skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's basically the difference between authoritarian education and exploratory play-led education.

Extremes of either seem to be destructive, but hitting the sweet spot where the balance is just right is incredibly hard, and also incredibly demanding of time and resources.
My personal comparison is: If a postal worker opens your mail is that okay? If your window is open but your curtains are closed, is it okay for someone to stand outside your house and open them? Humans protect their privacy with mostly pathetic measures due to an intrinsic sense of trust, but that doesn't give other humans the right to erode that trust.
If you really enjoy it, then great. As long as you didn't keep at it for so many years merely as a way to meet women.

But what else do you enjoy doing? There are meetups and organizations of people doing almost any activity out there. Maybe explore some other interests and find groups of people who do those things. You'll get exposed to a whole different group of women that way.
If the United States of America - the wealthiest society the world has ever known - can't even provide healthcare for its citizens, what hope is there that, in a world where all profits accure to the owners of robots (capital), anyone other than these people get any of the benefit? History is not exactly rich with examples of such.
It is the correct site. The court record says "Mr. Fischbach first examined Nick Tsotsikyan, founder, owner, and Director of Operations of Security Specialists."

Nick Tsotsikyan is noted on the about page of the website you linked to.
> You presume every strategic professional murder involves a torture session.

Not. I was thinking in a post-mortem "cleaning" of the corpse. Why to remove the tags in clothes but forget to distroy the fingerprints if they where professionals? It seems that badly damaged but partial fingerprints where recovered.
> I'm always iffy about articles like this because so much of the ground has been utterly salted by online "men's rights" activists that are more motivated by misogyny and antifeminism than actually righting wrongs.

That's in large part a result of the mainstream completely ceding ground to MRAs. When it's become socially unacceptable to talk about issues affecting men, because so much of the discussion has become framed in terms of privilige and patriarchy - what you're left with is the only groups willing to talk about issues that affect men in public are the socially unacceptable ones (and indeed, MRAs tend to be a nasty bunch).

But that doesn't change the fact that there's real issues, and when no one else is willing to talk about them that's what sustains the MRA groups.

The reality is, gender norms screw everyone over. And gender norms aren't the result of men today trying to screw over women; gender norms are perpetuated by society as a whole, men and women alike.

And you and your wife might have it all figured out; more power to you! But please recognize it ain't so easy for most people. The way you describe it you're living a lot of guy's dream/fantasy, _very_ few men have the option of taking 7 months of leave to be with their kids - or anything like a fully equal household, whether they want it or not.

You may have it made, but a lot of men feel trapped and unable to even talk about these issues.
There are basically two usecases for LSM trees vs B+trees:

- Either you have a lot of random new writes and not so many updates, in which case LSM trees will ingest new data as fast as the disk can store them

- Or you care more about read performance, and LMDB and BoltDB will have more predictable (and arguably better) performance

InfluxDB is a timeseries database, so they write a lot of stuff and don't even read all of it. As data gets older it can be pruned efficiently with an LSM-based design, not so easily with B+tree. Dgraph on the other hand seems to sit right in the middle as it wants to be a general purpose database so there's no easy winner here. Hopefully the choice was correct for most use cases.
I've never heard anyone claim that priveleged white men never work hard. Consider that other less privileged people may work just as hard yet see fewer opportunities for success. This is the concept of privilege as I understand it.
> if you've ever seriously considered starting a business, then you're probably privileged.

I under that definition: We can consider a huge percentage of minorities to be privileged. Business popups where there are needs.
Docker’s keynote story is great… until the software auditors knock on the door
I am indifferent to this except for the possible negative effects it might have on HN.

I hope it does not cause any significant changes to the community here, either from signs of censoring criticism or the topic consistently derailing threads. Every single online community I am apart of is getting wrapped up more and more into American politics it seems.
I might give it another look if they finally use native scroll behaviour in Android.
Nearly four years after this was written, there is still no satisfying solution to providence tracking in a data science workflow. The few solutions that do exist tend to be too opinionated to catch on.

I've gotten a lot of mileage out of hacking some provenance tracking into a plain-old-Makefile workflow, but it's hard to balance human-readable makefiles and the amount of hackery it takes.
What's special about WannaCry that has made this such a widespread thing? I presume there's has been plenty of malware for a while that can propagate itself around a network of unpatched old Windows machines and people have been trying to get users to clicks on emails to infect themselves for years.

So why now? What's so special now?
"Men's rights," like feminism, has adherents with beliefs across a spectrum, from "reasonable things most people can agree with" to "wild and perverse antipathy toward the other sex."

