skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Warning: I'm a vendor. Take everything I say with a grain of salt. I will try to sell you something.

1 biased perspective I have here: Infra is often a different team from data science. They don't always do the deploying.
Beyond "some sort of serving thing" the data scientists might not necessarily know about what's being deployed.
This is not true at every organization and there are exceptions. This is typically true of most companies we sell to though. There are usually ML platform teams that do the "real" deployment (especially at sizable scale)

Another characteristic of production is it's "boring". "Production" is a mix of databases to track model accuracy over time, possibly microservices depending on how deployment is "done". Characteristic ways of giving feedback when a model is wrong, experiment tracking and model maintenance among other things.

A lot of these things are typically very specific to the company's infrastructure.

The "fun" and "sharable" part that people (especially ML people) is usually related to "what neural net did they use?"

The other thing to think about here: "production" isn't just "TF serving/CoreML and you're done" there's typically security concerns, different data sources,.. that are often involved as well that might be specific to a company's infrastructure. There also might be different deployment mechanisms for each potential model deployment: eg: mobile vs cloud.

Grain of salt sales pitch here: We usually see the "deployment" side of things where it's a completely different set of best practices that happen to overlap with data scientists experiments. This includes latency timing, persisting data pipelines as json, gpu resource management, kerberos auth for accessing data, managing databases and an associated schema for auditing a model in production (including data governance), connecting to an actual app/dashboard like the ELK stack,..

TLDR: The deployment model would be its own blog post.
If it isn't clear, this is the transcript of the first episode of a podcast called "Masters of Scale". https://mastersofscale.com/
Recently my dad entered his SIM PIN incorrectly three times and it locked him out. Turns out his mobile operator has an IVR service which hands out the PUK to any phone number you enter! No authentication whatsoever, just the phone number. How common is this?
I can't speak for whether or not Facebook is doing it, but the carrier of the number is usually a determining factor on whether or not an arbitrary line is allowed for registration.
Analyzing the attack landscape of the #DarkWeb. There is no honor among thieves
Understanding Git Conceptually
I actually disagree with your assessment.

You contend that the top sentence is valid English; I disagree with that. It subscribes to the "first order" rules (or an overly simplistic model), but isn't a sentence that an English speaker would use. Not being one that an English speaker would use makes it invalid English -- it's just a case where the first order approximation is wrong.

Similarly, if your syntax rules reject the second sentence, they're wrong -- since it's a sentence that English speakers can parse: the conclusion can only be that your syntax rules don't actually match the language you're trying to model.

I get the distinction that you're trying to point out with syntax/semantics, but you're ignoring my point: that divide is artificial and 'semantics' as you mean it is merely higher order syntax.

You haven't shown there's an inherent meaning to the difference (ie, that you haven't just drawn an arbitrary line in the sand), just that you can find examples that (naively) fall on different sides of it.
Not practical. You could capture everything, but who would go back and index it all well enough to make the video useful?

Or maybe you could come up with some sort of standard "this is what I'm doing and why" preamble that each engineer would give at the start of the session?
This is a very common oversimplification of how Brazilian society works that's popular among many who didn't really spend too much time studying Brazilian or American history.

The justification goes like this: Brazilian society was based on exploration of large farms and American society was based on settlement by Puritans and other immigrants. Since that's the main difference in the two countries formation it must play the main role about their outcomes.

This common folk explanation is used in some circles and probably took hold after WWII when Brazilian upper classes began to use the USA as a role model (before that, Europe, and especially France, was used more as a model than the USA[1]).

It generally ignores every nuance of the history of both countries. For example, people that make this comment in Brazil largely ignore that the USA had to deal with something like the Spoils System. They also largely ignore that the Southern USA had something very close to what they describe as an "exploration colonization." It was what formed the base of the wealth of the local elites[2].

There are many more differences and similarities between Brazil and the USA during their formation years and after their independence that can't be ignored.

One similarity that is not acknowledged is that both countries had debates about having a stronger central government or a weaker one.

In the USA, Alexander Hamilton argued strongly for this. In Brazil, Emperor Dom Pedro I tried to install a unitary state in the new country, only to fail under the pressure of the local elites that wanted more autonomy for themselves. The Additional Act of 1834 turned provincial autonomy into the law of the land. When the monarchy was overthrown, the new constitution gave even more powers to the local elites.

I generally think the leeway given to the elites during colonization, after the passage of the act of 1834 and especially during the first Republican government was way more of a problem than what system of colonization was adopted. This generally allowed local strongmen to run their region as some sort of quasi-warlords. It's where the whole thing we call "Coronelismo" in Brazil came from and something like it still dictates how politics is done in Brazil to this today.

[1]: You can read more about this in the book "The Seduction of Brazil."

