skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my field (theoretical CS), I have never heard about a journal refusing papers from authors that have declined to review for the journal. In fact I would consider this extremely shady: journals shouldn't handle papers differently depending on the identity of the authors, no matter the reason.
"Hi Dropbox support! You get $1m USD if you figure this out."
This has left me scratching my head - why just 2006 ? Having just one year of publications and labeling them "Classic Papers" is pretty misleading as the term is used to indicate a wide gamut of publications over a much longer period of time. It should be just called "Top papers or research from 2006". Unless this expands to at least cover a decade, it shouldn't be labeled as such.

This almost sounds like collecting my most liked pics from 2006 on Facebook and creating an album "Best moments of my life".

Do they not have data before 2006 ?
I agree, this is painful. I understand they might not want to maintain 32bit versions of all their libraries (uikit etc), but there are many many useful apps (for example, hardware specific configuration utilities) that aren't being updated. It would be wonderful if 32bit support was available, perhaps as an optional download. Even hiding 32bit apps in the appstore for users who haven't already "purchased" these apps is OK, but it wouldn't hurt non-32bit-users if 32bit support for existing purchases was still available. But for users with important 32bit legacy applications, having the apps run at all is more important than any type of performance and disk space loss caused by having duplicate 32bit and 64bit sets of libraries. Even if 32bit UIKit doesn't get updated with new iOS11 features like drag&drop.

Apparently, macOS 10.13 will also be the last macOS to run 32bit x86 mac apps "without compromise". While unfortunate, that's not too bad since you can always run a VM with an older version of macOS for those kinds of apps, something that is impossible on iOS.
One of the things about blockchain is that it has a history, that history makes it to some extent atomic.

This means it can be used to turn digital assets which are normally considered infinite in that it can be copied and pasted, into scarce resources.

One example could be a 2nd hand ebook market where books could actually increase in value because it's been owned by this and this person.
Yes you can - if you're new its a remarkably painless way to get started, at least compared to the pain you would otherwise endure :-)
As someone building a business off of VR in the browser, I think we should always have a fallback. The systems we use for building the web--whatever they may be--should do more to encourage accessibility, rather than leave it as an "exercise for the reader", aka "afterthought". Users of these systems have a legal responsibility to make their site accessible. As framework developers, I think that we must share that responsibility, at some level.
He was interviewed in the embassy by Swedish prosecutors[1][2][3][4].

1 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/julian-assange-poli...

2 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ecuador-sweden-assange-idU...

3 http://www.smh.com.au/world/swedish-prosecutor-ingrid-isgren...

4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_...
No, US law only work in USA. If you buy any virtual item/service from me in EU via internet, I don't care about US law, I only care about EU law and international treaties.
They will release more.
The title is a bit misleading though enticing ... IMO, it is not an even a dead horse ...
There's so much room for error I can't wait to see how this will turnout.
Which is why all Objective-C language features introduced since Swift were to make interop between the languages easier, and also why some Swift design decisions were to make it easier to seamlessly use the Objective-C's runtime.
I thought the 'double payment' refers to people paying for the research through the tax system, and then paying again to look at the resulting paper?
So... that was a weird way to spend 30 minutes
I'm not sure why I was downvoted but I clearly stated that "I'm not certain".

The reason I had this idea is: If you are in finance and accepting US customers you'll need to oblige to US laws. It'd be better if an experienced person clear this more.
My version 1 tesla does rain detection
I was thinking of Red Dead Redemption, same feature!
Elon's Mars ideas has been a real hot topic on HN recently, and generally on average the most upvoted comments seem to be those deriding his ambitions. I think that's fair. They seem quite bonkers at times. Most of the reasons being that it's "ridiculous", "pointless", "a waste of money", "impossible", and so on and so on. Essentially the overriding HN opinion _seems_ to be that something that sounds for the most part irrational, should never be attempted until we have first completed every single possible "rational" incremental step beforehand, so that eventually we've learnt enough to make the initially irrational idea more plausible and therefore rational. For example, on HN i've seen such steps being "colonising the Sahara Desert", "then colonising the moon" , and so on.

I really disagree with this view as a whole. It's unsustainable and in the end unproductive. It seems ridiculous to say, and maybe a touch over-zealous I admit, but we as humans could still be simple hunter-gatherers like tens of thousands of year ago, if it wasn't for that one guy who everybody laughed at for mixing mud and water and burning it with fire - which initially seems absolutely bonkers - but actually makes clay.

At the end of this ramble is maybe a little sense. Robert Zubrin and similar people love to bash the ISS and the Space Shuttle as complete failures. After all, it _appears_ that they are a step back from the "good old Apollo days", and in some respects that is probably true. But if we didn't try new things, try things that initially seem to have little benefit, then we'd go nowhere, or at least excel much slower.

