skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No this thread is a response to obvious and blatant grievance mongering about one anecdote.

If you don't want to be interrupted, keep talking. If the moderator is an ass, he's an ass.

If you expect to always be treated with respect by default, a) you're privileged and b) you're deluded. Those men probably learnt to assert themselves because if they didn't, they'd be invisible. The woman on the other hand learned that if she waits long enough, someone will stand up for her and everyone will applaud.

So the cycle continues, that those whose problems are automatically taken seriously by most are those who are the least self sufficient and the most coddled. Hacker culture and the internet doesn't apply this rule so much, most of all because physical attractiveness and charisma is usually out of the picture.

What's that line again, about how when you're used to privilege, equal treatment feels like oppression? Strange how nobody examines it in both directions.
There is clearly a difference between scraping and not scraping, or you wouldn't want to scrape a site.

Why _should_ scraping be your right, morally? Your convenience doesn't remove ownership of data.
Maybe you would like to address the substance of the comment, otherwise your only argument is "you are arguing and you shouldn't".
Investing in Bitcoin and Altcoins with Tone Vays
Net neutrality: Amazon among top internet firms planning day of action
You can read more about essay here http://parsonscollegemuseum.weebly.com/
1LpNNdapFg2sZ5Lxn8dHSr2pj6RcMDX8Zk
Are there any American printer makers not selling out their customers?
>No one will be able to compete with SpaceX once they achieve full reusablility with Block 5. Their costs to launch will go down by 90% (10x cost reduction): meaning that SpaceX can respond to any competitors' price reductions instantaneously ... while stacking huge amounts of cash, on fantastic margins, as everyone else tries to catch up.

How will a couple of blown rockets affect this plan?
I... what? The first Air was underpowered, throttled quickly, didn't even have a backlit keyboard, had a worse screen and was much more expensive than the base MBP. It slightly outmatched the MBP physically and in battery life, but it did not 'kick the shit out of the MBP by every other measure'.
Why Corporate Bonds Are Your Best Friends to Protect That Retirement Nest Egg
How Russian Propaganda Spread from a Parody Website to Fox News
You can implement an minimal ajax interface in js (no jquery) in less than 30 LOC. But I grasp what you mean, it not just that. There are other concerns and requirements and you do not want to reinvent the wheel everytime...
Honestly I'd just use the money to make my house more accessible for my kid. No lofty goals.

18euqMNBCh3ZPyMR5os3DZ4S9eaZSWLvym
For an app like that, I'd like to see a "approve every request" option. I don't always need my transit app requesting my position (even if only when in the foreground) when I really only need to look up the nearest stop occasionally.
> The goal of a traditional university is to enable financial security for students through high-quality employment enabled by a skill set provided by the university.

I believe universities traditionally aspired to loftier goals. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_education
Or the flagging is because these issues are trawled over here regularly and never really go anywhere, and people feel there are already better fora to discuss those issues?
313 U.S. 69 (1941)
>A State has power to govern the conduct of its citizens upon the high sea with respect to matters in which the State has a legitimate interest and where there is no conflict with Acts of Congress

Sounds like a fun Supreme Court case :)

Also, from the article:
>Like the Paris accord, the deals are all non-binding. They call for investments in low-carbon energy sources, cooperation on climate research and the commercialization of cleaner technologies.

Which doesn't sound like a Treaty (in the same way the Paris Accord was not a treaty as the US President unilaterally signed the agreement without consent of Congress)
D-Expressions: Lisp Power, Dylan Style (1999) [pdf]
Dan Carroll's (co-founder, CPO of Clever) reading list for founders
I have to say, it's quite fun to refresh every couple of minutes and downvote anyone who just gives their Bitcoin address without any reason...
My suggestion: give it to voat.co and support free speech and healthy lifestyles.
Think longer-term. Don't over-focus on the money. Unless you're already living independently, you're in a privileged position wherein your expenses -- while still annoying, I'm sure -- are far lower than they will be at any other point in your life. You can take advantage of that by adjusting your priorities. Rather than having a primary goal of earning money, your primary goals should be building up your expertise, your portfolio of work, and (especially) your passion -- (since passion can carry you farther than just about anything else in life).

