skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
404

https://haydenjames.io/php-performance-additional-cpu-cores-...
A local school held a production on pirates a few years back. I noticed a significant emphasis on women on board (and it was used effectively to undermine the male actors who were all relegated to tertiary roles in the name of equality and were the brunt of derogatory comments that were not based on fact).

When I looked up historical pirate codes (the several known pirate codes), the topic of women on board was mentioned once and was discouraged because it was likely to cause division among the crew. There was also explicit law to protect any female who found herself on board.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_code

I discussed the misrepresentation with my wife who is very knowledgeable on maritime history and maritime protocol. She agreed and mentioned that it was not uncommon for merchant marine captains to take their wives with them.

History is often revised for political purposes. The sad bit is how nasty some people become without even bothering to check facts.
That's quite a jump in time scale. The overall lifetime of the human species is miniscule, relative to the timing of mass extinctions.
> In its feed-forward architecture, layers of perceptrons—also referred to as neurons—first perform weighted averaging of their inputs, followed by nonlinearities such as a sigmoid or rectified-linear curves.

I have a really hard time keeping reading after this passage.
One disadvantage of zfs in this case is that it uses its own caching layer, since it's basically an OS subsystem in itself. So on a memory constrained host (eg. rpi), you might have some issues with the zfs and linux buffers competing for RAM.
Golpe oferece Netflix grátis durante 1 ano para roubar informações pessoais
I never said it was sexy
That's kinda the design requirement though, isn't it? If it were easy to detect and remove, they wouldn't have served their jobs.
App monetization in a whole new perspective
Good point! It slipped my mind.
I program for 33 years, do it five days a week and love it. There are so many areas and if you change one every five or so years it's not boring at all. I'm 56 if you're curious.
I'm 44. When I'm not working on bootstrapping my own SaaS, I contract for other startups around town. It can be tough being a one-man-band sometimes.

I contribute to various small open source projects from time to time. I recently ported an ACL library from PHP to JavaScript:

https://github.com/GorillaStack/acl
That's a different word (read the definition).
Really, the important part is that Argentina lost the war. But I get that people need to blow off steam about that sort of thing from time to time - there's something humiliating in losing a fight you started, especially when your opponent, basically just for the hell of it, sinks the severely superannuated secondhand light cruiser that's the pride of your nation's adorable little pocket navy. Why take it seriously? The result that matters is in. All the rest is just woofing.
This is why stocks are shown on graphs with logarithmic scales
36 still code occasionally in work but do a lot of future planning, technical direction and leadership work. Experience is a huge benefit and I love having experienced people on my teams. I do a lot of side projects and open source
I'm very torn on the polyglot topic.

Adding just one additional framework, library, or language that performs a similar function to what's already used can add a huge burden on a mature organization. You end up with so much tooling around what you're using, that adding something new means your system is much less robust than if you'd stuck to the things the rest of your org uses.

At the same time, using the same stuff leads to a stagnant stack: it makes it harder to hire and retain, and you miss out on some genuinely better ways of doing things.

A "do whatever you want" policy is destined to fail, but being to strict and disallowing experimentation isn't the answer either, and I struggle to find where the balance should be.
45.

I'm not a professional programmer (although I did start my career as one), but have released various bits of software over the years[1].

- It's harder to find time on any personal projects when you have small kids. Mine's now at Uni, so lots more free time for 'my stuff'. Wasn't so in my 30s though.

- My official job is as a Technical Architect. As such, I'm in front of a PC all day and I always insist on having Visual Studio installed, so I can 'test' stuff. In reality, I'm always working on little coding side projects whenever I need a change of 'brain-work' for an hour or so.

---

[1] The most recent being: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14206309
How do you know the company is in breach of contract for not paying? Have you seen the contract that is in play here? You have no idea what the payment terms are, let alone clauses regarding delivery. Even if we were to see the contract, we are not able to assess and respond in a manner that has any legal merit.

Seriously, these kinds of "Ask HN" make me angry with the kinds of comments people reply with. You cannot possibly know the legal situation the OP finds themselves in based on the (lack of) details they've written. What you are telling them could see them in court losing the case, and maybe even having to pay damages for cutting ties. You are giving advice that could potentially destroy their business, or even result in personal financial ruin.

Read that again: your comment could ruin a person's life. Think twice before you pretend to be in a position to help someone by spewing advice without having a clue what the situation calls for.

