skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A quick check on wikipedia quotes:

"Current aircraft engines feature valve gear components which are designed for compatibility with the leaded ASTM D910 fuels. In such fuels, the lead acts as a lubricant, coating the contact areas between the valve, guide, and seat. The use of unleaded auto fuels with engines designed for leaded fuels can result in excessive exhaust valve seat wear due to the lack of lead. The result can be remarkable, with cylinder performance deteriorating to unacceptable levels in under 10 hours."

https://web.archive.org/web/20120413123438/http://www.tcmlin...

Also lead is an anti-knock agent so it is used to get to the very high octane ratings in Avgas.

And it seems the problem may be solved soon!

"By May 2012, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Unleaded Avgas Transition rulemaking committee) had put together a plan in conjunction with industry to replace leaded avgas with an unleaded alternative within 11 years. Given the progress already made on 100SF and G100UL, the replacement time might be shorter than that 2023 estimate."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avgas
> I'm all for that.

Nice to find a point of common ground.

> But when people have gotten to the point of excluding those who are perfectly fine with "live and let live"

"those who are perfectly fine with 'live and let live'" is more or less the definition of the group that welcoming communities welcome. What exclusion are you referring to, here? Because it isn't what was discussed in the article, nor anything I've advocated, nor anything I've seen advocated elsewhere in the parts of this overall comment thread I've read.

> Your desire to ostracize -- there is no hate here for you?

I don't desire to ostracize; I desire an absence of hate. The ideal case would be that nobody has hate to spread; attempting to limit the damage done is a fallback position.

> I'm saying that how you propose to react against it is a bad idea and if it spreads will itself foster more injustice.

I'm not (here or anywhere) suggesting exclusion as a first and only resort. I'm suggesting that it's an entirely valid tactic for people unwilling to learn to "live and let live", to make things more pleasant and welcoming for those who do. To paraphrase the description of an anti-harassment team in one community I'm fond of, de-escalation is always the first resort.

> Ostracizing people from organizations deemed important by society and important to people's lives and careers carries a lot more consequence than some college aged kid posting some memes.

I don't have the impression that the entirety of the groups were excluded; it sounded, from the article, more like they were excluding ringleaders and people who specifically stirred things up. I might also hold a different opinion if there was some genuine sign of recognizing the screwup and attempting to improve that was being ignored in favor of putting on a show. But as long as we're talking about the consequences to people's lives and careers, also consider the other students they'll interact with over the coming years, not just those 10 students.

> Is it because they're the children of privilege?

Nope. And I'm not sure where in anything I posted you would have gotten that from.

Let's take this in another direction, please. You suggested elsewhere in this thread that you'd have been fine with some form of academic probation. That also suggests that you'd be fine with the consequences of such if the behavior continues. So if this is just a question of degree, then as far as I can tell we're on the same page and disagreeing about positions not actually held. As posted here and elsewhere, I'm similarly in favor of de-escalation and proportional responses. Bans and exclusions are near-last resorts, to use with 1) people who show no indication of recognizing and changing their behavior, or 2) people who would be put in a position where they could do a lot of damage. This isn't "screw up once and you're excluded for life", and if you thought that's what I was advocating, then let's just chalk it up to limitations of the medium and move on.

People can change, though it's not necessarily the job of everyone and every group in society to put up with them while they do.
Scrolling looks fine to me (using Safari).
Back of the envelope calculation:

- assume $100/TB for cloud data transfer

- assume one employee full time equivalent to manage colo'd servers ($10,000/mo), plus $30/TB data transfer

The break even point for the colo'd setup from a networking perspective is:

10,000 + 30X = 100X
X = 10,000/70 = 142 (TB/month)

At 1MB per "request" I believe this works out to about 50 requests per second average to reach this traffic level.

Weaknesses of this model:

- Data transfer only. Depending on what else you're doing you could also save a lot on compute and storage.

- I don't know that much about how colocated data transfer would be priced ... i.e. do you need overprovision to guarantee availability, etc.

- one employee to handle servers to replicate the Amazon AWS experience ... could be highly variable depending on what AWS features you are using.
Not all sources are equal in terms of quality and information provided in the linked to article.

IMO, in certain areas (financial industry, investigative journalism, international business issues, etc.) WSJ consistently has better coverage than most other sources - so I'm willing to pay for it now that they've made it much harder for me to get to it.

I regularly read other sources, and if at some point I feel I'm not getting enough value from WSJ, I'll cancel.
I just used the instructions here[0], with some minor changes (pathnames, db server, etc). I've never seen more than two tesseract processes running on my two-core VM, no matter how many documents I give it.

Maybe something changed at some point to limit the active workers to the number of cores.

[0] http://mayan.readthedocs.io/en/stable/topics/deploying.html
Probably combusted because he plugged the 230v power supply to the 600v plug.