They called JFK mad for asking the US to go from never having sent a man above a few ten thousand feet to over 1.2 billion feet to the moon in under a decade.

I think we need a fair balance of rationalism and irrationalism (or at least "optimistic ambition") in technology, since sometimes the best things in life come from a witches-brew of the two. We keep the ambition irrational, the math and science rational, as my Professor always said.
Technology wasn't always so centralized and vertically integrated though. Companies that made trucks still had to sell them to someone, they didn't just run a national logistics company themselves, and yet when we get self-driving tech, some car companies are definitely looking at operating their own fleets.
We didn't move to the USA to take funding.

Both founders still live in Australia. Roughly half our global staff are Australian.

These days with local VC funds you can get funding much easier than when we started. That said, for later rounds (>150m+ valuation, tens of millions of dollars in), you are likely to get a better deal from the USA firms.

Scott, founder Atlassian
Any nearby business? I thought lost property was to be turned into the police station​. Otherwise the owner could call the cops on the business employees "I was never at Dunkin Donuts yesterday."
Awful, awful website for mobile. I was redirected three times before I reached the article page, which itself popped and reloaded a few times before I could read anything. Then three separate modal windows pestering me to subscribe or log in or sign up to the newsletter stopped me because they wouldn't close.

How have we fucked up the mobile web experience so much?
Many people also create multiple accounts for various purposes like joke accounts/throwaway accounts/etc.
Also, please put the number of games in each category. Or if there are new games in the category this week or since your last visit?
The unauthorized release of the Film has caused our clients to suffer ongoing irreparable harm, and exponentially increasing damages every time a new viewer sees the Film.

Somebody will be very rich, very fast.

Yeah, I know I'm fighting a lost battle. But that's the most ridiculous abuse I have seen in a while.
Pavel Durov is the guy who started vk.com which stores passwords in plain text: https://thehackernews.com/2016/06/vk-com-data-breach.html
He has no clue about security. Whatever he claims, I would never use Telegram.
> Also the fact that in the long term colonization may help with overpopulation on Earth.

the population growth rate in developed countries tends to 0 as sanitary conditions and child survival rates increase, it's even negative in some countries, actually. Do you really think it would be easier to develop industrial nations in a barren wasteland than on earth?
It seems to indeed be more that China is up and coming, while the US is declining. Remember how the US used to be friendly to immigrants and prided itself on its diversity? Well, now everyone's already there, everyone speaks English and there hasn't been an internal war in a while. It's like it grew fat and is now hibernating on that.

Just a wild guess, but like many people have said in this discussion: I find it pleasant to go to China, but I have to be paid to go to the US.

Hopefully the US will sort itself out and people can be happy visitors again, and not simply go there because it's normal to do so.
What does Instagram for Learning even mean? If someone puts up short instructional videos on Instagram, isn't that Instagram for learning?
`-O` is already used. `curl -O <URL>` is roughly equivalent to `wget <URL>`.
This is partly why we should be more open to non traditional educations. I don't see why someone needs an entire four year degree to be able to contribute to these kinds of engineering problems. There are certainly "university level" subjects that need to be covered, but that could easily be taken as needed. Or in a more condensed form.
You are free to pave the way.

But pretending that compiler developers are currently just ignoring the issue out of mischief and preference for performance above anything else is disingenous. If the problem were so simple, we'd probably already have a dozen free static analyzers that do a good job, and you'd be happy to use them.

The thing is, "detecting" UB in the sense you imply is usually not what happens in the context of said optimizations (that's not to say they won't attempt to do it... ever seen a compiler warn you about use of uninitialized variable?).

What compilers do is they assume the program is correct. And following that assumption, they perform an optimization that is only correct for correct programs. That is in fact very simple to do. They do not try to prove or disprove that program actually invokes UB there -- that is impossible in general, and even in the subset of cases where it is possible it could require deep whole-program (including libraries!) analysis that could take massive computational resources.

Many people here keep trivializing the problem but I don't think they understand the problem at any depth.

And that is why I say you should pave the way, not in a smug "fuck off get off my lawn fix your own problem" sense, but to get people to honestly gain some background in program analysis, read research papers, study existing analyzers, and gain some appreciation for what it takes. It is far, far from trivial. Especially if you can't just take the language and change it to your liking (breaking nearly all existing code) until all the hard stuff is out.

And in saying that, I suggest that it is easier to start with a new language (or, at least some existing language other than C) that was designed from ground up with such analysis & correctness provability in mind.
If you are unsure it's always better to ask a question instead of stating something, probably people will not downvote you then.

