skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes.

But IPv6 doesn't really have a route cache either. However, it handles exceptions differently than IPv4. With IPv6, exceptions are put in the tree along regular entries (there has been some bugs, like /128 routes disappearing due to a "cached" entry being expired) while IPv4 stores the exceptions with the next-hop information.

EDIT: I stand corrected: before 4.2, route entries were created for almost any destination, so it was essentially a route cache. After that, the entry is created only when it is really needed (MTU lower than the default MTU).
Ask HN: Is people making thousands a week selling Aliexpress products on Amazon?
http://freedomfastlane.com/amazonprofits/
There are tons of blogs and youtube videos of people claiming making thousands a month just by selling products from aliexpress to amazon. Sometimes their business model is actually waiting for people to click buy on amazon to buy on aliexpress with free shipping to end customer! Anybody in HR already in this business? Looks like a lot of work to identify right products but maybe webscrapping and AI could help? Is this selling arbitrage business legal? Are people really paying required taxes?
Not if they force you to do work for them in order to use it. They're basically employing you to look at ads, and paying you in game time.
15+ Backyard Wedding Ideas That Reflects That Home Is the Perfect Venue
Line speed has nothing to do with it. The speed of the transmission from card to reader is dwarfed by the latency of the transaction as a whole.
Guess you lack the level of abstraction capabilities I expect. Sure. The parable is just about lies and not signals and noises. All Linus rants are full of information. He is a brilliant programmer. Everything he screams and shouts about is always correct. He has never confused a raccoon with a wolf.
We know too little about this person's circumstances to pass judgement in this way. Not to mention that the armchair "tough love" approach to suicidal ideation doesn't work very well, if at all.
That's a pretty interesting loophole in the GPL: apparently (at least with V2), it might be fine to impose consequences for exercising your rights while technically giving them to you. It certainly violates the spirit of the GPL even if it doesn't violate the letter.
The model seems to correlate what worked previously to what will work next. However, in a field that is supposed to lead to new product funding - past industries may steer funding in the wrong direction from what will work next. Two issues:

1. The purple cow effect - the opportunities for highest growth may be in underserved segments which are best addressed by founders less represented in Silicon Valley. (the next big thing may be a farming startup in India, but the founder won't fit the well connected or well advised by people with startup exits model this framework uses, and thus will be missed by SV investors, which leads to problem 2. )

2. The money trumps product problem - whatever you can't beat with a solid product, you could always hammer with more money in the bank. Instead of hearing about a farming innovation in India, American farmers could be getting FarmVille ads on TV instead and tuning out. Since VCs invest locally, even if a startup starts picking up steam in Chicago, SF investors who don't have a toe in that pond, pick the local fish that eats the same algae and fund it far better than the Chicago company, which might have a better product. In a land-grab industry that money may be enough to gain adoption to the SF pond-dweller, but returns for the entire market will be lower, due to lower product quality and tendency of big firms here to pick only one company per industry.

So the framework, biased by past data, may skew future data away from results that would be optimal without a framework.
FWIW, Square's chip reader seems to be much faster than many others.
Then write your own? Why bother commenting here.
As jpatokal said though, AirAsia has one of the better safety records of Asian airlines.

I was just adding that they're not just safer (apparently), but also a more pleasant airline to fly with.

Let's not forget that Qantas also managed to have a turbine failure in 2010. Even if you fly with a reputable airline, there's always the risk of terrorist attacks, suicidal pilots, or getting shot down. At the end of the day, no matter what airline you're with, it's probably safer than driving a car.

You're more likely to die in one of the destinations that AirAsia serves than on the plane itself, ~30 Australians die every year in Bali alone.
How SunTrust Bank’s CMO Uses Data to Start a Movement
To put it in more tech-industry terms, doctors are either Level 2 (general practitioners) or Level 3 (specialists) health support. Adding more low-cost Level 1 health support is a great way to reduce the workloads of L2 and L3 and thus both reduce costs throughout the system as well as improve outcomes for most ~customers~ patients.
> As a consumer, most of the time the convenience, security, service and shipping speed is worth the trivial difference. I don't bother doing price comparisons anymore unless it's several hundred, and even then usually need about 10% delta to switch retailers.

