skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Bad analogy if you consider reality of Zika vaccine:

"Army is planning to grant exclusive rights to this potentially groundbreaking medicine–along with as much as $173 million in funding from the Department of Health and Human Services—to the French pharmaceutical corporation Sanofi Pasteur. "

https://www.thenation.com/article/the-government-created-thi...
Latest IPv6 Measurements Show Growth in Vietnam
How often do those kinds of attacks occur? I'm actually curious. From my research it's more common that DDoS are intersubnet rather than intra. If this is the case, why not make Comcast prevent spoofing within its own network? They're at a good place to know legit IPs.

If I'm correct, we're going to need this sooner rather than later. As IoT gets rolled out (had to remove my new AC from the WiFi since it was just easier to let the install hook it up than explaining why it's a bad idea), we need to have someone be accountable for security. IoT manufactures should be on the hook, but so to the network admins.
The second paragraph said he sent texts. Texts can be verified.
I completely agree with you and its still the best cross platform general purpose GUI library.
I think there is some interesting middle ground where you could use machine learning to go from 'show only relevant ads' to 'show only ads you might actually click on with greater than .001 probability'. I guess this is like 'extreme' outlier detection but it'd be interesting to see what revenue the ads at the 'long tail' of likelihood generate anyway. My guess the bulk of it is from the standard high CPC stuff like Mortages and Insurance. Google says it does this but i'm not too sure - I've never intentionally clicked an adword and yet they're still shown to me.

Anyway this may solve the tragedy of the commons situation we're in now and allow us to move away from the technology war of ad blockers, ad blocker blockers, ad blocker blocker blockers, etc.

edit: removed comment on clarity of Gsuite vs Free due to downvote brigade.
Love the article! But wow this site hurts my eyes. Yellow and red font on a black background aligned very far right?
Interesting, in Ireland we don't have the red and white pedestrian sign, but we do have the likes of this[0] red and white taxi sign signifying a taxi rank (implicitly disallowing parking for non-taxis).

For "no pedestrians", we have what to my eyes much more sensible: the same sign as the Italian one but with a strike through it [1]

[0]http://st2.depositphotos.com/7458252/11066/i/950/depositphot...

[1]http://www.gettyimages.es/detail/foto/no-pedestrians-in-irel...
In this case it's more of a "he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said".
Can you expand on this? I'm willing to grant that it is true in practice, but it is not at all clear to me that a benevolent, lawful dictatorship impossible in theory.
This was everyones first thought, I'd trust.
> Did people actually think ACA was sustainable or anything but a payout to insurance companies as it was passed?

Well, they thought it was the former (in part because of the ways in which it was the latter; a sustainable public service not provided directly by government typically involves payment from the government to the service providers.)

Much of the collapse and withdrawal is due to payments they were mandated under the ACA not being funded by Congress (resulting in a giant stack of lawsuits and at least one $200 million+ judgement against the government in favor of an unpaid insurer), with the deliberate intent of causing a collapse of just the kind that is occurring. (And the recent acceleration is that exacerbated by additional uncertainty deliberately injected by the Trump Administration with the intent of producing exactly that result.)
Agreed. Just run this in the console for a little better experience.

document.getElementsByClassName("left")[0].style.right = "55%";
document.getElementsByClassName("articles")[0].style.width = "50%";
Minecraft started as an indie game, so this statement is not quite correct.
I am well aware of the French revolution and its causes, thank you. As I said, Guillotin did not invent the machine. He did not like death penalty, but if it had to be done, he would rather have had it done by a machine than by axe or sword (for the nobility) which occasionally did not kill in one hit, or by hanging (for the ordinary populace).

The actual inventor of the guillotine is one Antoine Louis [1].

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine_Louis
Yes, I know. I’ve deployed them, and they crash. While following your full instructions. Because tzdata isn’t writable.
I think that's deliberate.
Are texts really an example of "sexual assault?" My understanding was that sexual assault had to be physical, though I may (probably) be wrong.

EDIT: Thanks for the clarification, all. As many have pointed out, there's also the harassment portion. I guess my question is now: how do you prove intent? I know nothing about due process, so I'm curious. I suppose in this case it really matters what it says in the texts.
Yes exactly, fraudsters exploiting your service to have as many email as they need to create very many accounts on Winterest.

If you have 1 single email account per service that is fine.

