skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Science in general needs more staff scientists. Currently the system is based mostly on "cheap" labor by students and postdocs who often work long hours for minimal pay in the hope of one day getting a real position. This is not only demotivating and unfair but also very inefficient, since labs will often tend to solve problems using manual labor instead of seeking more innovative solutions.

Personally, I think a well-run lab needs a combination of staff scientists, very good engineers and salespeople, with one or more visionaries at the top who define the direction of work. OpenAI is a great example of how this can work (IMHO),as they have both excellent scientists but also brilliant engineers and people that are very good at selling their vision to the world.
Just because you don't understand/like something doesn't make it illogical.
No, not parallel. Though it should be possible to add extension functions to Collection that use Java 8's Stream apis to provide that functionality.
Here's a link to the Google Security Rewards Program

https://www.google.com/about/appsecurity/programs-home/
My major issue with bytea is two fold, the same oid issue that you have with LOB's (we have 10's of billions of pages) so you're forced to less than optimal solutions like table inheritance for large numbers of records, plus it severely bloats the size of the heap file making a VACCUM FULL take a century if needed.
Xamarin Forms Embedding
I wonder what the median is though
Say so to the people who is using RxJava or similar, whether they need to rewrite everything or not. In every program you need to take architectural decisions that affect how everything is build and a change on them could mean to rewrite everything. It can be a library or the programming language.

JetBrains was supporting kotlin for Android, the same people that build IntelliJ idea (the base of Android Studio). But who is supporting RxJava? Imagine that the react community wants to make a move that will harm Android devs, so they change all the Rx*, including RxJava.

Using kotlin wasn't a risk. Google said it will make it first class citizen, but do you really trust Google in the long term? They close products very quickly. I feel safer knowing that JetBrains is behind kotlin and not Google.
One issue:

> All institutions should be like Broad (paraphrasing)

> The Broad Institute attracts world-class scientists, as both faculty members and staff.

HHMI's Janelia, the Salk Institute, and others that function like Broad can all attract world-class scientists. I'm skeptical that they're producing better/more interesting science because of their staff-scientist heavy model. A simpler explanation is that they attract better scientists and have almost unlimited funding.
Ahh, rewrite vs letting it stay! The classic maintainer dilemma!

Answering this really depends. I think I would start with "what do I hope to get out of this process". Are you doing this to learn? Are you doing it to grow a user-base? If it's a user-base, is this the biggest problem preventing your growth? If it's learning, is this the most interesting problem for you to solve?
Actually, assuming about 2000 RPM at 60 mph in a 4 cylinder car you are getting more like 17 detonations/second
I'm not sure how the ambulance count is pertinent in this article. In such a huge workforce you will have events that need ambulances regularly. And sending for one can actually bee a pro-active measure that actual evidences care for their workers. For example if someone has shortness of breath, or faints, etc.
Totally agree, I learned Clojure early on and wrote a few small projects in it, and it completely changed how I look at programming.
Global+Peritoneal+Dialysis+Market+Drivers+and+Challenges+Report+2021
...name calling conclusion jumping anti-circlejerk-circlejerkers.
Thanks for the suggestion. We will try to fix that soon...
I own a Tesla S85 and recently had a Cadillac ATS rental for a few days. It was an interesting contrast, since the official 0-60 times of the two cars are almost the same, yet the Cadillac felt like an absolute slug by comparison.

I think a lot of it is that there's a great deal of lag in traditional drivetrains, and we rarely do 0-60 in actual real-life driving. More typically we're doing 0-30 or 30-40 or 55-65. Once the traditional drivetrain does all of its clunking around and can start putting down the power, it can compete, and in a 0-60 run that initial period isn't too bad. But in normal driving, the relative significance of the delay is huge. It doesn't just feel quicker, it is quicker for more typical situations.

