skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They look like this. I guess I should have said "aphids":

https://www.bbbseed.com/blog%20images/Aphids%20Kale%20Judy%2...
Our Apple WWDC Keynote Liveblog Is Right Here
Clojure concurrency: the ultimate guide
The very same could be said about women being able to vote, same sex marriage or in the US a black guy using the same restrooms as white people or being the POTUS.

All these things were illegal by laws backed and supported by the highest, most sensible and most respected authorities back in the time, even during centuries.

But it was the determination of people to be able to make all these illegal things fully legal nowadays. This is progress.

If people wants, anything is possible. Laws are to serve people, and if they do not work, they should be changed.

People can even change a constitution.

To help you fully understand the context, the Spanish constitution was written only 3 years after a military dictatorship that lasted 40 years (2 generations) with many people afraid of the military coming back and the police charging in people's demonstrations.

I do not know if you ever have had to run in a demonstration with a policeman running behind you with a gun with a clear intent to shoot you. I did and believe me, it is really scary. You even develop a sense of foreigness for certain symbols.

The Spanish constitution can and should be changed to meet the needs of people in the 21st century. The one we have now is the bastard child of the turmoil after the military dictatorship.
Turned out to be fake news. I found the debunking of the story to be more relevant to HN than the story itself. Details: http://i.magaimg.net/img/pao.png
> This doesn't have anything to do with increasing shareholder value.

> The plan drew immediate support from most airlines

> the White House said the 13-member board of directors for the new corporation should be made up of appointees from industry stakeholder groups
wait is the mac not getting 32GB ram options?
Who's claim? The commentator or in Google's?
The Onion just tweeted this: http://www.theonion.com/article/apple-unveils-panicked-man-w... [2013]. Ouch.
> If a calorie is a calorie is a calorie,

A calorie is a calorie, period.

"Sawdust has calories. Try eating that".

Doesn't matter. Whether the body can extract calories out of it doesn't change the definition of calorie and a calorie is still a calorie.

"But some foods are more filling and satiating than others despite the calories being the same"

Still doesn't matter. How does how long the body takes to process calories out of food affect "a calorie is a calorie".

You must already know this. I might have been a bit pedagogical but that's because "a calorie is a calorie" is false is one of my pet peeves.

More to the point:

> then we need to be able to explain why two people eating the same amount of calories per day, but one eating a high fat, low carb diet, and the other a low fat high carb diet see starkly different outcomes.

Studies please. Especially for "starkly different outcomes". I can copy pasta the famous /r/fitness link dump which is posted every time keto comes up but I will wait for you to find me some studies supporting your argument first.

> All things equal except the composition of their diet, the person on the HF diet will stay lean and feel consistently satiated, while the LF person will put on more fat and feel hungry far more frequently than the HF.

So I can feed 5000 kcal/day to a 5 feet girl and she will stay lean as long as it's olive oil shots?

> IMO, the claim that all calories are created equally is the most damaging "science" that's been put forth as common knowledge about dieting.

But all calories are equal, by definition. Some people do well on a high fat/high protein diet, some don't. You want to lose weight, burn calories(eat less, move more) above your tdee. You want to gain weight, give your body more calories than it burns. As annoying as hearing this may sound(it isn't annoying to me but for argument's sake), that's all there is to it. People have lost weight and maintained lean mass on all sorts of shitty diets. If high fat diet works for you, superb. But it's not a panacea and the science is no where as clear cut as you make it out to be. In fact, keeping protein constant, a high fat and high carb diet had the same results.
Please read the next paragraph with an awareness of how you feel at each comma, period, and exclamation point.

I'm very grateful for your comments because they've advanced the conversation, given me specific things to reflect on, and ultimately challenged my perspectives, which helped me gain clarity around them. Thank you!

How did you feel at different points? I hope, ultimately, you felt a little joy from receiving some gratitude. Note: I'm not praising you, nor expressing approval/disapproval. I'm nonjudgmentally allowing you and your opinion to exist while saying what's true for me. The point is we can feel good about ourselves simply by hearing gratitude from others acknowledging our contributions. Approval doesn't need to be part of the equation. It can, however, help as a way to temporarily lower mental barriers getting in the way of building self-esteem.

