skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My setup is based on Roku devices connected to a Freenas server with 12x 3Tb HDD on a RaidZ2 setup to store all the media which is then served through Plex Media Server. It works very well and I've had no problems with this setup aside from a hard drive dying on me every once in a while.

Plex also has an option to use Google Drive or Dropbox and others as a storage medium through their new (although only for the premium Plex Pass holders) Plex Cloud (it's also possible to roll your own though, i've written about it here: https://nunosouto.com/blog/how-to-install-plex-cloud)
Whether it's a big plus or a big minus depends on the application. I probably wouldn't mind if voice recognition software in a device like Google Home or Amazon Echo uses an opaque and unverifiable algorithm. But the creator of an algorithm that controls something that can kill me - like a car or a plane or a nuclear power plant or a robotic surgery tool - had better be able to prove that their software works safely.
I really like fiction in audiobook format, too. I have been disappointed by the short story collections I've found, but it seems like there could be a great marketplace for short fiction in audio form.
Single threaded single process Python 3 is faster than Python 2 on I/O intensive workloads if you use asyncio effectively.

You need to consider Cython, Celery, and C-extensions such as numpy for performance critical code.
More readable than In Search of Lost Time by Proust :)
Amateurs have been tracking it [0] and even photographing it [1] while in orbit. Any government that has the capability to send satellites to space can do the same.

[0] http://www.space.com/8470-secret-37b-space-plane-spotted-ama...

[1] https://www.universetoday.com/65338/amateur-astronomer-image...
Yes, I noticed that that's why I said if you live the Japanese way you can save some money. So I am aware.
Maybe I should rephrase that?

The beer is almost 8-10x more expensive compared to where I come from though.

You are right that most people here live and raise kids in smaller apartments. But just because this is the status quo and you don't 'need' more I wouldn't say it's good. Why should your kid have to live in a 5sqm room? I wouldn't be able to justify that for myself and would have to move outside.
I think it's the mentality here, singles, for example, spend most time at work or similar so they don't mind having a tiny, affordable home. Also most Japanese (there are exceptions) normally don't invite many people to their home etc.
Ok, so from this I see that $20m/year is going towards staff for "product" and "technology"; but there is no breakdown on what that is being spent towards. The point I was making is that if we knew the percentage of effort going towards engineering and multiplied it by the percentage of time being allocated towards some targeted projects and that value was low, then it would not be relevant... but we only have he first number and that number is high enough to mean we have to be concerned by the second number. Spending $20m for a year of engineering effort is a ridiculously large number for a website that fundamentally does as little as Wikipedia does... what was shown for it and what percentage of that can be allocated towards each outcome?
You could use a colored lense to filter the backlight output delivering any color even with a white backlight.
One reason this works is that folks use their bells and people yield. Even in more unexpected areas:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7oGk-ozhKI
I don't know what could be more distracting in a work day than this. :/
Well if you are hardcore you could probably hack some fuse abstraction that talks to netlink and does what you want. However it's probably not that straight forward to map nftables to directory/files.
Once upon a time I was suspended from high school for having pen-testing tools on a flash drive in my locker.

I was interested in network security and asking to my teacher about the best way to learn this information and whether 'these' tools would give me an understanding, I told her I brought them in to ask questions about and next thing I knew they broke into my locker, read the drive and I was pulled out of class and in the principals office for "possessing" these tools.

I still remember him saying "it's like you brought a gun to school, just because you didn't use it doesn't make it ok. The only reason we haven't expelled you is because we can't prove you used them on the school network."

I understand now they reacted this way out of fear but it was a pretty terrible way of handling a curious kid and ruined both my trust in teachers and interest in learning any kind of network security.
You could specify a dataset that mounts to a specific (sub)directory. Or even have a file-backed pool just like the example.
Show HN: Trump News Today – Feed of Trump Headlines, Tweets, and Video
People always talk about kinetic strikes in the context of big flashy things like rockets and spaceplanes. I'd be a lot more worried about them being dropped from stratospheric balloons - maybe not so useful for full scale bunker busting but extremely cheap to make and almost indefensible against as a strategic strike system.
The driving requirement of the Shuttle was that it should be feasible to steal a Soviet satellite sporting unknown new orbital technology, before the Soviets had the opportunity to intervene, and that it be prepared to fly fairly quickly whatever its faults to be ready for potential Soviet expansions into spaceflight as an area of competition.

There were a lot of other requirements and stakeholders that were part of the planning process, and any of them who didn't understand that espionage was a critical component were left wondering why anyone would design such an expensive, impractical failure; Why every stage of the process where it seemed to be unworkable, someone said "Yeah, don't worry about that" and poured money on the problem. Aside from direct requirements, we also encouraged the Soviet Union to spend lavishly copying our design.