If you want to voluntarily pay a 10% tax most Americans can't afford, that is your choice.
Oh, I have plenty of discretionary income for my situation. Maybe a teensy bit more than I would in a place with low housing costs but also low salaries.

But even a sacrifice of 100% of my discretionary income wouldn't put homeownership or childrearing (extra bedroom + good school district or private tuition) within reach. Certainly not both. Maybe I'll get to pick one on this salary if I ever see liquidity on my equity, but really I'm holding out for making a much higher salary in 10-20 years.

It's a fun thing to do with my early 20s. But I understand the presumption that a middle-aged man would not take this salary, as it'd be pretty damn difficult to rent more than a studio. Even the studio is extravagant: several of my peers of similar age have roommates. A family is certainly below middle class if it has to share an apartment with other families.
There seems to be no evidence that public money is being spent on national cyber-defense, i.e. counter measures - at least there have been no links suggesting the NSA, CIA or GCHQ are working on patches.

This leaves private industry, e.g. Microsoft et al, solely responsible for defending citizens.

As there is no disclosure by the spies, Microsoft cannot patch without knowledge of the vulnerabilities - at least until there is a leak or potential leak that promts a reluctant disclosure.

This leaves one wondering is tax money being spent solely to make us less safe ?

Could Wannacries NHS (UK) devastation have been averted if academic security researchers had responsibly disclosed the potential for this vulnerability ? Surely the UK Health Minister should have been more properly briefed on the dangers to patients that his decision not to patch Windows could have ?

If these agencies come crying for more tax dollars we should seriously enquire if they have any plans to make us safer rather than continuing to backdoor their own citizens.

Surely laws being passed in the UK and USA to curtail security research the danger to the public can only increase.

Without whistleblowers and journalists such as Wikileaks we would far more at risk from cyber-attacks !

I say Wikileaks as we know journalists are being targeted by Nation State actors to hack the identities of their sources. and Wikileaks is a fine exemplar of decent Op-Sec.
Definitely not. Both of those parts are neither old enough, nor influential enough, to have "shook the world" in any way.
"And there was value in the thing, clearly, that they were certain of. But what is the application? In a matter of hours, they had given it into everything from mass transit to satellite launching, imagining devices the size of jumbo jets. Everything would be cheaper. It was practical, and they knew it. But above all that, beyond the positives, they knew that the easiest way to be exploited is to sell something they did not yet understand."

I've always been quite impressed by the writing in Primer. The dialogue is a massive departure from the clean world of Hollywood but it makes it feel far more frantic but also real.
> not be as willing to put in absurd hours that a young employee could be squeezed for

This is exactly what makes them valuable. They refuse to get sucked into the burnout dynamic.
There's also no enforcement mechanism for punishing someone from defecting.
Sega Forever's launch is a disaster
Just as an aside, that's not technically a rule but a guideline.

For example at a busy airport, failing to communicate during an emergency might prove more dangerous ( to self and others ) than failing to navigate.
Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1827/
Notable features:

1. Unlock using Yubikey

2. TOTP 2FA

3. Diceware password generator

4. ASLR for in-memory security (didn't expect this!)

5. Portable and Single instance mode (I'll have to check this one in detail)

Thanks for your work team!
ICO are the best thing that ever happened. This is no different then kickstarter.com started. People where saying the same things. People put up lot of BS project and they got funded, in time these kind of project will fail on there own. This is just the start, no government or bank would have supported such system. For once, the small guy can participate in this market. I would have loved to invest in amazon, facebook, etc when they where private. You had to have the connection and access .. here the little guy in columbia or Africa has the same access to such a deal
While eating less and having CR and IF is important, equally important is the actual process of eating.