Also, how are you defining narcissism? I'm asking because how you phrased your perspective implies self-limiting thoughts at play. Here's what I mean:

"I don't think I can build a nice feeling about myself, in a non-narcissistic way, if I receive a lot of negative feedback from my peers." - Our reality is defined by our perceptual sets, which includes our beliefs, emotions, motivations/intentions, and learned behaviors. Each component in a perceptual set can impact/define the others. What I've quoted defines a belief acting on a core component of well-being: self-esteem. If you truly believe what you typed, then you're applying that belief to yourself unless you also believe you're the only human who's figured out how to do the opposite. If applying this belief to yourself, it will inherently limit the actions you perform to develop your self-esteem while reinforcing the belief. Beliefs imposing unnatural limits can lead to persistent states of suffering, so I hope you can find another perspective.
+1

Or try to make an <insert non-trivial application> in Brainf*uck.
So are the RIAA/MPAA and the NFL until recently.
very understandable. while a user manual database with additional youtube videos or other comments would be values to ... some, it wouldn't be many people, as most never look at any manuals, no matter how many problems they've got with their devices.

sorry for the ninja edit on my previous comment. i didn't see your response before i rewrote it. i kept the meaning, just clarified my point a little.
These people are not being fired, just being transferred to a new company. I believe they will continue to perform at the same level. And with a non-gov entity we also get the benefit of optimal resource allocation. A win-win for everyone. Only reason of opposing this would be personal vendetta against Trump.
>as the package names have changed in Win10

Yes, you need a different script for 7 than 10

>some of the commands in the 1st PS script I found do not work anymore

use an updated script

>here are reports of some the "features" coming back after updates

That was once, it has been patched

>OneDrive is still in your face on most systems

Yes, my script (and most clones of it) remove it

>MS is making it quite hard to just cleanly remove the crap / adware / telemetry they build in

No, it's quite easy, I run one script once at install. That's the point.

>If you have a script that works well would you please mind sharing it with the rest of us.

Tron is probably the most comprehensive, personally I just use a modified version of Debloat: https://github.com/W4RH4WK/Debloat-Windows-10
There is a reason that air traffic is tightly controlled, primarily there is massive public risk for minimal errors.

There is a saying that the FARs are written in blood, as in regulations aren't passed willy-nilly, but passed after there has been a serious incident.

Air traffic is one place where "Iterate quickly and break shit" doesn't work. What happens when in the name of "efficiency", one tower reduces current safety limits because "99% of the time these are unnecessary", then the one time it actually was necessary, you've got two jets about to make a head-on collision, or one quickly changes course, loses control, and crash-lands into a town.

There are absolutely improvments that can be made with the FAA, but privatizing ATC is definitely not one of them.
The parent is claiming one has to catch up to the other.
I am pointing out this it not actually right.
You are claiming "they are both just as bad".

So you don't seem to disagree with me?
Right, but why. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Is there any evidence that our current system doesn't work?
"The New York metropolitan area is the single largest aviation market in the United States. Last year, there were nearly 33 million domestic origin and destination passengers that came to and from the three major New York airports (LaGuardia, Kennedy and Newark). Nearly 60% of the total delays endured by these passengers are a result of today’s inefficient air traffic control, among the highest in the nation."

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/air-traffic-control-tech-...
It is an acronym proposed in 2001: Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
Location: Russia

Remote: No

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: JS (ES5/ES6), Node.js, React, Redux, Python, Django, Docker, Ansible

Résumé/CV: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PfqRnY-xaxi0yHs2UUSp3hqS...

Email: mslyapunov@gmail.com
Don't forget you need a doping atom as well.
That last part at least is correct. Clark Stanley (the original snake oil salesman) traveled around with a bag full of snakes, and made a big show out of rendering them into oil. But the actual product was just beef fat and some other ingredients.
Rejseråd
This only works ( and also for Appstores) if your expected LTV is high enough that the real users will bring in enough money to recoup the initial spent.

If your book/game is crap, the it will fall again, you lost your money and your spot in the charts.
Ask HN: How valuable is karma?
Which must have happened before he became President. Air Force One gets to hear something before anyone else: "cleared to land".
Ignore it. How is that even up for debate?
with a non-gov entity we also get the benefit of optimal resource allocation

How do you figure?
Address reuse only becomes a problem in the theoretical case that someone can determine the private key from a signature. This would only happen if there was some sort of breakthrough in cryptoanalysis of elliptic curve cryptography, which while theoretically possible, is unlikely.
Didn't realize the Rocket Labs Electron had its first launch about a week ago:

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/05/rocket-labs-electron...

"It was a great flight. We had a great first stage burn, stage separation, second stage ignition and fairing separation. We didn’t quite reach orbit and we’ll be investigating why..” said CEO Peter Beck.
Reduce the size of government.
Is this really that controversial? Competition only exists in Capitalism, if there's no competition, then there's little benefit to improve.
Yeah, but private orgs usually like to play fast and loose with safety regulations to cut costs and increase efficiency. I believe ATCs top priority should be safety, and efficiency should be secondary.
I agree and furthermore I think that excessive praise even when someone is just doing what's expected of them can be harmful.

