
Not to be pedantic, but it's called "G Suite" nowadays.
We're going to ban this account if you don't stop with the unsubstantive inflammatory sarcasm like we've asked.
Read the comments of that post. They're a painful confirmation of what the author is saying.
>some we're hired by big companies, but they were alone for a long time

I would imagine they would've been happy with staying alone rather than being managed by a boss, but sadly no one bothers to donate to most projects.

I'm not talking about your average software developer, but large companies that save hundreds of man hours that would've gone into creating and maintaining the projects they use.
I'm currently living in the US, but from what I hear, it can be a real PITA to be a US citizen living overseas since the US introduced new laws to catch wealthy citizens hiding their wealth from taxes.

In their zeal to find and tax such hidden wealth, the US has passed a law mandating that all banks must do extensive reporting on the assets of all US citizens living outside the United States, or they will be faced with high penalties. So any bank who does business in the US or has any sort of assets in the US is required to do this. The law applies to all banks everywhere, but the US can only reach what's located in the US.

The banks overseas find this requirement to be quite onerous and costly. The result? Many banks in other countries are refusing to take US citizens as clients and many US citizens living in other countries finding themselves without bank accounts and have to work to locate a bank who will be willing to accept them as a client.

The taxation of non-resident citizens overseas is once again aimed at the wealthy escaping taxes, but it affects the non-wealthy too. The average citizen living overseas won't end up having to pay taxes on their income (at least if the US has a tax treaty with the country they are living in) unless they make a lot of money, but they still have to declare all their assets and file taxes.

It's a lot more complicated filing from other countries than filing taxes when you're located in the US, especially if you have a range of assets like property, investments, and earned income. You also have to balance what you pay in US taxes vs what you pay in local taxes and figure out what to deduct on which tax return. This means a citizen has to find a tax expert who is familiar with the tax laws of the US and the local country, and that tends to be expensive.

So all the measures to tax the wealth of wealthy people fleeing the country end up significantly negatively affecting the lives on non-wealthy US citizens living in other countries.

So I'm not surprised that US citizens living overseas are increasingly giving up their US citizenship. As time goes on, US citizenship is slowly becoming less of an asset and more of a liability for anyone living outside the United States.
It was a fraction of what it is today before WW2. I don't see any trend downward over time.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFRGDA188S

Let's see your data?
The underlying course has a video series on Youtube with a very very close proximity to the title: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPnZfvKID1Sje5jWxt-4C...
A lot of people seem to be missing the culture shock involved in this.
Good point! That's why posting on HN is so great, even if you're 99.9% correct, someone will always reply to tell you precisely how you are 0.1% wrong . Thanks for the link, I tried to find official sources online and had trouble.
Context here means the context of the output page.

Usually this means the HTML context. Different sanitization is needed depending on _where_ in the HTML document the input is used.

For instance, if the input is used in between HTML tags (let's say $foo is user input in this PHP example):

... <body><?php echo $foo ?></body>

Here, the input that you need to transition to JavaScript execution is a < character (among other things): <script>alert(1)</script>.

Therefore, to correctly sanitize this, you would call the PHP `htmlentities` function:

... <body><?php echo htmlentities($foo) ?></body>

Now, this XSS vulnerability is fixed.

What if foo is used in a different context?

... <body><a href='<?php echo htmlentities($foo) ?>'>...

Here, what we need to transition the HTML parser to executing JavaScript is a ' character, and this can be exploited by the following input (in between the double quotes): "' onclick='alert(1)"

The key problem is that `htmlentities` is not valid sanitization in the context of an HTML attribute value. In this example, you need to use `urlencode`

... <body><a href='<?php echo urlencode($foo) ?>'>...

The general idea also applies to CSS, JSON, and JavaScript. SQL is a different vulnerability class (SQL injection).

I highly recommend the following research paper from 2011 that discusses the context-sensitivity of JavaScript in depth: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~prateeks/papers/scriptgard-ccs11...

In my mind, the context-sensitivity of XSS is one of the key reasons why it is so prevalent.
That's all there is to it, except for any contractual obligations the employee may have signed on for.
Well if you see his statement, they weren't lying.
A good club sound system doesn't actually need to be very loud. It will still be loud enough that long-term exposure will cause hearing loss, but not loud enough that you would be shocked when you walk in the room.