At this point, the main thing traditional cars have going for them is cost. And that's probably just a matter of time.
Union organizer runs blog claiming work force unhappiness. News at 11.
Your secret sauce is purely based on the hard work of open source developers. Pardon me if I don't support your obscurantism.
This add-on will be available for Firefox here after it is reviewed by Mozilla: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/don-t-fuck-wi...
The overall aggregate ROI of college should be neutral, right? And therefore half the population will find their individual data points to be negative.

If the ROI of college aggregated over all consumers is positive, then the colleges are mispricing themselves. As capitalists, they should charge more until they capture all the consumer surplus and the aggregate ROI for all consumers converges to zero. This is more or less what has happened over the past generation. (Not all colleges are strictly capitalist, of course, but in broad strokes this is what we've seen.)
> We do not communicate on the exact tools

Honestly, you're not communicating much. Serious question: why would anyone give you their card details for a complete unknown? Your site doesn't provide free scans, sample reports (or even partial ones), or even say anything about who 'ScannerSec' is.
Most of their consumer-facing services are not, shall we say, famous for being high-touch...

But presumably different people look after the security side of things.
I suspect that people of the future will look back and be amazed that for more than a century we've been legally allowing our slow-reacting bodies [1] to ride around at 80mph in a 2-ton hideous mechanical equivalent of a horse, killing ourselves [2] and simultaneously destroying our cities [3].

I myself used to be a "petrolhead" my 20s and it's quite amazing to observe this awakening when looking in the mirror. I suspect it was caused by the revolution in electric/self-driving tech and traveling more and comparing car-centric US cities to other places.

[1] 250ms delay at best, for young and healthy adults.
[2] #1 cause, ahead of all guns, including suicides.
[3] https://progressivetransit.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/cars-kill-cities
Sounds the the 'system' is working and things have improved dramatically:

"The company did release more recent data, which indicates its record of safety incidents went from slightly above the industry average in late 2016, to a performance in the first few months of 2017 that was 32% better than average. The company said that its decision to add a third shift, introduce a dedicated team of ergonomics experts, and improvements to the factory’s "safety teams" account for the significant reduction in incidents since last year."

Of course the focus of the article is going to be the most inflammatory version possible because that's where the eyeballs come from.
> It's amazing what happens when Internet is treated like a utility.

It's not really like a utility though. A utility usually has a low fee and charge per use. Not that I encourage data or bandwidth limits, but there's a difference. Consider you could either get gigabit for $90 or you could get a fixed speed or data (say 10 mbit or 100gb) for $30 but full speed access to Netflix, YouTube, Windows Update etc. is included. How many people would pay $60 extra for unlimited access to the rest of the Internet?

I think it's a fair question to ask why consumers are paying for both installation, the bandwidth itself and the services they access (in cash or ad revenue) while everyone else is making money.

Edit: Not sure what the point of downvotes is. If you can't answer a basic argument like this you can't expect your views to be taken seriously. But hey, instead of actually doing something relevant let's talk about which Internet connection we all have.
In what applications will electric engines not be able to replace internal combustions engines? I don't want these improvements to go to waste long-term!
A staff scientist at a National Lab is going to make $100K or more (cost-adjusted for the region; Berkeley likely pays more than Argonne, since the former is near SV, while the latter is an hour+ outside Chicago).

A grad student is never a replacement for a staff scientist. Grad students aren't particularly useful until 4-5 years into a 7 year program, and then they're out in a couple years, so they can't do complex, long-running research.
I think we're viewing the issue from 2 different stand points. You are correct that from a library authors perspective they shouldn't impose undue restrictions. I was thinking more along the lines of code maintenance within the same library module where it could be helpful to signal to others that come along that the stl string is the expected default. I think most people would agree that (using...) in the header is a bad idea if the header is intended to be apart of the Public API for the library but I think its use can be justified in a few select instances of internal headers in order to impose cohesive coding convention.