[1]: More about this in the book "The Grandees of Government."
Wonder why a guy came in sick to the anti-labor publication that publishes vile bullshit like a Kevin Williamson piece shitting on the poor people he evicted from a home he inherited: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447292/underclass-char...

What a self-serving narrative that an employee must have come in when terminally ill because he "didn't want to die alone" instead of that he was falling in line with the calvinist dogshit work culture this publication helped to sustain. Fuck the national review, I hope Alex finally got some peace.
> iMessage has always been maximally private from day one. However a drawback to the current implementation is that new devices cannot sync message history.

No it hasn't and yes they can. I've done it several times. The ability to restore messages to a device is specifically what breaks the otherwise end-to-end encrypted iMessage architecture, which is why Federighi talking about the new iOS 11 capabilities is intriguing.

To your last point, my personal hypothesis is that Apple has designed a cryptosystem that uses a PKI with redundant key pairs to extend the redundant encryption. That shifts the recovery usability solution from redundant trusted devices to redundant keys that are written down.
I have a shaky understanding of "non-shared environment", I get the sense that it is based on the context of the study. e.g. If I do a study on genetically identical mice and control their sugar intake, "sugar intake" would be shared environment and something like "exposure to lead" would be non-shared. If I did the same study and controlled their exposure to lead, it would be "shared" in that case.

Is that an accurate understanding? Is "non-shared environment" basically the "everything else" category after genetics and shared environment have been controlled for?

Also,

> If clones in as exactly identical environments as researchers can create and perceive still wind up with such dramatic individual differences, how is science even possible on what causes the differences?

Another point in favor of simulation theory? :)
It would be interesting to see how much of this is truly biological and how much of it is due to societal and situational conditioning.

There were lots of things I could do in my 20s (e.g. refuse to use gasoline-powered city transportation, refuse to patronize places that used disposable cutlery, refuse to use non-free software, etc.) that I can't do when I'm in my 30s because people around me would think I'm a stubborn idiot, jeopardizing my career at a point where I have not yet established myself. It's very easy to tell a colleague, advisor, anyone at school that you're going to bike to the destination or take electric-powered transit [because you don't believe in a fossil fuel future]. It's very difficult to say the same thing to an investor, co-founder, employee, customer, or whoever is offering you a ride in their car, without feeling like an ass. I'm basically forced to be "normal" during work times and fit into the mould of society. I can only be myself on evenings and weekends.

I can only imagine how much more "being normal" I need to do if I had kids, pets, tenants, or whatever. I don't have any of those at the moment. The other night I was pondering over potential improvements to our music and mathematical notation systems while staring at the Milky Way. (I didn't come to anything conclusive, but I love thinking outside the boxes that society defines for us.)

10 years ago, I could truly be myself 24 hours a day. I was basically learning all kinds of things about the world by doing that. Now, I only get about 5 hours a day to be myself. The rest of the time, I need to conform. The lack of "me" time itself may be contribute to some degree of mental rot/aging, apart from the biological component.
Lyft's Open Platform for Autonomous Cars
How's that law thing doing vs prostitution? I ask 'cause encryption can also be a roll-your-own enterprise too, very much so: done on air-gapped computers at each end; and just use XOR and a common random (one-time) pad at each end. That's not very sophisticated - just perfectly secure. Maybe show you can successfully eliminate prostitution merely by passing laws first, and then impress me by unveiling laws that can do the same to prevent or open up any and all encryption.
Your outlook will change in your 50s for sure, things will get punishingly clearer then.
there was no point to be made. I wasn't saying that either platform is insecure. Just seems the link wasn't to show anything other than if you care about security, using the latest version of macos is prudent.
Trust WhatsApp? You must be joking. We can't see the source and it's owned by an advertising company.

I'd trust iMessage over WhatsApp any day of the week. The parent company doesn't make money by potentially knowing who I am and what I say.
We ban accounts that use HN primarily for political and ideological battle. Since that's how you've been using it, we've banned this account.

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&prefix=false&page=0&date...

We do this because, regardless of the politics and ideology you favor, it poisons the site for its intended use, which is the gratification of intellectual curiosity (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html). One is about flamewars and smiting enemies, the other is about thoughtful conversation. Can't do both at the same time.
My plan consists of waking up at 5 am and going to bed at 10 pm. If I work on it on the first 3h of my day, when I go to work I've already worked on my side project and there's nothing anyone can do about it :)
Reviews on Truthfinder – Legit or Not
Sense2Vec is a thing; Spacy has a demo https://demos.explosion.ai/sense2vec/?word=natural%20languag...

For many downstream tasks it doesn't seem to improve things though. NLP is hard - lots of things should work but don't because of the sparse training data. Like this slide deck says: most sentences occur only once.
I was in tumbling as a young child and involved in wrestling for many years after that. I've had numerous serious falls that have resulted in no injury (other than some bruising). While others that have had similar falls have had fractures.

