skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Please see here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-s...

The gist of it is that no NATO members are in arrears for the contributions that are required to NATO. There is a NATO goal that member states should spend 2% of their GDP on their own defence each year. This is where some countries are not meeting that goal but the money certainly is not owed to the United States. Further it could be said that given that the US is home to many companies that make weapons this is a way for the US to get NATO members to spend money on US goods. (NATO members are unlikely to buy weapons systems from Russia or China).

So as I said there is a very real difference between the 2 systems and it is unfair to use them in conjunction with one another because the NATO one is a goal, a 'nice to have' if you will.
I await the release of Grand Theft Planet.
> It tries to undercut the ARM model of establishing how CPUs or other cores should work and how they should be valued.”

Companies are not going for ARM just to license professor ISA's. They also license and value the underlying efficient and high performance architecture ARM has developed.

What can happen with RISC-V is that there are several competing IP companies that develop competing RISC-V architectures and ask royalties and license fees for their IP. This competition can bring down the cost somewhat. If ARM royalty is 1.5% today, the cost may be 0.77% in the future. It's also possible that one company will dominate others with superior design, price and foundry connections. That company might be ARM, AMD or Intel.
Yeah, pretty much.

The point is it all comes as part of the framework though, so hopefully building for kubernetes will be consistent.

Also, whilst you could put wordpress in a pod (php, mysql) it's probably more typical to put nginx + php-fpm inside containers next to each other (a pod) rather than mysql. You'd probably run mysql as another service, at least that's how I typically do it.
If you look at "man git-commit-tree"

While parent object ids are provided on the command line, author and committer information is taken from the following environment variables, if set:

GIT_AUTHOR_NAME
GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL
GIT_AUTHOR_DATE
GIT_COMMITTER_NAME
GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL
GIT_COMMITTER_DATE

(nb "<", ">" and "\n"s are stripped)

In case (some of) these environment variables are not set, the information is taken from the configuration items user.name and user.email, or, if not present, the environment variable EMAIL, or, if that is
not set, system user name and the hostname used for outgoing mail (taken from /etc/mailname and falling back to the fully qualified hostname when that file does not exist).

A commit comment is read from stdin. If a changelog entry is not provided via "<" redirection, git commit-tree will just wait for one to be entered and terminated with ^D.

DATE FORMATS
The GIT_AUTHOR_DATE, GIT_COMMITTER_DATE environment variables support the following date formats:

Git internal format
It is <unix timestamp> <time zone offset>, where <unix timestamp> is the number of seconds since the UNIX epoch. <time zone offset> is a positive or negative offset from UTC. For example CET (which is
2 hours ahead UTC) is +0200.

RFC 2822
The standard email format as described by RFC 2822, for example Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:13:13 +0200.

ISO 8601
Time and date specified by the ISO 8601 standard, for example 2005-04-07T22:13:13. The parser accepts a space instead of the T character as well.

Note
In addition, the date part is accepted in the following formats: YYYY.MM.DD, MM/DD/YYYY and DD.MM.YYYY.

Edit see this repo and screenshot:

* https://github.com/yeukhon/demos/commits/master/git-date

* https://github.com/yeukhon/demos/blame/a9fc9dfe6d35c5ffe14af...

* https://github.com/yeukhon/demos/commits/a9fc9dfe6d35c5ffe14...

You see I got a 3 minute (using local time) and then 4 hours ago because I set the timestamp manually in the most recent commits. So yes you can set time in the future / past.
Brave raises $35M in 1 min with ICO
PCs usually refers to IBM PC compatible systems. Which PCs are you referring to?
It is important for birth rates. So much of government borrows from the future, its why you hear so much commotion about falling birth rates and immigration. The system needs more bodies to grind.
True, but they do want to win elections, don't they?
Qt is an option. Supported on Windows, Mac, and Linux.
I do a lot of compiles of a codebase which is pretty big (Netflix version of FreeBSD). A full recompile takes me ~1 hr on my box (Xeon E5-2630 v3, 8 cores, 16 threads, 32GB DDR4). Most of this is a parallel make that is 100% CPU bound. So I'm probably going to update to thread ripper when it comes out. Doubling my core count should come close to halving my compile times.

I probably will do storage via a ZFS array of small-ish SSDs or NVME drives. I started with a ZFS array of spinning drives when I built this machine ~2 years ago, with an SSD for L2 ARC. I was occasionally IO bound, so I moved most of the build stuff onto its own SSD. That's probably enough, but I want redundancy (without spinning drives to back up to), and I suck at cabling, so I'm leaning towards just using NVME drives in PCIe slots in order to avoid the cables.
They basically serve the same purpose, but Deployments move more of the "state" into the Kubernetes API controller.

