skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is it a foregone conclusion that we need to be producing this much protein?
And they said during the press conference that AlphaGo was running on a single machine this time.
I upvoted because I wanted to know the real story.

There some incredibly interesting comments about human history here now.
In the post-game press conference, DeepMind mentioned that the version currently playing uses 10x less compute than the Lee Sedol version and runs on a single machine.
(test "this ) will not ( work")
So that you get innovations like the iPod, Facebook and various gadgets -- while working 60 hours/week to make ends meet and you're still a sudden illness away from debt.
> How much energy goes into creating a civilization that produces that human?

By your definition, on AI side we should add energy spent on creating AI and civilization that produced it.
And also 2 years ago in even greater detail.
What I read so far, the Fiat 500X delay trick is new, the Fiat/Chrylser investigation is new and the rest is stricter, formally better, but the conclusions behind are lacking.

The CAN parametrization A2L cheat for the low temp trigger is missing/fixed, they identified it as acoustic mode. InjCrv_stNsCharCor, "Status der Akustikbedingung"
All the other manifacturers they caught cheating are missing.
But at least they confirmed now Bosch as the real culprit, in their EDC17 diesel ECU software.
Major news and US law still is targeting VW only. In fairness I believe Bosch implemented the cycle detection as
project for Audi, and the delay for Fiat/Chrysler.

"Notably, we find strong evidence that both defeat devices were created by Bosch and then enabled by Volkswagen and Fiat for their respective vehicles"

The real workflow for the 4 deactivating conditions is described better though, but the A2L is missing, which is what Bosch describes to their partners. How to activate the cheat.

Read here: http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~klevchen/diesel-sp17.pdf

[Update: The A2L is there, all clear.]

For explanation: Car manufacturers/customers get the basic ECU diagram/model pictures and the A2L files, which contains the descriptions what they can do with the controller software in the ECU. So for this "crime" there needs to be a partnership between the creator (Bosch) and the user (VW), which demanded that feature, and then Bosch describing it to VW how to activate or deactivate it. Under which name it is hidden.

Also note that under european law it is not a crime. European law only cares for emission testing during the test cycle, and also only for a few selected engines upfront. Under european emission law catching a real engine cheating with their NOx will have no consequences. US law is different. US regulations avoid the simple to detect cycles, and use a real driver on a chassis dyno. So the US is cheating by using specialized drivers who are experts like F1 drivers driving through the tests, while the Europeans and Asians use the test cycle detection SW.
Can you explain (just a broad overview) why that wouldn't work? I mean, it's not like black porn actors are categorically different from black people in general... in particular, if you have an algorithm that can locate the face, you could just pass the face of the porn actor to the other algorithm to determine age/race/whatever...
The state is facing a budget shortfall, per Brown administration estimates.
Tackle the backlog - those bugs that have been just sitting there for months or even years because other things keep getting prioritized above them. They may be minor, low-priority fixes, but when you solve them, what people will think is "Wow! This developer fixed a bug that no one else could in 3 years! That's always annoyed me but now it's finally fixed!". Next thing you know, they'll be giving you the most important tasks.

Along the way, you'll of course need to talk to people to understand both the code that has the bugs and what is expected of it, and you'll learn years of history from both the development side and the product side, which is invaluable.
>Every single human being has the potential to be an Einstein, so to speak, in my opinion

Your opinion is completely unsupported by evidence. Do you truly believe someone with Downs Syndrome or a severe traumatic brain injury has the capacity to be a theoretical physicist?

The belief that everyone is capable of great things might be comforting, but it's ultimately very cruel. Many people will try their very hardest and get the best available support, but still struggle with the most basic tasks of life and work. Pretending otherwise just absolves us of responsibility. It's a get-out-of-jail-free card when we see people suffering.