I think you should call out these two aspects on your site, to show that you're increasing privacy for users, but also protecting services from being abused exploiting nbox. It should reduce the likelihood to be blacklisted.
Project Jengo: Explaining Challenges to Patent Validity
This article seems to indicate that multiple journalists were investigating these allegations, but couldn't go to press without sources:

https://www.axios.com/pro-rata-2446752020.html

One journalist got six sources, three on the record, and claims to have verified parts of the stories (such as reviewing message history on phones), which led him to have the confidence to go to press.
I feel like people who work on startups and indie games have a slightly more sensible form of a gambling addiction.

Even if you don't make any money, you still get a lot of joy from your first few players and sales, and just creating something useful or fun. You also get a lot of experience and knowledge that you can put to use on other projects, or even employment opportunities.

Sure, your game might flop (and mine probably will), but I learned a lot and had a lot of fun. I think it was worthwhile. I just spent the last 3 months developing a mobile game [1]. I tell people that I did it to learn React Native, but it's actually because I wanted it to be successful and make some money. So far I've earned ~$20 from ads, and ~$50 from the in-app purchase to remove ads. It's not much, but I think it could be a promising start.

I do agree with the article though; my next app is not going to be a game.

[1] https://sudoblock.com
Seems pretty clear to me. GSuite never had email scanning.

>Alphabet Inc.’s Google Cloud sells a package of office software, called G Suite, that competes with market leader Microsoft Corp. Paying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the free version of the program, but some business customers were confused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said Diane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud. “What we’re going to do is make it unambiguous,” she said.
Hah, I wish. Still working on some of the basics.
The slow, secret death of the six-string electric guitar
We thought about doing that but were scared of the repercussions from the school. We felt like it was much easier to argue for notification than for automatic sign-up. Luckily, we didn't get in any trouble, so we didn't have to argue it anyway.
One of the girls interviewed on Startup Podcast mentioned that a VC propositioned her; like these girls she was Asian. I wonder if this guy is the same alleged pervert?
Trump's Lies
"That's money being pulled out of the economy through taxes."

That money goes straight back into the economy.
Per Diane Greene's post, this has always been the case for GSuite and now consumer Gmail will catch up:

"Consumer Gmail content will not be used or scanned for any ads personalization after this change"

https://blog.google/products/gmail/g-suite-gains-traction-in...
"Consumer Gmail content will not be used or scanned for any ads personalization after this change."

Original post: https://blog.google/products/gmail/g-suite-gains-traction-in...

Disclaimer: I work for Google, but not on this.
Remarkable that Vue.js (Single dev) is holding up well against React. I was recommending Vue.js to others while react was the craze. It somehow felt more cleaner to me and the performance, if I am not wrong was on par or better than React.
This is why I'm very much interested in Guix and GuixSD, which use Guile Scheme. Unfortunately I don't think they have an officially-supported story for running on the server, yet, or an equivalent to NixOps.
50% Off Uber Rides in South Africa
It's time to upgrade to TLS 1.3 already, says CDN engineer
I tend to write JavaScript that looks a bit like Nix... but in general, the imperative constructs aren't suitable to the lazy evaluation strategy of Nix.
A dictatorship could conceivably alter the law such that whatever he/she does is not illegal, possibly even chinging the laws as he/she goes. If you're a dictator, changing the law need not be a long and difficult process.

I'll grant that in practice it is very difficult to have rule of law without democracy. It is interesting to think about as a "gedankenexperiment" though. :)
I'm not sure I understand rejecting a library because it allows two-way binding. If two-way binding doesn't work for some control, nothing is stopping you from falling back to one-way binding.
I'm new to these kind of frameworks. I have been hacking away some small apps. Do you mind explaining why two-way data-binding is a "bad" thing?
Almost certainly a transcription error, since "giro" is fairly close to the pronunciation of gouraud.
You're right these systems are currently flawed, and may remained flawed. But, the same is true for all systems.

Don't get me wrong I agree in theory that every company should not retain any customer information - I work for one of a few companies that does that, but, I also know that many company's will not make that switch (example a bank, or a medical record) and in such cases that data should be as secure as possible.

To counter the irresponsible promises you are talking about it'd be ideal to see compliance and security regulation like we see with HIPPA applied to all customer data, but until we evolve proper trust-less identification models and ways for users to self-secure and trustlessly validate their information then some businesses will always collect data.
> RF dead chambers are bloody expensive for a reason: you can't emulate them by pasting some paint on a wall.

Couldn't you just stick yourself in a metal box (with a metal door that is careful to get a good seal)?
> Paying Gmail users never received the email-scanning ads like the free version of the program, but some business customers were confused by the distinction and its privacy implications, said Diane Greene, Google’s senior vice president of cloud.

