skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My point is that anyone can use an adblocker or Squid proxy filtering to block GoogleAnalytics, but if the site uses jquery from a Google CDN to render content, that cannot be blocked without making the site unusable. It's even worse if the Google CDN request is made with https, because then a redirection needs to be made inside the browser.
Aside from what you wear, consider a tailor. It's a reasonably low cost, and a shirt tailored to fit you makes a huge difference in appearance.
Ask HN: Tech giants and investment into Blockchain technology
I did a little digging and to the best of my knowledge, only IBM and Microsoft among the tech giants are providing blockchain services and conducting research into it. The other giants(Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple) aren't doing same. What could be the reason?
Mobile environment, IMO, is hyper focused towards the software content consumer rather than software content creators. While what you say is certainly possible to an extent, a person attempting this will be much more hobbled than someone with a cheap laptop, access to constant electricity and an internet connection. This situation can be remedied if the dev environment owning companies in question - Google, Apple and Microsoft - make a substantial attempt to make the mobile environment conducive for software development.

But I honestly don't know why they would do this because the incentives aren't extremely strong here. The vast majority of developer population across the world already has access to the tools mentioned earlier. If you are talking about the populations of the developing world who don't have access, then the companies in question would rightly ask what is the incentive for the effort required to target these populations when it's unclear how many of them would want to participate in this sort of activity.

That said I'd love to see mobile devices with environments as configurable as desktop linux, while giving you full control over the hardware, including even the radio reciever (if not the transmitter).
This is hacker news so take it all with a grain of salt but I found that buying clothes that fit, and just buying and trying a lot of stuff to see what worked over a few years led to a massive improvement. I think if you just follow a guide that tells you specific things you will feel weird and get stuck. I'm not saying you should ignore the "rules". I just mean you have to put in some effort and try a lot of stuff. Imitating people you think look cool is an easy way to start and will get you half way there
Are nuclear waste that toxic for that long?

The longer lived an element is, the less radioactive it is, so if some radioactive waste can last for 100000 years, it must be radiating very weakly. You probably could have a barrel of it under your bed and live your life normally, although with a slightly increased risk of cancer.

And finding ways of preventing future generation from digging is thinking little of humanity. That's assuming we won't be able to detect radiation in the future. In fact, this "waste" may prove very valuable.
The mutations might be random but not every mutation is fit to survive any given environment. As such only "the fittest bacteria"* with "the best mutations"* survive in the end. So it's not as random as it might appear, it's actually quite focused.

for that given environment

That's why antibiotics should generally be used as conservatively ass possible because overkilling bacteria does nothing but accelerate the evolution of the few surviving into "super bacteria" that much faster by giving them a harsh environment they can adapt to.
the primary purpose of a gun is to deter possible aggressors from starting trouble with you.

the ultima ratio is to actually use the gun. for 99% of threats, showing it off is good enough.
Don't overdo the Reddit male fashion advice
Google exec quoted in the article said that Seattle ‘is going to be basically Google Cloud’. It means that most of the engineering behind Google Cloud (not Google itself) will be there, implying the concentration I mentioned.
I would say the more appropriate razor for this one would be Occam's.
If You Can’t Find an Angel Investor, Look Again, Here
...and changes the native scroll behavior iOS (which is much slower). Google has no respect for the native behavior
The highest point in the Netherlands and Denmark is respectively 1060 and 560 feet, but yeah 200 feet would be terrible.
Buy nicer jeans and designer hoodies.
HTML Imports are the best web component
This just in: "women in male-dominated fields are not more likely to switch fields compared to their female peers in other fields"

From "Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-016-0583-4
Out of curiosity, what are some examples? You can also submit feedback directly in the results, which the DDG team uses to improve their algorithms.
Uh huh. Have you studied the genocides of the 20th century? How does a disarmed and helpless populace look in those circumstances?

And since you think the government should be trusted to mete out all force, I'm certain you'll have no trouble handing the government all your passwords and keys, right? Maybe mail them a copy of your car keys and house keys too, since they're so trustworthy?

You trust them to protect your physical safety, to protect your life, if you're willing to hand over your right to self protection. Surely you then trust them with your data and property?
Sounds like hashing used in network protocols for things like LACP
Prozac Nation Is Now the United States of Xanax
The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors
It depends on what you do with that blob; if you use it to request some required encrypted content, for example, users won't be able to do much about that.
One should also consider the possibility that if we fall back to the point where we can't reason about radioactivity cholera and dysentery will likely bounce back to the leading causes of human death.
These sentences capture my takeaway from this article.

Every man is the sum total of his reactions to experience. As your experiences differ and multiply, you become a different man, and hence your perspective changes.

So it would seem foolish, would it not, to adjust our lives to the demands of a goal we see from a different angle every day?

