skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's something that I hadn't considered. Have we received confirmation that the Model 3 will be available with the optional full suite of self-driving sensors?

On the Model S, this includes two high-priced options:

1. Enhanced Autopilot ($5000) quadruples the number of cameras from 1 to 4 and adds 12 ultrasonic sonar sensors and additional computing power to crunch the data.

2. Full Self-Driving Capability ($3000) doubles the number of cameras from 4 to 8.
There were no questions, except agressive "Really?", so I decided to skip the points. The thing is that the original author tries to put a nationalistic mask on science, i.e. "the X was invented by country Y", which is a fallacy suitable for populist debates. Science doesn't happen in vacuum, and scientific "achievements" are usually called "contributions".

Regarding your questions. 1) Three scientists received a Nobel prize for their work on lasers, you can check the wiki for names. 2) About the TV: my bad, A. Zworykin has been working in the US on the TV problem --- it's hard to trace everyone who emigrated due to the Soviet massacre. Anyway, you can find experiments, etc. for example, by Leo Theremin.
bsjdblog.wordpress.com
I hope not. He has no real bade in either party, and an independent run would inevitably siphon off Democratic votes.
Still don't understand how UBI is not inflationary?

No real value is created since its not tied to any productive work. So supply of real good remains static, and in a local market, won't there be sudden increased demand for housing, for example?

What will happen to apartment prices?
The fastest way to find command options
Ask HN: How do I attract clients to my software dev firm?
To clarify, did you try this with a remotely hosted .html file or one on the local hard drive? Browsers treat this case specially and allow more access to the local filesystem.

Putting an html file with an <img src="file:///..."> in it on a remote server should not trigger the vulnerability, if I understand correctly.
I wonder if there will be aftermarket driver displays. If all the data you need is on the CAN bus, should be just a question of mounting points and power wiring.

I joined the Model 3 wait list the day it opened and I'm really looking forward to getting one. The biggest concern I have so far is the lack of driver display.
Where can I see some examples or documentation on using coroutines in C++?
Frankly I figured bezos or etc would've been the first tech leader on that train.

After all, when you're in the business of (A) optimizing every nook and cranny and (B) selling to the masses new luxury technologies, it's in your interests to see that they have the money to waste on such excesses and/or can afford you optimizing away their sources of income.
Probably not. Some marine invertebrates are much longer and being colonial a coral born from a single egg has unlimited growth, so could be theoretically larger than a whale and more massive.
Predicting values with linear regression
It's redistribution of wealth, not quantitative easing.
Do PMs keep documentation around the features (high level, what's the purpose/function etc) in a separate tool than Trello? Or is that not a thing they do at all?

For Github Projects you mean each repository has many projects, but you wanted it to be each project could have many repositories, right? :) That does make it a lot harder, especially as what you work on grow bigger and span multiple repositories..
OK that makes a great amount of sense using the differentiation between fair use, satire, etc.

In the case of the Nissan's, it seems less clear. As the Nissan Computer domain holder, he registered the domains and had an established business before Nissan Car had any interest. What would stop him from pivoting into car manufacturing/sales and even if he called his company something different, used nissan.com to promote his car sales?
We'll do our best ;)
Divorce work from income and you will also divorce value from the currency.
I would contest the label of 'good friend' then.
I believe you are referring to running out of ports, as 65k available ports * 40 ~= 2M.

The limitation is actually on a quad tuple: {src_ip, src_port, dest_ip, dest_port}

As such, the actual limit is outrageously high and isn't really a problem. Interestingly enough, the referenced Phoenix benchmark overlooked the dest component and hit a limit as they had only 40 or so machines to use in the test. Had they used multiple ips on the server it would have given them a lot more breathing room.

EDIT: Multiple IPs != Multiple NICs. You can assign multiple IPs to a single physical interface. Also, they could have used multiple ports to accomplish the same effect.
We need to differentiate between neural networks, which do not have robust theoretical underpinnings, and practical considerations.