Google doesn't read e-mails from GSuite. So the change is to stop reading from Gmail's free accounts.
In what way? The number given isn't true? Or Clooney barely has a stake in it?
2) He was not talking about total recites. And the top tax rates are a very different story: https://www.cch.com/WBOT2013/029IncomeTaxRates.asp

PS: IMO, a ~1 to 2% AMT on all wealth per year would be incredibly beneficial. But, there is currently about zero chances of that ever happening.
Is Complexity Bad?
> I dont see the reason we are sympathetic to chickens alone here

If you want to try to fix animal cruelty in the whole world, you're boiling the ocean. I don't think its far fetched to say that Americans should fix stuff at home (chickens, pigs, cows...) before we try to fix the world (unless its your life mission or something).

I personally have never been to Asia, so I don't see the dog meat thing as "my battle". I don't think we need to make people feel guilty for problems on the other side of the planet when there are plenty of local problems.
All of his victims are Asian in this case.
The problem is that nobody has really come up with a reliable way to figure out in advance what people want to play. Even the professional game development companies with perhaps the best track record of delivering consistent hits like Blizzard haven't hit on a reliable formula to figure out what's going to be successful before they invest a ton of resources into building it.

Not saying you shouldn't bother with market research but when some of the biggest hits have resulted from people just building what they want to play and when big companies with a string of previous successes had done their market research and still released something that bombs I think it's fair to say there's no simple formula to producing a hit.
It's an ad for Twilio, of course Twilio is needed for that.
Interesting, I wonder if the reticle limit is smaller on EUV litho machines, that would explain their smaller maximum die size compared to 193i immersion steppers.
That's not very accurate. It's more like:

Your accountant prepares your tax return for free. They also have a lot of boxes of flyers provided to them by people who want to sell things. After preparing your tax return, they use their knowledge of your return to choose which flyer to put into the envelope. They then send that envelope back to you, and when you open it to read your tax return, there's a flyer for something else paperclipped to the front with a note saying "Thought you might find this interesting."

(In particular, the accountant is only one who sees the information in your tax return.)
Eclipse Che 5.12 Released
I really don't get how separating templates is a good thing. Been there, done that. Not going back. Not going back to separate CSS either. Because having everything together is great. Not to mention using JS for render logic. That's great too. It's what I always wanted. People kept pushing "best practices" on me—like not using the style attribute, separating templates—and I am so grateful for the people at Facebook for ending that.

Like most articles about Vue.js—and I keep looking because I keep wanting to understand the appeal—there's never a clear explanation regarding why separating templates and not using JS for render logic is good. Maybe it's a matter of taste. For me, having everything about a component in one place is very convenient and simplifies abstraction and composability.

Maybe I just need to try Vue.js to understand the draw. That was true for me with React. But React was a totally new paradigm for me. Vue.js seems like a combination of several familiar paradigms in a way that doesn't really make sense having gone React.
Full Stack React Native Development Using Graphcool and Apollo
The quality of Atom extensions is good, so that's clearly not true.

Also, you are going nuts with the scare quotes. I don't even see what point you are trying to make with those.
Depends. Is that drone providing me with some other useful service, or is it following me around entirely without my knowledge or consent?

Gmail provides me with a free email service. They already have the full text of all my emails. If they want to use that data to help decide what ads to serve me, I have no problem with that so long as that data isn't shared with anyone else without my consent.
I have implemented a while ago an Android version (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en-gb&id=com.o...).

By far, the most interesting part is automatically generating the levels by difficulty. In my implementation, I first generate a full puzzle and then start removing pieces one by one, as long as the part just removed can be logically deduced. The only difference between easy/medium/hard is the amount of work performed in the logical deduction: one step for easy, two steps for medium and three for hard.
> Your profile IS your personal identity, and can be associated trivially.

I'm hardly new to his stuff and to say it's trivial is nonsense. Most people make it trivial but it's not trivial to associate identities of people who put basic effort into obscuring them.

Merely disconnecting your primary profiles from your online activity is enough to throw most mass-surveillance/drag-net stuff off, aka 99.9% of advertising firms and most government programs.

If you're an activist or someone interested in keeping your internet activity private then the bar is far higher (and the targets of which are ever expanding as governments and private organizations get better at this stuff). FBI agents, or likewise in your country of residence, have plenty of forensic tools at their disposal to connect disparate identities. It takes some real time investment and requires being super careful to evade these measures. But I'm not talking about that here. I mean the average person in 2017.

I've personally done the total anonymity stuff as an experiment so I know what that takes.