...to put our faith in tangible goals would seem to be, at best, unwise. So we do not strive to be firemen, we do not strive to be bankers, nor policemen, nor doctors. WE STRIVE TO BE OURSELVES.

I don't mean that we can't BE firemen, bankers, or doctors—but that we must make the goal conform to the individual, rather than make the individual conform to the goal.

...beware of looking for goals: look for a way of life. Decide how you want to live and then see what you can do to make a living WITHIN that way of life.

In doing this... he avoids frustrating his potential (choosing a path which puts no limit on his self-development), and he avoids the terror of seeing his goal wilt or lose its charm as he draws closer to it

Summary: rather than fixating on specific goals, find a way of life that maximizes your potential for self-development and lets you be your most authentic self.
Apple Is Trying to Make iMessages More Private
Why it is there I understand.

But using a UI element to switch between two states that only shows one of those, exchanges the option it shows at the same place and is normally used to indicate on/off states is a bad choice.

It would make semi sense if left was "white", right was "orange" and switching the toggle to each side chooses what it says on that side.
I've used a handgun to signal for help, to find lost people in the woods in Alaska, to hunt, to scare away bears, and for fun. And on a few occasions, I've been very glad to have a handgun with me stateside, because I came quite close to needing to use it to protect myself. Fortunately I was able to negotiate those situations without using force.

Are you a pacifist, incidentally? Can you really think of no valid reason why a citizen might need to wound or kill someone?
If they leave the company, their access might be left running for a while in case they're asked to come back on and fix something during that post handover period.

Or maybe they had backups running under their account and when their account was disabled everything failed so they re-enabled it while they sorted out the mess...

Or they had multiple accounts as part of "security" and HR only knows to disable one and didn't find the other one in time.

There's a whole bunch of reasons why shit like this goes wrong. Every time. You'd cry.
Kangaroo Twelve Implementation in Go
Russia Has Buried Nuclear Bombs on the Coast of America
I've often suspected that early people ate a lot of bugs, and we don't know because it doesn't leave a lot of evidence.

Without domestication or preservation/storage, hunting and foraging may take a while and be unreliable.
Why to use WSL(Windows Linux Subsystem) and How to use it for machine learning
The board can't force him out if he doesn't want to go, can it? (Due to his special shares) Can the company thrive with someone else running it? And will it be obvious enough for Travis to see this? (How do you fight all the local taxi commissions without a combative streak?)

I wonder if this will eventually cause companies to think twice about this type of governance.
the wiki reference talking about rafting photographers ([1] for convenience) using this is pretty cool - gives you a (somewhat sensationalized) sense of the the reliability of the pigeons.

[1] - http://origin.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_6209735
What if their information was all secretly being leaked to intelligence agencies and there was no way to ever let them know except to burn everything?

There's probably excuses and justifications. I personally wouldn't do it and they're probably wrong for doing it but I don't want to jump to conclusions and moral absolutes so easily.
5) tap to scroll to the top of page also doesn't work on the iPhone
A mention of the always-on culture of these times seemed appropriate. Easy access to information doesn't seem beneficial if said information is geared to attract clicks or foment fear. Or both.
Shameless self-promotion. I have a YouTube channel where I basically try to offer a path for learning exploitation.
I'm done covering all the basics, and we will soon move to more advanced stuff. I have videos on various different security topics, but here is the probably more relevant playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhixgUqwRTjxglIswKp9m...
You catch my thoughts here. I'm torn between "This is a great resource, we should pay for it" and "Does MIT really need any more money?"

This does seem to just be one aspect of their annual fundraising. Donors like to see their money go to specific targets, and this happens to be a feel-good one.
It's impossible to happen from offshoring because there are contracts in place to prevent it! (cheeky grin)
I've been waiting for a comment on why re-hosting verbatim copies of the original content by google is not considered copyright infringement? How come there seems to be no discussion on this at all?
This is a thought-provoking new framework, thank you! It's novel and easy to understand.

Having worked on sophisticated React apps, I've come to understand the benefits and shortcomings of its architecture.

One insight is that properly encapsulating UI components and their behaviors leads directly and naturally to nested state machines. React is cleanest if you have one state machine, or N independent global state machines, that drive your app. Once you start trying to compose state machines to make a sophisticated UI, you end up in setState/callback hell, and then you try the Redux/Elm model, in which states are composed to make bigger states. I think it's fruitful to experiment with ways of composing state machines in which you don't just glue the states together, but you let the machines interact. Of course you still want to keep your program easy to reason about and avoid spaghetti, but I'm sure there are interesting patterns lurking there.