Most of the articles focus on results, but not on the actual process.

If one is eating sitting on the couch, watching television, completely oblivious of the activity, it is not going to help.

There is nothing absolute in nature, everything is connected.

How do we eat is far more important than how much we eat.

One simple experiment one can do at dinner is to sit alone, without any distraction with the dinner plate and for every morsel one takes in, chew it till you count 20 and then swallow.

Notice what happens...
Actually my position is close to yours as stated directly above.

Just stop trying to tar my people or my religion with another genocide.

Another difference is I see law enforcement and armed forces as basically good forces that have sadly been misused as tools for greedy powerful people. In fact I have served and would maybe even have attempted a career (edit: in the army) if it wasn't for the fear that I would be sent to some war halfway around the globe to fight people who never harmed us instead of just doing the thing that I believe in: defending the our country at our borders and the borders of our allies.

As for any hashtag that suggests groups of humans should be killed that should be covered by the definition of hate speech and around here I'd halfway expect people to get a visit from law enforcement or child protection if they do that.
Transputer lived on partly in Firewire.
Unless it's a direct 1 to 1 conversation, it's still consumed. Typically in AMAs it's a one-way communication. A person asks a question, if it gets chosen then a response is done, nothing ever happens after that.
This is, as I understand it, the core of the thing. They're making derivative works of a GPL work. They don't get to have it both ways. There's nothing for the Linux Foundation to go after, and they wouldn't be able to even if there was because they don't have the copyright for grsecurity's stuff.
That's a good question, I'm pretty sure it's not a normal dictionary. However, I'd have to go through the CPython source to confirm. Maybe someone who's more familiar with CPython's implementation will chime in.
It's easier if you look at the bytecode produced for the expression, which is:

1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (foo)
2 LOAD_ATTR 1 (bar)
4 LOAD_ATTR 2 (baz)
6 STORE_NAME 3 (a)
8 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
10 RETURN_VALUE

The CPython implementation is a stack-based virtual machine. The first instruction here, LOAD_NAME, pushes co_names['foo'] (basically, whatever 'foo' is bound to in local scope) to the top of the stack. That's at least one hash table lookup, since the scope is a hash table mapping names to values. Then LOAD_ATTR replaces the top-of-stack value with the value of its 'bar' attribute. That's another hash table lookup, since attributes are a hash table mapping names to values. Then another LOAD_ATTR to get to 'baz', that's another hash table lookup. Then STORE_NAME binds the value at the top of the stack to the name given as an argument ('a'). That's an insert or update of a hash table.

So, the expression 'a = foo.bar.baz' involves at least three hash table lookups and one insert or update.
One of my favorite, failed chips that probably failed mainly due to management:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_i960
Google taps Monster, Facebook, Glassdoor to let you job hunt and receive alerts
Related to this, I have one question.

Suppose one is going to write a paper and he need to add a reference of another paper which he has got from Sci-hub. So is there any check or any sorts of things of originality of reference paper ?

(I don't know exactly how publishing works)
Ceterum censeo Elsevier esse delendum.
I re-read his message, I'll delete my comment and hope someone tracks the person down and calls the necessary emergency service.
Then you mean "most permissive."
I guess I'm not getting this. The game costs no money out of pocket to play, I'm just exchanging ads for playing? Isn't that a free (as in money) game?
On Chrome on a mac, this website is "jerky". I think a lot of these scroll-jacking scripts are designed to make the Windows user's experience better, but in reality, it is screwing up the Mac user's experience where scrolling has already been fixed perfectly for years.
These are completely different (mostly national) systems, evidently optimized for different things. For example, in the Netherlands there is still plenty of retailers that don't even accept EMV cards (there is only a small number of (mostly foreign) visitors that'd be interested in such transactions, also the costs of supporting these are typically higher than just supporting the national system).
Once Falcon Heavy is flying you could upgrade those flights to FH with a flight profile where you can land all cores on land. The only difference would be more fuel used (which is cheap) and threefold increased risk of stuff going wrong in the first two minutes. May depend on how important it is to get those cores back immediately. Upgrading otherwise expendable flights to FH is already planned as well.