Anecdotal: My boss used to go around praising people in general for just doing their jobs. I was even on the receiving end of so many "have I told you how awesome you are" or "I hope you realize how valuable you are to the operation" canned responses that, although it was nice to hear, it lost its luster eventually. I ended up replying every time he'd do this with a motion of opening a beer can accompanied with a verbal "psshtt" sound and adding in a "thanks for the can of praise." It was meant in jest and he took it in stride and understood it wasn't meant with any malice. I was just poking a little fun at the observations he was making.

The point is, when you do it to too many people, too often, and for doing nothing but what's expected of them, it starts to ring hollow eventually.

Anecdotal: I observed something about myself which I found peculiar. A friend of a friend on Facebook, whom I observe to have quite intelligent DH4+ responses to comments even if the masses usually come back with a DH0 or DH1 response. I found myself observing his responses to other folks' comments and throwing in my own $.02. I discovered that the quality of my responses was greatly elevated when replying to him, clearly attempting to engage him at his level. This was sometimes rewarded with a 'like' from him, and sometimes not. When receiving a 'like' it resulted in a physiological response from me akin to a very light drug high.
MacOS High Sierra: A Refined, Polished Version of Sierra UK
lot of hedging there.

What you're referring to is a research project, not a deployable one.

I agree it's worth researching. Common industrial research grants with a mixture of government and private funding can perform the research and develop it.

And those improvements may be deployed to the sector whether it's private or not. There's no need to pre-emptively privatize the industry to perform R & D.
The tall gray haired guy seems to be a Jobsian figure, in appearances.
This needs to be required reading for everyone, especially teachers.

The Debugging Mindset - http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3068754
There are a bunch of them now and they vary wildly in their composition. Determine your diet's target macronutrient percentage (50% carbs, 30% fiber, etc) and try to find one that matches. They also changed from batch to batch, I switched to Joylent from Soylent because they dropped the fiber content.

Also, start with one meal replaced a day, and see how you feel. Don't replace all your meals at the very beginning.
It's definitely the case. Part of the problem is that not everyone knows about income based repayment plans.

You mostly get a few groups complaining about the burden. People who don't know about income based repayment, people who make too much to qualify (basically what they'd pay if they paid 10% of their discretionary income is higher than the standard 10 year repayment plan), and people who took out private loans to go to for profit universities, or expensive private schools that weren't top tier (private loans are only 7% of total disbursements).

Add to that the arm chair analysts who see news stories about student loan debt and complain for them.

That's not to say that some of these grievances aren't legitimate. There really are people with $100k loans with useless degrees from for profit universities, but they are a small subset of loan borrowers.
+1. I have a corner of a bookshelf reserved for everything Kernighan, e.g. both Software Tools editions, both C Language editions, The Unix Programming Environment, The Practice of Programming, The AWK Language, even a copy of The Elements of Programming Style. I, and my employers and clients, may owe more to Mr. Kernighan for his teaching and programming style, than anyone else.
the benefits of globalization to the common folk arguemnt hasnt been well articulated as of late.
"In other words, if cell phone service providers were taking their customers' privacy (and constitutional rights) seriously, then this Supreme Court case should actually be the government suing a cell phone service provider for not turning over customer data in a case where a warrant has not been issued.
"

As much as i hate the cell phone providers, they are fairly screwed here.

See, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_...

and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stored_Communications_Act

and friends.
For everybody who seems baffled by this decision, it's about finances. He believes a private organization, which doesn't have the infinite pockets of the government is a better way to reign in cost.

Interestingly he's having the private organization take out loans for upgrades, instead of the government. That is a win for taxpayers if you ask me.
ok the available-at-the-end-of-the-year imac Pro - looks awesome. Too bad it'll be wicked expensive.
Why is it that only very simple programs can we written effectively with spreadsheets and that setups where complex arrangements of linked spreadsheets and databases are described as horrible to work with by the people that have to work with them?

I completely understand where you're coming from. I'm saying, "try to imagine how it should be," not, "how it is." Those experiences are horrible because current spreadsheets are for simple functions and nothing more.

Is it possible that nearly every professional is right and you are wrong and text is an effective means to represent computation?

I guess this is where we disagree. I see the software industry as a mess and every professional as a person who was given one part of a Rube Goldberg contraption to be an expert on. The contraption works, to be sure, but it boils an egg in a hundred arcane steps. Given the state of our art, we have no leg to stand on to say what is and is not an effective means to represent computation. Normally a billion professionals would lend clout to your argument, but in the case of our industry, we know that they just staff a million abstruse contraptions. It just means we lack imagination and ownership: we're professionals, yes, but on whatever junk we're handed.

It wasn't always like that. We have seen that Computer Science doesn't really advance, but what is fascinating is that maybe 90% of those pushing for it to advance are of the original, older, generation that brought us that innovation in the first place. Max Planck once said something to the effect of, "Science advances one funeral at a time." I worry that Computer Science retreats one funeral at a time. Slowly we're losing those from the time when our thinking wasn't constrained with current tools; failed efforts were taken as learning points, not barriers; and no one viewed current technology as something the gods handed down to them but as something they created (maybe the day before), so they were constantly evaluating it.