If its my library and I don't want other maintainers adding additional string classes internally, I can at the very least force them to use fully qualified names for their alternative string classes to avoid ambiguity. I hate working on code that has 5 different versions of the same freaking thing because each developer decided to implement their own version when the standard way would have sufficed. That was the point I was trying to make. Just like putting const and override on functions, it's a way to help maintainers avoid doing dumb things.
> With all the AI being thrown around, can't someone build a "tastefulness" filter

I've long wanted an extension for Google Image Search, eBay, Etsy, etc. that simply filtered out all listings with images of items with pure white backgrounds. That would go a long ways toward a "tastefulness filter".

Huge indicator of handmade / vintage / used items sold by an individual seller vs. a new item being dropshipped from Amazon or China.
How is 42 hours a week working to collapse?
Deep learning software for colorizing black and white images with a few clicks
Google’s TensorFlow Lite brings machine learning to Android devices
In this environment, they wouldn't need acquisitions. Progress isn't necessary for profit.
The article didn't say he was lifting a tire overhead, it pointed out that there was a difference between Tesla's claim that he was injured installing a tire, and the employee's claim that it was a cumulative injury from working on an overhead assembly station. 2 different stories, not one.
American cars (read SUVs and Trucks) are much, much bigger. I drive a Mini Cooper (R56S) which is probably about the same size as your Astra. Most of my co-workers and non-"car guy" friends think it's impossibly small. Even "small" CUVs (a smaller, more car-like SUV popular here in the States) dwarf my car. Vanishingly few US folks would want to drive something with under 300 hp and fewer than 4 doors. Not to mention the interior space people think is "appropriate".

Your first sentence really covers it. We have really cheap gas, so we don't care that fuel economy is bad. Every time someone I know comments about how poor gas mileage their car gets I respond with "what are you willing to give up"? They aren't - they want a giant SUV with hundreds of horsepower and they want to get 50-60 MPG.
> However, I think dynamic typing forces a certain familiarity with the codebase that can prove really useful. Yes, it slows learning down, yes it rules the lower end of the spectrum of developers out, but there are still benefits to this required familiarity.

Useful in what way? I don't see how static typing is going to make you less familiar with a codebase. Good use of types provides a certain amount of documentation for free as well.
Google is giving a cluster of 1,000 Cloud TPUs to researchers for free
There are already interfaces for Immutable collections in kotlin. And all the functional operators as map, filter, etc, returns them. But it is not true immutability as you said, because under the hood they are normal list. They aren't even read-only objects, but you encapsulate this behaviour under an interface.
Some of the conventions:

// Type indicated with `:`, type follows variable; value follows type.
variable: Type
variable: Type = "value"

// Generics with <>
strings: List<String>

// Operator overloading.
text = "a" + "b"
num = 1 + 2

// Capitalize type names.
class TheClass { ... }

// Use braces for delimiting.
class TheClass { ... }

Most of the conventions we're talking about were adopted by Scala; but we can see they also predate Scala. Many can be found in C++. The type/variable notation is very old, going back to ML and truthfully going back to mathematical notation.
Responsive Design for Motion
Without being a comparison the other tool(s), I would make a point regarding to your blocker, which actually it shouldn't be a blocker.

Many folks miss one important point: Salt's renderer interface is also pluggable. There are quite a few choices for you: https://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/ref/renderers/index.htm.... For data representation you can choose between: yaml, yamlex, json, json5, hjson, or even pure python. Nothing else can be more flexible than pure python. But, of course, this approach also has its drawbacks. Anyway, if none of them suits your needs for non-terrible DSL, you can even implement your own DSL, your own renderer.

All you have to do is adding few characters at the top of your pillar, i.e. #!json or #!json5 or even #!lobster.

So where is the limitation again? In reading documentation I guess.
Maybe this is true, but plenty of big companies are hiring tons of engineers... so I don't know how this is true universally.
It is traditional village. Women don't count. (And likely don't play since women and men don't mix in traditional villages - each gender has own culture.)

