skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It depends. But one of the reasons I can think of is if it is an early stage startup or small company. They might be using co-working space like WeWork or only have a virtual office and couple of employees working remotely/from home.

In such case they want to appear bigger than they are and if you could google their address and find out it's a virtual office with 200 companies registered there you might decide to look for a bigger / more established company instead of going with them.

But even if your company's address is just a virtual office, you should list it visibly on your website in my opinion. It doesn't look good when you appear to be hiding it. There's nothing wrong with small business or new startup not having a proper office from beginning.
Working for me as well, quick too.
Do you have any plans on making a mobile app? Reminders are most useful on mobile only.
Don't you remember io.js?
>The suspects, who worked in direct marketing and outsourcing for Apple in China [...]

Uh, would they be given unrestricted access to user data? Or does every Apple employee have access to this data and are left to exercise restraint?

And what about Apples claim that data is encrypted at rest?
Isn't 8 the latest LTS release?
Let em come out of the woodwork.
You are right, but that is just the case of rivers, phreatic water and the deep subsoil.

It must be the State reclaiming ownership of those commons, making people that benefit from them pay for their maintenance.
eyyyup.
Haha. I just proved you right. Common lisp apparently has block comments.
Not sure if you mean to be negative here, but they are two very relevant questions to everyone in tech. I love his answer regarding immigration:

> Well, it’s really important—and it hits close to home for us. My co-founder Arash Ferdowsi’s parents immigrated here from Iran. If these policies were in effect back then, there would be no Dropbox.
The same could be said for a lot of releases but they do well here as people use this site for news on updates on tools they use. See recent very minor ReactOS and Sublime Text build posts, for example.
The people at the Olkiluoto construction site in Finland where they are building the first (and probably the last) EPR nuclear reactor do not seem so upset about the delays and cost overruns... More money for them.
I don't really see the issue. This is well withon the bounds of acceptable and coaching the key points in more passive language would just make it longer with very little upside.

I mean, in other communities it would be a good thing. But I'd prefer to keep that kind of tone-policing away from HN and focus on content.
That's not what they did.

What they did is pseudo-trade around stuff and gave multiple persons checks with tax that was never paid so people could get back tax that they never paid.

There is no moral wiggle-room if you try to get tax returns on tax you didn't pay. If you don't agree, pay me back the money I never gave you. Doesn't make sense at all.
This is always the argument that makes my friends and family call be paranoid in data privacy discussions: "Even if the company has good intentions when they collect your data, there's no telling who else might end up with access to it in the future."

Obviously this is bad overall, but at least now I can point to a specific example of this happening.
Like Linux, Chrome, Ubuntu and many other major projects, Node has moved to a time based release schedule, so all that a major version number bump indicates is the passage of time. It doesn't give a good indication of the change velocity.
Spare me, if Hillary Clinton had won "mathematicians" would be off jerking around doing something else.
All those technically harder routes are like 50 metres high. Sure there are 350 people that could theoretically manage this climb technical skill-wise, but I'm also 100% certain none of those 350 would be able to accomplish this incredible feat endurance-wise or mentally for four hours and 1000+ meters and absolutely 0 mistakes, while I'm also certain that if Honnold puts his mind to it he will be able to climb those technically harder routes.
> Reporters successfully obtained a trove of material on one colleague — including flight history, hotel checkouts and property holdings — in exchange for a payment of 700 yuan (US$100).

So it's not just email addresses / metadata from iCloud. This implies that 1) at least some iCloud data is stored unencrypted at rest, and 2) employees can query this data using internal tools.

This seems pretty bad.
why not just develop your own framework?
The article author couldn't determine from the police statement if the criminals had access to just chinese customer data or foreign customer data as well. If the criminals had access to foreign customer data as well that would a failing on Apple's part (and might result in some sanction in Europe for example which has been placing more emphasis on the privacy of its citizens' data with American companies after the reveals from Snowden)
Ever hear of Sia? That's a new decentralized option gunning for Amazon. Website is sia.tech.
Super hit new narendra Modi's songs
Yeah. I still managed to read the english part. Painfully and slowly, and only because the subject looked really interesting. If they just added a voice over and changed the format they would finally ensure that I wouldn't watch it, what seems to be the goal.
They plan to designate it such in October, but it isn't yet.
A social networking application that entertains you with amazing features
laptop, headphones, fast wifi, Visual Studio 2017, comfortable chair & sturdy desk. Will work anywhere with that criteria.
Going off of much later European experience, this depended on the type of traffic.