Having studied many documents from the various global national security organizations and being fortunate to have dated a defense attorney in the past who engaged with police surveillance reports on a daily basis for their work I'm convinced that even basic privacy measures such as never using your real identity when using internet services, creating full legitimate sounding backstories (and subsequent online profiles) for your fake identity, and changing the ID you use often enough will throw off most basic surveillance measures.

I'm not doing anything to get people really invested in uncovering my online identities, as most people aren't, which is what I'm talking about.

The simple fact is the vast, vast majority of people reuse the same username (and passwords) across the internet and use their real name and emails everywhere. So it's really not hard to track people online from an LEO or 4chan doxxing perspective.

But I'm not convinced you have to be isolated from the utility of most online (cloud) services. You just have to invest in using them intelligently to not associate your actual identity with the services.

Ad companies aren't interested in deanonymizing people anyway. They are looking for low hanging fruit and there are more than enough people to fill databases who fit this profile. So I'm not that concerned about those who don't.
No one seems to know what percentage of the company the founders including Clooney had. Wonder what stake he held. With The Honest Company, Jessica Alba's stake is said to be around 15% last I remember.
They're only using EUV for a, couple of layers. Intel is using SADP (or SAQP), that should be able to hold its own.
>A private company owned by the very people who apparently did the breach. Dmitri Alperovitc is Russian and owns Crowdstrike, the company that did the 'investigation'.

All Russians are not members of the Russian government...

>Going by what we see of the FBI they absolutely reek of incompetence, paying $1 million to unlock an iPhone is another example!

I mean, sure if you phrase it like that. Actually understanding the circumstances around that (completely unrelated to what we're talking about) situation would show that it wasn't really that simple.
The texts are trivially verifiable proof of harassment, AFAIK, there is no trivially verifiable proof for the assault.
Dave Baggett wrote a couple of nice text adventures for the TADS system before he worked on Crash back in the early 1990s, I remember enjoying both "Unnkulian Unventure II: The Secret of Acme" and "The Legend Lives!" (Unnkulian episode 5)... and I also remember some fun conversations on natural language text parsing with him back on rec.arts.int-fiction in the same time period.
Legal definition of assault is not what you'd think it is, and I'd assume sexual assault legally is the same thing, just in a sexual manner.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/assault

edit: For reference the actual physical acts are battery in the legal sense.
There's also harassment, which can be textual.
The buyer wouldn't receive the nonce until they received the physical item, at which time they could claim they did not receive it.
I embraced Vue after making multiple attempts to digest the React platform with little success. I have found that Vue's templating system and APIs have brought so much clarity to the complex projects that I set out to build, and would highly recommend it to anyone. It is my hope that React may learn from some of Vue's triumphs.
Unless you were doing external vulnerability assessment, that granularity was a false sense of security. Rolling back sometimes re-introduced old bugs.
I am not like everyone else and is not dying to get in to the US as you can see that I moved to Canada. I am a highly skilled worker and was working for some of the top technology companies in the US. I should have been given preference for my Green Card. But I was queued up and backlogged to 9 years because of the country of my birth. That is not how skilled immigration should work.

The immigration system of Canada is called Express Entry and gives importance to skills than luck (H1B lottery). That's why I called US immigration system broken. I should have been specific that its the H1B system that is broken. Edited my comment for the same.
Thanks, I fixed it with something close to this.
Vue is really interesting, but feels like it's retreading some of the missteps of frameworks past.

I worked with knockout extensively on an inherited codebase a few years ago and my overriding opinion was that 2 way binding sacrifices everything for convenience.
Not in and unto themselves, but they certainly establish a pattern and lend more credence to the actual charges being brought.

They help move the needle from simply "He said; she said."
I initiated the adoption of Vue.js in our agency about a year ago and we never had to regret it.
One positive aspect that I didn't expect is that the architecture of Vuejs apps kind of forces you to write cleaner code: methods, states, mutations, every piece has its own place.
OP here, thanks for taking the time to look at this. Quite agree that it is light on features and is a minimal implementation of what we would like to build. It's something that we thought would be useful, that we would use ourselves and wanted to get some early feedback to see if the idea has traction.
https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/single-file-components.html
There's something to be said about staying as close to the "intended" way of doing things as possible with libraries.

Yeah, you might be able to stick with one way binding, but anything that interacts with vue will most likely expect 2 way binding, as well as most learning resources. Updates and improvements will be made with 2 way binding in mind, and you won't have nearly as many "coded with vue in mind" tools or libraries to use.

It's possible, and it might actually work out just fine. But in my experience going "against the grain" with libraries only leads to pain.
Hm, why was the headline changed for my post?