By the time the USSR unexpectedly broke up, Energia had just (unsuccessfully) flown a test run with a giant Polyus laser weapon. Mission accomplished, right? But we didn't then want all of the Soviet scientists to spread to the winds and start building ICBMs for anyone who could pay. We needed them to stay in Russia until Russia could become a solvent, stable state.

So we said "What sort of international cooperative effort could we use a whole bunch of Shuttle AND Soyuz flights for?" and designed (or adapted) a space station around that requirement. We decided to revamp Reagan's ill-fated "Space Station Freedom" program into the ISS.

That's the only reason we didn't retire the Space Shuttle long before the Columbia.
Powered landings after an intense atmospheric deceleration.
> Rapid developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning have enabled scientific racism to enter a new era, in which machine-learned models embed biases present in the human behavior used for model development. Whether intentional or not, this “laundering” of human prejudice through computer algorithms can make those biases appear to be justified objectively.

Let's be honest here. Realistically, could those biases ever be justified objectively to the satisfaction of the author? Probably not, because any evidence in their favor will likely be swiftly dismissed as itself racist, and thus, somehow automatically invalid.

On the issue of race, the modern leftist increasingly resembles a Sixteenth Century geocentrist desperately adding epicycle after epicycle in a futile struggle to preserve their cherished ideal. I suggest listening to Sam Harris's recent interview with Charles Murray. It's a rare, refreshing example of a prominent leftist at long last conceding the existence of a reality that they for so long denied:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1lEPQYQk8s
mesh networks that use a layer 2 routing protocoll - or if you have VPNs that use layer2 and you want to filter the clients on the VPN server bridge.
My experience tracks yours.
That's exactly the wrong mentality in the business. How much does it cost to allocate a million dockers for a million developers to play? A million dollars? Take it as a huge advertisement billboard that will pay a million fold when they tell their bosses how cool that platform is.
It's not. A lot of young people voted for Le Pen. People are sick and tired of Marxists destroying their countries. It's obvious they just won some time but big changes are coming.
The article is about finite subsets of N. N is the initial segment in every non standard model of PA. Hence your in=bjectiinnin your original post is not valid.
Pretty big difference. Check your facts next time and stop the fearmongering.
NEED a HACKER?
I am Albert Gonzalez a hacker who has built a very good reputation and undeniably one of the best hackers you can come across.i have got access to hack into any account and also get to generate passwords for accounts like Facebook,Instagram,Twitter,gmail,yahoo mail,whats-app,we-chat,etc..I also have logins for bank like BOA,welsfargo,chase,credit union,capital one, and many other different banks for transfers and credit card top ups,Retrieving hacked social media accounts,clearing criminal records,increase credit scores,CC hack,hacking computer systems,Website hack,Catch hacker scammers,Phishing emails, that's to mention a few ... You can contact me on..........albertgonzalezhacks@gmail.com ...you can also text on +13146437091
Yup, WebSockets could certainly be used for push.

I think the choice of HTTP vs WebSockets comes down to architecture style. WebSockets are optimized for bidirectional communication with a specific remote server. In other words, something about the service makes it better if client I/O is sticky, maybe due to an in-memory session.

HTTP can make more sense in a stateless architecture, where GETs and POSTs could potentially go to different servers in the cluster. Of course, one could use WebSockets statelessly too (have no messages depend on past messages for context).
Then islamophobia is also fine, since I don't tolerate sick archaic beliefs.
Good ramen—not the stuff from a packet, the real thing—is more like $10-15 here in the low-cost-of-living Midwest.
> believe the MediaWiki parser itself is something like a single 5000 line PHP function!

It's not. I'm on mobile so not easiest to link, but the PHP versio of the parser is nothing like a single function. There is also a nodejs version of the parser under active development with the goal of replacing the php parser.
The True Cost the FBI Paid to Break into the San Bernardino iPhone
NEED a SOLUTION TO ALL HACKING PROBLEMS?
Hello there, tired of throwing away money to fake hackers?Worry no more
as we can help you with that.We are part of a team consisting of highly efficient developers and
hackers.We carry out services like,upgrade school grades, Get passwords
for all social networks like Facebook,Instagram,Twitter,Whats
app,Line,Skype Hack, We also delete unwanted online pictures and videos
on any website,clear criminal records,hack bank accounts for transfers
and credit card top ups,application hacking.We do custom software and
web development in php, java, asp.net etc.We have 100% records from our
client as well as highest repeat hire rate,and a refund policy we work
with,our work speak for ourselves, we provide a perfect software
solution to all clients.We believe in mutual growing with client and
hence we work as a technology partner and consultant for our clients.
Contact us ............albertgonzalezhacks@gmail.com
text +13146437091
Thanks as we anticipate working with you now and in the future to come
I loved that show.
Very cool but why is there no way for me to easily click to go to the Amazon page? I would be more than happy for you to use your affiliate account.
Why do you think a shepherd is protecting sheep in the first place? Just out of compassion for them? A shepherd protects them in order to be able to farm their wool and their lambs.
Wikipedia doesn't have cancer
>patriarchal

what does this have to do with patriarchy?
Ask HN: How to escape extremist discourse?
When discussing sensible matters (global warming, globalization, choice of JS framework, etc) the discussion is often monopolized by extremist participants' ideas. Usually because they are so out of touch with reality that more reasonable participants think they ought to counter those arguments.