Another issue is components in React aren't supposed to address each other. You can easily call methods on your children using refs, though this is discouraged and interacts badly with the update cycle and higher-order components. Components not talking directly to each other is a great feature right up until it's not, such as when you have to deal with focus and selection changes. You're forced to contemplate taking what you thought of as pure UI state -- local to a component and tied to that component's lifecycle -- and moving it outside of React into a store whose structure parallels the component tree (which in turn parallels the DOM), just so that you can traverse it in a reasonable fashion and update it synchronously while DOM updates remain asynchronous. In Cell.js, these three trees become one.
That quote may make sense in context, but dressing informally will certainly not prevent stupidity.
Microsoft cares about backwards compatibility above anything else.

Yes and no. If you're buying a managed service - like Azure HDinsight say - why do you care or even need to know what's under it? The volume buyers of CPUs now are the big cloud operators. If you're buying a tablet and consuming "apps", then why do you care about compatibility with old Windows desktop applications?
LSTMVis – Visual Analysis for Recurrent Neural Networks
>I find it shocking how many people who clamor for electronic freedom and an uninterfered-with internet are perfectly happy to cede their rights and independence in other areas to the government without so much as a grumble...

This is absolutely the most shocking thing I have come to notice recently, which just shows that these people have reasons spoon fed to them from somewhere, (knowingly or unknowingly) and have not really thought it through..

What I feel is that the while modern society feels not susceptible to the evils,oppressions and exploitations that were prevalent 100 years ago, while most people were poorly educated, this seems to be just a fallacy. And educated people can be manipulated just as easily by feeding them some kind of "reason" and selective "statistics" from certain "reputable" sources or authority.
The reproductive cycle for quasi-immortal beings is necessarily quite time consuming.
I spent a ~week in the Gili Islands in Indonesia. I sent (with little hope of ever making it) my mom a postcard. The mailbox was a neglected tiny wooden box that was overflowing with mail and exposed to the elements. I squished my postcard with the rest of the mail. Surprisingly, the postcard made it a year and a half later.
Burning waste is not uncommon in general: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration#Trends_in_inciner...

A modern incinerator is probably safer and less polluting than a simple garbage fire, though.
Fantastic machine learning in Swift
> others will be interested by what it was implemented with

Agreed but I think the point is regarding which "with". Let's say your hot-dog-not-hot-dog project leverages glibc, linux, json, LLVM, scipy, pandas, OpenCV. When you write a title to feature your project on HN or similar, should you pick "hot-dog-not-hot-dog in OpenCV" or "hot-dog-not-hot-dog using glibc"? Yes, it's true that you couldn't have gotten it done at all w/o a libc. But that's probably not what you should lead with.
Am I missing a reference?
Take this advice over anything. I'd rather work with a hoodie and jeans kid than someone who buys into 80% of the trends they get into over there.
Can't you whitelist the specific jQuery library on Google's CDN though?

Serving widely used libraries out of a CDN is a best practice for a reason. Most visitors will already have it in cache. What alternative are you supposing? Local hosting? That has drawbacks, including more cache misses and increased bandwidth costs for the website provider.
Agreed.

I think this thread can be summarized simply as: "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're completely different."

In theory, adhering to the CSV specification strictly is the Right Thing to Do. It's simple and makes it easy to confirm that the data you're parsing is correct.

But in practice, that all goes out the window. There are few things worse than running your CSV data through the standard parser and discovering that a smattering of fields contain stray quotes. And what do you get for that? The entire parser falls over and you can't do anything until you go in and fix the data. Or, if we're to believe other users in this thread, until someone goes and writes a specialty parser just for this task to fix the data.

In practice, CSV data is messy and therefore a strictly conforming parser tends to be incredibly annoying to use. IMHO, the authors of RFC 4180 failed to recognize this. As a result, most people just ignore it.
Start by showing how proxying is copyright infringement. Or even search results...
A lot of technological innovation does not necessarily make individual lives better, but it does allow more people to live.
When I was in college, there was this guy named Arman, that, at parties or bars and etc. would simply walk up to girls and would, after perhaps a moment of small talk, ask them straight away if they would like to sleep with him. I thought that was crazy but his explanation was that although true, it did not often work, but when it did, you had a sure thing. I think the Nigerian scam is based on the same principle Arman was using.
A friend of mine got absolutely amazing task from one company: write and publish on github extension to LLVM. It was some really simple language, nothing practical, but this whole task tests so much skills so my friend was really enjoyed doing it.
AMD included a number of Intel ISA components like SSE2 in AMD64, which was ok for them because AMD has a patent cross-license with Intel, but means it's still a patent minefield to implement it.
Do y'all have any way of tracking feature for custom images and machine types for GCP?