We need a society that provides a good life for everyone, regardless of their ability to contribute. It's great if truckers can retrain to be software developers or psychotherapists, but we shouldn't be planning our society based on that assumption. Some people are very unlikely to develop advanced professional skills, but that's fine. They're still human beings and they're still entitled to a dignified and fulfilling life.
Some links about FineArt.

In English

http://technode.com/2017/03/20/tencents-fine-art-wins-comput...

https://qz.com/936654/googles-alpha-go-now-has-a-serious-gam...

In Chinese

http://tech.qq.com/a/20170319/015726.htm

https://www.huxiu.com/article/186238.html

From the second English link:

> As Tencent’s tech blog explains (link in Chinese), FineArts works in a similar way to AlphaGo. Both AIs comprise two computer systems modeled on the human brain, which can be trained on large data sets. One part of the system, the “policy network,” predicts which of the possible moves are the likeliest to be played. The other, the “value network,” then evaluates which of those is likeliest to win
What Are the Career Paths in Systematic Trading?
It's not the trucker's fault they're traffic jammed. Does that mean it's their employer's fault?
Everyone else has their pride, black pride, gay pride, womens' pride(?).

Christmas is mentioned less as it's slowly turning into 'Happy Holidays' but we have more mention of Eid, Ramadam, Yom Kippur etc.
TV news reports explain to us the meaning of these religious festivals completely uncritically and visit families in their homes as they celebrate them.

It's like our culture is oppressive whilst others are enriching. Turn down the volume on ours and increase it on others.
That sounds like it could be used to argue for environment or genetics!
sadly that haproxy (which stack overflow uses) does not support http/2 directly, you need to terminate it via nginx or anything else.
But in the linked repository the tokenizer has been adjusted:
https://github.com/maryrosecook/littlelisp/blob/master/littl...
It won't. It will instead operate over the first googol items and then require a restart.
> If you don't have to worry about all the shit that comes along with those things then you have privilege, regardless of your skin color.

Of course. Race and privilege are only joined insofar as their cultural context makes them. In a society that's virulently prejudiced against grey-eyed Slavs, 'pandaman is necessarily going to be "less privileged" than whoever that society favors.

That's exactly what the concept was created to indicate: how much of a given society's aggregate human mental garbage (racism, sexism, ableism, whatever-else-ism) a given person has to deal with, on the basis of who they happen to be, within that society.
This article goes into the supporters and detractors of the research

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2132026-our-common-ance...
Winners and shortlisters of Canada's most lucrative non-fiction prize
My friend, a math teacher, had this saying: only 5% are good at math, but those 5% are good at anything.
Funny coincidence, but I just read it a few weeks ago.

Yes, highly recommended reading.
That was true until a few years ago. Now humans cannot add value to computer chess programs and only slow them down. Implications for future economy and job markets are worth pondering.

http://www.businessinsider.com/computers-beating-humans-at-a...
The Ultimate List of Wonderfully Specific Museums
He certainly failed in basic understanding of tax law!
Consensus is a political instrument, not a scientific one. In science it takes only one right idea. As Einstein said: "a thousand experiments couldn't prove me right; a single one can prove me wrong." That NASA site is pathetic. All the data is right; all the conclusions, wrong. Any high school kid should be able to tell. Honestly, no one should be allowed to leave high school if they cannot state how bogus all this is. This is all a disgrace to science.

As for the article in discussion. Kudos for the amazing graphs, photos, and videos, a superb view on a fascinating and not easily accessible location on this planet. Really stunning imagery and data and information on that. Once we drop all the brain watch human induced warming of the text, it's quite good.