The upgrades of Block 5 later this year will improve reusability and performance, though, so more missions can be RTLS.
There will be countries that will die later.
Still no KDBX 4 support though?

Please consider making it a priority - it looks like someone tried to pull request it but that failed? The older format uses a custom AES-based KDF - and while I don't personally see any major issues with it, I'm much more comfortable with the modern, heavily reviewed Argon2 design used in the KDBX4.

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/148
This article is bullshit. There is a reason that insurance companies pay for chiropractic visits but not for faith healers.
Yah signing has never made sense for that reason
That's a big part of the situation you left out. MFN 3rd-party is rarely going to beat any FBA for the buy box, even on a $7 difference.

Also, I'm pretty sure you're allowed to set different prices on different marketplaces. Your Amazon offer must be the lowest though right?
Is that legal ?
Pandora CEO Tim Westergren plans to step down
> because the state space that you need to cover for several cycles for all the module inputs and outputs is beyond the capability of any formal verification tool.

Then use a proof methodology that doesn't require exhaustive enumeration. This objection is actually fairly alarming to me; perhaps there is a larger disconnect between industrial formal techniques for hardware and software than I thought. Strings also occupy a "large state space", but this obviously doesn't prevent us from doing formal verification on functions over strings.
It doesn't matter how you get a copy of the paper; the citation is the same either way. Plenty of academics have been passing around PDF copies of papers their libraries don't buy access to for years before this!
To me, the two points are completely orthogonal.

Whether he's religious or not, or decides to pray or not - is separate to how good a pilot he is. (And honestly, sometimes these things are outside of his hands).

There are plenty of religious people who are good pilots.

There are plenty of non-religious people who are good pilots.

Unless you have some meaningful data, you can't really make a conclusion either way.

In terms of asking somebody to pray - I've never been particularly offended by that, no matter what the faith of the person. (I have my own faith). Unless of course they were asking me to pray for something that in itself is offensive - such as say, death to all Jews or something.

If they're asking me to pray for say, the safe return of their husband, or that their puppy dog might recover - I'd feel like a real jerk if I just said no, instead of just going, um sure? If they want me to pray with them in their language, sure.
The huge disadvantages of Itanium's style of compile-time VLIW, as they were explained to me, were:

1. There is absolutely no flexibility in scheduling. Any EU stalls due to memory access delays, non-constant-time instructions, or the like delays completion of the entire instruction word. This makes cache misses disastrous.

2. If a newer CPU makes improvements to the architecture (say, adding new EUs), programs cannot take advantage of those improvements until compilers are updated to support those improvements, and the programs are rebuilt with the new compiler. This is unlike typical superscalar architectures, where a new EU will be used automatically with no changes needed to the program.
Then just use the software. You get the same version whether you read lkml or not.
Similarly Starbucks employees will initiate a transaction then step away to prepare the order then come back and finish up.
>Van Braun being washed of his Nazi part is a conscious part of a US government propaganda campaign as Von Braun having safe haven in the USA in the 1950s was very controversial at the time.

I honestly thought this was common knowledge amongst people who know who Von Braun was.

He was a Nazi collaborator and party member in full blood. As you noted, explaining his actions with the camps he ran would be an interesting exercise for any apologist.
Not Your Grandfather's Tobacco, Not Your Father's Marijuana
> Somehow, someway, SEGA is using an emulator that is worse than the one they were using in the 2009 iOS releases. That emulator wasn't very good to begin with either.

Ouch. Releasing an emulator that runs slower on modern hardware than their old emulator did on old hardware? Sounds like they used whatever the iOS equivalent of Electron is called.
> I draw a picture of Shammoo most of the time

I like you.
When first rolled out in New Zealand it was quite slow - as the EFTPOS hardware fleet was updated the performance improved to the point where chip-and-pin was just as quick as swipe-and-pin.