DNN is fantastic from a computational standpoint. Its _GEMM all the way down. You get high flop counts and with modern techniques, gradient-based methods find optimums relatively reliably.

But from a theoretical standpoint there are major question marks. Why does dropout work? Why has SGD been so successful? To make the field more rigorous these need to be pounded out. And in the course of it, this will make DNNs more powerful, more generalizable (as Ferenc noted), and more useful. I'll also add that it might help us discover fundamental laws of intelligence.

As evidence of this approach being useful, I'll note that Yann LeCun is openly Bayesian.
I'll take a crack at this - coroutines are not about performance. They are for converting callbacks to a single thread of execution that's easier to reason about (which could themselves be embedded in other threads).

Imperative logic is equivalent to a state machine but again much easier for humans to reason about, that's why developers got so much more done in the past with synchronous execution and macros than they do today as we struggle to build even the simplest user interfaces. I'm hopeful that we can get all of the benefits of 1980s cooperative threading but that the decades of experience since allow us to avoid the pitfalls.
Well I use Vim more for navigation and skimming around, or reading when I know where I am going. But for opening for example Redis source just wanting to read the source code and learn, I still like Sublime the best for that, it is so smooth and nice looking. Reading source code in Sublime really is a pleasure.

Emacs on the other hand provide very nice integration with various REPLs and functional languages have best tooling in it. Vim I use as terminal editor, and when I do work inside repo, reading diffs and programming in some languages (like C for example).

I really want to switch to only one editor, but whenever I try, I come to the point where I miss the feature of some other one of these 3. : ) I'm bit too weird when it comes to editors and configs...
Do you want to die?! Do not use the Tesla autopilot unless you are in a medical emergency and cant operate the vehicle.
I would like to have a setup like this:

- One VPN to connect laptop on the road with machines at home LAN, and with VM:s on different hosts.

- Have this VPN "exit" via a commercial VPN-provider (for privacy).

Could I easily configure this? Have one of the VM's be the VPN server and configure it to "exit" trough the commercial VPN?

I haven't really managed / configured "real" VPN's, how does local access work? I.e, when I'm at home with my laptop and access my desktop that's on the same network, will the packets flow out to the remote VPN server and back, or can it resolve it locally somehow?

Also, will this break stuff that depend on Bonjour / ZeroConf (i.e Apple Airplay and stuff?)
There's not enough room for it. The Model 3 is much smaller than the Model S.
> there are unreasonable economic expectations by users as well as the article's author: Wait you want gigabit speeds, ultra-reliability in challenging radio conditions, and that at a tenth of the cost of a 3G mobile radio?

Honestly the big reason mobile radios are more reliable is that they're allowed to transmit at like 20x the power of devices in the ISM band. That's not a cost thing, it's just a regulatory issue steming from (some rather outdated) concerns about interference in the shared environment.

I mean, it's true that wifi is sort of a mess. Marketing of the standards has gotten way ahead of real world hardware capability (frankly MIMO as it stands is basically voodoo snakeoil that provides no consumer benefit whatsoever). But it's no less complicated than all the junk going on in LTE either. Everything's a mess.

Wifi continues to have the extraordinary advantages of being privately deployable, performant, pervasive, and standard (i.e. ethernet-framed, so everything Just Works the way everyone expects). It's not going anywhere.
While it would have only been a blip on the century's graph, there _was_ this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_famine_of_1944–45
Interesting.. yeah a todo in its simplest form is not a bad idea :)

When you say "explicit model of a sprint" do you think about the whole start-date, end-date kind of thing per Kanban board? Or is it the kanban board itself that sort of leads to this formal process?
I love the idea of a universal basic income. It makes sense from a humanitarian standpoint, an automation taking away jobs standpoint and a minimizing bureaucracy standpoint.

But I have to admit, if you look at it from a pure numbers perspective, it does not make sense financially, even with simple back of the envelope calculations. Take the population of a country. Multiply that by, say something as little as $1000 a month, per person. $12,000 per year.