In order not to make this a useless discussion (really you all want to waste your time and throw all your money in a useless "control" of CO2, that even if achieved will do absolutely nothing to climate whatsoever, be my guest. I, particularly, think we should be investing time and money preparing for the unavoidable changes, because they are all natural and expected, but...). Anyway, could anyone please, just clarify to me this: "About 120,000 years ago, before the last ice age, the planet went through a natural warm period, with temperatures similar to those expected in coming decades. The sea level was 20 to 30 feet higher than it is today, implying that the ice sheets in both Greenland and Antarctica must have partly disintegrated, a warning of what could occur in the relatively near future if the heating of the planet continues unchecked." Also before it talks about Noah and Vishnu, etc. In the past, when everything happened similarly was all natural and the "gods"; now we have "replaced the 'gods' - though the memo hasn't reached most of the world because we're still pretty much killing each other about it - we are the cause, by the cheer magic of "smoke" (quite literally). And before? if that is not cherry picking, I don't know what is.
How can I help? I'll bring my own butter and salt.
Another vote for this. I started with Haskell through RWH and http://haskellbook.com/, and while I could write and understand code, I was really struggling with how to solve problems with Haskell.

Elm was just easier enough (but not too easy) that I could practice much more quickly. It also helped that I was writing a web app I could look at, rather than somewhat more contrived Haskell exercises.

After ~5 full days of Elm in my free time over a month or so, I came back to Haskell and found it much easier to get stuck into solving real problems.
Because, to a certain extent, it's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

When you're an early-stage, cash-strapped business entity, doing business in TX probably seems like an acceptable risk.
Hi all, I made this.

The reason it is described as "the world's most secure" is because both the code and the data are served from IPFS. IPFS is a content-addressable storage system, so as long as you access it over an IPFS gateway you trust (running one locally is the best way), you know the code and data haven't been meddled with.

It degrades to the same security model as ordinary encrypted pastebins when accessed over a gateway you don't trust (e.g. the hardbin.com public gateway).

This article (was on HN a couple of weeks ago) gives a good overview of IPFS: https://ipfs.io/blog/24-uncensorable-wikipedia/

And you can learn how to set up a local IPFS node here (it's super duper easy - copy binary into /usr/local/bin, ???, profit): https://ipfs.io/docs/getting-started/

So, please, don't knock it before you understand it :)

EDIT: Although I did try to explain it thoroughly in the About section, I do take responsibility for not making it easy enough to understand.

IPFS is pretty new technology, and presents a very different set of assumptions compared to traditional web apps.

If you didn't understand it at first but you do understand it now, please let me know what the key piece of information was that made it "click" so that I can put more emphasis on that next time.
I think you may have misread. The parent comment mentioned housing as an issue because people with even normal incomes are struggling to afford housing. That has nothing to do with the commute, although I totally agree that commuting for work is its own very serious proble.
So it's because AlphaGo is 10x more efficient this time.

Really impressive.
I don't favor this because then you get someones outdated view of the product, if at all. In an ideal world, yeah, you should get onboarding, and some walk throughs from the current developers. In reality this rarely happens in my experience. The code deployed to production is the ultimate source of the truth.

I recently witnessed an instance when a senior develoer heavily relied on others for information as you suggest. The team was failing to deliver the manager was incompetent. This senior developer I hired on with was made a scapegoat and blamed for slowing down the team and causing missed deadlines. This was absurd of course, but she got away with it, and he was fired.
You're certain that it's out of spite/indifference, more than say economics?
Cold. Discompassionate.
Because VR doesn't scale up like this. If you want multiple people interacting with the same virtual surface, this is much better than VR.
There were also some privacy/bureaucratic slow downs (my girlfriend had to sign a monster of T&C regarding data sharing with her doctor).
And also, there's a certain amount of 'healthcare' cost involved like with all other computers.
I'd also add that one of the big things to look at is the documentation and start improving it as a way for you to understand the systems.
I've seen abuse of this pattern. I am currently re-designing a medical form that has about 50 steps on separate pages, and if you do an error on page 5 and notice it later on page 45, you have to hit back 40 times and refill those 40 pages again.
This is actually the case and I probably misused the term, mgmt is actually the founders trying to find out if the features are going to be pushed before the next client meeting 90% of the time
> I have all rights to be afraid of racist cops of different color.