Cloud ML feels not nearly ready, and but being able to do something like this on GKE would be magical.
Makes a lot of sense, allows them to focus their truly limited resource (human labor) on the pre qualified targets.
In some parts of the world it's still common that the (broader) families arrange who marries whom. The results are typically better than you'd believe (it "worked" so often that the custom survived through the centuries).
Exodus Americanus

The War Room

American Renaissance

Radio Derb

Counter Current Radio

Radical Agenda
indeed,this experiment is to find out that, whether a mobile could be used for creating value also like programming skills resulting into direct or indirect employment.

certainly no incentive for biggies here because time spent creation in mobile means, time not spent consuming which is ulterior to their motive.
FreeBSD 11.1-Beta1 now available
If you encrypt something, isn't it because you're trying to hide child molestation and sexual exploitation footage?

"Think of the children" is one of the most powerful cards there is, and it will be played in full force by governments, only less elegantly than you just did.
Reminds me of John Boyd's call "To Be or To Do".

https://www.myosynthesis.com/john-boyd-to-be-or-to-do
- Dress to your body (not too tight or too loose).

This also goes to things like stripes. If you're chubby, don't wear horizontal stripes. If you're short, wear vertical stripes to elongate you. If you're short wear waist or butt length jackets not long trenches. If you're tall, don't wear things that would elongate your lines, like wearing the exact same color through your shoes and pants. Silhouette is the term you're going to want to looking for in discussions.

- Honestly, just go to https://www.reddit.com/r/malefashionadvice/ and go through the sidebar.

+1 at MFA, but take it as a getting started guide on fits, and then once you get fits down, explore your own style. Check their WAYWT threads for lots of pictures of fits. You want to have a versatile wardrobe, not one with a ton of clothes that you can only wear with one or two things. I'm a huge fan of /r/streetwear personally with a touch of the flavoring of MFA (like collared shirts, polos, non perfecto leather jackets) and a bit of Americana like flannels and boots.

Also SHOES! Shoes are super important. I'm a sneakerhead, but if you're into more officey/professional vibe, Allen Edmonds makes some terrific shoes. Broguing on a shoe is more informal than not, a good cap toe in black and brown will serve you for a very long time. For boots, the MFA recommended Wolverine 1000 Mile and Redwing Beckmans are fantastic and can be dressed up or down.
Caveat: I'm currently in the process of losing a lot of weight and really looking forward to hitting target weight and then getting a new wardrobe of good fitting stuff. It should be an adventure, and you don't need to do anything that other people tell you, but do take advice. That said, I dress like a sack of potatoes right now, so take this with a pinch of salt:

Lots of good advice here, and basically buying more expensive jeans and hoodies that fit you better is going to be a start. Dark/black jeans and a really good hoodie that fits you well is not a terrible idea. Pair it with great sneakers. Then, start to expand into other clothes if you want to.

I'd also suggest taking a look at https://www.reddit.com/r/malefashionadvice - particularly the advice linked in the sidebar starting with the "Step by step intro".

They will suggest: really think about your style and realise dressing well != dressing formally and vice versa; wear stuff that fits properly; buy one really, really good foundational item (like a really good pair of jeans), and build from there; colo[u]r matters; learn what clashes and what doesn't; try things and see if you like it or not.

To get to the next step from where you are, there is nothing wrong with sticking with hoodies and jeans, but you could consider chinos, semi-casual shirts, polo shirts, jumpers or sweatshirts. Try new things, figure out what you like and don't like.
A new hypothesis in medicine: give patients drugs they know don’t work
Then do we count all the military R&D to develop the weapon systems used or the infrastructure for deploying a military response.

I think a better measure would be total funds that wouldn't have been spent otherwise (had 9/11 not occurred), as a measure. So for the US the costs to cleanup/rebuild Ground Zero and the Pentagon + the cost of deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan and whatever we're spending on Syria now plus whatever other operations happened as a result. For AQ it would be the cost of the attacks plus costs of expanding into Iraq and whatever involvement they had in Afghanistan.

This is to say nothing of the human costs in all this which we can all agree are the real tragedy.
The whole point of Reuters news is to inform traders about things that will lead to more trades being done over the Reuters platform, so it's entirely likely Bloomberg operates the same model.
We do ignore these to make the point that growing meat doesn't solve world hunger, but growing plants does.
Government /= State
This sounds ridiculous. In the writer's own words, "As a mathematician who studied at Berkeley, Harvard and Princeton, I’ve known geniuses". Maybe that's what she means by "geniuses", but usually the word tends to mean "who studied at Berkeley, Harvard and Princeton".

In terms of IQ, I think mathematicians are averaging something like +2 SD (>= 130). They are certainly "geniuses" (or "gifted"). But they themselves don't think they are geniuses, because by that word they mean +4 SD (>= 160) people.
DEC RDB might have done it, if it was still available.
I'm largely a X, but I will now proceed to say something that is totally the opposite of what X stands for.

:)
I was just going to comment this, but I will upvote your comment instead. This drives me crazy
Nope. The argument was that law-violating gun owners kill children (and others) while law-violating encryption does not.