Completely discard any systems in the government budget that would no longer be needed due to UBI- You'll STILL come up way, way short. This is true even if you completely zero out all the additional services that would become less needed (ie less money to Medicaid because people would be healthier, etc). And this is for just the $1000 dollars a month variant.

Could someone please point me to what kind of tax structure a country would need to have to realistically be able to afford UBI? I would love to see UBI become a reality.
Those are the same things, just different methods and targeting different economic cohorts.

QE vastly inflated equity and real estate values, benefiting the wealthiest (at least in the US).
After I moved to mac, my UltraEdit became TextWrangler.
UMatrix – Point and click to forbid/allow Classes of requests made by your browser
UBI does not eliminate work-based income.
For that matter, what isn't a glorified CRUD app? Facebook? CRUD. Amazon? CRUD. Instagram? CRUD. eBay? CRUD.

FWIW it sounds like the founder is more of a techie that is disappointed the tech is so simplistic, and assumes everyone else will feel the same way. Hardly anyone will. A business is a business, a job is a job. Find someone who is more on the business end, customer relationships, product definition, whatever, and is excited to be working on something that's "tech" at all.
Like, I'm not sure why anyone thinks that:

1. AWS, DO or Linode won't respond to a subpoena

2. That any of those three won't have extensive logging in place, without the privacy goals that a VPN provider would have

You're just switching your ISP to AWS when you do this, which might be better than what you've got, but certainly isn't flawless untraceable security
Hey, I can use his results while still decrying him. And I intend to. I call it standing on the shoulders of giants while chipping off their faces.

Seriously, though, you're right. One shouldn't dismiss all of people's work just because they were wrong about some things. But whether someone is a 'great scientist' is a bit unimportant in that sense.
In fairness, the article is about executives, not employees, but everything you said is right.

One of the biggest and hardest jobs a startup exec/founder/whatever has is having a steady hand in the face of serious fucking freakouts.

It's a natural tendency to blame juniors for shit being all fucked up, even though a) shit being fucked up is your natural state of existence and b) shit being fucked up is all your fault. You fucked shit up.

My cofounder and I have talked each other down from the ledge many times. I'm maybe less patient with junior cats naturally than I should be, but I know my tendencies towards Jobsian ass-chewing and I am mostly successful in suppressing my bloodlust when things go wrong and I have to fix them.
Cool idea , let's share his wealth first then see what he feels about it.
Grille (cryptography)
Nobody could understand how a PC would get on every desk either. And then it happened. Thanks to a bunch of young people unhampered by that thinking.
First attempt at restoring Magnetic Scrolls backup tapes
Lost Joys of the Screen Saver
I totally agree with you. I code as a hobby in my spare time making no money off it so I'd rather use a free option.
Could just as well be pessimism.
I wonder how much of a deal breaker his lack of charisma is. Certainly people have been elected without it, but it's a nice equalizer if you're short in other areas, like experience.
It's not generally inflationary. Some goods will go up in prices, some will go down, depending on if they're essentials or luxury goods.

Though supply of real goods also wouldn't remain static. To the extent that some people can't afford basic necessities, capital would shift to making those.
What is your IP, what is your DNS, what informations you send to websites
The difference between compiling and lowering is that the syntax of the output of lowering is a strict subset of the syntax of its' input, whereas the output of compiling produces a completely different format, e.g. an AST, an in-memory graph, assembly, machine code, etc.

This makes implementing the next layer (compiler perhaps) simpler because it has to understand fewer syntax elements. This also makes a difference is that you could manually write the output of the lowered code yourself in the original language. Another effect is that (ideally) applying the lowering function L() to any code a second time should produce no change i.e. L(code) == L(L(code)). This is not true of compiling.
Basic requirement for UBI would be for Facebook to pay their fair share of tax first, surely.
Thanks!

I was at LensCrafters the other day and had to fill out a paper form that someone input into a computer by hand, so definitely see the need there.