Frankly, I'm astounded that HN allows "Ask HN" posts seeking advice with legal ramifications. These should be moderated and removed. The ONLY valid answer to these posts is "consult a lawyer". Nothing else is helpful, whatsoever. Even real lawyers who might respond cannot determine the correct course of action without hours of research into the specific case at hand.
(except for the most extremely coarse cases where there's only one object in the general direction of the head)
The power of integration in API-first referral marketing
Indeed but that's not always feasible and still doesn't alter the fact that the lighthouses interfere with one another if the laser scanned regions overlap. Hence the curtain.
If you read the section you linked it has some very serious - I would say fatal - objections listed to the theory that the impact occurred in 1178.
I'm also part of those who never registered an account on facebook because it was obvious from the get-go what this was gonna be about.

There were only one major difference from the previous similar services namely the shift to having people carelessly use their actual names which is something that was unthinkable until then.
And a minor difference in the large use of tricks from the dark book of anti-patterns and dark patterns to get more and more unsuspecting people on board.

To be 100% honest I did use facebook for a little while as I was employed in the shady business of uncovering online users identities and tracking them in the real world. The emergence of facebook made my job a breeze at first, then before long made the whole job position entirely expendable, clients would simply use facebook themselves to conveniently find all the info they were after in one place.
I'm 30. I'm the youngest person in my team.
Junior Developer
We are a fairly new (funded) hedge fund looking to grow our tech team in our office in London to build tools and systems to gain a trading edge.
Our stack has been built over the last couple of months and consists of a python back-end with a React.js front-end.
The job spec is here: http://www.v-cmt.com/job/junior-developer
Drop me an email at fbegum@cmtam.com with any questions you have
Thanks,
Fateha, Ops Manager, VCMT
45 here. I tried management roles for a few years at the end of my 30s, early 40s. Found out the hard way, that I'm no good at it. These days I've switched to Contracting, and focusing on niche solutions for Identity Management as an Architect.

I'm much happier like this.
31 years here, married, no kids. Still active, working full time as a dev (100% on FLOSS projects). Recently I got a tech lead position on a small team, which was a nice change that brought a plethora of new and interesting challenges.

I don't see myself stopping anytime soon.
How can you understand the node event driven architecture without mentioning the node event loop? You can't.

The event loop is not something you can be abstracted from, it is a core component of node that you need to be aware of all the time.

If you have long lived code within an event loop tick you will starve the I/O and everything will start timing out.

Then, freecodecamp (and every other coding camp) do an incredible disservice to society by telling everyone that ever touched a computer for 5 minutes that they're "full-stack engineers", a denomination that is in itself very questionable too.

It's like calling myself a veterinarian because I walked my dog, or calling myself a chef because I fried an egg. These camps promote a very oversimplified vision of what it means to be a software engineer.
35 and loving it.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1937
It's a form of propaganda. Release just enough information to pip curiosity and speculation. Then call the rest of it classified. For all you know it could be having a dummy payload but call it classified and the bad guys would think that it has some advanced technology.
Making maps with React
PortraitPro 15.7.3 Standard Crack and License Key Download
User Session Routing via HTTP Headers with Fly and Rails 4+
Chances are that none of this is actually ever deleted but simply made unavaible, in the realm of the shadow profiles facebook is reported to have on people that are not yet registered.

Even if you probably can't achieve actual deletion, what you did probably didn't hurt and removed information for other public or API access.
Can a Bad Reputation Be Good for Business?
My point is if DuPont put out a doco warning everyone about CFCs don't put them down for that.

Use logic and talk about what they did do that's bad.

Shell is a mega corp full of different people and different departments.

Why are we using the fact part of the mega corp tried to make a positive change against them?

Why are we being negative about positive behaviour?
Simple Habit is hiring #2 engineer (full stack web developer)
Simple Habit (YC W2017) is a Netflix for mindfulness & meditations. We've launched less than a year ago, but we're already one of the top grossing health & fitness apps on the AppStore.

Simple Habit is backed by YCombinator, NEA and a handful of prominent angel investors.

We're a team of 4 (CEO, CTO, engineer, designer) and we’re looking for our #2 engineer to join our team in San Francisco. An ideal candidate would have at least 3 years of full stack web experience. You'll lead our web platform development!

We’re using React on our web app. Our backend is built using Heroku/NodeJS/Express and Python3.

If you're interested in helping people live resilient lives through mindfulness, please reach out to jobs@simplehabit.com (mailto:jobs@simplehabit.com) with your resume or linkedin.
"With the sole exception of Jesus Christ, more books have been written about Luther than about any other person who has ever lived."