For example, the standard way to do a rolling update using RCs is to create a new RC that is responsible for the updated pods, and then gradually increase/decrease the replica counts to reach the desired state. This is conceptually simple, but the downside is that the Kubernetes API doesn't know anything about the relationship between the old and new controllers. All the responsibility is pushed to the client.

With Deployments, both the old and new configurations are first-class objects. So you can view the history of previous configurations, and you can query the progress of a rolling update. You also get better-defined behavior when multiple clients are trying to concurrently make changes, because Kubernetes can arbitrate between them at a higher level.
Worlds Greatest Pathological Language: TECO
Yeah, it's pretty awful. It's unreadable, it's not clear what can be interacted with, or what I'm being shown. Apparently if you refresh you get a different image? I dunno. I have no idea what this site is trying to show me.
This article is painfully relevant for me. I just reviewed a code base with zero tests, documentation, no inheritance- rampant duplication.

It's a simple event tracking system and yet there are 75 models, and over 80 controllers. This was outsourced to a team which coincidentally appears to have close to that many devs working there. The good news is that according to the client "it pretty much works". I know better than to suggest a Big Bang - though it seems so appealing.

Documentation and code freeze are my next steps and implementing end to end testing.
Some people organize their deck with an end slide and then an "appendix" of backup slides with figures that might be relevant during Q&A but don't really have a role in the flow of your presentation. Of course, they could just have two, duplicate, "Thanks!" slides, one at the logical end of their talk and another at the physical end of their deck...
Ah, I was thinking it might be a more complex series of tricks to integrate GC more easily with C. For instance, redefining some C keywords, like 'return', to inject a prologue for freeing tagged locals or something.
I'd love to read this article, but the website is absolutely broken for me on Chrome -- HTTPS issues.
"if you quit to set up your own company" that directly competes with and/or rips off your work for your previous employer, "tread carefully"
Not giving access to my photos to a random app.
10 More Baffling Real Estate Photos
Fair enough. My biggest question is the same old problem that plagues all databases: Do you have any plans coming up to help us deal with modifying large tables, scaling writes and/or dealing with current known storage limits?
To be honest the EU as an organisation has probably saved as many (if not more) lives than NATO has if we are saying that preventing wars is saving lives. I have nothing against NATO but it does seem like you don't understand the system and are taking your president at his (notoriously unreliable) word.
He also doesn't really think well from the company's perspective, here's an Employee FAQ to complement the Boss FAQ on what's not addressed:

1. There is a fixed cost to having an in-house employee no matter how many hours he/she works. Healthcare, Office Space, Parking, lunch, any subscriptions to systems per-head etc. So inherently it's a bad deal to lower % productivity because these cost stay same. Note that not only these costs don' decline, company now has to hire more people to replace lost time, and incur these costs for those people as if they're full-time. So instead of fixed cost going from 1x->.8, it actually goes to 1.25x to get same amount of work done!! (assuming 80% productivity at 5h)

2. Even if (1) wasn't an issue, splitting a project to a larger team is inherently less efficient. The communication overhead of a 2 person team (1 comm. channel to manage) is 1/3 of a 3 person team (3 relationships/channels). Communication complexity increases exponentially with team size.

3. Time & context are very important to competitiveness in technology. Doing the same project in the same #hours and same $ is irrelevant in the real world if Team1 did it in one 4 weeks real-world time and Team2 did in 6 weeks of real world time, even if total hours worked is same. Likewise, employees build company and project context faster, can iterate faster, acquire relevant domain knowledge faster, and thus become more productive in Team1.

4. Should your stock vest over 5-6 years now instead of 4?

[ edited for paragraph breaks ]
I don't see anything about royalties.

That's for Qt for Devices. Conditions aren't public, but: "To learn about Qt for Device Creation pricing – developer licenses and embedded device distribution fees – start the conversation now"

also, it's LGPL or $80/developer-month, not and.

It's actually more like $300/dev/month unless you qualify as a startup.
When Schools Meet Trauma with Understanding, Not Discipline
> You call it "distorting the language", I call it "exposing the capabilities of every single CPU manufactured in the last 15 years".

There are plenty of CPU capabilities that languages don't exploit fully (e.g. most languages won't give you direct access to the carry flag) or only allow you to access via a specialized interface rather than making them a first-class part of the language (e.g. SIMD instructions). This seems entirely normal.

> Say I have a memory address on 32-bit (note that this applies equally well to 64-bit) and I'm doing pointer arithmetic. I'd better not be doing a signed multiply, or else values above 2GB will be corrupted!

