skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
When I did a presentation on RISC-V last year I counted 6 real implementations (full custom ASICs). Now granted only one or two of those you can buy, the others are research projects, but they do exist and they did produce real silicon. This year we should see a couple of 64 bit implementations, which is when it'll get really interesting.

There are of course multiple FPGA implementations (I have one about 2 feet away from me now), but they are very slow.
The sad part is that open-sourced TensorFlow isn't same as TensorFlow that Google uses.

I've also heard Google is not really fond of cooperation with other corporations (say, NVidia) on TensorFlow
Exactly, AMT is essentially a remote console without any sort of direct access to the running system. You'd have to reboot the system with a remotely recovery media in order to compromise it.
Why is direct Democracy dangerous?

I think not educating your population effectively is dangerous. Unfortunately the non-direct democrats have taken advantage by not educating each oncoming generation so as to more easily manipulate them.

Now we have Trump...
Helios|Yume(tone.js demo)
in Italy we say "you're cutting off your dick to do your wife wrong"
I would say don't install plugins when you start using vim. Only install them if you cannot find something in the docs to do it easily. I found that it makes for a good learning experience after I uninstalled all the random plugins I had.

As far as learning curve, do vimtutor but use the arrow keys. They don't use arrow keys because the computer didn't have one then. It doesn't make sense not to use it now.
> Intel ignoring it after being given years of notice

Sure about that? From what I can tell, it's a recently discovered vulnerability that was promptly fixed.
I am not here to defend Democracy or 'the system'. In fact I noticed the fallback to those fundamental critique comes always up when one's own favorite did lose. How the voting system works has been known for decades. It is the job of politicians and all those trying to shape the public opinion to convince people to vote.
> I'm pretty sure it was welcomed, and you were invited to contribute.

I was invited to join a mailing list and try to convince people that my protocol change was important. There is nothing unreasonable about saying no to this request.

> (You're not coming off super well in this thread. "I have feedback and time to engage a HN subthread, but getting involved with the actual thing I'm criticizing is a burden I choose not to bear, and this is your problem and you should change to accommodate me.")

"I have useful feedback and I am offering it for free"

"Sign up to this list and try to convince people to do work"

"No thanks"

Wow, I'm such a bastard.
Thank you for the thoughtful reply. I am not an expert in all the law complexities in this area but I feel like that can be a great challenge for a lawyer that's up to the task to try and defend Uber.

One can argue (and in my opinion, quite rightfully so) that it's not Uber's responsibility to offer anyone "correct data", especially when someone is trying to use it maliciously against them or their clients. To give another shot at an analogy, the radar manufacturing company doesn't owe the police a working radar (which also happens to be "free" in Uber's case).
This is a wonderful resource and I come back to it for some courses quite often.
Vagrant: Setup and Share Your Digital Geo-Lab – Digital Geography
Follow Pages, Instagram Alike for Facebook Pages
INTERNAL-MIX-AIRBRUSH
Slyme – A Robust URL Shortener with DDoS Protection
This tech Forbes 30 Under 30's advice is pretty great
All the ethnic cuisines aren't actually that old, and the period that they range from has been full of mass migration, cultural genocide, and actual genocide.

Most people live in cities, and likely their only contact with large groups of Native Americans involves tribes lucky enough to have a reservation nearby where a casino can flourish. It's still a bitter ongoing thing in rural areas, where we take their children and send them to boarding schools for most of their childhood, robbing them of a family experience and robbing the community of good paying jobs and opportunities.

This probably isn't the right place for this, but I grew up in the same town as one of these schools, and the more I learn the more ridiculous it is. They are a Catholic charity so don't have to reveal their spending, they've had multiple scandals for lying on donation requests, basically everyone running it is rich and white. Yet no one seems to care.
Ditto to the ditto to the dit-tt-o.

Down vote me all anyone likes for this inane I have to totally agree with this absolute truth.
Who do you say is running Brexit then? In the Tory cabinet 80% (24) backed Remain including Theresa May, all Parties backed Remain except the DUP. Yet here we are the following year crashing headlong in to the hardest possible Brexit with an ex-Remainer supposedly steering the ship, destroying years of accord left and right.

Somebody coordinated the campaign, somebody established writing £350M on the side of a bus was the perfect way to win people over, knowing it was a lie.

Doesn't a foreign business contacting a supposed grass-roots campaign unsolicited look even a little suspicious to you?

Where's the link between Farage and Trump's campaigns in your version of events.
Top 20 MCQ on Constructors and Destructors in C++ – InfoTechSite
At least improve your English before commenting. Embarrassing.
I agree. Politics has always been on the forefront of using new technology. Just look at Eisenhower's pioneering use of trains for his whistle-stop tour in 1952. And that's my problem with the article - it is just a demonizing one sided narrative with no new insights on the technology.
I'm not quite sure how to respond to this. The IETF is aware that there's already a high burden on people, that decisions tend to be made mostly by the people who can get to meetings and talk in the rooms where standards are hashed out.

