In Defense of Minor Attracted People or I Think it's Genocide.

People lived short brutish lives in our ancient history, 30,000
years ago, often dying around age 30. If girls didn't get started
reproducing just as soon as they hit puberty, they might not have
lived long enough to see that their own children made it to puberty
themselves; people had to reproduce early, the species literately
depended on it. Therefore, it's no coincidence that the age of
puberty is somewhere around half the age of 30. It also explains why
there are so many people accused of being pedophiles, that's the way
nature has made some of us, to be attracted to youth as a
reproductive strategy. But rather than discuss why there seems to be
so many “pedophiles”, we chose to just throw them in jail. Truth
is, it's the way nature made them through evolution.

We are still running on 200,000 year old software, and no stupid,
recently created, feel good, socially constructed laws are going to
change that. There was no supportive social services in those ancient
times, and young girls who lost their families either died or grew up
quick. The ones that were attracted to older men survived, and
eventually reproduced. That is why you have girls who like older men,
and men who like young girls. It's an adaptive strategy that worked
in the past, simple as that. Men taking in young girls was natures
answer to a social safety net.

It also explains why the model industry has such young models,
they know men are attracted to youth, beauty and neoteny (look up the
word). No one really thought much of it back in the day when Calvin
Klein was using a 14 year old Brook Shields as a model. Only recently
are people outraged so much over so little. I really think it is so
the deep state can use it as a way to control our politicians. Makes
you wonder.

Why persecute people for the way nature made them if they are not
hurting anyone? No wonder the birth rate in western civilization is
declining. Unfortunately, as always, religious prudes are standing in
the way of sound reason but try to get your heads around the idea,
it's a sound theory. It very well might have made the difference
between the human race surviving, and not to acknowledge this
possibility is just being unreasonable. The economy has changed but
our biology hasn't. There is nothing wrong with being attracted to
girls, and boys, around the age of puberty. It's just recently that
young people can't find work, and people are stretching their child
like behavior all the way into their 30's.

Throwing people in jail for having an interest in young girls, and
boys, around the age of puberty is just predatory policing for money,
just like with drugs. Lawyers, politicians, law enforcement types,
persecuting people for non-violent crimes that shouldn't even be
crimes in the first place, like drugs, which is really just to defend
the racketeering of the medical/phama industry, and to prop up their
socialist make-work jobs.

Being attracted to youth doesn't make one a monster, it's the way
nature made us. What does make one a monster is destroying the lives
of innocent men, and women, who did nothing more than follow their
human nature. Not only does it destroy the lives of men when they are
taken to prison but destroys the lives of the families, and pets,
that depend on them. Think of all the poor animals that get hauled
off to animal shelters,and get killed because their owners get put in
prison for stupid, non-violent crimes, feeding the prison industry.
If I was a cop, I would have trouble sleeping at night for thinking
about all the lives I've destroyed.

Morality is just an abstract concept, a social construct created
by parochial minded religious people that are trying to make you
submit to their antiquated group think. They often craft shaming
language toward you, accusing you of having a “high hope for a low
heaven." Evil and morality are points of view. Picture a cat
playing with a mouse. To the cat, he is just playing with his food.
To the mouse, the cat is the equivalent of evil it's self. This on
the other hand, this is not evil; this is evolution adapting people
to be attracted to youth as an adaptive strategy. It's the way we
have evolved and is why there are so many supposed “pedophiles"
everyone is freaking out about.

This is the realist's perspective who lives by natural law and
understands evolution - Life is a question, asked of the Universe,
"Is this right?"...and answered by death if it isn't. We
literally evolved, through evolution, to be attracted to youth and
neoteny to survive! If the trait of being attracted to youth was not
beneficial, it would not have been passed on!

So, every one, stop being uptight prudes, know that everyone is
different, and just because you don't like something doesn't mean
that it isn't or wasn't at some point a good thing. Older people
taking in younger people, as companions, was natures answer to a
social safety net, there was no welfare for them when their parents
died at an early age. Can you imagine using the strategy that women
do today, of waiting 'till age 30 to have kids, back when there was
no medical system of any kind, with your teeth rotting out of your
heads! You people are silly for not seeing the obvious truths of our
own biological evolution.

Again, our biology hasn't changed, only the laws, and peoples
brainwashed, reactive monkey, herd-like perspectives. Think for
yourselves people! We are throwing people in jail for stupid
non-violent crimes longer then people who attempt, or succeed, in
murder because some stupid politicians were grandstanding for tougher
laws that we didn't need. It doesn't even begin to make sense unless
you consider it is being used to manipulate politicians through
deep-state intimidation. Seems to me some arm twisting like that
would explain a lot about the crazy decisions our politicians have
made.

I would say the age of consent of 12, like in Mexico, is about
right for a legal cut off. Nature gave us every thing we need to
consent to sex and that is the drive to have sex. I was a horny
little bastard at 12, and so was everyone, of that age, around me.
If you deny this, you are not only being disingenuous with yourself
but everyone around you as well. Perhaps your memory is faulty, and
doesn't go back that far?

Do other animals wait for a certain age to have sex after they
become able to sexually reproduce? No. It's just as stupid to put
limits on it for us after one has reached puberty. People had jobs at
those ages 100 years ago. My father would be 90 this year if he was
still alive, and he told me that when he was 14 he earned a man's
wage reading water meters. Everyone was younger in the past, on
average, than they are now. In 1900, 18 percent of all American
workers were under the age of 16. Child laborers often worked to help
support their families. In colonial America, child labor was not a
subject of controversy. It was an integral part of the agricultural
and handcraft economy. Children not only worked on the family farm
but were often hired out to other farmers. Boys customarily began
their apprenticeship in a trade between ages ten and fourteen. Years
ago each child you had made you richer, you could tend another acre
of crops. Now, each child you have makes you poorer or if you are too
poor to support them, burdens on the system.

The economy has changed but our biology hasn't. We are keeping
young people in school, which is essentially just giving them busy
work to keep them out of the real economy, and treating them like
kids longer and longer because the economy can't support work for
them, as it has all been outsourced due to globalism. The system is
all screwed up, and people are too concerned about being called names
rather than speak out about the real problems in western society.

I see a globalist system, which has shipped all our jobs over
seas, and implemented silly laws restricting sex WELL beyond the ages
of puberty. It looks more like a means of genocide to me. Those
people in the middle east aren't exactly having a shrinking
population like Europeans in the west are. Yes, the young people are
still having sex because they have a high sex drive as nature
intended. Nothing is going to stop that but instead of society
pushing them into safe, monogamous, long-term relationships, they are
making it to dangerous for that. Yes, these elites know what they are
doing to us, and have been doing for a long time now. I think it's
genocide.

Grandparents were a rare breed until 30,000 years ago... when life expectancy grew

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2016759/Life-...

90 percent of a womens eggs are gone by age 30

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/women-fertility-falls-lose-...