Which is just to say that both groups consist of people and people vary.
In this thread or another someone said it was a kill switch for testing it in a sandbox, probably used while developing the code.
I did at least.
After getting vocational training, my aunt had to sue to get a job as a welder. After she was hired, she did well at it.
> I consider "hacking" to be any instance of an entity deliberately undermining the confidentiality, integrity or availability assurances

That sounds extremely broad, in the same way that calling jaywalkers criminals would be.
i assume you're on mobile and that's why you commented before even opening the article. it's a review of that book!
It's a Reddit-esque comment that adds no value. (and at best, it's off topic where the topic is about an improved Hacker News)

There are instances where humorous comments can add value (e.g. irony/satire), but it's not common and hard to do properly.
Please explain how, since it’s easy.
My X230 does as well.
The better solution is installing a capable adblocker.
Whenever I see this type of collectivist central-planning idiocy in action, I grin and think of all the corruption and waste that's guaranteed to follow.
It's insulting for Achatz and Kokanas, but the dirty secret of these advance deals is that while they're certainly tilted towards publishers, book publishing is a losers-pay-for-the-winners business.

That doesn't make book writing for publishers a good deal for anyone, by the way. Executing on a book contract is one of the lower effort/reward things you can do.
Problem with this solution is that creepy "IT Companies" cannot charge a fortune installing it.
Ask HN: What made you decide to marry your spouse?
A popular "Ask HN" was posted recently, that asked how to find a wife[1].

Suppose you have found someone. When do you know it's the right time to get married?

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14332698
Luckily, in Texas, child support is capped and alimony is politically unpopular. So there is a motivation for divorced men to make more.
Looks nice, but I would always prefer Chocolatey (https://chocolatey.org/packages). Reason: More (and easier to customize) packages / applications to get.
Testing Packer builds with ServerSpec
I had my first child in London at 26. It was very tough financially, but it is possible renting in travelzone 3. I think I was making £40k at the time and we were a single-income family.

Something we didn't expect was that it would be so difficult to meet other parents our age. Most of the time we were hanging out with people 10-20 years older than us, because those were the only other parents we could find. Not that that was a bad thing, though. We made some lovely friends!
>Isn't that already the case?

Yeah, but it wasn't robots that got us here, it was rather more mundane - union busting, offshoring and outsourcing.

Robots are a rather convenient scapegoat though.

The financial crisis was simply symptomatic of that (middle class households were forced to swap rising incomes for more and more debt).
The US obvuisky does provide healthcare for its citizens, we are just in a messy argument over who should pay for it. Reagan mandated over 40 years that hospitals had to offer care to everyone.
> but they don't have to work for someone else who extracts surplus

This surplus is profit, which is the motivation for setting up businesses. Take that away and there is no good reason for taking the risk

> They can organise themselves and work themselves, voluntarily.

This is already allowed in a capitalist society

> They then own the products they make and decide how and if to distribute them

Disagree. The labourers own their labour and the owners own the product

> In slavery, the slave owner is providing the housing and food which could potentially lift the slave out of being in a state without food or shelter

Again, in slavery you do not own your labour. So the surplus of your wages ( or time ) cannot be invested, or used to create capital

> The owner and employer both perpetuate the system of oppression, this much is a fact. If there were no capitalists, there would be capitalism. If there were no slave owners, there would be no slavery. If there were no lords, there would be no feudalism.

What does this even mean ?

> You cannot escape the fact that the capitalist is taking advantage of the lack of choice and lack of capital by virtue of accident of birth and the property system which the capitalist defends and supports

Without property ( which ultimately boils down to the right to enjoy the fruits of one's labour ) there is no good reason to perform the unenviable job we call "work"

To me, it looks like the system you are proposing would be very much like slavery
I disabled it in bios on my Lenovo T450s back when this was first reported and the tool reports...

Intel AMT is present
AMT is unprovisioned

So disabling it puts it in the same state.
They're more analysis defeaters than killswitches. Some testbeds will respond to all dns lookups as valid. If this is the case the binary assumes its in a testbed and exits to avoid analysis.
I was thinking more of brokerages. E.g. Charles Schwab, E*Trade, Fidelity, and Interactive Brokers use non-SMS 2FA.

https://twofactorauth.org/#investing

Also, non-SMS 2FA on your email helps secure anything that uses emailed password recovery. Same if you use a hosted password manager.
If it's so cheap to build robots/AI that it's cheaper than working, then anyone will be able to afford robots. That's the essential logical test the fear of robots can't pass.
Its also put presure on govemnets that in the past dont coperate with extrdaitions.

Puting 50% of your diplomats on a plane with 48 hours notice sends a message - you can also start having the IRS / HMRC invstigate rich expats friedly to the regime.
Keep on moving the goalposts.

It doesnt change the fact there is no general wage gap when experience and accurate jobs comparison are taken into account.