So, first and foremost, look for projects/companies/organisations where the work is both maximally interesting and maximally personally challenging. There's a lot of living-on-the-edge startups and NGOs that can't pay very much, but wouldn't care about your age if you've got the skills they need. The monthly Hacker News "who's hiring" threads are littered with such companies. The best hire I ever made was via a "who's hiring" post -- I had a scrappy but exciting startup, and was thrilled to find an incredibly talented developer who wanted to work on it at way below market rate. Took me almost a year to find out that he was 19. Really didn't matter, given his competence. He's now accumulating a co-founder's worth of equity, so hopefully the investment will ultimately pay off for him.

Tl;dr, here's your sort algorithm, in order of priority:

1. They don't ask and/or care about your age. (You don't need that BS.)

2. Company/organisation/product is something you actually feel quite passionate about.

3. The role you'd be given is very challenging and would do a lot to develop your skills.

4. Last and least: salary.
Getsploit v0.2 with offline exploit search released Yay
An Early Look at C# 7.1: Part 1
What an absolutely baseless argument.
> There is nothing "hostile" about preventing individuals from breaking the law.

It all depends on how they do it. There are plenty of hostile things that are done in the name of law enforcement.
15CDdRiLiKbFnzmikmf9KFPK6eNXEoDned

Merci! :-)
Definitely and I think that trend will continue as the platform matures into something approaching feature parity with a desktop operating system.

Hopefully that won't actually happen. Apple and Google are putting a great deal of thought into the APIs and features they're implementing on iOS and Android with much consideration to factors such as battery use and performance.

That being said, the latest versions of Google's apps have really kneecapped the Nexus 4 which I've used as my daily driver since 2012. Sadly I might just have to upgrade.
I just did the same experiment and, coincidentally, also checked feedly, only to receive a totally blank page. However, a little digging revealed an intent on feedly's part to handle this case. They have a 'feedlyBlocked' element, with content, that is simply fixed to "opacity: 0"; obviously, without javascript enabled, they can't then dynamically display that content. Another approach required.

As an aside, it's very difficult to contact feedly directly, but they do have a uservoice account (https://feedly.uservoice.com).
> Let's not forget, she had the right to speak up and say "can I answer the question"... We all have the responsibility and option to guide things back on track if something isn't running smoothly. Don't just sit there waiting for balance to restore, or for the audience to come to rescue, do something about it.

Women who do this are very often shamed and called "pushy" or "aggressive" for doing so, even though a man doing it would garner no such complaint. The cultural position of "take charge and get what you want" being appropriate doesn't apply for women. The advice you're giving, frankly, is part of the problem.
> in this instance, if you watch the video, males were treated differently.

and in other instances women were treated differently.

so what?
what's the point?

do you wanna say that this instance represent the way women are generally treated when they talk?
Same for RFCs.

Let's search for "rfc 1855". The first item is indeed the original plain text source, unfortunately without links or anything:

- https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt

But the second hit is a third-party source, that doesn't provide much over the plain text version. It doesn't even contain the RFC contents directly. I can't imagine anyone seriously linked to that page, let alone that so many are doing it to push it to the second place:

- https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1855 ... wtf?!

Moreover, the RFC authors group itself, the IETF, already provides a beautiful HTML representation, with links and everything:

- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855

But you won't find that in the first 10 hits. Not even in the first 50 hits, for that matter. You will find it, however, if you click at the third item, which is the corresponding Wikipedia entry:

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etiquette_in_technology

The very first item in the "External links" section points to tools.ietf.org.