European commission directive from around 2013 states that place of sale is in the origin country of the seller which means it's bound to origin country law which means it's bound to EU law.
POP Peeper Pro 4.4.2 Crack Plus Serial
In the UK, /r/CasualUK is quite chill
I'm not putting words in your mouth. Direct quotes: "No offense, but you sound like a person who hasn't been outdoors a lot, not even on an overnight hike." and "That should hopefully rid you of the naivete and hubris about space frontierism."
that is amazing offer from Tesla as hardward+software upgrade as a package. I also love the design of "call to action" buttons for buying 2 new car models.
Can someone rephrase the conclusion and results? I read through it multiple times but can't figure out if a higher T/S ratio is a good thing or not.
No doubt that there are "better" tools, still you can't put the blame on Excel.
You can choose to put it on either the sloppyness/lazyness of not having checked (double checked) data and formulas or to the decision to use Excel (possibly due the ignorance of the existence of other "better" tools).
I remember how I was googling deeply for the most cited papers / science articles of all time and didn't find anything.

I naively thought that it is a simple thing and someone have that "collection of best articles".

Things are going to more like "this is hard problem"
Assuming you don't intend on doing business in the US in some other capacity. Which is why banks get fussy with US citizens: They at the very least want access to USD, and often directly operate in the US, so they can't just ignore US reporting requirements.
Historically this is a reversal. In the U.K. after WWII a lot of the people who had worked in aircraft engineering moved to working in Motorsport. This is usually given as one of the main reasons for the concentration of F1 teams in the U.K.
In many other industries, yes. In law, not as much as you'd think.

Big law firms aren't really looking for efficiency. They charge for every 10th minute that they're doing something. If they have more work than they can handle, they'll hire more associates at lockstep salaries based on their "year" - or contract attorneys at less than half that if they only need some spare capacity to do rote tasks. Their labor costs are known and very stable, and with the sheer number of underemployed lawyers out there, it's going to stay that way.
No matter what, they're billing those associates or contract attorneys at far more than they're paying them. And the kicker is, the culture of "prestige" in the industry will basically prevent the largest firms from ever marketing that they'll do the same work in fewer hours. They don't pitch on a lower bill than their competitors, they pitch on expertise in a given area of law and a favorable track record of outcomes from similarly sized/situated clients. And because of that, few GCs want to take a chance on a firm doing things differently.

I'm not saying there isn't a place for Atrium - I'm not saying it's a hard sell to be negative. I really want them to succeed. It's just more likely to be in the small and mids where their clients do apply more pricing pressure, and maybe eventually in the larger firms if it really catches on. I think there's also an in-house play, because in-house counsel is often stretched pretty thin and needs better tooling to manage internal workloads and its supervision of outside counsel.
No, trench warfare predated Bismarck, although it didn't peak until after he died. Vicksburg and Petersburg are good examples from the U.S. Civil War.
I personally would see this as a disaster.

I want the old language warts and all. I want to learn how words were expressed in a historical context. That teaches me more than just the words themselves, that transports you to their time.

I did a search in the Google Groups about 'modernization' and you get quotes like this coming up [0] (about William Wollaston's "The Religion of Nature Delineated"):

> I've got a first draft ready, after about a month's steady work. I could use some proofreading help, in three areas in particular:

> 1. general typos (the use of the long-s in particular I'm sure has led to several)

> 2. suggestions for improved use of commas. They did this weirdly in the 18th century, and I think a new edition could do well by bringing the practice up to date, but it isn't my strong suit

... and in reply ...

> then it sounds like we'll have to do some significant spelling modernization

So they've moved from just 'tasteful' to 'significant'.

I don't see how you can draw a line for this kind of thing. But I guess I don't know very much about the painful process up digitising old books.

[0]: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/standardebooks/etzVBgBo1VE...
> In particular, and I quote from the C99 rationale

Maybe you should read the C11 principles instead, and I quote:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2021.htm

"12. Trust the programmer, as a goal, is outdated in respect to the security and safety programming communities. While it should not be totally disregarded as a facet of the spirit of C, the C11 version of the C Standard should take into account that programmers need the ability to check their work."
You don't have to make a big decision right away, but those are certainly signals that the decision may be made for you in the next few months if you are unlucky.

I'd certainly start the usual job-hunting process: updating my CV, mentioning to friends that I may be open to a new position, breaking out the ol' whiteboard for algorithm interview practice, going to meetups etc.

Also, prepare yourself for being laid-off, financially and mentally. It sucks, but it's the reality of startup life.

Don't worry about questioning the founders - it's their job to be upbeat and optimistic to get the best result for their startup, but it's your responsibility to look after your career. But that doesn't necessarily mean giving up the day job - hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
I'm getting really tired of the "website sucks on mobile" comments.

Yes, a lot of sites are not optimized for mobile devices. That doesn't mean I want to read a rant about it on every 3rd article.
Currently 1337, which seems appropriate
Who hack something for 3 000 €?
We need a hacker to pass out the security of several french mobile apps just to have the e mails of every subscribers of those apps. (Almost 6 millions of e-mail adresses)

List:
Mobile app Auchan + Auchan drive
Mobile app E.Leclerc + E.Leclerc drive
Mobile app Intermarche
Mobile app Carrefour
Mobile app Liddl
Mobile app Cora

Who's Skilled enough to do that ? Who is ready for that ?
We want something to prove the authenticity of the documents.