Though I guess more accurate title would be "half of an Indian village addicted to chess", it is not end of the world.
What if you loose your smartcard ?
@kmm's measurements are in Liters per 100KM. The translation is correct.
This is an incredibly frustrating thing with the way OS X handles encrypted disk images as well. Needing to share confidential documents with coworkers, we were hoping to store them in an encrypted disk image. (GPG proved way too complex for anyone to adopt) Of course, the standard OS X GUI prevents you from pasting a password when mounting, which of course led to coworkers resorting to short, easy to type, easy to remember (and easy to crack) passwords.

The best solution I found was to mount via the command line but that definitely wasn't an option for any coworker unfamiliar with the terminal.

https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/42257/how-can-i-mo...

Also while this may be ultra paranoid, I really don't like typing passwords in public places where endless he cameras can record my screen and keystrokes.
>There is no future in software development as a job.
this
> The "let the market decide" shills don't seem to understand there's no market.

Oh, trust me, we understand that very well. What we want to do is expand competition by making it easier to compete. This largest barrier to competition at this time is local municipalities, which is a good place for the FCC to step in and tell them to back off and let the ISPs install their fiber.

I support the FCC regulating governmental entities, not so much private ones. Net neutrality should, if enforced by government, be legislated, not initiated by a regulatory agency. This issue was brought up by people on both sides of the issue for different reasons. On the pro- side because they new a regime change would just undo it, and on the con- side because they thought such a large change was unfit for unelected bureaucrats to decide.

The idea that we should introduce more regulation in order to fix bad historic policy is like government asking for a temporary tax. A long time ago my state asked for a new temporary tax for school renovations. Guess what, that tax never went away. It's the same thing with regulations. They just keep piling up.
The word you're looking for is exorbitant.
We aggregate data from multiple web vulnerability scanners, and provide a unified and simplified report about the vulnerabilities detected.
value as being immutable is a common idiom
microserfs was amazing. It's a slice of time. Worth reading for a perspective.
2l of water seems really low to me, unless that's just an emergency supply?
Effective TensorFlow for Non-Experts [video]
The civility here never fails to disappoint me
Those numbers are also pretty meaningless without a reference.

Having never worked in a 10K+-employee facility, I have no idea how many ambulances should be called per year. I would imagine that with that many people, even under idyllic working conditions, the number of medical emergencies/year would be non-zero, but I'm having trouble picking up an intuitive expectation for what it should be.
Yes but no.

One of the reasons the UK left EU because it was not allowed to have different laws for EU immigrants and locals - for benefits for example.

Europe choose values over money. They - Merkel - may not be the best people in the world but some moves are very commendable.
There is Karabiner for Mac. It let's you remap every key of your Mac. For instance I remapped the enter key to behave like a Control key if I use it in combination with another key. Otherwise (if I just hit enter it behaves like the enter key)
The new BMW M5 is also closer to the size of a 7 series from 30 years ago. Additionally, even with AWD being added it's 200lbs lighter than the last gen was. Cars are certainly heavier on the whole than they used to be, but lightening them is starting to happen again and they're much safer than any car from decades past.
Oh man, "The Leftovers" is an amazing show in my opinion, but it's definitely not for the faint of heart.

Another gem I discovered this year is Amazon's "Patriot". Coincidentally, it features one of the main actors from "Lost" :P
Don't try to learn everything. Take 2-3 main areas and become an expert in these areas. Then keep revisiting every 2 years what you wanna be an expert in.
Ah ok so 1984 was pretty much the worst year to look at when finding heavy cars? That explains a lot :)
Indeed, or sometimes I want to try certain attack vendors and the next second I am thinking I am fooling myself, they're smarter than me, they wouldn't leave such bugs in, queue a few weeks later, someone gets a few $k because they let themselves sucked into it :D.