I don't really see how this works (pointer arithmetic, not that one should be doing it at all, would generally involve adding or subtracting small offsets to pointers, I can't see any use case where you would want to multiply a pointer?), but in any case it doesn't apply equally well to 64-bit in any practical sense? If you happen to need an amount of memory between 2GB and 4GB or between 8EB and 16EB then maybe using unsigned pointers lets you use a smaller pointer, but that seems like a pretty narrow use case.
You can't measure engineering productivity over a span of a couple of weeks. You can't compare the output from week X to week Y unless the test conditions and subjects are completely in-sync. We all know that would be impossible.

Here, the author claims there is a change in productivity, all the way down to a %.

There is nothing scientific behind this; you might as well let your cat pick the numbers. They will be just as valid.
LiveZilla: self-hosted web chat bubble and ticketing/support system
$2400 sounds incredibly low even in PPP terms for Mexico.
"This is a DLC. All craftdwarfship is of the lowest quality for its price. It menaces with spikes of suck and greed."
An Elegant Way to Ruin Your Company's Day
Show HN: Travel the world on your dinner table – food that skips the restaurant
The woman who 'painted' music:

"Unraveling Bolero" by Anne Adams - http://imgur.com/a/wkwKZ (photograph of work)

---

> "In this podcast, a story about obsession, creativity, and a strange symmetry between a biologist and a composer that revolves around one famously repetitive piece of music.

> "Anne Adams was a brilliant biologist. But when her son Alex was in a bad car accident, she decided to stay home to help him recover. And then, rather suddenly, she decided to quit science altogether and become a full-time artist. After that, her husband Robert Adams tells us, she just painted and painted and painted. First houses and buildings, then a series of paintings involving strawberries, and then ... "Bolero."

> At some point, Anne became obsessed with Maurice Ravel's famous composition and decided to put an elaborate visual rendition of the song to canvas. She called it "Unraveling Bolero." But at the time, she had no idea that both she and Ravel would themselves unravel shortly after their experiences with this odd piece of music."

Radiolab - Unraveling Bolero (S14E01)
http://www.radiolab.org/story/217340-unraveling-bolero/

---

> "Most neurological lesion studies emphasize performance deficits that result from focal brain injury. Here, we describe striking gains of function in a patient with primary progressive aphasia, a degenerative disease of the human language network. During the decade before her language deficits arose, Anne Adams (AA), a lifelong scientist, developed an intense drive to produce visual art. Paintings from AA's artistic peak revealed her capacity to create expressive transmodal art, such as renderings of music in paint, which may have reflected an increased subjective relatedness among internal perceptual and conceptual images. AA became fascinated with Maurice Ravel, the French composer who also suffered from a progressive aphasia, and painted his best-known work, ‘Boléro’, by translating its musical elements into visual form. Later paintings, achieved when AA was nearly mute, moved towards increasing photographic realism, perhaps because visual representations came to dominate AA's mental landscape during this phase of her illness. Neuroimaging analyses revealed that, despite severe degeneration of left inferior frontal-insular, temporal and striatal regions, AA showed increased grey matter volume and hyperperfusion in right posterior neocortical areas implicated in heteromodal and polysensory integration. The findings suggest that structural and functional enhancements in non-dominant posterior neocortex may give rise to specific forms of visual creativity that can be liberated by dominant inferior frontal cortex injury."

Seeley, W. W. et al. Unravelling Boléro: progressive aphasia, transmodal creativity and the right posterior neocortex. Brain 131, 39–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm270

(note- edited for formatting)
Mostly on need, though. If I'm hungry, I'm hungry now, not 10 days from now.
Same on ff
We've been delivering authentic, unique food to families in the Bay Area over the past year. In Taro Gourmet, food lovers get to enjoy a curated experience from different parts of the world every week and experience new cultures through food - unique dishes and rare micro-cuisines that skip the local restaurant. In this journey, we may go to Japan to try the famous 5-course Siawase Menu, then go to Cuba to try Beef Empanadas and Polenta like the locals, and perhaps take you to Coastal Gujarat for a Kathiawadi Thali.

Once you are onboard as a Taro Gourmet, you will have option to receive specially curated meal for two every Tuesday. In a week leading to your delivery, we will send you all the information on this cuisine, chefs and story behind each item. As we embark on this gastronomic journey, Taro will satiate your palate as well as bring out the story the restaurants don't tell you.

Our first menu - exploring the Peranakan Chinese cuisine (called "Baba Nyonya") from the Malay Peninsula is live - we'd love your feedback :)
The International Time-Temperature Beer Curve
It seems the portal is actually here:

http://www.europeana.eu/portal
why not just get a reproduction of the DIGICOMP I?

http://mindsontoys.com/kits.htm

it's not turing complete, but it goes a long way and is fun to build!
I would love it even if they keep the same graphics but make the physics better and more free of bugs.
Same here. Also Chrome.

http://i.imgur.com/p9VdBM9.png
Can you pay your taxes with bitcoin or ethereum?
For anyone interested in Kubernetes: Red Hat's OpenShift is worth taking a look at.