I can definitely testify to the importance of making falling an instinctual response. When I had my most recent and only fall since being a fully grown man (30 years old, off an unsteady step ladder) I felt my body go completely limp right before my ribs smashed into the step ladder and my subsequent hitting of the ground. While falling I just knew I was going to be hurt, however I ended up only having the wind knocked out of me and a slight bit of bruising at my ribs.

I'd encourage healthy people to take up an activity that teaches them how to fall instinctually based on my own experiences.
Except that colloquially it seems to be used basically like ok, particularly with the roger that
Anyone here happen to know how hard it is to steal a Twilio number as compared to a number issued by eg T-Mobile or Verizon? Is the only way to do so, by accessing the Twilio account that controls the number (whether directly or by API)?
So, is modding only really possible in the Java edition?
> But, there is a level of social isolation here, and a lack of a sense of allies and someone who "has your back", even if at the same time someone else is trying to "take you out".

This nails it I think - which then creates a myriad of social issues that end up being a feedback loop. I do also strongly feel the US "suburban" style of living is a large driver of this. The more I travel and the more places I experience I've come to the conclusion that density matters. A lot.

Even small towns were dense walkable communities in many ways until recently. The forced day to day social interactions naturally built up social cohesion and trust - and those cannot be replaced by scheduled human engagement.

The lack of "community" in the US is quite concerning. There are many reasons, but being locked into various boxes (house, car, cube/office) through pretty much 100% of your day has to add up. The natural ebb and flow of a socially vibrant neighborhood just is nonexistent in I'd posit the extreme majority of the US.
I came here to use my fav browser, IE 3. You could add bookmarks and it supported CSS I believe.

:(
> 1) Ban SMS as a second factor for high risk targets like banks.

As others have pointed out, if it were just a second factor they would also need your password. SMS is being used for full account recovery, so as a single factor.

> 2) Telecom companies should require social security number

This is exactly what we should not be doing. I would like it to be harder to steal my identity than getting a 9-digit number, which can never be rotated, and which I am required to provide in plaintext to many different people in many different situations (renting an apartment, opening a credit card, etc.).

To make matters even worse, up to the first 5 digits of an SSN can be easily guessed if you know the person's age and birthplace, and the last 4 digits are used even more haphazardly than the entire number is (e.g. sometimes the last 4 are displayed in plaintext on a website while the first 5 are starred out).
I meant: "Mathematicians, with virtual certainty, tend to score very high on such tests".

This seems easily tested or refuted, and I'd be surprised if nobody has done it. However, I haven't figured out a good search query yet.
> Sourceforge fell from grace due to ads.

Not just ads. Bundling malware into installers of popular projects.
No. There is no way that would ever be an acceptable work environment.

If a company seriously tried it productivity would go to zero. You have invented a system that aligns the developer interest with gaming the system not shipping quality code.
I just use k.
Let's break this down for the benefit of anyone who hadn't noticed.

+ Right now it's 2017 [0].

+ 2017 > 1998 [1]. In fact it has been 6,944 or 6,945 days since June 7, 1998, depending on (i) your time zone and (ii) how you do your math. [2]

+ Moot facts are moot [3]

[0] http://www.time.gov

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater-than_sign

[2] http://www.howlongagogo.com/date/1998/june/7

[3] http://www.dictionary.com/browse/moot
Understanding Window Functions (2013)
Do you or Sir_Cmpwn have a small, real-world example of elegant XML namespace composition in the context of Wayland?

I didn't see XML namespaces used in the example given in the article, so I'm curious how Wayland leverages them.
If you think politics is not the realm of intellectual curiosity and that there's nothing political about this article you're a fucking sickening human being.
No, you need to delete the .git folder from your server entirely. Ideally, delete it before you deploy. In fact, don't even put a github deploy key on the server. Deploy binaries.

And don't just stop with .git: Delete any folder/file that's not required to operate the app in production.
You can just use the weights in a Go matrix. There's some code at https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/master/install/install_g... but it wouldn't surprise me if they have their own implementation.
So they got a court order against Microsoft to hand over a hotmail account simply because the account was copied on a mass reply-all chain about a rat in a barbecue grill where one other person on the chain was under investigation? That seems like massive governmental overreach. And Microsoft didn't even fight the order?
How would this be any different on self hosted platform
Google Code was the best when you wanted public Subversion with issues and wiki. IMO it was a thing that started dragging on Source Forge who then flailed. Once git started it's uptick GitHub became the leader. Classic S-Corp of adoption of new-shiny.

Book: Innovators Dilemma
Thanks for your response.

I completely agree with your points. I run two side projects (non-monetised) which keep me very entertained. I've attended security conventions (for which I take annual leave, and receive strict instructions never to let a client know) and overall I have a very optimistic attitude to what the industry is capable of.