I guess it's as much mindset as it's skill.
Boost – Your personal advisor and career coach
If you go and visit a church, you will realize that no, you don't have a communal meeting ground across class. Class and geography is strongly correlated, so that pre-sorts already. Within that church, people self-select according to the smaller sub-strata of class they belong to.

As placeholder for class, here's an interesting stat on racial diversity: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/07/27/the-most-and...

Most of the large denominations are quite homogenous. The same shakes out across individual churches, and across class. We tend to sort, as humans.

(Then again, having a recourse does not rely on mingling)
Shining Light on the Shadow Brokers
Definitely lichess
But using that as your basis to ignore the question is ignoring the can.

Religion tries to answer the questions on existence, meaning and morality (this is not meant to be defimitively comprehensive). An atheist who calls the religious person a fool for asking a question and finding an answer that still leaves some questions is himself the fool.
That is why most religions have a revelatory component. Hardly anyone thinks that you could figure out from first principles what God's intentions are. But he can tell you his intentions if he wants to.
It's a very clever optimization (could it be categorized as vectorization?) in a very used part of the C library. In some cases these optimizations very justified.
Not specific to scrum but I am reminded of a part from Peopleware:

"The most surprising part of the 1985 Jeffery-Lawrence study appeared at the very end, when they investigated the productivity of 24 projects for which no estimates were prepared at all. These projects far outperformed all the others (see Table 5-3)."

Table 5-3 Productivity by Estimation Approach (Full Result)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Effort Estimate Prepared by Average Productivity Number of Projects
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Programmer alone 8.0 19
Supervisor alone 6.6 23
Promgrammer & supervisor 7.8 16
System analyst 9.5 21
(no estimate) 12.0 24

Source: https://www.amazon.com/Peopleware-Productive-Projects-Teams-...
JetBrains is doing this, not Google. Google is only going to collaborate with JetBrains to help with the Android support.

> Android update breaks your app which is written in Kotlin

then it also breaks the same app written in java. Because the good thing about kotlin is that it is transparent, it generates bytecode as java does. So from the point of view of the platform there is no difference between kotlin and java.

> first-class access to new APIs as soon as they're created.

This makes me think you don't know how kotlin works. You can mix java and kotlin files in the same app and call methods from one to the other without problems.
Some of it is due to theoretical alignment. For example, succinct function expressions come out of the the desire to simplify use of functional programming. Another example is the adoption of ML-style type notation: we want people to use static types, we want it to be easy, and we want types to be expressive -- <var>: <type> allows <type> to contain some spaces and punctuation while still being clear.
Another implication of all this power is that there is now little need for "passing". Everybody can reach the speed limit easily on almost all roads.
To a first approximation, it seems like

Java : Kotlin :: JavaScript : TypeScript

This seems like a good idea.
Driving is massively safer now than it was even 20 years ago. Automated safety systems are big reason why, and we aren't too far from fully automated braking/lane holding systems being cheap enough to be standard equipment, and reduce accident rates substantially more (even with distracted drivers).
I’m personally using Online.net, although you might also want to try out scaleway.

You can check out https://gist.github.com/justjanne/205cc548148829078d4bf2fd39...

I’m personally actually paying 30€ now, for several Dediboxes from Online, running kubernetes.

The big issues of Google, AWS, etc is the cost for bandwidth and performance – I can transfer 180TB in one month on one server, and pay no extra fee, and don’t get throttled – while a startup using Firebase might end up paying 7000% more (or worse).
I also have a model S, but I have owned a couple of other high performance gas cars that are much more responsive on the 55-65 or 40-70 acceleration test (passing at highway speeds). That's the only common case where the tesla loses to gas vehicles, and then only high performance gas vehicles (e.g. 300HP+ coupe/sedan models).

But the 0-30 thing is exactly right in my experience. Even more powerful vehicles don't have the instant and smooth acceleration feel of an electric motor.
Is This the End of the “Old” IoT?