Given the prominent low-quality links to w3schools, rfc-editor and so on, I'm asking myself if Google is actively harming Mozilla and IETF. Maybe not harming, but being ignorant. These issues are known for years. If they want to be the best possible search engine, why don't they do anything about these widely known issues? I understand that they'd rather fix their algorithms than adding special rules for IETF, but then, they should have analyzed their algorithms how they can be tricked by low-quality sites. And fix that. Meanwhile, years have passed and nothing changed.

Maybe we should introduce a new search engine:

"Second-Order Wikipedia"

It would work like this:

1. Look up the search terms in Wikipedia articles

2. For each hit, show the Links of all articles' "External Links" sections.
Working at a startup as an employee with the expectation your gonna get rich is a fools game.

Negotiate for the best deal on options you can get (I.e quantity, terms like early excercise etc) but treat them as a lottery ticket.

A startup is a good way to learn rapidly so focus more on the quality of the people you will be working with, technologies used, what your role will be, vcs backing it etc.

In the long run the network and experience you build from doing this will probably have a greater impact on your networth. Especially if you yourself want to start a startup.
i just add mdn at the end of my query.
Hey Dan, it would be great if we could auto-kill all the comments here containing a wallet address.
Can't agree more with this assessment of Rose. I don't understand how he got or keeps his job.

I wish they'd give that position to Alec Baldwin. His work on "Here's the Thing" has proven him to be an adept interlocutor. While he also has a tendency to talk over his guests it's usually to help enlighten or at least to say something funny.
Yeah i prefer word for windows 3.11
kinda looks like you never talked in public with other people…
Characteristics of Good APIs
She certainly can, the question is why didn't she; the answer of course could show it had nothing (or everything) to do with her sex.
Same 10/10 score with Google's Project Fi which just resells T-Mobile, Sprint and US Cellular service.
Sorry, but if you are OK with the term "mansplaining" then you are OK with sexist behaviour.
Wonder Woman Introducing New Gadgets
There were four men on the stage who weren't talked over.
If you watch the rest of the video you will find the moderator imposes himself and cuts off the panellists and talks over them multiple times, seemingly regardless of gender. This makes me strongly inclined to believe that this incident had nothing to do with sexism, but rather with the annoyingly dominant and imposing personality of the moderator.

Maybe you think otherwise. Why would you say this incident is a "painfully frustrating reminder that women get talked over by men"? Surely you can't construe this incident to mean that when all panellists alike suffered the same treatment? What's your take?
RDBMS's have gone through the same journey. First it was hardcoded, now for many of them we can specify the codepage or UTF encoding and collation of a DB, some even offer it per table or column, and so on.

Filesystems should do the same.
Either pick one way and stick to it (expose it as UTF8, with a sensible normalization and collation) or offer several options that can be specified when creating a volume and do on the fly conversions for clients that need it.
Very interesting, and I would say "brave" article, to be submitted to HN!

Something I have often wondered and curious what the spacex's solution is to this

>But why? Why did countries like the ex-USSR which made them in tens of thousands prefer to use new engines than use ones they knew could be reused. Well.. it comes down to a cost and risk calculation. Rocket engines, even the most simplified and robust ones, are always one tiny defect away from blowing up. It is easier to be certain about the lack of tiny but fatal defects in a newly built engine than a refurbished one. Moreover the cost of a refurbished engine blowing up once in a while exceeds the cost of using freshly built engines. Also refurbishing and testing used engines can get almost as expensive as building new ones from scratch.

Also, no wonder this is getting downvoted considering how the article ends....