These things absolutely get me through the day.
Yes. (They've added more and more abilities for custom maps into the base game, but these come nowhere close to what's possible by modding)
I can go back even further. While not useful as a full blown Mac -- i.e. A computer sold by Apple running Mac OS -- my parents still occasionally use my 2006 era Core Duo Mac Mini with 1.5 Gb of RAM. I put Windows 7 on it and they run Office and Chrome on it. It runs surprisingly well. The wifi is crap - 802.11g but it does have Gig-e Ethernet.
Thanks for your comment. I was appalled that the article didn't mention the implications of being prescribed benzodiazepines (both culturally, behaviorally, and physically). I wish in America these consequences were taken more seriously AND that people were more educated about it, but it almost seems like a long-running joke from the 50s -- "Oh, just take a valium! You'll be fine!" and etc. I really wonder how long until that is not socially acceptable...
Yes, but that's not realistic. I mean, I'm already doing pair work from time to time - I don't care if more people join in.

But I see big issues in practice: 1. I can't imagine anyone paying higher rate just because I'm streaming. 2. You can't avoid displaying secret credentials once in a while, which would be a security nightmare. 3. "This has the advantage that one can figure out what another person was thinking" is BS. You can look at my commit messages and documentation to find out what I wanted to show. You'll never know what I was thinking.
I've encountered that from multiple cultures: ending almost every sentence with "OK". I'm curious about the origin of it.
Have you actually tried to use the angelist job search as a new user?

All other job sites just let you do a search. Why not this?
It seems to me that before Prozac and such there was a more robust "depression" culture. People tried to make meaning out of their persistent sorrow and anxiety. Maybe that's for the better that that's somewhat of a relic of the past, but I would like to be convinced otherwise.
9 Questions: For Better Tech Vendor Selection
> I wish English had a word more neutral than OK or uh-huh. "I acknowledge what you said" is too clunky.

"Got it" works well for that, in almost any context. As long as you have enough context for it to come across the right way, "noted" can work too. Doesn't imply agreement, just acknowledgement.
It's really bad news when it's GitHub, as far as I'm concerned (Python...). Self-hosted GitLab or Phabricator is great news (GNOME,[1] Wikimedia[2]).

[1]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure...

[2]: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabrica...
I realized after posting that I was naive. LSTMs are practically word embedding combinators. Training LSTMs should solve the problem of combining words and interpreting them in context.
Icecream Slideshow Maker PRO 2.64 Crack with Serial Key Free Download [HERE]
Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsGf8cV4hqg
Can't upvote enough! Thanks Paragonie team
In 1902, Australia was the first country in the world to give women both the right to vote in federal elections and also the right to be elected to parliament on a national basis.
Ask HN: What's the best technical book that came out in the last decase
I've enjoyed reading classic CS books like Unix Network Programming, but if you ask me to name a seminal book that came out in the last decade or so, I'd draw a blank.

What are some good CS books that are relatively new yet offers high quality technical content, the sort that can rival the classics but shed light on recent research and developments in Computer Science?
As controls are not as tight as you know real medicine several have in fact died of homeopathic meds that contained far too much of the active ingredients
The techie is the new hipster – but what is tech culture even?
Jaguar Land Rover takes a stake in ride-share operator Lyft
I thought exactly that after reading the title and for some reason was only mildly surprised by it.
Brain Dead – Drop 6
That example is essentially building (and ostensibly training) an albeit a trivial model in Go. Typically you have more complicated architecture so you're deployment has two parts:

* the weights
* and the architecture
I wonder if that has anything to do with auto correct on phones changing "OK" to "Okay".
Great to hear thanks!
About the data. It depends on what you mean. If you mean that you can currently not change the data of a single bookmark that's true. However, if you mean that the data can not be corrected in general then not, but it is not very clear for incomplete data yet.
There are two possibilities. None technical people can simply click on the (!) in the top right corner of an entry to inform us about wrong or incomplete data. We will then fix it asap. More tech savvy people can use our "Data Selector" tool. If there is no data at all it will display a large button for it directly on the entry. If the data is incomplete it can be reached via "Plugins -> Data Selector" on the top of the page. It allows to easily define what kind of data should be extracted and how it can be found.
That tool is still in an early stage so would definitely love some feedback!
They make crazy amount of money from paid accounts and hosted option. They won't run out anytime soon.
I’m I using it for debugging barcode scanners talking to a web service. I much prefer the qt based UI. It’s much faster and obviously feels much more native to the platform
WSL doesn't support the graphics stack at all. But it is possible to VNC or RDP (with xrdp as a server) into an X11 session running inside WSL, so that's what people do.

You wrote below that Wayland supports RDP. If so, it sounds like that should work?