Despite the speed and cost/weight advantages of sea travel, the Habsburg Spanish empire maintained a land route between their possessions in Italy and the Netherlands [1]. Road travel had the advantage of reliability - more resistant to both natural disasters and to enemy action in war. This was very important for moving military forces through a large empire, which was a very important consideration for a polity like Rome which was constantly moving troops around to fight some revolt, war of expansion, or war of defense. There were also civilian applications - for small, expensive, non-time-sensitive cargoes.

In general, see [2] if you're interested in the transportation network of ancient time - see what combinations of weather, transport preferences (passenger carriage vs. donkey, for example, or safer daylight-only sailing vs. more efficient all-day sailing) push traffic onto coastal roads.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Road

[2] http://orbis.stanford.edu

EDIT: For example, let's take the example of travel from Aelia Capitolina (Jerusalem) to Tyrus (Tyre/Sur). For a military application (travelling at military march speeds (60km/day) but restricting yourself to daylight sailing for fear of shipwrecks) relative travel speeds depend on weather - roads are better in winter, sea in summer. If you add in transfer time and cost (finding or rendezvousing with ships, cross-loading cargo, hiring porters) then the relative transfer times and costs change yet again.

In general, roads were better for: shorter trips, where transfer times and costs dominate; trips involving faster means of land travel, such as military forced marches, passenger travel by carriage, or in the extreme message passing by horse relay; and trips where protection from weather and enemy action (pirate or military) was paramount. Whereas bulk cargo of relatively low value, such as the massive grain shipments from Egypt to Rome, was only practical by sea.
Truth is powerful. It is stronger than willpower.

Anger is not a primary emotion. It is a secondary emotion. It cannot exist without thought. This is fact.

Anger is a response to unmet expectations. You expect and feel you deserve some "state of the universe" whether it is success, recognition, remuneration, respect, or basic human treatment. You then do not receive that thing you expected and believed you deserved, had a right to, earned, or very much wanted. That mismatch is where anger comes from.

The first way to stop anger, is to stop it from growing. If you know where it comes from, then you can change your circumstances or your expectations. Your body is presumed to have overcome an invasive bacteria when it can stop the invader from net growth. The same thing works for anger.

Anger cannot remain unless you replenish it. If you do not feed it, it does not grow. Do not review the thing that "made you angry" over and over. There is an brain hijack where you get a short-term emotional high, and find it harder and harder to resist replenishing the anger. You can't tell yourself "don't think of pink elephant". Instead you can say think very hard of "a". Read "how to live on 24 hours a day" for a good guide on focus mind on single topic.

If you don't like living in a world that makes you angry, try to make it a world that does not make others angry. If even a small majority has this as their process, then you get to live in a world where others help you to be less angry, less unfulfilled, less disappointed. You might find that fulfilling.

After you have the mental and emotional roots resolved, then you can look elsewhere.

Also, stay away from prescribed hormones. They hack the wetware. They make your biology fight your mind, instead of being its servant.

Best of luck.

-EngrStudent
The key word here is “personally”. Personally, I can't read anything with dark background at all. It only takes a few seconds before everything starts swirling in front of my eyes, and when looking away from the screen everything around me starts to look weird. It takes several seconds for me to return to normal.

I've been told this can be caused by astigmatism (which I have), but I haven't spent much time researching it. When I come across a web site with dark background (thankfully quite rare) I use a Chrome plugin that can fix it, and it works reasonably well in most cases.
Designing for Wearables: 11 Things to Keep in Mind
You might be interested in searching for:

Richard Feynman - Names Don't Constitute Knowledge
&
Alan Watts: Bigger Wiggle

It seems those two have said something about which you are saying now: people by default try to understand by compartmentalizing ideas in little boxes. A lot of the time they don't even know what's in the box, they just know the name that's on it and what the stuff inside tends to look like.

That's just a shortcut we take to manage our limited resources.
Yet another problem of TLH is that you must have all your investments with Betterment to ensure you don't trigger the "wash sale" rule. (Alternatively, you can handle it yourself manually, but that negates most of the benefit of having Betterment from a TLH perspective.)
How Can an IT Infrastructure Service Provider Benefit Your Business?
Who's to say he would not have developed it in Iran or some other third country? Or is he saying the secret sauce is US + foreign talent and that that formula is atomic?

I would posit that that is false as there are many world class tech companies which did not begin in the US nor need the US to succeed.

To be clear, I'm glad they both successfully founded the company and that it contributes to the economy, but that's altogether a different topic.
Thanks for response. Main idea is - I want to check if people understand project when they open site or app from first glance.
Shipping was very much a commercial activity in the Roman Empire - you paid a ship owner for a spot. There were, however, pretty considerations pushing traffic to coastal roads - see my sibling comment.
I Only Regret That I Have But One Upvote to Give
Sure, I think this will probably just be reaffirming what you already interpreted the idea as but basically I think that the notion of humans being able to perceive self sacrifice in an abstract manner (as opposed to traditionally killing other humans as a means of sacrifice and whatnot) gave us the ability to perceive 'the future' in a sense.