It's upstream Kubernetes + a PaaS framework built in top of it.

It takes care of role-based access control, has a secured Docker registry (prevents applications from pulling each other's source code), Jenkins integration and can automatically build, push and deploy your applications.

Our team started using it and it's great. The documentation is top-notch (it's probably the best docs I've ever seen in an open source project).

I've seen many teams re-invent the wheel over and over again, when OpenShift already does most of what they need.

Happy to answer questions!

https://www.openshift.org/ (`oc cluster up` and a running Docker is all it takes for a first test)

Docs: https://docs.openshift.org/latest/welcome/index.html

Blog: https://blog.openshift.com/
The owner of ARM is now using it in the fastest computer in the world, with perhaps the fastest interconnect and memory IO subsystem to match.
I saw somewhere that Riot had also picked up a few of them. Not that it really makes what happened much better, but at least these guys got a reward of sorts.
Ask HN: How do you react when you see another company doing what you intend to?
I've been fleshing out a new concept for an old idea. I haven't seen anyone 'do it right' and I've learned there is a market demand for this platform. However, I've discovered a local startup that is kinda doing what I want to. I'm trying not to get discouraged or in my head too much, so I'm asking here for some guidance on how you or someone you know has dealt with the same situation.
Here is the important part from your article:

>Are NATO nations violating a rule?

>No. The 2 percent standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement. In 2006, even as the United States was increasing military spending because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, European allies were shrinking their military spending. NATO defense ministers that year adopted a guideline suggesting that each spend the equivalent of 2 percent of its annual economic output on its military — but it was a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state.

So the NATO 2% spending thing is: "just a guideline", "not a legally binding requirement", "a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state".

While the Paris Agreement is a formal treaty, signed in New York by a Representative of the United States, and then ratified by the US afterwards.

I don't see how you can compare the two side-by-side in any serious discussion.
Man, this brings back memories: I was visiting this and k10k.net daily for inspiration.
same here. reader view is good (tested with firefox)
Ah, yes. I hadn't looked at it, but now I see that fixed date/times are in the html source, and the "x hours ago" messages are rendered in the browser.

Fairly compact implementation too: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/33710bd9c7175a645dd0d72d1a...
You're making the mistake of saying fewer hours would be less productive, and there's considerable doubt about that.
Comprehending Monads [pdf]
No. Can you pay your taxes with stock or houses?
Same. Getting HTTPS issues.
Likewise. I disabled uBlock and HTTPS Everywhere but still no luck.

Edit: If you're on Mac, Safari with Reading mode works.
I don't understand what that has to do with your original premise.
No, but you can use bitcoin or ethereum to avoid paying taxes.
Here is my favourite from the "DHTML" era: http://www.ozones.com/

I can't believe that people don't even remember that word anymore. Just getting this crap to work at all, let alone look good, or work cross-browser, was a miracle. This is the before browsers had developer tools at all and often you'd have to guess what was wrong when you had layout or styling issues. Years later, firebug came and fixed a bunch of that. Script errors were arcane and horrifying.

Sigh. We needn't have suffered through so much in the dark ages of the web :-) I don't miss any of that at all, aside from the cool looking websites.
Cue a black budget program of retrieving all the lost cryptocurrency and selling it off.
> I REALLY want to get into all this but this seems like SO MUCH MORE WORK than just running them traditionally...

It is... Unless you have hundreds of servers - and then it pays off handsomely.
As I wrote elsewhere in this thread, I write talks mainly because I want the finished talk to exist in the world. I think this is the same relationship an artist has with their art.

That said, having given some memorable talks[1] at high-profile conferences probably has helped my career more than a little bit.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLv3BG8BSXbeFNfR2Zk4n8...
The US has forgotten how to do infrastructure
Gezonde alternatieven voor pasta met veel koolhydraten
I fail to see what the problem is. If you don't like their service, then switch to a competitor, or just set up your own git server. It's like this for any vendor: if you don't like the product or service you're getting, you can either bitch and complain endlessly, or you can look for alternatives. One of these choices is more productive than the other.
Are stocks and houses aspiring to someday replace fiat currency?
The different approaches and results of speakers is what makes a conference interesting, when the mix is right IMHO :-)
201 is "request has been fulfilled, resource has been created". It is explicitly not "we will get to it when we can". You are thinking of 202, "request has been accepted for processing", for asynchronous request processing.
For the 2nd time, the U.S. is leaving a climate treaty we forced others to adopt
Issues you mention have nothing to do with RISC-V ISA.

RISC-V Is just open source ISA, hopefulĺy without any patent issues.

Nobody is going develop open source high performance RISC-V processor architecture IP and give the design away free. You pay licenses and royalties just like before.