In 2017, equal work DOES have equal pay.
I think the problem is they never will contribute back any modifications upstream. Pick the right license for the project. Apache is for marketshare, gpl is perfect framework for community involvement, agpl is best for control
Will it cancel out the therapeutic effects of my Space Blanket?
If your looking for indicators of surveillance teams, we've got quite a bit on it in Umbrella.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.secfirst.u...
"Don't tell me what I can't do!" - John Locke, LOST
China has an extremely large expat community which stays in close contact with the mainland trough social media. Their view of the occidental left is mainly based on the gossip about it from the expat community, and such gossip is usually very negative considering how the two cultures are at odds.
It is if client gets that money. If you write and sell your software to such clients you can't use community version even if you work alone and get paid less than a million.
This time you have to pay money. That perks people up.
Hmm I tried this and I see 4 reasons:
(1) Seen this ad multiple times
(2) Already bought this
(3) Not interested in this ad
(4) Ad covered content

There doesn't seem to be an option for "this ad is a huge DOWNLOAD link directly above the actual download link on a page that offers to help me download software." I did try filling out the form at https://support.google.com/adsense/troubleshooter/1190500 with this info, though. There was no way to indicate with a screenshot in that form exactly what the bad ad was.
Running Containers in OpenShift
Or even just sha256(unixtime().rand()).com

Or a domain in a TLD that allows only second level TLDs (such as some of the commonwealth countries).
It also counts if your client has such revenue. You could be making little, but you can't use community version if you work with such clients.
If anything can be automated it's healthcare.

Houses don't get more expensive, not in proportion to wages. And the costs of urban housing is land costs, which are dictated by government policies driven by NIMBYS. Cheap robots can build cheap apartments a thousand feet high to save on land costs, or cheap houses on cheap desert land.

The coming robot apocalypse is actual nirvana.
Willie Brown is still a kingmaker? He's 83 and hasn't held office since 2004.
Validate Gitlab .gitlab-ci.yml one-liner
Uh, this looks very promising indeed.

I'm currently trying to get into meditation, and that "silencing the default-mode network" part is really really hard.
Apple’s New Headquarters Is a Sign of Tech’s Boom, Bravado
I think the point here is about interacting with a computer vs interacting with the people in the room.
Hasn't that been a common thing in bitlocker malware for ages too?

Did they just manage to craft so really persuasive emails this time?
There is the big difference that I am in control of my UI. My UI hasn't changed in something like 15 years, other than tweaks I made and features added that I can use or not.
For really simplistic applications, omitting SQL is a fine choice, especially in golang you don't have the comfort of a well established ORM.

There exists libraries that do provide an ORM, but since the declarative side of golang is limited compared to languages, say Python, I find them unwieldy. Also, the current trend shuns the usage of an ORM in golang and encourages directly or indirectly writing SQL queries and interacting with the database through database/sql and its extending libraries, like jmoiron/sqlx.
>>What would feminists know about a non-feminist man's perspective on marriage and fatherhood?
>What would someone who doesn't even seem to understand the concept of cultural privilege have to add to a discussion about cultural privilege?

I think what we seem to keep pointing out is that: the idea of cultural privilege is bullshit. It hasn't been proven. It doesn't exist. They won't even give us a solid definition that we could apply a scientific method. Therefore, any knowledge of the subject is moot. And, you ought to realize that the fact that you sit around thinking of ways to describe the chip on your shoulder is what's keeping you from this "privilege", not that someone has a wealth of opportunities that you do not.
Markdown into LaTeX
Drug use across the generations – data analysis
Maybe so, but then you'd be misrepresenting anti-tiger rocks as anti-cancer rocks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVqLHghLpw
Have we not asked you before and again to post civilly and substantively? We ban accounts that won't do this.
What negativity are you referring to? Most comments seem to be positive or something to the effect of "how do B+ and LSM compare for this use case?".

> For most of the languages out there, it is always better to have a native implemention.

I'm not sure that's true...imagine a K/V store written natively in Ruby, Python, JS... People have done what DGraph did before, in other languages -- writing log-structured databases in Haskell, &c -- but without a very large community you didn't get the level of improvement and testing that you see with something written in C and used across many languages. The JVM is an example of an environment where the "native" approach has worked out well; but is that "most of the languages"?
It certainly depends on the industry. I.e. here in Russia if you work in the oil industry you would be making mad amounts of money. It is hard to get into, however, and you would have to live in middle of nowhere, Siberia for years.

Not quite sure about subdivisions in tech - i never worked for any buzzword "all the rage" things. I suspect that if you are a rare expert in a field with a lot of demand, you would get a good income regardless of the level of buzz.
When you say that there was a time that a family lived on a single 40-hour workweek... are you including housework and child-raising, or just paid work?
I'll take a crack at an explanation:

Google has machine learning technology that automatically reads street address numbers on houses, regardless of angle, color, size, focus, or typeface.

Using the same type of algorithm to answer "does this ad have anything that looks like a button in it?" is relatively simple by at least two orders of magnitude.