An example would be the parents in poor family working very hard day in and day out to ensure that their children go to college and secure future prosperity. That's just one example but you can think of countless different scenarios where people sacrifice a bit of their present to capture an ambitious future - or to make that present sacrifice in the name of ambition and future success.

I actually heard all of this in a video but I can't for the life of me remember who said it, and it was put infinitely better than my explanation. If I remember I will let you know!
> there is some value in not releasing new stuff every week

No, there isn't. This flies in the face of everything we know about software quality. "Release early, release often". Rapid iteration. Continuous integration.

Smaller releases are easier to upgrade through. It creates a clear path through which to modify legacy code to come up to date with the latest version. Big bang releases create too many issues all at once that people tend to stick to the old version and then bitch about it for so long that even if you do make turn-key upgrading an option, they still won't do it coughPythoncough.
Oh, that's shit. The more I work on the django-viewflow, the more my old django-fsm became popular.
For most components, that's true. But trying to use Arch without systemd can be difficult.
The article talks about two different schemes: one is 100% illegal, the other one is abuse of a loophole. So there was clearly theft in the first case.

For the second case, I'd call that theft, too. But theft that involves corrupt lawmakers. When communists confiscate people property, it is theft, no matter what the communists put in their law.
States and local governments collect lots of revenue.

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

And for the point you are making, it would be sensible to pull out some spending as "other" (Social Security, maybe Medicare, some portion of defense spending).
As far as I can tell there is no wave of new libraries that would suggest such an occurrence. Perhaps you want to point out some evidence I've missed?

Finally, I'll note that your post is a mis-inference of the point of my own.
Whoever made the donation was clearly of an opinion that MIT, being a bunch of smart people can allocate the money better than the donor or other institutions.
I think its lazy to blame politicians for this. Its complex, highly complex, financial horse trading. Its a loophole exploited. Thats probably far more sophisticated than any politician can reasonably be expected to understand deeply, let alone see the bigger destructive picture. (not to mention lobbyists badgering and actively asking for legislation for "loopholes" like this)

A Financial regulator/watchdog is to blame. And of course, Quelle Suprise, lots of countries let the finance sector regulate themselves.

Which is silly, because there are no ethics involved with some of these people. Just profits, at any cost.
I had never seen this kind of yoda-speak before:

\unless \ifnum \X>100 \repeat
"Birds" is a taxon (Aves is the scientific name for it). In modern biology, all taxa are defined to be "monophyletic lineages" or "clades", which means that in principle they comprise one ancestral population and all descendants. No taxon would be defined nowadays as you define it since your definition does not necessarily identify a clade. A valid monophyletic taxon might be coincident with a set of organisms identified by a definition such as yours, however.

Edit: The Wikipedia article has a section on the definition of the relevant taxa: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird#Definition
And when you moved your PST file out of the DropBox folder it works fine?
Suddenly potential workings behind celebrity nude photo exposure scandals, the most recent one just a month/weeks back, becomes more clear. Of course, brute forcing, weak passwords, or phishing, may still have happened, but this sure sounds convenient and perhaps not even expensive for hackers sharing the cost. It also sounds troubling with government staff exposure and all.
the current system is 10x more complex than a ranked system since they don't vote directly for the president at the moment.
Caring about peoples privacy, and technological negligence that results in that privacy being impinged upon, are in fact the same issue.
I went back to manual labour for a week – Here’s what I learned
I mean 'private' in a very strict sense. I think this is important here, if we want to reach a meaningful distinction between 'public' and 'private.'

The free market and personal responsibility can very well drive prices down and maximise efficiency. But a CEO of a public traded company is operating with other people's money and he is strongly regulated by a government. Both factors that hinder the optimisation by the above mentioned forces.

'Private' would mean at least that every penny wasted is out of the personal pocket of the people doing the work; in a very direct sense.
What I am saying is that the theft discussion is defined by society and the laws of society. So you can't claim that Tax is theft.
Command line, git, github, atom, chrome console.
> I mean jesus, aren't many people on here some kind of intellectual elite?

Instead of debating based on facts and laws (codified morale and ethics) you expect the "intellectual elite" to debate mob style based on gut feelings?

> This kind of shit has to stop

Personally I agree. But some context:

* Germany holds federal elections later this year.

* The business practices where not secret. Not at all. They have been debated publicly for years.

* The business practices have been allowed to go on by the very same who now fake outrage.

* All but the most incompetent players will provide a "Rechtsgutachten" and thus walk free. A "Rechtsgutachten" in German law is basically the testimony of an expert witness [1] that you get before doing something. If later a judge deems your doing wrong, you pull that out and can rightfully claim that someone from the government who is supposed to know more than you told you "it's ok".