If it's slow in the US I would expect it's merchants choosing not to upgrade their terminals.
I'd argue that most managerial positions are working with systems and processes. People happen to be a part of those systems and processes. Which is why managers call their underlings "resources" - screws and bolts that can be moved around to make the system more efficient.
You're not using the term "crying wolf" correctly[1]. It has a very specific meaning in English, and that is what my complaint is in relation to. No amount of personal derision about how I "lack the level of abstraction capabilities" (whatever that means) will change that you are using the phrase incorrectly.

I even specifically said that I agree that we need less difficult personalities in kernel development. It's quite ironic that you then followed up the way you did.

[1]: https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/cry_wolf
For anyone wondering - the TOTP 2FA is not on the password wallet itself, but that the wallet is able to store the TOTP key, authenticating TOTP involves knowing the key, by which point there's really no value in using it to authenticate the wallet, it'd be a UI-only protection.

However I think storing TOTP keys in your wallet is a bad idea for security - now if someone hacks your machine they get both your password and your TOTP key at the same time. The main advantage of TOTP is that it puts your second form of auth on a separate device, preventing a single point of compromise.

not much malware will exploit this as not many people will use it, but a targeted attack might greatly benefit from something like this.
Eh, one of the standard performance tips for hot loops is to store everything relevant, including functions, in local variables because the interpreter looks in the local dictionary first. The last time I optimized Python code that made a significant difference.
A reference is just a listing of author(s), year of publication, title, journal/conference. There's no link (perhaps a DOI). There are usually no checks (other than the reviewers/editor looking over the list of references).
It's there in the event that the fact that a purchase was made at all is disputed. Of course it doesn't do much to verify who signed, but it proves that someone actually meant to make a purchase.

One of the most foolproof ways to win a chargeback claim is not to claim a card was stolen, but merely that you didn't mean for them to charge you. How do you fight that? So for big ticket items we sold online we required a signature, thus (mostly) killing their ability to file that kind of a chargeback.

Of course that's a huge hassle for online sales, but if you're a grocery store and they're already there eh why not.
A beginners dive into the MVP world
A Dive in the Loader API with MVP
Sega games with poorly-coded emulators/ads aside, the Sonic 1 fully-native port is still incredible from a gameplay standpoint, and contains a few surprises even for those very familiar with the game. It's worth it to pay for ad-free. (and it also works on the new Apple TV too, but I recommend having a MFi controller if you want to play it like that)
Yes, if you write performance sensitive code you have to be very careful with dictionaries. See for example this nice talk by Chandler Carruth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHNmRkzxHWs
Copying behaviour without divining intent can lead to problems such as 'cargo-culting'.

Imagine observing a man shaking his leg, first one then the other, then his whole body convulses and twitches - is he dancing ?

Absent the knowledge that a wasp has flown up his trousers leg.

Copying without comprehension may lead to getting stung !

Inverse Reinforcement Learning [1] to reverse engineer goals will be needed especially for embodied AI in Partially Observed Enviroments, i.e. the real world (as opposed to simulations).

Berkeley's CS294-112 [2] Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics provides good coverage of methods of mirroring, DAGGer, Deep-Q, iLQR, and IRL.

[1] https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~pabbeel/cs287-fa12/slides/...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkFD6_40KJIwTmSbCv9OV...
Lot's of embedded vendors have plenty of GPL violations - Linksys and Ubiquity for instance in the case of grsecurity it was appearently Wind River. Apparently even no source code even if you purchased a device.
HyperApp: https://itunes.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1179750280?mt=8

Hyper.app: https://hyper.is/

hyperapp: https://github.com/hyperapp/hyperapp
There is way more mockery targeted at men who like my little pony then on women who like boy shows.

People tend to look down on men who do feminine anything.