>My point is that SpaceX is bluffing and lying when it claims the ability to “disrupt” the space launch business or become the dominant global player in that sector. What is especially sad to see is the number of otherwise intelligent people who are willing to treat the press releases of that company as holy gospel. Then again the USA is full of self-delusional types who are confident of becoming multi-millionaires within the next decade. To summarize, the long-term (and even medium-term) business model of SpaceX is a confidence scam based on rosy and polished presentations combined with exhortations to positive thinking. And that is why I called it a quintessentially american fraud.
This list is too long and could benefit from curation. Most people don't need twenty competitive coding sites, just one or two good ones. Rankings and/or reviews of the resources would help.
Show HN: Binci containerized development workflows with Docker
Maybe you would care to watch the video more closely. You will find the moderator has the same attitude with every member of the panel.
There should be something as a fallback, though, surely? Take out all the functionality, by all means, but at least give me a map image. If you can't even get link-to-zoom working to display different images, just give me a map image based on my IP location; give me anything rather than nothing.
> I've never understood using income inequality as a measure of the health of a society.

Relative deprivation is empirically shown to be a significant source of disutility. Further, even if only absolute deprivation is held to be significant, aggregate statistics don't show you the degree to which that is present in a society without distributional measures. Either of these reasons, much less both together, make distributional measures important alongside aggregate measures.

> As Milton Friedman said, the only place where people are equal is in a prison and in the grave.

The “in a prison” part is obviously and flagrantly wrong, but even beyond that the observation is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. That some inequality will always exist in real societies does not mean degree of inequality is unimportant alongside other measures, just as the fact that some aggregate output will exist in real societies does not mean that the degree of aggregate output is unimportant.
I tend to be sympathetic to the original poster of the story, it sounds like the woman was treated differently, and an expert being talked over like that by a host is ridiculous. It does indeed sound like an example of sexism.

This probably marks me as an ignorant oppressor, but I do find this style of telling a story to be a bit confusing and off-putting though. Why all the references to "with my hands shaking" and "I'm feeling light headed" and so on?

I guess it's a personal story that she can tell however she likes, but this idea of having a violent physical reaction to a relatively straightforward conversational faux-pas seems to be the hallmark of a certain genre of story.
If someone "fucks up" with women but not men, even if not intentional, is that not sexism?
I can't speak for the general public, but as for the nerds (ok, specifically for me): probably because the new movie was not on par, either in style or philosophy, with the 1995 movie?
It's very likely both, and out of all the panelists she did seemingly have fewer chances to speak. So in this isolated case, a surface evaluation of some gender bias being involved isn't completely outrageous. It doesn't by any means indicate that he's a bad person.
That would be a valid reason to provide a JS alternative depending on context, not so much a valid argument for JS-free alternatives as standard.

There will always be something you can do to reduce power consumption: expecting (or advocating) JS-free versions of all websites for that reason is a completely arbitrary line to draw.
gaslighting in a nutshell
And why not?

There is a certain element of... shenaniganery going on here, perhaps.

Giving away "money"? Users claiming "good and charitable works"? Neither side with real "evidence" or "proof"...

So everyone must simply be taken at their word.
Then quit playing political games and secede. Until then, it's all for the show and to give a big fat finger to the current administration
That doesn't mean it doesn't bother her!
Yeah, I have to say I agree with this article for the most part.

For example, I've spent most of my time recently as a writer, and found that it's been almost impossible to tell what works will become popular and what won't. You can throw something out in minutes and have tons of people sharing it and liking it, or spend months researching a piece and find that no one gives a toss.

But (somewhat sadly), I'm not sure I'd agree with the article that:

> being prolific doesn’t give you an excuse to get sloppy and start blurting out half formed ideas – that’s just going to piss off everyone apart from your mum. Your work still needs to be the very best you can do.

Because somewhat unfortunately, that's exactly what search engines and social networks kind of want now. They want quick responses to breaking news and trends, not well thought out pieces that take all the facts and views into consideration.