This creates a situation where the original ideas from reasonable participants are not the focus, the extremist dominates the train of thought.

It's likely that reasonable participants will have ideas that need refinement. However, they are robbed of the opportunity to do that because there simply isn't space to focus on it. Again, the extremist ideas dominate.

Pseudo real world example: Party A in a certain country is in favor of immigration and wants to discuss a plain to accept refugees. Their ideas are good for at most 10k refugees but could be refine to support receiving 100k. Because anti-immigration extremists will dominate the discourse, these ideas won't get the exposure and refinement they need. Then, there is an actual need to receive 500k refugees and nobody is prepared because time was waste refusing extremist bombs, which in turn plays to extremists advantage because now 500k refugees will arrive and it will be a huge mess, validating their claims that immigration is bad.

How to escape this cycle?
Is there any legitimate need for a phone mic to pick up sounds way outside the range of human speech and hearing? If this sort of thing should not be allowed, why not just add a software low-pass filter in the front of the audio input chain? What would the side effects of this be?
The opportunities for high school kids to malinger and avoid learning things are many and manifest.
You realize that cancer has meanings outside of biological cancer, right?
I took his meaning to be that they are acting as a ruling father (i.e. or parent), just declaring what one _needs_ to do, rather than express the fact this is an opinion and not based on any news or science.
"... into actual structured data."

Would there be some particular structure that everyone would agree on?

Alternatively, what is the desired structure you want?

Because the current format is so messy, I just focus on what I believe is most important: titles and externallinks. IMO, often the most interesting content in an article is lifted from content found via the external links. I also would like to capture the talk pages. Maybe just the contributing usernames and IP addresses.

Opinions or explanations that have no supporting reference are inexpensive. One can always these for free on the web. No problem recruiting "contributors" for that sort of "content".

Back to the question: I am curious what structure would you envision would be best for Wikipedia data? Assume hypothetically that a "perfect" parser has been written for you to do the transformation.
There isn't really a sharp distinction, is there? The primary method of generating lift for both wings and lifting bodies is simply the fact that it's an inclined plane moving through a fluid with positive angle of attack.
>>> round(15.5)
16.0
>>> round(16.5)
16.0

I wonder what's the logic behind this.
They probably meant patronizing
Yes, there are many interpretations of the data, as with any social science data. None the less, women end marriage (we are discussing preserving marriage) vastly more frequently than men, and I stand by my interpretation.

I doubt very much we will convince one another of much, so I hope only that exposure to an alternative view point helps us both better understand our own thinking.
Just to add some details to the above well-informed comment:

Sometimes people who are not used to management of large-scale projects are surprised by the development of tools and specialized vocabulary in project cost/schedule/risk assessment. The following is a pretty good summary of some common tools that integrate cost, schedule, and risk analysis: http://www.iceaaonline.com/ready/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/...

See in particular the first couple of slides on motivation, the "risk cube" on pages 19-20, the scatter plots of cost/schedule on pages ~30, and the example "risk lists" on page 57. Project management can be viewed as an assault on the remaining top items of the relevant risk list.

All these concepts are standard practice for large aerospace projects. There will be risk analysts with stats or operations research PhDs running simulations and developing tailored methods just to assess risk of large projects. (Example: https://viterbi.usc.edu/sae/faculty/part-time-lecturers/jair...)
It's a common enough phrase to describe a certain kind of moralizing and instructive manner of speaking. Derived from times gone by where it was a given that the head of the family was male and would instruct others and be deferred to.
Cancer has definitions outside of biology that fit still...

"Racism is a cancer" is a valid use of the term, as well...
That is the whole idea here, though. That Wikipedia's money, which is being "reinvested in growth" is not having an impact on the mission. Stopping businesses from reinvesting in growth -- at least, stopping them doing it the traditional way -- is the point that Buffett is trying to make.

(I'm not equipped to evaluate whether or not that point is true, especially in the case of any specific company. Just trying to point out that the argument you're making here kind of begs the question.)
> After he unlocked his iPhone SE, agents took it out of sight for five to 10 minutes before giving it back and sending him on his way.