Unfortunately, a sound system of that quality is extremely expensive and requires skilled workers to operate each night, so only clubs in places that allow clubs to operate openly and make money can afford it.

If a city doesn't allow clubs to stay open all night, or if the police crack down on drug use, the clubs go underground and don't make any money (or won't invest it in equipment that may be confiscated). Then, they use lower-quality equipment that must be played too loud in order to fill the space, and don't hire sound engineers to operate the system properly and safely.
traceroute -m 50 bad.horse
The truth today, is that the internet makes it very easy for anyone to compare things against all others. Add to that the fact that certain games are clearly better, and that most games of a similar genre and quality are pretty much interchangeable.

This means that you'd need to make a game which is unique against all others, but also clearly better and of higher quality. If you can't do that, you'll be lost at sea.
Even if you find yourself in a tedious back-and-forth (which we don't need on HN to begin with), we can't respond like this.
> A technology whose proponents's best answer even today is "wait until the next breakthrough".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_lightbulb

This was researcher was completed by the United Aircraft Corporation in the late 60's and early 70's before it was canceled by Nixon along with the Mars program. It was under a NASA contract for space exploration so the literature is in the context of a rocket engine but it is even more compelling as a terrestrial reactor as it uses a tiny amount of fuel (tens of kilos instead of tens of tonnes) and actively keeps that fuel at supercritical so if power is lost the entire thing fizzles out. This is a fast neutron design with an extremely high neutron cross section, far beyond that of any other reactor, easily allowing you to feed nuclear waste into it and very efficiently transmute much of it into fuel or more manageable waste that is then separated out by centrifuges (which are already in the design to separate usable UF6 from the neon exhaust). UAC was set to win a contract to test the reactor with nuclear fuel when NASA pulled the plug so the anti-nuclear crowd isn't to blame for that line of development dying.

However, all of the technological breakthroughs in computation, material science, and nuclear engineering needed to make this happen at an industrial scale have all been discovered since the project was canceled. If it weren't for all the anti-nuclear hysteria, we might have actually had someone willing to take the risk to bring the nuclear lightbulb reactor to market. Sadly, almost all of the scientists and engineers that worked on this design have passed on so the institutional knowledge is gone and the design was classified for a while so no other nations picked up on it in time. You may be able to find the original papers on NASA/JPL's archives but AFAIK they were reclassified a few years ago.
It's the New Yorker--I'd be disappointed if there were any other reaction one could have.
I started to listen the first episode but felt a lot of overlap with How I Built This that I had to stop listening.
That's assuming that the false accusations are statistically independent. I would expect false accusations to be more common in cases with more accusers.
Polynomial arithmetic shorthand
It's very clear that the author wrote this for the reader to sympathize with the father; the author's purpose is clearly to relate that she's made major mistakes in her life, misplacing her relationship with her father. She even mentions that her 'supposedly perfect marriage' [to a rich Princeton Ivy Leaguer like her] ended up in divorce.

It's very clear the tone, and it is in no way subtle; this is a piece meant for compassion for the father, and I assume is a cathartic release for the author. By writing it up and admitting her faults openly, she's giving herself the chance to forgive herself.
Not sure if sarcasm or serious stupidity. Please clarify.
This is something I am always baffled by, is a western or modern thing. The lack of remorse really disturbs me.
Right. it is pointless to point out "until something that is impossible"

even gcc -O0 would optimize that out as unreachable code :D
Milan Meet with Fiorentina's Nikola Kalinic
They could but is it worth it?

I suspect the scanning of emails hasn't yielded the personalization once hoped. And the bad publicity outweighs any future potential.
Google will stop reading my emails for Gmail ads because I will stop using Gmail. It's kind of a sad story, because they are the good guys, but once they built a huge company they started to focus on maintaining it, possibly at any cost. This is a cautionary tale: power corrupts. You, me, everyone. And yes, the web will produce dictators we never imagined possible, because the Internet is so powerful it will enable them.
If any, they were most likely due to sheer number of responses and theories rather than any wisdom.
Not with that big of an ego. She can just call and say sorry.