Especially if they're racist against you, of course you do. That's the point. Please see my reply to 'flukus's comment that is a sibling to yours.

> I am not a woman so my chances of assault and murder are way higher...

I was speaking primarily of domestic violence. If you give any kind of credence to the statistics about how under-reported that is, women get beat up a lot more often than men.
> Black kids don't get to spend time with their fathers

All too often true, but...

> Feminists made sure of that.

I think you have the "war on some drugs, especially those in the possession of non-whites" confused with "feminists".
> America defeated japan essentially by itself while providing enough food and supplied to keep the russian army alive while also providing the majority of the military strength to the western front, essentially being the primary factor in the defeat of fascism.

Where to start? The US did most of the work in beating Japan but they also got a lot of help from Russia toward the end. Once Japan had lost Manchuria to the Russians they gave up on a conditional surrender, they had nothing to bargain for.

And the primary factor in defeating fascism? If it wasn't for the British holding out in the west that front would have been lost before you guys even got involved. But more importantly on the Eastern front, the tide had already turned before lend lease to Russia made any difference. It sped the war up but it didn't decide it.
Also, prison is a business much more than anywhere else in the world. And business is the most sacred thing we have in Ferengistan.
Idly click on a link to one offering in a marketing email and be prepared for a flood of follow-ups reminding you of that item you were interested in.
I never click on anything in an email from Udemy for this reason.
This smartphone can give tough competition to DSLR camera
Decidability doesn't necessarily imply the absence of "optimization deficiencies". Many program analyses make approximations not (only) because of undecidability but simply due to complexity issues. Even in decidable languages it's trivial to write programs with an exponential number of code paths, which forces analyzers to make approximations.
Compressing Images Using Google’s Guetzli
Remote Desktop Manager Enterprise 12.5.4.0 with Multilingual and Portable Version
No. I meant to imply that slippery slope isn't a fallacy in this case.
They likely don't know of the prior art. In fairness "one thing per page" isn't a very literature searchable topic and many people have trouble finding good search terms to uncover all the relevant prior art. "Wizard" doesn't intuitively scream out "one thing per page".

I have no idea how prominent IBM wizards are in the design literature, but I'm a scientist and I can speak to the challenges of finding relevant literature when all you have is what search terms makes sense to you.
Yeah, whenever new hires complain about the lack of
completeness or correctness of documentation, I'm like: that's a great place for you to start. It also seems to be a great signal of the attitude of the new hire, because the people who kind of groan at that task usually end up having problems.. but that's another topic altogether.
Having to work too many hours due to a low minimum wage is a common reason low earners don't have the energy to try to study and move up the ladder. So I agree, removing the minimum wage doesn't sound like a good answer at all.

It's all well and good to want to study but for some their are many roadblocks. Not all bootstraps are made at the same length and some are just a little too short to reach.
If you have time, give me a shout (my contact details are on my account page). I'd to chat about what you are doing.
According to several people I'd consider authorities on the subject matter, yes it is really a thing. You can measure any aspect of intelligence you want, but in the end all aspects correlate strongly together, and they have predictive power in terms of success in life.
My favorite picture of this is Rob Gronkowski as a 12-year-old[1]. Getting into the NFL requires hard work, but it's not sufficient; without the genetic athleticism, you aren't getting in.

[1] https://sportsofboston.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/gronk-...
How Deep South are we talking? The first and second nations in the world to introduce minimum wage laws (New Zealand and Australia, both are pretty South) weren't ever slave states, about 40 years before the US caught on. It was introduced for welfare reasons - to ensure people had a living wage. A few other places had minimum wage before the US as well.
> Everyone seems to be discussing UBI and largely ignoring the fact that even if you cut everyone a check for some kind of basic income, if we don't solve some of our housing issues, you will still see growing numbers of people either homeless or crammed together like sardines in a space not intended to hold that many people.