I would have let them keep it, or thrown it away.
> creating jobs for 5500 relatively well paid people

Apple has made almost $10 million per employee with those tax savings. Maybe not the fairest of trades?
Agreed, editing anything more complex than a simple text i.e. a table or some note is a shore. And I'm an advanced user!
Full-length version: https://nplusonemag.com/issue-28/essays/ghost-in-the-cloud/
Show HN: Bluebook – API test management and execution
Yeah, I was really surprised how good it is.

Besides all the Pirating action, I'm really surprised how credible the economics and politics of the show is. I'm often embarrassed by how naively those things are treated in TV, but here it mostly makes sense on at least some level.

Aside for 1 or 2 miscasts I find the acting pretty damn great. All the 4 captains are a joy to watch.

I did stop watching for a time after a really dumb plot development at the end of Season 2, but I'm glad I picked it up again.
> Tax evasion is a crime, though, and they haven't even been accused, let alone convicted.

It's almost like you're just making shit up, since the EU did exactly that with Apple's Ireland tax scheme already:

Apple tax: Why tech firm has been hit with £11bn bill[0]

Google "apple tax evasion" if you'd like to know more.

[0] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/apple-ordere...
Yes, I read it in approximately 1988. Changed my life.
Joel Spolsky famously praised this policy of backward-compatibility at all costs which he called "The Raymond Chen Camp"[1]. Many agreed with him, but I always thought that Microsoft compatibility ideals were too radical to be real wisdom. At some point the list of features you try to keep compatibility with grows large enough that the Raymond Chen Way becomes unmaintainable.

The received wisdom of the 90s is wrong. Most users don't care about compatibility, as Apple's success has clearly shown, and most companies are now out following the Apple road.
Large enterprise care about compatibility, and they pay a lot, but this is not a forward-looking market. They'll keep using buying new versions of your software because of the compatibility, but if compatibility is the only story you have to offer, you'll slowly lose that market.

I completely agree with you that Microsoft should have had a strategy for deprecating these features back in the 90s, when they were already old.

In this specific case of outdated filename restrictions, you could start with what they already did:
Windows NT 3.5 - Allow accessing all filenames with a special prefix (which they already did).
Windows NT 4.0 - Make it easy to migrate to sane filenames by providing an opt-in per-process flag that makes all APIs use them by default.
At this point they can easily dogfood and migrate all Microsoft software to the new APIs, so you would be able to delete these pesky files in explorer.
Windows 2000 - Make the new API flag default for all versions compiled with the latest version of the Windows SDK.
Windows XP - Make the new API default for any app without a special entry in the compatibility database.

Somewhere along the road, batch files (which is the only place where compatibility with the old filenames was necessary) could be easily made compatible by modifying the batch parser to replace redirections to NUL with redirections to \\?\devices\null or something akin. You may see some breakage in scripts which use NUL and CON in non-standard way (e.g. as an argument), but the migration pain won't be huge, and you could still save an old script with a compatibility flag.

Microsoft obviously didn't take that way, and yeah, all the batch files written back in 1981 may still work without hitch, but newer things keep breaking in strange ways.

[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2004/06/13/how-microsoft-lost...
Author here! I've been working on this idea for running api/e2e tests. Please check it out and leave any questions/suggestions.
That's only raw text. The Archive Team and Wikipedia itself have mirrors on the order of 30TB.
Dave's not here, man
Although I don't see eye tracking in games as 'the next big thing' in any sense (the few I've tried were severely lacking in the fun department), I would be interested to try playing Soma with this.

Soma had some flaws to be sure, but damn did it do some things really well. I'd highly recommend it - eye tracking or no.
Art with Watson
Often they'll pay it without looking :)

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/05/email_scammers_hit_...
If your website doesn't have large pictures of people having a good time, you're behind the times, and you won't have a general readership.
I read about a British maths expert that wrote some formula that would accurately predict if couples would stay together. His key variable was working out if people have a willingness to compromise.
"Embrace change" may be a great idea, but I don't think it gets to the heart of the issue. I think the key to staying married is having two people who are committed to staying married. From that, other things follow: embracing change, learning to be a better spouse, etc.

I've only been married for 12 years, but I can absolutely say that my wife and I have always been very happy and willing to be accommodating, precisely because we're committed to lifelong marriage for religious reasons. I've met a lot of people who think that sounds like a prison sentence, but for me it's been bliss.
Well, try to draw a trend line through the operating margin and tell me it's not that scary. I think that it's pretty scary if your permanent, ongoing financial commitments are growing to match your revenues. This way, you have no cash to react to intermittent expenses or R&D. And let's remember that Wikipedia is already doing more donation drives than ever.
Press it in osmosis membrane and ship it in a can.
I believe the poster you are replying to meant that with a touch of sarcasm.