Is there any basis for this claim or did writer forget that there are other religions and their characters ?
Is that really so backwards? Seems to me that a personal sale is a more intimate exchange and it might be expected that the seller vets the buyer a bit more carefully than your average retail transaction, thus justifying the lower age restriction.
Jupiter's south pole
Seeing history trough individuals can be misleading. There would have been reformation even without Luther.

There were several reformations before Luther. Bible was translated into German and other languages before Luther. Mentel Bible was on it's second printing when Luther started his reformation. Several other successful reform movements started at the same time or little later.

Question is why reformations started at that particular time and why Luther was so successful and several reformations before him failed.

The answer is technology. Printing press revolution had exploded. There was over 1000 printing presses throughout Western Europe when Luther started his reformation. Germany and Italy were the main centers. Pamphlets from reformists spread around like wildfire and the movement was able to grow much faster among common people.

https://blogs.qub.ac.uk/medievalforum/2015/08/19/literacy-an...

>Between 1516 and 1546, 3.1 million copies of Martin Luther’s works were sold in Germany (excluding whole and partial Bible translations). Considering that each reprint had around 1,000 copies, that equates to 3,100 editions of his work alone. Over this period, 1,057 editions were published in Wittenberg, 490 in Augsburg, and in comparison, Basel produced 131 editions. On a shorter time-scale, the number of pamphlet editions produced from 1518 to 1529 is as follows: 181 in Wittenberg, 140 in Augsburg and 61 in Basel. What is more remarkable is that Luther also authored 20% of the 7,500 cheap broadsheets printed between 1520 and 1526. Besides preaching, the Protestant reformers clearly published a large amount of material to disseminate their ideologies to a wider audience.
I wonder if there are any other professions, other than pro sports people, where this would be a reasonable question to ask.

In most professions experience is desired, in fact I'd go so far as to say you only start becoming decent at your profession at that age.

This sort of question really makes me want to rage at anyone who thinks it's unusual or shouldn't be the case!

I'm 35 and a much better programmer than I was at 11.
You embody my greatest fear and annoyance in this area.

I think it's perfectly possible that, within my lifetime, significant or indefinite life extension could become possible.

But I'd bet that fears about effects on society, as well as the arrayed forces of religious conservatism, will create so much strife on the matter that it'll be denied to people for long enough that I'll die unnecesarily.
This is an enhanced image. Here's a submission with the first image: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13614530
take this post to /r/sysadmin and watch them bring out the pitchforks.
Almost all of the 'alternative' use cases mentioned by the OP are not what JWT was designed for. JWT was designed to authenticate users/entities by giving them a token which contains basic non-sensitive metadata about that user/entity. It's for authentication not for authorization.

Sure, some implementations of JWT have had bugs in the past, but this hasn't been an issue for quite a while and it's definitely not an issue with the RFC itself. It's the same as if you blamed the TLS/SSL RFC for being responsible for the heartbleed bug in OpenSSL - It makes no sense.

>> You might have heard that you shouldn't be using JWT. That advice is correct - you really shouldn't use it.

This type of blanket thinking is dangerous. There are cases where JWTs are practically necessary and unavoidable. Whenever an extremist blanket idea like this catches on in this industry, it becomes a major pain to have to explain to people over and over why in THIS SPECIFIC CASE it is actually the best solution possible.
I've implemented some of OpenID Connect, "a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol". Combined with OAuth 2.0, it's one of those giant corporate specs (giant at least for security/crypto purposes) with way too many options so anybody can do anything with any algorithm and any kind of workflow.

I wanted to go with a simple, minimal NaCl-based system but in the end did implement a lot of OpenID Connect in the hope it would make interoperability easier with existing client libraries. I don't want to write a client for each and every programming language other people in any related projects would want to use. That in my opinion is the value of something like JWT: you can tell people up front that that's the way they're going to get the user's ID data, no matter how much server or client implementations will be switched around.

I feel that when faced with a spec like OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0, it's not necessary to implement more than what is strictly needed. If you don't need all the flows and algorithms in your project, don't implement and don't accept them. The parts you implement should comply – why base it on a spec if you throw any interoperability out of the window – but don't waste months of trying to correctly implement all of a huge corporate spec if that doesn't make sense for the size of your project or organisation. Complete implementations might have value only if that's your main product and you need that line to sell it.

I use JWT only as ID, not as session, allow only one server-chosen algorithm for signing, and rely on TLS for encryption.