Minimum wage => You get what you pay for.
If you read further down, they clarify that they are talking about collision (i.e. The driver was at fault and banged into something) and comprehensive ("act of god") claims.

Those are rate lines independent of liability.
Medisas is hiring our first Marketing Generalist
$40k/yr/server
That phrase comes from the TechZing podcast ("increase one's luck surface area") and is a really valuable insight (surface area = depth of value created times breadth of people who see it), so all the credit to them.
I received a 16th place ribbon in a cross country race in middle school. I thought it was silly but my Dad kept it for a long time. I don't think everyone got a ribbon, though. Maybe the top 20.
This analysis is way too oversimplified. It completely ignores the shape of the traffic (real apps have peaks and valleys of usage - they don't pump exactly 100 Mbps every second of every day). Cloud providers charge the same amount regardless of how bursty your app is, and they have to provision capacity so that all customers get good performance even under unusual spikes (the more spiky your traffic, the better a deal per-MB pricing is for you). And of course it ignores all the ancillary networking HW and SW that supports these services, and all the labor you save by not having to manage that stuff yourself.

I've analyzed the cost of cloud services to death (I've worked for a couple of them) and the only way they aren't great deals is if you don't need high quality operations (i.e. if you can deal with slow-downs or occasional outages then you can do better elsewhere). Otherwise, if you're small-scale then these marginal cost differences don't matter, and if you're larger scale then call up these cloud providers and get yourself a discount off the list price.
... per server.

It really, really depends on on your use case, but there are some scenarios where bare metal just makes more sense. Also there are ones where cloud makes everything much easier.

North America-oriented B2B app that's a JavaScript SPA witch connects to some lightweight services fronting a database? I think that's a great contender for the cloud.

500-node Hadoop cluster running 24/7 with heavy load? You are going to see some huge savings by maintaining a Datacenter. You can use the extra 1.7MM/mo. to set up some robust networking equipment and have few people on-site.
And this is how democracy ends...

If all it takes to enforce one-party rule is to claim the other party was aided by a foreign power, then the 3 letter agencies can, in effect, choose who rules.
You can do this with Android. I was going to put it in our app but I pivoted.
It can be both the WSJ and a scam site at the same time.
I don't agree it's hair-splitting. You can't get kicked out by surprise by repealing Prop 13 unless you've enjoyed huge capital gains and are therefore likely rich. It would make no difference for poor people who don't own property that was acquired at low cost many years ago.

It's really the opposite situation of what you said.
Thanks for the links. What was your starting point the Docker/Golang source?
Double the P4500. The raid is not gonna store data out of thin air.
> A dedicated m4.16xLarge EC2 instance in AWS is $3987/month. You could build that same server for $15,000 through Dell, lease it at $400/month (OpEx)

Cherry-picking a bit there. You're entering a 3-year commitment with the Dell lease, but not with the EC2 lease. Take a 3-year RI on that EC2 instance, and the price drops considerably. If you also take away the 'dedicated' requirement, the 3-year RI is about twice as expensive, not ten times.

Edit: correction from Johnny555 above: this top-tier server doesn't have a 'dedicated' option, so there's not an 'extra' cost for that. It's just twice the price, if you do a 3-year commitment (as you are doing for the dell)
You can buy sysadmin services. This isn't a full time job at that level.
You're paying for the staff time to set up the lower-level infrastructure and keep it running at _least_ as reliably as if you had your own staff on bare metal, quite likely more so. (including scaling it when you need more etc).

It is interesting that they end up charging you this for _bandwidth_ though. Their staff time doesn't actually probably scale with bandwidth, but their prices do.

I think it's probably kind of a way of pricing based on a proxy for customer size, likely revenue, and ability/willingness to pay. Rather than as a % margin on actual costs.
Doesn't make much sense for one server... but if you have 5, then you are looking at $200k. Then as you go up the numbers start making more sense.
If colocation actually cost that much, it would make sense for a connection that allows extreme bursting to charge 3x as much per byte.

The real number to compare to is the google data for business rate. You can do lots of colocation in that price range. And that is why the cloud prices are unreasonable.
And add a third one while you're at it.

Given the price of the server and the data you have on it, it's important enough to warrant a hot spare.
Most people carry their 2nd factor on a keychain, which is usually in close proximity to their phones - anyway, I think the benefit is that we can stop keeping one factor on a device that's potentially remotely exploitable (google auth on a phone)
How much raw output data are we talking about? What order of magnitude? Unless we're talking PB a month EC2 prices seem fairly reasonable. Also keep in mind intra-region communication between instances is free
This is simply untrue for bandwidth charges if you're pushing a lot of data.