Having said that, I'm not sure I agree that it's an unreasonable burden to ask somebody to join a mailing list and defend an opinion if they want to influence a standard which will hopefully be useful for tens of years and implemented by hundreds or thousands of people. Any additional complexity for server and client implementers becomes quite a lot of work multiplied by all those people, and the additional burden of implementing a bigger standard may even be enough to discourage people from using it at all.

And it's a fact, the decisions are made by those who show up and put the work in. Wishing it was otherwise doesn't change the reality that we need to make tradeoffs and that the IETF favours rough consensus and working code. Both of which take work.

I will forward this discussion to the mailing list, that's about all I can do as chair, I won't proxy all the IETF work over to comments on HN!
There are easy collision attacks against MD5. If they used a stronger hash, we would know that they couldn't have been coerced to use a hash that collides with a bad version of the update.
The irony, of course, is that it was branded a social-utility.

Anything but.
Very interesting. My main concern is that such systems should suit their owners very well. But, of course, everyone has their own preferences regarding task management, time tracking, app ecosystems, usage patterns etc. Consequently, it is very hard to make a single open source project that fits everyone.

Me and my friend were working on a very similar project for the last 10 months, and we still hesitate to publish it (also, it is written in Scala, thus limiting potential audience). Below, I provide more information about our work, some insights discovered during development, and future plans. I hope it could help other projects too.

The project is focused on outsourcing memory, providing smooth, most of the time automatic, time-tracking, being hackable and keeping personal data private.

Key features needed for that are different integrations (we use JIRA, Trello, Hubstaff, Trakt.tv, Apple Health, sleepasandroid, Beddit); constant location tracking; convenient input (currently, Telegram bot with NLP capabilities, suggestions and autocompletion).

Eventually, it turned out, that chatbot interface works like a charm for actions like forwarding links to read them later, managing tasks in JIRA (when chatbot sends you updates, and then you can use your messenger to comment on or manage tickets; also works well with time-tracking), aggregating notifications.

We also have some analytics: daily briefs, time tracking summaries, metric-based reports. Another features include global search, flashbacks, GPX track export (to use with Lightroom, for example), history-based notifications. Future plans include: finance tracking, delivery tracking, ReSpeaker integration, newsfeed aggregation.
I would also suggest https://github.com/karan/joe/ for ease of using the template repository.
According to SemiAccurate (terrible name for a source) they reported it to Intel some time ago.
I doesn't seem to work anymore! But it used to work as the library was using that in the beginning.
It's a link to a link, but with an inflammatory title. The project just released a major version.
Machine learning has departed from the venture of understanding-based science much before deep learning [1][2]. Thus, singling out deep learning reeks of motivated reasoning or just lack of awareness of the history of machine learning.

Having said that, there still exists the lunatic fringe (it's a compliment) inside deep learning who continue to work on the task of generative modeling in the hope of "understanding the world" rather than "solving a task". Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun don't miss an opportunity to impress on the world how important unsupervised learning is.

Physics too has abandoned understanding for predictive power. If you take philosophy of science seriously, you either have to pick "science is whatever the elite society believes in (Kuhn)" or "science gives us tools for prediction (Post-Kuhn)". Claiming that science helps in finding truth or understanding, is going to put you in a very indefensible slippery slope.

"Understanding" is a subjective human concept, and not worth pursuing. Humans evolved to run from tigers, and struggle with harder tasks like understanding quantum mechanics or understanding the brain. The directionality of scientific progress as evidenced by QM is not "understanding", but tooling and predictive power. I hope Deep Learning is going to follow the path of predictive power, rather than regress into the pseudoscientific mess of elegance and understanding.

[1]: http://www2.math.uu.se/~thulin/mm/breiman.pdf

[2]: http://norvig.com/chomsky.html
> Your assumption that the issues are due to floating point errors is incorrect.

Its not as easy as declaring the resolution of absolute position. If you really want to spend the time on figuring it out, then examine the difference in scale between the bodies positions, velocities, accelerations given different model timestep values, what happens during the squaring summing and rooting, multiplying by G of those values and also even (because i have looked into this before) the subdivided timestep values involved in tempering this models data, so it becomes a perfectly stable quantised version of its anologe values (with no need for the kind of corrections Runge-Kutta is notable for)

That link is very intresting to me thankyou. You can notice that it includes some quite simple integration schemes as 'symplectic' (basically means stable without need for gross correction)
I think it would be way easier to devolve into an authoritarian government when there's no one to tell you to slow down and rethink it.

There's already plenty of Nazis in Britain. "Britannia rules", "Destroy the fascist/socialist/capitalist EU" (yeah, make up your mind please), "kick out the foreigners".