[1] in this case someone with actual judicial/legal powers like a judge or a high ranking IRS official
> Yes, the food wouldn't be as cheap

If you removed the trade barriers that prevent the developing countries from competing in agriculture, that would change rather quickly. They'd have a better shot at actually becoming "developed," too.
Limitations of DIY web scraping tools
Is this a follow up to injuring a woman in a wheelchair yesterday?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/woman-confined-whee...
So what, The board of Apple only care about their money.
I think a major point was missed: The reason for infrastructure projects is the meta effect called "jobs." There are no projects that don't take into consideration how many blue collar jobs get created/maintained. You look at all the road and bridge projects and everything else and those projects are rarely centered around need but rather "how many jobs are preserved or created." That's what Obama's "shovel ready projects" were about. A lot of jobs are a form of welfare doled out by government. Unlike the true welfare recipients, there are people who prefer to work because it gives them a sense of satisfaction but similar to out and out welfare queens, they are recipients of a further form of welfare which they do trade labor for. But, unlike the true private sector, those who oversee these workers make sure that some new project springs up each year to keep them employed. It's a weird system...
> user is incentivised to seek the most "premium" treatment

They can "seek" it, but in the public system you don't really have a route for doing that. You might want a CT scan, but if your doctor doesn't think you need it you're not going to get it.

Your list left off (4) queueing. In the UK public system, if your condition is not urgent you'll have to wait, possibly for months. Unless you have private top-up insurance which will cover the specialist you're waiting for.

(It's difficult to estimate how much money the NHS saves by people on queues for non-urgent operations dying from something unrelated in the meantime - e.g. dying of a heart attack while waiting a year for a hip replacement)
Where is it being sold? I wanna check if I or family members have been made.
So what, the board of Apple only care about their money
Takeaways from WWDC 2017 Keynotes – A developers perspective
Interesting, but (wiki):

> Their work, completed two centuries before the invention of calculus in Europe, provided what is now considered the first example of a power series (apart from geometric series).[2] However, they did not formulate a systematic theory of differentiation and integration, nor is there any direct evidence of their results being transmitted outside Kerala.
Anyone Can Be Creative
BTW, if you aren't familiar with the Nielsen Norman Group, it's worth visiting their other work. It includes Don Norman (jnd.org, Design of Everyday Things), Jacob Nielsen of Alertbox UX fame, and Tog (Bruce Tognazzini) who started the Human Interface Group at Apple and made many of the loved (and hated) interface choices in Apple products for years. A very impressive team they've assembled.
Semver projects could avoid the bitching about rapid version number churn by just adding a fourth number on the left. Moving from "v1.8.0.0" to "v1.8.1.0" or even "v1.9.0.0" and people wouldn't freak out so much. It means the exact same thing, but apparently all these folks didn't get the message that Semver is different from the arbitrary version numbers of the past.

Or better yet, just hide the version number completely. I'm sitting here, using Google Chrome in version... uhh, what is it? 59.0.3071.86! "OH MY GOD! How can there be 59 versions of Chrome?!" There aren't--or rather, there are a lot more versions of all other software than you are used to thinking--they just don't use your version numbering scheme and rightly hid it away so you wouldn't freak out about it. Firefox does the same thing now.
Google doesn't sell the information either. (You can buy ads, though.)
Apple does not allow your iOS iCloud data to be encrypted in a manner where Apple cannot access it. As is alluded to in this article.

Privacy advocates and privacy caring IT specialists have repeatedly asked Apple to offer such an option, but so far Apple has decided that regular people would turn such an option on, forget their password, then ask Apple for help and would be unhappy with their brand experience if Apple could not help them out.

If Apple would implement such an option where Apple could not access your data, shenanigans like the ones outlined in the article could not happen. It would also allow people who feel the state will misuse their info use iCloud for the first time.

There could be something good that comes out of this. These bad news could pressure Apple into finally offering an optional iCloud service where only you can see your data.

Answers to likely responses: "just use a different cloud service": on iOS, for cloud backups, there are no alternatives: it's iCloud or nothing.
You shouldn't've switched to node8 if you wanted a stable node: https://github.com/nodejs/LTS

In October node8 will be ready for LTS, & one can begin working out a migration plan from node6 (probably just an update, but impact)
In fairness I don't think this was necessary for the celebrity leaks. With a celebrity, with much of their lives being public knowledge I can imagine it was probably easy enough to guess their security questions.
Did you report that?
I see a lot of people defending Apple but I wonder how would they react if this was Microsoft.
Like when you go to google.com with a non-google browser.
Had the opportunity to listen to Drew speak recently. He seems like a great guy and very humble. Definitely rooting for them.