Our goal is to get a high enough accuracy for handwriting OCR to work in enterprise settings. 90% may be good for consumers, but I wouldn't want to put anyone's health on the line due to a transcription error
Can you honestly say that, within some defined boundary, whether you think of it as geographic (some predominately low income community) or by product segment (local real estate markets for example), that the money supply hasn't increased after this policy?

Are there not now more dollars chasing the same goods?
It would be great if these tech scions spent as much time defending our existing social insurance programs (e.g. food stamps) as they did with these utopian fantasies. UBI will never become a reality in a cultural context that constantly paints any kind of floor on poverty as parasitism and moral failure, which is where we are right now in the US.
Building a quick DSL
He's not really a likeable person either
No. One changes the money supply, one shifts money from one group to another.
They're not. QE devalues all dollars equally. Wealth redistribution targets high income people to the benefit of low or no income people.
or use docker: https://hub.docker.com/r/kylemanna/openvpn/
Blackberry, Qualcomm settlement reaches $940M
I contend that most people that will cause trouble with smart pointers will also cause trouble with manual memory management, so your point is moot.
Is UBI just re-branded welfare reform?
Where New Slang Comes From
Same for a company that makes money from advertisers, though. Facebook needs their audience to be able to afford things (or think they can afford things) their advertisers want to sell.
Plenty of money to be made advertising to those people too.
Let's replace politicians, engineers and doctors with software! That's Fresco. It's also crazy.
Yeah and that PDF: misleading graphics, and no standard deviation. Someone has to be above average and it intuitively makes sense that the rushing upstart would be, but how bad is it really? You can't tell without more statistics
Like @yebyen said in a sibling comment, satire and parody are protected and comcastroturf is pretty clearly satirical, even if it is pointed, critical satire.

Another comment further down on this post also references a few legal precedents protecting domains that demonstrate protection for domain names along the lines of <trademarkedname>sucks.com

Basically, if you're offering a product in a marketplace and benefiting from consumers' familiarity with the trademarked brand then you're probably in trouble. But if you're not, then you're probably okay.
> Because there are going to be fewer and fewer jobs in the future (automation, etc).

Folks said the same thing before for every industrial revolution. I'd like to see more facts than religion on this matter.
I disagree. The JS is easier to read because it has an easier to parse structure. I've been coding in clojure for several years now.
I think he's charismatic.
Haha, that's extremely cynical but it actually makes sense.
> (arguably faster, better, more customizable) editors.

What are those arguments?
Is a ubi sustainable?
Oh, this is going to end well.
Does he sell the data? My impression was that Facebook generally hoards the data and then sells products that use it. The data itself stays inside and then you can use it in very specific ways by using Facebook tools. So you could use Facebook's users' data to target them on Facebook but Mark Zuckerberg isn't giving you the data.
1. Medicine: Advanced phage therapy

>'Isolated from Western advances in antibiotic production in the 1940s, Russian scientists continued to develop already successful phage therapy to treat the wounds of soldiers in field hospitals. [..] However, due to the scientific barriers of the Cold War, this knowledge was not translated and did not proliferate across the world.[16][17] A summary of these publications was published in English in 2009 in "A Literature Review of the Practical Application of Bacteriophage Research"'

2. Electronics: Léon Theremin work in the Soviet Union which is the basis of RFID technologies [1] [2].

3. History: Knorozov work deciphering the Mayan glyphs. He work put modern Mayan studies on a firm foundation. [3]

4. Physics: Much of the developments in dynamical systems came from "the Moscow School":

>"A more abstract approach, developed in Moscow, gained attention outside the U.S.S.R. via the translation of (Nemytskii and Stepanov, 1960), introduced by S. Lefschetz, who had himself published a text on qualitative theory a few years earlier (Lefschetz 1957). Here the first clearly-defined strange attractor – the solenoid – was described. The works of Kolmogorov, Anosov, Arnold and Sinai grew out of this "Moscow school" in the 1950-60's, with important work on ergodic theory (Sinai, 1966), geodesic flows (Anosov, 1967) and billiards (Sinai, 1970), using Kolmogorov's idea of K-systems. Some of this was motivated by S. Smale's visit to Moscow in 1961, during which he met Anosov, Arnold and Sinai and told them of the conjecture that structurally stable systems with infinitely many periodic orbits could exist (see Smale's Horseshoe, below)." [4]

5. Computer Science/Complexity Theory: "The concept of NP-completeness was developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s in parallel by researchers in the US and the USSR."