A streaming video service, for example, might end up paying $0.10/user/hour. So a movie-a-night customer would cost $6. What multiple of reasonable do you think that is?
Houses are such a rip-off! Just look how much more expensive they are than a pile of wood!
As you heat gas it gets bigger. Jupiter is cool enough that it's got liquid and perhaps solid hydrogen in the middle (Juno will tell us the details soon!) I think this thing is so hot that it won't have a liquid or non-rocky solid core.
So the actual product was pretty much the opposite of therapeutic... I mean, at least go with beef gelatin, at least that could fix someone's joints.
I'm getting

401 Authorization Required
Getting Hyped for Deep Learning Configs
What is the system requirement to use this app?

How many items can you store on the clipboard?
I do, on a regular basis. Blink (http://blink.sh) has brought the iPad completely on par with the Macbook for me as far as the command line goes.
I would imagine that you'd have a huge upwelling on the hot side, flow of gas to the dark(er) side, then cooling and sinking and flow along the inside over to the hot side.
At least circa whenever it was that BTC broke $100, the state of exchanges' APIs was such that arbitrage wasn't practical. I remember reading about it on an old bitcointalk.org thread when the Butter-Bot developers were soliciting feedback regarding what direction their paid customer base wanted them to go.

The only working arbitrage software I ever saw was this short-lived one with a circular UI (IIRC), & it wasn't fully automated.

I'd be interested to learn the current state of affairs on the subject.
Apple has no credibility to offer UI guidelines at this point.

This is a company that increasingly relies on Easter eggs and peek-a-poo UI instead of legitimate design. Their applications are rife with invisible controls that only appear if you accidentally roll over them; what are we supposed to do, sweep the cursor over every pixel on the screen, looking for hidden goodies?

One of the worst Apple UI affronts is the secret, alternate menus that appear if you press modifier keys while a drop-down menu is open. So every menu is potentially... trying to remember my statistics here, 2^3 + 1 menus?

Then there's "force touch," another shitty, lazy gimmick. So now you're supposed to press and hold and then press HARDER on every on-screen widget... once again to see if there are hidden goodies.

And need we even address the embarrassing "touch strip" on the new laptops? The lack of a real Delete key on EVERY Apple laptop?

The lack of a headphone jack on Apple's best-selling MUSIC PLAYERS, in an era when Apple's future profits will (by Tim Cook's own admission) be increasingly based on the consumption of services like Apple Music?

Nobody should be taking user-experience advice from these inbred hypocrites.
tl;dr Valve is replacing the greenlight system with a per title fee. Supplement above with http://steamcommunity.com/greenlight/discussions/18446744073... for details on how they'll handle games in during the interim.
​Why you must patch the new Linux sudo security hole
Yes, but sticking to old-school Javascript features was dramatically faster than either.
It does seem like being cross-platform makes it more natural for Chrome to lock down the content process very tightly, and provides a strong incentive to do so. On the other hand, it may make it more difficult or less natural to lock down some of the other processes.

On our end, it's natural to sandbox every new process we introduce, but also easy to fudge what is allowed in sandbox profiles. Sometimes we have a choice of accessing a service through a separate process, or working to make sure that service itself is more secure (sandboxed itself, offers thinner and properly validated IPC interface, etc). In many cases, the real right choice may be to do both. As well as fuzzing the heck out of every IPC boundary.
Considering it's the basis of the entire hypothesis, here's the nature of the intervention:

All cases with two BLL tests exceeding the alert threshold (10
ug/dL) trigger
eligibility for an intervention which includes the following actions: education for caregivers (which includes nutritional advice and information about reducing
exposure in the home); a voluntary home environment investigation; and a
referral to lead remediation services. A more intensive intervention can be
triggered by tests over 15
ug/dL or 20
ug/dL. In addition to educating caregivers
and providing a referral to remediation services, the intensive intervention
typically includes: a mandatory home environment investigation; nutritional
assessment; medical evaluation; developmental assessment; and a referral to
the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children
(WIC)
The LDS Church has a prohibition on hot beverages but cold caffeinated are actually allowed. It is a common misconception that all caffeine is not allowed. Homebrewed beer, and homebrewed wine are technically allowed also. Many also ignore the part in the wow about eating meat sparingly while misinterpreting the rest.
Refer to the Monterey Bay Aqauarium's Consumer Guides for the most ecologically responsible choices of fish. From those, cross reference with a list of "healthy fish" such as https://www.rodalesorganiclife.com/food/healthy-fish . As for "honest labeling", I just don't pay lots of money for fish. Culinary skill is more likely to make it taste great than exotic variety.