Look at YouTube for example. Many popular channels there basically cash in on whatever the latest controversy or drama is, usually within about a day of it occurring. A lot of popular games and apps are ones that literally just cash in on a recent trend, quality be kind of damned (see that Mega Man Xover 'fan game' which showed you could copy Capcom's product by spending 5 minutes in Flash or various game mods and stuff which stick Donald Trump into existing games). And when news is concerned... well, the most successful papers and sites (as far as traffic is concerned) are those that rush out stories as quickly as possible. Someone who watched yesterday's Pokemon themed Nintendo Direct would get a lot more clicks if they capitalised on the typo that said it'd released for the Switch rather than if they waited for more facts before proceeding.

So being prolific definitely helps more than trying to be 'original' and focusing too much on any one piece. But I'd also say the setup on a lot of modern internet sites actually goes further and kind of advantages people who can just get stuff done quickly in general, quality be damned.
...which were pretty bad. So we can rule out this idea! :)
So is Formula 1 / NASCAR driving, deep sea diving and even innocuous things such as Sky Diving carries a lot of risk of death and injury which we casually ignore. Alex and other free soloist climb the rock multiple times charting the route, memorizing it, studying the environment and weather and then attempting the challenge. Alex had climbed El Capitan multiple times in the prep for going free solo until the time he can do the climb literally blindfolded. Folks sometime read these stories and assume he just walked to that rock for the first time and started climbing. That's not the case. Risks are there no doubt but it's no different than risking your life Base jumping or White Water rafting.
>"yay, X% means I get X% of the company!" and then I found out the shares can be diluted.

There seems to be a common misunderstanding about dilution.

Dilution is not really the issue. In fact, dilution is a positive sign. It means more investors value the company and want to buy into the ownership.

How do current owners who collectively own 100% of the shares "sell" more shares to future owners?!? By way of dilution. That means everybody gets diluted including the founders, the angels, the VCs, and yes the employees too.

More important than dilution is the shares multiplied by price.
Copyright doesn't cover factual content only the specific presentation of the content if it's distinctive/artistic enough.

In Europe we have IPR covering data though.
>I am not ok with sexist behaviour, which is why I use a term that is used to discriminate men.
The majority of criminals are good people who deserve no punishment. The majority of criminals who deserve punishment don't receive it. The law has grown to the point where perfectly moral and reasonable behavior is criminal. Automating a authoritarian system of enslavement is not a good thing when it has become so divorced from morals or ethics.

If anything, we need to slow down the justice system. Remove plea deals. For every charge to go before a jury. Force the DA to focus only on the bad crimes and let anyone with minor crimes off with no charges.
I guess you're not a man (or you don't define yourself as such)

I've been talked over by literally everybody, including my dogs and cats
you have to import the teams gpg key
Apple Announces Metal 2, External GPU Support, and Steam VR at WWDC 2017
announcing macOS High Sierra, Apple at WWDC 2017 revealed the new Metal 2 graphics API which the company claims will make code run 10x faster versus last-gen Metal.
WTF? You do realize most of the users on the internet don't even know what CSS/JS is and would be thoroughly displeased at being presented with a page with no styling. They don't appreciate that the rendering is done without JS/CSS. A properly built website is one that caters to most users, not developers or power users concerned about JS being enabled in 2017.
Vice Media Enters the Hyper-Competitive Meal-Kit Business
I'm leaning towards picking up an iPhone next, just to show some support for the solid pro-privacy stance Apple has taken in recent times. Uber isn't going to be happy with this at all, and that's a great thing.
Programming is mostly creating functions and interfaces to decompose problems into reusable parts where reuse makes sense. Nothing wrong with creating a simple function for making XMLHttpRequests or for fetch API. Most of the time there's no need for the level of generality of jQuery interfaces.

Just by making a function you're not creating a library. Sometimes I find DOM API verbose too. Nevertheless the fix does not need to be a interface like jQuery to completely hide DOM API under another interface. It may be enough to extend the HTMLElement prototype a bit or write a function to "compress" the code a bit and make it more readable.
Not mine. But it's hard to top "Hiding $10k in fake vaginas buried on the beach" for quick and dirty PR...

http://www.myviralsecrets.com/