The list is very long and I don't have all day so I'm stopping here but people living in the Soviet Union made many important scientific achievements. This is not an endorsement of the Soviet Union (see Theremin's poor treatment).

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phage_therapy

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Theremin#Return_to_t...

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Knorozov#Key_research

[4]: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/History_of_dynamical_sys...

[5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cook%E2%80%93Levin_theorem#Con...
What did "Debian" say exactly? Can you link it?

Or are you just stating what you imagine "they" might have said? :)
The autograph James Bond never signed
Gross world product is about $16,000 per capita. So that's about how much your income would be if it was all evenly distributed. That's actually enough to boost you over the poverty line in the US. But people in the US also receive other benefits from the government.

However, given 50 years of modest 2% economic growth, you'd be up to a respectable $43,000 per person.
You mean some just consume for nothing? Maybe if most works are replaced by machines.
I guess $15,000 at the bottom of the market would not tend to have huge localized effects on housing (I think people would be more inclined to move towards cheaper housing than to compete for scarce housing; the $15,000 eases pressure on moving to better paying jobs).

For goods like food, the supply is pretty freaking elastic.
I usually already wear a jacket, I'm talking about wind entering the chest area.
Pvpkcs11 – Input validation library and a set of PKCS#11 implementations
Well... if history is any lesson, the Weimar era of Germany is probably the nadir. We've got a ways to go.
Rust has a monoculture. So firefox does/will have one
But that's exactly the opposite of what universal basic income should be used for (waste on excesses/luxuries before basic needs are met).

I grew up in a household with relatively little income, where you barely have enough for food and housing. I cannot imagine being in that situation and spending much on random next day delivery luxuries from Amazon - you literally would starve. The first thing on my mind would be upgrading from beans and rice to other foods, etc... that sort of thing.

Buying into luxuries only really occurs when you exceed the ability to provide for basic needs. Basic income if implemented will be tuned to provide basic needs, not luxuries -- the only time I see this changing is in a distant future post-scarcity economy.
Machines do steal jobs - the repetitive, manual labor jobs that humans do not want. They also increase efficiency and profits for companies, leading to lower costs for consumers and investments in new industries that may not have existed before.
If everyone gets basic income, you can be sure that the rents will rise accordingly.
Why Twilio's Function Strategy Is Revolutionary
They should respond like slutsofinstagram.com did (slutsof in stagram) which was a children's story. I don't understand what Comcast is so mad about:

Com C AstroTurf

Clearly Communications Companies Astroturfing was too long for a domain. so they shortened it to ComCAstroturf. What's the issue?
UBI is just a "basic" subsistence income with the intent that everyone can afford to participate in society at the most basic level (not the case today). If you want more you can work for it just like you do today. There will still be plenty of jobs that need doing.
True, I should have generalised it as "people who put content on the web", which isn't limited to developers at all.
What does this have to do with the specific criticism of the policy being inflationary?

You could have said "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?" and it would have had as much bearing on the discussion as undervaluing the growth of the PC market.

Whether one is hopeful or young, or not... doesn't allow them to escape basic economic forces. Do you have an economic argument to inform the conversation?
Did you check the address on the comment to make sure it was the same person? Because I don't see how Comcast would even have the name of a 3-year-old.
Great idea, thanks! Adding it to the feature ideas ;-) Btw I'm happy to help with contributions!
This is all about managing expectations. Getting a model 3 is not getting a mini model S. I like it, and the approach.