I think you really shouldn't consider it so much, though. A lot of work is put into minimizing how "unsightly" our food is and it results in a lot of waste. Fruit and veggies have more parasites than fish, for example, and consumer-facing fish gets a lot of prep work before you ever get to see it.
I started with a basic understanding about the parts involved, but not so much how they fit together. Most of the necessary information came from the lwn series of articles posted in another comment:
https://lwn.net/Articles/531114/

The actual namespace stuff was easy, the harder part was pivoting the root fs and figuring out all the things to mount. At some point I looked at the source for systemd-nspawn, but I forget exactly what for.
I certainly agree that fear is not the best motivation, nor is it ideal. But it is not the job of every last person in society to exercise the patience of a saint and try to fix such problems on an individual basis

A government that is ruling through fear has lost its moral justification. That you'd just say it's not the best nor ideal -- I find this highly suspect. You'd really take a grudging, fake consensus, over just giving people the opportunity to talk as they will and live and let live? It really is analogous to taking fake consent for sex!

I'd like people who hate others to do as little damage as possible, and I'd like as little interaction with them as possible, because quite frankly, life's too short.

You don't have to look far to find the depredations of people in authority who secretly hate. I'd like hateful authority to do as little damage as possible, and I'd like as little interaction hateful authority as possible, because quite frankly, life's too short. (Not to say that all authority is hateful, of course.)

As an aside, I also find your use of the term "infiltrating" interesting; that has fascinating ingroup/outgroup connotations for who you consider infiltrators versus who belongs.

There is a pattern of "activists" and media critics doing this to various spheres of interest, and to specific organizations, as well as explicit talks in political groups about doing exactly this. I think "infiltration" is a very apt way of describing such insincere political-agenda driven behavior in a non-political group. As for who belongs: Those who are primarily and genuinely passionate about the area of interest.

The poor, the downtrodden, the beleaguered -- people like that have their passions, and they are often the most stalwart and pure in their interests. Very often, for these reasons, they produce the best art. It's no wonder then, that they react to "Carpetbaggers" with passion and vehemence. It's not so different when it comes to interest groups of the affluent. If you want society to make progress, then enable as much sincere, passionate interaction as possible. Balkanizing society into strict divisions based on political viewpoint is exactly the wrong thing to do. Fostering a society where people can interact with those of different viewpoints is the right thing, and this will require the ability to interact with those of highly differing viewpoint -- just so long as it's all live and let live. The version of "tolerance" where it's alright, just so long as everyone agrees with me -- this is just like the "multiculturalism" of many Muslim and Christian fundamentalists, who are all for tolerance, so long as everyone converts to their religion.
I checked more thoroughly as I first commented "mildly seriously". I recently quit working with Apple and it wasn't on the best terms.

Still, here is the prices:

Also, I am a re-seller, and had good prices:

- 7048A-T system: 990$

- Intel CPU Xeon E5-2650 v3 2.3 GHz: 2x 950$

- PNY P4000: 650$

- The memory is unbranded. A customer of mine needed about 500 of them, and I bought 16 for me at 200$ each, which makes 3200$. I don't have formal confirmation, but I think it's 95Y4812 clone.

Total is around 5800$.

I checked the regular price of the 64Gb memory modules and realized it was nearly 10 times more expensive, so I guess it doesn't count in comparison with the iMac...

Also about the re-seller thing, I've been an Apple re-seller and evangelist for years, and never got more like 3% rebate on their products while I sold Mac by the dozen.
This is a super irritating feature of "enterprise" vendor pricing. What almost everyone on these platforms is doing is moving most of their bandwidth out of one of the CDN services (like say cloudfront) and then negotiating custom pricing on that bandwidth that is often as much as a full decimal place cheaper as long as you sign a couple grand a month yearly commit. There's still this massive massive pricing cusp between using the cloud as a utility and jumping into the suits & drinks & lunches sales guy game.
Can you really call the person an attacker when they simply used the contact as-written?

I think that's spinning things a bit to fit a narrative.
> You're lumping one group of people (people who's earing ability is diminishing over time) in with a different one (non-Clinton voters) and making the two a 1:1 correlation. That's incorrect.

No, because the damage I'm referring to has been done over decades, due to support for the Republican policies, foreign and domestic, and at the state and federal level.

>Also, flip it around and it works equally on the other side: 'it is very difficult to be sympathetic to the very people who's intellectualism and morality policing have caused so much damage to rural areas and the working classes'.

Except that makes no sense at all - it's dissembly.

Intellectualism has not hurt the rural demographic, while their refutation of it certainly has.

And, it's laughable to suggest that they have been hurt by morality policing. Moreover, the bulk of the actual, legislated morality policing has come from the right, and is being driven by the hate and intolerance of, you guessed it, those same voters.
#3 is why we went to Amazon, and its one of the reasons we were successful. Sad as that was. No weeks/months of delays/hassles/fights/sabotage. Just success as fast as we could do our part and figure out the few small hurdles.
If you're an academic you could probably negotiate with google/msft/aws for a discounted if not free egress rate.