Yes, the future of software development has to be away from free text toward data, and it follows as a logical syllogism. I was about to add that that is my opinion, but it's not so much of an opinion as a conclusion. While it's absolutely fair to wonder what that means, we can't brush it away because we already have the best Rube Goldberg contraption we could ever have.
Doesn't really compare. The US sets de-facto global aviation safety standards; Canada does not. Regulatory capture of Canada's ATC wouldn't move the needle, this absolutely will.
It's not like it should surprise anyone. The import machinery in Python 2 was mostly written in C, while it's pure Python in Python 3. And if you've seen what that stuff does it's no surprise that even fairly small applications can take .1-.2 s to reach main.

A tool gathering imports in one file if it is safe to do so would be really quite neat for deploying interactive Python applications (command line / GUIs).

On the more extreme end you'd have a C application linking not too many libraries (symbols are lazily loaded, libraries are not) that reaches main after 0.0001-0.0002 s (i.e. one to two hundred µs).

On the other extreme would be Java apps using heavy runtime-code-generating frameworks like Spring, where even a trivial app can take up to ten seconds to spring to life.
New Kaby Lake iMacs and iMac Pro Coming from Apple
> http://www.spacex.com/falcon9

According to the technical overview, Falcon 9 can also deliver 4020 kg to Mars :)
SteamVR is coming to Mac–and Apple says it will actually work
Hey everyone!

I'm a developer at Aclima. We are working with Google on the mobile sensing tech talked about here: https://environment.google/projects/airview/

Honestly I'm really excited about it, but of course I'm just a tiny bit biased :)

If anyone has any questions I would love to do the best I can to answer them. Cheers!
One of the main Ethereum co-founders is working on a new experimental contract language targeting the Ethereum Virtual Machine called Viper which still seems to be under relatively active development[1].

Why pick Solidity if Viper and other languages like Low-level Lisp-like Language (LLL) by Consensys[2] are around the corner? Or is this just a matter of language flavour similar to how anybody can pick from a plethora of languages targeting the JVM (Clojure, Scala, Java, etc.)?

[1] https://github.com/ethereum/viper

[2] https://media.consensys.net/an-introduction-to-lll-for-ether...
Watch Movements
Apple Teases Upcoming Space Gray iMac Pro, "the most powerful Mac ever"
> A monolithic private institution doesn't inspire confidence in me any more than a monolithic public one. I don't see the purpose in switching one for the other, and would probably rather see it run by the government.

Indeed; this is why almost all "let's privatize X" initiatives are ultimately pointless (or perhaps even counterproductive). They merely shift the monopoly-holder from public-sector to private-sector, without alleviating the "there is a monopoly" status. Indeed, the private sector's legendary efficiency advantage specifically occurs when there is competition, and is not some magical thing that is endowed to the private sector and forbidden from the public sector.
Read the source code to Emacs. It has everything a growing programmer needs: portability, compilers and interpreters, user interface(s), language design, build systems...

http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs
Indeed he has something against air traffic in general.

I remember an article where it claimed someone told him to buy a house near airport and sue them for noise. According to Wikipedia he did it twice and lost twice teen sold the property.

Here is another article on same subject:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/13/luxury/trump-palm-beach-laws...
Salesforce Integration with Ballerina [http://ballerinalang.org/]
I was kinda hoping for a better battery and discrete graphics on Macbooks in addition to Kaby Lake. Oh well.
And none of those made the same inference as you that they were lucky as a result, which was the specious mischaracterization I referred to.
>The larger question, though, is not whether police should be required to obtain a warrant to access location data from cell phone service providers, but whether cell phone service providers should be providing this information to police without a warrant.

It's not really about whether they can provide this information to the police without a warrant. They can. The 4th Amendment doesn't protect against someone sharing your secrets voluntarily.

But this wasn't a voluntary sharing of information. It's done by a government order under the Shared Communications Act. Under current Court precedence this law is constitutional, but there are decent arguments was wrong when it decided that.
Thanks for the feedback i336_,

I've sent you a private email but including a summary for anyone else interested.

I'm glad we got at least a few of the queries in your test. For the ones that we didn't get I'd like to get your thoughts on how likely you are to ask in that particular way. The reason I ask is that, thanks to our unique approach to natural language understanding, we could theoretically add support for these phrases. I doubt Google/Amazon could because theirs is a much more uncontrolled machine learning style black box - and we are a long way from achieving this kind of complexity through machine learning. For example check out Zuckerberg's blog post and try some of his "impossible for ML" queries on Hound.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/building-jarv...

So if these types of queries are useful to you/anyone - we can add them!