There's clearly a need for up-to-date "web-approved" standards to pass crypto-friendly data structures around – or maybe I'm just not familiar with any recent efforts. Normalising and serialising JSON is pretty error prone...
Blockchains: Hockey stick adaption or a FoMO bubble?
> Why would you want to do that? People want to invest in the United States and give us money, we are instead suppossed to spend money and create a blackmarket to prevent them from doing so at a loss?

Is this the sort of investment you want? Is this good investment? Driving up the price of housing?
Researchers identify 6500 genes that are expressed differently in men and women
One of the advantages in using JWT is that the verification is in the cpu level and not a lookup via disk. This may sound strange, but if you don't have a quick lookup cache or centralized cache, This would be a great advantage to use CPU.
Experimental: Syntax AI with React.js
The question is: what if you change the algorithm on the server, and a user still has an old token.
why perl? just curious
Except if you use saml, now you have xml digital signatures. If you thought jwts were bad, take a look at the specs for xml digsig sometime. You can specify multiple signed portions of a document, have multiple sigs, or choose to sign only a part, use a bunch of different algorithms, specify your own canonicalization rules, and you get all the usual fun of xml parsing risks.

If jwts are bad, xml digsigs are "literally cthulu".
Fun, that's what I tell since years.

That is the reason, why I believe its more companies like Car2Go have a better position than Uber. (If that future of self-driving cars and transportation as a service becomes true.)
Never read such nonsense masquerading as an authoritative piece of information.

Author clearly doesn't appreciate that the ultimate truth of any authentication scheme is you should not trust anything from the user. So what if you take away a clients ability to specify what algorithm a piece of data is signed or encrypted with - if you blindly just accept whatever a client did and proceed then you're always gonna find yourself vulnerable.

Intel didn't use JWT tokens or pass a client header - they just trusted what the client sent and landed themselves in the same mess. I make the point to illustrate that what real security pros do is make sure basic checks like validating user input is done regardless of what specification or algorithm is involved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncFS
It's funny how what you say in line with what others often say.

To me it seems that you remove almost all of what facebook offers to keep instant messaging, contact list and email. Things one can achieve outside of facebook but for some reason people still insist on using facebook for these even though they admit they dislike it.

Just leave the damn thing already and build your networking outside of it instead giving more momentum to something you don't like and know is bad at the global scale.
> like virtually any other mature business

That's the problem. A non=profit is not a "mature business" because it's not a business at all. In fact, in most non-profits any effort to "run it like a business" will be met with opposition. Once again, for evidence look at any government agency, budget, etc.

But even if it was a "mature business" the idea that any organization knows when and how to cut costs after its past its prime is dubious at best. For evidence, look at any company bankruptcy. Their costs outpaced their revenue and they didn't react fast enough or in the right ways.

And that's assuming there were "right ways" to react.
Use ZFS, create a dataset for the dir and turn compression on per dataset.
90% of China's energy consumption is from hydro-carbons [0]. Mostly coal.

[0] https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm?iso=CHN
Came here to mention that guy who registered the "nul" package on npm an hour ago. Found your post. The world is a small place.
Most don't as long as everyone is getting paid, the galas and events continue, and outward appearances are fine.

Once invoices or paychecks are delayed, people stop and question why the leadership is "making so much money" and the ROI on galas and events. And once a few donors see the deficits, the questions get harder and money slows down.. making the next round of invoices a little harder.
Or Uber will secretly program a few self driving cars that are not Ubers to crash in to people.

This will stall self driving legislation for 5 more years.

you heard it here first.
it is also true to say that a lot of people voted leave on the promise of £350 million a week extra for the NHS

No it's not. Can you show that with any sort of data at all? Or do you define "a lot" as simply "more than a few"?

The Remain obsession with a single bus is really sad. There's no evidence that this was a major factor in the vote. Immigration and sovereignty were the top two issues as shown by repeated polls, vox pops, the views of campaigners themselves, etc.

It's an especially weak point to bring up because it appears to have been wrong in the wrong direction: nobody campaigning for the EU mentioned an £80 billion exit fee, and if that had been known about or incorporated, the true cost of membership would have been much higher, perhaps more like £500 million a week.

Additionally there were lots of lies told by the Remain campaign that were far more impactful and serious. For example, Cameron saying he'd stay on to negotiate with the EU in the case of an out vote (despite having failed to achieve anything before), which turned out to be a colossal lie. And a very important one because it made Osborne's threat of a "punishment budget" credible. Yet he resigned immediately, clearly he didn't decide that on the spot, he knew he wouldn't continue if he lost the vote.
True, but it allows you to test and fix things that are predictable, something that current evolution does not.