Remove the EU oversight and they can do whatever they want.
Why we get upset about the wargrave of someone in uniform, but dont think twice about the wargrave of someone not, eludes me.

Because that's what the country is willing to pay you for willing to die for the country, i.e. being a soldier. The military has to uphold a much higher standard for honoring the dead, or it will face problems finding new recruits.
Could you give a summary of what you learnt from it?
George Soros is a euphemistic stand-in for "the international conspiracy of rich Jews" -- a persistent scapegoat with a very sordid history.
It's interesting - as Tocqueville (Democracy in America) and Mill (On Liberty) argued precisely that it was civil society and discourse that help us protect against a tyranny of the majority.

And that generally what separates 'democratizing' nations from 'democracies' is that one simply has democratic institutions such as voting, and the other has a culture of democratic decision making, civil discourse etc etc to go with it. Iraq may have elections and be able to kick out its leaders but it sure isn't a democracy in the same way Britain and the United States are.

Now its not a 'the people are stupid' argument that I'm making - there have been people throughout history who have contended that we take a too simplistic view of affairs. Fine, blah, I'm sure they do, and I'm happy to accept there are people who don't reason critically on both sides and there's no reason to think one side has a monopoly on those.

What I'm saying is that we can't fairly determine the information that is being seeded to all parties. It's the equivalent of someone turning up to lots of Tocqueville's town hall meetings and distributing pamphlets biased to one side to people who look like they're from a certain socioeconomic background as they walk in.

There is something that happened in Britain in the last five years that merits explanation. A population which according to Eurobarometer 2010 data, only five years ago was 45% Pro-EU and 33% anti voted 52% to 48% to Leave when the government of the day, international instutitions, and all major political parties were arguing that we should stay. This, in Britain, a country not generally known for upending its whole political system on a whim.

Now you can pin the explanation for that on whatever you want (and I happen to think your austerity theory has something in it), but it's reasonable to think in a democracy that we should be able to have a discussion (or at least know about) the factors that swayed people.
Vue HN 2.0
Fun fact: corn and cornbread is so embedded in the cuisine of the North Caucasians[1] that it's perceived by locals as historically theirs as opposed to wheat and white bread that is thought of as "Russian". Older, less-educated locals don't even believe when you tell them it had been imported from America just few hundred years ago.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Caucasus
Fun fact: In both referendums on EU membership, less than half the registered voters cast votes for the winning decision.
Grothendieck's notes to be released on 10th May
I've long felt that the primary value of democracy isn't so much to select good leaders (since counterexamples abound) but to provide a mechanism to remove the really egregious ones.
Are you looking at JMAP getMessageList here? It paginates the response (offset/anchor and count), but yes - it has to build the complete list. Not that we're using that in FastMail production yet, we're using XCONVMULTISORT still. It's roughly the same algorithm though.

The biggest expense is all the index.c stuff to support IMAP protocol requirements. There's a lot of cost in there which will go away with JMAP, and which will go away even more when we replace the separate cyrus.index files with a structured database per user. That's still got a ton of work to do though... one of the goals for long term Cyrus improvements.
Luddites have been getting a bad rap for 200 years but turns out they were right
I agree with your points, when composing I wrote "left (communist/socialist)" but edited for brevity, which was a mistake. I was trying to compare political traditions with different emphases on 'greater good for the many' vs 'individual rights'.

> ... and all the other checks and balances of a healthy democracy

Is there anything new we should asking for here ? Data disclosure/provenance laws ( a bit like supply chain traceability), Rights of appeal vs algorithm etc ? Unfortunately it seems like the EU was one of the more progressive forces here for the UK
the problem with the supermajority argument is that there was no such vote to join the EU in the first place. You can't apply stringent rules in only one direction of a decision, or you're weighting the default to the position you personally prefer. At the end of the day, the vote could be repositioned from "remain/leave" to "be in the EU/not be in the EU" to make it an A/B rather than a yes/no decision, at which point the argument about direct democracy being unfair becomes clearly biased.
Japan Shows the Way to Affordable Megacities (2014)
One of my favorite features of Vim is the built-in history of copy/pastes with history registers. You can learn about them here: https://github.com/steveshogren/10-minute-vim-exercises/blob...
Trafic analysis based on cellphone tracking is already part of free GPS apps like: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/waze-gps-navigation-maps-soc... Even one user per 100 drivers is plenty to locate traffic issues and we are well past that. Now sure, the situation is improvable but the reality is knowing about bad traffic is more or less solved.

For higher precision tragic flow that's going to fail while their is still a high percentage of human drivers. So sure when there are 50+% AI drivers it's a useful optimization. However, for the first decade or so it's not going to happen making it a waste of time for now.