If you done that, contact me at izohra@msn.com and send me those documents.

The first one to done the job earn 3 000 € !! ULTRA SERIOUS PROPOSITION !!
That's a logical fallacy.

People have dreamed about a LOT of things. Probably 99.999% turned out to be bunk. Only a small amount could be turned into something real.
> From the list of JS libraries they're using alone, I'm guessing it's going to get even fatter and laggier than it already was :(

Why? Only 3 of the 'JS libraries' listed are actual run-time code (React, Redux, Immutable). And React + Immutable are typically paired together specifically for speed optimisation reasons.

> I just want a listview of requests that appears in under a second

I think calling it a listview is a little unfair, and clearly there has to be tool/library cohesion with the rest of the Firefox devtools too, which are also much more than the odd listview.
This:

var x = DoubleIt<NumInt, int>(Int32.MaxValue); // 20

Performs exactly the same as this:

var a = Int32.MaxValue;
var b = Int32.MaxValue;
var c = a + b;

DoubleIt calls NumInt.Add which invokes the same code, why wouldn't it work in exactly the same way?
In the biomedical fields, many articles have to be deposited on PubMed Central, which requires them to be reformatted in their archival JATS XML format. Since articles are typically written in Word in those fields, this process involves a lot of manual tagging of references and figures and such, only partially aided by scripts. The process must incur a fairly hefty cost in maintaining warehouses full of people to do the tagging.

In principle it's great that articles are uniformly in XML -- you could easily write reader software for tablets or phones, data-mine the text, extract references, whatever -- but I haven't seen much software taking advantage of it.
I think Mars offers us a chance to short-circuit some of that.

Fights over land? We'd be opening up an entire Earth's worth of surface area.

Fights over resources? See above.

Fights over oil? None.

Fights over arbitrarily-drawn national boundaries drawn by collapsing colonialist empires? None.

It's remarkably pessimistic to argue that colonizing a new planet after two centuries of experience with industrialization, democracy, environmentalism, ex-colonialism, etc. under our belt wouldn't be at least slightly better than the situations we find ourselves in on Earth.
> Do you really think it would be easier to develop industrial nations in a barren wasteland than on earth?

Did I say anything about that?
Hair tips for women
The company is not profitable. Compensation is based on raising money. The financials are not in "good shape".You say they haven't received their next raise so consequently you either. If that concerns you, you should seek employment elsewhere.
They do terrific long-form reporting.

My guess is that he'll become an Amazon employee like Tony Hsieh did and continue to run the business. At least until he finds something else he wants to do more than that.

He'll get a windfall from the sale of course. And he'll probably start a charitable foundation, or perhaps join another one (like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) and only keep his current $100mm to live on. Which is "enough" for most purposes.

I've stopped by the new 365 store in Cedar Park (a suburb north of Austin) and I find that it's less intimidating than the mothership at Lamar & 6th. I hope the concept does well.
I wonder? If Jupiter has the power to move the Sun, then other planets should be affected to. From this and the fact planet orbits are still said elliptical, I infer that other planets actually also orbit the Jupiter-Sun barycenter. Correct?
Right. If someone is going to make that argument, they should be expected to at least explain why something won't scale up.
If reddit founders and investors make bank out of content generated for free, the content creators will get pissed off there's nothing for them. And they'll move on.

YouTube is the only one I see who is really trying to make it work. Instagram worked it out by placed ads for the most popular models.

And a key sin of all these sites is they think the content is theirs. It's not. Stop trying to regulate it to be what you want. It is what it is and you should be thankful, very thankful, they chose your site to host it. But this doesn't seem the case. The reddit admins in particular seems to hate a large part of their content-creating user base.
I'll ask again. Do you have any evidence to back up your claims? You are arguing by assertion. Where is the evidence your assertions are correct?
I don't think anyone thought that Amazon would rebrand the stores. I think what you wrote is the obvious thing to most observers.
You don't lose anything by starting to look at alternatives. You don't have to do that full time either. But if you're uncertain about the future, while still holding a paying job, this is the perfect time to refresh the CV, request old references, subscribe to some job ad feeds.

You can easily send an application a week or two to places you find really interesting without the "need money for food" feeling.
What a terrible waste. Especially in Kazakhstan that money could have had some serious positive impact if spent wisely.
Start with highways - they are grade separated, there are no pedestrians, no traffic lights, no intersections (besides merging), driving is often long and boring.
i'm pretty sure most if not all the evidence is against you, seeing as the small news outlets are all dying and the large (non-tv based) news outlets are struggling to monetize.