And you seem to miss the fact that with UBI you have no incentive to live and stay in an expensive area.

For the deposit amount on an average house where I live I would cover 80% of the cash price of a bigger house country side. But you know, I'd have no work.

The problem is not housing, the problem is cramming all the work in cities. My last 3 jobs could've been done remotely, I asked and was always denied even while offering to take a pay cut.

I and many like me despise living in cities, we do not live there by choice. I've slightly moved out of a big one (London) but still live/work in the outer rim where housing is a dream far away, even on a way above average salary.

Give me UBI and I quit my job to settle country side tomorrow, so would my wife. So would a few of my colleagues.
It's a sliding scale. There is a lot of work out there that has some value, but that value is lower than the value the people are willing to do the job for. Let's say there is a job that is 'worth' $5/hour but it costs $12/hour to hire someone to do it. A reasonable argument could be made that the additional value generated for the government/society to get one person off of actual welfare and into the job market could be worth $7/hour.
Skin in the game. You can't expect fair play if one does not put and risk his share.
How much energy goes into creating a civilization that produces that human?

Did... you really just say that, about a process that requires not only a civilization, but one sufficiently decadent that it can afford to waste resources making silicon that turns burned coal into pointless game victories?

The machine has no health care costs and can play 24/7.

I think by your previous metrics, you should be counting the heathcare costs of the ops folks who run the hardware, and I guess the healthcare costs of their healthcare workers, ad nauseum.
3-3 invasion means you're giving thickness to 2 sides. After studying the 60 master games I concluded that 3-3 invasion only makes sense if you can make the thickness on BOTH sides inefficient (AG only played it when it has stones on both sides)
I don't think selection by Mendelian breeding is very relevant here. Direct autosomal genetic engineering is. Your designer baby is not going to get an intelligence boost if the gene you modify actually has an indirect confounding effect via a parent's phenotype.
I love the TFS issues system.
Nokia and Apple end their patent fight and become health allies
Sounds like your team needs better onboarding documentation. Make creating those docs your responsibility so that the next person that joins doesn't need to do what you're going to need to do.

Start by having someone on the team give you a brain dump.
Record it. It doesn't need to be high quality. Use Quicktime
and your laptop's webcam.

After the braindump, write out everything that was said and make the following diagrams:

- Architectural diagram showing the components involved.

- Infrastructure diagram that shows where things run.

- Deployment pipeline that shows how code gets from git commit to production.

- Data flow diagrams for the most common usage patterns. This one might come a bit later as you're more hands on in coding.

Show the diagrams to your team members as you create them and ask them to verify that it's accurate. If it's not, understand why and fix your diagram.

Add the above to your onboarding docs. If none exist, create it somewhere.

Add a page to onboarding docs that describe how to access logs.

Add a page that describes how monitoring in the system works.

Add a page that will act as an index for recipes on how to do useful things. From that page, create a bunch of useful scripts that you gather as you learn stuff daily. Encourage others to do the same.

I think you get the picture. Add a page for everything you need to know in order to be productive. Think about all the things you knew how to do in your previous position. Try to document how to do all those things in your new position.

Soon, before you know it, you'll be productive and you'll enable your team to be able to onboard new team members more efficiently.

In addition, write code and review PRs. Ask a lot of questions in PRs. Investigate how things work. Get curious.
Give me UBI and I quit my job to settle country side tomorrow, so would my wife. So would a few of my colleagues.

If you're a halfway skilled programmer you can scrape together the equivalent of what you'd get on any sort of realistic UBI doing small freelance jobs while living in the country side.
Being 'bad' is IMO a consequence of two things:

- You can be bad (i.e., lack of consequences)

- You want to be bad (i.e., some sort of reinforcement, often $).

Now both of these are de facto there if you become a high level politician and that's IMO the reason for real world outcomes [...] decidedly not good
Thẻ canonical là gì? tìm hiểu về thẻ canonical trong seo