As to finding a parking space, again mostly a non issue for self driving cars, because they don't need to park near people they are better off going to a garage which already tracks open spaces than using street level parking when it's hard to find. Can you slightly optimize this sure, but again it's not a hard problem relative to driving without a person in the car.
The proxy is a pretty crappy Perl JMAP server layered on top of a middling quality IMAP sync layer. The CalDAV/CardDAV bits are a bit better because it has nicer synchronisation primatives, but it's still code I slapped together over a couple of weeks of evenings. It's fine for playing with, but I wouldn't try to use it for large mailboxes. There's not much optimisation in there, it's doing pretty basic sqlite queries against a fairly normalised database, so there's no denomalisation for efficiency.
All that doesn't justify the US govt getting a claim to it..
I know, but that's not what I meant. The idea is that if you give useful information to people, they will then do the same for you later. Of course you need to have a good crap filter or it doesn't work.
Show HN: PyCarGr – Unofficial car.gr API
is he? My understanding is that he actually funds organisations like the Open Society Foundation and Media Matters - just because he's Jewish doesn't mean he's a stand-in for old conspiracies, especially if he actually does fund progressive political organisations.
I just wanted to say that I agree with you and I find your point perfectly respectable, and I have no idea why you get downvoted.
Not being moved to one of the ten empty seats might have been per some policy, or because of crew being stubborn. Or, those ten seats may have been broken in some way, as the writer's seat itself was broken in a couple ways (leg rest, entertainment).
I wonder how this was not on the list as it is the most obvious solution. I spend most of the reading time while commuting. In winter by reading in summer on my bike listening.

It took some time to get used to it but it works!

Can you recommend a speaker? I thought about that too but never took it really serious.
VC: "Do you know your customer acquisition costs?"

You start to think. You started working on this full time 9 weeks ago. You've spent maybe 45 hours per week on the project total. You spent between 15 to 40% of your time managing the press, blogging, replying to email inquiries. Honestly, it's hard to estimate. You have not given your credit card out or made any bank transfers, it's been only just you. You are now closing a round at a valuation of 1.7 million. You have 745 users. Scenario A: your last day job was as a florist, working for someone else and netting $9.50 per hour after taxes. Scenario B: in your day job you make $165k as a senior engineer.

Question: what are your customer acquisition costs? If it's relevant, answer separately under scenario A and B. (A and B may also be red herrings,- a trick, irrelevant information.) if you need additional information to perform the calculation, ask and I'll give it to you.

What is your calculated response? Justify your calculation.
Or maybe you should consider the flip side, this law is fundamentally abusive and immoral, and should neither apply to corporations, nor individual citizens...
Direct democracy is dangerous.

So are all other forms of governance.

The only significant example of direct democracy in action has been Switzerland, and it's been pretty successful in comparison. Yes, n=1 is not good, but better than n=0.
At least regarding the UK and brexit I'd disagree with this. I'm a us/uk dual living in London and watched a bbc show called questiontime avidly pre-brexit vote. The show moves around the country each week with a different audience and generally skews left. But in the brexit issue week after week it was clear to see which side the audience was for. They just did not find the remain arguments compelling.

I think the UK is civically engaged and that the brexit outcome actually reflected this despite the sour grapes in London... and at the Guardian.
The problem is the direct voter communication bandwidth is at best a few bits per election. People need to condense thousands of very important choices into one overall choice per election. Which often boils down to are you doing a terrible job or not.

Granted elected officials often listen to side channels, but they care about what will influence the election not what most people actually want aka 'the will of the people'.
Great. Explain why training converges in subexponential time despite the nonconvex cost function and does not overfit the data.
Hotspot Shield VPN Elite v6.20.27 Crack and Patch Full Download
>such as 'Five a Day' (a marketing campaign that most didn't realize was a marketing campaign that has long since been accepted as a piece of general health advice)

Care to provide your source for this?
I believe the one major change has been about trust in institutions. It used to be that census, or unemployment data was, for the purposes of political discussions, assumed to be accurate.

Now, unemployment data was so-so-fake just before the election, and the-best-numbers-ever just after the elections, although they changed only marginally. This sort of bad-faith argument will lead to a complete breakdown of civil society if continued.

This may just be a symptom of polarisation, though: Republicans (and yes, it's almost exclusively Republicans, so far) can only get away with it because their voters have staked their identity on their team's success, and are willing to go to such extremes to protect it. Yes, democrats have similarly absorbed politics into their sense of identity, and it may just be luck that they ended up getting reality as their playground.
South American native food is equally bad.
How silly is this article?! If anything the establishment, Clinton and friends has the most money and the biggest aparatus.

Brexit happened because EU has failed in handling urgent problems around refugee inflow and monetary/fiscal constraints (forcing countries such as Greece into pro-longed economic depression) plus EU's lack of democratic legitimacy.