So rather than it being "easy" in some absolute sense, what's meant here is that it is easy compared to similar tasks that we already know Google does routinely and has largely automated.
> > This licencing model wouldn't be appropriate for a community-centric database, such as PostgreSQL.

> I don't disagree.

> It's interesting, though, how counterintuitive this is. I would think that GPL wouldn't be a problem for individual contributors (the types of participants I imagine when I think of a "community"), but for business contributors who don't want competitors to take advantage of their modifications. And yet, anything a business contributes back to an MIT/Apache project is actually less protected than a contribution to a GPL project.

Well, a lot of them want to, at least temporarily, distribute some features without releasing them. And that simply doesn't work for GPL projects, unless there's a sole owner and all external contributions are made under some form of CLA. There's a lot of open-core type projects, but in my experience they're on average less healthy than projects with multiple contributing entities.

For PostgreSQL there've been a lot of closed source forks, but a lot of them folded and/or couldn't keep up with the amount of changes and thus are based on some super old version (hello Redshift, hello Greenplum). The only ones that appear to be able to keep up are ones 1) that move more invasive changes upstream after a while and religiously rebase after every release, never delaying, or 2) move their modifications into extensions, possibly adding the necessary extension APIs to core PostgreSQL.
These problems (and the mistakes thereof) wouldn't happen between Rust threads, because the typesystem is explicitly designed to handle that safely. It's only when you're introducing type-unsafe boundaries where these problems occur, and the best solution to that is typically to use a wrapper that creates a type-safe abstraction. Supposedly Neon handles this for Node.
Fun project. FYI, on my machine:

In [1]: X = randn(10000,100)

In [2]: timeit apply_along_axis(np.mean, 0, X)
100 loops, best of 3: 7.91 ms per loop

In [3]: timeit X.mean(axis=0)
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.21 ms per loop
I linked the Recode article that also links to the SF chronicle column.

SF Chronicle article:
http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/williesworld/article/The-...

Recode article that links the to the SF Chronicle article:
https://www.recode.net/2017/5/14/15638046/willie-brown-colum... with the title 'Sam Altman for governor?'

My submission (now flagged):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14337211

I originally found the Recode article from http://techmeme.com/river . Here is a screenshot as of 5:20 PM EDT: https://imgur.com/a/xJFcS

In hindsight, I should have used Techmeme's description as the title of my submission, but I did not think of that at all at the time. I feel as though that users should be able to post the original title and a possibly editorialized version in cases where the original title is suspect, but the article itself has some newsworthy merit.
It's always a good thing, plus the additional "bad" side-effect of less work for the populace to do, driving down the price of labor.

As the price of labor trends downwards, some cohorts are going to have a harder time selling their labor to pay for necessities: food, shelter, healthcare, etc.

A good amount of these problems could be mitigated by a strong welfare system and/or basic income.
It's actually not. Laws are not an appropriate analogy for technical security controls. First and foremost, laws exist which are clearly not enforced. Technical security controls exist, or they don't. They don't generally rely on human arbitrators for enforcement, unlike legislation. Once it is in place, the technical nature of the control is self-enforcing; bypassing the enforcement is what constitutes "hacking." In this way criminality and hacking aren't comparable. A better comparison might be security policies and laws, but that's close to tautological because they're so similar.

Moreover, laws can be broken unintentionally, and under this definition you cannot hack something unintentionally. Awareness can be tantamount to intentionality - I'd argue most people aren't even aware they're jaywalking when they do it. It stretches the boundaries of believability that someone would log in as someone else and not be aware that they did it. In a contrived scenario where they did somehow accomplish that, I wouldn't call it hacking.
Interesting, for me the options were

1) Not interested in this ad
2) Seen this ad multiple times
3) Ad is inappropriate
4) Ad covered content

I chose 3 for all of them, but I'd argue that 4 would also fit somewhat.
Always exciting to get something up on the hacker news board... weekly reader here for a long time.

Happy to answer any questions you may have.

-- Nick
That works around the problem for you. It does not solve it.
WannaCry is a worm. It does not require people to click on anything in emails to be infected. It scans for vulnerable computers and infects them directly over the network.
Machine Learning in Production
Someone said it was to avoid behavior analysis by security researchers
Brown still basically runs San Francisco. He certainly ran it when Rose Pak was still alive and Ed Lee is definitely his guy. Outside of SF he's certainly knowledgable but I doubt he has any pull in Sacto. Not with Jerry, not with Gavin.

Kingmaker, no. And Brown is definitely not a kingmaker if you want to run statewide. I doubt he has any pull in LA or the Central Valley. Any at all.

Frankly, this bores me. If Altman wants to run for office, he should start a little lower and get a little experience. At 32, I don't count a social networking startup and an incubator for much of a resume especially with respect to running the government of the 6th largest economy in the world.